First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Dry Run for Jihad?

by savage ( 208 Comments › )
Filed under Islamists, Terrorism at December 2nd, 2009 - 4:14 pm

I was listening to KNZR1560 out of Bakersfield today and Jaz McKay (a host who has Pam Geller on frequently) was talking about this. Seems AirTran flight 297 from Atlanta to Houston was delayed due to Muslims acting up as usual. Here is an eyewitness accounting of what when on, which you will never hear on the MSM.

One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, November the 17th, I returned home. If you read the papers the 18th you may have seen a blurb where a AirTran flight was cancelled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before takeoff. It was on Fox.

This was NOT what happened.

I was in 1st class coming home. 11 Muslim men got on the plane in full attire. 2 sat in 1st class and the rest peppered themselves throughout the plane all the way to the back. As the plane taxied to the runway the stewardesses gave the safety spiel we are all so familiar with. At that time, one of the men got on his cell and called one of his companions in the back and proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very aggressively. This took the 1st stewardess out of the picture for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at the time. He ignored her as if she was not there.

The 2nd man who answered the phone did the same and this took out the 2nd stewardess. In the back of the plane at this time, 2 younger Muslims, one in the back, isle, and one in front of him, window, began to show footage of a porno they had taped the night before, and were very loud about it. Now….they are only permitted to do this prior to Jihad. If a Muslim man goes into a strip club, he has to view the woman via mirror with his back to her. (don’t ask me….I don’t make the rules, but I’ve studied). The 3rd stewardess informed them that they were not to have electronic devices on at this time. To which one of the men said “shut up infidel dog!” She went to take the camcorder and he began to scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all 11 of them got up and started to walk the cabin. This is where I had had enough! I got up and started to the back where I heard a voice behind me from another Texan twice my size say “I got your back.” I grabbed the man who had been on the phone by the arm and said “you WILL go sit down or you Will be thrown from this plane!” As I “led” him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed out with him. I then grabbed the 2nd man and said, “You WILL do the same!” He protested but adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go. As I escorted him forward the plane doors open and 3 TSA agents and 4 police officers entered. Me and my new Texan friend were told to cease and desist for they had this under control. I was happy to oblige actually. There was some commotion in the back, but within moments, all 11 were escorted off the plane. They then unloaded their luggage.

We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happen, when suddenly, the door open again and on walked all 11!! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic (the only way I can describe it). The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw this, she was having NONE of it! Being that I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agent there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with these men. The agent told her they had searched them and were going to go through their luggage with a fine tooth comb and that they were allowed to proceed to Houston. The captain and co-captain came out and told the agent “we and our crew will not fly this plane!” After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. 5 minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on.

Again…..this is where I had had enough!!! I got up and asked “What the hell is going on!?!?” I was told to take my seat. They were sorry for the delay and I would be home shortly. I said “I’m getting off this plane”. The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off. (now I’m mad!) I said “I am a grown man who bought this ticket, who’s time is mine with a family at home and I am going through that door, or I’m going through that door with you under my arm!! But I am going through that door!!” And I heard a voice behind me say “so am I”. Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same. Within 2 minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met with more agents who asked me to write a statement. I had 5 hours to kill at this point so why the hell not. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was cancelled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6pm. I got here at 12:30am.

Look up the date. Flight 297 Atlanta to Houston.

If this wasn’t a dry run, I don’t know what one is. They wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it.

I’m telling this to you because I want you to know….
The threat is real. I saw it with my own eyes….

-Tedd

UPDATE: An eyewitness account from a chaplin on the same flight.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

208 Responses to “Dry Run for Jihad?”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Scott Madsen
    1 | December 2, 2009 16:17

    I make sure I ID any potential assholes and allies everytime I enter a cabin on a commercial fight. I always try to be seated near the rear so I have line of sight on as many other passengers as possible.


  2. 2 | December 2, 2009 16:19

    @ Scott Madsen:

    I do also.


  3. exploding toe
    3 | December 2, 2009 16:21

    And we, as paying passengers, are supposed to sit back and take this shit? When ELEVEN men are taken off, then allowed back on, a passenger aircraft after being openly belligerent and spiteful (“Sit down, Infidel!” apparently is a meaningless phrase to the TSA!), I’d get off the damn jet, too! I’ve pretty much sworn off flying ANYWHERE unless it is literally a life-or-death emergency that requires my presence!

    Screw TSA, to hell with the airlines, and piss on that child-fucking moon god.


  4. exploding toe
    4 | December 2, 2009 16:23

    The few times I’ve flown since 9/11, I make it a point to scan the entire jet for whatever lowlife bastards might lurk. And, I make no secret to my personal profiling, either!


  5. LGoPs
    5 | December 2, 2009 16:26

    PC is going to be the death of us all. It’s only a question of how high a price we’re willing to pay until we all call bullshit on it.
    I’m about ready, right now.


  6. 6 | December 2, 2009 16:26

    @ exploding toe:

    When I heard this story on the air today, I could NOT believe what I was hearing.


  7. 7 | December 2, 2009 16:26

    Glad to find out the email I got about that today isn’t a hoax.


  8. buzzsawmonkey
    8 | December 2, 2009 16:27

    It’s like the Flying Imams from a few years ago, but with heavier 9/11 overtones.


  9. 9 | December 2, 2009 16:27

    Is CAIR on the way?


  10. Doppelganger
    10 | December 2, 2009 16:28

    if Air Tran offers some apology it will probably be to the 11 scum and not the rest of the passengers. Damned PC nation we are living in!

    kudos to the first flight crew.

    and honstly I’m surprised these 11 assholes didn’t have the living shit kicked out of them. They should have


  11. 11 | December 2, 2009 16:28

    American’s thank goodness are sick of the bullshit and are no longer timid to let things just happen. Fuck them and fuck them big. LOL


  12. Doppelganger
    12 | December 2, 2009 16:29

    When does Eric Holder charge these two brave men with racial profiling hate crimes ?

    spit!


  13. 13 | December 2, 2009 16:29

    Fuck the TSA, Fuck Obama and Fuck the Goat fucking followers of Mohammad the Pedophile.


  14. 14 | December 2, 2009 16:30

    Policy for everyone on a plane is all cell phones turned off. From that moment on, they were asking for trouble.


  15. 15 | December 2, 2009 16:31

    On Drudge there’s an article that people are calling on Barbara Boxer to investigate the climategate hoax and her response is that the hackers should be investigated. These people are EVIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  16. 16 | December 2, 2009 16:32

    I’ll say this right now…

    When the next terrorist attack happens, I will drop off the grid and either start a death squad to hunt down and exterminate this trash or I will go lone wolf.

    And I know quite a few people that will join me.


  17. Doppelganger
    17 | December 2, 2009 16:32

    I was on a flight right after 9/11. Right after service began back into DCA.
    Sitting in the aisle in first class. Mandatory that we were in our seats for 30 min prior to arrival. My seatmate in the window seat suddenly stands up to access the overhead bin.

    all of a sudden I had air marshall from same row across the aisle gently but sternly bear hugging him and forcing him down.

    oh how far we’ve come.

    we’re totally and completely vulnerable again


  18. LGoPs
    18 | December 2, 2009 16:34

    One of the primary intellectual failings of liberalism is their inability to account for human behavior and it’s reaction to changing conditions. As an example, most liberal fiscal projections fail because they use straight line projections, failing to take behavior into account as people react to their plans. That’s why their revenue projections based on tax hikes always fall short. The point I’m rambling on about is that the liberal construct of PC is another of those bad ideas that will inevitably fail as people come to understand the price it exacts. Liberals don’t understand this and will be rocked back on their heels when the vast majority of sentient Americans finally realizes that the price we pay for it is no longer acceptable. And we will react and it will be ugly, IMO.


  19. 19 | December 2, 2009 16:36

    I’ve noticed that CJ is now calling everyone in the right wing blogosphere a criminal. Typical leftist behavior on his part.

    So-called moral codes that devalue human life invariably result in human death. When are the puritans of Gaiaism going to start liquidating the “Enemies of the Earth”?


