Anyone who has ever had any dealings in a court of law knows well what the phrase “contempt of court” means. That means that if you’re insufficiently respectful of the court and the judge, you can go to jail.
Anyone who listened to the SOTU speech last night heard a most amazing and unprecedented thing – brazen and open contempt of the SCOTUS to the faces of six of the nine by the POTUS. Ordinarily, this would be considered gauche, but let’s remember one thing. That this POTUS was once a professor of Constitutional Law. Thus, as much as a gaffe like this would be inexcusable coming from a Ronald Reagan or a George Bush, it should be a lot more inexplicable coming from Professor Obama.
But it’s even stranger. On this point of the McCain-Feingold decision, the POTUS said:
Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said. “Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.
I’m not a lawyer (and I won’t say where I’ve stayed), but it’s pretty obvious on inspection that there’s a elephant-in-the-parlor type problem here. It’s a matter of basic civics that if something is ruled unconstitutional in the US, that’s the end of the discussion barring a constitutional amendment.
Note that he didn’t say pass a constitutional amendment. He said “pass a bill”. The professor of constitutional law said, outright, that congress pass a bill to correct a SCOTUS ruling.
Now it might in theory be possible in some situations to correct a technical flaw in a bill to avoid a constitutional issue, if the constitutional issue is peripheral to the thrust of the bill. This is clearly not the case with MF. The SCOTUS said that the main thrust of the bill was unconstitutional. And the constitutional law professor wants to work with congress to undo the SCOTUS ruling. I’m just astonished. So was Justice Alito.
POLITICO’s Kasie Hunt, who’s in the House chamber, reports that Justice Samuel Alito mouthed the words “not true” when President Barack Obama criticized the Supreme Court’s campaign finance decision.
[...]
The shot of the black-robed Supreme Court justices, stone-faced, was priceless.
The court was not prepared for this in-your-face Chicago-style contempt. This is what hopenchange looks like when it doesn’t get its way. It gets pissy and childish. And contemptuous. But as they said in the ’70s, here comes the judge.
Here come da Judge
It was pure demoagoguery for his libturd proles. They don’t know the difference, so they’ll just blame the eeeevil reichwingers if Obama can’t get his “bill” passed to counter the scotus decision. Classic rabble rousing.
Good evening everyone!
No, he was not a professor; he was an adjunct-faculty lecturer. That means that he was in the academic plebe class.
Allegedly, he was offered a tenure-track position, but he turned it down so as not to deny his talents to the nation at large.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
And what good would a tenure-track job be to michlele’s children anyway?
So much for the smarter than thou Constitutional lawyer. Did this guy actually graduate from Harvard or anywhere else? Kindergarten does not count.
Mark Levin, a bona fide Constitutional expert is talking about it now.
When zero fails to win or steal the next election, I would love to see the look on michele’s face. I would to hear what she has to say to him, cus I have a sneaking suspicion who really wears the pants in that family.
Obama a professor? uh huh.
When I was a grad student I was an assistant instructor and taught “Computers in Society”, a 100 level class. Does that make me a former Sociology Professor?
vagabond trader wrote:
Ah levin, one of those right wing Jews Obama said was causing all the trouble ha?
@ father_of_10:
Given the skimpy professional pedigree of Hussein,you should be running for president in 2012.
How come we’ve heard nary a peep from his former students?
I read the case. Sounds like BHO did not. It does not say this at all. The disclosure requirements have been upheld and the decision never reached the issue of foreign donations.
Boggles the mind that the libs refuse to see this a free-speech victory.
@ citizen_q:
or classmates.
citizen_q wrote:
Great question.
@ citizen_q:
He threatened to come back and fail them.
buy ammo
I’ve been reading Judge Dee mysteries the last few days, and this is one time I’d like to see the Tang Dynasty contempt-of-court laws apply!
@ calcajun:
Foreign based corporate donations were prohibited before and after the decision.Nothing to do with this case,therefore the comment of opening the floodgates to foreign money untrue as presented by the genius in chief.
What the Court did is what the Court does they interpret the law according to their own personal biases, hopefully actually following the Constitution.
Interesting though is that this only bothers a New Leftist when the decision is against their liking.
Funny how they accuse, in different words, the Court as being activist when they vote against their policies, but embrace completely a horribly legally incorrect decision such as “Roe v Wade”.
As the left likes to say “Slavery was long held law too…”
Beck has a picture of him at a blackboard (I hope that isn’t racist), where it looks like he is lecturing on Cloward-Piven, or something similar.
