First time visitor? Learn more.

Liberal Hate Speech

by Speranza ( 160 Comments › )
Filed under Hate Speech, Media at February 5th, 2010 - 1:00 pm

It is funny how during Bush’s time in office that dissent was called “the highest form of patriotism”, now it is called subverting the nation and trying to weaken the president.  They feel that The One should be beyond reproach and that like good little citizens of  oh say North Korea – we need to be singing the praises of The Great Leader. I think we need to out Alinsky them and ratchet up the legitimate criticism of Obama’s failed and failing policies.

by  James Dietrich

When Sarah Palin made Rahm Emanuel’s expletive-enhanced use of the word “retarded” an embarrassment for him and the president, she forced the left to live up to its own P.C. standards. Saul Alinsky would be proud.

Normally, according to the media elites’ rulebook, when liberals rant, it’s called free speech; when conservatives rant, it is hate speech.

Members of the media elite appear to sincerely believe that liberals are less vitriolic than conservatives, and through repetition they have convinced a large part of the public that this is true. The reason liberals can “rant” without fear of being labeled terrorists is that their “rants” are justified in the eyes of the media elite. Liberals believe that their beliefs are based on the rational analysis of scientific data. Their opponents’ beliefs are based on superstition and prejudice.

This perspective was exemplified by comedian Bill Maher, who explained that “half this country wants to guide our ship of state by a compass. A compass, something that works by science and rationality, and empirical wisdom. And half this country wants to kill a chicken and read the entrails like they used to do in the old Roman Empire.” Opponents of the liberal agenda are frequently described as “racist,” “unpatriotic,” and “ignorant.” Conservative “rants” are not only incorrect; they are evil. It is therefore not “hateful” to describe opponents for what they are: “ignorant, unpatriotic racists.”

Criticism of liberal administrations is seen as destroying public faith in our institutions, and in some cases, it is called dangerous. In the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing, Washington Post columnist David Broder opined, “The bombing shows how dangerous it really is to inflame twisted minds with statements that suggest political opponents are enemies.” During the Clinton administration, columnist Anthony Lewis criticized Rush Limbaugh, saying Limbaugh’s “game” was “to throw dirt on government and anyone who believes that society needs government. In his hateful talk about President and Mrs. Clinton and others in office, he is really trying to destroy public faith in our institutions.”

Recent criticisms of President Obama and his policies have been characterized as un-American. Suggestions that his policies should fail are equated with a suggestion that America should fail. This concern for American institutions may be something new, because it apparently was not a factor in the past. In 1986, Washington Post columnist William Raspberry commented on his view of the Reagan administration: “Ronald Reagan is in trouble, and [we might as well own up that] some of us are tempted to take a certain fiendish pleasure in the fact.” Later, Michael Kinsley of the New Republic wrote in the Washington Post, “The fall of Reagan is a laughable matter. The only irritating aspect of the otherwise delightful collapse of the Reagan administration is the widespread insistence that we must all be poker-faced about it.”

Read the rest: Liberal Hate Speech


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

160 Responses to “Liberal Hate Speech”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | February 5, 2010 1:10 pm

    Considering that liberals used the most vile language in describing, ridiculing and demonizing George W. Bush, it is comical to hear them denounce “hate speech”.


  2. 2 | February 5, 2010 1:12 pm

    @ Speranza:

    And incivility and partisanship. As though they weren’t the most uncivil hyper-partisans anywhere on the planet.


  3. Nikis Knight
    3 | February 5, 2010 1:17 pm

    Bill Mahr–too stupid and obscure to bother refuting.


  4. 4 | February 5, 2010 1:20 pm

    @ Nikis Knight:

    Who?


  5. spinmore
    5 | February 5, 2010 1:28 pm

    Liberals are assholes.

    (unfortunately I’ve got a fair number in my extended family – makes for some funny/awkward family get togethers)


  6. unclassifiable
    6 | February 5, 2010 1:28 pm

    So when you hear “we must return to civility” think “I don’t like what you are saying you big meanie”.

    And when you hear that “our thinking is guided by reason” think “we don’t accept your reasoning”.

    And when you here “we are doing it for the good of the people” think “we will hold a country hostage to get what we want”.


  7. coldwarrior
    7 | February 5, 2010 1:32 pm

    as soon as you hear a liberal use the terms ‘hate speech’ or ‘racist’ or ‘bigot’, und zu weiter. you have won the argument and are allowed at this point to kick them in the shins moe howard style.


  8. snork
    8 | February 5, 2010 1:33 pm

    spinmore wrote:

    Liberals are assholes.

    Pretty much.


  9. Speranza
    9 | February 5, 2010 1:33 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    And incivility and partisanship. As though they weren’t the most uncivil hyper-partisans anywhere on the planet.

    Of course a certain husky blogger likes to throw the term “hate” around rather promiscuously.


  10. vagabond trader
    10 | February 5, 2010 1:35 pm

    Haters has about as much bite as racist and climate deniers. Fck them.


  11. 11 | February 5, 2010 1:35 pm

    Sorry to go off topic.But someone called my attention to the frothing at the mouth idiots and now Im frothing at the mouth.

    Delusion held by one person is a mental illness, held by a few is a cult, held by many is a religion, the religion of LGF.
    That first sentence describes DarkFalcon bless his/her/it heart. Holds no self respect and unashamed to show it. Could such a person be permitted to walk around without a straitjacket. Does this person have living relatives? A wife? Would they puke if they could see what this sub human writes? Maybe not.

    38 Dark_Falcon Fri, Feb 5, 2010 10:44:10am replyquote 6

    down
    up
    report

    re: #22 ArchangelMichael

    The past of LGF is riddled with the carcasses of the damned banned who couldn’t keep up.

    Even most of The Banned have been better informed than the norm. It was usually their refusal to apply such knowledge and act decently that earned them the stick. Charles, in my experience, has always worked to give the ignorant here the knowledge they need to grow. It’s the assholes and the willfully ignorant who end up getting the heave-ho.


  12. goddessoftheclassroom
    12 | February 5, 2010 1:36 pm

    Good afternoon, y’all. It’s snowing here in Western PA.


