First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Is International Policy On Jewish Presence In Judea & Samaria Racial Segregation?

by WrathofG-d ( 205 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Fatah, Gaza, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamists, Israel, Judaism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Palestinians, Progressives, Racism, Religion, Sharia (Islamic Law), United Nations, World at December 29th, 2009 - 5:00 pm

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_BLlJwLdIRpk/SFK22rL6_nI/AAAAAAAAAno/kqlxOVWco44/s1600/WhitesOnly.jpg

It seems that the more you live, the more you realize that there is nothing new under the sun. This is ever so true with the canary-in-the-coal mine of the Jewish people, and their representative on the international stage; Israel. The amount of hypocrisy, and downright injustice of the American policy (especially recently) regarding the post-1967 Jewish communities of Judea and Samaria continues to be on display to the World, and yet they continue to choose the status quo of ignorant blindness.

While the entire world, lead by our President Obama is up in arms over “illegal building” in Judea and Samaria, -even going as far as to state that it is the number one problem stumbling block regarding “Middle East” peace, they are purposefully blind to the fact that Arab/Muslim illegal building continues at a remarkable pace.


No Inspectors to Enforce Illegal Building by Arabs

Although the issue of Jewish life in Judea & Samaria is often discussed, and debated among the talking heads throughout the world, none (or at least very few) are aware or willing to admit or discuss the horrible inequality, and injustice to the present “accepted norms” with this situation.

This is surprising however as what is going on regarding the treatment of the Jews in Judea & Samaria is very familiar to the World, and especially Americans. As some have argued, the continuing double standard, and willful blindness to the violations by the Muslim/Arabs within the world and specifically Judea and Samaria and the World’s “accepted norms” regarding their final solution is in actuality nothing short than an actual Apartheid policy and the implementation of racial segregation laws against he Jewish people reminiscent to the “separate but equal”, and other famous former Civil Rights problems within the United States.

Settlement freeze is like racial segregation in U.S. (from Haaretz if you can believe it!)

Once upon a time there was a black woman; her name was Rosa Parks. There were racially discriminating laws in the United States, but she continued to sit on the bus even when she was told to vacate her seat for a white person. She was arrested, which set off a process whose end saw the abolition of racial segregation on American buses. How is it possible that one little black woman, a dressmaker by profession, could change history simply because she remained sitting? Her protest was stronger than any demonstration, op-ed piece or Knesset vote. She opted for the natural choice; that is why she was triumphant.

My family and friends were outlawed. Why? Because we are building in the Land of Israel. After all the permits and approvals, in recognized and orderly settlements in which a third generation has already been raised, we woke up one morning to the humming of drones in the sky, taking pictures of us and the situation on the ground. It is forbidden to build. Not even a storeroom. Not a kennel. In certain places, it is even forbidden to add an air conditioner.

The freeze is an edict that the public cannot tolerate. It is not democratic, nor is it humane… But at its foundation, either intentionally or by accident, is pure and basic apartheid – it is forbidden for Jews to live in certain places. It is forbidden to build. It is forbidden to develop.

This author, although admittedly not eloquent, is right as these rules apply ONLY to Jews, and the excuses by the world for such treatment, and their excuses are not much different than when the U.S. claimed “separate but equal”. Then, as is the case as well now, the situation and laws applied are anything but “equal”, and as a result of the inherent injustice with the application of the laws the “separate” part only applies to the Muslim/Arab neighborhoods, as the Jews are forced to allow Muslim/Arab building, and inclusion, where the Muslim/Arab ones aren’t. A great example of this was the 2005 Expulsion of everything Jews in Gaza without any requirements or demands on the Muslim/Arabs within Israel, or within Gaza. This horrible segregation and double standard is still present today in the complete silence about the nearly complete Islamification of Gaza by the Islamist Hamas. The international communities policy on Israel is that it force Jews living in Judea & Samaria (and then, Gaza) to halt life, be stripped of all their rights, and be expelled yet they are completely silent regarding the Arab/Muslim populations within Israel or within Judea & Samaria. Similar to pre-Civil Rights America, the policies are directed at curtailing the existence of one racial group at the preference of another. In the U.S., the Black communities rights were curtailed while the Whites were given free reign.

In the context of Islamist doctrine (Sharia Law), the Caliphate, and dhimmihood, none of this really is surprising. As the Koran instructs, the Muslims are to have the superior (white/Muslim) role in society, and the infidel/dhimmi (Black/Jew) the inferior. The double standard and racial segregation methods of the presently used “peace process” where Muslims can live where ever they wish, build whatever they wish, and practice their religion openly and freely, but the Jews of Judea & Samaria cannot, only bolsters this understanding.

Further bolstering the argument that what we see today against the Jews of Judea & Samaria is nothing less than racial segregation are the stats as provided by the CIA Fact Book regarding the population of Gaza, Judea & Samaria, and Israel where Israel has a large minority of cultures, religions, ethnicities, and languages while Gaza and Judea & Samaria are nearly 100% “palestinian arab” and “Muslim” only.

There is a bit of irony to the fact that our President, raised in a Black Liberation Church, and who happens to identify with his Black heritage would be the leader of the new international Klan which has at its core -consciously or unconsciously – policies of racial segregation and our generations own “separate but equal” treatment but on an international scale.

► Hot Links

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

205 Responses to “Is International Policy On Jewish Presence In Judea & Samaria Racial Segregation?”
( jump to bottom )

  1. song_and_dance_man
    1 | December 29, 2009 17:04

    First of all I want to say this comment serves no other purpose than to say first first.


  2. krik_t_semaj
    2 | December 29, 2009 17:05

    Is there a deeper meaning with the top picture? I want allies not skin.


  3. Speranza
    3 | December 29, 2009 17:07

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    First of all I want to say this comment serves no other purpose than to say first first.

    I hope that eventually one day you will get that out of your system.


  4. 4 | December 29, 2009 17:09

    Israel liberated Judea/Samaria. They can do what they want. If Israel can’t build there, then Turkey can’t build in North Cyprus.


  5. 5 | December 29, 2009 17:09

    “We want “Palestinian” Tenants In Our “Palestinian” Community”


  6. Nevergiveup
    6 | December 29, 2009 17:10

    Of course—judenrein


  7. krik_t_semaj
    7 | December 29, 2009 17:13

    @ krik_t_semaj:

    Leonard Cohen, Here it is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0eqIl-_zE4

    Most do not know that King David had a son who he loved, truly loved, beyond measure. Absalom


  8. Nevergiveup
    8 | December 29, 2009 17:13

    OH quick aside: ON the Waterfront is on TCM–” I could been champ”


  9. 9 | December 29, 2009 17:15

    krik_t_semaj wrote:

    Is there a deeper meaning with the top picture? I want allies not skin.

    My point can be summed up in #5. There is a blatant similarity between the accepted point of view of the Arab/Muslims/World regarding post-1967 Jewish communities, the presumed “future state of Palestine”, and the attitude of the White racists before Civil Rights movement in the U.S.

    In short: the accepted policies of the aforementioned regarding the Jews of Gaza, Judea & Samaria is possibly nothing less than racial segregation. Their argument is ““We want “Palestinian” Tenants In Our “Palestinian” Community: Jews OUT!”


  10. song_and_dance_man
    10 | December 29, 2009 17:15

    @ Speranza:

    I’m still formulating the comment for the last post in every thread. The timing is critical-just ask TFK-we had a wee bit competition
    doing just that over there, in the sanctum.

    But I see your point. The ongoing firstie bit gets to be a drag and beneath a serious poster.

    So what is you favorite color?


  11. 11 | December 29, 2009 17:15

    What exactly is troubling about the nice Palestinians insisting on a Judenrein Judea? Oh…


  12. krik_t_semaj
    12 | December 29, 2009 17:16

    @ krik_t_semaj:
    Absalom deserved death, David is a type of Messiah. We are all supposed to easily tell the difference between King and liar. E#ven David was blind.


