First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Dismantling a Lib….

by savage ( 100 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Media, Politics, Progressives at November 4th, 2009 - 8:37 pm

This is a great call…

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

100 Responses to “Dismantling a Lib….”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Macker
    1 | November 4, 2009 20:43

    LOL!


  2. iam7545
    2 | November 4, 2009 20:45

    bwahahahahaha


  3. song_and_dance_man
    3 | November 4, 2009 20:52

    That was pretty funny. Even though Mark didn’t let Larry say much, he allowed enough to show his socialist slant and serves notice these are the kind of people that support B. Hussein. Larry encourages the demise of free enterprise for what he describes as greed. This is socialism. Redistribution of wealth and nationalization of industry. I think Marks remarks were right on about the uselessness of bureaucracies by citing the Dept. of Energy as No Energy and the Dept. of Education as Illiteracy.


  4. 4 | November 4, 2009 20:54

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    This leftist mindset has to be exposed at every turn.

    That’s why I posted the vid…


  5. 5 | November 4, 2009 20:55

    sadm, I fixed your comment.

    Got the mad skilz going LOL


  6. song_and_dance_man
    6 | November 4, 2009 20:57

    @ savage:

    Thanks. MightyConservative re-installed the edit feature last night, but it disappeared after only a few minutes.


  7. 7 | November 4, 2009 20:57

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Well, its working on my end.


  8. 8 | November 4, 2009 20:58

    Yankees win their 27th Championship!

    I’m having a beer!


  9. snork
    9 | November 4, 2009 20:59

    What do these dweebs expect to accomplish by calling in to somebody twice their IQ, anyway?


  10. snork
    10 | November 4, 2009 21:01

    @ savage:

    Well, its working on my end.

    You get the extra super deluxe ‘mote control.


  11. song_and_dance_man
    11 | November 4, 2009 21:01

    I’m gonna have to start listening to Levin online.


  12. song_and_dance_man
    12 | November 4, 2009 21:03

    snork wrote:

    What do these dweebs expect to accomplish by calling in to somebody twice their IQ, anyway?

    Levin is as sharp of mind as our species comes bundled with.


  13. 13 | November 4, 2009 21:04

    @ snork:
    yay me!


  14. song_and_dance_man
    14 | November 4, 2009 21:05

    savage wrote:

    @ snork:
    yay me!

    Yah us too. We can now post videos.


  15. 15 | November 4, 2009 21:07

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    savage wrote:
    @ snork:
    yay me!

    Yah us too. We can now post videos.

    In a few days, we are gonna have a bunch of goodies installed.


  16. wolfie
    16 | November 4, 2009 21:07

    I’ve never understood why lefties think that Caesar is NOT greedy, despite the fact that he “taxes everything that moves and doesn’t move,” as the charming Mrs. Clinton recently put it.

    The IRS is by far the most efficient government department because it’s the only one that has to show results. It’s the only one Caesar really cares about.


  17. song_and_dance_man
    17 | November 4, 2009 21:09

    @ savage:

    Looking forward to that. I am so glad you guys took up MightyConservatives offer to help with the blog.

    Whatever happened to glachorn (s?) who was assisting about 6 months ago?


  18. chickadee
    18 | November 4, 2009 21:09

    I just love Mark Levin. What a Patriot. He annihilated that worthless fool (who kept calling Americans greedy) by saying, “Who would pay your salary , sir, if there weren’t “greedy” people like me out here.?”

    Thanks for posting this {sav}. I missed most of Mark’s show today.


  19. 19 | November 4, 2009 21:12

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    You know, he pretty much vanished. I have no idea what happened to him.


  20. song_and_dance_man
    20 | November 4, 2009 21:13

    @ savage:

    Oh well. It seems MC has better skills anyway.


