First time visitor? Learn more.

Border enforcement and the rule of law

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 125 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Democratic Party, Mexico, Multiculturalism, Politics, Progressives at June 26th, 2010 - 3:30 pm

If you haven’t heard, there’s a rumor going around that the POS bungler-in-chief and the America-hating swine that work for the incompetent a**hole are considering giving amnesty to illegal aliens without Congress’s approval. I doubt they’d try to do it, but nothing these pathetic scumbags do would surprise me.

Here’s an excellent article by Roger Hedgecock about what will happen if the 20 million illegal criminal aliens do get amnesty and become citizens. It’s worth remembering that a lot of them are not interested in assimilating and becoming Americans, nor obeying our laws.

For those who don’t know him or who he is, Roger Hedgecock is the former mayor of San Diego, and a talk show host on KOGO radio in San Diego. For about 10 years, he used to be Rush’s “substitute teacher” when Rush was on vacation.

From www.humanevents.com, and coming soon to a town near you, if this illegal invasion continues unabated-

Welcome to Maywood, Mexico
by Roger Hedgecock

Boasting a population that is 97% Hispanic, more than half foreign born, and 40% illegal, the Los Angeles County, Calif., incorporated city of Maywood has achieved the Reconquista goal. It is now as lawless and chaotic as any place in Mexico. Maywood is a warning to every city and town in America.

The Maywood City Council announced this week that after years of radical policies, corruption and scandal, the city was broke and all city employees would be laid off and essential city services contracted out to neighboring cities or to L.A. County government.

Maywood was the first California city with an elected Hispanic City Council, one of the first “sanctuary” cities for illegal aliens, the first city to pass a resolution calling for a boycott of Arizona after that state passed a law to enforce federal immigration laws, the first California city to order its police department not to enforce state laws requiring drivers to have licenses to drive, the first American city to call on Congress to grant amnesty to all illegals.

In August 2006, a “Save Our State” anti-illegal immigration rally in Maywood drew hundreds of protesters—but a larger number of defenders of illegal immigration. The pro-illegal protesters carried signs which read “We are Indigenous ! The ONLY owners of this Continent!” and “Racist Pilgrims Go Home” and “All Europeans are Illegal Here.”

According to newspaper reports at the time, objectors to illegal aliens were subject to physical attacks. A 70-year-old man was “slashed,” a woman attacked, and cars vandalized. Pro-illegal demonstrators raised the Mexican flag at the U.S. Post Office.

Click here to read the rest of the article

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

125 Responses to “Border enforcement and the rule of law”
( jump to bottom )

  1. coldwarrior
    1 | June 26, 2010 3:38 pm

    “We are Indigenous ! The ONLY owners of this Continent!” and “Racist Pilgrims Go Home” and “All Europeans are Illegal Here.”

    really, you are indigenous, huh…so that makes you indian, not latin/hispanic.

    well, i have indian in me too, so…ya wanna get off my land?


  2. coldwarrior
    2 | June 26, 2010 3:39 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    “We are Indigenous ! The ONLY owners of this Continent!” and “Racist Pilgrims Go Home” and “All Europeans are Illegal Here.”

    or is it they are protesting to get casino’s and tax free smokes too?


  3. justin case
    3 | June 26, 2010 3:41 pm

    you should have an opt out list on your tax, police, ok, fire service ok. military, ok, welfare no thanks, advertising for charity for the unfortunate, yeah that is ok.


  4. 4 | June 26, 2010 3:44 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    really, you are indigenous, huh…so that makes you indian, not latin/hispanic.
    well, i have indian in me too, so…ya wanna get off my land?

    Hmm, that would depend on how far back we go in determining what defines “indigenous”, no?


  5. coldwarrior
    5 | June 26, 2010 3:46 pm

    as for the ‘rightful owners’ of the land…i have a story about the lombards, etruscans, and the umbrians and their dealing with the romans.


  6. 6 | June 26, 2010 3:47 pm

    Here’s my take on the article.

    Boasting a population that is 97% Hispanic,

    Irrelevant, the problem is that they vote for Progressives.

    and 40% illegal

    This is the issue right there, they are not supposed to be here in the first place!

    The pro-illegal protesters carried signs which read “We are Indigenous !

    If they claim to be Indigenous, then they can’t claim to be Hispanic. Hispanic refers to people from Spain or Latin Americans who are of Spanish origins, mixed with Spanish or follow the Spanish Culture. Indigenous have their own culture. Hence they can’t be Hispanics.

    “All Europeans are Illegal Here.”

    Really, since they speak a European latin language, Spanish they need to brush up on Native dialects. Also since Europeans are illegal, that means 40% of Mexicans who are Europea or mixed must leave.

    Starting with

    Vicente Fox
    Felipe Calderon
    Salma Hayek (Lebanese)
    Plus many other Mexicans.

