First time visitor? Learn more.

Meltdown Mann

by snork ( 141 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Economy, Free Speech, Media, Progressives, Science, United Nations at December 21st, 2009 - 6:00 pm

One of the chief figures in the climategate debacle is Dr. Michael Mann of Penn State. Next to Jones, he was probably the most notorious and obnoxious. He, of course, is famous for the now long debunked MBH (Mann-Bradley-Hughes) “hockey stick” graph, made using goofy statistics and Californian trees.

Not knowing when to keep his mouth shut, he takes to the pen in this oped in the WaPo. If you have the time, look at the comments. The WaPo readers aren’t having any of it.

Particularly bizarre, illogical, and utterly left wing, is this:

Palin wrote that Alaska’s climate is changing but referred to “thawing permafrost and retreating sea ice” as “natural, cyclical environmental trends.” In fact, such changes are among the effects scientists predicted would occur as greenhouse gas levels increase.

In context, the statement doesn’t even fit. But it was red meat for the left-wing fanatics that he imagines that we all are. Could have just as easily come from a certain little green weenie. You can’t have a proper defense of the shenanigans at CRU without dragging Sarah Palin into it.

Steve McIntyre did a reasonable fisking of it at his blog here. The basic problem with the whole piece is that it’s a complete non-sequitur. It’s actually not a new argument, it’s basically the fake-but-accurate argument warmed over.  But it does have an additional bit of fakery: the “independent lines of evidence” claim.

Here’s the short refutation of the “independent lines of evidence” argument: If these other lines of evidence were so robust, why does he hang on to his phony hockey stick by his fingernails?

Imagine that you’re on a jury. The prosecutor tells you that he has the sworn testimony of a drug-peddling pimp, and lots of other evidence that he doesn’t talk about. If the other evidence is so solid, why does he make the testimony of the pimp the centerpiece of his case?

Sorry, Mike. You already shot your best shot. Now your hockey stick goes down in history next to Piltdown Man. That was quite a meltdown, Mann.

Update: Mann is a victim.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

141 Responses to “Meltdown Mann”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Mrs.Robinson
    1 | December 21, 2009 4:04 am

    Great reporting snork. I am trying my darnedest to get my friends and family to pay attention to all this. I don’t think a lot of folks understand how important it is!


  2. savages_girl
    2 | December 21, 2009 6:09 pm

    Hola!


  3. SciFiGuy
    3 | December 21, 2009 6:12 pm

    And why is this lying bastard still a Professor at PSU?? Shouldn’t he be practicing the line “DO you want to supersize that order for $.99 more????”


  4. 4 | December 21, 2009 6:20 pm

    Their Gorebull warming lies have been exposed. They are becoming unhinged.


  5. chickadee
    5 | December 21, 2009 6:23 pm

    I bet all these conspirators are pulling their hair out and screaming. Think how frustrated these pos creeps must feel. They got so close to pulling off the hoax of the century. And such a big money maker for so many. Their hubris lost them riches, fame and glory. I LOL when I think of them scrambling to hide the warming, trying to stifle real factual information, shutting down debate, and acting like they alone ruled the inquiry. What a bunch of money grubbing huckster thugs. What they have done should land them in jail.


  6. lobo91
    6 | December 21, 2009 6:25 pm

    @ SciFiGuy:

    And why is this lying bastard still a Professor at PSU?? Shouldn’t he be practicing the line “DO you want to supersize that order for $.99 more????”

    It’s going to take years to clean out the AGW supporters from academia and government.

    Much like the fighting on Iwo Jima, where the Marines had to hunt down every last Japanese soldier, and even then, they’d still turn up years later refusing to believe the war was over.

    Maybe if their emperor, Algore the Not-So-Great, goes on TV and tells them to surrender…


  7. Silhouette
    7 | December 21, 2009 6:26 pm

    The Palin insult seems like circular arguing. As an “additional” argument as to why he is right, he evidences his first argument.

    He says, “mankind is warming the earth.” She says, “Actually, it is cyclic.” To which he responds, “Ha! She says it’s cyclic when we’ve said mankind is warming the earth.” Repeating your first argument does not bolster it.


  8. wolfie
    8 | December 21, 2009 6:29 pm

    Wow, Snork. You aren’t kidding about the comments! For the WaPo, too. That’s good news.

    Hey! There may a challenger to the ocean acidification idea people have been floating around as the next Impending Disaster™ .
    Check this comment:

    “Time to move on your next fraud – ACD (anthropogenic continental drift). That is the big danger. We must increase the friction by pumping all the oil out of the earth and burning it.”