  21. snork
    21 | November 4, 2009 21:13

    Jeez. All I can think of is Foghorn Leghorn:

    Boy’s as sharp as a bowling ball…


  22. 22 | November 4, 2009 21:15

    @ chickadee:

    As soon as I can, I am going to put together a section of various podcasts and the like.

    Also, I got an email from another poster who asked if we can make links open in a new window. What do you think?


  23. snork
    23 | November 4, 2009 21:16

    We don’t produce any energy; the oil companies do that.

    And we need you precisely why?


  24. song_and_dance_man
    24 | November 4, 2009 21:17

    savage wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    Also, I got an email from another poster who asked if we can make links open in a new window. What do you think?

    Yes do that. I always have to right click links because I don’t want the current tab to leave here.


  25. Moe Katz
    25 | November 4, 2009 21:17

    Can I get banned for lurking?


  26. snork
    26 | November 4, 2009 21:17

    @ savage:

    I always prefer links to open in a new tab, but it’s not a big deal, I’m used to right-clicking and selecting new tab.


  27. 27 | November 4, 2009 21:18

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    OK, I’ll bring it up. Shouldn’t be too hard to install that feature.


  28. song_and_dance_man
    28 | November 4, 2009 21:19

    Moe Katz wrote:

    Can I get banned for lurking?

    Try 1.0 if you need to be banned for that. Oh yeah, dinging posts will accelerate the process.


  29. snork
    29 | November 4, 2009 21:19

    @ Moe Katz:

    Have you commented at any unapproved sites?

    /Because nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition…


  30. snork
    30 | November 4, 2009 21:24

    Somehow, that guy seemed almost too perfect. How many think he was just somebody Levin found to play the part?


  31. wolfie
    31 | November 4, 2009 21:24

    Moe Katz wrote:

    Can I get banned for lurking?

    You have to make a comment within 60 minutes of appearing.

    You may not ding anyone, including your wife, until you have made a minimum of 50 comments. Deleted comments do not count toward your total.


  32. 32 | November 4, 2009 21:25

    Oh, IrishRose is whining.

    Bastards.

    Of course they’re not going to provide retroactive payments, so that people can get caught up on their utility bills and rent, or pull their homes out of foreclosure. They just tack the extra weeks on at the end of a recipients’ benefit period and hope that they don’t end up having to pay it out.

    I’m curious about the laws concerning unemployment benefits and retroactive payments. The state of Michigan did this to me a while back, when they had to make a minor re-determination on my current claim. It took them six damned weeks to do a simple re-determination, and I went for a month and a half without income waiting for my benefits to kick back in. They didn’t pay even a single week of retro pay.

    Someone in the State of Michigan needs to cut that fat sluts pay off completely.


  33. 33 | November 4, 2009 21:25

    How do’ folks.
    Never heard Levin’s show, and I don’t disagree with his points. BUT there is a trend in talk radio to shout down the callers. Comes off as rude and smarmy to me. Chris Matthews is a pro at the irrational shout down attack, and he puts me off as well.

    On the other hand, Medved doesn’t mock his lib callers with derision; he does it with logic, as does Rush.


  34. Moe Katz
    34 | November 4, 2009 21:26

    @ snork:
    Well many years ago I used to comment at Jewish-Palestinian Encounter. You got to talk to real Arabs there. But they kicked me out for saying Islam needed to evolve.


  35. 35 | November 4, 2009 21:27

    that looks better. haha


  36. wolfie
    36 | November 4, 2009 21:27

    @ snork:

    He sounds pretty typical to me,…..and I hang around with a lot of moonbats. (Not necessarily voluntarily.)


  37. Moe Katz
    37 | November 4, 2009 21:29

    @ wolfie:
    “You may not ding anyone, including your wife, until you have made a minimum of 50 comments.”

    Well heaven forfend that I should ding another man’s wife. “Thou shalt not ding they neighbour’s wife,” etc.


