First time visitor? Learn more.

Today Is Israel Independance Day!

by WrathofG-d ( 139 Comments › )
Filed under Israel at April 19th, 2010 - 1:30 pm

Today, the 5th of Ayar on the Jewish calendar, is Israel Independence Day; a day when we commemorate nothing less than a modern-day miracle.   After 2000 years of grueling exile, the Jewish people once again were a free people in their own land.

(The full text of The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel)

Israel; a tiny nation besieged by her Arab/Muslim neighbors even before its founding has made the barren desert bloom and continues to succeed against all odds.

May G-d continue to bless, protect and grow Israel!

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

139 Responses to “Today Is Israel Independance Day!”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | April 19, 2010 1:37 pm

    May 14 is Israel’s Independence Day. Nobody but Israel uses the Hebrew calendar.


  2. 2 | April 19, 2010 1:37 pm

    62nd Israel Independence Day

    April 2010

    Israel’s Independence Day celebrates a double miracle in the life of the Jewish people.

    The first miracle is the restoration of Jewish sovereignty. There is no other example that I know of in the history of nations in which a scattered people, practically left for dead, has been able to re-assert its national life.

    The second miracle is what we’ve done since the establishment of the Jewish state. Israel is fact becoming a regional economic power and one of the world’s leading technological powers.

    All the powers of creativity and genius in the Jewish people are bursting forth in every area: in science; in technology; in medicine; in the arts. This incredible burst of creativity promises a great future for the Jewish people and for all mankind.

    This double miracle is a testament to the life-force of the Jewish people. It’s a testament to the deep wells of hope we carry inside us and to the deep connection that we have both to our past and to our future. The two miracles that have already occurred are only the beginning. If we stand together, if we remain committed to our common destiny, there’s nothing we cannot achieve.

    Chag Sameach!

    Sincerely,

    Benjamin Netanyahu

    Also here you can “visit” Israel without leaving your comfy computer chair.


  3. 3 | April 19, 2010 1:38 pm

    Happy Birthday Israel!


  4. 4 | April 19, 2010 1:39 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Yeah I thought it was May 14th.

    Oh well, Israel gets to celebrate twice.


  5. 5 | April 19, 2010 1:41 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    May 14 is Israel’s Independence Day. Nobody but Israel uses the Hebrew calendar.

    Every Jew celebrates every Jewish holiday according to the Jewish calendar whether in Israel or not.

    right?


  6. vagabond trader
    6 | April 19, 2010 1:42 pm

    May G-d bless Israel and curse those who curse her.


  7. NoThreat2U
    7 | April 19, 2010 1:43 pm

    Happy Birthday!!!!

    BTW, I was watching that idiot Tariq Ramadan on tv last night. (Sometimes I like to watch people lie with a straight face) I cringed everytime he mentioned the “creation” of Israel. I HATE when people say that! It has always been there! It wasn’t just “created” 62 years ago. Some people act as if there was never a nation called Israel, ever. Grrrrrrrr that makes me so mad!


  8. Rorschach
    8 | April 19, 2010 1:46 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    resurrection maybe more accurate


  9. buzzsawmonkey
    9 | April 19, 2010 1:47 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    BTW, I was watching that idiot Tariq Ramadan on tv last night. (Sometimes I like to watch people lie with a straight face) I cringed everytime he mentioned the “creation” of Israel. I HATE when people say that! It has always been there! It wasn’t just “created” 62 years ago. Some people act as if there was never a nation called Israel, ever. Grrrrrrrr that makes me so mad!

    As long as people remember that the nations of Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq, among others, were actually created out of the wreckage of the Ottoman Empire at most a mere 19 years before Israel won its independence, that the nations of India and Pakistan were created at the same time as Israel, and that many of the nations of Africa were created after the birth of Israel, I have no problem with it.


  10. Nevergiveup
    10 | April 19, 2010 1:49 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Pakistan

    hey and how is that Pakistan thing workin out?


  11. NoThreat2U
    11 | April 19, 2010 1:50 pm

    Rorschach wrote:

    @ NoThreat2U:
    resurrection maybe more accurate

    Exactly!!!

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    I may be a little rusty, but I though India too has always “been”. Wasn’t Pakistan “created” from a part of India? India is ancient too.


  12. 12 | April 19, 2010 1:52 pm

    I tried to add this video originally to this post but couldn’t get it to fit – Israel, Then & Now. Enjoy.

    I also would find it interesting to hear some “what Israel means to me” if anyone feels so inclined.


  13. imploder
    13 | April 19, 2010 1:53 pm

    I really want to go visit Israel. Happy Birthday!


  14. buzzsawmonkey
    14 | April 19, 2010 1:54 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    I may be a little rusty, but I though India too has always “been”. Wasn’t Pakistan “created” from a part of India? India is ancient too.

    India and Pakistan were both part of the British Empire. Neither were independent countries; both were, at various times, a patchwork of independent or semi-independent principalities and states, and parts of other empires.

    For that matter, if we’re going to talk about nations of long standing, it is useful to remember that neither Italy nor Germany were unified into nations until the latter part of the 19th century.


  15. 16 | April 19, 2010 1:55 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    that’s the spirit!

    Hate those who hateth you, and curse him who curseth you. Or whip out your submachinegun and blow the motherfuckers away. II Opinions 3-6

    :mrgreen:


  16. NoThreat2U
    17 | April 19, 2010 1:56 pm

    1947 British India was divided into the independent states of India and Pakistan. Jawaharlal Nehru became India’s first prime minister. War broke out between India and Pakistan over the territory of Jammu and Kashmir
    © 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.


