First time visitor? Learn more.

Who lost Iran?

by Speranza ( 90 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Iran, Progressives at February 27th, 2010 - 4:01 pm

Who lost Iran? The Left did. Starting with Jimmy Carter and continuing with cynical Democratic ex presidents  (and a current president) we’ve seen appeasement, obstructionism, and out and out sabotage of Republican presidents who actually wanted to confront the mad mullahs who are on the verge of obtaining a nuclear bomb.

The Left printed a false story (either in Newsweek or Time Magazine – I forget which one) that the Defense Intelligence Agency claimed that Iran had abandoned its nuclear ambitions years ago, the Left (in the form of the unspeakable Zbigniew Breszinski a former NSC head under Carter) wants American planes to confront any Israeli planes that that fly over Iraq to strike the Iranian nuclear facilities (something that will never happen by the way). By the way does anyone for a moment think that had Saddam remained in power he would have sat back and allowed Iran to go nuclear without trying to get a hold of a bomb himself?

by James Lewis
“Who lost China?” was the Republican slogan in the 1950s, after Mao Zedong conquered China and turned it into a Communist tyranny. Jozef Stalin was in power in the Soviet Union at the time and controlled half of Europe. China and Russia were both nuclear-armed tyrannies, and democracy was in retreat all over the world.

[...]

We are once again threatened by a fast-rising rogue state, run by a totalitarian, suicidal cult, soon to be armed with nuclear weapons. The life-or-death question for the coming elections should therefore be: Who lost Iran?

We have to pin that tail on the donkeys who let it happen. The Left is always boasting about their “compassion” and “progressivism” — and most recently, they are boasting that they are “the educated class,” when they have nothing but abysmal ignorance to show. Grandiose boasting and abysmal performance — who does that remind you of?  It’s a shocking sight. But as long as the Left controls the organs of propaganda, the schools and the media, it will be an uphill battle to tell the simple truth.

[...]

The responsibility of the Left for this looming disaster is undeniable. Who enabled the viciously anti-American Khomeini revolution, right at the height of the Cold War? (Jimmy Carter!) Who allowed the suicide cult of Khomeini to get the biggest weapons of mass destruction ever? (Jimmy! Bill! Barry!) Who radicalized the Democratic Party, so that a once-decent group of mainstream politicians were replaced by radical Lefties? (The Left.) Who constantly sabotaged efforts by sane US presidents — all Republicans — to stabilize the Middle East? (Jimmy! Bill! Barry!) Who failed to protect this country against the biggest terror attack ever? (Bill!) And who didn’t lift a finger to keep the Khomeini fascists from getting strategic missiles and nukes? (Barry!)

There you have it. Who lost Iran? The Left. The Left has constantly sabotaged US defenses, always agitating to expose the civilized world to nuclear terror.  Who blocked anti-missile defenses in Poland and Czechoslovakia? (Yes.) If ever the world has been led by a suicide cult this is it.

Bush and Cheney were trying to stop the two dangerous powers in the Gulf: Saddam and Iran. As a direct result George W. Bush was bruised and bloodied for two terms. The Left — Carter, Clinton and Obama — go out of their way to surrender to Islamic Fascism whenever they can. Obama just appointed a Muslim Brotherhood agitator to be his ambassador to the Organization of Islamic States.

At some point we’re no longer looking at stupidity and ignorance on the Left, but rather at real malevolence, a real desire to destroy this country and civilized life. When you see the same people always driving the school bus into the same marsh, over and over again, you have to finally realize they are really acting out of destructive hatred. And that is how they sound on their “progressive” websites: They are filled with rage and hatred. These are just not normally constructive people.

[...]

When — not if — Ahmadinejad gets his fingers on the nuclear button, it is our responsibility to pin that tail on the donkeys. The media will scream and Blame Bush for Iranian nukes. We have to tell the truth, and ensure that it is never forgotten.

[...]

Once that nuke goes off, Americans must come to their senses.

Obama is not the Messiah. He’s more like the Prince of Darkness.

Read the rest: Who Lost Iran?

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

90 Responses to “Who lost Iran?”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | February 27, 2010 4:08 pm

    Obama is not the Messiah. He’s more like the Prince of Darkness.

    No truer sentence was ever written.


  2. Beltfed
    2 | February 27, 2010 4:09 pm

    Who lost Iran.

    The Mullahs will when Israel bombs the crap of them.


  3. vagabond trader
    3 | February 27, 2010 4:11 pm

    @ Speranza:

    I was just going to comment on that! Of course it is also raaaaacist. James Lewis is excellent.


