First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Israeli Navy Captures Imperialist Vessel

by Rodan ( 124 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Hezballah, Iran, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Lebanon at November 4th, 2009 - 6:33 pm

In a daring operation backed by great intelligence, the Israeli Navy has captured an Iranian imperialist vessel on its way to Lebanon.  This ship was transporting weapons to the militant radicals:  from Iran.  The Israelis caught this ship and sent the aggressors a message.

Hundreds of tons of weaponry, the largest arms seizure in Israel’s history, were intercepted overnight Tuesday in a daring raid by Israeli naval commandos aboard a cargo ship sailing 100 nautical miles west of Israel.

The arms shipment was 10 times the size of the cache found on the Palestinian arms ship Karine A in 2002.

The cache was hidden inside shipping containers belonging to the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) which departed from the Badar Abbas Port in Iran some 10 days ago, were unloaded in the Egyptian port of Damietta and then loaded onto the Francop, a German vessel flying an Antiguan flag.

The operation had been in planning for several days and was dubbed “Four Species,” for the recent Succot holiday.

Read the rest.

I salute the Israelis and their resistance to colonial aggression. Hizb’Allah is a fanatical organization that occupies, and has a choke hold over the once free nation of Lebanon.  Now it is just another colony for the Islamo-Imperialists. Israel is their target, so their seizing of the ship is an act of  survival.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

124 Responses to “Israeli Navy Captures Imperialist Vessel”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | November 4, 2009 18:36

    Wow teh Hezbos are being armed against the UN brokered agreement? Shocka! The next war with Hezbo and Hamas needs to be total war. Thak God that loser Olmert is gone.

    Yanks winning 4-1 top of the 5th Mastsui all 4 runs driven in – 2 run homer and 2 run single. Phillie pitching sucks!


  2. savages_girl
    2 | November 4, 2009 18:36

    Howdy…have to read… Damn Yankees…


  3. savages_girl
    3 | November 4, 2009 18:39

    Interesting article. GO ISRAEL! Somebody’s got to do the right thing.


  4. Speranza
    4 | November 4, 2009 18:42

    Great intelligence work by the Israelis by the way.
    They had to be tipped off.
    Hate the Phils for beating the Dodgers but I am a fan of anyone who plays the Yankees.


  5. 5 | November 4, 2009 18:44

    @ Speranza:

    yes they really ahve improved their intelligence against Hizb’ALlh. In a rematch they will be better prepared this time. The Islamic Colonial expansion must be stopped.


  6. snork
    6 | November 4, 2009 18:50

    Speranza wrote:

    Great intelligence work by the Israelis by the way.
    They had to be tipped off.

    That’s something the Buchananites and Paulians never talk about – that the Mossad is an enormous asset to the US and other western countries, because they have such effective operations in areas where we don’t; specifically in Iran. If we’re not using them to maximum advantage we’re fools, and if we’re going to stab them in the back with this “peace” charade, it’s potentially going to cost us.


  7. 7 | November 4, 2009 18:55

    @ snork:

    Yup, they have shared information with the US many times. They even gave Russia some information on Chechen rebels back in the early 2000′s. They are cooperating with Serbia. They also helped Colombia pull off the raid into the FARC camp that had Bentacourt. SO they have assisted against resisting the Imperial-Progressive AXis.


  8. 8 | November 4, 2009 18:55

    Should have just sunk the ship and left. Do that a couple of times and you won’t be able to find ships or crews willing to run the shit no matter how big the payday is for the job.


  9. CtheP
    9 | November 4, 2009 18:56

    Good evening, folks…

    Howzabout them Yankees!? (not over yet but lookin’ gooooood!)