  17. 18 | April 19, 2010 1:58 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    IIRC, the American Nation is the oldest nation under the same system of governance in the world. Others have deeper history, of course, but the Britain of today isn’t the British Empire we rebeled against. France has been through, what, five Republics since we were established? Much of the rest of the modern world are 20th Century creations.


  18. 19 | April 19, 2010 1:58 pm

    Jerusalem


  19. vagabond trader
    20 | April 19, 2010 1:59 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Its that Old Testament tough love. :-)


  20. NoThreat2U
    21 | April 19, 2010 1:59 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    But Israel is different. I can’t seem to put it into words. Israel was Israel for over 2,009 years. Like Rorschach said above….resurrection. Israel is not a new concept in the Middle East like some try to make it.


  21. vagabond trader
    22 | April 19, 2010 2:01 pm

    Fascinating chronicle of pre independence.

    http://www.jpress.org.il/publications/PPost-en.asp


  22. NoThreat2U
    23 | April 19, 2010 2:01 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Shared it on my facebook :)


  23. 24 | April 19, 2010 2:01 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    I have Jewish relatives whose Jewish family lived in Hebron since they left Spain after the inquisition.

    Jews have always lived in Israel, and she has always been waiting for more to come home.


  24. 25 | April 19, 2010 2:02 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Wonderful, now if someone could help me make that video fit here. :)


  25. NoThreat2U
    26 | April 19, 2010 2:06 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I guess I am saying that Israel has always “been”. This bull about “creating” it 62 years ago is kukkuk. It was there 2,000 years ago when Jesus was there. It is not new. It annoys me when people act like the world got together and, just to piss someone off, decided to give those uppity Jews a chunk of THEIR land to live on. It’s bullshit.


  26. m
    27 | April 19, 2010 2:13 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Yeah, and the idjits that go so far as to provide an alternate place… (“why don’t they put Israel in Greenland or someting”) can’t, don’t or won’t ever get it.


  27. 28 | April 19, 2010 2:14 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Yes, the Arab/Muslim false narrative (accepted by their moronic useful idiots) is that “Palestine” was there eternally and the world was unicorns and fluffy bunnies until WW2 when white usurper imperialist Jews came out of nowhere, and were forced randomly upon the most peaceful people in the World – the “Palestinians” – by the White colonist powers as a gift to the Jews for their guilt over Europe’s Holocaust (which might or might not have happened).

    Of course, this ignores so much reality that one wouldn’t know where to start. However, it was because of this that I included the link above to the 1929 Hebron Massacre (the last time my family ever lived in Hebron)


  28. NoThreat2U
    29 | April 19, 2010 2:14 pm

    @ m:
    I have seen that a few times. lol Stupid asses. lol lol


  29. buzzsawmonkey
    30 | April 19, 2010 2:14 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    IIRC, the American Nation is the oldest nation under the same system of governance in the world. Others have deeper history, of course, but the Britain of today isn’t the British Empire we rebeled against. France has been through, what, five Republics since we were established? Much of the rest of the modern world are 20th Century creations.

    Yes. We still think of America as “a young country,” and in some ways it is—but it is still the oldest country to exist under the same form of government, as you say.


  30. Nevergiveup
    31 | April 19, 2010 2:15 pm

    Why Israel?

    This is why.

    And This!


  31. buzzsawmonkey
    32 | April 19, 2010 2:15 pm

    m wrote:

    Yeah, and the idjits that go so far as to provide an alternate place… (“why don’t they put Israel in Greenland or someting”) can’t, don’t or won’t ever get it.

    I have even heard some Jews—nonobservant, but Jews nonetheless—say things of that sort.


  32. 33 | April 19, 2010 2:18 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    You might enjoy this:


  33. m
    34 | April 19, 2010 2:23 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Surprisingly unsurprising.


  34. NoThreat2U
    35 | April 19, 2010 2:28 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Re your link about Hebron.

    So this asshole wants to kill 70 yeshiva students and if allowed will leave the rest of them alone? My God! “Hello, I am a murderous barbarian, but if you give me permission to kill just 70 students, I will go away”. How else would someone answer that request but with a resounding NO? Good grief.


  35. 36 | April 19, 2010 2:31 pm


  36. snork
    37 | April 19, 2010 2:31 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Hate those who hateth you, and curse him who curseth you. Or whip out your submachinegun and blow the motherfuckers away. II Opinions 3-6

    Ludwig? You Keyboard Kommandoing again?


  37. 38 | April 19, 2010 2:32 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    What is also interesting about that account is how similar it is to the way things are today. All of the multicultural efforts, the peace gestures, and international involvement has been meaningless. Jews peacefully protest their right to their holy sites, and muslims murder in response.


  38. NoThreat2U
    39 | April 19, 2010 2:33 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    If only Mark Twain could see her now :) Beautiful. I want to go there someday. Alas, I am but a pauper so I will have to live that dream through videos you post here.


  39. NoThreat2U
    40 | April 19, 2010 2:34 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    It is SOP for the barbarian hordes. Cause trouble, start murdering innocents, and pillage and loot. SSDD. I noticed that.


  40. 41 | April 19, 2010 2:34 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Visit Israel….you’ll never be the same.


  41. NoThreat2U
    42 | April 19, 2010 2:37 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    It’s open. It’s airy. The water looks so beautiful. If I ever come into big money, I would definitely go there. I want to walk where biblical figures walked. I want to see the ancient tombs and churches. A trip to Israel goes on my bucket list :)


  42. 43 | April 19, 2010 2:38 pm

    Hmmm, seems I might have been a day early on this one for the U.S.


  43. NoThreat2U
    44 | April 19, 2010 2:40 pm

    It is a damned shame that the palis cannot make in Gaza and such what Israel has made. I guess they prefer being the arab battering ram instead. Jealous little people.


