First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Your typical Democrat in action…

by savage ( 231 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Healthcare, Terrorism at December 27th, 2009 - 2:32 pm

Shows up drunk. To Hell with Max Baucus.

And this corrupt bastard is big on the Obamacare solution. And we depend on POS’s like him and the majority party to keep us safe.

When (not IF, WHEN) another terror attack occurs, then the military needs to arrest Obama, his entire Cabinet, and the ENTIRE Senate and House of Representatives for treason, high crimes and misdemeanors and an entire laundry list of crimes (of which there are MANY) and lock the entire sorry lot of them in a prison somewhere where they can do no more damage to the United States.

These Communists have to be stopped dead in their tracks.

► Hot Links

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

231 Responses to “Your typical Democrat in action…”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | December 27, 2009 14:33

    A man in this condition shouldn’t be driving, much less trying to control a major part of the U.S. economy. What a pathetic display.

    Is it too much to ask that these people at least be sober while they’re screwing up the country? Apparently so.


  2. 2 | December 27, 2009 14:34

    Uh, FIRST!


  3. 3 | December 27, 2009 14:36

    the military needs to arrest Obama, his entire Cabinet, and the ENTIRE Senate and House of Representatives for treason, high crimes and misdemeanors and an entire laundry list of crimes (of which there are MANY) and lock the entire sorry lot of them in a prison somewhere where they can do no more damage to the United States.

    Please dear G-d PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!


  4. 4 | December 27, 2009 14:41

    Hey Teacake! What about our Saints? First, they can’t play in the first half and now they can’t play in the second!


  5. bar
    5 | December 27, 2009 14:43

    What no hat tip?
    ///


  6. Truck Monkey
    6 | December 27, 2009 14:45

    Oh suuuuuuuuure. Who among us doesn’t show up to work drunk now and then……..
    /


  7. linoleumknife
    7 | December 27, 2009 14:56

    @ Truck Monkey:

    Well I have been known to tie one on every now and then. It makes starring at my computer fun.


  8. linoleumknife
    8 | December 27, 2009 14:57

    @ linoleumknife:

    LOL, I guess I should add a sarcasm tag to that huh?


  9. taxfreekiller
    9 | December 27, 2009 14:57

    So, keep in mind this one you see drunk on his ass and stupid.

    He is 100% better than Democrat Party leader John F. Kerry.

    Where does that put freedom and the U.S. Constitution.


  10. linoleumknife
    10 | December 27, 2009 14:58

    @ taxfreekiller:

    In a very bad place, and it’s high time we clean our beloved country of these traitors and rats.


  11. chickadee
    11 | December 27, 2009 14:59

    Something is so seriously wrong in our country when bastards like this are calling the shots.
    Our very lives hang in the balance . They should never have so much power.
    That pos brought us Death Care as a Christmas gift.
    The world has gone mad.


  12. Macker
    12 | December 27, 2009 15:02

    When (not IF, WHEN) another terror attack occurs, then the military needs to arrest Obama, his entire Cabinet, and the ENTIRE Demo☭rat contingent of BOTH the Senate and House of Representatives for treason, high crimes and misdemeanors and an entire laundry list of crimes (of which there are MANY) and lock the entire sorry lot of them in a prison somewhere where they can do no more damage to the United States.

    These Communists have to be stopped dead in their tracks.

    There, fixed that for ya!


  13. wolfie
    13 | December 27, 2009 15:06

    Who says he’s drunk? Seriously. Where’s the proof of that?
    I doubt he would have shown up for his big CSpan speech drunk.

    Just because he’s a whiny, incoherent babbler doesn’t mean he’s drunk.

    Think of Joe Biden. We’ve seen him sober and we’ve seen him drunk. No real difference.


  14. 14 | December 27, 2009 15:08

    MacDuff wrote:

    Hey Teacake! What about our Saints? First, they can’t play in the first half and now they can’t play in the second!

    oh? forgot the game today. So they lost?


  15. wolfie
    15 | December 27, 2009 15:10

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    He is 100% better than Democrat Party leader John F. Kerry.

    Amen.

    And I see that the Iranian people are spoiling John F***ing Kerry’s trip to Iran. Ha!


  16. Truck Monkey
    16 | December 27, 2009 15:10

    I didn’t used to be this pessimistic. I am now pretty sure that we are going to be hit hard. Again and again and again. It’s not that no one’s watching the store as much as the shop owner has left and given the keys to the neighborhhood kids.


  17. 18 | December 27, 2009 15:14

    teacake wrote:

    MacDuff wrote:
    Hey Teacake! What about our Saints? First, they can’t play in the first half and now they can’t play in the second!
    oh? forgot the game today. So they lost?

    By 3 in OT :(


  18. PrincessNatasha
    19 | December 27, 2009 15:14

    Looks like Baucus is a fan of Bacchus… ;)


  19. taxfreekiller
    20 | December 27, 2009 15:20

    Something up in Iran.

    http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/12/27/iran-protests.html

    5 killed , one of them,, nephew of Mousavi


  20. NoThreat2U
    21 | December 27, 2009 15:22

    @ PrincessNatasha:
    Good one!! +1


  21. 22 | December 27, 2009 15:22

    Truck Monkey wrote:

    I didn’t used to be this pessimistic. I am now pretty sure that we are going to be hit hard. Again and again and again. It’s not that no one’s watching the store as much as the shop owner has left and given the keys to the neighborhhood kids.

    Well put. These barbarians smell weakness like sharks smell blood in water, and they capitalize on it. Janet “the system worked” Napolitano does nothing to deter them.


  22. 23 | December 27, 2009 15:24

    @ Macker:

    Thanks for the edit.


  23. NoThreat2U
    24 | December 27, 2009 15:25

    Dear Janet,

    If the system worked, this asshole would have never made it on the plane.
    thank you

    [My name here]


  24. 25 | December 27, 2009 15:26

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Something up in Iran.
    http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/12/27/iran-protests.html
    5 killed , one of them,, nephew of Mousavi

    That “strongly worded statement” from Obama doesn’t seem to be working. Perhaps they should reissue it in bold uppercase.


  25. calcajun
    26 | December 27, 2009 15:27

    Nice pipe dream– will never happen. In fact, the reverse is likely. Imagine “suspended elections due to terrorist threat”. There’s the nightmare.


  26. calcajun
    27 | December 27, 2009 15:28

    @ PrincessNatasha:
    This has to be shown to the Montana electorate again and again to remind them of the douf they elected.


  27. 28 | December 27, 2009 15:30

    @ Truck Monkey:

    There are only two things that can stop the enemy. The first is near total extermination, but that is not in the cards, not even under Bush. The second is a continuous, intelligence driven offensive that takes them out, breaks them up, and makes it difficult to impossible to organize massive attacks. With this strategy Bush kept us safe from another major attack for nearly eight years.

    Obama refuses to empluoyee either strategy so, yes, it is not a matter of if but when will we be hit again. It takes time and resources to pull off something major. 9-11 was under construction for 2-3 years, and that was with a terrorist infrastructure that had been growing since the early ’90s. It will take time for al Qaeda ro rebuild what they have lost, maybe more time than Obama has left in office, but they are no doubt begining to rebuild even as we speak. And Obama intends to do nothing. After all, the system “worked”.


  28. wolfie
    29 | December 27, 2009 15:31

    @ calcajun:

    Yep. He’s up for re-election in 2012.


