First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

NFL Sunday Football and Open Thread

by Rodan ( 333 Comments › )
Filed under NFL, Open thread at November 8th, 2009 - 9:30 am

It’s week 9 of the 2009 NFL Season. As it stands only 2 teams are undefeated, The Indianapolis Colts and the New Orlean Saints. Of the 2, the Saints are the stronger with a better defense.

Today’s big showdown is Eagles vs. Cowboys at 8:20 PM EST on NBC. This is a battle for the NFC East.

This matchup between the Dallas Cowboys and Philadelphia Eagles isn’t nearly as big as the last one. Still, it always seems meaningful when these archrivals play, and the 100th meeting is certainly no different.

A few weeks after both teams seemed headed in the wrong direction, the Cowboys and Eagles have gotten back on track but only one will leave Lincoln Financial Field on Sunday night alone atop the NFC East.

This should be a good game.

Green Bay comes down to Tampa to take on the pathetic Bucs. This game will be broadcast on TV locally so I will be stuck watching this crappy game. The Packers will win this one big.

Monday Night the big showdown is Denver Broncos vs. The Pittsburgh Steelers. Both are top AFC teams and this could be a playoff Preview. We will see if the Bronco offense can overcome the Steel Curtain.

Here is a week 9 Analysis.

Enjoy the Games and discuss any Sports or Non Sports topics.

This is also an Open Thread, so any topic is encouraged.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

333 Responses to “NFL Sunday Football and Open Thread”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | November 8, 2009 09:47

    Wake me up when the Bills have a new owner.


  2. bellamags
    2 | November 8, 2009 09:50

    I love fresh new open threads. The possibilities are endless! Hey rightside how are you doin?


  3. 3 | November 8, 2009 09:57

    @ bellamags:

    Hello, bella! Doing fine thanks. I didn’t mean to sound disparaging on the last thread about FB… wasn’t my intention.

    I see your new gravatar, but have to say I liked the old one ;-)

    How are you?


  4. 4 | November 8, 2009 09:58

    The NFL and the USO just put on the best NFL PreGame Show EVER! They were in Afghanistan with our troops.


  5. 5 | November 8, 2009 10:00

    yay, Arizona Cardinals game is about to start. totally inconsistent team but i gotta support the home team. :-)


  6. bellamags
    6 | November 8, 2009 10:05

    @ Rightside:

    I’m good. I decided to put a pic of the REAL Bella up. I feel safer that way. I understand your FB remarks. My sister tried to get me to sign up a LONG time ago and I kept telling her NO WAY, I hate that sh*t. But I did because I wanted to keep up with family then I realized its a great political information melting pot. Most of my discussions are politics with the occasional “I’m eating a tuna sandwich” status update. LOL. I have met a LOT of people online that are like minded. A few would give up to the minute reports from the tea-parties and demonstrations in Washington. Kind of a cool resource.

    I was a friend of Dr. Marc Lamont Hill’s a while ago. He keeps up his own page and would write his own status updates. I friended him to see what he was really like, outside the world of TV and to get opposing views and opinions. I deleted him off of my friends list when I realized he really was that racist and hate filled off the air as well. EVERYTHING was whitey’s fault. I’m not surprised he is off of FOX news.


  7. 7 | November 8, 2009 10:07

    holy cow! Bears Harris ejected from the game for slugging a Cardinal in the head. wth is wrong with people???


  8. bellamags
    8 | November 8, 2009 10:10

    I hear Obama and I get physically ill. Will the bill cover this pre-existing condition?


  9. 9 | November 8, 2009 10:13

    @ bellamags:
    yeah, i thought Clinton made me sick. ha! 8O


  10. 10 | November 8, 2009 10:14

    yay! Arizona touchdown!


  11. 11 | November 8, 2009 10:14

    @ bellamags:

    I hear you.

    I am just getting so disgusted by what zero and his minions are doing to this country on purpose. This healthcare bs, forcing us to buy into that crap? No f*cking way. If that garbage becomes law, I will humiliate anyone I meet who voted for that manchild.


  12. 12 | November 8, 2009 10:18

    @ Rightside:

    If that garbage becomes law, I will humiliate anyone I meet who voted for that manchild.

    actually, they deserve humiliation based on what he’s already done.


  13. 13 | November 8, 2009 10:21

    oh no, Bears touchdown. :-(


  14. 14 | November 8, 2009 10:23

    @ Kirly:

    True, but I will actively go find them. In my line of work, many of us are very conservative. But there are a few persons that I know personally who voted for him, based on one thing.


  15. bellamags
    15 | November 8, 2009 10:23

    Rightside wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    I hear you.
    I am just getting so disgusted by what zero and his minions are doing to this country on purpose. This healthcare bs, forcing us to buy into that crap? No f*cking way. If that garbage becomes law, I will humiliate anyone I meet who voted for that manchild.

    You know I was thinking the exact same thing the other day. Let’s blame the ones who VOTED in this administration. The whole thing. Congress, Senate and the White House. Uneducated, intolerant, spineless voters who voted in all these people that vowed to bring them hope and change and free shit. They were promised things, their worries were soothed, they were finally getting Bush out of office. They hated Palin, hated McCain. Thought McCain wasn’t conservative enough, Palin wasn’t smart enough. They were fooled. Blame them. The politicians are just doing what they do.


  16. 16 | November 8, 2009 10:25

    @ Rightside:

    there are a few persons that I know personally who voted for him, based on one thing.

    if that one thing is race, then they’re racists.


  17. snork
    17 | November 8, 2009 10:27

    @ bellamags:

    The real Snork is my cat, but I wouldn’t want everyone to think I’m some sort of cat dude. It’s a guy thing. You wouldn’t understand.


  18. bellamags
    18 | November 8, 2009 10:33

    snork wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    The real Snork is my cat, but I wouldn’t want everyone to think I’m some sort of cat dude. It’s a guy thing. You wouldn’t understand.

    I understand… this is for you.

    this is nasty so if anyone is easily offended don’t click on this link.

    http://www.someecards.com/card/owning-a-cat-lowers


  19. 19 | November 8, 2009 10:36

    bellamags wrote:

    I hear Obama and I get physically ill. Will the bill cover this pre-existing condition?

    Cover it? hell, it’ll make it worse.


  20. bellamags
    20 | November 8, 2009 10:37

    @ snork:

    (but i really don’t have anything against men who own cats. As long as they don’t dress them in little cat clothes, its all good)


  21. 21 | November 8, 2009 10:37

    @ Kirly:

    *cough* *cough* *points at you, and touches my nose*

    This person was in the Navy with me for over 20 years.


  22. 22 | November 8, 2009 10:38

    @ bellamags:

    That’s funny! I’m a cat owner, and it’s hilarious!


  23. snork
    23 | November 8, 2009 10:38

    @ bellamags:

    Well, in that case, she’s not really a cat. Just sort of looks like a cat, but the tail is too long, and the reflexes are weird, and she’s really a Peruvian Lemur-haha. That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it.


  24. 24 | November 8, 2009 10:39

    @ Rightside:

    One of those douche bags is my brothers sister-in-law, I already told that bitch I never wanted to see her or talk to her again.


  25. 25 | November 8, 2009 10:40

    @ Rightside:

    This person was in the Navy with me for over 20 years.

    yikes. i wonder if he approves of the giddy prez0 blathering on for 2 minutes on Thursday before getting serious and addressing the Fort Hood shooting. it was worse than clinton and his laughing and joking and then wiping a tear from his eye. These people are despicable.


  26. NoThreat2U
    26 | November 8, 2009 10:40

    So does this health care bill mean that my soon to be 22 year old son will have to buy insurance or face jail time/fines? He only works as a cook in a bar for God’s sake!


  27. NoThreat2U
    27 | November 8, 2009 10:42

    Oh, and GO STEELERS!! (tomorrow)


  28. bellamags
    28 | November 8, 2009 10:42

    snork wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    Well, in that case, she’s not really a cat. Just sort of looks like a cat, but the tail is too long, and the reflexes are weird, and she’s really a Peruvian Lemur-haha. That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it.

    LOL that’s funny.. This is long and maybe you have seen this but its still funny:

    Excerpts from a dog’s daily diary:

    8:00 am – Dog food! My favorite thing!
    9:30 am – A car ride! My favorite thing!
    9:40 am – A walk in the park! My favorite thing!
    10:30 am – Got rubbed and petted! My favorite thing!
    12:00 pm – Lunch! My favorite thing!
    1:00 pm – Played in the yard! My favorite thing!
    3:00 pm – Wagged my tail! My favorite thing!
    5:00 pm – Milk Bones! My favorite thing!
    7:00 pm – Got to play ball! My favorite thing!
    8:00 pm – Wow! Watched TV with the people! My favorite thing!
    11:00 pm – Sleeping on the bed! My favorite thing!

    Excerpts from a Cat’s Daily Diary….

    Day 983 of my captivity…

    My captors continue to taunt me with bizarre little dangling objects. They dine lavishly on fresh meat, while the other inmates and I are fed hash or some sort of dry nuggets.

    Although I make my contempt for the rations perfectly clear, I nevertheless must eat something in order to keep up my strength.

    The only thing that keeps me going is my dream of escape. In an attempt to disgust them, I once again vomit on the carpet.

    Today I decapitated a mouse and dropped its headless body at their feet. I had hoped this would strike fear into their hearts, since it clearly demonstrates what I am capable of. However, they merely made condescending comments about what a ‘good little hunter’ I am. Bastards..

    There was some sort of assembly of their accomplices tonight. I was placed in solitary confinement for the duration of the event. However, I could hear the noises and smell the food. I overheard that my confinement was due to the power of ‘allergies.’ I must learn what this means and how to use it to my advantage.

    Today I was almost successful in an attempt to assassinate one of my tormentors by weaving around his feet as he was walking.. I must try this again tomorrow — but at the top of the stairs.

    I am convinced that the other prisoners here are flunkies and snitches. The dog receives special privileges. He is regularly released – and seems to be more than willing to return. He is obviously retarded.

    The bird has got to be an informant. I observe him communicating with the guards regularly. I am certain that he reports my every move. My captors have arranged protective custody for him in an elevated cell, so he is safe. For now…


  29. 29 | November 8, 2009 10:43

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    So does this health care bill mean that my soon to be 22 year old son will have to buy insurance or face jail time/fines? He only works as a cook in a bar for God’s sake!

    The good news is it will be a premium based on what you make rather then what you get. The bad news is the rate will be 110% of total unadjusted gross income within two years.


  30. 30 | November 8, 2009 10:46

    @ Kirly:

    I honestly think that the only thing matters to them is that we now have a half black president. Period.

    Yes, they are. Bastards.

    This SOB president makes W sound like W F Buckley.


  31. 31 | November 8, 2009 10:49

    @ Rightside:
    racists are despicable regardless of their motivations.


  32. 32 | November 8, 2009 10:50

    woohoo! Arizonas 3rd touchdown!


  33. wolfie
    33 | November 8, 2009 10:54

    Gag. Blecccccccccccccchhhhhhh.


  34. wolfie
    34 | November 8, 2009 10:56

    Excuse me.
    Redskins.
    Bad.
    Pitiful.


  35. bellamags
    35 | November 8, 2009 10:57

    Is the Telegraph a reliable source of information?


  36. MightyConservative
    36 | November 8, 2009 10:57

    I hate waiting for 3pm games … I hope the Saints can remain undefeated but the Panthers have a strong running game. The Saints have a few key injuries affecting their defense on that, so I hope the backups and Gregg Williams (Saints D coordinator) can shore up for it.


  37. snork
    37 | November 8, 2009 11:03

    @ bellamags:

    It’s one of the better British papers. Definitely better than Al-Guardian. It’s not a tabloid, if that’s what you’re getting it.


  38. wolfie
    38 | November 8, 2009 11:03

    Don’t worry about the Panthers. They could barely eke out a win against the Redskins. You know. The same Redskins that lost to Detroit and Kansas City.

    *sob*


  39. 40 | November 8, 2009 11:07

    @ bellamags:

    I blame his killing spree on political correctness and liberals who worship at its altar


  40. bellamags
    41 | November 8, 2009 11:08

    @ Rightside:
    yep


  41. bellamags
    42 | November 8, 2009 11:09

    Rightside wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    I blame his killing spree on political correctness and liberals who worship at its altar

    One Army doctor who knew him said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim soldier had stopped fellow officers from filing formal complaints.