  20. 20 | December 2, 2009 16:39

    @ The Other Les:
    Sounds like CJ is criminally insane.


  21. 21 | December 2, 2009 16:40

    I added an update


  22. buzzsawmonkey
    22 | December 2, 2009 16:40

    The Other Les wrote:

    I’ve noticed that CJ is now calling everyone in the right wing blogosphere a criminal.

    I am Fantomas!


  23. 23 | December 2, 2009 16:41

    Are there any new video spoofs about cj to know about?


  24. LGoPs
    24 | December 2, 2009 16:45

    The Other Les wrote:

    I’ve noticed that CJ is now calling everyone in the right wing blogosphere a criminal. Typical leftist behavior on his part.

    Remember that Projection is one of the calling cards of the left. If there’s any criminality here, or contemplation of it, it’s on their part.


  25. Flyovercountry
    25 | December 2, 2009 16:46

    As a society we need to drop this PC crap. It is going to get us all killed. That supposed minority of finatics is actually closer to about half. Islam is a major problem, just like it was for Thomas Jefferson over 200 years ago. Islamiphobia is not some curable disease which can be treated. It is a very reasonable response to the actions of its practitioners. If Salmon Rushdie were treated for his Islamiphobia, he would be just as dead as soon as a Muslim saw him.


  26. taxfreekiller
    26 | December 2, 2009 16:50

    You right wing nuts leave these good Obowma voters alone, they have Constitutional rights and ACORN rights too, also.


  27. snork
    27 | December 2, 2009 16:50

    A dry run perhaps, or…

    Recently the “six imams” reached a settlement with US airways. The airline paid the terrorists hijackers imams. I’m sure word got out in their community how much it was, and now everyone knows how profitable tweaking the kufr is.

    I’d say that’s more likely. Terrorism, for prophet and profit.


  28. buzzsawmonkey
    28 | December 2, 2009 16:51

    Flyovercountry wrote:

    As a society we need to drop this PC crap. It is going to get us all killed.

    Before it gets us all killed–well before–it will rob us of our liberty. It is doing that now.

    Physical death is something to be forestalled as long as possible, but the social rot that PC represents can make life a living hell.


  29. snork
    29 | December 2, 2009 16:52

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    You right wing nuts leave these good Obowma voters alone, they have Constitutional rights and ACORN rights too, also.

    Stick it in your ear, Chuckles. And btw, even moonbat sez the CRUtape letters are a big deal.


  30. OldNuc
    30 | December 2, 2009 16:54

    PC is a terminal disease, it will kill you. Most recently it killed 14 people at Ft. Hood and probably 4 police officers in Seattle. How many bodies is too many?


  31. wolfie
    31 | December 2, 2009 16:56

    OMG! Tfk has converted too!

    /not a chance!


  32. 32 | December 2, 2009 16:56

    The law these days seem to be in the favor of the criminals.


  33. yah
    33 | December 2, 2009 16:57

    True Story:
    My brother was visiting us in FL from NY to celebrate his birthday, Sept 6. He got a call from his company he had to immediately fly to Huston. So on the way to the airport, he stops at a men’s store to buy some business clothes as all he had brought was shorts and T-shirts.
    So on 9/11 he is in a meeting room in the Enron building and he gets a phone call from his boss in NY. His boss told him to get out of the building immediately, drive on such and such a route out of Huston, and then drive back to NY in your rental car. Do not go back to your hotel.
    It took him several days to get back to New York and he had to stop and buy more clothes, shaving stuff, tooth brush, etc.
    The only thing he can figure is that there was a plane that had not landed after they were told to or there was one missing. And the Eron building would be a prime target. We never knew what really happened, but a few of the oil big shots do.


  34. LGoPs
    34 | December 2, 2009 16:59

    teacake wrote:

    The law these days seem to be in the favor of the criminals.

    That’s because liberals are in charge.


  35. 35 | December 2, 2009 17:02

    @ yah:

    Was that this year?


  36. 36 | December 2, 2009 17:03

    @ LGoPs:

    The more the Left cry “racist” about anyone who disagrees with them, the less the accusation really means. When people see people called “racist”, and they damn well know that the accused is not a racist, people start considering the source’s credibility as they consider the charge. Done often enough (and the Left are way, way into this territory), people start tuning them out entirely. Look at CJ. He calls everyone a racist. He calls Pam Geller a racist, Michelle Malkin a racist, hell, me a racist and that is bullshit everyone can smell. So when he calls Robert Stacey McCain a racist, I figure he is full of shiut. He hasn’t supplied any backup for the accusation that I am aware of, and people who are in positions to know cast doubts on CJ’s aspersions.

    I see no reason to believe that RSM is a racist. That is just one especially egriegous example of this. The “racist” accusation has lost its impact.


  37. 37 | December 2, 2009 17:07

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    And for those with children, permitting the PC bullshit to destroy liberty will cost those children their liberties, probably for life. Once liberty is lost it is very difficult to get that liberty back.


  38. 38 | December 2, 2009 17:07

    Scott Madsen wrote:

    I make sure I ID any potential assholes and allies everytime I enter a cabin on a commercial fight. I always try to be seated near the rear so I have line of sight on as many other passengers as possible.

    I’ve been doing that since Egyptair 990.

    I’ve gotten some amazing dirty-looks from flight crew for it.


  39. 39 | December 2, 2009 17:07

    @ Iron Fist:
    One come back I like is – and you opinion matters because..?


  40. vagabond trader
    40 | December 2, 2009 17:10

    @ snork:

    I don’t care what their black hearted motive was. I don’t trust the fuggers.


  41. 41 | December 2, 2009 17:10

    @ yah:

    A more likely explanation is simply that your brothers boss didn’t want to loose an employee. I seriously doubt that “a few of the oil big shots” knew anything at all except what everyone else knew. And at 10:00am on 9/11/01 the only thing anyone knew was that a passenger plane had hit one of the World Trade Center buildings. Your suspicion that “a few of the oil big shots” knew anything borders dangerously on insane crazy conspiracy BS.


  42. 42 | December 2, 2009 17:11

    @ Iron Fist:
    Sad thing is the parents don’t realize they’re gullible and brainwashed. Last week I was sitting outside at a coffee shop and some lady was pointing to the curly light bulb in the shop next door. She was telling the child, see that? That saves energy. That is good for the environment. I’m not aggressive or assertive at all so I didn’t ask her if she knew those bulbs contain mercury and are in fact bad for the environment. LOL


  43. wolfie
    43 | December 2, 2009 17:14

    Iron Fist wrote:

    The “racist” accusation has lost its impact.

    I think it has been blunted a bit, but it’s still a very powerful weapon in the leftist arsenal.
    *sigh*


  44. vagabond trader
    44 | December 2, 2009 17:16

    @ Iron Fist:

    “The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes.” — Thomas Paine


  45. vagabond trader
    45 | December 2, 2009 17:19

    @ teacake:

    We are overdue, some of them are classic.


  46. krik_t_semaj
    46 | December 2, 2009 17:21

    Random post….

    “….I was listening to KNZR1560 out of Bakersfield today and Jaz McKay (a host who has Pam Geller on frequently)…..”

    Far away eyes
    Who do we trust?


  47. mawskrat
    47 | December 2, 2009 17:23

    why is cfnj being such a schill for Shell[Royal Dutch Shell] they wer Nazi collaboraters for cryin out loud. he pulls that crap on everyone else


  48. 48 | December 2, 2009 17:24

    @ vagabond trader:
    It would be hilarious if there was a CJ spoof video film fest.


  49. snork
    49 | December 2, 2009 17:25

    Am I missing something or is Barbra Boxer a complete moron?

    Boxer said her committee may hold hearings into the matter as its top Republican, Sen. James Inhofe (Okla.), has asked for, but that a criminal probe would be part of any such hearings.

    Umm, Babbs. It happened in Great Britain, which last time I checked was…y’know…another country. So the US senate is going to hold hearings on an alleged crime that took place in the UK?