  10. refugee000
    10 | November 4, 2009 18:57

    I’m enjoying the thought of how much money the Iranians/hezbollah just flushed down the toilet. :)


  11. snork
    11 | November 4, 2009 18:57

    @ Iron Fist:

    OMGponies!!!! that would release toxic chemicals into the Mediterranean, and might endanger the Mediterranean Polar Bear…


  12. Scott Madsen
    12 | November 4, 2009 18:59

    They need to do a big loud PR job on this right in the Security Councils duplicious face. They should load the containers onto a ZIM Line carrier and sail it right up the East River and unload it onto the back porch of the UN.


  13. Speranza
    13 | November 4, 2009 19:00

    @ snork:

    That’s something the Buchananites and Paulians never talk about – that the Mossad is an enormous asset to the US and other western countries, because they have such effective operations in areas where we don’t; specifically in Iran. If we’re not using them to maximum advantage we’re fools, and if we’re going to stab them in the back with this “peace” charade, it’s potentially going to cost us.

    Because the Buchananites and Paulians are pure and simple Jew haters who wish that Hitler finished his work of extermination.


  14. 14 | November 4, 2009 19:00

    The Yankees are up 7-1!

    Hideki Matsui is killing the Phillies. If they win because of him, how can they get rid of him. Damon also helped them win games this series, they really have a dilemma becasue they have to get rid of one of them.


  15. song_and_dance_man
    15 | November 4, 2009 19:01

    CtheP wrote:

    Good evening, folks…
    Howzabout them Yankees!? (not over yet but lookin’ gooooood!)

    Is that you Chris?


  16. Speranza
    16 | November 4, 2009 19:02

    CtheP wrote:

    Good evening, folks…
    Howzabout them Yankees!? (not over yet but lookin’ gooooood!)

    Hi christheprofessor

    Philly pitching sucks (outside of Cliff Lee)!


  17. savages_girl
    17 | November 4, 2009 19:03

    @ Rodan:

    Yankees winning? (Hands over ears) LALALALALA – I can’t take it…


  18. CtheP
    18 | November 4, 2009 19:03

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Yes, it’s me. Good to see you. How are ya?


  19. Speranza
    19 | November 4, 2009 19:03

    @ Rodan:
    They do have a relentless lineup – propbably one of the best since the 1989 Athletics and the 1976 Reds.


  20. 20 | November 4, 2009 19:05

    Do not mess with Israel!


  21. Speranza
    21 | November 4, 2009 19:05

    refugee000 wrote:

    I’m enjoying the thought of how much money the Iranians/hezbollah just flushed down the toilet.

    I hope the IDF integrates all those weapons into their own arsenal an d points it towards Syria, Lebanon and Gaza.


  22. CtheP
    22 | November 4, 2009 19:05

    @ Speranza:

    Hi, Speranza. At least for tonight, the Philly pitching sucks — Pedro gone and down by 6! Not a big Yankee fan, but pulling for them, being a natural-born Yank….


  23. manforallseasons
    23 | November 4, 2009 19:05

    The Israelis continue to astound me with their capable military. Hopefully this nation was smart enough to support them with intelligence data.


  24. song_and_dance_man
    24 | November 4, 2009 19:05

    @ CtheP:

    Doing great, working and raising my son. Well, it’s really great to see you again.

    How the teaching going Professor?


  25. song_and_dance_man
    25 | November 4, 2009 19:06

    @ Speranza:

    And Iran.


  26. Speranza
    26 | November 4, 2009 19:06

    loppyd wrote:

    Do not mess with Israel!

    I would feel so much better if Obama were not in the White House. He makes Neville Chamberlain seem as courageous as Spartacus.


  27. 27 | November 4, 2009 19:06

    @ Rodan:

    Just added Blogmocracy to my blogroll.


  28. CtheP
    28 | November 4, 2009 19:07

    loppyd wrote:

    Do not mess with Israel!

    Don’t mess with the Yankees!

    /how the hell are ya?


  29. Speranza
    29 | November 4, 2009 19:07

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    And Iran.

    Katyushas do not have the range to hit Iran.


  30. 30 | November 4, 2009 19:08

    @ CtheP:

    C….the…..P!

    Hello! So good to ‘see’ you!