  38. chickadee
    38 | November 4, 2009 21:29

    wolfie wrote:

    I’ve never understood why lefties think that Caesar is NOT greedy, despite the fact that he “taxes everything that moves and doesn’t move,” as the charming Mrs. Clinton recently put it.

    The IRS is by far the most efficient government department because it’s the only one that has to show results. It’s the only one Caesar really cares about.

    The IRS gets “Direct Results.” (Community Agitators like that result too.) All the rest is to muddy the waters, soften us up, make us vulnerable to yet more money and power grabs from the commies. I watched TV the other night, I couldn’t believe all the agitprop about the environment. “Going Green” Lots of people saying bogus one liners. It ended with a sad kid saying, “Do it for the polar bears.”

    Like they are NOT already increasing in numbers. Very manipulative.
    The commies at the top of the Ponzi scheme do not care about wild life.


  39. AZfederalist
    39 | November 4, 2009 21:29

    snork wrote:

    We don’t produce any energy; the oil companies do that.

    And we need you precisely why?

    If they were producing plans and technology for nuclear power plants and/or methods of storing/disposing of nuclear waste, they might have a purpose. Since they aren’t doing that, your point is valid.

    One wonders about folks who would call in to people like Levin from the other side. You’d at least think they’d have put some thought into what they are going to say — this guy pretty much just had the liberal Dem / Jeremiah Wright talking points. No depth

    /Thanks to the admins for the return of all the features.


  40. wolfie
    40 | November 4, 2009 21:31

    @ Bunk X:

    Agreed, but then to each his own as far as style goes. I like Dennis Prager myself. He’s always respectful of opponents and very fair.


  41. snork
    41 | November 4, 2009 21:32

    @ Bunk X:

    They all control the conversation, it’s just that some are more obvious about it that others. And frankly, they reason that I stopped listening to Medved is that he won’t control his pet moonbats. He needs them on a shorter leash, or the whole exchange is unlistenable.


  42. AZfederalist
    42 | November 4, 2009 21:33

    The point Levin made regarding the source of this Lib’s income was priceless. Funny how that side rails against the very people upon whom it depends for its funding and livelihood. Guess they think the rich are in unlimited supply while at the same time crying about how we are depleting our supplies of oil and other natural resources. Seems like they have this almost back-assward


  43. Moe Katz
    43 | November 4, 2009 21:34

    ALL radio commenters control the conversation, even sports jocks. It takes a certain gift of gab and a domineering personality that I sure don’t have (unless you ask my wife).


  44. wolfie
    44 | November 4, 2009 21:35

    @ Moe Katz:

    :)
    I must admit the rule that no man should ding without a certain measure of conversation beforehand is a rather good one.


  45. snork
    45 | November 4, 2009 21:37

    @ AZfederalist:

    If you recall, when Carter created the DoE, he rolled the existing nuclear functions into it. That included the entire military mission. Because of that, when Hazel O’Leary was in charge under Clinton, security at Los Alamos was essentially eliminated, and the Chinese walked away with a lot of valuable nuke technology.

    As far as I can tell, that’s the only thing that agency has ever accomplished in its 30+ years of existence.


  46. wolfie
    46 | November 4, 2009 21:37

    You don’t make it in radio without loving the sound of your own voice.


  47. Moe Katz
    47 | November 4, 2009 21:37

    Umm, Savage or whoever is responsible for the Churchill quote above—I’d suggest finding something along the same lines by Maggie Thatcher instead. Churchill was born pretty high up in Britain’s class system and is related to Princess Di and Chuck’s boys, so his comments about envy don’t right quite true. Thatcher, unlike Churchill, wasn’t born on third base.


  48. snork
    48 | November 4, 2009 21:39

    AZfederalist wrote:

    Funny how that side rails against the very people upon whom it depends for its funding and livelihood.

    Not just that, but the villainous oil companies were responsible for producing the product that we all use, and they’re there to…what was that again?


