First time visitor? Learn more.

The ICJ Ruling and the Quisling Regime in Serbia

by 1389AD ( 127 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Invasion, Kosovo, Serbia, Tranzis, United Nations at July 24th, 2010 - 1:30 pm

Kosovo is Serbia graphic, in English

In ICJ Ruling: Blow to Serbia, Boon to Tadic, noted author and scholar Srdja Trifkovic explains that the current government in Serbia is, in effect, nothing but a puppet regime that is selling out the Serbian people, and Judaeo-Christian civilization in the Balkans, to jihadi forces in the Balkans.

The back story is that, ever since Reagan left office, the US, NATO, and the EU have worked to assist the jihadis to form a Muslim stronghold in the Balkans. Obviously, this is counter to the interests of the US and of the nations that form the EU. (See Bosnia and Kosovo export Muslim terrorism everywhere.) But our politicians and State Department bureaucrats do the bidding of Middle Eastern oil interests, George Soros, and other nefarious individuals and groups such as Muslim narcoterrorist drug gangs, who covertly bankroll prominent members of the elite in politics, academia, think tanks, the media, and other areas of influence.

As I have pointed out before, the UN is thoroughly corrupt. Just about all NGOs do the bidding of this transnational elite. That obviously includes supposedly “neutral” entities such as the ICJ. The bureaucrats who enjoy cushy jobs at NGOs know what side their bread is buttered on, and they also know what the consequences of defying their masters inevitably must be.

Because the current government in Belgrade is nothing but a powerless American puppet that does nothing to protect the interests of the Serbian people, it is no surprise that the Tadic government will use the decision of the ICJ as a way to try to sell the Serbian people on the idea that they had better give up Kosovo, and continue to throw the remaining Serbs stranded there, under the bus – or else.

As Dr. Trifkovic points out, the time frame is much longer than anybody in Washington or The Hague is capable of comprehending. Kosovo has been Serbian as long as the Serbs have existed, the truth will eventually come out, and God is not mocked.

ICJ Ruling: Blow to Serbia, Boon to Tadic
By Srdja Trifkovic
Thursday, July 22, 2010 – 13:20

Ever since the U.S. intervened in Serbia’s domestic politics two years ago and helped the current coalition take power in Belgrade, Boris Tadic and his cohorts have been looking for a way to capitulate on Kosovo while pretending not to. The formula was simple: place all diplomatic eggs in one basket – that of the International Court of Justice – and refrain from using any other political or economic (let alone military) tools at Serbia’s disposal. On July 22 the ICJ performed on cue, declaring that Kosovo’s UDI was not illegal.

It should be noted that the ICJ has only assessed Kosovo’s declaration of independence; it has not considered more widely Kosovo’s right to unilateral secession from Serbia. Furthermore, the ICJ has not assessed either the consequences of the adoption of the UDI, namely whether Kosovo is a state, or the legitimacy of its recognition by a number of countries. The ICJ decision was unsurprising in view of the self-defeating question which the UN General Assembly posed at Serbia’s request: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?” As a former British diplomat who knows the Balkans well has noted, international law takes no notice of declarations of independence, unilateral or otherwise; they are irrelevant:

[I]f the town council down the road here in the UK makes a solemn unilateral declaration of the town’s independence from the UK, the rest of us will make a wry smile and go back to blogging or working. The declaration is ‘in accordance’ with UK law – free speech and all that. [ ... ] If citizens of our town en masse support the declaration of independence, put up road-blocks, stop paying taxes to Westminster and proclaim Vladimir Putin their new king with his consent, things begin to get more interesting. Norms are being created and broken in all directions.

The ICJ has done more than its share of norm-creation. Its advisory opinion is deeply flawed and non-binding, but the government in Belgrade now has a perfect alibi for doing what it had intended to do all along.

Following the appointment of Vuk Jeremic as Serbia’s foreign minister in 2007, this outcome could be predicted with near-certainty. As President Boris Tadic’s chief foreign policy advisor, Jeremic came to Washington on 18 May 2005 to testify in Congress on why Kosovo should stay within Serbia. In his subsequent off-the-record conversations, however, he assured his hosts that the task was really to sugar-coat the bitter Kosovo pill that Serbia would have to swallow anyway.

Two years later another advisor to Tadic, Dr. Leon Kojen, resigned in a blaze of publicity after Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer declared, on April 13, 2007, “We are working with Boris Tadic and his people to find a way to implement the essence of the Ahtisaari plan.” Tout Belgrade knew that “Tadic’s people” meant—Vuk Jeremic. Gusenbauer’s indiscretion amounted to the revelation that Serbia’s head of state and his closest advisor were engaged in secret negotiations aimed at facilitating the detachment of Kosovo from Serbia—which, of course, was “the essence of the Ahtisaari plan.” Jeremic’s quest for sugar-coating of the bitter pill was evidently in full swing even before he came to the helm of Serbia’s diplomacy.

In the intervening three years Tadic and Jeremic have continued to pursue a dual-track policy on Kosovo. The decisive fruit of that policy was their disastrous decision to accept the European Union’s Eulex Mission in Kosovo in December 2008. Acting under an entirely self-created mandate, the EU thus managed to insert its mission, based explicitly on the provisions of the Ahtissari Plan, into Kosovo with Belgrade’s agreement.

That was the moment of Belgrade’s true capitulation. Everything else — the ICJ ruling included — is just a choreographed farce…

The ICJ opinion crowns two decades of U.S. policy in the former Yugoslavia that has been mendacious and iniquitous in equal measure. By retroactively condoning the Albanian UDI, the Court has made a massive leap into the unknown. That leap is potentially on par with Austria’s July 1914 ultimatum to Serbia. The fruits will be equally bitter.

Aiding and abetting Muslim designs in the Balkans, in the hope that this will earn some credit for the United States in the Islamic world, has been a major motive of American policy in the region since at least 1992. It has never yielded any dividends, of course, but repeated failure only prompts the architects of the policy to redouble their efforts.

It is virtually certain that Washington will be equally supportive of an independent Sanjak that would connect Kosovo with Bosnia, or of any other putative Islamistan, from western Macedonia to southern Bulgaria (“Eastern Rumelia”) to the Caucasus. The late Tom Lantos must be smiling approvingly wherever he is now, having called, three years ago, on “Jihadists of all color and hue” to take note of “yet another example that the United States leads the way for the creation of a predominantly Muslim country in the very heart of Europe.”

