First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Look who is whoring herself out for ACORN…

by savage ( 131 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Politics at November 29th, 2009 - 9:30 pm

Hat Tip to rayra at GCP

There is every Democrat talking point and deranged opinion out of this psycho in this clip. Holy shit, I’m waiting for that POS Cindy Sheehan to make a guest appearance next.

Anyone looking forward to being slaves to ‘people’ like this?

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

131 Responses to “Look who is whoring herself out for ACORN…”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | November 29, 2009 21:33

    Non serviam

    I am no one’s slave.


  2. 2 | November 29, 2009 21:33

    Who is it? first!


  3. 3 | November 29, 2009 21:34

    @ davehm:

    Heh™


  4. 4 | November 29, 2009 21:35

    She’s been doing that for several years. She used to have a blog and is a MAJOR bitch and psycho.


  5. 5 | November 29, 2009 21:37

    SHe told me once at her blog, since I was one of the only person who didn’t kiss her ass, that the kaballah says, there is nothing more evil in the world than Jewish women.


  6. 6 | November 29, 2009 21:38

    @ teacake:

    You actually got a reply to a comment? wow!


  7. Beltfed
    7 | November 29, 2009 21:38

    teacake @ 4:

    MAJOR bitch and psycho

    Roseanne in the military, wow.

    ///


  8. 8 | November 29, 2009 21:39

    @ teacake:

    there is nothing more evil in the world than Jewish women

    Did she forget she’s Jewish? LOL!


  9. The Rani
    9 | November 29, 2009 21:41

    Ahh, yet again Hollywood mistakes the ability to read lines with true talent.


  10. 10 | November 29, 2009 21:47

    Cindy Sheehan couldnt be there because she was busy yelling at this veteran.
    [Saw this at Gateway pundit]

    Now I would never beat the crap out of a “woman”, so thankfully I don’t consider these bitches to be “women.”


  11. 11 | November 29, 2009 21:48

    She had a blog about 8 years ago. I went there out of curiosity to see what her views were about Israel. Found out soon enough she was insane. I called her on her shit many a time and she HATED me! LOL I think I reminded her of her sister.


  12. 12 | November 29, 2009 21:48

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ davehm:
    Heh™


  13. 13 | November 29, 2009 21:50

    I have yet to see a picture of a woman on this thread! :)


  14. 14 | November 29, 2009 21:50

    @ Grouchy when NoMobeer:
    Such brave and intelligent women. /


  15. 15 | November 29, 2009 21:52

    @ AZRedneck:
    lol


  16. 16 | November 29, 2009 21:52

    @ Grouchy when NoMobeer:

    Oh, I saw that on the news this morning. I was hoping and praying for someone to come out from behind the camera and blow her fucking head off.


  17. 17 | November 29, 2009 21:53

    @ AZRedneck:

    Hopefully ‘m’ shows up soon. THAT’S a real woman! ahhhh!


  18. 18 | November 29, 2009 21:54

    savage wrote:

    @ Grouchy when NoMobeer:
    Oh, I saw that on the news this morning. I was hoping and praying for someone to come out from behind the camera and blow her fucking head off.

    Or at least stuff a wad of wet socks in her yap. lol


  19. Eliana
    19 | November 29, 2009 21:54

    Acorn sued the banks so that they would be forced to make bad mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them.

    So Roseanne says it’s all the banks’ fault?

    Obama was one of the lawyers who sued Citibank to make them give out bad mortgages.

    Roseanne is a moonbat’s moonbat (like Charles Johnson is now).

    Nothing she says matters.


  20. snork
    20 | November 29, 2009 21:55

    Huh?


  21. danrudy
    21 | November 29, 2009 21:55

    Roseanne Barr?

    She can suck my @#$%!!!

    Anyone get the reference?

    (THe reference is to her old stand up act …when she was funny. SHe claimed folks were accusing her of being too masculine.. so she told them they could suck her Dic%)


  22. 22 | November 29, 2009 21:56

    Its possible she might still have a blog somewhere. lol she needs attention 24 7. It would be sad if she wasn’t such a bitch.


  23. 23 | November 29, 2009 21:58

    yep. still there. lol http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/


  24. 24 | November 29, 2009 21:59

    @ danrudy:
    I wouldnt let Roseanne Barr toss my salad.
    Yeah even assholes have standards.
    :lol:


  25. 25 | November 29, 2009 21:59

    She bakes Jew cookies in an oven dressed like hitler.


  26. snork
    26 | November 29, 2009 22:00

    I wouldn’t know Rosanne from Bozanne. Is that some celebrity?


