Radical Totalitarian Progressive Anita Dunn who is White House communications director is an admirer of Mao. She has declared war on Fox News because they don’t support the Progressive agenda. Glenn Beck, who is an expert on using the tactics of Saul Alinsky against the Left has exposed her. In June of this year, she praised Mao as one of her idols.
I wish more on the Right were like Glenn Beck. He goes for the jugular of the Progressives and nails them. This has rattle the Left who have launched non stop smear campaigns. At the forefront of these attacks on Beck, is Neo-Stalinist blog Little Green Footballs. These attacks have had no effect on Beck as he continues to Anita Dunn, Glenn Beck hammer the left. This video clip is rattling Progressive circles, but Charles “Icarus” Johnson of LGF has come out in her defense!
95 Charles Thu, Oct 15, 2009 3:59:33pm replyquote
* 5
* down
* up
* reportThe people attacking Anita Dunn at Hot Air for comments she made years ago are the same ones defending Rush Limbaugh for his “take that bone out of your nose” comment — because he made it years ago.
Wow look at Charles spinning, It’s OK for Anita Dunn to support Mao but no one is allowed to criticize her. This is an example of Progressive hypocrisy when they are exposed. They just know how to attack and not defend. I salute Glenn Beck and hope he keeps exposing these Progressives!
Progressives are rattled and we must keep up the pressure! When they are exposed, they slither like the cowardly vermin they are!
Update: Instead of addressing Anita Dunn’s comments, The Neo-Stalinist Blog Little Green Footballs mocks Glenn Beck Alinsky style. Beck got emotional and Charles “Icarus” Johnson attacks him! This is an example of Progressive tactics, define the target and mock it.
Update II: here is a clip about Anita Dunn and Charles Johnson’s Idol Mao Tse-Tung.
This is what Totalitarian Progressivism looks like when it’s power is unchecked.
UpdateIII: Charles “Icarus” Johnson is caught in another lie.
54 Charles Thu, Oct 15, 2009 8:22:13pm replyquote
* 0
* down
* up
* reportBeck’s attack on Anita Dunn is what anyone who speaks out against that freaking moron can expect — they’ll dig into your past and use anything they find to smear you in front of millions of people.
I have no doubt they’ve been digging into my past too — Beck has attacked me on his show twice.
Anita Dunn made this statement this year, keep up the Progressive Propaganda Charles. You attack Beck daily, so don’t complain when he hits you back.
I wonder how many innocent people died at the hands of Mao?
95 Charles Thu, Oct 15, 2009 3:59:33pm replyquote
* 5
* down
* up
* report
The people attacking Anita Dunn at Hot Air for comments she made years ago are the same ones defending Rush Limbaugh for his “take that bone out of your nose” comment — because he made it years ago.
Hey Dipshit, Rush Limbaugh doesn’t work for the fucking president of the united states.
There is a difference , get it?
Plus, only in a sick sick mind can anybody equate a bone in the nose comment, with support for a man like Mao who murdered MILLIONS of people.
This relates to my recent blog post on Afrocity’s site. Global socialism… It is happening.
http://afrocityblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/obamas-berlin-promise-by-bellamags/
These people are so scary.
1.0 is looking for love in all the wrong places.
looks like Icarus’ wings have melted.
I’m waiting for the splash. Not long now
Rush Limbaugh did not make that bone in the nose comment.
“Years ago,” I read on the internet that that speech was made just last June. So unless Nancy can proof that contention wrong, it’s true.
Rodan, good to see you going after Nancy again. He makes a perfect example of the Progressive Fascist Liberal type. So debunking him is both worthwhile and lots and lots of fun.
Man Rodan, you beat me to it!
This Anita Dunn flap shows how utterly bankrupt selrahC really is.
One of Obama’s top people is caught on tape praising a Communist scumbag who murdered tens of millions of people, and the only thing Old Yellowstain can think to do is try to spin some damage control by pointing to some “bone in the nose” comment by Limbaugh.
Memo to selrahC: Even if Limbaugh DID say that (and let’s face it – whenever a leftist says Limbaugh said something, it can’t be taken at face value), a “bone in the nose” comment never killed whole villages full of people for not leaping forward fast enough.
And if selrahC can’t, or won’t, understand the difference, then he truly has gone off the cliff entirely.
Anita Dunn, however, expressed her admiration for the “philosopher” – and mass murderer – Mao Tse-Tung.
You know what’s interesting? That despite the mania for demanding apologies, the apologies are never accepted, but rather regarded as perpetual proof of unremovable guilt.
OK, maybe Rush Limbaugh went over the line with the “bone in the nose” comment. What commenter here–hell, on any blog–hasn’t been objectively intemperate at some time or other? People talk, people slip–but one comment, or even two or three, unless they are astoundingly egregious, do in no way define a person’s life or thoughts. It is more significant that Limbaugh works with black people on a regular basis than that he may have said something that pisses off the Dour Racism Police–for everything pisses off the Dour Racism Police. That is what they live for, and they will manufacture offense if they cannot find it.
But saying straight out that you admire one of history’s great butchers as a philosopher is not a slip of the tongue. It is a self-prompted proclamation of one’s own loyalties and admirations. Mother Teresa (who was, lest we forget, seriously trashed by sometime lefitst icon Christopher Hitchens) was basically dragged in to whitewash Mao.
In any event, Limbaugh could grovel and snivel and apologize from now through next Tuesday, and his apologies would merely be taken as admission that he is as bad as his detractors already believe him to be. Apologies are supposed to bring forgiveness and rehabilitation, but in the politics of apologymania they merely are considered to be confessions at a show trial.
Have you noticed that the leftwing constantly demands apologies, but almost never utters them?
re: #10 by buzzsawmonkey
I missed you SOOOO much!!!!
re: #11 by bellamags
Hey, bella! Nice to see you!
re: #2 by Doppelganger
You are, of course, assuming Rush even made the “bone in the nose” comment. What the source of this possibly apocryphal comment (other than CJ)?
Honestly, I am wondering how much the global socialists thought about the power of the internet and information technology. There is simply no where to hide anymore, except in plain sight… but…The liberals have dumbed down the population by infiltrating the school system so they can hide in plain sight. No one sees them until its too late.
Nancy also exemplifies the Progressive “morality.” Even if Limbaugh made the “bone in the nose comment,” here’s how Nancy’s moral calculus works: radio talk show host who makes questionable joke is the equivalent of government official who “favorite philosopher” is the worst mass murderer in human history. Good job Nancy, hope you find those strawberries.
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/CHINA.CHAP1.HTM
re: #7 by Infidel
Icarus is fair game when he attacks beck. I have to expose his Alinsky Tactics. I use Alinsky and caught Charles deflecting Anita Dunn’s comments. Instead of addressing her comments. He is mocking Beck fro getting Emotional.
This is straight ALinsky.
re: #6 by Gypsy Commenter
Thanks– was this a denial from Rush or there just is no substantiation?
re: #10 by buzzsawmonkey
Mao is an icon to Progressives.
re: #2 by Doppelganger
Apparently the Rush bone comment was made in his early days of radio. And Rush has said he isn’t proud of that comment. Now that was according to Snopes. Even if he said it, he has also said he wasn’t proud of it. When has a leftist ever admitted shame for some of their statements?
re: #13 by calcajun
Whether or not he made it is irrelevent to me. Rush could be a N word bomb dropper like Killgore trout as far as I am concerned. He does a radio show. He is not the white house communications director.
But this hag works for the American taxpayer and she speaks for the president of the united states.
oh wait, maybe Mao lovers are exactly what Obama wants speaking for him
re: #12 by buzzsawmonkey
How do I know this is the real buzz?
uh oh
294 borgcube
Thu, Oct 15, 2009 5:36:22pm replyquote 0downupreport
re: #281 bratwurst
Watch the clip. She’s a fan of Mao. In fact, she’s a devotee. She “turns” to him in her own words. Insane. And the context is horrible. Quoting Mao in regards to his war with the KMT to advance ideas of individual choices? That’s an endorsement, and she also seemed to be pleased that he defeated the Nationalists. It was also embarrassingly idiotic on her part.
Youtube Video
Just fight your fight kids, like Hitler did…er, Mao. Sorry.
re: #18 by Rodan
Not to mention an idol to sociopaths, pederasts and buggerers of little children.
re: #20 by Doppelganger
bingo.
re: #13 by calcajun
What the source of this possibly apocryphal comment (other than CJ)?
Why, Wikipedia of course!
re: #21 by bellamags
who else can write like that
re: #18 by Rodan
Hey, I had a copy of the Little Red Book in high school/college. Mostly, it’s a crashing bore; I remember only the most famous line, “Every Communist must grasp the truth; political power grows out of the barrel of a gun,” and my personal favorite, “An army without culture is a dull-witted army, and a dull-witted army cannot defeat the enemy.”
I’m completely unknowledgeable on the gun stuff, but I try to do my bit on the culture side.
re: #19 by Knightwatch
But it’s OK to like Mao.
/
Progressives
Well, at least we know Dunn is a Maoist. (Probably one of those trolls that went storming around her college campus with her Little Red Book.)
Now the rest of the task must be accomplished: Identify the brand of Commmie that each member of the Obama administration is: Leninist? Stalinist, like Obama? Trotskyite? Paleo-Bakhuninite? Putinite?
re: #21 by bellamags
Check out #112 on the Paleontology thread from Monday. You’ll know.
Hey, for liberals one can torture and murder dogs and be forgiven. One can blow up buildings and try to overthrow the US government and be forgiven. One can go all “Hymietown” and be forgiven. Etc. ad nauseum. But for liberals, supporting the US Constitution and common decency is not forgivable.
re: #6 by Gypsy Commenter
Do you recall the witch-doctor thread over there?
It was the bone through the nose that transfixed Charles. It carried the freight of the “racist” charge.
He would be delighted to believe in that Limbaugh said it.
His entire argument about Limbaugh – that even if he didn’t say some things, he said other ugly racist things – is that of “truthiness”. Mary Mapes, Rigoberta Menchu are his peers.
re: #26 by Grimcargo
(yeah, I know) ; )
re: #29 by Gypsy Commenter
and she could make a train take a dirt road
Hey people. I just want to know how telling the truth is racist. People in Africa DO have bones in their noses don’t they? If they want to claim everything else about their African American i.d. they can’t discard that.
re: #27 by buzzsawmonkey
That book influenced Alinsky’s Rules for radicals.
re: #35 by Grimcargo
Yeah, but the really funny part was… The witch Doctor was not from Africa!
