First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

NASA: Warmest March Ever…

by snork ( 153 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Weather at April 17th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

…in Finland.

This next chapter in “how to bullshit with statistics” brought to you by Jean S. at ClimateAudit. When the Warmatarians start claiming that “xxx was the warmest xxx on record”, it helps to look a little closer:

A few notes: Gray means no data, so much of South America and most of Africa just don’t show up in the “world” at all. The scale at the bottom shows which parts of the world were hot spots and which were cold spots. Conveniently, the parts of the world where people actually live were all unusually cold, and the parts where they don’t were all unusually hot, making the average come out high.

But wait! There’s more!

Jean had the unbridled chuzpah to actually start checking things and axing questions.

[T]he warmest March on record is set inevery Finnish station GISS is following. For instance, according to GISS, the mean March temperature in Sodankylä (61402836000) was a remarkable +1.5 °C beating the old record (-2.2 °C) from 1920 by 3.7 °C!

That’s a lot. All over the country, everything was way high. So he checks with the actual Finnish meterological folks, and lo and behold:

Well, according to the Finnish Meteorological Institute, March 2010 was colder than usual all over Finland, especially in the northern part. For instance, the mean temperature in Sodankylä was -10.3 °C, which is almost three degrees below the base period 1971-2000 average (-7.5 °C). So the GISS March value for Sodankylä is off by amazing 11.8 °C!

Oy. 11.8 C high is 21 F high. Not a small error. This is the handiwork of Jimmy “Storms of my Grandchildren” Hanson. It’s like climategate never happened. Back to business as usual for these freaks.

Master of understatement, Jean says:

Some quality control, please!

Down in the comments, Mosher gets it right:

Steven Mosher Posted Apr 15, 2010 at 10:22 AM | Permalink | Reply

and the standard response:

1. Finland represents less than 1% of the worlds surface, therefore any mistakes make no difference. this excuse can be made virtually any time. In fact, there is no requirement to get any country correct.

2. Whatever warm bias errors there are , they will be cancelled by the magic of the LLN [Law of Large Numbers - ed]. Cool biases are sure to exist and perfectly cancel the warm biases

3. Do your own damn science.

4. Oil shill!

I think 4 was supposed to come first.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

153 Responses to “NASA: Warmest March Ever…”
( jump to bottom )

  1. vagabond trader
    1 | April 17, 2010 20:06

    A few notes: Gray means no data, so much of South America and most of Africa just don’t show up in the “world” at all.

    Not only do they lie but they are also raaaaacist!


  2. snork
    2 | April 17, 2010 20:11

    It looks like my last edit didn’t make it. I also wanted to note how Pakistan was so much hotter than the neighboring countries. How does the weather respect national borders like that? Suppose something else is going on?


  3. coldwarrior
    3 | April 17, 2010 20:15

    i see a lot of blue and white on this map…who fudged the data this time


  4. song_and_dance_man
    4 | April 17, 2010 20:18

    Oh fudge.


  5. snork
    5 | April 17, 2010 20:18

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    Packer.


  6. goddessoftheclassroom
    6 | April 17, 2010 20:23

    Good evening, y’all!


  7. rain of lead
    7 | April 17, 2010 20:25

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    hi gotc
    been havin a good day?


  8. song_and_dance_man
    8 | April 17, 2010 20:29

    @ snork:

    They also tend to reach around- way around- just to have their way.


  9. Doppelganger
    9 | April 17, 2010 20:30

    This measurement is the same as only talking to iceweasel for the month of March and then Declaring March the Bitchiest Month in history


  10. goddessoftheclassroom
    10 | April 17, 2010 20:31

    @ rain of lead:
    {rain of lead}

    Yes, thanks! I’m redecorating my bedroom, and I’m really pleased about how some of my choices will look.


  11. song_and_dance_man
    11 | April 17, 2010 20:32

    Looks like the wackos will have to dump the Climate Change slogan back to Global Warming. I mean, look at all that red cheddar in Antarctica.


  12. chickadee
    12 | April 17, 2010 20:35

    I don’t believe anything they say. These people aren’t scientists, they are criminals who smell money and power and gone over to the dark side.


  13. rain of lead
    13 | April 17, 2010 20:35

    @ goddessoftheclassroom:

    it’s always fun when stuff like that works better than hoped for.


  14. goddessoftheclassroom
    14 | April 17, 2010 20:36

    @ chickadee:
    I so agree.


  15. Doppelganger
    15 | April 17, 2010 20:36

    It’s like bunking with Icarus for the month of March and then declaring that this is the fattest and dumbest March ever


  16. rain of lead
    16 | April 17, 2010 20:43

    related
    Save the Earth … or else

    The frenzy of the self-righteous is woeful to behold. Who knew that rage was green? A few weeks ago, one of the smug, angry activists who populate the eco-corporation Greenpeace (a certain “Gene” from India) put up a feverish post on its website. The subject was — what else? — the sacred and unquestionable cause of global warming:

    “If you’re one of those who have spent their lives undermining progressive climate legislation, bankrolling junk science, fuelling spurious debates around false solutions, and cattle-prodding democratically-elected governments into submission, then hear this: We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.”

    Break out the Windex folks. What you have there, in all its childish fury and threat, all its ignorant arrogance and entitlement, all its breathtaking vigilante righteousness, is a window into the mind-set of some of those who are out to save the panda, stop the seal hunt and guard Mommy Gaia. “We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.” Pure threat coupled with an unimaginable volume of sanctimony.

    yeah.
    read it all.