    Pro-illegal demonstrators raised the Mexican flag at the U.S. Post Office.

    Since they are Indigenous, they should not carry the Mexican Flag. Miguel Hidalgo designed the Mexican Flag. He is of Latin-European Origins. he sure doesn’t look Indigenous.

    La Raza are nothing but slaves of the Tranzi Progressives. As Rightwing Latins like me call them Los Esclavos (The Slaves)

    Also the GOP Candidate from Nevada, Brian Sandoval sure doesn’t look Indigenous!

    Let’s not let these people hijack the term Hispanic and please don’t associate us with these scum.!


  7. coldwarrior
    7 | June 26, 2010 3:47 pm

    MacDuff wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    really, you are indigenous, huh…so that makes you indian, not latin/hispanic.
    well, i have indian in me too, so…ya wanna get off my land?
    Hmm, that would depend on how far back we go in determining what defines “indigenous”, no?

    these laraza types are agitators, they are latin like i’m japanese.


  8. lobo91
    8 | June 26, 2010 3:47 pm

    OT: In case anyone’s interested, it looks like Fox News is going to run an hour-long documentary about Petraeus tonight at 9 eastern.

    Might be worth watching.


  9. 9 | June 26, 2010 3:48 pm

    @ MacDuff:
    @ justin case:
    @ coldwarrior:

    Look at my Number 6. I totally debunk these loons.


  10. 10 | June 26, 2010 3:50 pm

    If Obama does that. I believe he can be impeached and I sure as hell hope so.


  11. lobo91
    11 | June 26, 2010 3:52 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    If Obama does that. I believe he can be impeached and I sure as hell hope so.

    He should be, but it wouldn’t amount to anything.

    The Dems in the Senate wouldn’t convict him. They want 12 million new Dem voters.


  12. 12 | June 26, 2010 3:54 pm

    @ Grimcargo:
    @ lobo91:

    See my #6, I debunk La Raza!


  13. coldwarrior
    13 | June 26, 2010 3:58 pm

    can 0 legally give amnesty to all these aztecs?

    can his order stick as law?


  14. vagabond trader
    14 | June 26, 2010 4:00 pm

    Far as I’m concerned you are either American/USA variety,applying to become one,legally visiting/working or shuddup.


  15. vagabond trader
    15 | June 26, 2010 4:04 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Los Esclavos (The Slaves)

    I like that,good breakdown Rodan. :-)


  16. mjazz
    16 | June 26, 2010 4:05 pm

    the first California city to order its police department not to enforce state laws requiring drivers to have licenses to drive

    Huh? Am I reading this correctly?


  17. justin case
    17 | June 26, 2010 4:07 pm

    bet if i wanted to come and live in america, i would be right up against it. treated like shit.


  18. lobo91
    18 | June 26, 2010 4:08 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    can 0 legally give amnesty to all these aztecs?
    can his order stick as law?

    I don’t really think so.

    They’d try to justify it under the pardon power, but I don’t think it would fly. When someone is granted a pardon, they get a signed document with their name on it and stuff. Pretty hard to do that with millions of random unnamed individuals.


  19. lobo91
    19 | June 26, 2010 4:08 pm

    justin case wrote:

    bet if i wanted to come and live in america, i would be right up against it. treated like shit.

    You’d never get in.


  20. coldwarrior
    20 | June 26, 2010 4:09 pm

    justin case wrote:

    bet if i wanted to come and live in america, i would be right up against it. treated like shit.

    you, being british, would have to wait in line for a very long time.

    you see, we have nothing in common with the british, so you would never assimilate and would be a problem; a burden on society, as it were.

    /s (do i have to)


  21. 21 | June 26, 2010 4:10 pm

    @ mjazz:

    I guess it will somehow be racist to enforce any laws in California in the future. Maybe they should book their next holiday to beautiful Somalia if rule of law isn’t their cup of jihad.


  22. justin case
    22 | June 26, 2010 4:11 pm

    @ lobo91:
    too right mate i wouldent want to ne part of a country that would have someone like me as a citizen.


  23. mjazz
    23 | June 26, 2010 4:11 pm

    @ justin case:
    Is the sun over the yardarm there?


  24. 24 | June 26, 2010 4:13 pm

    @ justin case:

    I know a lot of foreigners who have quit trying due to all of the legal battles. I’m also talking about highly skilled Europeans who already want to assimilate before they arrive. For many of them, assimilation would only be learning a bit about our government, which is already a fair bit more than any American teenager knows. Sad really. A lot of these people would have truly been a boost to our economy.


