First time visitor? Learn more.

Napolitano: “The system worked”

by snork ( 175 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Democratic Party, Islamists, Media, Politics, Terrorism at December 27th, 2009 - 10:00 am

This is either the most incredible act of chutzpah or ignorance from this administration yet.

From Politico: Napolitano: “The system worked”

It’s a short article, so I’ll quote the whole thing:

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that “the system worked.”

Asked by CNN’s Candy Crowley on “State of the Union” how that could be possible when the young Nigerian who sought to set off the bomb was able to smuggle explosive liquid onto the flight, Napolitano responded: “We’re asking the same questions.”

Napolitano added that there was “no suggestion that [the bomber] was improperly screened.”

And what “system” is this? Individual initiative of a passenger? Incompetence of a jihadi?

And what precisely does that last sentence mean? That everything is hunky-dorey because he wasn’t profiled?

Napolitano needs to meet the bus. It’s bad enough when you’re ideologically blinkered, but she’s a general purpose moron on top of it.

Hat tip: Bumr50

Update: See also Great Ball of Fire! Heh.

Update 2: Peter King rebukes Napolitano (hattip to Goddessoftheclassroom)

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

175 Responses to “Napolitano: “The system worked””
( jump to bottom )

  1. mjazz
    1 | December 27, 2009 10:05 am

    הראשון?


  2. goddessoftheclassroom
    2 | December 27, 2009 10:06 am

    I’m praying that this at last is the tipping point.


  3. mjazz
    3 | December 27, 2009 10:08 am

    “The system worked” – a passenger jumped the terrorist.
    Wouldn’t dogs be able to sniff out an explosive liquid? I saw on tv where one dog was able to smell coke enclosed in a pressurized gas shipment.


  4. Beltfed
    4 | December 27, 2009 10:08 am

    “the system worked.”

    Right, the civilian passenger did what he did because he had more balls than the current administration and not worried about insulting the religion of pieces.


  5. savages_girl
    5 | December 27, 2009 10:11 am

    That is such BS that she thinks the system “worked”. I can’t believe anyone would say that. I’d be looking at how this guy slipped through…inside job? Luckily for that flight, the guy was an inept terrorist…


  6. goddessoftheclassroom
    6 | December 27, 2009 10:12 am

    Rep. Peter King’s response


  7. newsjunkie_ky
    7 | December 27, 2009 10:13 am

    Beltfed wrote:

    “the system worked.”
    Right, the civilian passenger did what he did because he had more balls than the current administration and not worried about insulting the religion of pieces.

    What Beltfed said!


  8. mjazz
    8 | December 27, 2009 10:13 am

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:
    I agree.


  9. savages_girl
    9 | December 27, 2009 10:15 am

    Lucky one guy on the flight wasn’t afraid of being “politically correct” and jumped that asshole…were the rest of the passengers scared into submission or did they just not register what was going on? The guy who acted and took down the wanna-be bomber is a hero in my book and has some cajones. Good for him!


  10. Mashiki
    10 | December 27, 2009 10:16 am

    What. The. Hell. The system worked? How much fail can there be in such a small sentence? Just crank up the CD and start asking the politicians what color the sky is in their world.


  11. snork
    11 | December 27, 2009 10:17 am

    M, apparently I don’t have update privileges. I think the link in #6 (GotC) should be added as an update. Can you?


  12. unclassifiable
    12 | December 27, 2009 10:18 am

    “The system worked”

    “Peace in our time”

    “The check is in the mail”


  13. snork
    13 | December 27, 2009 10:19 am

    savages_girl wrote:

    Lucky one guy on the flight wasn’t afraid of being “politically correct” and jumped that asshole

    Lucky also that his scroticles were on fire. He was an easy target with his groin being barbecued. The fact that that one guy had to go over several others is disturbing.


  14. Beltfed
    14 | December 27, 2009 10:19 am

    she’s a general purpose moron on top of it

    No need to insult morons, I have a great deal of respect for the average moron. ;)


  15. savages_girl
    15 | December 27, 2009 10:19 am

    Fellow Blogophiles – have a great day. Gotta go. BBL…


  16. snork
    16 | December 27, 2009 10:20 am

    unclassifiable wrote:

    “The system worked”
    “Peace in our time”
    “The check is in the mail”

    “Obama’s going to pay my mortgage.”


  17. mjazz
    17 | December 27, 2009 10:21 am

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:
    From the link:

    “For the first three months of this administration, they refused to use the word terrorism.”

    The news said the White House called it an act of terrorism. Wow. Really. And something to the effect that He ordered that the strictest security measures be in place. Good to know he’s on top of things.


  18. goddessoftheclassroom
    18 | December 27, 2009 10:21 am

    @ snork:
    I wonder who was sitting next to him.

    When I last flew (2007), I swore to myself that if anyone tried anything, I would take him (or her) down even if I died trying.


  19. mjazz
    19 | December 27, 2009 10:24 am

    @ snork:
    Well, you know those third degree burns the guy suffered? If I was the doc I’d give him a few aspirins a day.


  20. chickadee
    20 | December 27, 2009 10:25 am

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    Rep. Peter King’s response

    I love Peter King. He is a real Patriot much like John Bolton. We need more people like this running in 2010.
    Oh and thank you so much for keeping the prayer list. That is such a wonderful uplifting thing that you do.


  21. 21 | December 27, 2009 10:26 am

    “the system worked.”

    Of course the system worked, it was the bomb that didnt work. The system worked because he was suppose to blow up that airplane, Obama and company desperately need a tragedy to distract the American people from Obamacare……..


  22. goddessoftheclassroom
    22 | December 27, 2009 10:27 am

    @ chickadee:
    {chickadee}

    You are so kind. Keeping this list is an honor and a privilege.


  23. 23 | December 27, 2009 10:29 am

    “The system worked”

    Truthfully, I expect nothing different from people that still believe that dialogue with the worlds most disgusting of dictators, and murderous tyrants would work.

    Its all unicorns, rainbows, and teddy bears for the Obama Administration.

    Realty is not a part of their world view.


  24. Beltfed
    24 | December 27, 2009 10:29 am

    With the actions of the idiot shoe bomber, security tightened up and all shoes had to be removed and placed in the bin for xray.

    Now all passenger will have to remove their drawers and place then in the bins.

