First time visitor? Learn more.

Saudis against Valentine’s day

by Rodan ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic hypocrisy at February 12th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

The beloved Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has now decided that Valentine’s Day is bad. They are banning any store from selling red items. The reason they are banning Valentine’s Day is because it’s a Christian Holiday!

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – The Saudi religious police launched Thursday a nationwide crackdown on stores selling items that are red or in any other way allude to the banned celebrations of Valentine’s Day, a Saudi official said.

Members of the feared religious police were inspecting shops for red roses, heart-shaped products or gifts wrapped in red, and ordering storeowners to get rid of them, the official said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to reporters.

Red-colored or heart-shaped items are legal at other times of the year, but as Feb. 14 nears they become contraband in Saudi Arabia. The kingdom bans celebration of Western holidays such as Valentine’s Day, named after a Christian saint said to have been martyred by the Romans in the 3rd Century.

Read the rest.

Islamic Tolerance, they ask for it here but show none in their homelands. This shows you how miserable this culture is and why me must be intolerant of them. It is time to remove the stench of Saudi influence from American politics. We don’t need them as “allies” or their oil. Screw Saudi Arabia they are an enemy and it’s time America realized it.

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

123 Responses to “Saudis against Valentine’s day”
( jump to bottom )

  1. lobo91
    1 | February 12, 2010 12:05 pm

    Nothing new here. They do this every year around this time. I can remember reading stories like this going back at least 10 years.


  2. m
    2 | February 12, 2010 12:07 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Yep. It still cracks me up. The religion of hate – fo sho.

    Hating Valentine’s


  3. Speranza
    3 | February 12, 2010 12:07 pm

    A miserable misogynist country filled with a miserable death cult (Wahabism). lobo91 is right- nothing new here. Back to the previous thread! lol


  4. kansas
    4 | February 12, 2010 12:08 pm

    I think the Mohammed dildo is probably a bit much, let alone the 72 virgins crotchless panties.


  5. Nevergiveup
    5 | February 12, 2010 12:09 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Nothing new here. They do this every year around this time. I can remember reading stories like this going back at least 10 years.

    Ah no big deal. I think they are only restricting the sale of red valentines in the Churches and Temples of Saudi …..oh yeah…nevermind


  6. vagabond trader
    6 | February 12, 2010 12:11 pm

    So this means Pajamas.com doesn’t deliver to the Kingdom? What a joyless bunch of hairbags.


  7. 7 | February 12, 2010 12:11 pm

    “There is no fun in Islam” —Ayatollah Khomeni….

    /nuff said.


  8. snowcrash
    8 | February 12, 2010 12:14 pm

    Women are property, romantic love is not an option.


  9. Nevergiveup
    9 | February 12, 2010 12:15 pm

    Olympic Luger Dies After Training Accident
    NewsCore
    Georgian luge hopeful Nodar Kumaritashvili was killed Friday in a crash after flying off the Olympic track in Whistler, Canada during a training run.

    That’s really a shame


  10. m
    10 | February 12, 2010 12:16 pm

    They should love the anti-Vday parties…

    Scarier still, there’s the anti-Valentine’s vampire party at Penderels bar in London, £5, where you’re invited to come dressed for “your own fangtastic funeral”. Not for the faint-hearted.

    The worst Valentine’s Day ideas – ever


  11. 11 | February 12, 2010 12:16 pm

    They are misled about the orgins of V-day and bigoted, but I feel their pain.


  12. Mad Mullah
    13 | February 12, 2010 12:20 pm

    Islamists are sexually frustrated, totalitarian, brainwashed, violent, psychopathic degenerates and a cancer to the entire civilized world.


  13. m
    14 | February 12, 2010 12:20 pm

    Revolutionaries: Black market for red roses surges with Valentine’s Day crackdown


  14. 15 | February 12, 2010 12:21 pm

    @ m:

    The Saudis are miserable people. Why are we allies with these rodents?


  15. chickadee
    16 | February 12, 2010 12:21 pm

    I don’t think they ban it because it is a “christian” holiday. They ban it because it celebrates being in love and they don’t want to encourage any violations of Islam. Like dating, having fun, choosing the person you want to be with . . . . behavior that will get you killed or 100 lashes.