  31. CtheP
    31 | November 4, 2009 19:09

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Really glad to hear things are going well — I was going to ask about your son, but figured he’s on his own by now… ;) (It’s been that long, it seems!)


  32. Speranza
    32 | November 4, 2009 19:09

    CtheP wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Hi, Speranza. At least for tonight, the Philly pitching sucks — Pedro gone and down by 6! Not a big Yankee fan, but pulling for them, being a natural-born Yank….

    I find rooting for that team with its unlimited payroll, arrogant fans, and sense of entitlement akin to rooting for Microsoft and General U.S. Steel.


  33. CtheP
    33 | November 4, 2009 19:09

    @ loppyd:

    So, are you married, with puppy, yet?


  34. Speranza
    34 | November 4, 2009 19:10

    loppyd wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Just added Blogmocracy to my blogroll.

    I will tell “m” to add your blog to this blogroll.


  35. CtheP
    35 | November 4, 2009 19:10

    @ Speranza:

    Ouch! Didn’t meet to piss you off! ;)


  36. 36 | November 4, 2009 19:11

    CtheP wrote:

    @ loppyd:
    So, are you married, with puppy, yet?

    Married, yes. Puppy, no. :(

    But we are dog sitting this week.

    7-3 now. Howard!!


  37. 37 | November 4, 2009 19:12

    Speranza wrote:

    loppyd wrote:
    @ Rodan:
    Just added Blogmocracy to my blogroll.

    I will tell “m” to add your blog to this blogroll.

    Thanks.


  38. CtheP
    38 | November 4, 2009 19:13

    And the Phillies rally!


  39. 39 | November 4, 2009 19:14

    Take a bow, juicer.


  40. waldensianspirit
    40 | November 4, 2009 19:14

    @ Speranza:
    What steel? Governor Ed is turnin’ them into gamblin’ halls; dens of sin.


  41. song_and_dance_man
    41 | November 4, 2009 19:15

    @ CtheP:

    He still with me but is getting close to that age. He has a beautiful girlfriend whose parents are a doctor and lawyer. I’m sure he didn’t realize that when he met her, but she is a fine girl and was raised properly and am certain that’s what attracted him to her.


  42. Speranza
    42 | November 4, 2009 19:15

    CtheP wrote:

    And the Phillies rally!

    7-3 or 7-4 Yankees – Pettite is taken out.


  43. waldensianspirit
    43 | November 4, 2009 19:16

    @ CtheP:
    Hi CtheP! Good to see you posting.

    You would’ve known me as Roger


  44. Speranza
    44 | November 4, 2009 19:16

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    What steel? Governor Ed is turnin’ them into gamblin’ halls; dens of sin.

    Typo – I meant U.S. Steel. I as going to add General Electric in that group.


  45. Speranza
    45 | November 4, 2009 19:16

    7-3 Yanks Joba Chamberlain is in.


  46. calcajun
    46 | November 4, 2009 19:17

    Not a real rally–yet.

    Hold on Philly fans.


  47. 47 | November 4, 2009 19:18

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ CtheP:
    Hi CtheP! Good to see you posting.
    You would’ve known me as Roger

    Now you tell me. :)

    Hi Roger/waldensianspirit


  48. song_and_dance_man
    48 | November 4, 2009 19:18

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ CtheP:
    Hi CtheP! Good to see you posting.
    You would’ve known me as Roger

    Well what a pleasant surprise. Roger in the house.


  49. CtheP
    49 | November 4, 2009 19:19

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Well, good on him! I’m sure his manners and decency had a good part in their initial attaction as well…


  50. iam7545
    50 | November 4, 2009 19:19

    Moussad has it covered quite well. This isnt the first ship with weapons they captured and it wont be the last. Most of the Drones in use in Afghanistan are Israeli. The new hot tshirt in Israel says – “Don’t Worry USA – Israel has your Back” with a picture of a fighter Jet!

    I just got me one!!!