  49. 49 | November 4, 2009 21:40

    @ snork:
    I disagree. I like listening to the other side, especially when they spout bizarre concepts about basic economics. Draw them out of their hidey holes, lettem make their own irrational claims.


  50. snork
    50 | November 4, 2009 21:42

    @ Bunk X:

    Tweech his own. I just don’t have your stomach.


  51. chickadee
    51 | November 4, 2009 21:43

    @ savage:

    Angry welfare deadbeats who are completely thankless are so disgusting. She is demanding and expectant and full of piss and vinegar about the”vested” monetary benefits she now thinks accrue to her automatically. What a loser. What a jerk.


  52. 52 | November 4, 2009 21:46

    @ snork:
    Tweech. Cool.

    For me, it’s boring to read the 1.0 threads anymore as most of the downdinging has stopped. CJ’s comments are usually off topic and get updinged no matter what.


  53. 53 | November 4, 2009 21:46

    @ chickadee:

    That’s why she needs to be cut off completely. Maybe lack of food will do wonders for her waistline.


  54. wolfie
    54 | November 4, 2009 21:49

    @ snork:

    In the summer of 2008, all of the moonbats I know were railing against the high gas prices and attributing them to greeeeeeeed.

    After the prices went way down, I posited that perhaps a whole slew of oil executives had experienced some sort of religious conversion. Perhaps their hard hearts had been reached by a humble Amish preacher or a Benedictine monk. Who knows? It was a miracle of moral transformation!

    Hey, if high prices are due to bitter greed, low prices must be due to sweet generosity. But they nervously changed the subject.


  55. wolfie
    55 | November 4, 2009 21:52

    @ Bunk X:

    I’ve seen a swarm of updings on comments of his that say nothing more than “testing.” You would think he would be embarrassed by it.


  56. Moe Katz
    56 | November 4, 2009 21:52

    @ wolfie:

    I think it’s speculation by third parties rather than the oil companies, isn’t it?


  57. snork
    57 | November 4, 2009 21:53

    @ wolfie:

    Funny. There were some moonbats who saw the price of crude collapsing, and spun it into a conspiracy theory to get McCain elected. McCain had his buddies GW and Cheney pull some strings and get crude to fall from $150 to $40.

    You can win when dealing with paranoid nut cases, as we all know here.


  58. snork
    58 | November 4, 2009 21:54

    Er…can’t.


  59. snork
    59 | November 4, 2009 21:58

    @ Moe Katz:

    There was some speculation, but unlike gold, crude is hard to store. There’s only so much tankage available, and it’s expensive to lease. That tends to make the price rather brittle, as we saw.

    Speculating on futures contracts is even dicier. The contract ends at a date certain, and if you don’t have a customer lined up, you’re going to have 100,000 barrels of black stuff in your back yard.


  60. 4_Sticks
    60 | November 4, 2009 21:59

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    If you run Firefox theres an add-on called CoolPreviews – works lie a charm ! Can’t live without it myself. Hover over a link and the link pop-up as a new window (full sized or half – just drag edge). Move the whadda ya call it – pointer/mouse thing-a-ma-jig off the page and the pop up/page disappears – great for those times when you just need a quick bit op info or if the link turns out to be something you’re not interested in.Conversely,you can click a button so the page will remain in place and theres another button which makes the page a regular ‘tabbed’ web page. Sorry for the crummy description but trust me, once you have it you’ll feel like you’re going back to the corded telephone if you loose it – like I did the other night. WARNING !! The newest version of Firefox 3.5.4 (?)
    will make the add-on inoperable. I thought I would loose my mind the other day when I agreed to a FF ‘update’ and lost this nifty add on !
    Not sure why this is – maybe the developer just needs to update so as to be compatible BUT, again, I could not STAND another minute of life on the net without it !! I had to delete FF and reinstall and older version (3.0) to get the add-on back. Man was I relieved when I saw it working again. Try it – you will LOVE it !


