First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Progressives Continue to Push away American allies

by Rodan ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under American Supremacy, Barack Obama, Multiculturalism, Progressives, Tranzis at March 4th, 2010 - 1:30 pm

The foreign policy of Barack Hussein Obama is 3rd World Liberation based. Whether it’s allies like Israel, the UK or Colombia he continues to ignore their interests to please our enemies. His appeasement of Dar AL Islam has resulted in nothing. The Progressives in Congress continue to hold up the Colombia Free Trade Agreement to please Hugo Chavez. Now is he backing Argentina against our British allies over the Falklands. He is destroying a century of friendships all for the sake of his radical Transnationalist Ideolgy.

Almost 30 years after losing a war over the Falkland Islands, Argentinais once again warning Britain that it still wants back what it calls the Malvinas.

Argentina is now angry over a British company’s oil exploration off the windswept islands in what it considers its own South Atlantic backyard.

Although nominally democratic, the unpopular Kirchner government in Buenos Aires has claimed that the sparsely settled islands are a symbolic matter of Spanish-speaking pride throughout Latin America – and is theirs because the islands once belonged to Spain in the 19th century.

Read the rest: No Allies — But Plenty of Enemies

Victor Davis Hanson, being the historian he is, grasps the enormity of what Barack Hussein Obama is doing. Our President was influencedby 3rd World Liberation Ideology in his youth. His backstabbing of traditional American allies is a strategic disaster. He is not turning our enemies into friends, but isolating the US. At this rate, we will lose allies and have only enemies.

Clearly, Barack Hussein Obama is fulfilling the 3rd World Liberation goals of a weakened America. I don’t think his foreign policy is an accident, but based on designed.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

123 Responses to “Progressives Continue to Push away American allies”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Nevergiveup
    1 | March 4, 2010 13:32

    And this to shall pass. This schmuck is gonna be gone. Our traditional allies know this prick does not speak for the Real America.


  2. 2 | March 4, 2010 13:33

    Yes, this is the same Barack Hussein Obama who promised better relations with our allies if he was elected. He is turning out to be quite the loser. I hope the 52% are happy…


  3. Nevergiveup
    3 | March 4, 2010 13:35

    Iron Fist wrote:

    I hope the 52% are happy…

    I bet ya can’t find more than 44% that will admit it


  4. citizen_q
    4 | March 4, 2010 13:39

    borat whosename mobama is a muslime sleeper traitor.


  5. imploder
    5 | March 4, 2010 13:40

    Hugo blames his country’s El-Nin~o based drought and its dire economic consequences on us, because of our contribution to AGW. Maybe this explains Barrack’s love for cap and tax.


  6. NoThreat2U
    6 | March 4, 2010 13:43

    Sorry to go off topic so early but here is more on why we decided not to recognize the Armenian Genocide:

    http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME01.XAM12304.html


  7. 7 | March 4, 2010 13:44

    @ imploder:

    Yup, Obama wants Hugo’s acceptance. So he wants Cap-N-Trade to make this nation 3rd World.


  8. Purre
    8 | March 4, 2010 13:44

    When US backs Argentina against Britain like this, the only thing that Britain can do is to pull from Afghanistan and prepare for the possibility of war. This may well be just Argentina’s blustering to bolster the popularity of its president, but then again previous Falklands War also started a bit like this.


  9. Bumr50
    9 | March 4, 2010 13:45

    He wants an equal, third-world playing field for all beacause that’s the only road that gets you to global government.

    If just one nation is successful and happy, it becomes hope for all others. If all are on their back, a global solution can sweep in and save everyone.


  10. 10 | March 4, 2010 13:49

    @ Purre:

    Meanwhile Kirthchners are just puppets of Hugo Chavez. This is a sign of his desperation.


  11. Nevergiveup
    11 | March 4, 2010 13:49

    Purre wrote:

    When US backs Argentina against Britain like this, the only thing that Britain can do is to pull from Afghanistan and prepare for the possibility of war. This may well be just Argentina’s blustering to bolster the popularity of its president, but then again previous Falklands War also started a bit like this.

    Your correct, but this time I think the British are alittle more prepared and the Argentinians perhaps a bit less adventerous after the last beating the Brits gave them.


  12. 12 | March 4, 2010 13:50

    Barack Obama’s top 10 insults against Britain

    1. Declaration of neutrality over the Falklands
    2. Downgrading of the Special Relationship
    3. Support for a federal Europe
    4. Undermining of British influence in NATO
    5. Refusal to recognize Britain’s sacrifice in Afghanistan
    6. Throwing Churchill out of the Oval Office
    7. Insulting words from the State Department
    8. DVDs for the Prime Minister
    9. Refusal to meet the Prime Minister in New York
    10. Robert Gibbs’ embarrassing attack on the British press

    Its funny how the liberals all thought the world would worship at the altar of Zero just like they do. Turns out that Obama is too much of a smug asshole for the world to give a rats ass about Barack Magic Negro.


  13. 13 | March 4, 2010 13:50

    @ Bumr50:

    That is their ultimate goal, a Transnationalist regime. Hence their alliance with islam. Islam is Transnationalist also.