  13. 13 | February 5, 2010 1:36 pm

    unclassifiable wrote:

    So when you hear “we must return to civility” think “I don’t like what you are saying you big meanie”.
    And when you hear that “our thinking is guided by reason” think “we don’t accept your reasoning”.
    And when you here “we are doing it for the good of the people” think “we will hold a country hostage to get what we want”.

    That’s also another term for UNCLE


  14. vagabond trader
    14 | February 5, 2010 1:37 pm

    @ Grimcargo:

    Anyone still over there needs an intervention. Above my pay grade.


  15. 15 | February 5, 2010 1:37 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    Good afternoon, y’all. It’s snowing here in Western PA.

    Hello Goddess..build a snowwoman lol


  16. 16 | February 5, 2010 1:37 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    ahhhh just more snowbal warming.


  17. vagabond trader
    17 | February 5, 2010 1:38 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Heard that from a friend in Eastern Ohio.

    Hi Goddess!


  18. 18 | February 5, 2010 1:39 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Considering that liberals used the most vile language in describing, ridiculing and demonizing George W. Bush, it is comical to hear them denounce “hate speech”.

    Speranza thank you for your thoughtfulness. I appreciate it very much.


  19. coldwarrior
    19 | February 5, 2010 1:39 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    Good afternoon, y’all. It’s snowing here in Western PA.

    it sure is!

    {goddess}


  20. snork
    20 | February 5, 2010 1:41 pm

    @ Grimcargo:
    Oh, Chucky pin a rose on me…


  21. citizen_q
    21 | February 5, 2010 1:42 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    We have global warming falling out of the sky at a brisk pace here in central Maryland as well.


  22. snork
    22 | February 5, 2010 1:43 pm

    @ Grimcargo:
    But Chuckles IS trying to walk back his libel against O’Keefe. The spin cycle is on overdrive.


  23. vagabond trader
    23 | February 5, 2010 1:44 pm

    My best ex friend, an “educated” libral,told me I drank the kool aide because I actually did research on the jokester and co. prior to election.Talk about offensive.


  24. Guggi
    24 | February 5, 2010 1:47 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Sorry for OT but related to your posting in the previsious thread ;-)

    Dr. K is rally amazing. A psychiatrist by training, he turned his keenly analytical mind to commentary after he became paralyzed in a diving accident.

    Dr. K. was a trained political scientist before he attended Narvard Medical School:

    Krauthammer was born on March 13, 1950 in New York City.[3][4] He was raised in Montreal, Canada where he attended Herzliah High School and McGill University and obtained an honors degree in political science and economics in 1970. From 1970 to 1971, he was a Commonwealth Scholar in politics at Balliol College, Oxford. He later moved to the United States, where he attended Harvard Medical School.


  25. Nikis Knight
    25 | February 5, 2010 1:49 pm

    @ Grimcargo:

    It was usually their refusal to apply such knowledge and act decently that earned them the stick. Charles, in my experience, has always worked to give the ignorant here the knowledge they need to grow.

    So long as they trust in him fully and do not look elsewhere, for yea do all others seek to turn you from the path of truth and reason, yea even unto the vile creationism and birtherism and denial of the very climate that is the dear embrace of mother gaia. Amen.

    … hmmm, I sorta drifted liturgical there.


  26. taxfreekiller
    26 | February 5, 2010 1:49 pm

    Ya and big time poster there ludwigged out is such a prize, yet I sort of understand Charels not banning Ludwiggedout, that would not be a safe thing to do IMHO. Ludwigged is nuts.

    Dark Falcon is just a run of the mill ass kisser, Ludwigged, now that is bat shit crazy there.@ Grimcargo:


  27. wolfie
    27 | February 5, 2010 1:49 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    to give the ignorant here the knowledge they need to grow.

    Aaaaaaaaauuuuuuughhhh! :D
    Guru and the cult-members!


  28. Nevergiveup
    28 | February 5, 2010 1:52 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    Sorry to go off topic.But someone called my attention to the frothing at the mouth idiots and now Im frothing at the mouth.

    Delusion held by one person is a mental illness, held by a few is a cult, held by many is a religion, the religion of LGF.
    That first sentence describes DarkFalcon bless his/her/it heart. Holds no self respect and unashamed to show it. Could such a person be permitted to walk around without a straitjacket. Does this person have living relatives? A wife? Would they puke if they could see what this sub human writes? Maybe not.

    38 Dark_Falcon Fri, Feb 5, 2010 10:44:10am replyquote 6

    down
    up
    report

    re: #22 ArchangelMichael

    The past of LGF is riddled with the carcasses of the damned banned who couldn’t keep up.

    Even most of The Banned have been better informed than the norm. It was usually their refusal to apply such knowledge and act decently that earned them the stick. Charles, in my experience, has always worked to give the ignorant here the knowledge they need to grow. It’s the assholes and the willfully ignorant who end up getting the heave-ho.

    I’m at a lose for words…ah just kidding, no I’m not:: Hey pal go fuck yourself you ignorant liberal slob.


  29. coldwarrior
    29 | February 5, 2010 1:52 pm

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:
    It was usually their refusal to apply such knowledge and act decently that earned them the stick. Charles, in my experience, has always worked to give the ignorant here the knowledge they need to grow.
    So long as they trust in him fully and do not look elsewhere, for yea do all others seek to turn you from the path of truth and reason, yea even unto the vile creationism and birtherism and denial of the very climate that is the dear embrace of mother gaia. Amen.
    … hmmm, I sorta drifted liturgical there.

    VERILY!!! PREACHETH IT, BROTHER!


  30. goddessoftheclassroom
    30 | February 5, 2010 1:54 pm

    @ citizen_q:
    Where in central Maryland? I grew up in Anne Arundel County.


  31. 31 | February 5, 2010 1:54 pm

    You know, I must say that I have over the years been greatly disappointed in the lack of overt butt-kissing, and fawning adulation of the Admins here…

    Where are our expression of undying allegiance, and written testaments to our infallible greatness?

    Don’t you know how amazing we are, and how impossible it is to run a blog, and only by the grace of Science are we able to get this perfect result to you peons?

    /


  32. wolfie
    32 | February 5, 2010 1:55 pm

    @ citizen_q:

    About 8 inches here in SW Va overnight and through the day. Looks like it will either snow or sneet tomorrow too.