  42. snork
    43 | November 8, 2009 11:10

    @ bellamags:

    Here’s the most damning paragraph in the whole piece:

    One Army doctor who knew him said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim soldier had stopped fellow officers from filing formal complaints.

    Right there. Was afraid to do the right thing because of PC retaliation. This is 100% unadulterated caca de vaca.


  43. bellamags
    44 | November 8, 2009 11:12

    snork wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    Here’s the most damning paragraph in the whole piece:
    One Army doctor who knew him said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim soldier had stopped fellow officers from filing formal complaints.
    Right there. Was afraid to do the right thing because of PC retaliation. This is 100% unadulterated caca de vaca.

    GMTA


  44. 45 | November 8, 2009 11:12

    bellamags wrote:

    One Army doctor who knew him said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim soldier had stopped fellow officers from filing formal complaints.

    Uncredible.


  45. BuddyG
    46 | November 8, 2009 11:13

    Extra Point


  46. bellamags
    47 | November 8, 2009 11:14

    Lieberman talking to Chris Wallace right now about it.


  47. 48 | November 8, 2009 11:20

    @ bellamags:

    Chrissy’s leg is probably tingling at the thought of it…


  48. wolfie
    49 | November 8, 2009 11:22

    @ Rightside:

    They have not only tolerated this vicious ideology, but have actively encouraged it. They have opened wide the doors to immigrants espousing anti-Western hatred; they have bent over backwards to accomodate their every whim and not demand assimilation; they have allowed the Saudis to plant Salafi extremist mosques all over the country; they have rolled out the red carpet for radical imams; they have turned a blind eye to the anti-semitism and anti-Americanism taught in Muslim schools. Then they pretend that people associated with these mosques are not a problem.

    And no one is allowed to object to all this without being ridiculed and demonized.


  49. lobo91
    50 | November 8, 2009 11:24

    @ bellamags:

    Having spent the past 30 years in the Army, I can absolutely believe that.

    I also understand why he was sent to Ft Hood instead of being separated from the service. It’s always easier to push your problems onto someone else than to deal with them.

    There’s a lot of effort involved in getting rid of problem Soldiers (especially officers). Trust me on this. I speak from experience.


  50. 51 | November 8, 2009 11:25

    @ wolfie:

    Well said.


  51. waldensianspirit
    52 | November 8, 2009 11:28

    @ Rightside:
    It’s called human sacrifice unto Baal. To hold unto their imaginary reality and unhinged beliefs, the gated-community ones in power see it is done.

    It seems ever since Cheney was side-lined it has only gotten worse.


  52. 53 | November 8, 2009 11:31

    First thing to do, would be to call the JCS before congress from hearings. Have them explain how this could have happened. All the warning signs, and no one does a thing.

    Force them to admit the culture of fear of reprisal in reporting moooslims as being radical.

    Force zero to make a policy decision, and put out a directive to his JCS, that our armed forces must not be afraid to report warning signs, as we’ve all been trained to notice. Even if they are moooslims.


  53. 54 | November 8, 2009 11:32

    @ Kirly:

    That is exactly right. Racists are people who consider race the most important, or one of the most important feeatures a person has; I am not sure where it slips into racism, though. Someconcern? is that really the right word? I’ll use it, some concern about race is probably acceptible, but I am not certain how much is permissible.

    Certainly the people who voted for Obama solely because he is black are dispicable racists. People would have no trouble calling someone who voted for McCain solely because he is white a racist. Why are Obama supporters some how exempt?

    Feh. I despise racism and racists. I always have.


  54. snork
    55 | November 8, 2009 11:35

    @ Rightside:

    It sounds like Joe Lieberman is all over this. Expect it to happen. And watch the donkeys not know what to do.


  55. 56 | November 8, 2009 11:36

    @ Iron Fist:

    let’s pretend a prominent black conservative were nomitated for president. If other black did not vote for him, would they be racists?


  56. bellamags
    57 | November 8, 2009 11:36

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    Having spent the past 30 years in the Army, I can absolutely believe that.
    I also understand why he was sent to Ft Hood instead of being separated from the service. It’s always easier to push your problems onto someone else than to deal with them.
    There’s a lot of effort involved in getting rid of problem Soldiers (especially officers). Trust me on this. I speak from experience.

    I believe that. Do you know what the process is if someone suspects a solider of being a “problem”?


  57. lobo91
    58 | November 8, 2009 11:38

    @ snork:

    They plan to do their best to downplay the truth and push a combination of the “scared to deploy” and “unfairly ridiculed” angles as motivation for the attack.

    And anyone who tries to bring up the truth will be slimed.


  58. snork
    59 | November 8, 2009 11:40

    @ Rightside:

    It would have been very interesting if Powell had run in ’96. Hypothetically, let’s say he got the R nomination and ran against Clinton. I really have to wonder how the black vote would have split. It would have been very, very illuminating.


  59. lobo91
    60 | November 8, 2009 11:44

    @ bellamags:

    I believe that. Do you know what the process is if someone suspects a solider of being a “problem”?

    That’s kind of a broad term. “Problem Soldiers” are most often people who don’t show up on time, do a poor job, are unable to be trained to standard, have substance abuse problems, etc. I’ve never had to deal with one who was spouting jihadist ideology during what was supposed to be a professional development session.

    The fact that these incidents have been reported in various media outlets tells me that Hasan’s views and behavior were not secrets. His chain of command had to know.

    Dealing with him was their responsibility, which they abdicated by sending him to Ft Hood.

    His former superiors at Walter Reed should be composing their resignations right about now.


  60. bellamags
    61 | November 8, 2009 11:44

    I just got my divorce paperwork done. whew…


  61. bellamags
    62 | November 8, 2009 11:45

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    I believe that. Do you know what the process is if someone suspects a solider of being a “problem”?
    That’s kind of a broad term. “Problem Soldiers” are most often people who don’t show up on time, do a poor job, are unable to be trained to standard, have substance abuse problems, etc. I’ve never had to deal with one who was spouting jihadist ideology during what was supposed to be a professional development session.
    The fact that these incidents have been reported in various media outlets tells me that Hasan’s views and behavior were not secrets. His chain of command had to know.
    Dealing with him was their responsibility, which they abdicated by sending him to Ft Hood.
    His former superiors at Walter Reed should be composing their resignations right about now.

    I would say so.


  62. 63 | November 8, 2009 11:48

    @ snork:

    That would have been interesting. I don’t think that there is any question Powell could have had the nomination that year. I am not a huge Powell fan, but then I wasn’t a McCain fan, either. Either of them would have been better than what we have.


  63. 64 | November 8, 2009 11:49

    Yep, I heard many people express happiness that at last we had a black president. If he wasn’t black, every blunder he made would have been noticed and commented on. 57 states for example. Can’t even imagine Hillary making an error like that.


  64. lobo91
    65 | November 8, 2009 11:49

    @ bellamags:

    When I said “should be,” the implied rest of the sentence was, “if they had any sense of responsibility.”

    I’ve seen no evidence to suggest that they do.

    I still expect to see a coverup, and not just by the media.


  65. 66 | November 8, 2009 11:50

    Very scary that one puny muslim man can have that much influence inside of the US military.


  66. kansas
    67 | November 8, 2009 11:50

    @ Iron Fist:
    Seriously can think of anyone who would have been worse?


  67. waldensianspirit
    68 | November 8, 2009 11:51

    @ teacake:
    Hillary just overcharges buttons.


  68. 69 | November 8, 2009 11:51

    Anyhow, all the things people on the left think they are going to get because of obama, I doubt will really happen. Gay marriage? What other things are all so important to the left? I’m still too upset to even think straight.


  69. lobo91
    70 | November 8, 2009 11:51

    @ Iron Fist:

    Powell might have been able to get the nomination in ’96, but I doubt that he would have beaten Clinton. Clinton was still extremely popular at that point, and Powell’s RINO tendencies would have come out during the campaign.

    Why would anyone vote for Dem lite when they can have the real thing?


  70. 71 | November 8, 2009 11:53

    @ lobo91:
    Lobo, the cover up began even before he shot anyone. I saw an article today that said they still haven’t charged him because they still don’t have a motive.


  71. 72 | November 8, 2009 11:55

    @ waldensianspirit:
    LOL, translating isn’t as stupid a mistake as someone who is SUPPOSEDLY a US citizen.


  72. lobo91
    73 | November 8, 2009 11:56

    @ teacake:

    I don’t think there’s any great hurry to formally charge him. He’s not much of a flight risk at the moment.

    It will be interesting to see what he has to say when he wakes up (assuming that he does).


  73. wolfie
    74 | November 8, 2009 11:58

    @ snork:

    My guess is that he might have gotten about 30%, at best. Clinton was the first black president, y’no! Very popular with blacks until his wife ran against the Obamassiah.

    Michael Steele did fairly well running for the Senate in Maryland in 2006. IIRC, he got over 25% of the black vote. That was a baaaad year for the GOP label, so that’s not too shabby a showing. And Steele is more conservative than Powell….(which isn’t saying much!)


  74. waldensianspirit
    75 | November 8, 2009 11:58

    @ teacake:
    Translating Indonesian can get messy too :-)


  75. 76 | November 8, 2009 11:59

    @ kansas:

    Denis Kucinich would have been worse than the Zero. Propbably much worse. OTOH, Kucinich might not have had as much success getting his agenda through the Congress, but Obama has problems with that, too. Both of them suck pretty hard, though.


  76. Pianobuff
    77 | November 8, 2009 12:00

    I’ve never used the expression “we’re screwed” before.

    Guess what. We’re screwed.

    Oh…and go Cowboys.


  77. waldensianspirit
    78 | November 8, 2009 12:00

    @ lobo91:
    Here’s a prequel for what he’ll say:

    My god is greater than yours!


  78. 79 | November 8, 2009 12:02

    @ lobo91:

    That is a good point, but I think Clinton was beatable in 96. Dole was the most awful candidate for President that has ran in my lifetime, and I can’t think of anyone worse in history. The frucker barely showed up. The Republicans have to do better than him and McCain.


  79. Macker
    80 | November 8, 2009 12:04

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Here’s a prequel for what he’ll say:

    My god is greater than yours!

    And most of the country will reply “F**K YOU” to that! Oh wait a minute, they already have.


  80. goddessoftheclassroom
    81 | November 8, 2009 12:05

    Good afternoon, y’all.


  81. snork
    82 | November 8, 2009 12:06

    Iron Fist wrote:

    The frucker barely showed up. The Republicans have to do better than him and McCain.

    Calling him a fruit?


  82. 83 | November 8, 2009 12:07

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ teacake:
    I don’t think there’s any great hurry to formally charge him. He’s not much of a flight risk at the moment.
    It will be interesting to see what he has to say when he wakes up (assuming that he does).

    Not about flight risk Lobo. The army guy said they still don’t know his motives! To me this means they have to be ultra PC about this as to not inflame CAIR and the such. No doubt they have been hearing from CAIR too.


  83. Poteen
    84 | November 8, 2009 12:08

    @ Macker:

    If he wakes up, I’ll spring for his breakfast. A heaping plate of pork chops, bacon and eggs. Force fed.


  84. waldensianspirit
    85 | November 8, 2009 12:08

    @ Iron Fist:
    The Republicans are so out of touch they’re likely to try Lindsey Graham next.

    They still think it is a matter of being the lesser of two evils so they can rebag the public till their way again.


  85. snork
    86 | November 8, 2009 12:10

    The Telegraph’s on a roll:

    Bloodless President Barack Obama makes Americans wistful for George W Bush

    On Friday, when most of the basic facts were available, Mr Obama tried again. It was scarcely any better. He began by offering “an update on the tragedy that took place” – as if it was an earthquake and not a terrorist attack from an enemy within – and ended with a promise for more “updates in the coming days and weeks”.

    Completely missing was the eloquence that Mr Obama employs when talking about himself. Absent too was any sense that the President empathized with the families and comrades of those murdered.

    Ding x 11ty.


  86. 87 | November 8, 2009 12:10

    Iron Fist wrote:

    That is a good point, but I think Clinton was beatable in 96. Dole was the most awful candidate for President that has ran in my lifetime, and I can’t think of anyone worse in history. The frucker barely showed up. The Republicans have to do better than him and McCain.

