First time visitor? Learn more.

Retail sales decline as Obama Boom continues.

by Rodan ( 71 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Iran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Media, Misery Index, Progressives at June 11th, 2010 - 10:30 am

The greatest economic recovery since the Carter years continues. Retail sales declined in May, supposedly unexpectedly, as the Progressive Propaganda Media’s spin of a booming economy is falling apart. This is the second report in a week, including last week’s job numbers that is exposing the made up Obama boom.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Sales at retailers unexpectedly fell in May for the first time since September following a record slump in purchases of building materials, adding to fears the economic recovery was losing some steam.

The Commerce Department said total retail sales dropped 1.2 percent, the largest decline since September, after rising by an upwardly revised 0.6 percent in April. Sales in April were previously reported to have increased 0.4 percent.

Read the rest: Unexpected decline in retail sales fans recovery fears

Here’s what the media is really worried about and it’s not the stagnant US economy.

Restoring the economy to health is a key priority for President Barack Obama and voter anguish over the slow pace of the recovery could inflict heavy losses on the Democratic Party in November’s Congressional elections.

It’s all about Obama and the Democrats electoral situation the media is concerned with. Clearly Obama’s economic policies are failing. The problem with the US economy was too much debt, outsourcing of good jobs and stagnant wages. Obama has addressed none of these and until they are addressed the US will continue its descent into economic has been status. The Stimulus put us in more debt and this is capital sucked out of the private markets that should be going to investments.

The Obama Boom is over and we hardly knew it!

Update:In other news, Barack Hussein Obama  is pressuring Congress to weaken the Iran sanctions bill that is being worked on. The fact Ahmadinejad once again called for Israel’s extermination doesn’t matter to the Obama regime.

The Obama administration, which labored for months to impose tough new United Nations sanctions against Iran, now is pushing in the opposite direction against Congress as it crafts U.S. sanctions that the White House fears may go too far.

Administration officials have begun negotiations with congressional leaders, who are working on versions of House and Senate bills that would punish companies that sell refined petroleum products to Iran or help the country’s oil industry.

As always the Obama regime rides to the rescue of the Ayatollahs.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

71 Responses to “Retail sales decline as Obama Boom continues.”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | June 11, 2010 10:36 am

    Hey keep saying to yourself that we are in a recovery. Please ignore those unemployment checks that are coming in.


  2. 2 | June 11, 2010 10:37 am

    Nobody I’ve talked to believes the spin of the Obama Boom. They trust their Lyin’ Eyes, instead and agre that the economy is in the shitter, and it doesn’t look promising for the foreseeable future. We’re hosed.


  3. citizen_q
    3 | June 11, 2010 10:38 am

    The Obama administration, which labored for months to impose tough new United Nations sanctions against Iran, now is pushing in the opposite direction against Congress as it crafts U.S. sanctions that the White House fears may go too far.

    I wonder what little miss pants-suite thinks about


  4. Nevergiveup
    4 | June 11, 2010 10:41 am

    I have one more patient and then I am done till Monday. I can’t wait.


  5. citizen_q
    5 | June 11, 2010 10:41 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Nobody I’ve talked to believes the spin of the Obama Boom. They trust their Lyin’ Eyes, instead and agre that the economy is in the shitter, and it doesn’t look promising for the foreseeable future. We’re hosed.

    It will be with a mixture Schadenfreude, horror, and fear that I will watch Nero-Zero unhinge as Rome burns around him.


  6. Nevergiveup
    6 | June 11, 2010 10:42 am

    Arizona Immigration Law May Be Driving Hispanics Out of State

    So the law is driving illegals out of the State? And there is something wrong with that?


  7. Nevergiveup
    7 | June 11, 2010 10:44 am

    A 7-year-old boy was murdered by the Taliban in an apparent act of retribution this week. Afghan officials said that the child was accused of spying for U.S. and NATO forces and hanged from a tree in southern Afghanistan.

    Daoud Ahmadi, the spokesman for the provincial governor of Helmand, said that the killing happened days after the boy’s grandfather, Abdul Woodod Alokozai, spoke out against militants in their home village.