  51. calcajun
    51 | November 4, 2009 19:19

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ CtheP:
    Hi CtheP! Good to see you posting.
    You would’ve known me as Roger

    We will call you Roger the Shrubber!


  52. manforallseasons
    52 | November 4, 2009 19:19

    To all those involved: I really enjoy the blog, especially the comments section. I’m not big on commenting, but I’m here multiple times a day reading up on the latest ever since the poleshift at 1.0.

    Keep up the great work – this blog is destined to be huge.


  53. waldensianspirit
    53 | November 4, 2009 19:19

    @ Speranza:
    Wasn’t thinking about that. More about the sad direction from industrial to service to pathetic economic system to please the progressives.


  54. CtheP
    54 | November 4, 2009 19:20

    @ loppyd:

    That’s DR. Juicer, to you… ;)


  55. 55 | November 4, 2009 19:21

    @ CtheP:

    Doctah!


  56. manforallseasons
    56 | November 4, 2009 19:21

    @ iam7545:

    Send me a link. I want to buy one, too!


  57. waldensianspirit
    57 | November 4, 2009 19:22

    Hi all. Been here and hotair. Read hotair more than I comment there.


  58. song_and_dance_man
    58 | November 4, 2009 19:22

    @ CtheP:

    Thanks. He’s a fine son. So where have you been? I think I saw you over at C2 or somehwere.


  59. Moe Katz
    59 | November 4, 2009 19:22

    http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/04/don-martin-vote-seals-fate-of-gun-registry.aspx

    Canadian news: The bill to abolish the federal gun registry passed the House of Commons today. According to Don Martin of the National Post it should pass the Senate with no problem.


  60. calcajun
    60 | November 4, 2009 19:22

    CtheP wrote:

    @ loppyd:
    That’s DR. Juicer, to you…

    Too kinky./


  61. CtheP
    61 | November 4, 2009 19:22

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Hi Roger! Good to see you as well… I recall discussing the origin of the term “to roger the thread”… ;)

    Good to see all of you that I haven’t seen in so long!


  62. calcajun
    62 | November 4, 2009 19:23

    Moe Katz wrote:

    http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/04/don-martin-vote-seals-fate-of-gun-registry.aspx
    Canadian news: The bill to abolish the federal gun registry passed the House of Commons today. According to Don Martin of the National Post it should pass the Senate with no problem.

    Now the left will really “Blame Canada!”


  63. 63 | November 4, 2009 19:23

    I’m up past my bedtime for the 2nd night in a row.

    ‘Night all.


  64. 64 | November 4, 2009 19:25

    @ loppyd:

    I just added you. Thanks for the addition!


  65. CtheP
    65 | November 4, 2009 19:25

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Posted over there a bit but really haven’t posted much in the last year or two (compared to when we all met). No reason, just enjoyed reading the comments…


  66. waldensianspirit
    66 | November 4, 2009 19:26

    @ CtheP:
    Someone rogered the thread. Charles could you please fix it?


  67. CtheP
    67 | November 4, 2009 19:26

    @ calcajun:

    Heh…


  68. 68 | November 4, 2009 19:27

    One more thing.

    If the Yankees win, then congratulations to those here who are fans.

    If the Phillies pull off a miracle then somebody better wake me up!


  69. waldensianspirit
    69 | November 4, 2009 19:27

    Some one Moe Katz’ed the thread!


  70. snork
    70 | November 4, 2009 19:27

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Dood! “Roger the thread” Roger! I’m e2m. Now don’t go rogering this thread.


  71. Moe Katz
    71 | November 4, 2009 19:28

    @ calcajun:

    It’s a funny feeling having a conservative government up here when you guys have gone socialist.


  72. 72 | November 4, 2009 19:28

    @ Rodan:

    You are welcome and thank you!

    Now I am really gone.

    Lataah.


  73. song_and_dance_man
    73 | November 4, 2009 19:28

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ CtheP:
    Someone rogered the thread. Charles could you please fix it?

