First time visitor? Learn more.

► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Physics Corner – The Turbo Encabulator

by Bunk X ( 105 Comments › )
Filed under Education, Humor, Open thread, Science, Technology at May 17th, 2010 - 11:05 pm

It amazes me how some people can take a very complex concept and break it down to its basic premise with brevity and simple language, allowing the layman to fully appreciate the science.  All I can say is I wish I’d thought of it first.

Lets discuss this further with an Overnight Open Thread.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

105 Responses to “Physics Corner – The Turbo Encabulator”
( jump to bottom )

  1. snork
    1 | May 17, 2010 23:07

    I prefer the oldskool Retro encabulator:


  2. coldwarrior
    2 | May 17, 2010 23:09

    brilliant!


  3. Doppelganger
    3 | May 17, 2010 23:09

    if Only LVQ could weigh in with his nonexistent PhD in physics to dazzle us with his wisdom bullshit and lies


  4. snork
    4 | May 17, 2010 23:10

    Even LvQ can understand this. Except maybe the capacitive Diractance.


  5. snork
    5 | May 17, 2010 23:12

    Of course, over there, they’d want to shove the marzelcoptic vanes where the moon don’t shine…


  6. huckfunn
    6 | May 17, 2010 23:12

    Only $750 million? That’s so retro.


  7. coldwarrior
    7 | May 17, 2010 23:12

    so, can it make coffee?


  8. snork
    8 | May 17, 2010 23:14

    Of course, you guys are probably wondering what an automatic transmission has to do with a motor control center. Well, they both have something to do with energy. Controlling energy. That’s the ticket!


  9. coldwarrior
    9 | May 17, 2010 23:15


  10. snork
    10 | May 17, 2010 23:16

    coldwarrior wrote:

    so, can it make coffee?

    What to you think the cardinal grammeters are for? They’re to measure out creamer and sugar.


  11. coldwarrior
    11 | May 17, 2010 23:16

    @ snork:

    i’m still laughing at some of the terms

    :lol:


  12. coldwarrior
    12 | May 17, 2010 23:17

    the Retroencabulator has now reached a very high level of technical development. It has been successfully used for operating nofer trunnions!


  13. coldwarrior
    13 | May 17, 2010 23:18

    snork wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    so, can it make coffee?

    What to you think the cardinal grammeters are for? They’re to measure out creamer and sugar.

    :lol:


  14. snork
    14 | May 17, 2010 23:18

    @ coldwarrior:
    Ooh! Ooh! a front wheel drive turbo-encabulator!!!


  15. coldwarrior
    15 | May 17, 2010 23:19

    The early attempts to construct a sufficiently robust spiral decommutator failed largely because of lack of appreciation of the large quasi-pietic stresses in the gremlin studs; the latter were specially designed to hold the roffit bars to the spamshaft. When, however, it was discovered that wending could be prevented by the simple addition of teeth to socket, almost perfect running was secured.

    :lol:


  16. snork
    16 | May 17, 2010 23:20

    Electrical engineers will appreciate the difficulty of nubbing together a regurgitative purwell and a superaminative wennel-sprocket

    No shit. If we could figure out how to do that, we could have perpetual motion.


  17. snork
    17 | May 17, 2010 23:21

    coldwarrior wrote:

    spamshaft.

    There’s your problem, right there. Not halal.


  18. 18 | May 17, 2010 23:21

    @ coldwarrior:

    Hey check my last comment to you in the previous thread…


  19. snork
    19 | May 17, 2010 23:22

    The operating point is maintained as near as possible to the HF rem peak by constantly fromaging the bituminous spandrels. This is a distinct advance on the standard nivelsheave in that no drammock oil is required after the phase detractors have remissed.

    No more drammock for oil!


  20. coldwarrior
    20 | May 17, 2010 23:25

    @ snork:

    this is hysterical…i bought it for the first 45 seconds.


  21. coldwarrior
    21 | May 17, 2010 23:26

    @ doriangrey:

    bad stuff there…he is finished, or should be, in politics


  22. song_and_dance_man
    22 | May 17, 2010 23:26

    Musical Science!


  23. pinkfreud
    23 | May 17, 2010 23:27

    Goodnight all. Rodan, everyone …thanks for the welcome!