    I wonder how much global warming they got in eastern Va.
    Vapig said they were forecasting as much as two feet in the DC area. Yikes.


  33. coldwarrior
    33 | February 5, 2010 1:56 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:

    :lol:


  34. RIX
    34 | February 5, 2010 1:56 pm

    My how acceptable speech changes with a Progressive in the White House. Policies not supported by BHO & the Progressives are “unamerican”. If you oppose him , then you are “unamerican”
    Remember when the Left opposed everything that Bush did even when it jepordized our troops & screamed “Don’t question my patriotism!”


  35. coldwarrior
    35 | February 5, 2010 1:57 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ citizen_q:
    About 8 inches here in SW Va overnight and through the day. Looks like it will either snow or sneet tomorrow too.
    I wonder how much global warming they got in eastern Va.
    Vapig said they were forecasting as much as two feet in the DC area. Yikes.

    so i guess we in sw pa are going to get pretty much the same as what y’all got.


  36. Nevergiveup
    36 | February 5, 2010 1:57 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    Anne Arundel County.

    Is that anywhere near Apple Strudel County


  37. citizen_q
    37 | February 5, 2010 1:57 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:
    Frederick, or as my brother calls it Fredneck. :)

    I grew up in Southern P.G. County.


  38. myselfandi
    38 | February 5, 2010 1:58 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Ya and big time poster there ludwigged out is such a prize, yet I sort of understand Charels not banning Ludwiggedout, that would not be a safe thing to do IMHO. Ludwigged is nuts.
    Dark Falcon is just a run of the mill ass kisser, Ludwigged, now that is bat shit crazy there.@ Grimcargo:

    Ludwiggs being allowed to stay is why I left – no flouncing, no flibbertygibbiting. Just left the room.


  39. snork
    39 | February 5, 2010 1:59 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    Aaaaaaaaauuuuuuughhhh! :D
    Guru and the cult-members!

    1.0: where you don’t know whether to laugh or scream.


  40. Nikis Knight
    40 | February 5, 2010 1:59 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Wrath, I thought your penmanship has been improving quite steadily.
    And Coldwarrior has damn near perfect attendance.

    /


  41. snork
    41 | February 5, 2010 1:59 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    VERILY!!! PREACHETH IT, BROTHER!

    D’oheth!


  42. myselfandi
    42 | February 5, 2010 1:59 pm

    RIX wrote:

    My how acceptable speech changes with a Progressive in the White House. Policies not supported by BHO & the Progressives are “unamerican”. If you oppose him , then you are “unamerican”
    Remember when the Left opposed everything that Bush did even when it jepordized our troops & screamed “Don’t question my patriotism!”

    wrong. Unamerican and Racist damn it. never forget the racist.


  43. unclassifiable
    43 | February 5, 2010 2:00 pm

    @ Grimcargo:

    DON’T DRINK THE KOOLAID!!!!!!!!

    …because you can tell that is being served up next.


  44. coldwarrior
    44 | February 5, 2010 2:00 pm

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Wrath, I thought your penmanship has been improving quite steadily.
    And Coldwarrior has damn near perfect attendance.
    /

    wooohoooo!!! i get a gold star!


  45. snork
    45 | February 5, 2010 2:01 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    You know, I must say that I have over the years been greatly disappointed in the lack of overt butt-kissing, and fawning adulation of the Admins here…
    Where are our expression of undying allegiance, and written testaments to our infallible greatness?
    Don’t you know how amazing we are, and how impossible it is to run a blog, and only by the grace of Science are we able to get this perfect result to you peons?
    /

    Let us now bow our heads and meditate to the great M…
    MMM…MMM…MMM…


  46. 46 | February 5, 2010 2:01 pm

    @ Nikis Knight:

    :P

    /

    now a thread interlude…


  47. chickadee
    47 | February 5, 2010 2:02 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Haters has about as much bite as racist and climate deniers. Fck them.

    Yeah, what’s wrong with ‘hate?’ I hate them. I’ll say it.
    And what they are trying to do is vile and evil and I hate that too.
    fck em.


  48. unclassifiable
    48 | February 5, 2010 2:02 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:

    I have Monty Python/Terry Gilliam visions of a 21 butt horn salute.


  49. Crashnburn01
    49 | February 5, 2010 2:02 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    Sorry to go off topic.But someone called my attention to the frothing at the mouth idiots and now Im frothing at the mouth.
    Delusion held by one person is a mental illness, held by a few is a cult, held by many is a religion, the religion of LGF.
    That first sentence describes DarkFalcon bless his/her/it heart. Holds no self respect and unashamed to show it. Could such a person be permitted to walk around without a straitjacket. Does this person have living relatives? A wife? Would they puke if they could see what this sub human writes? Maybe not.
    38 Dark_Falcon Fri, Feb 5, 2010 10:44:10am replyquote 6
    down
    up
    report
    re: #22 ArchangelMichael
    The past of LGF is riddled with the carcasses of the damned banned who couldn’t keep up.
    Even most of The Banned have been better informed than the norm. It was usually their refusal to apply such knowledge and act decently that earned them the stick. Charles, in my experience, has always worked to give the ignorant here the knowledge they need to grow. It’s the assholes and the willfully ignorant who end up getting the heave-ho.

    Thank goodness the LGF types have the Husky One ™ to explain how and what to think. It makes their lives so much easier. And he would have no reason to steer them down the wrong road. I mean he wouldn’t point them towards certain books which might have a higher payout to him at a certain on-line retailer because it benefited him personally, would he?


  50. RIX
    50 | February 5, 2010 2:02 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:
    But Chuckles IS trying to walk back his libel against O’Keefe. The spin cycle is on overdrive.

    What is he saying?


  51. myselfandi
    51 | February 5, 2010 2:03 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    You know, I must say that I have over the years been greatly disappointed in the lack of overt butt-kissing, and fawning adulation of the Admins here…
    Where are our expression of undying allegiance, and written testaments to our infallible greatness?
    Don’t you know how amazing we are, and how impossible it is to run a blog, and only by the grace of Science are we able to get this perfect result to you peons?
    /

    I ordered three burgers and two fries, not two fries and three burgers.


