OK, I know that these LGF flashbacks are getting a little played out, but it’s been a little while for me. And, hey, I still follow you guys (even if it is just via twitter sometimes), and every so often something pops up that I think you might find amusing. So…follow me…
TWEET!!!:
Lizardoid: Report: Bush Administration Released Two Al Qaeda Leaders Behind NW 253 Terror Plot http://bit.ly/4E1cOl
Crib notes: Bad guys got released from gitmo. It’s Bush’s fault, and/or the Saudis…and he called it two years ago.
{{{ZOINKS}}}
And with that, you are transported to the alternate “called it two years ago” Lizardoid Universe. This is a cute story, 2-something years in the making, folks:
Anyone remember that thread? This is classic stuff.
For the record, I entered this one with a sort of disbelief, since there was nothing presented to back up the assertion. It was just kinda blurted out there. So, I basically went in the thread in progressive flame warrior mode, shrugged my shoulders, put my hands up, and laid a grenade on the lizard table (ya know, where they have their “gamy buttocks“). The usual lizard swarm appeared. (It’s kinda entertaining if you want to follow the timestamp and go back. Of course, I conceded that “left” elements may have pushed for extending certain rights for the prisoners, but I kept coming back to the question of who actually released them.)
And as is written (for now) in the annals of “tough room”, there was a period of noble and deft swarm management on my part. But, eventually…well, I just couldn’t believe we were arguing about blaming the “left” for something that was obviously Bush territory. So, I posted 351:
Crib notes: For the last time. If they’re released, the administration released them. As in, the Bush administration.
The response was…disappointing:
Crib notes: You’re dumb.
If you continue follow the thread, you’ll see that I ducked out for a bit, and came back with some fact checking, and proved that it really was a matter that Bush’s DOD took on a case-by-case basis and often involved a lot of back-channel diplomacy (not with the “left”, of course, but with other nations). And… pounced on again, I was.
After all, the Clairvoyant One had spoken.
Exit question: What do you suppose is the statute of limitations for “hat tips”?












You should write an email to Charles and ask him that! You called him out on it and now he back peddles and agrees with your view!
The twitter redirect link works, BTW.
@ ChenZhen:
In all honesty, You really nailed Chunky hard here. He was defending Bush but now he’s a Bush hater. He clearly is a 2 face hypocrite. Good job!
So now what’s the score? Everybody’s in agreement that it was Bush’s fault? So now you kiss and make up?
This is a beaut, ChenZhen. Thanks for the little trip down memory-lane. I remember following that discussion as it went on, though I don’t think I took part.
I recently noticed that Poormouth Charlie’s not blocking me from viewing his site anymore. Not that I will be giving him traffic, it’s all leftist-spew and AGW-bullshit anymore over there, but it’s interesting that he’s unblocking his Enemies List. Traffic must really be down, to overcome his paranoid hostility in this matter.
@ snork:
Charles got caught out there. He blamed the Left and now blames Bush for the Gitmo release. His spin has no end.
@ garycooper:
He’s begging for money.
I wonder what would happen if someone were to point out to CJ that the Gitmo inmates who were released are probably also ones on whom we didn’t have enough legally admissable evidence to warrant a trial?
Given that a substantial number of them have turned out to be guilty as hell, what does he think we should do when the ones who are still there are tried in civilian court and are acquitted for the same reason? We’re pretty damn certain those guys are bad, since we’re still holding them.
I guess a few thousand dead infidels is just the price we’ll have to pay in order to avoid upsetting Charles…
ChenZhen wrote:
Now that’s interesting. Apparently I’m no longer IP blocked. Maybe he has a limited number of blocked IPs, and he assigns them round-robin?
@ snork:
He’s also begging for cash!
@ Rodan:
It’s good to know he’s not getting the support from his new Prog-pals, that he used to get from his conservative members. Funny how that works, eh? Seems the libtards just assume the government will step in and fund everything, so they don’t go in much for private charity.
Poor Chuckles.
@ garycooper:
That’s why he’s supporting Obamacare. He thinks government subsidizing his Health coverage is good.
Just went over there, didn’t stay long, but the thread is “How to get banned from the swamp, exhibit T” Uh, why all the use of the alphabet when post his little pissy rants about one thing or another. Exbibit H for Homophobia, now Exhibit T, blah, blah, blah. Some of the people over there hitting the pipe so much they forget the alphabet?
Oh, this is the former MNsnowlizard, now re-incarnated as Dreamy in MN. Yes, that is after my cat…all I can say is he is lucky he is cute!
@ Dreamy in MN:
Great to have you here. I notice many posters here have cats in their avatar.
Thanks, Rodan. Like I said a few weeks ago when I was here last, I feel more comfortable here then I ever did over there. Thanks for the site!
@ Dreamy in MN:
This is a banning offense. What’s funny is that this guy speaks for how we all feel!
Feeling holier than thou because we as a country profess horror at torturing terrorists is laughable (although I guarantee you no one that watches NASCAR or NFL football, i.e., the majority of Americans, would give a shit if we tortured the fuck out of these animals). We’re making ourselves marginally more vulnerable to becoming extinct by fighting with both hands tied behind our back, while our enemies put no such constraints on themselves, and then mock us for our weakness. Our enemies actually understand the concept of self-preservation when it comes to their culture, whereas we don’t. Meaning we’ve become “that guy,” you know, the one you can mock to his face without him knowing it. Which is to say, we’re fucking pathetic.
This was another one of the class of 2004, by the way.
Rodan wrote:
The 180 is well documented at this point, so I guess I’m just poking fun at the use of some extreme selective memory techniques.
Dark Falcon bowing before his Progressive masters!
As has often been the case lately, Jimmah, I wish I could disagree with you and your better half, but I can’t. When you’re right, you’re right. Add to my list of miseries the fact that the party I’ve supported since I was 14 has turned to slime beneath my feet.
