First time visitor? Learn more.

Voice of the Resistance!

by Kafir ( 166 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Open thread, Politics at August 19th, 2010 - 9:00 pm


Enjoy the show ~!!

The Voice of the Resistance – on blogtalkradio

1 (347) 996-5447

Email the gmail for a toll free number!
blogmocracy @ gmail .com


Listen to internet radio with The Blogmocracy on Blog Talk Radio


Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

166 Responses to “Voice of the Resistance!”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Eliana
    1 | August 19, 2010 9:03 pm

    The State Dept is PAYING for the Mosque builders to raise money for this mosque in other countries!!!!


  2. savages_girl
    2 | August 19, 2010 9:06 pm

    Yoo-Hoo!

    Show time!


  3. m
    3 | August 19, 2010 9:06 pm

    Hey ladies!


  4. 4 | August 19, 2010 9:07 pm

    Here’s the story.


  5. savages_girl
    5 | August 19, 2010 9:08 pm

    @ m:
    Hello Ms M! :)


  6. theTarCzar
    6 | August 19, 2010 9:09 pm

    OT: Grade obamas presidency so far at CBS
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-6116297-503544.html?tag


  7. Eliana
    7 | August 19, 2010 9:09 pm

    Rush Limbaugh says that the mosque builders have only raised $18,000 for the Ground Zero mosque but the State Dept is giving them $16,000 to visit Arab Muslim countries to raise the rest of the money they need for the Ground Zero mosque!


  8. vagabond trader
    8 | August 19, 2010 9:10 pm

    @ Eliana:

    State is owned by the muzz,moreso with Hussein running the show.Wonder how much of all that stimulus money is being funneled to these scrunts.


  9. Eliana
    9 | August 19, 2010 9:10 pm

    Bush is still refusing to comment on the mosque, right?


  10. savages_girl
    10 | August 19, 2010 9:11 pm

    Sounds like it might be Savage’s mom in the background…


  11. Eliana
    11 | August 19, 2010 9:11 pm

    The leftists are begging for Bush’s help on the mosque -- unreal!!


  12. vagabond trader
    12 | August 19, 2010 9:11 pm

    Boom is a bomb. :sad:


  13. savages_girl
    13 | August 19, 2010 9:12 pm

    @ Eliana:

    the State Dept is giving them $16,000 to visit Arab Muslim countries to raise the rest of the money they need for the Ground Zero mosque!

    Seriously???

    that’s just absurd…


  14. 14 | August 19, 2010 9:13 pm

    Bummer. Need somebody to call in for Rodan to bounce off of.


  15. savages_girl
    15 | August 19, 2010 9:13 pm

    Where’s speranza?

    He needs to call in and shoot the shit with Rodan for the next 15 minutes…


  16. savages_girl
    16 | August 19, 2010 9:13 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    GMTA!!


  17. chickadee
    17 | August 19, 2010 9:16 pm

    What are the topics on the show tonight? LOL Like there is a shortage of topics.
    Well, my phone is charging in the car because the other charger isn’t working so I have to go outside to get it if I want to call in. :(

    NO to the 911 MUZZ MOSK.


  18. vagabond trader
    18 | August 19, 2010 9:16 pm

    Nope,it is not a coincidence. There has been an escalation in fuzzy muzz stories the last month or so.Trying to desensitize us to all the nefarious sh*t going on with their pet jihadis.Not working.


  19. m
    19 | August 19, 2010 9:17 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Haha! I dropped and called him, LOL!


  20. m
    20 | August 19, 2010 9:18 pm

    @ chickadee:

    They “SAY”:

    24% of Americans think Obama is a Muslim.

    The Left asking for Bush to help with Mosque.

    The U.S. budget deficit last year was a record $1.413 trillion, 9.9 percent of gross domestic product.

    Weekly Jobless Claims Post Surprise Jump, Hit 500,000
    Virginia Democrats Swept in With Obama Now Vulnerable to Defeat

    But you know how THAT goes, LOL!


  21. savages_girl
    21 | August 19, 2010 9:18 pm

    @ m:
    You know it’s his mom…


  22. Eliana
    22 | August 19, 2010 9:19 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    It’s true -- the State Dept is giving the mosque builders $16,000 to travel to Muslim countries to raise money to build the ground zero mosque.

    It’s absurd!


  23. 23 | August 19, 2010 9:20 pm

    @ chickadee:
    Lotta stuff, but Rodan hinted about reserving the last half hour for something.