  17. song_and_dance_man
    17 | April 17, 2010 20:43

    Doppelganger wrote:

    It’s like bunking with Icarus for the month of March and then declaring that this is the fattest and dumbest March ever

    In a FTFY moment, to lend to the credibility *cough* of the climate shills.

    It’s like bunking with Icarus for the month of March and then declaring that this is the thinnest and smartest March ever


  18. lobo91
    18 | April 17, 2010 20:43

    Well, according to the Finnish Meteorological Institute, March 2010 was colder than usual all over Finland, especially in the northern part. For instance, the mean temperature in Sodankylä was -10.3 °C, which is almost three degrees below the base period 1971-2000 average (-7.5 °C). So the GISS March value for Sodankylä is off by amazing 11.8 °C!

    Who are you going to believe, some people who are actually using thermometers and stuff to measure the temperature in Finaland, or the brilliant scientists at NASA, who divined the temperature using big, expensive computers?

    I’ll bet those Finnish guys don’t even have a Nobel Prize…


  19. chickadee
    19 | April 17, 2010 20:45

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    I so agree.

    {gotc}, Hey teach, I meant to say: “have’ gone over to the dark side.
    Don’t flunk me.
    ;)


  20. song_and_dance_man
    20 | April 17, 2010 20:46

    @ rain of lead:

    And speaking of Green…

    I hope in the upcoming Tea Party thread the pic I shot of a sign is posted.

    It read,…

    Go Green
    Recycle Congress


  21. SciFiGuy
    21 | April 17, 2010 20:46

    Can somebody please pass the sun-block???


  22. lobo91
    22 | April 17, 2010 20:46

    @ rain of lead:

    We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.

    And I have more guns and ammo than you do, along with the will to use them.

    Feel lucky, punk?


  23. SciFiGuy
    23 | April 17, 2010 20:47

    chickadee wrote:

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    I so agree.

    {gotc}, Hey teach, I meant to say: “have’ gone over to the dark side.
    Don’t flunk me.

    Didn’t they just reinstate paddling in a town in Texas??


  24. song_and_dance_man
    24 | April 17, 2010 20:49

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    Can somebody please pass the sun-block???

    One needs sun screen and mukluks, just to be sure, since the shift is still up in the air.


  25. Doppelganger
    25 | April 17, 2010 20:51

    does this mean al gore will come out of hibernation?


  26. 26 | April 17, 2010 20:53

    lobo91 wrote:

    Who are you going to believe, some people who are actually using thermometers and stuff to measure the temperature in Finaland, or the brilliant scientists at NASA, who divined the temperature using big, expensive computers?
    I’ll bet those Finnish guys don’t even have a Nobel Prize…

    Considering the NASA budget that Barry just announced the other day, expensive computers are a thing of the past; they might consider breaking out the Apollo lunar lander computers for their work, along with the ever speedy slide-rules.


  27. snork
    27 | April 17, 2010 20:54

    rain of lead wrote:

    Break out the Windex folks. What you have there, in all its childish fury and threat, all its ignorant arrogance and entitlement, all its breathtaking vigilante righteousness, is a window into the mind-set of some of those who are out to save the panda, stop the seal hunt and guard Mommy Gaia. “We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.” Pure threat coupled with an unimaginable volume of sanctimony.

    Lutefisk Van Queeg?


  28. m
    28 | April 17, 2010 20:55

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    It’s in there!


  29. Insert Clever Name Here
    29 | April 17, 2010 20:56

    lobo91 wrote:

    country

    LOL!


  30. chickadee
    30 | April 17, 2010 20:56

    SciFiGuy wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    goddessoftheclassroom wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    I so agree.

    {gotc}, Hey teach, I meant to say: “have’ gone over to the dark side.
    Don’t flunk me.

    Didn’t they just reinstate paddling in a town in Texas??

    oops, hopefully not for my transgression of failing to proofread.
    :)


  31. Doppelganger
    31 | April 17, 2010 20:56

    It was 41 freaking degrees today.
    41

    the last half of april

    God. please warm the earth. It’s cold!


  32. snork
    32 | April 17, 2010 20:56

    FurryOldGuyJeans wrote:

    Considering the NASA budget that Barry just announced the other day, expensive computers are a thing of the past; they might consider breaking out the Apollo lunar lander computers for their work, along with the ever speedy slide-rules.

    Don’t knock sly drools. Retro geek is in again.


  33. Insert Clever Name Here
    33 | April 17, 2010 20:57

    Well that came out wrong.
    I meant that the “I”ve got more ammo…” comment cracked me up.


  34. snork
    34 | April 17, 2010 20:58

    @ chickadee:
    Some people like getting spanked. :twisted:


  35. huckfunn
    35 | April 17, 2010 20:59

    @ snork:

    It’s like climategate never happened. Back to business as usual for these freaks.

    While the global whining crapola has been thoroughly debunked and exposed as fraud, we have Kerry, Graham and Lieberman who are still trying to cram this crap down our throats.
    Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) will roll out their compromise climate proposal April 26, according to several sources.
    Gag!


  36. citizen_q
    36 | April 17, 2010 20:59

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ rain of lead:
    We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.
    And I have more guns and ammo than you do, along with the will to use them.
    Feel lucky, punk?

    What he said!

    Your mouth shouldn’t write a check your ass can’t cash.


