First time visitor? Learn more.

Patrick Henry and the ‘Tea Bashers’

by Konservo ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Guest Post, Politics, Progressives, Tea Parties at February 12th, 2010 - 4:00 am

SFC Steve McQueen (Ret.) writes on BigGovernment.com about the anti-Tea Party campaign, “The Party is Over.” McQueen argues that ‘Tea Bashers’ divert money and resources from Progressives and, to show our support, he says that we should contact the group and let them know what we think of their campaign. Here’s that information:

Contact us: contact@theteapartyisover.org
Press Inquiries: news@theteapartyisover.org

Visiting the ‘Bashers” site, one can find their mission statement and strategy which concludes:

Other ideas include undermining the legitimacy of the federal government in favor of a radical rightwing form of state’s rights. We need to prevent their dangerous ideas from gaining a legislative foothold. So our strategy is to spread the truth about their dangerous ideas and prevent their policies from taking root in America.

“Dangerous ideas” like defending state’s rights and opposing a bloated central government as unconstitutional are not just “gaining a legislative foothold,” in fact, the Framers of the Constitution spent much time and effort debating the merits and drawbacks of forming a central government in the first place.

In the second Continental Congress, James Madison put forth the ‘Virginia Plan’ in which a new, central government would be created with the power to tax and legislate when the states’ governments were deemed incompetent. But other Virginians following George Mason and Patrick Henry were strongly opposed to the idea of a central government. Why should the people be taxed twice, once by the state and again by the central government?

In a recent post about Patrick Henry, I cite the following quote from one of his statements:

When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: Liberty, Sir, was then the primary object. We are descended from a people whose Government was founded on liberty: Our glorious forefathers of Great-Britain, made liberty the foundation of every thing. That country is become a great, mighty, and splendid nation; not because their Government is strong and energetic; but, Sir, because liberty is its direct end and foundation: We drew the spirit of liberty from our British ancestors; by that spirit we have triumphed over every difficulty: But now, Sir, the American spirit, assisted by the ropes and chains of consolidation, is about to convert this country to a powerful and mighty empire: If you make the citizens of this country agree to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of America, your Government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together: Such a Government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism

Henry, of course, was not talking about the Republican Party’s views. He was talking about the form of government that exists in America: we are a republic.

In Latin, res publica literally refers to ‘a public thing.’ Patrick Henry’s warning, therefore, is that the consolidation of political power will, necessarily, strip the people (the populous, publica) of their natural rights and property. We will be ‘subjects’ not citizens. We will live lives of serfdom instead of freedom.

This argument and “radical rightwing” view was a serious concern for the Founding Fathers. It was men like Mason and Henry who campaigned for the adoption of The Bill of Rights using the same basic argument against the surrender of freedom to a powerful centralized government. The anti-Tea Party group, you can be sure, knows this and they are purposefully re-framing and revising American history and the ideas upon which our republic was founded. So, by all means, contact the group multiple times (don’t worry, they want to hear from us, that’s why they’ve provided the contact info!), but we should not over-look the revisionism and propaganda.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

56 Responses to “Patrick Henry and the ‘Tea Bashers’”
( jump to bottom )

  1. mawskrat
    1 | February 12, 2010 4:04 am

    It’s all mine i tells yah


  2. Speranza
    2 | February 12, 2010 4:14 am

    Hmm I thought that Steve McQueen died in 1979.


  3. Doppelganger
    3 | February 12, 2010 4:15 am

    Dangerous ideas” like defending state’s rights and opposing a bloated central government as unconstitutional are not just “gaining a legislative foothold,” in fact, the Framers of the Constitution spent much time and effort debating the merits and drawbacks of forming a central government in the first place.

    Sadly, modern school children will never know this because they are now being taught gender studies, Heather has two mommies, African American history, and progressive ideaology!


  4. vagabond trader
    4 | February 12, 2010 4:22 am

    @ Doppelganger:

    I just read many schools are cutting out study of the Revolution through the Civil War and will start at Reconstruction. WT He11?


  5. Fritz Katz
    5 | February 12, 2010 4:26 am

    Here are theteapartyisover.org’s first three targets for a concerted campaign of lies, harrassment, & character assassination:

    Randy Hultgren

    Arie Friedman

    David McAloon

    Interesting, what do these three have in common? They are all representing Illinois. Wonder if there’s some Chicago thug behind theteapartyisover.org?


