First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Egypt’s Christians In Peril

by Speranza ( 231 Comments › )
Filed under Egypt, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamists at February 16th, 2010 - 2:30 pm

Actually all non Muslims are in peril in the Middle East, yet if you read the news you would think that the people who are suffering the most are those in Gaza. The Copts go back long before the Islamic invasion of Egypt and are a direct link in the chain which  goes back to the ancient Egyptians. Recently there has been a ludicrous attempt to promote “bi-nationalism” In Israel/Palestine which in effect would guarantee an Islamic Palestine on the ruins of Israel. What has happened to Lebanon since 1970 is a good indication as to how bi-nationalism really would work. Islam is not there to be “tolerated” or to coexist,  but to dominate.

by Faith McDonnell

At midnight every January 6th, Christmas Eve Mass ends and the early hours of Christmas Day begin for the Coptic Church in Egypt. As Orthodox Christians, descendants of Egypt’s ancient Christianity that far outdates Islam [1], the Copts have to wait longer for Christmas festivities than those who celebrate on December 25. Perhaps to emphasize that the long-anticipated day has arrived, the Mass celebrating Christ’s birth ends with the joyous ringing of bells as Egyptian Christians, dressed in their finest clothes, head home to continue their Christmas celebrations.

It is unusual for church bells to ring before midnight. But such was the case this past January 6, 2010, at Mar Yohana (St. John’s) Church in Nag Hammadi, Upper Egypt, the town famous for the discovery of the Gnostic Gospels. The church’s pastor, Bishop Anba Kirollos, was concerned by threats made against the Christians and decided to start Mass an hour early. At 11:00 P.M., church bells rang and worshippers streamed out the doors. It was a perfect time for an attack on the Christian community.

Three cars drove by the church and masked men with automatic weapons shot into the crowd, eyewitnesses later told the Middle East Christian Association (MECA). The cars then drove down three nearby side streets, shooting more Copts. Eight Christians were killed, six young church deacons instantly. A Muslim security guard was also killed, and many worshippers injured.

“The Muslims promised us a wonderful Christmas,” one wounded parishioner told the Coptic News Bulletin, “I think the message is received now.” All further Christmas celebrations were cancelled. In a moment’s time, one of the most joyous days of the year for Christians was transformed into a day of horror and carnage. That was as much the goal of the Muslim gunmen as the actual shootings. Christian holy days and holy places are most often targeted. Just seven months before, Muslims in the village of Higaza opened fire on worshippers leaving an Easter Eve service, killing two young men and wounding a woman.

[...]

Read the rest: Egypt’s Christians In Peril

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

231 Responses to “Egypt’s Christians In Peril”
( jump to bottom )

  1. vagabond trader
    1 | February 16, 2010 14:44

    My disgust runneth over. Our “Christian” potus thinks he can charm his Islamist brothers into acting civilized? How stupid can he get. Never mind, that was rhetorical.


  2. Ma Sands
    2 | February 16, 2010 14:47

    I thought of Egypt’s Copts when I read this story this morning, that Storagemanager had posted on his Winds of Babylon site:
    http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Mosul,-anti-Christian-violence:-two-murders-and-a-kidnapping-in-24-hours-17637.html


  3. Speranza
    3 | February 16, 2010 14:48

    vagabond trader wrote:

    My disgust runneth over. Our “Christian” potus thinks he can charm his Islamist brothers into acting civilized? How stupid can he get. Never mind, that was rhetorica

    Who said he is a Christian? I think he really is an atheist/Muslim.


  4. vagabond trader
    4 | February 16, 2010 14:49

    @ Speranza:

    Me too, thats why I used quotation marks.


  5. Speranza
    5 | February 16, 2010 14:51

    @ vagabond trader:
    He actually is a Socialist/atheist/Muslim.


  6. vagabond trader
    6 | February 16, 2010 14:54

    When I was in school my roomate and friend was an Assyrian Christian girl from Iraq. Her family fled with their lives after Saddam Hussein took power.Even heretical muslims have no tolerance for Christians.They are hopeless.


  7. Guggi
    7 | February 16, 2010 14:54

    In Mideast, Bet on a Strong Horse

    A new book on Arab politics has diagnosed a pathology.


  8. 8 | February 16, 2010 14:55

    Speranza wrote:

    vagabond trader wrote:
    My disgust runneth over. Our “Christian” potus thinks he can charm his Islamist brothers into acting civilized? How stupid can he get. Never mind, that was rhetorica
    Who said he is a Christian? I think he really is an atheist/Muslim.

    I agree with you one hundred percent.It becomes more clear each day.


  9. Macker
    9 | February 16, 2010 14:55

    A Disease, wrapped around an Ideology, inside a Cult. ISLAM DELENDA EST.


  10. Ma Sands
    10 | February 16, 2010 14:55

    @ Speranza:

    I remember so well, when the other site’s mgr. was covering, live, a speech of Obama’s during the campaign, where Obama finally made the leap and spoke the words of what Jesus accomplished for us on the cross.
    As Obama spoke those words, his face became so red with the “shame” of having to do such a thing to “buy off” the Christians, that it actually GLOWED…..and, almost before he was done saying the words, he let some thought “distract” himself, and his mouth was off and running on another subject, but the words had been said, and recorded –and, obviously, they have done their dirty work.


  11. vagabond trader
    11 | February 16, 2010 14:56

    @ Speranza:

    Gaiaist/socialist/atheist/muslim lover of himself worshipper.


  12. Macker
    12 | February 16, 2010 14:56

    @ vagabond trader:

    It’s always easier for civilized people to act like barbarians than the other way around.

    – Paraphrase of James Tiberius Kirk


  13. Macker
    13 | February 16, 2010 14:57

    @ Ma Sands:

    So he glowed like Mr. Dinner Jacket at the UN?


  14. Guggi
    14 | February 16, 2010 14:58

    A new blog: Bad Rachel

    Hillary and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Foreign Policy Day(s)


  15. Ma Sands
    15 | February 16, 2010 14:58

    @ Macker:

    Did that happen? I did not watch, and didn’t hear of it…..


  16. vagabond trader
    16 | February 16, 2010 14:59

    @ Ma Sands:

    I remember that also. The shame of a liar,a poor liar at that. G-d works in mysterious ways indeed, too bad more people didn’t notice.


  17. Ma Sands
    17 | February 16, 2010 15:03

    @ vagabond trader:

    Thank you. –I have mentioned that several times since then, and no one else seemed to have caught that…….it is nice to be vindicated. : )


  18. Macker
    18 | February 16, 2010 15:05

    @ Ma Sands:

    Linky?


  19. 19 | February 16, 2010 15:06

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Ma Sands:
    I remember that also. The shame of a liar,a poor liar at that. G-d works in mysterious ways indeed, too bad more people didn’t notice.

    The only truth he ever told was his slip of the tongue in an ABC interview..’My Muslim faith.’


  20. 20 | February 16, 2010 15:08

    My cat is helping me navigate…


  21. Ma Sands
    21 | February 16, 2010 15:11

    @ Macker:

    No, I’m sorry…..wouldn’t know how to locate that, from so long ago, summer of ’08, I think……perhaps you could check with the mgr. of that other site?

    / : )


  22. vagabond trader
    22 | February 16, 2010 15:13

    @ Iron Fist:

    Little rascals.This big dum dum tries to squeeze his rotund self into the skinny space between the monitor and tower.He just doesn’t get how huge he is.


  23. RIX
    23 | February 16, 2010 15:14

    Back again, woof!


  24. vagabond trader
    25 | February 16, 2010 15:14

    @ RIX:

    Pat pat pat, good RIX. :D


  25. Guggi
    26 | February 16, 2010 15:15

    Iron Fist wrote:

    My cat is helping me navigate…


  26. Guggi
    27 | February 16, 2010 15:16

    @ Iron Fist:

    or this one ;-)


  27. RIX
    28 | February 16, 2010 15:16

    @ Grimcargo:
    The only truth he ever told was his slip of the tongue in an ABC interview..’My Muslim faith.’

