First time visitor? Learn more.

The Asylum that is LGF

by coldwarrior ( 338 Comments › )
Filed under Art, Open thread at March 12th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

A Rake’s Progress, Plate 8

‘The rake ends his life in Bedlam’

Willliam Hogarth (1697-1764)

As we know, Chuckie ‘Icarus’ Johnson (obscure jazz guitarist and all ’round husky blogger) decided to libel one of our very own, and favorites Buzzsawmonkey last night. Nice work chuckie, you are picking on a cyber identity that exists in one blog. Wooohoooo! youdaman…not. Btw, chuckie, Daedalus say hi!

Well, for our enjoyment, lets have some fun with LGF. Above is William Hogarth’s ‘The Rake Ends His Life in Bedlam’.

A Rake’s Progress by William Hogarth, Plate 8: “A Rake’s Progress” ends in the famous madhouse, Bethlehem Hospital (Bedlam). Chained, half-naked, and in great anguish is our final view of Tom Rakewell. Faithful to the end, Sarah Young attempts to give him whatever comfort she can. One keeper attends to Tom’s chains while another molests Sarah.

This particular image is among Hogarth’s greatest and most damning indictments of society. Its cast of tormented characters points to the many causes of madness. Behind Tom and Sarah, science has claimed two victims. One studies the stars through a useless role or tube of paper, while another scribbles geometric calculations on the wall. Religion, too, has led to madness. In the cell to the left, a tormented, half-animal, soul worships his cross. To the extreme right a delusional man believes he is the Pope. Beside him a musician madly plays his violin with a stick. On the steps a love lost man has carved the initials of his obsession (‘Charming Betty Careless’, who was a famous prostitute of the day) on the banister. Rounding out this horrific scene is a mad tailor and, in cell 55, a naked delusional King.

Most disturbing, however, are the two, pretty aristocratic ladies who have come to view the suffering of the insane as a form of entertainment. Throughout this entire, masterful set, Hogarth has shown us the dangers of a morally bankrupt society.

Almost thirty years (1763) after completing A Rake’s Progress, Hogarth returned to this final plate and made one significant addition. On the wall he etched an image of a halfpenny portraying Britannia with her hair wildly flying behind her. Within the lower margin he also wrote, “Retouch’d by the Author, 1763.” In the last year of his life, Hogarth clearly felt that Britain and its ruling classes had not improved.

A Rake’s Progress was first published by William Hogarth in 1735. Created several years after A Harlot’s Progress, it chronicles many of the same vices and follies. But whereas Moll, the heroine of the earlier set, is a victim of society, the young, aristocratic ‘hero’, of A Rake’s Progress, Tom Rakewell, is a victim of himself. In this series, Hogarth brilliantly satirizes the often useless and destructive character of Britain’s ruling classes.

This original engraving was both designed and engraved by William Hogarth and published by William Heath in 1822.

There is the background…SO…just for fun, lets pick out which of our favorite LGF characters are in the above plate. Be sure to explain why!

and its an open thread, the bar is also open!

h/t vagabond trader for reminding me of Hogarth’s work on Bedlam Mental Hospital

Buzzsawmonkey has a reply as well”:

The Unicorn
—apologies to Shel Silverstein and the Irish Rovers

A long time ago, when Johnson was lean,
He had a lot of posters on a site called “Green”
The foibles of the day they would discuss with scorn
And none of them believed in silly unicorns.

There were some believing Christians, atheists too
Some gun nuts and some poets, and a mix of Jews
Conservatives and liberals, but sure as you’re born
Not one of them believed in silly unicorns.

Then Johnson found a weasel with fur soft and warm
Who said, “Let me come in and play, too–what could be the harm?”
He forgot that rabid animals will scratch and bite
And it went for everyone in sight.

It started biting believing Christians, atheists too
Some gun nuts and some poets, and a mix of Jews
Conservatives and liberals, but it said, “For fear of horns,
One thing that I will never bite is unicorns.”

Johnson started eating Cheetos, potato chips too,
And as his waist expanded, paranoia grew—
He started seeing enemies, his mind grew sick
And he got himself a banning stick.

He started banning believing Christians, atheists too
Some gun nuts and some poets, and a mix of Jews
Conservatives and liberals, and one fine morn
He even started to believe in unicorns.

One who goes seeking enemies is quite a dope
‘Cause quickly you’re a-sliding down a slippery slope
Johnson decided he’d make his site globally warm
For anyone who won’t believe in unicorns.

So the believing Christians, atheists too
Some gun nuts and some poets, and a mix of Jews
Conservatives and liberals decided, best be gone
Rather than be forced to believe in unicorns.

Johnson stands the solid emperor of his own site
And the weasel capers ’round his feet both day and night
The folks who’ve turned their backs on him view him with scorn
And he’s butthurt ’cause he’s sitting on a unicorn.

Yes, the believing Christians, atheists too
Some gun nuts and some poets, and a mix of Jews
Conservatives and liberals are all ignorin’
The idiot who now believes in unicorns.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

338 Responses to “The Asylum that is LGF”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Formercorpsman
    1 | March 12, 2010 4:04 pm

    Well, I am glad I did not log off yet.

    Ah man. Buzz, you misogynistic lunatic, you.


  2. snork
    2 | March 12, 2010 4:05 pm

    One studies the stars through a useless role or tube of paper, while another scribbles geometric calculations on the wall.

    That’s Queeg Chunky! The geometric logic he used to prove the existence of the second key.


  3. song_and_dance_man
    3 | March 12, 2010 4:05 pm

    Good job buzz. Welcome to the club where Foster has perused the comments of those he hopes to scorn and found a comment to make him look like he did the right thing by showing us the 1.0 back door. He did this to me more than once.


  4. DEZ
    4 | March 12, 2010 4:05 pm

    Buzz, that was fantastic.

    Now would someone clue me in about what Cankles said about Buzz?


  5. coldwarrior
    5 | March 12, 2010 4:06 pm

    @ Formercorpsman:

    i thought buzz needed his say right out front on a post…its the nco in me, i dont like my guys getting messed with


  6. snork
    6 | March 12, 2010 4:07 pm

    The folks who’ve turned their backs on him view him with scorn
    And he’s butthurt ’cause he’s sitting on a unicorn.

    It helps of you mount the part between the pairs of legs. Mounting the head is…well…teabagging.


  7. song_and_dance_man
    7 | March 12, 2010 4:07 pm

    It makes him look like a desperate, vengeful and pitiful man. I don;t know what he means to gain by these kinds of spiteful attacks other than revealing himself as a total nutjob.


  8. vagabond trader
    8 | March 12, 2010 4:08 pm

    The Boys of Bedlam, Steeleye Span


  9. Formercorpsman
    9 | March 12, 2010 4:08 pm

    @ DEZ:

    He had a thread yesterday, essentially dedicated to how he has proof Buzz is stalking him to other sites he now posts at.

    The guy is such a panty-waist.


  10. Beltfed
    10 | March 12, 2010 4:08 pm

    Is that king charles in the closet. lol


  11. Speranza
    11 | March 12, 2010 4:09 pm

    I think that Ludwig Von Quackquack is the guy holding the thing to his eye.


  12. wolfie
    12 | March 12, 2010 4:10 pm

    I nominate Killgore for the guy who thinks he’s Pope!


  13. song_and_dance_man
    13 | March 12, 2010 4:11 pm

    Is that Irish Rose and Sharmuta going out the door?


  14. 14 | March 12, 2010 4:11 pm

    That “Unicorn” is truly first rate Buzzsawmonkey songsmithing.
    Being a half-assed guitarist myself, I could never be the sycophant that LGF desires.
    Such conformity and bludgeoning bullying go had against my grain.
    Playing people like puppets or allowing yourself to be so strung, gives me the creeps.
    Hi Song and dance man, you’re right, a favor he did us to ban from such madness.
    What about the doggie ?


  15. snowcrash
    15 | March 12, 2010 4:11 pm

    @ Formercorpsman:
    He also claimed Buzz is sending him hate emails. I call BS.


  16. Speranza
    16 | March 12, 2010 4:12 pm

    Btw the Imperial War Museum in Lambeth, London is on the site of what was Bedlam Asylum.


  17. song_and_dance_man
    17 | March 12, 2010 4:12 pm

    What ever happened to Salmantis? Did he disappear once the Darwinist threads dried up?


  18. coldwarrior
    18 | March 12, 2010 4:12 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    oh, and hat tip to VT…i had forgetoen about the works by hogarth, she brought the bedalm works up i a thread some weeks ago…


  19. vagabond trader
    19 | March 12, 2010 4:12 pm

    Jimmah-Ice – the aristocratic ladies amusing themselves.

    kkkkk trout- the guy who thinks he is Pope.

    Naked delusional king….. lol,guess who


  20. Speranza
    20 | March 12, 2010 4:13 pm

    iceweasel and Jimmah are on the left.


  21. snork
    21 | March 12, 2010 4:13 pm

    Buzz, have you earned your death threat medal yet? I’ve got mine, and my sockpuppet ribbon. Now I just need a pair of outing clusters.


  22. song_and_dance_man
    22 | March 12, 2010 4:14 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    He also claimed Buzz is sending him hate emails. I call BS.

    He said the same about me. It wasn’t long ago he claimed I sent him ‘creepy’ emails after my banning. A total lie from Foster. But that is par for him.


  23. 23 | March 12, 2010 4:14 pm

    SHARMUTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  24. Speranza
    24 | March 12, 2010 4:14 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:
    oh, and hat tip to VT…i had forgetoen about the works by hogarth, she brought the bedalm works up i a thread some weeks ago…

    Hogarth has another series of engravings of The Rake’s Progress where the guy ends up at Tyburn (the place n London where malefactors were hanged for many centuries).


  25. snork
    25 | March 12, 2010 4:14 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    iceweasel and Jimmah are on the left.

    We know that.


  26. Formercorpsman
    26 | March 12, 2010 4:16 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    i thought buzz needed his say right out front on a post…its the nco in me, i dont like my guys getting messed with

    Buzz is a good man. I feel comfortable saying this for numerous reasons.

    Quite frankly, Buzz rarely uses vulgarity, posts with consideration, and I have never seen him go out of his way to demean anyone.

    I was around when the last few folks were getting their marching orders over there. I assume I was in that group too.

    The beautiful irony in all of this, is that Charles tries to bleed supposed intellectual honesty.

    Good lord, he about wet himself when Kos mentioned him, Obviously can’t remember Andrew Sullivan’s insane pregnancy rants, and just overlook’s Cato’s own Palinistic misogynistic invective.

    He is quickly approaching 33&1/3 level of the Order of the Unicorn.


  27. Speranza
    27 | March 12, 2010 4:16 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    He said the same about me. It wasn’t long ago he claimed I sent him ‘creepy’ emails after my banning. A total lie from Foster. But that is par for him.

    and he has no way of proving it. He just throws out accusations and his acolytes just suck it all up. Three idiotic threads today abut Texas Board Of Education. The man is a walking sleeping pill.


  28. vagabond trader
    28 | March 12, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I did? Another hatip, well I’ll be durned.I got teh Bedlam from the song in #8, plus having worked at one or two. btw, they haven’t changed all that much, just better care. :-)


  29. snork
    29 | March 12, 2010 4:17 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I did? Another hatip, well I’ll be durned.I got teh Bedlam from the song in #8, plus having worked at one or two. btw, they haven’t changed all that much, just better care.

    And drugs. And surgery.


  30. Speranza
    30 | March 12, 2010 4:18 pm

    snork wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    iceweasel and Jimmah are on the left.

    We know that.

    I meant the characters on the Left (Jimmah the guy with no shirt on).


  31. coldwarrior
    31 | March 12, 2010 4:18 pm

    @ Speranza:

    i was/am familiar with hogarth…and had forgotten all about them. the VT mentioned bedlam…


  32. vagabond trader
    32 | March 12, 2010 4:19 pm

    @ snork:

    comes under care,customers are pretty much the same. Religous political erotic and identity delusions.


  33. snork
    33 | March 12, 2010 4:19 pm


  34. Formercorpsman
    34 | March 12, 2010 4:20 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    snowcrash wrote:
    @ Formercorpsman:
    He also claimed Buzz is sending him hate emails. I call BS.

    He said the same about me. It wasn’t long ago he claimed I sent him ‘creepy’ emails after my banning. A total lie from Foster. But that is par for him.

    It is painfully obvious to anyone with a brain stem.

    When I was unable to log on, I sent one email. Short and sweet. I asked what I did to get banned. Of course there was no response, but I could care less anyway.

    I have communicated with Buzz outside of these forums, and I can say he is a decent guy.


  35. Speranza
    35 | March 12, 2010 4:20 pm

    snork wrote:

    Buzz, have you earned your death threat medal yet? I’ve got mine, and my sockpuppet ribbon. Now I just need a pair of outing clusters.

    Isn’t Islandlibertarian Iron Fist’s sock? (According to the Great and Powerful Chaz?)


  36. coldwarrior
    36 | March 12, 2010 4:21 pm

    Sarah Young attempts to give him whatever comfort she can. One keeper attends to Tom’s chains while another molests Sarah.

    oh will someone please ID these characters?