    NO FUN IN ISLAM


  16. Nevergiveup
    17 | February 12, 2010 12:23 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Why are we allies with these rodents?

    Well unfortunetly in the short term, whether you like it or not, we do need their oil. Although I for one am not opposed to just stealing it.,


  17. 18 | February 12, 2010 12:23 pm

    @ chickadee:

    Islam is a misrebale Totalitarian system.


  18. 19 | February 12, 2010 12:25 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    That’s what I’m about. We should just take it and in the meantime get an alternate source. We can get here and use Natural Gas to replace imported Saudi Oil.

    I’m sick of the House of Saud and their influence.


  19. 20 | February 12, 2010 12:26 pm

    Semi-related but hilarious: GOP Valentine’s Day cards!

    /driveby


  20. 21 | February 12, 2010 12:27 pm

    PaladinPhil wrote:

    “There is no fun in Islam” —Ayatollah Khomeni

    …except with little boys.


  21. lobo91
    22 | February 12, 2010 12:28 pm

    @ chickadee:

    I don’t think they ban it because it is a “christian” holiday. They ban it because it celebrates being in love and they don’t want to encourage any violations of Islam. Like dating, having fun, choosing the person you want to be with . . . . behavior that will get you killed or 100 lashes.

    NO FUN IN ISLAM

    Pretty much what I was thinking, as well.

    I can’t really see the average Saudi man buying flowers or candy for the wife he purchased from a neighboring family.

    Anyone buying Valentine’s Day stuff is automatically under suspiscion of adultery there.


  22. NoThreat2U
    23 | February 12, 2010 12:28 pm

    Moes are incapable of celebrating Valentines Day. The only emotion they understand is anger….never love.

    And Jane Fonda needs to STFD and STFU. Old bitch is irrelevant.


  23. 25 | February 12, 2010 12:30 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    That’s why they have sex with young boys.


  24. Poteen
    26 | February 12, 2010 12:31 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    Valentine’s Day: A holiday overdue for extinction ?

    And all day long, couples toted around their precious flowers, while the rest of us carried the scent of rejection

    Still not over it? What a loser.


  25. 27 | February 12, 2010 12:31 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Their Ideology is based on Hate. Their so called Diety, Allah (Baal, satan, Lucifer) is a hateful entity. Muhamed was a pedophile and a hateful person.


  26. 28 | February 12, 2010 12:32 pm

    @ Speranza:

    That guy is a loon.


  27. Nevergiveup
    29 | February 12, 2010 12:32 pm

    Durbin: D.C. residents panic as if snowstorm is ‘a nuclear attack’

    Is idiocy common in Chicago?


  28. 30 | February 12, 2010 12:33 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Unreal, Dick Durbin that treacherous bum!


  29. RIX
    31 | February 12, 2010 12:37 pm

    This whole culture is totally depraved. On the other hand the guys won’t have to run out & get candy & flowers.


  30. 32 | February 12, 2010 12:38 pm

    @ RIX:

    ha ha ha ha!


  31. lobo91
    33 | February 12, 2010 12:38 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Is idiocy common in Chicago?

    That was a rhetorical question, right?


  32. Nevergiveup
    34 | February 12, 2010 12:38 pm

    RIX wrote:

    This whole culture is totally depraved. On the other hand the guys won’t have to run out & get candy & flowers.

    Yeah, they beat their women and then send them out to get them


  33. calcajun
    35 | February 12, 2010 12:39 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    It takes a certain kind of looney to strap yourself to a sled too small for a munchkin while wearing your underwear and throw yourself down a frozen log flume. Sorry that the guy died, but that is a scary event.

    Remember, it takes real stones to engage in curling.


  34. Speranza
    36 | February 12, 2010 12:40 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    That guy is a loon.

    A raging maniac. Fits in well at PMSNBC.


  35. 37 | February 12, 2010 12:40 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I don’t know what he’s smoking but 3 feet of snow in two storms back to back is a big deal even for Canadians. We just wouldn’t be shut down as long is all.


  36. Poteen
    38 | February 12, 2010 12:41 pm

    RIX wrote:

    This whole culture is totally depraved. On the other hand the guys won’t have to run out & get candy & flowers.

    Wouldn’t want any of the chattel in your haram to think she was special.