    Stephanopolus had to walk him back, “You mean Christian.”


  28. Beltfed
    29 | February 16, 2010 15:17

    vagabond trader @ 25:

    Forget the Pat pat pat, get them dogie treats out.


  29. RIX
    30 | February 16, 2010 15:17

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Pat pat pat, good RIX.

    Grrrr, I should getr a treat.


  30. vagabond trader
    31 | February 16, 2010 15:18

    @ RIX:

    Jameson neat?


  31. RIX
    32 | February 16, 2010 15:18

    Beltfed wrote:

    vagabond trader @ 25:
    Forget the Pat pat pat, get them dogie treats out.

    That’s what I’m thinkin, just not the liver ones.


  32. buzzsawmonkey
    33 | February 16, 2010 15:19

    RIX wrote:

    Stephanopolus had to walk him back, “You mean Christian.”

    “Yes. Yes, of course. What you said.”


  33. Speranza
    34 | February 16, 2010 15:19

    Sorry to go OT on my own thread but I was digging and came up with these gems from 1/11/10 from the cesspool
    ice v. Sharm-wow

    535 iceweasel Mon, Jan 11, 2010 1:44:49pm replyquote

    re: #533 Jimmah

    I can’t say I’m sorry she brought the real issue up. From the beginning of her vendetta against me she has been seeking ways to smear my character and pretend that this is all somehow about LGF. It is not. She has called me a liar multiple times, a narcissist, and a sociopath, and I took it all. She has been frantically emailing and IMing others, to enlist them in her campaign of hate.

    It has been, and always has been, purely personally motivated, entirely by events occurring off the blog. It’s been going on for months.
    I would never have divulged that information about her and did not, in all this time, no matter how nasty she has been to me. Even when people here asked me what it was about. Even when her spite and malice and envy led her to sneak back to an old thread to downding our wedding video– which was the moment when I lost all remaining sympathy for her.

    Now it’s out, and in future should she try to malign me again, I will be linking these posts, so people can see exactly what this is all about. What it has always been about.

    And now I intend to engage in no further discussion on the matter — or with her, ever again.


  34. huckfunn
    35 | February 16, 2010 15:20

    OT

    This is big: Three Major Firms Pull Out of Climate Change Alliance


  35. RIX
    36 | February 16, 2010 15:20

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Jameson neat?

    Sounds good, in back of a Guiness.


  36. RIX
    37 | February 16, 2010 15:22

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    Stephanopolus had to walk him back, “You mean Christian.”
    “Yes. Yes, of course. What you said.”

    It was just like that.


  37. Speranza
    38 | February 16, 2010 15:24

    537 Jimmah Mon, Jan 11, 2010 2:06:33pm replyquote

    re: #535 iceweasel

    Exactly. It’s unfortunate that Sharmuta dragged such personal matters up here, but having done so and lied about it, there was nothing else to do but to correct that lie.

    It’s a shame this discussion had to take place, but it’s better on a dead thread like this.
    538 Sharmuta Mon, Jan 11, 2010 2:29:37pm replyquote

    Lies.
    539 Sharmuta Mon, Jan 11, 2010 2:39:37pm replyquote

    And some real ugliness.


  38. Macker
    39 | February 16, 2010 15:24

    @ Grimcargo:

    3.8 TRILLION UPDINGS!


  39. vagabond trader
    40 | February 16, 2010 15:25

    @ Speranza:

    Oh my, that was what I heard rumors of. Tsk tsk, dog, meet old tricks.

    oops, sorry RIX, guinness and Jameson coming up!


  40. RIX
    41 | February 16, 2010 15:26

    535 iceweasel Mon, Jan 11, 2010 1:44:49pm replyquote
    She has called me a liar multiple times, a narcissist, and a sociopath, and I took it all. She has been frantically emailing and IMing others, to enlist them in her campaign of hate.

    What’s the problem here? That all sounds pretty accurate, but I would throw in that she’s also a Sheltey.


  41. Macker
    42 | February 16, 2010 15:28

    RIX wrote:

    What’s the problem here? That all sounds pretty accurate, but I would throw in that she’s also a Sheltey.

    WTF is a Sheltey?


  42. RIX
    43 | February 16, 2010 15:29
    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Oh my, that was what I heard rumors of. Tsk tsk, dog, meet old tricks.
    oops, sorry RIX, guinn
    ess and Jameson coming up!

    Can you put out a bowl of Fritos with that?
    I don’t want any fruit & water.


  43. 44 | February 16, 2010 15:29

    Is Sharmuta back? Wow! Cage Death Match!

    Sorry, but my money is on Iceweasel.


  44. RIX
    45 | February 16, 2010 15:30

    Macker wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    What’s the problem here? That all sounds pretty accurate, but I would throw in that she’s also a Sheltey.
    WTF is a Sheltey?

    A dog. It has to do with the last thread.


  45. Speranza
    46 | February 16, 2010 15:30

    Irish Rose jumped in a gave it to both of them – iceweasel and Jimmah. Cato also puts his 2 cents in.
    546 iceweasel Wed, Jan 13, 2010 2:35:21pm replyquote

    re: #545 Jimmah

    You should be apologising to iceweasel – she is the one you were lying about.

    It will never happen. Just last night she dropped this little turd onto an active thread to continue to stir shit.
    And was ignored by all, deservedly.

    She has, and has always had, my email. Yet she continues to choose to use LGF for her own petty and personal vendettas, and for weird forms of emotional gratification, rather than behaving like an adult.
    That comment I linked is merely another sad attempt by her to garner points from others for her newfound ‘religion’. Oh, and attention.
    547 Irish Rose Thu, Jan 14, 2010 4:33:35am replyquote

    You’re both assholes.
    Grow the fuck up.

    548 iceweasel Thu, Jan 14, 2010 4:38:38am replyquote

    re: #547 Irish Rose

    Physician, heal thyself.

    You might want to apply your words to all involved in the discussion, not merely me and Jimmah.
    549 Jimmah Thu, Jan 14, 2010 8:11:30am replyquote

    re: #547 Irish Rose

    You’re both assholes.
    Grow the fuck up.

    I guess the mature thing would be to let Sharmuta’s slanders stand huh? Sorry, but that makes no sense at all. Want to lie about me or my wife? Go right ahead but don’t start crying when we set the record straight.

    And someone who breezes on to a dead thread trying to stir up shit with nothing but downdings and name calling is the last person I will be taking advice on mature behaviour from.

    PS – Remember you wrote me and invited me to contribute to your new blog? Just to let you know – I’m not interested.

    551 Cato the Elder Thu, Jan 14, 2010 9:37:39pm replyquote

    There aren’t enough martyr cookies in the world to satisfy some people.


  46. 47 | February 16, 2010 15:30

    @ Macker:

    Read the previous thread. :mrgreen:

    (I hope. I have no bad blood from it)


  47. RIX
    48 | February 16, 2010 15:31

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Is Sharmuta back? Wow! Cage Death Match!
    Sorry, but my money is on Iceweasel.

    She’s rabid. That series of shots is supposed to be really painful.


  48. Speranza
    49 | February 16, 2010 15:32

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Is Sharmuta back? Wow! Cage Death Match!
    Sorry, but my money is on Iceweasel.

    No this exchange was from Jan.11, 2010.


  49. Formercorpsman
    50 | February 16, 2010 15:33

    Just realize, they are insane. All of them. Neurotic to the bone.


  50. 51 | February 16, 2010 15:33

    @ Ma Sands:

    The Christian population of Iraq has be cut in 1/2 since our invasion. That’s why I don’t view Iraq highly in retrospect.