  37. wolfie
    37 | March 12, 2010 4:21 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    @ coldwarrior:

    Nice job, both of you!


  38. snork
    38 | March 12, 2010 4:22 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Snot nice to fool the tool.


  39. garycooper
    39 | March 12, 2010 4:22 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    snowcrash wrote:
    @ Formercorpsman:
    He also claimed Buzz is sending him hate emails. I call BS.
    He said the same about me. It wasn’t long ago he claimed I sent him ‘creepy’ emails after my banning. A total lie from Foster. But that is par for him.

    Years ago, upon the occasion of my first banning, he also claimed I sent him threatening emails. It’s a major fantasy with him, that people are out to get him. Classic paranoid delusion.

    Unseen in Hogarth’s pic, but implied, are the vast, empty, echoing halls leading off from the scene in the day-room. Where lizards used to frolic.


  40. Speranza
    40 | March 12, 2010 4:22 pm

    Formercorpsman wrote:

    When I was unable to log on, I sent one email. Short and sweet. I asked what I did to get banned. Of course there was no response, but I could care less anyway

    He has no answer to that question or for most of the people he banned. He did ig because he could, he is on a power trip, and wants to purge any conservatives that have enough intellectual integrity to question him on his leftist dogma.


  41. coldwarrior
    41 | March 12, 2010 4:23 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I did? Another hatip, well I’ll be durned.I got teh Bedlam from the song in #8, plus having worked at one or two. btw, they haven’t changed all that much, just better care.

    you mentioned Bedlam some weeks ago…it jarred my memory of hogarth


  42. vagabond trader
    42 | March 12, 2010 4:23 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I told you,the molester is Cato, the molestee is anything that moves and poor Tom is banished to the cornfield by the mad naked king. OK?


  43. coldwarrior
    43 | March 12, 2010 4:24 pm

    @ wolfie:

    thanks.


  44. vagabond trader
    44 | March 12, 2010 4:25 pm

    @ wolfie:

    Bedlam has always been a fave word. :D


  45. garycooper
    45 | March 12, 2010 4:25 pm

    I think I see Peter Sinclair in the back, conducting climate research.


  46. NoThreat2U
    46 | March 12, 2010 4:25 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Cato is standing on the steps wearing a pointy hat. Charles is the Rake and that is Sharmuta holding his arm.


  47. coldwarrior
    47 | March 12, 2010 4:26 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    missed it…speghetti o’s and a 15month old distracted me


  48. Formercorpsman
    48 | March 12, 2010 4:26 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Formercorpsman wrote:
    When I was unable to log on, I sent one email. Short and sweet. I asked what I did to get banned. Of course there was no response, but I could care less anyway
    He has no answer to that question or for most of the people he banned. He did ig because he could, he is on a power trip, and wants to purge any conservatives that have enough intellectual integrity to question him on his leftist dogma.

    He is a tool. The radio interview with Colmes proved that. They have a delay button, and a call screener. It was fluff. This is the same guy who put the Rueuters counter on his site.

    Like I posted before, he has become what Kos was on his site 4-5 years ago.


  49. garycooper
    49 | March 12, 2010 4:26 pm

    Why, oh why, didn’t Hogarth include a dog in the picture?


  50. snowcrash
    50 | March 12, 2010 4:26 pm

    IceW and jimmah are the watchers. They laugh and appear delighted by agitated the state of the inhabitants.


  51. vagabond trader
    51 | March 12, 2010 4:26 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    :D :D


  52. NoThreat2U
    52 | March 12, 2010 4:26 pm

    The one who thinks he is the Pope is definitely Walter. He’s such an athiest theologian.


  53. song_and_dance_man
    53 | March 12, 2010 4:27 pm

    @ Speranza:

    What is really strange – and buzz mentioned it last night – that of the thousands of comments buzz posted Foster found one post to use against him. For me it was 30k and in the same manner he found one.

    One.

    It’s not the comments that are the real story, it’s Foster’s obsession where he would pour over 30,000 comments, in my case, to find one that he found to be used as fodder to load his hate cannon.

    I have written about this before and truly believe he does this in attempt to denigrate former posters more popular than he. He wants to be the brightest bulb in the room, and nowadays, after banning all the people that are smarter than him, he just might now be that one. And that is a sad state of affair for a blog that used to be filled with a grand assortment of really sharp minds.


  54. garycooper
    54 | March 12, 2010 4:28 pm

    Btw, that video of his interview is crying out for some creative re-dubbing. I wish I had the computer skilz.


  55. coldwarrior
    55 | March 12, 2010 4:30 pm

    garycooper wrote:

    Why, oh why, didn’t Hogarth include a dog in the picture?

    um, there is a dog…lower right


  56. vagabond trader
    56 | March 12, 2010 4:32 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Hey cuz. That is truly bizarre behavior on his part. Wonder if he jobbed out the 30K comments to his trusted flunkies.Go forth and find me dirt.There is a disturbing pathology at work here.


  57. Formercorpsman
    57 | March 12, 2010 4:32 pm

    Another thing that was clear, was how the usual suspects would drop in on a dead thread in the morning, usually when Avanti would make a generalized & bombastic claim.

    A few of us would ask him to back himself up, and you would then have Kilgore start posting the stupid links with the titles of “oh neos” and shit like that.

    Truth be told, I disagreed with Avanti, but there were times when I stood up for him when other people would make claims about his service. I could be wrong, but I think one might have been albusteve, (who I also got along with pretty well) but I could be remembering that individual wrong as well too.

    Bottom line, the guy has painted himself into a corner. He is a knucklehead.


  58. snork
    58 | March 12, 2010 4:33 pm

    Speaking of assylums. They climatati are done with methane. Now the greenhouse panic gas de jure is – not kidding – laughing gas.


  59. vagabond trader
    59 | March 12, 2010 4:34 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    um, there is a dog…lower right

    Poor Haiku, incarcerated with his mad master.


  60. song_and_dance_man
    60 | March 12, 2010 4:34 pm

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Gordon, in his chronicles of the banned, provided proof that I never emailed Foster. From the mouth of Charles himself. Charles wrote, after BBEV asked if I might be reinstated, that I had the chance if only I had contacted him and admitted I had not done so.

    So there you go Charles, you consummate liar.


  61. snork
    61 | March 12, 2010 4:35 pm

    AFAIK, I haven’t been accused of writing any threatening emails {sniff…pout…}. Always a stalker, never one of the uberstalkers. Story of my life.


  62. coldwarrior
    62 | March 12, 2010 4:36 pm

    i intend on labeling the characters hogarth’s plate and having more fun with it…


  63. Guggi
    63 | March 12, 2010 4:36 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    He said the same about me. It wasn’t long ago he claimed I sent him ‘creepy’ emails after my banning. A total lie from Foster. But that is par for him.

    If true he would have published them as he did numerous times before with other “hatemails” he had received.


  64. 64 | March 12, 2010 4:36 pm

    @ jimash:

    I’m not only glad I’m gone from there, I am ashamed that I was ever associated with, let alone promoting, LGF.


  65. vagabond trader
    65 | March 12, 2010 4:37 pm

    @ snork:

    Dead zones between their ears so long as the government teat provides for them.


  66. Beltfed
    66 | March 12, 2010 4:38 pm

    garycooper @ 49:

    Why, oh why, didn’t Hogarth include a dog in the picture?

    He did, don’t you see Haky barking at Ned on the stairs


  67. Buckeye Abroad
    67 | March 12, 2010 4:39 pm

    53. song_and_dance_man

    And that is a sad state of affair for a blog that used to be filled with a grand assortment of really sharp minds.

    A brief spark in the political realignment in the world after 9/11. Alot of people around the world have awoken to whats amiss. The chips have fallen, but so has 1.0. Although alot of us are now here or elsewhere, but awake.


  68. Formercorpsman
    68 | March 12, 2010 4:39 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Gordon, in his chronicles of the banned, provided proof that I never emailed Foster. From the mouth of Charles himself. Charles wrote, after BBEV asked if I might be reinstated, that I had the chance if only I had contacted him and admitted I had not done so.
    So there you go Charles, you consummate liar.

    Well you know, as well as I, there have been some other folks from way back who made the claim that posts were tampered with.

    I wish I could have gotten a screen shot, but I remember seeing a post by Yertle himself, and when I hit new comments button, it was gone.

    The guy has lost credibility, he knows he lost his credibility, he lies, and is dishonest. It is sad it went this way, but so is life. He has gone out of his way to really slime quite a few people. Of course people are critical of him, he puts himself out there.

    Typical passive – aggressive belly aching on his end.


  69. Crashnburn01
    69 | March 12, 2010 4:39 pm

    snork wrote:

    Speaking of assylums. They climatati are done with methane. Now the greenhouse panic gas de jure is – not kidding – laughing gas.

    Every thing changes our climate – hard to believe nothing lowers the temps, these things only raise them…


  70. Formercorpsman
    70 | March 12, 2010 4:40 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ jimash:
    I’m not only glad I’m gone from there, I am ashamed that I was ever associated with, let alone promoting, LGF.

    Very true.


  71. song_and_dance_man
    71 | March 12, 2010 4:41 pm

    @ Guggi:

    One would think the former fact check your ass site would provide proof. especially from Foster. Huh? And if none was forthcoming then someone should have taken him to task and fact checked his ass and asked for proof. But those heady days are long gone from that site of toe lining sycophants.


  72. wolfie
    72 | March 12, 2010 4:42 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    What is really strange – and buzz mentioned it last night – that of the thousands of comments buzz posted Foster found one post to use against him. For me it was 30k and in the same manner he found one.
    One.

    And it was a pretty pathetic one to make a case against you, at that. It was a personal, poetic, and mystical reflection and there was nothing wrong with it. Nothing. Not one ounce of ugly in it.


  73. Formercorpsman
    73 | March 12, 2010 4:42 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Exactly.


  74. Crashnburn01
    74 | March 12, 2010 4:43 pm

    @ Formercorpsman:
    I was banned for calling the sycophants, well, kiss-butts (I didn’t even swear!) for updinging Charles for saying he was on hold with Alan Colmes. That and some prior discussions about AGW that he didn’t like. Regardless, no reason given and all posts were deleted.

    You are correct: he has no credibility and he will not debate anyone if he feels there is a chance he’ll lose. When you start to believe your own press clippings, it is time to hang up the cleats.


  75. 75 | March 12, 2010 4:44 pm

    @ Speranza:

    That one just positively confuses me. We’re in different hemispheres. Charles knows this. He’s not all the hot shit he thinks he is as a programmer, but he can surely trace an IP. It is such a blatant, useless lie that is is pathological. Bedlam, indeed.


  76. 76 | March 12, 2010 4:45 pm

    ROFLMAO Buzz that’s first class


  77. snork
    77 | March 12, 2010 4:47 pm

    Now all we need to go with this is a picture of butthurt Chunky mounting the front end of an unicorn.


  78. Beltfed
    78 | March 12, 2010 4:47 pm

    Haky laying on the floor. Wonder what procedure he had done to have his leg and side shaved.


  79. DEZ
    79 | March 12, 2010 4:47 pm

    Yes Cankles, your hated, not simply loathed or pitied.
    People have no love for fat lazy sloths.
    You have put your bloated anemic face on the internet in an effort to seek admiration, only you proved your as ugly on the outside as in.


  80. Russkilitlover
    80 | March 12, 2010 4:47 pm

    Buzz, you are a wit and a wonder; which is why you get under Charles Johnson’s skin. Your verbal rapier thrusts meet their target every time you focus on him. Heh. It pisses him off, obviously. Actually, sends him ballistic. Keep up the good work! :)


  81. snork
    81 | March 12, 2010 4:48 pm

    To the unicorns:


  82. Formercorpsman
    82 | March 12, 2010 4:48 pm

    Crashnburn01 wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    I was banned for calling the sycophants, well, kiss-butts (I didn’t even swear!) for updinging Charles for saying he was on hold with Alan Colmes. That and some prior discussions about AGW that he didn’t like. Regardless, no reason given and all posts were deleted.
    You are correct: he has no credibility and he will not debate anyone if he feels there is a chance he’ll lose. When you start to believe your own press clippings, it is time to hang up the cleats.

    I’ll admit, I mostly kept of it, and actually laid low knowing Pacino was getting to shout at any minute. I never flounced, but the writing was on the wall.

    The inrony, is that he had the fix in for other folks, with other blogs, and let imbeciles do his bidding for him. I was fine not going there anymore. I read everywhere, comment much less, etc. I remember Mother Superior coming over to Zombie’s place and giving the I am ashamed speech.

    Laughing stock. Even the lefties are laughing at him. Hell, I hate the NYT, but they coined some truly funny phrases.

    It is comical. Poor Charlie.


  83. Beltfed
    83 | March 12, 2010 4:49 pm

    Another pic of Haku.


  84. 84 | March 12, 2010 4:49 pm

    He had an intellegent following, and the blogworld by the tail, and he chose to throw it away with both hands. I think that he saw that there was some sort of “Liberal Revolution” underway and chose to get on board.

    He chose poorly, and will reap the whirlwind.

    His site is now populated by fawning sycophants and run by a dead-eyed, emotionless dictator who rules over a rapidly decaying empire.

    He made his hell, let him live in it.