  4. coldwarrior
    4 | February 27, 2010 4:12 pm

    @ Speranza:

    hey, i flipped your post and mine…that puts the open/humor post for the overnight.


  5. Speranza
    5 | February 27, 2010 4:13 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Thanks. We need to end the night on a light note.


  6. Macker
    6 | February 27, 2010 4:14 pm

    Remember folks…in an alternate universe, Iran and Iraq 
    (under Saddam) fight the first nuclear war….


  7. Macker
    7 | February 27, 2010 4:14 pm

    Hey! Someone fix the word wrap please!


  8. Speranza
    8 | February 27, 2010 4:14 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I was just going to comment on that! Of course it is also raaaaacist. James Lewis is excellent.

    According to Keith Olberbite and Chunk Johnson it sure is. However it was alright to call Dick Cheney “Darth Vader”.


  9. coldwarrior
    9 | February 27, 2010 4:16 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Thanks. We need to end the night on a light note.

    yeah, thats what i thought.


  10. Speranza
    10 | February 27, 2010 4:16 pm

    Macker wrote:

    Remember folks…in an alternate universe, Iran 
    and Iraq (under Saddam) fight the first nuclear war….

    Henry Kissinger’s quip about the 1980 -88 Iran-Iraq War – “Too bad they both can’t lose” wsa so true.


  11. coldwarrior
    11 | February 27, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ Macker:

    fixed


  12. Speranza
    12 | February 27, 2010 4:19 pm

    Jimmy Carter, John Kerry, Al Gore, even Bill Clinton – sure like to interfere in U.S. foreign policy matters. Ever hear of the Logan Act?


  13. vagabond trader
    13 | February 27, 2010 4:20 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Don’t worry Pelousy is working on draining the swamp.


  14. Speranza
    14 | February 27, 2010 4:21 pm

    Recallhow on a certain blog there used to be “Iran’s Manhattan {Project Goes on” – now all you see is shit about tea parties. Well Chunk when that nuclear device goes off in SoCal go call KKKillgore Trout to complain.


  15. justin case
    15 | February 27, 2010 4:21 pm

    why is it the west never stopped pakistan from getting the bomb.
    not a word was said, and the pakis are cave men compared to the iranians.


  16. Speranza
    16 | February 27, 2010 4:22 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Don’t worry Pelousy is working on draining the swamp.

    I hope that magnificently ignorant woman has a botox reaction.


  17. Macker
    17 | February 27, 2010 4:24 pm

    justin case wrote:

    why is it the west never stopped pakistan from getting the bomb.
    not a word was said, and the pakis are cave men compared to the iranians.

    I don’t think the Chinese were as involved with the Iranians 
    as they were with the Pakistanis. 
    After all, they encouraged them to go nuclear, 
    just to give India headaches.


  18. Speranza
    18 | February 27, 2010 4:25 pm

    @ Macker:
    You are running over again. I think the problem might be on your end.


  19. vagabond trader
    19 | February 27, 2010 4:26 pm

    @ Speranza:

    There are studies that the sh@t may cross the blood brain barrier and cause head problems.I submit Nancy Pelousy as patient 00.


  20. Speranza
    20 | February 27, 2010 4:27 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    There are studies that the sh@t may cross the blood brain barrier and cause head problems.I submit Nancy Pelousy as patient 00.

    Putting politics aside, I am just staggered as to how stupid she really is.


  21. coldwarrior
    21 | February 27, 2010 4:28 pm

    Macker wrote:

    justin case wrote:
    why is it the west never stopped pakistan from getting the bomb.
    not a word was said, and the pakis are cave men compared to the iranians.
    I don’t think the Chinese were as involved with the Iranians as 
    they were with the Pakistanis. After all, they encouraged them to go nuclear, 
    just to give India headaches.

    log out, close yer browser, and log back in


  22. Macker
    22 | February 27, 2010 4:28 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Macker:
    You are running over again. I think the problem might be on your end.

    I just downloaded and installed the latest WebKit build. I hope that fixes things.


  23. vagabond trader
    23 | February 27, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ Speranza:

    She truly is a blthering idjit. It never ceases to amaze how so many fools become wealthy and powerful.


  24. Speranza
    24 | February 27, 2010 4:31 pm

    @ Macker:
    I hope that works. By the way I was perusing the LGF archives last night and it was weird seeing you, Iron Fist, loppyd, Carolina Girl, Nevergiveup, Earth2Moonbat, m, Opinion and so many others who are now here.