  37. calcajun
    39 | February 12, 2010 12:41 pm

    PaladinPhil wrote:

    “There is no fun in Islam” —Ayatollah Khomeni….
    /nuff said.

    Says the man that put the “Slam” in Islam.


  38. 40 | February 12, 2010 12:42 pm

    calcajun wrote:

    Remember, it takes real stones to engage in curling.

    I don’t use stones, I use rocks. :)

    /*ding*


  39. calcajun
    41 | February 12, 2010 12:44 pm

    @ PaladinPhil:
    Big warm round ones, no doubt. But, how do you get them to be so smooth? (I so do NOT like where this is going.)


  40. Speranza
    42 | February 12, 2010 12:45 pm

    @ calcajun:
    This is for you. I was thinking about you yesterday
    Queen petitioned for posthumous pardon for Harry ‘Breaker’ Morant


  41. RIX
    43 | February 12, 2010 12:46 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Hey, how was South Beach?


  42. chickadee
    44 | February 12, 2010 12:47 pm

    m wrote:

    Revolutionaries: Black market for red roses surges with Valentine’s Day crackdown

    It is almost incomprehensible that in modern times a gov’t will try to stop sales of roses on a certain day of the year and send goons around to make sure it doesn’t happen. This is Islam.
    A fcked up bunch of nonsense that seeks to rule the world.
    I hope that on Valentine’s Day at least some women in Saudi Arabia will get roses and neither she nor her sweetheart gets their heads chopped off.


  43. calcajun
    45 | February 12, 2010 12:47 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Thanks.

    The truth I’ve heard is that he DID do it and there was evidence that he had been following lawful orders.


  44. RIX
    46 | February 12, 2010 12:49 pm

    @ Poteen:
    Wouldn’t want any of the chattel in your haram to think she was special.

    Nope, keep em in bags. Is it just me or when you see a Muslim Woman in full regalia with the face covering & glasses, does it remind you of an Adams Family character?


  45. m
    47 | February 12, 2010 12:50 pm

    @ Poteen:

    haha! Ding ding ding!


  46. RIX
    48 | February 12, 2010 12:52 pm

    @ chickadee:
    It is almost incomprehensible that in modern times a gov’t will try to stop sales of roses on a certain day of the year and send goons around to make sure it doesn’t happen.

    True & did you ever think that you would see the day when a U.S president would dispatch SEIU thugs to beat up American citizens?


  47. Speranza
    49 | February 12, 2010 12:54 pm

    calcajun wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Thanks.
    The truth I’ve heard is that he DID do it and there was evidence that he had been following lawful orders.

    I sitll think the fact that they were throw away colonials meant that the British were looking for scapegoats.


  48. Nevergiveup
    50 | February 12, 2010 12:56 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ calcajun:
    This is for you. I was thinking about you yesterday
    Queen petitioned for posthumous pardon for Harry ‘Breaker’ Morant

    Well I don’t know enough about the case but I thought it was a good movie


  49. 51 | February 12, 2010 12:57 pm

    @ chickadee:

    Islam sucks, end of story!


  50. Guggi
    52 | February 12, 2010 12:57 pm

    Oxford student at Israeli minister: ‘Kill the Jews’

    Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister was met by a protester screaming “slaughter the Jews” as he spoke at the Oxford Union.

    Antisemitic and anti-Israel abuse was shouted throughout Danny Ayalon’s speech on Monday evening, with students causing numerous disruptions to the event.

    During the hour-long session one student ran towards Mr Ayalon shouting the Arabic phrase “Itbah Al-Yahud” [Slaughter the Jews].

    As many as 10 others, carrying Palestinian flags, made attempts to attack Mr Ayalon but were intercepted and removed by security.

    Outside the hall protesters chanted: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

    Snip


  51. Nevergiveup
    53 | February 12, 2010 12:57 pm

    calcajun wrote:

    he had been following lawful orders.

    Well that’s the rub hey, isn’t it?”Lawful Orders” ?


  52. Poteen
    54 | February 12, 2010 12:58 pm

    @ RIX:
    Cousin it?


  53. chickadee
    55 | February 12, 2010 12:58 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    It is almost incomprehensible that in modern times a gov’t will try to stop sales of roses on a certain day of the year and send goons around to make sure it doesn’t happen.

    True & did you ever think that you would see the day when a U.S president would dispatch SEIU thugs to beat up American citizens?