  50. 50 | December 2, 2009 17:25

    mawskrat wrote:

    Shell[Royal Dutch Shell]

    Ummm, because his penis is very small and Shell[Royal Dutch Shell] promised to buy him a new large one???


  51. krik_t_semaj
    51 | December 2, 2009 17:25

    @ vagabond trader:
    Please provide a list of nobil causes. I have 12.


  52. krik_t_semaj
    52 | December 2, 2009 17:26

    @ vagabond trader:
    Which ones?


  53. wolfie
    53 | December 2, 2009 17:26

    teacake wrote:

    I’m not aggressive or assertive at all so I didn’t ask her if she knew those bulbs contain mercury and are in fact bad for the environment.

    I’m not either. I’m a real wimp about it.
    I think it’s time for us to step up and speak out more when the opportunity presents itself.
    (I am working on a sweet voice and expression so I don’t sound cranky when I do!)


  54. mawskrat
    54 | December 2, 2009 17:26

    krik_t_semaj wrote:

    Random post….
    “….I was listening to KNZR1560 out of Bakersfield today and Jaz McKay (a host who has Pam Geller on frequently)…..”
    Far away eyes
    Who do we trust?

    carefull cj will will label you a Nazi because Lynx and Lamb Gaede from Prussian Blue were from there


  55. 55 | December 2, 2009 17:27

    @ teacake:

    Yeah, I truly fear for the generation that is being raised now. The Government (Republicans and Democrats) seems intent on mortgaging their entire future for credit to spend right now. Whether we actually repay the cash (Ha!) or pay through hyperinflation and economic collapse the Bill will be paid. Personally, I don’t expect to ever be able to retire. I can’t save for it right now for various reasons, and I sure don’t expect to draw Social Security. Yet I pay 7 1/2% (really 15%) of my salary into that ponzi scheme.

    My central focus is on the Right to Keep and Bear arms. This right wasn’t even in question (except for freed slaves. See US v. Cruikshank) until the 20th Century, but it has been assaulted by the Democrats since the early 1930s. Without the diligent effort of millions of people (the NRA alone has something like 4 million members), we would have lost that freedom, just like Canada, Britain, and Austrailia. The courts are finally starting to come down on our side, but the fight isn’t over. The maintenance of liberty requires vigilance and determination.


  56. vagabond trader
    56 | December 2, 2009 17:27

    @ krik_t_semaj:

    I don’t believe in noble causes, you might try asking a local moonbat, they seem to have a fondness for them.


  57. 57 | December 2, 2009 17:27

    @ mawskrat:
    The list of people he doesn’t call nazis is the shorter one.


  58. krik_t_semaj
    58 | December 2, 2009 17:28

    @ doriangrey:
    Yes.


  59. 59 | December 2, 2009 17:29

    @ teacake:

    Oooh, now THAT’S a homework assignment I can sink my teeth into!


  60. mfhorn
    60 | December 2, 2009 17:29

    1) How will upChuck spin this as racist, Islamophobic etc?

    2) As a right winger, how can I be racist since the vast majority of people living for 4 blocks in any direction from me aren’t evil white Conservative, homophobic, global warming denying, anti-science Republicans?


  61. krik_t_semaj
    61 | December 2, 2009 17:30

    @ doriangrey:
    You remind me of someone.


  62. 62 | December 2, 2009 17:31

    snork wrote:

    Am I missing something or is Barbra Boxer a complete moron?
    Boxer said her committee may hold hearings into the matter as its top Republican, Sen. James Inhofe (Okla.), has asked for, but that a criminal probe would be part of any such hearings.

    Umm, Babbs. It happened in Great Britain, which last time I checked was…y’know…another country. So the US senate is going to hold hearings on an alleged crime that took place in the UK?

    NASA funded a significant amount of that research, Remember Michael Mann and James Hansen??? They are American citizens involved with East Anglica’s CRU’s fraudulent scheme, they played, according to the leaked e-mails a very significant role and that is what the US Senate has a legitimate right to investigate.


  63. 63 | December 2, 2009 17:31

    Just to be clear:
    The PDF of the update crashed my browser ( happens alot)
    This story is definitely true ?
    That sucks.
    Oh and for all : “YUP “


  64. krik_t_semaj
    64 | December 2, 2009 17:32

    @ vagabond trader:
    You know no noble causes? Fail. bigtime.

    That was a password.


  65. vagabond trader
    65 | December 2, 2009 17:32

    @ teacake:

    Some Jews are offended by the Downfall vids, I find them hilarious.Hope Pam makes more.:-)


  66. 66 | December 2, 2009 17:32

    krik_t_semaj wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    You remind me of someone.

    Hey… whats up Jimmy boy…


  67. 67 | December 2, 2009 17:32

    @ jimash:

    It is. I checked into it.


  68. krik_t_semaj
    68 | December 2, 2009 17:32

    @ krik_t_semaj:
    American exceptionalism for 10 phil.


  69. krik_t_semaj
    69 | December 2, 2009 17:33

    @ doriangrey:

    Newswatcher?


  70. passionate conservative
    70 | December 2, 2009 17:34

    doriangrey wrote:

    Fuck the TSA, Fuck Obama and Fuck the Goat fucking followers of Mohammad the Pedophile.

    Nah, someone else can. I’m not catching some nasty disease, like Withering Crotch Rot.


  71. snork
    71 | December 2, 2009 17:34

    @ doriangrey:

    As a crime???


  72. snork
    72 | December 2, 2009 17:35

    @ doriangrey:

    Dude. I don’t think you get it. She doesn’t want to investigate the criminals Jones and Mann, she wants to investigate the whistleblower.


  73. 73 | December 2, 2009 17:36

    krik_t_semaj wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Newswatcher?

    Anymore I would rather have sex with a meat grinder than watch the Mother E’ffing Mainstream Marxist Propaganda Media…


  74. krik_t_semaj
    74 | December 2, 2009 17:36

    @ vagabond trader:

    Downfall vids? Tell me more.


  75. vagabond trader
    75 | December 2, 2009 17:37

    @ krik_t_semaj:

    Oh come on, gimme another shot ok? Laphroaig 40 year, a truly noble pursuit.


  76. mfhorn
    76 | December 2, 2009 17:38

    @ vagabond trader:

    Laphroaig. Sounds great!


  77. 77 | December 2, 2009 17:38

    snork wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Dude. I don’t think you get it. She doesn’t want to investigate the criminals Jones and Mann, she wants to investigate the whistleblower.

    Let her, those kinds of investigation never end up going where the Senator who pushes them wants them to go. Braindead Boxer is only one Senator, there are quite a few others who would like to see a different path to that investigation.


  78. krik_t_semaj
    78 | December 2, 2009 17:38

    I see now, the Hitler parody vids. Those are funny.


  79. 79 | December 2, 2009 17:39

    @ doriangrey:

    What is offensive is that they are going to investigate this hacking/whistle blowing, but they did dog sqwat about it when our secret wire-tapping of terrorists was leaked to the NYT. Someone should have gone to jail for that one. They could find out who did it pretty easy. There weren’t that many people who knew about it.


  80. krik_t_semaj
    81 | December 2, 2009 17:40

    @ doriangrey:

    Is that yes?


  81. vagabond trader
    82 | December 2, 2009 17:40

    @ mfhorn:

    ummm ummm ummm!

    Hubbly gets his cut in half bonus tomorrow and we are heading to NH for tax free booze,the way it ought to be!

    :mrgreen:


  82. 83 | December 2, 2009 17:42

    And, to think, the TSA forcibly disarms every law abiding citizen on a plane, turning us ALL into potential victims for such scumbags, in an actual hijacking.

    I’m not talking about letting us all have firearms on a plane (after all, explosive decompression sucks), but there is no reason why we shouldn’t have pocket knives.

    “Oh, but Lance, the 9/11 hijackers used box cutters to hijack the planes! We can’t have knives on a plane!”

    boxcutters are no match for a good folder or buck knife. the 9/11 box cutters were effective because people couldn’t have their buck knives on their person.

    Imagine 11 muslim terrorists with box cutters, then another 80 passengers with folding knives, buck knives, kabar, etc.