  51. Speranza
    52 | February 16, 2010 15:34

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Ma Sands:
    The Christian population of Iraq has be cut in 1/2 since our invasion. That’s why I don’t view Iraq highly in retrospect.

    That statistic is not being pushed in the MSM.


  52. 53 | February 16, 2010 15:35

    @ RIX:

    Sheep-fan-opolus? Oh my, oh, my!


  53. chickadee
    54 | February 16, 2010 15:35

    huckfunn wrote:

    OT

    This is big: Three Major Firms Pull Out of Climate Change Alliance

    Excellent. Caterpillar was never on board with Zero. Zero lied abt. them to pass his Porkulus.
    The CEO came and said NO, we are not hiring because of this bill, we are laying off more than ever.

    Eat it Zero


  54. Formercorpsman
    55 | February 16, 2010 15:35

    Beautiful….oh, breathtaking, oh……lovely, oh……..marijuanaphobe.


  55. Guggi
    56 | February 16, 2010 15:35

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Is Sharmuta back? Wow! Cage Death Match!
    Sorry, but my money is on Iceweasel.

    Noooo, look at the date.


  56. 57 | February 16, 2010 15:36

    @ Speranza:

    Nope, when Christians and Jews die who cares. When it’s Muslims, It’s genocide!


  57. RIX
    58 | February 16, 2010 15:36

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Macker:
    Read the previous thread.
    (I hope. I have no bad blood from it)

    I think that we all got out ok, grrrr.


  58. 59 | February 16, 2010 15:37

    @ Guggi:

    Who would want to date Iceweasel? Eeeeewwwwwwwwee!


  59. buzzsawmonkey
    60 | February 16, 2010 15:37

    @ Speranza:

    Why bring up the psychotic arsewhistle and her throwback spouse? Let them squat in the filth they have created.


  60. Formercorpsman
    61 | February 16, 2010 15:38

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Who would want to date Iceweasel? Eeeeewwwwwwwwee!

    Fist, did you lose a bet? ;)


  61. Speranza
    62 | February 16, 2010 15:38

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Nope, when Christians and Jews die who cares. When it’s Muslims, It’s genocide!

    I am glad that Saddam is gone but I have no love for these people who have taken his place.


  62. RIX
    63 | February 16, 2010 15:38

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Sheep-fan-opolus? Oh my, oh, my!

    He was really trying to help out BHO. I’m sure that he would have done
    the same for Sarah Palin./


  63. Speranza
    64 | February 16, 2010 15:39

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Why bring up the psychotic arsewhistle and her throwback spouse? Let them squat in the filth they have created.

    I just felt we needed a light hearted moment watching two of the worst of LGF go at each other. That’s all. Back to the topic at hand.


  64. 65 | February 16, 2010 15:39

    @ Speranza:

    Exactly, we have replaced one Evil with another.


  65. RIX
    66 | February 16, 2010 15:39

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Who would want to date Iceweasel? Eeeeewwwwwwwwee!

    Ya ever been that drunk? Me either.


  66. vagabond trader
    67 | February 16, 2010 15:40

    @ RIX:

    I don’t want any fruit & water.

    LOL! Will do!


  67. Formercorpsman
    68 | February 16, 2010 15:40

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Why bring up the psychotic arsewhistle and her throwback spouse? Let them squat in the filth they have created.

    Buzz, I guilty of it too. I admit. There is an absolute train wreck quality to it.

    But to be fair, my posts were mentioning the other person.


  68. Guggi
    69 | February 16, 2010 15:40

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Who would want to date Iceweasel? Eeeeewwwwwwwwee!

    Calender-date ;-) Look at the calender-date !


  69. Speranza
    70 | February 16, 2010 15:40

    Rodan wrote:

    Exactly, we have replaced one Evil with another.

    It is a lesser evil, however they are still Arabs and none of them are worth a damn.


  70. chickadee
    71 | February 16, 2010 15:41

    @ Speranza:

    I think cluck banned sharmie. After the nyt article, I’m thinking her reaction made her a detriment to his blog. And he had no interest in working thru anything with her. She had outlived her usefulness. Just like that. . . . Deleted.


  71. buzzsawmonkey
    72 | February 16, 2010 15:42

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Here you go, FCM. Have a song on your lips.


  72. vagabond trader
    73 | February 16, 2010 15:42

    @ chickadee:

    You watching FOX? Did you see the story about Rashad Hussein, another terrorist enabler working for the enabler in chief. Un frikkin real.


  73. RIX
    74 | February 16, 2010 15:42

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ RIX:
    I don’t want any fruit & water.
    LOL! Will do!

    Thank you, grrrr.


  74. Macker
    75 | February 16, 2010 15:42

    @ RIX:

    Thanks for that info.


  75. Speranza
    76 | February 16, 2010 15:42

    chickadee wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I think cluck banned sharmie. After the nyt article, I’m thinking her reaction made her a detriment to his blog. And he had no interest in working thru anything with her. She had outlived her usefulness. Just like that. . . . Deleted.

    I think so too. She must have written him some type of “bad crazy” email and he said to himself “WTF who needs this nutjob any more?” He obviously prefers asswhistle and Dimmah to Sharm-wow and Eye-rash Rose.


  76. 77 | February 16, 2010 15:43

    @ Speranza:

    It’s Ironic that the US which is majority Christian, preisded over the decimation of one of the oldest Christian communities.

    How Ironic, all in the name of Muslim Democracy!

    Spit!


  77. Formercorpsman
    78 | February 16, 2010 15:43

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Exactly, we have replaced one Evil with another.

    I’m still out on that one. The facts are the facts no doubt. But I also think Iraq could very well be the catalyst for those protesting in Iran over the last year or two.

    Don’t get me wrong, I certainly appreciate what has been the norm for 1400 years can’t be reversed in 10 years.

    But if we can flip Iran, I think that just might be the domino we need to fall. I could be wrong, I admit.


  78. RIX
    79 | February 16, 2010 15:44

    Macker wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Thanks for that info.

    De. nada


  79. Speranza
    80 | February 16, 2010 15:44

    Rodan wrote:

    Muslim Democracy!

    The ultimate oxy-moron


  80. 81 | February 16, 2010 15:44

    @ Speranza:

    He used Irish rose as his pittbull and once she wasn’t useful, he threw her under the bus.


  81. Formercorpsman
    82 | February 16, 2010 15:44

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Here you go, FCM. Have a song on your lips.

    Awesome!


  82. vagabond trader
    83 | February 16, 2010 15:44

    @ Speranza:

    I am glad that Saddam is gone but I have no love for these people who have taken his place.

    Cannot help thinking, these people still hate non muzz, esp Christians and Jews, why should we die for them again?


  83. Formercorpsman
    84 | February 16, 2010 15:45

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    He used Irish rose as his pittbull and once she wasn’t useful, he threw her under the bus.

    Is she banned now?


  84. Guggi
    85 | February 16, 2010 15:45

    chickadee wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I think cluck banned sharmie. After the nyt article, I’m thinking her reaction made her a detriment to his blog. And he had no interest in working thru anything with her. She had outlived her usefulness. Just like that. . . . Deleted.

    No, she isn’t banned, she left the blog after ice outed her. ice&jimmah are a hellish beastlike couple.


  85. Rorschach
    86 | February 16, 2010 15:45

    @ Speranza:

    And someone who breezes on to a dead thread trying to stir up shit with nothing but downdings and name calling is the last person I will be taking advice on mature behaviour from.

    i guess everyone has to agree with you for your opinion to matter. they act as if those dingy thingies actually matter.


  86. Speranza
    87 | February 16, 2010 15:45

    Formercorpsman wrote:

    I’m still out on that one. The facts are the facts no doubt. But I also think Iraq could very well be the catalyst for those protesting in Iran over the last year or two.

    I hope you are right, however Iraq needs to get greater control over its own internal security first. They have made great strides so far.