  61. Moe Katz
    61 | November 4, 2009 22:02

    @ snork:

    But you can own future production purely on paper without physically holding it, can’t you? This is not my area of expertise, but that was my impression.


  62. chickadee
    62 | November 4, 2009 22:02

    Well, my late late supper tonight was pop corn. a cup cake and a glass of wine. LOL
    I gotta go folks. I’m never up this late. Enjoy your evening and be proud of the recent surge of conservatism sweeping this country.


  63. wolfie
    63 | November 4, 2009 22:04

    @ Moe Katz:

    Well, sure, there are a lot of factors involved in actuality.

    But if you want to make a moral melodrama about high pricesconsistency should require you to do the same when prices change! Then you see how silly the formulation is.


  64. wolfie
    64 | November 4, 2009 22:05

    Dang. Turn off the radio. Those stooooooopid Yankee fans are celebrating.


  65. snork
    65 | November 4, 2009 22:07

    @ Moe Katz:

    A future contract is buying a delivery in the future. As I said, if you’re going to buy those, you’d better know where the oil’s going to go, because when the ship shows up in the harbor, they’re going to want to know where to pump it to.

    Some airlines (SW in particular) were using this as a hedge against an increase in aviation fuel cost. This works great while it was expensive, but bit them in the butt when it got cheap. But even they had to partner with a refiner to make the whole thing work.

    As I said, this is different from owning gold, for example, because you can sit on the gold indefinitely, but the contract has to be delivered on a certain date. If you don’t have an arrangement with a refiner, you can’t play that game. And the refiners may want to play, as well.


  66. wolfie
    66 | November 4, 2009 22:07

    @ chickadee:

    popcorn: whole grain
    cupcake: vegetable
    wine: fruit

    Sounds healthy to me.


  67. theTarCzar
    67 | November 4, 2009 22:08

    well congrats yankees…from a mets fan*ughh*


  68. Moe Katz
    68 | November 4, 2009 22:12

    @ wolfie:

    But different markets and commodities are regulated differently. The public good is one legitimate factor that can be taken into account in how a given market sphere is set up, i.e. on that continuum between absolute laissez-faire and absolute collectivism. My take on it, anyway. No ideological qualms about shooting a few greedy SOB’s if it encourages the others :)


  69. chickadee
    69 | November 4, 2009 22:13

    @ wolfie:

    And it was a carrot cupcake. Wow, so I did have a healthy supper.
    ;)


  70. 70 | November 4, 2009 22:15

    Kinda sorta OT–

    From the OC Register, here’s a guy who won the college lottery: $100,000 to attend UCLA. Good for him, but he doesn’t know what he’s going to study, and says he wants to, “Give back to the community.”
    So, if he takes $100K from “the community,” shouldn’t he owe it already? This kinda feelgood pap makes me puke.
    He’s won the bucks for a great education paid for by mmm-mmm-mmm I guess, and he doesn’t know what he wants to do with it? Phew.
    From the OCR:

    Q. Did you always hope to attend UCLA?
    A. Yes I did. UCLA was my favorite school since the eight grade.

    Q. What is your major at UCLA?
    A. I have yet to decide my major. I am still trying to figure out what path to follow. But I still have some time to decide.

    Q. What do you want to do after college?
    A. I don’t know yet. However, I do know that I want to give back to my community and serve as a role model for high school students.

    “Serve as a role model?” Only if you want to become another socialist pig at the trough. Meh.


  71. Moe Katz
    71 | November 4, 2009 22:20

    @ wolfie:

    Oil is underpriced on this continent anyway. Most good minds in government and economics favor a laissez-faire approach while it rises to its real value. So I guess we’re in agreement.