    No,
    I never thought I would see the day that 52% of voters would elect for POTUS someone who to me was such an obvious America hating, racist, narcissistic, commie bastard.


  54. lobo91
    56 | February 12, 2010 12:59 pm

    @ RIX:

    True & did you ever think that you would see the day when a U.S president would dispatch SEIU thugs to beat up American citizens?

    That’s really about all the Saudi mutaween are, anyway. They’re not actually police, and have no real training, aside from having memorized the Koran. Many of them are ex-convicts.

    The royal family tolerates them, as long as they leave them alone.

    Pretty much the way they pay terrorists to blow other people up, instead of them, actually.


  55. 57 | February 12, 2010 1:00 pm

    @29: Nevergiveup wrote:

    Durbin: D.C. residents panic as if snowstorm is ‘a nuclear attack’

    Actually, as a former northerner who’s also seen MD/DC/VA residents run around in panic at the slightest hint of snowfall, I actually have to agree with Durbin on this one. Yes, this year’s snow was bad; but the locals panic every winter, and it doesn’t take more than a couple of flakes to make them do it.


  56. 58 | February 12, 2010 1:00 pm

    RIX wrote:

    On the other hand the guys won’t have to run out & get candy & flowers.

    In Japan, the girls give boys chocolate.


  57. vagabond trader
    59 | February 12, 2010 1:01 pm

    @ chickadee:

    Last nite O’Reilly was insisting Hussein is not a socialist. I screamed at the tv, no hes a fcking commie! Bill should stick to sleazy gossip and looking out for abused kids,all hes good for.


  58. lobo91
    60 | February 12, 2010 1:02 pm

    @ Guggi:

    Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister was met by a protester screaming “slaughter the Jews” as he spoke at the Oxford Union.

    Subtle, huh?

    Pretty hard for the anti-Israel left to spin that one…


  59. Nevergiveup
    61 | February 12, 2010 1:02 pm

    RoboMonkey wrote:

    @29: Nevergiveup wrote:
    Durbin: D.C. residents panic as if snowstorm is ‘a nuclear attack’
    Actually, as a former northerner who’s also seen MD/DC/VA residents run around in panic at the slightest hint of snowfall, I actually have to agree with Durbin on this one. Yes, this year’s snow was bad; but the locals panic every winter, and it doesn’t take more than a couple of flakes to make them do it.

    It’s still a stupid thing for a sitting Senator to say, especially to compare it to a nuclear disaster in these times.


  60. chickadee
    62 | February 12, 2010 1:04 pm

    I just heard on the radio that there is snow on the ground in all “57″ states now. LOL
    Tuff luck AGW hoaxers.


  61. Guggi
    63 | February 12, 2010 1:04 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Pretty hard for the anti-Israel left to spin that one…

    They will find a way… :-(


  62. Nevergiveup
    64 | February 12, 2010 1:05 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Pretty hard for the anti-Israel left to spin that one…

    “Well if the Jews were not committing genocide on the west bank and gaza then we would not have say such things”—–that’s the usual response from the scumbags


  63. 65 | February 12, 2010 1:06 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    It’s still a stupid thing for a sitting Senator to say, especially to compare it to a nuclear disaster in these times.

    This is true. I don’t have to exercise “tact”, “politics”, or “diplomacy”, but a Senator should. On the other hand, the residents of DC aren’t Durbin’s constituents, so it shouldn’t cost him votes; it might even gain him votes since his insult of the locals is a compliment by contrast to the residents of Illinois who are his constituents.


  64. chickadee
    66 | February 12, 2010 1:06 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    Last nite O’Reilly was insisting Hussein is not a socialist. I screamed at the tv, no hes a fcking commie! Bill should stick to sleazy gossip and looking out for abused kids,all hes good for.

    He’s sucking up to Zero so he can get another interview with him.
    O’Reilly’s creepy.


  65. 67 | February 12, 2010 1:07 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Pretty hard for the anti-Israel left to spin that one…

    “He was mistranslated.” That’s how they explained away Ahmadinejad’s comments.

    /”Itbah Al-Yahud” actually means “hug the Jews.” -moonbat


  66. RIX
    68 | February 12, 2010 1:07 pm

    Poteen wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Cousin it?