  27. 27 | November 29, 2009 22:03

    “Look who is whoring herself.” PERIOD


  28. 28 | November 29, 2009 22:03

    savage wrote:

    @ AZRedneck:
    Hopefully ‘m’ shows up soon. THAT’S a real woman! ahhhh!

    m is a good ole Carolina Redneck Girl!


  29. 29 | November 29, 2009 22:05

    @ savage:
    Me and my big mouth would have had those crazy bull dikes throwing fisticuffs, the trick is knowning the correct thing that really piss’s them off.

    For whatever reason, I am a natural at pissing liberal women off.


  30. 30 | November 29, 2009 22:06

    @ AZRedneck:

    One of my dearest friends….


  31. snork
  32. MrPaulRevere
    32 | November 29, 2009 22:10

    “Barr has written that she considers herself a kabbalist and a follower of Jesus Christ. Roseanne has stated in her blog that she believes Jesus fought to bring the temple of the goddess back and to restore women to their proper role as priestesses for the goddess. Roseanne also believes that she herself is the goddess and through her meditations will restore the order of the priestesses and the ancient goddesses. She has stated this several times in her blog. Roseanne closely follows the kabbalist teachings of Rav Berg and staunchly defends his teachings as the only universal truth” : Yep, shes a full on whack job. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr


  33. MrPaulRevere
    33 | November 29, 2009 22:16

    The transformation is now 100% completed. According to you know who, the European ‘far right’ now more of a danger than Saudi funded mosques with minarets: Charles Sun, Nov 29, 2009 9:33:35pm replyquote

    * 5
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #475 Gus 802

    Yeah, it was an architectural design issue. Right.

    Shades of pro-Koln, Vlaams Belang, BNP, and other far-right European parties. Only in this case it’s the ultra nationalist Swiss People’s Party.

    Absolutely. This was an initiative by the European far right.


  34. 34 | November 29, 2009 22:18

    savage wrote:

    @ AZRedneck:
    One of my dearest friends….

    Based on a conversation we had here one night I think she grew up around 20 miles from where I did. Based on her picture she did it many years after I did.

    She appears to be contemporary with my kids ages!


  35. Eliana
    35 | November 29, 2009 22:20

    @ MrPaulRevere:

    The transformation is now 100% completed.

    He’s going to see absolutely every single thing (no matter how benign) that Europe does to avoid becoming the Islamic European Union as a far-right European conspiracy.


  36. 36 | November 29, 2009 22:23

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    The transformation is now 100% completed. According to you know who, the European ‘far right’ now more of a danger than Saudi funded mosques with minarets: Charles Sun, Nov 29, 2009 9:33:35pm replyquote
    * 5
    * down
    * up
    * report
    re: #475 Gus 802
    Yeah, it was an architectural design issue. Right.
    Shades of pro-Koln, Vlaams Belang, BNP, and other far-right European parties. Only in this case it’s the ultra nationalist Swiss People’s Party.
    Absolutely. This was an initiative by the European far right.

    This guy will defend Islam tooth and nail wont he?


  37. MrPaulRevere
    37 | November 29, 2009 22:24

    @ Eliana:
    As much as I find Cato the Elder to be an oddball, at least he is telling it like it is over there, he is sticking by his guns. Sharmuta, Gus802 and the other attack dogs are now now sticking up for Islam.


  38. snork
    38 | November 29, 2009 22:25

    Ok Chuckles, if you’re for the minarets, you’re anti-feminist. They are kinda like big pointy dildos, er, at least the Swiss femnistas saw they are…


  39. danrudy
    39 | November 29, 2009 22:25

    Well..poor captdiggs on LGF.

    He stood up to Charles and pointed out Charles hypocrsiy on the Huckabee clemency thread. (CJ seems to take pleaseure in pointing out that this 4 cop murder is all Huckabees fault but we had to wait 24hours lest we think the Ft Hood killings were in any way related to Islam despite the early facts which were very indicative of such a relationship. Dark Falcon warned him about being contrary with Charles.
    captdiggs made a wonderful point about people should not be afraid to say what they think lest they be banished….and then he stopped posting around #247.

    Was he banned? His posts are still up (for now)

    If he was banned I would like to welcome him/her here.


  40. buzzsawmonkey
    40 | November 29, 2009 22:26

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    Sharmuta, Gus802 and the other attack dogs are now now sticking up for Islam.

    The Little Minaret Club?


  41. MrPaulRevere
    41 | November 29, 2009 22:27

    @ davehm:
    What? You don’t believe Vlaams Belang is a greater threat to America than radical Islam? I bid you adieu, and cordially invite you to bite me. Now get off my blog ///


  42. Eliana
    42 | November 29, 2009 22:27

    @ MrPaulRevere:

    As much as I find Cato the Elder to be an oddball, at least he is telling it like it is over there, he is sticking by his guns. Sharmuta, Gus802 and the other attack dogs are now now sticking up for Islam.