  25. coldwarrior
    25 | February 27, 2010 4:31 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    There are studies that the sh@t may cross the blood brain barrier and cause head problems.I submit Nancy Pelousy as patient 00.

    that kind of industrial grade stupid is genetic


  26. Speranza
    26 | February 27, 2010 4:32 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    She truly is a blthering idjit. It never ceases to amaze how so many fools become wealthy and powerful.

    I would lvoe to get her in a game of jeopardy on prime time TV.


  27. vagabond trader
    27 | February 27, 2010 4:33 pm

    @ Speranza:

    lol,that would be painful.


  28. Speranza
    28 | February 27, 2010 4:34 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    and they say that Sarah Palin is dumb?


  29. Macker
    29 | February 27, 2010 4:35 pm

    @ Speranza:

    I’m surprised he didn’t disappear me….


  30. goddessoftheclassroom
    30 | February 27, 2010 4:36 pm

    Good evening, y’all.

    I’m so tired that I want to borrow a pair of legs from the cat.


  31. Beltfed
    31 | February 27, 2010 4:36 pm

    Speranza @ 20:

    I am just staggered as to how stupid she really is.

    She does know itsy-bitsy spider and a little of this and a little of that.


  32. Speranza
    32 | February 27, 2010 4:37 pm

    Speaking of Celeebrty Jeopardy
    “I’ll take famous titties for $500, Trebek”


  33. Speranza
    33 | February 27, 2010 4:38 pm

    Macker wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I’m surprised he didn’t disappear me….

    He would have to disappear a whole lot of folks.


  34. rain of lead
    34 | February 27, 2010 4:39 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    wow, busy day huh?


  35. Macker
    35 | February 27, 2010 4:40 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    vagabond trader wrote:

    She truly is a blthering idjit. It never ceases to amaze how so many fools become wealthy and powerful.

    I would lvoe to get her in a game of jeopardy on prime time TV.

    And would your other opponent be…Sean Connery?


  36. goddessoftheclassroom
    36 | February 27, 2010 4:43 pm

    @ rain of lead:
    SAT Prep, 8-12 noon, then rehearsal 1-5. I’ll be heading off to bed in a minute.


  37. chickadee
    37 | February 27, 2010 4:44 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Obama is not the Messiah. He’s more like the Prince of Darkness.

    No truer sentence was ever written.

    I couldn’t agree more. I hate to call him a Prince though. Maybe the devil of darkness.
    Your post rings so factual and true. It is depressing.


  38. 38 | February 27, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ Beltfed:

    Israel isn’t going to bomb Iran. If they ever were going to do it, they’d have done it by now. They didn’t hesitate to hit Syria when their nuclear ambitions were much less close to fruition. I wish I were wrong on this, but I’m not. No one is going to do anything meaningful to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons. That means that soonner or later there will be a nuclear war in the Middle East. It is becoming inevitable. Think about that the next time you hear an Leftist proponant of appeasement whine that they are just giving Peace a chance.


  39. rain of lead
    39 | February 27, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    wheeee!
    have a glass of wine then sack out


  40. Speranza
    40 | February 27, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ Macker:
    You’ll rue the day you crossed me Trebek!


  41. Speranza
    41 | February 27, 2010 4:47 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    Oh I agree , it is too late for Israel to do it. I do not think that they ever could. You need stealth aircraft and Tomahawk cruise missiles and only one nation can do that.


  42. 42 | February 27, 2010 4:47 pm

    @ Speranza:

    I thought he’d obliterated me :mrgreen: It’d be kind of hard to go through and whack out all the people who responded to me. I’m harder to get rid of than he realizes. Like crabs, I guess :twisted:


  43. 43 | February 27, 2010 4:49 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Yeah. We could do it with B-2s, no sweat, but that won’t be happening for at least the next three years, and that is probably long enough for Iran to get their shit together and build the Islamic Bomb.


  44. Speranza
    44 | February 27, 2010 4:50 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    He did. Someone referred to you on the blog in a post.


  45. Beltfed
    45 | February 27, 2010 4:54 pm

    Iron Fist @ 38:

    Israel works in mysterious ways, I tend to believe that Israel is waiting until they have stored enough fuel for a bomb or two and then hit them hard spreading radiation all over the place.

    That’s my take on it.


