The Obama Administration has open supporters of Mao Zedong working for them. This genocidal dictator is admired by the Third World Liberation Movement and Progressives in America. Well low and behold, there is an ornament of Mao on the White House Christmas Tree!
These photos of ornaments on the White House Christmas tree in the Blue Room were taken just days ago. Of course, Mao has his place in the White House.
Read the rest.
This is despicable. Mao was a genocidal madman. He was responsible for the deaths of millions and fought us in the Korean War. The fact that many people who surround Obama support this speaks volumes about our so called President. The truth of the matter is Barack Hussein Obama is a 3rd Worldist. He admires anti-Western causes, so his defacto support of Maoists is no shock. I am embarrassed over this and this shows the Totalitarian nature of the Progressive Movement.
the long march…
Saw this. Mr. and Mrs. Barry hate the USA!
/Bush’s fault!!!!
how many dead in china because of mao?
If that is true that is disgusting.
@ Nevergiveup:
It sis the White House claims some community volunteers put it up. Community Volunteers, interesting store.
Ahem,…!
It’s a Ho-l-i-day tree!
This is like a nightmare, except we’re all awake.
@ Urban Infidel:
Oh yeah, I was politically incorrect!
Any signs or pictures of Christ? Obama doesn’t like to be photographed near Jesus.
@ Urban Infidel:
Jesus is out and Mao is in!
Maowee Kwristmas America
Sincerely,
-The B. Hussein Family
The Re-Education Camp Song
—dedicated to Harry Belafonte
Mao! Maaaaaaaaaaaao!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Hey! Me say Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaao!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Work hard at re-education camp
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Quiver in terror from Red Guard foot stamp
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Come Mister Komissar, see I have the Red Book
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
I read every day and I give the words a close look
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
It’s rule by assassination, force and fear!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
All deviationists get sent here!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Mao! Maaaaaaaaaaaao!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Hey! Me say Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaao!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Everything the Chairman says is true
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
His men beat the resistance out of you
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
It’s rule by assassination, force and fear!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
All deviationists get sent here!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Mao! Maaaaaaaaaaaao!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
Hey! Me say Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaao!
When is the Chairman gonna let me go home?
@ Urban Infidel:
Well we couldn’t have Jesus stealing the 0′s thunder. That would be bad for the USSA.
If anyone hasn’t seen the other ornaments on the tree in the link, there’s a transvestite on one and Obama pasted onto Mount Rushmore on another.
PUKe!
Mao is probably more popular now in America than he is in China? Go figure
@ coldwarrior:
This must piss you off. You win the Coldwar only to have a version of the enemy here now.
Nevergiveup wrote:
Well, those Che shirts were getting kinda old. Need a new mass-murderer for the freshest fashion looks!
Urban Infidel wrote:
My bet is they’re not calling it a Christmas Tree either. Probably called The Holiday Tree, or something like that.
Ha! Just5 found this at ABC.
Isn’t having more than one tree eco-unfriendly?
Urban Infidel wrote:
And you probably thought BJ’s in the Oval Office was a low as ya could go ha?
@ Urban Infidel:
Too divisive. The man who killed a hundred million chinese? Why, kids can learn from him to follow your dreams, and he looks quite festive, too!
Where’s the ManBearPig ornament?
Urban Infidel wrote:
Of course, the Obamas—who apparently couldn’t be bothered to decorate a tree themselves—hired it done by Simon Doonan, edgy director of Barney’s windows.
So basically this is Courtier Fashion Queen Christmas.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
it never ceases to amaze me how fast you are on those
coldwarrior wrote:
I’ve read that one before.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Yep. I know Doonan. A friend of mine used to work for him doing the windows at Barney’s. He’s a royal flaming pain in the ass!
Can anyone imagine for a second George or Laura Bush seeing ornaments like these on the White House tree and letting it go?
Rodan wrote:
it doesnt, because i know because of these proggies the pendulum will swing way back my way very very soon.
I’m surprised there are no teleprompter ornaments.
coldwarrior wrote:
That one, I confess, was “on the spike” from before. And a good thing, too; I’ve been a little under the weather.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
i have a mao watch, his right arm is the second hand and its holding a little red book
song_and_dance_man wrote:
oooohhhhh!
bubble bursted!
now that i look at that ornament…its from the warhol piece
@ Urban Infidel:
No, because they were actually Christians. Not pretend Christians. What the hell is a wishing tree anyhow? That sounds like some pagan horse hockey.