Experts tell us the body was Pacific Islander.
Dunn looks like any other “progressive” college Professor. They do not have to live in the real world in any way, shape, or form. Of course her hero is Mao. Put aside that re-education camp stuff and the mass murder of millions. He was a really cool dude and spoke truth to power. I know people like this. I don’t suffer them very well.
re: #35 by Grimcargo
Forget people in Africa having bones through their noses. Have you seen the trendoids of the last few years with those little doorknockers hanging out of their noses? Have you seen the folks with big spacer rings in their ears, so that they have holes there big enough to use the holes as pockets, the way naked Stone Age tribesmen still do?
re: #20 by Doppelganger
The point people keep missing here is that Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot, Guevara, Peron, Hussein are all cut from the same cloth. Their politics are immaterial, except to a few.
People like Dunn idolize Mao because of what they dreamed the world could be like. I’m sorry, but that does not fly in any sense; if you admire a man who buggered little kids and caused the deaths millions, but he meant well and had some nifty notions of how the world should be, then you are an idiot. Likewise, by that same logic, people who still admire Hitler and the Third Reich are to be equally excused and exempted from ridicule because, well, people are entitled to their own opinions about what constitutes an utopia.
re: #30 by buzzsawmonkey
It’s twue! It’s twue!
“He is the messiah and I should know, I’ve followed a few!”
re: #39 by buzzsawmonkey
Next year’s fashion trends in Paris, no doubt.
re: #39 by buzzsawmonkey
Holy Smokes I thought the GOURDS used down below were beyond belief.
So in Chuckie speak:
June 2009 = years ago heh
I heard he’s taking flack for being a child molester… he’s not is he?
re: #32 by Overlook
That was a South Seas Islander, wasn’t it? A witch doctor from Borneo or the Solomon Islands or Fiji, or some place in that area? How is that anti-African racism? I mean that’s the culture in that part of the South Seas; is it racist to comment on the ring through the nostrils of some dippy white goth girl?
re: #5 by Doppelganger
When one lands in the lake of eternal fire, they do not make a splash, just a very very very long scream of agony…
father Gagan mollsested those kids yeaaaars ago.
and besides, Rush Limbaugh said Bone in the nose
re: #43 by Grimcargo
The trend today is to paint your genitals gold. Everybody’s into Gold Man-Sacks these days.
re: #30 by buzzsawmonkey
Roses are red,
Commies are too,
I’m glad that you’re here,
I’ve no doubt that its you.
: )
re: #48 by buzzsawmonkey
hahahah I just had a (as charles Barkly would say) a turrible turrible thought. How about if a lion got after you while you were wearing that gourd?
re: #32 by Overlook
It was the bone through the nose that transfixed Charles.
Will ye no come back again?
Will ye no come back again?
Better loved ye canna’ be
Will ye no come back again?
–Song to Bony Prince Charlie. Oh, sorry–that’s “Bonnie.”
re: #48 by buzzsawmonkey
Yep, that definitely is the genuine buzzsawmonkey. Only he could make a pun like that.
#43:
Whhhhhaaaaat, please tell me your just kidding….PLEASE!
re: #44 by LordNazh
Well it is a suspicion currently floating around the internet, while being disputed Charles hasn’t proven it false, so according to Charles himself it is probably true.
re: #48 by buzzsawmonkey
Yeah Chuckles did that. I saw it somewhere on the internet so it must be true. took only one of those little airplant jars. 1 mil.
re: #53 by Conservative Democrat
Come on–where do you think the phrase “you’re out of your gourd” came from?
re: #56 by buzzsawmonkey
Tipper Gourd?
re: #39 by buzzsawmonkey
Brilliant.
Emulation of the primitive.
Crotch-to-knees pants emulating prison.
Women emulating marquees.
Multi-cultural heaven.
re: #53 by Conservative Democrat
It true. start planting gourds. have to be long skinny ones.
re: #57 by Doppelganger
Actually, it all depends on whose ox is being gourd.
Gourd grief people,
re: #44 by LordNazh
someone said that at hotair I think. But he should stfu since he called Pamela a drunk. and another poster said she was a necroflia
re: #48 by buzzsawmonkey
I bow to the master.
#56
I understand some native places used gourds, but to PAINT em’ gold is …is whats the word…..Oh yeah ASININE!
We have lost our culture. Steadily and stealthily, the erosion has been going on for over 40 years now.
All our major institutions are infected and continue poisoning future generations.
I’m at a loss for what to do other than support the few voices out there that speak the truth.
Inelegant or not, Beck is one of those voices and is doing yeoman’s work waking up the sheep out there.
But other than supporting him and those of like mind…I just don’t know. I fear for my country.
Anything more I’m not willing to speak of.
Did anyone notice the bizarre facial movements of Anita Dunn.
That kind of lip smacking and tongue sticking in and out is often done by people on psychotic drugs. I could only watch 20 seconds of her ticks and crazy face contortions.
This woman is not right in the head.
re: #45 by Gypsy Commenter
Papua New Guinea. We should respect native cultures enough to know the difference between them.
OH LORD HAVE MERCY Im skeering my dog laughing so much.
re: #66 by chickadee
She smoked way too much before the speech. That’s called “I’ve got cotton mouth so bad I could spit Q-tips”
re: #67 by Overlook
Papua New Guinea.
It’s being renamed Mamua New Guinea to help combat global patriarchal hegemony. Haven’t you heard?
re: #45 by Gypsy Commenter
Papua New Guinea. For goodness sake, it is orientalist not to know the difference between cultures of witch-doctoring.
re: #45 by Gypsy Commenter
I came out of the woodwork on that thread because Chucks premises on it were so weak in his attempts and grasping to paint everything he fears as racist or stoopid.
I was feed up with the constant BS and stuck my neck out expecting decapitation, and the axe fell. I was even chided on spelling errors by a poster as a demonstration on what an ignoramus I was.
I have the whole thread saved if anyone needs it.
Chuckles = El Hombre Gourdo
re: #60 by buzzsawmonkey
Gourd grief
re: #66 by chickadee
she dips snuff. probadly stole it from michele
That’s what I thought dorien
disputed… the new ‘fake but accurate’
re: #61 by bellamags
You beat me to it…..
re: #66 by chickadee
I was going to say something similar.
#59:
well YOU can have a long skinny gourd…but me, well suffice it to say zuchini may work but it needs to be a hybrid EXTRA WIDE type!
re: #71 by Overlook
Whoops! Didn’t think earlier one went through.
re: #70 by buzzsawmonkey
LOL, holy crap that was good.
Well thanks buzz, now my whole family is going to think I’ve gone off the deep end again for laughing at my computer for hours. You really can’t effectively explain the humor of these threads to others.
re: #67 by Overlook
Jeez, I ain’t Margaret Mead, ya know?
re: #66 by chickadee
You’re right, I think it’s called tardive dyskenisa. Moe would know.
re: #79 by Conservative Democrat
length IS over-rated.
re: #79 by Conservative Democrat
well that’ll cost you more and if a lion gets after you. you have no chance.
re: #82 by Gypsy Commenter
Jeez, I ain’t Margaret Mead, ya know?
But you can be. Margaret Mead™ is now available at most liquor stores in pint, 750ml, and full liter sizes.
re: #76 by LordNazh
It would seem, having made that particular statement, that Charles Johnson is now being hoisted upon his very own petard. His own standard of proof is convicting him.
re: #73 by Doppelganger
You meant to say gordita didn’t you.
Let’s not give him the benefit of the gout.
re: #84 by bellamags
is you a wimmin? hahahah
A Chinese lady I worked with kept trying to explain Chairman Mao was a very spiritual man.
It took months of discussion with her on numerous subjects before it dawned on me her sense of religion/spirituality was rather twisted. Chairman Mao was a very ‘spiritual’ man “because he was earnestly seeking to become a god.” Only ‘gods’ can fuck over the lives of so many people.
wouldn’t it be painful if chuckles had to wear a gourd riding his tricyle.
re: #84 by bellamags
length IS over-rated.
I’m sorry, but that’s just Enzyte-ment to riot.
re: #72 by Scott Madsen
The place sounds like a complete nuthouse – what you’ve said only confirms that nowadays you can’t even try to rationally discuss/dispute one of CJ’s obsessions.
re: #89 by Grimcargo
yes…or a gay man. you pick.
re: #94 by bellamags
enny minnie miney mo…
re: #86 by buzzsawmonkey
That’s a HONEY of a suggestion.
re: #92 by buzzsawmonkey
You are just pro-longing this.
I’ve always had serious philosophical problems with people who had people link mao and marx as their personal philosophers. Makes me question their ethical, and fundamental reasoning.
It usually becomes a self-circular argument like this: “So if person believes such belief, does that mean that they adhere to such adherents? If so, does that mean that they believe that any end justifies the means?”
Usually about that time, I’m into a full blown argument with them. My personal philosophers fall into 3 categories: Fredrick Hayek, Sun Zi, and Karl Popper.
People might say that their politics are immaterial, I’ve seen it mentioned above by calcajun. This isn’t quite true. They had a political system, but it wasn’t meant for the average person it was meant for the political ruling class. Peons are peons, and they were to be ruled over by coercion and force at the far end of the political spectrum.
After all — who is going to collect the food? It sure won’t be your “betters” who raised you up.
re: #86 by buzzsawmonkey
But you can be. Margaret Mead™ is now available at most liquor stores in pint, 750ml, and full liter sizes.
I always heard she had spirit but now I know why…..
re: #96 by Gypsy Commenter
Here, have Samoa.
re: #95 by Grimcargo
RACIST!!
Notice Charles attacks Beck, to deflect his exposing of Anita Dunn?
That is classic ALinsky.
re: #97 by bellamags
Yeah, it was a bit of a stretch.
re: #100 by buzzsawmonkey
Why are you Fiji-ting…….
re: #97 by bellamags
Are there no lengths you guys wont go to for a little crass humor???
re: #91 by Grimcargo
Not gourding his loins was necessary to maintain his ego.
re: #100 by buzzsawmonkey
Has it Come of Age?
Margaret Mead™!
It’s the coming of aged-in-the-wood!
re: #106 by Scott Madsen
Not if gourding his loins was necessary to maintain his ego.
This crazy disgusting old lib loser hag may love and admire Mao and groups him right in there with Mother Theresa, for effect and to appear quirky and unique, but there is no way either of these people would give her the time of day.
