First time visitor? Learn more.

Female Suicide Bombers on the Way to America

by Rodan ( 100 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Terrorism at January 23rd, 2010 - 6:00 pm

The Imperialist ambitions of the Dar Al Islam has no scruple. They will do anything and use any means to terrorize their enemies. The Imperialists use our own laws against us and play the victim role. Now according to a report, they are planning on using female Suicide bombers.

American law enforcement officials have been told to be on the lookout for female suicide bombers who may attempt to enter the United States, law enforcement authorities tell ABC News.

One official said at least two of them are believed to be connected to al Qaeda in Yemen, and may have a non-Arab appearance and be traveling on Western passports.

Read the rest.

The interesting part is them mentioning the Imperialists using Non-Arab lackeys. I will bet any amount of money it will be the Bosnian and Albanian Muslims so beloved by Progressives and the Neo-Wilsonian Compassionate Conservatives. An attack done by these Arabized peoples will shatter the “they are different type of Muslims” lie. They are Dar Al Islam and that makes them no different than Arabs or Pakistanis. They are the enemy as well.

This report shows the ruthlessness of the Imperialist enemy and we must retaliate with furry if that happens. Unfortunately the elites in the Democratic and Republican Party will repeat their tolerance mantra. As has been mentioned here,  America’s patience is wearing thin and the days of tolerance is drawing to a close. Let the enemy know that if we wanted to engage in Terror, we would be very effective Terrorists. We warn you Islamo-Imperialists, the volcano will soon explode and no mercy will be shown.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

100 Responses to “Female Suicide Bombers on the Way to America”
( jump to bottom )

  1. snork
    1 | January 23, 2010 6:04 pm

    Are they Mata Hari-like?


  2. 2 | January 23, 2010 6:06 pm

    @ snork:

    Ha ha ha ha, nah. The fact that they say Non-Arab tells me they will be Bosnian or Albanian. They will appear to be White European looking. If I was Al-Qaeda I would do the same.


  3. snork
    3 | January 23, 2010 6:08 pm

    “Non-Arab appearance” covers a lot of territory. Maybe they look like this?


  4. 4 | January 23, 2010 6:12 pm

    @ snork:

    Yes could be, Bosnians appear like that.


  5. 5 | January 23, 2010 6:12 pm

    OT-

    To save myself an hour of reading comments in the previous threads (I just got home from work), has anyone picked to pieces CJ’s fuzzy math yet (see: Fact-Checking the New York Times)?

    It really isn’t that hard, and I thought I’d whip up a quick thread about it (unless someone already has one cookin’).


  6. snork
    6 | January 23, 2010 6:17 pm

    @ ChenZhen:
    There were several comments in the last thread that attacked several aspects of it. What I noticed is that he’s playing semantic games. He’s also using a 30-day basis for counting unique users, which if you think about it is arbitrary and meaningless. Someone (Opillio? Speranza? Wandensianspirit?) recalculated the numbers on a per-thread basis (which is a lot more logical) and came up with numbers that made the NYT piece generous.

    Just look over the previous thread; it’s all there.


  7. waldensianspirit
    7 | January 23, 2010 6:18 pm

    They’ll look like this.


  8. 8 | January 23, 2010 6:19 pm

    @ ChenZhen:

    No go ahead, we will post it for the overnight!


  9. huckfunn
    9 | January 23, 2010 6:31 pm

    I posted this several threads back but I just had to do it again.

    Obama IS The Tax Man


  10. rain of lead
    10 | January 23, 2010 6:34 pm

    on history chanel
    military sniper in Iraq
    in an attack, he fired a .50 cal sniper rifle for over 12 hrs
    holy god.


  11. snork
    11 | January 23, 2010 6:34 pm

    Rodan, don’t you just hate it when your thread goes off-topic before it hits comment #10?


  12. buzzsawmonkey
    12 | January 23, 2010 6:34 pm

    Muslimas! You can be svelte and chic in your Lady Shahada™ suicide belt!

    Sacrificing yourself for the Caliphate does not require a sacrifice of femininity! Now you can blow yourself all over the map and still retain the lightness and delicacy of fresh-baked baklava!


  13. waldensianspirit
    13 | January 23, 2010 6:36 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Where is that European lingerie ad a few weeks back? I think we need it on this thread.


  14. 14 | January 23, 2010 6:41 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:
    and I doubt like this.


  15. 15 | January 23, 2010 6:44 pm

    Muslima jihad mass murderers coming to the US. I brought this very thing up here on this board just a couple of weeks ago.
    Profile ‘em!


  16. 16 | January 23, 2010 6:44 pm

    they’ll be
    more like this…….


  17. 17 | January 23, 2010 6:47 pm

    @ Urban Infidel:

    The fact they are Non Arab, means they will be European Looking. That means Bosnia and Albania.


  18. 18 | January 23, 2010 6:50 pm

    @ ChenZhen:

    I could email you some recent LGF thread stats if you’re interested.