    The problem with the Republicans is that, all to often, they go with the “next guy in line”. That was the case with Dole as well as McCain. They rarely stray from that practice; W was an exception to the rule.


  87. 88 | November 8, 2009 12:11

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ teacake:
    Translating Indonesian can get messy too

    Hahaha. Good one. How he became Senator is the head scratcher to me. Are people in Chicago big union sorts? Never mind…. forgot about Daly &co


  88. 89 | November 8, 2009 12:12

    I really was rooting for Sarah.


  89. snork
    90 | November 8, 2009 12:13

    @ MacDuff:

    W was still among the anointed, though. I mean, what could have possibly gone wrong from nominating the Yalie son of a former president?


  90. wolfie
    91 | November 8, 2009 12:15

    @ Iron Fist:

    The MSM heavily favors Democrats and leftists no matter who they are, but they would not have slobbered all over Kucinich, nor would they have pimped his policies so blindly.

    Above all, no one would be able to call the criticism of Kucinich RAAAAAAAACIST. Centrists wouldn’t be paralyzed by guilt/fear and would join the public outcry.

    I would MUCH rather have Kucinich as POTUS. Easy target.

    (Kucinich, of course, could not have been elected in the first place because he was widely KNOWN to be a radical leftist. But we’re playing at hypotheticals.)


  91. 92 | November 8, 2009 12:15

    teacake wrote:

    @ teacake:
    Hahaha. Good one. How he became Senator is the head scratcher to me. Are people in Chicago big union sorts? Never mind…. forgot about Daly &co

    The fact that he was a procuct of the currupt Chicago Political machine should have disqualified him in the minds of any honest person.

    They didn’t invent political coruption in Chicago, but they did perfect it.


  92. lobo91
    93 | November 8, 2009 12:17

    @ teacake:

    Obama became a Senator because the Chicago Dem machine convinced a judge to unseal the records of Jack Ryan’s divorce proceedings shortly before the election. When the salacious details came out, it sunk Ryan’s candidacy. Alan Keyes came in and took over as the Republican candidate at the last minute, and was soundly trounced.

    Prior to 2008, Obama had never actually run in a contested election. He was basically handed every office he’s held.


  93. 94 | November 8, 2009 12:18

    Seems the nation is too extremely polarized to find someone in the middle that could make most people happy. I actually understand not wanting an old fashion old white guy, but going with MTV sort of thugs is insane. I saw something that compared the two campaigns… the Dems used very modern technology and design whereas the R’s sort of remained in the Leave It To Beaver style. Nothing to get excited about. How did McCain get the nom anyhow? Really.


  94. snork
    95 | November 8, 2009 12:19

    Yow.


  95. wolfie
    96 | November 8, 2009 12:19

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Goddess, Thanks for putting the prayer list up this morning!

    Did you see the message I left on that thread about RedneckNaRocknRollBar? He (she?)got some rough news at the doctor’s and was asking to be put on the list.


  96. 97 | November 8, 2009 12:20

    @ MacDuff:
    LOL until this election I had no idea about Chicago other than the other O and she was the one I think that got him elected in the first place. Right before I got rid of my TV I happened to have that station on since I didn’t have cable…. and heard her introduce her guest as the next president.


  97. waldensianspirit
    98 | November 8, 2009 12:28

    Hungry anyone? Right up there with dip chips and salsa.


  98. 99 | November 8, 2009 12:30

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Good God, not the republican version of john edwards!


  99. 100 | November 8, 2009 12:30

    Geez, I forgot this was the NFL thread.

    GEAUX (Unbeaten) SAINTS!


  100. 101 | November 8, 2009 12:33

    @ bellamags:

    Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America’s Fort Hood military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he said non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.

    Is that part in the Koran somewhere, or is that just some sort of morbid creativity? Either way, it’s just f*cked up. I’ve got to think that any employer in the country would fire you for saying that kind of stuff. Yet somehow the military just shrugged its shoulders? Crazy.

    Ya know, having been a witness to wingnuttia’s eagerness to label examples of “Muslims gone bad” as “sudden jihadi syndrome” over the years, and having routinely dismissed it, I’ve got to say that there appears to be something to it here. If all this stuff is really true, then this guy should really be classified as a terrorist. I’m interested to see how this all shakes out when the guy comes to, and what he might have to say. But at this point I have to say that he deserves a firing squad, if anyone deserves it. And I’m pretty anti-capital punishment.

    And I hate to admit it, but Malkin makes a pretty good point about all this stuff being reported by the British press. What’s up with that? I mean, I noticed that CNN has been doing a pretty decent job by not ignoring the Islamic extremist as motivation angle, but one scan of memeorandum over the last couple days reveals that it’s the Brits who are doing the uncovering in this regard.


  101. goddessoftheclassroom
    102 | November 8, 2009 12:35

    @ wolfie:
    {wolfie}

    Yes, I did, and I’ve updated the list. I will be posting it every Sunday as its own thread; I will be less likely to miss updates this way!


  102. vagabond trader
    103 | November 8, 2009 12:37

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Great idea!

    :-)


  103. 104 | November 8, 2009 12:40

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Tube snake?


  104. 105 | November 8, 2009 12:40

    Back to the open thread topic….

    I’m getting absolutely creamed in my fantasy football game right now. I don’t even want to look.


  105. 106 | November 8, 2009 12:40

    Good morning!


  106. wolfie
    107 | November 8, 2009 12:41

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    That’s just wonderful! Bless you! :)


  107. 108 | November 8, 2009 12:41

    @ MacDuff:
    Is that today or tomorrow? Last Monday was an awesome game.


  108. vagabond trader
    109 | November 8, 2009 12:41

    Just when you thought the moonbats could not sink any lower.

    http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/11/new-british-play-features-jesus-as-transsexual-woman/


  109. lobo91
    110 | November 8, 2009 12:42

    @ ChenZhen:

    Is that part in the Koran somewhere, or is that just some sort of morbid creativity? Either way, it’s just f*cked up.

    As a matter of fact, yes:

    “And say: ‘The truth is from your Lord.’ Then whosoever wills, let him believe, and whosoever wills, let him disbelieve. Verily, We have prepared for the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.), a Fire whose walls will be surrounding them (disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah). And if they ask for help (relief, water, etc.) they will be granted water like boiling oil, that will scald their faces. Terrible the drink, and an evil Murtafaqa (dwelling, resting place, etc.)!” — Koran 18:29


  110. 111 | November 8, 2009 12:43

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    {goddess}


  111. goddessoftheclassroom
    112 | November 8, 2009 12:43

    @ wolfie:
    You’re very kind, but it speaks VOLUMES for this site and its admins that I’ve been invited to do this.

    The whole (you know where) imbroglio was very hurtful, but funny enough, it was worth it to have The Blogmocracy now.


  112. 113 | November 8, 2009 12:47

    @ vagabond trader:

    The cowards would never do anything like that with mo. Pussies. When they put a koran in a jar of piss, or have an elephant crap on aisha, then we’ll talk.

    Otherwise, they’re yellow-bellied cowards.


  113. snork
    114 | November 8, 2009 12:48

    @ ChenZhen:

    Yes, that is out of the koran (that’s what will happen to all usses infidels when we die).

    The Islamic heaven and hell are a lot more physical that Christians and Jews understand them to be. Thus the 72 virgins and the young boys and all that. This is why they shave their bodies that stay on earth. Somehow, they believe that there will be some sort of physical teleportation or something like that.


  114. wolfie
    115 | November 8, 2009 12:49

    @ ChenZhen:

    Fantasy football? Hah! That’s for wimps!
    I go for nightmare football!!!!
    (Redskins.)


  115. 116 | November 8, 2009 12:50

    @ lobo91:

    And 2008 differed, how? You basically had McCain campaigning for the fucker when he was telling the voters they didn’t have to be afraid of asn Obama Presidency. Really? McCain was a waste. The only thing he did right was pick Sarah, and I’ve become convinced he picked her with the intention of cutting her off at the knees.

    Bastard. I despise McCain.


  116. waldensianspirit
    117 | November 8, 2009 12:51

    @ ChenZhen:
    He’s a bit mixed up. The head is still on in the quran when the horrible drink is forcibly administered.

    Note to get a better understanding of what a polytheist and wrong-doer is, the quran provides the disciples of the Jesus written about by Jewish scribes as the typical polytheists and wrong-doers.


  117. 118 | November 8, 2009 12:52

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    We learned some important lessons about some people we considered friends. In the grand scheme of things, they were pretty cheap lessons, although they were painful in their way.


  118. lobo91
    119 | November 8, 2009 12:52

    @ Iron Fist:

    And 2008 differed, how?

    It didn’t. That was my point. Running a RINO didn’t work in 2008, and it wouldn’t have worked any better in 1996.


  119. 120 | November 8, 2009 12:54

    woohoo! AZ beating Chicago 41-21!! :-)


  120. Macker
    121 | November 8, 2009 12:54

    @ waldensianspirit:

    ISLAM DELENDA EST.


  121. vagabond trader
    122 | November 8, 2009 12:55

    These victims were murdered by idiotic PC run amok. Hasan could have and should have been stopped.

    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091108/D9BRD8GO1.html


  122. lobo91
    123 | November 8, 2009 12:55

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Note to get a better understanding of what a polytheist and wrong-doer is, the quran provides the disciples of the Jesus written about by Jewish scribes as the typical polytheists and wrong-doers.

    That does bring up a common misconception about Islam’s view of Christianity. Many people point to the stuff about Christians being “people of the book,” and thus being accepted, but what they don’t understand is that Islam considers most traditional Christian sects as polytheistic, because of the belief in the Holy Trinity.


  123. Macker
    124 | November 8, 2009 12:55

    Kirly wrote:

    woohoo! AZ beating Chicago 41-21!!

    They are sure playing like Duhhhhhh, Bears…. 8)


  124. buzzsawmonkey
    125 | November 8, 2009 12:56

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Just when you thought the moonbats could not sink any lower.

    http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/11/new-british-play-features-jesus-as-transsexual-woman/

    So are worshippers supposed to use a Host or a Hostess now?


  125. 126 | November 8, 2009 12:57

    @ lobo91:

    Bush wasn’t much different when he was running. I remember him pissing me off saying he’d sign a re-up of the “Assault Weapons” ban. Meaningless noise, since not even the Democrats want to repeat that particular mistake, but words do matter. Bush grew in office after 9-11. He took one of the two real paths available. I’d have chosen the other one, but he may be right. Maybe. We’ll see.


  126. waldensianspirit
    127 | November 8, 2009 12:58

    @ vagabond trader:
    I wonder if we’ll find out who Maj. Hasan voted for in the last election


  127. 128 | November 8, 2009 12:59

    @ Macker:

    We should have turned Afghanistan into a 21st Century Carthage. With the warning that if the Mohammedans wante to play, we’d play rough. See what happened.


  128. wolfie
    129 | November 8, 2009 12:59

    @ Iron Fist:

    True.

    But we also learned some lessons about ourselves. The majority of us, I believe, stayed past the point that we should have. That is, with very few exceptions, we compromised our own integrity to a greater or lesser extent. That’s something we can learn from. IMHO.


  129. 130 | November 8, 2009 13:01

    @ Macker:

    They are sure playing like Duhhhhhh, Bears….

    today they are playing a lot better than duh bears. woohoo!


  130. goddessoftheclassroom
    131 | November 8, 2009 13:01

    @ wolfie:
    In my own case, definitely.


  131. waldensianspirit
    132 | November 8, 2009 13:01

    @ Iron Fist:
    At the very most we shouldn’t be “rebuilding” that which we didn’t destroy.


  132. vagabond trader
    133 | November 8, 2009 13:01

    @ waldensianspirit:

    lol, still waiting to find out what his medical status is. Odd we know nothing of his condition other than he was shot, put on a vent ,taken off and isn’t communicating.Seriously doubt we’ll be getting much more except perhaps from the Brits who seem to know more than the American media. Fancy that.


  133. wolfie
    134 | November 8, 2009 13:02

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Perhaps a Hostess Ho-Ho. ;)


  134. buzzsawmonkey
    135 | November 8, 2009 13:03

    wolfie wrote:

    Perhaps a Hostess Ho-Ho.