@ citizen_q:
Yuh, I remember that pic, it was something to do with social justice.
The commanding officer of Naval Weapons Station Charleston, S.C., was arrested Tuesday and accused of trying to pay a prostitute $20 for oral sex, police said.
Capt. Glen Little, 55, was immediately relieved of command and reassigned to administrative duties with Navy Region Southeast, said Scott Bassett, a spokesman for the Navy base.
Gee the HOs down there really should raise their prices.
vagabond trader wrote:
Nothing quite as good as a convenient straw-man.
@ Nevergiveup:
Humiliating enough, but 20 bucks? Ewwwwwwwwwww!
It’s crack ho city down there.
Nevergiveup wrote:
Doesn’t he know you can only do that as POTUS?
vagabond trader wrote:
Yeah I mean a Captain really ought to be able to go uptown and all
Uptown Girl
@ citizen_q:
Funny, I had strawman in there but erased it, not sure if it applied.
Also, we still don’t know where Barry received his three quarters of a billion in campaign donations from.iirc there was a lucrative phone bank set up in Gazastan at some point.
GrandJunctionite wrote:
Gimme crack ho’s, and I don’t care
Gimme crack ho’s, and I don’t care
Gimme crack ho’s, and I don’t care
That’s how I’ll spend my pay…
@ Bayonet:
That would have involved a $20.00 pizza.
I’ve not heard this brought up before but, FWIW, Obama resides between boomers and gen x. Are all boomers leftist dolts? Of course not. Are gen x tools all South Park tools? Of course not.
It seems that tea party folks are middle to older types who fled from the kool aid….
Since Wee has come along, the office of the Presidency has been diminished.Clown hotel. The Nobel prize,diminished.Though that was diminished long ago. The office of the Presidency always demanded the highest respect. no more. No more from Americans and no more from other countries. Now the Supreme Court.
Here is a real Law Prof who get’s it. Someone here linked to her last week.
“Isn’t it fascinating that the lengthy, amplified, magnified speech of the most powerful man in the world with his big captive audience — in the magnificent room and in smaller rooms all over the country — are outweighed by one man’s headshake and silent mouthing of 2 or 3 words? And isn’t it ironic that, right when we saw the judge’s minimalist expression that overwhelmed the President’s torrent of words, Obama was railing about the ‘powerful interests’ and that would use their great wealth to speak far too much during election campaigns?”
Althouse
@ vagabond trader:
Projection
The dems are only 2 trick ponies.
mooslimbs as well.
I read something yesterday that someone had quoted about Obama that I think fit beautifully:
Cool is to competence as words are to deeds…
vagabond trader wrote:
or fellow lecturers
or friends
or anyone . . . for that matter
Where is Rodan?
http://www.weaselzippers.net/.a/6a00e008c6b4e588340120a81fd2a5970b-pi
Obama crossesd a very dangerous line attempting to intimidate the Supreme Court.
He taught Constitutional law & knows or should know that passing a law does not trump a court ruling based on the Constitution.
He reminds me of the deposed President of Honduras in this case, attcking the Court & Costitution.
I now think that he is more dangerous than I did before.
calcajun wrote:
Obama is a LIAR.
@ chickadee:
Astonishing how little there is, eh?
@ RIX:
I donno, I thought Pelosi was in it for dissing the CIA, and it looks like she got away with it scott free.
Perhaps he felt lucky?
I wonder if his above the fray ,aloof coolness just means he doesn’t get it?
@ RIX:
Wreckless and inept never ends up good.
More on O’s phonyness. Those of us (and I know there are some) that are Vets and have used the GI Bill heads up.
On Saturday Jan. 23, VA posted the following letter on their website. Although the letter is light on details, one thing is clear, those of us who received the “cash advance” on our GI Bill payments will soon begin paying VA back as the it begins “recovering” the advance payments.
Time to pay the VA Back
@ vagabond trader:
I can’t believe there is no girlfriend willing to tell all.
If the Republicans make a camppaign issue out of it Obama may pay in the midterms.
They should run the footage with his own words & then say something like “Mr. President have you know respect for Seperation of Powers & Rule of Law?”
RIX wrote:
And railing on and on about evil bankers.
What’s next? Blaming everything on cosmic rays sent by the Jooooooos?
The vote in MA is the tempalte,neuter the guy & make him a lame duck, one termer.