In the region, the ICJ verdict will encourage two distinct but interconnected trends: greater-Albanian aspirations against Macedonia, Montenegro, Greece, and rump-Serbia (Preševo), and pan-Islamic agitation for the completion of the Green Corridor – an Islamic belt anchored in Asia Minor and extending north-westward across the Balkans into the heart of Central Europe.

Beyond the Balkans, it will breed instability in each and every potential or actual separatist hotspot, from Galilee to Kashmir, from the Caucasus to Sinkiang.

Kosovo is now an expensive albatross costing American and European taxpayers a few billion a year. It will continue developing, not as a functional economy but as a black hole of criminality and terrorism. The ever-rising and constantly unfulfilled expectations of its unemployable multitudes will eventually turn – Frankenstein’s monster-like – against the entity’s creator. There will be many Ft. Dixes to come, over there and here at home.

God acts in mysterious ways. Kosovo had remained Serbian during those five long centuries of Ottoman darkness, to be liberated in 1912. It is no less Serbian now, the ugly farce in Priština and at The Hague notwithstanding. It will be tangibly Serbian again when the current experiment in global hegemonism collapses, and when the very names of its potentates and servants – Boris Tadic and Vuk Jeremic included – are consigned to the Recycle Bin of history.

Here’s the same article in Serbian.

Be sure to visit The Lord Byron Foundation for Balkan Studies to read many other articles about the Balkans counterjihad and how US and EU foreign policy has consistently favored our jihadi enemies.

Kosovo is Serbia graphic, in Serbian

(hattip to NoThreat2U)

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

127 Responses to “The ICJ Ruling and the Quisling Regime in Serbia”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | July 24, 2010 1:34 pm

    Israel is next. This same court will declare a Palestinian state next. The US is wrong for backing the Jihadis in Kosovo. Clinton did Christians wrong here and Bush recognizing Kosovo was doing at the behest of his Saudi masters.

    When America is free we should re-arm Serbia and let them take back what’s theirs.

    Long live Serbia!


  2. Macker
    2 | July 24, 2010 1:40 pm

    There are two co-workers: one is Bosnian/Roman Catholic (I believe) and the other is a teammate of hers who is Mohammedan. I wonder what they would think of this. Of course, I can’t ask them at work, and I don’t have their e-mail addresses.

    Just wondering.


  3. coldwarrior
    3 | July 24, 2010 1:41 pm

    the bureaucrats/elites side with the muslims again. kosovo has been serbian since the 14th century when the serbs halted the turkish muzzie advance into europe.

    i’m shocked, NOT!

    fine, give the muzz bastards kosovo, the minute one iota of a problem is detected the serbs can then declare war, invade, and start destroying the narco-terror state that is kosovo/albania. the serbs can bring back Arkan’s Tigers.


  4. 4 | July 24, 2010 1:43 pm

    You realize that in 1861 these people would have recognized the Confederate States of America right off the bat, and would have gone ape-shit over William T. Sherman’s War Crimes in Georgia and South Carolina…


  5. coldwarrior
    5 | July 24, 2010 1:44 pm

    ever wonder how most of the heroin gets here form afghanistan?

    it goes right through the kosovo muzzies and albanian muzzies.

    narco-terrorists.


  6. Macker
    6 | July 24, 2010 1:46 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    They’d have gone apeshit over the People of Israel leaving Bondage in BFEgypt.


  7. 7 | July 24, 2010 1:49 pm

    @ Macker:

    Well, of course. Moses should have formed a Union, and bribed Pharaoh for better working conditions. Or, even better, perks for himself, and left the Jews where they belonged, don’t you know. IIRC, Pharoah offered something along those lines, but Moses was working for a different Boss by that time…


  8. coldwarrior
    8 | July 24, 2010 1:53 pm

    the euro-peon elite dhimmis strike again, they would rather side with their muzz allies than with christian europeans.


  9. coldwarrior
    9 | July 24, 2010 2:03 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    while they are at it the ICJ should give half of austria back to the muzz as well.


  10. 10 | July 24, 2010 2:08 pm

    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.


  11. 11 | July 24, 2010 2:13 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Be careful. They just might. And all of Spain. Because what is once muzz is always muzz, now and forever. The muzz can’t win it by conquest, but they can win it by political warfare if the West is pussy enough to let them. The pussification of the West since the end of the Second World War is astounding. You wouldn’t think you were dealing with the same culture, which, I guess, to a large degree you are not. We’ve become over-civilized. We don’t know how to win wars anymore. Not ewven when we have overwhelming force. Loiok at what the Norks are doing. Dos anyone expect the West to do anything substantive about it?


  12. 12 | July 24, 2010 2:17 pm

    savage wrote:

    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.

    That is for sure!


  13. The Osprey
    13 | July 24, 2010 2:22 pm

    Poles say Kosovo is Serbia!


  14. snork
    14 | July 24, 2010 2:24 pm

    @ savage:
    Meaning?


  15. 15 | July 24, 2010 2:24 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    This is a perfect comment on a thread over at Jihad Watch about the Croatians. I know you are Serbian so you probably know this, but I’m sure most reading this thread aren’t but I think it’s good info.

    And you, “southcoastcrusader”, shove your Nazi Croat “Roman Catholic Church” propaganda back down your throat.

    Do you seriously think you can deceive the folks here? Your Nazi Croats disgusted even Nazi German SS ( SS ! ! !) with their unspeakable sadism toward Ortodox Christian Serb men, women and children, whose only guilt was not being Roman Catholic. An SS Sturmbannfuhrer in his report described the Croat actions toward the Orthodox (Serbs) as “beastly”. On June 22, 1941 the Croat Education Minister, author Mile Budak outlined “the Final Solution to the Serbian question”: “One-third of them we will kill, one-third expel, and convert the rest into Catholisism”. The Croats had a clear preference for the 1st option. When the terrified population of the Serb village Glina obediently followed the Croat order to gather in their Ortodox Christian church to be converted to Catholisism later that summer, the Croats bolted down the doors and burned more than 1,300 Serb men, women and children alive with the church.

    Just murdering a Serb was never enough for the Croat Nazis. No, there had to be torture first: limb crushing or amputation, genital mutilation, and eye-cutting, the all-pervasive practice of eye-cutting. All Croat Nazis wore small crooked knives attached to a brasslet, one that can nicely carve out eyes in a Halloween pumpkin. Only the Croats did not use those knives to carve pumpkins. They used them to cut eyes out of live human beings. It was almost like: “You’re out of new torture ideas? Just cut the Serb’s eyes out”.