  13. Nevergiveup
    13 | December 29, 2009 17:18

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    In short: the accepted policies of the aforementioned regarding the Jews of Gaza, Judea & Samaria is possibly nothing less than racial segregation. Their argument is ““We want “Palestinian” Tenants In Our “Palestinian” Community: Jews OUT!”

    And that is basically the attitude of almost every Arab Country on the face of the Earth. And if they have Jews- they usually have to live in “Ghettos” and are closely watched.


  14. 14 | December 29, 2009 17:19

    @ Nevergiveup:

    How many non-Mohammedans are allowed to live in Mecca? How is that not Apartheid?


  15. song_and_dance_man
    15 | December 29, 2009 17:21

    I say Israel should insist on the Davidic borders and the neighbors should count their lucky stars that Abraham isn’t brought up.


  16. 16 | December 29, 2009 17:21

    @ Nevergiveup:


    Of course—judenrein

    In their own country!


  17. 17 | December 29, 2009 17:22

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Exactly, and yet the World enforces and imposes this racial segregation on Israel, and accepts it in the Muslim countries. How ironic that the U.S.’s 1st black President, and Trinity Church go’er would be this policies head cheerleader.

    To support a Judea, Gaza, and Samaria without Jews (as most Liberals do) is to support racial segregation!

    Watch the end of this video, and tell me it doesn’t remind you of the burning Churches in the segregated South.


  18. krik_t_semaj
    18 | December 29, 2009 17:22

    @ WrathofG-d:

    Start here:
    http://www.peacefaq.com/index.html

    Then here:
    What do people mean when they refer to ‘The Occupied Territories’ of the Middle East?

    The ‘Occupied Territories’ refers to land lost by Israel’s Arab neighbors, and gained by Israel, in the Six-Day War of 1967. They include Judaea and Samaria (previously occupied by Jordan, and now known as the ‘West Bank’), the Golan Heights (previously occupied by Syria), and the Gaza Strip (previously occupied by Egypt). Interestingly, while these territories were conquered by Jordan, Syria and Egypt in 1948 to the time they were gained by Israel, the territories were not refered to as ‘occupied’ by the international community. Furthermore, the people living in those territories before 1967 were not called ‘Palestinians’ as they are today; they were called Jordanians and Egyptians. How things change…

    When you confuse me, you must also be confusing Jew haters.


  19. buzzsawmonkey
    19 | December 29, 2009 17:23

    “It’s judenreinin’, men—
    Hallelujah, it’s judenreinin’, men!”

    —popular Arab disco song


  20. Nevergiveup
    20 | December 29, 2009 17:23

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    How many non-Mohammedans are allowed to live in Mecca? How is that not Apartheid?

    Live? Shit they are not even allowed to enter!


  21. Speranza
    21 | December 29, 2009 17:26

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    So what is you favorite color?

    Chartreuse.

    I am watching Alan Colmes on Fox News right now and he is the dumbest ****** I have ever seen.


  22. buzzsawmonkey
    22 | December 29, 2009 17:27

    Iron Fist wrote:

    How many non-Mohammedans are allowed to live in Mecca? How is that not Apartheid?

    The same people here who believe that “you can’t be racist unless you’re white” also believe that it isn’t apartheid if you are swarthy and run around in a nightshirt.


  23. 23 | December 29, 2009 17:27

    @ krik_t_semaj:

    now you have confused me. What are you trying to say?


  24. Nevergiveup
    24 | December 29, 2009 17:27

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Well i don’t agree the Gush Katif decision is part of this. I know you did not agree with Sharon’s decision, but it really should be seperated from this discussion.


  25. citizen_q
    25 | December 29, 2009 17:29

    If there did not have double standards they’d have no standards at all.


  26. 26 | December 29, 2009 17:32

    @ WrathofG-d:

    The same with Northern Cyprus. The Muslim Turks don’t allow the Christian Greeks tolive in their own land. It’s a double standard that only apply to non Muslims.


  27. m
    27 | December 29, 2009 17:33

    Binyamin Residents: High Court Decision Racist

    “It has again been proven that the security of Israel’s citizens is worth less than the comfort of travel of the Palestinians,” Ariel said. “Yet, in view of the ruling, the IDF is duty-bound to allow Jews to use roads that are open only for Arab use, like the Dolev – Beit Horon road. It is unacceptable that while the High Court accommodates the Palestinians and allows them de facto free access to all of Judea and Samaria’s roads, the Jews must travel in specific roads only.”


  28. Nevergiveup
    28 | December 29, 2009 17:34

    OT:

    US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has delayed a planned visit to Israel by two weeks due to the ongoing investigation into the attempted terrorist attack on a US airliner over Detroit last week, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

    Napolitano was originally scheduled to touch down in Israel on Saturday evening, and meet with officials from the Public Security Ministry, as well as elite Israel Police units

    Maybe TSA would not let her on the plane?


  29. lobo91
    29 | December 29, 2009 17:34

    @ Speranza:

    I am watching Alan Colmes on Fox News right now and he is the dumbest ****** I have ever seen.

    I don’t know…this stupid defense attorney they have on now may be even dumber.

    She keeps claiming that there’s no such thing as an enemy combatant, because Obama has stopped using the term.


  30. buzzsawmonkey
    30 | December 29, 2009 17:35

    lobo91 wrote:

    She keeps claiming that there’s no such thing as an enemy combatant, because Obama has stopped using the term.

    Combat, little Sheba.


  31. huckfunn
    31 | December 29, 2009 17:37

    lobo91 wrote:

    Maybe TSA would not let her on the plane?

    That would be understandable if they took a snapshot of her with one of those naked-body-scanner thingys.


  32. vagabond trader
    32 | December 29, 2009 17:37

    Just watching a series on WWII. What makes this any different than the Nuremburg Laws. Oh I know, the vanquished enemy and busybody outsiders are telling a sovereign state how to use
    their own land


  33. 33 | December 29, 2009 17:38

    @ Nevergiveup:

    But it isn’t. The underlying premise of “The Disengagement” was that Jews don’t have a right to live in peace among Arabs. If they did, the question would not have been how quickly can we get these dang Jews out of Gaza, but instead what will it take to get the Arabs to live with them as Phakestinians/Gazans. But see that wasn’t a question at all. Everyone just accepted that they had no right to live on Muslim/Arab land (ie: gaza). This is an example and precursor to what the Arabs/Muslims/”World” desire and hold for all of Israel – but Judea & Samaria first.

    The policy is plain and simple – how do we get rid of the Jews. A less racially segregated, and more equal resolution would be to have the Jews live there in peace. But that was NEVER the question, and surely isn’t one asked by the Muslims/Arabs or “World”. Why can’t Jews live among Muslims when so many Muslims, Christians, Zoroastrians, Atheists, Buddhists, etc., live among Jews in peace?

    Why is Arab life/building/settlement in J&S seen as acceptable, but Jewish isn’t? Again, it is nothing more than racial segregation, and a double standard. The Muslims are given Rights that are not given to the Jews.

    Gaza was the first example of this in practice. Next is J&S, then Israel as a whole. The racists are being allowed to win. In the U.S. they didn’t give in to the White racists but instead, with strong people like Rosa Parks, forced them to accept the Blacks among them. Gaza was the complete opposite of this. The Racists were allowed to keep Gaza “white”.


  34. lobo91
    34 | December 29, 2009 17:39

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    She keeps yapping about how he’s going to end up in prison, so there’s no problem.

    It’s completely beyond her ability to understand the idea that we need to find out anything this loser knows about other attacks that may be in the works.


  35. vagabond trader
    35 | December 29, 2009 17:40

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Big sis is probably afraid she’ll receive a lecture from her betters in Israeli security.