RIX wrote:
There might have been. Cept it was not a girl. Remember the murdered choir director in GD America’s church? All the stink about that just disappeared.
I believe he gets it.He is just not going to live by it. He is an arrogant in your face spoiled by the people around him,especially the msm. snowcrash wrote:
GrandJunctionite wrote:
Hey tell Obama to forgive those loans ha?
@ vagabond trader:
Thats a great pic. I can’t wait for the day.
Probably, because it can’t be his fault.
wolfie wrote:
I guess that I am very paranoid, because I keep waiting for that other shoe to drop.
This is scary stuff. Obama is acting like Hugo Chavez.
@ Nevergiveup:
“We will do everything to ensure our brave men and women in uniform get the benefits they deserve”
Now pay up fuckers.
@ GrandJunctionite:
Zip comes up with some classic “fake but accurate” stuff.
@ wolfie:
and your first clue was..?
Even in fawning articles abt. Zero there is little mention of actual people who knew him in the past or specific facts abt. his life, activities and accomplishments. Zero is a vague generality wrapped in a platitude.
He apparently always was.
snowcrash wrote:
That is a good one. Inquiring minds want to know.
Krauthhammer on Fox just said the big O could never admit being wrong. He’s my hero!
@ RIX:
The wind is at our back. he will be a lame duck in 10 months.
Faster please.
Just read at HotAir this Administration does not support the 9/11 health bill. Holy cow.
A lot like him. He is now Comrade Che Hussein.
Let the spending freeze commence. Might of known that skank Sebelius was involved.
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/28/wow-white-house-opposes-funding-health-bill-for-911-victims/
Rodan wrote:
He knows we know thats why he supported Zelaya.
Krauthammer just called Zero a scoundrel!
@ snowcrash:
or boyfriend. He is the post modern post American metrosexual potus.
GrandJunctionite wrote:
FREE education is the least they owe the fighting Men and Women of this country. COMPLETELY FREE!
Given the way Obama’s donation website had the basic software for receiving online donations altered so that repeated donations which might be over the limit, and foreign donations which are not allowed, could be received and processed without triggering the appropriate responses, his sounding the alarm about foreign donations—even if it were true—is the very nadir of hypocrisy.
RIX wrote:
RODAN AS WELL.
Now that I am shut out, if it is still there, someone really should put together that New Left thread I was working on.
Of course Obama would act like Castro, Chavez, et al, they are all cut from the same Soviet “new left” cloth.
He has learned nothing & just displays his disrespect for the will of the people. The Dems bet a loser.
@ citizen_q:
CK is the man. He and VDH are top notch.
CK got a once a week segment on O’reilly. That moves Oreilly up a notch with me.
That is absolutely true.
GrandJunctionite wrote:
I can’t move him up because he still gives that babbling moron Mark Lamont Hill a platform.
Yep, money to bribe taliban informers,rebuild Iraq infrastructure and rebuild Haiti, but no money for folks getting sick from their service at Ground Zero.
@ GrandJunctionite:
Mark Steyn belongs in their company imho.
The Hammer rules!
@ RIX:
Obama = Zelayla
The picture is getting clearer. Obama thinks he can trump the Constitution and courts.
@ snowcrash:
Don’t forget the billions a show trial near Ground Zero is likely to cost.
@ Grimcargo:
Hill exposes himself for the commie he is though. I can’t stand Bill O’qwack talking about his ratings all night.
I love how Zero got openly laughed at when he tried to push the GW hoax last night.
@ GrandJunctionite:
Seeing your nic, reminds me of several visits in and around Grand Junction, Montrose and Ouray. Good times.
He is a grinning, fast talking fool.
I am a lawyer. First, Zero got it flat out wrong. Foreign corps cannot make contributions. Second, Zero took an oath to uphold the Constitution. Members of Congress do the same. Thus, they have a duty to refuse to enact unconstitutional laws. It’s not that hard to figure out. Third, the Supreme Court was there out of respect and Zero was petty and small in comparison. Just wait until the Supremes have an opportunity to respond.
He’s a total bum.
I believe that, but he can’t control the military imo.
He’s still getting away with it. The MSM still has his back.
Say, when is Chris Matthews going to be fired? Isn’t that what is called for by the prissy thought police?
Later gators
@ chickadee:
Wish we knew who was chortling and if there were any Ds.It was great, a beautiful thing.
vagabond trader wrote:
I agree
RIX wrote:
But you can find him easy in the dark.He has some teeth George Washington would have died for.