    Curzio Malaparte, an Italian Fascist Army officer, recalls in his memoirs “Kaputt” his visit to the headquarters of Ante Pavelic, the Fuhrer of the “allied” “Hezavisna Drzava Hrvatska” (“Independent State of Croatia”) that he found the Fuhrer feasting on what at first glance looked as shrimp. At a closer examination, to his horror, Malaparte realized that those were not shrimp but human eyes. Like a Vurdalak ghoul of the Serb folklore, the Croat Fuhrer was eating them raw and bloody, human blood running down out of the corners of his mouth.

    Not just Malaparte, but the entire Italian Fascist Army were revolted by their Croat “allies” and fellow Roman Catholics. The Itallian General Mario Roatta ordered his army to take a military action against the Croats. The Italians shot thousands of Nazi Croats saving thens of thousands of Serbs, Jews and Gyspsies from them.

    By contrast, the Croats called the Bosnian Muslima “the flower of the Croation Nation”. Nazi Croats, Bosnian and Kosovar Albanian Islamo-Nazis engaged in an all-out atrocity contest.

    Comes from this JW thread….

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/aiding-and-abetting-muslim-designs-in-the-balkans-in-the-hope-that-this-will-earn-some-credit-for-th.html#comments
    As a Catholic, I am disgusted by the Croatians.


  16. The Osprey
    16 | July 24, 2010 2:26 pm

    The Ustashe were truly evil bastards.


  17. 17 | July 24, 2010 2:26 pm

    @ snork:

    Read my latest just above this…


  18. 18 | July 24, 2010 2:30 pm

    @ The Osprey:

    The first time I heard of the Ustacha, I was watching Adam 12 when I was a little kid and Malloy and Reed had pulled this old guy over for something and tthe old man wouldn’t get out of the car so Malloy told Reed about the Ustacha. For some reason I still remember that Adam 12 show cause of that.


  19. jeppo
    19 | July 24, 2010 2:31 pm

    Maybe Serbia will be better off in the long run letting Kosovo go. That’s 2 million fewer Muslims within their borders. It’s also 2 million fewer Albanians, making rump-Serbia (Serbia without Kosovo, as Trifkovic calls it) more *Serbian* than Serbia-with-Kosovo (SwK) linguistically and culturally
    as well as in terms of religion.

    Rump Serbia will be only about 3%-5% Muslim, much less than the 20% of SwK, and less than some Western European nations like France, Belgium and Holland. Rump Serbia can then join with the very small Muslim minority countries of East Central Europe like Poland, Czech, Hungary, Romania and Ukraine, while SwK would remain relegated to the Muslim majority and strong minority Balkans, like Albania, Bosnia, Macedonia, Bulgaria and Montenegro.


  20. coldwarrior
    20 | July 24, 2010 2:31 pm

    both sides need to stop with the croat v serb thing.

    they have buried the hatchet is the face of the common muzz enemy.

    the left would love to keep that old ww2 wound open so that neither side fights the muzz:

    Croatia and Serbia have penned a landmark military cooperation deal. The agreement is part of efforts to normalize ties between the two former foes, and is being seen as a step forward for their EU-membership bids.


  21. coldwarrior
    21 | July 24, 2010 2:36 pm

    @ jeppo:

    that looks ok on paper…but the history of kosovo is intertwined with serbia…no land to muzzies. make all of them move to albania.


  22. savages_girl
    22 | July 24, 2010 2:38 pm

    @ savage:

    The first time I heard of the Ustacha, I was watching Adam 12 when I was a little kid and Malloy and Reed had pulled this old guy over for something and tthe old man wouldn’t get out of the car so Malloy told Reed about the Ustacha. For some reason I still remember that Adam 12 show cause of that.

    I can’t believe you remember that!

    I was a huge fan of that show! Never missed it. They filmed in our neighborhood one day.

    I had a crush on Martin Milner (the blond one)! HAHAHAHA!


  23. 23 | July 24, 2010 2:40 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Make all of them move to Saudi Arabia. That is the kind of world they want to live in, let them move there. We don’t need it or them here. That is probably the most practical solution, but the West is too pussified to even consider it.


  24. 24 | July 24, 2010 2:41 pm

    @ jeppo:
    No, after the US is no longer able to intervene on the side of the Muslims (and that day is coming), the Serbs need to send the Muslims in Kosovo back to their homes in Albania whence they came.


  25. NoThreat2U
    25 | July 24, 2010 2:43 pm

    Not looking for any praise or anything, but did this happen to come from me? I sent this article to the blog for either Rodan or 1389. I thought they would be interested. The only reason I ask is I’m curious how often the blog email is checked and if it gets full pretty quick. Glad to see yinz picked up on it no matter where it came from.


  26. NoThreat2U
    26 | July 24, 2010 2:44 pm

    savage wrote:

    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.

    *feeling nervous about being Croatian**


  27. The Osprey
    27 | July 24, 2010 2:45 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ jeppo:

    that looks ok on paper…but the history of kosovo is intertwined with serbia…no land to muzzies. make all of them move to albania.

    My understanding is that Hitler and Tito are the ones responsible for the present day Albanian majority in Kosovo. During WWII, the Muslim Waffen SS Divisions Handschar (Bosnia muzz) and Skanderbeg (Albanian muzz) massacred Serbs in Kosovo and a lot of Serbs fled. After WWII, Tito encouraged Albanian immigration to Kosovo because he wanted to “balance” the Serbian majority in Yugoslav Federal Socialist Republic.

    Milosevic built his reputation by opposing Tito’s Kosovo policy and standing up for rights of Serbs in Kosovo beginning in the 1980′s after Tito’s death.

    As animosity between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo deepened during the 1980s, Milošević was sent to address a crowd of Serbs in Kosovo Polje on 24 April 1987. While Milošević was talking to the leadership inside the local cultural hall, demonstrators outside clashed with the local Kosovo-Albanian police force.
    The New York Times reported that “a crowd of 15,000 Serbs and Montenegrins hurled stones at the police after they used truncheons to push people away from the entrance to the cultural center of Kosovo Polje.”
    Milošević heard the commotion and was sent outside to calm the situation. A videotape of the event shows Milošević responding to complaints from the crowd that the police were beating people by saying “You will not be beaten”. Later that evening, Serbian television aired the video of Milošević’s encounter.
    In Adam LeBor’s biography of Milošević, he says that the crowd attacked the police and Milošević’s response was “No one should dare to beat you again!”


  28. 28 | July 24, 2010 2:45 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    both sides need to stop with the croat v serb thing.
    they have buried the hatchet is the face of the common muzz enemy.
    the left would love to keep that old ww2 wound open so that neither side fights the muzz:
    Croatia and Serbia have penned a landmark military cooperation deal. The agreement is part of efforts to normalize ties between the two former foes, and is being seen as a step forward for their EU-membership bids.