    Okay, okay. Given that it has a productive solution, rather than a government imposed destructive one, it will never fly! :D


  9. 9 | December 21, 2009 6:29 pm

    @ Silhouette:

    They are obsessed with Palin.


  10. wolfie
    10 | December 21, 2009 6:31 pm

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    Shouldn’t he be practicing the line “DO you want to supersize that order for $.99 more????”

    Ah, would that it happened!
    And if it did, from what I’ve seen of Mann’s creative math, I’m counting my change. :)


  11. SciFiGuy
    11 | December 21, 2009 6:32 pm

    Silhouette wrote:

    The Palin insult seems like circular arguing. As an “additional” argument as to why he is right, he evidences his first argument.

    He says, “mankind is warming the earth.” She says, “Actually, it is cyclic.” To which he responds, “Ha! She says it’s cyclic when we’ve said mankind is warming the earth.” Repeating your first argument does not bolster it.

    Of course his logic is circular. He studies tree RINGS for a living!!


  12. orangecrush
    12 | December 21, 2009 6:32 pm

    Liar, Liar, Global warming pants on fire.


  13. Silhouette
    13 | December 21, 2009 6:32 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Silhouette:
    They are obsessed with Palin.

    They had all that obsession lying around that they weren’t using anymore. After Bush and Cheney went home.


  14. SciFiGuy
    14 | December 21, 2009 6:33 pm

    HAAAA! It could be called a TREE RING CIRCUS!

    Sorry couldn’t pass it up!


  15. chickadee
    15 | December 21, 2009 6:33 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ SciFiGuy:

    And why is this lying bastard still a Professor at PSU?? Shouldn’t he be practicing the line “DO you want to supersize that order for $.99 more????”

    It’s going to take years to clean out the AGW supporters from academia and government.

    Much like the fighting on Iwo Jima, where the Marines had to hunt down every last Japanese soldier, and even then, they’d still turn up years later refusing to believe the war was over.

    Maybe if their emperor, Algore the Not-So-Great, goes on TV and tells them to surrender…

    Algore isn’t going to tell them to give up. He is still saying polar bear numbers are declining and the earth’s core is 2 million degrees. He’s still spewing the crazy. . . ‘hopen’ he has a chance to be relevant.
    Truth doesn’t matter to these idiots. In fact the truth is an inconvenient detail. Algore grimaces like he has been stabbed when he is informed that polar bears are no longer endangered. Wonder why that’s a problem for him.
    ha ha ha


  16. Silhouette
    16 | December 21, 2009 6:33 pm

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    Of course his logic is circular. He studies tree RINGS for a living!!

    I’m glad I wasn’t drinking a coke. ;-)


  17. orangecrush
    17 | December 21, 2009 6:35 pm

    Any association with Mann or the CRU should sully one’s climatology analysis. Not to be trusted.


  18. 18 | December 21, 2009 6:36 pm

    @ orangecrush:

    They are Propagandists, not Scientists.


  19. SciFiGuy
    19 | December 21, 2009 6:38 pm

    @ Silhouette:
    SO am I! I’m tired of having to replace monitors and keyboards!!


  20. orangecrush
    20 | December 21, 2009 6:39 pm

    @ 15 chickadee: I have to wonder if Al Gore is into Alien and UFO belief systems?


  21. 21 | December 21, 2009 6:39 pm

    @ Rodan:

    She scares them. That is why they spend so much effort saying that she doesn’t scare them.


  22. SciFiGuy
    22 | December 21, 2009 6:42 pm

    @ orangecrush:
    I don’t think he is . But , I will ask my SIL. She is Al Gore’s niece


  23. 23 | December 21, 2009 6:42 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    “Time to move on your next fraud – ACD (anthropogenic continental drift). That is the big danger. We must increase the friction by pumping all the oil out of the earth and burning it.”
    Okay, okay. Given that it has a productive solution, rather than a government imposed destructive one, it will never fly!

    FYI
    http://thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=1668


  24. 24 | December 21, 2009 6:49 pm

    orangecrush wrote:

    Liar, Liar, Global warming pants on fire

    FYI
    http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/-224413–.html?pic=1


  25. chickadee
    25 | December 21, 2009 6:50 pm

    LOL, quite possible. I really do think that after he lost the election to Pres. Bush he suffered a break down.
    Now, losing this opportunity to be somebody (also get $$$) could be the final nail in his fragile sanity.
    He is going to be so irrelevant so soon.