    Ahmadi said: “His grandfather is a tribal elder in the village and the village is under the control of the Taliban. His grandfather said some good things about the government and he formed a small group of people to stand against the Taliban. That’s why the Taliban killed his grandson in revenge.”

    Shamsuddin Khan Faryie, an elder in the boy’s home village of Heratiyan, said that the victim was seized as he played in his garden. He was found hanged from a nearby tree.

    The killing of children to punish their families has echoes of Western mafia-style violence. Under Pashtunwali, the ancient honor code of the Pashtuns, it is likely to provoke more vendettas and blood-letting.

    Ah I call bullshit on that. The Mafia might have been many things, but they did NOT kill 7 year old kids of their enemies.


  8. huckfunn
    8 | June 11, 2010 10:50 am

    Sales at retailers unexpectedly fell in May for the first time since September following a record slump in purchases of building materials, adding to fears the economic recovery was losing some steam.

    There it is again. That convenient word “unexpectedly”.

    Let’s try that a different way. “Reuters was expectedly surprised by the May slump in retail sales. Everyone else but Reuters and the MSM expected this slump as a result of the failed fiscal policies of Obowmao and the dems continue to strip jobs and drive down the value of the dollar.”


  9. 9 | June 11, 2010 10:51 am

    @ Speranza:
    @ Iron Fist:

    Yesterday I was walking around my work complex. There was a group of women and someone pulled up in a PT Cruiser. One of them screams, see Obama be looking out!

    I was laughing!

    In all seriousness, the Obama Boom lie was working from preventing his numbers from Collapsing. Well ever since the jobs report last Fridat ripped the mask off the Obama Boom lie, his numbers in Gallup have collpased to 44& aproval! Rasmussen has him at 46 as well as Fox. He’s moving lower from high 40′s to mid 40′s.


  10. 10 | June 11, 2010 10:51 am

    I am in a spending frenzy while my cash still has some value.

    ….and I ain’t buying designer jeans and botox treatments with it!


  11. 11 | June 11, 2010 10:52 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Exactly, The Mafia never killed Kids.


  12. 12 | June 11, 2010 10:53 am

    @ Rodan:

    I want to see him down in the low 30s. We can’t reasonably expect him to get lower than that. The percent of the population that lives by sucking off of the rest of us is always going to approve of a tax-and-spend liberal, and Obama has spent record sums. That’ll buy him cover in certain circles.


  13. 13 | June 11, 2010 10:54 am

    @ huckfunn:

    They really were hyping the non existent Obama Boom. Now that its being exposed, the Media doesn’t know what to do.


  14. 14 | June 11, 2010 10:56 am

    @ Rodan:

    It’s pathetic that people respond to those reports instead of looking under the rocks for theirselves….of course that is why we are where we are today.

    When the cities burn, Sally the Soccer Mom and Larry the Marketing Guy better stay the hell off of my lawn, ’cause I am not lifting a hand in charity to them.


  15. 15 | June 11, 2010 10:57 am

    There’s one thing the Liberals will never spend money on, and that is Defense. Bawny Fwank had a commission enpaneled, and they produced the answer he wanted to hear. They want to slash a trillion dollars out of the defense budget. I guess they think France will police the world for us. Billions for Jizya, but not one penny for defense! That is the Democrat motto.


  16. 16 | June 11, 2010 10:57 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I don’t think he may even get lower than 40%. That’s might be his floor. Either way, I’m glad his approval ratings are finally crumbling. We need to keep the pressure on him and show no mercy.


  17. huckfunn
    17 | June 11, 2010 10:57 am

    @ Rodan:
    I think that we can expect them to stumble over a plethora of unexpecteds. :mrgreen:


  18. snork
    18 | June 11, 2010 10:59 am

    Speranza wrote:

    Hey keep saying to yourself that we are in a recovery.

    Keep repeating: I believe in the Keynsian multiplier effect. I believe in the Keynsian multiplier effect. I believe in the Keynsian multiplier effect. One slip up is all it takes for the Keynsian multiplier effect to pass you over.


  19. huckfunn
    19 | June 11, 2010 10:59 am

    I need to work on some work.

    Later.