  29. 30 | December 27, 2009 15:40

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Truck Monkey:
    There are only two things that can stop the enemy. The first is near total extermination, but that is not in the cards, not even under Bush. The second is a continuous, intelligence driven offensive that takes them out, breaks them up, and makes it difficult to impossible to organize massive attacks. With this strategy Bush kept us safe from another major attack for nearly eight years.
    Obama refuses to empluoyee either strategy so, yes, it is not a matter of if but when will we be hit again. It takes time and resources to pull off something major. 9-11 was under construction for 2-3 years, and that was with a terrorist infrastructure that had been growing since the early ’90s. It will take time for al Qaeda ro rebuild what they have lost, maybe more time than Obama has left in office, but they are no doubt begining to rebuild even as we speak. And Obama intends to do nothing. After all, the system “worked”.

    I couldn’t agree more, Fist. From all appearances, we’re giving al Qaeda “lead time”, and they’re using it to their advantage – testing, probing, experimenting, etc.

    My question is: what could a President do, other than what Obama has done, to facilitate a terrorist attack?

    No, that’s not a rhetorical question.


  30. chickadee
    31 | December 27, 2009 15:40

    MacDuff wrote:

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Something up in Iran.
    http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/12/27/iran-protests.html
    5 killed , one of them,, nephew of Mousavi

    That “strongly worded statement” from Obama doesn’t seem to be working. Perhaps they should reissue it in bold uppercase.

    Zero’s empty platitudes are a red carpet for the enemy now. They can see he is a dork and they are going to slap him around and take OUR lunch money. And they know he will do nothing to stop them.
    In fact, they know if they are caught Zero will treat them well, with great deference and respect. He’s already doing it.


  31. vagabond trader
    32 | December 27, 2009 15:42

    Come on demonrats, tell us how this is Booooshs fault or Israel or the bitter clingers. Come on.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1238574/Aircraft-passengers-face-heightened-security-measures-emerges-London-educated-syringe-bomber-Flight-253-exploited-loophole.html


  32. 33 | December 27, 2009 15:52

    @ chickadee:

    And we’re not evem a year into this morass we call an “administration”.


  33. 34 | December 27, 2009 15:53

    There I was thinking that this latest terror attempt would finally shut up the 9/11 troofers… then I read this comment on an ABC News website about the story:

    There is only one possible reason why this well known and well watched terrorist was NOT on the no fly list. The CIA KNEW he had a powerful bomb and they allowed him to board, knowing the plane would be destroyed. This fits the pattern of 9-11, the US Government allowing the terrorists to carry our their plot by ordering the guard jets to stand down ON THAT DAY ONLY. Why, you say? because our Government has to find new reasons to carry on their program of removing our rights by using the excuse of ‘The War On Terror’. A small group of super wealthy people have given the order so as to propagate their goal of a one world government. Obama is merely carrying out the orders of the rich elitists just as Bush did. The CIA figured that the plane would be completely destroyed and this man’s particular ID would never be found. We may also find out later that someone the Government wants to eliminate was on that plane. Besides, the no-fly list has hundreds of people on it that are ordinary people, NOT terrorists. The only reason they are on the list is because they are business competitors of the wealthy people who give the real orders. The whole thing stinks and it is obvious that there is more to the story than we are being told.
    Posted by:
    sonofeliajh


  34. buzzsawmonkey
    35 | December 27, 2009 15:54

    Re Baucus: I guess the booze boos in the chamber is not coming from the gallery.


  35. chickadee
    36 | December 27, 2009 15:54

    I did read that Gibbs actually said the word “terror” in regard to the crispy crotch jihadi.
    The Zero cabal is such a bunch of poofs opposite muslim killers. They really think they are going to rewrite the plot with Islam by being so respectful to them. LOL
    Well at least they didn’t call the Nigerian terrorist a ‘perpetrator of a man caused event.’
    Is this because they know the public is getting fed up with them coddling Islamic terrorist monsters who are hell bent on killing Americans. I think that’s all it is.


  36. linoleumknife
    37 | December 27, 2009 15:55

    @ Urban Infidel:

    WOW, the troofer is strong in that one. What the hell is up with these people? Is it genetic or some product of their environment?


  37. vagabond trader
    39 | December 27, 2009 15:57

    @ chickadee:

    the crotch bomber. I like it.


  38. Macker
    40 | December 27, 2009 15:58

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Good Lord! That person must be hanging out over at LFG .00001….


  39. buzzsawmonkey
    41 | December 27, 2009 15:58

    Baucus: Awright, who wanna fight? I got shixty motherfriggn’ votesh here, an’ I can lick any ol’ Republican inna plashe. You think, you think I can’t? I can! You betcha I can. Lemme at ‘em! Way’ minit, way’ a dam minit, I jush wanna say, I love alla you guysh on my side ovva aisle. I mean it—besh’ guysh a Shenate ever’ had….


  40. MikalM
    42 | December 27, 2009 15:58

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Rule #1 of conspiracy theorists: If a major event contradicts your pet theory, assert that the conspirators “allowed it to happen” and explain that assertion with another level of unprovable speculation.


  41. linoleumknife
    43 | December 27, 2009 15:59

    @ Macker:

    Hell it could be Dorkfalcon or that lab tech LVQ.


  42. 44 | December 27, 2009 16:00

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    There I was thinking that this latest terror attempt would finally shut up the 9/11 troofers… then I read this comment on an ABC News website about the story:
    There is only one possible reason why this well known and well watched terrorist was NOT on the no fly list. The CIA KNEW he had a powerful bomb and they allowed him to board, knowing the plane would be destroyed. This fits the pattern of 9-11, the US Government allowing the terrorists to carry our their plot by ordering the guard jets to stand down ON THAT DAY ONLY. Why, you say? because our Government has to find new reasons to carry on their program of removing our rights by using the excuse of ‘The War On Terror’. A small group of super wealthy people have given the order so as to propagate their goal of a one world government. Obama is merely carrying out the orders of the rich elitists just as Bush did. The CIA figured that the plane would be completely destroyed and this man’s particular ID would never be found. We may also find out later that someone the Government wants to eliminate was on that plane. Besides, the no-fly list has hundreds of people on it that are ordinary people, NOT terrorists. The only reason they are on the list is because they are business competitors of the wealthy people who give the real orders. The whole thing stinks and it is obvious that there is more to the story than we are being told.
    Posted by:
    sonofeliajh

    And to think that this person’s vote is equal to mine. It’s almost enough to just give up and become a hermit.


  43. vagabond trader
    45 | December 27, 2009 16:00

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Holy cats, that took a lot of disorganized thought to come up with. They must have seen Avatar over the weekend.


  44. lobo91
    46 | December 27, 2009 16:00

    @ Urban Infidel:

    It’s truly frightening to think that there are people that batshit crazy who are walking the streets freely.


  45. 47 | December 27, 2009 16:03

    @ chickadee:

    “crispy crotch jihadi”

    I think we have a winner!


  46. 48 | December 27, 2009 16:04

    @ lobo91:

    Truly frightening. I’ve already met two of my boyfriend’s relatives who think it was an inside job. Cue Twilight Zone music…


  47. 49 | December 27, 2009 16:04

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Holy cats, that took a lot of disorganized thought to come up with. They must have seen Avatar over the weekend.

    LOL!


  48. Poteen
    50 | December 27, 2009 16:04

    @ Urban Infidel:

    sonofeliajh?

    son of elijah?