    CJ voted against the California bill against gay marriage while screaming bloody murder at Christians all the way.

    Now he supports the people/religion that EXECUTES gays.

    Liberalism twists rational thought into pretzels.


  43. buzzsawmonkey
    43 | November 29, 2009 22:29

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    As much as I find Cato the Elder to be an oddball

    Cato is irascible as hell. And I disagree with him about a lot of things. But he’s also well-educated and erudite, and in consequence I miss talking with him.


  44. snork
    44 | November 29, 2009 22:30

    From that article:

    The brand ‘Swiss’ must continue to represent values such as openness, pluralism and freedom of religion,” said Hanspeter Rentsch, a member of the board of Swatch, the watchmaker

    Hanspeter? Hanspeter???


  45. 45 | November 29, 2009 22:30

    @ danrudy:

    Dark Falcon

    Now there is a real winner.
    /
    I myself am shocked that people that stupid can even find the internet.


  46. Eliana
    46 | November 29, 2009 22:31

    Did CJ delete all his ‘ROP (Religion of Peace) has done it again’ or whatever posts?

    Now that he sees Islam as the best course for western civilization, he would need to do a lot of self-deleting without having his past roar up and bite him in his ponytail.


  47. snork
    47 | November 29, 2009 22:32

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    And for whatever reason, he’s about the only one left there able and willing to disagree with Master. Sometimes. And sometimes Mandy. That’s pretty much it.


  48. pat
    48 | November 29, 2009 22:33

    I was banned at 2 AM in a rather secretive manner. I was not there. After a year of warning. You see CJ was trying to make others see his new make-believe worls.


  49. Eliana
    49 | November 29, 2009 22:33

    @ snork:

    The brand ‘Swiss’ must continue to represent values such as openness, pluralism and freedom of religion,” said Hanspeter Rentsch, a member of the board of Swatch, the watchmaker

    Does this guy understand that Islam is ANTI-open, ANTI-pluralism and ANTI-freedom of religion?


  50. MrPaulRevere
    50 | November 29, 2009 22:33

    Gus 80211/29/2009 10:21:09 pm PST

    * 3
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #652 Dark_Falcon

    “And the effect of it will be to push them into the arms of the Islamists. This makes the Islamists case.

    Muslim Brotherhood recruiter: “See? That the infidels would pass this is proof that they hate us and cannot be trusted. We cannot rely on their filthy elections, Jihad must be our path!”

    “That is sometimes the unintended consequences when one effectively creates an underclass. It feeds into the Jihadis hands.” Dork Falcon and Gus the attack stooge are now worried about pissing off the Islamists. Let me buy you a clue boys, they are ALREADY and PERPETUALLY pissed. They see your groveling as weakness.


  51. pat
    51 | November 29, 2009 22:34

    I love Mandy. Others differ, but fuck em.


  52. snork
    52 | November 29, 2009 22:36

    Ok, Hanspeter. Get your hans off my peter.


  53. 53 | November 29, 2009 22:38

    snork wrote:

    Ok Chuckles, if you’re for the minarets, you’re anti-feminist. They are kinda like big pointy dildos, er, at least the Swiss femnistas saw they are…

    They commemorate Ishmael’s circumcision, NOT A JOKE


  54. Eliana
    54 | November 29, 2009 22:38

    @ MrPaulRevere:

    Muslim Brotherhood recruiter: “See? That the infidels would pass this is proof that they hate us and cannot be trusted. We cannot rely on their filthy elections, Jihad must be our path!”

    “That is sometimes the unintended consequences when one effectively creates an underclass. It feeds into the Jihadis hands.”

    It’s part of the liberal idea that fighting against terrorism only makes terrorism worse.

    “If we don’t let them kill us, it will make them want to kill us.”

    In this case, it’s: “If we don’t let them swamp our country with minarets so that we hear Muslim calls to prayer all over our country three times per day, they’ll get mad and they’ll want to kill us so that they will be allowed to swamp our country with minarets so that we hear Muslim calls to prayer all over our country three times per day.”

    Liberals want to surrender to Islam, one way or another.


  55. buzzsawmonkey
    55 | November 29, 2009 22:39

    snork wrote:

    And for whatever reason, he’s about the only one left there able and willing to disagree with Master. Sometimes. And sometimes Mandy. That’s pretty much it.

    I had an indulgence—sort of, anyway—to disagree up to the moment that the axe fell. That is to say, there were any number of times that I went against the Proprietary Pronouncements, and against the Song of the Sycophants, and still kept my account, after contradictions which had been sufficient to end the accounts of others.