  44. daughter of patriots
    45 | April 19, 2010 2:41 pm

    Ezekial 38 + 39

    Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:

    11And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,

    12To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.


  45. m
    46 | April 19, 2010 2:42 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Start an Israel fund (or change jar or whatever!)! I have one! Back at the old place there were a few people who were going to get a tour together. Let’s do that here!


  46. NoThreat2U
    47 | April 19, 2010 2:45 pm

    @ m:
    By the 15 of the month, I am broke. lol I can’t even spare change. lol lol But I may have something coming up. I will have to wait and see.


  47. snork
    48 | April 19, 2010 2:45 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    They missed one of the most spectacular things of all; the Bah’ai shrine in Haifa.

    @ NoThreat2U:

    It’s hard to go there on a shoestring, because lots of things are expensive, including airfare, which will set you back at least $1500. But some careful web surfing will get you reasonable B&Bs (or better yet, Zimmers), and you can live off of bread and cheese and veggies in the stores.

    But you have to rent a car. The cars aren’t expensive, but gas is, but the distances aren’t that great. A car gets you out to all the really out-of-the-way places the tour buses won’t take you. And despite what you may have heard, driving isn’t any more aggressive than in say NYC. They lean on their horns a lot, but that’s just what they do.


  48. Nevergiveup
    49 | April 19, 2010 2:47 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ m:
    By the 15 of the month, I am broke. lol I can’t even spare change. lol lol But I may have something coming up. I will have to wait and see.

    You could volunteer to work on a Kibbutz. You would still have to dig up the air fare, but living there would be taken care of for the most part. And there would be plenty of time to tour also.


  49. The Osprey
    50 | April 19, 2010 2:47 pm

    You’ll just have to run the thread again tomorrow, Wrath! I don’t think anyone will mind.


  50. 51 | April 19, 2010 2:51 pm

    Eh chem…..Jews…come home!



    Only in Israel.

    Nothing short of a miracle


  51. snork
    52 | April 19, 2010 2:52 pm

    Or is is Baha’i?


  52. snork
    53 | April 19, 2010 2:53 pm

    Of course, the better way to get there is to fly into Athens, and then take a slow boat to Haifa.


  53. NoThreat2U
    54 | April 19, 2010 2:53 pm

    @ snork:
    Yeah I would have to know exactly what I needed.

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Really? It would be that easy? I might check into that.


  54. 55 | April 19, 2010 2:56 pm

    @ snork:

    Not sure, but for those who might not know what we are talking about:

    What the video doesn’t tell you however is why the Bahai Shrine is in Israel at all. The “Bab” is buried in Israel because the Bahai were violently chased out of Persia by the Muslims and Israel took them in.


  55. Nevergiveup
    56 | April 19, 2010 2:58 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ snork:
    Yeah I would have to know exactly what I needed.

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Really? It would be that easy? I might check into that.

    Well I didn’t say easy, but sure it can be done. And the Buses in Israel are actually quite good, crowded at times, but go most anywhere. And since Homicide Bombings are down, also quite safe. There are organizations you can contact to find info


  56. Guggi
    57 | April 19, 2010 2:59 pm

    The TNR EXCHANGE: Trust Fall

    What Americans and Israelis are saying about each other–but not to each other.

    Dear Jim,

    You say that Israel has been caught in amber, even as the rest of the world has changed. Not so: Israel has changed beyond recognition. We’re no longer an ideological, pioneering state but a high-tech society that desperately wants to be part of the globalizing world. And Israelis are willing to pay the territorial price for that admission—provided we can be reassured that a Palestinian state wouldn’t turn into an even worse nightmare than the one we’re caught in now.

    In urging Israelis to face reality and accept Palestinian statehood, you’re pushing against an open door. That argument was resolved, at least in theory, 20 years ago, during the first intifada, when a majority of Israelis concluded that the occupation would devastate Israel from within and turn us into a pariah from without.

    A majority of Israelis agree that ending the occupation is an existential need—to spare us from growing isolation, from the moral attrition of occupation, from the untenable choice between Israel as a Jewish state and a democratic state.

    But that’s only half the equation. You ignore the other half: that a Palestinian state could turn into an existential threat to Israel. Most Israelis are convinced that, given the current state of the Palestinian national movement, an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank would lead to missile attacks against the Israeli heartland, including greater Tel Aviv and Ben-Gurion Airport. All it takes is a few “primitive rockets” to be launched every day against Israeli neighborhoods—and for the international community to tie our hands when we try to defend ourselves—for normal life in this country to become impossible.

    In order to make your case against Israel, you have to ignore the fact that Israel tried—three times in the last decade—to create a Palestinian state. Palestinian leaders rejected the equivalent of one hundred percent of the West Bank and Gaza, because that deal would have required them to restrict refugee return to a Palestinian state. The Palestinian pre-condition for an Israeli withdrawal is that Israel commit suicide. As a veteran Peace Now activist said to me recently: The Palestinians won’t let us end the occupation.

    We’ve tried negotiations and got suicide bombings; we tried unilateral withdrawal without negotiations and got rocket attacks. What would you have us do next?

    What’s so depressing about your position, Jim, is that it offers proof that Arab intransigence is winning, that with enough time, the combination of terrorism and denial of Israel’s legitimacy will wear down even friends of Israel like you. And then the Middle East conflict seems to turn into an endless blood feud. Or that stupid journalistic phrase, a cycle of violence. And then what you once knew about the conflict—that at crucial moments Israel has accepted compromise and the Palestinians have rejected it—gets lost in the general weariness.

