<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birtherism Is A Winning Political Issue? Gimmie A Break!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/</link>
	<description>&#34;When you can&#039;t make them see the light, make them feel the heat.&#34; -Ronald Reagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-267034</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-267034</guid>
		<description>Those who are familiar with my comments in the past on the birthers know I&#039;m neutral.  Neither side in my opinion has provided irrefutable proof to corroborate their claims.  What exactly the President is hiding, I don&#039;t know.  I agree this is not a winning political issue, but it&#039;s still serious enough I&#039;d like to see irrefutable documentation.  We&#039;re talking about a possible subversion of the Constitution, hence the seriousness.  

Should it have been an issue in the first place?  Never.  The matter of the President&#039;s birth certificate should&#039;ve been resolved back when he was Senator Obama running for President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who are familiar with my comments in the past on the birthers know I&#8217;m neutral.  Neither side in my opinion has provided irrefutable proof to corroborate their claims.  What exactly the President is hiding, I don&#8217;t know.  I agree this is not a winning political issue, but it&#8217;s still serious enough I&#8217;d like to see irrefutable documentation.  We&#8217;re talking about a possible subversion of the Constitution, hence the seriousness.  </p>
<p>Should it have been an issue in the first place?  Never.  The matter of the President&#8217;s birth certificate should&#8217;ve been resolved back when he was Senator Obama running for President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Underzog</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-266960</link>
		<dc:creator>Underzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-266960</guid>
		<description>Pam Geller did excellent work with &lt;em&gt;techdude&lt;/em&gt;, pointing out how invalid and phony Barack Hussein Obama&#039;s COLB is.

As the circumstances of his birth are fishy -- especially his using millions of dollars to hide is long form birth certificate -- it is certainly a legitimate question. And as Obama seems to really fear this and is an enemy of the country he leads, this &lt;em&gt;birther&lt;/em&gt; can be pushed from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam Geller did excellent work with <em>techdude</em>, pointing out how invalid and phony Barack Hussein Obama&#8217;s COLB is.</p>
<p>As the circumstances of his birth are fishy &#8212; especially his using millions of dollars to hide is long form birth certificate &#8212; it is certainly a legitimate question. And as Obama seems to really fear this and is an enemy of the country he leads, this <em>birther</em> can be pushed from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zimriel</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-266649</link>
		<dc:creator>Zimriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-266649</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-266260&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;teacake&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, check Pam’s site. Way more things on there now that you won’t see anywhere else. Wow! Some really spooky things at the moment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Has Geller got over her own birtherist phase? She could go a long way in my estimation if she admitted that Obama is legally the President. She could riff on that to a general condemnation of all the secrecy behind Obama&#039;s documentation, including school records. That doesn&#039;t bother me. What always bothered me was the implication that Obama&#039;s not the President, which is an attack on the military chain of command while they&#039;re on duty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="#comment-266260" title="Go to comment of this author" rel="nofollow">teacake</a></b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yeah, check Pam’s site. Way more things on there now that you won’t see anywhere else. Wow! Some really spooky things at the moment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Has Geller got over her own birtherist phase? She could go a long way in my estimation if she admitted that Obama is legally the President. She could riff on that to a general condemnation of all the secrecy behind Obama&#8217;s documentation, including school records. That doesn&#8217;t bother me. What always bothered me was the implication that Obama&#8217;s not the President, which is an attack on the military chain of command while they&#8217;re on duty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgranger</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-266494</link>
		<dc:creator>rgranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-266494</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-266077&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MikeA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;:

Or someone channeling Chuck....LOL, sorry, I could not resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ <a href="#comment-266077" title="Go to comment of this author" rel="nofollow">MikeA</a></b>:</p>
<p>Or someone channeling Chuck&#8230;.LOL, sorry, I could not resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speranza</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-266324</link>
		<dc:creator>Speranza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-266324</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-266274&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;vagabond trader&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;His wife,Isabella the She Wolf of France was something.Her brother was Philip the Fair, King of France and it was through her that Edward III, her son, claimed the French throne leading to the 100 Years War.Now the Brits coddle muslims. Go figure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
In the Braveheart movie she was played as a mature woman while in reality she was 6 years old at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="#comment-266274" title="Go to comment of this author" rel="nofollow">vagabond trader</a></b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>His wife,Isabella the She Wolf of France was something.Her brother was Philip the Fair, King of France and it was through her that Edward III, her son, claimed the French throne leading to the 100 Years War.Now the Brits coddle muslims. Go figure.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the Braveheart movie she was played as a mature woman while in reality she was 6 years old at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vagabond trader</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-266293</link>
		<dc:creator>vagabond trader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-266293</guid>
		<description>httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMhUZAq5IxQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="420" height="340">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EMhUZAq5IxQ&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EMhUZAq5IxQ&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="420" height="340"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMhUZAq5IxQ">www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMhUZAq5IxQ</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodan</title>
		<link>http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/09/birtherism-is-a-winning-political-issue-gimmie-a-break/#comment-266277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?p=23541#comment-266277</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-266241&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WrathofG-d&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;…coming to America&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nope, because we are organized here. If this Bus Driver pulled A stunt like this here, he&#039;d get his head smashed in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ <a href="#comment-266241" title="Go to comment of this author" rel="nofollow">WrathofG-d</a></b>:</p>
<blockquote><p>…coming to America</p></blockquote>
<p>Nope, because we are organized here. If this Bus Driver pulled A stunt like this here, he&#8217;d get his head smashed in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