  24. lobo91
    24 | August 19, 2010 9:20 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Are they out of stimulus money?


  25. chickadee
    25 | August 19, 2010 9:22 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    The State Dept is PAYING for the Mosque builders to raise money for this mosque in other countries!!!!

    They’re not paying . . . . we’re paying. grrrrr

    islam is the only ‘religion’ our current gov. likes and supports.
    Wait. . . . I think there’s a problem with that. hmmmm
    I doubt they will give US financial help to put our nativity scene this Christmas?


  26. savages_girl
    26 | August 19, 2010 9:23 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Hey (waves hi)


  27. 27 | August 19, 2010 9:24 pm

    I am stuck on a bus where I can get WiFi but no signal!


  28. lobo91
    28 | August 19, 2010 9:24 pm

    @ chickadee:

    They’re probably actually paying for the mosque, too, in a money laundering deal.

    We send some “foreign aid” money to them, and they give money to the imam for the mosque…


  29. chickadee
    29 | August 19, 2010 9:24 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    The leftists are begging for Bush’s help on the mosque – unreal!!

    I hope he just continues to live his life as a patriot and gentleman, showing grace and dignity and letting these fcks twist in the wind.


  30. 30 | August 19, 2010 9:24 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Eliana:
    Are they out of stimulus money?

    The never had it to begin with. It’s imaginary.


  31. lobo91
    31 | August 19, 2010 9:24 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Hi there


  32. Eliana
    32 | August 19, 2010 9:25 pm

    @ chickadee:

    The leftists are begging for Bush’s help on the mosque – unreal!!

    I hope he just continues to live his life as a patriot and gentleman, showing grace and dignity and letting these fcks twist in the wind.

    Oh -- well put!!

    I hope so too!


  33. savages_girl
    33 | August 19, 2010 9:26 pm

    @ lobo91:
    How’s things?

    I conked out last night after saying hi on the ONT last night… see if I can stay awake tonight…


  34. 34 | August 19, 2010 9:26 pm

    Yeah, m!


  35. lobo91
    35 | August 19, 2010 9:27 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    @ Eliana:
    Are they out of stimulus money?
    The never had it to begin with. It’s imaginary.

    I keep hoping that Obama is imaginary.


  36. 36 | August 19, 2010 9:28 pm

    savages_girl wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    How’s things?
    I conked out last night after saying hi on the ONT last night… see if I can stay awake tonight…

    Last night was verrrrry slow. Creeped me out. Cricket echoes.


  37. m
    37 | August 19, 2010 9:28 pm

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Oh damn! It’s a conspiracy!


  38. savages_girl
    38 | August 19, 2010 9:29 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    LOL!


  39. 39 | August 19, 2010 9:30 pm

    Bush is not the fool the left paints him. The tradition is the outgoing President should not speak out -- especially whe your successor is making himself look like an idiot.


  40. lobo91
    40 | August 19, 2010 9:31 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Pretty quiet, at the moment.

    Waiting for the Rockies game to start.


  41. snowcrash
    41 | August 19, 2010 9:31 pm

    @ chickadee:
    Bush had to endure those press conferences where he was criticised by the right and the left for how many years? Why give the media a statement and allow them restart the antagonism now when he is a private citizen? He is doing the right thing by keeping his opinion to himself.


  42. 42 | August 19, 2010 9:32 pm

    DUCK!


  43. savages_girl
    43 | August 19, 2010 9:33 pm

    UH OH!

    Savage on fire!


  44. savages_girl
    44 | August 19, 2010 9:33 pm

    Savage rant off


  45. snowcrash
    45 | August 19, 2010 9:34 pm

    Savage, enough please my ears are bleeding.LOL


  46. 46 | August 19, 2010 9:34 pm

    “Wow, so, ah…” --Rodan 19 August 2010


  47. savages_girl
    47 | August 19, 2010 9:34 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Who are The Rockies playing tonight?


  48. savages_girl
    48 | August 19, 2010 9:34 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    HAHAHAHA


  49. m
    49 | August 19, 2010 9:34 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Oh man I missed it -- was screening. I’ll have to listen to archives.


  50. lobo91
    50 | August 19, 2010 9:34 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    The Dodgers.


  51. m
    51 | August 19, 2010 9:35 pm

    @ snowcrash:

    ok, mebbe i won’t!


  52. Eliana
    52 | August 19, 2010 9:35 pm

    This is the link about the $16,000 trip being paid by the State Dept for the ground zero mosque builders:

    Imam Behind New York Project Starts Mideast Tour

    After Bahrain, Imam Feisal will visit Qatar from Tuesday through Friday, and then the United Arab Emirates from Aug. 28 through Sept. 2. The trip will cost the State Department about $16,000.