  72. snork
    72 | November 4, 2009 22:20

    Oh, Lord God, this is hilariously ironic. Top thread @ 1.0:

    ‘When the Captain’s Crazy, It’s Time for a New Ship’

    Politics | Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33:50 pm PST

    Really, Capt. Queeg? If you say so, Capt. Queeg…


  73. 73 | November 4, 2009 22:24

    @ snork:
    The captain is being a petulant bitch, so let’s scuttle the ship. =)


  74. wolfie
    74 | November 4, 2009 22:25

    @ Moe Katz:

    No, no. I wasn’t making a policy point.

    I was just poking fun at the simplistic melodrama of the leftist narrative as rendered by sentimental souls—-like poetry professors.


  75. snork
    75 | November 4, 2009 22:27

    Well, goddammit, Frank:

    448 goddamnedfrank Wed, Nov 4, 2009 8:29:40pm

    Like I have noted before, LGF sociology is certainly interesting. For the record, the poster who challenged me to violence was rewarded, I was severely down dinged for noting that doing so was “retarded.” Mandy then ironically asked me “What the fuck do you care about language,” before expressing her amusement over the dogpile.

    Then she goes on to savagely abuse a new Lizard, purportedly because of his nic, as follows:
    re: #340 MandyManners

    Yeah. Bachmann has bitch-slapped Capitol Hill cops. She’s asserted that thousands of prisoners were

    Oh, just fuck it.

    And, fuck you.

    re: #413 MandyManners

    Oh, go fuck yourself.

    and

    re: #439 MandyManners

    STOP BEING AN ASSHOLE.

    Honestly I think that several so-called “lizards” should more accurately be called chameleons, here just to blend in with the crowd while maintaining a pretense towards propriety. This thread is a surreal read.

    Nobody took you out to the back 40 and ‘splained it all to you, did they?


  76. calcajun
    76 | November 4, 2009 22:30

    @ savage:
    Uh, what the hell is an unemployed person doing with their time futzing around on the internet–and paying for internet services?


  77. calcajun
    77 | November 4, 2009 22:32

    snork wrote:

    Oh, Lord God, this is hilariously ironic. Top thread @ 1.0:
    ‘When the Captain’s Crazy, It’s Time for a New Ship’
    Politics | Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33:50 pm PST
    Really, Capt. Queeg? If you say so, Capt. Queeg…

    He does not get that he has become a parody of himself.


  78. 78 | November 4, 2009 22:32

    @ snork:
    For those who fantasize about Mandy coming over here, Blogmock needs an archive of Mandy’s pissy blowoffs to refer to.


  79. wolfie
    79 | November 4, 2009 22:33

    calcajun wrote:

    @ savage:
    Uh, what the hell is an unemployed person doing with their time futzing around on the internet–and making us pay for paying for internet services?

    FIFY


  80. Moe Katz
    80 | November 4, 2009 22:34

    @ wolfie:

    I agree. Sometimes I should go back to a moonbat venue just to remember what I escaped from.


  81. calcajun
    81 | November 4, 2009 22:36

    @ wolfie:
    Actually, if they are collecting unemployment, then they are getting essentially insurance payments for which they already paid a premium in with holdings from their pay. Welfare is the dole for which all taxpayers pay.


  82. calcajun
    82 | November 4, 2009 22:37

    @ snork:
    Sounds like Mandy is going over the edge.


  83. wolfie
    83 | November 4, 2009 22:43

    @ calcajun:

    Good point. Although it is a heavily subsidized insurance program.


  84. 84 | November 4, 2009 22:45

    @ calcajun:
    Exactly right. Collecting unemployment is not a debit to those still working, but rather it’s recouping one’s taxes paid over previous years of employment.


  85. Eliana
    85 | November 4, 2009 22:52

    Mark Levin sounded like he was enjoying himself quite a bit.

    Good job!


  86. 86 | November 4, 2009 22:52

    @ wolfie:
    You’re comparing apples to orangutans. “Unemployment insurance” is a money grab, half paid by you, and half paid by your employer, and it all goes into the General Fund, just like your Soc.Sec payments do.