  24. coldwarrior
  25. coldwarrior
    25 | May 17, 2010 23:28

    @ pinkfreud:

    night!


  26. gulfloafer
    26 | May 17, 2010 23:29

    That’s how Pud Johnson and his ilk explain the validity of gorbal warming.


  27. coldwarrior
    27 | May 17, 2010 23:29

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    classic python


  28. 28 | May 17, 2010 23:31

    @ pinkfreud:

    Night!


  29. snork
    29 | May 17, 2010 23:32

    @ gulfloafer:
    Pretty much. Captin! Her gurglespring is overloading! She can’t take this much longer!


  30. huckfunn
    30 | May 17, 2010 23:32

    Roughnecking was never so complex. We’d nipple up the BOPs, string up on 10 lines, unlatch the cow’s cock and run the pipe in the hole. But this…


  31. 31 | May 17, 2010 23:32

    @ gulfloafer:

    Pud Johnson

    :lol:


  32. snork
    32 | May 17, 2010 23:34

    Both these liquids have specific pericosities given by p=2.4 Cn where n is the diathecial evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition and C is the Chomondeley’s annual grillage coefficient. Initially, n was measured with the aid of a metapolar pilfrometer, but up to the present date nothing has been found to equal the transcetental hopper dadoscope.

    Oh, shit. That means the polar bears are going to die.


  33. snork
    33 | May 17, 2010 23:35

    huckfunn wrote:

    Roughnecking was never so complex. We’d nipple up the BOPs, string up on 10 lines, unlatch the cow’s cock and run the pipe in the hole. But this…

    Meanwhile in the refineries, these guys would get stripper bottoms all over them.


  34. 34 | May 17, 2010 23:37

    @ snork:

    The Polar Bears are in danger! Al Gore said so!


  35. coldwarrior
    35 | May 17, 2010 23:40

    lunar wainshafts

    :lol:


  36. snork
    36 | May 17, 2010 23:44

    @ coldwarrior:
    that’s no big deal, but the ambifacient lunar vaneshaft was a real advancement. Nobel peace prize material.


  37. coldwarrior
    37 | May 17, 2010 23:44


  38. snork
    38 | May 17, 2010 23:46

    Like Ludwig says, if you can’t dazzle ‘em with brilliance, baffle ‘em with bullshit.


  39. huckfunn
    39 | May 17, 2010 23:46

    snork wrote:

    Meanwhile in the refineries, these guys would get stripper bottoms all over them.

    I always heard about that but never got any refinery work. Funny story. I roughnecked in the summers while going to college so the regulars who worked there all summer were somewhat suspicious of me. Anyhoo, there was a trailer where we changed clothes. There were lockers, washer/dryer and a shower. Think of this. Gulf coast. July. Humidity of 110+. Hard, dirty work. When we got off, I would shuck down and go straight to the shower. The other hands would wash their faces, wash their arms up to the sleeve cut, put on street clothes (no change of drawers) and head straight to the bar hoping to get lucky. Sadly, they did. Those were the days.


  40. coldwarrior
    40 | May 17, 2010 23:49

    classic dave allen on first contact with god:


  41. gulfloafer
    41 | May 17, 2010 23:51

    @ huckfunn:
    I found an old clip from your past.


  42. coldwarrior
    42 | May 17, 2010 23:54

    night everyone…


  43. 43 | May 17, 2010 23:55

    Is pinkfreud from lgf?


  44. gulfloafer
    44 | May 17, 2010 23:55

    @ typicalwhitey:
    yep


  45. gulfloafer
    45 | May 17, 2010 23:56

    @ coldwarrior:
    g’night CW


  46. snork
    46 | May 17, 2010 23:57

    @ gulfloafer:
    Mullet?


  47. 47 | May 17, 2010 23:57

    @ gulfloafer:
    same name over there as here?


  48. huckfunn
    48 | May 17, 2010 23:59

    @ gulfloafer:
    Believe you me; I know the rough version of those folks.