    All passengers will be required to sit still, feet flat on the floor and hands in full view of the flight attendant.

    Happy happy, joy joy.


  25. mjazz
    25 | December 27, 2009 10:29 am

    Abdulmutallab finished an engineering course at the University College London last year, but a fresh visa request was refused in May after he applied for a bogus course, Whitehall sources said.
    Nigeria’s This Day newspaper reported family members as saying that Abdulmutallab’s father was uncomfortable with his son’s extreme Islamic views.
    Mr Mutallab was said to have reported his activities to the US embassy in Abuja as well as Nigerian security agencies.


  26. snork
    26 | December 27, 2009 10:30 am

    mjazz wrote:

    @ snork:
    Well, you know those third degree burns the guy suffered? If I was the doc I’d give him a few aspirins a day.

    To increase the bleeding.


  27. goddessoftheclassroom
    27 | December 27, 2009 10:30 am

    BBL


  28. newsjunkie_ky
    28 | December 27, 2009 10:30 am

    “the system worked.”

    In the 0 administration’s eyes it did work. They believe the ‘stimulus’ is working, GM is a success, and the won’s favorables are through the roof.


  29. Beltfed
    29 | December 27, 2009 10:31 am

    @ snork @ 16:

    “The system worked”
    “Peace in our time”
    “The check is in the mail”

    “Obama’s going to pay my mortgage.”

    “Fill my pickup with gas.”


  30. mjazz
    30 | December 27, 2009 10:31 am

    I hope they read him his rights.


  31. 31 | December 27, 2009 10:32 am

    @ Beltfed:

    The system is broken….as it is always playing the “defeat the last terrorist game”, instead of being proactive. It seems that we are fighting Terrorism with a wait-and-see mentality.


  32. snork
    32 | December 27, 2009 10:33 am

    Meanwhile at the funny farm, another hat tip to Andrew Sullivan. Are they like…**** buddies or something?


  33. 33 | December 27, 2009 10:33 am

    mjazz wrote:

    I hope they read him his rights.

    I’m guessing they did since he has asked for a public defender…


  34. 88Cid
    34 | December 27, 2009 10:33 am

    http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/12/after-passenger-saves-plane-from-terrorist-bombing-new-rules-require-heroic-passengers-to-stay-seated-during-last-hour-of-flight/
    This administration is totally insane. There is not a competent person in the whole bunvh. Not one of them has any common sense.


  35. snork
    35 | December 27, 2009 10:34 am

    Beltfed wrote:

    With the actions of the idiot shoe bomber, security tightened up and all shoes had to be removed and placed in the bin for xray.

    So are we going to have to remove our balls and run them through the x-ray machine now?


  36. mjazz
    36 | December 27, 2009 10:34 am

    My sister’s bro-in-law is such a liberal that when I mentioned this incident he said of course they’ll (meaning conservatives) use this to criticize Obama.


  37. Beltfed
    37 | December 27, 2009 10:35 am

    @ mjazz @ 19:

    Well, you know those third degree burns the guy suffered? If I was the doc I’d give him a few aspirins a day.

    I’d go one step further,

    Mr, Achmed I have bad news for you, your balls were burned beyond treatment so we cut them off.


  38. chickadee
    38 | December 27, 2009 10:35 am

    Nothing worked but the courage of one man. Look at these bastards trying to discount that lone person who saved 300 others. Zero and his cronies who can’t say terror for fear of offending the monster who crispy fired his junk, are just plain stupid to the point of being as dangerous as this charred junk jihadi.
    Let them keep talking around the issue, bowing to evil, doing p.c contortions. Most people want to stay alive, it is becoming obvious that our lefty pols don’t give a shite abt. what happens to us, as long as they think they are ingratiating themselves to monsters.
    Bottom line, is that we are all looking into the face of the beasts who now circle the free world. Prepare yourselves. There could easily come a time when you alone stand between hideous destruction and saving lives. The libs in power do NOT have our backs.


  39. 88Cid
    39 | December 27, 2009 10:35 am

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Actually we have returned to 9/10 and are treating terrorism as a law enforcement problem and not a military problem. Morons can’t digest the lessons of 9/11 and want to double down on stupid.


  40. mjazz
    40 | December 27, 2009 10:37 am

    His own father reports him to the US Embassy and they let him on a plane anyway. Headed to the US.


  41. 41 | December 27, 2009 10:37 am

    @ doriangrey:

    He wanted to be left in a room with an American solider?

    ;)


  42. 42 | December 27, 2009 10:37 am

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Beltfed:
    The system is broken….as it is always playing the “defeat the last terrorist game”, instead of being proactive. It seems that we are fighting Terrorism with a wait-and-see mentality.

    I wish that were what they were doing, sadly I believe that they have calculated that the terrorists cant actually do any genuine serious damage to America but periodically reducing security allows some to get through and perpetrate acts of terrorism that allows them to keep the threat of terrorism as a tool for destroying liberty and freedom and eroding constitutionally guaranteed rights.


  43. 43 | December 27, 2009 10:40 am

    Beltfed wrote:

    @ mjazz @ 19:
    Well, you know those third degree burns the guy suffered? If I was the doc I’d give him a few aspirins a day.
    I’d go one step further,
    Mr, Achmed I have bad news for you, your balls genitals were burned beyond treatment so we cut them off were forced to perform transplant surgery, unfortunatly the only genitals avaiable on such short notice were female pig genitals.

    Heh heh heh… Fix’t that fer ya…


  44. 88Cid
    44 | December 27, 2009 10:42 am

    Send him to Gitmo!!! He isn’t an American citizen, put him there with his buds.


  45. wolfie
    45 | December 27, 2009 10:43 am

    What is the purpose of a new rule that passengers must remain in their seats for the last hour of the flight? How the hell is that supposed to stop a terrorist?!!? I can’t for the life of me see how that rule solves anything.

    Well, maybe it would deter private citizens from getting up to stop a terrorist harass an activist.


  46. 46 | December 27, 2009 10:43 am

    @ 88Cid:

    I am really beginning to believe that it really is an emotional/intellectual acceptance issue which we are mostly dealing with. It is amazing how difficult it has been for many Americans/Westerners to accept that there is an Islamist Army out there which wants to destroy us, and do us harm. Their refusal to accept this highly uncomfortable reality doesn’t allow them to grasp at the things which are going to keep them alive, but instead they will bend over backwards, and otherwise to avoid this reality. I really believe the problem is psychological, and pervasive. They have been so spoiled by safety, success, and indoctrination of a “perfect world” that we are having difficulty grasping this truly inconvenient truth regarding Islamist Terrorism.