    I think a Gramscian Ho will do just fine.


  135. 136 | November 8, 2009 13:05

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I wonder if we’ll find out who Maj. Hasan voted for in the last election

    i read something the other day (was that here?) that said he had made statements after the election that now that 0 was prez, maybe American policies in the ME would change.
    Plus, with him being a member of a Homeland Security panel which advised 0, i’m thinking it’s a pretty sure bet that he voted for 0.


  136. snork
    137 | November 8, 2009 13:06

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I see where you’re headed with that. Now they can have twinkie communion.


  137. wolfie
    138 | November 8, 2009 13:07

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Me too. Very much so.

    But now I’m glad that I had the chance to find out about my own weakness.


  138. 139 | November 8, 2009 13:07

    @ wolfie:

    I should have left when he banned Ayatollah Ghilmeini. I knew the guy. Met him at Geepers’ one year. Really great guy. I was reading when he banned him, and I was just WTF? We were better than that, you know? There was a time when LGF was very good. Gone now, of course, but there was a reason I did up colors for us and all.


  139. vagabond trader
    140 | November 8, 2009 13:10

    Ya know, went over to the other place because, well, I need a laugh. Guess what? It just isn’t funny anymore.


  140. 141 | November 8, 2009 13:10

    @ Kirly:

    Plus, with him being a member of a Homeland Security panel which advised 0, i’m thinking it’s a pretty sure bet that he voted for 0.

    That is the scariest thing about this. How does a screaming jihadi nutbag get that close to the President of the United States? Apparently there were plenty of signs he was going to do something like this, but they were all ignored. PC bullshit, no doubt. Bullshit that cost 13 people their lives.


  141. 142 | November 8, 2009 13:10

    ok, the Windows7 7 Word Recap at the end of the game is just stupid. very, very lame.


  142. snork
    143 | November 8, 2009 13:10

    @ wolfie:

    Think of it as a big test, that most failed. The only ones who really passed are @ GCP. I got out earlier than most here, but even I look back with a certain sense of shame.


  143. Carolina Girl
    144 | November 8, 2009 13:11

    I’m hopeful of failure of this health care monstrosity in the Senate. While the idiots in the House may only worry about the voters in their districts, the Senators must run statewide – and statewide elections in Jersey and Virginia must be giving them pause, especially if you’re a Dem elected from a traditionally red state state that went for Zero in the general last year.


  144. waldensianspirit
    145 | November 8, 2009 13:12

    @ lobo91:
    Yea many discussions of this went unappreciated at 1.0. Blog owner wouldn’t say peep so how was I to know he hated my commentary.


  145. snork
    146 | November 8, 2009 13:13

    @ vagabond trader:

    Yup. That’s why you’re seeing less and less attention paid in the form of quotes. They’ve gone from the ridiculous to the banal. And even though all political blogs got a traffic spike over the past few days from news events, the long term trend is still toward oblivion.


  146. 147 | November 8, 2009 13:14

    @ Iron Fist:
    it’s downright criminal and should be treated as such. the people who made excuses for him and kept him in when they should have done something to get him kicked out, should themselves be kicked out. the military is no place for political correctness.

    i have 2 nephews who are Marines right now. Even allowing myself to think for a second how i might feel if it had been one of these awesome young brothers is more than i can bear. i do know that i would be wanting someone (or a whole list of people) punished appropriately in addition to the shooter.


  147. 148 | November 8, 2009 13:17

    oh, you guys know that hasan attended the same radical mosque as some of the 911 hijackers, right?


  148. snork
    149 | November 8, 2009 13:17

    @ Carolina Girl:

    If you look at who’s up in ’10, there’s not much encouragement. Most of the donx are in safe seats. There are a few though, who may be feeling uncomfortable.

    The ones up in ’12 maybe be getting a little nervous though, and several of them are from red states.

    We’ll just have to see. If Reid tries to pull of the nuke option, it could get ugly.


  149. 150 | November 8, 2009 13:18

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    I should have left when he banned Ayatollah Ghilmeini. I knew the guy. Met him at Geepers’ one year. Really great guy. I was reading when he banned him, and I was just WTF? We were better than that, you know? There was a time when LGF was very good. Gone now, of course, but there was a reason I did up colors for us and all.

    Colors? Like you got an LGF tattoo?


  150. wolfie
    151 | November 8, 2009 13:19

    @ snork:

    I didn’t join LGF until right after the GCP exodus. People were still whispering about it, but the references were oblique. I never figured out why all those people were canned and/or left, and no one would tell me!


  151. waldensianspirit
    152 | November 8, 2009 13:19

    @ snork:
    I differ on gcp; many of them wanted the power of the ban stick and desired to be monitor lizards. Since then some have learned better and are good commenters. The start of gcp wasn’t pretty either with the fight over Katrina monies. Most of that is water under the bridge though.


  152. bellamags
    153 | November 8, 2009 13:20

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    I should have left when he banned Ayatollah Ghilmeini. I knew the guy. Met him at Geepers’ one year. Really great guy. I was reading when he banned him, and I was just WTF? We were better than that, you know? There was a time when LGF was very good. Gone now, of course, but there was a reason I did up colors for us and all.

    His posts were always so good and well thought out.


  153. vagabond trader
    154 | November 8, 2009 13:21

    @ Kirly:

    No interest by authorities to investigate a US Army officer attending the hateful mosque but don’t worry we’re still keeping an eye on those blue hairs boarding planes.///


  154. 155 | November 8, 2009 13:22

    @ vagabond trader:
    which would only make sense if the 19 hijackers had been blue hairs.


  155. 156 | November 8, 2009 13:22

    hi kids


  156. 157 | November 8, 2009 13:22

    @ Kirly:

    Yeah, the people who up-checked this freak should get the axe. It isn’t like this guy had a hidden agenda, or kept quite about his anti-American, anti-Infidel feelings. Yet he continued to be given responsibilities up to and including Homland Security issues. What do you want to bet his being a “Moderate” Mohammedan was seen as a “special” qualification to advise the President? The Obama Administration has shown an appalling lack of sense in choosing subnordinates. Van Jones was a screaming nut, truther, and all around dick, but this is just amazing. It isn’t just people in the military, but also in the Administration that should lose their positions. An Administration that picks advisors like Van Jones and this freak is in bad need of a shakeup. Think about what would have happened if Bush had had an advisor on the Gun Control issue that was a member of the Militia of Montana. Not that anyone in MOM would do this kind of thing, but it is the closest thing I can think of.


  157. waldensianspirit
    158 | November 8, 2009 13:23

    Wasn’t w-lover hangin’ at gcp for a bit? Can’t check the old forum but its a IIRC.


  158. 159 | November 8, 2009 13:24

    @ ChenZhen:

    No, not a tat, but PDM and I designed a patch that I had made. I figured you’d seen pictures. They got out on the internet.


  159. wolfie
    160 | November 8, 2009 13:25

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I thought W-lover was the earlier nic of Sharmuta.


  160. vagabond trader
    161 | November 8, 2009 13:26

    @ Iron Fist:

    The other day I suggested that he has received preferred minority victim status treatment from day one starting with his entry to college, fully funded under the Clinton Administration. I was soundly ridiculed but stand by my belief. Clinton was making nice nice with the Jordyptians at the time and I wonder how many others have benefitted from these affirmative action appointments to our schools and military.


  161. mawskrat
    162 | November 8, 2009 13:27

    yeeee..haaaa hung out with Hennessy girls today,boy did I have fun


  162. vagabond trader
    163 | November 8, 2009 13:27

    @ savage:

    Hey savage, where you be?


  163. 164 | November 8, 2009 13:28

    @ Iron Fist:

    Did Babbazee have a picture of that on her blog at one time?


  164. coldwarrior
    165 | November 8, 2009 13:28

    i would like to know how is it possible for the honey-do list to get longer as i finish more and more jobs…

    its like a self perpetuating machine…amazing.

    back to work!


  165. vagabond trader
    166 | November 8, 2009 13:29

    @ coldwarrior:

    You are just too good at what you do CW!

    :D


  166. waldensianspirit
    167 | November 8, 2009 13:30

    @ vagabond trader:
    After all resources need to be focused on returning vets. DHS and 1.0 say so.


  167. waldensianspirit
    168 | November 8, 2009 13:30

    @ wolfie:
    yep it was.


  168. Moe Katz
    169 | November 8, 2009 13:30

    @ lobo91:

    Islam also rejects both the Jewish and Christian Bibles as fabricated and distorted.


  169. vagabond trader
    170 | November 8, 2009 13:31

    @ waldensianspirit:

    A POX on them all.


  170. 171 | November 8, 2009 13:31

    @ Rightside:

    There was a pic at FallbackLGF. BabbaZee was one of the original 10 people that ordered patches so that I could make the run.


  171. Moe Katz
    172 | November 8, 2009 13:32

    @ wolfie:
    That schism occurred during one of my self-imposed sabbaticals from LGF due to right-wing groupthink fatigue. As a matter of fact I feel another coming on.


  172. coldwarrior
    173 | November 8, 2009 13:35

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    That schism occurred during one of my self-imposed sabbaticals from LGF due to right-wing groupthink fatigue. As a matter of fact I feel another coming on.

    i get left wing group think fatigue when i watch/read the main steam media. so i can appreciate just how frustrating it is.


  173. chickadee
    174 | November 8, 2009 13:35

    bellamags wrote:

    Rightside wrote:

    @ bellamags:
    I blame his killing spree on political correctness and liberals who worship at its altar

    One Army doctor who knew him said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim soldier had stopped fellow officers from filing formal complaints.

    I believe that. I said yesterday if the killer had been a white christian ( or even black,) the military would have intervened way before anyone got hurt. They let it go on because the sob was a Muslim.
    That has got to stop. We need to start calling these bastards evil and dangerous when they so obviously are. And not even give a second thought to their stone age death screed.
    It is sickening that this jihadi was able to kill and maim so many innocent people because no one wanted to appear discriminatory by calling attention to his outrageous behavior.


  174. mawskrat
    176 | November 8, 2009 13:36

    So like I was sayin’, here’s yer open thread for a Sunday afternoon as I geek out into the void.

    yes butfuckchuck you are in the void of no return


  175. coldwarrior
    177 | November 8, 2009 13:36

    bbl…

    i’m baking bread. the house smells fantastic!


  176. 178 | November 8, 2009 13:37

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ ChenZhen:
    No, not a tat, but PDM and I designed a patch that I had made. I figured you’d seen pictures. They got out on the internet.

    Oh yea. The “minion” patch.

    Which one is you?


  177. 179 | November 8, 2009 13:37

    oops, tried to embed an image. didn’t work out


  178. 180 | November 8, 2009 13:39

    @ ChenZhen:

    I’d be the, um, guy. That would be the one with the bald head :-)


  179. bellamags
    181 | November 8, 2009 13:39

    I believe that. I said yesterday if the killer had been a white christian ( or even black,) the military would have intervened way before anyone got hurt. They let it go on because the sob was a Muslim.

    yep


  180. bellamags
    182 | November 8, 2009 13:40

    @ chickadee:
    whoops. that was chickadee’s quote.


  181. waldensianspirit
    183 | November 8, 2009 13:41

    @ coldwarrior:
    I get fatigue reading moral equivocations explainin’ that Muslim authorities are just like Christian and Jewish authorities and have the ability to reform their religion yada, yada, they’re all seeking truth and the same G-d, yada, yada, yada. Mean while PC bullshit blood sacrifices good Americans at Ft. Hood.


  182. snork
    184 | November 8, 2009 13:41

    @ Moe Katz:

    Which is a very important and underappreciated point. While (to a first approximation) Christianity simply adopts the Torah as the Old Testament and appends the New Testament, the Koran goes back and tweaks everything, and then piles another layer of incoherent stuff on top of the substrate of revisionism.

    If Christian Replacement Theology is odious, what does that make the entirety of Islam?


  183. 185 | November 8, 2009 13:41

    We’re watching MMA fights wile hanging out, and damn some dude just got a good knockout in. Won the fight standing on his feet. Good show!


  184. 186 | November 8, 2009 13:44

    @ vagabond trader:

    I’m in Southgate at a Starbucks. Trailer isnt gonna be off the train until 3pm PST.