    People don’t understand it… you can’t legislate weapon-free environments because ANYTHING can become a weapon. The fewer weapons you allow law abiding citizens to have on their person, the more victims you have when some scumbags decide to break the law.


  83. vagabond trader
    84 | December 2, 2009 17:43

    @ LanceKates:

    What you said Lance!


  84. 85 | December 2, 2009 17:45

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    What is offensive is that they are going to investigate this hacking/whistle blowing, but they did dog sqwat about it when our secret wire-tapping of terrorists was leaked to the NYT. Someone should have gone to jail for that one. They could find out who did it pretty easy. There weren’t that many people who knew about it.

    Odd’s are that it will be a VERY SHORT investigation into who leaked the material, once it is confirmed that it was an inside job, the investigation ceases right then and there. The senate, pissed off that they cant violate the whistler-blowers protection act will turn their anger on Phil Jones, Micheal Mann and James Hansen, Sen. Inhofe will make damned sure Micheal Mann and James Hansen get grilled like a marbled Angus Tri-tip on a July 4th BBQ…


  85. mfhorn
    86 | December 2, 2009 17:47

    @ LanceKates:

    Tazers, good.


  86. 87 | December 2, 2009 17:47

    @ LanceKates:

    ROTFLMAO… explosive decompression on an aircraft due to bullets is a hollyweird myth…


  87. 88 | December 2, 2009 17:49

    @ krik_t_semaj:

    No, and don’t you have some green women to be harassing???


  88. 89 | December 2, 2009 17:49

    @ doriangrey:

    Maan, I hope you are right. I don’t trust the Senators as far as I can throw an Abrams main battle tank.


  89. 90 | December 2, 2009 17:50

    @ savage:

    These things are hushed up FAR too often.
    This one makes me sick.


  90. vagabond trader
    91 | December 2, 2009 17:51

    @ doriangrey:

    LOL, that is no longer allowed by the Federation Dorian.

    :mrgreen:


  91. buzzsawmonkey
    92 | December 2, 2009 17:55

    I seem to recall some blog site proprietor saying recently that domestic jihad incidents were no longer a problem.


  92. 93 | December 2, 2009 17:55

    krik_t_semaj wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    You remind me of someone.

    Yea, I remind myself of someone too, I just cant remember who???


  93. mfhorn
    94 | December 2, 2009 17:57

    I don’t know what kind of problems this could cause, but I wondered if commercial aircraft could be equipped with some kind of gas which could be released during a hijacking. Keep one member of the cockpit crew on oxygen at all times to land the flight, reinforce the door and you might have a solution. Thoughts? Anything I’m missing?


  94. 95 | December 2, 2009 17:57

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    I seem to recall some blog site proprietor saying recently that domestic jihad incidents were no longer a problem.

    I believe he posted that while sucking crystal meth from a glass dick…


  95. 96 | December 2, 2009 17:58

    mfhorn wrote:

    I don’t know what kind of problems this could cause, but I wondered if commercial aircraft could be equipped with some kind of gas which could be released during a hijacking. Keep one member of the cockpit crew on oxygen at all times to land the flight, reinforce the door and you might have a solution. Thoughts? Anything I’m missing?

    Besides the annoying fact that such gases kill a third of the people exposed???


  96. snork
    97 | December 2, 2009 17:59

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    I seem to recall some blog site proprietor saying recently that domestic jihad incidents were no longer a problem.

    I seem to recall some blog site proprietor saying a little further back that the six imams were a problem.


  97. 98 | December 2, 2009 17:59

    @ jimash:

    Indeed.

    That’s one of the reasons we put this site together. The truth, right between the eyes!


  98. vagabond trader
    99 | December 2, 2009 18:02

    @ mfhorn:

    I think the Russians used an unknown gas on Chechen terrorists who held a theater hostage in 2002. Unfortunately the gas ended up killing many of the innocent.


  99. chickadee
    100 | December 2, 2009 18:02

    teacake wrote:

    On Drudge there’s an article that people are calling on Barbara Boxer to investigate the climategate hoax and her response is that the hackers should be investigated. These people are EVIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Today, for the first time, on the msm radio news, I heard a mention of Climategate. A few sentences abt. hackers and e-mails. Then a statement from Barbara Boxer. She said the e-mails don’t mean anything. People can say some pretty wild things in e-mails.
    LOL That was it. They are mentioning this major scandal almost in passing.


  100. 101 | December 2, 2009 18:02

    @ mfhorn:

    I’m not aware of anything that would be suitible for that. The Russians tried something analogous at Beslan, and a number of people died from the effects of the gas. Armed pilots are the first thing that we should have, but even the Bush Administration fought that. The fucker’s driving the plane, fo God’s sake. A little pissant .44 Magnum pales in comparison to that.


  101. 102 | December 2, 2009 18:04

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    A Jihad DENIER ?


  102. mfhorn
    103 | December 2, 2009 18:05

    @ doriangrey:
    @ vagabond trader:

    Ok, that’s a problem. :)

    Would it have to be a gas that knocks people out? Tear gas? Laughing gas? Or simply depressurize and let the lack of oxygen knock everyone out until you’re at a lower altitude.


  103. buzzsawmonkey
    104 | December 2, 2009 18:06

    jimash wrote:

    A Jihad DENIER ?

    Sweepin’ it under the prayer rug.


  104. mawskrat
    105 | December 2, 2009 18:07

    mfhorn wrote:

    I don’t know what kind of problems this could cause, but I wondered if commercial aircraft could be equipped with some kind of gas which could be released during a hijacking. Keep one member of the cockpit crew on oxygen at all times to land the flight, reinforce the door and you might have a solution. Thoughts? Anything I’m missing?

    the Russians used fentynal gas


  105. snork
    106 | December 2, 2009 18:07

    The fact that the Russians failed to improvise something on the spot doesn’t mean the concept can’t work, but who wants the liability if people do die from the gas? The airlines don’t want the liability, and neither does HS. If they crash the plane and everyone dies, well s**t happens, but if someone on a hijacked plane dies from the gas used to immobilize the hijackers, there’ll be hell to pay.


  106. vagabond trader
    107 | December 2, 2009 18:08

    @ mfhorn:

    The military is working on non lethal weapons to incapacitate,the Israelis too. Don’t know if they could be applied to confined spaces tho.You would think if we can cure AGW we’d be able to knock some assholes out. :-)


  107. wolfie
    108 | December 2, 2009 18:08

    snork wrote:

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:
    I seem to recall some blog site proprietor saying recently that domestic jihad incidents were no longer a problem.
    I seem to recall some blog site proprietor saying a little further back that the six imams were a problem.

    Why does this remind me of the 13 yr old girl down the road, the one that was in loooooooove with some movie star called Zac Ephron last summer and now thinks he’s a dweeb and hates to be reminded of her past crush because she is in loooooove with some actor called Taylor Laitner(?), who is soooooo much more mature, y’no???????


  108. 109 | December 2, 2009 18:10

    @ mfhorn:

    Tear gas wouldn’t do anything other than make everyone very uncomfortable. Nitrous won’t do anything significant. You might make everyone feel like they’d smoked a good joint if you poured enough into the cabin. There’s no mechanism to deliberately depressurize the passengers. Air marshals and armed pilots and a cockpit door that the hijackers won’t be able to kick through is better.

    I don’t think they’ll try aircraft like that again. 9-11 is really a unique event. They’ll try some other way. The way Obama is going they’ll have their own nukes before 2012.


  109. 110 | December 2, 2009 18:12

    @ wolfie:

    ROTFLMAO… I’m thinking that the 13y/o acts more mature than that certain blogger…


  110. Speranza
    111 | December 2, 2009 18:13

    I dont want to give Eyerash Hose the traffice so I copy pasted and edited her iditopic ranbnings. I did not realzie she cuold get her tongue that far up her amsters ass!