  37. song_and_dance_man
    37 | April 17, 2010 21:01

    snork wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    Some people like getting spanked.

    Again…Foster is brought up again.

    Protest.

    Oh wait…


  38. mawskrat
    38 | April 17, 2010 21:01

    if I cook a fillet of fish in my soul kitchen does that make
    it a fillet of sole?

    ///Buzz would know!


  39. snork
    39 | April 17, 2010 21:02

    @ huckfunn:
    It’s a tax. It’s got zero to do with the climate. I’ve got some serious evidence of that, just not sure of the time to whip up a post.


  40. lobo91
    40 | April 17, 2010 21:04

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    Considering the NASA budget that Barry just announced the other day, expensive computers are a thing of the past; they might consider breaking out the Apollo lunar lander computers for their work, along with the ever speedy slide-rules.

    Maybe they can hire that cat that was using the iPad in that video the other day…


  41. song_and_dance_man
    41 | April 17, 2010 21:05

    @ snork:

    It’s always about control and mammon, coming from the left. That is their transmission it the drive train.


  42. citizen_q
    42 | April 17, 2010 21:06

    mawskrat wrote:

    if I cook a fillet of fish in my soul kitchen does that make
    it a fillet of sole?
    ///Buzz would know!

    If you were born in Parm Italy does that make you a Parmesan?


  43. 43 | April 17, 2010 21:06

    snork wrote:

    Don’t knock sly drools. Retro geek is in again.

    That may be very well the case, but speedy and accurate to any high degree of precision they ain’t.

    At least they don’t have to do paper-based calculations any more.


  44. huckfunn
    44 | April 17, 2010 21:07

    @ snork:
    You’re exactly right. No more to do with climate than healthcare has to do with health. Also, what is the purpose of the tax, you axe? Wealth redistribution; and it’s already happened. 45% of the population pay no tax which means the other 55% will pay for whatever the tax revenues supposedly buy.


  45. Insert Clever Name Here
    45 | April 17, 2010 21:08

    I’m not too well-versed in the AGW issue, but I’d like to try to answer the Steven Mosher post.

    “4. Oil shill!” — Nice science you got there. Call names much?

    “3. Do your own damn science.” — I do my job properly. Is it too much to ask that others do theirs properly too?

    [Those were too easy. On to the meat of the matter...]

    “2. Whatever warm bias errors there are , they will be cancelled by the magic of the LLN [Law of Large Numbers - ed]. Cool biases are sure to exist and perfectly cancel the warm biases” — These are actual things that you’re actually measuring with actual tools-hopefully properly calibrated tools. We shouldn’t need to depend on math games to get the numbers. Just tell us what those properly calibrated tools say.

    “1. Finland represents less than 1% of the worlds surface, therefore any mistakes make no difference. this excuse can be made virtually any time. In fact, there is no requirement to get any country correct.” — You’ve already excluded giant areas of land mass from lack of data. What percentage of the “worlds surface” that you’ve actually included is Finland now? Also, No requirement to get any country correct? Perhaps you didn’t get any country correct.


  46. Macker
    46 | April 17, 2010 21:09

    OFF TOPIC: God, on my six-month anniversary with my wife, I am so bummed. Not at her, not at all!
    With my sister. She went and bought a Government Motors crossover.


  47. lobo91
    47 | April 17, 2010 21:12

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    That may be very well the case, but speedy and accurate to any high degree of precision they ain’t.

    But what does that have to do with NASA? I haven’t seen much evidence of any “speedy and accurate” calculations coming out of them lately.

    Aside from being unable to figure out what the temperature in Finland was last month, these are the same people who keep crashing space probes into planets because they can’t keep miles and kilometers straight.


  48. snowcrash
    48 | April 17, 2010 21:14

    @ Macker:
    What did she get? I bought a GM crossover in 2008 to replace my beloved but very old GM Suburban. That was before the bailout. I will never buy another GM, ever.


  49. snork
    49 | April 17, 2010 21:14

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ snork:
    You’re exactly right. No more to do with climate than healthcare has to do with health. Also, what is the purpose of the tax, you axe? Wealth redistribution; and it’s already happened. 45% of the population pay no tax which means the other 55% will pay for whatever the tax revenues supposedly buy.

    Except – A carbon tax can’t be made “progressive”. They can go for full rationing, but barring that, any carbon tax will cost gramma trying to heat her house, and junior trying to fill up his purple Cadillac. So the tax has to be un-progressive.

    This redistribution business is a lot trickier than his royal messiahship thought.


  50. huckfunn
    50 | April 17, 2010 21:15

    Macker wrote:

    OFF TOPIC: God, on my six-month anniversary with my wife, I am so bummed. Not at her, not at all!
    With my sister. She went and bought a Government Motors crossover.

    I currently drive a ’03 Chevy Tahoe Z-71. I bought it ’06 when it had only 21k miles. It’s been a great vehicle. Leather, 4×4, Bose, all the bells and whistles. Also a nice driver and, with 128k miles on it now, my biggest expense has been a new water pump. Will I buy another GM? HELL NO!! The UAW has gotten their last nickel out of me. Toyota’s are made right down the road in San Antonio by non-union Texas and that’s where my $$ are going.


  51. snork
    51 | April 17, 2010 21:16

    @ Insert Clever Name Here:
    Just to be clear, Mosher was being sarcastic. That was basically what the “team” has said in similar situations before.