  36. 36 | December 29, 2009 17:43

    @ lobo91:

    She’s too fucking stupid to notice that the term is unlawful enemy combatant. There’s a word for women like her…


  37. Speranza
    37 | December 29, 2009 17:46

    @ m:
    I think that Arabs and Jews should not be on the same roads together. Arabs are murderous thugs and this is for the protection of the Jews. The two peoples are at war.


  38. Nevergiveup
    38 | December 29, 2009 17:46

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I have a differant take on Gaza. You had a situation there where there were more Troops than there were settlers ( I know you hate that term, but for simplicity I am using it ). There were more Soldiers injuried and killed than Settlers. For that reason and others, a JEWISH Government made the decision that it was counter to the long term interests of the State Of Israel to continue this situation. You don’t have to agree with that decision, but in a Democracy, decisions like that are often made. It was not imposed on the “Jews” or on Israel by an outside source. To allow any Jews to stay after the Army pulled out would have been suicidal. Sharon would not let a massacre happen. So agree with is decision or not, but it is not the same as the UN telling Israel it can not let any more Jews live on the West Bank or that it must remove those who are there now.


  39. 39 | December 29, 2009 17:46

    @ WrathofG-d:

    Gaza was the first example of this in practice. Next is J&S, then Israel as a whole.

    And after that the World. The Mohammedans are completely intolerant of everyone, even other Mohammedans. It comes from worshipping a Demonic being as a god. They are driven to destroy.


  40. 40 | December 29, 2009 17:47

    Muslims are given a pass on their bigotry and racism–even toward and among themselves. It’s just the way it is.


  41. m
    41 | December 29, 2009 17:47

    @ Speranza:

    They opened a Jewish road to Arab traffic.

    (and the double standards are astounding)


  42. snork
    42 | December 29, 2009 17:51

    m wrote:

    They opened a Jewish road to Arab traffic.

    The Jews got the parts of Palestine with the good roads. It’s only fair…


  43. 43 | December 29, 2009 17:51

    @ Iron Fist:
    They are now called “unprivileged enemy belligerents”.


  44. lobo91
    44 | December 29, 2009 17:53

    CAIR-bear alert!

    Sounds like one of CAIR’s spokespoodles is going to be on O’Reilly in a minute or two, to whine about the expected “anti-Muslim” backlash from the Jihadaroo bomber.


  45. Nevergiveup
    45 | December 29, 2009 17:54

    lobo91 wrote:

    CAIR-bear alert!

    Sounds like one of CAIR’s spokespoodles is going to be on O’Reilly in a minute or two, to whine about the expected “anti-Muslim” backlash from the Jihadaroo bomber.

    And profiling.


  46. Nevergiveup
    46 | December 29, 2009 17:54

    Shit that hooper asshole


  47. Speranza
    47 | December 29, 2009 17:54

    m wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    They opened a Jewish road to Arab traffic.
    (and the double standards are astounding)

    They never learn do they? The Arabs and the Left only respect the strong. Start making concessions to them and it never ends. Like a predatory animal they sense weaknesses in their opponents and when they attack, they attack to kill. Winners never make apologies. I also would not supply them with utilities, let the rest of the Arab world take care of them.


  48. m
    48 | December 29, 2009 17:55

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Latest memo says UNDER-privileged enemy belligerents, I think. They deserve more privileges. Alan Colmes just said so.


  49. 49 | December 29, 2009 17:55

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    To allow any Jews to stay after the Army pulled out would have been suicidal.

    Although the rest of your comment is not really all that factually correct “Jewish government”, “will of the people”, “more soldiers than [residents]” etc., I don’t wish to rehash the Disengagement argument. It happened.

    But the quoted portions above is 100% my point. We all just simply accept that any Jew left among Muslims will be murdered, yet no one works to resolve this issue, but instead racially segregates the murdering racists from the victims.

    This is accepted. The “black” must be removed from the South, to appease the “White”. Instead of forcing the racist “Whites” to have to desegregate South and incorporate the “Blacks”. The situation in Gaza, and now in Judea & Samaria (and then Pre 67 Israel) is similar to the U.S. before Civil Rights, but instead of the world telling the Whites that they must give Rosa Parks a seat in the front of the bus, they are deciding that it is too costly, and troublesome since “there are more racists than cops”, and the Whites really hate the blacks and will murder them if you remove the National Guard so they give in to the racist “whites”.

    Whether this decision was made by a “Jewish government”, democratic or not, etc. etc., it is still a policy of accepted racial segregation against Jews – unfortunately as you point out, in Gaza it was enforced by Arik the Dik Sharon & Co. In Judea & Samaria, it is being promoted by the Muslims/Arabs, Obama/U.S., and most of the “World” as the only acceptable final solution to the Jewish question in “palestine”.

    Unfortunately now though, I have to run.


  50. lobo91
    50 | December 29, 2009 17:56

    “If you do something that’s suspicious, you should be singled out.”

    Exactly. Such as being a Muslim trying to get on a plane with no passport.


  51. 51 | December 29, 2009 17:56

    @ lobo91:
    He should whine about it to the Dutch man who jumped the POS on the plane.


  52. m
    52 | December 29, 2009 17:56

    @ Speranza:

    I also would not supply them with utilities, let the rest of the Arab world take care of them.

    You get an AMEN! from the peanut gallery.


  53. Speranza
    53 | December 29, 2009 17:57

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I felt that the Jewish communities in Gaza served no purpose but it was essential to keep the IDF there at lest to take enough territory to neutralize the range of missiles.


  54. 54 | December 29, 2009 17:57

    Iron Fist wrote:

    And after that the World. The Mohammedans are completely intolerant of everyone, even other Mohammedans. It comes from worshipping a Demonic being as a god. They are driven to destroy.

    Yup.


  55. Nevergiveup
    55 | December 29, 2009 17:58

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Well then we will leave this for another time


  56. 56 | December 29, 2009 17:58

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Northen Cyprus is another example. Under Turkish occupation, Greeks aren’t allowed.


  57. Speranza
    57 | December 29, 2009 17:58

    m wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I also would not supply them with utilities, let the rest of the Arab world take care of them.
    You get an AMEN! from the peanut gallery.

    Thanks darlin’! I never understood the concept of giving your enemies water, gas, electricity, fuel and access to your first rate medical facilites.


  58. Nevergiveup
    58 | December 29, 2009 17:59

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I felt that the Jewish communities in Gaza served no purpose but it was essential to keep the IDF there at lest to take enough territory to neutralize the range of missiles.

    They were still firing missiles into Sderot when the Army was in Gaza


  59. 59 | December 29, 2009 17:59

    @ lobo91:

    Exactly. Such as being a Muslim trying to get on a plane with no passport.

    Never mind all of the screaming red flags leading up to this. But, how the hell did that even happen?? How does one–anyone–get on a plane without a passport?


  60. Speranza
    60 | December 29, 2009 18:00

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Northen Cyprus is another example. Under Turkish occupation, Greeks aren’t allowed.

    Funny how we never hear or read about that occupation even though it has been going since August 1974.


  61. 61 | December 29, 2009 18:00

    @ m:

    Another example is North Cyprus. The Turks occupy it and don’t allow Greeks to live there.When it comes to Islam, double standards rule.


  62. vagabond trader
    62 | December 29, 2009 18:01

    Heh, my comment got deleted over at Atlantic50. Go figure, even had an upding.LOL!


  63. 63 | December 29, 2009 18:01

    Speranza wrote:

    I felt that the Jewish communities in Gaza served no purpose

    What “purpose” does your family home serve?

    You are all proving my larger point actually. Even us the most Pro-Zionist of people accept some sort of reality where the Jewish right to live in peace is less than that of the Muslim. What “purpose” for us to consider do the Muslim/Arab homes serve? What purpose do they serve being in Haifa, Jerusalem, Bat Yam, Raananaa, Hertzaliyah…. Yea, never asked that question did we? Nope, only about the right of Jews to live among Muslim/Arabs, not the other way around. We have internalized this racial segregation policy and now take it for granted.