    In the end, however, that indulgence came to feel like window-dressing; that I was being permitted to caper solely for the purpose of providing a Potemkin village of open discussion—a false-front simulation of the real thing.


  56. 56 | November 29, 2009 22:39

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ davehm:
    What? You don’t believe Vlaams Belang is a greater threat to America than radical Islam? I bid you adieu, and cordially invite you to bite me. Now get off my blog ///

    Well that would depend on who side your on and what you want this country to look like in the future.


  57. MrPaulRevere
    57 | November 29, 2009 22:39

    The Best national anthem evah!!! ///Roseanne’s Infamous National Anthem


  58. 58 | November 29, 2009 22:39

    @ Eliana:

    It gets even better, a so called Zionist is supporting the Islamo-Imperialists.


    710 SanFranciscoZionist Sun, Nov 29, 2009 10:37:03pm replyquote

    * 1
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #698 Bagua

    Of course they are sending a message.

    No Islamisation of Switzerland.

    That is clear.

    They know the political significance of the Minaret and are putting a stop to it.

    Hmmm. So what is the political significance of banning kosher slaughter?

    Seriously. They want no ‘Islamisation’? Let them ban Muslims from their precious country. Better yet, let them kiss my ass.

    Four minarets in the whole country, and I’m supposed to believe this is a defensive move?


  59. snork
    59 | November 29, 2009 22:39

    @ BenZacharia:

    What kind of a mohel makes them pointy like that? A pencil sharpener?


  60. MrPaulRevere
    60 | November 29, 2009 22:39

    Lets try that again…


  61. 61 | November 29, 2009 22:42

    This is a jaw dropper!


    720 McSpiff Sun, Nov 29, 2009 10:40:22pm replyquote

    In my experience, the only equal to muslim hospitality is jewish hospitality.


  62. 62 | November 29, 2009 22:43

    Snork

    One that uses a pencil sharpener, of course.


  63. 63 | November 29, 2009 22:44

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Eliana:
    It gets even better, a so called Zionist is supporting the Islamo-Imperialists.

    710 SanFranciscoZionist Sun, Nov 29, 2009 10:37:03pm replyquote
    * 1
    * down
    * up
    * report
    re: #698 Bagua
    Of course they are sending a message.
    No Islamisation of Switzerland.
    That is clear.
    They know the political significance of the Minaret and are putting a stop to it.
    Hmmm. So what is the political significance of banning kosher slaughter?
    Seriously. They want no ‘Islamisation’? Let them ban Muslims from their precious country. Better yet, let them kiss my ass.
    Four minarets in the whole country, and I’m supposed to believe this is a defensive move?

    Spoken like a 100% genuine artificial Zionist.


  64. MrPaulRevere
    64 | November 29, 2009 22:45

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    “Song of the Sycophants”. There is a you tube video in the future for that phrase methinks.


  65. 65 | November 29, 2009 22:45

    Cato is the only one speaking the truth. I respect him now!


    724 Cato the Elder Sun, Nov 29, 2009 10:41:32pm replyquote

    * 1
    * down
    * up
    * report

    Apparently, the only people in the world who still have an absolute right to any culture of their own are Muslims. Whether they live in a Muslim country and ban all other cultural/religious displays, or whether they live in a country with an entirely different culture, architecture, history, religious background, and political structure, they must not be interfered with, or else you’re a racist, eliminationist, supremacist shite.

    Understood.

    I’m for bed.


  66. 66 | November 29, 2009 22:49

    @ pat:
    Maybe you should go piss up a rope?
    /
    :lol:


  67. MrPaulRevere
    67 | November 29, 2009 22:49

    Cato is whipping some major ass over there, try wrapping your head around this without giving yourself a stroke: Sharmuta Sun, Nov 29, 2009 10:44:33pm replyquote

    * 3
    * down
    * up
    * report

    So… muslim countries should be religiously tolerant, but not the Swiss?


  68. 68 | November 29, 2009 22:51

    Gus 802 making excuses for Islamic Antisemitism.


    734 Gus 802 Sun, Nov 29, 2009 10:43:41pm replyquote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #729 Cato the Elder

    Except it’s not. You won’t find any synagogues there.

    I know that. That’s life. Doesn’t mean we have to be like them in all respects. Things take time.

    No shocker, he comes from a German Nazi Argentine family.


  69. Eliana
    69 | November 29, 2009 22:51

    There is a group that takes disadvantaged High School kids from Texas to Israel to show them a different culture (well, ok, it’s sponsored by Jews who want them to see Israel as a cool culture – which it is).

    These are kids who would never get the chance to travel anywhere else so they are thrilled out of their minds to get to go all the way to the Middle East.

    Each visiting kid stays with a Jewish family that also has high school aged (or school aged) kids, I think.