/I know it’s not pagan, but they could try to be a little more anti-Christian.
coldwarrior wrote:
That just makes it worse.
In the meantime, Obama is being criticized for not doing enough for black people.
Has Obama picked a church yet..??? Just askin’!
song_and_dance_man wrote:
i kinda like the warhol stuff.
@ linoleumknife:
A ‘wishing tree’? What in God’s name is that?
@ coldwarrior:
Warhol was a master of appropriation and a so-so illustrator.
Urban Infidel wrote:
I wish i knew?
@ Urban Infidel:
Some liberal clap trap that is meant to take Christ out of Christmas. All I have to say is that in the end God will not look on this with favor.
@ Nevergiveup:
Ha! Well maybe the wish fairy will come by and sprinkle you with unicorn dust. Then you will have your wish.
Urban Infidel wrote:
true..i still like his work tho
My grandpa would tell me all the time: “Son, you can wish in one hand and shit in the other. See which one fills up first.” Maybe some people should take that to heart.
linoleumknife wrote:
my grandad the commanad sergeant major used to say that…i say that too!
one of my favorite expressions!
linoleumknife wrote:
Yup. That about sums it up. Smart man, your grandfather.
@ coldwarrior:
Sage advice from the greatest generation.
Actually, my grandad is probably a generation after yours, but those were tough dudes.
@ Urban Infidel:
Yeah, he is a treasure. Rice graduate and he knows Texas history like no other. The stories he can tell….
Urban Infidel wrote:
Maybe it’s a tree everyone gathers around to make special wishes for peace, coexistence, socialized medicine, and other wonderful things.
Then again, maybe it’s a Festivus pole.
@ wolfie:
I can hardly wait for Easter! /
@ snork:
Right under the first lady icicles?
m wrote:
With a box of wookie cookies…
I find this to be a real surprise.
I thought the reason Zero returned the bust of W. S. Churchill to Britain was to make room in the oval office for his bust of Mao.
@ Urban Infidel:
Actually, I THINK he has.
@ wolfie:
I want to do the Airing of Grievances! That looks like the most fun part.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Wasn’t it a bust of himself, complete with halo?
I want a bust of a bust in my house.
linoleumknife wrote:
Yeah, but in the White House, WE are the main grievance!
@ wolfie:
Well if these are the type of people who have Mao ornaments then I will take that as a compliment. I fuckin hate Commies.
The Mao ornament does not change how I feel about the big “0″(pronounced zero). Never liked him. But I will pray for him.
We’ve had a tree shortage here every year, so I’ve had to improvise.
Mele Kalikimaka me ka Hau’oli Makahiki Hou!
@ m:
Wishing tree, unreal.
Urban Infidel wrote:
He’s still trying to find a local Mosque that isn’t being watched by the FBI.
Now, here’s an ornament that Inflated Scrotum Man would envy…
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Ha ha ha ha ha!
@ linoleumknife:
What the hell is a wishing tree anyhow?
It is the central icon in the religion of unrest. It’s is looking and wishing for what you don’t have rather than seeing what you do have.
If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.
/OH YEAH? I’m spoiling Liberal
Christmas values? Well BAH HUMBUG!Wishing tree
per Wikipedia
I guess since we’re so worried about globalogna warming, then we need to give offerings to the trees which will help save us.
God, I’m making myself sick saying that.
@ IslandLibertarian:
Hey, spoil away. I don’t mind at all.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I am sooooo sorry I clicked that.
You did warn us, but……….. ! Yikes!
IslandLibertarian wrote:
And if wishes were thongs, the beggars would ride up.
Urban Infidel wrote:
He would probably melt or splode er sumpin.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
That should come with a viewer’s warning..
The health care bill comes with a rider that says it’s too be unmodified for eternity. WTF is with these people?
pbird wrote:
is this knucklehead 0 trying on purpose to be the most unpopular pres in the history of the US?
he is at 56% dissaproval…thats 3/5 against
linoleumknife wrote:
Sounds like Kwanza horse hockey.