    There are many parallels between the groups.


  14. 14 | March 4, 2010 13:52

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Neither will fight. The UK has gutted it’s Navy and Argentina doesn’t have teh military it did back in 1982. This is a way for Hugo’s Argentine sock puppets to regain popularity. Obama should of stated that the UK is a NATO ally and America will stand by her. He didn’t and chose his 3rd World Ideology to make his decision.


  15. 15 | March 4, 2010 13:53

    @ Babu-Bar:

    He’s a wants to be like Idi Amin.


  16. Purre
    16 | March 4, 2010 13:54

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I agree. However, when it comes to matters of war, I prefer to be more than certain. Thus I would pull one top of the line combat unit from Afghanistan and redeploy it to Falkland Islands to make sure that if Argentineans do come there, the ground troops in place will fast destroy the landing force.

    Sure USA would lose allied troops from Afghanistan, but they have only White House to blame here.


  17. Speranza
    17 | March 4, 2010 13:54

    Anyone notice that Mark Steyn, Victor Davis Hanson, Charles Krauthammer and Caroline Glick are no longer used for threads on LGF?


  18. Nevergiveup
    18 | March 4, 2010 13:56

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Neither will fight. The UK has gutted it’s Navy and Argentina doesn’t have teh military it did back in 1982. This is a way for Hugo’s Argentine sock puppets to regain popularity. Obama should of stated that the UK is a NATO ally and America will stand by her. He didn’t and chose his 3rd World Ideology to make his decision.

    I hated Gates when President Bush appointed him. I hate Hilliary. I hate Obama. I hate former General Jones. I hate Susan Rice.


  19. Speranza
    19 | March 4, 2010 13:56

    @ Babu-Bar:
    here is #11

    11. Giving the Queen a gift (an iPod) which has his speeches on it.


  20. Speranza
    20 | March 4, 2010 13:56

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I hate Samantha Power


  21. 21 | March 4, 2010 13:57
    He is destroying a century of friendships all for the sake of his radical Transnationalist Ideolgy.

    Change!


  22. Nevergiveup
    22 | March 4, 2010 13:57

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I hate Samantha Power

    And George Mitchell


  23. 23 | March 4, 2010 13:58

    @ Bumr50:

    +1

    that is exactly why they want to bring the USA down. Otherwise, the people in all these third world hellholes might start wondering exactly why they don’t have as good a life as we do. Their so-called leaders aren’t going to like the answer one little bit.


  24. 24 | March 4, 2010 13:59

    Babu-Bar wrote:

    Barack Obama’s top 10 insults against Britain
    1. Declaration of neutrality over the Falklands
    2. Downgrading of the Special Relationship
    3. Support for a federal Europe
    4. Undermining of British influence in NATO
    5. Refusal to recognize Britain’s sacrifice in Afghanistan
    6. Throwing Churchill out of the Oval Office
    7. Insulting words from the State Department
    8. DVDs for the Prime Minister
    9. Refusal to meet the Prime Minister in New York
    10. Robert Gibbs’ embarrassing attack on the British press
    Its funny how the liberals all thought the world would worship at the altar of Zero just like they do. Turns out that Obama is too much of a smug asshole for the world to give a rats ass about Barack Magic Negro.

    Not sure about that last comment, but…

    That is the thing about the Left. (and probably the right as well) they spend so much time among each other, that their little bubble forms their world view. They travel from Berkeley, to New York, and then to visit some far Leftist in London, and meet up with a leftist from Paris, and assume that that is the view of everyone!


  25. 25 | March 4, 2010 14:00

    @ Bumr50:

    If you search “New Left” on Wiki, it actually is more devious, and deeper than just that.


  26. 26 | March 4, 2010 14:01

    @ WrathofG-d:

    That is actually what he meant by radically transforming America.


  27. Speranza
    27 | March 4, 2010 14:01

    @ WrathofG-d:

    Not sure about that last comment, but…

    Yeah me too.


  28. 28 | March 4, 2010 14:01

    @ Rodan:

    Nah. I don’t think he has that kind of appetite. He wants to be Robert Mugabe, thoough. King Shit of Turd Mountain, and he wants to turn us into a Third World hellhole. He may succeed. His out of control spending is putting us in the shitter, sure as the world.


  29. 29 | March 4, 2010 14:02

    @ WrathofG-d:

    I finally will get around to do that thread this weekend. It’s interesting this New Left-3rd World Liberation-Islamic Axis.


  30. 30 | March 4, 2010 14:02

    @ Iron Fist:

    Yup, Mugabe is more like it!


  31. Speranza
    31 | March 4, 2010 14:03

    @ Iron Fist:

    He already is well on his way to being the worst president ever.


  32. Nevergiveup
    32 | March 4, 2010 14:04

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:

    He already is well on his way to being the worst president ever.

    Yup


  33. 33 | March 4, 2010 14:04

    Rodan wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I finally will get around to do that thread this weekend. It’s interesting this New Left-3rd World Liberation-Islamic Axis.

    Insofar that I dropped it, I am in no position to give you a hard time about it…

    But, I think that it will explain a lot about what is going on. It specifically instructs these types of tactics. The 3rd world (according to New Left doctrine) is a tool.