@ ChenZhen:
The funny part is seeing so called Conservatives like Sharmuta, Hoosier Hoops and Dark Falcon going Hard Left to sty in the cult!
@ Rodan:
Exactly. You know, I am 36, and I am amazed how things have changed since I was a kid. You know, that really isn’t that long ago when you think about it. I just cannot believe what has happened to this country. I only supported one democrat–Mondale. He was from MN, I was being force fed all the anti nuke crap regarding Reagan and I was 11 years old. But I grew out of that and have been conservative since I was oh, 12. I just cannot wrap my brain around how things have changed.
My mom’s brother lives out in Napa and she knew I can not stand the guy, LIBERAL to the core! She would tease me (jokingly) about going out to visit him. My response, “Only if I can go to San Francisco and go hippy hunting.” Not that I would do anything, because that would be WRONG.
Dreamy in MN wrote:
Kaching! The threat counter just clicked up over at the other place.
It’s as though CJ switched places with his double from the Star Trek Mirror Universe– and we got the lesser end of the deal.
@ Rodan: @ #19
What the hell? Is he that much of a stooge (I already know the answer)? Good gravy, I am a female and I have more balls than that GAH! Suck ups and sycophants…that is all that’s left.
@ snork:
I said it would be WRONG. Oh well, what is going to happen, his little group of flying monkeys going to come to MN to find me? Bah, Dreamy and I can take them.
@ Dreamy in MN:
It is a shame. I feel as if I live in a different country.
@ Dreamy in MN:
He’s actually one of our biggest readers!
Hi Dark Falcon you kiss ass!
@ Dreamy in MN:
I don’t know about wrong, but it would certainly be un-sporting.
Sorta like hunting at a petting zoo.
Ah poor Icarus!
A large percentage of the class of 2004 is now posting comments like that at stalker blogs, and obsessively hating me. Which is always fun.
calcajun wrote:
One of these days, I’m going to be proven right, when it comes out that the blog’s been run by three college kids in the UK for the past year or so.
The only doubt that I have is, who, other then Charles F Johnson, could possibly produce such gawdawful pictures?
Hi Dark Falcon you chump!
They’ve caught onto it over at the Stalker Blog. Its the usual nasty troll frenzy that happens whenever you point out the glaring moral faults of some people who call themselves conservatives. With disgustingly predictability, the posters there are justifying their being banned by expressing support for rcm.
@ lobo91:
Maybe if someone would chase them with oh, soap, shampoo and water, that would get them to running. Would that make it a little sporting? But like I said, it would be WRONG.
Did you guys see this over there tonight in that same thread? I’m stunned that it’s still there:
“118 marioworld5
Tue, Dec 29, 2009 9:32:54pm
-7
down
up
report
This must be my 3rd or so comment over the many years religiously reading LGF (the 1st comment was “hello world” and 2nd may have been some important news story that hasn’t yet been mentioned at LGF at the time). I don’t participate in discussion groups. This may very well end up being “exhibit C” for “Criticizing Charles” and may get me banned from the site, but to be perfectly honest, I don’t care any more.
I am not a liberal or conservative, I am not a republican or a democrat (nor do I care to make this soliloquy grammatically correct) , I am just a regular guy who is appalled by what this site has become.
1. Charles, I think it is pathetic that you conciser yourself the unquestionable moral authority. You have become drunk with power (I suppose running a blog is powerful stuff, and absolute power to ban people must be absolutely corrupting)
2. I think it is pathetic that you spend your valuable time not only reading every comment on LGF in case someone utters something “hateful” (in your supreme opinion), but you actually go through comments on other sites (which apparently don’t have the time or desire to moderate every comment). Yes, it is equally pathetic that I am writing this in the first place.
3. I think you have become as much as a wingnut as you liberally call every person who disagrees with you. As the banned person pointed out, most people do not enjoy or condone torture, but I honestly think you fell prey to the same shortsightedness as those you ridicule. Have you forgotten what steps were taken in WWII to ensure you, me, and everyone else who enjoys the liberties of this great country did not end up as a lamp shade? Did you forget Hiroshima? Nagasaki? Dresden? Berlin? It is absolutely SICKENING to see how far your game of devil’s advocate has allowed you to sink. You might as well petition for membership in ACORN (after all, no wrongdoing was found during the investigations)
The bottom line on the subject of torture in my humble opinion: It is unpleasant, it is violent, it is perhaps immoral, but when you are dealing with “people” who would fly planes with hundreds of people into buildings with thousands more, if there is one innocent life to be saved by employing “enhanced interrogation techniques”, I am 100% for it. Now ban away…”
@ katemaclaren:
Yup saw it, he nailed Chucky!
Okay, why am I supposed to care about someone who gets waterboarded when there is a possibility it will save lives? I don’t. I just don’t care. Why am I supposed to hold the life of a criminal who would not hesitate in killing hundreds or thousands of Americans, in high esteem. I don’t! I just don’t care. This is about survival, kick their effing asses for all I care, the lives of my fellow countrymen and the lives of our allies are more important than some bastards who would not hesitate slitting our throats.
@ Rodan:
We don’t hate him– least I don’t. We’re ridiculing him and he hates that.
Rodan wrote:
Who’s rcm?
@ katemaclaren:
A flounce, a golf clap and a warm welcome to a future member of the Blogmocracy.
I’m not sure I concur–I really really dislike him–for the way he manipulates people–and for his dishonesty and hubris. However, the ridicule is fun and all I want to say is Encore!
@ calcajun:
OT, but if Justice Kennedy is really serious about following European precedent, I wouldn’t mind in this case:
French Revolution! Carbon tax ruled unconstitutional just two days before taking effect
Heh. Heh heh. Just when you’re about to write the French off, they surprise you.
snork wrote:
I stop short of making a big deal about it with fingers pointing and all that. I suppose you could blame him insofar as his system being imperfect. I don’t expect any system for that to be perfect, though.