    That was not an attack…but just think about it!

    Ok its unfair for me to have done that…i really need to go.


  64. Speranza
    64 | December 29, 2009 18:01

    @ Nevergiveup:
    They needed to take over more territory.


  65. 65 | December 29, 2009 18:02

    @ Speranza:

    I believe in giving my enemies the best I have. Jacketed hollowpoints are the best, if I have them…


  66. Speranza
    66 | December 29, 2009 18:03

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Don’t be a wise guy with me. I felt that the fact that they needed more soldiers then “settlers” made it a costly effort.


  67. Nevergiveup
    67 | December 29, 2009 18:03

    @ WrathofG-d:
    It’s not a matter of a “right” to live but the everyday practicalities of living. Cost vs Benefits.


  68. 68 | December 29, 2009 18:04

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Northen Cyprus is another example. Under Turkish occupation, Greeks aren’t allowed.

    Their hate cuts across countries, languages, races, colors, arab, non-arab. They hate themselves and each other but only when it is time for them to get on their ‘Dar Al Harb’, are they the global ummah.


  69. 69 | December 29, 2009 18:04

    @ Speranza:

    Off course not. Muslims occupy no lands!


  70. 70 | December 29, 2009 18:05

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Yup meanwhile the Greeks who have lived on Cyprus for 3,000 years can’t go into the Northern part. It’s hypocrisy!


  71. 71 | December 29, 2009 18:06

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    but the everyday practicalities of living.

    wow.

    simply, wow.

    just….wow!


  72. Nevergiveup
    72 | December 29, 2009 18:06

    freaken democrats have always been against profiling and bashed the Bush Administration at every turn and now they are lying their asses off- bastards


  73. Speranza
    73 | December 29, 2009 18:07

    m wrote:

    Latest memo says UNDER-privileged enemy belligerents, I think. They deserve more privileges. Alan Colmes just said so.

    That feret faced walking liberal cliche is not very smart.


  74. Nevergiveup
    74 | December 29, 2009 18:07

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    but the everyday practicalities of living.

    wow.

    simply, wow.

    just….wow!

    You say “wow” but i say “how else”?


  75. lobo91
    75 | December 29, 2009 18:07

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Never mind all of the screaming red flags leading up to this. But, how the hell did that even happen?? How does one–anyone–get on a plane without a passport?

    Every day, we hear about another screwup related to this incident.

    First, he should have been on the no-fly list, after the British revoked his visa (and told us about it).

    Next, his father told the US embassy that his son was a threat.

    Then, the guy buys a one-way ticket in Nigeria, with cash, and shows up with no luggage.

    The airport in Lagos actually has the puffer machines that would have detected his bomb–but isn’t using them.

    After he gets to Amsterdam, they let him on a flight to the US with no passport.

    That’s just what we know about so far.


  76. Speranza
    76 | December 29, 2009 18:08

    Rodan wrote:

    Off course not. Muslims occupy no lands!

    Every land is part of the House of Islam.


  77. snork
    77 | December 29, 2009 18:10

    OT, but what the ph*q’s up with Chuck? Yesterday, he was telling us that the system worked, and now there’s this:

    Hitchens on Our Absurd Ideas of ‘Security’

    Opinion | Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:54:45 am PST

    Again, Christopher Hitchens cuts through the nonsense: The truth about airplane security measures.

    Why do we fail to detect or defeat the guilty, and why do we do so well at collective punishment of the innocent? The answer to the first question is: Because we can’t—or won’t. The answer to the second question is: Because we can. The fault here is not just with our endlessly incompetent security services, who give the benefit of the doubt to people who should have been arrested long ago or at least had their visas and travel rights revoked. It is also with a public opinion that sheepishly bleats to be made to “feel safe.” The demand to satisfy that sad illusion can be met with relative ease if you pay enough people to stand around and stare significantly at the citizens’ toothpaste. My impression as a frequent traveler is that intelligent Americans fail to protest at this inanity in case it is they who attract attention and end up on a no-fly list instead. Perfect. [...]

    If Sarah Palin said those exact same words, he’d be calling for her head on a pike. Dude’s senile or something.


  78. 78 | December 29, 2009 18:11

    @ lobo91:

    The airport in Lagos actually has the puffer machines that would have detected his bomb–but isn’t using them.

    I guess they don’t care about passports in Lagos so much either.

    Look, nothing is fool proof, there is no way to control everything and every outcome, but this is ridiculous!


  79. 79 | December 29, 2009 18:11

    Were it up to me, Israel would have pulled back from Gaza, and given peace a chance. When that didn’t work out, I’d have scraped Gaza off into the Med, and rebuilt. There’s no “rinse and repeat”. Running the exercize fully once should have sufficed.


  80. Nevergiveup
    80 | December 29, 2009 18:11

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Never mind all of the screaming red flags leading up to this. But, how the hell did that even happen?? How does one–anyone–get on a plane without a passport?

    Every day, we hear about another screwup related to this incident.

    First, he should have been on the no-fly list, after the British revoked his visa (and told us about it).

    Next, his father told the US embassy that his son was a threat.

    Then, the guy buys a one-way ticket in Nigeria, with cash, and shows up with no luggage.

    The airport in Lagos actually has the puffer machines that would have detected his bomb–but isn’t using them.

    After he gets to Amsterdam, they let him on a flight to the US with no passport.

    That’s just what we know about so far.

    And the hits just keep on coming


  81. Speranza
    81 | December 29, 2009 18:11

    snork wrote:

    If Sarah Palin said those exact same words, he’d be calling for her head on a pike. Dude’s senile or something.

    He can change his position on a subject with the speed of lightning.


  82. m
    82 | December 29, 2009 18:12

    Israel’s Right to the ‘Disputed’ Territories Very good read.


  83. 83 | December 29, 2009 18:13

    @ lobo91:
    Then there’s this video up on HotAir-

    Update: Not enough missed red flags for you yet? Here’s former CIA agent Bob Baer discussing a security study he conducted three years ago, which concluded with him predicting that a Northwest flight from Amsterdam to Detroit would be a terror risk. Bingo.


  84. Speranza
    84 | December 29, 2009 18:13

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Were it up to me, Israel would have pulled back from Gaza, and given peace a chance. When that didn’t work out, I’d have scraped Gaza off into the Med, and rebuilt. There’s no “rinse and repeat”. Running the exercize fully once should have sufficed.

    For every Kassam that was fired at Israel I would have sent 15 155mm shells into Gaza randomly. I would have attacked their water, electric and fuel supplies.


  85. 85 | December 29, 2009 18:13

    @ snork:

    FYI your post is up next!

    Now time for comic relief!


    204 Charles Tue, Dec 29, 2009 6:04:10pm replyquote

    Please do not link to that website — it’s an anti-Muslim hate site, and they’re connected to all kinds of bad people.


  86. chickadee
    86 | December 29, 2009 18:13

    I want Israel to push and squeeze and force all the fcking savages out of their land. Get rid of them.
    Let Egypt or Jordan wipes their asses.


  87. Speranza
    87 | December 29, 2009 18:15

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    You say “wow” but i say “how else”?

    It’s hard to argue with a Kahanist.


  88. lobo91
    88 | December 29, 2009 18:15

    @ Urban Infidel:

    I guess they don’t care about passports in Lagos so much either.

    Actually, from what I saw the other day, the Nigerians are claiming that his passport was scanned at the airport in Lagos (of course, I have no idea if this is true or not).


  89. Speranza
    89 | December 29, 2009 18:15

    chickadee wrote:

    I want Israel to push and squeeze and force all the fcking savages out of their land. Get rid of them.
    Let Egypt or Jordan wipes their asses.