  25. lobo91
    25 | June 26, 2010 4:14 pm

    We Are Government wrote:

    @ justin case:
    I know a lot of foreigners who have quit trying due to all of the legal battles. I’m also talking about highly skilled Europeans who already want to assimilate before they arrive. For many of them, assimilation would only be learning a bit about our government, which is already a fair bit more than any American teenager knows. Sad really. A lot of these people would have truly been a boost to our economy.

    That’s why they can’t come in.


  26. justin case
    26 | June 26, 2010 4:14 pm

    seriously i have met a few people that have bought property in americe and they have good pensions so they will never be a drain on the state, but they are having a hell of a time getting a green card
    whatever that is.


  27. coldwarrior
    27 | June 26, 2010 4:15 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    but they would have ended up voting for republicans…so they cant come in.

    the left MUST perpetuate the ‘disadvantaged class’ to stay in power.


  28. coldwarrior
    28 | June 26, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ justin case:

    green card is a permit to work and then reside here for long periods of time, like a permanent visa


  29. vagabond trader
    29 | June 26, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Don’t put it past them,but wouldn’t states be able to sue over it like with he11care? Also,who would be eligible for this pardon,people already here or would the door be swung wide open? Gad!


  30. justin case
    30 | June 26, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ mjazz:
    i dont know mi amigo, no say.


  31. mjazz
    31 | June 26, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    They say they oppose the AZ law because it would lead to racial profiling. That’s not a valid reason to oppose a law. You could say that about having a tail light out, or any number of things.


  32. justin case
    32 | June 26, 2010 4:19 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    the pension will be spent in america how can you lose, its insane


  33. mjazz
    33 | June 26, 2010 4:19 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    I think it would be a great thing to let the persecuted Christians in. They are industrious and would probably start a business as soon as they got here. There are some Christian Lebanese that do my auto repairs and they are great guys.


  34. vapig
    34 | June 26, 2010 4:20 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    “We are Indigenous ! The ONLY owners of this Continent!” and “Racist Pilgrims Go Home” and “All Europeans are Illegal Here.”
    really, you are indigenous, huh…so that makes you indian, not latin/hispanic.
    well, i have indian in me too, so…ya wanna get off my land?

    That’s what I keep telling these a$$holes. I’m English, Scot, Seminole and Choctaw -- what part of my DNA do you want to deport?


  35. vagabond trader
    35 | June 26, 2010 4:21 pm

    @ mjazz:

    We supposedly admit those who are seeking asylum. No idea what kind of acrobatics you have to go through.


  36. 36 | June 26, 2010 4:21 pm

    @ lobo91:
    @ coldwarrior:

    I sincerely believe that one of the reasons the left wants to create a separate slave class out of our Latin immigrants is to protect their own world view as well as their position in society. If your view is that America is “inauthentic” and inferior to developing nations, the last thing you want to see is an assimilated immigrant standing for the Star Spangled Banner and waving an American flag. It throws a spanner in the machine if people openly embrace the freedoms the left disdains. Likewise, they don’t like the job competition.


  37. 37 | June 26, 2010 4:22 pm

    We Are Government wrote:

    I know a lot of foreigners who have quit trying due to all of the legal battles. I’m also talking about highly skilled Europeans who already want to assimilate before they arrive. For many of them, assimilation would only be learning a bit about our government, which is already a fair bit more than any American teenager knows. Sad really. A lot of these people would have truly been a boost to our economy.

    Sorry, producers need not apply. We’re already punishing native producers, why would we need more?

    No, we need people who will readily succumb to the welfare state and accept their govenment assistance with appreciation, and express that appreciation in the form of Democrat votes at the polls.


  38. mjazz
    38 | June 26, 2010 4:22 pm

    @ justin case:
    I agree, that sucks big time. It’s as if those in power here are doing everything in their power to hinder those who would help us the most and make it easy for the freeloaders and drug smugglers.


  39. vapig
    39 | June 26, 2010 4:23 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Grimcargo wrote:
    If Obama does that. I believe he can be impeached and I sure as hell hope so.
    He should be, but it wouldn’t amount to anything.
    The Dems in the Senate wouldn’t convict him. They want 12 million new Dem voters.

    The 12 million number is a lie. If all illegals inthis country where to come out the numbers would be more like 50 million.


  40. 40 | June 26, 2010 4:24 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Good post. If these people want to live in Mexico, they should live in Mexico. It infuriates me when they come here and march around with thte Mexican flag. They are invaders, and should be treated as such.


  41. vapig
    41 | June 26, 2010 4:25 pm

    justin case wrote:

    bet if i wanted to come and live in america, i would be right up against it. treated like shit.

    Learn spanish and come through the southern border. No questions asked.


  42. vagabond trader
    42 | June 26, 2010 4:25 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    Yes,those are the ideaological reasons,votes are the bottom line ones. Plus a less informed populace makes corruption so much easier.