    The agency sends about 50 religious figures each year to lecture about tolerance and interfaith dialogue as part of its speakers program, a spokesman said.


  53. lobo91
    53 | August 19, 2010 9:35 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    In LA.


  54. Speranza
    54 | August 19, 2010 9:36 pm

    savages_girl wrote:

    sper

    he is here but has a sore throat


  55. savages_girl
    55 | August 19, 2010 9:36 pm

    @ lobo91:
    The Dodgers! My other favorite team! Yoo-Hoo!

    You’re going to have to keep me abreast of the score! Oh, how exciting!


  56. m
    56 | August 19, 2010 9:37 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Hey, a quarter Speranza kicks ass, LOL!


  57. savages_girl
    57 | August 19, 2010 9:37 pm

    @ Speranza:
    You sound great!

    I’m so glad you called in when you did!


  58. lobo91
    58 | August 19, 2010 9:38 pm

    @ Eliana:

    The agency sends about 50 religious figures each year to lecture about tolerance and interfaith dialogue as part of its speakers program, a spokesman said.

    Andrew Wilkow was talking about that this morning.

    What is the point of sending a Muslim to talk to Muslims about “tolerance and interfaith dialogue”?

    Shouldn’t they be sending Christians or Jews?


  59. F
    59 | August 19, 2010 9:38 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Bush is not the fool the left paints him. The tradition is the outgoing President should not speak out – especially whe your successor is making himself look like an idiot.

    Too bad that Jimmah and Billy Jeff couldn’t diaper their verbal diarrhea when GW was in office.


  60. savages_girl
    60 | August 19, 2010 9:38 pm

    @ m:

    Oh man I missed it – was screening. I’ll have to listen to archives.

    He dropped a lot of “F” bombs…


  61. snowcrash
    61 | August 19, 2010 9:38 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Didja take 2 Tylenol? Works very well for sore throat pain, but often isn’t used.


  62. Speranza
    62 | August 19, 2010 9:38 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Didja take 2 Tylenol? Works very well for sore throat pain, but often isn’t used.

    thanks will do


  63. lobo91
    63 | August 19, 2010 9:39 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    So far, they’ve each won a game. Tonight’s the final game of the series, then they go to Arizona.


  64. F
    64 | August 19, 2010 9:39 pm

    @ lobo91:
    I find it hard to believe that the Mooslums would even deign to give an act of listening to a kuffr.


  65. lobo91
    65 | August 19, 2010 9:40 pm

    F wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    I find it hard to believe that the Mooslums would even deign to give an act of listening to a kuffr.

    Probably true.

    So what’s the point?


  66. Eliana
    66 | August 19, 2010 9:41 pm

    @ lobo91:

    What is the point of sending a Muslim to talk to Muslims about “tolerance and interfaith dialogue”?

    Shouldn’t they be sending Christians or Jews?

    Well, Muslims do kill Muslims more than anyone else does, so they may be thinking about that (although I doubt the State Dept under Hillary would ever be willing to admit it).


  67. chickadee
    67 | August 19, 2010 9:42 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Bush is not the fool the left paints him. The tradition is the outgoing President should not speak out – especially whe your successor is making himself look like an idiot.

    They have been so rude and cruel to Pres. Bush, It is a gross insult now for them to think they can call upon him to help them further their hideous agenda. Every rime he reached across the aisle, they took advantage of him and then unceremoniously shit on him. fck them.
    I am amazed at how the left can grovel and debase themselves in the hopes of getting what they want.
    Like 2 year olds.


  68. savages_girl
    68 | August 19, 2010 9:43 pm

    OK, who’s the lady talking?


  69. chickadee
    69 | August 19, 2010 9:43 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ chickadee:
    Bush had to endure those press conferences where he was criticised by the right and the left for how many years? Why give the media a statement and allow them restart the antagonism now when he is a private citizen? He is doing the right thing by keeping his opinion to himself.

    agree completely.


  70. lobo91
    70 | August 19, 2010 9:44 pm

    @ Eliana:

    I still think it’s cover for a money laundering operation.

    That’s something Hillary actually knows about.

    Unless you actually believe that immigrant dishwashers gave her the maximum allowable campaign contributions out of their minimum wage earnings…


  71. m
    71 | August 19, 2010 9:44 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Her name is Drew- from California. I don’t think she is on the blog maybe from blogtalkradio? She’s on it ~:)


  72. F
    72 | August 19, 2010 9:44 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Probably true.
    So what’s the point?