  19. chickadee
    19 | January 23, 2010 6:50 pm

    They are going to use anyone and anything they can to kill us. They are already using women and children in the M.E. Remember when the monsters put the belts on children at a pet fair in Iraq? We have to expect that they will constantly tailor their murderous ways to counter what we do to stop them. Now it’s women who look european. I think more and more it will be observant everyday people who happen to see something and pounce on these scum and choke the life out of them. We are becoming the first line of our own defense. Get ready.


  20. 20 | January 23, 2010 6:54 pm

    nil stooge wrote:

    @ ChenZhen:
    I could email you some recent LGF thread stats if you’re interested.

    That might help (although I have a feeling I won’t be surprised).

    Go ahead. Use my contact form.


  21. 21 | January 23, 2010 6:54 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    The fact they are Non Arab, means they will be European Looking. That means Bosnia and Albania.

    I mentioned that they’d be European or even possibly American too. I also feel that Mumbai-style seige attacks in US cities are not far off.

    Obaba the weak has emboldened our enemies.


  22. 22 | January 23, 2010 7:15 pm

    This report shows the ruthlessness of the Imperialist enemy and we must retaliate with furry if that happens.

    I don’t know if furries will scare the terrorists, but some of them sure scare me.


  23. Opilio
    23 | January 23, 2010 7:20 pm

    A Pearl of Wisdom from MKC:

    322 Charles Sat, Jan 23, 2010 5:56:41pm reply quote

    Yeesh.

    Dinged up to +6 by the adoring crowd.


  24. snork
    24 | January 23, 2010 7:25 pm

    @ Opilio:
    Got some real geniuses there:

    323 Slumbering Behemoth Sat, Jan 23, 2010 5:57:04pm

    re: #311 lrsshadow

    Nazism/Fascism is reactionary. That places them on the far right as far as political ideologies are concerned.

    Well, shirt. Why dint I thunka that.


  25. mjazz
    25 | January 23, 2010 7:40 pm

    @ snork:
    Are those real?
    The leaves on the necklace?


  26. 26 | January 23, 2010 7:46 pm

    Opilio wrote:

    A Pearl of Wisdom from MKC:

    322 Charles Sat, Jan 23, 2010 5:56:41pm reply quote
    Yeesh.

    Dinged up to +6 by the adoring crowd.

    Brevity is the soul of wit!

    LORD POLONIUS
    This business is well ended.
    My liege, and madam, to expostulate
    What majesty should be, what duty is,
    Why day is day, night night, and time is time,
    Were nothing but to waste night, day and time.
    Therefore, since brevity is the soul of wit,
    And tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes,
    I will be brief: your noble son is mad:
    Mad call I it; for, to define true madness,
    What is’t but to be nothing else but mad?
    But let that go.

    From Shakespeare’s Hamlet, 1603


  27. Guggi
    27 | January 23, 2010 7:55 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Opilio:
    Got some real geniuses there:
    323 Slumbering Behemoth Sat, Jan 23, 2010 5:57:04pm
    re: #311 lrsshadow
    Nazism/Fascism is reactionary. That places them on the far right as far as political ideologies are concerned.
    Well, shirt. Why dint I thunka that.

    Since Fascism and National Socialism were a third path movement, both were influenced as well by communism (Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, Strasser brothers) as by (Christian) conservative ideas (Paul de Lagarde, Alfred Rosenberg). Hitler eliminated socialist ideas and their exponents very soon after he had taken over power.

    Rodan, don’t you just hate it when your thread goes off-topic before it hits comment #10?

    No, Rodan is Spanish and very generous ;-)


  28. snork
    28 | January 23, 2010 7:56 pm

    Yeesh. Ok, where’s my Nobel in literature?

    288 talon_262 Sat, Jan 23, 2010 4:14:34pm

    Jonathan Dee and the NYT can bite me for being biased f**ksticks…and they can quote me on that.

    /it must hurt what little pride they have left to know that Charles just fact-checked their asses into oblivion…

    Into oblivion. I mean, like you told them, dood.


  29. Mad Mullah
    29 | January 23, 2010 8:05 pm

    They may very well be non-arab in appearance, but their minds will have been infected with Jihadist filth, and that is something that all Islamic terrorists have in common.

    It is ridiculous when certain people claim that being anti-Jihadist is racist, because Jihadists can come in all shapes, sizes and colors. Oftentimes, the western converts are the worst, because they will have something to prove, being recently radicalized and brainwashed. Only a mentally unstable person would ever convert to Islam, in my opinion.

    I am against all Jihadists, the arab ones from the mideast, a black African-American Islamist who converted in prison, a brown Pakistani Jihadist, or a blue-eyed, blonde haired Swedish Jihadist, it really makes no difference, they are all diseased and they all share the same hatred of infidels.


  30. 30 | January 23, 2010 8:08 pm

    @ snork:

    They seem a little testy over at the BVoAF, kinda like they might be if someone with a national audience accurately called them “the Blog Version of Animal Farm“.


  31. mjazz
    31 | January 23, 2010 8:08 pm

    They all need to be deprogrammed.


  32. 32 | January 23, 2010 8:09 pm

    @ Guggi:

    Hitler eliminated socialist ideas and their exponents very soon after he had taken over power.