    Missed out on a great run, they were gonna send me to Minneapolis. I could have given a blogmocracy shoutout to Sharmuta, face to face. bwahaha


  185. wolfie
    187 | November 8, 2009 13:47

    @ vagabond trader:

    This was definitely a PC problem, but I’m not so sure that affirmative action played much of a role in his advancement. (Could be, but I dunno.)

    He went to a public high school and was in AP honors courses. He got good grades. He spent 2 years at a community college and got an associate degree in science with high honors. He graduated from VaTech with honors in biochemistry. And this was all in the 90′s, before anyone would consider him a minority that had to be “helped,” grade-wise.

    This is not an Obama, who had everything handed to him and who has presented no evidence that he ever earned academic promotion.


  186. Moe Katz
    188 | November 8, 2009 13:50

    @ coldwarrior:

    Groupthink on either end of the spectrum is a drag. I try to get a spectrum of different media perspectives. Foreign media views on one’s country can be useful at times, too.


  187. 189 | November 8, 2009 13:50

    OK, if this number is accurate…

    Organizing for America, which is under the umbrella of the Democratic National Committee, claims its supporters have made 502,651 phone calls to congressional offices since October 20, all urging the passage of health care reform.

    I’m going to suggest that we all start calling at least one member of congress every day. Come on, the numbers are easy to find (http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov) and most people have cell phones that don’t charge extra for long distance.


  188. 190 | November 8, 2009 13:51

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ ChenZhen:
    I’d be the, um, guy. That would be the one with the bald head

    So who is the other, um, person?


  189. waldensianspirit
    191 | November 8, 2009 13:53

    Fallback LGF: there a old familiar list
    * Buck
    * zombie
    * Urban Infidel
    * Poitiers-Lepanto
    * LGFer
    * Kragar
    * Karridine


  190. 192 | November 8, 2009 13:54

    @ Moe Katz:

    Moe said

    That schism occurred during one of my self-imposed sabbaticals from LGF due to right-wing groupthink fatigue. As a matter of fact I feel another coming on.

    now, if the rest of you don’t see the insult to us right here at the blogmocracy… well, look again.

    have a nice break moe. don’t hurry back.


  191. 193 | November 8, 2009 13:54

    @ ChenZhen:

    Well, they aren’t here to speak for themselves, so I think I’ll leave that to your imagination.


  192. 194 | November 8, 2009 13:57

    @ Kirly:

    Yeah, I was chewing on my tounge about that one. Have you noticed how much I’ve mellowed over the last five years?


  193. Moe Katz
    195 | November 8, 2009 13:57

    @ snork:
    Funnily enough, Rambam considered Islam preferable to Christianity. In his view, Islam was like a bad copy of Judaism; he used the analogy of a false human body that lacked the nerve and sinew connections under the skin to be the real thing. However, he argued that a Jew should die rather than convert to Christanity, whereas it was okay to make an outward conversion to Islam.

    Anyone wanna guess why? Because it is, from a Jewish perspective, a lesser blasphemy to say that Mohammed is a prophet than to declare Jesus the Son of God. This was the commonly held Jewish view during classical Islamic times.

    Reference: Bernard Lewis, The Jews of Islam, 1984, paperback edition, p. 84.

    Back in about 45 min.


  194. waldensianspirit
    196 | November 8, 2009 13:58

    @ snork:
    It is very sad so many Christians do the replacement theology where some even take it to the point the Mississippi River is the replacement Jordan river.

    It is the reason why

    Romans 11:18 do not boast over those branches. If you do, consider this: You[ Christianity] do not support the root[Judaism], but the root supports you.

    was posted so many times at 1.0


  195. vagabond trader
    197 | November 8, 2009 13:59

    @ wolfie:

    You miss my point. Quotas are what I’m talking about. As in we need X amount of X in the US army. Find us some.Disagree about the minority issue. Palestinians have been leftist pets much longer than post 9/11.


  196. Moe Katz
    198 | November 8, 2009 13:59

    @ Kirly:

    I will try to take as many breaks as are necessary to remain polite and respectful with someone having a mind such as yours. Toodles.

    Moe


  197. Moe Katz
    199 | November 8, 2009 14:00

    @ Iron Fist:

    Man, you’re welcome to take the cheap shot if you want to. It’s there for the taking :)


  198. vagabond trader
    200 | November 8, 2009 14:04

    @ vagabond trader:

    Oh yeah, as for the jihadis grades got a reputable link?


  199. waldensianspirit
    201 | November 8, 2009 14:04

    @ Moe Katz:
    I already took an expensive shot:-)


  200. 202 | November 8, 2009 14:05

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ ChenZhen:
    Well, they aren’t here to speak for themselves, so I think I’ll leave that to your imagination.

    An imagination I have, but I guess I won’t go there.

    Maybe you could tell me, though, out of the original members of your gang, how many are still active “minions”?


  201. snork
    203 | November 8, 2009 14:05

    @ wolfie:

    There’s formal affirmative action, than there’s the broad concept. In the broad concept sense, Obama was elected by an affirmative action process, and Hasan was tolerated for the same reason.

    There should be another term for it when it’s informal, but just as forceful. The insidious thing about PC is that as often as not, it’s enforced by social networks rather than formal policy.


  202. lobo91
    204 | November 8, 2009 14:05

    @ vagabond trader:

    You miss my point. Quotas are what I’m talking about. As in we need X amount of X in the US army. Find us some.

    The Army really doesn’t do much of that. We tend to have enough trouble making recruiting quotas as it is.

    As far as I know, he went to VA Tech and got his commission through ROTC there. Not sure if he was on an ROTC scholarship or not. Even if he was, they aren’t that hard to come by, and there aren’t any affirmative action quotas for them.


  203. chickadee
    205 | November 8, 2009 14:08

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:

    Oh yeah, as for the jihadis grades got a reputable link?

    I heard on the Bob Grant radio show this morning that some leftie idiots are referring to the Muslim killer as Dr. Hasan as they try to mitigate the horror of what he did.
    Dr. “jihad terrorist” Hasan is he way I would say it.


  204. 206 | November 8, 2009 14:10

    @ lobo91:

    What about promotions in the Army? Quota’s there?


  205. 207 | November 8, 2009 14:11

    @ ChenZhen:

    None. None at all, and doesn’t that speak volumes. I was the last of us to go. I held on way, way past reasonable tolerance. I just didn’t want to see something I had loved go away. This is not, in and of itself anything wrong, but I should have seen what was in front of me before I did.


  206. Moe Katz
    208 | November 8, 2009 14:13

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I’d recommend reading one of the excellent books by Norman Stillman or Bernard Lewis on the history of Jews under Islam. It wasn’t multiculturalism, modern style, but for the Middle Ages it wasn’t that bad either most of the time.


  207. 209 | November 8, 2009 14:13

    @ Iron Fist:

    Have you noticed how much I’ve mellowed over the last five years?

    i have. have you noticed how much i’ve unmellowed during that same time?


  208. lobo91
    210 | November 8, 2009 14:13

    @ Rightside:

    Nope. Anyone trying to tell board members to select someone because of their race or gender would be smacked down pretty hard.


  209. 211 | November 8, 2009 14:15

    @ Kirly:
    Never tell a Lady she has unmellowed. Women are like wine. Both get better with age.

    :P


  210. 212 | November 8, 2009 14:17

    @ Moe Katz:
    i see no reason to remain polite to some one outside my country, constantly tells me what is wrong with it, someone outside my religion constantly tells me what is wrong with it, etc. you hate us that much? then don’t stress yourself by talking to us.

    have a nice break! have many nice long breaks!


  211. vagabond trader
    213 | November 8, 2009 14:17

    @ lobo91:

    Really, they just go handing out full medical school scholarships to just about anyone? From what I understand right up until the here and now the military is anxiously seeking Arabic speakers.They don’t have a quota to fulfill?

    As I recall Clinton was CIC when the jihadi joined up and BJ was sure as hell into racial religious ethnic gender quotas PC and ask don’t tell.But hey,I doubt he ever expressed his vision of what the American military should look like to anyone of significance in the ranks because he was so proper.


  212. lobo91
    214 | November 8, 2009 14:17

    @ Rightside:

    I have had people (civilians) try to tell me that the Army does use affirmative action quotas by pointing to the fact that there actually is an Army Regulation with a title that implies just that. Of course, if they actually read it, they’d find that it was a poor choice of title more than anything else. The Army goes by the principle of equal opportunity, not affirmative action.


  213. 215 | November 8, 2009 14:17

    @ lobo91:

    The Army’s process for choosing who is to be promoted must be different than the Navy does.

    I do not have proof, but I would bet a year’s paycheck, somewhere in the pentagon, they decide how many women, minorities, etc. will be promoted.


  214. snork
    216 | November 8, 2009 14:18

    @ Kirly:

    I was defending him before, but you’re right. That’s downright trollish to make that kind of a broadside slam. One hard and fast rule that marks a troll is talking about the entire site as if it speaks with one voice.

    As far as I’m concerned, he’s as welcome as SpaceJesus or any other troll by virtue of the general philosophy here, BUT:

    1) Now the gloves are off, and

    2) his petulance is pitiful. If he chooses not to grace us with his wit and wisdom, he’ll leave a hole here. Just like the hole a boat leaves in the water when you take it out.


  215. vagabond trader
    217 | November 8, 2009 14:18

    @ vagabond trader:

    forgot the / at the end.


  216. buzzsawmonkey
    218 | November 8, 2009 14:18

    chickadee wrote:

    I heard on the Bob Grant radio show this morning that some leftie idiots are referring to the Muslim killer as Dr. Hasan as they try to mitigate the horror of what he did.
    Dr. “jihad terrorist” Hasan is he way I would say it.

    I wrote the following after the five jihadi doctors engaged in the Glasgow terror plot:

    Can You See the Jihadi?
    —with apologies to Pete Townsend and the Who

    They arrested another doctor
    
Trying to make jihad.

    Planting car bombs on the weekend

    Just to make Mohammed glad.
    Can you be a jihadi, doctor?

    Can you be a jihadi, doctor?

    Can ya mmm, can ya

    Professionals one after another

    And jihad is what they do

    Apologists say it’s poverty

    But the docs show that’s not true.
    Oh can you be a jihadi, doctor?
    
Can you be a jihadi, doctor?
    
Can you be a jihadi

    Can you be a jihadi

    Can you be a jihadi, can ya

    Can you be a jihadi

    Can you be


  217. waldensianspirit
    219 | November 8, 2009 14:22

    @ Moe Katz:
    Recommendation not taken. Your phrase “most of the time” speaks volumes over the nostalgia for the caliphate.


  218. mawskrat
    220 | November 8, 2009 14:22

    Kirly wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Have you noticed how much I’ve mellowed over the last five years?
    i have. have you noticed how much i’ve unmellowed during that same time?

    they call me mellow yellow.lol


  219. vagabond trader
    221 | November 8, 2009 14:23

    @ chickadee:

    I am going to refer to him as the jihadi from now on because it rankles some folks. Especially those who have diagnosed him from afar as being insane.

    :D


  220. waldensianspirit
    222 | November 8, 2009 14:25

    @ snork:
    Otherwise known as a Spicoli floater.


  221. lobo91
    223 | November 8, 2009 14:27

    @ vagabond trader:

    Really, they just go handing out full medical school scholarships to just about anyone?

    You’re confusing two different things. He got his commission through Army ROTC at VA Tech, possibly on a scholarship. And while they don’t just “hand them out to anyone,” they aren’t that hard to get if you have decent grades (which I understand he did). Also, we’re talking about the late ’90s. The economy was relatively good, and there weren’t exactly lines of people beating down the recruiters’ doors to get in.

    Once he was in, he applied to (and was accepted into) the Uniformed Services Health University, which is a medical school run by the military. There are no “scholarships,” because there’s no tuition. It has a good reputation as a medical school, and isn’t that easy to get into.

    From what I understand right up until the here and now the military is anxiously seeking Arabic speakers.They don’t have a quota to fulfill?

    That would have nothing whatsoever to do with Hasan, for several reasons. First, he doesn’t speak Arabic worth a damn, according to everything I’ve read. Second, he’s a doctor, not a linguist. I doubt that there’s much call for Arabic-speaking psychiatrists. If there were, he would have been overseas a long tim ago. Finally, he’s been in since before 9/11. There was no great demand for Arabic linguists at that time. As I recall, we were looking for Chinese speakers then.