    To spend money and show the Mooslum World that they have a fellow butt elevating head banger in the WH.


  73. 73 | August 19, 2010 9:44 pm

    The race card hasn’t been played out. Ask Dr. Laura… ///


  74. chickadee
    74 | August 19, 2010 9:46 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    This is the link about the $16,000 trip being paid by the State Dept for the ground zero mosque builders:

    Imam Behind New York Project Starts Mideast Tour

    After Bahrain, Imam Feisal will visit Qatar from Tuesday through Friday, and then the United Arab Emirates from Aug. 28 through Sept. 2. The trip will cost the State Department about $16,000.

    The agency sends about 50 religious figures each year to lecture about tolerance and interfaith dialogue as part of its speakers program, a spokesman said.

    We are being taken to the cleaners by these frauds. The imams and the muzz lovers in our gov.
    This has to stop unless we also send preachers and rabbis. Enough of sending the jihadis.


  75. 75 | August 19, 2010 9:46 pm

    @ savages_girl:
    I don’t know. All I have to say is it sounds like she’s repeating talking points from Coast to Coast AM. Heard stuff like that 5 years ago when he had the two authours of the book “Spy Chips”.


  76. m
    76 | August 19, 2010 9:47 pm

    @ PaladinPhil:

    Hey I was just worried if it was a friendly… LOL! You never know!!


  77. 77 | August 19, 2010 9:48 pm

    Ohio voter registration
    http://lwvohio.igpr.com/base.cfm?page_id=1691


  78. Speranza
    78 | August 19, 2010 9:48 pm

    Carolina Girl


  79. Speranza
    79 | August 19, 2010 9:49 pm

    call in carolina girl


  80. rain of lead
    81 | August 19, 2010 9:50 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    hmmmm lotta “f” bombs there.


  81. 82 | August 19, 2010 9:51 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    Here we go.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/10/opinion/10tue1.html


  82. Possum
    83 | August 19, 2010 9:51 pm

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — More than 100,000 Ohioans signed up to vote through welfare programs from January to June in part of an effort to get more poor people involved in elections.

    The Election Assistance Commission says the number of people who registered to vote with public-assistance programs nearly doubles the annual average in 2007 and 2008.

    The increase in low-income voters comes after a new set of rules went into effect in January. The rules make sure Ohio follows a federal law that says voter registration information has to be provided to people applying for welfare programs.

    Since Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, states like Ohio focused more on tying voter registration to driver’s license applications than to public assistance programs.

    http://www.onntv.com/live/content/onnnews/stories/2010/08/15/story-columbus-welfare-voters.html?sid=102


  83. 84 | August 19, 2010 9:51 pm

    @ m:
    Lot of different beliefs out there. I just start getting cynical when I hear of “New World Order”, and other conspiracies. It will probably bite me on the ass on of these years.


  84. savages_girl
    85 | August 19, 2010 9:52 pm

    @ Possum:
    Possum!


  85. rain of lead
    86 | August 19, 2010 9:54 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    hahaha, lotta lefties whining and seething in the comments
    Heh.


  86. 87 | August 19, 2010 9:54 pm

    @ Possum:
    Nice find, dude of the dudeness.


  87. Piglet-U93
    88 | August 19, 2010 9:55 pm

    If your religion taught you (via the Quran and Ahadith) that Infidels were the same as feces ($h!t)* would you have any issue on any level (spiritual, intellectual, emotional or physical) in lying, deceiving, harming, disposing, mutilating or killing those Infidels?

    What attention, deference or concern do you give a piece of feces on the ground? If you have ever stepped in feces ($h!t)* then you know just how Muslims are suppose to feel about you.

    *see Najis


  88. savages_girl
    89 | August 19, 2010 9:56 pm

    What the hell is an “electronic cigarette”???


  89. lobo91
    90 | August 19, 2010 9:56 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    But the best reason to applaud the Justice Department’s new posture is that it will bring more voters into public life. When advocacy groups sued Ohio and Missouri to force their public assistance offices into complying, huge groups of new voters surged onto the rolls — more than 100,000 in Ohio, and more than 200,000 in Missouri. Nationwide enforcement by the Justice Department could add millions more. The more people who have access to the ballot, the better the country will be.

    Really? Getting more people to vote who are too dumb to even figure out how to register on their own is good for the country?