  46. Doppelganger
    46 | February 27, 2010 4:58 pm

    Our only hope is that the internet, twitter, youtube. The information age, awakens the young people of Iran, and they become a secular nation. The old Mullahs will die out and be replaced by people who aren’t fanatics.

    because the west isn’t going to do shit to stop Iran. Only these kids can rise up and have a revolution. This time it will be of rational people.

    anyway, that’s my dream. In the meantime I hope Israel takes them out before they get a nuclear weapon


  47. goddessoftheclassroom
    47 | February 27, 2010 5:04 pm

    @ rain of lead:
    That’s exactly what Im going to do!

    Thanks be to God for sparing Hawaii; prayers for Chile.


  48. coldwarrior
    48 | February 27, 2010 5:05 pm

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ rain of lead:
    That’s exactly what Im going to do!
    Thanks be to God for sparing Hawaii; prayers for Chile.

    2005 clos du bois merlot

    enjoy


  49. coldwarrior
    49 | February 27, 2010 5:12 pm

    @ Beltfed:

    hmmmmm…..


  50. 50 | February 27, 2010 5:13 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Israel doesn’t have the capabilities to hit Iran. That’s a fact, if they did would of happen. Only the US can Obama wants them to get Nukes.


  51. RIX
    51 | February 27, 2010 5:15 pm

    The Shah may not have been a perfect leader, but he was far superior to the Theocracy running things now.
    The Shahs biggest problem may have been dragging Iran into the 20th Century. He held the Mad Mullahs in check & was a great ally to the U.S.
    Carter disgracefully forced the Shah out of the U.S for cancer treatment to Panama to please the Ayatollah.
    That & his fecklessness in the face of the hostage crisis in my opinion put us in the position that we are in now, fighting Jihad.


  52. 52 | February 27, 2010 5:17 pm

    @ RIX:

    Carter is to blame for all this.


  53. coldwarrior
    53 | February 27, 2010 5:19 pm

    @ RIX:

    shah was an exigency of the cold war


  54. coldwarrior
    54 | February 27, 2010 5:19 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Carter is to blame for all this.

    nope, blame chimpymcbushhitler.

    :)


  55. RIX
    55 | February 27, 2010 5:23 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Carter is to blame for all this.

    Yes he is & his inaction ignited the Jihad that we face now imo.
    Islam became enboldened.


  56. 56 | February 27, 2010 5:25 pm

    @ RIX:

    Yup!


  57. RIX
    57 | February 27, 2010 5:27 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ RIX:
    shah was an exigency of the cold war

    Carter tossed the Shah off of the sled. He never approved of him & look what we have, a total lunatic trying to usher in the return of the Mahdi by causing a nuclear war.


  58. coldwarrior
    58 | February 27, 2010 5:32 pm

    RIX wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    @ RIX:
    shah was an exigency of the cold war

    Carter tossed the Shah off of the sled. He never approved of him & look what we have, a total lunatic trying to usher in the return of the Mahdi by causing a nuclear war.

    but, but, but carter’s foreign policy was so human rights pure!


  59. coldwarrior
    59 | February 27, 2010 5:33 pm

    wales v france rugby on setanata sport…

    i am happy!


  60. RIX
    60 | February 27, 2010 5:37 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    but, but, but carter’s foreign policy was so human rights pure!

    Yeah & Obama plays the same tune, “Our Values”
    Our values are great , but they don’t win wars. Overwhelming force wins wars & that actually protects our values in the long run.


  61. coldwarrior
    61 | February 27, 2010 5:37 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    but, but, but carter’s foreign policy was so human rights pure!
    Yeah & Obama plays the same tune, “Our Values”
    Our values are great , but they don’t win wars. Overwhelming force wins wars & that actually protects our values in the long run.

    most societies and cultures cant handle our values.


  62. RIX
    62 | February 27, 2010 5:41 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    most societies and cultures cant handle our values.

    True, the Founders were enlightened & gave us our values that persist & justify American Exceptionalism.
    Obama & the other progressives here & in Europe are more in tune with the French Revolution which is not all that swell.


  63. rain of lead
    63 | February 27, 2010 5:41 pm

    this is just cool

    the moment a 5-inch shell is blasted from a cannon


  64. snork
    64 | February 27, 2010 5:48 pm

    Beltfed wrote:

    Israel works in mysterious ways, I tend to believe that Israel is waiting until they have stored enough fuel for a bomb or two and then hit them hard spreading radiation all over the place.

    I think they’re still getting their UAVs ducks in a row. Don’t be surprised if there’s an apparent kamikaze attack of old F-15s, and all present and accounted for afterward, if you get my drift.


  65. snork
    65 | February 27, 2010 5:49 pm

    And yes, the Israelis could rig some old planes to do that in their sleep.