    Given what has recently happened in Greece, I seriously doubt that the EU will expand any further anytime soon. (See EU door finally shut to Eastern hopefuls.) I think that, whatever the Serbs and/or their government (not the same thing at all) may currently think, Serbia is far better off in the long run not being part of the EU.


  29. snork
    29 | July 24, 2010 2:45 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    the left would love to keep that old ww2 wound open so that neither side fights the muzz:

    It’s a lot older than WWII. It’s about a people divided into two religions. The only fitting analogy is Ireland. And that division was related to the empires of Europe; the Serbs were clearly in the Russian orbit, and the Croats were in the Hapsburg orbit. To this day, many Serbs spell their common language with Cyrillic letters.


  30. 30 | July 24, 2010 2:49 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    savage wrote:
    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.
    *feeling nervous about being Croatian**

    Don’t worry, we’re not bigots here.


  31. 31 | July 24, 2010 2:50 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    Not looking for any praise or anything, but did this happen to come from me? I sent this article to the blog for either Rodan or 1389. I thought they would be interested. The only reason I ask is I’m curious how often the blog email is checked and if it gets full pretty quick. Glad to see yinz picked up on it no matter where it came from.

    I did get this from email, and to protect your privacy I won’t reveal the email addy, though I suppose it must have been from you.


  32. coldwarrior
    32 | July 24, 2010 2:51 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    @ snork:

    the move in serbia/croatia is to burry the hatchet and unite against the common muzz enemy.

    there is no reason whatever to continue a fight between orthodox and catholic over there when the muzz are beating down the door. ost of us over here dont really understand what a huge problem albania and the muzz bastards that live there are.

    its god damned stupid and it appears that the serbs and croats are able to get over it.


  33. NoThreat2U
    33 | July 24, 2010 2:52 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    I really wish I understood the confliict a little better. My Mother always told me that the Croats and the Serb didn’t get along well. Even she didn’t know exactly why because the family never talked about it. I think it is awful. Now I know why my family came to America….too many commies in my family. There is a direct line to my family and Tito. Need to do more family research. Sure am glad I ain’t no commie.


  34. NoThreat2U
    34 | July 24, 2010 2:53 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    Glad to see you found it interesting.


  35. 35 | July 24, 2010 2:53 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    They used to film parts of that show right on our street.


  36. savages_girl
    36 | July 24, 2010 2:54 pm

    @ savage:

    They used to film parts of that show right on our street.

    I loved that show!

    It was one of my favorite shows as a kid.


  37. coldwarrior
    37 | July 24, 2010 2:56 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    savage wrote:
    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.
    *feeling nervous about being Croatian**

    just go dahn da croatian club and getta shot of plinkovac…yinz y’ll be right as rain in no time!


  38. jeppo
    38 | July 24, 2010 2:58 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    “no land to muzzies”

    Too late. The US and NATO created 2 Euro-Muslim states (Bosnia and Kosovo) out of parts of former Yugoslavia, and now we pretty much have to live with it. But the silver lining for Serbia is that it’s only 3-5% Muslim instead of 20% Muslim. And that’s the difference between national survival and impending dhimmitude in the long run.


  39. The Osprey
    39 | July 24, 2010 2:59 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Tito wasn’t that bad as commies go. At least his Partisans were on the side of the Allies in WWII, and his indpendent nature was a perpetual thorn in the side of Josef Stalin. And the guy had a sense of humor. When Churchill’s military liason to the Yugoslav Partisans met Tito, a Scottish officer (forget his name at the moment), he was wearing a Scottish regimental uniform with a kilt. Tito’s first words to him were “Did you parachute in wearing that?” LOL.


  40. NoThreat2U
    40 | July 24, 2010 3:00 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Don’t be dissin’ my pelinkovac. That is my family’s drink right there. lol


  41. coldwarrior
    41 | July 24, 2010 3:00 pm

    jeppo wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    “no land to muzzies”
    Too late. The US and NATO created 2 Euro-Muslim states (Bosnia and Kosovo) out of parts of former Yugoslavia, and now we pretty much have to live with it. But the silver lining for Serbia is that it’s only 3-5% Muslim instead of 20% Muslim. And that’s the difference between national survival and impending dhimmitude in the long run.

    give me one reason why the lines on that fools map cant change?


  42. The Osprey
    42 | July 24, 2010 3:01 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    savage wrote:
    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.
    *feeling nervous about being Croatian**

    just go dahn da croatian club and getta shot of plinkovac…yinz y’ll be right as rain in no time!

    As long as I’m not drinking it under a picture of Ante Pavelic.


  43. 43 | July 24, 2010 3:02 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    I really wish I understood the confliict a little better. My Mother always told me that the Croats and the Serb didn’t get along well. Even she didn’t know exactly why because the family never talked about it. I think it is awful. Now I know why my family came to America….too many commies in my family. There is a direct line to my family and Tito. Need to do more family research. Sure am glad I ain’t no commie.

    I had Serbian communists in my family (no longer living) but I certainly am not one! They had fallen away from the Orthodox Church, and I went back to it.


  44. NoThreat2U
    44 | July 24, 2010 3:02 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    I heard we wasn’t THAT bad as far as commies go. I really need to research it a lot more. Sure am glad I am an American patriot. I fear there were Nazis in the family too. Not sure why we all fled Europe…to escape justice or to escape the commies and nazis. Should make for an interesting book someday.


  45. NoThreat2U
    45 | July 24, 2010 3:03 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    Oh great, fascists too :(


  46. NoThreat2U
    46 | July 24, 2010 3:05 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    Like I said, one day it will be interesting to find out everything about my family. Then again, maybe I don’t want to know. The part of Europe my Father’s family was from was there to push back the Ottoman hordes. Interesting people…to a degree.


  47. coldwarrior
    47 | July 24, 2010 3:05 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    I really wish I understood the confliict a little better. My Mother always told me that the Croats and the Serb didn’t get along well. Even she didn’t know exactly why because the family never talked about it. I think it is awful. Now I know why my family came to America….too many commies in my family. There is a direct line to my family and Tito. Need to do more family research. Sure am glad I ain’t no commie.

    read this

    this

    and this

    and this

    there will be a quiz.
    :lol:


  48. coldwarrior
    48 | July 24, 2010 3:07 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Don’t be dissin’ my pelinkovac. That is my family’s drink right there. lol

    plinkovac versus slivovitz…that’s where all the trouble started


  49. 49 | July 24, 2010 3:08 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    jeppo wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    “no land to muzzies”
    Too late. The US and NATO created 2 Euro-Muslim states (Bosnia and Kosovo) out of parts of former Yugoslavia, and now we pretty much have to live with it. But the silver lining for Serbia is that it’s only 3-5% Muslim instead of 20% Muslim. And that’s the difference between national survival and impending dhimmitude in the long run.
    give me one reason why the lines on that fools map cant change?