  52. song_and_dance_man
    52 | April 17, 2010 21:17

    Hey, I got an idea. Let’s set up instruments in Yellowstone and Wisconsin and use them respectively to make the data fit a predisposed theory that would be anathema to the current jerks. Whenever it is convenient for us, that is.

    Ice for ice and heat for heat, you know.


  53. Doppelganger
    53 | April 17, 2010 21:17

    I’m driving a new Chevy Traverse.

    Bottom line is that I tried out every similar vehicle and this one won hands down. Been in it for a few months and I love it. I don’t care who made it, it’s an awesome vehicle. Beats the crap out of the Ford, the Honda, the Toyota, the Nissan and everything else I test drove and researched.

    I buy the best product and this is the best.


  54. lobo91
    54 | April 17, 2010 21:18

    @ snork:

    Except – A carbon tax can’t be made “progressive”. They can go for full rationing, but barring that, any carbon tax will cost gramma trying to heat her house, and junior trying to fill up his purple Cadillac. So the tax has to be un-progressive.

    Every scheme I’ve seen has included some sort of rebates to “low income” people to offset it.

    Of course, the definition of “low income” seems to vary from day to day…


  55. goddessoftheclassroom
    55 | April 17, 2010 21:19

    @ chickadee:
    {chickadee}


  56. huckfunn
    56 | April 17, 2010 21:19

    snork wrote:

    This redistribution business is a lot trickier than his royal messiahship thought.

    That’s true. The scary thing is that if Cap & Tax passes, the tax payer is getting blasted with both barrels inasmuch as Obowmao has already directed the EPA to regulate Co2. It’s like there’s no way out.


  57. lobo91
    57 | April 17, 2010 21:20

    Since Earth Day is next Thursday, I guess it’s time to take the Mustang out of storage to celebrate.


  58. 58 | April 17, 2010 21:20

    rain of lead wrote:

    We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.”

    Bring it. I’ve spent most of my life training to kill people. Practicing killing people. Thinking about killing people. Sad thing, except under very ridgedly controlled circumstances, it is illegal to kill people. Wah. The one circumstance where I can use my lifes work is one where someone who has threatened to hunt me down where I live and perform acts of violence on me actually tries to do as they have threatended. In that case, the restrictions are out, the mission is “Go”, and I can do what I was born to do.

    Come out and play!


  59. Insert Clever Name Here
    59 | April 17, 2010 21:21

    snork wrote:

    @ Insert Clever Name Here:
    Just to be clear, Mosher was being sarcastic. That was basically what the “team” has said in similar situations before.

    Thanks, Snork. That makes sense now that I re-read it.


  60. snork
    60 | April 17, 2010 21:21

    @ Macker:
    Here’s your Government Motors Car of The Future:


  61. huckfunn
    61 | April 17, 2010 21:22

    lobo91 wrote:

    Since Earth Day is next Thursday, I guess it’s time to take the Mustang out of storage to celebrate.

    Yeah, man! I’ve got a ’74 Cadillac El Dorado convertible that’s been chained up all winter. Those 501 cubes need to breath.


  62. citizen_q
    62 | April 17, 2010 21:24

    @ snork:

    This redistribution business is a lot trickier than his royal messiahship thought.

    I have heard that they will use the tax code to provide favored groups with a mechanism such as tax credits to off-set what was paid towards cap and tax. This same method may also be used to offset payment of the VAT when they force that down our throats when surprise, surprise, surprise, they can’t pay for what they promised.


  63. 63 | April 17, 2010 21:24

    @ snork:

    I can see that suffering the same basic problem as the Sinclair C5, which was a great idea in principle but had the teensy flaw of being so small and hard to see that truck drivers kept running over them at traffic lights.


  64. song_and_dance_man
    64 | April 17, 2010 21:24

    @ Doppelganger:

    The only new car I have ever bought was at 19 when I became manager of a Der Weinershcnitzel in so cal. Since then the cars bought are always quality used cars. Or trucks.


  65. snork
    65 | April 17, 2010 21:24

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    Hey, I got an idea. Let’s set up instruments in Yellowstone and Wisconsin and use them respectively to make the data fit a predisposed theory that would be anathema to the current jerks. Whenever it is convenient for us, that is.

    Ice for ice and heat for heat, you know.

    You say you want to shove a thermometer up iceweasel’s what?


  66. Macker
    66 | April 17, 2010 21:25

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ Macker:
    What did she get? I bought a GM crossover in 2008 to replace my beloved but very old GM Suburban. That was before the bailout. I will never buy another GM, ever.

    She got a Chevy Traverse.


  67. Macker
    67 | April 17, 2010 21:26

    @ snork:

    And here I thought it was the Pelosi Galore. 3.8 TRILLION UPDINGS!


  68. snowcrash
    68 | April 17, 2010 21:27

    @ Macker:
    That is a lot like the GM Acadia I’m driving. I’ve been very happy with it. We still take road trips to visit family in the summer and next year to visit my son in Austin. Great for travelling. I’ll look at Ford first, next time.


  69. snork
    69 | April 17, 2010 21:27

    @ archonix:
    Wipeout:


  70. snork
    70 | April 17, 2010 21:29

    @ Macker:
    You gotta admit, the turning radius is nice. Zero is a good turning radius.


  71. song_and_dance_man
    71 | April 17, 2010 21:29

    @ snork:

    That looks like a a teleprompter/Segway hybrid. Just perfect for the Left.