    That’s it! Thing is the hand.


  67. 69 | February 12, 2010 1:08 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Poteen wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Cousin it?

    That’s it! Thing is the hand.

    Well, since the hand is all you can see coming out of some burqas, the kind with vents that even hide the eyes, then Thing could also be appropriate.


  68. Poteen
    70 | February 12, 2010 1:09 pm

    @ RIX:
    All that hair under a burqa. Gotta be hot.//


  69. buzzsawmonkey
    71 | February 12, 2010 1:09 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    O’Reilly’s creepy.

    O’Reilly wants to be Pat Buchanan when he grows up. Hannity wants to be O’Reilly when he grows up.


  70. RIX
    72 | February 12, 2010 1:09 pm

    RoboMonkey wrote:

    RIX wrote:

    On the other hand the guys won’t have to run out & get candy & flowers.
    In Japan, the girls give boys chocolate.

    Really? Hmmm, I’ll bet that the real keepers give the boys beer.


  71. Speranza
    73 | February 12, 2010 1:10 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Well I don’t know enough about the case but I thought it was a good movie

    A great movie! The best court martial movie I ever saw.


  72. Nevergiveup
    74 | February 12, 2010 1:11 pm

    RIX wrote:

    I’ll bet that the real keepers give the boys beer.

    Maybe, I was thinking of something else?


  73. calcajun
    75 | February 12, 2010 1:11 pm

    @ Speranza:
    That’s exactly what they were doing. British regulars did the same thing, but they picked on an irregular Colonial unit for some political sacrifices.


  74. RIX
    76 | February 12, 2010 1:11 pm

    Poteen wrote:

    @ RIX:
    All that hair under a burqa. Gotta be hot.//

    You just know that when a lot of those veils are taken off that there is shock. Kind of like Jimmah when the lights went on.


  75. calcajun
    77 | February 12, 2010 1:12 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    A nice distinction that is of recent vintage.


  76. RIX
    78 | February 12, 2010 1:12 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    I’ll bet that the real keepers give the boys beer.
    Maybe, I was thinking of something else?

    That too.


  77. calcajun
    79 | February 12, 2010 1:13 pm

    @ Speranza:
    We caught them and we shot them under Rule .303!


  78. calcajun
    80 | February 12, 2010 1:13 pm

    Later, gang.


  79. Nevergiveup
    81 | February 12, 2010 1:14 pm

    calcajun wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    A nice distinction that is of recent vintage.

    Yes, but i bet that still comes into play if the Queen actually ever gets involved. And unfortunetly I do not think she will.


  80. lobo91
    82 | February 12, 2010 1:14 pm

    @ calcajun:

    I prefer Rule .308, but to each his own.


  81. RIX
    83 | February 12, 2010 1:14 pm

    @ RoboMonkey:
    Well, since the hand is all you can see coming out of some burqas, the kind with vents that even hide the eyes, then Thing could also be appropriate.

    We should have a beer summit on this.


  82. Nevergiveup
    84 | February 12, 2010 1:15 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ RoboMonkey:
    Well, since the hand is all you can see coming out of some burqas, the kind with vents that even hide the eyes, then Thing could also be appropriate.

    We should have a beer summit on this.

    I’m 2 beers ahead of ya


  83. 85 | February 12, 2010 1:16 pm

    Well it seems that Muslim affections for the fairer sex may have just had their figurative veils torn asunder:

    Taliban Rape Tapes: A ‘Muslim Abu Ghraib’

    http://bigjournalism.com/bthor/2010/02/12/taliban-rape-tapes-a-muslim-abu-ghraib/

    [snip]Recently, this mid-level Taliban commander shared a chilling story with me. He told me it was a scandal that would rock the Muslim world like nothing before and that it would “devastate” the Haqqani network. “What Abu Ghraib was for you Americans,” he said, “this will be for the Haqqanis; only worse.”

    A Muslim Abu Ghraib? Considering the horrific violence that the Haqqanis had perpetrated to date, I had trouble imagining what they could have done now that would suddenly have the power to enflame the Muslim world. After all, that kind of outrage is normally reserved for terrible insults by the West, like cartoons, operas, or free speech. Then, my contact told me his story. It made me absolutely sick to my stomach.