    Isn’t that how we got Obama, in the first place?


  90. m
    91 | August 19, 2010 9:57 pm

    @ Possum:

    There you are!


  91. Possum
    92 | August 19, 2010 9:59 pm

    It is Thursday!

    :)


  92. 93 | August 19, 2010 10:01 pm

    savages_girl wrote:

    What the hell is an “electronic cigarette”???

    It’s a cigarette with a battery, so if your car dies you can jump start it through the lighter.


  93. Possum
    94 | August 19, 2010 10:02 pm

    I learned my lesson Sunday.

    Tonight I have a cooler on the desk with a 6, um now 3-Pack and ice in it and a bucket under the desk.

    ;)


  94. Calo
    95 | August 19, 2010 10:03 pm

    @ Possum:
    Why the bucket?


  95. m
    96 | August 19, 2010 10:04 pm

    @ Calo:

    !

    You’re a brave woman.


  96. F
    97 | August 19, 2010 10:04 pm

    savages_girl wrote:

    What the hell is an “electronic cigarette”???

    This

    There are several different manufacturers of eCigs.


  97. Possum
    98 | August 19, 2010 10:04 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ Possum:
    Why the bucket?

    Where would I put the empty cans?

    Duh…..


  98. Calo
    99 | August 19, 2010 10:05 pm

    @ m:
    Or, as Possum would say, “nosy”.


  99. 100 | August 19, 2010 10:05 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ Possum:
    Why the bucket?

    Remember Mr. Creosote? [Sorry I brought it up.]


  100. F
    101 | August 19, 2010 10:06 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ Possum:
    Why the bucket?

    For the “pause that refreshes”.


  101. savages_girl
    102 | August 19, 2010 10:08 pm

    @ F:

    This

    There are several different manufacturers of eCigs.

    Well I’ll be darned…

    I wish I could get Savage to use those…


  102. lobo91
    103 | August 19, 2010 10:09 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Urgh…the Rockies released Brad Hawpe after last night’s game.

    Great. Especially after Carlos Gonzalez kamikazed into the right field wall late in the game and took himself out making a catch.

    Brilliant move…


  103. savages_girl
    104 | August 19, 2010 10:11 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Is Brad Hawpe a pitcher? (If not, what position does he play?)

    Has the game started? What’s the score?


  104. 105 | August 19, 2010 10:12 pm

    Oh, puke. I was hoping they wouldn’t give the pud a single word.


  105. Possum
    106 | August 19, 2010 10:13 pm

    Ludwig is a fake and a fraud.

    We know.


  106. lobo91
    107 | August 19, 2010 10:13 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Outfielder. He was going to be a free agent at the end of the season, anyway. They’ve mostly been using him as a pinch hitter recently.

    The game just started.


  107. snork
    108 | August 19, 2010 10:14 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    The more people who have access to the ballot, the better the country will be.

    Military excluded, of course.


  108. Eliana
    109 | August 19, 2010 10:14 pm

    Which LGF woman is a biker from New Mexico?


  109. Speranza
    110 | August 19, 2010 10:15 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    Which LGF woman is a biker from New Mexico?

    wrenchwench


  110. Eliana
    111 | August 19, 2010 10:15 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Oh.

    Thanks!


  111. m
    112 | August 19, 2010 10:15 pm

    @ Eliana:

    wrenchwench

    She used to be normal, or so we thought. But then again, there was a time I thought sharmuta was normal.


  112. lobo91
    113 | August 19, 2010 10:15 pm

    snork wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    The more people who have access to the ballot, the better the country will be.
    Military excluded, of course.

    Of course.


  113. Eliana
    114 | August 19, 2010 10:16 pm

    The libs want CJ to apologize for Rather.


  114. Eliana
    115 | August 19, 2010 10:17 pm

    @ m:

    Thanks -- I haven’t seen her but I’ve heard of her here, I guess.


  115. 116 | August 19, 2010 10:18 pm

    Great. Adobe 10′s update just crashed me twice now.


  116. Possum
    117 | August 19, 2010 10:18 pm

    Rodan has mail, I hope he puts on the Pee music when he reads it.


  117. Eliana
    118 | August 19, 2010 10:20 pm

    Yup -- Howard Dean has gone against the mosque!


  118. rain of lead
    119 | August 19, 2010 10:20 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    The libs want CJ to apologize for Rather.

    huh?whaa….
    *blink**blink*

    oh please please please
    do it do it do it
    come on charlie , you know ya wanna


  119. Eliana
    120 | August 19, 2010 10:21 pm

    Zero has “negative coattails”? :-)


  120. chickadee
    121 | August 19, 2010 10:21 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    Yup – Howard Dean has gone against the mosque!