  72. song_and_dance_man
    72 | April 17, 2010 21:31

    @ snork:

    Er… no. As of yet, I’m not that jimmied.


  73. Macker
    73 | April 17, 2010 21:31

    @ snork:

    That vehicle, or Президент Оба́ма?


  74. song_and_dance_man
    74 | April 17, 2010 21:35

    ˙ɐʇɐp ʍǝu ˙uoos buıɯoɔ


  75. lobo91
    75 | April 17, 2010 21:43

    WoooHooo!

    Ubaldo Jimenez just pitched the first no-hitter in Rockies history against Atlanta!


  76. lobo91
    76 | April 17, 2010 21:45

    Wow. His Wikipedia page has already been updated.

    That has to be some sort of record…


  77. goddessoftheclassroom
    77 | April 17, 2010 21:46

    Good night, y’all!


  78. mtc
    78 | April 17, 2010 21:47

    Just a heads up. LGF has a thread up making fun of Lord Monckton. There’s a video by Peter Sinclair debunking Monckton’s AGW denialism. Dark Falcon said he had been over here to read the thread. LVQ replied back that he would rather hammer nails in his unmentionables han come here to see what we have to say. Reginald Perrin accuses us of being an echo chamber with no original thought. Projecting much? So they might start trouble again like last Saturday.


  79. 79 | April 17, 2010 21:48

    Here’s some coolness via Soylent Green. Clicky here.


  80. snowcrash
    80 | April 17, 2010 21:48

    I left a comment in the diary of deadalus by pasting a comment found from the other place. Read it and be amazed and repulsed at the current level of discourse.


  81. 81 | April 17, 2010 21:49

    lobo91 wrote:

    But what does that have to do with NASA? I haven’t seen much evidence of any “speedy and accurate” calculations coming out of them lately.
    Aside from being unable to figure out what the temperature in Finland was last month, these are the same people who keep crashing space probes into planets because they can’t keep miles and kilometers straight.

    And think, they have been tasked by Barry to investigate the Toyota accelerator problem that was all the news last month.


  82. mtc
    82 | April 17, 2010 21:49

    Of course, they’re welcome to post here if they want to. We welcome different opinions.


  83. snowcrash
    83 | April 17, 2010 21:52

    @ mtc:
    You know what is weird, I don’t want them over here. They can’t help but bring their ugliness with them and lately I don’t find it remotely amusing. .


  84. lobo91
    84 | April 17, 2010 21:53

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    And think, they have been tasked by Barry to investigate the Toyota accelerator problem that was all the news last month.

    Wait until they hold their big press conference to announce their conclusion:

    “Well, we think we’ve found the problem. When we looked at the code used to program the car’s onboard computer, it turned out to just be a bunch of ones and zeroes. No wonder it doesn’t work!”


  85. snork
    85 | April 17, 2010 21:53

    mtc wrote:

    Peter Sinclair debunking Monckton’s AGW denialism.

    Peter Sinclair doesn’t have the the scientific chops to debunk voodoo.


  86. chickadee
    86 | April 17, 2010 21:53

    huckfunn wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:

    Since Earth Day is next Thursday, I guess it’s time to take the Mustang out of storage to celebrate.

    Yeah, man! I’ve got a ‘74 Cadillac El Dorado convertible that’s been chained up all winter. Those 501 cubes need to breath.

    Wasn’t that the heaviest car ever made. What color is it?
    I bet it is beautiful.


  87. snork
    87 | April 17, 2010 21:55

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ mtc:
    You know what is weird, I don’t want them over here. They can’t help but bring their ugliness with them and lately I don’t find it remotely amusing. .

    Not even SpaceMohammed, or whoever that little pecker is?


  88. SciFiGuy
    88 | April 17, 2010 21:55

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    And think, they have been tasked by Barry to investigate the Toyota accelerator problem that was all the news last month.

    Wait until they hold their big press conference to announce their conclusion:

    “Well, we think we’ve found the problem. When we looked at the code used to program the car’s onboard computer, it turned out to just be a bunch of ones and zeroes. No wonder it doesn’t work!”

    I like that better…


  89. 89 | April 17, 2010 21:55

    @ mtc:
    To be exceedingly blunt and perfectly frank, I don’t give a bit of an iota of a whisper of a hint of what happens at that place any more. They want to think they are superior in the asylum, that is their business. I don’t want to be exposed to the virulent rabidness.


  90. chickadee
    90 | April 17, 2010 21:56

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ snork:

    That looks like a a teleprompter/Segway hybrid. Just perfect for the Left.

    LOL, I looked at it and saw Segway too. The teleprompter doubles as a windshield.


  91. snork
    91 | April 17, 2010 21:56

    lobo91 wrote:

    “Well, we think we’ve found the problem. When we looked at the code used to program the car’s onboard computer, it turned out to just be a bunch of ones and zeroes. No wonder it doesn’t work!”

    And there’s a gif file of a bouncing green football in there. What’s up with that?


  92. 92 | April 17, 2010 21:57

    lobo91 wrote:

    Wait until they hold their big press conference to announce their conclusion:
    “Well, we think we’ve found the problem. When we looked at the code used to program the car’s onboard computer, it turned out to just be a bunch of ones and zeroes. No wonder it doesn’t work!”

    Gotta have some part or the entirety of the problem be blamed for not having union workers.


  93. snork
    93 | April 17, 2010 21:57

    chickadee wrote:

    Wasn’t that the heaviest car ever made. What color is it?
    I bet it is beautiful.