  87. RIX
    88 | February 16, 2010 15:45

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    It’s Ironic that the US which is majority Christian, preisded over the decimation of one of the oldest Christian communities.
    How Ironic, all in the name of Muslim Democracy!
    Spit!

    And they are democratic, they vote to kill all Infidels.


  88. 89 | February 16, 2010 15:46

    @ Speranza:

    Muslim Democracy means Islamo-Imperialist parties like the AKP (Turkey), Hizballah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza) and the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt) gain power. After all they do reflect the popular will of those countries.


  89. Formercorpsman
    90 | February 16, 2010 15:46

    Speranza wrote:

    Formercorpsman wrote:
    I’m still out on that one. The facts are the facts no doubt. But I also think Iraq could very well be the catalyst for those protesting in Iran over the last year or two.
    I hope you are right, however Iraq needs to get greater control over its own internal security first. They have made great strides so far.

    No doubt, you will not get an argument from me there.


  90. Speranza
    91 | February 16, 2010 15:46

    Rorschach wrote:

    i guess everyone has to agree with you for your opinion to matter. they act as if those dingy thingies actually matter.

    Those silly Karma points the idjit instituted was the tolling of the death-knell for Little Green Balls.


  91. 92 | February 16, 2010 15:47

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Actually Iran because it’s Persian not Arab is the most likely to go Pro American. I can see Iran, not Iraq being a long term American ally.


  92. buzzsawmonkey
    93 | February 16, 2010 15:47

    Guggi wrote:

    ice&jimmah are a hellish beastlike couple.

    If by that you mean that Jimmah is the Pithecanthropus version of Richard Dawkins and iceweasel is Andrea Dworkin in the grip of ‘roid rage, then yes.


  93. Formercorpsman
    94 | February 16, 2010 15:48

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Muslim Democracy means Islamo-Imperialist parties like the AKP (Turkey), Hizballah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza) and the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt) gain power. After all they do reflect the popular will of those countries.

    Very true. Even worse, Carter legitimizing the Hamas elections.


  94. lobo91
    95 | February 16, 2010 15:48

    @ RIX:

    What’s the problem here? That all sounds pretty accurate, but I would throw in that she’s also a Sheltey.

    Now you’re insulting Shelties.

    Unlike her, Shelties are cute, and smart.

    They’re just not good hunters.


  95. Speranza
    96 | February 16, 2010 15:48

    Rodan wrote:

    Muslim Democracy means Islamo-Imperialist parties like the AKP (Turkey), Hizballah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza) and the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt) gain power. After all they do reflect the popular will of those countries

    Even Turkey after almost 90 years of “Secularism” has an Islamofascist enalber like Erdogan in power.

    Listen guys I am sorry for posting the Shamrm/Ice/Jimmah arguments from January. I just felt at the end of the day EDT we needed a bit of a chuckle.


  96. chickadee
    97 | February 16, 2010 15:49

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    You watching FOX? Did you see the story about Rashad Hussein, another terrorist enabler working for the enabler in chief. Un frikkin real.

    Zero is up to his arse in radicals. This is who he has always associated with. Nothing but radical scum from day one.


  97. Formercorpsman
    98 | February 16, 2010 15:49

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Actually Iran because it’s Persian not Arab is the most likely to go Pro American. I can see Iran, not Iraq being a long term American ally.

    Maybe one day. It was that way before.


  98. Speranza
    99 | February 16, 2010 15:49

    Rodan wrote:

    Actually Iran because it’s Persian not Arab is the most likely to go Pro American. I can see Iran, not Iraq being a long term American ally.

    It was until we helped betray the Shah.


  99. RIX
    100 | February 16, 2010 15:50

    @ vagabond trader:
    Cannot help thinking, these people still hate non muzz, esp Christians and Jews, why should we die for them again?

    That actually is my point, it is about our security.


  100. Macker
    101 | February 16, 2010 15:50

    @ Guggi:

    You mean the beast with two backs? EEEEWWWWWW!


  101. Guggi
    102 | February 16, 2010 15:50

    @ Speranza:

    And someone who breezes on to a dead thread trying to stir up shit with nothing but downdings and name calling is the last person I will be taking advice on mature behaviour from.

    The hellish couple is now after “bagua” with down dinging and name calling. Look at the end of the “Walter-CRU-data” thread from yesterday.


  102. Rorschach
    103 | February 16, 2010 15:50

    @ Speranza:

    what do they do exactly? why are they so excited to have them?


  103. Formercorpsman
    104 | February 16, 2010 15:50

    Speranza wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    Muslim Democracy means Islamo-Imperialist parties like the AKP (Turkey), Hizballah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza) and the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt) gain power. After all they do reflect the popular will of those countries
    Even Turkey after almost 90 years of “Secularism” has an Islamofascist enalber like Erdogan in power.
    Listen guys I am sorry for posting the Shamrm/Ice/Jimmah arguments from January. I just felt at the end of the day EDT we needed a bit of a chuckle.

    It is totally cool. It is the glue that binds us.

    To me, it really is no different than how we all at one time would critique kos or huffpo. Charles has earned his rightful spot.


  104. Speranza
    105 | February 16, 2010 15:50

    Rodan wrote:

    He used Irish rose as his pittbull and once she wasn’t useful, he threw her under the bus

    What she did in having us closed down for an hour and the shit she stirred up at zombie’s place – I have zero sympathy for her.


  105. Guggi
    106 | February 16, 2010 15:51

    Macker wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    You mean the beast with two backs? EEEEWWWWWW!

    ;-) ;-) ;-)


  106. Macker
    107 | February 16, 2010 15:51

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Actually Iran because it’s Persian not Arab is the most likely to go Pro American. I can see Iran, not Iraq being a long term American ally.

    Perhaps we should start calling Iran “Persia” again?


  107. RIX
    108 | February 16, 2010 15:51

    @ lobo91:
    Now you’re insulting Shelties.

    Unlike her, Shelties are cute, and smart.

    They’re just not good hunters.

    What up Dawg?


  108. 109 | February 16, 2010 15:51

    @ Formercorpsman:

    That’s what will happen once this regime is gone. It
    ‘s better to deal with Persian Nationalists who want to restore the Sassanian Empire, than Islamists who wnat a Caliphate.


  109. Formercorpsman
    110 | February 16, 2010 15:52

    Macker wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ Formercorpsman:
    Actually Iran because it’s Persian not Arab is the most likely to go Pro American. I can see Iran, not Iraq being a long term American ally.
    Perhaps we should start calling Iran “Persia” again?

    I second the motion.


  110. Speranza
    111 | February 16, 2010 15:52

    Formercorpsman wrote:

    It is totally cool. It is the glue that binds us.

    To me, it really is no different than how we all at one time would critique kos or huffpo. Charles has earned his rightful spot.

    We are a banned of brothers. theblogmocracy (unlike BabbaZee’s place, GCP, and others) was specifically formed for ex LGFers and for any other conservatives who wanted to come aboard to regroup.


  111. buzzsawmonkey
    112 | February 16, 2010 15:52

    Macker wrote:

    Perhaps we should start calling Iran “Persia” again?

    Be a good way to sell taking action against Iran—if Obama were going to take it. “US vs. Iran—this time, it’s Persianal!”


  112. Formercorpsman
    113 | February 16, 2010 15:53

    @ Rodan:

    Hey, if they let the persian chicks out of the bag, that would be cool too.

    (Sorry)


  113. vagabond trader
    114 | February 16, 2010 15:53

    @ Macker:

    They used to be. I went to school with a guy who lived there and taught English back in the early 1970s when teachers couldn’t get jobs around here. He loved it and the pay was tremendous for the time.


  114. 115 | February 16, 2010 15:53

    @ Macker:

    You know why it’s Iran and not Persia?