  85. coldwarrior
    85 | March 12, 2010 4:49 pm

    i just wish there were someone playing at being a soldier in this plate.

    it could be dark falcon, pretending to be a real soldier while playing his video games…


  86. Guggi
    86 | March 12, 2010 4:51 pm

    snork wrote:

    AFAIK, I haven’t been accused of writing any threatening emails {sniff…pout…}. Always a stalker, never one of the uberstalkers. Story of my life.

    You weren’t banned you “flounced”


  87. song_and_dance_man
    87 | March 12, 2010 4:53 pm

    @ DEZ:

    Cankles? HA. I suspect I’ve seen you at another site where that name was coined after watching that PJTV vid of him in his inglorious 300+ lbs.


  88. DEZ
    88 | March 12, 2010 4:53 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    it could be dark falcon, pretending to be a real soldier while playing his video games…

    And dad is tired of paying for those games.;)

    56 Dark_Falcon Fri, Mar 12, 2010 3:36:15pm replyquote

    * 8
    * down
    * up
    * report

    It’s time for me to see my parents and face my father’s anger. Wish me luck and I’ll be back later.

    Its a long mile up the basement steps.


  89. coldwarrior
    89 | March 12, 2010 4:54 pm

    One studies the stars through a useless role or tube of paper

    ludwig on agw


  90. DEZ
    90 | March 12, 2010 4:54 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    I always post as DEZ.
    :)


  91. The Osprey
  92. The Osprey
    92 | March 12, 2010 4:56 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ DEZ:

    Cankles? HA. I suspect I’ve seen you at another site where that name was coined after watching that PJTV vid of him in his inglorious 300+ lbs.

    I keep hearing references to this infamous vid…is it still available anywhere?


  93. snork
    93 | March 12, 2010 4:56 pm

    DEZ wrote:

    It’s time for me to see my parents and face my father’s anger. Wish me luck and I’ll be back later.

    Shouldn’t have gotten into his Playboys.


  94. coldwarrior
    94 | March 12, 2010 4:57 pm

    @ DEZ:

    .


  95. song_and_dance_man
    95 | March 12, 2010 4:58 pm

    MacDuff wrote:

    He had an intellegent following, and the blogworld by the tail, and he chose to throw it away with both hands. I think that he saw that there was some sort of “Liberal Revolution” underway and chose to get on board.
    He chose poorly, and will reap the whirlwind.
    His site is now populated by fawning sycophants and run by a dead-eyed, emotionless dictator who rules over a rapidly decaying empire.
    He made his hell, let him live in it.

    Just had to see that again.

    I have concluded that once he started to purge the faithful and truly conservative from his site he found others that agreed with him. That gave him the impetus to move forward with his break from the right. Which was, in essence, ridding his blog of those with whom he always disagreed with. But, as it now appears, he used us to make his blog what it became, then turned his back on the very ones that made his site popular.


  96. snork
    96 | March 12, 2010 4:58 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    WTF???


  97. DEZ
    97 | March 12, 2010 4:58 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    If any of us had said we were gonna pop corn in Cankles lobes, he would be calling the FBI over the threat and then hiding under his bed in his wet depends.


  98. coldwarrior
    98 | March 12, 2010 5:00 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    WTF???

    what…i’m torturing a metaphor!

    the tube is his intellect…

    :)


  99. song_and_dance_man
    99 | March 12, 2010 5:01 pm

    @ The Osprey:

    I’ve checked PJTV many times and it is no longer available. The Cankles reference is about his ankles. His chin was jiggling as he spoke and his ankles had the appearance of cankles.


  100. coldwarrior
    100 | March 12, 2010 5:01 pm

    DEZ wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    If any of us had said we were gonna pop corn in Cankles lobes, he would be calling the FBI over the threat and then hiding under his bed in his wet depends.

    true that!


  101. DEZ
    101 | March 12, 2010 5:06 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    He would also put up a thread about the heinous threat to his life for his worshipers to praise his bravery.


  102. coldwarrior
    102 | March 12, 2010 5:10 pm

    @ DEZ:

    i did like the popcorn line tho…funny.


  103. wolfie
    103 | March 12, 2010 5:10 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    …once he started to purge the faithful and truly conservative from his site he found others that agreed with him. That gave him the impetus to move forward with his break from the right. Which was, in essence, ridding his blog of those with whom he always disagreed with.

    And then it got out of control. Or rather, it came under control of CJ’s personal demons, and he began to purge anyone who would not grovel, including agnostics, atheists, and even liberals. Anyone who questioned him. Anyone who would not bow down.


  104. song_and_dance_man
    104 | March 12, 2010 5:10 pm

    @ wolfie:

    Had he given me the opportunity I would have explained the post. But of course there was no chance for that since he used it as a means to get back at me. And what was the reason for his attack? I suggested on Jihad Watch he was going insane. And that accusation was not a stretch after witnessing what came after. I think my comment at JW has found credence among many after seeing his behavior post that comment. It really lit him up and sent him over the top in my case.


  105. snork
    105 | March 12, 2010 5:11 pm

    He’s back to his climate jihad. This time he’s quoting some dingaling who’s argument boils down to “I know you are, but what am I?”.


  106. snork
    106 | March 12, 2010 5:15 pm

    Because, y’know, actually making any kind of argument yourself would, y’know, mean you actually have to know, y’know, shiite from kiwi.


  107. The Osprey
    107 | March 12, 2010 5:15 pm

    snork wrote:

    He’s back to his climate jihad. This time he’s quoting some dingaling who’s argument boils down to “I know you are, but what am I?”.

    So, he’s no longer issuing fatwas against Texas?


  108. song_and_dance_man
    108 | March 12, 2010 5:16 pm

    DEZ wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    He would also put up a thread about the heinous threat to his life for his worshipers to praise his bravery.

    That is bad craziness.

    And enough of feeding his ego. And also, stop adding Twinkies to his Amazon Wish List.


  109. coldwarrior
    109 | March 12, 2010 5:16 pm

    OK i have my tags and ideas for the plate above….

    OPEN THREAD>>>

    martinis anyone?


  110. 110 | March 12, 2010 5:17 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    garycooper wrote:
    Why, oh why, didn’t Hogarth include a dog in the picture?

    um, there is a dog…lower right

    That’s not a dog. That’s Stinky Beaumont. Where is the Banning Stick?


  111. DEZ
    111 | March 12, 2010 5:20 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    That’s not a dog. That’s Stinky Beaumont. Where is the Banning Stick?

    YELP YELP YELP


  112. wolfie
    112 | March 12, 2010 5:21 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    And that accusation was not a stretch after witnessing what came after.

    Insanity is often voluntary. The result of an incremental, progressive surrender to our darker nature.

    You, Babba, and Gagdad Bob were among the first to sense that the road CJ chose would end in Bedlam.


  113. 113 | March 12, 2010 5:22 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    snork wrote:
    AFAIK, I haven’t been accused of writing any threatening emails {sniff…pout…}. Always a stalker, never one of the uberstalkers. Story of my life.

    You weren’t banned you “flounced”

    And it was an EXCELLENT flounce. Anyone keep a copy?


  114. song_and_dance_man
    114 | March 12, 2010 5:23 pm

    Now that I look at the pic again I think those who suggest Trout is the Pope-like character got it wrong. That is the clownish Foster himself with a custom Tin Foil Hat holding a Progressive receiver antenna orchestrating the bedlam.

    The one to the left of him has a 1.0 cookbook on his his head and just may be Juante.


  115. NoThreat2U
    115 | March 12, 2010 5:34 pm

    @ snork:
    ROFLMAO @ climate jihad. hahahahahahahahaha

    @ The Osprey:
    Love the “fatwas against Texas” line! hahahahahahahaha

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    Twinkies to his Amazon wish list? Bwahahahahahahahaha

    **peeing my pants**

    You guys are killing me here.


  116. mtc
    116 | March 12, 2010 5:35 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    Yes, he’s had several threads about Texas. I think he may have some good points, but these threads have a way of inflaming prejudice between states.


  117. NoThreat2U
    117 | March 12, 2010 5:36 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Hey yinz! I noticed you made a remark on another thread about visiting the gold course! Feel better? Gettin’ over the golf feenin’? lol


  118. bluliner10
    118 | March 12, 2010 5:37 pm

    Sorry for this, but I can’t get this idea out of my melon (head for non-Marines/hockey players).

    While it is a fun academic exercise to try and name who is figuratively represented in this piece to those we know and loathe at the other place. I can’t think of this as a very fair exercise. Certainly the individuals in the image can be closely linked to the foul personalities at 1.0, there is still an issue with the way the folks are gathered together.

    Not too many of the folks would voluntarily enroll themselves in an asylum, of course a few of them ought to consider it. No, to me; I am torn between some picture of Hell where personal choice leads to the torture their souls receive, not someplace where the family or society incarcerated the unique characters portrayed.

    Perhaps a nice image of Jonestown, or that weird cult that put on their black tennis shoes and tried to catch the comet to the spacecraft is more apropos of what remains of the influential LGF.

    Semi-smart and independent choices to belong to a group that is driving itself over the edge as the cult leader and his key minions drive the rest to the bowl of koolaid. Just my opinion and not meant to grab the arm on the fun meter and try to pull it back to level.


  119. NoThreat2U
    119 | March 12, 2010 5:42 pm

    @ bluliner10:
    Dude, you are harshing our mellow. We are purposely being juvenile. lol lol It is best not to overthink humor. Takes the fun out of it ;)


  120. The Osprey
    120 | March 12, 2010 5:43 pm

    mtc wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    Yes, he’s had several threads about Texas. I think he may have some good points, but these threads have a way of inflaming prejudice between states.

    Having lived in California, I know they be h8in’ on Texas big time. Probably worse now that Commiefornia is going down the tubes while Texas is weathering the recession fairly well due to the fact they don’t have a state government that wants to punish businesses with burdensome regulations and taxes.


  121. 121 | March 12, 2010 5:43 pm

    DEZ wrote:

    Yes Cankles, your hated, not simply loathed or pitied.
    People have no love for fat lazy sloths.
    You have put your bloated anemic face on the internet in an effort to seek admiration, only you proved your as ugly on the outside as in.

    And..they can’t find his ears.


  122. 122 | March 12, 2010 5:44 pm

    DEZ wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    That’s not a dog. That’s Stinky Beaumont. Where is the Banning Stick?
    YELP YELP YELP

    Ooh. A commenter on my site just gave me a link to a closeup of Stinky Beaumont.


  123. Guggi
    123 | March 12, 2010 5:46 pm

    snork wrote:

    He’s back to his climate jihad. This time he’s quoting some dingaling who’s argument boils down to “I know you are, but what am I?”.

    Did you open the link ? The blogger “Deep Cliamte” uses statements about two different CRU’s. Osborn’s is about CRU 28 while McIntyre’s is about CRU 32 and McIntyre is NOT lying about Osborn, he defends him when he writes:

    31. Osborn proposed a draft statement, which, had it been accepted by CRU, would probably have prevented much, if not most, of the following controversy:

    Snip

    Absurd.


  124. NoThreat2U
    124 | March 12, 2010 5:46 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    OMG that was horrible. I have three kittehs!!!!!!! Freaked me out!!! lol


  125. Truck Monkey
    125 | March 12, 2010 5:47 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    Ooh. A commenter on my site just gave me a link to a closeup of Stinky Beaumont.

    Nice kitteh


  126. snowcrash
    126 | March 12, 2010 5:47 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    Bunk, what/where is your site?


  127. Buckeye Abroad
    127 | March 12, 2010 5:49 pm

    118. bluliner10

    While it is a fun academic exercise to try and name who is figuratively represented in this piece to those we know and loathe at the other place. I can’t think of this as a very fair exercise. Certainly the individuals in the image can be closely linked to the foul personalities at 1.0, there is still an issue with the way the folks are gathered together.

    Completely agree.

    OT: Can any of the admins here give a date when the “look how f*cked the 1.0 threads” are officially dead? The current topics are meat enough, but it seems every couple of days we have to vear off and kick a corpse. Its fun a couple of times, but…..


  128. Et Norsk Troll
    128 | March 12, 2010 5:49 pm

    OT, but this political cartoon really sums it up, when it comes to Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Healthcare:

    http://cagle.com/working/100311/ramirez.jpg

    Unreal.

    ~Norsk Troll


  129. Guggi
    129 | March 12, 2010 5:49 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    OK i have my tags and ideas for the plate above….
    OPEN THREAD>>>
    martinis anyone?

    Grog ?

    I’ve got a bad cold.


  130. huckfunn
    130 | March 12, 2010 5:51 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    mtc wrote:
    @ The Osprey:
    Yes, he’s had several threads about Texas. I think he may have some good points, but these threads have a way of inflaming prejudice between states.

    Having lived in California, I know they be h8in’ on Texas big time. Probably worse now that Commiefornia is going down the tubes while Texas is weathering the recession fairly well due to the fact they don’t have a state government that wants to punish businesses with burdensome regulations and taxes.

    And here’s more reason for Kolifornia to be hatin’ on Tejas: Texas board endorses conservative-backed curriculum

    AUSTIN — The State Board of Education tentatively approved new standards for social studies on Friday with members divided along party lines — some blasting them as a fraud and conservative whitewash, others praising them as a tribute to the Founding Fathers that rightly portrays America as an exceptional country.