    Charles Johnson is right: on parting ways with the right

    December 2, 2009 by Wild Irish Rose

    Charles Johnson over at Little Green Footballs is once again demonstrating his usual level of moral candor and intellectual honesty with a deep, bold cut to the GOP’s jugular:

    [insert Johnson's post]
    As expected, his post early this morning prompted a predictable response from the right: shrieks of outrage, howls of indignation, venomous attacks on his character and accusations of betrayal and liberal leftism all across the right wing blogosphere… a veritible shitstorm of abuse and hostility, all set to the tune of seriously bad crazy.

    Which prompted Charles to follow up on his original post here:
    [yadda yadda yadda]

    To the surprise of absolutely no-one, the usual mob of venomous frothing Johnson haters are out in force tonight, trying to downplay the post and discredit Johnson’s character on every venue that will allow them the bandwidth to do so, and on every blog post where the writer displays even a modicum of support for Mr. Johnson.

    Too late, of course: the mainstream media has taken note. The cats’ out of the bag, and it’s not going back in.

    Sigmund, Carl and Alfred have responded to Johnson’s post today with an opinion piece that is absolutely spot on:

    Charles Johnson Rides Off Into The Sunrise
    [blah blah blah]

    More support coming in from Andrew Sullivan, here. (Ed note – just great having support from a misogynist obsessed with Sarah Palin’s uterus who claims she did not give birth to Trig, a Jew hater and a pot smoker)

    UPDATE: I’m feeling generous today. Just for the helluvit, I’ve decided to turn moderation off on this one so that my readers and visitors can see the morally upstanding and highly principaled right-wing that Charles speaks of in full flower.

    So spew your filth, folks… rant and rave, spray your venom, get it all out of your system. And don’t say that I didn’t give you anything for Christmas.

    3 Responses

    1.
    on December 2, 2009 at 3:09 am | Log in to Reply Serr8d

    What a bunch of sorry mind-controlled losers, you who are left posting at LGF! Wasting away for one batshit crazy old loner who spends far too much time online and hasn’t a pot to piss in and no real friends; just a sour attitude and a ‘get off my lawn!’ narrative. Dennis the Peasant is right…Charles Johnson is a sad old man with little self-esteem and absolutely no life.

    Tell me, little one, when Charles gives you an up-ding, do you pant, drizzle, or simply lung for the refrigerator?


  111. vagabond trader
    112 | December 2, 2009 18:14

    @ mawskrat:

    Yup, that’ll do it. Goodnite nurse.


  112. Speranza
    113 | December 2, 2009 18:14

    Damn I forgot to spell check. Anyway you get the idea.


  113. 114 | December 2, 2009 18:14

    @ Iron Fist:

    I must disagree.
    These guys LOVE airplanes. And it goes back a long way.


  114. 115 | December 2, 2009 18:17

    @ Iron Fist:

    I don’t think they’ll try aircraft like that again. 9-11 is really a unique event. They’ll try some other way. The way Obama is going they’ll have their own nukes before 2012.

    I think the Jihadis will keep probing the airlines looking for an opening to repeat 9/11, but it wont be their attack of choice, it will be a chance to repeat a successful operation.


  115. vagabond trader
    116 | December 2, 2009 18:17

    @ Speranza:

    Notice she doesn’t refer to him as “Mr Johnson?”

    btw, IR announced she is getting hitched next year.

    Hi Speranza, where’ve you been?


  116. snork
    117 | December 2, 2009 18:17

    @ Speranza:

    Ok, I’ll bite. WTF is “moral candor”? Doesn’t sound like a good thing, if you ask me.


  117. 118 | December 2, 2009 18:22

    @ snork:

    In charles Johnson case, it’s probably the polite name for syphigonorherpesAIDS…


  118. 119 | December 2, 2009 18:23

    Speranza wrote:

    I dont want to give Eyerash Hose the traffice so I copy pasted and edited her iditopic ranbnings. I did not realzie she cuold get her tongue that far up her amsters ass!
    Charles Johnson is right: on parting ways with the right
    December 2, 2009 by Wild Irish Rose
    Charles Johnson over at Little Green Footballs is once again demonstrating his usual level of moral candor and intellectual honesty with a deep, bold cut to the GOP’s jugular:

    Oh yeah the gop is at its’ wit ends losing Hen Johnson like that.They are even flying flags at half mast.
    [insert Johnson's post]
    As expected, his post early this morning prompted a predictable response from the right: shrieks of outrage, howls of indignation, venomous attacks on his character and accusations of betrayal and liberal leftism all across the right wing blogosphere… a veritible shitstorm of abuse and hostility, all set to the tune of seriously bad crazy.
    Which prompted Charles to follow up on his original post here:
    [yadda yadda yadda]
    To the surprise of absolutely no-one, the usual mob of venomous frothing Johnson haters are out in force tonight, trying to downplay the post and discredit Johnson’s character on every venue that will allow them the bandwidth to do so, and on every blog post where the writer displays even a modicum of support for Mr. Johnson.
    Too late, of course: the mainstream media has taken note. The cats’ out of the bag, and it’s not going back in.
    Sigmund, Carl and Alfred have responded to Johnson’s post today with an opinion piece that is absolutely spot on:
    Charles Johnson Rides Off Into The Sunrise
    [blah blah blah]
    More support coming in from Andrew Sullivan, here. (Ed note – just great having support from a misogynist obsessed with Sarah Palin’s uterus who claims she did not give birth to Trig, a Jew hater and a pot smoker)
    UPDATE: I’m feeling generous today. Just for the helluvit, I’ve decided to turn moderation off on this one so that my readers and visitors can see the morally upstanding and highly principaled right-wing that Charles speaks of in full flower.
    So spew your filth, folks… rant and rave, spray your venom, get it all out of your system. And don’t say that I didn’t give you anything for Christmas.
    3 Responses
    1.
    on December 2, 2009 at 3:09 am | Log in to Reply Serr8d
    What a bunch of sorry mind-controlled losers, you who are left posting at LGF! Wasting away for one batshit crazy old loner who spends far too much time online and hasn’t a pot to piss in and no real friends; just a sour attitude and a ‘get off my lawn!’ narrative. Dennis the Peasant is right…Charles Johnson is a sad old man with little self-esteem and absolutely no life.
    Tell me, little one, when Charles gives you an up-ding, do you pant, drizzle, or simply lung for the refrigerator?


  119. manforallseasons
    120 | December 2, 2009 18:24

    World gone mad

    http://bit.ly/4NTbw6


  120. 121 | December 2, 2009 18:25

    What the ell happened to my text in that post? Oh well must be some devine intervention.


  121. vagabond trader
    122 | December 2, 2009 18:25

    @ Speranza:

    Too late, of course: the mainstream media has taken note. The cats’ out of the bag, and it’s not going back in.

    What the hey does that mean? Oh noes,tell me she doesn’t believes the msm is reporting about cjs shift to the right? As if,lmao!


  122. 123 | December 2, 2009 18:26

    The GOP is so dazed over Hen Johnson they are flying flags at half mast.


  123. Speranza
    124 | December 2, 2009 18:27

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Notice she doesn’t refer to him as “Mr Johnson?”

    btw, IR announced she is getting hitched next year.

    Hi Speranza, where’ve you been?

    I was away on vacation. IR and “Lars” announced their engagement, yes.


  124. Speranza
    125 | December 2, 2009 18:29

    @ vagabond trader:
    She really thinks that Chaz is an important player.


  125. 126 | December 2, 2009 18:30

    Speranza wrote:

    vagabond trader wrote:
    Notice she doesn’t refer to him as “Mr Johnson?”
    btw, IR announced she is getting hitched next year.
    Hi Speranza, where’ve you been?
    I was away on vacation. IR and “Lars” announced their engagement, yes.