    The Muslims who have infiltrated Kosovo over the past century, and especially under the Nazis, during the Tito era, and during the NATO occupation, all came from family/tribal homes in Albania. They can be sent back if anybody has the sense and political will to do that.


  50. Speranza
    50 | July 24, 2010 3:09 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Israel is next. This same court will declare a Palestinian state next. The US is wrong for backing the Jihadis in Kosovo. Clinton did Christians wrong here and Bush recognizing Kosovo was doing at the behest of his Saudi masters.
    When America is free we should re-arm Serbia and let them take back what’s theirs.
    Long live Serbia!

    Yes Israel is next. First they delegitimize, then demonize, then exterminate.


  51. The Osprey
    51 | July 24, 2010 3:09 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    I’ve often thought Pavelic was the model for “Fearless Leader” in the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoons.
    Fearless Leader speaks with an East European accent but his uniform looks Nazi/Fascist, not Communist.


  52. coldwarrior
    52 | July 24, 2010 3:10 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    @ NoThreat2U:
    I’ve often thought Pavelic was the model for “Fearless Leader” in the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoons.
    Fearless Leader speaks with an East European accent but his uniform looks Nazi/Fascist, not Communist.

    ok…i can see that.


  53. Speranza
    53 | July 24, 2010 3:11 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    savage wrote:
    I might add, keep the Croatians as far away from this as possible.
    That is for sure!

    The Croats were enthusiastic Nazi collaborators.


  54. NoThreat2U
    54 | July 24, 2010 3:11 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Oh yuck! I do love me some chilled pelinkovac though. Yum! I will read those links…probably saave them too. Thank you :)


  55. snork
    55 | July 24, 2010 3:11 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Not disagreeing, just saying that this has deep roots. The present-day hatred is really a vestige of the animosity between the Russian empire and the Hapsburg empire. And that animosity still lives to this day, with the EU standing in for the Hapsburgs.


  56. coldwarrior
    56 | July 24, 2010 3:14 pm

    @ snork:

    the croats and serbs have already signed military cooperation treaties and police/intle cooperation treaties as i said.

    they can get over it because they have to, the muzz (albanians/iranian intel) are the bigger threat to both of them right now.


  57. snork
    57 | July 24, 2010 3:14 pm

    BTW, if anyone has any interest in experimenting with electronics, let me recommend this Serbian company, who makes a very good and cost-effective line of microcontroller development hardware and software. Great stuff if you’re diddling with robotics, for example.


  58. Lazar of Serbia
    58 | July 24, 2010 3:14 pm

    ColdWarrior,

    Great work! Though there are a few small things here and there. For example, you wrote:

    “Yugoslavia, which contained Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Vojvodina, and Kosovo”.

    Yougoslavia actually had six “republics”: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and Montenegro.

    Vojvodina and Kosovo are “autonomous provinces” of Serbia.


  59. coldwarrior
    59 | July 24, 2010 3:15 pm

    @ snork:

    i like buycotts!


  60. snork
    60 | July 24, 2010 3:16 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    I have two of their compilers and three of their development boards. Because they’re good value.


  61. coldwarrior
    61 | July 24, 2010 3:16 pm

    @ Lazar of Serbia:

    i’ll have to go back and fix that.

    those posts gave me a large headache and made me want to drink slivovitz well into the night.


  62. The Osprey
    62 | July 24, 2010 3:17 pm

    @ Lazar of Serbia:

    Are you the same Lazar who posts at Jihadwatch? Welcome!


  63. coldwarrior
    63 | July 24, 2010 3:18 pm

    Lazar of Serbia wrote:

    ColdWarrior,
    Great work! Though there are a few small things here and there. For example, you wrote:
    “Yugoslavia, which contained Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Vojvodina, and Kosovo”.
    Yougoslavia actually had six “republics”: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and Montenegro.
    Vojvodina and Kosovo are “autonomous provinces” of Serbia.

    wait, i remember why i did it that way…i needed to get all the players listed for later. i should have been a little more clear…i’ll get back there and clarify the list


  64. NoThreat2U
    64 | July 24, 2010 3:18 pm

    So the Catholics aligned themselves with the muslims? Now aint that some shit *spit*


  65. Lazar of Serbia
    65 | July 24, 2010 3:19 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    :) Yes, it is very complex. I will let you know if there’s something else.

    Unrelated – how can I change my avatar?


  66. coldwarrior
    66 | July 24, 2010 3:20 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    So the Catholics aligned themselves with the muslims? Now aint that some shit *spit*

    gross error in judgment there.


  67. Lazar of Serbia
    67 | July 24, 2010 3:20 pm

    @ The Osprey:

    That’s me. Nice to be in such a good company!


  68. 68 | July 24, 2010 3:21 pm

    @ Lazar of Serbia:
    You’re correct.
    I don’t recall seeing you here, but then, I’m still a newbie on Blogmocracy. Where are you located?


  69. coldwarrior
    69 | July 24, 2010 3:21 pm

    Lazar of Serbia wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Yes, it is very complex. I will let you know if there’s something else.
    Unrelated – how can I change my avatar?

    gravatar.com has the setup

    feel free to proof those and let me know,


  70. NoThreat2U
    70 | July 24, 2010 3:21 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ Lazar of Serbia:
    i’ll have to go back and fix that.
    those posts gave me a large headache and made me want to drink slivovitz well into the night.

    LOL LOL LOL


  71. The Osprey
    71 | July 24, 2010 3:22 pm

    @ Lazar of Serbia:

    Our avatars are from Gravatar…setup an account there.


  72. The Osprey
    72 | July 24, 2010 3:23 pm

    Great thread 1389, thanks. I’ve got weekend chores to do though so I will see you all later.


  73. 73 | July 24, 2010 3:23 pm

    Lazar of Serbia wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Yes, it is very complex. I will let you know if there’s something else.
    Unrelated – how can I change my avatar?

    Go here, sign up with the same email addy you used for signing up at Blogmocracy, and upload the avatar image you want to use:
    http://en.gravatar.com/


  74. NoThreat2U
    74 | July 24, 2010 3:24 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    See it is stuff like this that convinces me my family was either a part of this shit or was fleeing from it. I realize those are the only two options, but you know what I mean. I aim to find out.