JohnH wrote:
No class
@ citizen_q:
This is home for me forever. I have traveled the world with the USMC and they will bury me here.
@ JohnH:
Simply and well stated.
calcajun wrote:
Because libs are only for free speech when it is theirs, not any that opposes them.
@ citizen_q:
yes. Steyn also. CK calling the O a Scoundrel is an all time classic I will remember.
wolfie wrote:
Wasn’t he an ass for saying that Zero’s speech was so good for a while he forgot Zero was black.
wtf? Talk abt. low expectations for black people. The leftists are such racist scum.
GrandJunctionite wrote:
Well don’t leave us to soon now. We need all the support and votes we can get.
Yabba Dabba Do time in the mountains.
Adios Amigos
vagabond trader wrote:
Incredible that Zero is so special he thinks he can still use the hoax for cap-n-tax.
citizen_q wrote:
Grand Mesa. Absolutely unique place to visit. Colorado is the best place you can go without an ocean, IMO.
RIX wrote:
…I have (had?) a bunch of information saved as WrathofG-d, but cannot access it now.
It shows the connections between the “Progressive” policies of today, and how they really are a rehasing of the Soviet induced “new Left” ideas out of the 1960s transferred by organizations such as the SDS, and its splinter groups including the Weather Underground and their splinter groups. (including Dohrn, Ayers, and other “mao” supporters)
Convince Rodan to put it together and get it out. Its quite eye opening and shows that all this “random” Progressive ideas are all part of a larger SDS and “new left” plan.
chickadee wrote:
Matthews said that? On the air? And he’s not being canned for making swinish racist utterances?
Astounding.
@ Bayonet:
Is it in draft?
@ Bayonet:
Oh I am!
Rodan wrote:
It is in super duper draft. The outline is there. It just needs to be put together.
@ Bayonet:
Don’t you think you are being manipulative?
GrandJunctionite wrote:
That is wonderful, enjoy it all.
My only regret in my visits is not topping out Mt. Sneffels from Yankeeboy basin.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Here it is
snowcrash wrote:
Is that a joke?
@ Bayonet:
Will do, I almost hit upon it in My 3rd World Liberation Thread. So this is definitely up my alley.
citizen_q wrote:
1 MILLION UPDINGS!
@ GrandJunctionite:
Da Hammer has teh gravitas.
JohnH wrote:
Yes it is. They have some biiiig mosquitoes up there!
@ Bayonet:
Nope, Why don’t you wait to hear what savage has to say instead of trying to air all the dirty laundry like you have in the last few posts? You are without pride? You have plenty of support, but you are acting like a whiney baby.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Yes. It was even on Yahoo headlines, so it should be easy to find.
(It think Gateway Pundit or Ace had the clip.)
@ Nevergiveup:
That’s grotesque.
wolfie wrote:
I just posted it
Mark Levin is on a roll. Hilarious.
I don’t think Zero is going to be able to stick us with the jihadi trials in lower Manhattan. Bloomberg is still waiting on Holder to call him back today to discuss keeping the vermin out. Gov. Paterson is against it too. There is no reason to bring these scum to NYC, except for Zero’s love of muzz murderers and what he can get from them to hurt Pres. Bush.
This shows what Zero would put American citizens through to tarnish others.
@ chickadee:
I think it was Boehner who said this fiasco will not be funded by congress. Hope not.
@ Nevergiveup:
I’m always slow!
@ Nevergiveup:
I am also astounded at Matthews whinging about how the Republicans are staying solid and refusing to pass Obamacare. Well, yeah—because it’s a bonehead idea from start to finish! You don’t go “bipartisan” on a truly crappy idea; you try and stop it.
Matthews saying that Obama was willing to take on the trial lawyers for tort reform was a real howler.
chickadee wrote:
Some Military base that is isolated and away from preying eyes and all them constitutional constrainst would be ideal. Kinda like, well GITMO
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
If he were any more in the bag, he’d be made out of burlap
Considering the fact that Obama likely took in about $250 million in illegal foreign contributions to his own campaign, he has a lot of nerve raising the issue of foreign money in politics.
On another note, I see the left is upset because he only promised to “work with Congress” to end the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, instead of just issuing some sort of royal decree or something.
These folks have an interesting view of the law…
@ vagabond trader:
I that is true, if might force zero to hit up the puppet master, money bags soros.