    I want Israel to recognize that she is at war with those people and a war for her very existence.


  90. vagabond trader
    90 | December 29, 2009 18:16

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Oh really? What is their excuse now? They thought he was just some poor innocent child trying to remain chaste, snapping his carrot while fantasizing the destruction of the infidel on some filthy muzz website?


  91. m
    91 | December 29, 2009 18:16

    @ Speranza:

    Not really. They just think it should be so. They live in houses of WAR even in lands supposedly under the house of islam.

    Idjits.


  92. 92 | December 29, 2009 18:16

    @ Speranza:

    Let the IAF play B-17 over Berlin seven nights out of seven for every Kassam. Get really nasty for every ‘splodeydope. There’s lots of ways Israel could deal with the problem of Gaza, including giving it lock, stock, and barrel back to Egypt. I have no doubt that the Egyptians would scruple not to massacre the Palestinians in whatever numbers were necessary to make them behave. And the world would remain silent, because it would be Mohammedans committing the massacre.


  93. vagabond trader
    93 | December 29, 2009 18:17

    @ snork:

    Hitchens is his man because he hates G-d lovers.


  94. Speranza
    94 | December 29, 2009 18:17

    Rodan wrote:

    @ snork:
    FYI your post is up next!
    Now time for comic relief!

    204 Charles Tue, Dec 29, 2009 6:04:10pm replyquote
    Please do not link to that website — it’s an anti-Muslim hate site, and they’re connected to all kinds of bad people.

    LOL! Coming from the guy with the threads “Seething Muslims”, Religion of Peace”, Palestinian Car Swarm”, “St. Pancake” etc. that’s a real hoot. What website was he blathering about?


  95. 95 | December 29, 2009 18:18

    @ Speranza:

    Israel should go in Serb style!


  96. Nevergiveup
    96 | December 29, 2009 18:18

    Speranza wrote:

    I want Israel to recognize that she is at war with those people and a war for her very existence.

    Yes. And while we are at it- lets also substitute America in there and hope she recognizes she is also at war. Sigh.


  97. m
    97 | December 29, 2009 18:18

    @ m:

    They’re mujahadreamin.


  98. Speranza
    98 | December 29, 2009 18:20

    m wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Not really. They just think it should be so. They live in houses of WAR even in lands supposedly under the house of islam.
    Idjits.

    They believe that any territory that was once Muslim always belongs to the House of Believers (think Spain and even Hungary).


  99. 99 | December 29, 2009 18:21

    @ vagabond trader:

    Wonder how Charles feels about Stalin nowadays? Stalin hated the believers, too. Hey, if Mao is now cool, why not Stalin?


  100. chickadee
    100 | December 29, 2009 18:21

    Speranza wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    I want Israel to push and squeeze and force all the fcking savages out of their land. Get rid of them.
    Let Egypt or Jordan wipes their asses.

    I want Israel to recognize that she is at war with those people and a war for her very existence.

    It is light vs darkness. Goodness vs savagery. The time to act is now.


  101. orangecrush
    101 | December 29, 2009 18:22

    Obama as the head of a new international Klan is a good metaphor.

    One of the main tenents of social justice is that racial discrimination while bettered for the individual now insidiously resides in major institutions. let he who shall not be named. That is based on about 200 years of history but with roots back into European feudal societies. Which if one accepts Afro Centrism as a central philosophical principle means slavery was created by Africans for Africans. That’s where that chicken goes home to roost.

    Now if the same institutional bias is applied to Judaism then they have more then 200 year of institutional discrimination still residing in current cultures world wide. and jews were the original African slaves.

    So where would OBama like to draw the discrimination line? Today, Two hundred years ago? or Two Thousand years ago? Indeed he maybe the modern Klansman that has got his and doesn’t want to see a better way to human dignity.


  102. Speranza
    102 | December 29, 2009 18:22

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Hitchens is his man because he hates G-d lovers.

    He also was or still is a man of the Left and a Trotskyite – who briefly saw the light when it came to Islamofascism. However Hitchens still thinks like Chuck does that Christian fundamentalists are equally as dangerous as Muslim splodeydopes. Hitchens never felt any sympathy for the Jews of Israel when they were going terrorism even during his most anti Muslim period.


  103. goddessoftheclassroom
    103 | December 29, 2009 18:23

    @ chickadee:
    I completely agree.

    Good night, y’all–you’re all in my prayers.


  104. orangecrush
    104 | December 29, 2009 18:24

    @ 99 Iron Fist: I have the feeling Charles would applaud Stalinism while denigrating fascism. And still not knowing how to apply the terms conventionally.


  105. 105 | December 29, 2009 18:24

    Speranza wrote:

    m wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    They opened a Jewish road to Arab traffic.
    (and the double standards are astounding)

    They never learn do they? The Arabs and the Left only respect the strong. Start making concessions to them and it never ends. Like a predatory animal they sense weaknesses in their opponents and when they attack, they attack to kill. Winners never make apologies. I also would not supply them with utilities, let the rest of the Arab world take care of them.

    Actually the left fears the strong, thus the hatred of the right and the military.


  106. m
    106 | December 29, 2009 18:24

    @ Speranza:

    I started to say they haven’t had our land – but … they claim they have! hahaha!


  107. Speranza
    107 | December 29, 2009 18:24

    Rodan wrote:

    Israel should go in Serb style!

    Since every Pali thinks that Israeli citizens are legitimate targets , Israel should tell them “Ok if that’s the way you want to do it, then every one of you people are legitimate targets for us”.


  108. vagabond trader
    108 | December 29, 2009 18:25

    @ Speranza:

    So long as they are fighting an elusive enemy that hides behind civilians and uses Israeli common decency as a weapon no way is that going to happen. Israel is also infected with leftist bleeding hearts and it simply is not in the Jewish DNA to do the scorched earth routine.Not going to happen. Either the Arabs go or Israel remains status quo at best. This isn’t 1967 or even 1973. Unfortunately.


  109. chickadee
    109 | December 29, 2009 18:25

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Good Night {gotc}
    Sleep well.


  110. 110 | December 29, 2009 18:26

    OT
    Looks like most of the comments on that stupid AtlanticWire post about 1.0 have been deleted. :)


  111. buzzsawmonkey
    111 | December 29, 2009 18:26

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Hitchens is his man because he hates G-d lovers.

    There is a certain breed of pseud who, upon hearing an English accent, rolls over on his back like a puppy begging to have his belly rubbed.


  112. Speranza
    112 | December 29, 2009 18:27

    m wrote:

    I started to say they haven’t had our land – but … they claim they have! hahaha!

    Their goal is to spread the word of their fake God “Allah” throughout the rest of the world and convert all of us to their pagan cult by having us pronounce the shahada. That will never happen and you will never wear a hijab!


  113. pig
    113 | December 29, 2009 18:29

    More of conservatives being raaacist and anti-science…..

    “Berkeley High May Cut Out Science Labs

    Berkeley High School is considering a controversial proposal to eliminate science labs and the five science teachers who teach them to free up more resources to help struggling students.

    The proposal to put the science-lab cuts on the table was approved recently by Berkeley High’s School Governance Council, a body of teachers, parents, and students who oversee a plan to change the structure of the high school to address Berkeley’s dismal racial achievement gap, where white students are doing far better than the state average while black and Latino students are doing worse.

    Paul Gibson, an alternate parent representative on the School Governance Council, said that information presented at council meetings suggests that the science labs were largely classes for white students. He said the decision to consider cutting the labs in order to redirect resources to underperforming students was virtually unanimous.”

    http://www.eastbayexpress.com/ebx/berkeley-high-may-cut-out-science-labs/Content?oid=1536705


  114. Speranza
    114 | December 29, 2009 18:29

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    There is a certain breed of pseud who, upon hearing an English accent, rolls over on his back like a puppy begging to have his belly rubbed.