    I can’t do their own words justice, but its all there.


  34. 34 | March 4, 2010 14:04

    @ Speranza:

    Yes, he is. And we have three more years of him. I only hope the Union can survive it.


  35. Speranza
    35 | March 4, 2010 14:04

    Rodan wrote:

    Yup, Mugabe is more like it!

    I think of him more as like those Soviet bloc pupppet dictators form the 1950′s, 60′s and 70′s: Honecker in East Germany, Novotny in Czechoslovakia, Kadar in Hungary, and Gomulka in Poland.


  36. Speranza
    36 | March 4, 2010 14:05

    @ Iron Fist:
    We’ve three more years of him at a minimum. The media will go full court press to get him another term.


  37. mtc
    37 | March 4, 2010 14:05

    It’s cruel what Obama is doing to the Falklands and its people. How could he sacrifice them like that? How can he look at himself in the mirror?


  38. Speranza
    38 | March 4, 2010 14:07

    @ mtc:
    He loves to look at himself in the mirror. he has no conscience and being a malignant narcissist – he thinks he is perfect.


  39. Nevergiveup
    39 | March 4, 2010 14:07

    Speranza wrote:

    The media will go full court press to get him another term.

    I don’t know. If they smell blood in the water they may jump to another dem before the primaries.


  40. Nevergiveup
    40 | March 4, 2010 14:08

    mtc wrote:

    It’s cruel what Obama is doing to the Falklands and its people. How could he sacrifice them like that? How can he look at himself in the mirror?

    He is doing to us and the rest of the free world. What’s so different about the Falklands?


  41. Speranza
    41 | March 4, 2010 14:08

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I don’t know. If they smell blood in the water they may jump to another dem before the primaries.

    Normally yes but Obama (based on let’s face it – his race) is an exceptional case.


  42. Nevergiveup
    42 | March 4, 2010 14:09

    Speranza wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I don’t know. If they smell blood in the water they may jump to another dem before the primaries.

    Normally yes but Obama (based on let’s face it – his race) is an exceptional case.

    Oh he’s an exceptional case alright


  43. 43 | March 4, 2010 14:09

    @ WrathofG-d:

    Their 3rd World obsession is amazing.


  44. Nevergiveup
    44 | March 4, 2010 14:22

    22:57 U.S. House panel votes to recognize Armenian genocide, 23-22 (Haaretz)

    Can anyone find how the vote broke out?????


  45. 45 | March 4, 2010 14:24

    If you haven’t seen this, listen very carefully to Holder’s words in this video.
    In politics, everything is planned. We are watching a most evil one unfold.


  46. bellevueace
    46 | March 4, 2010 14:33

    When obama first came on the scene many here in the UK saw another con man ala blair, blair said what he thought people wanted to hear and was just a front for what was going on behind the scenes. By the time people started to wake up to him and his hidden ideology the wheels were in motion for what was to come next. I was in the USA last year and speaking to people over there was suprised just how unpopular obama was, if hes so unpopular after just 12 months how did he actually get elected? The americans really seemed to wake up to obama rapidly, i wonder if whats happened in the UK made them that bit more aware? Obama is seen in a different light by those taken in over here more so since his refusal to support us over the falklands. The mainstream press are calling for british forces to pull out of Afghanistan due to obamas stance and his determination to wreck what has always been a special relationship with America.


  47. Nevergiveup
    47 | March 4, 2010 14:35

    @ bellevueace:
    Please let your countrymen know that America still stands with our bothers and sister in the UK. Obama will pass. I promise.


  48. RIX
    48 | March 4, 2010 14:37

    Looking at Obama’s international & domestic policies without accepting who he is makes it seem incomprehensible.
    However if you give it the proper context, which is that Obama
    hates this country, everything then makes sense.


  49. Nevergiveup
    49 | March 4, 2010 14:38

    ARTICLECOMMENTS (3)Updated March 04, 2010
    McCain, Lieberman Attempt to Ban Civilian Trials for ‘Enemy Combatants’
    By Trish Turner – FOXNews.com
    The legislation by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., would result in banning all civilian trials for terror suspects who have been classified as enemy combatants and forcing their cases into military commissions

    PRINTEMAILSHARE RECOMMEND (1)
    Two senators from opposite sides of the political aisle are set to unveil sweeping legislation that will prevent “enemy combatants” from being Mirandized, Fox News has learned.

    The legislation by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., would result in banning all civilian trials for terror suspects who have been classified as enemy combatants and forcing their cases into military commissions.

    The bill lays out “comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected unprivileged enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning,” according to a release from McCain’s office.

    “Unprivileged enemy belligerents considered to be a ‘high-value detainee’” would be required “to be held in military custody and interrogated for their intelligence value by a High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team established by the President,” the release states.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., expressed reservations about the bill, saying he “understands what John and Joe are trying to do.” But the former military lawyer added, “I just don’t feel comfortable with it. There is a role for the civilian courts to play.”

    A senior Senate Republican aide with knowledge of the legislation told Fox News that the legislation is not designed to have any retroactivity.