She is too stupid, banal, and ridiculous.
In fact Mao would most likely have her summarily executed because of her utter repugnance.
Won’t be long before someone shows their Tahiti’s
So many of Obama’s hangers-on admire mass murderers. That’s quite alarming to any normal person.
But no, sez Chuck, the important thing is that Limbaugh said “bone in the nose” 20 years ago!
Zero chose this obnoxious commie ideologue. He surrounds himself with people like this for a reason. They reflect his own mind set.
If he was a patriotic American he would have no use for such assholes and he would shun them.
Is it the real puppet, or is it the sock?
Is it addressing the issue, or merely the mock?
Dang it I couldn’t get on here was an error page. While I was waiting I found a Gourd for Buzz go here and look.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_V1ewasqk1FE/SKKc-ugWG8I/AAAAAAAAAZk/orP6gi82Rgs/s320/African+penis+gourd.jpg
Nobody ever talks about Sonny Bone-nose any more.
re: #112 by Donna V.
Or that Glenn beck cried. That is so evil! But it’s OK to like Mao.
re: #112 by Donna V.
The “bone in his nose” is critical. Much worse than mere mass murder. Chuck is good with that. So am I.
[deleted]
This could get fun…
Say Charles, it is Rather difficult to obtain comments folks make years or months into the future.
Secondly, would you quit being Anita Dunn’s peanut butter spoon man?
Beck is almost as harsh on the Republicans as he is on the Democrats.
The night that Glenn Beck cried
Brother, what a night it really was
Did you see that crewcut with the fuzz?
Glory be…
re: #119 by waldensianspirit
He sells her snuff on amazon.keeps him in donuts so he can maintain that big fat arse.
I got kicked out of this blog 15 minutes ago, and have been trying to get back in ever since. Finally made it back in. The traffic on this site must be overwhelming the system; I noticed earlier it took almost a minute for a comment to post.
re: #123 by Gypsy Commenter
It’s cause Chukles is watching out for threats.all his lil skunks to.
Jihad shmihad. We’re in a holy war right here inside our own culture.
The radical egalitarians are like religious fanatics. That’s why there’s no arguing or reasoning with them.
As strongly as many of us feel, it’s a patriotic passion we carry and not a religious fanaticism. That puts us at a disadvantage.
This is going to get a lot uglier before it’s over.
By Johnsonian logic, someone who tells a joke
such as “A Jew, and Irishman, and a Black walk into a bar” is worse then a guy who (lets say) praises Hitler (like Pat Buchanan).
So, it’s ok to wear my Mao Button again?
But no way will I put on those quilted pajamas!
/Red Fashion!
it’s the progressive thing to do……
re: #123 by Gypsy Commenter
I had a hard time getting in – got a 503 error message. however I was shown what the design for the blog will be like when we move to the new server and I must say it is stunning.
re: #124 by Grimcargo
I’m starting to get the impression that CJ regards 2.0 as his bastard offspring, or something. There’s almost a kind of a semi-proprietary interest in this blog on his part.
re: #127 by IslandLibertarian
you can just wear snuggies
Chuckles supports the vile comments about Mother Theresa while at the same time expressing outrage over people taking offense to the WH comm. director’s support for a genocidal poet.
koo koo
koo koo
koo koo
koo koo
re: #121 by buzzsawmonkey
Ah “The Night Chicago Died” by Paper Lace (1974) one of the wrost songs ever (but a fun song nonetheless).
re: #128 by Speranza
Wow! – how did you finagle that?
(All I got were error messages followed by my XP wallpaper)
re: #123 by Gypsy Commenter
We are on a shared server and whoever we serve it with has voluminous peak moments.
BTW, it’s good to see the familiar names and types of comments I’ve enjoyed for the last several years. Buzzsawmonkey, truck monkey, calcajun, goddess,…too many to mention.
It’s been a fun night. I bid you a do do.
re: #113 by chickadee
“Zero chose this obnoxious commie ideologue. He surrounds himself with people like this for a reason. They reflect his own mind set.
If he was a patriotic American he would have no use for such assholes and he would shun them.”
Zero is what used to be called “a fellow traveler”.
re: #132 by Speranza
And how’s is it going with the post?
re: #127 by IslandLibertarian
Sounds like your getting ready to capitalize on this communism thing./
[...] Show original post here [...]
re: #138 by song_and_dance_man
Peak moments? They musta hadda regular Everest there about 9:15
aladam the edit button.
O.K…I was in the middle of a post about gourds (on of my better “gourd” jokes) and WHAMMO out I went. could not get back in, had to reset my IP. Is someone messing with the site or is it just traffic….helllooooo Admins?
Why do so many folks keep revisiting there? I mean, I understand all that “keep your enemies closer” stuff, but really–who cares?
I mean, the jokes are easy, but that’s the problem. It’s shooting fish in a barrel. There are a few people there who ought to leave, and who would be welcome additions here or at any number of other sites, but slagging them while they stay is not the way to get them to wise up.
Heck, some folks here who welcomed me–and I thank you–slagged me when I stuck back there. I figure it’s just the dynamic, but I will say here that I had my own reasons, some good, some not so much perhaps–but they were mine. And if you folks believe in individual liberty, as you mostly do, then you have to respect that the people who still haven’t made the break have their own reasons too, and whether you or I or anyone else thinks they are good and sufficient, from where they are right now they seem so.
Give the embattled remainder some respect, folks, and try and wean yourselves from the easy slaps. Remember, the Satanist is a believer, even if a negative one; if you can’t get past the old joint, you haven’t really left yet, snarks notwithstanding.
re: #125 by LGoPs
After the ’06 election and during the immeadiately commencing run up to the next one is when I reoriented my prepping towards domestic enemies and away from external threats (which was complete anyhow).
I hate to sound like the L3 did about Bush but we have a graver threat to freedom right here right now.
re: #118 by Iron Fist
Charles was running his mouth about you. He claims you threatened him!
As Zero pushes harder with his commie agenda notice he is never without the American flag lapel pin.
re: #133 by Gypsy Commenter
I have connections.
re: #143 by buzzsawmonkey
Nicely put.
Gus 802, who is the son of a German Argentine Nazi is supporting Mao!
re: #140 by Gypsy Commenter
One may notice the blog here slows down at regular intervals.
The thin air begins around 3 MT and again around 6.
re: #127 by IslandLibertarian
Ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!1
re: #142 by Conservative Democrat
As a safety net, it’s a good practice to copy-to-clipboard before hitting the Muslim-of-all buttons, “Submit”.
#146: Yeah a pin he refused to whear prior to the election, get it…..But hey I am just a dumb ass hillbilly redneck racist! Clinging to my “large caliber” type weapons.
The Wun has dictated there shall be changes to the new mario game in order to make it more “relevant”.
http://dagobah.biz/flash/soviet_mario.swf
re: #149 by Rodan
Wow that is perverse. If the commie hag had said she admired Hitler they would even be fine with that, if CJ gave them the nod. Scary shit over at the swamp.
What’s next – that she admired Sheik Yassin of Hamas?
On a serious matter though, what the hell is this crap?
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/10/15/al-gore-advised-google-about-its-search-quality
re: #155 by chickadee
Yea but Hitler wasn’t Flemish
He’s in my top 5 list of psychotic communist mass-murdering maniacs.
Not sure I actually admire him for that though it is impressive.
Buzz, this will be over when it’s over. Not sure exactly when that will be, but every passing day brings us one day closer.
Anyway, I agree that this is like shooting fish in a barrel. Or maybe a better analogy would be that it’s like being a bear in Alaska when the salmon are running. You can’t possibly eat all the fish; you just pick ‘em here and there, and let lots of other go by. The insanity and inadvertent hilarity at that place is that abundant.
Charles Johnson:
PP
Projecting Progressive.
On his projecting regarding “sock puppets” on his blog. Before tfk reg. as taxfreekiller as a lurker prior tfk did notice the odd way Charles was so concerned with sock puppets. So knowing of the liberal back ground of said Charles tfk did his sock puppets prior to reg. the open conservative nic for the real me taxfreekiller.
The other three who remain got reg. prior so that he would not link them ever. Now when tfk goes about Texas, New Mexico, Okla. on bussiness useing various computers and socks none of them know them at all. Two of them are quite well known and liked by the loon liberals.
It does to me follow that several or even more of the more liberal long term posters are in fact Charles’ dirty socks.
Many of his up dings could well be coming from his own dirty socks. Over the last month Charles is often the top 5 or 6 upding winners.
All this cult by direction is growing stranger and stranger.
History will have a full report on this sick blog cult 10 to 20 years from now. Should be
some new age progressive Dr. Phil who first lies about the thing, then some real disection down down in the big memory Cisco System in the sky.
Charles :
a hint,,, avanti had down dings by tfk, and your blocked tfk’s down ding rights a long time ago, you never made note of my sock puppet up dinging avanti, that was sort of a test to see if you were in fact still a pure loon ass Calif. earth first , anti American/CO2 , Al Gore/John Kerry/Obama loving kook.
just now tfk is logged on your blog and talking to all your loon liberal new age progressives and acting just as bat shit crazy as they do,,,
that is all the hints you and iceweasle will get
Go Dodgers Go….
re: #158 by waldensianspirit
Yea but Hitler wasn’t Flemish
That’s only because he blew his nose on his sleeve.
re: #161 by taxfreekiller
remind me to never piss you off.
re: #143 by buzzsawmonkey
Complaining here is like walking in a field of weeds. No one notices until you are spiked by a thistle and say ouch.
re: #155 by chickadee
If Little Kim of North Korea came out in favor of evolution and warned about global warming, LGF would find nice things to say about him.
re: #161 by taxfreekiller
ROTFLMAO….. Hit him again TFK… Hit him where it hurts… right straight in his paranoid…
2 run homer for Manny… Nice!
Dodgers!!!
Via HOt Air
Sanchez and Huffpo back off the Limbaugh claims
No harm in admitting the lie now that his NFL bid’s dead. First, via the Standard, comes this belated HuffPo postscript to a post that’s three years old:
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post contained quotes attributed to Rush Limbaugh, which Limbaugh has since denied making. As is our policy when a fact in a blog post is called into question, we gave its author 24 hours to substantiate the quote. Since he has not been able to do so, the quotes have been deleted from the post.
And now here’s Sanchez, kinda sorta apologizing — on Twitter — for airing the bogus slavery quote on his show earlier this week:
i’ve know rush. in person,i like him. his rhetoric,however is inexcusably divisive. he’s right tho. we didn’t confirm quote. our bad.