    Yes an Englishman with the requisite accent and drink in his hand. I was never impressed by British accents. Hitchens is a bright guy but he has his demons: he was friends with Edward Said, he was a Trotskyite, and since his mother was Jewish – he is a Jew by Jewish religious law and he cannot deal with that.


  115. NoThreat2U
    115 | December 29, 2009 18:31

    @ Rodan:
    END THE OCCUPATION OF NORTHERN CYPRUS!!!!!!!!!!


  116. vagabond trader
    116 | December 29, 2009 18:31

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Nite Goddess!


  117. orangecrush
    117 | December 29, 2009 18:31

    @ 82 m: Bookmarked that to send to my congresscritters. That along with the points Buzz has made about the Nazi roots to Israeli hate need to be promulgated to those that don’t know.

    I’m going to make a business card with the salient points and hand them out to muslims around the area.


  118. orangecrush
    118 | December 29, 2009 18:33

    @ 115 NoThreat2U: I have been thinking lately that we need to start to push back against islam on all fronts. Cultural, Economic, and Military. Reject their 7th century philosophy. No mosques outside of Saudi unless there is a church built in Saudi. Islam lacks human dignity.


  119. vagabond trader
    119 | December 29, 2009 18:33

    @ Urban Infidel:

    2 of mine,but still one up.Why open comments if you don’t want comments. Heh. ;-)


  120. Nevergiveup
    120 | December 29, 2009 18:35

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    OT
    Looks like most of the comments on that stupid AtlanticWire post about 1.0 have been deleted.

    I just posted a little message for the hippie


  121. m
    121 | December 29, 2009 18:35

    @ Urban Infidel:

    It’s contagious. She caught it from cj.


  122. vagabond trader
    122 | December 29, 2009 18:36

    @ Iron Fist:

    He actually is quite Stalinist with all the disappearing of comments and commentors. Disappearing people in fact and imagery was one of Uncle Joes favorite pastimes.


  123. m
    123 | December 29, 2009 18:38

    @ orangecrush:

    THAT’ll go over well! ~:)


  124. NoThreat2U
    124 | December 29, 2009 18:38

    @ m:
    You would be wrong my dear. The proposal to build a mosque near ground central? I heard some crazy bitch (Daisy Khan, wife of the man putting up the money) claiming to Laura Ingrahm that it would be like “reclaiming that land from the extremists”. I feel it would be more like conquered land since they always build a mosque on top of conquered land. Her spin was ridiculous. I say someone should put up the money and build an interfaith community center… The Saint {whoever} Synagogue!


  125. vagabond trader
    125 | December 29, 2009 18:38

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    iirc Hitchens was the source of my final dustup at the pit of Bedlam. :-)


  126. Speranza
    126 | December 29, 2009 18:38

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    OT
    Looks like most of the comments on that stupid AtlanticWire post about 1.0 have been deleted.

    News of former Guantanamo detainees’ involvement in the Flight 253 terror plot set off a flurry of partisan bickering today, with each side attempting to hold the other responsible. In the midst of the political blame game, conservative Charles Johnson, who recently defected from “the American right wing,” took a moment to connect two debates: the furor over the detainees being released to Saudi Arabia for manifestly ineffective “art therapy,” and earlier discussions about the wisdom of civilian trials for terrorists. Faced with the renewed question of what to do with such detainees, Johnson suggests the following:

    Charles Johnson a conservative? WTF?


  127. Nevergiveup
    127 | December 29, 2009 18:40

    @ Speranza:
    This is what I just posted:

    Nevergiveup 1 minute ago
    Charles Johnson, the one who censors, and his group of sycophantic sidekicks might as well just up and join the the Socialist Party of America and be done with it. Conservative? Please.


  128. NoThreat2U
    128 | December 29, 2009 18:40

    @ orangecrush:
    I am with you one hundred percent!! I just learned something interesting about myself tonite. It seems I have a family history I need to start living up to. Not sure how much of a difference I can make, but I will do all I can.


  129. NoThreat2U
    129 | December 29, 2009 18:42

    @ m:
    m? I just wanted to tell you I LOVE your icon. Wanna know what I got for Christmas? Snoopy pajama pants, a Snoopy that play the main theme. and another Snoopy plush, also a Snoopy decoration. Did I mention my Mother bought me a Charlie Brown tree last year? It even came with the one lone ornament. lol


  130. vagabond trader
    130 | December 29, 2009 18:43

    @ NoThreat2U:

    What unmitigated bulldung! That very building they bought to turn into a cultist center was hit by the landing gear of one of the jets driven into the towers.Yeah, its a trophy, a prize, like that of some demented serial killer who takes his victims jewelry or underwear.To relive those moments of power and control. Pigs!

    ****spit****


  131. 131 | December 29, 2009 18:43

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    2 of mine,but still one up.Why open comments if you don’t want comments. Heh.

    Comments? Who doesn’t like comments….?


  132. m
    132 | December 29, 2009 18:43

    @ Speranza:

    You got that right! You know, by now you would think they’d realize – “allah” doesn’t will it.


  133. Speranza
    133 | December 29, 2009 18:44

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Is aw taht. I am assuming that Dark_Falcon is not the real Dark_Falcon and the same with KKKillgore Trout?


  134. NoThreat2U
    134 | December 29, 2009 18:45

    @ vagabond trader:
    It is conquered land right? No spin is gonna convince me otherwise!


  135. vagabond trader
    135 | December 29, 2009 18:46

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Truth to power. Don’t know why they found my little screed about bearing cjs baby and naming it kkkkkilgore trout offended.


  136. Nevergiveup
    136 | December 29, 2009 18:46

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Is aw taht. I am assuming that Dark_Falcon is not the real Dark_Falcon and the same with KKKillgore Trout?

    I would think your correct


  137. Speranza
    137 | December 29, 2009 18:46

    m wrote:

    You got that right! You know, by now you would think they’d realize – “allah” doesn’t will it.

    With fanatics like that – all that can be done is to kill them. They are as bloodthirsty as any hungry Tiger.


  138. vagabond trader
    138 | December 29, 2009 18:47

    @ Speranza:

    I know of one “Tiger” who may be going on a diet. :-)


  139. Nevergiveup
    139 | December 29, 2009 18:48

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Truth to power. Don’t know why they found my little screed about bearing cjs baby and naming it kkkkkilgore trout offended.

    I am surprised I am still there


  140. Speranza
    140 | December 29, 2009 18:48

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Truth to power. Don’t know why they found my little screed about bearing cjs baby and naming it kkkkkilgore trout offended.

    I am going to propose to Sharmuta on LGF using my sock puppet on New Years Eve. That ought to be something to witness.


  141. m
    141 | December 29, 2009 18:49

    @ NoThreat2U:

    How cool! Snoopy is the shiznit.

    I’m waiting for someone to ask if I’m leaving it up until march (might be a redneck) ~ but I don’t want to part with it yet! lol!


  142. vagabond trader
    142 | December 29, 2009 18:50

    @ NoThreat2U:

    They believe anything or anywhere their unholy book mentions or their conquering sword cuts down is theirs in perpetuity. They are quite proud of their NYC caper and imho this qualifies as subdued turf in their little minds.


  143. NoThreat2U
    143 | December 29, 2009 18:51

    @ m:
    Go for it! I remember when I was about 4 years old, I had eye surgery. I totally remember going into the operating room with a Snoopy in my arms. Mind you, I am 42 now. lol


  144. wolfie
    144 | December 29, 2009 18:51

    @ pig:

    This does not surprise me in the least.
    Over the last few decades, the academic left has developed a fear and loathing of the hard sciences, particularly the inorganic ones, where too many of the wrong sort of people excel.