    That means the bill would not affect the case of the Christmas Day bombing suspect, Umar Farouk Abdulmutullab.

    hey is Lindsey graham a dick or what?


  50. KGB
    51 | March 4, 2010 14:40

    As someone who has spent a few years in Taiwan, whose fiancee is Taiwanese, and whose children (God willing) will be Taiwanese, I shudder to think about that island’s prospects under an Obama presidency.

    The Chi-coms have reached a point where they can rest assured that a military move against Taiwan will be successful, no matter how long it takes. I don’t see the Taiwanese putting up a concerted struggle if things look dire. They’ll likely negotiate a settlement that will see a PLA presence on Formosa.

    My fear is that the butchers of Beijing have been taking Obama’s measure very carefully this past year, see that he’s completely without spine and completely unwilling to stand up for what’s right, and will watch the 2012 polls carefully. Should they see their window of opportunity about to close they may choose to act now, rather than wait 4 or 8 years for another chance.


  51. Beltfed
    52 | March 4, 2010 14:42

    bellevueace @ 46:

    The mainstream press are calling for british forces to pull out of Afghanistan due to obamas stance and his determination to wreck what has always been a special relationship with America.

    The zero could screw up a free lunch and at a soup kitchen.


  52. Nevergiveup
    53 | March 4, 2010 14:42

    KGB wrote:

    Should they see their window of opportunity about to close they may choose to act now, rather than wait 4 or 8 years for another chance.

    Very possible. Good analysis


  53. 54 | March 4, 2010 14:50

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Miss Lindsey Graham is a bitch. A whiny little bitch.


  54. snowcrash
    55 | March 4, 2010 14:52

    @ RIX:
    It really is hard to fathom. Instead of pride, he acts ashamed of the history of this country. That is probably why his actions seem so odd to me.


  55. chickadee
    56 | March 4, 2010 14:53

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Rodan:

    Nah. I don’t think he has that kind of appetite. He wants to be Robert Mugabe, thoough. King Shit of Turd Mountain, and he wants to turn us into a Third World hellhole. He may succeed. His out of control spending is putting us in the shitter, sure as the world.

    I think it’s personal for Zero because he hates us. He is a racist hater who wants to make us pay up. He’s a twisted vindictive pos who wants reparations for all the wrongs real or imagined that he thinks we are responsible for. All that on top of his burning desire to bring the country down in general and spread the plague of communism. I think Zero is like Mugabe and worse than Stalin. I don’t remember Stalin having a raging need to harm the Russian people.


  56. Nevergiveup
    57 | March 4, 2010 14:53

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ RIX:
    It really is hard to fathom. Instead of pride, he acts ashamed of the history of this country. That is probably why his actions seem so odd to me.

    His wife told the truth: Neither of them had ever been proud of this country. Fuckin assholes.


  57. Nevergiveup
    58 | March 4, 2010 14:55

    chickadee wrote:

    I don’t remember Stalin having a raging need to harm the Russian people.

    Well not so sure about that? I mean he did more or less kill 50 million or there abouts? Not exactly a act of love?


  58. 59 | March 4, 2010 14:56

    @ Speranza:

    Oh, yes, and I don’t really see a primary challenge going anywhere, even if his numbers are in the shitter. It is, as you said, his race. The howells from the usual suspects would be bad enough, but, as badly as the Dems abuse the blacks I don’t think they’d be able to hold 95% of the black vote if they discarded Obama. And they can’t win if they only take, say, 75% of the black vote. The numbers just aren’t there. So the donks will try and re-elect him. Who knows? I guess it is still possible that he’d win.


  59. snowcrash
    60 | March 4, 2010 14:56

    @ Iron Fist:
    South Carolina can do much better than Graham. I read in the Politico “Graham has had more in-person meetings with Emanuel than any other Republican lawmaker, roughly eight or 10 since Obama took office, aides said. The two men also talk regularly by phone.

    Read more:
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33671.html


  60. song_and_dance_man
    61 | March 4, 2010 14:56

    The Progs even push Americans away with their ‘damn the torpedoes’ push of Health Care even when the majority of Americans don’t want this transfer of power.


  61. RIX
    62 | March 4, 2010 14:58

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ RIX:
    It really is hard to fathom. Instead of pride, he acts ashamed of the history of this country. That is probably why his actions seem so odd to me.

    Exactly. His conduct is baffling without accepting that he sees
    America as a wicked ,oppresive country that needs to be punished & then transformed.


  62. jeppo
    63 | March 4, 2010 15:01

    Lawrence Auster and Ralph Peters have a go at the honky-hatin’ Prez here:

    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015846.html

    Also, Cristina Kirchner does the impossible: She makes Hillary Clinton look like a babe in comparison!


  63. chickadee
    64 | March 4, 2010 15:05

    mtc wrote:

    It’s cruel what Obama is doing to the Falklands and its people. How could he sacrifice them like that? How can he look at himself in the mirror?

    He doesn’t give a rat’s ass abt. them. He thinks they are imperialists who need to be crushed.