    “the system has worked”

    Maybe this is where Global Warming hysteria is coming from. Maybe its a response because of this mental anguish of having to grasp that there are bad guys out there, that the leftists need a diversion to which they can control, fix, and as they actually say “save the entire world”. Notice that “saving the world” with Global Warming is implementing every Leftist ideal, and is pretty, neat, and comes down to them!

    Hmmmmm….I just might be on to something…


  47. mjazz
    47 | December 27, 2009 10:44 am

    What the suspect failed to realize was that in order for that particular type of explosive to ignite successfully it has to be packed up the rectum as far as possible.


  48. mfhorn
    48 | December 27, 2009 10:44 am

    The system worked because the plane didn’t blow up. The fact that someone managed to smuggle explosives onto the a/c, a man whose own father warned us about him, doesn’t matter.

    God, doesn’t the bamster have ANYONE competent in his entire administration?


  49. 88Cid
    49 | December 27, 2009 10:48 am

    @ WrathofG-d:
    The Republicans are the true enemies of America you see. Those Islamists are merely noble savages righting all the wrongs perpetrated against them.


  50. calcajun
    50 | December 27, 2009 10:49 am

    I hope and pray such an attack will never succeed, but if it does, BHO will own it no matter what. It will be his Katrina.


  51. bar
    51 | December 27, 2009 10:49 am

    @ 88Cid:
    So Obama sides with the Moslem terrorists.
    Color me surprised.
    /

    Well just as I do not respect speed limit laws, this one is also to be disregarded.


  52. 88Cid
    52 | December 27, 2009 10:49 am

    @ mfhorn:

    God, doesn’t the bamster have ANYONE competent in his entire administration?

    Nope, no one, and a fish rots from the head first.


  53. livefreeor die
    53 | December 27, 2009 10:50 am

    Our “distinguished” DHS Secretary’s response is yet another confirmation that we are dealing with a whole new level of stupid.


  54. calcajun
    54 | December 27, 2009 10:51 am

    @ 88Cid:
    And the GOP was the epitome of the “Culture of Corruption”? The shame is that the system has always been one where patronage, not competence, was rewarded.


  55. 55 | December 27, 2009 10:52 am

    @ 88Cid:

    You are making a joke, but I believe that is exactly it actually. They can only see Western wrongs – specifically American wrongs. They actually cannot mentally grasp that something other than the West/U.S. can do wrong. As result of College/educational media propagandizing?


  56. calcajun
    56 | December 27, 2009 10:54 am

    @ mjazz:
    Which is surprising since such concepts are well known in that culture./


  57. livefreeor die
    57 | December 27, 2009 10:54 am

    Napolitano claiming she was misunderstood in 5…4…3…


  58. 58 | December 27, 2009 10:55 am

    OT:BTW: All heck is breaking loose in Iran again.


  59. livefreeor die
    59 | December 27, 2009 10:57 am

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    OT:BTW: All heck is breaking loose in Iran again.

    Darn it-don’t they know 0 is on vacation and all these crises are messing up his golf time?


  60. 88Cid
    60 | December 27, 2009 10:57 am

    @ WrathofG-d:

    You are making a joke, but I believe that is exactly it actually.

    I agree, and I wasn’t joking when I said that. To today’s Democrat elites, Republicans are the enemy. Consider that little manifesto that leaked out a while back about who to watch our for. It wasn’t Islamists, it was veterans, and anything right wing.


  61. calcajun
    61 | December 27, 2009 10:57 am

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I agree– that regime is not long for this world. Call me a foolish optimist, but you might see the Muslim Renaissance start with the overthrow of the mullahs.


  62. waldensianspirit
    62 | December 27, 2009 10:58 am

    The system did work; they were politically correct all the way.


  63. mjazz
    63 | December 27, 2009 10:58 am

    @ 88Cid:
    It all started when Jefferson hit them back.


  64. 64 | December 27, 2009 10:58 am

    it’s true, nappy is a moron. i should know too having lived with the idiot as governor of Arizona. We were quite glad to be rid of her (have you seen the deficit she left us with??) but it wasn’t a great joy knowing that she’d now be helping to ruin the entire country.


  65. livefreeor die
    65 | December 27, 2009 10:58 am

    calcajun wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I agree– that regime is not long for this world. Call me a foolish optimist, but you might see the Muslim Renaissance start with the overthrow of the mullahs.

    From your mouth to God’s ears.


  66. snork
    66 | December 27, 2009 10:58 am

    livefreeor die wrote:

    Napolitano claiming she was misunderstood in 5…4…3…

    You can take that to the bank. I expect it’s going to be something like “the fact that he had to smuggle this thing in his balls shows you that we’ve very successfully kept the guns off the planes”.


  67. mfhorn
    67 | December 27, 2009 10:59 am

    88Cid wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    The Republicans are the true enemies of America you see. Those Islamists are merely noble savages righting all the wrongs perpetrated against them.

    ‘Noble savages’? What a racist thing to say. They’re freedom fighters.

    //


  68. livefreeor die
    68 | December 27, 2009 11:00 am

    @ snork:

    She’s going to get dizzy from all the spinning she’ll be doing in the next 24 hours. 0 probably put her in complete charge of this so he can eat his waffle.


  69. 88Cid
    69 | December 27, 2009 11:00 am

    Gonna go get my exercise. Never know now whether you may have to reach out and pull with all you’ve got. It’s getting to be a hell of lot more dangerous world now.

    Laterz.


  70. 70 | December 27, 2009 11:00 am

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    OT:BTW: All heck is breaking loose in Iran again.

    Wish I knew why, it’s either because the Iranian people think they are about to get bombed into oblivion maybe even nuked by Israel, or they think the current government is to moderate and not acting quickly enough to eliminate Israel. Sadly my suspicion is the later not the former.


  71. calcajun
    71 | December 27, 2009 11:01 am

    @ mfhorn:
    I suppose the irony of the concept of “Muslim” freedom fighter is lost on many people given that Islam means submission.