Mao believed in Darwinism.
re: #157 by Mars
I was doing some research the other night and went to google, put in “alliance for” in the search bar and the words “climate protection” automatically completed my search string. I had never searched for this before, so google wasn’t being intuitive.
You can make a game out of it. Put in a few words and watch what google suggests.
re: #169 by Speranza
Yup Charles has egg on his face. Don’t expect a retraction from LGF.
re: #167 by doriangrey
Make that plural:
re: #161 by taxfreekiller
Dude. How do you do that batshit moonbat thing, anyway? I could never keep my Chuck down.
re: #167 by doriangrey
He’s got two?
re: #168 by bar
Finally a team we can agree on. I hope.
re: #164 by Knightwatch
Ya we’ll have to make him our friend…right tfk? buddy?..
Gus802 is still defending Mao!
And btw, tfk,,,
More commas!!!
CJ is never wrong about anything.
He is second, in his god like omniscience, only to Zero.
re: #180 by chickadee
That’s why he likes Mao!
re: #169 by Speranza
I think he’ll sue them for slander/ defamation of character, he’s got a case.
re: #165 by song_and_dance_man
I’m not quite sure how you mean.
Look, I understand the resentment and detox period that exists after being treated shabbily and arbitrarily. I understand the fascination of watching someone behave as if they are in a sort of political delirium tremens, thrashing around wildly at the pink elephants crawling all over his bed.
But I’m here for the same reason I was once somewhere else; because there are people who were once also somewhere else who I enjoyed talking to. I wasn’t interested in feeding some obsessive’s self-glorification there, so I left. I’m not interested in feeding it here. I may fall prey to participating in the snarkfests, since I love a good snark for itself, but I feel diminished each time I permit myself to do so.
Media Matters linking to LGF.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910150020
He’s part of the Machine.
dam it is hard to do,,,
lgf’s .0001 is just like the Kos Kids Kult of the time of the run up to Obama getting elected,
Now Charles is jumping Drak_Falcon for taking up for G. Bush and saying Obama talks shit about America, demanding Dark_Falcon post where Obama has said bad things about America…
makes me want to burn the sock I’m on there with,,,
na,,,, to easy for them, I’ll just play along some more..
later
re: #185 by taxfreekiller
It’s funny how he has yet to address Anita Dunn’s comments.
The Progressive machine is silent on this.
re: #170 by Rodan
And Darwin’s wife Emma enjoyed reading the “fully slavery supporting” Bible.
re: #179 by snork
too, also
re: #183 by buzzsawmonkey
I agree. Its almost like a divorce. Something that was part of your life that you enjoyed very much suddenly changed and there was nothing you could do about it except move on. You chose to make the situation ugly or not. There really isn’t anyone left there to concern ourselves with.
Rodan, that was a devastating video. You see, Mao really was a brilliant revolutionary strategist and tactician. No doubt. If you want to understand totalitarian strategy and tactics, he’s the first guy you should read. And, if you want to subvert a totalitarian system, he’s a great source.
But a favorite “political philosopher”?! That is what is so staggering, for then the desired end point is to destroy, utterly, the individual. And THAT is exactly what he did. It is also true that this fits with Alinsky’s pooh-poohing of “ends versus means” as a cop-out, an assertion that anyone who talks about means just favors the status quo. SOME means have only one end, as Mao showed very clearly.
(I admit that with all the fluff in these comments, few will even see my own comment. It’s a bit frustrating that the level of discussion isn’t a bit higher. No offense, y’all.)
I am in an argument on another site – what does an upside down US Flag stand for?
re: #183 by buzzsawmonkey
I think we all have to go about dealing with this in our own way.
If you feel diminished when you rag on CJ then don’t do it.
I personally feel fine commenting on the train wreck and discussing how strange the dynamics are.
What is going on there is the awkward elephant in the room. It is still hopping around, trumpeting and crashing into things.
That invites discussion.
re: #189 by bellamags
I would argue only to the extent of saying that the people who finally get fed up with being treated like wayward children or like acolytes of whom blind loyalty is demanded should not be slagged while they are in the process of coming to that realization, and should be welcomed when/if they do.
If they are not slagged beforehand, the welcome will be all the more genuine. Everything and everyone has their time.
re: #190 by sk
Little known fact, Mao admired Hitler also.
http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2009/10/10/progressives-and-gun-control/
Anita let the Progressive mask slipped and exposed what they really believed. That is why they admire Castro and Chavez.
re: #190 by sk
Mao really was a brilliant revolutionary strategist and tactician.
There is little brilliance to following the principle of “kill everyone who might disagree with you or torture and terrify them until they submit.”
re: #172 by Rodan
The problem.
Charles was a lefty before 9/11 and that epiphenomena event awoke in him a sense of Americanism/patriotism and support for the right, even though he was never really one of them. That dichotomy was a thing he grappled with until conservatives that filled his biog were no longer useful to him and he reverted to 9/10 thinking .
And then he began to comment.
That was when the problem started. His blog may have become even more relevant if he had continued to entertain the ideals of those he attracted in droves, but instead he decided to abandon and ban them to move it to what he always wanted.
Cults start this way.
re: #190 by sk
If I got any more serious and upscaled my discourse by the end of the evening/night I’d have to start oiling my pitchfork and soaking torches.
So a little levity helps out quite a bit.
It is rather odd that the free speech restrictions imposed by the ban stick at lgf’s 1.0 still live by other means in the universe with the urge of the ban still, too, also.
IMO
re: #193 by buzzsawmonkey
I only go at LGF in connection to attacking Progressives. They have made their camp and sometimes my artillery lands on them.
The Progressive Machine is huge and has tentacles everywhere.
re: #196 by song_and_dance_man
Yeah but when you are deflecting from criticizing a Mao supporter, that shows how Totalitarian Progressives are.
re: #191 by Lizzie_in_Texas
Military base sign for duress. Means base is under enemy control
re: #191 by Lizzie_in_Texas
Popular statement in Leftist demonstrations since the Vietnam era for “the country is in trouble.”
re: #191 by Lizzie_in_Texas
under siege
re: #193 by buzzsawmonkey
I agree completely.
I went back to 1.0 a few times about a month ago and never commented, just lurked and felt like I wouldn’t fit in anymore. In the south a lady knows when and how to leave. I just left quietly. I don’t know if I have been banned. I came here and saw familiar names and was welcomed. That’s all that matters.
Sort of like “John F. Kerry” was just misunderstood and now that he is older and in the U.S. Senate he should be accepted.
NOT
re: #191 by Lizzie_in_Texas
It is supposed to be flown as a sign of distress, an SOS. The leftists, however, have used it as a sort of symbol of disrespect to the flag/America. Flying it upside down is their version of saying “Look at ME!!!! I poop on America!”
re: #195 by buzzsawmonkey
That’s not why he was brilliant. Lots of mass murderers did this (e.g., off the top of my head, the other Hussein). No, Mao understood the use of propaganda, how to infiltrate the West, and how to wage a war against technically superior armies.
http://www.tamilnation.org/armed_conflict/mao.htm
re: #183 by buzzsawmonkey
It is hard to divest ourselves from a thing where so much was invested. Sure, we left only words, but those words to us mean much.
Come on, you may say that we are past that, yet you as well as I can go on and do so.
I’m with you in total divestment. And as I have said time and again, time is the real measure when we get to that place when 1.0 is a thing of the past.
These things are going on in the American people’s White House. This President is surrounding himself with Marxists in general and people who admire Mao Tse-Tung as their favorite philosopher.
It’s terribly wrong.
Mao Tse-Tung’s individualism (‘fight your own war’) was his desire to get hundreds of millions of people to cease being individuals or die. He brought death to 70 million of them.
This isn’t a matter individualism for everyone.
It’s individualism for despots only.
This is what the White House Marxists see as Obama’s ultimate destination.
re: #193 by buzzsawmonkey
Yes. As I said earlier, those who defect here can say they were brainwashed or suffering from Stockholm syndrome.
The act of defecting expunges all indictments of collaboration.
And as for Spacejesus – let him be to walk to and fro and up and down.
re: #210 by Overlook
When a Blog defends Mao now many at LGF are, this is sickening.
re: #209 by Eliana
“Mao Tse-Tung’s individualism (’fight your own war’) was his desire to get hundreds of millions of people to cease being individuals or die. He brought death to 70 million of them.
This isn’t a matter individualism for everyone.
It’s individualism for despots only.”
Absolutely.
So, if your a manipulative PP (projecting progressive) and you have some off line e-mail chats with some of your gang from lgf’s 1.0 and you pre-plan a ban of someone and the plan is to put them into lgf 2.0 as a disruption.
Be on guard for things like this, your dealing with some who are not nice at all.
Keep your heads in the game.
IMO
re: #198 by taxfreekiller
I hear you. It’s as if some people are afraid to look back at the flaming wreckage for fear that they’ll be turned to pillars of salt.
Buzzsaw – let me make something perfectly clear. I left that dive two years ago simply because it was getting boring. There are many like me; I’m sure that for every one of the 1545 on Kirly’s list there are several who simply got bored and left. So when I throw flames in their direction, it’s decidedly not out of any butthurtness of being rejected. I rejected that dive, and then two years later came back and deliberately rejected it again with as much anaerobic sludge as I could muster.
It’s not about me, and it’s not about my hurt feelings. It’s about the way someone fooled me. You expect stupidity out of Kos. I was lulled into expecting better there. So when this batshitness starts echoing all over the blogosphere to where I could even hear it at PJM, yeah, I felt like I had to come back and say something.
And I’m going to continue until I don’t feel like it anymore. If it’s annoying, well welcome to the Wild West of the internet. This is the un-LGF, and if the entropy is more than you like, well, don’t know what to tell you.
Anita Dunn’s constant tongue flicking is annoying, BTW.
As distracting as it is to see Nancy Pelosi blinking several hundred times per minute during a Presidential speech, imagine if Anita Dunn was the one back there sticking her tongue out 60 times per minute.
I think the TV camera operators for Congress would have to find a way to blue or green screen her out of the picture.
re: #208 by song_and_dance_man
Are HuffPo and “Screw ‘em!” Kos things of the past?
There are many battles coming up and we see 2010 rapidly approaching.
re: #208 by song_and_dance_man
No, no. The stage where that place is “a thing of the past” is only stage 4 of a 24 stage process.