  64. Guggi
    65 | March 4, 2010 15:08

    Sorry for OT but it’s late here and I’ve to go:

    House Adopts $15 Billion Plan to Spur Job Creation

    The House of Representatives on Thursday approved a $15 billion measure intended to spur job creation by granting payroll tax breaks to businesses that hire new workers, hoping to show voters that Congress was doing something about the dismal employment picture. The vote was 217 to 201.

    Democratic backers of the plan wanted to get the measure to President Obama’s desk before the monthly employment report on Friday. They characterized the measure, which also funneled an extra $20 billion into road and bridge construction, as just the first step in a broad legislative push to shore up the economy and encourage hiring.

    Representative Bob Etheridge, Democrat of North Carolina, said the legislation is “really all about our three most important priorities in this Congress — jobs, jobs, jobs.” He said the bill is a “good step toward rebuilding our job market, but we still have a ways to go.”

    Though the measure attracted bipartisan support in clearing the Senate last week, House Republicans were dismissive, saying it was a bill cobbled together by Democrats for political purposes and would do little to create new employment.

    Snip

    Good night all !


  65. RIX
    66 | March 4, 2010 15:10

    @ Nevergiveup:
    His wife told the truth: Neither of them had ever been proud of this country. Fuckin assholes.

    That’s the thing, they told us who they are. I don’t know why people are surprised.


  66. Nevergiveup
    67 | March 4, 2010 15:12

    RIX wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    His wife told the truth: Neither of them had ever been proud of this country. Fuckin assholes.

    That’s the thing, they told us who they are. I don’t know why people are surprised.

    Well we’re not. And I can’t stomach the people who say that to me. I rip em a new one. That’s why my list of friends has shrunk so much. It’s a smaller list but a more exclusive list.


  67. Nikis Knight
    68 | March 4, 2010 15:13

    mtc wrote:

    It’s cruel what Obama is doing to the Falklands and its people. How could he sacrifice them like that? How can he look at himself in the mirror?

    My guess? Longingly.


  68. Poteen
    69 | March 4, 2010 15:13

    @ Beltfed:

    The zero could screw up a free lunch and at a soup kitchen.

    And his sec-o-state could dry up a wet dream.


  69. 70 | March 4, 2010 15:14

    @ RIX:

    I’m not. He’s been pretty much as bad as I expected him to be. The only thing he hasn’t done that I anticipated was go for sweeping gun control. I am thankful that he didn’t go there, though I wonder if he would have had done it had his other priorities sailed through the Congress.


  70. Nikis Knight
    71 | March 4, 2010 15:15

    @ Nikis Knight: (only meant to bold the last question there, not the middle. Sounds almost bloodthirsty as I put it, rather than narcisstic to the point of ick as I meant it. We apoligize for the mistake, and doubly so for the excessive explanation)


  71. Nevergiveup
    72 | March 4, 2010 15:15

    Poteen wrote:

    @ Beltfed:

    The zero could screw up a free lunch and at a soup kitchen.

    And his sec-o-state could dry up a wet dream.

    OOH that’s gonna leave a mark


  72. RIX
    73 | March 4, 2010 15:16

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Well we’re not. And I can’t stomach the people who say that to me. I rip em a new one. That’s why my list of friends has shrunk so much. It’s a smaller list but a more exclusive list.

    How many times this year have you heard people say about Obama,
    “But I didn’t know………..”?


  73. Nikis Knight
    74 | March 4, 2010 15:16

    @ Iron Fist:

    The howells from the usual suspects would be bad enough

    You’re mistaken; the Howells were from Gilligan’s Island.


  74. RIX
    75 | March 4, 2010 15:17

    @ Iron Fist:
    He’s coming for the guns if he can.


  75. Nevergiveup
    76 | March 4, 2010 15:18

    RIX wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Well we’re not. And I can’t stomach the people who say that to me. I rip em a new one. That’s why my list of friends has shrunk so much. It’s a smaller list but a more exclusive list.

    How many times this year have you heard people say about Obama,
    “But I didn’t know………..”?

    I only gave one “kid” a pass when he said that. But he was a young corpsman who has just volunteered to be deployed to Afganistan.


  76. RIX
    77 | March 4, 2010 15:21

    @ Nikis Knight:
    You’re mistaken; the Howells were from Gilligan’s Island.

    How come Lovey & Thurston had a nicer hut than everybody?


  77. RIX
    78 | March 4, 2010 15:22

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I only gave one “kid” a pass when he said that. But he was a young corpsman who has just volunteered to be deployed to Afganistan.

    Yeah, I’d give him a pass too.


  78. Nevergiveup
    79 | March 4, 2010 15:26

    RIX wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I only gave one “kid” a pass when he said that. But he was a young corpsman who has just volunteered to be deployed to Afganistan.

    Yeah, I’d give him a pass too.

    yeah, he is a real good kid. Just young and inexperienced. But he is learning. When he gets back he is gong to BUD/S.


  79. song_and_dance_man
    80 | March 4, 2010 15:29

    @ Iron Fist:

    He’s probably waiting for the SCOTUS decision on the McDonald v. Chicago case that is before them.


  80. chickadee
    81 | March 4, 2010 15:30

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    I don’t remember Stalin having a raging need to harm the Russian people.