  43. 43 | June 26, 2010 4:25 pm

    @ mjazz:

    I agree. When I look at what happens to Christians living in Pah-kee-stan for example, it churns my stomach. I heard recently that 2 million Coptic Christians in Egypt have been forcefully converted in the last 2 generations. If you want to talk about someone who would weep with joy at living in a country governed by our constitution, my guess is that these persecuted Christians would.


  44. midwestgak
    44 | June 26, 2010 4:29 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    If Obama does that. I believe he can be impeached and I sure as hell hope so.

    If I recall, we had an impeachment of a president not so long ago. He continued to hold the office. (Not arguing, mind you). The Senate did not take the next step to remove him from power.


  45. justin case
    45 | June 26, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ mjazz:
    exactly these are people that have gone to america on holiday and fallen in love with the place, so they have sold up and bought property in usa hoping to enjoy the rest of their years there, but because they did everything by the book, they are treated like they could be a problem to the country with their pension and old age lol.
    maybe they should have gone to somalia and then the states, they would have their balls polished.


  46. 46 | June 26, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ MacDuff:

    That’s right. In Europe, the welfare bread lines are full of socialist voters. Just ask the Flemish how that is working out for Brussels.

    On that note, here is a little Saturday night Mo-town.

    “You don’t have to pay your bills anymore now, you just have to eat my welfare bread.”


  47. mjazz
    47 | June 26, 2010 4:31 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    I believe it’s more like what McDuff says right after you.
    They want perpetual Democrat voters.


  48. coldwarrior
    48 | June 26, 2010 4:32 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    the pension will be spent in america how can you lose, its insane

    that’s the point, they would be self sufficient and not need the liberal/tranzies to help them out, therefore they would not vote for the lefties….so entry is barred.


  49. justin case
    49 | June 26, 2010 4:35 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    that house of cards is coming crashing down on the wasters, their time is at an end, its not a good time to ne an anachist in europe or anywhere they can no longer be afforded. hope they starve to death the scum, they are already dead anyway.


  50. coldwarrior
    50 | June 26, 2010 4:35 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    oh my, we cant have more pro-american immigrants, the only thing that could be worse if if these new immigrants were christians that were abused by our muzzie brethren!

    /liberaltranzie american hater mode off.


  51. 51 | June 26, 2010 4:36 pm

    @ mjazz:

    That’s why they want to separate them and to keep them living in unassimilated communities. Successful immigrants with their own business will vote republican. A poor unassimilated immigrant will be more worried about getting free services. It’s the only legal way to buy votes; government handouts.


  52. justin case
    52 | June 26, 2010 4:36 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    i would agree with you but some of these people have been waiting since bush was in power.


  53. vapig
    53 | June 26, 2010 4:37 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ We Are Government:
    I think it would be a great thing to let the persecuted Christians in. They are industrious and would probably start a business as soon as they got here. There are some Christian Lebanese that do my auto repairs and they are great guys.

    There’s a store across the street that is owned by Christian Chinese. They work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day -- including blizzards! No addition to this society at all!


  54. 54 | June 26, 2010 4:39 pm

    @ justin case:

    At current tax and redistribution rates, I’ll starve first. Then my many government dependents after me.

    @ coldwarrior:

    The left is scared to no end to see former Moslems or Christians from Moslem countries speak at pro-Israel/pro-America rallies.


  55. mjazz
    55 | June 26, 2010 4:39 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    They kidnap and rape the Christians girls and then force them to convert to I卐LAM. The mohammedan girls aren’t pretty enough for them?


  56. justin case
    56 | June 26, 2010 4:40 pm

    @ vapig:
    thats because they cant afford locks for the door. lol


  57. lobo91
    57 | June 26, 2010 4:41 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ We Are Government:
    I think it would be a great thing to let the persecuted Christians in. They are industrious and would probably start a business as soon as they got here. There are some Christian Lebanese that do my auto repairs and they are great guys.

    And they certainly aren’t going to let in any more Christians than they have to.

    We have plenty of those already.

    There’s a shortage of muslims, though.


  58. 58 | June 26, 2010 4:41 pm

    @ mjazz:

    It’s about submission. Since women are considered property, it is similar to land conquest. And they call us imperialist!


  59. 59 | June 26, 2010 4:42 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ mjazz:
    exactly these are people that have gone to america on holiday and fallen in love with the place, so they have sold up and bought property in usa hoping to enjoy the rest of their years there, but because they did everything by the book, they are treated like they could be a problem to the country with their pension and old age lol.
    maybe they should have gone to somalia and then the states, they would have their balls polished.

    Bingo. Would the 9/11 hijackers been able to obtain citizenship, had they wanted to? The answer is “probably so”. Therein lies the problem; our immigration policy is not based upon national interest, but upon political correctness and a misguided quest for “diverity”.