  20. RIX
    20 | June 11, 2010 11:00 am

    Good morning. Obama economic policies failing is really not news.
    He is weak on economics , but admires Socialist models.
    He surrounds himself with Keynsians who believe in a great deal of government involvement & out right Socialists who want a complete government take over.


  21. citizen_q
    21 | June 11, 2010 11:01 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    The killing of children to punish their families has echoes of Western mafia-style violence. Under Pashtunwali, the ancient honor code of the Pashtuns, it is likely to provoke more vendettas and blood-letting.

    Ah I call bullshit on that. The Mafia might have been many things, but they did NOT kill 7 year old kids of their enemies.

    The brutality of the followers of mo-ham-mad is an apple that is impossible to shine. The attempt at moral equivalence is disgusting.


  22. 22 | June 11, 2010 11:08 am

    @ Scott Madsen:

    These are the same people who when the economy was OK in 2005, where saying it sucks because the media told them so.


  23. 23 | June 11, 2010 11:09 am

    @ citizen_q:
    Who wan’t to bet the Sicilians picked up there Omerta from the Mo’s while they were occupying Sicily.


  24. 24 | June 11, 2010 11:12 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    Reuters was expectedly surprised

    Hmmm, kind of like the way the Johnsonless Chuckles was unexpectedly surprised when people he had shit on wouldn’t direct traffic to his site and Reuters was unexpectedly surprised that people were offended by their misleading photographs.


  25. Speranza
    25 | June 11, 2010 11:14 am

    @ Rodan:
    As we have said, if you think the recession is over – go onto http://www.monster.com and try applying for an interview for a job which is similar to the one you have or for one in which you are qualified.See how many responses or interviews you get.


  26. 26 | June 11, 2010 11:15 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    The brutality of the followers of mo-ham-mad is an apple that is impossible to shine. The attempt at moral equivalence is disgusting.

    Here in this rural Southern California town I live in, we call them kinds of apples, Road apples, horse tend to deposit them on the road as they walk…


  27. RIX
    27 | June 11, 2010 11:15 am

    I love Obamas excuse for not talking directly to the CEO of BP.
    He just thinks that the guy will say all of the right things.
    Ah Barry you’re a lawyer, ask questions.
    He is just lazy & figures that he would be over matched.
    I bet that he had plenty of time to talk directly to Stevie Wonder & Paul McCartney etal, to plan concerts


  28. 28 | June 11, 2010 11:15 am

    In case you were under any illusions about the Hussein Obama Administrations intent with Iran, the following should put your mind at <A HREF="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/06/obama_administration_working_a.html"ease:

    Obama administration working against congressional sanctions against Iran
    Rick Moran

    Congress has been crafting sanctions legislation against Iran that would make the Obama administration’s paltry efforts at the UN look pitiful by comparison. Not surprisingly, the administration is working to squelch the legislation.

    Hussein Obama has absolutely no intention of stopping Iran from getting atomic weapons. He just wants it to look like he did something to the pliebians who aren’t really paying attention. Some plausible deniability when the flag goes up and there is a limited nuclear exchange in the Middle East.

    Or when al Qaeda lights one off in downtown New York City. Obama don’t care.


  29. Nevergiveup
    29 | June 11, 2010 11:16 am

    South Africa just scored


  30. 30 | June 11, 2010 11:16 am

    link

    Sorry about that.


  31. 31 | June 11, 2010 11:18 am

    @ RIX:

    Barry Hussein was never really a lawyer. He was a “Community Organizer” which we all know means bagman for the Chicago MAchine. He’s nothing but a street thug made good. Kinda like John Gotti, but without the humility :evil:


  32. 32 | June 11, 2010 11:21 am

    @ Rodan:

    Half the people in my neihborhood are of that ilk (Under fifty Penn State grads) children of post war parents that gave it all. Another twenty percent are solid Zero knob gobblers (Under forty Penn State grads whose family was of a labor lawyer, AFL/CIO exec, or shop foreman), Then there are the small business owners, doctors, civil defense attorneys, and private schooled types that know business finance and are all presently shitting bricks.