    The standards, which will influence history and government textbooks arriving in public schools in fall 2011, were adopted by 10 Republicans against five Democrats after weeks of debate and across a racial and ideological chasm that seemed to grow wider as the proposal was finalized Thursday.

    The document faces a public hearing and a final board vote in May.

    The often contentious process has been watched closely across the nation, particularly this week as the board gathered to debate and vote on the proposed standards. Because of Texas’ size, decisions by the board on what should and should not be included can influence publishers whose textbooks may be adopted by other states.

    Love it!


  131. NoThreat2U
    131 | March 12, 2010 5:53 pm

    @ Et Norsk Troll:
    Now THAT is a funny cartoon. lol BTW did you ever find an appropriate resolution picture for your Mom to paint?


  132. NoThreat2U
    132 | March 12, 2010 5:55 pm

    Time to relax and enjoy a Screw’em Driver. Catch yinz later. Be kind to one another and play nice :)


  133. coldwarrior
    133 | March 12, 2010 6:01 pm

    Buckeye Abroad wrote:

    118. bluliner10
    While it is a fun academic exercise to try and name who is figuratively represented in this piece to those we know and loathe at the other place. I can’t think of this as a very fair exercise. Certainly the individuals in the image can be closely linked to the foul personalities at 1.0, there is still an issue with the way the folks are gathered together.
    Completely agree.
    OT: Can any of the admins here give a date when the “look how f*cked the 1.0 threads” are officially dead? The current topics are meat enough, but it seems every couple of days we have to vear off and kick a corpse. Its fun a couple of times, but…..

    we want to do that…the audience tends to veer off…

    we are getting better. this will be the first and last lgf smashem up thread i do


  134. coldwarrior
    134 | March 12, 2010 6:03 pm

    @ Buckeye Abroad:

    oh, and he did go after one of our own…so i felt it necessary.

    bbl….got some stuff to do


  135. 136 | March 12, 2010 6:03 pm

    L.G.F.
    long gone, forgotten…………


  136. 137 | March 12, 2010 6:05 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Bunk, what/where is your site?

    Just click on my avatar YOU STALKER!


  137. huckfunn
    138 | March 12, 2010 6:10 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    we want to do that…the audience tends to veer off…

    we are getting better. this will be the first and last lgf smashem up thread i do

    Martinis all around. I am truly over the LGF thing.


  138. huckfunn
    139 | March 12, 2010 6:12 pm

    @ huckfunn:
    Martinis all around. That jug was empty. Try this.


  139. snork
    140 | March 12, 2010 6:16 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    I am truly over the LGF thing.

    Not butthurt any more?


  140. waldensianspirit
    141 | March 12, 2010 6:17 pm

    Hey Fred PhelpsCharles Nodickens, there were a lot of great people posting on your blog. Thought I’d point that out in case you don’t know.


  141. huckfunn
    142 | March 12, 2010 6:20 pm

    @ snork:
    Ha :lol: . I wasn’t all that involved so my butt wasn’t severely damaged. I did more lurking than posting. However I do understand why so many are pissed.


  142. snork
    143 | March 12, 2010 6:23 pm

    Lolz.

    Butthurt Report Form.

    Everybody grab a fistful. Especially if you intend to lurk the BVoAF.


  143. wolfie
    144 | March 12, 2010 6:25 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    Texas orange?
    Texas grapegruit?
    Why you knuckle-dragging creationiracifascist wingnut!


  144. Poteen
    145 | March 12, 2010 6:25 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ snork:
    Ha . I wasn’t all that involved so my butt wasn’t severely damaged. I did more lurking than posting. However I do understand why so many are pissed.

    The only butthurts I ever got were nasty Guinness farts while drinking and laughing at that shit.


  145. wolfie
    146 | March 12, 2010 6:25 pm

    Grapegruit?! :lol:


  146. 147 | March 12, 2010 6:26 pm

    As long as this is a thread about The Village, I’ll offer this for fun. I didn’t post the email exchange, but Walter did.

    What Kind of Man Posts at LGF?

    Hey, folks! Guess what. I stepped into a pile of Walter tonight. I don’t know what I was thinking.

    After going to a funeral yesterday, reading the news about the 8.8 earthquake in Chile and tsunami warnings, the healthcare debacle, talking to my sister who’s taking care of our alzheimer’s afflicted mother over a thousand miles away, thinking about the destruction of the U.S. economy via the global warming hoax, something led me to contact Walter F. Newton to congratulate him for standing up and speaking his mind and doing a pretty good job defending his opinions at a nefarious website known as LGF.

    [I'll admit that I posted some stoopid comments on LGF in response to other stoopid commenters two or three years ago, and I backed off at several times before I was banned. BFD. BUT...]

    A little while ago I found out that Walter was offended and incensed that I’d even contacted him. I’ve not shared these emails with anyone, until now. The messages posted below are in chronological order and have not been edited except to remove email addresses and personal links. (Note that there are posting time differences; Walter is apparently on GMT.)

    I respect Walter, but he’s got problems.

    From: Bunk X
    Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:16 PM
    To: Walter L. Newton
    Subject: LGF Commentary

    Walter–

    As an ex-lizard, I’ve gotta commend you for your recent posts and repostes, especially regarding AGW, and for sticking to your guns. You’ve got guts.

    Although I’m not an admin, feel free to stop by Blogmocracy and post comments under a different moniker. We’re rooting for you. I for one don’t want to see you get the banning stick as you’re one of the last great sentient logical commenters in The Village.

    Cordially,
    Bunk

    P.S. Blogmocracy, i.e, “The Stalker Website” is nothing like what Charles describes. All we do is mock his hypocrisy and watch the food fights. Coupla commenters are kinda out there, but there’s no walking on eggshells, and very few scuffles. Old time LGF, if you get the drift.

    From: Walter L. Newton
    Subject: RE: LGF Commentary
    To: “‘Bunk X’”
    Date: Monday, March 1, 2010, 3:43 AM

    Really, you’re all rooting for me? Here are some of the comments posted under my essay, which by the way, was illegally posted there to begin with. It was not a Fair Use excerpt, it was the whole fucking essay.

    1) Walter may be right on this issue, but he is still an ass.
    2) I think the worse part about it was the amount of groveling and sniveling he had to do to even be allowed to post it in the comments.
    3) Chen–I agree. I kinda feel sorry for Walter. He seems a thoughtful guy even if he can be a jerk sometimes. I used to laugh at some of his comments because he seems real–not a cardboard cutout like a few posters over there.
    4) i have no respect or sympathy for anyone still over there.
    5) Portly Playwright vs Chubby Jazz artist!
    6) what is walter planning on doing with the 250 LGF calendars that he ordered?
    7) As for Walter, it’s pretty obvious that he thinks AGW is bs, but he’s too afraid to just say so.
    8) Yeah Walter is scared of a Jazz Artist.

    You must be an absolute fool thinking that I would have any desire to hang around a bunch of cry babies who will stab me in the back BEFORE I even join your blog. What do you think you are doing? You need someone new to bat around like a fucking basketball. This is only a handful of the snide-assed comments I found, and that was on the thread that dealt with my essay.

    As you say below, I got guts. And I am sticking to my guns, and managing to get my point across about my concerns in regards to climate science and other issues on LGF. And if you really want to post something of mine without my permission, post this email, and your email, word for word.

    Rooting for me… you lying sack of shit.

    Walter L. Newton

    From: Bunk X
    Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 9:06 PM
    To: Walter L. Newton
    Subject: RE: LGF Commentary

    Walter–

    I thought I was being cordial enough, although I can’t vouch for other commenters, as even Charles Johnson can’t be held accountable for irrational vitriol. Your post was lifted and posted on Blogmocracy because it was worth reading. Johnson has set his site up to prevent some blogs from linking directly to his posts/comments.

    I meant no offense, other than to give you kudos. Apparently you are unable to accept a tip of the hat, and you’ve got some problems that are well concealed.

    Cordially,
    Bunk

    From: Walter L. Newton
    Subject: RE: LGF Commentary
    To: “‘Bunk X’”
    Date: Monday, March 1, 2010, 4:32 AM

    So,

    Your whole reply below is a deflection, a dishonest answer in which you don’t even attempt to address anything I pointed out to you.

    “Worth reading” is not a reason that would ever stand up in court for stealing a 25 hundred word essay without permission and publishing it.

    Anyone wanting to find my essay on LGF could have done it with no problem.

    I didn’t ask you to “vouch” for any other commenter’s on your blog. I was simply pointing out to you the bullshit that was being said about me.

    I really don’t care if you were being cordial, if you were giving me kudos or what ever. I showed you the true colors of the blog that you represented to me in you email. Would you like to be invited to a blog that made comments about you like that, behind your back, and in regards to something you wrote that you didn’t even know was lifted from you and published?

    Nothing is concealed. I am not anonymous, I use my real name, my real phone number is available to anyone who wants it on my website, for a matter of fact, I am quite the bit the shameless self promoter. Since you imply you know what and how I write on LGF, then you should have known before you even attempted to email me that I would not be taken in by your childish invite.

    No, nothing is concealed, never was, never will be.

    Maybe this email exchange will show up on your blog, or someplace else. You never know where it may show up.

    Walter L. Newton

    Monday, March 1, 2010 4:55 AM
    From: “Bunk X”
    To: “Walter L. Newton”

    Walter–

    I appreciate your position, and I think I understand why you were offended. I’ll restate that I thought your comments with references were excellent, regardless of what Charles or anyone else said. I forwarded them to other fellow bloggers also.

    Blogmocracy is not my blog. I’m a minor sarcastic snarky commenter at best, and the admins have published only two posts of mine out of only two submitted. I’ll forward these emails (unedited except to put them in chronological order) to the admins for a future post, with your permission.

    Cordially,
    Bunk


  147. waldensianspirit
    148 | March 12, 2010 6:28 pm

    Sean Penn and LGF are like peas and carrots.


  148. bluliner10
    149 | March 12, 2010 6:28 pm

    @ Buckeye Abroad:
    Oh I don’t mind bashing idiots.

    Didn’t mean to be a buzz kill. Live grotesque freakshow, Hissingtons, Dailyklown, and Offensiveman and the like, deserve the vitriol they receive. Especially as they do nothing but express unbridled hate. I am just a little bothered by picking on those who can’t fight back. Even figuratively.

    I am sure that we could find some more appropriate vehicle to drive the humor. The long mile walk upstairs regarding Dark F-up was pretty damn funny.

    The few times I have spent anytime looking at anything from there (normally tipped here or at Ace), I am astonished by the discourse that occurs. While I know none of them personally, I haven’t found one commenter there I would piss on if they were on fire. Maybe we need to be more inclusive of the TRANZI’s. Not just chucky’s place, but start targeting the other progressive blogs too. I understand familiarity breeds contempt, but the blogs we aren’t as familiar with deserve contempt too.


  149. snowcrash
    150 | March 12, 2010 6:29 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    Must improve my stalking skilz.lol. You have a really nice blog! Fun and funny topics.


  150. snork
    151 | March 12, 2010 6:31 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    I didn’t ask you to “vouch” for any other commenter’s on your blog.

    This guy’s a professional writer?


  151. 152 | March 12, 2010 6:32 pm

    snork wrote:

    Lolz.
    Butthurt Report Form.
    Everybody grab a fistful. Especially if you intend to lurk the BVoAF.

    Great form. I saved a copy for future Butthurt Complaints. Now translate BVoAF please.


  152. snork
    153 | March 12, 2010 6:33 pm

    BVoAF – from the NYT article on Chunkles – Blog Version of Animal Farm.


  153. KGB
    154 | March 12, 2010 6:38 pm

    I’m so sorry, buzzsawmonkey.


  154. 155 | March 12, 2010 6:41 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Must improve my stalking skilz.lol. You have a really nice blog! Fun and funny topics.

    TY. It’s a stress reliever for me, and allows me to spin out on other blogs. ;)


  155. 156 | March 12, 2010 6:46 pm

    snork wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    I didn’t ask you to “vouch” for any other commenter’s on your blog.
    This guy’s a professional writer?

    Minutes later, Walter posted it in The Village, and they all went on a Bunk hunt. (I spotted a sock in the comments… and he was absolutely right! If I told you more, the sock would be vaporized.)


  156. 157 | March 12, 2010 6:48 pm

    @ snork:
    lol dat


  157. garycooper
    158 | March 12, 2010 6:50 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    garycooper wrote:
    Why, oh why, didn’t Hogarth include a dog in the picture?
    um, there is a dog…lower right

    Hah! I’m so blind now, without my glasses. It’s getting sad.

    I have glasses for reading, which don’t work for the computer. I have prescription sunglasses for driving, which are too dark for night-time. I have contacts, that I am too daft to use properly, and which bug my eyes until I take them out after a couple of hours.

    I need help with “the vision-thing,” as someone once said. I think it was Dubya, and I think he was talking about something else.