  72. 88Cid
    72 | December 27, 2009 11:03 am

    @ calcajun:

    Call me a foolish optimist, but you might see the Muslim Renaissance start with the overthrow of the mullahs.

    Not foolish at all, considering Iran is where a lot of today’s radical Islamism came from about 30 years ago.


  73. 73 | December 27, 2009 11:03 am

    calcajun wrote:

    @ mfhorn:
    I suppose the irony of the concept of “Muslim” freedom fighter is lost on many people given that Islam means submission.

    Thats not irony, its self inflicted stupidity…


  74. Beltfed
    74 | December 27, 2009 11:03 am

    snork @ 32:

    Meanwhile at the funny farm, another hat tip to Andrew Sullivan. Are they like…**** buddies or something?

    The way cj is going forward with his lefty propaganda he didn’t want to leave his buddy “behind”. ;)


  75. snork
    75 | December 27, 2009 11:04 am

    Ow. Chuck’s old partner Roger Simon:

    But perhaps you are a perfect match for our reactionary narcissist president who continues to say not a word as the brave demonstrators in Iran again risk their lives to overcome their brutal Islamic regime. What’s interesting about Obama and Napolitano is that they pretend to be “progressive,” but they are actually heartless.


  76. mjazz
    76 | December 27, 2009 11:04 am

    @ WrathofG-d:
    That is great news. And in a characteristic display of decisiveness and his ability to respond quickly to changes in world events, Obama should have a statement and plan of action in, say, two or three months, give or take a week or two.


  77. 77 | December 27, 2009 11:05 am

    Beltfed wrote:

    snork @ 32:
    Meanwhile at the funny farm, another hat tip to Andrew Sullivan. Are they like…**** buddies or something?
    The way cj is going forward with his lefty propaganda he didn’t want to leave his “buddys behind”.

    cough cough cough… heh heh heh… I’m sooo bad today…. lol…lol…lol…


  78. waldensianspirit
    78 | December 27, 2009 11:05 am

    mjazz wrote:

    What the suspect failed to realize was that in order for that particular type of explosive to ignite successfully it has to be packed up the rectum as far as possible.

    Shhhhhh! Don’t be letting out scientific technology they might glean from theblogmocracy! This is an open forum on Al Gore’s internet and a google search might hit it.


  79. calcajun
    79 | December 27, 2009 11:06 am

    @ snork:
    I wonder when many Dems will realize that they are in an abusive relationship with the leaders of their party.


  80. Beltfed
    80 | December 27, 2009 11:06 am

    88Cid @ 34:

    Yep, close the barn door after the horses escaped.


  81. mjazz
    81 | December 27, 2009 11:07 am

    @ calcajun:
    I’ll tell ya, the women over there sometimes to have more cojones than the men.


  82. Beltfed
    82 | December 27, 2009 11:08 am

    snork @ 35:

    So are we going to have to remove our balls and run them through the x-ray machine now?

    CJ’s new job ??


  83. Beltfed
    83 | December 27, 2009 11:10 am

    doriangrey @ 43:

    Oink oink, lol


  84. 84 | December 27, 2009 11:11 am

    Atlas has several very in depth articles about what happened on the flight and how he got on without having proper papers. She also has pictures and video of the chaos going on in Iran.

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/


  85. waldensianspirit
    85 | December 27, 2009 11:12 am

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    OT:BTW: All heck is breaking loose in Iran again.

    Meeting bullets with sheer will

    I’m less optimistic. What do the power brokers want to happen in Iran?


  86. vagabond trader
    86 | December 27, 2009 11:13 am

    Nothing from this coward in the WH, no Christmas message, nothing about the third jihadi act on our soil this year.Now these pointless new rules about staying put in your seat whilst another jihadi finishes what this one did not because of the heroics of one man. bho gonna buy us all headstones the next time?

    I was astounded that when this story broke all the cable news networks did not mention Islam, including Fox. wth?? Acceptable loss to prove how pc we are? Unacceptable!!


  87. 87 | December 27, 2009 11:14 am

    Senators Leiberman and Spectar advocating greater erosion’s of constitutional rights to fight terrorists, this is what this terrorist attack was really all about all along.


  88. mjazz
    88 | December 27, 2009 11:15 am

    @ mjazz:
    *seem to have


  89. 89 | December 27, 2009 11:18 am

    Beltfed wrote:

    doriangrey @ 43:
    Oink oink, lol

    Oh dear… No 72 virgins for him now…..


  90. mjazz
    90 | December 27, 2009 11:18 am

    @ vagabond trader:
    Well, gee, what does religion have to do with it?/


  91. 91 | December 27, 2009 11:19 am

    @ mjazz:

    Unfortunately President Obama has already weighed in on this issue – he sided with the Regime.

    Remember, he didn’t want to get involved with another Countries internal issues (except Israel or Honduras) or something like that.


  92. snork
    92 | December 27, 2009 11:22 am

    mjazz wrote:

    What the suspect failed to realize was that in order for that particular type of explosive to ignite successfully it has to be packed up the rectum as far as possible.

    Who’s going to do the “how to” vid on that?


  93. mjazz
    93 | December 27, 2009 11:23 am

    I feel that the Iranians would adapt well to a western style democracy. We should bombard them with the example of the Carnation Revolution, via emails etc.


  94. bar
    94 | December 27, 2009 11:23 am

    So this POS Zero POTUS basically thought flight 93 was just wrong!
    I hope this POS gets what’s coming to him.


  95. mawskrat
    95 | December 27, 2009 11:26 am

    breaking…more crap in Detroit
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,581232,00.html


  96. mawskrat
    96 | December 27, 2009 11:27 am

    @ mawskrat:
    another Nigerian


  97. wolfie
    97 | December 27, 2009 11:27 am

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    Unfortunately President Obama has already weighed in on this issue – he sided with the Regime.

    Yep. Those stupid rebels really screwed up the lovely speeches and photo-ops he had planned for ‘peace-making’ in Teheran.


  98. mjazz
    98 | December 27, 2009 11:28 am

    @ WrathofG-d:
    We are right next door in Iraq too. But the Democrats aren’t into liberating people.


  99. vagabond trader
    99 | December 27, 2009 11:32 am

    @ mawskrat:

    Respect the muzz. Respect above all else.