    Back in the 30′s one of the Shahs was so taken into the Nazi talk of Aryan super race, that he renamed the country Iran or land of the Aryans. He did this because his point was that Iran was the homeland of Aryans.


  115. Macker
    116 | February 16, 2010 15:53

    Speranza wrote:

    It was until we helped betray the Shah.

    Indeed.


  116. Speranza
    117 | February 16, 2010 15:54

    Rorschach wrote:

    what do they do exactly? why are they so excited to have them?

    They get to be first in line to lick Chunk’s expanding buttocks.


  117. 118 | February 16, 2010 15:54

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Persian women are hot! I dated one back in the late 90′s. I was a jerk at the time and didn’t take her serious. Oh well!


  118. 119 | February 16, 2010 15:55

    @ Speranza:

    Jimmy Carter! The enabler of islamism!


  119. lobo91
    120 | February 16, 2010 15:55

    @ Speranza:

    It was until we helped betray the Shah.

    Which is great, if you think history began in 1979.

    We actually put the Shah in power in the first place, and overthrew an elected government to do it.

    While it’s true that the Iranian government under the Shah was pro-US (big surprise), the Iranian people were not.

    Without having much access to public opinion in Iran today, I don’t know how much that’s changed in the last 30 years.


  120. Macker
    121 | February 16, 2010 15:56

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Persian women are hot! I dated one back in the late 90’s. I was a jerk at the time and didn’t take her serious. Oh well!

    Even worse if she took you serious. Sorry to hear that, man.


  121. Speranza
    122 | February 16, 2010 15:56

    Rodan wrote:

    Persian women are hot! I dated one back in the late 90’s. I was a jerk at the time and didn’t take her serious. Oh well!

    yes they are very attractive. Actually rather European looking combined with being somewhat exotic.They have beautiful big black yes.


  122. Macker
    123 | February 16, 2010 15:56

    @ Speranza:

    EEEEWWWWWW!


  123. Buckeye Abroad
    124 | February 16, 2010 15:56

    #92 Rodan

    I can see Iran, not Iraq being a long term American ally.

    And we all know how well America treats her allies.

    The Shah was not available for comment.

    //sarc


  124. 125 | February 16, 2010 15:57

    @ Speranza:

    They resemble Greek/Italian/Southern Spanish women.


  125. vagabond trader
    126 | February 16, 2010 15:57

    @ Rodan:

    Wow, never knew that.


  126. Speranza
    127 | February 16, 2010 15:58

    lobo91 wrote:

    We actually put the Shah in power in the first place, and overthrew an elected government to do it.

    We helped overthrow a Marxist progressive in Mossadegh whou would eventually have turned into as much a dictator as Nasser, Castro, and other tyrants. He would have eventually aligned with the USSSR.


  127. 128 | February 16, 2010 15:58

    @ Buckeye Abroad:

    The Shah was not available for comment.

    Isn’t that the truth!


  128. 129 | February 16, 2010 15:59

    @ vagabond trader:

    Yup! The Shah at the time was doing it to impress Hitler.


  129. vagabond trader
    130 | February 16, 2010 15:59

    @ Speranza:

    They get to be first in line to lick Chunk’s expanding buttocks.

    EEEEEEEEEEEeeeeewwwwww! I did not need that visual after dinner.


  130. buzzsawmonkey
    131 | February 16, 2010 16:00

    Speranza wrote:

    They get to be first in line to lick Chunk’s expanding buttocks.

    That certainly gives new meaning to the term “Pacific Rim.”


  131. Speranza
    132 | February 16, 2010 16:00

    lobo91 wrote:

    Without having much access to public opinion in Iran today, I don’t know how much that’s changed in the last 30 years.

    Just about every Iranian exile or observer of Iran says that the young people (Iran is overwhelmingly populated by people born since 1979) are pro American precisely because the hated Iranian regime is anti American.


  132. 133 | February 16, 2010 16:01

    @ Macker:


    Even worse if she took you serious.

    She did, that’s the sad part!


  133. Macker
    134 | February 16, 2010 16:01

    Holy Shit! You gotta see this!


  134. Formercorpsman
    135 | February 16, 2010 16:01

    Speranza wrote:

    Formercorpsman wrote:
    It is totally cool. It is the glue that binds us.
    To me, it really is no different than how we all at one time would critique kos or huffpo. Charles has earned his rightful spot.
    We are a banned of brothers. theblogmocracy (unlike BabbaZee’s place, GCP, and others) was specifically formed for ex LGFers and for any other conservatives who wanted to come aboard to regroup.

    I still go to the other places at times too. I also respect their policy of not wanting to mention it. As far as I am concerned, Babba, Writer Mom, and the folks there are great. We have a great time when I get a chance to stop in.

    For me, if I want to speak my mind about something I think is asinine, then I will. We do that here. My feeling, it is fair game. They have decided to open themselves up for critique, so be it. Nothing nasty, but they want to play, then lets play.

    No different than any other blog out there as far as I am concerned. It is blogging. I am perfectly fine with pointing out when someone is making an ass out fo themself.


  135. vagabond trader
    136 | February 16, 2010 16:02

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    LOL! :LOL:


  136. Macker
    137 | February 16, 2010 16:02

    @ Rodan:

    When you and I meet, I will buy you the alcoholic beverage of your choice so you can drown your sorrows in it. 8)


  137. chickadee
    138 | February 16, 2010 16:03

    Guggi wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I think cluck banned sharmie. After the nyt article, I’m thinking her reaction made her a detriment to his blog. And he had no interest in working thru anything with her. She had outlived her usefulness. Just like that. . . . Deleted.

    No, she isn’t banned, she left the blog after ice outed her. ice&jimmah are a hellish beastlike couple.

    What makes you think she isn’t banned. I can’t imagine her not saying something of a farewell. It isn’t her style to just clam up. Ice scrunt is a fcking little hairy beast. She will be shocked when cluck deletes her. She is too stupid and vulgar. She won’t work out when he tries to stabilize his free fall.


  138. lobo91
    139 | February 16, 2010 16:04

    @ Speranza:

    We helped overthrow a Marxist progressive in Mossadegh whou would eventually have turned into as much a dictator as Nasser, Castro, and other tyrants. He would have eventually aligned with the USSSR.

    While that was what the Brits told the Eisenhower administration, I’ve never seen any evidence to support the claim.

    It’s also pretty hard to predict what might have happened.

    Sorry, but the 1979 revolution can be traced directly to the 1953 coup that we engineered.


  139. Macker
    140 | February 16, 2010 16:04

    @ chickadee:

    I guess she will have to suck his s**t-covered d**k to stay there.


  140. coldwarrior
    141 | February 16, 2010 16:04

    @ Macker:

    india paki border…there is NO brit influence to be seen in that clip there…

    /s


  141. RIX
    142 | February 16, 2010 16:04

    See ya later. Gonna see if I can get someone to take me for a walk after dinner, grrrrr.


  142. buzzsawmonkey
    143 | February 16, 2010 16:05

    @ Macker:

    Ah, the glory and pageantry of the mystic East.


  143. Speranza
    144 | February 16, 2010 16:05

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Hey I like those people too (particularly Pink Freud). They have their reasons for running their blogs the way they want to.


  144. Macker
    145 | February 16, 2010 16:05

    @ lobo91:

    Maybe so, but the Islamofascists stepped over the line when they took the Hostages.


  145. Speranza
    146 | February 16, 2010 16:06

    lobo91 wrote:

    Sorry, but the 1979 revolution can be traced directly to the 1953 coup that we engineered.

    Wrong. The 1979 Revolution can be traced to the reactionaries opposing the Shah’s modernization of Iran. Mossadegh was the Allende of Iran.


  146. lobo91
    147 | February 16, 2010 16:06

    @ Speranza:

    Just about every Iranian exile or observer of Iran says that the young people (Iran is overwhelmingly populated by people born since 1979) are pro American precisely because the hated Iranian regime is anti American.