    That’s right. It was you that rogered a 1.0 thread the first time.


  74. Speranza
    74 | November 4, 2009 19:29

    loppyd wrote:

    One more thing.
    If the Yankees win, then congratulations to those here who are fans.
    If the Phillies pull off a miracle then somebody better wake me up!

    I got your back and I will gladly waken you!


  75. CtheP
    75 | November 4, 2009 19:29

    @ loppyd:

    Thanks, and fair enough!


  76. waldensianspirit
    76 | November 4, 2009 19:30

    @ snork:
    Yea, I know. Watched and laughed my arse off at your antics as you reappeared here:-)


  77. Speranza
    77 | November 4, 2009 19:30

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ calcajun:
    It’s a funny feeling having a conservative government up here when you guys have gone socialist.

    and Europe has gone Right wing. The French are more stout hearted then our government!


  78. snork
    78 | November 4, 2009 19:32

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I seem to recall you having a nontrivial understanding of all that sciency stuff. So what’s your verdict on LVQ, the official climatologist of 1.0?


  79. Speranza
    79 | November 4, 2009 19:32

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Some one Moe Katz’ed the thread!

    How about “someome KKKillgore Trouted” a thread (i.e. dropped racist bombs all over the place)?


  80. 80 | November 4, 2009 19:32

    @ Moe Katz:

    I saw that a couple of days ago (that it was coming, anyway). I’m surprised. When you lose feedom on that scale there is usually no coming back from it. Japan might be the best example of this. They are still living under the same basic weapons laws as were laid down just before the Tokugawa Shogunate was founded. Say, roughly, 500 years ago.

    I’d like to see our Republican Congresscritters grow a pair of testicles on the subject and get down to the business of supporting the Heller decision and getting rid of at least som of the most assinine firearms regulations. You’ve got too start somewhere. If nothing else, repudiate US v. Cruikshank. Quite simply, there are no political risks in America in taking an anti-Ku Klux Klan position. That it also happens to be a pro-Second Amendment position is just gravey…


  81. bar
    81 | November 4, 2009 19:32

    I did the thread roger here a few weeks ago.


  82. song_and_dance_man
    82 | November 4, 2009 19:32

    @ CtheP:

    Well glad you could join us tonight. I should have given you my standard greeting. Have you been reading us lately? There are a whole lot of exiles you will recognize here that pop in and out.


  83. snork
    83 | November 4, 2009 19:33

    @ Speranza:

    How about “somebody dropped a trout”?


  84. calcajun
    84 | November 4, 2009 19:33

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ calcajun:
    It’s a funny feeling having a conservative government up here when you guys have gone socialist.

    Tell me about it. I’m even liking the French these days.


  85. calcajun
    85 | November 4, 2009 19:34

    Speranza wrote:

    waldensianspirit wrote:
    Some one Moe Katz’ed the thread!

    How about “someome KKKillgore Trouted” a thread (i.e. dropped racist bombs all over the place)?

    We’ve been trouted?


  86. waldensianspirit
    86 | November 4, 2009 19:34

    @ snork:

    ‘e plays one on the blogosphere.

    ‘e never ever titrated anything.


  87. song_and_dance_man
    87 | November 4, 2009 19:34

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ calcajun:
    It’s a funny feeling having a conservative government up here when you guys have gone socialist.

    That’s gonna change and last night was a preview.


  88. Speranza
    88 | November 4, 2009 19:35

    snork wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    How about “somebody dropped a trout”?

    That sounds better. How about “She Sharmutad him” meaning she sucked up big time?


  89. calcajun
    89 | November 4, 2009 19:35

    @ Iron Fist:
    Hell– Arnie the RINO signed that stupid ammo law into place making it even more difficult to legally buy ammo here in CA.


  90. Moe Katz
    90 | November 4, 2009 19:36

    @ Speranza:

    It can’t last. The polls show Americans want a strong foreign policy and military. Hopefully this president can be reined in and forced to the mainstream by next year’s elections….