“‘Wish Fulfilling Tree’ is the title of the world Anthem for children. The lyrics were written by the Buddhist monk kelsang Pawo and the music by the Greek composer George Lenoudius. It was released for the benefit of children in January 2009 and is to be recorded in every one of the worlds languages.” — Wiki
Argggggggghhhhh.
mjazz wrote:
progressive communist baby boomer shithead lefty assmunch woodstock types…they know how to run you life in perpetuity so much better than you.
no one is allowed to overturn them!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
He could have, at least, worn underwear. I’m sure they could order him a pair of custom Chinese sling shots (v-briefs or tighty whiteys, for those who may not know this slang term) from Big and Tall.
coldwarrior wrote:
Talkin bout my generation!!!
So you want me to rock the vote by shutting down cougars who think health care is great the way it is? (1:16)
mjazz wrote:
Ew. Nasty.
I got the Wishing Tree link from ABC news.
UPDATE: The Hope and Change Tree is in the Executive bedroom.
/
pbird wrote:
viagra and lipitor for all!
mjazz wrote:
Yeah. It would require a super majority (2/3 ???) of both houses to repeal it. That way if it turns out to be the disaster every sane person believes it will be, we get to keep it anyway!
@ coldwarrior:
This is just unreal!
coldwarrior wrote:
Not on yer life dude. I’ll stick to whatever comes natural.
@ coldwarrior:
I thought Lipitor was a killer robot…
Rodan wrote:
payback is gonna be a bitch.
the irony is is that this will prolly get shot down in the courts…in the same arena that the progs have been writing law for years
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
And I thought Lipitor was a separate tour of the White House to where Monica did her service for the POTUS.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
no, thats the shover robot…dont trust the pusher robot
@ mjazz:
Now that is in your face Prog BS.
@ pbird:
The best part is at 1:58. Class act. We weren’t like that. (WHAT’S IT SPELL?)
coldwarrior wrote:
“Trust the shover robot, but goddamn the pusher robot…”
—Steppenwolf
@ coldwarrior:
Actually some legal scholars are saying this is unconstitutional.
I’ll go OT
http://www.wattsupwiththat.com
Rodan wrote:
Scholars, schmolars—did they win?
Rodan wrote:
we shall see…it would be riotously funny for the courts, of all things, to throw this OBAMAnational prgram the hell out
@ taxfreekiller:
Good link TFK!
@ coldwarrior:
That would be ironic.
Bridgette Gabriel on FOX ripping apart Obamcare.
The left are so lent green.
@ Rodan:
Is there any way to watch FOX news on line?
Look at this exchange!
Maybe they shouldn’t have a car payment if they can’t even afford an abortion. Oops, late with the rent too. Tough. Maybe that would teach them to buy a condom next time, get a vasectomy, or pay a few bucks each month for birth control pills. Real tough.
Hey, here’s a thought. Maybe irresponsible people would stop fucking without precautions if they knew their neighbors weren’t going to bail them out over and over again? And that goes for more than just abortion.
Here is the response of Icarus.
And now we have our creepy right wing post of the evening
@ teacake:
Not that I know of.
I see a banning!
I made sure I got no one pregnant back in the day. One reason amongst others, is that I didn’t want to be responsible for a kid and I didn’t want to have to fork over the money for an abortion. Simple as that.
Here is the response.
re: #447 borgcube
If anyone wants to know why I made a very public break with the right wing, I’ll just point them to your comment.
Disgusting.
The truth is disgusting to Icarus.
@ Rodan:
If the word creepy was never invented Charles Nodickens would get perpetual writer’s block.
@ Rodan:
Got it. Sound logic mixed with a twist of morality, although a bit vulgar, is something considered as ‘creepy right wing’ by Foster.
Foster must buy Reynolds Wrap in bulk at his local big box store.
@ waldensianspirit:
why do we still bother with chucky j?
waldensianspirit wrote:
Not necessarily. He could always use Ookey.
Taking proper measures to not have a child is disgusting? We all know how easy it is to be a single mother.
@ Rodan:
How about the guy who orders a coffee with a knife sticking out of his chest?
coldwarrior wrote:
Now that is a question that many have brought up in other ways by more than just you.