  222. mawskrat
    224 | November 8, 2009 14:28

    mellow yellow

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCCjv2OiTxE&feature=related


  223. 225 | November 8, 2009 14:29

    @ vagabond trader:

    I don’t think you can call him insane. He knew the difference between right and wrong, he just chose to do wrong and call it right. You might define that as evil, but it is not insane.


  224. wolfie
    226 | November 8, 2009 14:31

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    You miss my point. Quotas are what I’m talking about. As in we need X amount of X in the US army. Find us some.Disagree about the minority issue. Palestinians have been leftist pets much longer than post 9/11.

    Yes. I think I did miss your point. I agree with you about the army’s probable desire to seek out “diversity.”
    I was thinking about “affirmation action” solely in the limited sense of favoritism in academic promotion. Giving the C student A’s, as it were. Admitting the mediocrity to Harvard Law, etc. etc.

    I do know a great deal about the Roanoke Valley and Va Tech. (I have actually taught at both Va Tech and at VWCC, the community college he went to. I am also familiar with the high school he went to.) There is no way he would have had any special academic consideration because of his background.
    In the first place, back then it seems he was assimilated. He wasn’t running around in funny clothes, thumping the Koran, and whining about being oppressed.
    In the second place, “help” is usually given to minorities that leftists, being racists, look down on as stupid, i.e., blacks and Hispanics. (Palestinians may be given a pass for “uncontrollable” barbarity, but they are not considered stupid.)
    Third, at Va Tech he’s not exotic. There are so many foreigners in the sciences there that no one would notice or care about his last name, much less give him better grades because of it.

    This why I say that, through undergraduate school at least, he probably earned his academic way.

    The big question is when he jumped the camel. Was it, as I would guess, when he went to NoVa/DC and got involved in the super-radicalized Muslim community there? I guess we’ll learn more as time goes on.


  225. waldensianspirit
    227 | November 8, 2009 14:32

    @ mawskrat:
    Yea, I don’t recommend Iron Fist switch his avatar any time soon! :-)


  226. lobo91
    228 | November 8, 2009 14:35

    @ Rightside:

    I do not have proof, but I would bet a year’s paycheck, somewhere in the pentagon, they decide how many women, minorities, etc. will be promoted.

    I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the Navy does that. They’ve done some fairly stupid things in that direction over the last 15 years or so. Spending millions of dollars to refit ships in order to accomodate a handful of women comes to mind. So does graduating female pilots who were clearly incapable of performing, only to have them prove it by crashing into the ocean and killing themselves.

    I’ve sat on promotion boards several times (although not officer promotions, obviously). I know officers who have sat on DA centralized officer promotion boards, though. I have never heard of anyone trying to put out quotas for promotions based on race or gender.


  227. vagabond trader
    229 | November 8, 2009 14:36

    @ lobo91:

    I was using the Arabic speakers as an example of Army quotas,not implying Dr Jihadi was one of these.Frankly unless you personally had the ear of the CIC I am inclined to believe that people like the jihadi,of Palestinian origin, would be highly sought after at the request of a leftist CIC like Clinton or Obama via his aides of course.We’ll never know.


  228. wolfie
    230 | November 8, 2009 14:37

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:
    As far as I know, he went to VA Tech and got his commission through ROTC there. Not sure if he was on an ROTC scholarship or not.

    A VaTech spokesman on our local news said he was not in ROTC at VaTech. (I’m in the area.) They did confirm graduation with honors in biochemistry. Honors would require a 3.5 GPA.


  229. Carolina Girl
    231 | November 8, 2009 14:39

    snork wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    Think of it as a big test, that most failed. The only ones who really passed are @ GCP. I got out earlier than most here, but even I look back with a certain sense of shame.

    I commented here once that I never thought I’d see the day I’d be actually GRATEFUL for the Dan Rather lawsuit that kept me from posting at 1.0.


  230. lobo91
    232 | November 8, 2009 14:41

    @ wolfie:

    The big question is when he jumped the camel. Was it, as I would guess, when he went to NoVa/DC and got involved in the super-radicalized Muslim community there? I guess we’ll learn more as time goes on.

    According to what I’ve read, it happened after the death of his mother in 2001. Prior to that, he was pretty much “secular” in his beliefs.

    He would have been most of the way through med school at that point, which explains a lot. I seriously doubt that anyone who walked around telling people that they were going to hell and would have their heads cut off and boiling oil poured down their necks would have gotten through ROTC, or been accepted into one of the military’s med schools.


  231. 233 | November 8, 2009 14:44

    They’re palying an Obama Youth commercial on TV. Am I the only person that finds that shit creepy? Imagine the outcry you’d have if Bush had done something similar…


  232. waldensianspirit
    234 | November 8, 2009 14:45

    @ Iron Fist:
    btw, deciding when to leave or flounce from lgf is an asymptotic problem. There is no perfect time. All of us stayed longer than our first inkling Charles NoDickens was gonna keep letting his inner progressive all raging out.


  233. song_and_dance_man
    235 | November 8, 2009 14:45

    Well at least The Raiders didn’t lose today. It’s their bye week.


  234. lobo91
    236 | November 8, 2009 14:45

    @ wolfie:

    That’s why I said “as far as I know.” I’ve heard other stories that said he was.

    Whatever the case, while there are certainly officers in the Army (including majors, trust me) who aren’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, I haven’t seen any evidence that Hasan was any sort of affirmative action type. He appears to have gotten into med school on merit.


  235. buzzsawmonkey
    237 | November 8, 2009 14:46

    @ Iron Fist:

    I can’t imagine that Obama Youth will work any better than Enzyte does.


  236. Moe Katz
    238 | November 8, 2009 14:47

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Sorry you’re not interested in learning about it. It was what it was, which is better than what the Christian world would offer the Jews for centuries to come.


  237. wolfie
    239 | November 8, 2009 14:48

    @ lobo91:

    The death of a mother can cause strange changes.
    And by then he was up in NoVa/DC, where radical Islam is not only strong, but has close to a monopoly on Muslim institutions.

    BTW, according to VaTEch, he was NOT a member of the Corps of Cadets nor involved in ROTC in any way.


  238. 240 | November 8, 2009 14:49

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I had to look “Enzyte” up. Lovely :-)


  239. Moe Katz
    241 | November 8, 2009 14:49

    @ Kirly:

    No problem, Kirly, I wouldn’t expect politeness from you. Nor would I particularly value it were you to grace me with it, for that matter.


  240. waldensianspirit
    242 | November 8, 2009 14:51

    @ Moe Katz:
    Here’s a recommendation for you.


  241. Moe Katz
    243 | November 8, 2009 14:53

    @ waldensianspirit:

    That’s pathetic.


  242. waldensianspirit
    244 | November 8, 2009 14:56

    lol! recommendations often are


  243. wolfie
    245 | November 8, 2009 14:56

    @ lobo91:

    Yes.
    Here you have a reasonably well-assimilated, bright fellow, who might have carved out a fine life for himself.
    Then………..

    Can someone explain again why we have to allow the Saudis to set up all these extremist mosques and schools?

    Yeah. I know. PC. And oil money.


  244. Moe Katz
    246 | November 8, 2009 14:58

    @ snork:

    Snork, I don’t miss your defenses of me—I’m not some nice elderly person that couldn’t help farting in church. I see a dominant mentality here that I find frequently very, very offensive to my own values. I can only take so much at a time without commenting on that. You don’t need to make excuses for me. That’s who I am.


  245. lobo91
    247 | November 8, 2009 15:00

    @ Iron Fist:

    Did you run across the part where it’s a big financial scam, as well?

    In order to get the “free trial” they promise on TV, you have to give them a credit card number and sign up for their automatic monthly shipment program, which they tell you you’re free to cancel anytime.

    When you call to cancel, they apparently tell you they’re doing it, but the charges don’t stop. They even go to the point of changing the merchant name under which they bill you, if you try to block the charges through your credit card company. Basically, the only way to get them to stop biling you is to cancel whatever card you used and get a new one. Lovely people.

    And no, I don’t know this from personal experience. Just what I’ve read online.


  246. 248 | November 8, 2009 15:00

    @ wolfie:

    See that is the problem I’ve had with the concept of “Moderate” Mohammedans. It is like saying “Moderate” Nazis. It doesn’t track.


  247. 249 | November 8, 2009 15:01

    @ Moe Katz:
    Considering that I’m not a left wing fool (like you), I am more than confident that my mind is far superior in it’s ability to recognize and use logic than that puny thing you’re using.

    btw, nice potshots at the Christians. Just like every other thread I’ve ever endured your comments in. I sure wish CFnJ would let you back in at lgf. Just get a new nic there. Enjoy.


  248. 250 | November 8, 2009 15:03

    @ lobo91:

    I just figured something like that had to be a scam, so I’m not surprised. My generally low opinion of humanity has once again been validated :-P


  249. Moe Katz
    251 | November 8, 2009 15:04

    @ Kirly:

    What potshots at the Christians? This is the medieval world, as it was. Why take that personally?


  250. 252 | November 8, 2009 15:06

    @ Moe Katz:

    I see a dominant mentality here that I find frequently very, very offensive to my own values.

    so offensive, in fact, that you keep coming back for more.

    have a nice break. have a nice LONG break. like until 2050 or so.


  251. lobo91
    253 | November 8, 2009 15:07

    @ Iron Fist:

    It’s not that uncommon of a story, either (aside from the mass murder of Soldiers part, that is).

    Lots of “secular” or “assimilated” Muslims change their views radically after some traumatic event, or after going to visit relatives in “the old country.”

    That’s one of the really insidious things about Islam. You really can’t predict who’s going to suddenly decide to go full-bore jihadi at some point in the future.


  252. waldensianspirit
    254 | November 8, 2009 15:09

    [* checks calendar*] 21st century and the darkness creeping across the earth is coming from …we have a winner! islam!


  253. Moe Katz
    255 | November 8, 2009 15:10

    @ Kirly:

    The Christians evolved and the Muslims didn’t. That is to the Christians’ credit as a civilization. I don’t see why you’d have a problem with that.


  254. lobo91
    256 | November 8, 2009 15:11

    @ Iron Fist:

    Of course, that’s on top of the fact that the product itself is a scam.

    I’m assuming that the reason they’re able to get away with the rest of it so frequently is that people are embarrassed to report them. Sort of like being ripped off by a hooker.


  255. 257 | November 8, 2009 15:11

    If the military needs Arabic speakers/readers, they really should recruit from Lebanese Christians. The ones I know, though, are reluctant to be involved in either side. They actually think that they are safe from it here in the USA and Canada. Shame that. They really should take sides and fight. imo


  256. buzzsawmonkey
    258 | November 8, 2009 15:12

    I’m an intermittent poster here, and therefore have no particular opinion about any one poster, yet.

    I will, however, observe that I have never yet found, on any board, a poster who used a nic based on an aggressively “Jewish-sounding” name who was not a troll.


  257. waldensianspirit
    259 | November 8, 2009 15:13

    @ Moe Katz:
    Because Christians did not evolve. Christians restituted. Reformation isn’t in the cards.


  258. 260 | November 8, 2009 15:13

    @ waldensianspirit:

    A bigger threat than Communism, really. The Communists were murderous enough, but they didn’t have in ingrained in their “religion” the way Mohammedans did. That is, Communism produced monsters like Stalin, but it did not teach individual communists to be monsterous. Islam does.


  259. Moe Katz
    261 | November 8, 2009 15:18

    @ waldensianspirit:

    You see, you should read Bernard Lewis. You’re missing some important concepts, like the distinction between Christianity and Christendom.


  260. wolfie
    262 | November 8, 2009 15:18

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    This is the medieval world, as it was.

    Actually, this is the medieval world as presented in one work of one scholar as interpreted by one layman.

    (Which is not to say whether it is a fair or unfair presentation.)


  261. Moe Katz
    263 | November 8, 2009 15:21

    @ wolfie:

    Lewis is pretty representative of the entire literature—also Goitein, Stillman, etc.


  262. 264 | November 8, 2009 15:22

    Question: What time is the Cowboys/Eagles game to take place?