    ****

    orangecrush wrote:

    @ 15 chickadee: I have to wonder if Al Gore is into Alien and UFO belief systems?


  26. 26 | December 21, 2009 6:50 pm

    @ SciFiGuy:

    Damn, man, you’re related to Algore? Man, that must suck! Like being related to John Wayne Gaycee without the hope of the death penalty…


  27. CynicalConservative
    27 | December 21, 2009 6:53 pm

    Maybe O/T but so timely… Mr. Smith Goes to Washington starts on TCM in about 1/2 hour.

    Back to lurking…


  28. 28 | December 21, 2009 6:53 pm

    @ SciFiGuy:

    wow, small world.


  29. 29 | December 21, 2009 6:56 pm

    @ chickadee

    He runs from Philem all the time.


  30. SciFiGuy
    30 | December 21, 2009 6:57 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    ONLY BY MARRIAGE!! NO BLOOD!!


  31. snork
    31 | December 21, 2009 6:59 pm

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    ONLY BY MARRIAGE!! NO BLOOD!!

    No blood for Gore!


  32. snork
    32 | December 21, 2009 7:02 pm

    I thinks I broked it.


  33. 33 | December 21, 2009 7:03 pm

    @ SciFiGuy:

    What does your SIL think of Gore?


  34. wolfie
    34 | December 21, 2009 7:04 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Now that makes two places I’ve read about it!
    Sounds like a consensus to me! Science™ !

    :lol: :lol: :lol:


  35. 35 | December 21, 2009 7:07 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Now that makes two places I’ve read about it!
    Sounds like a consensus to me! Science™ !

    The debate is over. Now we’re gotta do something about it ASAP. Hand me your wallet.


  36. snork
    36 | December 21, 2009 7:12 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    I got a better idea. The Global Winch™.


  37. 37 | December 21, 2009 7:13 pm

    @ snork:
    @ Bunk X:

    We are causing tectonics shifts! I swear the science is settled.


  38. 38 | December 21, 2009 7:15 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    I got a better idea. The Global Winch™.

    Combined with The Global Ring Clamp™, that just might work. Gimme your wallet, too.


  39. snork
    39 | December 21, 2009 7:16 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    No, you give me your wallet, a couple bottles of vodka, and a Copenhagen hooker, and I’ll give you the secret to the wind-powered Global Winch™.


  40. Silhouette
    40 | December 21, 2009 7:18 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    We are causing tectonics shifts! I swear the science is settled.

    We’re doing all we can. Euro finds us repulsive.

    /


  41. snork
    41 | December 21, 2009 7:20 pm

    I’ll fix it. Where’s my Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator™?


  42. 42 | December 21, 2009 7:22 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    No, you give me your wallet, a couple bottles of vodka, and a Copenhagen hooker, and I’ll give you the secret to the wind-powered Global Winch™.

    I can do the vodka, but the Copenhagen Global Wench™ is gonna cost you. Tell you what. If we pool our money, we can create Global Rustoleum™ for maintenance.


  43. 43 | December 21, 2009 7:25 pm

    snork wrote:

    I’ll fix it. Where’s my Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator™?

    Look behind the couch. That’s where I find things, mixed in with the cat stuff.


  44. snork
    44 | December 21, 2009 7:29 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    My Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator™ is in the litter box? Ewwwww! Now I’m going to have to decontaminate my Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator™!


  45. SciFiGuy
    45 | December 21, 2009 7:30 pm

    @ Rodan:
    She and AL are on opposite sides of the spectrum both ecologically and politically. His professional persona vs. his private life are much different also.

    My brother was a Major in the Marines who worked as the Liaison Officer for presidential inauguration events back in ’04.


  46. SciFiGuy
    46 | December 21, 2009 7:31 pm

    @ snork:
    I believe that if you check the avatar IT MINE!!!! End of story.


  47. orangecrush
    47 | December 21, 2009 7:32 pm

    @ 24 Bunk X: lol


  48. Speranza
    48 | December 21, 2009 7:32 pm

    i thin this man made global warming eventually will be exposed as one of the biggest frauds ever.


  49. SciFiGuy
    49 | December 21, 2009 7:33 pm

    @ Speranza:
    From your computer to Gods printing press!


  50. 50 | December 21, 2009 7:34 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    My Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator™ is in the litter box? Ewwwww! Now I’m going to have to decontaminate my Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator™!

    I wouldn’t worry too much. The Q-36 is a pretty state-of-the-art model. It’ll just smell kinda stinky the first coupla times you fire it.