    Just as all the Iraqi exiles said that we’d be hailed as liberators after overthrowing Saddam.

    I’m not saying they’re wrong. I’m just suggesting that you consider the source.


  147. Formercorpsman
    148 | February 16, 2010 16:06

    @ Speranza:

    I know. Sorry if it sounded as if you did not. Was not my intention.


  148. 149 | February 16, 2010 16:07

    @ Rorschach:

    They are necessary. How dare you question the power of the ding?


  149. grambo
    150 | February 16, 2010 16:08

    Speranza wrote:

    Formercorpsman wrote:
    It is totally cool. It is the glue that binds us.
    To me, it really is no different than how we all at one time would critique kos or huffpo. Charles has earned his rightful spot.
    We are a banned of brothers. theblogmocracy (unlike BabbaZee’s place, GCP, and others) was specifically formed for ex LGFers and for any other conservatives who wanted to come aboard to regroup.

    Well, I was banned. Granted, after only …..um, maybe a year. But I have to tell you that I don’t watch soap operas or reality TV and there’s not a spec of difference ‘tween that and the incessant goings-on here about LGF.
    When a thread here hits critical mass …i.e. more posts about LGF than not, I bail and go elsewhere, to return sometime later and try the newest thread.
    I know. Tough darts. It’s a free country. And Blogmocracy.
    But consider that I am your target audience. Very Conservative, lifelong supporter of Isrial, AGW denier for many years, etc.etc.
    I’ve heard here that there is interest in growing this Blog. I am of the opinion that won’t happen to any great extent as long as every thread gets diverted into endless posts that the average non-banned person will neither understand nor appreciate.
    I won’t give up. I’ll just keep doing what I do.
    But then, he,he,he, …I was banned ….


  150. vagabond trader
    151 | February 16, 2010 16:08

    @ Macker:

    With all the good natured strutting ceremony you’d think these people could get along.Next day the jihadis probably blew up a temple or something.


  151. Buckeye Abroad
    152 | February 16, 2010 16:08

    94. Formercorpsman

    Even worse, Carter legitimizing the Hamas elections.

    If you recall the Hugo Chavez election in 2002 (IIRC), Carter came down, blessed the results as fraud-free and got back on the plane. A couple of years later I was working with a consultant who fled Venezuela who told me the rumor in the streets of Caracas was that Carter got a cool $1 million for it.

    He is a vile old man, so I wouldn’t put it past him.


  152. lobo91
    153 | February 16, 2010 16:09

    @ Speranza:

    I’m not interested in entering into another argument with people here today.

    Believe what you like.


  153. 154 | February 16, 2010 16:09

    @ lobo91:

    n that I’ll agree with you. But do you remember the kid that ran across the plaza with an American flag streaming when the statue of Saddam came down? We were welcomed as liberators. Liberation was just messy.


  154. Speranza
    155 | February 16, 2010 16:12

    lobo91 wrote:

    I’m not saying they’re wrong. I’m just suggesting that you consider the source.

    The young peopel of Iran hate the mullahcrocy that represses them. They do not have to become ardent pro Americans but they hate the current regime that promises them death in a nuclear war in order for the hidden 12 Iman return.


  155. 156 | February 16, 2010 16:13

    @ lobo91:

    Shoulda nuked ‘em.

    Seriously, you make the case for extreme measures. We could have declared Pax Americana after Hiroshima. Maybe we should have.


  156. vagabond trader
    157 | February 16, 2010 16:13

    @ grambo:

    Cannot disagree but its tough not to get caught up in it on occasion.They are certainly unworthy of all the attention they receive.


  157. Speranza
    158 | February 16, 2010 16:14

    @ grambo:
    Ok no more surfing over there for idiotic psots.


  158. lobo91
    159 | February 16, 2010 16:15

    @ Iron Fist:

    I’m always wary of putting too much faith in the opinions of exiles and ex-pats about the places they left. They usually left them for a reason.

    It’s like basing your opinion of how Muslims think based on your experiences with your next-door neighbor who’s an engineer who came here from Pakistan.

    If he came here because he recognized that Pakistan was a shithole that’s never going to improve while its society is dominated by Islamists, he’s probably not a good source of information on how the majority of Pakistanis think.


  159. huckfunn
    160 | February 16, 2010 16:15

    chickadee wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:
    OT
    This is big: Three Major Firms Pull Out of Climate Change Alliance

    Excellent. Caterpillar was never on board with Zero. Zero lied abt. them to pass his Porkulus.
    The CEO came and said NO, we are not hiring because of this bill, we are laying off more than ever.
    Eat it Zero

    Hey, chick; glad you took note. I’m hoping that the thread gods will also take note and run with the ball. The global warming thing is coming unspooled on a daily basis and the pace seems to be accelerating. There is a group of major corporations that are partners in shaping “climate change” policy and legislation. That group is known as USCAP. BP, Conoco-Phillips and Caterpillar have pulled out of that group and I am hoping that more member corporations will feel the heat of public scrutiny and make their exit.


  160. Guggi
    161 | February 16, 2010 16:15

    chickadee wrote:

    Guggi wrote:
    chickadee wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    I think cluck banned sharmie. After the nyt article, I’m thinking her reaction made her a detriment to his blog. And he had no interest in working thru anything with her. She had outlived her usefulness. Just like that. . . . Deleted.
    No, she isn’t banned, she left the blog after ice outed her. ice&jimmah are a hellish beastlike couple.
    What makes you think she isn’t banned. I can’t imagine her not saying something of a farewell. It isn’t her style to just clam up. Ice scrunt is a fcking little hairy beast. She will be shocked when cluck deletes her. She is too stupid and vulgar. She won’t work out when he tries to stabilize his free fall.

    Some “lizards” were discussing it and were looking at her account and no, she isn’t banned. She only disappeared. To be fair: after this catfight (outing her from private emails as a bum) she couldn’t stay any longer, she had lost the fight.


  161. vagabond trader
    162 | February 16, 2010 16:15

    @ RIX:

    Bye RIX, don’t eat the yellow snow! :mrgreen:


  162. chickadee
    163 | February 16, 2010 16:15

    @ Macker:

    Oh noes. I can’t think abt. that. not going to think abt. it. la la la la la la la la la
    yuck


  163. 164 | February 16, 2010 16:17

    @ Speranza:

    No, but these same kids might consider turning Tel Avive into a radioactive parking lot a good thing. We haven’t done anything to make them think that there will be catestrophic consequences to such an act. We spent a month telling the Taliban we were coming. We’ll spend years telling the Iranians. And then we’ll never come.


  164. lobo91
    165 | February 16, 2010 16:17

    @ Iron Fist:

    Maybe so, but it’s a little late now.


  165. vagabond trader
    166 | February 16, 2010 16:17

    @ chickadee:

    Gaaaaaaah, between that and Speranzas comment I’m ready to hurl.


  166. Formercorpsman
    167 | February 16, 2010 16:18

    @ grambo:

    Understandable.

    I think you can probably say, this blog has been following such a course for a number of months now. It certainly seems to me, the focus has surely shifted from the topic of lgf, to other issues important to what you describe.

    At least from what I can see, the bashing has really slowed up. I was there for a while, and many other were than much longer. Despite most of us not knowing each other if we were to trip over each other, there was a very unusual dynamic involved. I don’t have the right words for it, but the old crew had a symbiotic feel I never got any other place.

    So please hang in there. This blog is doing good things, and forgive those of us who still chew on this bone probably too much still. I appreciate you response to me, seriously.


  167. chickadee
    168 | February 16, 2010 16:19

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ Macker:

    india paki border…there is NO brit influence to be seen in that clip there…

    /s

    It was cute. Maybe they will just keep having happy high step competitions and not go to war.
    What a great way to work out conflict.