    Well not so sure about that? I mean he did more or less kill 50 million or there abouts? Not exactly a act of love?

    I don’t think he had that desire starting out. I think he was a cruel ruthless thug but Zero is that and more. He despises the citizens of this country.


  81. Nevergiveup
    82 | March 4, 2010 15:35

    chickadee wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    I don’t remember Stalin having a raging need to harm the Russian people.

    Well not so sure about that? I mean he did more or less kill 50 million or there abouts? Not exactly a act of love?

    I don’t think he had that desire starting out. I think he was a cruel ruthless thug but Zero is that and more. He despises the citizens of this country.

    Lets not romanticize Stalin. He saw the people of Russia as nothing more than fodder for his paranoid delusional plans. They were all diposable. He was the greatest mass murderer ever.


  82. Nikis Knight
    83 | March 4, 2010 15:39

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    I only gave one “kid” a pass when he said that. But he was a young corpsman who has just volunteered to be deployed to Afganistan.
    Yeah, I’d give him a pass too.
    yeah, he is a real good kid. Just young and inexperienced. But he is learning. When he gets back he is gong to BUD/S.

    I wouldn’t mind seeing voting age raised to 25.
    But then, I’m probably cool with a host of voting restrictions; can’t be taking gov’t aid, or must be able to name your senators and reps before voting on them; etc.


  83. snork
    84 | March 4, 2010 15:41

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Lets not romanticize Stalin. He saw the people of Russia as nothing more than fodder for his paranoid delusional plans. They were all diposable. He was the greatest mass murderer ever.

    Agreed. But even he was at least batting for his own team. With Barack Obama, we have a leader of a major western power who doesn’t even seem to be batting for his own team. That’s something completely new in modern history.


  84. Nevergiveup
    85 | March 4, 2010 15:42

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    I only gave one “kid” a pass when he said that. But he was a young corpsman who has just volunteered to be deployed to Afganistan.
    Yeah, I’d give him a pass too.
    yeah, he is a real good kid. Just young and inexperienced. But he is learning. When he gets back he is gong to BUD/S.

    I wouldn’t mind seeing voting age raised to 25.
    But then, I’m probably cool with a host of voting restrictions; can’t be taking gov’t aid, or must be able to name your senators and reps before voting on them; etc.

    And should be able to recognize a commie at 100 yards


  85. Nevergiveup
    86 | March 4, 2010 15:43

    snork wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Lets not romanticize Stalin. He saw the people of Russia as nothing more than fodder for his paranoid delusional plans. They were all diposable. He was the greatest mass murderer ever.

    Agreed. But even he was at least batting for his own team. With Barack Obama, we have a leader of a major western power who doesn’t even seem to be batting for his own team. That’s something completely new in modern history.

    Yup. Hard to argue with that.


  86. Nikis Knight
    87 | March 4, 2010 15:44

    snork wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:
    Lets not romanticize Stalin. He saw the people of Russia as nothing more than fodder for his paranoid delusional plans. They were all diposable. He was the greatest mass murderer ever.
    Agreed. But even he was at least batting for his own team. With Barack Obama, we have a leader of a major western power who doesn’t even seem to be batting for his own team. That’s something completely new in modern history.

    Outside, of course, the current leaders of Eurpean nations anxious to sell their sovereignty.


  87. Nevergiveup
    88 | March 4, 2010 15:45

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    the current leaders of Eurpean nations anxious to sell their sovereignty.

    Yeah. And how is that working out?


  88. RIX
    89 | March 4, 2010 15:47

    @ Nevergiveup:
    yeah, he is a real good kid. Just young and inexperienced. But he is learning. When he gets back he is gong to BUD/S.

    What is BUD/S?


  89. Nikis Knight
    90 | March 4, 2010 15:49

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Nikis Knight wrote:
    the current leaders of Eurpean nations anxious to sell their sovereignty.
    Yeah. And how is that working out?

    Oh, well, I certainly didn’t mean to imply it’s good, just that O has not quite as much excuse that he didn’t know he was jumping over a cliff as it might seem.


  90. Nevergiveup
    91 | March 4, 2010 15:49

    RIX wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    yeah, he is a real good kid. Just young and inexperienced. But he is learning. When he gets back he is gong to BUD/S.

    What is BUD/S?

    Basic Underwater Demolition/ SEAL


  91. Nevergiveup
    92 | March 4, 2010 15:50

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Nikis Knight wrote:
    the current leaders of Eurpean nations anxious to sell their sovereignty.
    Yeah. And how is that working out?

    Oh, well, I certainly didn’t mean to imply it’s good, just that O has not quite as much excuse that he didn’t know he was jumping over a cliff as it might seem.

    No I know. I was joking. Seems they are all going broke.


  92. Nikis Knight
    93 | March 4, 2010 15:52

    @ Nevergiveup:
    And pissing the pants off their citizens subject.

    (perhaps there’s better metaphors to mix…)


  93. RIX
    94 | March 4, 2010 15:53

    @ chickadee:
    I don’t think he had that desire starting out. I think he was a cruel ruthless thug but Zero is that and more. He despises the citizens of this country.