  91. snork
    91 | November 4, 2009 19:36

    @ Iron Fist:

    Oh hell, believe it or not, Harriett Tubman is a controversial figure in feminist and black studies circles. She used those…..icky…..GUNS!!!11

    F’n A, you’d think that for all she did to free slaves, she’d be an unmitigated heroine to both groups. She’s certainly one in my book. Not to these asswipes.


  92. snork
    92 | November 4, 2009 19:37

    @ Speranza:

    She Sharmutad him

    That has overtones of castration…


  93. calcajun
    93 | November 4, 2009 19:39

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    It can’t last. The polls show Americans want a strong foreign policy and military. Hopefully this president can be reined in and forced to the mainstream by next year’s elections….

    Wanna bet. BHO will not learn from Clinton’s disaster in 1994 and move to the center. He will make Hitler in the bunker seem to be a positive extrovert with a firm grip on reality.


  94. song_and_dance_man
    94 | November 4, 2009 19:40

    snork wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    How about “somebody dropped a trout”?

    Or how about the new old standard Chuck Johnson’s

    Verb: related to Godwin’s law and Godwinism’s. To ‘Chuck Johnson’s’ is to label a person, group or philosophy with the reductio ad Hitlerum tag as means to close down debate.

    Chuck: transitive verb, meaning to a: toss , throw, Noun: Short for Charles


  95. calcajun
    95 | November 4, 2009 19:40

    snork wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    She Sharmutad him
    That has overtones of castration…

    Eww. What would it be like to be Ice Weaseled?


  96. Moe Katz
    96 | November 4, 2009 19:41

    @ Iron Fist:

    It’s rural Canada that really hated the long-gun registry, so the conservatives stand to increase their rural support by killing it. It was also a huge waste of over a billion dollars over its 11 year existence. Some people in this country are actually beginning to recognize that we don’t have a gun problem, we have a gang problem.


  97. Speranza
    97 | November 4, 2009 19:41

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    It can’t last. The polls show Americans want a strong foreign policy and military. Hopefully this president can be reined in and forced to the mainstream by next year’s elections….

    He cannot be because he is a hard core Leftist. He is a man of principles except his principles are all wrong -every single one of them. The only thing that can reign him in (and ironically might save his presidency) is a replay of 1994. With a GOP congress he cannot ram through socialism and the fickle public might think he has matured and figure “Well we’ve got divided government and that is good so we will keep a GOP controlled House and maybe Senate and let Obama be reelected”.


  98. 98 | November 4, 2009 19:41

    @ calcajun:

    Arnold has been quite the disappointment. It’d be interesting to ask him how he squared that bill with the 9th Circuit ruling that the Second Amendment (as an individual right) applies to the States through 14th Amendment incorporation. I’m not the brightest legal mind in the universe, but I’m not as dumb as Nancy Pelosie, and I can’t see how you do it.

    That kind of bullshit is why ammo sales have been through the roof for the last year. I don’t expect that to slack off for the foreseable future, although productionb of some rounds appears to be beginning to keep up with demand.


  99. Speranza
    99 | November 4, 2009 19:42

    calcajun wrote:

    snork wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    She Sharmutad him
    That has overtones of castration…

    Eww. What would it be like to be Ice Weaseled?

    I was thinking of Sharmutad being similar to “doing the Lewinsky on him”.


  100. Speranza
    100 | November 4, 2009 19:43

    What would it be like to be Ice Weaseled?

    iceweaseled means that you are turned into a eunuch.


  101. song_and_dance_man
    101 | November 4, 2009 19:43

    Speranza wrote:

    He cannot be because he is a hard core Leftist. He is a man of principles except his principles are all wrong -every single one of them. The only thing that can reign him in (and ironically might save his presidency) is a replay of 1994. With a GOP congress he cannot ram through socialism and the fickle public might think he has matured and figure “Well we’ve got divided government and that is good so we will keep a GOP controlled House and maybe Senate and let Obama be reelected”.