Here’s a brilliant, and completely factually inaccurate, post:
Funny…I know for a fact that at one point, we had over 23,000 detainees at Camp Bucca alone. And that wasn’t the only detention facility in Iraq (not to mention the ones in Afghanistan).
Where does he think all those people came from, if they didn’t surrender?
@ wolfie:
Robert Stacey McCain. The devil incarnate.
Yeah? Who is RCM? I thought RSM (the other McCain), but “C”?
@ wolfie:
Dreamy in MN wrote:
There’s no sport in that. They all eat veggies, so there’s no meat on ‘em. They don’t bathe, so they’re easy to track. No fun at all.
@ snork:
Where’s the “C” come from, then? Thought it was “RSM”.
Calcajun–is that Breaker Morant as your Avatar?
@ calcajun:
ChenZhen wrote:
Right. The current position may be technically correct, and the former one may have had a large element of truth to it also, but neither position of his was very insightful. One problem that Bush had was the bureaucracy not following policy. With Obama, I think there’s a similar problem, but it’s different people being wayward. Either way, what is directed at the top probably didn’t play very much into what ended up being done. Such are bureaucracies.
@ calcajun:
Alright. How about if I just make fun of them instead?
Oh, as a disclaimer, if anybody EVER thought that I would hunt other humans (not on this site I know), eh, not going to happen. Sorry to say, I brake for animals when the run out in front of the car. Only in Summer though. Seeing as we are butt high in snow right now, they are on their own!
@ Rodan:
And who or what in the Wide World of Sports is “rcm”? And how are we supporting it? Why do I feel we’re playing into someone’s paranoid fantasy?
@ katemaclaren:
Yep. Edward Woodward– RIP.
Rodan wrote:
But not as fun as you obsessively reading every post at every “stalker blog,” and sweating bullets over it to the point that you are forced to respond on your own dying blog. It’s fun to watch you squirm, Chubby. Because you’re basically a fascist fruitcake, with more delusions than the libtard Hofstra prof in the earlier thread here, and that guy thinks “the world is literally on fire” from AGW. Well, so do you, so we’ll call it a draw in the delusions department.
Ever notice that Dark Falcon makes an effort to point people over here quite a bit, and especially right after I post something?
He’s like my own telekinetically-controlled blog pimp.
@ calcajun:
The dweeb misspelled the initials. Or at least I assumed that. It couldn’t be Robert Spencer, his middle name is Bruce. Or who knows? Maybe another obscure character Chuck’s got a hardon for.
@ Dreamy in MN:
I’m with you!
What’s really amazing about the subject of torture is that the U.S. is agonizing over acts that don’t actually fall into the definition of real torture.
Waterboarding is scary, so some people call it torture. Keeping people up all night with loud music blasting at them is annoying and upsetting, so some people call it torture.
When the Arabs who call themselves “Palestinians” decide to torture someone for being a possible collaborator with Israel, the person ends up hanging upside down from a lamp post with his entrails spilling down the street.
When Hamas was fighting against Fatah in Gaza, they threw living people off the tops of tall buildings to crash to their deaths on the street. They held Fatah men’s legs in 45 degree angles off the ground so that a guy with a club could break them (both legs) on all parts of the legs including the knees.
When they perform lynchings, eyes are definitely gouged out and faces are smashed in. The intestines are removed and paraded up and down the street while the final remains are burned.
These things are done WITHOUT having the kind of urgency of saving thousands (maybe millions) of lives that we have when we go up against terrorists who are determined to murder as many of us as possible.
We have no need to be agonizing over how terrorists are treated when we can get information that will save lives. We’ll never be parading intestines down the street, but a little scary waterboarding or even physical pain is not out of line when it comes to enemies who aim to kill as many of us (men, women and children) as they possibly can.
More delusion:
“Our conservatives”? As if there are any actual conservatives left in that circle-jerk…
@ Dreamy in MN:
I brake for animals–it’s too hard to hose them off the grill and bumper.
Seriously, wife and I are driving out on Wildcat Canyon Rd. here in San Diego about 20 years ago to camp out in a 1990 Honda Civic. Saw a dark shape in the road–a VERY large bull in the middle of the road. If I had hit him, he would would have ended up in the passenger compartment and crushed us. Cattle and cars don’t mix.
ChenZhen wrote:
I think someone’s got a crush on you, big fella./
snork wrote:
katemaclaren wrote:
Yeah. Has to be RS McCain.
I thought for a moment it was Ronald McDonald.
Or Ricky Martin.
Or Roger Maris.
Or Rita Moreno.
Or…….well, the enemy of the week could be anyone!
lobo91 wrote:
Progressive far-left conservatives, eh? Kinda like J-street. Zionist islamists.
@ Eliana:
It’s pretty obvious that most people who agonize over such things have never (and probably will never) had to fight for their lives.
If they had, they’d understand that the time for such reflection is after the threat is past.
When you spend all your time worrying about what your enemy is going to think of your tactics, it becomes irrelevant, because your enemy is busy figuring out how to kill you.
@ Eliana:
Makes me sick, just sick how we are supposed to placate the monsters that do that kind of disgusting things to another human beings. They have people whacking people’s heads off and posting the videos on the internet. We on the other hand have lawyers saying, “Uh, uh, make sure you wear white gloves when you give them their Koran…”
lobo91 wrote:
Which is why the American Jews do, and the Israelis don’t.
@ lobo91:
Believe it or not, some conservatives have been bred in captivity. They must have some “farm-raised” conservatives over there. That, or it’s the few Lizards left who still see only “three lights” over CJ’s head. (it’s a “1984″ reference)
@ calcajun:
I think, by their current standards, Avanti might be considered a conservative…
Or a Star Trek:TNG reference, for many people.
@ calcajun:
FOUR– I see FOUR lights!
@ lobo91:
Very factually inaccurate, alright:
The Iraqi soldiers were conscripts who would have had their ears chopped off by Saddam’s forces if they didn’t show up to fight. They were chanting “George Bush! George Bush!” when they surrendered to U.S. news crews in exchange for water, for goodness sake.