  52. 52 | February 5, 2010 2:04 pm

    unclassifiable wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I have Monty Python/Terry Gilliam visions of a 21 butt horn salute.

    ha! quite appropriate. hot air for hot air.


  53. snork
    53 | February 5, 2010 2:05 pm

    RIX wrote:

    What is he saying?

    There’s a thread in the kitty, but if you don’t want to wait, put a proxy condom on, and go look.


  54. vagabond trader
    54 | February 5, 2010 2:05 pm

    Completely concur. When they start with the ad hominems throw the rubbish back at the demonrat scum.Too much is at stake for nicey nice debate and staying on the defensive the next three years.


  55. kansas
    55 | February 5, 2010 2:06 pm

    RIX wrote:

    snork wrote:
    @ Grimcargo:
    But Chuckles IS trying to walk back his libel against O’Keefe. The spin cycle is on overdrive.

    What is he saying?

    Looks to me like he’s saying O’Keefe is a White Supremacist, but I can’t stand to read his crap for very long.


  56. taxfreekiller
    56 | February 5, 2010 2:06 pm

    I have three old socks left, I may just use one of them to get Ludwigged to make a unlawful threat on lgf’s .0001 just to see what Charles will do, Ludwigged could be a real danger and if I did provoke him to violence that would be a real bad thing, so could be best to leave him to rant and not poke the nut to much,

    thinking on it though@ myselfandi:


  57. vagabond trader
    57 | February 5, 2010 2:08 pm

    @ chickadee:

    Hey fellow hater, hows that fudge coming along? :D


  58. coldwarrior
    58 | February 5, 2010 2:09 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    I have three old socks left, I may just use one of them to get Ludwigged to make a unlawful threat on lgf’s .0001 just to see what Charles will do, Ludwigged could be a real danger and if I did provoke him to violence that would be a real bad thing, so could be best to leave him to rant and not poke the nut to much,
    thinking on it though@ myselfandi:

    it isnt nice to mess with the mentally ill. or the mentally challenged.

    (unless you get a screen shot)

    ;)


  59. Speranza
    59 | February 5, 2010 2:10 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    Grimcargo
    18 | February 5, 2010 1:39 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Considering that liberals used the most vile language in describing, ridiculing and demonizing George W. Bush, it is comical to hear them denounce “hate speech”.

    Speranza thank you for your thoughtfulness. I appreciate it very much.

    My pleasure, good to see you back


  60. goddessoftheclassroom
    60 | February 5, 2010 2:10 pm

    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?


  61. El Chupacabra
    61 | February 5, 2010 2:11 pm

    spinmore wrote:

    Liberals are assholes.
    (unfortunately I’ve got a fair number in my extended family – makes for some funny/awkward family get togethers)

    I had a really funny exchange, or perhaps sad come to think of it, with a full blown Obama is the Messiah friend of my wife. I was actually polite and knew she was a super lib so I didn’t even remotely bring up any political subject. But, she assumed that I must have been in a funk knowing that Obama was about to get elected and she couldn’t resist gloating.

    I let her go off on everything evil about Republicans. etc. (Of course she assumed I was a Republican never considering for a moment I was pretty disgusted with the reckless spending of the Bush administration and might not wear a Sean Hannity lapel pin to bed). Anyway, she kept pestering me about universal health care. So…I finally asked her.

    “What gives you the right to demand that I and/or your neighbors pay for your healthcare?”

    Honest, she didn’t understand. You see, it was the government paying for it don’t you know? No matter how hard I tried, she couldn’t grasp something so fundamental. She’s in her 20′s and is otherwise a seemingly normal and very attractive woman with a nice career.

    It was at that moment I knew Obama was going to kill McCain.


  62. RIX
    62 | February 5, 2010 2:12 pm

    <

    blockquote>snork wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    What is he saying?
    There’s a thread in the kitty, but if you don’t want to wait, put a proxy condom on, and go look.</blockquote

    >

    I was just over there. CJ is now saying that the photographer “Isis” confirms the story. Isis? How about a real name if you are smearing somebody.
    Chuck is now trying to make the story true


  63. Aladin Sane
    63 | February 5, 2010 2:13 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?

    Twice as much as two parts?


  64. chickadee
    64 | February 5, 2010 2:13 pm

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Obama-
    She-insisted-shes-going-to-be-buried-in-an-Obama-t-shirt-83645132.html

    Look at how low the Narcissist-n-Chief will go to steal the spot light.
    From a dead woman.


  65. Speranza
    65 | February 5, 2010 2:13 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    I have three old socks left, I may just use one of them to get Ludwigged to make a unlawful threat on lgf’s .0001 just to see what Charles will do, Ludwigged could be a real danger and if I did provoke him to violence that would be a real bad thing, so could be best to leave him to rant and not poke the nut to much,
    thinking on it though@ myselfandi:

    TFK – pick your time and place. I have two socks plus my original nic is still active.


  66. 66 | February 5, 2010 2:15 pm

    El Chupacabra wrote:

    “What gives you the right to demand that I and/or your neighbors pay for your healthcare?”

    Honest, she didn’t understand. You see, it was the government paying for it don’t you know? No matter how hard I tried, she couldn’t grasp something so fundamental. She’s in her 20’s and is otherwise a seemingly normal and very attractive woman with a nice career.

    I know this experience all too well, and you are 100% correct! This is EXACTLY the reason liberals are liberal – they don’t get it. They don’t see how their imposition of this or that (green tech, etc.) is really them arrogantly forcing others to live their lives the way they, the liberal, want the other to.

    Once you show them this however…and they understand it…a light seems to go on.


  67. Aladin Sane
    67 | February 5, 2010 2:15 pm

    @ Aladin Sane:
    D’oh! Half as much as two parts!


  68. Speranza
    69 | February 5, 2010 2:15 pm

    kansas wrote:

    Looks to me like he’s saying O’Keefe is a White Supremacist, but I can’t stand to read his crap for very long.

    Sort of like Rush Limbaugh may not have said what I accused him of saying but he has said plenty of racist things in the past blah blah blah.