Nevergiveup wrote:
And then hang the confessed killers.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
It is not as if he said it on a network that is actually watched. I could go out on my front steps and shout though the neighborhood and be heard by more people.
snowcrash wrote:
Your comment is noted. As for Savage, he has had his opportunity to speak his mind (he was on the thread a bit ago), and has stated that it is his desire to compose a thread using personal e-mails. I can let it go here for a bit, you are right about that, but the way things are going, I wouldn’t be surprised if I was locked out for good when “his side” goes up, so I am trying to use the “air waves” when I still can.
I would also add I guess that since I know I am being 100% honest about the whole thing, I don’t have to wait to see what Savage has to say insofar that there is NO EXCUSE for what he did. He doesn’t have the right to ban anyone on his own, especially Admins! We, the Admins have had this discussion numerous times, and he continuously flaunts the agreements.
This is LGF crap that the Blogmocracy specifically rejected!
I hear you though, and will try to drop it for now – I get a bit passionate!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I think Obama plans to pursue tort reform right after building those nuclear power plants. Yup!
@ lobo91:
Obama also outsourced Campaign Calls to Gaza.
lobo91 wrote:
Are they gonna issue pink ribbons for all those who come out? Is that a “surface warfare” pin your wearing. No that’s my “decorating” pin? It’s gonna be a whole new Army I think?
lobo91 wrote:
I’m frankly not up on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”—but it is highly probable that as Commander-in-Chief he could issue an executive order and change the policy himself.
If that is the case, then the “work with Congress” line is a way of dodging his own responsibility and the consequences of his actions.
Nevergiveup @ 22:
Maybe the CO should find a better class of HOs, like Spitzer or Tiger.
Nevergiveup wrote:
“Curtains would do wonders for this barracks. You will not get them.”
–Commandant of Stalag 17 in the film of that name
Beltfed wrote:
Well on a 06 salary, those HO’s he can’t afford!
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I’m of the opinion that if Президент Оба́ма actually had the balls to rescind DADT by way of Executive Order…there would be a massive wave of non-reenlistments on the part of the enlisted folks…and outright resignations of commissions by the officers.
Macker wrote:
Nah. Besides the State of the economy, most are more dedicated than that.
@ Bayonet:
There is NO ONE here who agrees with stealth bannings and wiping comments. Savage will get that message from me and many others.
Macker wrote:
Possibly. Those more familiar with the military than I can speak to that.
I’m merely observing that his feints towards ending DADT were no more convincing than his strangled endorsement of building nuclear plants, domestic drilling, etc.; he was trying to placate an angry constituency while leaving himself wiggle room for selling out on what he had promised them.
@ Bayonet:
Wrath/Bayonet: email me when you get a chance.
@ Bayonet:
I’ve got this information in email. I can’t see other people’s drafts on the admin pages because I’m only a contributor, but I have everything you had put together as of several days ago when you sent it to me.
If we can stop bringing all the stuff about this internal problem up on the blog, I’ll write it up myself (even though it’s a LOT of stuff and more like a term paper than a post).
Please stop bringing up the internal conflict!!!
I’m begging Savage to stop it, too.
I will write up this post myself if you both take the conflict private!
Deal?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Sometimes DADT and Domestic Drilling are related….. no?
@ snowcrash:
Seconded
Truck Monkey wrote:
It is good insight into these libs who are such racist scum. I wonder how Zero feels abt. Chrissy’s slur.
Oh wait. . . . he’ll be fine with it. Just like he was fine with Biden’s condescending racist statements.
And Dingy Harry’s stupid ugly words. It must be awful for Zero to have to eat that bitter crap just to keep up appearances.
@ Eliana:
If we’re all making deals here, I’d like the new Apple I-Pad?
@ snowcrash:
Snowcrash,
Thank you. You have actually helped me gain a bit of scope with this whole thing. I get passionate, and often do no know when enough is enough. I thank you for helping me see the bigger picture here. I will let it go for today, and continue to hope that these issues, and the unnecessary drama will just go away, and never be repeated.
Seriously, thank you for speaking up and being honest!
@ chickadee:
Next thing you know Bill Clinton will be ordering him to get coffee. Oh wait……
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Nope. It’s federal law.
vagabond trader wrote:
He’d probably spit in it. Oh wait his name isn’t Jesse……
@ Eliana:
Why not? Posts have been altered. They need to be unaltered asap and no thread posted specifically on this full of explanations I don’t want to hear.