  66. RIX
    66 | February 27, 2010 5:58 pm

    See ya, everybody have a great evening.


  67. 67 | February 27, 2010 6:04 pm

    @ snork:

    If they do that, Israel better be prepared for all out war against Syria, Hizballah, Hamas and even Al-Qaeda.


  68. 68 | February 27, 2010 6:04 pm

    @ RIX:

    Night RIX.


  69. 69 | February 27, 2010 6:05 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Exactly and we better adjust our thinking.


  70. Macker
    70 | February 27, 2010 6:05 pm

    @ Rodan:
    @ coldwarrior:
    @ RIX:

    Indeed.


  71. 71 | February 27, 2010 6:07 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ snork:
    If they do that, Israel better be prepared for all out war against Syria, Hizballah, Hamas and even Al-Qaeda.

    Hmmm, aren’t they pretty much already in an all out war?


  72. snork
    72 | February 27, 2010 6:08 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ snork:
    If they do that, Israel better be prepared for all out war against Syria, Hizballah, Hamas and even Al-Qaeda.

    I think they understand that. That’s what they’re keeping the F-16s for.


  73. Alberta Oil Peon
    73 | February 27, 2010 6:08 pm

    Well, one of the people who lost Iran was the Shah himself. Too busy looking for Reds under every bed to see the Islamist elephant in the woodpile.

    He exiled Ayatollah Khomeini to France, for Pete’s sake, when he should have had SAVAK send him for a dirt nap, and laid the blame on some convenient commies, who would then subsequently get the dirt nap themselves.

    But the Shah’s American patrons were too ignorant, back then, of the threat of radical Islam.


  74. 74 | February 27, 2010 6:09 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    No, they are conducting drills but if they strike Iran, they better strike Syria, Hizballah and Gaza as well.


  75. Macker
    75 | February 27, 2010 6:12 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Aren’t there verses in the Bible which deal with the destruction of Damascus?


  76. coldwarrior
    76 | February 27, 2010 6:14 pm

    @ Rodan:

    we have a runaway post…Espana


  77. 77 | February 27, 2010 6:15 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    No, they are conducting drills but if they strike Iran, they better strike Syria, Hizballah and Gaza as well.

    Bear in mind once Iran is out of the picture Syria, Hizballah and Gaza have a very limited supply of weapons and ammo and very little chance of reacquiring a major supply source.


  78. 78 | February 27, 2010 6:18 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Well Iran will not be knocked out. Israel can inflict minimal damage on their nuke facilities. they will launch Missiles at Israel. as well as their allies. Israel is better off taking on Syria/Hizballah.


  79. 79 | February 27, 2010 6:18 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Reglado!


  80. 80 | February 27, 2010 6:19 pm

    @ Macker:

    Yup and the destruction of Lebanon.


  81. coldwarrior
    81 | February 27, 2010 6:20 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Reglado!

    восстановленный!


  82. 82 | February 27, 2010 6:22 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Well Iran will not be knocked out. Israel can inflict minimal damage on their nuke facilities. they will launch Missiles at Israel. as well as their allies. Israel is better off taking on Syria/Hizballah.

    I disagree, Israel could take out Iran’s infrastructure with the political instability in Iran that would be a mortal wound.


  83. 83 | February 27, 2010 6:28 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    I hope you are right!


  84. rain of lead
    84 | February 27, 2010 6:32 pm

    bwaqhahaha

    hope floats redeux

    http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2010/01/symbols-hope-floats-redux/


  85. 85 | February 27, 2010 6:34 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    I hope you are right!

    Sooner or later Israel has to realize that dying a slow strangled death is no better than fighting for their life. They need to forget about world opinion and put up a real fight because if they dont they are toast…


  86. coldwarrior
    86 | February 27, 2010 6:38 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ doriangrey:
    I hope you are right!

    Sooner or later Israel has to realize that dying a slow strangled death is no better than fighting for their life. They need to forget about world opinion and put up a real fight because if they dont they are glowing, radioactive toast…

    my input…


  87. 87 | February 27, 2010 6:43 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    They need to fight Serb/Latin style. Brutal and no mercy!


  88. 88 | February 27, 2010 6:52 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    They need to fight Serb/Latin style. Brutal and no mercy!

    Pretty much, cause the Muslims are never going to stop and it is a life or death struggle for Israel…


  89. 89 | February 27, 2010 10:14 pm

    [...] Who lost Iran? › 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


  90. 90 | February 28, 2010 7:19 am

    [...] Blogmocracy asks who actually lost Iran [...]


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David