    Snip


  57. 58 | April 19, 2010 2:59 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I’d dare to say that even when homicide bombings were not “down” the buses in general were still safe.


  58. Nevergiveup
    59 | April 19, 2010 3:02 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I’d dare to say that even when homicide bombings were not “down” the buses in general were still safe.

    Yes in general your right, but I know many people who did start taking alternate transportation in those troubled times. And anyhow “safe” is a relative term.


  59. NoThreat2U
    60 | April 19, 2010 3:03 pm

    bbiab


  60. snork
    61 | April 19, 2010 3:03 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    Not to be confused with the “Babs” Streisand, who should be chased out of Israel.


  61. buzzsawmonkey
    62 | April 19, 2010 3:04 pm

    It bears mentioning, I think, that during the height of the last intifada, before the security fence went up, Israel was suffering, in proportion to its overall population, the equivalent of a 9/11 attack every three months or so.

    Just to put things in perspective.


  62. 63 | April 19, 2010 3:09 pm

    @ Guggi:

    Great letter, but this part is just silly. (although I acknowledge that it is a common refrain from those who haven’t quite thought it out – and not getting into the misuse of the term “occupation”.)

    A majority of Israelis agree that ending the occupation is an existential need—to spare us from growing isolation, from the moral attrition of occupation, from the untenable choice between Israel as a Jewish state and a democratic state.

    No matter how many times it is drilled into someones head, this bold statement is not true. Removing Israeli citizens from Judea, Samaria, and Gaza does nothing to effect the percentage of Israelis and thus would have no baring on the democratic or Jews status of Israel.

    If you have 100 Jews living as Israeli citizens in Pre-67 Israel, Judea, Samaria and Gaza, and you those Jewish citizens living in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza and place all the Jews in Pre-67 Israel only, you still only have 100 Jewish citizens.

    Accordingly the percentage of Jewish citizens doesn’t change, and thus it has no baring on Israel being a “democracy” or its “Jewish character”.


  63. snork
    64 | April 19, 2010 3:10 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    You can look at all the pictures and watch all the videos all you want, but that place has to be visited to really grasp. It’s like the Taj – photography just doesn’t capture it.

    The connection to Haifa is interesting; the grandson of the Bab (Bahá’u'lláh) was exiled to nearby Akko (aka Acre). He has a separate (but smaller) shrine there.

    Basically, all of the important Baha’i shrines are in Israel.


  64. Nevergiveup
    65 | April 19, 2010 3:11 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Guggi:

    Great letter, but this part is just silly. (although I acknowledge that it is a common refrain from those who haven’t quite thought it out – and not getting into the misuse of the term “occupation”.)

    A majority of Israelis agree that ending the occupation is an existential need—to spare us from growing isolation, from the moral attrition of occupation, from the untenable choice between Israel as a Jewish state and a democratic state.
    No matter how many times it is drilled into someones head, this bold statement is not true. Removing Israeli citizens from Judea, Samaria, and Gaza does nothing to effect the percentage of Israelis and thus would have no baring on the democratic or Jews status of Israel.

    If you have 100 Jews living as Israeli citizens in Pre-67 Israel, Judea, Samaria and Gaza, and you those Jewish citizens living in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza and place all the Jews in Pre-67 Israel only, you still only have 100 Jewish citizens.

    Accordingly the percentage of Jewish citizens doesn’t change, and thus it has no baring on Israel being a “democracy” or its “Jewish character”.

    Hum, your math is off


  65. 66 | April 19, 2010 3:12 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    My only point really was – and as someone who has visited Israel you would know this – that although the bombings and the conflict get all the Western news, although significant they are not a huge bulk of the life that goes on in Israel.

    In short, Israel is so much more than the conflict. People live there everyday, every hour, every year, and every moment despite the conflict and are just fine.


  66. m
    67 | April 19, 2010 3:14 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Pennies & dimes add up!


  67. Fritz Katz
    68 | April 19, 2010 3:14 pm

    Here in Tampa, there’s no mention of Israel’s aniversary today. However our local liberal rag, The Tampa Tribune has declared today to be:

    National Crackpot Day − April 19

    Of course, the Tampa Tribune says: “the Tea Partiers are the CRACKPOTS and David Koresh and Timothy McVeigh are the Tea Partiers favorite martyrs”. If you go there, be sure to read my comment.


  68. Nevergiveup
    69 | April 19, 2010 3:15 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    My only point really was – and as someone who has visited Israel you would know this – that although the bombings and the conflict get all the Western news, although significant they are not a huge bulk of the life that goes on in Israel.

    In short, Israel is so much more than the conflict. People live there everyday, every hour, every year, and every moment despite the conflict and are just fine.

    I’m not arguing that point, but during the height of the Homicide Bombings, people’s normal routines were altered. Less people did take Bus transport and less people went clubbing at night and security was stepped up at malls and other places of public gatherings.


  69. taxfreekiller
    70 | April 19, 2010 3:16 pm

    any one notice??
    Has Walter been banned from the swamp?

    Have not seen him post of late, but not sluming much any longer.


  70. BuddyG
    71 | April 19, 2010 3:19 pm

    And today, April 19th on the Gregorian calendar, the first battles of the American Revolution were fought; Lexington & Concord.


  71. snork
    72 | April 19, 2010 3:19 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I don’t think the reference had anything to do with math. It had to do with the international left’s belief that Jewish and democratic are mutually exclusive.

    Odd that they never complain about the gazillion “islamic republics”. And as your video in the post mentions, there are a number of officially Christian countries in the world, mostly in uberenlightened Europe.

    It’s a dumb argument.


  72. m
    73 | April 19, 2010 3:19 pm

    @ Fritz Katz:

    Great comments.