    Hiler imposed State control over the Econmy (Socialism) , expanded Universal Coverage (Socialism) and expanded State powers over the people (Socialism).


    as by (Christian) conservative ideas (Paul de Lagarde, Alfred Rosenberg)

    What Christian-Conservative ideas?

    Did you see the Beck special?


    No, Rodan is Spanish and very generous

    Yes I am!

    :-)


  33. rain of lead
    33 | January 23, 2010 8:11 pm

    nil stooge wrote:

    @ snork:
    They seem a little testy over at the BVoAF, kinda like they might be if someone with a national audience accurately called them “the Blog Version of Animal Farm“.

    *blink**blink*
    …BVoAF……
    .
    .
    .spew bwahahahahaha


  34. 34 | January 23, 2010 8:14 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    They are mad Their Jazz Artist leader was exposed as a loon.


  35. Mad Mullah
    35 | January 23, 2010 8:14 pm

    nil stooge wrote:

    @ snork:

    They seem a little testy over at the BVoAF, kinda like they might be if someone with a national audience accurately called them “the Blog Version of Animal Farm“.

    They’re spinning worse than 0bama over there, it is truly laughable.


  36. mjazz
    36 | January 23, 2010 8:21 pm

    Sorry Charles, as it stands, I disagree…Feel free and delete my reponse because I feel embarrassed about disagreeing with you for you do great work (and I am frequently foolishly wrong).


  37. mjazz
    37 | January 23, 2010 8:23 pm

    Mad Mullah, is that the blackbird singing in the dead of night?


  38. mjazz
    38 | January 23, 2010 8:24 pm

    Did Rodan and Godzilla ever fight?


  39. rain of lead
    39 | January 23, 2010 8:26 pm

    that’s not a gun….THIS is a gun!!!
    shooting the .557 T-rex rifle


  40. MrPaulRevere
    40 | January 23, 2010 8:26 pm

    Air America, 2004-2010: Air America, a politically liberal radio network, was found dead Thursday in its New York City offices at the age of 5. After an autopsy, the cause of death was listed as cultural and fiscal asphyxiation. http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/22/air-america-2004-2010/


  41. rain of lead
    41 | January 23, 2010 8:28 pm

    @ mjazz:

    I think so


  42. Mad Mullah
    42 | January 23, 2010 8:33 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    Mad Mullah, is that the blackbird singing in the dead of night?

    It could be that, or It might just be a black cat in heat, scouring the neighborhood at midnight, searching for the light at the end of the tunnel, or something like that.

    It is only a temporary avatar, and I’ll probably change it out tomorrow sometime.

    :)


  43. mfhorn
    43 | January 23, 2010 8:33 pm

    @ MrPaulRevere:

    In the immortal words of Monty Python ‘And there was much rejoicing’.


  44. Alberta Oil Peon
    44 | January 23, 2010 8:34 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Well, non-Arab “could” mean Pakistani or Malaysian, too. (Birkenstock Cowboy got me sorted out on the OpenDNS trick.)


  45. 45 | January 23, 2010 8:34 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Just briefly in Ghidorah, then they were allies.

    They fought briefly in Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla 93, but allied after that.


  46. mjazz
    46 | January 23, 2010 8:34 pm

    I’m My Own Grandpa


  47. mjazz
    47 | January 23, 2010 8:35 pm

    @ Rodan:
    I had a feeling you might know.


  48. Mad Mullah
    48 | January 23, 2010 8:36 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    Air America, 2004-2010: Air America, a politically liberal radio network, was found dead Thursday in its New York City offices at the age of 5. After an autopsy, the cause of death was listed as cultural and fiscal asphyxiation. http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/22/air-america-2004-2010/

    Kucinich was threatening O’Reilly yesterday, and mentioned something about bringing back the fairness doctrine, because of liberal media being miserable failures.


  49. Eliana
    49 | January 23, 2010 8:38 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    Kucinich was threatening O’Reilly yesterday, and mentioned something about bringing back the fairness doctrine, because of liberal media being miserable failures.

    Has Kucinich heard of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts?


  50. Eliana
    50 | January 23, 2010 8:39 pm

    The Dems don’t have a super-majority anymore.


  51. mjazz
    51 | January 23, 2010 8:40 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    Pakistanis are not arabs?


  52. Alberta Oil Peon
    52 | January 23, 2010 8:43 pm

    No. They are Indian Aryans, not Semites.


  53. Mad Mullah
    53 | January 23, 2010 8:43 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    The Dems don’t have a super-majority anymore.

    A few liberals seem to have gotten the message, but just as many deranged liberals believe that they ought to go more to the left and push their agenda even harder now.

    I hope that they do, because it will backfire even more on them.


  54. Mad Mullah
    54 | January 23, 2010 8:45 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    Pakistanis are not arabs?

    In the UK, I believe they’re referred to as “Asians” in the media over there. I always thought that was strange.