  263. waldensianspirit
    265 | November 8, 2009 15:24

    @ Moe Katz:
    Wow, what a massive distinction!


  264. buzzsawmonkey
    266 | November 8, 2009 15:25

    To say that the Muslim world, one thousand years ago, was nominally less miserable to live in if you were not a member of the dominant religion than many areas of the Christian world, means little—except that it is currently possible, by looking at the Muslim world today, to see just how miserable it was to be a member of a religious minority one thousand years ago, because it is still one thousand years ago in the Ummah as far as that is concerned.


  265. Moe Katz
    267 | November 8, 2009 15:27

    @ waldensianspirit:

    It most certainly is. And there is another distinction that can me made, effectively, between Islam and ‘Islamdom.’ Christianity and Islam tend to be both a faith and, historically, a polity and these must absolutely not be confounded


  266. 268 | November 8, 2009 15:29

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    A thousand years ago the Koran still had the shit about sons of apes and pigs in it, not to mention the Jew-hating trees and rocks. Anyway, it doesn’t matter much what they did a thousand years ago. It is what they are doing in the here and now that I judge them on, and find them wanting…


  267. waldensianspirit
    269 | November 8, 2009 15:30

    @ Moe Katz:
    There ya go — got the equivocation flapping about.


  268. waldensianspirit
    270 | November 8, 2009 15:31

    I knew it was in there.


  269. Moe Katz
    271 | November 8, 2009 15:31

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    There’s some truth to that. The world of the dhimmi Jews of Islam is dead now. At its height, it produced Maimonides, Nahmanides, and many others.


  270. buzzsawmonkey
    272 | November 8, 2009 15:31

    @ Iron Fist:

    Yes, of course.


  271. Moe Katz
    273 | November 8, 2009 15:33

    @ waldensianspirit:

    By equivocation you mean unacceptable complexity.


  272. waldensianspirit
    274 | November 8, 2009 15:34

    Had to make up a word but it got it done.


  273. waldensianspirit
    275 | November 8, 2009 15:35

    @ Moe Katz:
    Nope. Wanna try door #2?


  274. buzzsawmonkey
    276 | November 8, 2009 15:39

    Moe Katz wrote:

    The world of the dhimmi Jews of Islam is dead now. At its height, it produced Maimonides, Nahmanides, and many others.

    No.

    The Jews produced sages in both the Christian and Islamic worlds. In both worlds, the greats of Jewish culture existed no thanks to the larger culture; they were products of their own parallel civilization. Rashi and the Gaon of Vilna, to name two, were great sages who lived in the Christian world.

    If the record of the sages in the Christian world is less complete, because they were massacred or their works were destroyed, that does not mean that they, too were not products of the Jewish world, not the “host” culture.


  275. Moe Katz
    277 | November 8, 2009 15:44

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    No, the Jewish sages of Islam were embedded in the ideas and the science of the classical Muslim world. There is extensive scholarly literature on the Arabic sources of Rambam’s Guide of the Perplexed. You cannot make any sort of scholarly argument that he stands apart from that cultural context.


  276. waldensianspirit
    278 | November 8, 2009 15:53

    Islam also rejects both the Jewish and Christian Bibles as fabricated and distorted.

    …waiting…but eventually out comes Islamic apologetics.

    /Not complicated at all. Seen it all before. Touch on the core of islam that claims Jesus wasn’t crucified but instead allah out-schemed the disciples of Jesus[as written about by Jewish scribes] and snuck Jesus away and out comes the apologetics. It further states the disciples of Jesus were the epitome of infidels/polytheists for believing in Jesus crucificion and Resurrection.


  277. buzzsawmonkey
    279 | November 8, 2009 15:56

    Moe Katz wrote:

    No, the Jewish sages of Islam were embedded in the ideas and the science of the classical Muslim world. There is extensive scholarly literature on the Arabic sources of Rambam’s Guide of the Perplexed. You cannot make any sort of scholarly argument that he stands apart from that cultural context.

    I certainly don’t see that you’ve made any “scholarly argument” to that effect; you’ve merely made a few unbacked assertions, without citing to anything specific.

    And, even if you do ultimately supply what you are so manifestly lacking, what has that to do with the price of beans, or anything else?


  278. Guggi
    280 | November 8, 2009 16:02

    @ Moe Katz:

    full quote p.84

    This response to persecution is of course familiar in Jewish history, and is known as marranism, the practice of the Spanish and Portuguese Marranos, who affected conversion to Catholicism but preserved their Jewish faith and to some extent even worshiped in secret until they came to another time, or more commonly another place, where it was possible to revert openly to their own faith. Significantly, the phenomenon of marranism in Jewish history is virtually limited to countries of Islamic civilization or influence. The outstanding examples are the Jews of Spain and Portugal after the expulsion. Other instances are attested in Islamic lands from North Africa to Iran and Central Asia. It is almost completely unknown among the Jews of Christendom, who suffered incomparably greater persecutions, and yet—in curious accord with their persecutors—chose death or exile rather than submission.

    Some medieval Jewish authors, among them the great Maimonides, even tried to provide a theoretical justification for this contrast and argued on theological grounds that while a Jew must suffer torture and death rather than pronounce a Christian creed, he may affect conversion to Islam in order to survive. The significant difference was that while the Jews recognized Islam as a strict monotheism of the same kind as their own, they had some doubts, which they shared with the Muslims, about Christianity. For one who believed neither statement, it was a lesser perjury to testify that Muhammad was the Prophet of God than to testify that Jesus was the Son of God. These distinctions, while no doubt based on an imperfect understanding of Christian doctrine, were nevertheless important in shaping interfaith attitudes.

    Since the Muslims were the ruling class conversion to Islam and not to Christianity made sense.

    quote 2 p. 102

    There is a striking contrast between Maimonides’ letter to his Hebrew translator in Europe in which he speaks of the richness of the Arabic language and the superiority of the Arab sciences, and his letter to the persecuted Jews of the Yemen, in which he complains bitterly of the wretched state of the Jews under Muslim rule: “You know, my brethren, that on account of our sins God has cast us into the midst of this people, the nation of Ishmael, who persecute us severely, and who devise ways to harm us and to debase us. … No nation has ever done more harm to Israel. None has matched it in debasing and humiliating us. None has been able to reduce us as they have.”

    Maimonides view in respect of conversion to Islam is an answer to an expertise of a rabbi who hold the view that Jews should become rather martyrs then convert to Islam. M. let us know that i) the rabbi lives in good conditions far away from the danger the Jews in Spain under Arab rules bear and ii) that Jews should live with the divine commands not die because of them. He wanted to save Jewish lifes and was a realistic adviser.


  279. Moe Katz
    281 | November 8, 2009 16:05

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    You want sources, I can give you sources. It’s the dominant view in academia. Yes, I do find it tedious, but I’ll give you a couple:
    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maimonides-islamic/
    Also Bernard Lewis, The Jews of Islam, paperback edition, p. 76 on Maimonides’ choice of Arabic for his philosophical writings.


  280. Moe Katz
    283 | November 8, 2009 16:11

    @ Guggi:

    Nice to see that someone else has Lewis’s book! Not sure if we disagree about much, but M. clearly considers Judaism and Islam more theologically compatible than Judaism and Christianity. That was my only point. The question of which is the politically dominant culture really has no bearing on this….


  281. waldensianspirit
    284 | November 8, 2009 16:12

    Bernard Lewis was ordered to pay one franc as damages to an association against racism and an association representing the Armenians by a French court in a civil proceeding for his statements on the Armenian Genocide in a November 1993 Le Monde article. — same wiki link.

    Yea real credible researcher you have there


  282. buzzsawmonkey
    285 | November 8, 2009 16:12

    Moe Katz wrote:

    It’s the dominant view in academia.

    The “dominant view in academia” is giving the Muslims a tongue-bath wherever it is possible to do so. I am personally acquainted with someone who, having gained a degree in Islamic studies under Bernard Lewis, was told by him to not, under any circumstances, to go into the field because he would not be able to get a position, merely because he was a Jew—Lewis himself being quite well aware that he would not have had his own career were he to attempt it today.

    So, your mere offering of citations means little; if you want to be convincing, you have to quote such things and then make an argument as to why they are accurate or relevant. Those of us who have actually hacked our way through to a degree from a respectable university are not particularly impressed by people who merely yammer about “dominant views in academia.”


  283. 286 | November 8, 2009 16:13

    @ lobo91:
    When ever I buy anything on line or to that nature, I always use my paypal card! If you don’t keep much in it, they can’t charge you. You can also find a place in the paypal transactions to cancel the subscription. If that does’t work, call paypal and have them send a new card. I’ve had to do this a couple of times… but usually the canceling of the subscription is effective.


  284. buzzsawmonkey
    287 | November 8, 2009 16:16

    BTW, given that suicide terrorism is an Islamic invention of the Crusades era—the Hashishiyun under the Old Man of the Mountain, from whom our word “assassin” is derived—babbling about the Islam of 1000 years ago being substantially different from the Islam of today is utter bullshit.


  285. Moe Katz
    288 | November 8, 2009 16:16

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Lewis is a HUGE expert on Turkey. This discredits French law more than it does Lewis.


  286. Moe Katz
    289 | November 8, 2009 16:20

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    “I am personally acquainted with someone who, having gained a degree in Islamic studies under Bernard Lewis, was told by him to not, under any circumstances, to go into the field because he would not be able to get a position, merely because he was a Jew—Lewis himself being quite well aware that he would not have had his own career were he to attempt it today.”

    Sounds like good advice to me. The field has been lost to the apologists of Islam, the Edward Saids and John Espositos and that lot.

    Look, if you have a problem with Maimonides being in a sense an Arab thinker of his time, that’s your loss.


  287. buzzsawmonkey
    290 | November 8, 2009 16:22

    Moe Katz wrote:

    Look, if you have a problem with Maimonides being in a sense an Arab thinker of his time, that’s your loss.

    No, I have a problem with you asserting this without any backup other than “it’s the dominant (unquoted) view.”


  288. waldensianspirit
    291 | November 8, 2009 16:22

    @ Moe Katz:
    You are claiming the Armenian genocide didn’t happen, wasn’t state sponsored and the Turks are right in denying it happened?


  289. Moe Katz
    292 | November 8, 2009 16:26

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Start with the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy piece I linked and go into his citations. Or Google “Maimonides” and “Islam” and see what you come up with. No one respectable is arguing Maimonides stands apart from the Arab thought of his time.

    And let’s not bother comparing our collections of university degrees, okay? Surely we’re both above making appeals to that kind of authority.


  290. pbird
    293 | November 8, 2009 16:28

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Yeah, I was chewing on my tounge about that one. Have you noticed how much I’ve mellowed over the last five years?

    Fer shure.


  291. wolfie
    294 | November 8, 2009 16:29

    Moe Katz wrote:

    It’s the dominant view in academia.

    What is the dominant view in academia?
    I have yet to hear a clear proposition.

    In any case, as a medievalist, I find your confidence in sweeping pronouncements about the period silly. Let’s just say that it is a long period of….”unacceptable complexity.”


  292. Moe Katz
    295 | November 8, 2009 16:29

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I don’t know enough about the accusations to have any opinion on this one. The French have all sorts of laws about what you can and cannot say. Brigitte Bardot is always paying fines for verbal indiscretions.


  293. waldensianspirit
    296 | November 8, 2009 16:31

    @ Moe Katz:
    I was no longer referring to Lewis and the French.

    You are claiming the Armenian genocide didn’t happen, wasn’t state sponsored and the Turks are right in denying it happened?


  294. Moe Katz
    297 | November 8, 2009 16:31

    @ wolfie:

    The dominant view is that Maimonides is rooted in and draws importantly on the intellectual world of Muslim Spain in which he lived. That’s all that I have claimed.


  295. Moe Katz
    298 | November 8, 2009 16:36

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I don’t think the events themselves are in dispute, but there remain questions about intentions and the semantic issue of what is meant by a genocide. I don’t really take any sort of stand on this one.


  296. waldensianspirit
    299 | November 8, 2009 16:38

    @ Moe Katz:
    Your “HUGE” expert took a stand. Why can’t you?


  297. Moe Katz
    300 | November 8, 2009 16:41

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Not my area of expertise. There doesn’t seem to be universal agreement on this issue with respect to planning, intentions.