    Must be a product of the ‘Laptops for the Institutionalized’ program a few years back.//


  49. lobo91
    51 | December 27, 2009 16:04

    @ vagabond trader:

    Holy cats, that took a lot of disorganized thought to come up with. They must have seen Avatar over the weekend.

    Apparently, that person is unfamiliar with Occam’s Razor.

    Yes, it’s possible that the elaborate conspiracy he posits might be real.

    It’s also possible that it happened as a result of the incompetence of some government employees.

    Which seems more likely?


  50. linoleumknife
    52 | December 27, 2009 16:04

    On the subject of Baucus and the Dems in general, maybe they are drunk all the time. It would explain their thought processes.


  51. calcajun
    53 | December 27, 2009 16:05

    @ vagabond trader:
    How about:
    “Fire Baller”
    “Thunderpants”
    “Glowing Gonads of Glory”
    “One-eyed Flamethrower of Faith”
    “Sizzling Scrotum against Satin”
    “Flaming Thong of Allah”
    “Mohamed’s Mighty Tighty Whitey!”


  52. 54 | December 27, 2009 16:06

    linoleumknife wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    WOW, the troofer is strong in that one. What the hell is up with these people? Is it genetic or some product of their environment?

    Clinically speaking, they’re fucking nuts.


  53. linoleumknife
    55 | December 27, 2009 16:06

    Then again, maybe they are just plain evil assholes who need a kick to the head.


  54. lobo91
    56 | December 27, 2009 16:06

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Truly frightening. I’ve already met two of my boyfriend’s relatives who think it was an inside job.

    It could very well have been an “inside job.”

    Involving security people in Nigeria.


  55. Poteen
    57 | December 27, 2009 16:07

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Actually, it makes as much sense as “The system worked.”


  56. linoleumknife
    58 | December 27, 2009 16:07

    @ MacDuff:

    LOL, well I was hoping to get some layman terms, but clinical is ok.

    :razz:


  57. chickadee
    59 | December 27, 2009 16:08

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Come on demonrats, tell us how this is Booooshs fault or Israel or the bitter clingers. Come on.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1238574/Aircraft-passengers-face-heightened-security-measures-emerges-London-educated-syringe-bomber-Flight-253-exploited-loophole.html

    Thanks for posting this. There is a lot of good information in this article. Like how the jihadi was wealthy and had everything to live for. Islamic insanity runs deep. It is a disease that corrupts minds.


  58. vagabond trader
    60 | December 27, 2009 16:09

    @ calcajun:

    How about infidels turned me into a d*ckless jihadi.


  59. chickadee
    61 | December 27, 2009 16:11

    calcajun wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:
    How about:
    “Fire Baller”
    “Thunderpants”
    “Glowing Gonads of Glory”
    “One-eyed Flamethrower of Faith”
    “Sizzling Scrotum against Satin”
    “Flaming Thong of Allah”
    “Mohamed’s Mighty Tighty Whitey!”

    All winners, LOL


  60. Poteen
    62 | December 27, 2009 16:11

    Joke on the HA underpants bomber thread;

    Q. How do you define ‘Weapons of mass destruction’?

    A. Depends


  61. calcajun
    63 | December 27, 2009 16:12

    @ vagabond trader:
    Ironic. He would get his 72 virgins and not have any equipment to use on them, except his mouth. Lucky virgins.


  62. 64 | December 27, 2009 16:12

    @ lobo91:

    It could very well have been an “inside job.”

    Involving security people in Nigeria.

    I meant they thought 9/11 was an inside job.

    The one from 12/25? Would not surprise me in the least that Nigerian security is a joke.

    What also makes me wonder is, why Detroit of all places?


  63. 65 | December 27, 2009 16:13

    Poteen wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Actually, it makes as much sense as “The system worked.”

    Precisely the same level of psychotic dysfunction.


  64. lobo91
    66 | December 27, 2009 16:14

    @ Urban Infidel:

    The one from 12/25? Would not surprise me in the least that Nigerian security is a joke.

    They were quick to say that security at the airport in Lagos, Nigeria is very good.

    Of course, it’s all relative. The truth is that airport security overall is a joke.


  65. vagabond trader
    67 | December 27, 2009 16:15

    @ chickadee:

    It would not surprise me if British intelligence had sent us a warning which we promptly ignored out of PC thought syndrome.The Brits denied crotch jihadi re-entry into the UK, why? I doubt it was simply because he incorrectly named a school he was to attend there.

    These Ivy League social engineers are going to get a lot of people killed I fear.They are way above their pay grades and abilities.Americans who voted for this sideshow had best wake up from their hypnotic fog.


  66. snork
    68 | December 27, 2009 16:17


  67. Macker
    69 | December 27, 2009 16:18

    @ chickadee:

    A disease, wrapped around an ideology, inside a cult.


  68. 70 | December 27, 2009 16:19

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Would not surprise me in the least that Nigerian security is a joke.

    Nigerian security is busy trying to move several million dollars to my bank account. Don’t ask me how I know this; we’re still finalizing the details.


  69. 71 | December 27, 2009 16:19

    @ lobo91:

    Walking the streets? If Van Jones is any indicator, they are part of the present Administration..


  70. goddessoftheclassroom
  71. deleted
    73 | December 27, 2009 16:22

    Are you baiting Chuckles again? I can see the lgf headline now: “Stalker blog calls for military coup, arrest of Congress” with the obligatory “Now you see why I am no longer associated with these wingnuts…” lol


  72. lobo91
    74 | December 27, 2009 16:22

    @ Iron Fist:

    That’s the great thing about the internet. That post could have been written by Janet Napolitano, for all we know.


  73. Truck Monkey
    75 | December 27, 2009 16:23

    chickadee wrote:

    “Sizzling Scrotum against Satin”

    Were his Jihadaroos satin? Did this actually mean to say Satan?
    //


  74. 76 | December 27, 2009 16:26

    chickadee wrote:

    calcajun wrote:
    @ vagabond trader:
    How about:
    “Fire Baller”
    “Thunderpants”
    “Glowing Gonads of Glory”
    “One-eyed Flamethrower of Faith”
    “Sizzling Scrotum against Satin”
    “Flaming Thong of Allah”
    “Mohamed’s Mighty Tighty Whitey!”

    All winners, LOL

    I heard he needs skin grafts. Can you graft a Johnson? OUCH! :)


  75. lobo91
    77 | December 27, 2009 16:27

    We clearly need to pitch this whole name-based “no fly list” and start over, at this point.

    Unless our security system is based on biometric data, it’s utterly useless.


  76. chickadee
    78 | December 27, 2009 16:27

    @ vagabond trader:

    agree, completely.
    Zero is putting us in grave danger with his messianic complex. Our enemies love this empty headed fool who keeps reaching out to them. They greet his eager advances with rudeness and then put bombers on planes to kill Americans. Yes, people in this country need to wake up.


  77. vagabond trader
    79 | December 27, 2009 16:28

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Too late,the he will probably become a she.


  78. 80 | December 27, 2009 16:28

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Our beloved Republic is in the hands of incompetents who refuse to acknowledge the nature and purpose of evil. Alas, this will be our reality for three more years.

    It’s time to pray; not for what we want, but for what we NEED.


  79. 81 | December 27, 2009 16:29

    lobo91 wrote:

    We clearly need to pitch this whole name-based “no fly list” and start over, at this point.
    Unless our security system is based on biometric data, it’s utterly useless.