  51. Overlook
    51 | December 21, 2009 7:38 pm

    The warmists always, always, whenever one set of data is challenged, fall back on “overwhelming” other data. They are so multitudinous, so big, so intuitively scary, that it is OVERWHELMING. No need to say any more; just gibber out: acid oceans, icecaps, glaciers, polar bears, rising seas, coral reefs, migrating birds, early fruit, mosquitoes, hurricanes…
    Take out any one item on that list as being within cyclical “norms” and you are told the other data are OVERWHELMING.
    Snork, how about producing a list with each item showing the scare story and the reality. The whole case is underwhelming.


  52. taxfreekiller
    53 | December 21, 2009 7:41 pm

    What is the atomic weight of these lies,
    The prior lies of atomic amounts too weigh in now,
    Mushroom clouds of lies seeding the CO2 fraud.
    How do the chalk pillars of the Progressive Democrats hold now,

    Man this Mann got some scales on his scaley person,
    The lies so heavy, such high flying high lies by high ones,
    The lies so tight theaded together with machine like rivits,
    yet the weight, the stress, the rivits pop, the sides heave,
    True lies by John F. Kerry on board, True lies of Los Alamos lab
    by Bill Clinton enable ones of China lost from the L.A. embasy,
    The lies of Reid, Pelosi and the Telepromter Telacaster liar of all time B. Obama, now split the seams well below the water line.

    Odd that cold water rushes in, Odd that snow is on the deck as the
    last songs are strummed by the Progressive Last Lost Orchestration of
    the Soros out of tune Commie Climate Line by Line Lie.

    So, heavy, and no one comes to help, only more tons of truth piled on.

    Break you liars, Break and soon.

    ps
    Mr. Mann, “man up”, your the one who self denies rational thought.

    like that


  53. Insert Clever Name Here
    54 | December 21, 2009 7:42 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    i thin this man made global warming eventually will be exposed as one of the biggest frauds ever.

    I hope you’re right, but what I fear is that even when it is exposed, they’ll get off scott-free. “You know, they meant well. They were just trying to save the planet.” NOBODY will hold them accountable.


  54. Speranza
    55 | December 21, 2009 7:44 pm

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    From your computer to Gods printing press!

    It will, it has to be.


  55. Alberta Oil Peon
    56 | December 21, 2009 7:45 pm

    Is there anyone here that still has a sock at the evil place? here is a video of CfnJ’s climate-change “authority”, Elizabeth May, totally losing it in an exchange with Bjorn Lomborg during the Munk Debate on Climate change last month. May and moonbat Numero Uno George Monbiot took on Nigel Lawson and Bjorn Lomborg, in front of a largely leftist audience, but by all accounts, the alarmists were handily defeated.

    Here:


  56. Formercorpsman
    57 | December 21, 2009 7:46 pm

    Semi OT, but it dovetails with the thread topic well.

    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091221/D9CO04700.html


  57. Speranza
    58 | December 21, 2009 7:46 pm

    Insert Clever Name Here wrote:

    I hope you’re right, but what I fear is that even when it is exposed, they’ll get off scott-free. “You know, they meant well. They were just trying to save the planet.” NOBODY will hold them accountable.

    It reminds me of the great heterosexual AIDs square of the late 1980′s.


  58. Alberta Oil Peon
    59 | December 21, 2009 7:46 pm

    Sheesh. here.


  59. Overlook
    60 | December 21, 2009 7:47 pm

    And moreover. The scientific community has not lost its collective wits. But they are showing undue deference to what is essentially a cooked up “studies” program, like all the politically motivated psuedo-sciences. A group of environmentalists set up “environmental studies” departments, which soon had “climate studies” offspring.

    Like “women’s studies”, climatology is accorded the status of science, but is in fact ideology. It exists to prove a point of view.

    When the lid is lifted on their methods, there is often fudging, or downright suppression of findings. Christina Hoff Summers exposed the feminists who suppressed their findings (that girls were not being intimidated in class) because their cause was too important.

    One of the important outcomes of the email expose is that true scientists will now wake up to the fact that they have allowed frauds to masquerade as scientists. Statisticians and mathmeticians – and some physicists and geologists have woken up already.


  60. Speranza
    61 | December 21, 2009 7:47 pm

    PI<F – scare not square


  61. Insert Clever Name Here
    62 | December 21, 2009 7:48 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    So, heavy, and no one comes to help, only more tons of truth piled on.

    What he said.


  62. wolfie
    63 | December 21, 2009 7:49 pm

    Insert Clever Name Here wrote:

    NOBODY will hold them accountable.