The terrorists in the Iraq War have NOT been conscripts who would surrender at the first opportunity. The terrorists who have been blowing up Iraqi civilians at food markets all these years are the people who have been expecting to become the next Saddam Husseins (or work closely with them).
These terrorists have been trying to control Iraq so that they would have $400-500 billion in yearly oil revenues all to themselves to spend on global terror. This is why they don’t surrender. They have huge goals and they think they’re going to end up ruling the world after destroying the west.
Liberals have NO idea what’s really going on with global terrorism.
lobo91 wrote:
Bingo. The vast majority of Americans today are very spoiled. Some of us realize that and some of us (lefties) don’t.
@ calcajun:
@#57
Oh, don’t I know it. Lived over in Western Iowa on the SD border. Boy oh boy, you had to watch for the cattle wandering on the roads, if you hit them, you got nailed for the cost of the animal. That is how it was when we were over there. My college roomie was on a band trip and the bus they were on hit one, everyone when went flying.
@ lobo91:
One of the best– David Warner and Patrick Stewart just chewing scenery.
@ lobo91:
@ Eliana:
Ooops, I meant to put italics in those quotes to make it more clear that you were quoting someone on LGF there. Sorry!
snork wrote:
Very good point.
Well, I am out. Going to hit the hay, have a good night everyone and hopefully everyone has a wonderful day tomorrow.
Off to walk the Akitas! Funny, but I can walk the streets here at midnight and no one bothers me with 100+ lbs of dog at my side.
@ Dreamy in MN:
Exactly!
Our enemies BRAG and CELEBRATE when they do monstrous things. They pass out candies on the streets of Gaza and in Arab areas of Judea and Samaria.
They get a TOTAL PASS for all this while liberals worry about not hurting terrorists’ feelings after they’ve been captured.
“rcm” is the LGFer to post that he wants to be bounced if he can’t ask critical questions about Nancy.
Yeesh! (great takedown of Chucky!)
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/showc/560/7984466
calcajun wrote:
Maybe, or ….hmmmm?
I think I was LGF class of ’06, but since I can’t view my profile,…
Class of ’04 rocks because Charles hates you! I’m so, ya know, like, way jealous.
@ calcajun:
I’ve been watching DS9 on DVD recently. 3 or 4 episodes a night, over the past few months.
I’ve started to identify with O’Brien, especially during the Dominion War. Maybe it’s because he’s a senior enlisted man, and I’m a sergeant major.
Or it could be the fact that he sees a lot fewer shades of gray then the rest of them. The Dominion wants to kill him, his wife, and their kids. He just wants to be left alone. The easiest way for him to be left alone is to beat the Dominion. He really doesn’t seem to care much what the Jem’Hadar soldiers think about that.
Makes sense to me.
@ Abu Bin Squid:
I was Class of ’04.
I didn’t realize that we were so special.
Can we have a little badge or something?
/
The graph for The One on this RealClearPolitics average approval poll (for a long list of polling services) is stunning.
Someone should put it up on The One’s wall.
Obama Job Approval
@ Eliana:
What happens when the two lines cross?
Is it like in Ghostbusters?
Abu Bin Squid wrote:
Yea, the rest of us have to earn the disdain.
RealClearPolitics’ average (for a bunch of polling services) for the health care bill:
RCP Average 12/8 – 12/20
For: 38.4
Against: 51.0
Obama and Democrats’ Health Care Plan
@ lobo91:
Yeah!
Obama will rate himself a grade of “B” if this happens.
The guy can’t face up to his own failures.
Rodan wrote:
I don’t hate Mad King Charles; I pity the poor dumb bastard.
He cut himself free from the rightwing without realizing what was going to happen to him and lgf 0.000001 as a consequence of this ill-considered action.
He should have known that he would never be accepted by the left nor would the right ever forgive him for his lack of principles.
There is no one left on the Internet who is willing to call him a friend; his rising star has fallen.
p.s. I go back to the days before lgf 0.000000001 had registration; I was one of the so-called 6/15’ers.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
I neither hate nor pity him.
I regard him with a mixture of contempt and amusement.
Of course, CJ thinks anything negative, anything short of praise and agreement, is “hatred.”
@ Da_Beerfreak:
While the Wally was sympathetic to the war against Islamism, and mined the intertubes for stories and writers who expressed that view, he managed to mask his superficiality. Now that he poses as the Yoda of moderate leftism his inability to reason is nakedly obvious. He rattles his light-saber and utters trite Jedi truthiness.
Fence
Overlook wrote:
And that’s on his good days!
I don’t waste any time thinking about the mad king, but once in a while I like to throw out a comment or two on what has happen to a once fine website. He built it and then broke it all by himself, it’s a sad thing to watch.
@ Possum:
I don’t know who is more embarrassing – Dark Falcon for boot-licking or the Wally for having his boot-licked.
Is it – just possibly – satire? Is DF a sock puppet of Rodan’s?
Overlook wrote:
This post is a good example. In 2007 CJ was blindly blaming “lefties” for the Gitmo releases. Today he is blindly blaming Bush. In neither instance does he manage to rise above the most superficial, contentious level.
@ Overlook:
I was too quick off the mark with my spoof. They have not realized that Chuckie put up a picture as they are in a cat fight again!
@ Possum:
I can’t see that comment over there. Memory hole?
@ Possum:
Is that for real or a parody?
You know, you just can’t tell anymore.
ChenZhen wrote:
I made it up…
Was trying to be clever and pre-empting him, but it backfired. (and I spelled Calendar wrong….)
wolfie wrote:
Sorry…..
And, I even tried to be extra clever and make the fake DF post one second after Charles posted the “Fence” thread.
Oh well….
@ Possum:
Damn, that was good!
@ wolfie:
He steps in his own poops all the time. The defense of Napolitano (“the system works”) immediately undercut by Obama (“systemic failure”).
The story of the federal worker’s suicide (not murder by Tea Party ). We should keep list.