  69. vagabond trader
    70 | February 5, 2010 2:15 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Depends on how many other parts there are and how snockered you want to get. :mrgreen:


  70. wolfie
    71 | February 5, 2010 2:16 pm

    Actually, LGF is very much ON topic when talking about the way the left “argues” with irrelevant smears while having grand pretentions of being logical.
    Not to mention the hysterical outburst when anyone dares to look at any site that is not on the master’s index of ideologically pure sources.


  71. coldwarrior
    72 | February 5, 2010 2:18 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?

    it means equla parts, what are you trying to make?


  72. coldwarrior
    73 | February 5, 2010 2:18 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:
    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?

    it means equla parts, what are you trying to make?

    stop.

    i misread that…ignore that post.


  73. Speranza
    74 | February 5, 2010 2:19 pm

    Crashnburn01 wrote:

    Thank goodness the LGF types have the Husky One ™ to explain how and what to think. It makes their lives so much easier. And he would have no reason to steer them down the wrong road. I mean he wouldn’t point them towards certain books which might have a higher payout to him at a certain on-line retailer because it benefited him personally, would he?

    Shouldn’t that guy/gal Dark_Falcon be out on a ledge somewhere?


  74. taxfreekiller
    75 | February 5, 2010 2:19 pm

    Isis

    Bill Clinton is the source?


  75. unclassifiable
    76 | February 5, 2010 2:19 pm

    @ El Chupacabra:
    @ WrathofG-d:

    This is willful ignorance. They will act like they don’t know the answer until there are enough people and arms to make “Eat the Rich” a reality.


  76. snork
    77 | February 5, 2010 2:20 pm

    kansas wrote:

    Looks to me like he’s saying O’Keefe is a White Supremacist, but I can’t stand to read his crap for very long.

    He’s trying to say that Breitbart can’t prove that O’Keefe isn’t a white supremacist, and Chucky says he never really said he was, but Weigel backpeddled, but Weigal might still be right, but (I think you get the idea)…


  77. coldwarrior
    78 | February 5, 2010 2:20 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?

    the funny part is that i have a post going up about cocktails at 1800est


  78. 79 | February 5, 2010 2:20 pm

    Is this thread open yet?


  79. Nevergiveup
    80 | February 5, 2010 2:20 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?

    Have you ever played poker?


  80. snork
    81 | February 5, 2010 2:21 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    I have three old socks left, I may just use one of them to get Ludwigged to make a unlawful threat on lgf’s .0001 just to see what Charles will do, Ludwigged could be a real danger and if I did provoke him to violence that would be a real bad thing, so could be best to leave him to rant and not poke the nut to much,
    thinking on it though@ myselfandi:

    Interesting how this ties in with the thread topic, isn’t it?


  81. goddessoftheclassroom
    82 | February 5, 2010 2:21 pm

    @ Aladin Sane:
    NOT helpful! :)


  82. coldwarrior
    83 | February 5, 2010 2:21 pm

    Aladin Sane wrote:

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:
    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?
    Twice as much as two parts?

    WOW!

    my kind of bartender!


  83. Speranza
    84 | February 5, 2010 2:21 pm

    @ Guggi:
    Krauthammer is such a joy to listen too on the Fox All Stars.


  84. wolfie
    85 | February 5, 2010 2:21 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:

    ROFLMAO ! :lol:


  85. unclassifiable
    86 | February 5, 2010 2:22 pm

    @ wolfie:

    It is not a blog anymore. It’s a vanity site. I am suggesting that may be the correct term for it now.


  86. 87 | February 5, 2010 2:23 pm

    …ever seen a grown man naked…..
    -Airplane


  87. RIX
    88 | February 5, 2010 2:23 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    I have never mixed a cocktail in my life. When the directions say, “One part,” how much is a part?

    I tended bar in college. Great gig, free drinks & even on dates, but I digress.
    1.5 parts is a shot, so equal parts would be another shot of whatever.
    Four parts mixer is four shots.
    Fortunately in a college bar they would drink absolutely anything,
    so I weas not real fussy about the measures.


  88. vagabond trader
    89 | February 5, 2010 2:23 pm

    @ chickadee:

    Dear G-d where to start.OK,what a pos this potus is.Using the death of one of his campaign workers to embellish his hellcare agenda?? How about why didn’t you, with all your ill gotten gains,including the Nobel winnings and that fat campaign chest,fork out a few bucks to help this stricken woman? Oh yeah, then you would not have been able to use an inappropriate tale in such a grotesque pitch. Barf, what a creature!


  89. snork
    90 | February 5, 2010 2:23 pm

    RIX wrote:

    I was just over there. CJ is now saying that the photographer “Isis” confirms the story. Isis? How about a real name if you are smearing somebody.
    Chuck is now trying to make the story true

    But Osiris says it’s not true…


  90. Speranza
    91 | February 5, 2010 2:25 pm

    snork wrote:

    But Osiris says it’s not true…

    From my knowledge of Ancient History – wasn’t Isis an Egyptian God that a lot of the Romans worshipped?


  91. Empire1
    92 | February 5, 2010 2:25 pm

    @ wolfie:
    Here in Central Delaware we’re supposed to get 20-30″. We’re pretty well stocked up on everything, so my main concern is going to be keeping a potty area clear for the dogs — especially Frank the dachshund! He drags in 6″ … at much over a foot, the only thing you’d see would be the tip of his tail!


  92. wolfie
    93 | February 5, 2010 2:25 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    It’s like in any recipe. It just refers to proportions. Like a sauce might be one part gravy to one part sour cream, which means that if you have 2 cups of gravy, you’d use two cups of sour cream. Or if you have one part gravy to two parts wine, and you have 1/2 cup gravy, then you’d use one cup of wine.


  93. wolfie
    94 | February 5, 2010 2:26 pm

    unclassifiable wrote:

    It’s a vanity site.

    Well put.


  94. chickadee
    95 | February 5, 2010 2:27 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    Dear G-d where to start.OK,what a pos this potus is.Using the death of one of his campaign workers to embellish his hellcare agenda?? How about why didn’t you, with all your ill gotten gains,including the Nobel winnings and that fat campaign chest,fork out a few bucks to help this stricken woman? Oh yeah, then you would not have been able to use an inappropriate tale in such a grotesque pitch. Barf, what a creature!

    This is such a grotesque display of narcissism from the totus who just can’t get enough attention.
    Everyday he exceeds the bounds of decency and decorum. And notice he didn’t even remember her name. He just used her sad situation to shine a light on himself. He is a really macabre sob.