    Suppose as a magical hypothesis that every university in this land suddenly had to make a choice between black studies/women’s studies/gender studies on the one hand and physics on the other. I have no doubt what the majority of schools would choose, and the answer is not physics.


  145. vagabond trader
    145 | December 29, 2009 18:51

    @ Speranza:

    Screenshot or it didn’t happen.


  146. m
    146 | December 29, 2009 18:53

    @ Speranza:

    And when she hunts you down and holds you to it, YOU’LL BE SOOOOORRRRYYYYY….

    :}


  147. Speranza
    147 | December 29, 2009 18:54

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Screenshot or it didn’t happen.

    Oh I intend on capturing it for posterity. I will offer her $10,000 and 1/3rd of my coming pension if she will bear my child as well. Ought to be a real knee slapper!


  148. vagabond trader
    148 | December 29, 2009 18:55

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Yours was a reasoned truthful comment. Mine were pure nonsense but I enjoyed it.


  149. NoThreat2U
    149 | December 29, 2009 18:55

    @ Speranza:
    **gag** **spit** **choke** I’ll be OK in a few minutes. LMAO


  150. Speranza
    150 | December 29, 2009 18:56

    m wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    And when she hunts you down and holds you to it, YOU’LL BE SOOOOORRRRYYYYY….
    :}

    hmmm second thoughts now. She does have a history of that don’t she? Maybe Irish Rose will be on (taking a break from her sexcapades with Lars) and I will offer to marry her as well (since iceweasel is taken).


  151. Speranza
    151 | December 29, 2009 18:57

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    **gag** **spit** **choke** I’ll be OK in a few minutes. LMAO

    Deep breathing!


  152. Nevergiveup
    152 | December 29, 2009 18:58

    Speranza wrote:

    (since iceweasel is taken).

    Revolting as that thought is, if it is not a giant hoax or they are not the same person, think Jimmah has the stuff to actually consumate the deal?


  153. m
    153 | December 29, 2009 18:59

    @ Speranza:

    EWWWW menage a’nasty!


  154. Poteen
    154 | December 29, 2009 18:59

    Speranza wrote:

    vagabond trader wrote:
    Truth to power. Don’t know why they found my little screed about bearing cjs baby and naming it kkkkkilgore trout offended.
    I am going to propose to Sharmuta on LGF using my sock puppet on New Years Eve. That ought to be something to witness.

    I have weaned myself from chasing ambulances to that wreck..
    But for this…. Just one more time!


  155. vagabond trader
    155 | December 29, 2009 18:59

    @ Speranza:

    Maybe a little rivalry situation with the Swede, that ought to create a stir.Then again, IR may be one upping the icehole and getting hitched on New Years Eve.


  156. citizen_q
    156 | December 29, 2009 18:59

    @ wolfie:

    Aren’t all of those “studies” classes just PC BS fluff?


  157. wolfie
    157 | December 29, 2009 18:59

    Speranza wrote:

    since iceweasel is taken

    Oh come on now! You aren’t going to let a little thing like a marriage license get in the way of true love are you? I mean, really. The weasel has been posting up a storm on her honeymoon. Jimmah ain’t man enough! Go for it!


  158. m
    158 | December 29, 2009 19:00

    @ Nevergiveup:

    He was quick about it if she spent her honeymoon posting on lgf.


  159. NoThreat2U
    159 | December 29, 2009 19:00

    @ Speranza:
    Dude! Keep it in your pants!!! (j/k)


  160. Speranza
    160 | December 29, 2009 19:01

    Revolting as that thought is, if it is not a giant hoax or they are not the same person, think Jimmah has the stuff to actually consumate the deal?

    Evver see the movie “The Crying Game”? Well I had this image of Jimmah sitting on the bed while iceweasel slowly undresses and when she reaches the part where she takes off the final part of her clothing revealing the “forbidden fruit” Jimmah shrieks and runs to the bathroom to vomit his guts up because his beloved ‘weasel has a willie!


  161. Nevergiveup
    161 | December 29, 2009 19:01

    m wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    He was quick about it if she spent her honeymoon posting on lgf.

    Maybe, endowed as he is, she never noticed?


  162. vagabond trader
    162 | December 29, 2009 19:01

    @ Nevergiveup:

    He sure likes to brag about his junk. I told him to stfu about it one time.


  163. snork
    163 | December 29, 2009 19:01

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Revolting as that thought is, if it is not a giant hoax or they are not the same person, think Jimmah has the stuff to actually consumate the deal?

    You can always put a mirror on your shoe, and look up his skirt kilt.


  164. m
    164 | December 29, 2009 19:01

    @ citizen_q:

    Kick.Ass avatar.


  165. chickadee
    165 | December 29, 2009 19:01

    I’m haunted by those videos of the graveyard that was once Detroit. It is such a travesty what the left has done in this country. The crippling, harmful manipulation and promises designed to undermine the human spirit. It is sinful and sad.


  166. Speranza
    166 | December 29, 2009 19:02

    m wrote:

    EWWWW menage a’nasty!

    I would need to be royally drunk and high.


  167. vagabond trader
    167 | December 29, 2009 19:02

    @ Speranza:

    Ok til the final curtain. I. don’t. think. it. would. upset. him.


  168. m
    168 | December 29, 2009 19:02

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Girl sure can multi-task.


  169. NoThreat2U
    169 | December 29, 2009 19:04

    @ Speranza:
    I’m trying!
    @ m:
    Oh that was funny!@ m:
    Bwahahahahahahahahahaha


  170. wolfie
    170 | December 29, 2009 19:04

    citizen_q wrote:

    Aren’t all of those “studies” classes just PC BS fluff?

    At best!


  171. Speranza
    171 | December 29, 2009 19:05

    wolfie wrote:

    Oh come on now! You aren’t going to let a little thing like a marriage license get in the way of true love are you? I mean, really. The weasel has been posting up a storm on her honeymoon. Jimmah ain’t man enough! Go for it!

    Yeah who the hell spends their honeymoon posting so much tripe on a blog? Maybe she wants to rub it into Sharm (whom she hates and the feeling is mutual).


  172. vagabond trader
    172 | December 29, 2009 19:05

    @ chickadee:

    I know, it is disturbing. Theres another one same vid, different soundtrack, very haunting, eerie sounding.This has bothered me since first viewing it a while back.The demonrats are worse than Vandals or Visigoths who actually “evolved” into civilized folk.


  173. citizen_q
    173 | December 29, 2009 19:06

    @ m:
    thanks!


  174. Poteen
    174 | December 29, 2009 19:06

    @ Speranza:
    hmmm second thoughts now. She does have a history of that don’t she? Maybe Irish Rose will be on (taking a break from her sexcapades with Lars) and I will offer to marry her as well (since iceweasel is taken).

    Your misogyny is eclipsed only by your masochistic misandry.
    May the wombs of all your wives be fertile Sheikh Abu bin Speranza.


  175. snork
    175 | December 29, 2009 19:08

    M? Why didn’t the thread scheduled for 7 kick off?


  176. wolfie
    176 | December 29, 2009 19:08

    chickadee wrote:

    I’m haunted by those videos of the graveyard that was once Detroit. It is such a travesty what the left has done in this country. The crippling, harmful manipulation and promises designed to undermine the human spirit. It is sinful and sad.

    Amen.


  177. 177 | December 29, 2009 19:09

    @ Speranza:

    I have this image of Iceweasel laying naked on her stomach, with Jimmah doin’ his very best doggy-style while she taps away on a laptop oblivious to the proceedings…


  178. Speranza
    178 | December 29, 2009 19:10

    Poteen wrote:

    May the wombs of all your wives be fertile Sheikh Abu bin Speranza.

    And may Allah’s blessings always be upon your head and of that of your first born!