@ Overlook:
I especially like all the “nontroversies” that are so insignificant that they warrant several threads.
lobo91 wrote:
Sounds kind of elitist to me.
@ wolfie:
Another way of putting it is that he is not worthy of hatred– that takes too much effort and emotional energy.
@ Possum:
What an unbelievable toady. The man has made “sucking up” an art.
Nite.
wolfie wrote:
I really like the Exhibit threads, you know the alphabet sort of serious stand up in a courtroom and say “Here is Exhibit B”
Except, you are only allowed one exhibit per letter (or one letter per exhibit, I sent an e-mail to John Grisham and Steve Martini asking them about this but nobody replied yet)
So far we have had TWO “Exhibit P”…
Mistrial!
calcajun wrote:
Aw shit! I made that up!
Bugger..
calcajun wrote:
Yes.
After all, he isn’t really a Stalin. He just plays one on the internet!
@ wolfie:
Ha! They are a perfect illustration of a blithering idiot. He does not want them to be important, but he is nervous that they might be…
It must be very hard to blog when you want to follow the news, but also suppress facts counter to your politics, get digs in at your enemies while monitoring your readers for treason, ban and block but rely on numbers for pay.
@ Possum:
I’m telling you, that was goooooooooood!
Possum wrote:
I never knew Dark Falcon used his face to moonlight as Mr. Johnson’s bicycle seat.
@ Simple Voice:
Ha! Their conservatives are wet noodles stuck up a stuffed tiger’s ass in a shoe box.
@ Overlook:
Yup.
The job, I fear, is above his pay grade.
OK a real posts about a picture,
Charles Johnson is such a great photographer he can control the haze andmakethe sea sparkle!
@ Possum:
But are the haze and the waves “in the right place?”
@ ChenZhen:
Thanks for the post, CZ.
And now goodnight all!
@ wolfie:
LMAO If Charles says they are, then the rest of the followers will agree.
I got to do the sleep thing.
nite!
@ lobo91:
Parthenogenisis…
Mornin’ all!
I linked to this over at Anchoress and found the review to be spot-on.
My Dad thinks the side-to-side head motion is simply a “no,” a denial of everything that’s coming out of his mouth.
A simple “we failed” acknowledgment would do such wonders for his respect, leading me to believe that his speechwriters share his lack of humility and connection to the American people.
What a disgrace to the Office!
HA!
Max Baucus sounds a lot like me at age 17, 2 hours past curfew “addressing” my parents.
Good morning.
@ RIX:
Good morning RIX.
I’ve been watching a piece on medical marijuana over at PJTV. It bothers me that weed is illegal and alcohol is not.
To me, it’s hypocrisy. If you follow their arguments for keeping cannabis as a prescription-only product, you’ll have a very good case for prohibition (of alcohol) as it causes almost exponentially more illness and death.
@ Bumr50:
Morning Bumr. Of course grass should be legal. The same restrictions should apply as to alchohol, impared driving etc.
Besides Grass stimulates the snack industry!
FNC is now reporting that the US government had intel from Yemen that
a Nigerian would blow up a US airliner on Christmas!
This story could switch back & forth over the next few days.
If this is true, they will still find a way to blame Bush.
@ RIX:
Cheetos!
I’ve seriously heard “serious” people argue that growing weed to smoke was no different than growing poppies to manufacture opiates.
There’s a conservative debate here that’s a pretty good read if you get some time.
@ RIX:
I guess Gitmo won’t be closed for a while after all.
@ RIX:
All I’d like is for the pompous ass to at least say WE screwed up. He doesn’t even have to say “I.”
He shows absolutely no humility or American comraderie whatsoever.
@ Bumr50:
I’ve seriously heard “serious” people argue that growing weed to smoke was no different than growing poppies to manufacture opiates.
I think that most people are just indifferent. It is much safer than posting on LGF.
Good morning!
So,libral neo commies are all in a twist over affording Constitutional protection to our enemies but actual citizens are exempted from said protection? Sums up this administration.
Helluva job Janet!
Bumr50 wrote:
Everythinh looke so easy to Obama during the campaign. “Sea levels will drop, the Earth will heal.”
The majority of the elctorate elected an immature narcissist.
Bumr50 wrote:
BHO is now being criticised for lack of emotion. I have seen that trait often from an inlaw & he is a diagnosed sociopath who
tries to mime appropriate responses. Just sayin.
@ vagabond trader:
Good morning Trader.
@ RIX:
I would include serious “enabling” when describing him as well, A cursory glance at his past shows nothing but a manufactured statist.
For a while there I was quietly HOPing that the harsh reality and responsibility of the Office of The President would at the very least expose him to reality enough to force him to seriously rethink his attitudes.
@ vagabond trader:
Good morning!
Their real war is with “us,” not “them.”
Good morning everyone…
@ Bumr50:
For a while there I was quietly HOPing that the harsh reality and responsibility of the Office of The President would at the very least expose him to reality enough to force him to seriously rethink his attitudes
IMO he is incapable of real modification. He seems to have a serious martyr complex just like a certain hippee blogger.
It is always “lesser ” individuals who are out to subvert him.
Paranoia strikes deep.
@ doriangrey:
Good morning Dorian.
Bumr50 wrote:
Why should he, we’re just his stupid proles/dhimminis
RIX wrote:
Good morning RIX, man getting this place to load in the early am has been rough the last few days…
@ RIX:
If only there were a way that we could force him to work at McDonald’s for a month…
@ doriangrey:
Good morning RIX, man getting this place to load in the early am has been rough the last few days…
Yeah, I have the same problem.
Bumr50 wrote:
Working at Micky D’s would be far to good for him, make him sort garbage at a waste transfer station for a couple of years…
Bumr50 wrote:
He would just keep screwing up the orders.
@ RIX:
Or unionize them.
Bumr50 wrote:
Yeah, but he would not want UFCW, the prference would be SEIU.