  75. 75 | July 24, 2010 3:24 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    Thanks very much!


  76. NoThreat2U
    76 | July 24, 2010 3:25 pm

    I do so love this topic though.. Finally something I can learn from. I am not all that interested in the global warming threads and am too stupid to understand what Snork is talking about most of the time. lol Thanks for this thread :)


  77. coldwarrior
    77 | July 24, 2010 3:27 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    See it is stuff like this that convinces me my family was either a part of this shit or was fleeing from it. I realize those are the only two options, but you know what I mean. I aim to find out.

    either way, the fight between the orthodox and catholics has to end, there is a real muzz enemey for them to fight.


  78. Lazar of Serbia
    78 | July 24, 2010 3:28 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    @ Lazar of Serbia:
    You’re correct.
    I don’t recall seeing you here, but then, I’m still a newbie on Blogmocracy. Where are you located?

    I don’t write too much. USA, but I was born in Serbia and lived there until a few years ago.


  79. NoThreat2U
    79 | July 24, 2010 3:29 pm

    These are the two quotes from the article that I found most interesting:

    Aiding and abetting Muslim designs in the Balkans, in the hope that this will earn some credit for the United States in the Islamic world, has been a major motive of American policy in the region since at least 1992. It has never yielded any dividends, of course, but repeated failure only prompts the architects of the policy to redouble their efforts.

    It is virtually certain that Washington will be equally supportive of an independent Sanjak that would connect Kosovo with Bosnia, or of any other putative Islamistan

    Scares the hell out of me.


  80. NoThreat2U
    80 | July 24, 2010 3:30 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    I agree totally and completely. Until we all come together against our common enemy, and I am including the Jews as “we”..there will never be peace. Anywhere.


  81. 81 | July 24, 2010 3:30 pm

    @ The Osprey:

    Actually, the image of Fearless Leader came from an anti-Nazi propaganda poster.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fearless_Leader


  82. NoThreat2U
    82 | July 24, 2010 3:31 pm

    It really is good versus evil…the followers of the One True God versus satan’s minions. Wow. Is there something wrong with me????


  83. 83 | July 24, 2010 3:33 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    either way, the fight between the orthodox and catholics has to end, there is a real muzz enemey for them to fight.

    Indeed. I just wanted to put that quote of mine into the discussion for the simple fact that everyone needs to know the background of the various players in the area.

    And if I pissed you off, I apologize.


  84. coldwarrior
    84 | July 24, 2010 3:40 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    Actually, the image of Fearless Leader came from an anti-Nazi propaganda poster.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fearless_Leader

    so fearless leader is an east german!


  85. coldwarrior
    85 | July 24, 2010 3:41 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:

    either way, the fight between the orthodox and catholics has to end, there is a real muzz enemey for them to fight.
    Indeed. I just wanted to put that quote of mine into the discussion for the simple fact that everyone needs to know the background of the various players in the area.
    And if I pissed you off, I apologize.

    i aint pissed.


  86. 86 | July 24, 2010 3:42 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Possibly Stasi. :D


  87. 87 | July 24, 2010 3:42 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    must have read it wrong.


  88. RIX
    88 | July 24, 2010 3:42 pm

    Hello all It was a very bad idea to support the Muslims against the Serbs.
    Clinton needed a distraction from his scandals & he went for the side that was
    losing.


  89. coldwarrior
    89 | July 24, 2010 3:43 pm

    @ savage:

    Staatssicherheit!


  90. 90 | July 24, 2010 3:44 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    It really is good versus evil…the followers of the One True God versus satan’s minions. Wow. Is there something wrong with me????

    There is something wrong with ALL of us because we live in a fallen world. Plenty of Catholics, other Christians, and Jews are followers of the True God. But we all need God’s help and nobody can accomplish any good without it.


  91. coldwarrior
    91 | July 24, 2010 3:45 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Hello all It was a very bad idea to support the Muslims against the Serbs.
    Clinton needed a distraction from his scandals & he went for the side that was
    losing.

    and he needed to reocver from inaction in rwanda, and he needed to somehow get a legacy, and somehow create the clinton doctrine, and somehow make that damned bj in the whitehouse go away.


  92. 92 | July 24, 2010 3:46 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Hello all It was a very bad idea to support the Muslims against the Serbs.
    Clinton needed a distraction from his scandals & he went for the side that was
    losing.

    I think it had to do with the Lewinski/impeachment affair and with the rape allegations that had recently surfaced.

    It was a “Wag the Dog” scenario, but for the fact that Clinton fought on behalf of the Albanians rather than against them.


  93. NoThreat2U
    93 | July 24, 2010 3:47 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    I sum it all up as “Us against a common enemy”. Time to set aside past differences. Civilization is in trouble. As Catholics, Orthodox, and Jews, what are we gonna do about it? I’ll stand beside my Jewish and Orthodaox brothers and sisters and fight.


  94. 94 | July 24, 2010 3:48 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Just like the Geheime Staatspolitzei.


  95. coldwarrior
    96 | July 24, 2010 3:51 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Just like the Geheime Staatspolitzei.

    well, yeah!

    why re-invent the wheel?


  96. 97 | July 24, 2010 3:52 pm

    @ Bob in Breckenridge:

    Dude, that is fucking awesome! As soon as I have time, I will find the episode where my old house is.


  97. 98 | July 24, 2010 3:56 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    If Obama has his way, the Secret Service will resemble something along the lines of either the Cheka (Chrezvychaynaya Komissiya) or the GPU (Gosudarstvennoye Politicheskoye Upravlenie)


  98. coldwarrior
    99 | July 24, 2010 4:00 pm

    @ savage:

    that stuff doesn’t work real well with an armed populace!


  99. lobo91
    100 | July 24, 2010 4:00 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    If Obama has his way, the Secret Service will resemble something along the lines of either the Cheka (Chrezvychaynaya Komissiya) or the GPU (Gosudarstvennoye Politicheskoye Upravlenie)

    They already have their version of the SA, in the SEIU.


  100. The Osprey
    101 | July 24, 2010 4:00 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    and he needed to reocver from inaction in rwanda, and he needed to somehow get a legacy, and somehow create the clinton doctrine, and somehow make that damned bj in the whitehouse go away.

    To paraphrase Willie the Bard “Out, damned dress stain!”


  101. coldwarrior
    102 | July 24, 2010 4:01 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    savage wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    If Obama has his way, the Secret Service will resemble something along the lines of either the Cheka (Chrezvychaynaya Komissiya) or the GPU (Gosudarstvennoye Politicheskoye Upravlenie)
    They already have their version of the SA, in the SEIU.

    a real unions like usw/teamsters/umw hate those jokers.

    i’ll take my former teamster brothers in a street brawl against sieu any day anywhere.