  60. 60 | June 26, 2010 4:42 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Sorry, hit button too soon. Apparently, 85% of the Arabs living in Israel and the West Bank have at least one Jewish great grandparent. This was all through forced conversion.


  61. lobo91
    61 | June 26, 2010 4:43 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    i would agree with you but some of these people have been waiting since bush was in power.

    It has nothing to do with who’s president.

    Our current immigration laws were set up in the late ’60s, primarily by Ted Kennedy.


  62. The Osprey
    62 | June 26, 2010 4:44 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ We Are Government:

    oh my, we cant have more pro-american immigrants, the only thing that could be worse if if these new immigrants were christians that were abused by our muzzie brethren!

    Or white Rhodesian farmers or “Seff Effricans”.


  63. 63 | June 26, 2010 4:44 pm

    @ MacDuff:

    I think we need to turn more towards economic reasons. An influx of skilled migrants who truly want to be Americans could be the boost we need to start the road to recovery.


  64. 64 | June 26, 2010 4:44 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    They kidnap and rape the Christians girls and then force them to convert to I卐LAM. The mohammedan girls aren’t pretty enough for them?

    Actually, it proves that rape isn’t about sex as much as it’s about dominance and violence.


  65. vapig
    65 | June 26, 2010 4:44 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ vapig:
    thats because they cant afford locks for the door. lol

    Naw -- they’d be a 24/7 store then.


  66. vagabond trader
    66 | June 26, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Nothing to do with looks. Its all about conquering the enemy,ancient tactic. Steal rape and impregnate the women, new bloodlines for the ummah.


  67. 67 | June 26, 2010 4:45 pm

    We Are Government wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    I think we need to turn more towards economic reasons. An influx of skilled migrants who truly want to be Americans could be the boost we need to start the road to recovery.

    I could not agree more!


  68. lobo91
    68 | June 26, 2010 4:47 pm

    We Are Government wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    I think we need to turn more towards economic reasons. An influx of skilled migrants who truly want to be Americans could be the boost we need to start the road to recovery.

    Makes perfect sense.

    If you assume that the Dems actually want the economy to recover.


  69. justin case
    69 | June 26, 2010 4:49 pm

    @ lobo91:
    never knew that, i suppose i could go and live in a forest as a wild man and eat the green horn hikers like some sad horror movie, and then when i am caught i would be famous and sell my story for millions and i really should stop drinking cheap booze and shut the fuck up.


  70. mjazz
    70 | June 26, 2010 4:50 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    The left is scared to no end to see former Moslems or Christians from Moslem countries speak at pro-Israel/pro-America rallies.

    That’s why they want to deport Mosab Hassan Yousef who wrote “Son of Hamas”.
    He spied for Israel and converted from mohammedism to Christianity.
    That’s two strikes against him right there.


  71. justin case
    71 | June 26, 2010 4:52 pm

    @ mjazz:
    no way on earth will that man be deported, impossible.


  72. 72 | June 26, 2010 4:53 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    If you assume that the Dems actually want the economy to recover.

    Alas, it also assumes that the Democrats have the best interests of our country at heart, a premise of which I am no longer convinced -- there’s just too much empirical evidence against it.


  73. 73 | June 26, 2010 4:57 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ mjazz:
    no way on earth will that man be deported, impossible.

    Agreed. I would sponsor the man, unequivocally, and I’m sure there are tens of thousands that would do the same thing.


  74. lobo91
    74 | June 26, 2010 4:57 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ mjazz:
    no way on earth will that man be deported, impossible.

    I would not take that bet.


  75. justin case
    75 | June 26, 2010 4:58 pm

    oh shit i feel really ill, got to eat rice with diced ham and tuna and then go to bed, i truly am a drunken cunt.


  76. lobo91
    76 | June 26, 2010 5:01 pm

    @ justin case:

    Good night


  77. Philip_Daniel
    77 | June 26, 2010 5:02 pm

    Aztlanistas wrote:

    “We are Indigenous ! The ONLY owners of this Continent!” and “Racist Pilgrims Go Home” and “All Europeans are Illegal Here.”

    No morons, you’re occupying Clovis-people land! Return to northeast Asia, and I’ll be glad to send one of my legs to Israel, the other to the Crimea, one of my arms to Spain, the other to Austria, my torso to Anatolia, and my head to Syria.


  78. chickadee
    78 | June 26, 2010 5:06 pm

    You just know that the zero regime is right now trying to figure out a way to make these 20 million illegals his voters.
    It is too irresistible for him not to try it. . He thinks he would be set for life. Maybe a full fledged dictator. He’s dreaming of power like that. He looks a Chavez and thinks why not me.
    This rumor has been going around for a a few weeks. I believe he will try something.
    My worry is that no one will stop him.