    So should we be prepared for a tsunami


  126. buzzsawmonkey
    127 | December 2, 2009 18:31

    Eleven li’l jihadis
    Sittin’ on a plane
    The air marshals made them get off
    Then let them on again

    Ten li’l jihadis
    Trying for to board
    Claiming Islamophobia
    ‘Cause they had to check their swords

    Nine li’l jihadis
    With a boarding pass
    Made it through security
    TSA’s head’s up its ass

    Eight li’l jihadis
    Scatter-seated ’round
    Hoping they can take the plane
    When it leaves the ground

    Seven li’l jihadis
    Talking on cell phones
    Air personnel pretending
    Their profile isn’t known

    Six li’l jihadis
    Just having some fun
    Knowing their disruptions were
    Only a dry run

    Five li’l jihadis
    How loudly they vent
    Their prayer rugs were stowed in the
    Overhead compartment

    Four li’l jihadis
    Came here from afar
    Disconcert the passengers
    Crying “Allah Ackbar”

    Three li’l jihadis
    Frustrated as can be
    Because they are too few to
    Immolate successfully

    Two li’l jihadis
    Silently steam with hate
    Because the airline snack food
    Is not a halal plate

    One li’l jihadi
    Sitting all alone
    Sad that he can’t take the plane
    When he’s on his own


  127. 128 | December 2, 2009 18:31

    Chuckie has a cookbook, a calendar and next a little figure of a fat ass sitting on a tricyle with flat tires.


  128. vagabond trader
    129 | December 2, 2009 18:31

    @ Speranza:

    What a pig pile of delusion over yonder. Holy cats, reminds me of my old profession working with lunatics. They can be quite fanciful.Maybe there will be a double wedding ceremony?


  129. Guggi
    130 | December 2, 2009 18:31

    @ mawskrat:

    why is cfnj being such a schill for Shell[Royal Dutch Shell] they wer Nazi collaboraters for cryin out loud. he pulls that crap on everyone else

    Not only this but the guy is so f*cking dumb that he doesn’t recognize that the link to Shell is contradicting with his argument the big oil-companies are behind the anti-AGW-movement.

    I didn’t know that people can live without a single working brain cell.


  130. 131 | December 2, 2009 18:32

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Eleven li’l jihadis
    Sittin’ on a plane
    The air marshals made them get off
    Then let them on again
    Ten li’l jihadis
    Trying for to board
    Claiming Islamophobia
    ‘Cause they had to check their swords
    Nine li’l jihadis
    With a boarding pass
    Made it through security
    TSA’s head’s up its ass
    Eight li’l jihadis
    Scatter-seated ’round
    Hoping they can take the plane
    When it leaves the ground
    Seven li’l jihadis
    Talking on cell phones
    Air personnel pretending
    Their profile isn’t known
    Six li’l jihadis
    Just having some fun
    Knowing their disruptions were
    Only a dry run
    Five li’l jihadis
    How loudly they vent
    Their prayer rugs were stowed in the
    Overhead compartment
    Four li’l jihadis
    Came here from afar
    Disconcert the passengers
    Crying “Allah Ackbar”
    Three li’l jihadis
    Frustrated as can be
    Because they are too few to
    Immolate successfully
    Two li’l jihadis
    Silently steam with hate
    Because the airline snack food
    Is not a halal plate
    One li’l jihadi
    Sitting all alone
    Sad that he can’t take the plane
    When he’s on his own

    Thats some funny S***


  131. 132 | December 2, 2009 18:34

    If garlic works with vampires I wonder if Hog lips on a chain would work on a plane.ha


  132. vagabond trader
    133 | December 2, 2009 18:35

    @ Grimcargo:

    The “Swede” according to IR, is quite the stud,lots of greenbacks too.


  133. 134 | December 2, 2009 18:37

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:
    The “Swede” according to IR, is quite the stud,lots of greenbacks too.

    Well he must be mentally whacked like her.I just don’t believe a word that old hag says.


  134. Lizzie_in_Texas
    135 | December 2, 2009 18:37

    I need to ask someone a question (off screen) about something and can’t remember the “chat” site. It used to be on the side bar, but I haven’t been there in a very long time. Any help???

    Re this story – all I have to say is WOW if true! I agree with the PC correctness here in the US. It needs to stop. If you don’t have thick enough skin to not be offended by someone referring to you as you actually are, then, you are not made out of the stuff that America was founded from. Were/are the Irish of the NYC FD/PD offended when we refer to them as such – hell no (i.e. 9/11 and the bag pipes that are played at every funeral). They are proud of their heritage. BS. Get over it sheet heads.


  135. Tanker
    136 | December 2, 2009 18:38

    155 Charles
    Wed, Dec 2, 2009 6:06:20pm replyquote 4downupreport

    Huckabee’s response to the prosecutors who begged him to reconsider:

    [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

    Dear Robert,

    The governor read you [sic] letter and laughed out loud.

    He wanted me to respond to you. I wish you success as you cut down on your caffeine consumption.

    Freaking UNbelievable.

    Just a quick post before putting myself out for the night. They are having a fit over letters back and forth between Huckabee’s office and a prosecutor about granting clemency printied online at the NYT. No one over there seems to catch the letters are dated 4 years after the clemency of Maurice Clemmons which happened in 2000.
    Truth never has a seat at their table!


  136. vagabond trader
    137 | December 2, 2009 18:39

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:

    Table 9? I don’t know the url,sorry.


  137. chickadee
    138 | December 2, 2009 18:40

    doriangrey wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:

    I don’t think they’ll try aircraft like that again. 9-11 is really a unique event. They’ll try some other way. The way Obama is going they’ll have their own nukes before 2012.

    I think the Jihadis will keep probing the airlines looking for an opening to repeat 9/11, but it wont be their attack of choice, it will be a chance to repeat a successful operation.

    I agree. What else could it be. Why would Muslims behave in such an obnoxious aggressive way on airplanes today. Given what they did on 9-ll, you’d think decent Muslims would be on their best behavior. These thugs are violent militant jihadis even if they didn’t succeed in blowing up the plane, their behavior was designed to disrupt and terrorize civil society. These fcks should be jailed for this. I’m thinking if they sue the airline, they won’t get money. Not today. Americans are getting fed up with these animals. The issue is what will passengers do if Muslims try to commandeer a plane. There can be no sitting down and hoping for the best. There can only be dog piling these beasts and killing them.


  138. 140 | December 2, 2009 18:41

    Tanker wrote:

    155 Charles
    Wed, Dec 2, 2009 6:06:20pm replyquote 4downupreport
    Huckabee’s response to the prosecutors who begged him to reconsider:
    [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
    Dear Robert,
    The governor read you [sic] letter and laughed out loud.
    He wanted me to respond to you. I wish you success as you cut down on your caffeine consumption.
    Freaking UNbelievable.
    Just a quick post before putting myself out for the night. They are having a fit over letters back and forth between Huckabee’s office and a prosecutor about granting clemency printied online at the NYT. No one over there seems to catch the letters are dated 4 years after the clemency of Maurice Clemmons which happened in 2000.
    Truth never has a seat at their table!</blockquot

    Huckabee was just trying to gain favor with Hen Johnson and prove he wasnt' a racist. Come onnn..They are the lowest of hypocrites.


  139. snork
    141 | December 2, 2009 18:42

    @ doriangrey:

    It sounds to me like “I’m and asshole; get over it”.


  140. Speranza
    142 | December 2, 2009 18:42

    Grimcargo wrote:

    So should we be prepared for a tsunami

    Lars is a blow up doll.


  141. manforallseasons
    143 | December 2, 2009 18:42

    http://table9chat.com/


  142. 144 | December 2, 2009 18:43

    @ chickadee:

    Jailed my ass, they should be taken up to 60,000 feet and made to walk home…


  143. chickadee
    145 | December 2, 2009 18:43

    Speranza wrote:

    Grimcargo wrote:

    So should we be prepared for a tsunami

    Lars is a blow up doll.

    LOL,
    Hey Speranza


  144. Lizzie_in_Texas
    146 | December 2, 2009 18:44

    Thanks all – lol I was thinking it was 7! lol!


  145. 147 | December 2, 2009 18:44

    Speranza wrote:

    Grimcargo wrote:
    So should we be prepared for a tsunami
    Lars is a blow up doll.

    wish she’d been more creative.Named him after part of her name LARD ass.


  146. Speranza
    148 | December 2, 2009 18:45

    vagabond trader wrote:

    What a pig pile of delusion over yonder. Holy cats, reminds me of my old profession working with lunatics. They can be quite fanciful.Maybe there will be a double wedding ceremony?