    He is trying to crap on the dems


  121. 122 | August 19, 2010 10:21 pm

    Kevorkian was a jazz artist on the side.


  122. 123 | August 19, 2010 10:22 pm

    @ lobo91:

    People on welfare shouldn’t be allowed to vote. The fact that they are is part of the reason we’re in this mess. Not only are they drawing money out of the public treasury for no work, they are allowed to vote for the guy who promises the most free goodies for no work to be their representative in Congress. All he has to do is keep the cash flowing back to his homies and he’s set for life. Good of the Country, be damned. In a nutshell, that is why we are where we are, bankrupt, reviled, and at war with an implacable enemy who has tracked us to our door and has decided he likes our place, and wants to move in.

    Thanks , Democrats.


  123. 124 | August 19, 2010 10:22 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    Therefore, CJ supports serial killers.


  124. savages_girl
    125 | August 19, 2010 10:22 pm

    What’s wrong with biker chicks?


  125. Possum
    126 | August 19, 2010 10:22 pm

    SHUT UP RODAN!

    Geeeezzzzzzzzz

    :(


  126. Possum
    127 | August 19, 2010 10:23 pm

    Possum wrote:

    SHUT UP RODAN!
    Geeeezzzzzzzzz

    :)


  127. m
    128 | August 19, 2010 10:25 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Nothing except they have to count wrenchwench among them, lol.


  128. 129 | August 19, 2010 10:25 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    I disagree. Sounds good on the surface. I’d rather raise the voting age back up to 21.


  129. 130 | August 19, 2010 10:26 pm

    @ Possum:

    My Bad!


  130. 131 | August 19, 2010 10:26 pm

    Bush messed up with Iraq?? Really??


  131. m
    132 | August 19, 2010 10:27 pm

    I think the people who were there “back then” and agreed with the majority of the posters and are still there now agreeing with the majority of the posters either have NO friends outside of lgf or they have no spine.

    That won’t get her far as a biker chick so maybe it’s the former.


  132. Possum
    133 | August 19, 2010 10:27 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Possum:
    My Bad!

    I am still laughing!


  133. song_and_dance_man
    134 | August 19, 2010 10:28 pm

    savages_girl wrote:

    What’s wrong with biker chicks?

    Well, those 6 inch choppers are are a bit noisome.


  134. lobo91
    135 | August 19, 2010 10:28 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    People on welfare shouldn’t be allowed to vote. The fact that they are is part of the reason we’re in this mess. Not only are they drawing money out of the public treasury for no work, they are allowed to vote for the guy who promises the most free goodies for no work to be their representative in Congress.

    You’re pretty much describing the electoral strategy of the Democratic Party since the mid-’60s…


  135. 136 | August 19, 2010 10:28 pm

    Bush’s financial problems started when the Dem’s got control of congress!!


  136. song_and_dance_man
    137 | August 19, 2010 10:29 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    The libs want CJ to apologize for Rather.

    If he does the blame will be shifted to the reader that Foster lifted the tip about the fakeness of the memo from.


  137. Possum
    138 | August 19, 2010 10:30 pm

    This show is too short. If we extended it another 5 minutes we could schedule a proper Pee break.

    I am OK but women have got bladders the size of a groundsquirrel.


  138. The Osprey
    139 | August 19, 2010 10:30 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    Calo wrote:

    @ Possum:
    Why the bucket?

    Remember Mr. Creosote? [Sorry I brought it up.]

    “I’ll ‘ave the lop.”


  139. Eliana
    140 | August 19, 2010 10:30 pm

    Good program!!!


  140. savages_girl
    141 | August 19, 2010 10:31 pm

    Wow. Show’s over already.

    Great job everybody!


  141. 142 | August 19, 2010 10:31 pm

    That final gong sounded like a small fart in a bathtub. Just sayin’.


  142. lobo91
    143 | August 19, 2010 10:31 pm

    AZOlddog wrote:

    Bush’s financial problems started when the Dem’s got control of congress!!

    Don’t start bringing facts into the debate…


  143. The Osprey
    144 | August 19, 2010 10:32 pm

    AZOlddog wrote:

    Bush’s financial problems started when the Dem’s got control of congress!!

    Hey OldDog, did you go to the Border Tea Party?