    Obama is continuing the war on the Middle Class that started with LBJ’s Great Society.
    Only now it is mean & racist.


  94. 95 | March 4, 2010 15:54

    Anyone hear about this? The local radio guy (on Rush radio) is making fun of these people, as well as the commenters. Sheriff’s Office Cites Islamic Terror ‘Cells’ In Bossier Parish Louisiana


  95. 96 | March 4, 2010 15:55

    @ RIX:

    How does a millionaire take on millionaires yet end up unscathed. Ahh…..socialism!


  96. RIX
    97 | March 4, 2010 15:56

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Basic Underwater Demolition/ SEAL

    Now that’s hardcore!


  97. 98 | March 4, 2010 15:57

    @ teacake:

    Jebus, the racism of the comments is shocking!


  98. Nikis Knight
    99 | March 4, 2010 15:58

    @ RIX:
    Yeah, but just think about the “Advanced Underwater Demolition” guys!
    ;)


  99. RIX
    100 | March 4, 2010 15:58

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ RIX:
    How does a millionaire take on millionaires yet end up unscathed. Ahh…..socialism!

    That’s the goal, but for you & me, not them.


  100. Bumr50
    101 | March 4, 2010 15:59

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Not sure if you saw the exchange I posted here that I had on ESPN, where I gave to this guy who said, in all seriosness, that “hockey allegiances are a hell of a lot more important than nationalistic pride.” I went off, and people rushed to this moron’s defense.

    Later on this was posted:

    I’m just wondering…will someone describe why we MUST be nationalistic about america’s teams during sporting events? Its not like Western Pennsylvanians really have all that much in common with North Dakota, Massachusetts, or Oklahoma. I mean really, all we do is talk trash on eastern PA, Ohio, and West VA….I’d much rather root for the players who represent my city or region than someone from Las Vegas who isn’t on my team.

    It seems to be an epidemic.


  101. Nevergiveup
    102 | March 4, 2010 15:59

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Yeah, but just think about the “Advanced Underwater Demolition” guys!

    BUD/S is one of the first steps in SEAL Training


  102. 103 | March 4, 2010 16:01

    RIX wrote:

    That’s the goal, but for you & me, not them.

    Ha, I wish I was a them (“millionaires”). I describe our government as Millionaires robbing thousandaires to fund the millionaires pet projects.

    President Obama, Pelosi, and Feinstein however are millionaires. Soros…billionaire. (IIRC)


  103. 104 | March 4, 2010 16:01

    The asshole on the radio is clueless really about infiltration, all he thinks is that its possible a random terror attack is possible one day, somewhere.

    He’s said on many occasions he has muslim friends that he hangs out with and they are really great guys… people are just so paranoid.


  104. RIX
    105 | March 4, 2010 16:02

    Nikis Knight wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Yeah, but just think about the “Advanced Underwater Demolition” guys!

    Tough guys & yet Seals are being prosecuted for allgedley punching the terrorist in the gut that led the torture & burning of the Blackwater contractors in Iraq. Lunacy!


  105. Nikis Knight
    106 | March 4, 2010 16:03

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Yeah, I was just teasing that there could be a basic sort of underwater demolition at all. Seals are hard core, just ask the Somali pirates.


  106. Nikis Knight
    107 | March 4, 2010 16:05

    @ WrathofG-d:
    One of these days I aspire to be a dollaraire. Won’t be soon, though.


  107. RIX
    108 | March 4, 2010 16:06

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Ha, I wish I was a them (“millionaires”). I describe our government as Millionaires robbing thousandaires to fund the millionaires pet projects.

    I think that is exactly what it is. The struggle takning place now is an attempt to transfer wealth from the Middle Class to others.
    Most of my life , I have seen the Middle Class demonized.


  108. 109 | March 4, 2010 16:08

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Yeah, it is going to be interesting to see what the gun controllers do if that comes down as expected. That’ll pretty much kill the idea of any new gun control. It’ll put what is there now in jeopardy. I think the current court would throw out the NFA when it comes to short barreled rifles right now. There is a case from the ’90s where the Justices said that such weapons did not pose any special or different threat than a normal rifle. It would seem to me that there is no basis to restrict them then. I think the current court would agree. I hope to find out in the near future.


  109. 110 | March 4, 2010 16:10

    @ RIX:

    That is insane. The fucking Republicans should be making that the poster child for Obama’s “Kinder (to our Enemies), Gentler Way”.


  110. 111 | March 4, 2010 16:10

    @ RIX:

    yes, except that the millionaires robbing the thousandaires aren’t pitching in for the effort.

    They get to keep their millions. Obama gets to have the most expensive freak from NY design his Christmas decorations with my tax dollars, but I have to struggle to put latkas on the plate for my family!

    I don’t wish to keep the millionaires from having their pet projects, but let them spend THEIR OWN money on them.


  111. RIX
    112 | March 4, 2010 16:12

    Scientific Review Shows ‘Unambiguous’ Evidence of Global WarmingEnvironment | Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:21:18 pm PST

    Guess which groovy husky blogger has this thread going?
    Come on guess.