    The program really works — these kids go back home loving Israel and the Jewish people. One kid was interviewed in Israel and he said that his host family didn’t speak English, but every time they saw him they tried to feed him!! :-)

    It’s what you do with kids — feed them well!

    He adored the host family and the food and Israel!

    It’s a great program!

    I thought it was cute that they tried to feed him every time they saw him (and he loved it)!

    Jewish mothers in particular provide great hospitality!


  70. MrPaulRevere
    70 | November 29, 2009 22:54

    @ Rodan:
    Gus was an ACORN hating winger until he got new marching orders. These cultist attack dogs are without character, integrity and decency, but we knew that already.


  71. 71 | November 29, 2009 22:54

    @ Rodan:
    Gus 802 reported us the “stalker site” to the FBI at least once, maybe twice, yet the FBI never called me or anyone else.

    I wonder why?


  72. Eliana
    72 | November 29, 2009 22:54

    @ Rodan:

    Apparently, the only people in the world who still have an absolute right to any culture of their own are Muslims. Whether they live in a Muslim country and ban all other cultural/religious displays, or whether they live in a country with an entirely different culture, architecture, history, religious background, and political structure, they must not be interfered with, or else you’re a racist, eliminationist, supremacist shite.

    Understood.

    Cato gets my respect for this too.


  73. Eliana
    73 | November 29, 2009 22:56

    @ Grouchy when NoMobeer:

    Gus 802 reported us the “stalker site” to the FBI at least once, maybe twice, yet the FBI never called me or anyone else.

    I wonder why?

    Can you imagine the eye-rolling that went on when Gus reported to the FBI that there’s a website that doesn’t like a website that HE likes? :-)


  74. buzzsawmonkey
    74 | November 29, 2009 23:00

    Eliana wrote:

    there’s a website that doesn’t like a website that HE likes?

    Does he “like” the website, or does he like-like it?

    And will Archie and Jughead have dates for the dance on Saturday night, or will Reggie foil them again?


  75. MrPaulRevere
    75 | November 29, 2009 23:01

    @ Eliana:
    There should be a sanction for wasting their time like that, especially during this time.


  76. 76 | November 29, 2009 23:02

    @ Eliana:
    I wish I had a Jewish mother, my American mom says, “fix it yourself.”
    And while that maybe somewhat admirable from an American feminist POV.

    It doesn’t feel very loving though, especially when you consider the male in the household is the one bringing home the money. It feels like the feminist one-way street.

    I guess they don’t realize that I can sit on my ass all day and just drink beer. They should though, because everyday can be like Sunday.


  77. 77 | November 29, 2009 23:10

    Dang. I wasted 8 minutes listening to Rosie Barr playing Rosie O’Donnell without one word about fire not being able to melt steel. :(


  78. Alberta Oil Peon
    78 | November 29, 2009 23:11

    I surfed through the video, looking for some indication of who that weatherbeaten old sow was, but ti wasn’t until I got into the comments that I realized it was Roseanne Barr.

    The inner ugly has come closer to the surface.


  79. Eliana
    79 | November 29, 2009 23:12

    Imagine how Gus would define a “stalker site” to the FBI:

    Gus: “They read what we write…”

    FBI: “Do they hack your site to read it?”

    Gus: “Um, no. It’s public.”

    FBI: “So they read your website on the public internet.”

    Gus: “RIGHT!!! Then they comment on it on their own website.”

    FBI: “So they explain their opinions about what you’ve said.”

    Gus: “EXACTLY!!! They’re STALKING US!!”

    FBI: “You do realize that the internet isn’t a physical location, right? I mean, you know that if anyone can read what you write, then they may very well decide to comment on it from wherever they’re located. Right?”

    Gus: “Um, yes. They say mean things about us, though.”

    FBI: “Do they threaten to kill you?”

    Gus: “YES!! One guy said something about a twig in bicycle spokes.”

    FBI: “Excuse me?”

    Gus: “A twig – you know – something that would make the bicycle fall.”

    FBI: “So someone spoke about tripping you?”

    Gus: “YES!!! Charles Johnson would be tripped, that is.”

    FBI: “Who is Charles Johnson?”

    Gus: “He’s a famous blogger.”

    FBI: “Never heard of him. Does he ride a bicycle?”

    Gus: “YES!!! He rides a bike and takes photos of rusty hinges.”

    FBI: “On purpose?”

    Gus: “YES!! If he fell off the bike, he could be killed.”

    FBI: “Is he over 80 years old?”

    Gus: “No, but a bicycle fall could be violent.”

    FBI: “Ok.”

    Gus: “So you’ll arrest the stalker blog????”