    I just act dumb about the whole present situation when I mingle among them at my children’s activities, and take notes on whose doors I will knock on looking for allies if it ever goes sideways.


  33. 33 | June 11, 2010 11:22 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Obama wants a Nuke armed Iran. He views them as his 3rd World Liberation brothers.


  34. Facetious - bar
    34 | June 11, 2010 11:23 am

    This is a great article from Gateway Pundit

    During the Bush years, despite the 2000 Recession, the attacks on 9-11, the stock market scandals, Hurricane Katrina, and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush Administration was able to reduce the budget deficit from 412 billion dollars in 2004 to 162 billion dollars in 2007, a sixty percent drop. In 2004 the federal budget deficit was 412 billion dollars. In 2005 it dropped to 318 billion dollars. In 2006 the deficit dipped to 248 billion dollars. And, in 2007 it fell below 200 billion to 162 billion dollars. During the Bush years the average unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, the economy saw the strongest productivity growth in four decades and there was robust GDP growth.

    Not only were more jobs lost after the 9-11 attacks in 2001 than in the 2008 market crash, but more jobs were created by President Bush’s pro-business policies and tax cuts than by the Obama-Pelosi “spend your way to hell” Keynesian failure.


  35. 35 | June 11, 2010 11:26 am

    [...] Retail sales decline &#1072&#1109 Obama Boom continues. › 2.0: Th&#1077 Blogmocracy [...]


  36. citizen_q
    36 | June 11, 2010 11:26 am

    @ RIX:

    New guessing game; What bigotry did nero-zero display?


  37. 37 | June 11, 2010 11:27 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Kinda like John Gotti, but without the humility, table manners, and potty training

    …fixed it for you


  38. Facetious - bar
    38 | June 11, 2010 11:32 am

    Obama proclaims Friday Kamehameha Day

    The nation’s first Hawaii-born president signed a statement Thursday proclaiming June 11, 2010, Kamehameha Day in honor of “King Kamehameha the Great,” who unified the Hawaiian Islands under one government.

    The statement calls on “all Americans to celebrate the rich heritage of Hawaii with appropriate ceremonies and activities.”

    I say we celebrate Captain Cook instead.


  39. RIX
    39 | June 11, 2010 11:36 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Barry Hussein was never really a lawyer. He was a “Community Organizer” which we all know means bagman for the Chicago MAchine. He’s nothing but a street thug made good. Kinda like John Gotti, but without the humility

    He was never actually a Professor of Constitutional Law, as he claims.
    He was an adjunct professor, which means that he was a lecturer, an assistant really.
    His best description is “outside agitator.”


  40. 40 | June 11, 2010 11:36 am

    @ Facetious – bar:

    Problem, Bush ran the deficit up to 412 Billion. Also under Bush outsourcing devasted good paying jobs. Wages fell under Bush not increase. It was anemic growth also.
    The Bush economy was OK, not great. It pales with the Reagan boom of the 80′s and the 90′s boom.

    Bush was a Progressive failure.


  41. 41 | June 11, 2010 11:38 am

    @ RIX:

    In terms of actual contribution to society, I’d put him at one level below wealfare suck. He’s never done anything, ever. It really takes effort to do that.


  42. RIX
    42 | June 11, 2010 11:38 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ RIX:
    New guessing game; What bigotry did nero-zero display?

    He has made rather clear in his words & writings that he does not
    really like Whites.


  43. 43 | June 11, 2010 11:40 am

    @ Rodan:

    Much of the ’90s boom was not real. It was artifical growth in the stok market fueled by a completely unrealistic valuation of the teck sector. That came to an end just before Bush took office. Add to theat the economic damage of 9-11, and it is a wonder the Bush economy was as robust as it was (4% unemployment is nothing to sneeze at).


  44. daughter of patriots
    44 | June 11, 2010 11:41 am

    COl. Lakin risks court martial because the Congress failed to do their due diligence: the Constitution matters.


  45. 45 | June 11, 2010 11:41 am

    @ RIX:

    He also hates Jews. He hates them seperately but equally to the way he hates whites.