    As Siraj Haqqani moved from village to village, rounding up the sons of poor Muslim families to fight for the Taliban and Al Qaeda, he offered the villagers free medical care. He even sent his physician, Dr. Hassan Duraz to conduct the clinics. There was a horrific catch, though. Duraz was a monster.

    He arrived in each village with Siraj Haqqani’s uncle, Ibrahim, and Siraj’s cousin, Ishak, in tow. With them, the Haqqanis brought along their own very special tools of terror – a video camera and an eye for human flesh. You see, with Haqqani healthcare, you not only received a medical exam, if you were an attractive young girl, you also got a screen test. And heaven forbid you passed.

    For those women and girls unfortunate enough to catch the good doctor’s fancy, it was show time. The Haqqani uncle and cousin would be brought into the exam room, they would set up their video equipment, and Duraz would drop his trousers and go to work.

    The Haqqanis and Duraz sexually assaulted poor women throughout the tribal regions and captured every moment of their degradation and humiliation on video to enjoy over and over again.

    Times were good for the Haqqani pornography ring. Their enterprise thrived until someone slipped up and word leaked out. In the blink of an eye, Siraj Haqqani was in big trouble.[snip]


  84. RIX
    86 | February 12, 2010 1:18 pm

    @ chickadee:
    I never thought I would see the day that 52% of voters would elect for POTUS someone who to me was such an obvious America hating, racist, narcissistic, commie bastard

    People ignored the obvious & many are still in denial.
    Still BHO looks like a one termer.


  85. RIX
    87 | February 12, 2010 1:19 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I’m 2 beers ahead of ya

    Guiness if ya got it. If not how about a Heiniken?


  86. vagabond trader
    88 | February 12, 2010 1:20 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    This is beyond repulsive. Not a word in the msm but put a pair of frilly undies on a hairy muzz head and its stop the presses. What an inhuman cult of murder.


  87. vagabond trader
    89 | February 12, 2010 1:23 pm

    @ RIX:

    Guiness if ya got it. If not how about a Heiniken?

    Guinness with a shot of Jameson=A Black and Tan. umm umm umm.

    Cheers! :D


  88. 90 | February 12, 2010 1:24 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    This is beyond repulsive. Not a word in the msm but put a pair of frilly undies on a hairy muzz head and its stop the presses. What an inhuman cult of murder.

    Yep, it will never make it to CNN, al Jizz, or even Fox


  89. 91 | February 12, 2010 1:26 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    Multiculturalism uber alles!


  90. mjazz
    92 | February 12, 2010 1:27 pm

    @ chickadee:
    Actually, it’s Michelle he’s got his eyes on.


  91. RIX
    93 | February 12, 2010 1:28 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    Guinness with a shot of Jameson=A Black and Tan. umm umm umm.

    Cheers!

    Now your talkin, that’s how to kick off the weekend!


  92. vagabond trader
    94 | February 12, 2010 1:31 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Bet you’re right. He is such a lout the only reason I even listen is when the hubby works nights the tv stays on. Bad habit.


  93. mjazz
    95 | February 12, 2010 1:31 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:
    WTF is wrong with them. Everybody knows that it is good and holy to rape only infidels.


  94. 96 | February 12, 2010 1:38 pm

    @ mjazz:

    It is a bit unfair to call what he Muslims did “Abu Gharib”, I dont’ think wearing panties on your head, and being naked in front of women, is equal to actual multiple rapes. I know that this story feeds into the myth of America’s Abu Gharib, but not the reality of it.

    Unlike our soldiers, their guys really are committing rape & torture – as policy no less!

    Now that it seems that the MSM has already begun to fail the test, I still wonder if this actual abuse (wow, that word isn’t strong enough) scandal will get the same coverage as the myth building one about the U.S. got.


  95. vagabond trader
    97 | February 12, 2010 1:42 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:

    According to the story this beast murdered his victims and everyone else who was involved including his own “men.”


  96. 98 | February 12, 2010 1:42 pm

    Scott Madsen wrote:

    [snip]Recently, this mid-level Taliban commander shared a chilling story with me. He told me it was a scandal that would rock the Muslim world like nothing before and that it would “devastate” the Haqqani network. “What Abu Ghraib was for you Americans,” he said, “this will be for the Haqqanis; only worse.”

    Yeah, only if the media reports it.