  100. 100 | December 27, 2009 11:33 am

    mawskrat wrote:

    @ mawskrat:
    another Nigerian

    Yes, but there is just something that connects all these attempts at murder, mayhem, destruction and terrorism that I just cannot put my finger on…

    Osama Bin Laden, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed Al-Quso, Jude Keenan Mohammad, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Husayn Al-Umari, Wadoud Muhammad Hafiz Al-Turki, Jamal Saeed Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Abdullah Khalil Hussain Ar-Rahayyal, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Muhammad Ahmed Al-Munawar, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, Ahmed Mohammed Hamed Ali, Ramadan Abdullah Mohammad Shallah, …

    hmmmmmm


  101. waldensianspirit
    101 | December 27, 2009 11:33 am

    @ mjazz:
    We’re also right next door in Barksdale AFB, Louisiana.


  102. Aussie Infidel
    102 | December 27, 2009 11:38 am

    THe Democrats have been quite clear folks. They said right from the off that they considered that Islamo-fascism is a law and order issue. Thereby removing it from the affairs of the security agencies who could actually pose a real threat to the Islamo-fascists. Obama knows that mere law and order Peace Officers can’t stop islamic terror and that is why the Demmicrats are doing what they are doing.

    What part of stupid can’t everyone understand/


  103. 103 | December 27, 2009 11:41 am

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    mawskrat wrote:
    @ mawskrat:
    another Nigerian
    Yes, but there is just something that connects all these attempts at murder, mayhem, destruction and terrorism that I just cannot put my finger on…
    Osama Bin Laden, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed Al-Quso, Jude Keenan Mohammad, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Husayn Al-Umari, Wadoud Muhammad Hafiz Al-Turki, Jamal Saeed Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Abdullah Khalil Hussain Ar-Rahayyal, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Muhammad Ahmed Al-Munawar, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, Ahmed Mohammed Hamed Ali, Ramadan Abdullah Mohammad Shallah, …
    hmmmmmm

    Heh, my mind says “Islam”, but my heart says “Satan”. Methinks both may be correct.


  104. mawskrat
    104 | December 27, 2009 11:42 am

    I think they maybe just misunderstanders of some religion


  105. calcajun
    105 | December 27, 2009 11:43 am

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Racial profiler! What about the atrocities committed by Catholic nuns (in the past 100 years)? How many broken wrists did they cause by forcing naturally left-handed kids to write with the right hand?


  106. mjazz
    106 | December 27, 2009 11:43 am

    Sen. Max Baucus Drunk on the Senate Floor


  107. 107 | December 27, 2009 11:46 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    Heh, my mind says “Islam”, but my heart says “Satan”. Methinks both may be correct.

    Impossible, my CAIR outreach official has informed me that Islam is 100% a Religion of Peace, and any acts of violence done in the name of Mohammad the War Cheif, um….”prophet” is actually a sin against Islam.

    Furthermore, this cannot be true as we all know that Islam is a monotheistic reilgion, like Judaism and Christianity and thus all the other tenants of these different religions must be the same. I would take the time to actually read the Koran, but my official CAIR political outreach associate has done the work for me and assures me that I don’t have the time.

    Anyway, all religions are the same so…

    /


  108. waldensianspirit
    108 | December 27, 2009 11:50 am

    @ mjazz:

    “Very good questions! Very good questions! Very good questions! Um, very good questions!”

    mind stuck with ethanol glue


  109. vagabond trader
    109 | December 27, 2009 11:51 am

    @ WrathofG-d:

    The infidel can never understand the truth of Quran unless you read Arabic and attend a madrassas./


  110. waldensianspirit
    110 | December 27, 2009 11:55 am

    @ mjazz:
    Probably found Teddy’s liquor stash


  111. 111 | December 27, 2009 11:55 am

    mjazz wrote:

    Sen. Max Baucus Drunk on the Senate Floor

    You would think that the same rules for driving a car would apply to fundamentally changinging the nature of our free market system.

    You would be wrong.

    Disgraceful.


  112. Abu Bin Squid
    112 | December 27, 2009 11:55 am

    I read the first fifty-ish comments on POLITICO and they were all anti-Janet. Someone even referred to Obama as “Crappy Nappy”. Wonder how long that will be up?

    Right now Charles is disowning/denouncing/littlegreenfootstamping everyone who’s ever linked to POLITICO.

    Get off my blog!


  113. 113 | December 27, 2009 11:56 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    The truth, even though I brought up the religious angle, is that one should profile Muslims not based on the fact that they are Muslim but simply because that is where the threat is coming from. Although admittedly a thin line, one does not have to attack Islam in general to pin-point Muslims for the threat.

    As much as one should not use Islam as a cause for attack, it cannot be a shield either. Especially in the face of the overwhelming evidence that the threat comes from those who follow Islam.


  114. waldensianspirit
    114 | December 27, 2009 11:56 am

    @ Abu Bin Squid:
    More dwindle.


  115. bar
    115 | December 27, 2009 12:01 pm

    I cant help but think that most of our issues with these Moslem terrorists arise from the idiots in our society that pretend that all religions are equal. Christians are just as bad as Moslem terrorists, also known as the American taliban, fantasy bullshit.

    Thus they hate everything remotely American.


  116. vagabond trader
    116 | December 27, 2009 12:02 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:

    Yes by all means lets give them the benefit of the doubt./


  117. vagabond trader
    117 | December 27, 2009 12:05 pm

    I wonder how many were on that plane and just sat there, shrugging their shoulders silently whispering Inshallah.


  118. waldensianspirit
    118 | December 27, 2009 12:05 pm

    @ bar:
    Add to that:

    President Carter established the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Present Clinton established the Islamic Republic of Bosnia.
    President Bush established the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Iraq and Islamic Republic of Gaza.


  119. 119 | December 27, 2009 12:07 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    I hope you didn’t understand that to be my point. It wasn’t. I was really only stating that when one is looking for red head terrorists, it is reasonable to look for red heads.

    Thus the fact that they are Muslim should not be used as a shield from pretty standard, and reasonable anti-Terrorism methods.

    I’ve said this many times, but the reality is that if instead it were Jewish Terrorists who desired to destroy the United States, and taking the actions in furtherance of that desire, I would expect Jews to be held under stricter scrutiny.

    But in this instance one is looking at Muslims not because they are Muslims, but because they are the most obvious threat.