The last stage is wallowing in the luxury of virtual theatre.
re: #211 by Rodan
We could demand disavowals.
But those leftists (who really do admire Mao) will not defect here – at least not with the same nics.
re: #216 by waldensianspirit
LGF has joined the Progressive machine.
And to think that the charlatan Zero rode the train from Illinois to DC as if he was Lincoln.
He feigned reverence for such a great american.
But I bet he was thinking of worthless commie bastards on that trip.
re: #216 by waldensianspirit
I was referring to things that meant much to us as posters on 1.0 as it stood as a place to have our say.
That is now gone.
We now have this forum.
re: #213 by taxfreekiller
[*looks furtively at snork*]…nah! it couldn’t be…[*side glance*]…
re: #206 by InsubordinateNonCom
I may be giving myself up here, but here is my reply
“Dang nabit, I am on vacation and was not going to read or post anything on two political sites I frequent – this one being one of them. The answer to this poll is not listed. See, the answer is not political; but moral, ethical and spiritual. The Supreme Court has ruled that it is not illegal to burn the United States of America Flag. It is ok in the sight of the law. In that manner, I have to look at those that do burn the Flag of the United States of America as not having any morals or ethics. They do not even comprehend that the fact that they are allowed to burn it is granted by the law of the land. The problem I have with this same rule of law has ruled that it is legal to kill a human in fetus form. Again, the law of the land ruled. We have been told that it is ok to treat the pieces of thread loomed together and then sewn together that represent my home country (The Great United States of America) as nothing more than such. So why would we treat an unborn child any different.
I will bet that more here (regardless of their political affiliation) will disagree with this point of view.
There is hope, it starts with every one of us – doing what we know is right, just and morally, ethical and spiritual and teaching our children and those around us to do the same. Just because the “law” allows it, does not make it right. We need to get back to our morality, spirituality and ethics. ”
The poll was this..
What group of people would be more likely to protest by Desecrating the US flag?
Conservatives/Constitutionalists/Patriots
Liberals/Leftist/Anarchists/Traitors
re: #218 by Overlook
They are cowards and the RINO’s like Dark_Falcon doesn’t take them on. He backs down when challenged.
re: #214 by snork
You have a point, I admit. There is certainly an element of betrayal in being led to believe someone was something and who turned out to be something else. And trying to be “the bigger man” can be cold comfort, often.
I am, however, urging people to let things go, not for the sake of feelings elsewhere, but for their own sakes. I’ve done anger and even hatred in my life, and it is corrosive. To the extent I’ve been able to slough it, in instances past, it was because I realized that it was hurting me and not the person I directed it to.
Pissed off at Yertle? Ignore him. It becomes easier over time, and being ignored will in the end hurt more than being slagged.
re: #207 by sk
You do refer to the commie democrats such as John F. Kerry and the other traitors he used.
re: #226 by taxfreekiller
I don’t understand.
re: #225 by buzzsawmonkey
If you let someone else control your emotions, they win. Oh what a valuable lesson THAT was.
re: #204 by bellamags
bellamags,
If you’ve poster here or on C2 or on Hot Air, etc etc, you are blocked. I posted on C2 and was blocked within hours. It’s a cult of busy bees….
charles “Mao was a poet after all” +15
DELETED
Charles “buh bye now!’ + 3
Yooper : “Charles that was kewl” +2
Sharmuta : No doubt we’ll that anti Mao scumbag over at the stalkers blog. +9
DELETED
Charles ” GET OFF MY WEBSITE” +8
Gus 802 ” the bad anti mao craziness on the right is scary” +11
Irish Rose ” Hi everybody ” +1
Chum ” correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Mao murder a bunch of people. – 25
Iceweasel ” never proven. this is a Glenn Beck lie” + 8
re: #227 by sk (skzion)
I think it was for 206 about the use of the upside-down flag by leftists.
I’m out. Enjoy.
Oh.
Was it cleared up that the speech was given this year?
Also JWF has it that the dems have opted for the nuclear option and will need only 51 votes in the senate to pass the obamacare bill.
re: #213 by taxfreekiller
TFK, your writing style is so, uh, unique, that if you are currently posting as a moonbat at 1.0 and haven’t been detected then I must ask you which writing style is really yours? TFK? Or the sock?
I don’t expect you to answer my question as it might reveal your undercover persona at LGF but thought I’d express my admiration that someone with such a one-of-a-kind style can comment elsewhere and not be exposed.
Bravo!
And P.S.: According to your comments above your alter-ego is well known over there. Now I’m curious! Hmmmm.
re: #227 by sk (skzion)
He had only U.S. inside treason to fight with,
as in Vietnam and other places. They could not win any real fight, so they used and still use the commie democrats like John F. Kerry to do the back stabing of the U.S. from within.
is that clear enough
re: #233 by sk (skzion)
I read it wrong:-) It does apply to your 207 afterall.
TFK, has your Moonbat 1.0 alter ego been quoted here yet?
If CJ served his sycophants poop in a dixie cup with sprinkles on top, they would gobble it down remarking on how good the chocolate ice cream was.
re: #200 by Rodan
His love for them was always there, but he held his tongue. When he began to comment the defining moment commenced. We all began to get a glimpse of the real CJ.
And now he has outed himself as a leftist progressive of the worst sort. Godlessness is not a problem for 1.0.
And don’t think I have any harsh words that are not based on fact. I only want the truth.
re: #239 by chickadee
LOL, NAILED it.
re: #2 by Doppelganger
The people ripping on Rush Limbaugh are the same ones defending Mao who murdered 70 million people.
Eat that Chuckles.
re: #224 by Rodan
A thought:
Couldn’t we borrow the Red Phone idea from Glenn Beck?
Once a day – perhaps the overnight thread – invite Charles (or a any of them) from there to comment – say whetever is on his/her mind. Also make the point that if the Red Phone never rings that is a telling silence.
A DMZ. Check-point Charlie.
Mr. Johnson tear down this wall!
Mao. . . . . no less.
Fucking Mao. Unbelievable.
Extolling the virtues of this monster.
re: #84 by bellamags
It’s the girth that matters.
And I squash your gourd.//
Easy way to spell, progressive,,”commie”.
re: #239 by chickadee
Thank you sir, may I have another!
re: #230 by Doppelganger
sharmuta’s comment is sicker than sick and lgf dinging someone down for pointing out mao killed millions of people? they have no conscience….it’s been shut off completely….they are no longer just useful idiots….they’ve crossed into evil
re: #230 by Doppelganger
Unfu&*ing believable.
re: #240 by song_and_dance_man
I am in total agreement.
And how’s it going S&D!
re: #241 by newsjunkie_ky
{newsjunkie_ky} LOL
How can it be so sad but so funny?
re: #230 by Doppelganger
Cripes. Talk about cognitive ignorance.
The Cultural Revolution was not an arts & crafts fair, dammit.
re: #230 by Doppelganger
Serious?!?
re: #239 by chickadee
he wouldn’t have to disguise his shit, in fact, he wouldn’t…he’d say eat my shit and they would willingly…in fact, they are eating his shit everyday!
Doug Hoffman surges in poll!
http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/10/doug-hoffman-surges-in-polls-time-for.html
re: #248 by phoenixgirl
I may be mistaken but I assumed Doppelganger was being satirical. At least I hope that’s the case …
re: #243 by Overlook
That sounds like a plan!
Somebody got the stinky for saying “firsties” over there.
lolz
re: #246 by taxfreekiller
I always thought Progressive was another was to speil Marxist.
Gus 802 ” the bad anti mao craziness on the right is scary” +11
Somebody pinch me. Could this asswipe really mean this?
re: #260 by Abu Bin Squid
I’ll pinch you. It was satire generated here.
re: #250 by Runner
Going good bro. I had to have my say as it goes.
re: #260 by Abu Bin Squid
What a bunch of uneducated moronic cowardly cultists.
Mao was a ruthless murderous commie.
And they are putting him on a pedestal because that’s the way CJ rolls now.
I hope a psychiatrist is studying this craziness.
re: #260 by Abu Bin Squid
Of course they actually mean it, these people are communist fools, basically they are domestic enemies of the United States.
re: #260 by Abu Bin Squid
What do you expect from the Son of a German-Argentine Nazi.
re: #263 by chickadee
Every day we learn more and more about the communists in the White House. We need to pray for our Country. I’m very afraid of what is going on to destroy America by this White House.
re: #262 by song_and_dance_man
Speaking your mind!? What are we going to do with you!?
// (do I need these?)
Hmm…
Ran out of fingers and toes?
re: #264 by doriangrey
Dorian! How goes it? I’ve been thinking about you for days. I’m so bummed that I couldn’t figure out which band you toured with in the 80s as per our last conversation. I need more clues!
Seriously though, how’s it going?!
re: #259 by song_and_dance_man
It was. The Communist party of the 30′s was called the Progressive party. It’s either ironic, or just pride on the part of our leftists that they have reused the name.
re: #268 by snork
Pretty soon the flounces/bannings will outnumber the thread comments!
Racer X just ask Charles about Anita Dunn and her commie connections.
tick, tock….
re: #243 by Overlook
Jah, Charles would be welcomed here as an unconfirmed and untried poster that must come prepared to jostle with words that are worthy of a much tougher room than he may be used to in his puffy love me comfort zone.
Can you imagine that> Charles allowing himself to be taken to task or in effort defend himself in a forum that he has no control over. I doubt he has the courage to become one of us.
Isn’t it a pity
re: #269 by Runner
ROTFLMAO… Sorry no more clues… How’s it going?? Well this is my newest blog post…
As you can plainly see I aint no Chukles the Clown…
Charles is worried that Glenn Beck is checking into his back ground.
He knows something, “its called projection” for a reason. Someone he knows has ratted on him and he knows it.
re: #268 by snork
The breathless relish at the drama of bannings. Proof that the bannings are what keep many lgf commenters both interested and locked in.
I should think that LVQ has at long last got tired of AGW proselytizing.
They’re celebrating being linked at mediamatters:
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910150020
Spock, I’m going to find you, and shave that beard off.
re: #260 by Abu Bin Squid
….and that should scare the shirt off of anyone with any objective knowledge of political economy.
re: #274 by doriangrey
Okay Dorian. I won’t bug ya for more clues.
A question though. Have you always had the political leanings you display here and on your blog? Or were you someone like me, i.e., a dumb liberal (ill-informed, not a moonbat in my case) who came to see the light?