  179. chickadee
    179 | December 29, 2009 19:11

    @ vagabond trader:

    It is very telling what is to come. The libs are aware of what bring. They are like vampires. Sucking a community dry and then moving on. It is what Zero wants to do. It is what he thinks we deserve.


  180. Speranza
    180 | December 29, 2009 19:11

    Iron Fist wrote:

    I have this image of Iceweasel laying naked on her stomach, with Jimmah doin’ his very best doggy-style while she taps away on a laptop oblivious to the proceedings…

    I can just see the two of them getting sloshed in their hotel room.


  181. Nevergiveup
    181 | December 29, 2009 19:12

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:

    I have this image of Iceweasel laying naked on her stomach, with Jimmah doin’ his very best doggy-style while she taps away on a laptop oblivious to the proceedings…

    Gee that is not one of memories I needed before going to bed tonight. Shit where did I put the pepcid?


  182. Poteen
    182 | December 29, 2009 19:12

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I have this image of Iceweasel laying naked on her stomach, with Jimmah doin’ his very best doggy-style while she taps away on a laptop oblivious to the proceedings…

    Boy! You ain’t right!///


  183. NoThreat2U
    183 | December 29, 2009 19:13

    @ Poteen:
    Sheikh Abu bin Speranza.

    I nominate this as the funniest damn post of the year!!!


  184. 184 | December 29, 2009 19:14

    @ Speranza:

    It wouldn’t surprise me. I don’t think Jimmah does sober. I don’t know about Ice.


  185. NoThreat2U
    185 | December 29, 2009 19:15

    @ Poteen:
    I quite concur!!!! WTF???? LMAO*****************


  186. m
    186 | December 29, 2009 19:15

    @ snork:

    Check your email – I think we’ll have to split it and put some “below the fold”. I just set it for 10:15 – if it doesn’t hit, we’ll know.


  187. vagabond trader
    187 | December 29, 2009 19:15

    @ chickadee:

    Totally agree,they are annihilators and its why they have such “empathy” for the muzz, birds of a feather.

    Heres the original vid and soundtrack if you’re interested.


  188. 188 | December 29, 2009 19:15

    @ Speranza:

    No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  189. coldwarrior
    189 | December 29, 2009 19:16

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I have this image of Iceweasel laying naked on her stomach, with Jimmah doin’ his very best doggy-style while she taps away on a laptop oblivious to the proceedings…

    aaarghhh!!!! my eyes!


  190. 190 | December 29, 2009 19:17

    I’m an evil, wicked man…

    :evil: :twisted: :evil:


  191. NoThreat2U
    191 | December 29, 2009 19:20

    @ coldwarrior:
    Dude! You seem to be a better student of history than I am. I am gonna look too, but could you find any information on the Transylvanian Saxons? I am just throwing this out here because I need to learn some things. If you find a way to direct me, I would of cource appreciate it. :)


  192. Poteen
    192 | December 29, 2009 19:20

    Speranza wrote:

    Poteen wrote:
    May the wombs of all your wives be fertile Sheikh Abu bin Speranza.
    And may Allah’s blessings always be upon your head and of that of your first born!

    Can I be your best man? I want to get Sharm, Weazy and Rose drunk as can be at the reception. See if they can still say ‘misogynistic’ after a few shots.//


  193. coldwarrior
    193 | December 29, 2009 19:22

    @ NoThreat2U:

    werent they the merchant class that killed vlad the impalers father?


  194. NoThreat2U
    194 | December 29, 2009 19:25

    @ coldwarrior:
    I honestly don’t know. I Googled it, but of course you only get Wiki article. I wanna look into it more. If you can steer me in the right direction……


  195. 195 | December 29, 2009 19:27

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    OT
    Looks like most of the comments on that stupid AtlanticWire post about 1.0 have been deleted.

    Hmmm, lets see how long this lasts before being deleted…

    doriangrey [Moderator] 0 minutes ago

    Heather Hornm

    Please seek psychiatric help, Charles Johnson is no conservative and never has been one.

    What he is is an individual suffering from delusions of relevancy masquerading as grandeur and importance whilst simultaneously displaying symptoms of a psychotic break with reality amazingly similar to acute amphetamine psychosis.


  196. coldwarrior
    196 | December 29, 2009 19:29

    @ NoThreat2U:

    thats quite a subject…most of the scholarly stuff is in german


  197. coldwarrior
    197 | December 29, 2009 19:31

    http://www.siebenbuerger.de/portal/land-und-leute/siebenbuerger-sachsen/

    but its in german and i have lost my german over the years


  198. chickadee
    198 | December 29, 2009 19:34

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    Totally agree,they are annihilators and its why they have such “empathy” for the muzz, birds of a feather.

    Heres the original vid and soundtrack if you’re interested.

    i saw this one. Notice the near total absence of people. It is so eerie. The burned out once fine homes.
    The vacant over grown lots. It is amazing how these city areas now look rural and abandoned. Rusting everything. Stripped cars. Boats full of garbage. We need an army of gay conservatives with degrees in architecture and interior design and the nerves of Navy Seals to go in and rehab these places. And that might not even work.


  199. NoThreat2U
    199 | December 29, 2009 19:35

    Headline over at Hot Air Watch:

    Rep. King: 100% of Islamic terrorists are Muslim
    Ok… how many Islamic terrorists are……Jewish?

    Catholic?
    Prebyterian?
    Lutheran?
    Buhddist?
    Sikh?


  200. NoThreat2U
    200 | December 29, 2009 19:37

    @ coldwarrior:
    @ coldwarrior:
    Well I didn’t think it could hurt to ask. :) I see I am gonna be on a quest now. lol Thank you anyway.


  201. lobo91
    201 | December 29, 2009 19:43

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Rep. King: 100% of Islamic terrorists are Muslim
    Ok… how many Islamic terrorists are……Jewish?

    Reminds me of one of Hooper’s stupid comments on O’Reilly tonight. The host said something to the effect of “since most of the terrorists are Muslims, we shouldn’t waste our time looking at Swedish grandmothers.”

    Hooper’s response was that we’d be wrong, because there’s a sizeable Muslim community in Sweden.

    There may be a lot of Muslims living in Sweden, but they aren’t Swedes, any more than the “youths” who periodically torch cars in the Paris suburbs are French.


  202. vagabond trader
    202 | December 29, 2009 19:43

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Not to butt in butt….I do a lot of English medieval history. Start with your local library and if you are near a larger university better yet.Librarians can be very helpful. There may even be a society or two that have the info you seek.

    If you are looking for family info I suggest the LDS genealogy website. The Mormons are cataloguing every human who ever was and converting them to Christ to boot. lol.


  203. vagabond trader
    203 | December 29, 2009 19:45

    @ chickadee:

    LOL, rainbow hood! The trees really get me,so forlorn, as if they want out.Like Lobo said a lot of these neighborhoods are being bulldozed, they just can’t afford to serve them.


  204. karridine
    204 | December 29, 2009 22:43

    @ Nevergiveup:
    That attitude will not change UNLESS and UNTIL this world’s Muslims are allowed to learn of the Coming of al-Qaim, 1260 AH (May 23, 1844), an historical fact kept from them by their clergy… some from ignorance, some for personal power over the hearts and minds of their ignorant, blind congregations, but whatever the MOTIVES of the Clergy, they have indeed ‘privily introduced damnable heresies, even denying our Lord Who redeems us’

    Terrorism, racism, elitism and rampant disunity all heal MUCH FASTER when Muslims are allowed to learn, publicly and formally, of the Coming of al-Qaim (The Bab) and al-Mahdi (The Glory of God)…

    Until then, we muddle along looking for political or military solutions to our SPIRITUAL problems…


  205. karridine
    205 | December 29, 2009 22:52

    @ Iron Fist:
    There’s a strong possibility that Iceweasel is chief moderator on what USED TO BE a valuable web-blog… I’ve seen forensic evidence in support of such an assertion…


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David