  55. Guggi
    55 | January 23, 2010 8:47 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Hiler imposed State control over the Econmy (Socialism)

    Only under condition of war. A lot of “left-wing”-National-Socialist supporters were very disappointed when Hitler left the “socialist path”. Of course there was still some socialism in the movement but e.g. no nationalization of the industry.

    expanded Universal Coverage (Socialism)

    The Hitler-regime continued the social and welfare policy of the Weimarer republic. There was nothing new. Ironically the the Hitler-regime started the first private health-care insurance in Germany (1936).

    expanded State powers over the people

    this is one of the core-issues of every dictatorship regardless of left-wing or right-wing.

    What Christian-Conservative ideas?

    Rosenberg e.g saw the National-Socialism as the achievment of Christianity. You have to read them to understand.

    Did you see the Beck special?

    No, my cable-provider doesn’t include Fox.


  56. waldensianspirit
    56 | January 23, 2010 8:54 pm

    Bernanke needs to go away. As he goes, where he hid the money needs to be water boarded out of him.


  57. mfhorn
    57 | January 23, 2010 8:55 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    Yeah, I’d like to see the Chosen One, ‘Dingy’ Harry Reid, SanFranNan and other leftists push even harder left, too. Recipe for failure!

    I saw something a while back, someone commented that Obama’s popularity is down because he isn’t far enough left. Good God, what would be left enough?


  58. AZfederalist
    58 | January 23, 2010 8:55 pm

    Rodan:

    As has been mentioned here, America’s patience is wearing thing and the days of tolerance is drawing to a close. Let the enemy know that if we wanted to engage in Terror, we would be very effective Terrorists. We warn you Islamo-Imperialists, the volcanoe will soon explode and no mercy will be shown.

    Along those lines:

    Three strangers strike up a conversation in the airport passenger lounge
    while awaiting their flights in Bozeman, Montana, .

    One is an American Indian passing through from Lame Deer. Another is a
    Cowboy on his way to Billings for a livestock show and the third
    passenger is a fundamentalist Arab student, newly arrived at Montana
    State University  from the Middle East .

    Their discussion drifts to their diverse cultures. Soon, the two
    Westerners learn that the Arab is a devout, radical Muslim and the
    conversation falls into an uneasy lull.

    The cowboy leans back in his chair, crosses his boots on a magazine
    table and tips his big sweat-stained hat forward over his face. The wind
    outside is blowing tumbleweeds around, and the old windsock is flapping;
    but still no plane comes.

    Finally, the American Indian clears his throat and softly he speaks, ”
    At one time here, my people were many, but sadly, now we are few.”

    The Muslim student raises an eyebrow and leans forward, “Once my People
    were  few,” he sneers, “and now we are many. Why do you suppose that is?”

    The Montana cowboy shifts his toothpick to one side of his mouth and
    from the darkness beneath his Stetson says in a drawl, “That’s ’cause we
    ain’t played Cowboys and Muslims yet, but I do believe it’s a-comin’.”


  59. snork
    59 | January 23, 2010 8:56 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    Only under condition of war.

    That’s generally true; for the most part he simply didn’t care about such things. But he did command some civilian industry. Case in point: the Volkswagen. He ordered Ferdinand Porsche to design it, he micromanaged Porsche, and then when it was finally designed, he ordered Auto Union (now Audi) to build it. It was private industry, but it certainly wasn’t free.


  60. 60 | January 23, 2010 8:56 pm

    @ Guggi:

    You can watch Beck daily episodes at : http://www.glennbeckclips.com/index.htm

    and you can watch Fox News at : http://freetubetv.net/ Fox link is under Top 5 Channels at #1.

    This was posted the other day over at AoS, hat tip to whoever I am forgetting for linking those.


  61. Eliana
    61 | January 23, 2010 8:56 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    A few liberals seem to have gotten the message, but just as many deranged liberals believe that they ought to go more to the left and push their agenda even harder now.

    I hope that they do, because it will backfire even more on them.

    Howard Dean thinks that people voted for Scott Brown because they support the Dems’ health care bill. He had to twist his head into a pretzel to make this case, though. Even Chris Matthews thought he was nuts when he said it.


  62. Alberta Oil Peon
    62 | January 23, 2010 8:58 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    Right. In the UK, “asians” are people from the Indian subcontinent, basically dark-skinned Caucasians. Could be Muslims, could be Hindu, could be Sikh, even Christian. People from the greater part of Asia, could be called “orientals”, I guess. It’s a relic of colonial times.

    There are plenty of Indo/Pak people here in Canada, and they are pretty easy to distinguish from Arabs, as a rule. Of course there are always some individuals who could be taken for either.


  63. Mad Mullah
    63 | January 23, 2010 8:59 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    I saw something a while back, someone commented that Obama’s popularity is down because he isn’t far enough left. Good God, what would be left enough?

    Yeah, I’ve read the same thing. Some of them are truly spinning the Mass defeat in truly ridiculous ways.

    0bama himself even claimed that the same anger that got him elected is the same anger that got Brown elected. That must be what delusional self-denial is.


  64. Eliana
    64 | January 23, 2010 9:00 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    0bama himself even claimed that the same anger that got him elected is the same anger that got Brown elected. That must be what delusional self-denial is.