I only ask because it seems like everyone in the music biz is at the least a liberal and at the worst a moonbat. I’m just curious how you got along with others!
re: #242 by McKinley
That is a great point! But it is apparent that LGF has been duped and drank the Kool-aid…right is wrong, up is down and left is right – this is what happens with they embrace moral relativism – there is no objective Truth. Sad, so sad what has happened. There was such potential!
re: #275 by taxfreekiller
Oh, shiite. Maybe your sock should tell him the Mossad has been asking questions. Whisper it right in there. Tell him they have that old Les Paul he had in ’73, and they know stuff about him from the quasigomotron machine in Haifa. Traces of strawberries. Ludwig V.Quacksalot will tell him it’s real.
re: #272 by taxfreekiller
Dark_Falcon is once again licking Progressive boots!
Once again, Beck points out a socialist/communist/marxist in our federal government and the liberals and media take the opportunity to trash Beck so as to shift the focus off of what he said.
It’s the same thing they did to McCarthy. He was right then, Beck is right now.
re: #267 by Runner
Send me into the ash well of unforgotten history.
I will order the jar well before the ashes are mixed.
re: #281 by snork
Hey Snork, when you refrained from commenting at 1.0 for the past couple of years did you ever at least read the comments to see what was going on?
Oh… Ms. Dunn is a Mao fan that explains why she likes CNN.
Would it be asking too much if there was at least one member of this administration that wasn’t a NAMBLA fan, eugenics fan, or lover of commie dictators?
re: #284 by song_and_dance_man
Old legends die hard!
re: #285 by Runner
Nope. I’d look @ the links (which were very good until all the good people like CiJ were run off), but the articles went stupid a couple of years ago. I mean, who needs the 374th thread on evolution from someone who doesn’t carbon from bourbon?
Good grief. Look at the time. It’s after 11:30 here. I have two more things to wrap up for a client. I would love to stay here as I see the comments to come will be a good time and help me get through the night with a smile. Alas, I must go…
Later everyone!!!
re: #279 by Runner
My step father had 27 years in the United States Navy before I was 25, I’ve been a politically inclined conservative for pretty much as long as I can remember.
How did I get along with my peers? Quite well as long as we didn’t discuss politics. I did however break Richie Blackmore’s nose once because he was a liberal pantywaist pussy (and an arrogant elitist bastard).
But mostly I drank a lot, did a lot of drugs and had a lot of crazy sex just like the majority of my peers. So of course we got along great…. lol…lol…lol… (oh and ya, I guess I was a pretty arrogant prick back then too)
Between the opening post and Buzzsaw’s #10 (and others) there’s more cogent thought and well-expressed good sense than in several years worth of “good grief”‘s.
More could be said of that place–like pointing out how tenous the ties must be to Nazis to get adding to the rotating list of enemies, but open admiration of Mao, who soaked China in blood, is shrugged off–but I’ll leave it at that.
I’m sick of the only moral lesson’s being acceptable these days as being “recycle” and “follow your heart.”
There is nothing new under the sun, so I think it is time to stop listening to the lessons of the graying “Don’t trust anyone over 30″ crowd, especially as they take those lessons from bloody handed slayers.
I mean, don’t liberals ever get sick of being used by commies? Why doesn’t the center left bitterly resent being used as useful idiots?
OT: I heard a country song that brought some of you all to mind tonight; “Country boys will survive” or something to that effect.
Wow, I just watched the top video. Unreal. Thanks for posting it.
I’ll have to watch the other one another time.
Charles is off the blog, he seems to be running some sort of search, my tech guy just e-mailed said something was dinging the Y-fi this main frame uses here in Ft. Worth. I’m on a lap top we use for inter office comm.’s. He or someone he hired or some other thing is looking for socks, must be very careful now.
re: #291 by Nikis Knight
The Progressives have hijacked the Democrats. This is the most radical government ever.
re: #274 by doriangrey
Why hide it? There is no reason. As a youth I tried out with a band called Rox who in my opinion kicked ass on Van Halen (pre hollywood clubs), who was led my Joey Carducci, who is now a Fender big whig. They were the best guitarists in the area at the time. I played in a band that knew the Van Halens and met them right before they made the big time. I jammed with Eddie. That was in the early 80′s.
And there is much more I can say. Why are you hiding your experience?
Say it. Even it it means it was trivial. Heck, after the early 80′s I went on to play with Christian groups and did some good things. The band I played with that had great success will not be known by most, but we played all the big venues in LA and the southwest sans the arenas.
There is no reason to hide your talent.
re: #230 by Doppelganger
What a bunch of F*cktards…..
re: #144 by Scott Madsen
Amen. With White House officials openly praising the greatest mass killer in history I am convinced that we are under enemy occupation.
And still, half of us are asleep. The schools have done their job well.
re: #236 by taxfreekiller
“He had only U.S. inside treason to fight with,
as in Vietnam and other places. They could not win any real fight, so they used and still use the commie democrats like John F. Kerry to do the back stabing of the U.S. from within.
is that clear enough.”
Actually, no. But I can figure out nearly anything, however carelessly written or poorly thought through.
If you bothered to review the link I provided before, you might have gotten a sense of what I was talking about regarding military doctrine. As for “only” having “U.S. inside treason to fight with,” that is absurd. There is nothing “only” about it: it was a carefully planned and executed campaign, producing very useful results It is foolish of you to think that such campaigns are not “war.” That you fail to understand this point shows Mao’s innovations. That Mao was effective is shown by his “legacy” in the U.S.
He also was quite effective against the Japanese invaders, though in this he shared credit.
Unlike Nancy and La Dunn, I do not admire Mao in any way, and certainly don’t admire him as a “political philosopher.” But since I want to win against totalitarians, I do pay attention to them.
I really don’t understand how people end up thinking like this and believe it has some sort of merit.
How is is that they can admire the likes of ultra violent intellectual type murdering dictators but think that random individuals who might have a stereotype opinion are evil ? Just don’t get this sort of “logic.”
What the fuck is going on in the world these days? Che Mao etc cool… Rush, Beck… squashed and silenced?
re: #294 by Rodan
Too much LSD in the past? I really don’t understand how people have become so totally irrational and insane and they truly believe they stumbled on the truth.
re: #297 by LGoPs
The worst is people like Gus802 defending Mao.
re: #293 by taxfreekiller
Wow, a sockpuppet in the DFW metroplex! So are you a cowtown sort of sockpuppet or an uppercrust dallas sockpuppet! There is a difference you know….
re: #143 by buzzsawmonkey
We mostly just slagged the ones that slammed us on command. It’s really frustrating when you get accused of things you didn’t do and people just take cj’s word for it as the *gasp* gospel.
If you didn’t do that, you prolly weren’t a target around here anyway. :}
re: #298 by sk (skzion)
It had not one thing to do with Mao, it had and has all to do with the Democrat party in the U.S.A., without them Mao would have been dead early on.
re: #301 by Rodan
Doppelganger’s post 230 was clearly satire.
Okay, I mean, is disputed up not unproven.
re: #282 by Rodan
Hitler was an animal Lover and his love of the opera and his dedication to the physical fitness of Blonde German children was indeed admirable
-Dork falcon
re: #295 by song_and_dance_man
I was a rude insufferable prick and made enemies who probably would not like to be reminded that I once played with them for a short time. We did not part on good terms, and quite honestly I am both embarrassed by the image I had then and don’t want anything I ever do in the future judged by the past.
If you guys don’t know who I played for, it cant influenced what you think of how I play now.
re: #299 by teacake
I think partly it’s due to generations of kids raised to become narcissists. People like that can’t be reasoned with. The pathology runs too deep.
Theories abound on what causes narcissism but there’s agreement that it starts at an early age and is encouraged by poor parenting. Specifically, parenting that overpraises and makes the child the center of the universe. My personal thoughts are that Dr Spock had a lot to do with this type of thinking, preaching to a generation of parents who had recently lived through the hardship of the Great Depression and then a World War. The instinct to overpamper and indulge was understandable but created a generation of young monsters who came to bloom in the 60′s.
These narcissistic monsters, never having done anything to earn the praise that was showered on them, grew older and more sophisticated in every respect but the most important one – wisdom.
And by burrowing into the educational and media establishments they’ve ruined following generations.
Just some random, meandering thoughts.
re: #296 by osama bin porkchop
Oops…lol….I certainly hope it was satire. Though what goes on there now, it wouldn’t have shocked me…
re: #303 by m
Hey m , heard from n2l, not seem him back since his exit last weekend. Hope it’s just a short hiatus.
re: #297 by LGoPs
Local talk radio guy had a great point:
If the Communists acted quickly and bombed us, we’d be demanding that we bomb the Communists back…. but they haven’t… they’re moving slowly to destroy America……. and so that’s ok? We just accept it? At the very least, legal and nonviolent civil disobedience, folks.
(roughly quoting)
OT/ Australian TV show apologizes for blackface skit
Did French Vogue cross line with blackface photos?
White model painted black lands Vogue in race row
French Vogue embroiled in ‘blackface’ controversy
Disturbing Trend: Reemergence Of Blackface In The Media
we need to make up racist quotes for Anita, then CJ will approve.
Actually showing a video of her…. now that’s just low and underhanded.
And
LBJ and Gen.Giap of NVA, we had his lat./lon.
three times for 24 hours, could not get LBJ to OK a bomb run or even a hatched team.
it is like that still
re: #306 by Doppelganger
That would be his defense!
re: #303 by m
Ditto that.
re: #308 by LGoPs
Very well said.
re: #307 by doriangrey
People are allowed to change their opinions and to retract stupid statements. I’ve done it many times. And I might retract this statement as well.
re: #310 by Sparky
I have, but I’ve been meaning to shoot him an email as a matter of fact. I think we lost him to cj fatigue.
Hopefully he’ll come back when we finish the 12 steps.
:}
re: #300 by teacake
The leftist have been grandfathered in from the 60′s mentality. They are the entitled ones born of radical egalitarianism who believe government owes them for past offenses. They are victims sloven to a ‘fact’ of past oppression that must be recompensed for living under the ‘man’.
They are tantrum laden childlike refugees who must take control of the cheesline
distribution. They are those who say ‘your fathers ate the raw grapes and now our children’s teeth are set on edge.’
They are the most unwelcome in the kingdom of God, unwilling to take for themselves the recompense of their own making. Their bed is made by their own hand and hate the fact they must bed down themselves down in it.