  79. 79 | June 26, 2010 5:13 pm

    @ mjazz:

    This double standard is appalling. I have followed the cases of several refugees from Moslem lands who have been either sent back to certain doom or forced to suffer for years. Meanwhile, if you are wanted in your home country because you committed a terrorist attack in the name of Islam and may be subject to the death penalty there, you are given a free ride in the West. It should be the other way around. Son of Hamas stays. We put the terrorists on a raft and push them out to sea with a pocket full of wishes from us for a speedy trip back home.


  80. Philip_Daniel
    80 | June 26, 2010 5:13 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ mjazz:
    Nothing to do with looks. Its all about conquering the enemy,ancient tactic. Steal rape and impregnate the women, new bloodlines for the ummah.

    Mushrik females are considered the legitimate ghanimaat (booty) of the mujahedin. They are, in Islamic fiqh, called ma malakat aymanukum — “possessions of the right hand”. Muhammad and his sahaba acquired many sex-slave concubines and even zawjat (wives) this way.

    “Be patient, wait and you will see Allah will inherit the Persian’s lands and money, furthermore their women will lie down ready for you to rape them.”--al-Sira al-Nabawiya al-Halabiya Part 2 pp. 4-5

    “Attack Tabuk and you will win blonde Roman girls and women.”—Tafsir at-Tabari “Surah at-Taubah [Q 9]”

    Sexual slavery, of course, persists into Jannat

    “Ali reported that the Apostle of Allah said, “There is in Paradise a market wherein there will be no buying or selling, but will consist of men and women. When a man desires a beauty, he will have intercourse with them.”"--al-Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 172, No. 34

    Of course, killing kaffir women instead of enslaving them and raping them is acceptable as long as it can be construed as “unavoidable” (which is intentionally a very vague, flexible admonition):

    “It is reported on the authority of Sa’b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah, when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.”--Sahih Muslim Book 19 Number 4321


  81. 81 | June 26, 2010 5:13 pm

    We Are Government wrote:

    In Europe, the welfare bread lines are full of socialist voters. Just ask the Flemish how that is working out for Brussels.

    FNC just had a story about a “minor” riot with “a little bit of looting” at the G20 summit.


  82. 82 | June 26, 2010 5:14 pm

    @ MacDuff:
    @ lobo91:

    I think they want a statist recovery. All of these private sector jobs are replaced by bureaucratic jobs that will breed state dependency.


  83. 83 | June 26, 2010 5:16 pm

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    As I say about the Youths that riot near my house, everybody has to have a hobby.

    This is the destruction of a bank around the corner from my house in May this year.


  84. 84 | June 26, 2010 5:16 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    You just know that the zero regime is right now trying to figure out a way to make these 20 million illegals his voters.
    It is too irresistible for him not to try it. . He thinks he would be set for life. Maybe a full fledged dictator. He’s dreaming of power like that. He looks a Chavez and thinks why not me.
    This rumor has been going around for a a few weeks. I believe he will try something.
    My worry is that no one will stop him.

    And once the illegals become voters they will be given multiple votes to better balance out the proportionality of their minority status.

    One NY judge already has done that with a largely Hispanic community that so far hasn’t elected a single Hispanic to public office. Some people were allowed to vote up to six times.


  85. 85 | June 26, 2010 5:18 pm

    MacDuff wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:

    If you assume that the Dems actually want the economy to recover.

    Alas, it also assumes that the Democrats have the best interests of our country at heart, a premise of which I am no longer convinced – there’s just too much empirical evidence against it.

    Many politicians, doesn’t matter about the party, only give a damn about getting re-elected so they can remain snout down at the public trough.


  86. vagabond trader
    86 | June 26, 2010 5:22 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    What a disgusting lot. Too bad most people here are blissfully ignorant.I have a sinking feeling the Saudis have something to do with the illegals too.Like funding them.


  87. 87 | June 26, 2010 5:27 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ We Are Government:
    I think it would be a great thing to let the persecuted Christians in. They are industrious and would probably start a business as soon as they got here. There are some Christian Lebanese that do my auto repairs and they are great guys.

    But we have a Muslim President who doesn’t want any practicing Christians here. Only Muslims, socialists of any stripe, and criminals are acceptable to him.


  88. spinmore
    88 | June 26, 2010 5:30 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    how is this tolerated? . . . is there no one to shoot these bastards?


  89. 89 | June 26, 2010 5:34 pm

    @ spinmore:

    The worst problem is that a lot of people sympathize with their motives, even if they don’t necessarily “condone” the violence. (That said, it doesn’t seem to bother the “peaceful” leftists when their attack dogs destroy the city.) The response has historically been one of deescalation on the part of the police, even if they were not the ones who escalated the problem to begin with. Now, several parts of the city are occupied. (That’s not my wording, that is theirs.) These are the new brown shirts; the act as the attack dogs of the left, and then leftist politicians spend the entire time talking about the vicious capitalist system that drove these poor “youths” to despair. I’ve said it before here, but I’ll still say it again. The left is ideologically bankrupt.