  6. Bumr50
    6 | February 12, 2010 4:33 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    Ya I think the new start date for American History is 1877.

    Seriously, in the proposed texts.


  7. RIX
    7 | February 12, 2010 4:37 am

    Bumr50 wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:
    Ya I think the new start date for American History is 1877.
    Seriously, in the proposed texts.

    1877 is the approximate year of the beginning of the Progressive Movement in this country. Must just be a coincidence.


  8. Fritz Katz
    8 | February 12, 2010 4:38 am

    Labor union money linked to anti-Tea Party Web site (SEIU purple-shirts)

    American Public Policy Comittee — Political Organization Filing Information


  9. RIX
    9 | February 12, 2010 4:42 am

    FNC has footage of Diane Finestein in debate with crib notes inked
    on her hands.
    I wonder if Gibbs will mock her. Well, actually I don’t.


  10. Bumr50
    10 | February 12, 2010 4:51 am

    OT,early,sorry-New Republic hit job on Thomas Sowell.

    via FrontPageMag

    Apparently there aren’t enough “happy thoughts.”

    This review IMO is a perfect example, as Horowitz states, of our divided nation.

    We live in the real world and they don’t.


  11. goddessoftheclassroom
    11 | February 12, 2010 4:51 am

    Doppelganger wrote:

    Dangerous ideas” like defending state’s rights and opposing a bloated central government as unconstitutional are not just “gaining a legislative foothold,” in fact, the Framers of the Constitution spent much time and effort debating the merits and drawbacks of forming a central government in the first place.
    Sadly, modern school children will never know this because they are now being taught gender studies, Heather has two mommies, African American history, and progressive ideaology!

    Not by me!

    Good morning, y’all.


  12. Bumr50
    12 | February 12, 2010 4:53 am

    Back onT-

    “Dangerous ideas” like defending state’s rights

    I was just commenting yesterday that Chris Matthews was openly stating that the Tenth Amendment was racist.

    Trust me, if it annoys the Left, it’s worth pursuing. Especially when our health care is involved. Congratulations to Virginia.


  13. RIX
    13 | February 12, 2010 5:05 am

    @ Bumr50:
    I was just commenting yesterday that Chris Matthews was openly stating that the Tenth Amendment was racist.

    Matthews also thinks that the Tea Partiers are planning a ‘Seven Days in May’ type coup.
    He must be afraid that grannies on walkers are going to nag us into
    eating our vegetables.


  14. Fritz Katz
    14 | February 12, 2010 5:30 am

    theteapartyisover.org — the money trail leads to Craig Varoga and George Rakis at Independent Strategies

    George Rakis served as political director of the Democratic Governor’s Association, which gave $60000 to Independentstrategies (George Rakis, is also a partner at Independentstrategies), etc., etc. “Oh, what a tangled web they weave…”

    More at Redstate:

    But WHO is “The American Public Policy Committee”? It’s a group organized by a Democrat political consultant, Craig Varoga. He was formerly Tom Vilsack’s campaign manager. He’s also known to raise money for Democrats from organizations like AFSCME and SEIU. Yep, he’s the guy that extracts money out of the pockets of union members to support leftist causes. All of the money used to fund this organization came from other 527 groups founded by Varoga, Patriot Majority and Patriot Majority West.

    So this is a 1 man committee funded by a stream of 527’s to hide the source and intended to support Democrat causes.

    Yep, they’re fighting back. Do they scare you?


  15. 15 | February 12, 2010 5:37 am

    I think that when Tranzis die they will go to a special place not unlike the one reserved for Jihadis. They too will find a locked cell with a reception party of seventy two Virginians.

    Sic Semper Tyrannis


  16. vagabond trader
    16 | February 12, 2010 5:38 am

    @ Fritz Katz:

    Good find.Yet we’re characterized as the ones who are tools of special interests.Anti American racist scareeee extremists.

    Keep exposing the demonrats for who they are and what lobby(s) they represent.


  17. vagabond trader
    17 | February 12, 2010 5:40 am

    @ Bumr50:

    Trust me, if it annoys the Left, it’s worth pursuing.

    Quite concur,its as simple as that!


  18. RIX
    18 | February 12, 2010 5:47 am

    This is posted over at Atlas Shrugs,

    The Fiqh Council of North America — a body of Islamic scholars — issued a fatwa this week that says going through the airport scanners would violate Islamic rules on modesty.

    Alright, then don’t fly.