RIX wrote:
Hmmm, make you wonder if Chuckles the balless clown isnt playing DDOS games in the early am when his faithful minions wont notice their computers spare clock cycles being used for his nefarious purposes.
@ RIX:
I’ve quite honestly been waiting for them to approach Long John’s.
Our local grocery stores force you to join the UFCW when you’re hired, and I can’t seem to get off of their rolls despite many requests and not having worked there for five years.
It’s so great having to pay union dues at your $8 an hour part time job!
/
Bumr50 wrote:
ROTFLMAO… Isnt Micky D’s food crappy and expensive enough already?
@ doriangrey:
LOL! They’d probably break for lunch!
@ doriangrey:
Hmmm, make you wonder if Chuckles the balless clown isnt playing DDOS games in the early am when his faithful minions wont notice their computers spare clock cycles being used for his nefarious purposes.
Not far fetched is it? Irish Rose shut us down for a while.
Maybe it’s Jimmah & Weasel, they seem to be having one weird honeymoon.
Bumr50 wrote:
Sound more like extortion to me, If I have to pay union dues I better be getting all the perks and bennies and a fat pay check.
@ doriangrey:
It’s Pittsburgh. Henry Clay Frick and all.
The Union is third to the Catholic church and the Steelers here.
RIX wrote:
I’m sure it;s just me, but lately every time I think of Chuckles the image that come to mind is the “Comic guy” from the Simpson’s… Only even creeper than the “Comic Guy”…
@ RIX:
That has been my semi professional observation from the first time he opened his mouth. He appears as an imitation of what is expected. Said as much in one of his “memoirs.”
@ Bumr50:
It’s so great having to pay union dues at your $8 an hour part time job!
I had the same experience working part time for UPS back in the day.
I had to become a Teamster, but I did get a keychain, seriously.
@ Bumr50:
Unions no longer serve a useful purpose, unless extortion is your hobby, imho.We didn’t think our opinion of the IFF/International Firefighters could sink any lower until they actively supported Chris Dodd, then The Obama for potus. Hows that working out losers?
vagabond trader wrote:
That’s why he is being called “Spock.” He seems to genuinely feel nothing except anger if he feels that he is not properly respected.
See ya later.
Oh man, here we go again… server not found… server not found, server not found…
@ RIX:
He is a very angry person,unresolved abandonment issues,internal racial conflict, guilt, oh someone could do quite a bang up thesis on the guy.Textbook.
vagabond trader wrote:
Uggg, think of the damage it would do to a person trying to crawl through the slime of his mind to write that thesis though…
@ RIX:
See ya.
@ vagabond trader:
How does he get this giant vacation in Hawaii? His job only lasts four years. Sheesh.
@ RIX:
Spock : “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the One.”
I sat there amazed this morning that the TOTUS would do a press conference on the Gubmint’s failure to detect the blowjob guy and he can’t find a stinkin TIE to wear?
It’s bad enough looking at his scrawny frame, at least he can dress the part.
Bumr50 wrote:
Awww, but do they outweigh the needs of the Won’s Wookie??? If ya dont let the wookie win, s/he’ll rip your arms from their sockets…
@ My5princesses:
Too busy gettin’ leid.
My5princesses wrote:
I gave up on expecting proper attire from him when I saw extended members of the First Family getting on Marine One dressed like gangster wearing their saggy fallin off their ass downlows backwards ball caps and tons of bling bling… Utterly disgraceful…
@ doriangrey:
That’s culturally insensitive. Off to camp for you…
@ Bumr50:
His favorite congerssional puppet is also vacationing in paradise. Personally I don’t care about them taking a break,just a problem with having to pay for it.Oh yeah, they might consider staying there for the next three years.
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/1496/Pelosi-enjoys-privacy-at-Hualalai-after-Palin-is-hounded-off-Maui.aspx
@ vagabond trader:
Of course! Who the hell wants pictures of Pelosi in a swimsuit?!
Why doesn’t he just put on his Red Army uniform and call us all Comrade?
This guy is male in body parts only, there are no qualities he exhibits that I consider manly. Or, maybe he’s the “New Man” type.
And remember children, this was an isolated incident. It’s not like there are millions of these togamen waiting to destroy us or nothing.
Bumr50 wrote:
Yup, me and another 25 to 50 million other fools who still believe in the US Constitution, Representative Democracy and Capitalism…
Welcome to the William Ayer’s Memorial Community Re-Education and Conservative Constitutionalists Elimination Facility…
@ doriangrey:
They remind me of someone on welfare with no experience in maintaining a budget suddenly winning the lottery and going beserk with the winnings.
Bumr50 wrote:
Oh dear god… where is the brain bleach????
@ Bumr50:
LOL! :LOL:
Come to think of it The Obamas are not exactly anything I wish to see sans clothing. Or fully clothed for that matter.
I see Fox is spotlighting the “lonely and depressed” aspect of the crotchbomber.
eHarmony? Psychiatrist? Support group?
vagabond trader wrote:
Dont they though??? Scary part is Barry is the prime example… TARP,Obamacare, Cap and Trade, Amnesty… Where does it stop???
@ My5princesses:
Good morning you! lol,yeah lets have some real transparency. Get out there at a joint session of congress and loudly proclaim your true intentions Mr Obama ya big puss!Come on, they’ll still love ya, probably even moreso.
@ vagabond trader:
Maybe they could use reverse blackmail.
Like, “Give me $50,000 or I’ll post these.”
Bumr50 wrote:
Meh… He probably isnt lonely anymore now that he is wiennieless and in a Federal Pound you in the Ass Prison…
@ doriangrey:
After your company is forced to transfer your wages to Obama, and they decide how much each peasant is allowed to keep?
Marxists don’t want you keeping your money, only Party Members are allowed wealth.
@ doriangrey:
“Obama money”
@ Bumr50:
Fox has been toning down its focus on the muzz aspect for quite some time now. They rarely utter the word Islamist or its variants. I do believe they have been compromised by a Saudi partnership of some sort. Will look for link.