  168. Speranza
    169 | February 16, 2010 16:19

    @ Iron Fist:
    Yo make some good points. Anyway I am out for the evening.


  169. coldwarrior
    170 | February 16, 2010 16:19

    grambo wrote:

    When a thread here hits critical mass …i.e. more posts about LGF than not, I bail and go elsewhere, to return sometime later and try the newest thread.
    I know. Tough darts. It’s a free country. And Blogmocracy.

    hell, i do that too, and i ‘work’ here!


  170. grambo
    171 | February 16, 2010 16:20

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    n that I’ll agree with you. But do you remember the kid that ran across the plaza with an American flag streaming when the statue of Saddam came down? We were welcomed as liberators. Liberation was just messy.

    You reminded me of a picture of a friend of mine there just after the liberation:
    Rachel and Friend

    Everyone was a lot more optimistic in those brief days ….


  171. grambo
    172 | February 16, 2010 16:22

    @ grambo:
    eh???? 404 ?

    Trying again


  172. Speranza
    173 | February 16, 2010 16:23

    @ grambo:
    I do not think that we anticipated the “insurgency” as we should have. I think we felt that once we overthrew Saddam, that was going to be the tough part. Actually getting rid of Saddam was surprisingly easy. Bush wasted three years until he went with the surge strategy.


  173. vagabond trader
    174 | February 16, 2010 16:24

    @ Speranza:

    Should have secured the borders too.


  174. maxhdrm
    175 | February 16, 2010 16:26

    Macker @134 Them people are Nuckin Futz!!

    Admins. when ever i hit reply or quote i get this

    WARNING! Add “ID=’comment’” into the field in the file ‘comment.php’ of your theme.

    this mean anything to you?


  175. Formercorpsman
    176 | February 16, 2010 16:28

    Have a good night guys, I’m still at work trying to tie up some loose ends. I need to get out of here. Catch you later.


  176. huckfunn
    177 | February 16, 2010 16:31

    @ grambo:
    @ Formercorpsman:
    @ coldwarrior:

    I guess my feelings weren’t all that crushed when I got punted from LGF (I was looking for a blog when I got there) as I don’t take all of this as seriously as some folks do. It’s entertaining and I love to vent my spleen; not so much toward individuals, but toward the forces that are trying to subvert this country. I don’t feel any need to participate in the hysterical anti-chunkles thing. He’s a yutz; OK; I’m done. Just a note. I think that I was the only one who ever got a hat tip on my first post. Yipp-f’nnn-eee. Anyhoo; we gotta take down the climate scammers.


  177. wolfie
    178 | February 16, 2010 16:32

    @ maxhdrm:

    Get off this blog!!!
    Then come back and newly sign in with your password.
    (Worked for me.)


  178. coldwarrior
    179 | February 16, 2010 16:33

    maxhdrm wrote:

    Macker @134 Them people are Nuckin Futz!!
    Admins. when ever i hit reply or quote i get this
    WARNING! Add “ID=’comment’” into the field in the file ‘comment.php’ of your theme.
    this mean anything to you?

    it did that to me too, then i re-logged in and it stopped


  179. coldwarrior
    180 | February 16, 2010 16:36

    @ huckfunn:

    it can turn into a rowdy here sometimes, we like that.

    we can be serious too, when needed.

    one day we will be over the obscure jazz guitarists and his cult


  180. lobo91
    181 | February 16, 2010 16:39

    @ Speranza:

    I do not think that we anticipated the “insurgency” as we should have. I think we felt that once we overthrew Saddam, that was going to be the tough part. Actually getting rid of Saddam was surprisingly easy.

    The problem was that the plan didn’t anticipate the reaction of Saddam’s government and military. They basically abandoned their posts, for the most part.

    The expectation was that it was going to be a lot more like the battle for Berlin in 1945. Whether Saddam was captured or killed in the process, the planners believed that we would have to militarily defeat them, and then some representative of the government would surrender.

    Had that happened, things would have been much different.

    Instead Saddam’s military and government basically evaporated, and started an insurgency against us. Then jihadists from all over the Islamic world decided to come and play.

    The single biggest mistake of the war, though, was putting Bremer in charge in Baghdad.

    He couldn’t manage a Taco Bell.


  181. waldensianspirit
    182 | February 16, 2010 16:42

    @ lobo91:
    What I didn’t expect was that we’d be “rebuilding” that which we didn’t break into an islamic republic. Period.


  182. maxhdrm
    183 | February 16, 2010 16:44

    ok thanks for the advice…be right back.


  183. huckfunn
    184 | February 16, 2010 16:53

    @ coldwarrior:
    I hear ya. I’ve done plenty of rowdy. MP duty in Thailand was like being a bouncer in SE Asia’s biggist and bestest ho-house. What a rip that was. I’m just bored with the endless LGF bash, but I like alot of the other direction of the threads. I’ll contribute to this joint as best I can.

    Cheers,


  184. maxhdrm
    185 | February 16, 2010 16:55

    @ wolfie:
    @ coldwarrior:

    thanks gents…obviously it worked.


  185. coldwarrior
    186 | February 16, 2010 16:56

    @ huckfunn:

    blogmocracy is going to be by definition a little rowdy, and sometimes the topics will be, well, they will be what they are.


  186. huckfunn
    187 | February 16, 2010 16:58

    @ coldwarrior:
    Good ‘nuf for me.


  187. lobo91
    188 | February 16, 2010 17:06

    @ waldensianspirit:

    What I didn’t expect was that we’d be “rebuilding” that which we didn’t break into an islamic republic. Period.

    Once Bremer issued orders basically disestablishing what remained of both the Iraqi military and its civil government, it became our responsibility.

    And Iraq today isn’t an “Islamic Republic.” It isn’t governed by Sharia law.

    Yes, religion is a bigger part of life there than it is in Western countries, but if you think you’re going to create a strictly secular state in the heart of the Islamic world, without it ending up as a dictatorship, you’re dreaming.


  188. waldensianspirit
    189 | February 16, 2010 17:10

    @ lobo91:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq

    The federal government of Iraq is defined under the current Constitution as an Islamic, democratic, federal parliamentary republic.


  189. lobo91
    190 | February 16, 2010 17:16

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Yes, I’m well aware of what Wikipedia says about it.

    And then there’s reality.

    Is Iraq governed by Sharia law today? Does it have a religious council that gets to veto laws passed by its legislature, like Iran does?


  190. coldwarrior
    191 | February 16, 2010 17:16

    conventional long form: Republic of Iraq


  191. waldensianspirit
    192 | February 16, 2010 17:18

    @ lobo91:
    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/iz.html CIA says:

    Legal system:
    Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
    based on European civil and Islamic law under the framework outlined in the Iraqi Constitution; has not accepted compulsory ICJ jurisdiction

    but what does ICJ mean?


  192. coldwarrior
    193 | February 16, 2010 17:19

    off the top of my head:international court of justice, i think


  193. lobo91
    194 | February 16, 2010 17:20

    @ coldwarrior:

    I believe that’s correct.


  194. waldensianspirit
    195 | February 16, 2010 17:21

    @ coldwarrior:
    hmmm, which reminds me, the ICC outfit in Belgium hasn’t been clamoring to hang Bush and Cheney of late. Wonder what got them to shut up.


  195. lobo91
    196 | February 16, 2010 17:22

    At any rate, have you heard of anyone being sentenced by an Iraqi court to stoning, or having their hand cut off?


  196. waldensianspirit
    197 | February 16, 2010 17:24

    @ lobo91:
    It will come. There is no doubt in my mind the mullahs still reign; just biding their time.


  197. coldwarrior
    198 | February 16, 2010 17:27

    @ waldensianspirit:

    i dunno if the population of iraq is that devout to have full blown mullahocracy. time will tell tho


  198. waldensianspirit
    199 | February 16, 2010 17:27

    Remember Four Southern Baptist missionaries killed in Iraq drive-by shooting [2004]? If the same thing were tried today it would be the same outcome.