  19. Fritz Katz
    19 | February 12, 2010 6:06 am

    Fox News is all over it: “Anti-Tea Party Web Site Part of Scheme to Funnel Funds“.

    Craig Varoga, head of the American Public Policy Comittee” also runs the $9.4 Million “Patriot Majority


  20. 20 | February 12, 2010 6:10 am

    “Our glorious forefathers of Great-Britain, made liberty the foundation of every thing. That country is become a great, mighty, and splendid nation; not because their Government is strong and energetic; but, Sir, because liberty is its direct end and foundation”

    And Great Britain / UK / England was indeed a great empire – remember? The sun never set on the empire. For a time. Now look at them. Subjects without even the most basic of human rights, self defense. Overrun by foreigners who refuse to assimilate and who will, eventually, run /ruin that country. That is also our future unless we stop it.


  21. 21 | February 12, 2010 6:13 am

    @ Kirly:

    The Uk has turned into an Islamic cesspool. We must prevent this in America.


  22. 22 | February 12, 2010 6:16 am

    @ Bumr50:

    The Reason the New Republic hates Thomas Sowell is because he is black. They are raaaaacists.


  23. Dolphin
    23 | February 12, 2010 6:18 am

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    Good for you! What grade do you teach?

    Sort of on topic to this.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124715

    A state board of only 15 people will vote on whether to revise U.S. textbooks to omit references to Daniel Boone, Gen. George Patton, Nathan Hale, Columbus Day and Christmas.

    The Texas State Board of Education will also vote on a proposal to substitute the term “American” with “global citizen.”

    -snip-

    He warns, one proposal suggests take the Declaration of Independence and literally erasing God from its Preamble.


  24. 24 | February 12, 2010 6:22 am

    @ Dolphin:

    I’m sure the husky, ponytailed blogger will get right on it. This is almost as big a threat as Creationism (well, not quite…)


  25. Nevergiveup
    25 | February 12, 2010 6:31 am

    Former British MP Tonge: Probe claims of IDF organ theft in Haiti
    Jewish Chronicle quotes baroness as saying, ‘IDF and Israeli Medical Association should establish independent inquiry immediately to clear names of team in Haiti’
    Ynet
    Published: 02.12.10, 09:04 / Israel News
    Baroness Jenny Tonge, a former Liberal Democrat member of the British parliament, said this week that Israel should set up an inquiry to disprove allegations that its medical teams in Haiti “harvested” organs of earthquake victims for use in transplants, The Jewish Chronicle (JC) reported Thursday.

    According to the report, the organ theft claims were published last week in the Palestine Telegraph, an online journal based in Gaza of which Baroness Tonge is a patron.

    Sometimes I wonder why Israel even bothers helping the rest of the world??????


  26. vagabond trader
    26 | February 12, 2010 6:33 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Disgusting. Baroness Blood Libel.


  27. 27 | February 12, 2010 6:33 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Another case of IDS!


  28. Nevergiveup
    28 | February 12, 2010 6:38 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Another case of IDS!

    Yeah but print it enough and soon it becomes Gospel


  29. Bumr50
    29 | February 12, 2010 6:40 am

    “At the end of the day, wherever this case is tried, in whatever forum, what we have to ensure is that it’s done as transparently as possible and with adherence to all the rules,” Holder told The Washington Post in an interview published in Friday’s editions. “If we do that, I’m not sure the location or even the forum is as important as what the world sees in that proceeding.”

    Holder’s priorities are clearly stated here. What’s truly important, in his mind, is not what’s correct for our nation, but how the “world” views it.


  30. 30 | February 12, 2010 6:40 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I notice that they say Israel should “disprove” these rediculous claims. You can’t prove a negative, so what they are really saying is that the truth doesn’t matter, it is the gravity of the accusation. Where have we heard that before?


  31. Nevergiveup
    31 | February 12, 2010 6:43 am

    FOX News is now reporting that Obama and the White House is going to get directly involved in paying for and where the Terror Trials are going to be?????What ever that means???????


  32. Bumr50
    32 | February 12, 2010 6:44 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Saw that.

    They’re gonna BUY themselves a trial somewhere gosh darn it!


  33. Dolphin
    33 | February 12, 2010 6:45 am

    Another good read, again similar to the tone of this thread..

    http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blogs/1938-austria-land-of-the

    Hitler Targets Education – Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children:

    Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school.. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang “Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,” and had physical education.
    - – -
    Hitler Restructured the Family Through Daycare:

    When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers. You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole generation of children. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology. By this time, no one talked about equal rights. We knew we had been had.