  46. Nevergiveup
    46 | June 11, 2010 11:44 am

    Agh–Biden sitting with Desomond Tutu and he has some red shmatta on him? What the fuck is that


  47. 47 | June 11, 2010 11:48 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    4% unemployment is nothing to sneeze at).

    Yeah but the fact remains wages declined. That 4% rate was mostly low wage service jobs. Keep in mind that at the peak of the early 2000′s recession the Unemployment rate went up to 6.2%. In Clinton’s last year we were at 4% as well. In other words the Bush economy did not create that many jobs. Under Reagan we went from 10.*% Unemployment to about 5.5%. That’s real economic growth.The recession ripped the mask off Bush’s outdated economic policies. Instead of Tax cuts, he needed Tax reform to compete in a Global economy and have incentives to create jobs here.

    Wass Bush’s economic policies better than Obama’s? yes but that’s not saying much. It wasn’t a bad economy, but it was not a boom where Americans were doing better.


  48. Facetious - bar
    48 | June 11, 2010 11:49 am

    @ Rodan:
    My own personal experience was different under Bush then it is now. Then I had a job and more than plenty of work, today not so much.


  49. 49 | June 11, 2010 11:49 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    He also hates Jews.

    That’s why he wants Iran to get nukles and would not shed a tear if Israel was nuked.


  50. RIX
    50 | June 11, 2010 11:50 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    In terms of actual contribution to society, I’d put him at one level below wealfare suck. He’s never done anything, ever. It really takes effort to do that.

    Agreed , but he is bitter & wants to settle scores for real &
    imagined slights.
    He has had things handed to him most of his life, but has no gratitude.
    Look how he trashed Grandma, the most genuine person in his life.


  51. 51 | June 11, 2010 11:52 am

    @ Facetious – bar:

    Oh no question, at least under Bush one had a job. I was just comparing the Bush economic record to reagan and the 90′s. Bush vs. Obama, I’ll take Bush’s OK economy over the stagnant Obama one.


  52. Facetious - bar
    52 | June 11, 2010 11:54 am

    @ Rodan:
    Look at your own link and the link within and you will see under Reagan incomes dropped.

    Then you would also need to see who was in control of congress, most of the time it’s the opposite party. So to lay all the blame at the Presidents feet ignores the other facts.


  53. Nevergiveup
    53 | June 11, 2010 11:55 am

    THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned that senior Obama administration officials have been telling foreign governments that the administration intends to support an effort next week at the United Nations to set up an independent commission, under UN auspices, to investigate Israel’s behavior in the Gaza flotilla incident. The White House has apparently shrugged off concerns from elsewhere in the U.S. government that a) this is an extraordinary singling out of Israel, since all kinds of much worse incidents happen around the world without spurring UN investigations; b) that the investigation will be one-sided, focusing entirely on Israeli behavior and not on Turkey or on Hamas; and c) that this sets a terrible precedent for outside investigations of incidents involving U.S. troops or intelligence operatives as we conduct our own war on terror.

    While UN Ambassador Susan Rice is reported to have played an important role in pushing for U.S. support of a UN investigation, the decision is, one official stressed, of course the president’s. The government of Israel has been consulting with the U.S. government on its own Israeli investigative panel, to be led by a retired supreme court justice, that would include respected international participants, including one from the U.S. But the Obama administration is reportedly saying that such a “kosher panel” is not good enough to satisfy the international community, or the Obama White House.

    Not sure if this is true, but if true, this is a MAJOR turning point in US-Israel relations


  54. snork
    54 | June 11, 2010 11:55 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Problem, Bush ran the deficit up to 412 Billion.

    Chump change compared to these guys. Really.


  55. 55 | June 11, 2010 11:58 am

    @ Facetious – bar:

    My 47 link has this.

    Under Reagan, the median income grew, in contrast to both Bush the younger and Bush the elder. (The median income declined 3.2 per cent during the elder Bush’s single term.) When Reagan was done, the median income stood at $47, 614 (again in constant 2008 dollars), 8.1 per cent higher than when Jimmy Carter left office in 1980.

    Congress is the key more than the Presidency.