    Anyways, that’s Cato’s put-upon service dog, in the picture.
    Save him! :)


  158. 159 | March 12, 2010 6:50 pm

    As for Walter:

    He was one of the guys Over There whom I viewed as My Kind Of Annoying. Of the eight comments he cited as upsetting him, I am aligned with #3. I don’t recall being the one who said those exact words; but if Walter’s reading this, he can assume that I feel the same way as #3. On the other side of the coin: #5 and #6 were needlessly insulting, and not Blogmocracy’s finest comments. As to the other five on his list: that is between those commenters, Walter, and Charles.

    I agree with Walter that lifting his whole essay without his permission was legally questionable. It should have been summarised.


  159. huckfunn
    160 | March 12, 2010 6:52 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ huckfunn:
    Texas orange?
    Texas grapegruit?
    Why you knuckle-dragging creationiracifascist wingnut!

    I’m more of a Texas A&M maroon knuckle-draggie. :mrgreen:


  160. bluliner10
    161 | March 12, 2010 6:56 pm

    1) Walter may be right on this issue, but he is still an ass.
    2) I think the worse part about it was the amount of groveling and sniveling he had to do to even be allowed to post it in the comments.
    3) Chen–I agree. I kinda feel sorry for Walter. He seems a thoughtful guy even if he can be a jerk sometimes. I used to laugh at some of his comments because he seems real–not a cardboard cutout like a few posters over there.
    4) i have no respect or sympathy for anyone still over there.
    5) Portly Playwright vs Chubby Jazz artist!
    6) what is walter planning on doing with the 250 LGF calendars that he ordered?
    7) As for Walter, it’s pretty obvious that he thinks AGW is bs, but he’s too afraid to just say so.
    Yeah Walter is scared of a Jazz Artist.

    This is classic! I left that place when they defended the craptastic memo by the DHS, and the idiotic comments regarding those potentially violent RW terrorists started getting back from Iraq and Afghanistan and turned to blowing up busses, pizza joints, and other viable “targets” because we were disappointed that we have a black president. The chorus of jackasses left me stunned. I should be surveilled by my government, because I am probably violently dangerous to the society and her guiding document I swore to defend? I was suprised that nobody suggested that I should be placed in some type of confinement to ensure that the dreaded neo-nazi’s didn’t recruit me before I could be deprogrammed.

    So let’s compare the insults…Walter is angry that some posters would call him, what he rightfully deserves to be called; an asshole.
    I was angry that I was labeled a potential murderer. Sorry Walter, it is a good thing you have a job in makebelieve, you wouldn’t last five minutes in the real world.


  161. snork
    162 | March 12, 2010 6:57 pm

    BVoAF – from the NYT article on Chunkles – Blog Version of Animal Farm.Zimriel wrote:

    As for Walter:

    He was one of the guys Over There whom I viewed as My Kind Of Annoying.

    I kind of thought so, too. But maybe it wasn’t an act. Maybe he really is that dorky.


  162. waldensianspirit
    163 | March 12, 2010 6:58 pm

    The Texas School Board is really doing a number on Icarus.


  163. snork
    164 | March 12, 2010 6:59 pm

    bluliner10 wrote:

    So let’s compare the insults…Walter is angry that some posters would call him, what he rightfully deserves to be called; an asshole.
    I was angry that I was labeled a potential murderer.

    Do I have to fill out a Butthurt Report Form on you?


  164. 165 | March 12, 2010 7:01 pm

    Zimriel wrote:

    As for Walter:

    I agree with Walter that lifting his whole essay without his permission was legally questionable. It should have been summarised.

    Walter posted the links on LGF for all the world to see, and repeatedly encouraged the other lizards to check them out. He was so spun out, his .pdf link still had all the http formatting. Chen merely copied the link and fairly credited it to Walter. No copyright violation. No plagiarism. No theft. No shit.


  165. bluliner10
    166 | March 12, 2010 7:02 pm

    snork wrote:

    bluliner10 wrote:
    So let’s compare the insults…Walter is angry that some posters would call him, what he rightfully deserves to be called; an asshole.
    I was angry that I was labeled a potential murderer.
    Do I have to fill out a Butthurt Report Form on you?

    Hahahahaha, only if I can trust it will be filed without me having to walk it to all the appropriate offices myself to ensure it gets put into my file…..


  166. snork
    167 | March 12, 2010 7:05 pm


  167. Poteen
    168 | March 12, 2010 7:05 pm

    @ bluliner10:
    THAT is a smackdown!! Good job Marine.


  168. huckfunn
    169 | March 12, 2010 7:05 pm

    snork wrote:

    Do I have to fill out a Butthurt Report Form on you?

    Filling out the butthurt report made my butt hurt and there was no appropriate box to check. OW!


  169. Poteen
    170 | March 12, 2010 7:06 pm

    @ snork:
    And you have way too much time on your hands.


  170. The Osprey
    171 | March 12, 2010 7:07 pm

    Buckeye Abroad wrote:

    With regards to kicking the corpse, the reason we keep coming back to it is, just when you think teh crazy over there could not get any crazier…it does…

    It’s like the night of the living dead over there…that damn corpse just won’t stay planted.


  171. snork
    172 | March 12, 2010 7:08 pm


  172. The Osprey
    173 | March 12, 2010 7:09 pm

    @ snork:

    “He’s dead Jim…you grab his tricorder, I’ll grab his wallet.


  173. waldensianspirit
    174 | March 12, 2010 7:12 pm

    Walter snork wrote:

    Lolz.

    Butthurt Report Form.
    Everybody grab a fistful. Especially if you intend to lurk the BVoAF.

    Is it based on the new ObamaCare forms they’ll be making us fill in? #2 pencil waiting line over there.


  174. waldensianspirit
    175 | March 12, 2010 7:16 pm

    oops the Walter was left there for something I was gonna snark but thought better of.


  175. garycooper
    176 | March 12, 2010 7:20 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Thanks for posting that glimpse into the warped-mind that is Walter. Good Lord! The guy has gone ’round the bend, from trying to tiptoe through the tulips, eggshells and land-mines at Porky’s.


  176. 177 | March 12, 2010 7:21 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    Chen merely copied the link and fairly credited it to Walter. No copyright violation. No plagiarism. No theft. No shit.

    That’s why I said “legally questionable”: because I don’t know the law around copyright of free material very well. I should have worded that in a less confrontational form.

    I have had my stuff stolen without attribution, even though it’s free for use with attribution; and it still burns me to remember that ordeal. That was the real deal – some shmuck in a university, teaching kids with my stuff, passing it on as his own. And I’ve seen “poor footnoting” happen to other writers I admire.

    So, sorry for flying off the handle.


  177. DEZ
    178 | March 12, 2010 7:23 pm

    @ garycooper:
    Walter was an ass, is an ass and will die an ass.
    He is a legend in his own mind.


  178. snork
    179 | March 12, 2010 7:24 pm

    @ Zimriel:
    Check the next IPCC report. It might end up there. Everything else does.


  179. 180 | March 12, 2010 7:24 pm

    garycooper wrote:

    The guy has gone ’round the bend, from trying to tiptoe through the tulips, eggshells and land-mines at Porky’s.

    Yeah, he’s scared. He’s definitely not a coward, in that he faces up to his fear consistently enough – but he’s scared.


  180. bluliner10
    181 | March 12, 2010 7:28 pm

    Poteen wrote:

    @ bluliner10:
    THAT is a smackdown!! Good job Marine.

    Thanks, and I hope I wasn’t insulting the other night. I had a couple little things going on in “the real world”, and it seemed easier to translate some internal stresses in some posts, rather than sitting in my hotel room voicing primal screams.

    After typing, I bravely risked the Taiwanese Immigration Authorities to go sip on a couple Tsingtao’s at a little pub a few blocks from my hotel. I was only allowed to leave the airport for the purpose of sleeping at the hotel. On the door of the hotel, my reservation sheet, and my immigration form was an order to stay in the hotel, as I really wasn’t cleared to be in Taiwan. But I did want some beer. Now, my angst is I don’t want to pack, and my normal golf partners are either in Korea or the Philippines…and me stuck on an absolutely gorgeous Okinawan day.


  181. garycooper
    182 | March 12, 2010 7:30 pm

    DEZ wrote:

    @ garycooper:
    Walter was an ass, is an ass and will die an ass.
    He is a legend in his own mind.

    He’s like a lot of writers, in thinking he’s the smartest boy in the room, no matter what room he happens to be in. Why he’s latched onto Johnson Sausage so desperately, is a possible topic for him to take up with his analyst. I’ll bet he has an analyst, too. ;)


  182. calcajun
    183 | March 12, 2010 7:32 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Btw the Imperial War Museum in Lambeth, London is on the site of what was Bedlam Asylum.

    How’s that for the British sense of irony.


  183. garycooper
    184 | March 12, 2010 7:35 pm

    Zimriel wrote:

    garycooper wrote:
    The guy has gone ’round the bend, from trying to tiptoe through the tulips, eggshells and land-mines at Porky’s.
    Yeah, he’s scared. He’s definitely not a coward, in that he faces up to his fear consistently enough – but he’s scared.

    But why bother? There’s nothing going on at LGF anymore, that might be construed as intellectually edifying. Walter’s not stupid. Why can’t he let go? Is LGF his “binky?”


  184. garycooper
    185 | March 12, 2010 7:38 pm

    calcajun wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    Btw the Imperial War Museum in Lambeth, London is on the site of what was Bedlam Asylum.
    How’s that for the British sense of irony.

    I’d like to visit that museum someday. It’s gotta be haunted! ;)


  185. snork
    186 | March 12, 2010 7:41 pm


  186. Poteen
    187 | March 12, 2010 7:42 pm

    @ bluliner10:
    Nuthin’ to worry about. Sounds like they’re pulling hard on the reins.
    Go hit a bucket of balls anyway. Stress relief. Can’t waste a good day.
    BTW After drinking beer with that crusty old soldier/sailor friend of mine for 30 yrs. it’s hard to be insulted.


  187. Macker
    188 | March 12, 2010 7:52 pm

    Someone hand me a drink, please.


  188. Poteen
    189 | March 12, 2010 7:54 pm

    Mandy’s avatar is on the bubble again. 4P showing concern. 5 to 1 she folds.


  189. 190 | March 12, 2010 8:01 pm

    Zimriel wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    Chen merely copied the link and fairly credited it to Walter. No copyright violation. No plagiarism. No theft. No shit.

    That’s why I said “legally questionable”: because I don’t know the law around copyright of free material very well. I should have worded that in a less confrontational form.
    I have had my stuff stolen without attribution, even though it’s free for use with attribution; and it still burns me to remember that ordeal. That was the real deal – some shmuck in a university, teaching kids with my stuff, passing it on as his own. And I’ve seen “poor footnoting” happen to other writers I admire.
    So, sorry for flying off the handle.

    There was no copyright violation any more than Walter’s posting our private email conversation was a violation of copyright infringement. There was an AGW post up here that night, and my intention was to invite him in, as he’s up on the stuff. Yeah, I know, several synapses misfired in sequence, but by then I’d already contacted him. BFD. :D


  190. snork
    191 | March 12, 2010 8:03 pm

    Theater of the absurd:

    423 Walter L. Newton Fri, Mar 12, 2010 7:03:11pm

    re: #418 BartB

    Just wondering how many of you scientists have duplicated the results from the AGW crowd.
    Just wondering how many stations provided data above 65 degrees.
    (answer: 1)
    Just wondering how many NOAA approved measurements were coming from BBQ pits or AC exhausts.
    Just wondering how many millions were spent on and by the unbiased AGW crowd, and where did the money come from?
    Just wondering how many people are in the unbiased AGW crowd.

    Just wondering…

    You know Bart… and please, take this with all the love I can extend to you… you are a fucking jerk. Where as, in another life, you and I could possibly agree on a few of the problems with certain parts of the process and procedures that revolve around the way some of the climate data was compiled, YOUR talking points have no basis in reality.

    You are spewing clip and paste rhetoric and I don’t think you could discuss the real issues with anyone, pro or con, skeptic or believer.

    Really, if you are going to try to contribute to any side of this debate, come to the table with some facts, but don’t waste our time with grammar school levels of discourse like you have done.

    Troll.

    Whatever you say, Walter…


  191. bluliner10
    192 | March 12, 2010 8:11 pm

    Naw, just Father Time pullin the reins. After my 2 week escape to Manila, it is one week to close or suspend things here, then a week in Hawaii getting inprocessed to my gaining command for my 6 month deployment to Enduring Freedom Philippines.


  192. 193 | March 12, 2010 8:12 pm

    @ snork:
    Mr. Politeness rides again.


  193. Bordm
    194 | March 12, 2010 8:13 pm

    Charles left his basement drunk one night, slid into bed beside his un-Mata Hari like companion, and fell into a deep slumber.

    He awoke before the Pearly Gates , where St. Peter said, ‘You died in your sleep, Charles.’

    Charles was stunned. ‘I’m dead? No, I can’t be! I’ve got too much to live for. Send me back!’

    St. Peter said, ‘I’m sorry, but there’s only one way you can go back, and that is as a chicken.’

    Charles was devastated, but begged St. Peter to send him to a farm near his home….
    The next thing he knew, he was covered with feathers, clucking and pecking the ground.
    A rooster strolled past. ‘So, you’re the new hen, huh? How’s your first day here?’