  95. Speranza
    96 | February 5, 2010 2:29 pm

    unclassifiable wrote:

    It is not a blog anymore. It’s a vanity site. I am suggesting that may be the correct term for it now.

    Sort of reminds me of those grainy newsreels of young Soviet children standing up and praising Stalin.


  96. coldwarrior
    97 | February 5, 2010 2:29 pm

    unclassifiable wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    It is not a blog anymore. It’s a vanity site. I am suggesting that may be the correct term for it now.

    THE CC AWARD:

    well done!!!

    your taxonomy of lgf earns the ‘well said’ award.

    as the representative and chair of the awards committee here at the Blogmocracy country club, i am pleased to inform you that your comment, that has brilliantly bagged and tagged LGF has been awarded the “well said” award.

    “well said”! hoorah!

    the cc has spoken, as it were!


  97. vagabond trader
    98 | February 5, 2010 2:29 pm

    @ chickadee:

    Beneath contempt. Everything we feared about him X……….


  98. wolfie
    99 | February 5, 2010 2:30 pm

    @ Empire1:

    We have 3 Goldens, which is problem enough. I can’t imagine how those little Dachsund legs could manage in deep snow!


  99. goddessoftheclassroom
    100 | February 5, 2010 2:31 pm

    @ wolfie:
    That’s what I thought, but I don’t know what the usual measure for a drink is. I mean, with all due humility, I’m a pretty good cook because I follow recipes and adjust to taste.

    I guess I want to know how much is the usual amount of the ingredients of an apple martini? I know they are 1:1:1/2, but us the one a quarter cup or what?


  100. Speranza
    101 | February 5, 2010 2:31 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    Beneath contempt. Everything we feared about him X……….

    Better off that he not tactically move to the center, I do not want the ignorant SOB to be reelected.


  101. RIX
    102 | February 5, 2010 2:31 pm

    @ snork:
    But Osiris says it’s not true

    I have no idea who this “Isis” indiviual is & you can’t tell from the article.
    Chuck is such a clown, “Van Jones didn’t know what he signed”
    Okeefe however, is smeared by some anonymous photorapher & that
    is ok.


  102. 103 | February 5, 2010 2:31 pm

    snork wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    I was just over there. CJ is now saying that the photographer “Isis” confirms the story. Isis? How about a real name if you are smearing somebody.
    Chuck is now trying to make the story true
    But Osiris says it’s not true…

    One thing about it.They’ll never catch Chucky at any kind of meeting unless Amazon forgets to deliver his donuts. He’ll be like George Jones on his lawn mower. Only he’ll be on that tricyle with the flat tires with his un matri hara on the back. scarves flying in the wind.


  103. chickadee
    104 | February 5, 2010 2:32 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    It is throw up your hands mind blowing. His lack of awareness is getting frightening. I think it’s time to get worried. He is not a stable person. wow


  104. coldwarrior
    105 | February 5, 2010 2:32 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    That’s what I thought, but I don’t know what the usual measure for a drink is. I mean, with all due humility, I’m a pretty good cook because I follow recipes and adjust to taste.
    I guess I want to know how much is the usual amount of the ingredients of an apple martini? I know they are 1:1:1/2, but us the one a quarter cup or what?

    one shotglass of vodka
    one shotglass of apple vodka
    one HALF a shot of vermouth


  105. 106 | February 5, 2010 2:33 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    That’s what I thought, but I don’t know what the usual measure for a drink is. I mean, with all due humility, I’m a pretty good cook because I follow recipes and adjust to taste.
    I guess I want to know how much is the usual amount of the ingredients of an apple martini? I know they are 1:1:1/2, but us the one a quarter cup or what?

    Please don’t drink an apple martini you’ll never smile again. YUK


  106. coldwarrior
    107 | February 5, 2010 2:33 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    That’s what I thought, but I don’t know what the usual measure for a drink is. I mean, with all due humility, I’m a pretty good cook because I follow recipes and adjust to taste.
    I guess I want to know how much is the usual amount of the ingredients of an apple martini? I know they are 1:1:1/2, but us the one a quarter cup or what?

    i thought you didnt drink much…

    make sure you eat something before you put all that booze into your system


  107. Speranza
    108 | February 5, 2010 2:33 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    One thing about it.They’ll never catch Chucky at any kind of meeting unless Amazon forgets to deliver his donuts. He’ll be like George Jones on his lawn mower. Only he’ll be on that tricyle with the flat tires with his un matri hara on the back. scarves flying in the wind.

    Ever get the impression that until his fiancee moved into his life (serving water and fruit), his place was strewn with empty Chinese take-out containers and cans of Coca Cola?


  108. coldwarrior
    109 | February 5, 2010 2:34 pm

    @ Grimcargo:

    they are quite nice when garnished with a cinnamon stick


  109. Guggi
    110 | February 5, 2010 2:35 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Krauthammer is such a joy to listen too on the Fox All Stars.

    I hold him in high esteem.


  110. chickadee
    111 | February 5, 2010 2:35 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:

    they are quite nice when garnished with a cinnamon stick

    You made me one once. I can attest to how good they are.
    ;)


  111. coldwarrior
    112 | February 5, 2010 2:36 pm

    Empire1 wrote:

    @ wolfie:
    Here in Central Delaware we’re supposed to get 20-30″. We’re pretty well stocked up on everything, so my main concern is going to be keeping a potty area clear for the dogs — especially Frank the dachshund! He drags in 6″ … at much over a foot, the only thing you’d see would be the tip of his tail!

    maybe dig a 6×6 area every hour or so…eventually it will be a 4×4 but enough room for a dog to go.


  112. coldwarrior
    114 | February 5, 2010 2:37 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    @ Grimcargo:
    they are quite nice when garnished with a cinnamon stick

    You made me one once. I can attest to how good they are.

    they are very nice on a cold snowy day like today!

    and with that:

    the bar is open, martinis, anyone?


  113. 115 | February 5, 2010 2:38 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    @ Grimcargo:
    they are quite nice when garnished with a cinnamon stick
    You made me one once. I can attest to how good they are.

    maybe my mixer was all mixed up..lol however though I am not really a martini type. though I will try most any drink once.