    I think the left sees the writing on the wall and is why they are so desperate to rush through Congress as much as they can while still in control.


  102. 102 | November 4, 2009 19:44

    @ snork:

    I can believe it. The Left like to ignore things like that if they can, sweep them under the rug. It wouldn’t do for the modern slave classes to take note of how the former slave classes fought for their freedom.

    Bastards.


  103. bar
    103 | November 4, 2009 19:44

    @ calcajun:

    Wasn’t that nice of the Donkey masquerading as an Elephant. ///

  104. Speranza
    104 | November 4, 2009 19:44

    Irish Rosed means that you turn into a sanctimonious, beer guzzling, harridan.


  105. Moe Katz
    105 | November 4, 2009 19:44

    @ calcajun:

    If he does that he may have a Dem congress that’s hostile to a Dem president. My Canadianb 2 cents’ worth, anyway.


  106. waldensianspirit
    106 | November 4, 2009 19:46

    We can’t be lindsey graham’ed. It means you’re a leftist a-hole getting your boots licked.


  107. sk (skzion)
    107 | November 4, 2009 19:46

    Rodan wrote:

    @ loppyd:
    I just added you. Thanks for the addition!

    BTW, Rodan, I really love your avatar. I don’t know why, really.


  108. Moe Katz
    108 | November 4, 2009 19:47

    @ Speranza:
    Did I hear someone say something about a “coup d’état”?

    /


  109. bar
    109 | November 4, 2009 19:48

    @ Speranza:

    That made beer guzzlers sound bad.
    If I could stop guzzling beer, I may find that offensive.

  110. 110 | November 4, 2009 19:50

    Folks, I’m out. See you tomorrow unless my insomnia decides to come out and play and I’m back before then.


  111. Moe Katz
    111 | November 4, 2009 19:52

    @ Iron Fist:

    Sleep well, IF.


  112. waldensianspirit
    112 | November 4, 2009 19:52

    @ Iron Fist:

    A little background noise helps me. Take care


  113. 113 | November 4, 2009 19:54

    @ Iron Fist:

    Agree 100%!!!!!!!


  114. sk (skzion)
    114 | November 4, 2009 19:56

    @ Iron Fist:
    Iron Fist, the NINTH CIRCUIT? Isn’t that the most leftist circuit in existence?


  115. savages_girl
    115 | November 4, 2009 19:58

    @ Speranza:

    http://www.biertijd.com/mediaplayer/?itemid=16297

    That was funny! ROFLMAO funny!


  116. savages_girl
    116 | November 4, 2009 20:01

    @ savages_girl:
    OK, I was not trying to post that link, I was trying to highlight a comment. However, that is a cool link!


  117. 117 | November 4, 2009 20:02

    @ Iron Fist:

    That kind of bullshit is why ammo sales have been through the roof for the last year. I don’t expect that to slack off for the foreseable future, although productionb of some rounds appears to be beginning to keep up with demand.

    Not at my local Walmart…. STILL out of 9mm and only a few bricks of .22lr.

    STill a ton of shotgun shells though.


  118. savages_girl
    118 | November 4, 2009 20:03

    Good night all


  119. calcajun
    119 | November 4, 2009 20:13

    @ LanceKates:
    7 shot or higher. No buckshot.


  120. 120 | November 4, 2009 20:17

    calcajun wrote:

    @ LanceKates:
    7 shot or higher. No buckshot.

    Try as I might, I can’t get those shells to load into my ruger p-95dc or my keltec pf-9


  121. Eliana
    121 | November 4, 2009 20:18

    @ savages_girl:

    Very cool link!!


  122. snork
    122 | November 4, 2009 20:30

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


  123. calcajun
    123 | November 4, 2009 20:36

    @ LanceKates:
    would not achieve the desired effect.


  124. Mr Krabs
    124 | November 5, 2009 07:07

    Imperialist? Great blog, but jeez, lighten up.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David