    Don’t expect Eyerash Rose/Lars to have a double wedding with iceweasel/Jmmah. The tow women despise each other.


  147. Speranza
    149 | December 2, 2009 18:46

    @ chickadee:
    Hey there. Are you home?


  148. snork
    150 | December 2, 2009 18:47

    @ chickadee:

    I just told everyone why (#27).


  149. vagabond trader
    151 | December 2, 2009 18:47

    @ Speranza:

    I still maintain jimmah-ice are one and the same.


  150. 152 | December 2, 2009 18:50

    snork wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    I just told everyone why (#27).

    That would be the reason why Americans would do it, Arab Muslims are not Americans, they dont think like we do, they do not have the same motivations we do. They are doing it for their own reasons.


  151. 153 | December 2, 2009 18:50

    @ Speranza:

    It is somewhat Ironic that I met my current Fiancee through LGF. That was back when LGF was solidly on the Right. We met and got to know each other over the internet and telephone. We took it a lot slower than Jimmah and Ice appear to be. It’s been over 5 years and there are still months to go before we make it official.

    I guess it can work as well for the Left as it did for us. I despise Jimmah, but I have no real beef with Ice. I wish them the best of each other.


  152. snork
    154 | December 2, 2009 18:54

    @ doriangrey:

    Horesdickies. If that were true, the imams wouldn’t have done what they did, and wouldn’t have sued.


  153. Speranza
    155 | December 2, 2009 18:55

    @ Iron Fist:
    What he did this morning to you was completely Stalinist. Remember when the communists used to air brush out of photos disgraced politburo members who were purged in the 1930′s?


  154. 156 | December 2, 2009 18:55

    snork wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Horesdickies. If that were true, the imams wouldn’t have done what they did, and wouldn’t have sued.

    The Imams did what they did and sued as psychological terrorism, not for the money.


  155. Speranza
    157 | December 2, 2009 18:56

    Iron Fist wrote:

    I guess it can work as well for the Left as it did for us. I despise Jimmah, but I have no real beef with Ice. I wish them the best of each other.

    The two of them are pricks. ice helped ruin LGF. I do have a beef with her.


  156. chickadee
    158 | December 2, 2009 18:56

    We don’t have to prove anything to Muslims. They have to show us they aren’t jihadis. If they act up on a flight, these fckers need a their asses kicked. And they’ll be lucky if that’s all that happens.


  157. Speranza
    159 | December 2, 2009 18:57

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I still maintain jimmah-ice are one and the same.

    I wish it were true but it is not.


  158. vagabond trader
    160 | December 2, 2009 19:03

    OT:

    Wow, just took this off Ace.


  159. 161 | December 2, 2009 19:04

    Speranza wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    I guess it can work as well for the Left as it did for us. I despise Jimmah, but I have no real beef with Ice. I wish them the best of each other.
    The two of them are pricks. ice helped ruin LGF. I do have a beef with her.

    No, Charles Johnson ruined LGF entirely on his own, Iceweasel just helped fill Charles new sewer with foul gangrenous shit.


  160. Guggi
    162 | December 2, 2009 19:05

    May I fight one idiocy with another?

    148 Charles
    Wed, Dec 2, 2009 3:11:51pm replyquote 5downupreport

    re: #133 recusancy

    I’m not following. People deny the existence of HIV?

    Not the existence of HIV — they deny that HIV is connected to AIDS. One of the main proponents of this dangerous idiocy is Phillip Johnson, the so-called “father” of intelligent design creationism.

    Clear idiocy but this one is spread by a reverend who married the president of the United States of America, baptized his children and was his religious andviser and spiritual leader for 20 years:

    Jeremiah Wright and the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Rev. Wright’s noxious recorded sermons suggesting that America deserved 9/11 and that the federal government created AIDS as a tool of black genocide were widely viewed on YouTube and discussed on talk radio and cable TV.


  161. taxfreekiller
    163 | December 2, 2009 19:06

    There will be no tear drops tonight,,,,

    Little liberal lips will quiver,,,

    Do not make me defend myself,,,they pray,,,

    That Taxfreekiller he will take care of me,,,

    No matter how low and sorry we may be,,,

    He and they always man the gates,,,,,


  162. 164 | December 2, 2009 19:08

    @ vagabond trader:

    Wow is right… Actually more like holy crap….


  163. vagabond trader
    165 | December 2, 2009 19:10

    @ doriangrey:

    The cops and the getaway car, lol.


  164. Speranza
    166 | December 2, 2009 19:11

    Talk Show host pwns Jesse Ventura!


  165. Lizzie_in_Texas
    167 | December 2, 2009 19:12

    Ok, I have been banned from 1.0!!! Yeah! Can someone help me change my screen name here? I want my identity back!! I am only known as Dolphin on any other blog and proud of it! I don’t post much, but am proud of my identity and who and what I stand for!


  166. Speranza
    168 | December 2, 2009 19:14

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:
    What was your nic on LGF?


  167. manforallseasons
    169 | December 2, 2009 19:15

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:

    Welcome!


  168. Lizzie_in_Texas
    170 | December 2, 2009 19:17

    @ Speranza:
    Dolphin


  169. snork
    171 | December 2, 2009 19:21

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:

    Don’t forget to report yourself to Kirly, and you can change your screen name, by setting a screen name different from you account name in your profile.


  170. vagabond trader
    172 | December 2, 2009 19:21

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:

    Did you give the scaly monster what fer or was it a stealth banning?


  171. Lizzie_in_Texas
    173 | December 2, 2009 19:22

    @ manforallseasons:

    Thanks, but I have been here for a while, I just don’t post much.


  172. chickadee
    174 | December 2, 2009 19:22

    @ vagabond trader:

    Amazing. Sometimes an inch is as good as a mile or your number just isn’t up.


  173. vagabond trader
    175 | December 2, 2009 19:24

    @ chickadee:

    What is especially astonishing is they were all caught on vid.Gave me a chill.


  174. chickadee
    176 | December 2, 2009 19:27

    @ vagabond trader:

    Yes all these together are pretty powerful. Someone was watching over these people.


  175. vagabond trader
    177 | December 2, 2009 19:29

    @ chickadee:

    Someone was watching over these people.

    Indeed. ^^^^^^^^^^


  176. Lizzie_in_Texas
    178 | December 2, 2009 19:32

    @ vagabond trader:
    No reason what so ever, look at the postings here and there, look (if you can at the posting at lgf I don’t post much. I never have.) I do have my values and felt filthy for still being there as long as I could be valued here. No more. I am done with it (in my mind). I wish I could have said it there, but, I will say it here, I love the knowledge that is exchanged here! I value it – now more than ever!


  177. 179 | December 2, 2009 19:32

    @ chickadee:

    Someone was watching over these people.

    Now if that someone would just do a little more of that proactive watching over America…


  178. vagabond trader
    180 | December 2, 2009 19:35

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:

    :-) :-) :-)


  179. 181 | December 2, 2009 19:36

    @ Speranza:

    Charles ruined LGF. Ice is just a tool. She probably doesn’t know how predictible her little routine is. In any event, the guy pushing the buttons is Charles. They all dance to his meter, most of ythem willingly.


  180. rain of lead
    182 | December 2, 2009 19:38

    file this under things that will make you laugh your ass off

    Democratic Reps are threatening a jobs March on Washington to protest their own failed economic policies.

    Members of President Obama’s own political party are charging that the White House and the Democratic Congressional leadership are not doing enough to help the unemployed and are threatening to organize a march on Washington of jobless Americans.

    “Obviously there’s something that’s not getting through to them,” said Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Illinois. “And we’re going to let the White House and everybody who’s concerned know that we have got people in our districts who are depending on us to deliver for them.”


  181. Speranza
    183 | December 2, 2009 19:39

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Charles ruined LGF. Ice is just a tool. She probably doesn’t know how predictible her little routine is. In any event, the guy pushing the buttons is Charles. They all dance to his meter, most of ythem willingly.