  112. Sylvester T Cat
    113 | March 4, 2010 16:15

    bellevueace wrote:

    Obama is seen in a different light by those taken in over here more so since his refusal to support us over the falklands. The mainstream press are calling for british forces to pull out of Afghanistan due to obamas stance and his determination to wreck what has always been a special relationship with America.

    The crisis point in this situation, imo, will come if the Falklands region deteriorates into even the slightest level of armed conflict. That’s when Obama is going to get a nasty surprise– when one of his clueless aides comes into the O’bunker with the text of the NATO treaty. A treaty, Barack, in the US legal system, overrides even the US Constitution, not that you’d know anything about that. If Britain picks up the NATO phone and says “Help” (in polite British phrasing, of course) Barack, you don’t get to vote on it.
    Then there’s the whole Afghanistan deal– Barack, baby, maybe they didn’t tell you this in community-organizer school, but it’s not just the UK that could pick up its marbles and go home. Three other countries fighting on our side there have portraits of H.M. Elizabeth II on their money.
    Think there’s a reason for that, Barack? Think they’re watching what you say about the Falklands? The mystery phrase is “H_LL Y_S”; feel free to buy a vowel.

    –STC

    –STC


  113. chickadee
    114 | March 4, 2010 16:15

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    I don’t remember Stalin having a raging need to harm the Russian people.

    Well not so sure about that? I mean he did more or less kill 50 million or there abouts? Not exactly a act of love?

    I don’t think he had that desire starting out. I think he was a cruel ruthless thug but Zero is that and more. He despises the citizens of this country.

    Lets not romanticize Stalin. He saw the people of Russia as nothing more than fodder for his paranoid delusional plans. They were all diposable. He was the greatest mass murderer ever.

    Who’s romanticizing Stalin? That’s absurd.
    I’m saying that Zero is a vindictive racist with a burning hatred of white American. That is in addition to his commie ideology. Stalin was a cruel ruthless thug who ground down anyone who got in way.
    Zero set out to punish specific people and is moving right along with his plans.


  114. RIX
    115 | March 4, 2010 16:17

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I don’t wish to keep the millionaires from having their pet projects, but let them spend THEIR OWN money on them

    I feel the same way. Somebody has lots of money, salutes.
    But the war on the Middle Class is worse now than ever.
    The good news is that there is a huge push back. People do recognize basic unfairness.


  115. RIX
    116 | March 4, 2010 16:23

    <

    b>Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    That is insane. The fucking Republicans should be making that the poster child for Obama’s “Kinder (to our Enemies), Gentler Way”.

    They are, at a press conference today with Dana Rohrbach & Dan Burton.
    I have to believe that their Commanding Officer would like to drop the whole thing , but it is the Obama Administration.


  116. snork
    117 | March 4, 2010 16:46

    @ RIX:
    Notice the hidden backhoe that he used to move the goalpost with?


  117. snork
    118 | March 4, 2010 16:51

    @ RIX:
    Did I peg this, or what?

    7 LudwigVanQuixote Thu, Mar 4, 2010 3:29:36pm

    re: #3 SanFranciscoZionist

    Maybe the melting glaciers will dilute the intensified salinity from the warming?

    /Old line: ‘Maybe the nuclear winter and global warming will cancel each other out.’

    It is very interesting that you mention this. It is precisely this mechanism – with the melts off of Greenland and Canada that are shutting down thermo haline circulation in the Atlantic.

    Remember the spoof threads? LVQ is Bill Nye the Science Guy!!!


  118. Empire1
    119 | March 4, 2010 17:06

    @ Iron Fist:
    Let’s just say that if I were on a jury for a firearms violation (just that, not murder or robbery with firearms, for instance … maybe carrying without a license) the rest of the jurors would get a lecture on jury nullification, and a hung jury if they didn’t agree with me.


  119. 120 | March 4, 2010 17:08

    @ WrathofG-d:
    @ Speranza:
    Sorry I had to step out.
    It should have said Barack “the” Magic Negro. It’s a reference to this:
    http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2008/12/barack-obama-ma.html
    Back ground:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_negro

    And this:


  120. PrincessNatasha
    121 | March 4, 2010 17:18

    chickadee wrote:

    Stalin was a cruel ruthless thug who ground down anyone who got in way

    That is a very correct assessment of Stalin, but there is more. He was, for all intents and purposes, the last Emperor of Russia. While ruling like a tyrannical monarch, he brought back some of the trappings of old monarchy. Also, he wanted to see Russia strong, and dominant in the world. He is opposite of Obummer in that he did not want to destroy his country. He wanted to and did destroy whom he perceived as enemies of the Empire.


  121. calcajun
    122 | March 4, 2010 17:23

    The sad part is that Gordon Brown is no Maggie Thatcher. HRH may have to have him pay her a call at Buck House and remind him of the fact that the UK has paid twice for those damned islands and they’re not going to pay again.


  122. calcajun
    123 | March 4, 2010 17:24

    @ PrincessNatasha:
    I saw his little rant yesterday with the doctors and have concluded that he is really NOT a nice guy. “Smug cocksucker” is my new per name for the present POTUS.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David