    That crap passes for “news” and not opinion nowdays… weeeeeeird.


  73. snork
    74 | April 19, 2010 3:21 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:
    I vaguely remember him tangling with one of the nomenklatura a few days ago. He may have made it on to Comrade Chuckles’ airbrush list.


  74. Nevergiveup
    75 | April 19, 2010 3:22 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ WrathofG-d:
    I don’t think the reference had anything to do with math. It had to do with the international left’s belief that Jewish and democratic are mutually exclusive.

    Odd that they never complain about the gazillion “islamic republics”. And as your video in the post mentions, there are a number of officially Christian countries in the world, mostly in uberenlightened Europe.

    It’s a dumb argument.

    The argument has to do with ruling over a few million unwilling palestinians and math that results from that.


  75. Nevergiveup
    76 | April 19, 2010 3:25 pm

    Hey Wrath you still here? I need to know when Rosh Hashana starts this year real fast?


  76. Nevergiveup
    77 | April 19, 2010 3:26 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Hey Wrath you still here? I need to know when Rosh Hashana starts this year real fast?

    Ah I just found out


  77. Fritz Katz
    78 | April 19, 2010 3:32 pm

    m wrote:

    Great comments.
    That crap passes for “news” and not opinion nowdays… weeeeeeird.

    Thanks!

    At least they let me comment on their silly story. Hopefully some higher-up editor at the Trib will take notice of how stupid Marty Moore sounds and give the boot.


  78. snork
    79 | April 19, 2010 3:32 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    The ideological argument though, is whether Israel should be “Jewish”, and thus violates the civil rights of anyone who isn’t (as you say, almost all Arabs). It’s an odd argument, seeing as Jews have no civil rights at all in any of the Arab countries.


  79. Nevergiveup
    80 | April 19, 2010 3:35 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    The ideological argument though, is whether Israel should be “Jewish”, and thus violates the civil rights of anyone who isn’t (as you say, almost all Arabs). It’s an odd argument, seeing as Jews have no civil rights at all in any of the Arab countries.

    It’s alittle more complicated than that. If the arabs residents of the West Bank ever get voting rights by virtue of their being in an annexed territory then the concept of both a “Jewish” and a “Democratic” State are at risk.


  80. Nevergiveup
    81 | April 19, 2010 3:36 pm

    And it looks like this Jew will be in Norfolk Virginia for Rosh Ha Shana


  81. snowcrash
    82 | April 19, 2010 3:42 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Oceana O club if you can drink.


  82. snowcrash
    83 | April 19, 2010 3:43 pm

    @ snowcrash:
    Forget it, that is Virginia Beach, not Norfolk.


  83. buzzsawmonkey
    84 | April 19, 2010 3:46 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    And it looks like this Jew will be in Norfolk Virginia for Rosh Ha Shana

    Then you can wear a Norfolk jacket to services, and be quite stylish.


  84. citizen_q
    85 | April 19, 2010 3:50 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    And it looks like this Jew will be in Norfolk Virginia for Rosh Ha Shana

    Ya got me thinking, and that usually spells trouble. Remember that ’50s group Sha Na Na? If they were Cantors for the services, would we be celebrating Rosh Ha Sha Na Na?


  85. Guggi
    86 | April 19, 2010 3:54 pm

    Finally, A Real White Supremacist Rally And Almost No One Notices

    For two years, opponents of Obama’s agenda have been painted by the mainstream media, left-wing blogs and Democratic leadership as racist and extremist white supremacists.

    The charges are malicious and false, as documented here dozens of times.

    So what happens when there is a real white supremacist, neo-nazi rally? Almost no one notices.

    As reported by the LA Times, a neo-nazi rally Saturday in Los Angeles drew a whopping 40 white supremacists and several hundred counter-protesters:

    A rally of about 40 white supremacists Saturday on the lawn of Los Angeles City Hall drew hundreds of counter-protesters, sparked brawls in which two people were severely beaten and ended with crowds of demonstrators hurling rocks and bottles at police and departing supremacists.

    Outside of the local media and a handful of blogs, the event received scarce attention. None of the usual suspects bothered to cover or comment on it. Firedoglake and Huffington Post covered it, but we saw none of the hyperventilated commentary and lecturing that is directed at Tea Parties.

    How curious. Tea Party events which are not white supremacist events are met with derision and abuse, while a real white supremacist rally is met mostly with silence.

    There is a lesson here. The attacks on the Tea Parties have nothing to do with stamping out white supremacy and everything to do with shaping the political dialogue to stamp out legitimate opposition to Obama administration policies.


  86. Nevergiveup
    87 | April 19, 2010 3:56 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ snowcrash:
    Forget it, that is Virginia Beach, not Norfolk.

    Oh I am sure i can find a place to drink in Norfolk


  87. snork
    88 | April 19, 2010 4:00 pm

    @ Guggi:
    Already have a thread in the queue on that.


  88. Fritz Katz
    89 | April 19, 2010 4:00 pm

    Did someone say Sha Na Na?


  89. Guggi
    90 | April 19, 2010 4:03 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Already have a thread in the queue on that.

    Fine ;-)


  90. Lily
    91 | April 19, 2010 4:07 pm

    Happy Birthday Israel!

    Not to go off topic…but if there is a admin around…I have lost my pass word and need it to be e-mailed to me. Before I am unable to post again.
    Thanks …
    Lily


  91. Nevergiveup
    92 | April 19, 2010 4:09 pm

    Lily wrote:

    Happy Birthday Israel!

    Not to go off topic…but if there is a admin around…I have lost my pass word and need it to be e-mailed to me. Before I am unable to post again.
    Thanks …
    Lily

    OK I’ll go for it? So how the hell did you just sign on???