  34. m
    34 | February 12, 2010 6:46 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Well it did come from the Palestine Telegraph, ya know. geesh
    Not like they’d LIE or anything!

    /

    >:-[

    That’s f’ed up.


  35. m
    35 | February 12, 2010 6:51 am

    George Lopez Says Sarah Palin Is Special Needs; Calls Her a B*tch (Video)

    Damn, and I liked him too.


  36. 36 | February 12, 2010 6:51 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Israel should put hits out on these people. Israel needs to get Gangsta with its enemies.

    Notice the Leftists don’t run their mouths about Colombia? They hate Colombia since they stand up to Chavez, but they dont attack it to much.

    You know the answer: Colombian Neckties.


  37. 37 | February 12, 2010 6:52 am

    @ m:

    PDS (Palin derangement Syndrome)


  38. Nevergiveup
    38 | February 12, 2010 6:52 am

    m wrote:

    George Lopez Says Sarah Palin Is Special Needs; Calls Her a B*tch (Video)

    Damn, and I liked him too.

    My shit list is long and glorious.


  39. 39 | February 12, 2010 6:54 am

    @ m:
    yeah, he is quite funny until he strays into politics. then he’s a complete dumbass. like many celebrities.


  40. m
    40 | February 12, 2010 7:00 am

    @ Rodan:
    BASED ON FEAR! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

    @ Nevergiveup:
    And growing by the day!

    @ Kirly:
    Seriously. They should stick to entertainment.

    It’s like me if someone comes into my office and I made them listen to my political views before getting to my actual job … I wouldn’t be in business very long. But because celebrities are surrounded by people that are as stupid as they are, they really think they’re being entertaining.


  41. 41 | February 12, 2010 7:02 am

    @ Kirly:

    What is it with celebreties and their political and scientific opinions? They think they are all knowledgable about these subjects. It’s like a certain Jazz ARtist, they don’t know crap.


  42. 42 | February 12, 2010 7:03 am

    @ m:

    It’s like a Jazz Artist discussing politics, what do they know!


  43. Bumr50
    43 | February 12, 2010 7:04 am

    @ m:

    That’s why I know that Meghan Fox is a total bitch, even though I never cared in the first place.


  44. 44 | February 12, 2010 7:07 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    What is it with celebreties and their political and scientific opinions? They think they are all knowledgable about these subjects. It’s like a certain Jazz ARtist, they don’t know crap.

    you know, i really don’t know. sometimes i think they’re all evil control freaks like the nuts they elected. other times i think they’re idiotic useful tools of the nuts they elected. every explanation i can think of reflects poorly on their motives and their intellect.


  45. 45 | February 12, 2010 7:07 am

    @ Bumr50:

    who’s Meghan Fox?


  46. 46 | February 12, 2010 7:14 am

    @ Kirly:

    Seriously, who do people take entertainers seriously?


  47. 47 | February 12, 2010 7:14 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Some Leftist loser.


  48. Bumr50
    48 | February 12, 2010 7:15 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Click here if you really want to know.

    I was using her as an example of someone who I otherwise would have never heard of had she not been such a liberal tool.


  49. 49 | February 12, 2010 7:17 am

    @ Bumr50:

    Sounds like she can’t understand normal thinking ;-)


  50. 50 | February 12, 2010 7:18 am

    OT

    OMG! Holger found the obama bubble mobile! lol


  51. Canoe Convoy
    51 | February 12, 2010 7:43 am

    @ Bumr50:

    Same as with all too many pretty young women all over the United States: Attractive exterior, yet ugly personality. “Pretty on the outside = pretty ugly inside.” Sounds like her list of what she looks for in a man is nothing more than the price tag for access to the sex.

    **shakes head in bitter, angry disappointment**


  52. Canoe Convoy
    52 | February 12, 2010 7:46 am

    Oh, and Good morning, everyone !


  53. m
    53 | February 12, 2010 8:34 am

    Good morning Conoe Convoy!


  54. buzzsawmonkey
    54 | February 12, 2010 9:30 am

    Test.


  55. m
    55 | February 12, 2010 11:15 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    PASS!


  56. 56 | February 12, 2010 7:33 pm

    [...] Patrick Henry and the ‘Tea Bashers’ Here’s a piece I wrote for The Blogmocracy: [...]


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David