  144. 145 | August 19, 2010 10:33 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    That won’t happen as long as you can join the military at 18. The age doens’t bother me as much as the stupidity, and you can guarantee that folks on welfare are not the sharpest knives in the drawer. They are sharp enough to figure out who gives them goodies, and they will pull the lever for that person/Party every time.


  145. rain of lead
    146 | August 19, 2010 10:37 pm

    ohmygod!
    somebody is making some funny, funny ads
    this is awesome


  146. 147 | August 19, 2010 10:43 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    Let me clarify. I’d raise the voting age back to 21, AND eliminate the welfare programs.


  147. Speranza
    148 | August 19, 2010 10:50 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Let me clarify. I’d raise the voting age back to 21, AND eliminate the welfare programs.

    I would raise it to 25. People need some real world experiences such as paying taxes,


  148. 149 | August 19, 2010 10:54 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Bunk X wrote:
    @ Bunk X:
    Let me clarify. I’d raise the voting age back to 21, AND eliminate the welfare programs.

    I would raise it to 25. People need some real world experiences such as paying taxes,

    Looking back, I didn’t have my shit together until 30, and there are some folks I know who would disagree with that statement too, but you gotta start somewhere.


  149. song_and_dance_man
    150 | August 19, 2010 10:58 pm

    @ Speranza:

    IIRC the initial argument for voting was to be a right only for those with real interest in the USA. The popular vote was for the representatives, Senate and the House, who then would use the members to vote for President. 2000 almost gave us a throwback to the initial intent. Too bad the SCOTUS stepped in and led us away from how it was intended. It would have been an education to all to see the congress battle for the vote.


  150. lobo91
    151 | August 19, 2010 11:02 pm

    @ Speranza:

    I agree.


  151. 152 | August 19, 2010 11:04 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    IIRC the initial argument for voting was to be a right only for those with real interest in the USA. The popular vote was for the representatives, Senate and the House, who then would use the members to vote for President. 2000 almost gave us a throwback to the initial intent. Too bad the SCOTUS stepped in and led us away from how it was intended. It would have been an education to all to see the congress battle for the vote.

    Originally the House of Representatives elected the Senate, so that Senators wouldn’t become the elitist boobs they are now. Repeal the 17th Amendment!


  152. lobo91
    153 | August 19, 2010 11:07 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Originally the House of Representatives elected the Senate, so that Senators wouldn’t become the elitist boobs they are now. Repeal the 17th Amendment!

    No it didn’t.

    The state legislatures did.


  153. 154 | August 19, 2010 11:14 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Originally the House of Representatives elected the Senate, so that Senators wouldn’t become the elitist boobs they are now. Repeal the 17th Amendment!
    No it didn’t.
    The state legislatures did.

    Oops. That’s what I meant. Thanks.

    Repealing the 17th Amendment would give STATE representatives more power to control what their STATE Senators could do, thus giving more power to the voters in the STATE Representatives’ districts.


  154. F
    155 | August 19, 2010 11:15 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    Let me clarify. I’d raise the voting age back to 21, AND eliminate the welfare programs.

    Let’s just apply some Heinlein and make public service such as serving in the military the requirement for voting.

    Paul Verhoeven and Edward Neumeier totally misunderstood the reasoning behind that when they adapted Heinlein’s Starship Troopers to be a Hollywood action flick.


  155. song_and_dance_man
    156 | August 19, 2010 11:16 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    @ lobo91:

    I’m using my memory to envisage the scheme the Founders had in mind, but Lobo appears to be closer.


  156. F
    157 | August 19, 2010 11:17 pm

    @ Bunk X:
    The 17th was one of the biggest con-jobs ever put forth by the Progressives.


  157. 158 | August 19, 2010 11:23 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    @ lobo91:
    I’m using my memory to envisage the scheme the Founders had in mind, but Lobo appears to be closer.

    As I recall, the 17th was enacted to combat in-state graft and corruption, especially with the early oil barons of PA and the train moguls. If the State Representatives were beholden to industries that provide work and pay for residents of that State, why shouldn’t the State Senators also work for the State’s financial interests? They’re not doing it in California.


  158. song_and_dance_man
    159 | August 19, 2010 11:31 pm

    @ F:

    The idea of representation was damaged, for the obvious reasons. We now have, or then, had two pols who had the advantage of a vote from more populated areas that did not represent the less advantaged in each state. And the band played on. The whole idea of the Congress became skewed.