  102. 103 | July 24, 2010 4:02 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I wouldn’t put it past Barry to attempt to suspend the Constitution. Then all bets are off.


  103. coldwarrior
    104 | July 24, 2010 4:04 pm

    savage wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I wouldn’t put it past Barry to attempt to suspend the Constitution. Then all bets are off.

    yep. time to go to the streets at that point


  104. Philip_Daniel
    106 | July 24, 2010 4:06 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    while they are at it the ICJ should give half of austria back to the muzz as well.

    More accurately, the towns of Perchtoldsdorf, Hainfeld, Türnitz, Wilhelmsburg, and Lilienfeld in Lower Austria (that’s geographically Northeast Austria) were briefly under Ottoman occupation in 1683 (their populations were massacred and enslaved — an estimated 92,000 slaves were taken by the Turks out of Austria alone); once the Turks were defeated that same year at the Gates of Vienna by the joint forces of Poland-Lithuania, the Holy Roman Empire, the Zaporozhian Cossacks and the Duchy of Tuscany, they were driven from Austria and authority over these towns fell back to the Hapsburgs. The only part of Austria to fall under official Ottoman administration was the city of Beltinci and its environs in modern-day Northeastern Slovenia (the Prekmurje region), as Balatin sanjak, part of Buda elayet and later Kanisza elayet during the period of Ottoman occupation and administration over nearly all of modern-day Hungary and parts of south-central and southwest Slovakia (Nove Zamky) in the 16th and 17th centuries. The northernmost sanjak, or province, of the Ottoman Empire was Podolia in historically Poland-Lithuania (modern-day Western Ukraine), held from the Treaty of Buczacz in 1672 until it was fully-liberated in 1699. The northernmost temporary territorial acquisition by the Turks was the ghazw against the Vestmannaeyjar archipelago by Barbary corsairs (engaged in al-jihad fi’l-bahr — jihad of the sea) led by Dutch-born mujahid-pirate Jan Janszoon aka Murat Reis the Younger. In this ghazw, as many as 400 Icelanders were captured and enslaved, taken down to Algiers to be sold in the slave-markets. These islands were under the Islamic flag for several days, so present-day mujahedin might possibly be able to claim them as eternal waqf land. The Isle of Lundy off the Cornish coast was held by the Ottomans and Barbary corsairs between approximately 1645 and 1660; it was used as a staging point from which ghazwat against the Welsh and English coasts were committed, and there are accounts of the “Islamic flag” (with the shahadah, presumably — but that’s just conjecture) flying over it.

    At the very least, outside of most of the Balkans and the Crimea, they can “claim” Western Ukraine, southwestern-southcentral Slovakia, and most of Hungary, not to mention the city of Otranto invaded and occupied by the Turks from 1480-1481 (site of a horrific massacre in which 800 Christians who refused to apostatize from Roman Catholicism to Sunni Islam were beheaded, their skeletal remains housed behind glass in the local cathedral behind its altar). Otranto was occupied and used as a base to plunder and terrorize surrounding cities in Apulia (where the emirates of Taranto [840-880] and Bari [847-871] and the Apulian-Basilicatan-Calabrian “Sultanate” of Muffaraj ibn Sallam [853-871] had been located). The imminent conquest of Italy was only prevented by the fact that Gedik Ahmed Pasha’s army was poorly-supplied and could not last the winter. (In contrast, the conquest of Italy by Fatimid Caliph al-Qaim in 934-935 was prevented by an anti-Berber revolt led by Abu Zayid, which forced al-Qaim to being back his troops and abandon the conquest of Europe north of Sicily)..


  105. coldwarrior
    107 | July 24, 2010 4:11 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    WOW! we need to have that list on hand at all times! nice work!

    the icj needs to get busy!


  106. 108 | July 24, 2010 4:16 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    Well isn’t this special!
    http://www.newpatriotjournal.com/Articles/Multiple_Ranches_In_Laredo_TX_Taken_Over_By_Los_Zetas

    This amounts to an act of war. Somehow I don’t expect our federal gummint, whose job it is to protect American soil from armed foreign invasion, to do its Constitutional duty in ridding us of these thugs and making sure they never come back.


  107. NoThreat2U
    109 | July 24, 2010 4:19 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    This part sums it up well:

    Their frustrations are understandable because keeping the truth suppressed continues to hamper law enforcement from receiving the true support they need along the border.


  108. 110 | July 24, 2010 4:35 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    I want the Army in there to slaughter these Zetas. Kill every damn one of them, then declare WAR on Mexico.

    And fucking flatten Nuevo Laredo.


  109. 111 | July 24, 2010 4:35 pm

    [...] Originally posted at 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


  110. Lazar of Serbia
    112 | July 24, 2010 4:37 pm

    Now I look better!

    Philip_Daniel wrote:

    the city of Otranto invaded and occupied by the Turks from 1480-1481 (site of a horrific massacre in which 800 Christians who refused to apostatize from Roman Catholicism to Sunni Islam were beheaded, their skeletal remains housed behind glass in the local cathedral behind its altar).

    We have similar “monument” in Serbia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_Tower


  111. NoThreat2U
    113 | July 24, 2010 4:39 pm

    At least Vlad knew who he was dealing with.


  112. orangecrush
    114 | July 24, 2010 5:19 pm

    I evolved into pro serb. I used to think moderate muslims were people that could be worked with. BUt now I think that the radicals in Islam use moderate muslims like swiss chees uses holes. The serb should should ally with Russia more and push back the muzzies at the UN and in the homeland.


  113. Guggi
    115 | July 24, 2010 5:23 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    But please, don’t forget to mention that also Hungarian Christians were allied to the Ottomans during the siege of Vienna 1683.


  114. Philip_Daniel
    116 | July 24, 2010 5:27 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:
    But please, don’t forget to mention that also Hungarian Christians were allied to the Ottomans during the siege of Vienna 1683.

    I’m fully aware of this. Hatred of the Hapsburgs was worse than hatred of the Ottomans among some Hungarians such as Imre Thököly. This does not preclude the facts of Ottoman imperialism and cruelty being rooted in canonical scriptural and exegetical texts of Sunni Islam.


  115. Guggi
    117 | July 24, 2010 6:17 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Europe was deeply divided and in between power struggles at that time which enabled the Ottomans – after consultations with France and with her acceptance - to siege Vienna.