    It was the heaviest front-wheel-drive car ever made. I had a ’71 convert once (sniff…).


  94. snowcrash
    94 | April 17, 2010 21:58

    @ snork:
    I dunno snork, usually SpaceJ makes me laugh but maybe I’m tired or something. Sorry.


  95. snork
    95 | April 17, 2010 21:59

    chickadee wrote:

    The teleprompter doubles as a windshield.

    That’s called a “heads-up display”.


  96. Palandine
    96 | April 17, 2010 21:59

    Poor Charles is still tilting at this windmill on his faithful steed Kilgore Trout, even as an enormous volcano continues to spew ash into the atmosphere, cooling the planet. No wonder the poor guy’s got a problem with God–His creations keep making a mockery of Charles’ faith.


  97. huckfunn
    97 | April 17, 2010 21:59

    chickadee wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:
    lobo91 wrote:
    Since Earth Day is next Thursday, I guess it’s time to take the Mustang out of storage to celebrate.
    Yeah, man! I’ve got a ‘74 Cadillac El Dorado convertible that’s been chained up all winter. Those 501 cubes need to breath.

    Wasn’t that the heaviest car ever made. What color is it?
    I bet it is beautiful.

    It’s red on red with white top. The whole thing wouldn’t fit in the avatar. Sucker will pass anything but a gas station. ’74 was the last year with the fender skirts.


  98. SciFiGuy
    98 | April 17, 2010 21:59

    chickadee wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:

    Since Earth Day is next Thursday, I guess it’s time to take the Mustang out of storage to celebrate.

    Yeah, man! I’ve got a ‘74 Cadillac El Dorado convertible that’s been chained up all winter. Those 501 cubes need to breath.

    Wasn’t that the heaviest car ever made. What color is it?
    I bet it is beautiful.

    Think it was only about 4700 lbs dry. 2008 Maybach 62 tips the scales at well over 6100.


  99. 99 | April 17, 2010 22:00

    mtc wrote:

    Of course, they’re welcome to post here if they want to. We welcome different opinions.

    You can talk to them, I have to watch for neutrino decay in a vat of chlorine.


  100. snork
    100 | April 17, 2010 22:00

    FurryOldGuyJeans wrote:

    Gotta have some part or the entirety of the problem be blamed for not having union workers.

    If you have UAW programmers, you will end up with nothing but zeros.


  101. Macker
    101 | April 17, 2010 22:04

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    While you’re checking that neutrino decay, please check your e-mail! 8)


  102. 102 | April 17, 2010 22:12

    mtc @ 78:

    For a guy that would

    “rather hammer nails in his unmentionables han come here to see what we have to say”

    sure knows more of what goes on here than most posters here.


  103. 103 | April 17, 2010 22:14

    snork wrote:

    If you have UAW programmers, you will end up with nothing but zeros.

    At least Teh Won Zero, for sure.


  104. snork
    104 | April 17, 2010 22:16

    @ Beltfed:
    Maybe he enjoys hammering nails in his junk?


  105. song_and_dance_man
    105 | April 17, 2010 22:18

    @ snork:

    More like hammering those who object to his lowness.


  106. Overlook
    106 | April 17, 2010 22:18

    Both the warmists and the sceptics have handy dandy lists of the opposite sides “myths” and how to answer them.
    What I have noticed is that the arguments that the warmists ascribe to what they call the “deniers” are straw-man arguments: no sensible skeptic makes them.
    The most common argument against sceptic points are:
    1. Even if that particular set of data is wrong – there is “overwhelming” agreement among other sets of data.
    2. The physics of CO2 absorbing light at certain parts of the spectrum is basic. The greenhouse effect has been known for over 100 years.
    3. Warming must be caused by man – because there is no natural cause that explains it.


  107. song_and_dance_man
    107 | April 17, 2010 22:20

    It might serve Foster well if he came over and imbibed in a civil discourse. I, for one, would keep it above the level he has set.


  108. Overlook
    108 | April 17, 2010 22:20

    @ Beltfed:

    His “unmentionables”? Does he mean his “physicist” colleagues?


  109. chickadee
    109 | April 17, 2010 22:23

    I love those early ’70′s Cadillacs. A block long and weighed a million lbs.
    It is amazing they got such good gas mileage.


  110. song_and_dance_man
    110 | April 17, 2010 22:23

    @ Overlook:

    The unmentionables are his bike and the recent past.


  111. coldwarrior
    111 | April 17, 2010 22:23

    woohooo!!!!

    the new machine is together, you all are a lot faster, and better looking, too!

    :lol:


  112. song_and_dance_man
    112 | April 17, 2010 22:26

    coldwarrior wrote:

    woohooo!!!!
    the new machine is together, you all are a lot faster, and better looking, too!

    So…you got new beer goggles? Cool.


  113. chickadee
    113 | April 17, 2010 22:27

    huckfunn wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:
    lobo91 wrote:
    Since Earth Day is next Thursday, I guess it’s time to take the Mustang out of storage to celebrate.
    Yeah, man! I’ve got a ‘74 Cadillac El Dorado convertible that’s been chained up all winter. Those 501 cubes need to breath.

    Wasn’t that the heaviest car ever made. What color is it?
    I bet it is beautiful.

    It’s red on red with white top. The whole thing wouldn’t fit in the avatar. Sucker will pass anything but a gas station. ‘74 was the last year with the fender skirts.