  159. F
    160 | August 19, 2010 11:32 pm

    Bunk X wrote:

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    @ Bunk X:
    @ lobo91:
    I’m using my memory to envisage the scheme the Founders had in mind, but Lobo appears to be closer.

    As I recall, the 17th was enacted to combat in-state graft and corruption, especially with the early oil barons of PA and the train moguls. If the State Representatives were beholden to industries that provide work and pay for residents of that State, why shouldn’t the State Senators also work for the State’s financial interests? They’re not doing it in California.

    from wikpedia:

    Election by legislatures generally occurred without major problems up to the mid-1850s. There were frequent vacancies of a few days up to several months, but these nearly always occurred when Congress was not in session, and so were harmless.[weasel words] In the 1850s, the sectional crisis over slavery led to increasing partisanship and strife. As a result, Indiana failed to elect a Senator from March 1855 to February 1857, while California failed to elect from March 1855 to January 1857.

    California had previously failed to elect from March 1851 through January 1852, missing two months of the first session of the 32nd Congress, while Delaware failed to elect from September 1839 to January 1841, missing the entire first session and half the second session of the 26th Congress.

    After the Civil War, the problems multiplied. In one case in the mid-1860s, the election of Senator John P. Stockton from New Jersey was contested on the grounds that he had been elected by a plurality rather than a majority in the state legislature.[1] Stockton asserted that the exact method for elections was murky and varied from state to state. To keep this from happening again, Congress passed a law in 1866 regulating how and when Senators were to be elected from each state. This was the first change in the process of Senatorial elections. While the law helped, there were still deadlocks in some legislatures and accusations of bribery, corruption, and suspicious dealings in some elections. Nine bribery cases were brought before the Senate between 1866 and 1906, and 45 deadlocks occurred in 20 states between 1891 and 1905, resulting in numerous delays in seating Senators. In the worst case, Delaware failed to elect from March 1899 to March 1903; by the end of this period both of Delaware’s seats were vacant for two years.[2]

    Congress meddled in things they didn’t like, the way the Founders had set things up.


  160. 161 | August 19, 2010 11:48 pm

    @ F:
    Funny. I hadn’t read the Wiki article before coming to my own conclusions. Although the language is typically couched, I agree with it.


  161. Aussie Infidel
    162 | August 20, 2010 1:33 am

    Damnit ! I missed the radio show AGAIN !

    Don’t you just hate time zones. While you guys were relaxing at home i was pumping iron at the gym, talking to a client about how to attack and take over a US company ripping off IP, and discussing building stuff and getting coffee rings on a set plans with my builder.

    How about you guys ‘radiotalk’ at midnight or something, then I can sit with a glass of beer and relax and even contribute a little. HEH ! Just kidding! :)


  162. Aussie Infidel
    163 | August 20, 2010 1:39 am

    The Federal Election in Australia is just 24 hours away. The sides are exactly 50:50. The Greens might be the power brokers in the Senate and ruin everyone’s day …. for the next 3 years. The election will be won or lost in Victoria and South Australia where they are either socialists or verrrry s-l-o-w learners … or maybe political masochists?

    Here’s hoping that the ‘Mad Monk’ on the right will best the ‘ginger anarchist’ on the nutzy left


  163. Aussie Infidel
    164 | August 20, 2010 1:47 am

    How come it’s always the marxist left ‘ends justify the means’ who get involved in electoral dirty tricks …. Ukhhhhh OH YEAH… I just answered my own question !

    There is an activist judge that has ‘made new law’ (all on his own) that allows 100,000 EXTRA folks to be enrolled right up to the time that the polls open. This without any oversight at all and it could be weeks before every one of these new voters will be checked and confirmed as real. I’m going for there to be LOTS of guys names Mr. Micharl. Mouse and Ms. Minnie. Mouse especially in marginal seats.

    Have the left no shame ? ….. Ohhh Yess …answered myself again !

    I gotta stop doing that! :)


  164. 165 | August 20, 2010 1:40 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    Zero has “negative coattails”?

    CoatFAILs.


  165. 166 | September 7, 2010 11:33 pm


    CheapTabletsOnline.Com. Canadian Health&Care.Special Internet Prices.No prescription online pharmacy.Best quality drugs. High quality pills. Order pills online

    Buy:Viagra.Propecia.Super Active ED Pack.VPXL.Viagra Super Force.Viagra Professional.Viagra Soft Tabs.Soma.Tramadol.Cialis.Cialis Soft Tabs.Cialis Super Active+.Maxaman.Levitra.Zithromax.Viagra Super Active+.Cialis Professional….


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David