  90. 90 | June 26, 2010 5:36 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    Video during the report showed about 6 or 7 car-be-ques in progress. Yeah, a minor riot with a little bit of looting, my big white hairy ass.


  91. 91 | June 26, 2010 5:36 pm

    We Are Government wrote:

    @ mjazz:
    This double standard is appalling. I have followed the cases of several refugees from Moslem lands who have been either sent back to certain doom or forced to suffer for years. Meanwhile, if you are wanted in your home country because you committed a terrorist attack in the name of Islam and may be subject to the death penalty there, you are given a free ride in the West. It should be the other way around. Son of Hamas stays. We put the terrorists on a raft and push them out to sea with a pocket full of wishes from us for a speedy trip back home.

    That’s one of the things I covered in this blog post, which is too harshly worded to post on any site but my own. I pointed out that we have a Quisling government who is selling us out to our enemies, and that we owe no more loyalty to the federal government under the Obama regime than a decent and loyal Norwegian would have owed to Vidkun Quisling during the Nazi puppet regime.


  92. 92 | June 26, 2010 5:38 pm

    FurryOldGuyJeans wrote:

    @ We Are Government:
    Video during the report showed about 6 or 7 car-be-ques in progress. Yeah, a minor riot with a little bit of looting, my big white hairy ass.

    Obozo does everything he can to encourage left-wing radicals all over the world, so he has himself to blame if this happens on his watch.


  93. 93 | June 26, 2010 5:41 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    justin case wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    i would agree with you but some of these people have been waiting since bush was in power.
    It has nothing to do with who’s president.
    Our current immigration laws were set up in the late ’60s, primarily by Ted Kennedy.

    That’s true, too, but somebody should have repealed them a loooong time ago.


  94. mjazz
    94 | June 26, 2010 5:43 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    Really.


  95. 95 | June 26, 2010 5:45 pm

    My Cousin is an Engineer in the Dominican Republic. He’s fluent in Englosh, yet when he signed up for a Visa the wait was 13 years. Yet the Aztecs want to be legalized.

    See a problem


  96. spinmore
    96 | June 26, 2010 5:48 pm

    @ We Are Government:
    When the “protectors” fail to protect they have outlived thier usefulness.


  97. 97 | June 26, 2010 5:50 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    That needs to stop!


  98. 98 | June 26, 2010 5:50 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    He’s a 3rd World Liberation Ideologue.


  99. 99 | June 26, 2010 5:51 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:
    What a disgusting lot. Too bad most people here are blissfully ignorant.I have a sinking feeling the Saudis have something to do with the illegals too.Like funding them.

    AFAIK, just about anybody who brings enough money into the US is accepted pretty much automatically. They can get in because the US accepts people from Third World countries who are wealthy enough to supposedly create jobs for people here. Never mind how they got their money, or what they actually do with it when they get here. You probably already know that the Saudi government funds mosques all over the world, including the US.


  100. 100 | June 26, 2010 5:52 pm

    @ Rodan:
    The kind of “liberation” enjoyed in Somalia, North Korea, Zimbabwe, all of the real hellholes.


  101. Mike C.
    101 | June 26, 2010 5:53 pm

    I have a question -- what organization is going to contract to provide services to another organization that is already broke and can’t pay it’s bills ?


  102. spinmore
    102 | June 26, 2010 5:54 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    My Cousin is an Engineer in the Dominican Republic. He’s fluent in Englosh, yet when he signed up for a Visa the wait was 13 years. Yet the Aztecs want to be legalized.
    See a problem

    THIS must be ‘OUR’ movement -- We must demand that immigrants like your cousin be given priority and illegals must be sent packing. WTF is this ‘path to citizenship’ for illegals. get out of my face u silly Frs


  103. 103 | June 26, 2010 5:56 pm

    @ spinmore:

    Agree, we have to emphasized skilled Immigrants. Also we need to restrict Immigration from Islamic countries unless they are Persians, Kurds, Apostates or Christian Arabs.


  104. lobo91
    104 | June 26, 2010 5:59 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    I have a question – what organization is going to contract to provide services to another organization that is already broke and can’t pay it’s bills ?

    One that’s looking for a tax write-off.

    Or a money laundering operation.


  105. lobo91
    105 | June 26, 2010 6:00 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    justin case wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    i would agree with you but some of these people have been waiting since bush was in power.
    It has nothing to do with who’s president.
    Our current immigration laws were set up in the late ’60s, primarily by Ted Kennedy.
    That’s true, too, but somebody should have repealed them a loooong time ago.

    Can’t. That would be racist.