    The Left is never held accountable. Never.
    Left means never having to say you’re sorry.


  63. chickadee
    64 | December 21, 2009 7:50 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    From your computer to Gods printing press!

    It will, it has to be.

    I think so too. People are fed up with lies and deceit. These hoaxers aren’t scientists. They had a scam and tried to twist and force the truth into falsehoods to ‘prove’ their fraud. The public is waking up to these thieves. AGW is now a tainted laughable concept.


  64. Overlook
    65 | December 21, 2009 7:50 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Brilliant. Thank you for that link. Bookmarked. 690 fictions. Has anyone tried to link this on the Wally’s site?


  65. SciFiGuy
    66 | December 21, 2009 7:50 pm

    Work with a PHD’d geologist who buys into the global warming crap. We had a serious discussion the other day after the CRU email story broke. I asked him a very basic set of questions;
    1. Has the Earth ever been hotter than it was in 1998?
    2. What caused this heating?
    3. What caused it to cool and by how much?
    4. Was man the cause of these events?

    He got pissed and left…..


  66. 67 | December 21, 2009 7:51 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:

    Climate is in flux.
    Gullible human beings
    Wrongly take credit.


  67. Formercorpsman
    68 | December 21, 2009 7:51 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    Unreal. There are no words. Un-fing-real.


  68. Overlook
    69 | December 21, 2009 7:52 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    Another good one. A classic.


  69. Alberta Oil Peon
    70 | December 21, 2009 7:54 pm

    @ SciFiGuy:

    Damn few geologists buy into the AGW nonsense, We are trained to be conscious of the great changes that Earth has undergone over the span of geologic time. There have been times when Earth was entirely free of polar ice. CO2 has been over 100 ppm. And those times were marked by a great burgeoning of all kinds of life on both land and sea.


  70. Alberta Oil Peon
    71 | December 21, 2009 7:55 pm

    Drat! make that 1000 ppm.!


  71. SciFiGuy
    72 | December 21, 2009 7:56 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    YOU have got to be kidding me! Is/was that for reals????


  72. Overlook
    73 | December 21, 2009 7:58 pm

    @ SciFiGuy:

    Was he overwhelmed?


  73. taxfreekiller
    74 | December 21, 2009 7:58 pm

    So many screws loose, so few who want to grab a screw-driver.


  74. SciFiGuy
    75 | December 21, 2009 7:58 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    Yea I know, He’s a full blown San Fran loving lib! AND ADMITS IT!! Wears it on his sleeves.


  75. 76 | December 21, 2009 8:02 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Insert Clever Name Here wrote:

    It reminds me of the great heterosexual AIDs sCare of the late 1980’s.

    I remember that. Every new report said a million more were infected in the U.S. When the actual numbers started dropping among the gay male population, due mainly to preventative measures and the attrition of the infected, the Surgeon General redefined AIDS to include a bunch of female-related auto-immune disorders. Guess what? The number of cases jumped up to where they wanted them to be.

    So… The solution to proving global warming is increasing at an alarming rate is to redefine the term “degree.”


  76. snork
    77 | December 21, 2009 8:02 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    Don’t you DARE say there’s no Great Pumpkin!


  77. SciFiGuy
    78 | December 21, 2009 8:03 pm

    @ Overlook:
    Being that I have all of a 12th Grade edumacation and work with 3 PHd’s, 3 Master Degreed Chemistists, and one other degreed chemist, well YES, he was.

    I design and build all the weird machines and apparatus that these guys need for their experiments. I have to be a very fast read.


  78. Overlook
    79 | December 21, 2009 8:03 pm

    Question: Every time there is a snow storm, something must happen to the “residual” heat “stored” by CO2 in the locality. Yet much of the warmist argument depends on the build-up of this residual heat globally over time. Can anyone direct me to a physicist’s response?


  79. SciFiGuy
    80 | December 21, 2009 8:04 pm

    @ snork:
    Only in Quebec..


  80. Insert Clever Name Here
    81 | December 21, 2009 8:04 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    So… The solution to proving global warming is increasing at an alarming rate is to redefine the term “degree.”

    Ha! That’s funny.


  81. snork
    82 | December 21, 2009 8:04 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    So… The solution to proving global warming is increasing at an alarming rate is to redefine the term “degree.”

    What do you think all the “adjustments” are all about? The “homogenization”?