    Yeah, Obama thinks a Republican Senator was elected in MA because the people are still mad at Republican President George W. Bush.

    Zero can’t handle the idea that people are mad at HIM.


  65. 65 | January 23, 2010 9:05 pm

    Mad Mullah wrote:

    0bama himself even claimed that the same anger that got him elected is the same anger that got Brown elected. That must be what delusional self-denial is.

    The only prism he can look through to compare things is his one rise to power. His training and belief structure don’t allow any other concept to creep into his head. At least that’s the way I see it.


  66. 66 | January 23, 2010 9:06 pm

    @ Guggi:

    He didn’t diverge form the socialist path. Hitler increased state Regulation of German Industries before the war. The Reich’s government received ownership stakes in the German Corporations. The Reich’s Government dictated Economic policies to the German Companies. It was no Free Market. It was a Socialist State.

    Did you know Marx and Engels called for a Greater Germany and the conquest of Slavic people’s? Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?


    Rosenberg e.g saw the National-Socialism as the achievement of Christianity.

    LOL, that’s too funny!

    National Socialism is a rejection of Christianity. It’s goal was to create a Neo-Pagan society based on the Old Teutonic Gods. The Thule society was big behind Nazism. They viewed Christianity as a weak Juadiac religion that needed to be removed from German Society.

    Here is the Beck special. I posted 6 clips of the episode today. It debunks the Leftist spin on Nazi Germany.

    Facts remain Hitler as a Left wing Progressive who’s economic polities were Marxist. In fact Obama and Hugo Chavez’s policies are very close to Hitler.

    Here’s another coincidence between the American Progressives and the Nazis.
    Both Believe in master and inferior races.
    The Nazis view Jews, Slavs and Gypsies as Inferior.
    The New Left American Progressives view Hispanics and Blacks as Inferior.
    What they disagree on is the solution.The Nazi believe in the Extermination of the inferior race.
    The American left believe the Inferior must be taken care of and kept as Serfs.

    Watch the Beck clips, it debunks the Hitler was a Right-wing Myth. Hitler was a man of the Left like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and Barack Obama.


  67. randian
    67 | January 23, 2010 9:07 pm

    An attack done by these Arabized peoples will shatter the “they are different type of Muslims” lie.

    You attribute far too much intelligence and insight to Western political institutions. The joy of PC is the ability to harden one’s worldview to the pressure of reality.


  68. 68 | January 23, 2010 9:08 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    They will use Bosnians and Albanians. They know Pakis are being watched as well.


  69. 69 | January 23, 2010 9:11 pm

    @ randian:

    Yeah but there is a faction of teh Right that agree. The Neo-Wilsonian Compassionate Conservative lets fight for Muslim democracy crowd. I’m sick of them as well.


  70. Alberta Oil Peon
    70 | January 23, 2010 9:17 pm

    @ Rodan:

    You are probably right. Just wanted to point out that there are non-Arab Muslims who are also non-European, too. They could also use black African Muslim women from former French African colonies, and try to to disguise them as Haitian earthquake refugees.


  71. snork
    71 | January 23, 2010 9:17 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    National Socialism is a rejection of Christianity. It’s goal was to create a Neo-Pagan society based on the Old Teutonic Gods. The Thule society was big behind Nazism. They viewed Christianity as a weak Juadiac religion that needed to be removed from German Society.

    Hitler also was quoted as admiring Islam. He thought Christianity was too squishy, and admired the martial character of Islam.


  72. 72 | January 23, 2010 9:20 pm

    Missed some good threads this week. Workin’ ’12s’ suck.

    evenin’ ya’all


  73. 73 | January 23, 2010 9:20 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    They could also use black African Muslim women from former French African colonies, and try to to disguise them as Haitian earthquake refugees.

    Very valid point! Yes, like the recent bomber was Nigerian!
    My God, I didn’t think about that!


  74. Opilio
    74 | January 23, 2010 9:20 pm

    To satisfy my insatiable curiousity, I just did a quick census on 3 of the more heavily commented recent threads at the other place.

    THREAD 1
    comments: 298
    total commenters: 52
    8 commenters made >50% of the comments

    THREAD 2
    comments: 568
    commenters: 58
    8 commenters made >50% of the comments

    THREAD 3
    comments: 1750
    commenters: 114
    15 commenters made >50% of the comments

    OVERALL
    comments: 2616
    commenters: 152
    16 commenters made >50% of the comments

    Shall we play “name that top 16″?

    About half are pretty familiar.


  75. 75 | January 23, 2010 9:22 pm

    @ BenZacharia:

    hey Ben Z great to see you.


  76. 76 | January 23, 2010 9:23 pm

    @ snork:

    Yup, that is true.


  77. Guggi
    77 | January 23, 2010 9:25 pm

    snork wrote:

    Guggi wrote:
    Only under condition of war.
    That’s generally true; for the most part he simply didn’t care about such things. But he did command some civilian industry. Case in point: the Volkswagen. He ordered Ferdinand Porsche to design it, he micromanaged Porsche, and then when it was finally designed, he ordered Auto Union (now Audi) to build it. It was private industry, but it certainly wasn’t free.