    Fantastic. I want to go for a spin.


  114. coldwarrior
    114 | April 17, 2010 22:27

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    woohooo!!!!
    the new machine is together, you all are a lot faster, and better looking, too!

    So…you got new beer goggles? Cool.

    vodka goggles, chief!

    new computer.


  115. coldwarrior
    115 | April 17, 2010 22:29

    @ huckfunn:

    nice ride! i love those early 70′s caddies!


  116. Formercorpsman
    116 | April 17, 2010 22:35

    20 Reginald Perrin Sat, Apr 17, 2010 6:17:28pm replyquote

    * 3
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #13 Dark_Falcon

    Why waste time reading the feces that the intellectual midgets at that cesspool write?
    That place has been reduced to being nothing but a circle jerk and echo chamber.

    You have to love it.


  117. song_and_dance_man
    117 | April 17, 2010 22:36

    @ coldwarrior:

    yeah I knew what you meant. Do you build your own as I do? Been doing that since 1990.

    This last build stumped me, because I had never seen the symptoms of failure. I kept getting an overclock error and so I thought either the ram was going south, hard drive failure, or the CPU overheated. After being stumped in trying to fix the problem, and after replacing each of the items mentioned the problem persisted. So I took it to a local shop. Something I have never done. It stumped them as well, but only for half a day. It turned out to be a faulty power supply after they went through everything that makes a box run.

    Now I know if ever I see this kind of problem again with my boxes.


  118. Formercorpsman
    118 | April 17, 2010 22:41

    One more.

    236 Cato the Elder Sat, Apr 17, 2010 7:23:51pm replyquote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #215 LudwigVanQuixote

    The one who is part of the problem is you, who for reasons of ego, feel it is important to try to measure his cock next to mine and “win” by derailing discussions of fact and consequences.

    We are all part of the problem. You, me, Steve, everyone on this board, everyone on the internet, every living, breathing human being on this planet.

    There is no solution that does not involve at least halving the human population. Maybe cutting it by two thirds would work.

    Otherwise, we’re screwed based on demographics alone.

    Yes, the wit & wisdom of the unemployed, sub-species dependent, drama queens hashing out the world’s population issues.

    Goodnight all. I’ve had enough. It writes itself.


  119. song_and_dance_man
    119 | April 17, 2010 22:42

    @ Formercorpsman:

    Little do they realize(or maybe they do and that is the why to the what’s up with that) the best of that blog had to offer is no longer there.


  120. SciFiGuy
    120 | April 17, 2010 22:42

    snork wrote:

    @ Beltfed:
    Maybe he enjoys hammering nails in his junk?

    I found Ludwig !!! HERE (not for the faint hearted)


  121. Macker
    121 | April 17, 2010 22:44

    @ Formercorpsman:

    So Ludwig IS teh ghey.


  122. coldwarrior
    122 | April 17, 2010 22:44

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    i build my own…and always buy a quality power supply.

    this supply is a rocketfish


  123. snowcrash
    123 | April 17, 2010 22:45

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Want to read more sparkling wit from Cato? Check out his comment to mandy m in the diary if deadalus. Filthy, foul and disgusting. He is a pig.


  124. coldwarrior
    124 | April 17, 2010 22:46

    Formercorpsman wrote:

    20 Reginald Perrin Sat, Apr 17, 2010 6:17:28pm replyquote
    * 3
    * down
    * up
    * report
    re: #13 Dark_Falcon
    Why waste time reading the feces that the intellectual midgets at that cesspool write?
    That place has been reduced to being nothing but a circle jerk and echo chamber.
    You have to love it.

    dont fall for the stunt. chuckie needs some web hits so he’s allowing his prisoner monkeys to bang on their cages with their mess kits.

    as always, they can post here, we cant post there.


  125. Formercorpsman
    125 | April 17, 2010 22:48

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Little do they realize(or maybe they do and that is the why to the what’s up with that) the best of that blog had to offer is no longer there.

    You caught me before I left. The irony of those 2 posts is off the hook. If irony were measured as an RPM, they are red lighting at 8000 right now.

    It really defied rationale. They are so off the deep end. It really does write itself.

    Think of this. Who the fuck do they sponge off of once they decide who needs to go in order to save the world?

    I’m out, have a good night.


  126. Formercorpsman
    126 | April 17, 2010 22:51

    I’ve had my head scratching laugh for the night. I have been missing in action because of youth baseball. I think this is my 21st, or 22nd day straight doing something baseball related with my boys.

    Everyone have a great night. I mean that. I’m beat. (BTW, our fellas are kicking ass in Ripkin tournament this weekend)


  127. song_and_dance_man
    127 | April 17, 2010 22:53

    @ Formercorpsman:
    Think of this. Who the fuck do they sponge off of once they decide who needs to go in order to save the world?

    I know you’re offline now, but would Sponge Chuck Circle Pants be the one?


  128. song_and_dance_man
    128 | April 17, 2010 22:54

    Well I certainly screwed the pooch with that post. Formatting wise at least.


  129. song_and_dance_man
    129 | April 17, 2010 22:56

    @ coldwarrior:

    And I now know the power supply is most important. I treated that component less important and bought with budget in mind. No more, now.


  130. 130 | April 17, 2010 22:59

    song_and_dance_man @ 29:

    And I now know the power supply is most important. I treated that component less important and bought with budget in mind. No more, now.

    As I always say, It’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.