    FBI: “They’re on the internet reading what you’re writing and they think you’re a dork. It isn’t illegal to do this or else we’d have to arrest ourselves.”

    Gus: “Huh?”

    FBI: “Never mind. Don’t get in touch with us again.”

    Gus: “Oh.”


  80. MrPaulRevere
    80 | November 29, 2009 23:15

    @ Eliana:
    Great satire, but I would imagine the conversation was pretty similar to that.


  81. 81 | November 29, 2009 23:16

    @ Eliana:
    FBI: Is that all?
    Gus: But what if someone named Kilgore left racist comments on their site that they refused to delete?
    FBI: *click*


  82. Eliana
    82 | November 29, 2009 23:16

    @ MrPaulRevere:

    Great satire, but I would imagine the conversation was pretty similar to that.

    I think so, too. :-)


  83. Eliana
    83 | November 29, 2009 23:18

    @ Bunk X:

    The *click* could have come at any second after the call started. :-)


  84. 84 | November 29, 2009 23:25

    @ Eliana:
    Insanity is not a crime until one is elected to office.


  85. MrPaulRevere
    85 | November 29, 2009 23:31

    I found a fascinating biography of the Saddam Hussein family on Hulu the other night. http://www.hulu.com/watch/72128/biography-the-hussein-family


  86. 86 | November 29, 2009 23:31

    @ Eliana:

    To funny


  87. Mad Mullah
    87 | November 29, 2009 23:47

    davehm wrote:

    Spoken like a 100% genuine artificial Zionist.

    I would wager that there is far more SanFrancisco lunatic liberal in that poster than there is zionist.


  88. 88 | November 29, 2009 23:49

    @ Mad Mullah:

    There must be something in the water.


  89. Mad Mullah
    89 | November 29, 2009 23:51

    As much as I find Cato the Elder to be despicable, he is in the right on the most recent 1.0 thread.

    1.0 has become totally disgusting now, obviously infested by Islam loving liberals and apologists for evil and terror.


  90. Mad Mullah
    90 | November 30, 2009 00:05

    davehm wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:

    There must be something in the water.

    Whatever is ultimately behind the cause of their extreme stupidity might be an interesting subject for scientists and doctors to study in the future. Perhaps their brains are slightly deformed or they have all have a tiny tumor that affects critical thinking areas and the thought processing centers of their minds.


  91. 91 | November 30, 2009 00:11

    Mad Mullah wrote:

    davehm wrote:
    @ Mad Mullah:
    There must be something in the water.

    Whatever is ultimately behind the cause of their extreme stupidity might be an interesting subject for scientists and doctors to study in the future. Perhaps their brains are slightly deformed or they have all have a tiny tumor that affects critical thinking areas and the thought processing centers of their minds.

    It’ll never be discovered as much of the raw data has been erased or otherwise disposed of accidentally. All we can do is take the existing stupidity, copy it by a factor of 1.2, and paste it into the stupid model. This will show that the stupidity is rising steadily.

    Please delete this comment after the patch is in.


  92. 92 | November 30, 2009 00:15

    P.S. I don’t know who wrote that previous peer-reviewed comment, but it wasn’t me as I went to bed hours ago.


  93. 93 | November 30, 2009 00:20

    @ Bunk X:

    LOL peer-review? it’s got to be true, a group of scientist said it was.


  94. 94 | November 30, 2009 00:20

    I’m out


  95. MrPaulRevere
    95 | November 30, 2009 00:35

    @ Mad Mullah:
    The funny thing is. if CJ gave a hint,or even the faintest suggestion that he approved of the Swiss decision all the attack stooges would have supported him 100%


  96. MrPaulRevere
    96 | November 30, 2009 00:39


  97. RIX
    97 | November 30, 2009 02:25

    Good morning everyone.


  98. 98 | November 30, 2009 02:38

    She is still alive?

    Morning Rix, everyone.


  99. RIX
    99 | November 30, 2009 02:41

    Rightside wrote:

    She is still alive?
    Morning Rix, everyone.

    Welcome Rightside. Did you watch the video?
    Rosanne is really ununformed.


  100. Panhandler
    100 | November 30, 2009 02:43

    Morning all, front just passed through, temp went up 10. We’re all doomed!


  101. Panhandler
    101 | November 30, 2009 02:44

    @ RIX:
    “unformed”, heh – I like that.


  102. RIX
    102 | November 30, 2009 02:48

    Panhandler wrote:

    @ RIX:
    “unformed”, heh – I like that.

    Did I actually say that? Charles , please delete my #99.


  103. RIX
    103 | November 30, 2009 02:50

    Some years back there was an issue with the Michigan Avenue Bridge in Chicago, it was stuck in the upright position.
    The joke was that a large nude photo of Rosanne would make it go down.