    Despite heavy lobbying in favor of one of the existing projects, Hitler choose to sponsor an all new, state owned factory. The engineer chosen for the task was Ferdinand Porsche. By then an already famed engineer, Porsche was the designer of the Mercedes 170H, and worked at Steyr for quite some time in the late 1920s. When he opened his own design studio he landed two separate “Auto für Jedermann” (car for everybody) projects with NSU and Zündapp, both motorcycle manufacturers. Neither project come to fruition, stalling at prototype phase, but the basic concept remained in Porsche’s mind time enough, so on 22 June 1934, Dr. Ferdinand Porsche agreed to create the “People’s Car” for Hitler.

    ——-

    This is not specific to National-Socialism. Have a look at the today European aircraft-industry (to name only one example).

    Or have a look at the research industry in Europe e.g. the so called “excellent centers”. They look as if they were private but are partly state sponsored and they get in parts their research assignments/development orders from the government.

    After WWII a lot of industry was nationalized, not only in Italy/Germany/Austria but in France or GB too.


  78. snork
    78 | January 23, 2010 9:25 pm

    I just happened to stumble upon a comment in another blog dealing with a different issue, but the comment seems germane to this conversation:

    American conservatives are, in general, Burkain and Jeffersonian small-statists, who trace their ancestry to 18th century Whigs and ultimately to John Locke. There is also the strain of non-conformist and Calvinist Christianity, which, of course, was one of the founding principles of the English colonization here.

    In any case, American conservatives, by and large, have an aversion to the Leviathan and everything it stands for. The streams of political, religious and social thought that inform American conservatism had their origins in the Reformation and in the 17th century’s breakup of dying feudalism: Private property, freedom of conscience, and the limitation of Royal/State power were the hallmarks of this Protestant, Northern European, and particularly British, social movement.

    The Continental European right wing, on the other hand, often consists of a witch’s brew of royalists, Fascists and pagan nativists (the Nazis having been the template), arch-conservative Catholics and the odd Protestant same, unrepentant militarists, skinheads, racists and, in Italy, Mafiosi, and those who pine for the glory of the Most Serene Republic of Venice and its grim plutocracy. The European Right would have both its trains and vaporetti run on time.


  79. 79 | January 23, 2010 9:27 pm

    @ Guggi:

    That’s Socialism, when the Governmental dictates to companies.


  80. 80 | January 23, 2010 9:30 pm

    Female Suicide Bombers on the Way to America

    Brings a whole new meaning to ‘she’s da bomb!’

    Delivery methods are always changing, someday they will resort to 85 year old Lutheran Church ladies.

    Until the security wonks change their fundamental basis for threat assessment and the enemies of G-d win. When you are constantly responding you lose. Getting out in front of the problem is the only solution.

    This will never happen until Patriots are the ones running the show as the progs want nothing more than ginned up crisis to which they can Cloward-Piven us to the 4th Reich.


  81. 81 | January 23, 2010 9:30 pm

    @ Guggi:


    r. Ferdinand Porsche agreed to create the “People’s Car” for Hitler.

    People is a Leftist term.

    People’s republic of China is an example.


  82. snork
    82 | January 23, 2010 9:31 pm

    @ Guggi:
    Thanks for making my point. It’s all socialism. We Americans can have a world-class aerospace company making everything from military to commercial to space craft and assemblies operating entirely in the private sector. Why can’t the larger economy of Europe?

    In the ’80s and ’90s I worked for a couple of French chemical companies in the US. They were buying plants in the US rather than using the capital to fix their plants back home, because as nationalized industries, their plants in France couldn’t make their profit goals. Something’s wrong with this picture. Eventually, the French government sold most of this back to the private sector.

    Like Roger Simon said, every time and every place it’s been tried, it’s been a disaster.


  83. 83 | January 23, 2010 9:31 pm

    @ Guggi:

    Just watch the Beck special and you’ll see Hitler was a Leftwing socialist.


  84. 84 | January 23, 2010 9:33 pm

    @ snork:


    It’s all socialism.

    Yup, Progressivism comes in many flavors. In fact Hugo Chavez’s Bolivarian socialism is a Latin form of National Socialism.


  85. 85 | January 23, 2010 9:34 pm

    Hey Rodan, how they hangin’?

    Savage been around?

    Loved the NYTs thread.

    ————-

    Amazing threads done by a bunch of amateurs that beat the snot outa most other blogs.


  86. 86 | January 23, 2010 9:35 pm

    OK, I have a post pending review.

    Should be entertaining….


  87. 87 | January 23, 2010 9:35 pm

    @ Rodan:

    ‘People for the American Way’ is another


  88. randian
    88 | January 23, 2010 9:35 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    You are probably right. Just wanted to point out that there are non-Arab Muslims who are also non-European, too.