    ‘Not bad,’ replied Charles the hen, ‘but I have this strange feeling inside. Like I’m gonna explode!’

    ‘You’re ovulating,’ explained the rooster. ‘Don’t tell me you’ve never laid an egg before? ‘

    ‘Never,’ said Charles.

    ‘Well, just relax and let it happen,’ says the rooster. ‘It’s no big deal.’

    He did, and a few uncomfortable seconds later, out popped an egg.

    He was overcome with emotion as he experienced motherhood. He soon laid another egg — his joy was overwhelming.

    As he was about to lay his third egg, he felt a smack on the back of his head, and heard…..

    “CHARLES, wake up! You crapped the bed again!”


  194. Poteen
    195 | March 12, 2010 8:16 pm

    bluliner10 wrote:

    Naw, just Father Time pullin the reins. After my 2 week escape to Manila, it is one week to close or suspend things here, then a week in Hawaii getting inprocessed to my gaining command for my 6 month deployment to Enduring Freedom Philippines.

    When you’re done do you come back through Pendleton?


  195. garycooper
    196 | March 12, 2010 8:19 pm

    @ snork:

    “I’m the only one who has been granted special dispensation to discuss the slight, very slight, so slight as to be hardly worth the effort of pointing them out, problems with the exhaustively-researched, totally settled-science of AGW. Charles has been too kind, in granting me this position as Devil’s Advocate, and I won’t have the discussion sullied with your impertinent gibes.

    Charles, if it’s okay with you, I’d like to present another modest paper tomorrow regarding the serious problem of cybertheft of scientific data, and the subsequent misrepresentation of said data as the “Mother Of All Smoking Guns, Blasting AGW-Hysteria To Kingdom Come.” Of course, I will submit the article to you before I post it, for final approval/rejection.”


  196. Opilio
    197 | March 12, 2010 8:19 pm

    Poteen wrote:

    Mandy’s avatar is on the bubble again. 4P showing concern. 5 to 1 she folds.

    Even CJ is taking a position in Avatargate?

    73 Charles 3/12/2010 7:22:14 pm PST +13

    re: #60 MandyManners

    I was kinda sorta hoping that you would rethink the wisdom of your offensive avatar yourself.

    Just sayin’.

    95 MandyManners 3/12/2010 7:29:12 pm PST -1

    re: #73 Charles

    I was kinda sorta hoping that you would rethink the wisdom of your offensive avatar yourself.

    Just sayin’.

    If you wanted me to change it, why didn’t you tell me earlier? You have my e-addy.
    I have had this avatar for years.
    Why is it suddenly bad?


  197. snork
    198 | March 12, 2010 8:19 pm

    Bordm wrote:

    St. Peter said, ‘I’m sorry, but there’s only one way you can go back, and that is as a chicken.’

    I got that far and said to myself, “this isn’t going to end well”.


  198. snork
    199 | March 12, 2010 8:23 pm

    Bordm wrote:

    He was overcome with emotion as he experienced motherhood. He soon laid another egg — his joy was overwhelming.

    Eggstasy.


  199. garycooper
    200 | March 12, 2010 8:24 pm

    snork wrote:

    Bordm wrote:
    St. Peter said, ‘I’m sorry, but there’s only one way you can go back, and that is as a chicken.’
    I got that far and said to myself, “this isn’t going to end well”.

    And, it didn’t.

    “Sorry, Weezy. I’ll clean it up.”


  200. bluliner10
    201 | March 12, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ Poteen:

    Actually, I will work for SOCOM, so I will inprocess with them in Hawaii, then I am off to Southern PI. Following that I will return to Okinawa, either to be promoted and moved, or finalize my retirement stuff, then probably will have to go to Pendleton for my last couple of days in uniform. That would be around Christmas. Good part of my deployment is a chance to network, in the Philippines with other USG or contractors to get the next career going right after this one would or could conclude.


  201. Bordm
    202 | March 12, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ snork:

    He’s become an expert at laying eggs.


  202. garycooper
    203 | March 12, 2010 8:27 pm

    @ Opilio:

    If you wanted me to change it, why didn’t you tell me earlier? You have my e-addy.
    I have had this avatar for years.
    Why is it suddenly bad?

    “Cuz Weezy doesn’t like it. Says it’s racist and stuff.”


  203. bluliner10
    204 | March 12, 2010 8:30 pm

    Now, I bid you all a good night there as I must use this sunshine to hit little white balls into a little hole cut in a thin cut carpet of grass…


  204. Poteen
    205 | March 12, 2010 8:30 pm

    @ bluliner10:
    When you hit Pendleton let me know. I’ll buy you some beer at Mugs or Big Helyn’s.


  205. spidly
    206 | March 12, 2010 8:31 pm

    CJ posting at other blogs? I thought posting on other blogs got you banned from 1.0. What the hell?


  206. Poteen
    207 | March 12, 2010 8:32 pm

    @ bluliner10:
    Trying to find the hole is the story of my life. Later.


  207. Poteen
    208 | March 12, 2010 8:40 pm

    Weazy and Jimmah have commented negatively on Mandy’s avatar. Odds that she folds have dropped to 5 to 3.//


  208. m
    209 | March 12, 2010 8:43 pm

    @ DEZ:

    Its a long mile up the basement steps.

    Bwahahahahahahaha!


  209. mtc
    210 | March 12, 2010 8:44 pm

    @ Bordm:
    That’s the best joke I ever heard.


  210. 211 | March 12, 2010 8:49 pm

    Hi kids.

    Just got back from seeing Avatar…


  211. Bordm
    212 | March 12, 2010 8:50 pm

    @ mtc:

    I thought it might fit in with the thread topic.

    /What makes you think it’s a joke?

    :twisted:


  212. m
    213 | March 12, 2010 8:51 pm

    @ Zimriel:

    Hell, I made comment #2 in his martyrdom manifesto up there- and I stand by it.


  213. Bordm
    214 | March 12, 2010 8:51 pm

    savage wrote:

    Hi kids.
    Just got back from seeing Avatar…

    Is it as propaganda riddled as they say?


  214. 215 | March 12, 2010 8:52 pm

    @ Bordm:
    lol
    And he promptly name his “eggs”…


  215. 216 | March 12, 2010 8:53 pm

    @ Bordm:

    YES!

    but the effects weren’t bad.


  216. Opilio
    217 | March 12, 2010 8:53 pm

    325 Charles Fri, Mar 12, 2010 6:07:14pm +4

    “buzzsawmonkey” is one of the crackheads who’s posting at every site I link to. He’s also the one using LGF readers’ names at Dangerous Minds.

    And he’s been sending me really messed-up emails full of weird homophobic insults, over and over, every day for months — emails that get automatically filed in the trash unread, like everything that comes through the contact form with a proxy IP.

    They’re filed in the trash, unread, yet somehow they’re known to be full of “weird homophobic insults”? That makes no sense.

    And what criteria distinguishes a weird homophobic insult from a run-of-the-mill homophobic insult?

    And, in closing, Hi, Dark_Falcon!


  217. 218 | March 12, 2010 8:56 pm

    @ Opilio:

    Ahh, another Opiliofact!


  218. m
    219 | March 12, 2010 8:57 pm

    @ Bordm:

    Yes. But it was a cool story, lol!


  219. 220 | March 12, 2010 8:57 pm

    Anyone in here a Barney the dinosaur fan?


  220. 221 | March 12, 2010 8:58 pm

    @ m:

    I wish that colonel ordered a nuke strike on Pandora.

    And damn that Sigourney Weaver, hell, she could have nuked the site from orbit, the nut


  221. m
    222 | March 12, 2010 9:00 pm

    @ savage:

    Shoot, they shoulda turned him and the corporate dude into pooper scoopers for the hammer head elephant thingies! ;-)


  222. m
    223 | March 12, 2010 9:01 pm

    Disclaimer – free on the internet. Wouldn’t pay for subliminal propaganda like that.


  223. 224 | March 12, 2010 9:03 pm

    @ m:

    Then they could have been one with the tree!


  224. Bordm
    225 | March 12, 2010 9:04 pm

    savage wrote:

    Anyone in here a Barney the dinosaur fan?

    Errr, NO.

    Please don’t tell me that, after watching Avatar, you now have a sudden affinity for Barney the dinosaur.

    /Hey y’all we may have to do an intervention over here!

    :razz:


  225. 226 | March 12, 2010 9:05 pm

    m, check your email!


  226. 227 | March 12, 2010 9:07 pm

    @ Bordm:

    oh, you’ll like this one!

    You’re about to witness the strength of street knowledge…


  227. Bordm
    228 | March 12, 2010 9:10 pm

    m wrote:

    Disclaimer – free on the internet. Wouldn’t pay for subliminal propaganda like that.

    I wouldn’t watch their anti-American crap if they paid me to.


  228. Bluebird
    229 | March 12, 2010 9:10 pm

    @ Opilio:

    He can divine the contents of the emails using the same extra sensory skills he used to reveal Van Jones’ real motive for signing the Troofer petition. He is not required to make ‘sense’ there, in any event.


  229. 230 | March 12, 2010 9:11 pm

    @ Bordm:

    Probably why The Hurt Locker kicked ass all over Avatar…


  230. The Osprey
    231 | March 12, 2010 9:15 pm

    Ok…now I’m looking for airborne swine, 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse, etc.

    Believe it or not folks, I actually am finding myself in agreement with Killgore Trout.

    He’s defending Mandy’s avatar…

    I think I need another glass of Bushmills.


  231. wolfie
    232 | March 12, 2010 9:17 pm

    @ Opilio:

    Does CJ really think anyone the least bit familiar with buzz could possibly believe such a lie?
    What a malicious, ugly POS.


  232. snork
    233 | March 12, 2010 9:17 pm

    @ savage:
    I hate you,
    You hate me,
    Let’s throw Barney in the sea,
    With a great big shove at the count of four,
    No more purple dinosaur.


  233. Poteen
    234 | March 12, 2010 9:18 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    She hasn’t posted since CJ told her he thought she was better than that.
    Either she’s e-mailing or she’s stunned.


  234. snork
    235 | March 12, 2010 9:19 pm

    @ wolfie:
    It’s his correlator tool. It must be made by Apple.


  235. The Osprey
    236 | March 12, 2010 9:20 pm

    There used to be a “jihad against Barney” group on Usenet, back in the day…


  236. Bordm
    237 | March 12, 2010 9:20 pm

    @ savage:

    I can see why they are so angry, someone slipped DNA altering drugs into the water supply in Compton. They’ve all mutated into brightly colored stuffed animals! I’d get an AK too, if someone did that to me.

    //


  237. snork
    238 | March 12, 2010 9:21 pm

    @ Opilio:
    Is “Dangerous Minds” here?


  238. Bordm
    239 | March 12, 2010 9:21 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ Bordm:
    Probably why The Hurt Locker kicked ass all over Avatar…

    Now, that was a good movie.


  239. 240 | March 12, 2010 9:22 pm

    Well get a load of this!

    Found it on IR’s site…

    LGF update: stalkerz r us
    March 12, 2010 Wild Irish Rose Leave a comment Go to comments

    It appears as though I’m now being accused of running an “anti-LGF stalker blog”.

    By Charles Johnson.

    Yes, really.

    P.S. I’ve also received word from a wee little birdie that I am now banned at LGF.
    A moot point really, since I walked away first.

    http://awildirishrose.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/lgf-update-stalkerz-r-us/

    bwahhaha


  240. 241 | March 12, 2010 9:23 pm

    @ Bordm:

    Yeah, I live about 20 miles north of Compton and it really does suck down there.


  241. Bluebird
    242 | March 12, 2010 9:26 pm

    @ wolfie:

    He’s flinging meat to the hyenas. (weasels)


  242. snork
    243 | March 12, 2010 9:26 pm

    Savage:


  243. snork
    244 | March 12, 2010 9:28 pm

    @ savage:
    Dontcha just want to give her a big kiss?


  244. 245 | March 12, 2010 9:31 pm

    @ snork:

    bwahahaha


  245. Opilio
    246 | March 12, 2010 9:32 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Opilio:
    Is “Dangerous Minds” here?

    I think Dangerous Minds is here.


  246. snork
    247 | March 12, 2010 9:32 pm

    @ savage:

    Charles Johnson replied to comment from Ernunnos • #11 • 09:25 on Wed, Mar.10

    First, thank you for the link to the interview, Boingers!

    Now, to respond to this latest urban legend being circulated here — yes, I banned Iowahawk. (gasp!)

    But there’s just a bit more to the story. LGF readers noticed one day last year that Iowahawk had suddenly delinked LGF, without a word to me about it, even though I had promoted his site for years and posted more than a hundred links to his satire pieces.

    When some LGF readers contacted him (on their own, not at my suggestion) to ask why he had delinked me, he emailed back snarky sarcastic comments that made it pretty clear it was done with malice, as part of a general campaign to delink LGF on the right wing blogs because I just wasn’t hatin’ President Obama enough for them.

    So sure, I banned Iowahawk — after it was completely clear that he had turned on me.

    Iowahawk ate his strawberries.


  247. The Osprey
    248 | March 12, 2010 9:32 pm

    Teh Stupid….Teh Crazy…it burns!!!!