  104. RIX
    104 | November 30, 2009 02:58

    1 Sharmuta
    Sun, Nov 29, 2009 11:14:17pm replyquote 2downupreport

    I love the bit of sunset breaking up the monochromatism.

    Charles has another “Ocean” Thread up & this is Sharmutas totally objective comment. Next I expect “I love you Damien.”


  105. 105 | November 30, 2009 03:43

    Eliana

    You’re terrible, do it again.

    Mornin’ ya’all

    Rix

    Right before the rope goes taut.


  106. Macker
    106 | November 30, 2009 03:51

    davehm wrote:

    This guy will defend Islam tooth and nail wont he?

    How much do you want to bet selrahC has a Muslima squeeze?

    ISLAM DELENDA EST.


  107. Macker
    107 | November 30, 2009 03:54

    @ Eliana:

    Man! That is SO funny!


  108. Macker
    108 | November 30, 2009 03:55

    Just watched the first ten seconds of the video. Roseanne’s a whore alright.


  109. 109 | November 30, 2009 04:00

    @ Macker:

    What? Couldn’t figure that out from her curriculum vitae?


  110. taxfreekiller
    110 | November 30, 2009 04:01

    tfk very busy today

    someone put up a link to El Paso Tx TV weather today

    so’s the snow will be seen,

    in fact looks like snow in northern New Mexico

    if you lust for a post delete post the national weather service
    for local weather during the snow at lgf’s .000001.

    it is like that
    SNOW WAY DOWN SOUTH


  111. taxfreekiller
    111 | November 30, 2009 04:03

    OOPS, tfk mis typed

    should be

    Northern Old Mexico ,, @ taxfreekiller:


  112. Macker
    112 | November 30, 2009 04:03

    @ BenZacharia:

    Hey I’m just getting out of a nice warm bed, gotta be at the x-ray office at 7. Which sucks. So gimme a break! 8)


  113. 113 | November 30, 2009 04:19

    Mack

    7:18 you be late


  114. 114 | November 30, 2009 04:38

    OT,

    Always, always remember that the dude who is trying to get you to break the law is an snitch:

    TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — A New Jersey blogger about to stand trial on charges he made death threats against federal judges apparently was paid by the FBI in its battle against domestic terrorism, according to a published report.

    The Record of Bergen County reported Sunday that Hal Turner received thousands of dollars from the FBI to report on neo-Nazis and white supremacist groups and was sent undercover to Brazil.

    Turner also claims the FBI coached him to make racist, anti-Semitic and other threatening statements on his radio show, but the newspaper also found many federal officials were concerned that his audience might follow up on his violence rhetoric.

    Keep this in mind the next time someone tries to get you to saw-off a shotgun (Randy Weaver) or commit othe illegal acts. Almost makes you wonder if KKKilgore is a snitch…


  115. 115 | November 30, 2009 04:52

    I wonder if this guy is referring to Charles?

    The Disgusting Use of “Denialist” by Warming Advocates Trivializes the Holocaust

    Nothing in the climate debate which I’ve been paying sporadic attention to is more repulsive than the global warming advocates’ attempt to smear skeptics of their theories and models and predictions as “denialists.” As if they were some analog of holocaust deniers.
    Not all those concerned about climate change use the term. (Some stick to a sneering use of “skeptics” as a stigmatizing word, as if science itself wasn’t an ongoing process of skepticism about received wisdom. Copernicus was a skeptic about the idea the sun revolved around the earth. He wasn’t a “solar denialist.”)

    But nothing causes me more revulsion — and skepticism — than the warming advocates’ (I think the CRU scandal — and the shameful reaction to it — has revealed many of the most celebrated of them to be more p.r. advocates than scrupulous scientists) application of the opprobrious term “denialist” to anyone who questions the work they have so assiduously screened from scrutiny

    At one time, this would have gotten a front page post along with a link and about a thousand comments supporting it. I suspect that those days are gone forever. Charles’ (or “Charles”) complete and total about face on AGW, right down to the calling skeptics “deniers”, is perhaps the biggest and spookiest of the many issues Charles has done an about-face on. IIRC, LGF once had a thread on exactly this topic, slamming the people using the “denier” slur as crypto-holocaust deniers themselves.

    This is probably the strongest evidence that “Charles” isn’t Charles. It would take someone of extroidnarily malleable principle to make that vast a sea change. It is analogous to a hard-core pimp-drug dealer finging God and changing his behavior accordingly.


  116. 116 | November 30, 2009 04:56

    ‘Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.’ ~ Thomas Jefferson


  117. RIX
    117 | November 30, 2009 05:04

    @ BenZacharia:

    Right before the rope goes taut

    I’m afraid that poor Sharmuta would open a vein Charles, but he would toss her off of the sled in a heartbeat if she strays from the Party line.