They sleep with dreams of a better bed and detest those with better comfort. They want the best but have no desire to buy better from working. They want what you have and will take it out of envy because working harder to have more is not as appealing as theft.
re: #191 by Lizzie_in_Texas
It is a distress call.
re: #319 by m
N2L took a break?
I can understand the feeling, but perhaps for different reasons.
re: #307 by doriangrey
People are never allowed to change their opinions and to retract stupid statements. I’ve never done it. Everything ever said, printed or posted stands. There are no “takebacks” in the grammar school of life.
Snorkcity.
re: #308 by LGoPs
They are selfish in that they feel that they’ve transcended the need for religion, at least in the otherworldly sense.
They are humanists, and as such believe that perfection can be achieved by humanity through correction.
I believe that to be the biggest difference between the conservative and liberal mind.
Conservatives tend to realize that humans are imperfect by nature, and thus place their faith in themselves and whatever form of spirituality they choose to embrace individually, while involving the least amount of influence from others who are inherently flawed.
Liberals seem to place their faith entirely in other like-minded people and believe that humanity is in control of its universe and can influence it towards a state of universal happiness through the imposition of ideas.
Oh dear me, I’ve made the front page of 1.0. From his daily Hot Air comments thread:
A badge of honor coming from such a creature:
This from a guy who has posted lies about Rush Limbaugh, but has a big “no comment” on Dunn’s favorite philosopher.
re: #311 by LanceKates
I hate to oversue the forg in warm water argument but incrementalism does work. the left has been pushing this shit for going close to 40 years now and look where we are.
They laid the groundwork by capturing the schools and the media. Media covers the present brainwashing needs while the schools take care opf the future.
The only good thing I can see in all this is that I’m heartened that even after 40 years of brainwashing there’s still roughly half of us that call bullshit on them. And that’s a testament to something strong in the American character, IMO.
the other good thing is that this President and the rpesent he got in a Democratically controlled Congress is overreaching and waking lots of people up. His hubris may play in our favor. What I can’t calculate is how much damage he can do before enough wake up or what lengths he’s willing to go to complete our subjugation.
I spent a dozen years patrolling the frontiers of freedom during the Cold War and rejoiced when the Wall came down, thinking we’d won. only to find that we’ve been seriously infected at home and have domestic enemies right in our midst.
This fight will be harder because the enemies are in among us. But I take heart in the fact that as Beck says, we also surround them.
Bastards.
Geez Looeeez! I need preview.
Sheesh.
re: #322 by LanceKates
Hush yo mouth.
re: #325 by Infidel
Well it’s nice to know I’m not the only one called freak.
Night all.
re: #327 by LGoPs
pimb
Well allk noww hat you meatn
re: #328 by m
We only talking bout Shaft.
re: #326 by LGoPs
I don’t believe that half call bs.
Remember, only about half the country votes.
that means that half the country doesn’t even have enough intelligence to pull the lever.
half of those that do manage to stand in line, state your name and pull a lever are smart enough to call bs.
I sit and wonder, given that I have the time, how we can take our country back. I run plans of one type or another, ranging from violent revolution to political maneuvering.
All attempts fail because, in the end, we get who we vote for. Every time.
What has happened to 5princesses? Haven’t seen him for awhile now.
OT/ Louisiana justice under fire for refusing interracial marriage
Animals feel the pain of religious slaughter
Excerpt:
re: #334 by newsjunkie_ky
He had a sixth.
re: #319 by m
I actually did try to have a please don’t talk about CJ rule for a few threads. It seems it wasn’t popular. I even only attacked CJ today because he tried to defend Anita’s Dunn’s Pro Mao statement. He is fair game when he defends Progressives.
re: #328 by m
Oh, no worries, I’m not going anywhere. Just that I understand the feeling.
There are always going to be folks who are a burr in your side. That’s the way of freedom. My freedom to do as I wish allows others the same ability.
Doesn’t mean I like it. *wink*
re: #326 by LGoPs
The kids are definitely brainwashed.
Overheard one of my employees this week : “She should get hours because she’s got kids, it’s not like (other)she has bills and kids.”
Nevermind the bit*h can’t show up on time, will call a cab before she gets on a bus, and spends her whole shift using the work phone for personal business (and trying to find a ride BACK home). She’s got kids, therefore, she should get hours.
Last year, after I mentioned that AGW was a hoax: “But they told us about it at school!” (from a 16 year old)
I guess you don’t question your teachers anymore.
re: #325 by Infidel
The problem is Anita Dunn said this this year. Charles attacks Beck fro crying but is silent on Dunn’s praise of Mao.
He used the Alinsky deflection method.
“He is fair game when he defends Progressives.” That’s pretty much all he does these days. And by defending Progressive I would include his vicious attacks upon anti-statists.
Yeah, Nancy knows Beck has just completely destroyed Dunn, so he moves into character attack mode against Beck.
re: #340 by Rodan
The progressives NEVER have the facts on their side. NEVER.
It’s always spiteful commentary with absolutely nothing to back it up.
I can almost guarantee that Keith Olbermann REALLY THINKS he’s doing for the left what Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh do for the right.
Except he’s not really saying anything. He just knows the reaction that HE has when he hears those fellows talk, and he regurgitates his twisted interpretation of what they’re doing in a feeble attempt to rally liberals the way they do.
re: #342 by Infidel
Icarus clearly is a follower of Rules for Radicals. His writing style is Alinskyite.
It sounds to me as though the author of this piece has never actually talked to a “fundamentalist Christian.”
He writes of them as though they are caricatures of what he thinks or assumes they must be like.
How to talk to complete idiots By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
That page has a reader comment section, if you’d like to leave your views there about his opinions.
Excerpt:
re: #143 by buzzsawmonkey
Good points, Buzz. Fair enough.
re: #339 by Bumr50
I learned early on that teachers are human, but it’s hard to fight that, especially once they get to college…. then they’re no longer ‘teachers’ . . .they’re “Professors” which gives them a divine quality.
re: #337 by Rodan
We can only hope it wane soon enough. We did have good run for a few days where the blog moved on without all the 1.0 talk, but then we got more ‘refugees’( and that is a good thing) and then it went back to what we want to leave behind.
There is no answer or resolution to correct it. It will happen on its own in due time. And we must let it come to that if we are to remain a blogmocracy.
re: #344 by Rodan
You’re giving him too much credit. He’s a follower.
re: #340 by Rodan
Exactly, what are you going to do, attack Anita Dunn’s future? How far back is the limit for past comments? 24 Hours? Her comments were JUNE 2009!!
re: #340 by Rodan
Beat Charles “Benedict Arnold” Johnson about the head and shoulders with his hypocrisy until he finishes his decent into oblivion. Give him a taste of the Alinsky rules for radicals he has suddenly grown so fond of.
re: #333 by LanceKates
I have also run the same “war Games” but I have achieved a positive result.
I have a program I recieved from a “friend” after I finished counterroism school. Let me say when I graduated we only had large binary computers. This was given to me about 3 or 4 years ago, it is somewhat outdated but still effictive.
Any how I put in numerous possible factors in about 20 scenarios and scored 75% and 90 percent on two. I found it interesting in the way the program decided the two best.
At this time all I will say is that BOTH scenarios have a collateral damage factor. As I go along If you guys are interested I will try to post new results as information becomes available. If not thats fine also.
(DISCLAIMER)
REMEMBER THIS IS A SCENARIO ONLY AND AS SUCH IS NOT CONSIDERED AS FACT OR IN ANY WAY AN ATTEMPT TO CAUSE DISRUPTION IN ANY GOVERMENT.
Has Banana Brain denounced the Beatles for their anti-Mao line in “Revolution”?
re: #348 by song_and_dance_man
That’s about how I see it. If there’s an editorial crackdown, we become them. If you let it evolve naturally (savor the irony), it’ll straighten itself out.
re: #345 by CloudyDay
Not the first I’ve heard from this piece of garbage.
Why is he so afraid of religion?
re: #348 by song_and_dance_man
We tried. Tomorrow I will ask again fro No CJ talk until an Open thread or CJ thread.
Today I had to go at him as he was caught defending Anita Dunn. He made himself a target.
re: #351 by doriangrey
I have many times! I read rules fro radical so I had to call his BS.
re: #352 by Conservative Democrat
I see no way to move the country to the left, given the groups that are having hte population boom, the general leftward slide of both parties, the stranglehold the left has on the media and the schools and that, in the end, the people voting for the scumbags in there now….. will still be voting after anything done.
I think there is a free future for America. I just don’t see it in my lifetime. We haven’t suffered enough. We’re not suffering now, not yet.
re: #345 by CloudyDay
“…as if you just jabbed him with a flaming homosexual cattle prod.”
There’s just something disturbing about that quote.
re: #357 by LanceKates
that first line should say ‘to the right’… my mind was half a sentence or so ahead of my fingers.
re: #356 by Rodan
Why not post a link to a .pdf download? Just a suggestion.
re: #355 by Bumr50
The same reason all militant atheist are afraid of religion. Not because they do not believe that their really is a god, but because they need for their not to be a god and they are afraid that their really is one.
re: #345 by CloudyDay
I doubt that such an individual, living in San Francisco, has had many occassions in which they actually have met a conservative christian.
They don’t quite run in the same circles.
They hate the idea of there being a god because they’d have to then be held accountable for their actions and their partially developed id (and nondeveloped ego and superego) just don’t like the thought of that.
re: #358 by Bunk X
That’s not so bad–someone had the mixed metaphor of “spineless dildo” earlier today.
re: #356 by Rodan
Good, just keep slamming him back into that little tiny box he has made for himself until he cant climb out of it anymore.
Anyone else find it interesting that such scumbags can speak in a church?
First, who invited them?
Second, why did the cross in the background NOT catch fire while people who idolize MAO were speaking?
I understood, I see your point. BUT the situation that I assume is a worst case scenario, all results are the product of what I put into the program.
All infromation is used (at least what I can think of) to try to obtain a non violent projection.
re: #350 by McKinley
Hell, her comments were more recent that R S McCain’s I’ll bet.
re: #366 by Conservative Democrat
How do your projections account for the folks who would vote for Obama because he promised free money and because he’s black?
re: #360 by Bunk X
Like this, I guess. Doy.
http://www.pdf-search-engine.com/alinsky-pdf.html
re: #367 by Nikis Knight
and hers were part of a prepared speech, likely vetted and edited by Admin speechwriters.
re: #365 by LanceKates
First: Because many so called Christians are only Christians in name, they have been feed communist doctrine instead of Christian doctrine and are to lazy to do their own research into what actual Christian doctrine is.