    We could also include:

    1) Filipinos. They’re busy slaughtering people in Mindanao.
    2) Thais. These are the jokers that beheaded 3 Christian schoolgirls.
    3) I’m sure we’ve all heard about the recent church burnings / mass murders in Malaysia.
    4) Plenty of jihadists in India, some of whom are Indian and not Pakistani.
    5) The Uighurs in China. Wasn’t the guy who knifed somebody on a bus Uighur?
    6) Central & South America. Jihadists are busy playing on the resentments of the Indian populations at having been conquered by Spain and Portugal.

    This is all more of a smokescreen, in my opinion. Too many homegrown jihadists working under the smokescreen provided by the foreign ones.

    1) Jamaat ul-Fuqra. Many training compounds in the US.
    2) Prisoner converts. They’re angry at the system, and Islam gives divine sanction for revenge.


  89. 89 | January 23, 2010 9:39 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    People is a Leftist term.

    People’s republic of China is an example.

    Yep, you can spot the totalitarian state by looking for “People” in the title of the countries name. All other democracies don’t need to place the people in the name.


  90. 90 | January 23, 2010 9:42 pm

    @ BenZacharia:

    He’s doing good. Yes he was around yesterday.

    @ ChenZhen:

    It’s up!


  91. 91 | January 23, 2010 9:44 pm

    New thread, let’s have fun!


  92. mjazz
    92 | January 23, 2010 9:46 pm

    Israel has the most secure airport in the world. I cannot imagine for a moment that a man with nitroglycerine in his undies would ever have made it on an Israeli plane. And why? Because they would have asked him some simple, direct questions with the purpose of studying his reactions. You’re from Nigeria. You’re going to the US. Why? How long are you staying? What is your purpose? And where is your return ticket? All along they would be scrutinizing not his bodily bulges but his twitches. What Israel excels at is not even ethnic profiling so much as psychological profiling.

    They are in the thick of it. Why aren’t we learning from them?


  93. randian
    93 | January 23, 2010 10:06 pm

    PaladinPhil wrote:

    Yep, you can spot the totalitarian state by looking for “People” in the title of the countries name. All other democracies don’t need to place the people in the name.

    Don’t forget their allies in media, “New”. “New Scientist”, “New Economist”, etc. That word is a reliable clue that the publication’s political leanings are both very public and very left.


  94. Beltfed
    94 | January 23, 2010 10:10 pm

    Rodan @ 34:

    They are mad Their Jazz Artist leader was exposed as a loon.

    Heh, why pick on loons, loons are beautiful birds.

    Dodo bird is more inline to describe ponytail, ugly and extinct.


  95. Alberta Oil Peon
    95 | January 23, 2010 11:08 pm

    @ randian:
    Absolutely. The islamists are looking at any dissatisfied subgroups as potential pools of talent they can subvert to their cause.

    These “female suicide bombers” may well included some genuine American or Canadian born women that have converted to islam because of some personal grievance or simple mental illness.


  96. randian
    96 | January 24, 2010 2:53 am

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    These “female suicide bombers” may well included some genuine American or Canadian born women that have converted to islam because of some personal grievance or simple mental illness.

    I would think that Islam’s general attitude of superiority and entitlement is very appealing to the self-absorbed. Know any women like that? Islam is also very appealing to those who want to be told what opinions to have and (literally) how to wipe their asses. I’ve never knowingly met such a pathetic imitation of an adult human being, but I’m told they exist.

    I’m surprised they’d use female suicide bombers here. Western converts to Islam, especially the female ones like the ever mendacious Karen Armstrong, usually work better in propaganda roles. Pushing the lie that Islam is really a female-empowering and almost feminist religion is worth dozens of suicide bombers.


  97. 97 | January 24, 2010 7:10 am

    [...] wonder if the female suicide bombers will be Mirandaized if they reach our shores? Blogmocracy has the [...]


  98. Guggi
    98 | January 24, 2010 8:01 am

    @ snork:

    Thanks for making my point. It’s all socialism. We Americans can have a world-class aerospace company making everything from military to commercial to space craft and assemblies operating entirely in the private sector. Why can’t the larger economy of Europe?

    The NASA is a private corporation ?


  99. Guggi
    99 | January 24, 2010 8:09 am

    @ Rodan:

    1. He didn’t diverge form the socialist path. Hitler increased state Regulation of German Industries before the war.

    After Hitler had gained power in 1933 he eliminated the “Socialism” out of the “National Socialism” what made the left-wing of the party (Roehm, Gregor Strasser etc.) very disaffected with Hitler. Hitler resolved the problem in “the night of the long knives” (“Roehm-Putsch”) when he let kill not only Roehm and Strasser but also about 200 other left-wingers of the party. Hitler’s supporters in the industry had made very clear before he took over that if he wouldn’t get rid of the socialist agenda (25 points program of 1920) they no longer would support him and his party and Hitler would have been toast.
    Hitler’s instruments of economic policy didn’t much differ from those in other European Countries or from those in the USA (Hoover’s, FDR). Hitler was very impressed by FDR’s “New Deal” and you may call this deal “Socialism” but you can’t compare this deal to the communist agenda in the former Soviet Union under Stalin.