  118. 118 | November 30, 2009 05:25

    @ RIX:

    I wonder if she has ever not liked any of his photos.


  119. coldwarrior
    119 | November 30, 2009 05:28

    Mad Mullah wrote:

    As much as I find Cato the Elder to be despicable, he is in the right on the most recent 1.0 thread.
    1.0 has become totally disgusting now, obviously infested by Islam loving liberals and apologists for evil and terror.

    i remember cato rom 1.0. he was on the ban squad when i got the axe. see, i was looking around over here and saying that 2.0 wasnt so bad, that it reminded me of 1.0. cato had some choice words for me about you all.

    so do be careful. words mean things.


  120. RIX
    120 | November 30, 2009 05:32

    Rightside wrote:

    @ RIX:
    I wonder if she has ever not liked any of his photos.

    She loves his photos & “So totally agrees” with whatever CJ says , even if she has to contradict herself from just miutes earlier.
    She needs a serious intervention


  121. goddessoftheclassroom
    121 | November 30, 2009 05:33

    Good morning, y’all. Last day of break…


  122. coldwarrior
    122 | November 30, 2009 05:39

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    Good morning, y’all. Last day of break…

    what?

    yinz aint out buck huntin’?

    morning goddess


  123. 123 | November 30, 2009 05:51

    @ coldwarrior:

    I have no use for Cato. He’s a bitter, irritating man. I will agree that sometimes he has the right of an arguement. Blind squrrils and all that.


  124. coldwarrior
    124 | November 30, 2009 05:53

    @ Iron Fist:

    indeed, blind squirrels.


  125. goddessoftheclassroom
    125 | November 30, 2009 05:53

    @ coldwarrior:
    {coldwarrior}

    No, I’m too squeamish/tender-hearted. I’ll gladly deal with it when it doesn’t look like something from a petting zoo and does look like something in the meat department.


  126. coldwarrior
    126 | November 30, 2009 05:57

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    {goddess}
    me too, i cant stand the cleaning. if i had to to survive i could.

    the other thing that concerns me about the deer hunt is that it is a fantastic disease vector if the person doing the cleaning is not careful…prions anyone?

    enjoy your day off


  127. 127 | November 30, 2009 05:58

    Health care rationing won’t happen unde ObamaCare? Does anyone believe that bullshit? I hope not, because it has already started:

    Two months after H1N1 flu vaccine was first distributed to public health districts around the country, people 65 and older with serious medical conditions still can’t get vaccinated.

    Anter’s doctors at Stanford University Hospital, where he received his transplant, tell him he has a compromised immune system and “the H1N1 flu could do me in.”

    He takes at least nine prescription medications daily to stay alive.

    “But when I try to get a shot, I’m told I’m too old ” he said as he sat in the study of his Peccole Ranch home.

    “I feel that they see me and other older people as garbage and are just waiting for the trucks to come pick us up,” Anter said.

    “I served my country. I enlisted during the Korean War. You don’t treat people this way just because they’re older.”

    The priority groups for the vaccine, which public health officials say is still in short supply, remain pregnant women; people who live with or care for children younger than 6 months; health care and emergency first responders; persons between 6 months and 24 years of age; and adults up to 64 with chronic health conditions

    I don’t get it. They’ve been talking like H1N1 is the Second Coming of the Black Death but they still haven’t manufactured enough vaccine. There’s something fishy there. In any event, this kind of denying health care to the old and chronically ill will undoubtably be a major component of ObamaCare if it passes. It can’t help but be. While they will cloak it in an euphamisim, they will be Death Panels, just as Sarah Palin said.


  128. coldwarrior
    128 | November 30, 2009 06:13

    @ Iron Fist:

    there is a little science behind that. h1n1 looks like the swine flu fromthe 50′s and the 70′s the elderly tend to have some immunity, in fact, anyone exposed to the swine flu in the 70′s has some immunity to h1n1.

    h1n1 hits the young HARD. i’ve seen it happen, the young/healthy immune system reaction goes in to hyperdrive. the older dont have the hyper immune system to this strain and dont get hit with the symptoms nearly as hard.

    this is a young persons flu…just like 1918


  129. coldwarrior
    129 | November 30, 2009 06:20

    @ Iron Fist:

    oopps…forgot, had hillary and bill not destroyed the vaccine production in the US during the 90′s, we would not have this problem.

    bbl

    deadline


  130. snork
    130 | November 30, 2009 09:05

    No,no. Rosanne can’t be a whore. Nobody would pay for that.


  131. joeb
    131 | December 1, 2009 16:17

    Looks like coke-induced weight loss to me!


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David