  120. vagabond trader
    120 | December 27, 2009 12:07 pm

    Don’t worry, to show our respect and tolerance we will foot the bill for the sex change operation this d*ckless wonder now requires.


  121. vagabond trader
    121 | December 27, 2009 12:08 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:

    I look at them because they worship stan.


  122. calcajun
    122 | December 27, 2009 12:10 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    I thought America was the “Great Satin”?


  123. mjazz
    123 | December 27, 2009 12:13 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    Without anesthesia.


  124. phoenixgirl
    124 | December 27, 2009 12:14 pm

    with janet as the homeland security czar, americans are in danger 24/7


  125. bar
    125 | December 27, 2009 12:18 pm

    Typical Kennedy Dhimmcrap!

    Senator Max Baucus (D-Montana) on the Senate floor indulges in a drunken tirade against Republicans during the health care hearings.


  126. lobo91
    126 | December 27, 2009 12:20 pm

    I’m sure DHS is busy working on new rules to tighten screening of NRA members, tea party attendees, those who oppose the government takeover of the healthcare system, and US military personnel returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, since we all know that these are the true threats to America.

    There will also be mandatory sensitivity training for all airline employees, as soon as CAIR can provide suitable instructors.

    I would add a sarc tag, but I’m not really sure this is a joke…


  127. vagabond trader
    127 | December 27, 2009 12:22 pm

    @ bar:

    No 40% excise tax for the scumbags insurance coverage and he still gets his viagra at below cost,so what is the old coot so angry about.Oh, thats right, demonrats are always angry and it is the fault of the bitter clingers.


  128. vagabond trader
    128 | December 27, 2009 12:26 pm

    @ calcajun:

    Sometimes we are sometimes we aren’t. For instance,today I don’t believe the rampaging Iranians are thinking of us as the great satin.Tomorrow, who knows.


  129. 129 | December 27, 2009 12:26 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ bar:
    No 40% excise tax for the scumbags insurance coverage and he still gets his viagra at below cost,so what is the old coot so angry about.Oh, thats right, demonrats are always angry and it is the fault of the bitter clingers.

    I’m still clinging, bitterly, albeit by a thread……


  130. newsjunkie_ky
    130 | December 27, 2009 12:26 pm

    @ bar:
    Why would Montana elect this idiot democrap?


  131. waldensianspirit
    131 | December 27, 2009 12:31 pm

    @ bar:
    I’ll bet he felt like a regular Aristotle.


  132. 132 | December 27, 2009 12:31 pm

    Dman. The “system” being that we rely on the essential incompetance of the Mohammedan “warrior” to save us? If this bitch is drinking she needs to quit. If she’s sober, she might should consider taking up drinking. This is a statement of phenomnal stupidity, the very Aristotielian essence of stupidity. To be charitable and say that they know the system is fucked up and just won’t admit it does not relieve the statement of its stupidity. I have to say that I am shocked at this level of stupidity from the Obama Administration. Napolitano should be called on to step down immmediately, and the Obama Administration to replace her with someone that knows their ass from a hole in the ground and can put in place proper screening to find people like this before they get on a plane.

    The Republicans need to show some balls and step up.


  133. vagabond trader
    133 | December 27, 2009 12:32 pm

    @ newsjunkie_ky:

    Same reason we keep electing iceholes like Dodd and Lieberman here in CT.


  134. Aussie Infidel
    134 | December 27, 2009 12:34 pm

    @ calcajun:
    Hey nice icon of the ‘Breaker’ mate! :)


  135. bar
    135 | December 27, 2009 12:35 pm

    @ newsjunkie_ky:
    I thought Montana would be filled with clingers.
    But then what do I know, I live in loony liberal California.


  136. lobo91
    136 | December 27, 2009 12:37 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Napolitano should be called on to step down immmediately, and the Obama Administration to replace her with someone that knows their ass from a hole in the ground and can put in place proper screening to find people like this before they get on a plane.

    I’d still like to know how she got the job in the first place. She has absolutely no qualifications in security that I’m aware of.

    About all I can think of is the fact that she’s from a border state. Apparently, being able to say, “I can see Mexico from my house!” is sufficient experience to be DHS Secretary in this administration.


  137. PrincessNatasha
    137 | December 27, 2009 12:37 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    What the suspect failed to realize was that in order for that particular type of explosive to ignite successfully it has to be packed up the rectum as far as possible.

    Actually, you are quite correct. For a successful explosion, you need 2 things: heat and pressure.


  138. bar
    138 | December 27, 2009 12:38 pm

    With regard to the new flight rules imposed by the POS “O”

    In a bit of irony, if this new rule was a standard back in 2001 then flight 93 would have smitten the White House.

    Is that what “O” really wants?
    Would we be lucky enough for him to be home at the time?


  139. vagabond trader
    139 | December 27, 2009 12:38 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Amen,enough of this pc krap. I’m beginning to wonder if this administration has an actuarial table that charts acceptable losses as a result of terror attacks, shoddy hellcare, you get the idea.They sure act like they care more for the terror menace than the peaceable citizenry.


  140. vagabond trader
    140 | December 27, 2009 12:40 pm

    @ bar:

    In a bit of irony, if this new rule was a standard back in 2001 then flight 93 would have smitten the White House.

    Always thought it was the Capitol.


  141. 141 | December 27, 2009 12:43 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Again the Republicans have failed us. They need to be a responsible opposition party. It isn’t enought that they oppose monstrosities like ObamaCare. They need to hold the Administration responsible for its actions. Napolitano, Holder, these people should have been opposed in the Senate even thought the Democrats had the votes to let them through. There isn’t a lot that the Republican could do, but they could at least force the Democrats to expose the naked force that they are ruling with to the American people.


  142. 142 | December 27, 2009 12:47 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    They are worried about Rightwing violence, of course. Remember the DHS memo or whatever? Rightwingers are the danger, not Mohammedans.

    *spit*


  143. NoThreat2U
    143 | December 27, 2009 12:49 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    The minute the R side says ANYTHING it will be construed as a direct attack on Obi because he is black. What they are really winning is the war on words. No one will listen to us because we are all right wingnut (in their opinion). We need to be louder.