@ vagabond trader:
That’s interesting.
NewsCorp could use some legitimate Conservative competition. Maybe Breitbart could raise the funds.
vagabond trader wrote:
Problem is, that all indications are that Obama cant tell the truth even if the truth could save his life…
He promised transparency, his version of transparency has a strangely uncanny resemblance to a brick wall. Nothing to see here, move along…
@12 Rodan wrote:
I spend too much on my own family’s health care; I really don’t need to spend even more supporting some unemployed hippie bum.
@ vagabond trader:
Looks like it happened earlier this month.
vagabond trader wrote:
More likely the Whitehouse used the FCC you crack a few skulls over at Fox…
@ Bumr50:
Bingo. Heh, the old brain cells can still retain a few facts.Oddly enough, this was the same prince who Rudy told to shove his big $$$$$$ donation after 9/11.
http://sec.wbir.com/article/0fJrgIj3YX9LU
@ vagabond trader:
He has proclaimed it, it’s just the Seagull Media has decided not to investigate the true meaning of what he says, and suppress all statements/writings of his in the past that would expose him.
The Male’s never put in a real day of work in his life.
@ My5princesses:
Too true, none so blind as he who will not see. Willfull ignorance and they still twist to defend him. A pox on the 52%. Traitors all. Harsh? Yup!
http://www.pointguardu.com/images/presidents.gif
Saudi and Soros axis of eeeevil.
vagabond trader wrote:
ROTFLMAO…………. Ouch… That is going to leave a bruise…
@ RoboMonkey:
That’s why we’re having Obamacare…. because you’re too stupid to know that you’re required to spend money you work hard for on people who don’t work, won’t work, or work but choose to not provide for themselves in a responsible way.
The incentive here is to work for cash, under the table, or not work at all.
Taxes are a disincentive. Whatever they’re applied to becomes a negative experience and when you tax one’s income, or produce taxes based on income, you make getting income out to be a bad thing.
That’s why I support a straight sales tax as a replacement for income tax (our government wants both!), to restrain reckless spending. It will encourage people to save rather than spend and that’ll lead to people who have less of a dependence on social security.
It’ll also gut out the IRS, reducing both their power and the money spent keeping the IRS running. (One of our largest expenses)
LanceKates wrote:
Ironically, us conservatives give way more to charity than liberals do.
We donate our own money, they donate other people’s money.
Heads Up
Dutch to hold news conference in a few re: the crotch bomber.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTKD882&show_article=1
Y’all do realize that it’s not just Chaz & Co. being mocked here, yes ?
vagabond trader wrote:
Meh… Murdock owns 20 percent of the Saudi News organization, the Saudi Prince owns 5.5 percent of News Corp. The person who owns the most stock gets to make the rules, not the other way around. Basically the Saudi Prince is paying Murdock to tell him to go suck a camels dick…
Edit: Shit… server not found, server not found, server not found…
@ vagabond trader:
Oasha should be on his skinny butt for that, improper standing on a ladder.
God allowed the Israelites many bad Kings, but once they repented, he was able to restore the nation. Let’s hope the same type of thing happens to us.
Granddaughter has discovered climbing the steps now. She makes sure I’m looking before she tears over there to begin her ascent. She laughs like crazy when I snatch her.
Mike C. wrote:
Ummm, so???
@ My5princesses:
lol, does she coyly look over her shoulder to make sure you notice?
@ doriangrey:
Don’t laugh, listening to Mark Steyn yesterday and he said that any contractor doing a gubbermint job involving ladders has to take a course on ladder safety. I kid you not.
Mike C. wrote:
Ummm, so??? Just wanted to add, we’re not afraid of a little ridicule or mockery here, we can take it as well as dish it out…
@ RoboMonkey:
Yup, and the left will justify it as “At least money is given.”
They have no problem with the idea that by taking money from X and giving it to Y without the permission of X, they’re stating that American citizens do not have a right to their own money, that it is a priviledge to receive payment in exchange for labor and that they get what is ‘left over’ after the government decides what to do with their money first.
And yet they rail on raising the minimum wage. Why? It just gives the government more money to take.
vagabond trader wrote:
That’s the Nanny Panic State for you…
@ RoboMonkey:
This was posited to a libral former friend and it actually left her speechless for about three minutes. Then she accused me of drinking the kool aid.
LanceKates wrote:
Parasites never care about the health of the host, these vile Marxists are parasites, they care only for power, power to take from others the fruits of their labors, because they themselves are to “Good” to do any actual laboring…
@ vagabond trader:
Yes, she does. She has many fine wimmin folk to guide her through this difficult task of getting what she wants from the man of the house.
And as you’ve seen, she’s cute.
vagabond trader wrote:
Ya should have told her, “Nope, you liberals stole all my Kool-aid money”
Meanwhile in the Persian kingdom, the
zionistsmuzz doing what they do best. To each other.Mike C. wrote:
He said back then it was a bad idea for the Bush Administration to let these folks go…… He was right.
If we won’t be big enough to own up when they’re right, we don’t have much room to point out when they’re wrong.
Besides, I’ve opposed releasing folks from Gitmo from the beginning…you don’t release prisoners of war (even if they are illegal enemy combatants) until the war is over.
As far as I am concerned, the really bothersome part is not that Bush released folks from Gitmo who ended up going back into the service of Jihad (I expect them to do that)
but that like Anakin Skywalker serving the Emperor, the transformation is complete with Charles, per his thread:
He then goes on to say that if they aren’t convicted in civilian court, it is because there wasn’t enough evidence to convict them.
Seems to me that being arrested trying to kill our soldiers is quites sufficient for me, but I guess I think about those things and Charles just worries about not offending terrorists.
@ vagabond trader:
linkee:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/12/29/iran.videos/index.html
@ vagabond trader:
Did you remind her of the taxes you had to pay to BUY that kool aid with your own money that you worked for?
*grin*
vagabond trader wrote:
I’m still waiting hopefully for the results of the Israeli conference.