  114. coldwarrior
    116 | February 5, 2010 2:38 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Grimcargo wrote:
    One thing about it.They’ll never catch Chucky at any kind of meeting unless Amazon forgets to deliver his donuts. He’ll be like George Jones on his lawn mower. Only he’ll be on that tricyle with the flat tires with his un matri hara on the back. scarves flying in the wind.
    Ever get the impression that until his fiancee moved into his life (serving water and fruit), his place was strewn with empty Chinese take-outramen noodle bowls and cans of Coca Cola Sam’s Choice cola?

    i have him in cash strapped mode.

    :)


  115. 117 | February 5, 2010 2:39 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    flaming Absinthe with some sugar please.


  116. coldwarrior
    118 | February 5, 2010 2:39 pm

    @ Grimcargo:

    i usually dont go for flavored martini’s like the apple version, its killer.

    trust me.


  117. RIX
    119 | February 5, 2010 2:40 pm

    @ Grimcargo:
    One thing about it.They’ll never catch Chucky at any kind of meeting unless Amazon forgets to deliver his donuts. He’ll be like George Jones on his lawn mower. Only he’ll be on that tricyle with the flat tires with his un matri hara on the back. scarves flying in the wind.

    Chuck would look so kewl at a confernce, black tee shirt , fluffed up
    pony tail, & ample girth


  118. coldwarrior
    120 | February 5, 2010 2:41 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    flaming Absinthe with some sugar please.

    french or spanish or belgian absinthe?


  119. wolfie
    121 | February 5, 2010 2:41 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:
    @ coldwarrior:

    Now we know!
    But if you don’t have shot glass, can you use a quarter cup?
    (That sounded about right to me.)


  120. 122 | February 5, 2010 2:43 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Spanish, of course!


  121. BBEV
    123 | February 5, 2010 2:43 pm

    For years I had to put up with this BS from most of my family and when they started to call me names I know I had won the argument. And they always did.


  122. coldwarrior
    124 | February 5, 2010 2:44 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:
    @ coldwarrior:
    Now we know!
    But if you don’t have shot glass, can you use a quarter cup?
    (That sounded about right to me.)

    you can use a 1/4 cup…it’ll be a little more than a standard martini…but it’ll work


  123. vagabond trader
    125 | February 5, 2010 2:45 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Exactly. I was concerned about that but if this kind of display continues, yikes!


  124. Speranza
    126 | February 5, 2010 2:45 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    i have him in cash strapped mode.

    Nah he buys all his groceries at Amazon remember?


  125. vagabond trader
    127 | February 5, 2010 2:46 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Even toilet paper! :mrgreen:


  126. unclassifiable
    128 | February 5, 2010 2:47 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Sorry CW. Had to step out for a minute.

    But thank you.

    So does that entitle me to a free personal bile spew from the vanity site?

    /


  127. coldwarrior
    129 | February 5, 2010 2:48 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Spanish, of course!

    right: here goes:

    1 1/2 shot of Mari Mayans Spanish Silver Medal Absinthe

    slotted spoon, sugar cube and ice water on the side.

    light the absinthe, have damp bar mat ready for customer to extinguish the flame.


  128. Speranza
    130 | February 5, 2010 2:48 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Even toilet paper!

    Yes. Now I would be embarassed to write that but he did! I mean just go down to Trader Joe’s and get all the stuff you need.


  129. coldwarrior
    131 | February 5, 2010 2:48 pm

    unclassifiable wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Sorry CW. Had to step out for a minute.
    But thank you.
    So does that entitle me to a free personal bile spew from the vanity site?
    /

    i believe it does!


  130. Nikis Knight
    132 | February 5, 2010 2:48 pm

    @ RIX:

    Chuck would look so kewl at a confernce, black tee shirt , fluffed up
    pony tail, & ample girth

    Maybe he could use one of those motorized carts like the people at Wal Mart use.


  131. Carolina Girl
    133 | February 5, 2010 2:48 pm

    @ Guggi:

    I once told my better half while we were watching “Inside Washington” “see him? If he ever gets divorced, I’m on the next plane to Maryland, and so long and it’s been real.”


  132. Speranza
    134 | February 5, 2010 2:50 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    I once told my better half while we were watching “Inside Washington” “see him? If he ever gets divorced, I’m on the next plane to Maryland, and so long and it’s been real.”

    I wish O’Reilly would develop abig case of STFU when he has Dr. K . on so he might actually learn something.


  133. Carolina Girl
    135 | February 5, 2010 2:51 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:
    One thing about it.They’ll never catch Chucky at any kind of meeting unless Amazon forgets to deliver his donuts. He’ll be like George Jones on his lawn mower. Only he’ll be on that tricyle with the flat tires with his un matri hara on the back. scarves flying in the wind.
    Chuck would look so kewl at a confernce, black tee shirt , fluffed up
    pony tail, & ample girth

    I’m now starting to wonder if the REAL reason Snowball never went to the various meetups was because we’d discover that just about all of us were more intelligent, better educated, and more astute than analysis than he ever was. And at that point all his blog would be the backyard where we’re all attending the cocktail party and he’s up in his room watching Jerry Springer and sending down the occasional song request to the D.J.


  134. Empire1
    136 | February 5, 2010 2:53 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ Empire1:
    We have 3 Goldens, which is problem enough. I can’t imagine how those little Dachsund legs could manage in deep snow!

    Well, six or seven inches (belly depth) he kinda jumps through like a rabbit. More than that … well, he gets stuck. With what’s predicted to hit us, he’d be in real trouble. Even Sam, the 86-pound pittie, would be at least shoulder-deep.


  135. Carolina Girl
    137 | February 5, 2010 2:54 pm

    Oh, by the way, all y’all, according to Gordon, I apparently have engaged in harassing Sharmuta. Other than to ask where Peacekeeper is in my “bombastic” flounce (Gordon’s description), I don’t recall directing a single word to her over at 1.0, so if she’s being “harassed” by me, she’s reading it here.


  136. Speranza
    138 | February 5, 2010 2:54 pm

    @ Carolina Girl:
    Interesting points. Is it possible that we actually made his blog while he merely provided us the forum?