  87. 87 | November 4, 2009 22:53

    @ Eliana:
    How do’, Eliana.


  88. Eliana
    88 | November 4, 2009 22:54

    @ Bunk X:

    Howdy, Bunk X!


  89. 89 | November 4, 2009 22:55

    @ Eliana:
    So how do you plan to piss off Moe tonight? Or is it a sekrit?


  90. Eliana
    90 | November 4, 2009 22:56

    @ Bunk X:

    So how do you plan to piss off Moe tonight?

    I dunno – I’m giving it some thought. :-)


  91. 91 | November 4, 2009 22:58

    @ Eliana:
    He’s still getting over some kinda crud that’s been going around. I guess you could kick him while he’s down if you wanted to.


  92. 92 | November 4, 2009 23:01

    Going upstairs. New tile. New handrails. Balcony city. Chupacabras hanging from the ceiling…


  93. Eliana
    93 | November 4, 2009 23:01

    @ Bunk X:

    He sounds pretty energetic when he gets angry actually, but it wouldn’t hurt to see him docile instead. He could use the rest.


  94. Aussie Infidel
    94 | November 5, 2009 02:11

    @ Moe Katz:
    You certainly can and we almost pulled off a great deal in London. Royal Dutch Shell offered oil 90 days ahead at a negotiated price. If the price dropped below the quote we only had to pay the then current market price and we broke even. If the price rose however we got it at the 90 day bid price and the $$$$ would roll in. Just pennies on the gallon translates into massive windfall profits.

    After spending 5 months getting the whole thing set up we finally got into the holy of holies at Royal Dutch Shell in Trafalgar Square in London. The multimillionaire investor (and former B-25 bomber pilot in WWII) who I was riding ‘shotgun’ for demanded a ‘deal’ plain and simple. Shell didn’t blink and I tried and tired to get Leon to take the sweetheart deal on offer but he wanted a simple discount or nothing. Shell logically gave us nothing! …. and i even had to buy Leon lunch afterwards.

    So near and yet so far! :) sigh!!


  95. RickZ
    95 | November 5, 2009 04:59

    Dept. Of NO Energy! LOL!

    Now if only windbags, like Obie, could be harnessed as an energy source, we’d never run out as it’s renewable daily/hourly. And quite green.


  96. Beltfed
    96 | November 5, 2009 05:11

    @ savage:

    Irish Rose:
    I went for a month and a half without income waiting for my benefits to kick back in. They didn’t pay even a single week of retro pay.

    She’s a big fat liar.

    This is her blog prfile.

    I’m a published writer, small business owner, prolific blogger, and accomplished gardener. I enjoy reading, writing, poetry, photography, travel, gourmet cooking, traditional folk music and dance, and cultural studies. I’m also a naturalist and outdoor enthusiast, and I enjoy fishing, hunting, swimming, sailing, hiking, camping, and horseback riding.

    Folk music and dance are my passion, and I enjoy attending Celtic/Folk festivals and workshops throughout the Midwest year ’round.

    Thank you for stopping by!

    Small business owners don’t get to collect unemployment.

    Where does she get the money to do all them activities.

    Hope she rides a Clydesdale, the only horse capable of lugging her ass around.


  97. Carolina Girl
    97 | November 5, 2009 06:45

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    sadm – Levin offers his podcast free through iTunes. You can download and listen without commercials. If you go to his website there’s a link to subscribe.

    I believe the link is http://www.marklevin.com or it might be http://www.marklevinshow.com – it’s been so long since I stuck it on my iTunes I don’t remember.


  98. Jesusland
    98 | November 5, 2009 07:14

    hahaha! That was funny. When a ‘tard has to always start his response by invoking the magical name of Barack Obama you know he’s drunk deep of the purple draught.


  99. 99 | November 5, 2009 20:35

    Hilarious!!


  100. 100 | November 5, 2009 20:37

    So funny I had to listen to it twice.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David