  82. SciFiGuy
    83 | December 21, 2009 8:05 pm

    Overlook wrote:

    Question: Every time there is a snow storm, something must happen to the “residual” heat “stored” by CO2 in the locality. Yet much of the warmist argument depends on the build-up of this residual heat globally over time. Can anyone direct me to a physicist’s response?

    It gets sent to Germany with the hunger from the Snickers commercials!

    (Sorry, Couldn’t resist)


  83. taxfreekiller
    84 | December 21, 2009 8:06 pm

    tfk has a sock still
    but cj is on the hunt
    got to be very careful now

    he and most of them read
    here every day, they
    see the links, they
    check it out, as does cj
    that is how he gets advance
    research done and reacts to
    post, he uses the resources here…

    like that


  84. snork
    85 | December 21, 2009 8:07 pm

    @ Overlook:

    The CO2 doesn’t store heat. I think you’re confusing it with the latent heat of the water vapor, which is given up to form clouds, and then more is given up again to make snow. The heat into the air, but up where the clouds are, not on the ground.


  85. 86 | December 21, 2009 8:08 pm

    @ snork:
    You’ve got a point there. That’s exactly what they’ve been doing all along.

    BRB. Daughter needs to harvest crops on Farmville or something.


  86. Alberta Oil Peon
  87. taxfreekiller
    88 | December 21, 2009 8:11 pm

    so

    whats up with all that

    http://www.wattsupwiththat.com


  88. SciFiGuy
    89 | December 21, 2009 8:11 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    SLOWLY SHAKES HEAD and says “FUCK!! I’ve got to get out more!!!


  89. Overlook
    90 | December 21, 2009 8:16 pm

    @ snork:

    No. I put “store” in quotes. Warmists claim that the radiation that is not reflected back into space – that is “absorbed” by CO2 – contributes to temperature rise. They also claim that the more CO2, the more the rise (even though logarithmic). They use “store” metaphorically. Further, that this builds a rising heat trend (currently being “masked” by oceanic oscillations ). I have not seen a coherent explication of the physics of this, but I though there may be a coherent critique of it. And I do not count the ever-repeated “greenhouse gas blanket effect” as a cogent analysis of the build up over time scenario.


  90. SciFiGuy
    91 | December 21, 2009 8:25 pm

    Been a long day already, Will be on most of tomorrow as today was my last day of work for the year!! CAN U SAY PARTY???

    Nite all!!


  91. snork
    92 | December 21, 2009 8:26 pm

    @ Overlook:

    “Store” is just plain wrong. What it does is slow down the escape. By how much is the big question, without getting into a 10-page dissertation.


  92. Alberta Oil Peon
    93 | December 21, 2009 8:33 pm

    Just listened to Nigel Lawson’s opening remarks. I’m liking this guy a lot.


  93. 94 | December 21, 2009 8:34 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    Man is causing tectonic plate shifts! The Science is settled!

    /


  94. Alberta Oil Peon
    95 | December 21, 2009 8:37 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Just get you some Tectonic Poligrip! That will stop your tectonic plates from shifting.


  95. 96 | December 21, 2009 8:40 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    I’m surprised they haven’t floated that theory yet


  96. 97 | December 21, 2009 8:41 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    I’m surprised they haven’t floated that theory yet

    You’re drifting from the topic. I thought we were talking about Teutonic Plates.


  97. 98 | December 21, 2009 8:42 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Ha ha ha ha ha!


  98. Panhandler
    99 | December 21, 2009 8:43 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Just get you some Tectonic Poligrip! That will stop your tectonic plates from shifting.

    That’s it! I can’t take the demeaning. I would advise you to stay in the Great White North. Any trip into the US will find you being served with a supenea to answer charges of Toothiness.


  99. Macker
    100 | December 21, 2009 8:43 pm

    OT: Ahmed and Salim’s Christmas Episode!


  100. Alberta Oil Peon
    101 | December 21, 2009 8:46 pm

    My Gawd! Elizabeth is such a tedious speaker. Sounds like the worst college lecturer I’ve ever endured.

    Di you know she’s a single mother? Proof positive of the awesome power of beer goggles.


  101. 102 | December 21, 2009 8:46 pm

    OT:

    A Congressman from Michigan DOES have his head on straight.


  102. 103 | December 21, 2009 8:47 pm

    @ Macker:

    Ha ha ha ha ha, this is too funny!


  103. Insert Clever Name Here
    104 | December 21, 2009 8:48 pm

    from the comments in the linked article:

    JCMills wrote:
    When Warmers (true believers) warn Skeptics (undecideds) and Deniers (Cynics or true unbelievers) that they should keep quiet and they don’t “know” enough to even ask a question or share an opinion,… why aren’t the warmers asking their non-scientist spokesman, AL Gore, to do the same thing?