    Ted Kennedy’s still on it.


  80. vagabond trader
    82 | December 27, 2009 16:29

    @ MacDuff:

    One of stans greatest feats was convincing humanity he does not exist.


  81. goddessoftheclassroom
  82. chickadee
    84 | December 27, 2009 16:33

    Macker wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    A disease, wrapped around an ideology, inside a cult.

    Perfect description.


  83. Macker
    85 | December 27, 2009 16:34

    @ deleted:

    So deleted, are you a Mac user?


  84. Truck Monkey
    86 | December 27, 2009 16:35

    chickadee wrote:

    A disease, wrapped around an ideology, inside a cult.

    It’s three, three, three treats in one!


  85. 87 | December 27, 2009 16:36

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Too late,the he will probably become a she.

    Maybe pig parts can be made available.


  86. calcajun
    88 | December 27, 2009 16:38

    @ Truck Monkey:
    Deliberate typo on my part.


  87. 89 | December 27, 2009 16:39

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    I heard he needs skin grafts. Can you graft a Johnson? OUCH!

    All he “needs” is an opening through which to urinate, and he doesn’t even deserve that. Letting his bladder explode may (would) be inhumane.


  88. calcajun
    90 | December 27, 2009 16:39

    @ Truck Monkey:

    Like bacon-wrapped sausage balls. Yumm.


  89. chickadee
    91 | December 27, 2009 16:40

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    calcajun wrote:
    @ vagabond trader:
    How about:
    “Fire Baller”
    “Thunderpants”
    “Glowing Gonads of Glory”
    “One-eyed Flamethrower of Faith”
    “Sizzling Scrotum against Satin”
    “Flaming Thong of Allah”
    “Mohamed’s Mighty Tighty Whitey!”

    All winners, LOL

    I heard he needs skin grafts. Can you graft a Johnson? OUCH!

    I think that’s going to be a bit of a problem. I just hope the other part of his junk unit is gone so he can’t reproduce.


  90. 92 | December 27, 2009 16:43

    @ MacDuff:
    All I know is that he had better be waterboarded six ways to Sunday stat!


  91. snork
    93 | December 27, 2009 16:43

    Has anyone explained the Iron Fist rule to Baucass?


  92. Beltfed
    94 | December 27, 2009 16:45

    chickadee @ 36:

    crispy crotch jihadi

    A CCJ ? love it. lol


  93. lobo91
    95 | December 27, 2009 16:48

    Way too much of our security is based on the appearance of doing something.

    Airport security is a good example. The only time the government’s “no fly lists” are checked in the entire process is when you purchase a ticket online. At that point, the system compares the name on the ticket to the name on the credit card used for the purchase, and checks to see if that name is on one of the lists. If not, you’ll be issued a boarding pass in that name.

    Notice that I didn’t say “in your name,” because nothing checks to verify the identity of the ticket purchaser, just that it matches the credit card used. On the no fly list? No problem. Just steal the credit card of someone who’s not.

    Thanks to the wonders of modern technology, you can then check in online and print your boarding pass at home. After doing so, you simply make a second copy, which you alter using PhotoShop to show your actual name, rather than the one on the stolen credit card.

    When you get to the security checkpoint, you hand the TSA drone your actual ID, and the altered boarding pass. As long as the ID is genuine (or a good quality forgery), and matches the altered boarding pass, you’ll be cleared. It doesn’t matter what name is on the ID. It could be Osama bin Laden, for all it matters, because they don’t check it against anything.

    After you get past the rest of the security checkpoint, you simply deposit your altered boarding pass in the nearest trash can, and continue to the gate. When you get there, you give the original boarding pass to the agent, who will scan it and let you on the plane.

    Great system, huh?


  94. Beltfed
    96 | December 27, 2009 16:48

    The Wonderoos bomber


  95. calcajun
    97 | December 27, 2009 16:52

    @ Beltfed:
    The “Jockey Jihadi?” “Fruit of the Loom Fanatic?” “BVD Bomber”


  96. chickadee
    98 | December 27, 2009 16:58

    I bet he flew into Detroit because so many muslims fly in there. Maybe he thought he wouldn’t stand out in the crowd. The screeners were probably busy patting down old white ladies and toddlers.


  97. 99 | December 27, 2009 17:03

    @ chickadee:
    Just heard a young sounding white sounding girl talk about how they inspected her. Here we go again. Apparently he didn’t even have proper papers according to one of the articles that Atlas has at her site. Someone was with him explaining he was a refugee in fear of his life or something like that. So, of course the security steps up to patting down obvious non muslims.


  98. lobo91
    100 | December 27, 2009 17:04

    @ chickadee:

    I bet he flew into Detroit because so many muslims fly in there. Maybe he thought he wouldn’t stand out in the crowd.

    Looks like he was right.


  99. vagabond trader
    101 | December 27, 2009 17:04

    @ chickadee:

    No doubt there were a number of his fellow religonists cultists so I guess he was ok with killing them to get the 72 hags.Pathological.


  100. lobo91
    102 | December 27, 2009 17:06

    @ vagabond trader:

    No doubt there were a number of his fellow religonists cultists so I guess he was ok with killing them to get the 72 hags.Pathological.

    They consider such people “accidental martyrs.”

    According to their thinking, he’d actually be doing them a favor.


  101. 103 | December 27, 2009 17:07

    Dark_Fucktard is sniffing around over here looking for sarcastic quotes to “prooove teh hates.” Try this, DF:

    30 Escaped Hillbilly12/27/2009 4:40:34 pm PST

    * 2
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #28 Dark_Falcon

    There’s a little black imam on the sun today.
    But it’s the same ol’ thing as yesterday.

    This racist comment gets two updings on 1.0 and Charles lets it go. Hypocrites.


  102. chickadee
    104 | December 27, 2009 17:07

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    No doubt there were a number of his fellow religonists cultists so I guess he was ok with killing them to get the 72 hags.Pathological.

    Collateral damage and he was taking them to paradise for their hags.
    So they should be thankful he decided their moment of death.


  103. Beltfed
    105 | December 27, 2009 17:08

    calcajun @ 97:

    “BVD Bomber”

    lol, I like that one


  104. 106 | December 27, 2009 17:09

    23 days to election day in Massachusetts….where is the attention?

    http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/12/scott-brown-sarah-palin-and-national.html


  105. chickadee
    107 | December 27, 2009 17:14

    teacake wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    Just heard a young sounding white sounding girl talk about how they inspected her. Here we go again. Apparently he didn’t even have proper papers according to one of the articles that Atlas has at her site. Someone was with him explaining he was a refugee in fear of his life or something like that. So, of course the security steps up to patting down obvious non muslims.

    We really need to get serious with these Islamic cockroaches who have learned how to use the victim card from the Dem. playbook, so they can kill Americans.


  106. snork
    108 | December 27, 2009 17:14

    Beltfed wrote:

    calcajun @ 97:
    “BVD Bomber”
    lol, I like that one

    Fruit of the boom?


  107. vagabond trader
    109 | December 27, 2009 17:15

    What are they going to do when you have 4 or 5 of these bastids board a plane togehter, start chanting their prayers to stan and act out mid air by threatening the passengers and crew. ….Oh wait……


  108. Beltfed
    110 | December 27, 2009 17:17

    Eyewitness in the Detroit-bound fligh,

    I saw the passenger flick his bic and lit his dick.