  49. gulfloafer
    49 | May 18, 2010 00:01

    @ typicalwhitey:
    same indeed


  50. gulfloafer
    50 | May 18, 2010 00:03

    @ snork:


  51. gulfloafer
    51 | May 18, 2010 00:05

    @ gulfloafer:
    The sad thing is that I think I recognize some of those people.


  52. snork
    52 | May 18, 2010 00:10

    Not too many here habla geekobafflegab?


  53. Facetious - bar
    53 | May 18, 2010 00:13

    Fake pilot flies thousands of passengers for 13 years without one mishap.

    Just print license and fly!


  54. phoenixgirl
    54 | May 18, 2010 00:16

    that just hurts my head


  55. father_of_10
    55 | May 18, 2010 00:18

    I’m not going to buy a new Mercedes unless it has a Turbo Encabulator.


  56. 56 | May 18, 2010 00:36

    It reminds me of the days when a stout young surgeon removed my consequences with his conflator. “Dr. Sickenhelper,” was his name. He was three-and-a-half years old. I always felt better after a session with Dr. Sickenhelper.


  57. song_and_dance_man
    57 | May 18, 2010 00:42


  58. song_and_dance_man
    58 | May 18, 2010 00:47


  59. Guggi
    59 | May 18, 2010 00:49

    Trouble Brewing for Wind?

    Amid much good news for wind–an onging global surge in wind energy installations, the go-ahead from the U.S. government for the immensely controversial Cape Wind project–comes a report detailing a sharp rise in wind operating costs and poor performance relative to other countries. Prepared by the independent business intelligence service Wind Energy Update, the Wind Energy Operations & Maintenance Report finds that current O&M costs are two or three times higher than first projected and that there has been a 21 percent decrease in returns on investments in wind farms. O&M costs were found to be especially high in the United States, “now the world’s largest wind power market.”

    Based on surveys, the report estimates average world O&M costs at 27 U.S. cents per kilowatthour, which compares with the 20 c/kWh at which costs roughly equal the value of U.S. wind production credits. The report says that while close to 80 percent of the world’s wind turbines are still under warranty, “this is about to change.” R&D is focusing especially on gearbox reliability: “Many gearboxes, designed for a 20-year life, are failing after six to eight years of operation.”


  60. song_and_dance_man
    60 | May 18, 2010 00:52


  61. song_and_dance_man
    61 | May 18, 2010 00:53

    Let’s try that again


  62. JacksonTn
    62 | May 18, 2010 00:56

    S&D … both great songs from my youth .. the second particularly reminds me of my son’s father … sweet to think of the past …


  63. song_and_dance_man
    63 | May 18, 2010 01:02


  64. song_and_dance_man
    64 | May 18, 2010 01:06

    @ JacksonTn:

    Nice. Just posting old songs I like.


  65. song_and_dance_man
    65 | May 18, 2010 01:07


  66. JacksonTn
    66 | May 18, 2010 01:08

    Sigor Ros … good night ya’ll … better day tomorrow … we will win …


  67. song_and_dance_man
    67 | May 18, 2010 01:15

    @ JacksonTn:

    Embedding disabled.


  68. song_and_dance_man
    68 | May 18, 2010 01:17


  69. 69 | May 18, 2010 01:29

    @ snork:
    @ coldwarrior:
    My how times have changed. Now of course, we have frommle valves and curpitude didactors to grannualize the HD5A hold downs, and you can buy them right off the shelf. Is this a great country or what?


  70. song_and_dance_man
    70 | May 18, 2010 01:34


  71. 71 | May 18, 2010 01:37

    Sorry I’m late to the thread. Had to go see a bishop tonight about an oily mark on daughter Bunkarina’s forehead that smells funny. He said she’s confirmed, but then went into a very long diatribe during which we had to stand up, sit down and sing numerous simple cloying songs with a large group of people that I’ve never met.


  72. song_and_dance_man
    72 | May 18, 2010 01:46


  73. song_and_dance_man
    73 | May 18, 2010 01:47

    last time I posted this it was not cut up as it is now. It ruins the continuity.


  74. song_and_dance_man
    74 | May 18, 2010 01:56


  75. 75 | May 18, 2010 02:10

    Mussorgsky’s “Pictures At An Exhibition” was always one of my favorites.