  92. Guggi
    93 | April 19, 2010 4:10 pm

    Poison pens point to anti-Israel hate

    The first e-mail comes from a frequent writer, typos and all.

    “U try to make ‘our’ president a pro muslim, when your ‘Jewish’ nation is the cause of most of our problems. Your PM is nothing more than a terrorist, but u defend him. I told u before, when u were in Israel, stay there.” — Bob De John

    The second writer also has grammar and spelling problems and a bellyful of hate. “You and the rest of that jew political group continually licking honey off your nasty tongues, are much more loyal to the country of israel than you are to The United States of America. That is only one reason why most Americans do not like the jew people.” — Joey Dluzak

    Here is another voice of darkness. “I so enjoy your rant on Islam and the President. It shows your ignorance and exemplify your dumbfounded fears . . . Cant wait for you to die from old age, maybe cancer, or something worse, like Alzheimer.” — Omar Khalil

    The three letters came to me in response to different columns, but the writers share two distinct views. They support President Obama’s hard-line policy toward Israel, and they are anti-Semites.

    They hear Obama’s policy as a license, and even a cue, to spew their hate. I am sharing their rants because letters like theirs are increasing as the president grows more forceful toward Israel.

    The connection is disturbing. With American-Israeli relations at a low point, anti-Semitism could be reaching a boiling point.

    Snip


  93. Lily
    94 | April 19, 2010 4:11 pm

    I lost it after I signed in….
    I stayed signed in most the time. So I don’t have to enter my pass word everytime I log on.
    But there will be a day I have to resign in normally once or twice a week.


  94. Lily
    95 | April 19, 2010 4:13 pm

    My computer got hit with a very bad virus and I wrote my pass word down before my son erased everything on my computer … that piece of paper is gone….


  95. Guggi
    96 | April 19, 2010 4:15 pm

    US troops could withdraw from Afghanistan ahead of 2011 deadline

    Mr Gates made the remarks during a visit to a dust-blown training ground in Kabul province where Afghan soldiers come for weeks of training under U.S. and British instruction. British Brigadier Simon Levy told Gates that if Nato countries contribute more trainers, the project to expand the Afghan army will keep pace.

    Snip


  96. snork
    97 | April 19, 2010 4:15 pm

    Monday Afternoon Open
    OPEN | Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:09:51 pm PDT

    Here’s a midday open thread while I deal with some analog world issues…

    I wonder if Chuck understands what the word “analog” really means in the real (not analog) English language?


  97. Lily
    98 | April 19, 2010 4:15 pm

    I haven’t been posting much lately….my husband had prostrate cancer and is recovering well. But I do like to post sometimes…:)


  98. 99 | April 19, 2010 4:17 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    But that is never going to happen. Its pure myth. There is no reason for it. No one speaks of the non-citizens of Israel in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza becoming citizens, or them getting rights to vote. Its a stupid scare tactic and red herring.

    We might as well discuss a terrorist from China becoming Israeli Prime Minister and how that would effect the Democracy or Jewish character of Israel.


  99. snork
    100 | April 19, 2010 4:17 pm

    @ Lily:
    If you log out, there’s a “lost password” option. You don’t need the admins to intervene.


  100. m
    101 | April 19, 2010 4:18 pm

    @ Lily:

    I will reset the password and you can change it to whatever you want. Check your email.


  101. snork
    102 | April 19, 2010 4:19 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    It’s not going to happen for another more basic reason. The “one state solution” isn’t on the table from either side. No point in worrying about the impossible.


  102. song_and_dance_man
    103 | April 19, 2010 4:19 pm

    Lily wrote:

    I haven’t been posting much lately….my husband had prostrate cancer and is recovering well. But I do like to post sometimes…:)

    Sorry to hear that, and glad he is recovering.

    You will have to log off. After that there will be a link for a lost password. It will send an email to the addy your nic is associated with and allow you to reset your password.


  103. m
    104 | April 19, 2010 4:20 pm

    @ snork:

    Oh, well there ya go! Mine stays logged in so I forgot about that! lol


  104. Nevergiveup
    105 | April 19, 2010 4:21 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    But that is never going to happen. Its pure myth. There is no reason for it. No one speaks of the non-citizens of Israel in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza becoming citizens, or them getting rights to vote. Its a stupid scare tactic and red herring.

    We might as well discuss a terrorist from China becoming Israeli Prime Minister and how that would effect the Democracy or Jewish character of Israel.

    Well I don’t want to fight with you but ultimately something has to be done on the West Bank. It’s not a scare tactic or Red Herring. And the China thing is not analogous since there at not a few million chinese on the West Bank.


  105. Lily
    106 | April 19, 2010 4:24 pm

    @ m:

    I got my new password…. thanks!


  106. Nevergiveup
    107 | April 19, 2010 4:25 pm

    Lily wrote:

    @ m:

    I got my new password…. thanks!

    What is it?
    / just kidding


  107. Lily
    108 | April 19, 2010 4:26 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Thanks Song…he is doing very well. I wasn’t on the computer much until his surgery. They did get all the cancer and it hadn’t spread.
    He is still recovering from the surgery…very long one.
    Thanks again too.


  108. snork
    109 | April 19, 2010 4:26 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Not if the “something” is worse than the status quo. Nobody’s talking about annexation, and nobody’s talking about one state. The wall is an attempt to define a boundary that will, among other things, avoid the demographic problem you’re worried about. But annexation isn’t in the cards, now or in the foreseeable future. They can and will keep on doing what they have been doing for decades.