    The Reich’s government received ownership stakes in the German Corporations. The Reich’s Government dictated Economic policies to the German Companies. It was no Free Market. It was a Socialist State.

    You have to split them in three groups:

    i) The Nazis inherited stakeholdership from the Republic of Weimar (e.g. Dresdner Bank and Commerzbank) and the Nazis re-privatized them as soon as possible (1937).

    ii) The condemnation of Jewish property. Also this ownership was only temporarily and re-privatized.

    iii) The re-armament of the German military.

    Did you know Marx and Engels called for a Greater Germany and the conquest of Slavic people’s? Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

    Yes and this were not news. May I remind you of the Templers (knightly orders) ?

    LOL, that’s too funny!
    National Socialism is a rejection of Christianity. It’s goal was to create a Neo-Pagan society based on the Old Teutonic Gods. The Thule society was big behind Nazism. They viewed Christianity as a weak Juadiac religion that needed to be removed from German Society.

    i) Rosenberg saw National Socialism as accomplishment of Christianity.

    ii) Germanic mysticism (e.g. the Thule Society) was seen as a tool to unite the “Germanic tribes” not as a religion to replace Christianity. Show me one temple which was built during National Socialism where German people the Germanic deities worshiped.

    iii) As long as Christians worked together (and a lot of them did so) with the Nazis the party had no problems with Christianity. Protestants in Northern Germany had their “own concentration camp” and were proud of the fact that they didn’t that much torture the inmates.

    Here is the Beck special. I posted 6 clips of the episode today. It debunks the Leftist spin on Nazi Germany.
    Facts remain Hitler as a Left wing Progressive who’s economic polities were Marxist. In fact Obama and Hugo Chavez’s policies are very close to Hitler.

    What Beck is doing is cherry-picking on the left. It’s ok for me as long as he doesn’t forget the other side of the coin: Conservatism. You and Beck have to understand that Conservatism at this time was mostly anti-capitalistic and Conservatives wanted the Feudalism back (Hitler didn’t touch the feudal estates although he had announced a land reform). The trick of the lefties now is to identify “Conservatism” with “Capitalism” and call the Nazis “reactionaries” but Capitalists at that time were called “Liberals” (Liberale).
    All forms of Fascism and National Socialism (as well as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offsprings) are amalgams of Socialism and Conservatism with a revolutionary element and often with the support of capitalists. Did you know that the term “Drittes Reich” (Third Reich) was invented by Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, a conservative ?

    In his book Das Recht der jungen Völker (“The Right Of Young Nations”), in which he presents the interests of Germany, Russia, and the United States and develops an expressly anti-Western and anti-imperialist philosophy of the state (Staatstheorie), Moeller van den Bruck attempts primarily to bridge the gap between nationalism and concepts of social justice. He had a major influence on the Jungkonservativen in their opposition to the Treaty of Versailles. He may have also supplied the Nazis with some of the concepts underpinning their movement, though upon meeting Hitler in 1922 he rejected him for his “proletarian primitiveness”. The Nazis nevertheless made use of his ideas where they could, including appropriating the title of his 1923 book Das Dritte Reich (meaning “The Third Reich”) as a political slogan.


  100. 100 | January 24, 2010 11:18 am

    @ Guggi:

    Sorry, The Nazis were Socialists. You can spin as much as you want, but there were Leftists.


    ) Germanic mysticism (e.g. the Thule Society) was seen as a tool to unite the “Germanic tribes” not as a religion to replace Christianity. Show me one temple which was built during National Socialism where German people the Germanic deities worshiped.

    That was their later stage plan, was to replace the Churches with the New Germanic Religion.


    As long as Christians worked together (and a lot of them did so) with the Nazis the party had no problems with Christianity.

    Yes they did, they viewed is as weak and sought to replace it with the Thule religion.

    My Grandfather fought in WW2 and Korea and told me there’s no difference between Communism and Nazism. It’s Leftwing Totalitarian Ideologies. I’ll take his word over yours.

    We can go all day with this, I read up on Progressvism.

    Want to discuss the Nazi’s support of Eugenics?


    All forms of Fascism and National Socialism (as well as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offsprings) are amalgams of Socialism and Conservatism with a revolutionary element and often with the support of capitalists. Did you know that the term “Drittes Reich” (Third Reich) was invented by Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, a conservative ?

    Nice try, but Fascism and National Socialism are actually distinct Ideologies. Nazis are to the Left of Fascism. There is nothing Conservative about them. Conservatives believe in less Government and Individual Freedoms. Nazism believes in the greater good of Society. Hence it’s Progressive. As for a Conservative investing the term, The Left has hijacked many Conservative Terms.

    Stalin discussed Mother Russia, would you say he’s a Rightwinger?

    You and Beck have to understand that Conservatism at this time was mostly anti-capitalistic and Conservatives wanted the Feudalism back (Hitler didn’t touch the feudal estates although he had announced a land reform).

    Wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Conservatism was Pro-Freemarket and wanted nothing to do with feudalism. It’s the Left that is Neo-Feudal.

    You can spin all you ant, but the fact is the Nazis are Leftists.

    Nice try, but your spin doesn’t work here.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David