  56. snork
    56 | June 11, 2010 11:59 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Add to theat the economic damage of 9-11, and it is a wonder the Bush economy was as robust as it was (4% unemployment is nothing to sneeze at).

    That’s where the seed of disaster were sown. The fed started handing money out like drunk sailors at a whorehouse to keep the economy from sliding into a crisis of confidence after 9/11. OBL really did achieve his strategic goal, whether knowingly or not. 9/11 set up a number of things that are biting us now, and teh won is one of them.


  57. tunnelrat
    57 | June 11, 2010 11:59 am

    Obama is doing a great job! He inherited the worst economy ever and now we are in the greatest recovery ever. He cares about us and we all love him!! Everything wrong with the world is George Bush’s fault but Obama is fixing everything. Hope! Change! Yes we can!

    //MSM


  58. 58 | June 11, 2010 12:01 pm

    @ Rodan:

    When Reagan was done, the median income stood at $47, 614

    Which is about where it was at the end of the Clinton Administration, too. Wages have fluctuated a little (everything does), but in real terms things have been pretty flat since the end of the Reagan Administration. Unless, of course, you are on the Government payroll. That is a different story.


  59. 59 | June 11, 2010 12:01 pm

    @ snork:

    Yeah it’s like comparing stealing potato chips to robbing a bank.


  60. 60 | June 11, 2010 12:02 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    but in real terms things have been pretty flat since the end of the Reagan Administration.

    Agreed 100%! The 1980′s was teh last time we had real economic growth that benefitted everyone.


  61. 61 | June 11, 2010 12:04 pm

    @ snork:

    Oh yeah Greenspan’s low interest rates contributed to the Housing Bubble and people running up debt.


  62. RIX
    62 | June 11, 2010 12:07 pm

    See you later


  63. MikeA
    63 | June 11, 2010 12:13 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    So what exactly are you spending your money on?

    ;)


  64. snork
    64 | June 11, 2010 12:13 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Agreed 100%! The 1980’s was teh last time we had real economic growth that benefitted everyone.

    The “post industrial” myth isn’t helping. If anyone thinks we have have a balanced and prosperous economy selling Chinese-made iPads to each other, they deserve the economic suckage. Unfortunately, the suckage tends to get spread around.


  65. snork
    65 | June 11, 2010 12:14 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ snork:

    Oh yeah Greenspan’s low interest rates contributed to the Housing Bubble and people running up debt.

    And the education bubble…


  66. Facetious - bar
    66 | June 11, 2010 12:15 pm

    @ Rodan:
    No, the housing bubble was cause by the Government forcing banks to make loans to people who could not afford them as a way to “help” minorities. Its simple supply and demand, more demand means less supply and thus higher prices.

    The debt most people run up is credit card debt, not exactly low interest stuff.


  67. 67 | June 11, 2010 12:23 pm

    @ Facetious – bar:

    No, the housing bubble was cause by the Government forcing banks to make loans to people who could not afford them as a way to “help” minorities.

    Why then are there White people in forclosure? It had nothing to do with minorities getting loans, as low income Whites also got loans they shouldn’t have. I’m a minority and I haven’t forclosed. It was a combination of low interest rate fueled specualtion, lower bank standards for all races and irresponsibility on the part of home owners.


  68. Facetious - bar
    68 | June 11, 2010 12:28 pm

    @ Facetious – bar:
    I should add that lots of people also borrowed against their homes (second-third mortgage) with a variable interest rate. Then rates went up, prices went down, people lost their jobs and then their homes. But I don’t think that was the majority of foreclosures, the majority was in my opinion the people who made less than 30K a year and getting a (Government backed) mortgage for 700K.


  69. Facetious - bar
    69 | June 11, 2010 12:31 pm

    @ Facetious – bar:

    I should have said: as a way to help “low income” families, not minorities.


  70. 70 | June 11, 2010 12:35 pm

    @ MikeA:

    Suppositories


  71. 71 | June 11, 2010 2:52 pm

    [...] Economic recovery right on track! Following up on the super-terrific May jobs news that the Obama fanboy blogs failed to mention, and the awesometacular 1,100 point May stock market drop that they also didn't post about, retail sales in May declined 1.2%… Go here [...]


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David