    Chuck has a thread up now about silly youtube videos of people’s Westies, Corgis and other small cute dogs barking when Obama’s name is mentioned, but just to set the mood he introduces it with some crap movie from the 80′s with Christy McNichol about a half shepard half golden retriever that was trained to be teh rednecks to be teh racist and bite teh black people….

    HEY CHUCK…TEH KITTEHS DON’T LIKE OBAMA EITHER!


  248. 249 | March 12, 2010 9:32 pm

    @ snork:

    I’ll let Lars have the honor…


  249. 250 | March 12, 2010 9:33 pm

    Teller • #9 • 16:39 on Tue, Mar. 9
    Charles Johnson parted ways with some of the commenters he attracted to his site. Not one inch more than that. A firestorm. What blogperbole.

    Amen to that!


  250. snork
    251 | March 12, 2010 9:33 pm

    Ernunnos replied to comment from Charles Johnson • #12 • 19:13 on Wed, Mar.10

    So it’s not a “lie”, it’s not a “legend”, it’s what actually happened. But you had a reason. He snarked at you! He’s part of a vast, right wing conspiracy of snark. And you won’t stand for it. It’s your blog, and you can run it however you see fit.

    Of course you can. It is your right to alienate and retaliate against anyone who doesn’t show you absolute agreement and utmost deference on your own blog.

    But if you recreate the atmosphere of a clique of high school cheerleaders, don’t be surprised when it gets kinda’ lonely.


  251. Opilio
    252 | March 12, 2010 9:36 pm

    Poteen wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    She hasn’t posted since CJ told her he thought she was better than that.
    Either she’s e-mailing or she’s stunned.

    I think she’s re-assessing her world-view.


  252. snork
    253 | March 12, 2010 9:38 pm

    Charles Johnson replied to comment from Ernunnos • #16 • 14:34 on Thu, Mar.11

    OK, now I see where you’re coming from; you went and dug up some links from one of the anti-LGF stalker blogs. Yawn.

    Some people might think it’s a good thing to take stands based on principle even if it’s unpopular, instead of prostituting oneself to pump up traffic. But those would be the people we call “normal.”

    I’ve never done anything at LGF just to increase my traffic. The opinions I express are the opinions I believe. I could not possibly care less whether my traffic goes up or down by a few points as a result, and the fact is that LGF is still pulling in better traffic than most blogs.

    Heh™.


  253. 254 | March 12, 2010 9:39 pm

    Watch out or Larry Craig might get y’all!


  254. 255 | March 12, 2010 9:40 pm

    My life is boring enough already, if I were to be stalking anyone still at lgf I would be nearly comatose.


  255. Poteen
    256 | March 12, 2010 9:41 pm

    @ Opilio:
    Assessing whether to change avatars to please the massa, hold her ground against the pile on, (carefully) or fire off a piss up a rope flounce. Weazy and Jimmah lessened the odds of her folding up.


  256. 257 | March 12, 2010 9:42 pm

    @ snork:
    uhoh. i feel the bannage restarting!


  257. snork
    258 | March 12, 2010 9:42 pm


  258. Bordm
    259 | March 12, 2010 9:43 pm

    @ Opilio:

    If Mandy’s looking for a new avatar, I’ve got a couple she can choose from.

    This one or this one should do nicely.


  259. 260 | March 12, 2010 9:44 pm

    @ snork:
    he’s such a liar! and “a few points”? ha! he’s tanked!


  260. 261 | March 12, 2010 9:44 pm

    snork wrote:

    the fact is that LGF is still pulling in better traffic than most blogs.

    Can’t argue with that. LGF is pulling more traffic than, say, my blog, Dennis The Peasant’s blog, and the blog of some lady in Peoria with fifteen very amusing calico cats.

    But LGF didn’t used to be competing with me, Dennis, and the cat lady. LGF used to be competing with Instapundit and Steven Den Beste.


  261. Bluebird
    262 | March 12, 2010 9:45 pm

    @ savage:

    Poor Hose. Relegated to the same reviled status as those she scorned, by the very person she so valiantly fought to defend. LOfuckingL!


  262. 263 | March 12, 2010 9:48 pm

    Opilio wrote:

    They’re filed in the trash, unread, yet somehow they’re known to be full of “weird homophobic insults”?

    If those emails were for real, you know they’d be endlessly quoted as the troof about That Evil, Evil Monkey.


  263. 264 | March 12, 2010 9:49 pm

    @ Bluebird:

    I think its great.

    Hose baby, if your reading, you are still a fat assed redheaded psychobeyotch from Hell. slut!


  264. Et Norsk Troll
    265 | March 12, 2010 9:51 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Et Norsk Troll:
    Now THAT is a funny cartoon. lol BTW did you ever find an appropriate resolution picture for your Mom to paint?

    No.

    No I did not, NT2U….

    …and that disappointed me.

    If anyone else has an idea of where to find one, I’d be grateful. The largest that was sent to me was barely 150K or so….

    :(

    ~ENT


  265. Bluebird
    266 | March 12, 2010 9:51 pm

    @ snork:

    ‘he turned on me’. What a psycho.


  266. 267 | March 12, 2010 9:52 pm

    good night, kids. Long day tomorrow.


  267. snork
    268 | March 12, 2010 9:53 pm

    Bluebird wrote:

    @ snork:
    ‘he turned on me’. What a psycho.

    Et Tu, Raptor?


  268. lobo91
    269 | March 12, 2010 9:55 pm

    @ savage:

    Probably why The Hurt Locker kicked ass all over Avatar…

    It was okay. I’m sure it was better than Avatar (which I haven’t seen), but that’s not saying much.

    I found it difficult to get past the glaring technical errors, personally. I suppose people who haven’t been in the military recently wouldn’t have that issue, though.


  269. m
    270 | March 12, 2010 9:55 pm

    @ savage:

    Hey I walked away from lgf myself and she didn’t have a problem branding me a banned stalker, lol.


  270. Bluebird
    271 | March 12, 2010 9:56 pm

    @ snork:

    ‘Fraid so. :)


  271. 272 | March 12, 2010 9:56 pm

    savage [ok, Irish Rose] wrote:

    It appears as though I’m now being accused of running an “anti-LGF stalker blog”.

    By Charles Johnson.

    What I’ve always appreciated about Mr Johnson, is the loyalty he’s shown to people who, for so many years, stood by him, sacrificed for him, and even tried to keep standing up for him after they got booted.


  272. Poteen
    273 | March 12, 2010 9:57 pm

    @ savage:

    Some still luv you Savage:)

    109 Cato the Elder Mon, Mar 27, 2006 5:34:00pm replyquote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    Oh, my, another vulgar one.

    Good for you, Savage


  273. Pink_Flamingo
    274 | March 12, 2010 9:59 pm

    Watch the Mighty Flamingo play the fallen Charles Johnson like a cheap whore! (Um… I mean he is not me)

    I can drag him around by his greasy ponytail and make him do my bidding.

    73 Charles Fri, Mar 12, 2010 7:22:14pm
    re: #60 MandyManners

    I was kinda sorta hoping that you would rethink the wisdom of your offensive avatar yourself.

    Just sayin’.

    114 Charles Fri, Mar 12, 2010 7:34:04pm
    re: #95 MandyManners

    If you wanted me to change it, why didn’t you tell me earlier? You have my e-addy.

    I have had this avatar for years.

    Why is it suddenly bad?

    Because I really do trust people to think for themselves, unless it becomes clear that they can’t.

    Um, not quite true Charles, Mandy has had that avatar for years! Something else may have changed your mind?

    128 Charles Fri, Mar 12, 2010 7:37:17pm
    Please note:

    [Link: http://www.bbc.co.uk...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/blogworld/2010/03/charles_johnson_to_be_publishe.html#P93455177

    Wow! The Flamingo shoots….. He Scores!

    200 Charles Fri, Mar 12, 2010 7:56:13pm
    I have no problem with blasphemy. Blaspheme all you want.I’m just saying: when the world is watching everything that happens here, you might want to choose your battles more carefully. And you might want to consider that it isn’t only your reputation at stake, and that it’s my real name that’s out there on the Internet.

    Hi Charles!


  274. m
    275 | March 12, 2010 10:00 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Actually, I thought avatar was a great story. The “green” stuff was overwelming and of course the people from earth just want to steal the indigenous peoples’ resources…

    But putting that aside…

    And Pandora at night looks like a 70′s blacklight poster. Who couldn’t like that? lol!


  275. Opilio
    276 | March 12, 2010 10:00 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    @ snork:
    he’s such a liar! and “a few points”? ha! he’s tanked!

    A picture is worth a thousand words. His traffic’s dropped by more than half in 1 year.


  276. wolfie
    277 | March 12, 2010 10:01 pm

    snork wrote:

    “….to take stands based on principle even if it’s unpopular,”

    That malicious liar doesn’t even know what a moral principle is.


  277. m
    278 | March 12, 2010 10:03 pm

    Hey y’all ~ it’s a great song on the next thread. At least check it out and come back to the cj thread if you wanna, lol!


  278. The Osprey
    279 | March 12, 2010 10:04 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Kirly wrote:

    @ snork:
    uhoh. i feel the bannage restarting!

    I feel a tremor in the force…as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror…


  279. Poteen
    280 | March 12, 2010 10:11 pm

    @ m:
    I feel so lonely!//


  280. Bordm
    281 | March 12, 2010 10:11 pm

    Bedtime for Bordm. Promised my lil’ sister I’d take her to see these guys tomorrow. The bass fiddle player is a friend of ours and neither of us has seen him in a few years.


  281. spidly
    282 | March 12, 2010 10:16 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    Not sure if there is going to be the slightest blip in the force over anyone left there.

    here’s a new avatar for mandy
    year of the long knives at 1.0


  282. Opilio
    283 | March 12, 2010 10:29 pm

    In the ongoing Avatar Wars, Walter is threatening the nuclear option:

    119 Walter L. Newton Fri, Mar 12, 2010 10:12:58pm +8

    If you all don’t stop complaining about avatars, I swear, tomorrow morning, when you all get back on here, my fucking avatar is going to be changed and it’s going to be me, NAKED, with my Siberian Husky.

    Go ahead… dare me… make my day.


  283. Pink_Flamingo
    284 | March 12, 2010 10:35 pm

    Opilio wrote:

    In the ongoing Avatar Wars, Walter is threatening the nuclear option:

    119 Walter L. Newton Fri, Mar 12, 2010 10:12:58pm +8
    If you all don’t stop complaining about avatars, I swear, tomorrow morning, when you all get back on here, my fucking avatar is going to be changed and it’s going to be me, NAKED, with my Siberian Husky.
    Go ahead… dare me… make my day.

    You know the ASSHOLE who finally triggered this whole avatar upset should be taken outside and, well, have something done to him.


  284. Bluebird
    285 | March 12, 2010 10:36 pm

    @ Opilio:

    I’m afraid for the Siberian Husky.


  285. Opilio
    286 | March 12, 2010 10:47 pm

    This whole avatar kerfuffle is emblematic of the continuing, even accelerating dissolution of what once was a (relatively) civil community into an intolerant rabble.


  286. Pink_Flamingo
    287 | March 12, 2010 10:51 pm

    @ Opilio:

    Yep! and we are all doing our bit to help!


  287. 288 | March 12, 2010 10:52 pm

    My avatar comes from beyond the stars, to feast upon the souls of those who delve too deeply into the fell secrets of the Necronomicon.

    Opilio’s avatar, meanwhile, is wearing a bag over its head. :^D


  288. 289 | March 12, 2010 10:56 pm

    “And he’s butthurt ’cause he’s sitting on a unicorn.”

    In-joke LOL. Love it!


  289. 290 | March 12, 2010 11:17 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ Bordm:
    Probably why The Hurt Locker kicked ass all over Avatar…

    District 9 kicked ass on illegal downloads. Jes’ sayin’


  290. 291 | March 12, 2010 11:30 pm

    Zimriel wrote:

    savage [ok, Irish Rose] wrote:
    It appears as though I’m now being accused of running an “anti-LGF stalker blog”.
    By Charles Johnson.
    What I’ve always appreciated about Mr Johnson, is the loyalty he’s shown to people who, for so many years, stood by him, sacrificed for him, and even tried to keep standing up for him after they got booted.

    That’s snark, right?
    He banned Zombie for having a self-promoting sock named “Chicken Kiev” or something instead of just vaporizing the sock. He banned Iowahawk for delinking LGF and responding to emails from the lizards who stabbed him in the back. “Petulant” is the word to describe King Liz, unless you want to include the modifier, “sniveling.”


  291. 292 | March 12, 2010 11:34 pm

    Opilio wrote:

    In the ongoing Avatar Wars, Walter is threatening the nuclear option:

    119 Walter L. Newton Fri, Mar 12, 2010 10:12:58pm +8
    If you all don’t stop complaining about avatars, I swear, tomorrow morning, when you all get back on here, my fucking avatar is going to be changed and it’s going to be me, NAKED, with my Siberian Husky.
    Go ahead… dare me… make my day.

    No doubt it’ll be a small uncompressed .jpg.


  292. 293 | March 12, 2010 11:36 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    He banned Iowahawk for delinking LGF

    The thing is, Iowahawk hadn’t delinked LGF at that point. I know because I checked, more than once.