    I understand that but if any one poster symbolized the toilet that LGF became it would not be Sharmuta, Thanos, Irish Hose, KKKillgore Trout, Cato the Ogre – it would be the weasel so I use her as the symbol.

    By the way rest assured she does not wish you or any of us well so no need for the “I have no beef with her”.


  182. Speranza
    184 | December 2, 2009 19:42

    Lizzie_in_Texas wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:
    No reason what so ever, look at the postings here and there, look (if you can at the posting at lgf I don’t post much. I never have.) I do have my values and felt filthy for still being there as long as I could be valued here. No more. I am done with it (in my mind). I wish I could have said it there, but, I will say it here, I love the knowledge that is exchanged here! I value it – now more than ever!

    Two months ago using one of my socks I actually posted several vanilla type of posts at LGf just to see how it felt -you know what? I agree with you, it felt dirty and I quickly got off of LGF. I found the people there to be obtuse, ignorant, and obnoxious.


  183. Lizzie_in_Texas
    185 | December 2, 2009 19:44

    @ Iron Fist:
    I don’t think that it is still the same “Chaz” that we knew and loved. I think he sold it (sold out)??. I said this in chat – look at 2002 11/2x/02 (Thanksgiving post) and this years – just saying – as I can no longer go there!! lol!


  184. rain of lead
    186 | December 2, 2009 19:46

    file this under…”D’OH”

    Ouch: If Elin Bolts, Tiger Parts With $300 Mil

    hey Tiger, is 300 million dollar nookie that much better that reg nookie?


  185. Lizzie_in_Texas
    187 | December 2, 2009 19:48

    @ Speranza:
    The only reason I realized that I was banned was the fact that every time (home or work), I went there, the computer “hung” and “locked-up”. I got suspicious and that is why I wanted to “chat” with someone off line – just to make sure what I thought was true.


  186. Speranza
    188 | December 2, 2009 19:53

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:
    Well the childish one banned you. Your crime is being an independent thinker. Believe me you will not miss LGF at all. The LGF diaspora is a growing by leaps and bounds.


  187. Nikis Knight
    189 | December 2, 2009 19:54

    No, Senator Boxer, I Think We’ll Stick With “ClimateGate”
    —Ace
    A rather lame attempt at re-branding.

    “You call it ClimateGate,” she hisses (I guess to Inhofe), “I call it Email-Theft-Gate.”

    Again, as Treacher says, ClimateGate is about stealing emails in much the same way Watergate was about parking garages.

    Wonder if the stupid git from my state was so outraged about Sarah Palin’s e-mail being hacked by a state Dem rep’s son?

    Didn’t think so.


  188. Aussie Infidel
    190 | December 2, 2009 19:56

    @ wolfie:
    I’m not !

    I was volunteer tutoring about a month ago with 12 other volunteers and the class teacher in a VERY low streamed class (Form 3 P (as in A,B,C,D,E, ….P) ) began dribbling on with some outrageous green nonsense. The other volunteer tutors all looked uneasy and i thought … ‘bugger this for a game of soldiers’ … I stood up and interrupted the teacher and asked him to prove his assertions. He looked physically shocked and tried one on. At that stage i cut him to pieces, chapter and verse, in front of his class for 10 minutes refuting every musing that he has dribbled on about. When I finished there was a deathly silence and then the whole class began to high five and the tutors hopped right in as well.

    The teacher looked sheepish and tried to be ‘the good fellow well met’ afterwards but nobody was having any of it.

    Frankly the teacher had a mere BSc in biology and lived in a schoolhouse bubble remote from adults who might challenge his world view, whereas 40% of the tutors had Phds and had actually lived in the real world. Next week in science and math individual tuition periods two bad asses in the class came up and asked to join my guys, and were really cooperative, interested and involved. These guys are quite smart and ended up in a low streamed class because they were disruptive. In fact they just has a more attuned ‘bullshit’ meter, and didn’t suffer fools and as a consequence fooled about in class.


  189. Lizzie_in_Texas
    191 | December 2, 2009 19:57

    @ Speranza:
    See, I think “socks” are funny things. I did not antagonize either side. I have/did state here that I did not post much and “thought” I was under the radar (with regard to lgf), but I guess I really did wish that I would be “found out”! Chaz’ (sp??) list on his post of why he left the right wing sealed it for me. Really, why continue to antagonize? It is not worth it; our time is better spent trying to push/sell (neither word “feels” right) our point of view. Live it, and show others that is the right way!


  190. Aussie Infidel
    192 | December 2, 2009 20:00

    Climate-gate is to stolen e-Mails …. as Watergate is about garages!

    These people are beyond belief! Is there a farm someplace that breeds leftards?


  191. Lizzie_in_Texas
    193 | December 2, 2009 20:04

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:
    I am a self educated person. I have read a lot of history, but have no one to help me interrupt it. I depend a lot on those that are more educated than I to explain a lot of things. It is why I do a lot of lurking and very little posting. I do read a lot and try an absorb what I read. I also listen to my gut.


  192. wolfie
    194 | December 2, 2009 20:13

    @ Aussie Infidel:

    Good for you! Great story!


  193. snork
    195 | December 2, 2009 20:17

    @ Aussie Infidel:

    One of my favorite climate bloggers calls the emails the “CRUtape letters”.


  194. imtoast
    196 | December 2, 2009 20:29

    chickadee wrote:

    teacake wrote:
    On Drudge there’s an article that people are calling on Barbara Boxer to investigate the climategate hoax and her response is that the hackers should be investigated. These people are EVIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Today, for the first time, on the msm radio news, I heard a mention of Climategate. A few sentences abt. hackers and e-mails. Then a statement from Barbara Boxer. She said the e-mails don’t mean anything. People can say some pretty wild things in e-mails.
    LOL That was it. They are mentioning this major scandal almost in passing.

    She’s right about that too, I have written multiple emails to her calling her an ignorant midget.


  195. mjazz
    197 | December 2, 2009 20:30

    Next time that happens all the passengers should exchange personal information and file a class action suit against whoever is responsible, for lost time, duress, you name it. Tie them up in court forever if you have to.


  196. 198 | December 2, 2009 20:34

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:

    I’ll change you over now.

    Gimme 5 minutes….


  197. mjazz
    199 | December 2, 2009 20:35

    @ mjazz:
    …and use your cells to film the disruptive behavior.


  198. wolfie
    200 | December 2, 2009 20:35

    @ imtoast:

    :lol:
    Ziiiiiiiiing!


  199. snork
    201 | December 2, 2009 20:44

    ‘Magine that:

    Former NASA climate scientist pleads guilty to contract fraud

    A NASA climate scientist misbehaving? GET OFF MY BLOG!!!!!11


  200. pbird
    202 | December 2, 2009 20:47

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    There will be no tear drops tonight,,,,
    Little liberal lips will quiver,,,
    Do not make me defend myself,,,they pray,,,
    That Taxfreekiller he will take care of me,,,
    No matter how low and sorry we may be,,,
    He and they always man the gates,,,,,

    We know.


  201. 203 | December 2, 2009 20:51

    Lizzie_in_Texas wrote:

    I was under the radar (with regard to lgf),

    The idea of being “under the radar” presupposes that Banana Brain bans people for causes based in reality.

    He may sometimes do that, but having any factual basis is not at all a pre-requisite for swinging the ban stick in the realm of the idiot prince.


  202. snork
    204 | December 2, 2009 21:07

    Just for the halibut:


  203. 205 | December 2, 2009 23:02

    @ snork:
    Only Joe Friday could take a stopwatch, go to Cornell, get into a head on crash, record it in tenths of a second, give them the data to study, and still walk away. Jack Webb beats Chuck Norris.


  204. Speranza
    206 | December 3, 2009 05:15

    @ Lizzie_in_Texas:
    I happen to know quite a bit of history (as Rodan and “m” can testify to).


  205. Jen06
    207 | December 3, 2009 10:09

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Ah Buzz, so nice to have you here.


  206. jakee308
    208 | December 4, 2009 11:59

    Now, THIS is Fried Chicken.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David