  109. Lily
    110 | April 19, 2010 4:27 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    It’s…..oh wait :)


  110. 111 | April 19, 2010 4:29 pm

    @ snork:

    Those who push forth the scare tactic that an ethnic cleansing of Jews from Judea, Samaria, and Gaza is necessary for any reason deal mostly in unrealistic red herrings. They argue that the expulsion of all Jews (something which itself should be anthema on its face) from Judea, Samaria, and Gaza are necessary to ensure a Jewish majority in Israel so that Israel can remain both a Democracy, and a Jewish State (ie: ensure a Jewish majority).

    This argument (as I pointed out above) is hogwash as a transfer of all Jews in Judea, and Samaria (formally Gaza as well) are already considered citizens and thus are counted as such, and the non citizen Arab/Muslims who call themselves “Palestinians” are not (and never will be).

    So, moving them from one part of Israel to another does not effect the Jewish majority and thus won’t fix any demographics issues or ensure Democracy or Israel’s Jewish Character.

    That argument is just smoke & mirrors to convince the intellectually immature to help the arab/muslims fullfil the first Phase of the PLO Phased Plan, and avoid the really tough questions – like; if you are really concerned about a Jewish majority in pre-1967 Israel what are you proposing to do about the non-Jews living in Pre-1967 now, non-Jewish birthrates, or to otherwise encourage Jewish birthrates/Jewish immigration??

    These questions are too hard to ponder for the “democracy” and “Jewish character” whining Jews (usually found on the Zionist left).

    So, I have a few questions of my own. Presuming that this mythical expulsion of Jews from outside Pre-1967 really did what the sillies say it would, what do you do when the pre-1967 demographics begin to change and there are predominantly Arab/Muslim non-Jewish neighborhoods where Jewish Israelis are no longer allowed to visit, and those neighborhoods expand? Do you just use the same argument about “too many Arab/Muslims surrounding Jews to protect it”? Then forfeit that neighborhood in the sake of “Jewish character and Democracy? What do you do when the Arab/Muslims out birth those the Jews in Tel Aviv, Yaffo, Haifa, The Kriyot, etc? Forfeit them like one would Hebron, Gaza, and other parts of Judea and Samaria?


  111. vagabond trader
    112 | April 19, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ Lily:

    Best wishes for you and hubby. Mine went through it ten years ago. His Doc told him that statistically, he is cured. :D


  112. m
    113 | April 19, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ Lily:

    Do you mind if I send your comment to Goddessoftheclassroom so we can add your husband to our prayer list?


  113. 114 | April 19, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    See 111. It is a irrational scare tactic as it is not, and never will be on the table. It is just as likely as the Chinese analogy.


  114. Nevergiveup
    115 | April 19, 2010 4:32 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Not if the “something” is worse than the status quo. Nobody’s talking about annexation, and nobody’s talking about one state. The wall is an attempt to define a boundary that will, among other things, avoid the demographic problem you’re worried about. But annexation isn’t in the cards, now or in the foreseeable future. They can and will keep on doing what they have been doing for decades.

    No but in many respects Israel still “controls” the lives of all those palestinians on the West Bank. Most Israelis don’t want to have to do that and whether you like it or not the “International” community is a pain in the ass and with someone like Obama in the White House, America’s attitude is no longer a given. I have no simple solution, but to just dismiss the problems that can and will arise is not wise. At this point Yes, they probably can and will do just what they are doing, but that is no answer long term.


  115. Lily
    116 | April 19, 2010 4:33 pm

    @ m:

    Oh please do! In thanks and for his energy to come back. He still tires easily. Mark is his name.


  116. Nevergiveup
    117 | April 19, 2010 4:33 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    See 111. It is a irrational scare tactic as it is not, and never will be on the table. It is just as likely as the Chinese analogy.

    Sorry I don’t agree


  117. Lily
    118 | April 19, 2010 4:34 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    Thank you!


  118. snork
    119 | April 19, 2010 4:34 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    You have the same dilemma as with Gaza – walk away, and have them attack you, or control them, and have to pay that price.

    If there were an easy answer, they would have done it already. And the Gaza fiasco has just shown them why they can’t just walk away.


  119. 120 | April 19, 2010 4:35 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    That is a completely different discussion. The discussion is about whether annexation or making the Arab/Muslims of Judea & Samaria citizens of Israel which would effect the demographics of Israel.


  120. 121 | April 19, 2010 4:36 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    How can you not agree with facts? Think this through. Tell me how I am wrong.

    Tell me what the difference is when you move the same Jews from Judea & Samaria to Tel Aviv. How does that affect demographics when the “palestinian Arabs” aren’t in the equation?

    Show me where I am wrong.


  121. vagabond trader
    122 | April 19, 2010 4:36 pm

    @ Lily:

    That is a rugged surgery,heavy blood loss is common. Has Mark been checked for anemia?


  122. mtc
    123 | April 19, 2010 4:38 pm

    Happy Birthday, Israel!!!


  123. Nevergiveup
    124 | April 19, 2010 4:39 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    You have the same dilemma as with Gaza – walk away, and have them attack you, or control them, and have to pay that price.

    If there were an easy answer, they would have done it already. And the Gaza fiasco has just shown them why they can’t just walk away.

    No Gaza was different. The security concerns with Gaza are not where as severe as the ones with the West Bank, not was the concentration of Israeli Citizens living in Gaza.


  124. Nevergiveup
    125 | April 19, 2010 4:40 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    How can you not agree with facts? Think this through. Tell me how I am wrong.

    Tell me what the difference is when you move the same Jews from Judea & Samaria to Tel Aviv. How does that affect demographics when the “palestinian Arabs” aren’t in the equation?

    Show me where I am wrong.

    Because you are entirely leaving out millions of palestinians, that is why.