  298. snork
    301 | November 8, 2009 16:41

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Those of us who have actually hacked our way through to a degree from a respectable university are not particularly impressed by people who merely yammer about “dominant views in academia.”

    This argument has a familiar smell to it. It’s the same as on the climate blogs as when someone yammers about the “consensus of experts”.

    Been there, done that. Different issue, same tactics.


  299. Guggi
    302 | November 8, 2009 16:45

    @ Moe Katz:

    No, the Jewish sages of Islam were embedded in the ideas and the science of the classical Muslim world.

    To know another culture doesn’t say one is “embedded”. Maimonides knew as well the surrounding culture of Muslims as Christians. Was he therefore “embedded” in the Christian culture and science?

    The philosophical works of the Greeks was brought to and translated by Christians and Jews to the Muslims. Before Maimonides and ibn Rushd aristotelean philosophy was interpreted in the view Neo-Platonism. But at the time when M. wrote his own philosophical work he had left Spain. Although he knew the writings of other philosophers of his time – Christians as well as Muslims (e.g. Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius and Averroes)- he was an original Jewish philosopher.


  300. snork
    303 | November 8, 2009 16:46

    @ Moe Katz:

    And they don’t have the smoking gun memo written by Hitler, either. So we give him the benefit of the doubt?


  301. RedneckNaRocknRollBar
    304 | November 8, 2009 16:48

    This was posted elsewhere today. And since this is an open/football thread, you gotta see this. It is simply the wildest finish ever to any football game.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHkABO0VwCg


  302. Moe Katz
    305 | November 8, 2009 16:50

    @ Guggi:

    He is an original Jewish thinker, and he also draws deeply on the Muslim thought of his time, notably Al-Farabi. Mozart is an original Viennese composer, yet his indebtedness to J.C. Bach and to Haydn is obvious.


  303. Moe Katz
    306 | November 8, 2009 16:51

    @ snork:

    Man, I just don’t know. Israel is leery about getting on the Armenian genocide bandwagon. I just think the jury is really out on this one.


  304. wolfie
    307 | November 8, 2009 16:57

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    The dominant view is that Maimonides is rooted in and draws importantly on the intellectual world of Muslim Spain in which he lived. That’s all that I have claimed.

    I have a problem with the “rooted in” phrase. I think the correct view is that he was firmly rooted in Judaism and Judaic culture. This also happens to be the dominant view, even today.

    I don’t think anyone would dispute that he “draws importantly on the intellectual world of Muslim Spain.” But then, I could get mischievous and stipulate that the truly important intellectual influences on him were by no means Muslim, but Greek.

    There are always controversies about influences on great thinkers. I concede that I am not an authority on Maimonides. All I can say is that I find the evidence for Islamic influence on his philosophy pitifully slim.


  305. Moe Katz
    308 | November 8, 2009 17:01

    @ wolfie:

    An example would be his letter to his Hebrew translator where he mentions the importance of Al-Farabi. I’m trying to find that at this moment.


  306. Moe Katz
    309 | November 8, 2009 17:05

    @ wolfie:
    Here’s something on the Al-Farabi connection:
    http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?letter=A&artid=1190

    Alfarabi claims that prophecy emanates from a soul of purified reasoning powers; the soul associates itself with the active reason and receives from it aid and instruction. From this naturalistic explanation of prophecy Judah ha-Levi totally dissents, holding the opinion that prophecy is in reality God speaking (i. 87). Nevertheless, Alfarabi’s conception of prophecy was shared by Abraham ibn Daud, who speaks of three gradations of reason: reason “in potentia,” “in actu,” and the “intellectus acquisitus.” Maimonides also adopted Alfarabi’s views concerning prophecy, while at the same time insisting on the selection by the divine will, and on the prophet’s inner preparation by a higher moral standard and imaginative faculty (Moreh, ii. 36) and follows him in his classification of the soul-powers in his “Eight Chapters.” From him, too, in all probability, Maimonides borrowed a passage concerning the seven divisions of medical science, which are to be found in Alfarabi’s distribution of the sciences. Finally, in his “Moreh,” ii. 27, Maimonides has made use of Alfarabi’s commentary upon Aristotle’s “Physics.” Other writers likewise reflect Alfarabi’s influence upon Jewish literature; Abraham b. Ḥiyyah Albargeloni, Joseph ibn Aknin, Shem-Ṭob Palquera, and Moses di Rieti knew and availed themselves of Alfarabi’s writings.


  307. wolfie
    310 | November 8, 2009 17:14

    @ Moe Katz:

    Can you find any idea in Al-Farabi’s philosophy that was not taken directly from Aristotle or the Neo-Platonists?


  308. wolfie
    311 | November 8, 2009 17:19

    I’m not disputing that Al-Farabi influenced Maimonides! My point is that the influence was not Muslim, but Greek.


  309. Moe Katz
    312 | November 8, 2009 17:24

    @ wolfie:

    I’m obviously not competent to answer the question to what extent Farabi goes beyond his own sources. I’m not sure that matters. He is credited by Maimonides and his contemporaries as an important thinker, and he is part of the Muslim intellectual world of Almohad Spain. There are Islamic strains in the thought of these Greek-influenced thinkers that can be discerned, but that’s not important for our purposes.


  310. Guggi
    313 | November 8, 2009 17:25

    @ Moe Katz:

    Mozart was from Salzburg.

    I hope you referred to Johann Christian Bach and not Johann Sebastian Bach.

    To study the work of others does not say you are embedded!

    I was engaged intensely with the work of Al-e Ahamad and Ali Shariati but I would never say I was ‘embedded’ or ‘have drawn deeply to their thought’.


  311. Moe Katz
    314 | November 8, 2009 17:25

    @ wolfie:
    Yeah, I think Farabi and his contemporaries gave neo-Platonism an Arab mystic twist, according to sources I’ve seen, but I’m no expert.


  312. Moe Katz
    315 | November 8, 2009 17:30

    @ Guggi:

    Mozart as an adult was professionally based in Vienna and is considered part of the First Vienna School of composers. The Bach I refer to was Johann Christian Bach, the “London Bach,” whose style anticipates the latter’s to an astonishing degree. Some of the piano concertos of J.C. Bach are uncannily proto-Mozartian, and M. acknowledges his influence in a letter to his father.


  313. 316 | November 8, 2009 17:30

    @ Moe Katz:
    The Arab Muslims stole all their philosophy from those they conquered. They took over the Advanced Persian Empire and some of Eastern Rome’s richest provinces like Syria, Egypt and North Africa. Spain itself was the most advance state in Western Europe before the Islamic invasion.

    Islam didn’t invent nothing, it leached off the pre existing knowledge of the Conquered Culture.


  314. snork
    317 | November 8, 2009 17:39

    @ Rodan:

    And they stole positional notation (and the number zero) from Indians. The “Arabic numerals” came from India. That’s huge. Without that, science and technology as we know it wouldn’t be possible. Think about it. How do you take the square root of MCXVII?


  315. Guggi
    318 | November 8, 2009 17:43

    @ Moe Katz:

    The “Eight Chapters” are mainly influenced by Farabi’s “Fusul al-Madani” but both are not specific “Jewish” or “Muslim” and though of no significance.


  316. 319 | November 8, 2009 17:43

    @ snork:
    They got the Indian numbers from the conquered Persians.


  317. Moe Katz
    320 | November 8, 2009 17:47

    @ Guggi:

    It’s the intellectual culture of Arabic-speaking Almohad Spain. Lots of influences.


  318. wolfie
    321 | November 8, 2009 17:56

    Moe Katz wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    I’m obviously not competent to answer the question to what extent Farabi goes beyond his own sources. I’m not sure that matters. He is credited by Maimonides and his contemporaries as an important thinker, and he is part of the Muslim intellectual world of Almohad Spain. There are Islamic strains in the thought of these Greek-influenced thinkers that can be discerned, but that’s not important for our purposes.

    Did not you yourself make a distinction between Islam and “Islamdom?”

    There is a difference between saying that Maimonides was influenced by “Islamic thinking” and saying he was influenced by thinkers following the Greek tradition who happened to be Muslims….mostly nominal or heterodox, BTW.

    My dental hygienist happens to be a Bosnian Muslim, but when I take her advice on teeth, I am not being influenced by “Muslim dentistry.”


  319. 322 | November 8, 2009 18:00

    Any Cowboy haters out tonight?


  320. Guggi
    323 | November 8, 2009 18:00

    @ Rodan:

    The Arab Muslims stole all their philosophy from those they conquered. They took over the Advanced Persian Empire and some of Eastern Rome’s richest provinces like Syria, Egypt and North Africa. Spain itself was the most advance state in Western Europe before the Islamic invasion.

    That’s not correct. Syrian Christians immigrated to the Muslim world and they took with them the writings of the Greek philosophers. They weren’t “stolen”. “Muslim” philosphers (I write “Muslim” in quotation marks because if one reads their work carefully one would must come to the conclusion they had been agnostics) – almost all of them non Arabs – did a great work to save the Greek philosophy and to define philosophical terms. Sad to say but this ended (more or less) with Averroes.

    Islam didn’t invent nothing, it leached off the pre existing knowledge of the Conquered Culture.

    They developed science further (algebra, geometry, physics etc.)


  321. Moe Katz
    324 | November 8, 2009 18:02

    @ wolfie:

    There was a culture there in Almohad Spain that drew on Greek, Arab and multiple other sources. Everything I’ve seen on their scholarship and their science suggests that they innovated, that they synthesized, that they were anything but passive custodians of the classical literature. There was an intellectual and scientific flowering going on in this milieu, and Maimonides was part of that. Can we agree on that summary?


  322. Guggi
    325 | November 8, 2009 18:06

    @ Moe Katz:

    It’s the intellectual culture of Arabic-speaking Almohad Spain. Lots of influences.

    Nonsense. The Almohad Dynasty was the enemy of every science and philosphy. They burned books and banned philosphy.


  323. Moe Katz
    326 | November 8, 2009 18:08

    I’m going outside to rake leaves in the dark while listening to Willie Nelson’s CD, Moonlight Becomes You.


  324. Moe Katz
    327 | November 8, 2009 18:10

    @ Guggi:

    Yes. All the more remarkable the intellectual flowering that took place in spite of them.


  325. wolfie
    328 | November 8, 2009 18:17

    @ Moe Katz:

    Partially. (And let’s leave it at that!)


  326. wolfie
    329 | November 8, 2009 18:27

    @ Guggi:

    What is significant from our point of view as moderns is that the Arab Aristotelian philosophers were suppressed by Islam, whereas the great Jewish and Christian Aristotelians were embraced as orthodox in their own religions.

    This is not a coincidence, nor does it have anything to do with “tolerance.”


  327. 330 | November 8, 2009 18:35

    @ Guggi:

    Syrian Christians immigrated to the Muslim world and they took with them the writings of the Greek philosophers.

    Syrian Christians were conquered by Islamic Imperialists in the 7th Century. The Muslims got the Greek learning from provinces that were once under Byzantine control. The Byzantines were Greek. The Syrians Christians had their lands conquered by the Muslims, so that proves my point.

    They developed science further (algebra, geometry, physics etc.)

    Nice Leftist Pro-Muslim spin.
    Algebra is Babylonian in origins, not Arabic Muslim.

    Geometry is Greek.

    Physics is also of Greek Origins.

    Nice try, try again.


  328. 331 | November 8, 2009 18:37

    My Ancestors finally crushed the Almohad occupiers at Navas de Tolosa!


  329. aussie_dave
    332 | November 9, 2009 00:03

    Sometimes I am asked about why Australia banned most firearms. Here is a fairly solid piece on why. Note also the wide diversity of views in the comments.

    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/americas-gun-outrage-276-people-killed-or-wounded-a-day-20091109-i4gj.html?


  330. waldensianspirit
    333 | November 9, 2009 03:07

    @ Moe Katz:
    Before you went with your “HUGE” expert. Now it isn’t your expertise.

    The point is, your “HUGE” expert has gained the bad university habit of worshipping his own intellect, enjoys being fawned over by insipid women at cocktail hours and after he sips the islamic cool-aid noted in #282 he no longer is an authority but a academic mercenary and an advocate for genocidal murderers like Maj. Hasan.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David