  137. chickadee
    139 | February 5, 2010 2:54 pm

    @ Grimcargo:

    I’m a wine drinker mostly but once in a while I do like a martini.
    Hey did you like that Jamey Johnson song I posted for you yesterday?


  138. wolfie
    140 | February 5, 2010 2:55 pm

    @ BBEV:

    One of the main problems with lefty relatives, in my experience at least, is that they will not avoid the subject of politics. For them it is an obsession, a religion, and just about everything to them has a political angle. It’s as if they have to make snarky anti-conservative quips out of the blue.


  139. Speranza
    141 | February 5, 2010 2:55 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Oh, by the way, all y’all, according to Gordon, I apparently have engaged in harassing Sharmuta. Other than to ask where Peacekeeper is in my “bombastic” flounce (Gordon’s description), I don’t recall directing a single word to her over at 1.0, so if she’s being “harassed” by me, she’s reading it here.

    Also you left LGF before she ever even morphed from W-lover into Sharmuta. Nodrog was never really strong with the “facts’.


  140. coldwarrior
    142 | February 5, 2010 2:56 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ BBEV:
    One of the main problems with lefty relatives, in my experience at least, is that they will not avoid the subject of politics. For them it is an obsession, a religion, and just about everything to them has a political angle. It’s as if they have to make snarky anti-conservative quips out of the blue.

    i am forbidden from going to family reunions on my maternal side. i dont put up with snarky.

    :)


  141. Speranza
    143 | February 5, 2010 2:57 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    One of the main problems with lefty relatives, in my experience at least, is that they will not avoid the subject of politics. For them it is an obsession, a religion, and just about everything to them has a political angle. It’s as if they have to make snarky anti-conservative quips out of the blue.

    Same with leftie friends. They throw politics into every conversation no matter what the original topic matter was (be it gardening or who makes the best hamburgers).


  142. BBEV
    144 | February 5, 2010 2:59 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Oh, by the way, all y’all, according to Gordon, I apparently have engaged in harassing Sharmuta. Other than to ask where Peacekeeper is in my “bombastic” flounce (Gordon’s description), I don’t recall directing a single word to her over at 1.0, so if she’s being “harassed” by me, she’s reading it here.

    Do you really care?


  143. vagabond trader
    145 | February 5, 2010 2:59 pm

    LOL, this is great. Lefturds all aflutter over another Focus on the Family ad to be shown X 4 pre game.

    http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/2010-02-05-family05_ST_N.htm


  144. Speranza
    146 | February 5, 2010 2:59 pm

    Outside of NodroG and Voice from Ireland – I am trying to remember other trolls (who lasted a while) on LGF?


  145. Speranza
    147 | February 5, 2010 3:01 pm

    BBEV wrote:

    Do you really care?

    She probably does not, but it is good to set the record straight. Sharmuta was the one doing all the harassing.


  146. BBEV
    148 | February 5, 2010 3:02 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ BBEV:
    One of the main problems with lefty relatives, in my experience at least, is that they will not avoid the subject of politics. For them it is an obsession, a religion, and just about everything to them has a political angle. It’s as if they have to make snarky anti-conservative quips out of the blue.

    I come from a very political family and every family function becomes a game to me and I love the fact that I now have two family members on my side after 30 years of being on my own.


  147. BBEV
    149 | February 5, 2010 3:06 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    BBEV wrote:
    Do you really care?
    She probably does not, but it is good to set the record straight. Sharmuta was the one doing all the harassing.

    Ya, She did that to me one night and I apologized to keep harmony man do I regret that now.


  148. Guggi
    150 | February 5, 2010 3:07 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    I once told my better half while we were watching “Inside Washington” “see him? If he ever gets divorced, I’m on the next plane to Maryland, and so long and it’s been real.”

    And what did your better half answer ? :-)


  149. RIX
    151 | February 5, 2010 3:07 pm

    Iceweasel, aka Seakiieh, aka Two Cats Fucking, speaks

    6 iceweasel
    Fri, Feb 5, 2010 1:59:49pm replyquote
    James O’Keefe: America’s preppy anti-corruption superhero?

    Nah, I think “shitbag” still works better.


  150. 152 | February 5, 2010 3:09 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:
    I’m a wine drinker mostly but once in a while I do like a martini.
    Hey did you like that Jamey Johnson song I posted for you yesterday?

    I never saw it. I couldn’t even get on here at all. Where is it? I ll go look now.


  151. 153 | February 5, 2010 3:11 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Ranbutan. Freebourne Seculeria. There were a few others, but less memorable. I never took them particularly seriously, so they just kind of disappeared from view and memory.


  152. chickadee
    154 | February 5, 2010 3:11 pm

    @ Grimcargo:


  153. 155 | February 5, 2010 3:12 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Oh, by the way, all y’all, according to Gordon, I apparently have engaged in harassing Sharmuta. Other than to ask where Peacekeeper is in my “bombastic” flounce (Gordon’s description), I don’t recall directing a single word to her over at 1.0, so if she’s being “harassed” by me, she’s reading it here.

    Please. She sat there while Iceweesil tore her a new one and worried about you?


  154. 156 | February 5, 2010 3:17 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:

    Thank you. Ten thousand hugs!!


  155. Carolina Girl
    157 | February 5, 2010 3:18 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    Carolina Girl wrote:
    @ Guggi:
    I once told my better half while we were watching “Inside Washington” “see him? If he ever gets divorced, I’m on the next plane to Maryland, and so long and it’s been real.”
    And what did your better half answer ?

    I got his response during a commercial featuring Cindy Crawford.


  156. chickadee
    158 | February 5, 2010 3:21 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:

    Thank you. Ten thousand hugs!!

    I thought you would like it.
    :)


  157. vagabond trader
    159 | February 5, 2010 3:36 pm

    Oh lord, just heard a snip from an Obot mouthpiece say something like “As a lawyer and professor he…” Gimmee a break. Dude never even practiced law except as a research underling in an ACORN scam case.


  158. Speranza
    160 | February 5, 2010 5:26 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Ranbutan. Freebourne Seculeria. There were a few others, but less memorable. I never took them particularly seriously, so they just kind of disappeared from view and memory.

    Oh yeas I do remember Ranbutan. He was a bit of a Jew hater.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David