  109. vagabond trader
    111 | December 27, 2009 17:17

    @ chickadee:

    Yep, there really is a connection between them and the neo commies.A matchup made in hell.


  110. calcajun
    112 | December 27, 2009 17:17

    @ snork:
    HA!

    Haynes, planes and auto-jihadis.


  111. 113 | December 27, 2009 17:17

    @ chickadee:
    The British too


  112. vagabond trader
    114 | December 27, 2009 17:18

    @ Beltfed:

    Nice. :D


  113. waldensianspirit
    115 | December 27, 2009 17:19

    Now imagine the ritalin over the formative years and uppers and anti-this anti-that prescription drugs these policy makers take at will


  114. calcajun
    116 | December 27, 2009 17:20

    @ vagabond trader:
    The smart thing will be for the plane to experience a sudden drop in altitude, a little decompression and for the plane to then continue on to its destination–minus a few “disruptive passengers. These attacks would stop soon enough.


  115. lobo91
    117 | December 27, 2009 17:22

    @ vagabond trader:

    What are they going to do when you have 4 or 5 of these bastids board a plane togehter, start chanting their prayers to stan and act out mid air by threatening the passengers and crew. ….Oh wait……

    You mean other than get sued if they try to do anything about it?


  116. snork
    118 | December 27, 2009 17:23

    @ calcajun:

    And involuntary D. B. Cooper?


  117. 119 | December 27, 2009 17:25

    This is a very odd thing for a radical lefty to be thinking about. I don’t want to ask him for details. I mean, huh? Obama is in charge, Dems are in charge, why would a proud commie want to leave the country? Comment from FB, a friend I have been not communicating with for quite a while now. lol

    early 2010 New Years resolution. Escape US insanity/inanity and move back overseas…in a fast car.


  118. calcajun
    120 | December 27, 2009 17:25

    @ snork:
    Chutes optional.


  119. Beltfed
    121 | December 27, 2009 17:26

    snork @ 108:

    Fruit of the boom?

    I think Hot Air has the video of the exploding watermelon. Gunny Ermey’s favorite target. lol


  120. 122 | December 27, 2009 17:26

    @ calcajun:
    Id like to see pigskin upholstery on all American planes.


  121. 123 | December 27, 2009 17:27

    @ Bunk X:

    Remember, if some racist sneaks on to your blog in the middle of the night and posts racist comments in the middle of the night you agree with those comments if they aren’t immediately deleted.


  122. vagabond trader
    124 | December 27, 2009 17:28

    @ teacake:

    Excellent idea and very luxe. :D


  123. Macker
    125 | December 27, 2009 17:30

    @ vagabond trader:

    no No NO! They’re not hags, I tell you they’re 72 Virgin DEMONS with anvil-shaped genitalia, ready to disembowel him!


  124. snork
    126 | December 27, 2009 17:31

    Beltfed wrote:

    I think Hot Air has the video of the exploding watermelon. Gunny Ermey’s favorite target. lol

    Racists!


  125. chickadee
    127 | December 27, 2009 17:32

    Beltfed wrote:

    Eyewitness in the Detroit-bound fligh,

    I saw the passenger flick his bic and lit his dick.

    Seriously, when we have muslims ready, willing and eager to burn their junk off for allah we have a problem way bigger than Zero will ever understand.


  126. 128 | December 27, 2009 17:32

    “They say that alcoholism is a disease. If the Senate cannot take care of a disease in one of their own members, why should we trust them to take care of us?” -Me


  127. 129 | December 27, 2009 17:32

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Remember, if some racist sneaks on to your blog in the middle of the night and posts racist comments in the middle of the night you agree with those comments if they aren’t immediately deleted.

    And if it happens in the late afternoon, it doesn’t count.


  128. 130 | December 27, 2009 17:33

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ teacake:
    Excellent idea and very luxe.

    And all in-flight movies should star a dog. lol


  129. orangecrush
    131 | December 27, 2009 17:34

    @ 48 Urban Infidel: Ancient Chinese advice on picking a future husband.

    1. Can they stand on their head?
    2. Can they lose gracefully at mahjong when the other 3 gang up on them
    3. do they love their family.

    And not listed but considered. Don’t marry into crazy.


  130. 132 | December 27, 2009 17:35

    Gotta go catch a bus. C ya


  131. 133 | December 27, 2009 17:37

    @51 lobo91 wrote:

    Apparently, that person is unfamiliar with Occam’s Razor.

    As well as Occam’s Soap and any other form of hygiene.


  132. vagabond trader
    134 | December 27, 2009 17:38

    @ teacake:

    A black dog.

    Speaking of watermelon, how cute is this:


  133. waldensianspirit
    135 | December 27, 2009 17:38

    @ teacake:
    Which bark is the most effective at that, do you think


  134. 136 | December 27, 2009 17:39

    @ wolfie:
    I don’t know for sure the circumstances, but Max always talks like this. Most of the people I talk to are pretty sure he had a stroke some years ago.


  135. vagabond trader
    137 | December 27, 2009 17:41

    @ chickadee:

    LOL, says it all.


  136. 138 | December 27, 2009 17:41

    Check this shit out. Obama “Likely” to Speak About Flight 253:

    White House sources tell ABC News the President will “likely” speak publicly about the alleged attempted terrorist attack on Flight 253 in the next few days. The President is on vacation in his native state of Hawaii – he has received regularly briefings on the incident and called for increased security for air travel, along with a full review of the terror watch list procedures. The White House is adamant that the President is actively engaged on the incident behind the scenes, receiving regular updates as information comes in. While on vacation Mr. Obama does not keep a public schedule, but he did spend much of the day golfing on Saturday and is spending Sunday with his family at the beach. He has been criticized because he has yet to address the American people directly.

    Can you imagine the unholy hell that would be raised had Bush done this? There would have been congressional investigations, and Ted Kennedy would have accused him of collusion.

    It is clear that either Obama doesn’t know how to address the situation (I could write him a speech and they could put it on his teleprompter) or he doesn’t care. I don’t know which one, but what a flawed narcissist we have for a President that he won’t take time out from his busy vacation to address the duties of his office.


  137. 139 | December 27, 2009 17:43

    Iron Fist wrote:

    It is clear that either Obama doesn’t know how to address the situation

    He’s not sure what joke to open with, nor whom to give a shout out to before the teleprompter signals him to put on his grim and serious face.


  138. unclassifiable
    140 | December 27, 2009 17:46

    He was quoted recorded out of context!


  139. lobo91
    141 | December 27, 2009 17:48

    @ Iron Fist:

    It is clear that either Obama doesn’t know how to address the situation (I could write him a speech and they could put it on his teleprompter) or he doesn’t care.

    I think the actual problem is that the people responsible for the problem don’t know how to address it, and Obama doesn’t care. As far as he’s concerned, once he told DHS to fix it, his work was done.


  140. waldensianspirit
    142 | December 27, 2009 17:48

    @ Mars:
    With that much drunk-style repetition?


  141. buzzsawmonkey
    143 | December 27, 2009 17:48

    The only way to prevent a repetition of this terrorist near-miss is to outlaw underwear.

    If nobody has underwear, then nobody can sew explosives into it.


  142. waldensianspirit
    144 | December 27, 2009 17:49

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Commando flights only


  143. waldensianspirit
  144. lobo91
    146 | December 27, 2009 17:51

    One relatively simple improvement they could make would be to require the TSA screeners stationed at the entry to the security screening area to compare each passenger’s ID, boarding pass, and credit card to see that all 3 match, as well as checking against the government watch lists.