  76. Da_Beerfreak
    76 | May 18, 2010 02:12

    But what about the very HOT tea? :wink:


  77. Da_Beerfreak
    77 | May 18, 2010 02:14

    @ Bunk X:
    The first version of “Pictures At An Exhibition” I heard was done by ELP. :grin:


  78. 78 | May 18, 2010 02:15

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    But what about the very HOT tea?

    ???


  79. song_and_dance_man
    79 | May 18, 2010 02:20

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    The first version of “Pictures At An Exhibition” I heard was done by ELP.

    They played that very song at their debut at the Isle of Wight festival.

    I saw them perform it at the California Jam.


  80. song_and_dance_man
    80 | May 18, 2010 02:21

    I got caught up listening to music, but it’s late.

    Catch you all on the rebound.


  81. Da_Beerfreak
    81 | May 18, 2010 02:22

    @ Bunk X:
    As improbable as this may sound, think of the number forty-two. There you will find the answer. :grin:


  82. tee
    82 | May 18, 2010 02:27

    Will, I was sitting at home, relaxing, then I got a load of emails from vets. Did anyone see Family Guy either tonight or last night. I don’t watch it much. When nothing is on I might try it. It gets harder to watch each time I try. The dog was eating the shit out of the babies dieper was the last try. Then tonight I learn, Family Guy is mocking dead Vietnam veterans at the Wall. Has our country come to this? Mocking our dead veterans? I will not link that piece of crap I saw on Fox on Family Guy. It is disgusting.


  83. 83 | May 18, 2010 02:30

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    @ Bunk X:
    The first version of “Pictures At An Exhibition” I heard was done by ELP.

    They played that very song at their debut at the Isle of Wight festival.
    I saw them perform it at the California Jam.

    The first version I heard was by Isaio Tomita in 1975, at a curbside drive-through restaurant. We weren’t entirely sober when we heard this on WEBN:


  84. 84 | May 18, 2010 02:34

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    As improbable as this may sound, think of the number forty-two. There you will find the answer.

    Hot tea is the meaning of life? Hmmm.


  85. 85 | May 18, 2010 03:04

    40 Charles Mon, May 17, 2010 11:41:16pm replyquote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #37 palomino

    Read the comments on the original USA Today piece; they’re hilarious. You’ve got commenters claiming that the warm temperature data must be erroneous because it was so cold where they live. Others don’t see a problem because 1.24 degrees isn’t really that much. (which is true if you’re cooking a steak, but not true in a fragile ecosystem)

    Don’t worry. We’ll see some of the same types of comments here before very long.

    What “fragile ecosystem?” This world has survived much worse than anything man is capable of doing, and man cannot control the largest greenhouse gas of all: water vapor. Given the two choices, I’d pick global warming over a new ice age any day.


  86. 86 | May 18, 2010 03:10

    Four solo comments in a row means it’s time for me to check out and hope that the overnight crew shows up. Later.


  87. Da_Beerfreak
    87 | May 18, 2010 03:11

    @ Bunk X:
    Close. IIRC the very HOT tea played a role (I don’t recall how large or small of a role.) in the discovery of the improbability drive. :smile:


  88. Guggi
    88 | May 18, 2010 03:43

    Six weeks old but nontheless very interesting (and very scary):

    Ovebanked, Underfunded, and Overly Optimistic: The New Face of Sovereign Europe, and Ireland in Particular!


  89. Eliana
    89 | May 18, 2010 03:52

    @ Bunk X:

    palomino: Others don’t see a problem because 1.24 degrees isn’t really that much. (which is true if you’re cooking a steak, but not true in a fragile ecosystem)

    In some states in the U.S., the temperatures can swing 30 degrees up and down within 24 hours. I’ve seen temperatures swing 40 degrees within two days (95 during the day and 55 at night a couple of days later).

    If the ecosystem is so fragile that an average increase of 1.24 degrees over 100 years (or whatever) will destroy it, then why doesn’t a 40 degree temperature swing within two or three days send the planet into an unrecoverable tailspin (ecologically speaking)?

    I keep three weather widgets up on my computer desktop screen. The temperatures in three cities (on two continents) swing wildly all the time without the world ending.

    Our planet is pretty doggone sturdy.