@ Eliana:
I hear you all loud and clear. I’m done with this in public for now. I have a few e-mails out to Savage and hopefully instead of posting the “Wrath Sucks” post, he will contact me and we can handle this like adults.
I need to let it go.
@ Nevergiveup:
I want one, too!
@ chickadee:
My guess is that he has been eating it most of his life. The paternalistic crap dished by the liberal elite is galling on its face. I’ve seen the soft bigotry of low expectations played out numerous times in my life. I always wondered what those on the receiving end thought about it but was always afraid to ask.
@ Nevergiveup:
That was the main topic of discussion this morning, while people were waiting for class to start.
Well, that, and what a bunch of crap the speech was in general.
The Pentagon will unveil steps next week that the military will take to lay the ground for a repeal of its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, which permits gays to serve in uniform as long they hide their sexual orientation, officials said on Thursday.
Shit I’ll probably have to take a mandatory course on this bullshit!!!!!
vagabond trader wrote:
I’ll take mine with cream, no sugar. Well. . . . oh no, I have to be a lib to say that.
LOL
Eliana wrote:
Well wait for the G-3 Model due out in April
Bayonet wrote:
Best wishes to work it out, Wrath. That would be good.
@ waldensianspirit:
Well, I don’t think the posts can be altered back in the way you’re suggesting. I think they were altered because Wrath is no longer an admin.
He should definitely get credit for his work, so perhaps they can be given his name in another way or something. There’s no way to put his name on them if he isn’t at least a contributor (if not an admin).
This is something the admins can work out.
I don’t think the whole year’s worth of interactions should become a topic. It would be simple enough to give Wrath credit without returning him to admin status (if this is part of the resolution).
Anyway, I’m closing up about all this now, too.
I’ll work on the term paper post from Wrath’s notes.
His notes on all this are excellent, by the way.
lobo91 wrote:
Thanks for clarifying.
@ Nevergiveup:
Just spoke with a gay guy friend about this. He is offended at Hussein pandering to gays lol.
@ Nevergiveup:
Absolutely!!
I’ve been waiting years for this thing to come out.
I have a special situation where the iPad will be perfect for me!
@ chickadee:
No deary,were you a libralit would be a double soy latte with a splenda and a dash of whipped cream.
vagabond trader wrote:
Anyone can tell the difference between a powerful politician placating a valued constituency and a wounded politician desperately whoring after support by blatant pandering.
Not to worry Constitutional expert and unSpeakable of the House Nancy Pelosi will make sure the other commie “O” hole does not diss the Court ever again.
@ Eliana:
Of course they can. It’s a database. And it needs to be done asap.
My biggest beef with Charles Nodickens was altering data and history revision.
@ vagabond trader:
It’s an incredibly stupid idea.
I really doubt that there are all that many openly gay people who actually want to work in an environment where they are overwhelmingly unwelcome.
Religious discrimination in employment is illegal, too. Do you know many Jews who are interested in getting a job at a mosque, just because the law says they can?
@ taxfreekiller:
unSpeakable of the House. Heh.
Truck Monkey wrote:
Normal people resent it. Only opportunists will swallow such degradation in order to get ahead.
Zero is a person with no character. No substance. He is an amorphous blob of desperation.
OK, say this went down.
Glen Beck ask the 4 liberal members of the court on his show,
at the same time he has say Dick Cheney on with them,,,,
then they both live on TV tells them how they feels about Roe V Wade.
How would Chris Mathews and the NYT view that?
@ chickadee:
Anyone who can lie so effortlessly knowing we can fact check him is pathological imho.
vagabond trader wrote:
He’s never been called on it before
@ chickadee:
A malignant narcisist. Dangerous to the core.
Nevergiveup @ 107:
Good grief, open shot, the three caballeros.
Beltfed wrote:
Amazing they are still on the air ha?
#169 chickadee
It must be awful for Zero to have to eat that bitter crap just to keep up appearances.
Zero is a racist biggot himself, so he is within his comfort zone. Anyone who can stomach Rev. Wrights hate speeches for 20 years can probably condition themselves to smile for the camera while hating within me thinks.
@ vagabond trader:
@ Truck Monkey:
@ Nevergiveup:
True does not reside in his soul.
I dunno, this makes it sound like all you really need to do is hold an iPod real close to your face (to make it look bigger) to get the same effect:
The Meme That Will Never Die: Hitler Debunks The iPad
[...] Contempt of Court › 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]