    Also, do away with online check-in. I always use it, and it’s a big timesaver, but it’s a huge security loophole.


  145. buzzsawmonkey
    147 | December 27, 2009 17:52

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Gives a new meaning to the term “joystick,” doesn’t it?


  146. calcajun
    148 | December 27, 2009 17:53

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Can’t go wrong with a thong. (unless you are Rosie O’Donnell-eww)


  147. goddessoftheclassroom
    149 | December 27, 2009 17:53

    @ Iron Fist:
    He just wants to finish his waffles…


  148. calcajun
    150 | December 27, 2009 17:54

    @ waldensianspirit:
    If God is your co-pilot, who the hell is your navigator?


  149. waldensianspirit
    151 | December 27, 2009 17:55

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    yaw and forward pitch should be kept minimal


  150. lobo91
    152 | December 27, 2009 17:56

    Well, I guess everyone was wrong about Napolitano being an idiot. Chuckles has spoken:

    170 Charles
    Sun, Dec 27, 2009 5:46:45pm replyquote 4downupreport

    Napolitano’s comment about “the system worked” was pretty clumsy.

    However, she wasn’t saying “the system worked” because the passengers tackled the terrorist. She was saying the system worked because the system-wide response following the incident worked well.

    Here’s the video:

    Youtube Video

    Sorry, can’t join in the outrage on this one either. She definitely worded it badly, but calling for her to resign over this? That’s ridiculous.


  151. Lincolntf
    153 | December 27, 2009 17:56

    Among all the other advice I’d give to the bafflingly stupid pols currently populating our Legislature, seeking out a scrip for some modern version of “Sears White Star Secret Liquor Cure” seems the kindest.
    I assume that all the bloated corruptocrats are vying amongst themselves to replace Teddy K. as the most disgusting example of excess in DC. Useless yammering assholes, every last one of them.

    Merry belated Christmas.


  152. 154 | December 27, 2009 17:58

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Check this shit out. Obama “Likely” to Speak About Flight 253:

    Could you give us the correct link, please?


  153. vagabond trader
    155 | December 27, 2009 17:59

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    No underwear and kilts.


  154. calcajun
    156 | December 27, 2009 17:59

    lobo91 wrote:

    Napolitano’s comment about “the system worked” was pretty clumsy. However, she wasn’t saying “the system worked” because the passengers tackled the terrorist. She was saying the system worked because the system-wide response following the incident worked well.

    Well, just imagine how well it would have worked if the plane had been blown out of the air. CJ is being willfully ignorant here; the system is meant to keep people like this from getting aboard in the first place.


  155. Overlook
    157 | December 27, 2009 18:01

    @ Iron Fist:

    I would hate to hear Obama address the American People on this, or any other matter. Unless he speaks Austrian.


  156. buzzsawmonkey
    158 | December 27, 2009 18:03

    It really is not stop-press news
    Some Senators can’t hold their booze
    Just watch old Max Baucus
    Orate and get raucous
    Before he throws up on his shoes


  157. chickadee
    159 | December 27, 2009 18:08

    Zero did not address the Ft. Hood jihad massacre of 14 innocent people in a timely respectful way. He interrupted his address to American Indians to utter a few stupid statements and then gave some ‘shout outs’ to some people in the audience. He proved himself a calloused insensitive bastard. And he didn’t even go to Fort Hod until days after after the islamic terrorist attack was committed. The fact that 300 people could have been killed on Christmas Day, by the crispy crotch jihadi, apparently means little to Zero. He seems unconcerned. More focused on golfing and laying on the beach.

    His failure to address the nation personally is unforgivable. Who the fck is this narcissist? And where is his allegiance?


  158. mfhorn
    160 | December 27, 2009 18:09

    @ lobo91:

    ‘The system worked’ would only apply if the S.O.B. had been kept off the frickin’ flight in the FIRST PLACE. I don’t give a rats @ss about his RIGHTS, I care about the safety of innocent people on the flight & on the ground.


  159. 161 | December 27, 2009 18:10

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    The only way to prevent a repetition of this terrorist near-miss is to outlaw underwear.
    If nobody has underwear, then nobody can sew explosives into it.

    So in other words, with no chonies allowed, a terrorist should opt for an explosive suppository. Blow it out your ass.
    ;)


  160. 162 | December 27, 2009 18:10

    calcajun wrote:

    CJ is being willfully ignorant here;

    Shocked, yes shocked am I!


  161. 163 | December 27, 2009 18:11

    Bunk X wrote:

    So in other words, with no chonies allowed, a terrorist should opt for an explosive suppository.

    Another terrorist in Saudi Arabia already attempted the explosive suppository scheme.


  162. buzzsawmonkey
    164 | December 27, 2009 18:11

    chickadee wrote:

    Zero did not address the Ft. Hood jihad massacre of 14 innocent people in a timely respectful way.

    He was Ditherer-in-Chief during the Iranian election riots, too.

    Crises do seem to bring out his inner waffle, don’t they? Think of the delay in this case as his Christmas “Present” to the nation.


  163. Overlook
    165 | December 27, 2009 18:13

    @ chickadee:

    No, really and truly, we do not need him to get up and preach on this. In any case, he himself does not have flameproof pants.


  164. mfhorn
    166 | December 27, 2009 18:16

    @ chickadee:

    It’s a repeat of the murder of Dr. Tiller, where Obama, within hours, condemned a ‘heinous act of violence’ vs the murder of a military recruiter & wounding of another recruiter, which took Obama more than a day to respond.

    In Tiller’s case, federal marshals were sent to protect abortion clinic, while in the recruiters case, no special arrangements were made to protect other recruiting offices.


  165. 167 | December 27, 2009 18:17

    RoboMonkey wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    So in other words, with no chonies allowed, a terrorist should opt for an explosive suppository.
    Another terrorist in Saudi Arabia already attempted the explosive suppository scheme.

    Sorry. It’s really not a very humorous topic. But if they want to get their asses blown away, there are many who have volunteered to do it for them.


  166. Lincolntf
    168 | December 27, 2009 18:18

    @ calcajun:

    If we’re gonna start measuring reality against what Chuckles McGiblets posts, then we’re totally screwed.


  167. chickadee
    169 | December 27, 2009 18:18

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    Zero did not address the Ft. Hood jihad massacre of 14 innocent people in a timely respectful way.

    He was Ditherer-in-Chief during the Iranian election riots, too.

    Crises do seem to bring out his inner waffle, don’t they? Think of the delay in this case as his Christmas “Present” to the nation.

    And he didn’t come out decisively when Russia started kicking Georgia around. He tried to act like an important mediator who people would perk up and listen to. He said both sides should stand down.
    L the fck OL. Only after McCain harshed on Russia did Zero try to act tough toward them.
    He is as weak as a popcorn fart.


  168. bar
    170 | December 27, 2009 18:18

    @ chickadee:
    IIRC our POS pres didnt even get the “shout outs” right, what a stupid asshole!


  169. Beltfed
    171 | December 27, 2009 18:18

    lobo91 @ 146:

    Why put the burden on us, why not give all members of the religion of pieces an extra going over before boarding the plane, that would be easier and it works for me.


  170. 172 | December 27, 2009 18:19

    The problem with explosive suppositories is that your plot may backfire.