  90. 90 | May 18, 2010 04:00

    Nuke the whales wells!


  91. 91 | May 18, 2010 04:02

    @ Eliana:

    Don’t forget the daily swing from millions of lumens to near zero.

    G-d is great!


  92. Bumr50
    92 | May 18, 2010 04:14

    @ Eliana:

    My Dad was just recounting to me how when my brother (20 now) was in second grade, he brought home this assignment about conserving water, along with some pretty stern lefty voodoo from his new teacher.

    He shut her up pretty good apparently by asking her where it went, aside from a bottle or two that may have been left on the moon.


  93. Guggi
    93 | May 18, 2010 04:27

    @ Eliana:

    Sorry, Eliana, but you can’t compare local climate which is adapted to the situation, to global climate.

    What those doomsayers don’t take in account is, that if the world would cool only 1°C (a temperature we had in the 19th century) Canada could no longer grow crop which would lead to famine.

    The world has survived a cooling of the world climate of 0.5°C within months and a cooling is much more dangerous for the people than a warming (erruption of Tambora 1815 “year without summer 1816″).


  94. Guggi
    94 | May 18, 2010 04:33

    @ Bumr50:

    He shut her up pretty good apparently by asking her where it went, aside from a bottle or two that may have been left on the moon.

    Congrats to your father, he is very intelligent man !!!

    Water doesn’t disappear and there is enough water all over the world for everyone. It is a question of cleaning the water and a question of distributing the water to the people.


  95. Bumr50
    95 | May 18, 2010 04:48

    @ Guggi:

    He wasn’t as successful, unfortunately, when he went to my brother’s Catholic high school outraged over out-and-out “social justice” curriculum. It wasn’t even disguised. He was spending gads of time writing and studying “social justice”-worded as such-to fulfill humanities credits, and my Dad went to his principal.

    The principal was outraged at first, went to his superiors (not sure how Catholic school is structured), and came back with his tail between his legs muttering something about “the position of the Church.”

    I went to public school 14 years earlier(94′) and never saw anything nearly as blatant. I can’t imagine what they’re teaching.


  96. Guggi
    96 | May 18, 2010 05:04

    @ Bumr50:

    I’ve a lot to do with one of the oldest Catholic Universities in Europe. Especially the young professors and university lecturers are very left-wing leaning and I watch a kind of “liberation-theology-revival”. “Social justice” and equality are also the main favored buzzwords in political science nowadays. It is all about “social justice” and equality, never about liberty or freedom.

    Interesting article from 1938 (pdf-file):

    Hoover Warned “New Deal” May Lead To Fascism, Asserting War In Europe Was Result Of Similar “Planned Economy”


  97. Bumr50
    97 | May 18, 2010 05:32

    @ Guggi:

    Great article!

    He sounds just like a Tea-Partier.


  98. 98 | May 18, 2010 05:41

    World wide web asshole alert!

    Chris Giles of Port Richey in Pasco county Florida is a POS whiney girly man Democrat.


  99. 99 | May 18, 2010 05:42

    @ Bumr50:

    Not so fast. Hoover was the author of the New Deal, FDR expanded Hoovers OWN programs.


  100. 100 | May 18, 2010 05:44

    Union members abandon blind girl on plane, locked her in to boot.


  101. Bumr50
    101 | May 18, 2010 05:53

    @ BenZacharia:

    Not in the contract…


  102. Bumr50
    102 | May 18, 2010 06:09

    Heh.

    FOX is saying Napolitano hasn’t read the AZ Immigration bill either.

    Notice a pattern?

    They haven’t read it ON PURPOSE, or if they did, they’re not admitting it.

    Why?

    Because they are scared to death to answer the next question, which will force them to express a POSITION rather than mumbling nice-sounding generalities.

    Better to be perceived as stupid or lazy in their world than having any conviction.

    Disgusting.


  103. citizen_q
    103 | May 18, 2010 07:00

    Good morning everyone!


  104. Bumr50
    104 | May 18, 2010 07:07

    Rev. Wright – “When Obama threw me under the bus, he threw me under the bus literally!”

    Uh,…no.


  105. 105 | May 18, 2010 07:40

    Had to be a malamanteau or two in that clip.


back to the top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David