  125. Lily
    126 | April 19, 2010 4:41 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    yeah he is okay there. He is back to work (desk job) but by the end of the week he is bone tired. Boy it was a rugged surgery very long.
    His doctor says he is cancer free now … it is all down hill now. Each week is a bit better for him.
    Thank the Lord.


  126. 127 | April 19, 2010 4:42 pm

    @ snork:

    Gaza was no different, it was just 1st, next is Judea and Samaria. Then you really have to begin to ask the tough questions regarding Tel Aviv, or Acco, etc., when their “security concerns” become as bad as those in Gaza.

    One thing someone who shares NGU’s point of view cannot answer is exactly the question above, they will tell you it is different but cannot show you how. They will tell you that it is necessary, but cannot prove it. These are the same people that would tell you before the 2005 expulsion that leaving Gaza was “necssary”, and would either (a) finally let the Arab/Muslims be seen for what they are to the world or (b) bring calm/peace.

    As we all know, they are wrong!


  127. snork
    128 | April 19, 2010 4:43 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    The security concerns with Gaza are not where as severe as the ones with the West Bank,

    ???


  128. vagabond trader
    129 | April 19, 2010 4:44 pm

    @ Lily:

    He’ll do great! :D


  129. 130 | April 19, 2010 4:45 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Because you are entirely leaving out millions of palestinians, that is why.

    They aren’t Israeli citizens, and they never will be. This is why I leave them out. When I worry about the population of California should I include those who live in Canada, Syria, or Guatemala?

    The “Palestinian arabs” living in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza do not effect the demographics of Israel. You are bringing in unrelated items and emphasizing them as “necessary”.


  130. Lily
    131 | April 19, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    Thanks! :)


  131. snork
    132 | April 19, 2010 4:47 pm

    @ WrathofG-d:
    A better analogy would be Nazareth. Israel was fortunate that that was a primarily Christian city, because if a bunch of islamists holed up there, it would be a security nightmare. There are a lot of Arab strongholds like that, and leaving them autonomous just isn’t practical, and including them is the only realistic option.

    They’re going to have to continue with the fence, finish it, declare borders, and wash their hands. There are no other options. If Jordan wants them back, they can have them. But they won’t, because they’re not crazy.


  132. snork
    133 | April 19, 2010 4:54 pm

    You guys are talking past each other (as usual). Never seems to think that annexation is inevitable. I don’t. Annexation would be demographic suicide, and everybody knows it. And it really doesn’t matter whether Israel remains “Jewish” or not; if it’s democratic, and the Arabs get the upper hand, it will become the islamic rebublic of Palestan, and cease to be democratic or Jewish.

    IOW, if it’s not Jewish (in fact), it won’t long remain democratic (in fact).


  133. 134 | April 19, 2010 4:55 pm

    @ snork:

    I agree, but the major point I wish to get across here today is not about an ultimate resolution to the conflict (I fear it would require a finishing of the population exchange that began many decades ago) but to show the emptiness and ridiculousness to the argument that a judenrein Judea, Samaria, and Gaza is necessary to maintain the Jewish Character or Democracy of Israel.

    The “palestinian arabs” only become a demographic issue for Israel if she decides to annex Judea & Samaria, and not couple it with a population exchange. But, and most importantly, this is NOT something they are not discussing – and insofar that it would destroy Israel, never will.

    Either way however, none of that discussion even comes close to getting into what happens within 1967 borders the Zionist left loves so much. All of their attention is with the Muslims and their narrative of the necessity of ethnically cleansing Jews from any non-Muslim approved land, which completely ignores the true demographic issues for Israel of what to do with a growing disloyal Arab/muslim population even within the 1967 borders.

    If the Zionist Left’s attitude doesn’t change, their loser mentality will again be applied in this dystopian future where cities such as Tel Aviv, Raanana, Haifa, Jaffo, Acco, Cesaria, and the Kriyot are overun by a muslim majority and thus “no longer worth the amount of soldiers being used to protect them” as they argued in Gaza, and now for Judea & Samaria.


  134. dm60462
    136 | April 19, 2010 4:58 pm

    Put the Israel flag up this morning. 5 minutes later my Moselm naighbors shut all thier drapes so they wouldn’t have to see it.


  135. 137 | April 19, 2010 5:07 pm


  136. 138 | April 19, 2010 5:51 pm

    @ snork:

    Brilliant!

    Speaking at a Memorial Day ceremony yesterday, for instance, Defense Minister and Labor-party chairman Ehud Barak declared that only by signing a peace agreement with the Palestinians could Israel preserve its Jewish majority. Ehud Olmert made this claim even more bluntly in 2007, when he was prime minister, declaring that if “the two-state solution collapses … the State of Israel is finished.” Olmert’s successor as head of the Kadima party, opposition leader Tzipi Livni, has made similar remarks.

    In other words, Israel has no control over its own fate; its continued existence depends entirely on the goodwill of a nation that would like nothing better than to see it disappear. Moreover, all the Palestinians have to do to secure this outcome is to continue doing exactly what they have done for the past 17 years: say “no” to every peace offer Israel makes. If that is true, Israel really is finished.

    Thus if Israel is to survive another 62 years, it desperately needs its leaders to relearn the wisdom that guided its founders in 1948, when the demographic situation was much worse: that the purpose of independence is precisely to enable the Jewish people to shape Israel’s fate, rather than being the helpless hostages of a hostile nation. The “demographic threat” cannot destroy Israel. But its leaders’ own folly can.

    This is exactly right. By tying their own policy to those who would have them destroyed – including the loser “2-State Solution”, Israel surrenders her independence and ensures her destruction.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David