  144. PrincessNatasha
    144 | December 27, 2009 12:49 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:
    They are worried about Rightwing violence, of course. Remember the DHS memo or whatever? Rightwingers are the danger, not Mohammedans.
    *spit*

    I am still disgusted and pissed off about that.


  145. lobo91
    145 | December 27, 2009 12:50 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    They are worried about Rightwing violence, of course. Remember the DHS memo or whatever? Rightwingers are the danger, not Mohammedans.

    I’m sure I’ll be strip-searched the next time I fly in uniform.


  146. vagabond trader
    146 | December 27, 2009 12:50 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Thanks for your prayers and encouragement from last nite.

    :D :D


  147. Formercorpsman
    147 | December 27, 2009 12:52 pm

    The only thing that worked, is we still have some folks in this world who refuse to be victims.

    Janet, the system got lucky you dope.

    The system was given a second chance by someone willing to face this head on, recognizing there was no time left to give this shit bird another chance at doing it right.

    I can’t stand these people.

    They already have Fort Hood in the history books as far as they’re concerned, and they don’t have anyone they need to read a Miranda Warning to.

    Heaven forbid, they are not thrown out on their ass in 2010.


  148. NoThreat2U
    148 | December 27, 2009 12:53 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    No problem! Hang in there :)


  149. vagabond trader
    149 | December 27, 2009 12:54 pm

    We have had 15 people killed on American soil by jihadis this year. The toll would have been in the hundreds had the Dutchman not acted with great courage. Meanwhile, somewhere in Hawaii the potus and his consort snicker at the useful idiots they rule over and will soon be lecturing us about tolerance.


  150. Formercorpsman
    150 | December 27, 2009 12:55 pm

    Formercorpsman wrote:

    The only thing that worked, is we still have some folks in this world who refuse to be victims.
    Janet, the system got lucky you dope.
    The system was given a second chance by someone willing to face this head on, recognizing there was no time left to give this shit bird another chance at doing it right.
    I can’t stand these people.
    They already have Fort Hood in the history books as far as they’re concerned, and they don’t have anyone they need to read a Miranda Warning to.
    Heaven forbid, they are not thrown out on their ass in 2010.

    Correction: and they get to read a Miranda Warning to someone.

    Sorry.


  151. Formercorpsman
    151 | December 27, 2009 12:55 pm

    I need to split.

    GO BIRDS!


  152. calcajun
    152 | December 27, 2009 12:57 pm

    @ Aussie Infidel:
    TY– Edward Woodward– RIP


  153. 153 | December 27, 2009 1:03 pm

    @ lobo91:

    I recall something like that happening, where service members were hasseled. Unfrotunately, Hasan showed us that just because someone wears the US uniform, they aren’t necessarily not a Jihadi. You know, the security measures generally aren’t particulary onerous. One of the times I went to California they pulled me out and ran my license because my name is so common. It took about five minutes. It was just a reasonable check to make sure that I was who I said I was. No big deal. But it wouldn’t have happened to me if my name was Mohammed abu bin Blowinshitup. That would have been profiling, after all. That is what is offensive.


  154. vagabond trader
    154 | December 27, 2009 1:11 pm

    Wow, this looks more like ’79 than the recent post election demos.Best wishes to them in disposing of the tyrants.


  155. NoThreat2U
    155 | December 27, 2009 1:12 pm

    Hey guys. I am up on the new thread talking shit about ya’ll. lol


  156. vagabond trader
    157 | December 27, 2009 1:13 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    LOL!


  157. Buckeye Abroad
    158 | December 27, 2009 1:15 pm

    #38 chickadee

    The libs in power do NOT have our backs.

    They never were. Their weren’t any libs having my six in the 3 foreign tours I did, so I never made that assumption and after LBJ’s S.E. Asia jamboree, I don’t think my father did either.


  158. NoThreat2U
    159 | December 27, 2009 1:15 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    :) :) :) :)


  159. bar
    160 | December 27, 2009 1:18 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    It was an either or: WH or Capital building, we don’t know the exact target for certain.


  160. Canoe Convoy
    161 | December 27, 2009 1:18 pm

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Upding! Upding! Upding! I mean, Concur!


  161. vagabond trader
    162 | December 27, 2009 1:23 pm

    @ bar:

    No.comment.


  162. lobo91
    163 | December 27, 2009 1:25 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    One of the times I went to California they pulled me out and ran my license because my name is so common. It took about five minutes. It was just a reasonable check to make sure that I was who I said I was. No big deal. But it wouldn’t have happened to me if my name was Mohammed abu bin Blowinshitup. That would have been profiling, after all. That is what is offensive.

    That’s exactly the problem with the current system. The TSA people are supposed to “randomly” check some percentage of people each day, and it’s left up to them to decide who is selected. Naturally, they select the people who look like they’ll cause them the least trouble. That means middle-aged white Americans and old ladies. They specifically DO NOT “randomly” check anyone who looks Middle Eastern, or who’s wearing a hijab or anything, because those people might complain that they’re being “profiled.”

    Yes, it does make sense to look more closely at someone who has a one-way ticket that was purchased the day prior to the flight, but not when it turns out to be a government fare, and the person’s in uniform, traveling on orders. I’ve been in exactly that situation, and nearly missed a flight because of it.


  163. bar
    164 | December 27, 2009 1:27 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    I got my info from fake-a-pedia, so its more than likely fake!


  164. Canoe Convoy
    165 | December 27, 2009 1:32 pm

    “the system Worked.” No it didn’t! A person who did not wish to be a victim worked. “The System” failed, because someone with explosives got aboard an aircraft! For those who failed to understand what they just read, go back and re-read it until you understand that passenger with explosives on his person = Security system failure!


  165. 166 | December 27, 2009 1:35 pm

    So what’s up with Nigeria??

    A Nigerian man in his thirties aboard the same Delta/Northwest flight that was attacked on Christmas Day was taken into custody but posed no security risk to the plane, a law enforcement official said.

    The official says the passenger was taken into custody after becoming verbally disruptive on landing. Subsequent interviews by investigators determined he was a businessman who became ill during the flight.

    Northwest Airlines Flight 253 requested emergency assistance upon landing after the crew reported suspicious behavior from the passenger, who got up and down from his seat several times and spent about an hour in the plane’s bathroom.

    Something smells (metaphorically speaking).