  293. 294 | March 12, 2010 11:37 pm

    I’m up way past my bedtime. Night, folks.


  294. 295 | March 12, 2010 11:52 pm

    Josephine wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    He banned Iowahawk for delinking LGF
    The thing is, Iowahawk hadn’t delinked LGF at that point. I know because I checked, more than once.

    Heh. Something else bit him then, and he blamed Iowahawk. Not the first time that CJ found a windmill to charge at.


  295. Sylvester T Cat
    296 | March 13, 2010 12:05 am

    Josephine wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    He banned Iowahawk for delinking LGF

    The thing is, Iowahawk hadn’t delinked LGF at that point. I know because I checked, more than once.

    I checked at the time too. Frogger definitely delinked Iowahawk first, immediately after the sycophant ratpack started whining in an open thread about how Iowahawk had been in the sacred private thread for an hour and never said a word. (Iowahawk probably just didn’t remember to close that window on his browser, but the sycos always did get paranoid fast.)

    Since then Iowahawk has never so much as mentioned Frogger or the Lonely Green Frogpond.


  296. Bluebird
    297 | March 13, 2010 12:06 am

    @ Josephine:

    Chunk knew Iowahawk wasn’t going to Jonestown and could effortlessly destroy him in a debate, so he preemptively deleted him without fanfare to avoid the embarrassing drubbing he would have received. He left 30 minutes early. Again.


  297. Bluebird
    298 | March 13, 2010 12:13 am

    @ Sylvester T Cat:

    I kinda wish he would. Imagine how hilarious the Iowahawk beatdown would be!!


  298. Sylvester T Cat
    299 | March 13, 2010 12:28 am

    @ Bluebird:
    LOL!


  299. Kitteh
    300 | March 13, 2010 2:04 am

    Buzz,
    Another masterpiece.

    I haven’t clicked on that site in months, and won’t pollute my new computer with his cookies, but I assume, the weasel is still a rapid bitch and the rest are just as brainwashed as ever.


  300. 301 | March 13, 2010 2:48 am

    Dead thread I guess but wanted to say: Mandy..it’s not your avator.It’s step two. On to step three and unless you jump ship out of your own self respect, there will be no step four. Hi Charles you pos.

    247 Jimmah
    Fri, Mar 12, 2010 8:06:33pm replyquote 5downupreport

    re: #219 Cato the Elder

    As Jimmah said here recently, he knows some Progressive Scottish Muslim friends whom he’d like to invite to contribute here.

    I’d like to see that too.

    They’re coming in here. Oh yes.

    I HOPE EVERYONE WHO DECIDED TO KEEP THEIR ALLAH PISS AVATARS IS FUCKING HAPPY NOW


  301. orangecrush
    302 | March 13, 2010 3:18 am

    @ 147 Bunk X: Initially Walter was one foul mouthed poster who took offense at anyone who disagreed with him. I can still see a hint of it here in his reply. Lacking some class there he is. A reflection of a smarter irish rose. Walter’s life will improve when he learns to talk to people. Falling back on logic to solve ALL disagreements is folly.


  302. orangecrush
    303 | March 13, 2010 3:25 am

    @ 217 Opilio: That is unreal. I think Charles has gone a little bonkers. We all now he makes this crap up to curry favor with the cult members. It’s a sublimnal threat to them that they will be treated the same if they every leave.

    Since Charles is so hot on logic and science he should prove BSM made those comments or keep his blog mouth shut. No he would rather appeal to authority (himself) as that is the easiest method to manipulate.

    What a farce. Only the screwed up people have stayed at LGF.


  303. orangecrush
    304 | March 13, 2010 3:30 am

    @ 253 snork: Better then most blogs doesn’t mean much for LGF. Most blog fold after a few years.


  304. orangecrush
    305 | March 13, 2010 3:35 am

    How is the Charles crush going Mandy M? Tough choices there.


  305. vagabond trader
    306 | March 13, 2010 3:53 am

    @ Grimcargo:

    Progressive muslim,an oxy-moron.


  306. 307 | March 13, 2010 4:23 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    Nah, they want to progressively take over instead of doing it all at once.


  307. vagabond trader
    308 | March 13, 2010 4:27 am

    @ archonix:

    Seems to be working.Progressive Scottish muslim made me laugh.Maybe I need more caffeine. :lol:


  308. Speranza
    309 | March 13, 2010 5:03 am

    m wrote:

    Disclaimer – free on the internet. Wouldn’t pay for subliminal propaganda like that.

    I watched for free on the Internet “The Hurt Locker” the other day.


  309. Crashnburn01
    310 | March 13, 2010 5:15 am

    Opilio wrote:

    In the ongoing Avatar Wars, Walter is threatening the nuclear option:

    119 Walter L. Newton Fri, Mar 12, 2010 10:12:58pm +8
    If you all don’t stop complaining about avatars, I swear, tomorrow morning, when you all get back on here, my fucking avatar is going to be changed and it’s going to be me, NAKED, with my Siberian Husky.
    Go ahead… dare me… make my day.

    Somehow, I think that photo was shot a few months ago….


  310. Speranza
    311 | March 13, 2010 5:20 am

    Bluebird wrote:

    @ savage:
    Poor Hose. Relegated to the same reviled status as those she scorned, by the very person she so valiantly fought to defend. LOfuckingL!

    The irony meter is sky high.


  311. 312 | March 13, 2010 5:22 am

    @ Grimcargo:

    Progressive Mohammedna friends. Another step down the Prog/Mohammedan alliance against the West. They don’t even really try to hide it.


  312. 313 | March 13, 2010 5:24 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    You don’t remember the Glasgow Airport? Crispy fried Progressive Mohammedan…


  313. taxfreekiller
    314 | March 13, 2010 5:40 am

    LGF = “Lost Kingdom of Mutant Smurfs”


  314. Speranza
    315 | March 13, 2010 5:47 am

    232 Charles Fri, Mar 12, 2010 10:12:42pm replyquote

    * 2
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #231 cosmo

    Get off my website, you fanatic moron. And I’ll get rid of your sock puppets too while I’m at it.


  315. vagabond trader
    316 | March 13, 2010 5:58 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    So many doctors=jihadis. This begs further examination. :mrgreen:


  316. danrudy
    317 | March 13, 2010 6:24 am

    As I have noted in past my wife is an Intellectual Property lawyer and has volunteered any advice needed by admins of this site if they think they are in murky waters. She thinks our nation and children need to be protected from the crazy libs and views this as a national service.

    Bunk X wrote:

    Zimriel wrote:
    As for Walter:

    I agree with Walter that lifting his whole essay without his permission was legally questionable. It should have been summarised.
    Walter posted the links on LGF for all the world to see, and repeatedly encouraged the other lizards to check them out. He was so spun out, his .pdf link still had all the http formatting. Chen merely copied the link and fairly credited it to Walter. No copyright violation. No plagiarism. No theft. No shit.


  317. vagabond trader
    318 | March 13, 2010 6:54 am

    @ danrudy:

    Good to know and very kind of your wife!


  318. Doppelganger
    319 | March 13, 2010 7:18 am

    I’m very late to this thread, but damnit I’m gonna speak my mind

    Buzzsawmonkey has more talent in the crap he/she took this morning than in the entire cast of sycophants commenting over at the 1.0

    Icarus is a cut and paste man. He doesn’t have any creative talent. Even his guitar licks were written for him by somebody else. He attached himself to clever people like Zombie and Iowahawk, and claimed he was helping them. To the contrary, he used them to make his blog appear clever.

    He’s banned every single creative, funny, interesting person.

    And what is Icarus left with at his bog ( pun intended)

    Wits like Iceweasel who uses the word butthurt and thinks she’s clever.
    You’re not clever, honey, just annoying.
    Intellectuals like Walter E Newton, who is famous for being the best floor mopper in his theatre.
    Great minds like cato the elder who spends his days writing letters to the editor about his parking that wasn’t picked up by the city and how he’s so much smarter than Trig Palin.
    Genuises like kkkilgore trout who discuss the finer points of jerking off.
    Brave souls like dork falcon who hides in his parent’s basement.

    On their best day, they stink on ice!


  319. Goodbye_Natalie
    320 | March 13, 2010 7:24 am

    LGF is a shell of its former self because it lost exactly what made it unique – a diversity of opinion where one could express their thoughts without fear or much in censorship. Sure, some of it was over the top for effect (mine included), but it was never a threat to the owner or anyone else. The flame wars were fun until Charles started taking sides and punishing those he didn’t agree with. And with that, LGF as gone.

    LGF fragmented into groups of common thought and the magic that made LGF won’t easily be recaptured.

    And the reason that Buzzsaw garners special disdain from Charles is because he was one of the unique talents that any blog would treasure. The shriller Charles gets about a former user, rest assured the more Charles knows what he lost.


  320. FishFearMe
    321 | March 13, 2010 7:26 am

    I am, like Doppelganger, very late to the thread, but I bring momentous news ! I have been banned at LGF ! I don’t know why, other than the fact that I occasionally post here, at Ace’s joint and JWF. I have posted VERY few, if any, comments at The Sewer for the past year or so. Oh, well…there goes my LGF Twinkie Concession.


  321. phoenixgirl
    322 | March 13, 2010 7:35 am

    first he came after the vlaams belang supporters
    then he came for the abortion foes,
    then he humiliated the birthers
    and creationists, lumped Christians in
    with the islamic terrorists…..shut down the lounge
    (after apologizing 3 times the night he closed it)
    stalked “stalker blogs” to see who was posting elsewhere
    and then banned them….picked fights with anyone who had any opinion
    that varied from his….delinked his “good friends” came out as a lib, came out as
    an atheist and now he is going after mandy’s avatar……..


  322. 323 | March 13, 2010 7:42 am

    @ phoenixgirl:
    it took him days to really shut down the lounge. those who were logged in and kept the window up were able to log in for days. he isn’t as smart as he thinks he is. anybody can cut and paste code.


  323. FishFearMe
    324 | March 13, 2010 7:58 am

    @ Kirly:
    Kirly…please add me to The List of The Banned. See my #321.


  324. Speranza
    325 | March 13, 2010 8:01 am

    FishFearMe wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Kirly…please add me to The List of The Banned. See my #321.

    Welcome and congratulations!


  325. FishFearMe
    326 | March 13, 2010 8:09 am

    @ Speranza:
    Thank you ! :)


  326. 327 | March 13, 2010 8:23 am

    savage wrote:

    Hi kids.
    Just got back from seeing Avatar…

    Avatar: Dances With Wolves meets Fern Gully in outer space.


  327. m
    328 | March 13, 2010 8:55 am

    Josephine wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:

    He banned Iowahawk for delinking LGF

    The thing is, Iowahawk hadn’t delinked LGF at that point. I know because I checked, more than once.

    That’s what I thought. He banned Iowahawk because one of his paradies had a character named Nancy or some such and the johnson took offense.


  328. m
    329 | March 13, 2010 9:02 am

    @ m:

    Or one of the characters called someone a nancy – something like that. Anyway – that man is so thin-skinned he’s transparent.


  329. Doppelganger
    330 | March 13, 2010 11:01 am

    Thin of skin and thick of skull


  330. 331 | March 13, 2010 4:43 pm

    Is Mandy using the “Calvin pissing on Allah’s name” avatar that I made?


  331. m
    332 | March 13, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ RoboMonkey:

    Oh so you da one! Good job!


  332. 333 | March 13, 2010 5:37 pm

    @ m:
    Yeah, I also made (as a joke which she didn’t get) that badge with Godzilla on it for IR. I’m an avatar trouble-maker, I guess.


  333. buzzsawmonkey
    334 | March 13, 2010 6:57 pm

    Clearly, I missed a lively thread last night—but as most people here know, I do not post on Shabbos.

    I’m glad everyone enjoyed the song above. For the record:

    1) I have not sent Mad King Yertle an email since well before I took my leave of his site. I have certainly not sent him emails—abusive or otherwise—since I left.

    2) Nor have I posted responses to anything he has written on any blog not his own where he might have written something. I have neither time to do so nor interest in doing so.

    3) I do not use other posting names or screen nics. I have never had a sockpuppet, on Yertle’s site or any other.

    4) It is ironic that the Man Who Took Down Dan Rather is expending such energy to try and stomp a wandering balladeer who has, at present, no blog of his own—or even a show on Fox.

    5) However, since Mad King Yertle’s attacks on Glenn Beck have, if anything, improved Beck’s viewership, I look forward with anticipation to the prospect of his attacks aiding me in becoming a media star.

    Once again, thanks to everyone for their kind words.


  334. 335 | March 13, 2010 7:08 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    You sure rock Buzz!

    I have rarely if ever met a finer character than you online.


  335. passionate conservative
    336 | March 13, 2010 7:43 pm

    When did I miss the Sharmuta banning? Damn. It’s getting tough now. Chuckles is running out of sycophants.


  336. 337 | March 14, 2010 8:27 am

    [...] Blogmocracy: The Asylum that is LGF [...]


  337. The Osprey
    338 | March 14, 2010 8:38 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ vagabond trader:

    You don’t remember the Glasgow Airport? Crispy fried Progressive Mohammedan…

    Now, here’s a TRUE SCOTSMAN!


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David