    *rimshot*


  171. chickadee
    173 | December 27, 2009 18:20

    mfhorn wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    It’s a repeat of the murder of Dr. Tiller, where Obama, within hours, condemned a ‘heinous act of violence’ vs the murder of a military recruiter & wounding of another recruiter, which took Obama more than a day to respond.

    In Tiller’s case, federal marshals were sent to protect abortion clinic, while in the recruiters case, no special arrangements were made to protect other recruiting offices.

    Exactly. Can we say we detect a pattern yet?


  172. goddessoftheclassroom
    174 | December 27, 2009 18:20

    @ RoboMonkey:
    I think that needs some more analysis…


  173. snork
    175 | December 27, 2009 18:24

    Napolitano’s comment about “the system worked” was pretty clumsy. However, she wasn’t saying “the system worked” because the passengers tackled the terrorist. She was saying the system worked because the system-wide response following the incident worked well.

    Say what? What system-wide response?


  174. goddessoftheclassroom
    176 | December 27, 2009 18:24

    Good night, y’all.


  175. 177 | December 27, 2009 18:26

    snork wrote:

    Say what? What system-wide response?

    The system-wide response of excuses, rationalizations, and ass-coverings.


  176. calcajun
    178 | December 27, 2009 18:26

    @ Lincolntf:
    Not saying we should. Just pointing out how he has come a full 180 from 9/11 to being an apologist for an incompetent.


  177. lobo91
    179 | December 27, 2009 18:27

    @ Beltfed:

    Why put the burden on us, why not give all members of the religion of pieces an extra going over before boarding the plane, that would be easier and it works for me.

    As soon as you develop a 100% accurate Muslim detector, that’ll work.


  178. buzzsawmonkey
    180 | December 27, 2009 18:27

    snork wrote:

    Say what? What system-wide response?

    Perhaps the system-wide lackadaisical yawns by the TSA airport workers…?


  179. Beltfed
    181 | December 27, 2009 18:27

    lobo91 @ 152:

    CJ
    She was saying the system worked because the system-wide response following the incident worked well.

    Is that clown for real. The Cliff Claven of the blogosphere.


  180. 183 | December 27, 2009 18:33

    RoboMonkey wrote:

    The system-wide response of excuses, rationalizations, and ass-coverings.

    Chaz has bravely volunteered to be a part of this effort. Apparently he has finally completed work on his anal bum cover.calcajun wrote:

    You forgot hand-wringing, tongue-clucking, blame-shifting, scapegoat identifying, etc..

    I collected as much of it as I could.


  181. 184 | December 27, 2009 18:33

    Simply amazing.

    235 Charles12/27/2009 6:05:56 pm PST

    * 7
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #211 Cannadian Club Akbar

    I like Bonham, but I am a huge Neil Peart fan. Also, the drummer for Journey (Steve Smith?) did one of the best solos I have ever seen.

    Speaking of drummers — as a musician I was blessed to have worked with many of the best drummers who’ve ever lived. A partial list:

    Karen Carpenter
    Ed Begley, Jr.
    Dickie Goodman
    Don Imus
    Andrew Sullivan
    Satchel Page
    Church Lady

    And lots more.

    //snark//


  182. MrPaulRevere
    185 | December 27, 2009 18:35

    snork wrote:

    Has anyone explained the Iron Fist rule to Baucass?

    To the best of my knowledge,not even Ted Kennedy spoke (on TV anyway) while drunk in the Senate.


  183. 186 | December 27, 2009 18:36

    RoboMonkey wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    Check this shit out. Obama “Likely” to Speak About Flight 253:
    Could you give us the correct link, please?

    Link. Sorry.


  184. Beltfed
    187 | December 27, 2009 18:37

    lobo91 @ 179:

    As soon as you develop a 100% accurate Muslim detector, that’ll work.

    Here’s one.


  185. MrPaulRevere
    188 | December 27, 2009 18:37

    @ Bunk X:
    Speaking of music, here is my musical tribute to Janet Napolitano: Nobody’s Fault But Mine


  186. lobo91
    189 | December 27, 2009 18:40

    @ Beltfed:

    You want to replace the TSA employees with trained pigs?


  187. 190 | December 27, 2009 18:43

    @ lobo91:

    And therein lies the rub. Mohammedans aren’t all bearded, turbaned fanatics shouting “I Keeeeel you!”. They can be a soft spoken, white person from Londonistan, or even a pregnant woman not wearing a head scarf, let alone a bag. That is why straight profiling isn’t the answer. But it is crazy not to give Abu abu bin Blowinshitup a second glance because he is a bearded, turbaned fanatic shouting “I Keeeeel you!” because that would be profiling, and profiling is wrong.


  188. buzzsawmonkey
    191 | December 27, 2009 18:43

    lobo91 wrote:

    You want to replace the TSA employees with trained pigs?

    Sounds good:

    1) Increased competence

    2) Training costs offset by money gained through ham and bacon sales at retirement

    3) No pension expenses


  189. taxfreekiller
    192 | December 27, 2009 18:44

    Free Goverment Paid Flights for all Islamics.

    All they have to do is fly Islamic’s only.

    Give the moderate islamic’s some thinking to do in the waiting areas.


  190. chickadee
    193 | December 27, 2009 18:45

    Beltfed wrote:

    lobo91 @ 152:

    CJ
    She was saying the system worked because the system-wide response following the incident worked well.

    Is that clown for real. The Cliff Claven of the blogosphere.

    Isn’t it remarkable how Cj knows what people are thinking and saying. How he knows what they REALLY mean. He is incredible. Cult leaders are often mind readers. He was able to determine through his great intuitive skills, for example, that Van jones who signed a ‘troofer’ petition, didn’t really KNOW what he was signing. CJ just made that up. That an attorney putting his name on a document without looking at it is quite common. CJ sleuthed that by himself, thereby exonerating Mr. Jones from being a troofer.
    Though Jones freely admitted he knew what he had signed. LOL
    CJ goes above and beyond the call of duty to fabricate completely made up scenarios to defend his new found heros. All lefty commie bastards.
    He is pathetic at this point.


  191. calcajun
    194 | December 27, 2009 18:45

    @ lobo91:
    Would reduce the numbers of flying muslims if they had to be searched by one.


  192. lobo91
    195 | December 27, 2009 18:45

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I’m pretty sure their union would object.


  193. kansas
    196 | December 27, 2009 18:47

    snork wrote:

    Napolitano’s comment about “the system worked” was pretty clumsy. However, she wasn’t saying “the system worked” because the passengers tackled the terrorist. She was saying the system worked because the system-wide response following the incident worked well.
    Say what? What system-wide response?

    The one where they institute all sorts of useless changes that annoy the shit out of Americans and make Muslims laugh their asses off.


  194. buzzsawmonkey
    197 | December 27, 2009 18:47

    @ chickadee:

    Flake, but accurate?


  195. calcajun
    198 | December 27, 2009 18:47

    @ chickadee:
    Not that I care, but what is the traffic like these days over there?


  196. Lincolntf
    199 | December 27, 2009 18:48

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Wouldn’t want that. Sounds like a poor scene.


  197. buzzsawmonkey
    200 | December 27, 2009 18:48

    lobo91 wrote:

    I’m pretty sure their union would object.

    Pigs have a union?


  198. kansas
    201 | December 27, 2009 18:48

    calcajun wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Would reduce the numbers of flying muslims if they had to be searched by one.