  166. lobo91
    167 | December 27, 2009 1:35 pm

    @ Canoe Convoy:

    “the system Worked.” No it didn’t! A person who did not wish to be a victim worked. “The System” failed, because someone with explosives got aboard an aircraft!

    Ah, but you’re making the assumption that “the system” was intended to prevent someone from bringing explosives aboard an aircraft.

    I’ve seen no evidence to support that assumption.


  167. Buckeye Abroad
    168 | December 27, 2009 1:36 pm

    #46 WrathofG-d

    Their refusal to accept this highly uncomfortable reality doesn’t allow them to grasp at the things which are going to keep them alive, but instead they will bend over backwards, and otherwise to avoid this reality. I really believe the problem is psychological, and pervasive. They have been so spoiled by safety, success, and indoctrination of a “perfect world” that we are having difficulty grasping this truly inconvenient truth regarding Islamist Terrorism.

    I had the same epiphany after Beslan while talking with local (German) staff. The fact that innocent children were targeted was simply dismissed as the result of a “separitist” movement and not islamic. I made the comment, “when it happens here what will be your reaction then?” No one answered that.


  168. Poteen
    169 | December 27, 2009 1:37 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    The Republicans need to show some balls and step up.

    To hell with Rs and Ds. Time for the people to step up.
    I felt pretty good about this until I found out the guy who moved on the bomber was a Dutchman. Nothing against Dutchmen but 300 folks on the plane and 1 guy has the balls to take on the bomber. Bullshit. The punk should have come off the plane in 300 little pieces.
    Many folks in this country are nothing but lemming-like little followers. And if it means following the plane into the dirt because they’re told to, they’ll do it. Those that do deserve what they get.
    The fact that a few inconvenienced passengers who fit a profile can make life dangerous for a whole planeload who don’t is just plain asshole stupid. Politicians can’t fix that. They can’t make money off it. The rest of the people on that plane are responsible for their own safety. Just fucking say something or do something. Not just one of them, all of them.
    Maybe a clearer way of saying it is this;
    You are being told to trust your safety to govt. employees with minimal training and almost no responsibility for their failures.
    That happens a lot in modern society. But on an airplane? Once onboard you can’t call a cab or take a different route or just run away. The cops aren’t 5 min. away.
    The same folks who whine about hood gangsters and police response times will sit quietly in their assigned seat while 1 lunatic takes them to hell.
    In what other situation would people allow this?
    Since 9-11 you have more spending on more TSA employees making flying more miserable for more people, and no increase in security. That’s what politicians do.
    If you want to feel secure on an airplane, don’t be afraid to do what you have to, to make the flight crew aware or make the ‘suspicious’ take another flight. And if the guy next to you tries to light his shoe–fuck him up!!
    Don’t be a lemming.


  169. 170 | December 27, 2009 1:42 pm

    @ lobo91:

    “The System” is spotty, at best. Many airports don’t have the technology to detect explosives and MOST don’t have the technology to detect nuclear material.

    As we focus on international flights, were you a terrorist, where would you shift YOUR focus?

    Once again:

    All four of the 9/11 flights were domestic, not international. Maybe we should take that into consideration.

    Additionally, have you seen the people who work in airports these days? For a long time I have felt that there is a distinct possibility of explosive devices, or components of explosive devices “coming in the back door” and passed on to a designated passenger.

    How about ramp personnel? I actually saw a ramper once, in Washington Dulles, with arabic letters written with a marker on his yellow reflective vest. This type of thing doesn’t give me a feeling of security, no matter what it actually said.

    The security levels vary wildly from airport to airport. Small airports simply do not offer the level of security, or the technology, that large ones do. Once you pass through security the first time, you have unlimited access to every domestic airport in the country, as long as your destination is domestic, without ever having to go through secuity again. In other words, you can board a flight at some 3 gate regional airport in the middle of Kansas and if you make it through security, you’re home free.

    Feeling secure yet?


  170. kansas
    171 | December 27, 2009 1:54 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:
    From the link:
    “For the first three months of this administration, they refused to use the word terrorism.”
    The news said the White House called it an act of terrorism. Wow. Really. And something to the effect that He ordered that the strictest security measures be in place. Good to know he’s on top of things.

    Well, the deal is if an attack fails, the system works, and it is a terrorist attack. If it suceeds, like Fort Hood, it is not.


  171. lobo91
    172 | December 27, 2009 1:55 pm

    @ MacDuff:

    Additionally, have you seen the people who work in airports these days? For a long time I have felt that there is a distinct possibility of explosive devices, or components of explosive devices “coming in the back door” and passed on to a designated passenger.

    How about ramp personnel? I actually saw a ramper once, in Washington Dulles, with arabic letters written with a marker on his yellow reflective vest. This type of thing doesn’t give me a feeling of security, no matter what it actually said.

    Contrary to popular assumption, the level of security screening of airport workers is a joke. The “background check” done on the people who work at our airports is no better than what it takes to get a job as a security guard in most places. In other words, they do a criminal records check. If you haven’t been convicted of a felony, you’re good.

    Once they get that security pass, those hundreds (thousands, in some big airports) of workers are home free. They don’t go through any sort of screening when they go to work each day. No metal detectors, no bomb-sniffing dogs, nobody looks in their bags. Nada.

    The only reason nobody’s ever exploited that system to smuggle something onto a plane is that they haven’t tried.


  172. 173 | December 27, 2009 1:56 pm

    @ Poteen:

    Ditto. The bottom line is that we simply MUST take responsibilty for ourselves. I fly constantly, and I profile every SOB that boards and focus on the suspicious ones.

    As they say “when seconds count, the police are just minutes away”. At 30,000 feet, police are nonexistant, unless you have an Air Marshall on board.


  173. Poteen
    174 | December 27, 2009 2:07 pm

    @ MacDuff:

    At 30,000 feet, police are nonexistant

    Absolutely true, and it used to be worse.
    Right after 9-11 rules allowed the pilot to refuse any arms on board his plane, including law enforcement. Many of them did just that.
    A friend of mine, 6’3″ 230# 20 year veteran federal agent was forced to take a later flight to Washington of all places because the pilot refused weapons on his plane and he didn’t have time to secure his before boarding. Stupid if you ask me but I believe that has since been changed.


  174. Macker
    175 | December 27, 2009 2:56 pm

    She. Is. Full. Of. Shit!


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David