@ My5princesses:
Man… there is something just plain wrong with that statement… I’m sure she is a cutie pie and a half and the apple of your eye, but the idea of teaching a woman to be to use men to get what they want is wrong on sooo many levels…
OK… off to the slave labor camp… err I mean work…
doriangrey wrote:
parasites serve a purpose in the natural order though. I don’t consider communism/socialism/marxism/progressivism to be a parasite…. I consider them to be cancer.
A deformed version of normal cells that serve no purpose, but tend to grow and invade the whole organ/location until there is nothing left and they spread through the rest of the body, planting seeds of death until the body itself dies.
MUCH more applicable and stark, in my opinion. When I think of what our country will go through, I think of my uncle who died of cancer.
@ LanceKates:
Hi Lance!
I’ll be sure and ask her that one.On second thought we haven’t spoken since the
anointingelection.Oh yeah, shes a law school grad.
vagabond trader wrote:
Sadly they wont kill enough of each other for it to make a difference…
@ RoboMonkey:
If only,have my doubts tho.
“Professional”? It was a complete cock-up!
*rimshot*
LanceKates wrote:
Yes, good call…
vagabond trader wrote:
Ahh, so she is going to make a difference, rather than us proles that just fund the government.
*grin*
I know…. I know…. not all lawyers are bad….
I just have to keep telling myself that after I deal with one.
Off to work overtime I go, take care all
vagabond trader wrote:
We can dream, though.
That’s the last thing they haven’t figured out how to tax yet.
LanceKates wrote:
Not all lawyers are bad.
But the ones who are bad ruin it for the other 1%.
@ doriangrey:
It isn’t easy being the King ya know. And as I always tell people, I’m allowed to be King as the Queen gets what she wants … When she wants, and how she wants, and me being thankful that I have the privledge of getting it for her.
Something like that.
My all time fave explanation of socialism:
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/K/k/1/socialism_explained.jpg
@ RoboMonkey:
She never actually practiced law but probably considers herself a Constitutional scholar. Oh wait.
Have a great day, BBL
And VT, a good wife is well worth spoiling. I’m sure smokey would agree.
On the P.E.T.A. deal with the huge pet store in Arlington Texas.
Fox 4 in Dallas had little blurb on this moring.
“The owners of the store in court swear the P.E.T.A. inside guy they hired not knowing he was a plant by P.E.T.A. , was the person who was responsible for feeding the pets, and that he did not feed them in order to enable the P.E.T.A. big wigs to get the cops in the deal.”
So far it is they said vs he said.
If it turns out to be true, the guy and P.E.T.A. need to get their ass’s sued off. IMHO.
taxfreekiller wrote:
Same way the unions had inside people sabotaging Food Lion, to set them up.
@ lobo91:
Cardassian style torture.
Man, wish I had some spare coin, there will be bargains!
http://images.liveauctioneers.com/static/mail/client-promo-emails/gov-dec2009/webview.html
@ vagabond trader:
He is a very angry person,unresolved abandonment issues,internal racial conflict, guilt, oh someone could do quite a bang up thesis on the guy.Textbook.
That pretty much covers it. I would add a narcissitic sense of entilement & you have a witches brew.
@ RIX:
My first whiff of serious dysfunction was the dissing of his Gramma. What normal human, let alone a potus candidate, with a healthy sense of shame and inhibition, would publicly declare the woman who raised him ” typical white person.” otoh, what voter with a healthy sense of revulsion would elect this.
passive aggressive also. Hes a mess. Hes our potus.
Arrrgggghhhhh!
Good morning, y’all!
You mean like the sky was on top, and the sand was separated from the sea and shit? Woah.
ChenZhen I always look forward to your threads.
vagabond trader wrote:
His grandma who never rejected him and raised him like a son.
Rodan wrote:
Unfortunately for him his posters are all a bunch of 19 year old college kids.
Aristotle speaks!
45 Sharmuta Tue, Dec 29, 2009 9:03:36pm replyquote
re: #35 windsagio
the trick, I think, is that ‘conservatism’ has shifted so much into the dominionist territory that people that consider themselves conservatives (or haven’t made the break yet) easily get offended by descriptions of the current situation.
Have you read Barry Goldwater? Do I have to start whipping out Goldwater quotes again?
You’re damn straight that Goldwater Conservatives get pissed, and for good reason. They stole our name, hijacked our movement, and now we’re not even welcome in the party. You’re damn straight it’s offensive.
THIS IS NOT CONSERVATISM
doriangrey wrote:
I have that problem quite a bit.
Me thinks Chuckles ponytony or biking pants are a bit too tight.
Oh yeah, almost forgot.
Happy New Year Charles, thanks for making it possible for me to become acquainted with many fine folks.
PS: Your new friends suck!
Rodan wrote:
I notice how derisively Chaz refers to “the class of 2004” – a class that was overwhelmingly conservative.
Rodan wrote:
Sharmuta knows zilch about Goldwtersism. Goldwatersism was called Nazism by the Charles Johnson’s of 1964.
Rodan wrote:
Let’s see…..he visits sites that mock, supposedly “stalk” and obsessively hate him – further proof of Chaz’s innate narcissism is not needed – he’ll take any attention he can get. No wonder he kisses the ass of the Narcissist in Chief – it’s his fucking role model.
Speranza wrote:
Have we ever discovered what Sharmuta is actually knowledgeable in? Other than stalking other blog members?
@ snork:
Best description of LGF. Half truths with no wisdom.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Let’s see if we can find the unfounded assumption in your question…
It’s always nice to see proof of a lying two faced sack of shit.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Being the first to upding the great one?
Carolina Girl wrote:
Chaz calling anyone a “stalker” is hilarious considering that his devoted acolyte is Sharmuta. Let’s see he betrayed all the people who supported him when he turned into Daily Kos II, banned people for no reason – why would anyone be pissed at him?
Possum wrote:
This is the funniest thing I’ve read in ages. Thank you for the laugh; I really, really needed it!