    Duh.


  106. spinmore
    106 | June 26, 2010 6:00 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ spinmore:
    Agree, we have to emphasized skilled Immigrants. Also we need to restrict Immigration from Islamic countries unless they are Persians, Kurds, Apostates or Christian Arabs.

    . . . there was a day when we (our State Dept.) did select for the good of the nation -- that was before good was re-difined by the Leftists


  107. coldwarrior
    107 | June 26, 2010 6:01 pm

    o/t driveby:

    TEHRAN, Iran – Iran will not be sending a blockade-busting ship to Gaza in defiance of Israeli warnings, an Iranian lawmaker said Saturday, citing Israeli “restrictions.”


  108. 108 | June 26, 2010 6:01 pm

    @ FurryOldGuyJeans:

    What is it with the car-b-ques? These bastards started in Hamburg a few years ago with so called “luxury” cars. Now they are just randomly burning cars in residential neighborhoods where they could easily start a fire what could kill and wipe hundreds out of a home. They hit my former street last week.

    @ Rodan:

    Hi Rodan. Zeropeans don’t seem to have the guts. Plus, most people agree with their motives, even if they wouldn’t set the fire themselves. Parts of Germany (Kreuzberg, Schanzenviertel) are biweekly war zones, and the only talk I here is of police restraint. These leftists here are nihilistic filth. Of course, what do you expect in a country where the Stasi has come back to form a political party?


  109. 109 | June 26, 2010 6:02 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    *ouch.* That must have left a mark.


  110. Mike C.
    110 | June 26, 2010 6:02 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Municipalities don’t get tax write-offs, and no municipality in CA has any money to launder.


  111. vagabond trader
    111 | June 26, 2010 6:03 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Awwww poor fckn loudmouthed bullies are actually cowards when confronted with Jews ready and able to defend their homeland.


  112. 112 | June 26, 2010 6:04 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    What? The glorious People’s Republic of North Korea? Can’t you just smell the beauty of communism?


  113. vagabond trader
    113 | June 26, 2010 6:05 pm

    @ Mike C.:

    Was wondering that myself. Probably tucked into one of those porkulus packages.


  114. huckfunn
    114 | June 26, 2010 6:06 pm

    If you haven’t heard, there’s a rumor going around that the POS bungler-in-chief and the America-hating swine that work for the incompetent a**hole are considering giving amnesty to illegal aliens without Congress’s approval.

    The lawlessness of Obama and his regime continues to astound me on a daily basis. When Obama took the oath of office, he swore to “the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” It seems to me that since day one he has been at war with not only the American people but more particularly with the Constitution. His only possible defense of his actions would be that pesky phrase, “to the best of my ability”.


  115. 115 | June 26, 2010 6:06 pm


  116. vagabond trader
    116 | June 26, 2010 6:08 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    He had his fingers crossed behind his back during that second oath of office he took. / :-)


  117. 117 | June 26, 2010 6:12 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Yeah, Rodan. I see a big f****** problem with that. I had a housemate who was a Columbian doctor. (His father was Franco’s ambassador to Columbia.) It took him well over a decade and $40,000 to finalize everything to stay in the US.


  118. lobo91
    118 | June 26, 2010 6:13 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    His only possible defense of his actions would be that pesky phrase, “to the best of my ability”.

    Well, it is kind of a vague oath. The founders never anticipated that it would need to be any more specific that that, of course.

    Maybe he’s taking a phrase out of the Vietnam playbook and “destroying the Constitution in order to save it.”


  119. 119 | June 26, 2010 6:14 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    It’s sick what is going on over there.


  120. 120 | June 26, 2010 6:14 pm

    @ We Are Government:

    Oh yeah, they want the peasants, but not the educated class.


  121. vagabond trader
  122. texasam7
    122 | June 26, 2010 7:18 pm

    @ MacDuff:
    Quite right. The purpose of an immigration department is to serve the State, not the other way round.


  123. 123 | June 26, 2010 7:20 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    1389AD wrote:
    lobo91 wrote:
    justin case wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    i would agree with you but some of these people have been waiting since bush was in power.
    It has nothing to do with who’s president.
    Our current immigration laws were set up in the late ’60s, primarily by Ted Kennedy.
    That’s true, too, but somebody should have repealed them a loooong time ago.
    Can’t. That would be racist.
    Duh.

    But it would be Constitutional. Nothing in the Constitution requires that we admit anybody at all, much less that we apply any sort of evenhandedness in our standards regarding whom to admit.


  124. Macker
    124 | June 26, 2010 8:21 pm

    justin case wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    too right mate i wouldent want to ne part of a country that would have someone like me as a citizen.

    What about Canada, eh.


  125. Macker
    125 | June 26, 2010 8:28 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Chickenshits!!!!


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David