    Interesting point, no?


  104. 105 | December 21, 2009 8:48 pm

    @ LanceKates:

    This guy is speaking the truth


  105. Macker
    106 | December 21, 2009 8:49 pm

    @ LanceKates:

    1 MILLION UPDINGS!


  106. 107 | December 21, 2009 8:49 pm

    @ Insert Clever Name Here:

    They are Fanatical Fascists.


  107. 108 | December 21, 2009 8:49 pm

    Overlook wrote:

    @ snork:
    No. I put “store” in quotes. Warmists claim that the radiation that is not reflected back into space – that is “absorbed” by CO2 – contributes to temperature rise. They also claim that the more CO2, the more the rise (even though logarithmic). They use “store” metaphorically. Further, that this builds a rising heat trend (currently being “masked” by oceanic oscillations ). I have not seen a coherent explication of the physics of this, but I though there may be a coherent critique of it. And I do not count the ever-repeated “greenhouse gas blanket effect” as a cogent analysis of the build up over time scenario.

    That sounds so comfy…. think about it… a greenhouse gas blanket.

    It’s better than a Snuggie!


  108. 109 | December 21, 2009 8:52 pm

    @ Macker:

    man, not a million…

    dude, I have to pay taxes on those!


  109. Alberta Oil Peon
    110 | December 21, 2009 8:53 pm

    Nothing beats alehouse gases!


  110. waldensianspirit
    111 | December 21, 2009 8:57 pm

    If rich men and women never had heart troubles [in our free society] we wouldn’t have high tech pacemakers and stints and other life systems for anyone.


  111. 112 | December 21, 2009 9:03 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    If rich men and women never had heart troubles [in our free society] we wouldn’t have high tech pacemakers and stints and other life systems for anyone.

    So, since rich men and women [in our free society] also get intestinal polyps, we have them to thank for colonoscopies?


  112. Alberta Oil Peon
    113 | December 21, 2009 9:05 pm

    George Monbiot is actually an engaging speaker. He does a good job of presenting the warmist viewpoint.


  113. 114 | December 21, 2009 9:06 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    better a little camera than someone’s arm, feeling around.


  114. Possum
    115 | December 21, 2009 9:07 pm

    I see the stupid fucktard at LGF has got another “The Sky is Falling” thread up.

    World’s Highest Glacier Ski Run is Nearly Gone

    Well, if rich bastards like Al Gore and all those Jazz Musicians that actually made any money didn’t pollute the planet by jetting off to Bolivia in the summer to ski on the worlds highest glacier thus producing greenhouse gas that warmed the planet and melted the glacier that they now cannot ski on they would still be able to ski there!

    That guy that runs Little Green Footballs is such an asshole.

    Things would have been much better over there if Charles had just left and let the Ballet Dancer run the place.


  115. snork
    116 | December 21, 2009 9:08 pm

    Just finished watching the Fox climate special from last night. It’s on again Wednesday. Recommended.


  116. 117 | December 21, 2009 9:08 pm

    you know, with all our advancements, I’m suprised that they don’t have some sort of pill you can take….. it breaks down in your intestine….. releases a camera that takes pictures from all angles and does nothing but take pictures and beam them to a storage bank that you’d keep with you for one day, then out goes the camera when you use the restroom.

    That way they get all the pictures, but don’t need to do the whole ‘up the bum’ thing.


  117. Alberta Oil Peon
    118 | December 21, 2009 9:08 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Welcome to the five-year voyage of the starship Colonprise; it’s mission to go where no man has gone before.


  118. 119 | December 21, 2009 9:09 pm

    OT,

    Iron Maiden can still knock them out of the park:


  119. 120 | December 21, 2009 9:09 pm

    @ Possum:

    Well, there was a time that Greenland was Green….. I can’t imagine that the world’s weather patterns change…. I mean, that’s only caused by man driving cars and eating beef, and we’ve only done both of those since the early 1900′s.


  120. Alberta Oil Peon
    121 | December 21, 2009 9:09 pm

    @ LanceKates:

    Lance, I think that is soon going to be the way it gets done.


  121. 122 | December 21, 2009 9:10 pm

    LanceKates wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    better a little camera than someone’s arm, feeling around.

    Can we go back to moving German plates around?


  122. 123 | December 21, 2009 9:11 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Welcome to the five-year voyage of the starship Colonprise; it’s mission to go where no man has gone before.