    Shit, if they had to be searched at all. Can’t insult them, you know. They’ll just search you and me twice.


  199. lobo91
    202 | December 27, 2009 18:49

    @ kansas:

    The one where they institute all sorts of useless changes that annoy the shit out of Americans and make Muslims laugh their asses off.

    You mean like the stuff they just announced?

    Not sure how preventing passengers from getting up in the last hour of a flight is going to keep someone from detonating a bomb sewn into their undewear.


  200. buzzsawmonkey
    203 | December 27, 2009 18:51

    @ Lincolntf:

    Heh. Now that was subtle.


  201. 204 | December 27, 2009 18:51

    @ MrPaulRevere:
    Dred Zeppelin’s version is pretty good, too, but I like this cover of “Rock N Roll” featuring a bloated Sammy Hagar and a very talented Desiree Bassett:


  202. lobo91
    205 | December 27, 2009 18:51

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Pigs have a union?

    I’m sure they will soon enough.


  203. chickadee
    206 | December 27, 2009 18:51

    calcajun wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    Not that I care, but what is the traffic like these days over there?

    I haven’t been there in over a year. I really don’t know.


  204. buzzsawmonkey
    207 | December 27, 2009 18:56

    lobo91 wrote:

    I’m sure they will soon enough.

    Probably an offshoot of the SEIU; the SEIUEEEEE.


  205. taxfreekiller
    208 | December 27, 2009 18:57

    Better yet.

    All the Islamic’s on the no fly list.

    Buy them all free round trip tickets on the Saudi and Iran’s national air lines, to and from say, Moscow and Chairman Mao’s city in China.

    Sort of let the fur fly kind of a deal.


  206. chickadee
    209 | December 27, 2009 18:59

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:

    I’m sure they will soon enough.

    Probably an offshoot of the SEIU; the SEIUEEEEE.

    LOL


  207. Beltfed
    210 | December 27, 2009 19:02

    lobo91 @ 189:

    You want to replace the TSA employees with trained pigs?

    Why not, if pigs can be trained to root out truffles, why not

    Two porkers is all that’s needed, one at security and one at the boarding gate.


  208. 211 | December 27, 2009 19:07

    calcajun wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    Not that I care, but what is the traffic like these days over there?

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/littlegreenfootballs.com
    Looks like the purge dropped traffic considerably, but he’s picking up more leftists.


  209. snork
    212 | December 27, 2009 19:22

    @ Bunk X:

    Quantcast picture is a little different.

    No idea why they’re different.


  210. snork
    213 | December 27, 2009 19:25

    This’ll flush out the porkophobes.


  211. 214 | December 27, 2009 19:26

    snork wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Quantcast picture is a little different.
    No idea why they’re different.

    Some of the data was corrupted, missing and/or deleted on Alexa so they created a model to adjust the graphs using vectors. Note that their model relies heavily on manipulated data and tree rings from a sapling, and does not take into account cloud cover.


  212. Beltfed
    215 | December 27, 2009 19:31

    snork @ 213:

    lol

    Or they’ll fall in love. ;)


  213. Lincolntf
    216 | December 27, 2009 19:38

    Seems empty in here.
    Have I recently waxed (drunkenly or not) poetic about the virtues of the Classic Rock/80′s/70′s music channels hidden in the nether numbers of the Time Warner cable umbilicus?
    Humming along to Cyndi Lauper with my tin-ear to the anthems of the ’80′s cheeseball-era, I cringe. Nobody must ever know how lame we were. It’s horrifying. Tears for Freakin’ Fears? I hate 15 year old me.
    It’s like when I was 9, watching my Uncle Bruce snapping along to “Rocky Raccoon”. Just not cool.


  214. Runner
    217 | December 27, 2009 19:47

    Lincolntf wrote:

    Seems empty in here.
    Have I recently waxed (drunkenly or not) poetic about the virtues of the Classic Rock/80’s/70’s music channels hidden in the nether numbers of the Time Warner cable umbilicus?
    Humming along to Cyndi Lauper with my tin-ear to the anthems of the ’80’s cheeseball-era, I cringe. Nobody must ever know how lame we were. It’s horrifying. Tears for Freakin’ Fears? I hate 15 year old me.
    It’s like when I was 9, watching my Uncle Bruce snapping along to “Rocky Raccoon”. Just not cool.

    Oh Lincolntf, do not despair. The 80s gave us some awesome music. And yes, I consider Tears For Fears in that category! C’mon, “The Hurting”? For its time, it was eye opening.

    At the risk of incurring the wrath of the music gods I submit that the 80s are as important as the 50s and 60s when it comes to groundbreaking acts. And the 50s are only important because it had never been done before quite like that.


  215. calcajun
    218 | December 27, 2009 19:48

    @ Beltfed:
    Welcome back, trotter.


  216. Lincolntf
    219 | December 27, 2009 19:51

    @ Runner:

    All I know is that the theme of my first prom was “Eye of the Tiger”.
    That leaves a mark.


  217. Runner
    220 | December 27, 2009 19:54

    Lincolntf wrote:

    @ Runner:

    All I know is that the theme of my first prom was “Eye of the Tiger”.
    That leaves a mark.

    Ouch!

    But hey, the theme of my senior prom (1981) was some song by Styx! Now that’s embarrassing!

    The only saving grace is that the most popular song at the prom was AC/DC’s “Back in Black”. Try dancing to that!


  218. calcajun
    221 | December 27, 2009 19:59

    @ Runner:
    That’s easy- just fake a seizure.


  219. Runner
    222 | December 27, 2009 20:01

    @ calcajun:

    I’m sure there were some troublemakers that did just that!


  220. Runner
    223 | December 27, 2009 20:08

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzz


  221. Lincolntf
    224 | December 27, 2009 20:10

    “Hey Joe” by Hendrix on the Music Channel.
    Redeeming themselves song by song.


  222. Lincolntf
    225 | December 27, 2009 20:19

    The caption accompanying “Four Sticks” from Zep 4, on the TV right now…

    “Led Zeppelin manager Richard Cole famously participated in a lewd act involving a groupie and a live fish.”


  223. Macker
    226 | December 27, 2009 20:19

    @ Lincolntf:

    Here’s an 80s anthem which got me through some very dark times…


  224. Lincolntf
    227 | December 27, 2009 20:28

    Dire Straits “Money for Nothing”.
    Revolutionary in it’s own little way.

    Reminds me of tennis and dish-washing.


  225. pbird
    228 | December 27, 2009 21:03

    calcajun wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:

    Ironic. He would get his 72 virgins and not have any equipment to use on them, except his mouth. Lucky virgins.

    Ick.


  226. 229 | December 27, 2009 23:29

    Lincolntf wrote:

    The caption accompanying “Four Sticks” from Zep 4, on the TV right now…
    “Led Zeppelin manager Richard Cole famously participated in a lewd act involving a groupie and a live fish.”

    That would be the infamous mudshark incident.

    LAST.


  227. Speranza
    230 | December 28, 2009 03:59

    And this corrupt bastard is big on the Obamacare solution. And we depend on POS’s like him and the majority party to keep us safe. ”

    Uhh Savage I am sure that on a thread you can express your self better then that.


  228. Doppelganger
    231 | December 28, 2009 06:52

    I wish I would have been a senator on the floor when Senator Bacchus asked where is the courage….I would have said, Courage or Dutch courage?

    /rimshot


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David