@ song_and_dance_man:
The fact is if people are responsible you wouldn’t have these issues in society.
How in the HELL can the 2/3 majority requirement to get rid of this monstrosity survive a court challenge? Or is Dingy Harry going to count on judges like Sotomayor, Stephens and Ginsburg to follow their orders from the Chosen One?
coldwarrior wrote:
I actually agree with you CW. He is totally irrelevant.
@ coldwarrior
Because he believes the people wiped out by muslims on 9/11 were “excess” people on his planet and he still has 9/11 content on his blog that doesn’t belong with him.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
once this blog is out of it’s adolescence the fixation will end…we will grow out of it in time
(little kid voice on)
Personal responsibility is creepy.
(little kid voice off)
song_and_dance_man wrote:
It’s good for a laugh every now and then.
@ mfhorn:
That 2/3 majority is because they know they will be voted out of office.
@ Rodan:
I kind of makes you wonder what happened to the irresponsible 50 years ago. Now that our betters have determined that healthcare is a “right”, how soon is it that housing and transportation are a “right” too?
@ Rodan:
I agree with the sentiment. Abstinence is the best cure for unintended conception and birth control. The big money rubber, pill, and abortion lobby have no interest in that.
@ Truck Monkey:
That’s the next cause of the Left. In fact some have already said it.
http://opportunityagenda.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=781&qid=414934
A file and website making it’s way around the progressive agenda. Strategy on how to enfranchise the left and ignore the conservatives.
Truck Monkey wrote:
And food.
@ Rodan:
I want my electric car and house in the burbs! Oblahblah can just give me some money from his “stash”!
Mao killed so many people that the historians have lost count. Literally. The number that site cites is 49-78,000,000. The best contrast is with the Japanese occupation of the same nation; that was “only” 5,000,000.
The major racial genocide under Mao was in Tibet, whose population “fell from 2.8 million in 1953 to 2.5 million in 1964″ (Black Book of Communism, 546).
Mao didn’t limit himself to non-Han populations though. His Lysenkoist agricultural programme halved the output of Liaoning province. In Henan province alone 2-8 million Chinese died. The Chinese fled to the less-Maoist northern provinces -- like Heilongjiang, which shot from a population of 14 million to 20 million.
And then there were the laogai, the Chinese gulags. Millions of Chinese ended up there too. And when I say “ended up”, I mean it.
We could add to this the Chinese support of the Khmer Rouge, even though Mao died before that regime really got moving.
waldensianspirit wrote:
He likes “disgusting” and “smear” a lot, too.
He uses them so indiscriminately that they have become meaningless over there.
@ orangecrush:
Social Justice, Progressive ket term.
@ Zimriel:
Thanks for those facts, it’s disturbing this idolization of Mao.
I wish I could remember her name, but some French politician was described as their most rightwing, and she believed housing was a right. Makes you wonder what their leftwing believes.
Silhouette wrote:
soylent green
@ song_and_dance_man:
What on earth is wrong with birth control? What man anywhere on earth would rather abstain? Single people are the only people that have sex. Marriage doesn’t prevent pregnancy.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/latinamerica/6783415.html
@ Rodan:
What’s that got to do with the “right wing”?
@ coldwarrior:
I believe that. But the growing up part is tough for some because of the rejection of this other, who has little bearing on where blogs are going. The quicker we remove ourselves from the association of 1.0 the better. Soon we will get new posters here who will have no reference to the 1.0 v. 2.0 dilemma, and it will be up to us, who have the greater vision in mind for this blog, to explain it once and then leave it to die for all time.
@ Rodan:
Oh I understand why they’re doing it. I’m just wondering how they expect it to survive any kind of legal challenge. FORCING people to buy a product? Of course, we’ve been forced to pay into the social security scam for over half a century now…
Well while we are demands from the wishing tree (a.k.a. the U.S. Treasury)I think I will demand a new 3000 sq ft. house, and they can feel free to pay the electric cost for me too.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
we dont constantly bash daily kos or huffpo, hell, most of us dont go there…wtf…let 1.0 go, they arent worth it now.
@ snork:
And what precisely is he so disgusted over?
@ Rodan:
Not having an abortion, or not having sex with everyone/everything in sight is disgusting?