    Btw.: also Christianity was mostly spread through the sword and not through the word. After all in both cases it was more about power politics than about religion.


  116. The Osprey
    118 | July 24, 2010 6:21 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    Fedgov may not do anything but I’ll bet the Texas Rangers will.


  117. Philip_Daniel
    119 | July 24, 2010 7:09 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    Europe was deeply divided and in between power struggles at that time which enabled the Ottomans – after consultations with France and with her acceptance – to siege Vienna.

    Absolutely correct (France and the Ottomans collaborated, as they had a common enemy in the Hapsburgs, but once their common enemy would’ve been out of the way, one can assume that they — the French and Ottomans — would have then assumed the status of foes), but this does preclude (yes, that word again!) the existence of a ghazi culture in the Ottoman empire, a deeply expansionist drive hidden under the legislation of the holy war. (I should add that the Ottomans had a deep desire to subjugate as much of Europe as possible [their vassal, the Crimean Tatar Khanate, drew up plans for the conquest of Russia after the 1571 destruction of Moscow and the surrounding hinterlands by aforesaid Tatars -- ambitious plans which were thwarted by the Battle of Molodi a year later] but were deeply embroiled in conflicts with the Safavids in Persia and the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean which inescapably diverted their attention.)

    Guggi wrote:

    Btw.: also Christianity was mostly spread through the sword and not through the word. After all in both cases it was more about power politics than about religion.

    I am not an apologist for Christianity. I am familiar with the Northern Crusades against the Balts, for instance, a clear Christian equivalent of the phenomenon of jihad al-talab wa’l-ibtida (which had subsumed land from the Maldives to the Khanate of Sibir in modern-day Siberia). However, even ibn Khaldun, a brilliant historiographer of Berber extraction, noted an intrinsic difference between Islamic and Christian theology in the subject of the holy war for expansion of theocracy…

    “In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the [Muslim] mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united [in Islam], so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them [i.e. religion and politics] at the same time. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense…Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations…Thereafter, there were dissensions among the Christians with regard to their religion and to Christology…We do not think that we should blacken the pages of this book with discussion of their dogmas of unbelief. In general, they are well known. All of them are unbelief. This is clearly stated in the noble Qur’an. [To] discuss or argue those things with them is not up to us. It is [for them to choose between] conversion to Islam, payment of the poll tax, or death.”–Ibn Khaldun, The Muqudimmah: An Introduction to History (pp. 60, 473, 480)

    Muhammad made clear pronouncements that the global suzerainty of his deen will, and must, be spread at the point of al-sayf — the sword. The pronouncements of Jesus and even Paul on this subject are not quite as belligerent, as I can recall. Both Islam and Christianity have bloody, violent, imperialist histories, but upon further acquaintance with the scriptural and exegetical works of both religions, one can easily assess that of the two, Islam is more innately belligerent, per the prescriptions of the nasikh ayat of the Qur’an, the sahih ahadith, and traditional tafsirun and fiqh of the mainstream madhaheb of Sunnism and Shi’ism .


  118. The Osprey
    120 | July 24, 2010 7:09 pm

    @ Guggi:


  119. Philip_Daniel
    121 | July 24, 2010 7:10 pm

    Philip_Daniel wrote:

    does preclude

    Mea culpa — does not preclude.


  120. 122 | July 24, 2010 7:45 pm

    orangecrush wrote:

    I evolved into pro serb. I used to think moderate muslims were people that could be worked with. BUt now I think that the radicals in Islam use moderate muslims like swiss chees uses holes. The serb should should ally with Russia more and push back the muzzies at the UN and in the homeland.

    I’m with you on that.

    By the way…
    More stuff about Kosovo and the ICJ ruling:

    ICJ on Kosovo: Less Than Meets the Eye


  121. Philip_Daniel
    123 | July 24, 2010 8:28 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    @ Guggi:

    “The instruments of God’s religion, a servant of God who cleanses the earth from the filth of polytheism…the sword of God.”–Ottoman poet Ahmedi [dated circa 1402]


  122. Guggi
    124 | July 24, 2010 8:31 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    …that the global suzerainty of his deen will, and must, be spread at the point of al-sayf — the sword.

    You certainly know that Ayat al-sayf can be interpreted in different ways ?


  123. Philip_Daniel
    125 | July 24, 2010 8:47 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:
    …that the global suzerainty of his deen will, and must, be spread at the point of al-sayf — the sword.
    You certainly know that Ayat al-sayf can be interpreted in different ways ?

    You take me for an idiot, don’t you? There are those who say it only applied to the context of the time, there are some who say it is only ad-daf’ (defensive), some who say it can be both ad-daf’ and al-talab (offensive), there are some who say it is only al-talab, there are some who say it is a fardh kifaya (collective obligation) if al-talab and a fardh ain if ad-daf’ and relevant until the Hour of Ressurection, there are some who say it that both are fardh kifaya and relevant until the Hour of Ressurection. I am aware of the variety of legalistic opinions. The ad-daf’ as fardh ain and al-talab as fardh kifaya is most common — it is enshrined in the writings of such influential mufassirun as ibn Kathir and al-Suyuti and al-Tabari. Fact is, the Qur’an and the Sunna have been heavily referenced by self-proclaimed ghuzat in their wars of conquest, whether al-futuh al-habash by the Adal Sultanate or the wars of the Ottomans against the Hapsburgs or the raiding expeditions of the Sumatran Sultan al-Malik az-Zahir as recorded in the writings of traveler ibn Batouta.


  124. Guggi
    126 | July 24, 2010 9:10 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    …Fact is, the Qur’an and the Sunna have been heavily referenced by self-proclaimed ghuzat in their wars of conquest,…

    “self-proclaimed ghuzat” is the key-term. Now we can agree ;-)


  125. Philip_Daniel
    127 | July 24, 2010 9:37 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:
    …Fact is, the Qur’an and the Sunna have been heavily referenced by self-proclaimed ghuzat in their wars of conquest,…
    “self-proclaimed ghuzat” is the key-term. Now we can agree

    They have a stronger comprehension of the nuances of fiqh than either you or I…no matter whether they’re “right” or “wrong”, they have an enormous amount of textural support for their contentions as well as historical precedent. I’m not fond of Christianity, and I am all-too-aware of its own legacy of what it considers Bellum Justum, but it is mujahedin who are invoking both rasul’allah and the jihadin of such “luminaries” as Sokoto Caliphate founder Usman dan Fodio in 19th century West Africa, as these modern-day incarnations of al-Ansar and al-Muhajirun behead and mutilate their way to Islamic Utopia from Latin America to the Phillipines…


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David