    Depends on the man.


  123. 124 | December 21, 2009 9:14 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    I also think that we could have nanobots that’d feed on the crap that clogs arteries….. have a program that lets them work for X days/weeks then they shut down and eventually get absorbed by the body or passed out as waste.

    I’ve also thought that, rather than having to cut someone open to replace their pacemaker battery, have a plate inserted below the skin so that once a week or month they wear a belt across their chest to bed, which plugs in and charges the pacemaker via magnetic fields.


  124. 125 | December 21, 2009 9:15 pm

    @ LanceKates:
    Ooh. He’s dripping weasels.


  125. 126 | December 21, 2009 9:16 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    Can we go back to moving German plates around?

    Sure, I have the whole David Hasselhof collection from Knight Rider to Baywatch.

    Oh, not THOSE plates…


  126. 127 | December 21, 2009 9:18 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    I should print up that photo on glossies and mail it to PETA.


  127. Alberta Oil Peon
    128 | December 21, 2009 9:18 pm

    @ LanceKates:

    Those both sound like good ideas, and the latter one is eminently practical with today’s technology.


  128. 129 | December 21, 2009 9:20 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    @ LanceKates:
    Those both sound like good ideas, and the latter one is eminently practical with today’s technology.

    I’m (basically) an only child, single and so I have alot of time on my hands to think of stuff.


  129. Alberta Oil Peon
    130 | December 21, 2009 9:26 pm

    Of course we could power pacemakers with little nuclear batteries that would last for 50 years or more.


  130. 131 | December 21, 2009 9:29 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    Pfft, we can’t power our HOMES with nuclear power, I don’t think they’ll let pacemakers get it… imagine the bad press:

    “Get a chernobyl put in your chest by buying my competitor’s product, how do YOU know it won’t melt down?”


  131. 132 | December 21, 2009 9:31 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    Of course we could power pacemakers with little nuclear batteries that would last for 50 years or more.

    But then any flatulence would be pure water vapor, a major greenhouse gas. Gotta get the media on your side first.


  132. snork
    133 | December 21, 2009 9:31 pm

    LanceKates wrote:

    “Get a chernobyl put in your chest by buying my competitor’s product, how do YOU know it won’t melt down?”

    A fitting end to the “Meltdown Mann” thread.


  133. 134 | December 21, 2009 9:32 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    That’s easy, we’ll make one that is powered by hemp.


  134. Alberta Oil Peon
    135 | December 21, 2009 9:34 pm

    How about a pacemaker that is powered by HUMP. You could get Jenna Jameson to endorse it.


  135. 136 | December 21, 2009 9:34 pm

    LanceKates wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    That’s easy, we’ll make one that is powered by hemp.

    He was my favorite Stooge.


  136. 137 | December 21, 2009 9:42 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Now that’s funny.


  137. 138 | December 21, 2009 10:20 pm

    PZ Myers’s last post on this was on 19 December. He’s quoting a propaganda cartoon. The cartoon is “the bottom line”.

    The setting is the “climate summit”. It has the Leftist caricature of the skeptic – middle aged angry white man – saying “what if it’s all a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?” Next to him there is a black woman turned around in unhappy incredulity. Meanwhile the presenter is showing a slide of all the benefits of … well, the reader can’t be sure. What could be a “hoax” about a general “climate summit”? The cartoon doesn’t say.

    So the reader has to conclude that skeptics are against “healthy children”, “livable cities”, “sustainability”, “green jobs”, “energy independence” and a generally “better world”. Because they’re white conservatives. And insufficiently sensitive in the presence of minorities.

    This is an attempt to change the subject. The cartoon knows that the game is over. The cartoon has to fall back on that promise of that “better”, socialist world; and on the caricature of skeptics as reactionaries and evil.

    Les jeux sont faits.

    (At least scienceblogs still has GNXP, or else it would be a total waste of a DNS registry.)


  138. Aussie Infidel
    139 | December 22, 2009 2:59 am

    The definitive AGW interview from Lord Monkton

    Worth a few minutes watching as he sets out the scam chapter and verse and Names Names and calls them what they are.

    http://vimeo.com/8023097


  139. kansas
    140 | December 22, 2009 8:03 am

    Well, he might be right, and I for one am really worried. Check this out.

    US Weather Bureau Report

    The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen , Norway . Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.

    I’m sorry, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922 as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post.


  140. kansas
    141 | December 22, 2009 8:04 am

    Oh and I forgot. Sarah Palin is a liar.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David