  97. Nevergiveup
    99 | February 12, 2010 1:46 pm

    RoboMonkey wrote:

    Abu Ghraib

    Ah it will not matter. They will only keep repeating “Abu Ghraib” and how terrible the Americans are. We get screwed either way


  98. chickadee
    100 | February 12, 2010 1:46 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    OMG This is a really vile muzz monster. Once the word got out abt. what he was doing, he went back and killed all the girls he had raped and their families. And others who had witnessed anything. Surely if there is anything at all good in Islam, this ccksucker will be be brought to justice.
    Thankfully, he didn’t succeed in destroying all the tapes.


  99. 101 | February 12, 2010 1:47 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    According to the story this beast murdered his victims and everyone else who was involved including his own “men.”

    Oh, well then I stand corrected. That sounds just like the horrors of making people sleep on the floor that our soldiers did.

    /


  100. 102 | February 12, 2010 1:48 pm

    @ Guggi:

    Religion of peace.


  101. Doppelganger
    103 | February 12, 2010 1:48 pm

    Muslims are an incredibly tolerance bunch , aren’t they?

    I was just at the mall watching all the hags in niqabs stroll by, no doubt their kids are all on WIC.

    just thinking that I am expected to tolerate their slave costumes in public.

    HELL NO. I DO NOT TOLERATE YOUR 7th CENTURY COSTUMES!!!!!!!!!!


  102. 104 | February 12, 2010 1:49 pm

    oh, I should add that it doesn’t bother me too much that Saudi Arabia banned Valentine’s Day.


  103. 105 | February 12, 2010 1:49 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I wonder if they have Teddy K in Saddam’s Abu Ghraib under American Management in Hell?


  104. tunnelrat
    106 | February 12, 2010 1:51 pm

    Thankfully, he didn’t succeed in destroying all the tapes.

    A Muzzie porn collection called “the doctor is in”
    /


  105. Doppelganger
    107 | February 12, 2010 1:52 pm

    I hope every moron with a COEXIST bumper sticker goes to a majority Muslim country and sees how they COEXIST with them.


  106. Doppelganger
    108 | February 12, 2010 1:52 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I wonder if they have Teddy K in Saddam’s Abu Ghraib under American Management in Hell?

    with no happy hour


  107. Canoe Convoy
    109 | February 12, 2010 1:54 pm

    I had to post this here:

    J Geils Band: “Love Stinks! Yeah, Yeah!”


  108. vagabond trader
    110 | February 12, 2010 1:57 pm

    @ tunnelrat:

    Why are so many perverse creatures MDs.Very disturbing.


  109. mjazz
    111 | February 12, 2010 1:57 pm

    Well, we did put a caterpillar in a cell with one of the prisoners.


  110. 112 | February 12, 2010 2:00 pm

    @ mjazz:

    I heard we had women stand near them. This made their Mohammedan little peckers shrivel…


  111. 113 | February 12, 2010 2:01 pm

    They only did this because we had Abu Gharib
    /Leftist

    This is Obama’s fault for sending more troops.
    /Rightist


  112. Canoe Convoy
    114 | February 12, 2010 2:06 pm

    Here we go:

    The Anti- Valentine’s cards: LOLOLOL


  113. Canoe Convoy
    115 | February 12, 2010 2:06 pm

    Let me try that a second time.


  114. m
    117 | February 12, 2010 2:37 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:

    Doesn’t bother me either. Because by the grace of God I was born here! It’s still pretty messed up, lol!


  115. m
    118 | February 12, 2010 2:39 pm

    @ Canoe Convoy:

    You’ll do.

    Like to see the success rate with that one


  116. Macker
    119 | February 12, 2010 2:40 pm

    Ripley has the right idea:


  117. m
    120 | February 12, 2010 2:43 pm

    @ Macker:

    It’s the only way to be sure.


  118. Canoe Convoy
    121 | February 12, 2010 4:44 pm

    @ m:
    LOLOL !!!


  119. Canoe Convoy
    122 | February 12, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ m:

    Concur. When one absolutely, positively has to make sure that the opposition is blown to smithereens, Nuke ‘em from orbit.


  120. vagabond trader
    123 | February 12, 2010 4:55 pm

    @ Canoe Convoy:

    Plus they’ll never have to agonize over Valentines Day.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David