  199. lobo91
    200 | February 16, 2010 17:29

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Well, as I said on a previous thread, my Magic 8 Ball is in the shop.

    I’ve seen nothing to suggest any such future for Iraq, though.


  200. lobo91
    201 | February 16, 2010 17:32

    @ waldensianspirit:

    And northern college students were killed in the south while trying to register black people to vote in the early 1960s, too.

    Personally, I think Baptist missionaries going to Iraq are probably not all that bright, even today.

    Doing so in 2004 was downright stupid.


  201. lobo91
    202 | February 16, 2010 17:34

    @ coldwarrior:

    I seriously doubt that the Sunnis or the Kurds would be too open to the idea, under any circumstances.

    Best case, it would lead to civil war.


  202. coldwarrior
    203 | February 16, 2010 17:38

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I seriously doubt that the Sunnis or the Kurds would be too open to the idea, under any circumstances.
    Best case, it would lead to civil war.

    and then the joint can turn into 3 countries like it should be imho.


  203. coldwarrior
    204 | February 16, 2010 17:43

    lobo91 wrote:

    Personally, I think Baptist missionaries going to Iraq are probably not all that bright, even today.

    Doing so in 2004 was downright stupid.

    darwin award winners.

    morons


  204. lobo91
    205 | February 16, 2010 17:43

    @ coldwarrior:

    and then the joint can turn into 3 countries like it should be imho.

    Which would end up in a perpetual state of war against one another, because of the distribution of resources. The Sunnis wouldn’t have any oil, for one thing.

    It might have worked as three semi-autonomous regions with some sort of federal government.


  205. lobo91
    206 | February 16, 2010 17:44

    @ coldwarrior:

    Much like the idiots who were hiking in Iraq and wandered into Iran.

    Who the hell goes to Iraq for a hiking trip?


  206. coldwarrior
    207 | February 16, 2010 17:47

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    and then the joint can turn into 3 countries like it should be imho.
    Which would end up in a perpetual state of war against one another, because of the distribution of resources. The Sunnis wouldn’t have any oil, for one thing.
    It might have worked as three semi-autonomous regions with some sort of federal government.

    yeah it would be unstable…but as long as the violence didnt spill over…

    ;)


  207. lobo91
    208 | February 16, 2010 17:53

    Speaking of clueless, did you catch this comment that was dropped a couple threads back?

    Ben_Dover wrote:

    I do not believe that winning ‘hearts and minds’ bullshit will be the winning factor here. Let’s not forget that a sizable population are outright supporters of the Taliban. I laugh at the word ‘indigenous’ being tossed around, as if the Taliban are Martians from a different planet.

    I believe America was more sucessfull in Iraq simply because there were 3 distinct groups ie Sunnis, Shias and Kurds that the US could pit against each other. However in Afghanistan, the people there are more or less homogenous. I believe the leading languages are dari and pashto.

    There is no one quick fix solution here. If the US were not a democracy, it could employ Chinese tactics, harsh and brutal but it’s hands are tied. The Russians lost because of stinger missiles provided to the Mujaheedin by the US otherwise today Afghanistan would be another Russian province and that is simply a fact.

    It’s been awhile since I’ve seen anything so factually inaccurate posted here. Probably since the days of Champion.


  208. coldwarrior
    209 | February 16, 2010 17:56

    lobo91 wrote:

    However in Afghanistan, the people there are more or less homogenous. I believe the leading languages are dari and pashto.

    just to nit pic…how can a people be all that homogeneous if they speak 2 separate languages.

    and the stingers helped, but werent the only reason…


  209. lobo91
    210 | February 16, 2010 17:58

    @ coldwarrior:

    And we certainly didn’t win in Iraq by “pitting groups against each other.”


  210. coldwarrior
    211 | February 16, 2010 17:59

    @ lobo91:

    its a weak post.


  211. lobo91
    212 | February 16, 2010 18:03

    @ coldwarrior:

    You’re in a more charitable mood than I am.


  212. coldwarrior
    213 | February 16, 2010 18:06

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    You’re in a more charitable mood than I am.

    i had a better day than u!


  213. lobo91
    214 | February 16, 2010 18:10

    @ coldwarrior:

    I haven’t had many good days lately, especially now that it looks like I’m going to be divorced soon.


  214. coldwarrior
    215 | February 16, 2010 18:13

    @ lobo91:

    uh oh…was this a surprise or a long run up

    i’ve done my divorce duty already.


  215. lobo91
    216 | February 16, 2010 18:17

    @ coldwarrior:

    Things have been going downhill rapidly since she started grad school last fall.

    On the plus side, at least it’s fairly simple in Colorado. You don’t even have to go to court if both parties agree. Just file a petition with the court clerk’s office, and they mail you the completed documents in a few weeks.


  216. coldwarrior
    217 | February 16, 2010 18:18

    @ lobo91:

    well the ease and lack of lawyers will help.

    both sides going to be ‘amicable’?


  217. lobo91
    218 | February 16, 2010 18:27

    @ coldwarrior:

    Yeah. I’m not in the mood for a fight anymore.

    If she wants to be on her own, with no income, that’s her choice.


  218. coldwarrior
    219 | February 16, 2010 18:32

    @ lobo91:

    keep yer head up, it gets better…trust me, i know about this topic.


  219. lobo91
    220 | February 16, 2010 18:34

    @ coldwarrior:

    My main concern at the moment is what to do with the dog if I go overseas.


  220. coldwarrior
    221 | February 16, 2010 18:38

    @ lobo91:

    hmmm….thats a problem that can be solved.

    are there any services at ft carson for pets, like foster parents thing


  221. lobo91
    222 | February 16, 2010 18:43

    @ coldwarrior:

    Not that I’m aware of, although I don’t really go down there much.

    I live at the other end of town, close to the AFA. Ft Carson’s almost 20 miles from here.


  222. coldwarrior
    223 | February 16, 2010 18:47

    @ lobo91:

    call yer counterparts down there and ask.

    it seems to me that a division sized post should have something like that.


  223. lobo91
    224 | February 16, 2010 18:48

    If it really comes down to it, I’ll try to get someone from my unit to take care of her.

    Worst case, I could always take her down to my mom’s place in NM. She really isn’t any trouble, which is good.

    Does have to go to the groomer periodically, though. Not sure if they actually have one where my mom lives, now that I think about it.


  224. lobo91
    225 | February 16, 2010 18:51

    She looks a lot like this dog, except the white on her chest goes all the way around her neck, like a mane.


  225. coldwarrior
    226 | February 16, 2010 18:53

    @ lobo91:

    my neighbor has one of those, cool dog


  226. lobo91
    227 | February 16, 2010 18:56

    You can tell she’s a herding dog when she’s running around at the dog park.

    She’s able to execute a 180 degree turn within the length of her body from a full run.


  227. coldwarrior
    228 | February 16, 2010 18:58

    @ lobo91:

    yeah, my neighbor’s tries to round up the neighbor kids when they are running around in the field…busy animal!


  228. lobo91
    229 | February 16, 2010 19:01

    Well, I need to get something to eat, after which I’m probably going to go kill some Klingons in Star Trek Online.

    Thanks for listening.


  229. coldwarrior
    230 | February 16, 2010 19:06

    @ lobo91:

    u bet


  230. waldensianspirit
    231 | February 16, 2010 20:07

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ waldensianspirit:
    And northern college students were killed in the south while trying to register black people to vote in the early 1960s, too.
    Personally, I think Baptist missionaries going to Iraq are probably not all that bright, even today.
    Doing so in 2004 was downright stupid.

    No different 2010 and beyond. This is where you and coldwarrior don’t get it. You say they weren’t too bright but they knew/know something you don’t. That unless islam[anti-Truth] is replaced with Truth, any area of the world is fucked.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David