@ Zimriel:
A Chinese lady at a prior job would go on about how Mao was a very spiritual man. I couldn’t understand for the longest time what she was trying to say until I learned her viewpoint on religion. She was saying Mao wanted to become a god and she admired that.
@ linoleumknife:
ugh… *making demands
@ mfhorn:
Actually, I doubt the courts will touch that question.
It involves the rules of the Senate. According to the Constitution, each house of Congress has the sole authority to set its own rules.
mfhorn wrote:
I just dread when Sasha has to sell coupon books for school. Or if Michelle takes up Mary Kay.
@ waldensianspirit:
She’d love Obama, then wouldn’t she? And Gore, and everybody in Hollyweird…
@ snork:
Yep she does. But she and her husband are here for the milk and honey. They oversell their mathematics and get away with it.
@ waldensianspirit:
That’s scary. What actually might be more frightening though, is that thought process seems to be gaining a foot hold here. It used to be you could tell the difference in between the U.S. and the Commie hell holes. They idolized a single person. Turned them into a living “God” so to speak. We always had our ideas and our Constitution to guide us. Now, sadly we seem to be idolizing individuals over our heritage.
OT- If I get the Obama Chia Pet, should I get the happy or the http://www.amazon.com/Chia-Obama-Handmade-Decorative-Planter/dp/images/B001PKU2OI/ref=dp_colorn_0?ie=UTF8&s=grocery&img=0&color_name=1?
I. Kid. You. Not.
@ teacake:
I don’t see anything wrong with birth control, but there is only one way that is fool proof. It’s just a fact, not a slam.
@ linoleumknife:
And the elected officials from at least one of our parties believe that the Constitution is, at best, an obstacle to overcome, or, at worst, an anachronistic old document that should be ignored.
@ teacake:
Birth control, before the many convenient devices of modern days, was simply abstaining from sex. There is a way to control the desires of the flesh but that practice has been lost. Using devices that block the conception of life that is brought forth in the act of ‘sex’ thwarts the purpose of its meaning. There is a way to control conception and birth, and once again, the practice has been lost, because the impulse to control the desire for it has been forgotten or disregarded.
As a follower of God any sex outside marriage is like having sex with a pagan whore before the altar of a creature who serves Lucifer. But that is just me.
@ linoleumknife:
I would bet that one tactic of the leftists is to separate people from their heritage.
@ lobo91:
Well they are enemies of America then, and it is high time we purge our system of the damned traitors.
@ song_and_dance_man:
Wow, I am pretty low on your list then, huh? I have had my own transgressions.
@ linoleumknife:
I couldn’t agree more.
@ mjazz:
Well there is no doubt about that. They are doing that through rewriting history and through the classrooms.
@ linoleumknife:
I knew one girl who was saving herself for her husband.
@ Silhouette:
It was “Happy” Obama or “Determined” Obama.
@ mjazz:
“knew” in the Biblical sense? lol
Silhouette wrote:
wife says i’m not allowed to have either. period.
coldwarrior wrote:
So it’s not just me that kinda wants one?
@ linoleumknife:
Not so much since I also score high on that meme. In my youth I was a sorta, Johnny Apple Seed, but nothing became of my youthful indiscretions as far as progeny is concerned. But, as you can see, I’ve changed my mind.
@ mjazz:
I am 26, and I waited till I was 18. Which for my generation is a long time apparently. My best friend is still a virgin, but he is getting edgy. LOL
@ linoleumknife:
Read a little Song of Solomon and it will lift you up:
@ song_and_dance_man:
Well I do thank God everyday that I am not a father yet. I got lucky though. Now that I am older I am far more carefull.
linoleumknife wrote:
@ linoleumknife:
Hilarious time for a careless typo.
@ Silhouette:
Heh, yeah. I make them to often.
Rodan wrote:
Weird thing about these ones is that they appear to be total n00bs yet at the same time a lot more malevolent than the originals.
WTF?
Wonder if Oprah admired these. Could bear to watch the show.
To give them the benefit of the doubt… I think that Mao portrait is by Andy Warhol. Could be whoever put it on the tree liked Warhol (or just the style/colors) and not necessarily Mao or Mao’s politics.