Second: Because Christ is greater than the evil that Mao or his followers represent.
re: #363 by calcajun
Creative non-sequitor insults. Gotta love ‘em.
re: #365 by LanceKates
Probably a local school was having a baccaloriate at the church.
As to why she wasn’t struck dead for praising Satan’s underlings in a church, I guess God is willing to suffer fools, for the present at least.
re: #373 by Nikis Knight
Something I read in a comic, many years ago.
“God said that the meek shall inherit the earth, but he didn’t account for the mighty.” (said as a city was being destroyed by metahumans)
re: #373 by Nikis Knight
Because God doesn’t want anyone to perish, hence he grants each person as many opportunities as that individual might take advantage of to repent.
re: #368 by LanceKates
I used a principal of Mazlow (Lazlow, can’t remember the proper spelling) Higherarchy.
Because there would be no precived change in their status There may be “isloated riots” based on the Idea of racism, but overall it will be accepted as a “change” for the better.
re: #372 by Bunk X
Turgid Micro Morons
Partially-shined patty hefters
Silicone-breasted wino pigs
Miners of the Deep Drool Pits
Naw. I can’t compete.
In these trying times I remember a “Pogo” comic strip, during the beginning “swamp war” Pogo said “We Have Met The Enemy, and he is us.”
re: #376 by Conservative Democrat
Maslow
re: #378 by Conservative Democrat
Walt Kelly was one of the greatest comic strip artists since the comics strips were invented.
re: #376 by Conservative Democrat
I’m talking about once it is all over, and there is the first vote.
People voted for people like Obama, Dodd, Reid, Pelosi, etc.
Those people would be voting again. It doesn’t fix the issue in the long term, one might suggest that it wouldn’t last more than an election or two.
It is the voter we have to change, but when the liberals promise free money and no need to work because they’ll take it from ‘the rich’ (which only lasts until the rich leave), and the conservatives promise that with hard work and discipline, you can take responsibility for yourself and MAYBE pull a net gain in life…… it is hard to sell conservativism to someone who expects free handouts.
anyone else finding they cant view 1.0?
Like everyone else, I slow down and feel compared to stare when I pass a traffic accident.
re: #382 by danrudy
what kind of error do you get?
re: #383 by LanceKates
Forbidden
You don’t have permission to access /weblog on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the req
re: #382 by danrudy
You have annoyed the idiot prince enough to be blocked.
I
re: #385 by Crusader Rabbit
I saw that his contact was open so I sent him an email.
Not a verbally abusive email mind you, but an email critical of his hypocrisy about accepting the “fake but accurate” Limbaugh quotes.
you are required to give an email so I gave my yahoo catch all dump email.
I suppose I can get an IP blocker to go around this if I want.
re: #345 by CloudyDay
Good heavens CloudyDay. This man thinks he is a
genuis and of sound mind. His hubris is off the charts. His hate for anyone believing in God is self evident.
So all religious people are idiots.
Wow!
re: #381 by LanceKates
Actually, during the “transformation” all Offices NOT critical to operations of the nation and its defense will become null and void. The changes must be swift, and stable. New election laws built off of the old will be enforced. National requirement for I.D. to vote and proof of citizenship must be shown. All laws in the Original Constitution up to 1858 will remain in effect.
A National vote for Office will be required within 9 months of completion.
re: #386 by danrudy
You dared to disagree with his highness. That practically makes you a fascist.
Worse, you reminded him that he’s clearly a hypocrite. That practically makes you a white-supremacist.
/Queeg off
He’s not paranoid, but he “knows” that everyone thinks he is.
OT: Is it possible to add something to the format of a WordPress post to show the date/time of the most recent comment along with the total number of comments?
It would be nice if we could see the most recent comment date/time next to the total number of comments on the posts here so that it would be easier to spot if the post has had any new comments since we were here last.
Thanks.
re: #389 by Crusader Rabbit
well…i just invested in an IP blocking program so I can re-register with sock puppets (Think that will make him paranoid ) and try to be a voice of reason (then get blocked) and then start over again….
Annoying CJ is like winning the lottery over and over again these days
I’m hoping he’ll eventually block all ip’s not identified with registered members.
re: #381 by LanceKates
A coupla weeks ago I went to a “Parents’ Night” at the local Hi Skool.
The history teacher, a professional student by his own admission, advised us that over the summer he’d read a book that “changed his life.”
He was touting Thomas Friedman’s book “The World is Flat.” This is the same environmentalist fanatic who, in September 2009, declared his love for the chinese communist system of government, as they had the rule of fiat.
You wonder where the left gets it’s influence?
LGF loaded fine for me.
I’ve been investigating.
Charles has a thread up, suggesting that a man named John Gimbel, aged 59, is a right wing extremist because he sent an email threatening to kill Obama and his family.
I did a little research, something Charles may want to look up in a dictionary, and found out some interesting things.
First, I don’t see him as a ‘right wing extremist’ . . . just a scumbag nutball. Why? Because he also made threats against President Bush and against Police in general:
So the cops involved, who deal with this nut regularly say that he’s non-partisan. That took 1 minute of research. I spent the next 5 or 6 looking for a picture of Mr. Gimbel. Couldn’t find one. Anywhere. At all.
I did find this, though, which is an offensive and racist screed he submitted for a lawsuit against the County he apparently lived in, for arresting him for calling for cops to get assassinated by people with ‘deer rifles’.
Most of it is the unreadable rantings of a hateful soul. But near the end, something caught my eye. I could be wrong, and if someone has pictures of this guy that show otherwise, I’ll gladly admit it…. but the left keeps trying to push this ‘They hate Obama because they’re racist” stance…. and this guy calls himself “the greatest nig who ever lived.” and referred to some Saundra Armgstrong as a “black-cracker”
…. is Gimbel Black? If so, is the press (which will not show his picture) and lgf passing off an insane black man who hates authority as a ‘racist right winger’?
BTW, the second link is to a PDF file.
It was submitted as a lawsuit, but the judge dismissed it without investigation based upon the language used, the personal insults and the general hateful tone.
re: #393 by Bunk X
I’d put down money that he didn’t read it. He just bought it, read some reviews and a “Cliff’s Notes” version, then put it in a place where people can see it.
Lefties read such books like most people ‘read’ the wall stree journal: They don’t. They just want to be seen as intellectual, so they carry it around so they can be seen with it.
I used to read the wall street journal, and used to go around making up stories to test whoever I saw with one. “Hey, did you see the story about [whatever wasn't in there]?”
half the time I’d get “Yeah! Isn’t that amazing?” or some variation of that.
I swear, these days I feel like I somehow fell through the looking glass. There isn’t enough time in the day to go through all the lies, broken promises and terrorist-worship that still exists on video or audio and to this day can still be heard or seen, while the lefties quote fiction they **claim** was spouted by the right, that they can’t even find the source for, much less prove ever happened. But they quote it as fact and ignore all the piles of evidence they have left behind for all to see, pretending it’s not even there.
re: #394 by LanceKates
good work…
I found this…
“Federal authorities visited Gimbel in 2007 as well, after he threatened to “kill Bush and his family. Decapitate them with axes.” During the visit, Secret Service agents interviewed one of his sisters, who said Gimbel was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and was troubled after being discharged from the military. Documents also note that Gimbel owns several guns.”
The guy is a diagnosed PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIC!!!
Maybe Chucky should have done that research… I would love to see a picture of this guy a the coup de grace
John Gimbel has a record of threatening to kill government officials:
April 2004: Gimbel is accused of making threats in an e-mail complaining about a $5 parking ticket, saying he would deputize “all of the citizens of Crescent City. … Grab those high-powered deer rifles, each and every, and get in groups of 50 and more and go breeze away to dust the skull of the police chief.”
May 1, 2007: Gimbel sends an e-mail to NBC Universal to “kill Bush and his family.”
May 7 and 13, 2007: Gimbel sends e-mails to 80 U.S. representatives and senators asking them to kill President George W. Bush.
May 14, 2007: The Secret Service visits Gimbel at his Crescent City home. He tells them he
is “harmless.” He said, “I just make ugly comments.”
June 2007-June 2009: Gimbel sends more than 20 threatening e-mails.
Sept. 7: Secret Service once again visits Gimbel.
Oct. 13: Gimbel is indicted for threatening President Barack Obama
http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/64415727.html
ALL thoe other stuff before 9/7 is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is that he threatened Zero
re: #399 by danrudy
We need to find a picture of this guy.
I’m amazed that there aren’t lists of mugshots from where this guy was processed.
re: #400 by LanceKates
I doubt he is man of color but it would be funny if only to puncure yet another CJ assumption about people as racists.
I am going to post on the new thread now….
The church – probably the national cathedral, or some wealthy parish run by the same people, the Episcopalians, who are seriously faith-challenged. Ever notice how many of these revolutionary commie worshippers are wealthy bourgeois…like a certain Chicago neighborhood…
re: #401 by danrudy
The reason why I question it come from the pdf I linked to. he calls himself a ‘nig’ and calls this saundra armstrong lady a ‘black-cracker’
since I already distrust that I can’t find one picture of this guy, which a long criminal record, after an assassination threat on the President, that really raises a red flag for me.
[...] 6% – Birmingham, AL » Anita Dunn Admires Mao Tse-Tung >> 2.0: blogmocracy.com 9 hours ago Beck got emotional and Charles “Icarus” Johnson attacks him! This is an example [...]
Yeah, Mao and Stalin murdered millions but don’t you ever pray in a public place!
“These attacks have had no effect on Beck”
Except to boost ratings. Did the “bone in the nose” comment really happen and what is the context? It may be a racists remark, and I stress may, but one remark doesn’t make you a racist. Rush’s number two guy “Snerdley” is black and my favorite economist in the world, Walter Williams, is black and often subs for Rush. I can’t imagine under what context saying Mao is your favorite philosopher could lead one to not think that you are a communist.
re: #403 by LanceKates
Crecent City California.
Someone local needs to hit their library.
News articles. find out if he is native to the area. Age. High School Yearbook photo from library heritage collection.
Anita Dunn + Mao Tse-Tung= Dung
“Communism is not love, communism is a hammer we use to smash our enemies” [Mao Zedong]
I wonder if people in the audience got up and walked out when Anita Dunn announced her admiration for Chairman Mao’s politcs.
I’d like to think that happened, or were they so oblivious that such an admission meant nothing?