  131. coldwarrior
    131 | April 17, 2010 22:59

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    And I now know the power supply is most important. I treated that component less important and bought with budget in mind. No more, now.


    i got this one


  132. huckfunn
    132 | April 17, 2010 23:01

    @ chickadee:
    @ coldwarrior:
    It does have its issues, but it’s all original and most of the parts work. I put dual exhaust on it a few years ago and I think it boosted the HP just a skosh and now it sounds kinda hairy-chested.


  133. coldwarrior
    133 | April 17, 2010 23:01

    Beltfed wrote:

    song_and_dance_man @ 29:
    And I now know the power supply is most important. I treated that component less important and bought with budget in mind. No more, now.
    As I always say, It’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.

    i got burned on a cheap power supply, it took out my mobo and memory with the spike.

    never again


  134. coldwarrior
    134 | April 17, 2010 23:04

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    @ coldwarrior:
    It does have its issues, but it’s all original and most of the parts work. I put dual exhaust on it a few years ago and I think it boosted the HP just a skosh and now it sounds kinda hairy-chested.

    its still large, luxurious american iron. beautiful.


  135. song_and_dance_man
    135 | April 17, 2010 23:10

    @ Beltfed:

    Good thinking.

    @ coldwarrior:

    I can’t recall which model I bought, but I decided on the best they had. Unfortunately there is no Fry’s Electronics here in ABQ, so the choices were not that varied.

    And like you, the performance of the box is way better than I had prior. I went with the AMD Athlon II 2.81 GHz. No quad needed since I’m not a gamer.


  136. lobo91
    136 | April 17, 2010 23:10

    @ Beltfed:

    As I always say, It’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.

    That’s my ammo-buying logic.


  137. huckfunn
    137 | April 17, 2010 23:12

    coldwarrior wrote:

    its still large, luxurious american iron. beautiful.

    Thanks. Hey; quick question. I use Firefox for my browser. My computer is several years old but it is current and has plenty of power. I use Firefox for my browser. Recently, the browser locks up and the only way out is control-alt-delete. I run Spyware Blaster and Spybot Search & Destroy several times a week and rarely find a cootie. I also flush the cache at least once a day. What’s my problem? While writing this post I just had to get out and then come back in. Any ideas?


  138. Poteen
    138 | April 17, 2010 23:12

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Beltfed:
    As I always say, It’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
    That’s my ammo-buying logic.

    Applies to beer and hookers too./ :)


  139. 139 | April 17, 2010 23:17

    @ snork:

    I wouldn’t call anything that small a nail. Little tacks, maybe, but that is still overkill for Ludwig von Quack Quack’s junk…


  140. song_and_dance_man
    140 | April 17, 2010 23:19

    @ huckfunn:

    What I do from time to time is check the processes that Windows is running. If they are not needed I disable them so the CPU is not overtaxed. Every program you load assumes that it must be running in the background just in case you need it right then.


  141. coldwarrior
    141 | April 17, 2010 23:21

    huckfunn wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    its still large, luxurious american iron. beautiful.
    Thanks. Hey; quick question. I use Firefox for my browser. My computer is several years old but it is current and has plenty of power. I use Firefox for my browser. Recently, the browser locks up and the only way out is control-alt-delete. I run Spyware Blaster and Spybot Search & Destroy several times a week and rarely find a cootie. I also flush the cache at least once a day. What’s my problem? While writing this post I just had to get out and then come back in. Any ideas?

    registry error?

    maybe…didya try to unistall/reinstall?


  142. huckfunn
    142 | April 17, 2010 23:21

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    Thanks for the tip. Now how the hell do I do that?


  143. huckfunn
    143 | April 17, 2010 23:23

    coldwarrior wrote:

    registry error?

    maybe…didya try to unistall/reinstall?

    I’ve Registry Fix and run that from time time. I think Song & Dance has the right idea and I used to know how to do what he’s talking about. Regedit or something?


  144. huckfunn
    144 | April 17, 2010 23:24

    Friggin’ thing’s tryin to lock up right now.


  145. song_and_dance_man
    145 | April 17, 2010 23:28

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    Thanks for the tip. Now how the hell do I do that?

    It’s complex and one must know what they are doing. Try googling ‘turning off windows processes’ or a variant to that with unwanted or program processes.

    I submit that because I would have to write a tutorial to answer you.


  146. huckfunn
    146 | April 17, 2010 23:33

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    Thanks. I’ve had this problem before and I should be able to stumble on to the answer.


  147. 147 | April 18, 2010 00:11

    lobo91 @ 136:

    That’s my ammo-buying logic.

    That was the logic I used in Nam when it came to “how much M-60 gun ammo do we need”


  148. pat
    148 | April 18, 2010 02:29

    I am late and will not read thread. I am sure that you already have been informed that NASA assumed a temp was positive when it was negative. In other words Finland like the rest of continental Eurasia was really cold. Russia had the coldest winter in 110 years. You cannot forgive this degree of incompetency. It is scary.


  149. 149 | April 18, 2010 09:53

    [...] March the warmest ever? Blogmocracy [...]


  150. RIX
    150 | April 18, 2010 10:58

    TEST


  151. 151 | April 20, 2010 17:28

    [...] NASA: Warmest March Ever… › 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


  152. 152 | May 9, 2010 07:00

    [...] NASA: Warmest March Ever… › 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


  153. 153 | May 9, 2010 16:50

    [...] NASA: Warmest March Ever… › 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David