First time visitor? Learn more.

Jihadi false flag ops, again

by 1389AD ( 204 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, Al Qaeda, Islamic hypocrisy, Kosovo, Military at August 30th, 2010 - 6:00 pm

This post on Jihad Watch describes an attack that could easily have gone much worse:

Afghanistan: Jihadists in U.S. Army uniforms attack NATO base

Quoth Muhammad: War is deceit.” “Insurgents attack 2 bases in east Afghanistan,” by Rahim Faiez for the Associated Press, August 28:

KABUL, Afghanistan – Insurgents wearing U.S. Army uniforms launched pre-dawn attacks Saturday on a major NATO base in eastern Afghanistan and a nearby camp where seven CIA employees were killed last year in a suicide bombing. NATO said there were no coalition casualties and the attacks were repelled.

Afghan police said about 50 insurgents attacked using rifles, heavy machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other weapons, but had been repelled.

After being driven away from the bases, the insurgents approached the nearby offices of the governor and provincial police headquarters but were driven off, said Khost provincial police Chief Abdul Hakim Ishaqzai.

“Given the size of the enemy’s force, this could have been a major catastrophe for Khost. Luckily we prevented it,” he said.

Small arms fire continued through the morning, while NATO helicopters patrolled overhead.

NATO said two insurgents had managed to breach Salerno’s perimeter, but were observed cutting the fence and killed immediately.

Dead insurgents were seen wearing camouflage jackets and pants seemingly identical to those warn by U.S. Army soldiers….

Read the rest.

It always happens whenever we trust Muslims

The following is an excerpt from a 1999 article about another false-flag operation carried out by the narcoterrorist/Islamist KLA, who, under various names and guises, were then, and still are, the local branch of al Qaeda in Kosovo.

This, of course, took place during the aftermath of the Kosovo War. For those not old enough to remember, Bill Clinton arm-twisted NATO into going along with him in his unprovoked war against the Christian Serbs, on behalf of the Muslim KLA.

The KLA obligingly helped him out by masquerading as Serb soldiers to commit acts of violence against civilians, so as to give Clinton some halfway-credible pretext to bolster his shaky rationale for committing the US and NATO militaries to make war on the Serbs.

Masked smiley in a curved frame

Masks!

On December 3, 1999, Agence France Presse (AFP) reported that UN police and KFOR [that is, NATO] troops found illegal weapons, KLA uniforms, and Serb police uniforms in a house “inhabited by members of the future Kosovo Protection Corps” [the successor to the supposedly-disbanded Kosovo Liberation Army or KLA].

Would someone please tell us: what are KLA operatives doing with Serbian police uniforms?

Remember all of those news stories about various war crimes and atrocities that were supposedly committed by Serbian police, often wearing masks, during the NATO bombing and before?

The stories completely contradicted other reports, such as official documents from the German Courts, which ruled that there was no persecution of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo. [See note #2 at the end]

Of course, the stories did not offer any hard evidence that the culprits were actually Serbian police.

But these stories certainly were convenient for the NATO sales team, and the mass media, in terms of selling the war against the Serbs. What an effective way to turn public opinion against the Yugoslav nation and the entire Serbian people!

One thought we had at the time: ANYBODY can put on a stolen police uniform. And the KLA wouldn’t have to steal the uniforms either; they could simply manufacture identical uniforms in any clothing factory.

This is all especially eerie because we read a Reuters story dated December 4, 1999 about the fighting going on in Chechnya, in Russia. According to the story the “US-sponsored Radio Liberty” reported that “masked Russian troops had opened fire at close range on the column of refugees.”

“Masked Russian troops”? Again, why the masks? IF they were trying to disguise who they were, why wear Russian uniforms? Unless of course they really anti-Russian troops trying to provide negative media coverage to be played in the West, where the governments (especially the Clinton administration) are supporting the Chechnya rebels behind the scenes because they want to see Russia broken up into edible pieces.

Here is the first half of the AFP story about the uniforms:

Illegal arms cache found in homes of Kosovo Corps members

PRISTINA, Yugoslavia, Dec 3 (AFP) – A stash of weapons was found in a house in southern Kosovo inhabited by members of the future Kosovo Protection Corps, UN police said Friday. UN police officers and members of the NATO-led forces in Kosovo (KFOR) searched two houses in Stimje, where they said they found “anti-tank rockets, anti-personnel land mines, sub-machine guns, thousands of bullets, as well as Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) and Serb police uniforms.” They arrested two members of the Kosovo Protection Corps, who police said would be charged with “illegal possession of military armaments.” Police did not specify the number of weapons found, only indicating that the number was “substantial.”

Read the rest.

The take-home lesson

Never fight on behalf of Muslims, and be exceedingly wary of Muslims as enemies. Muslims can never be counted on to follow the ‘normal’ (i.e.,customary European) rules of warfare, though Muslims are always the first ones to complain whenever they can find a way to make it look as though we are not following our own rules.


Tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

204 Responses to “Jihadi false flag ops, again”
( jump to bottom )

  1. mjazz
    1 | August 30, 2010 6:04 pm

    يجب محو الإسلام من على وجه الكوكب.


  2. 2 | August 30, 2010 6:08 pm

    The Jihadis adhere to no rules of war, no laws other than shari’ia, which encourages things like this (always assume a Mohgammedan is lyaing. You are probably right). A quick solution? Start impaling any of them you catch like this. I am in no way joking. I kill every last one of the motherfuckers I captured. That might help. Takes care of the ones you catch, at least…


  3. Nevergiveup
    3 | August 30, 2010 6:11 pm

    So lemme ask a question: If an scumbag Islamie in US Military Uniform sneaks onto one of our bases and kills a US Sailor, Soldier, AirMen, or Marine will Obama prosecute him in a civilian court?


  4. 4 | August 30, 2010 6:17 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Prosecute him? Why would Obama do that? They are brothers in the Ummah, after all. Or didn’t you see where Obama basically dropped the charges against the guy who did the Cole bombing? Planned it and executed it, anyway. Obama may think he is a god, but he can’t drop the charges against the ‘Splodeydopes where they are now…


  5. 5 | August 30, 2010 6:20 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    So lemme ask a question: If an scumbag Islamie in US Military Uniform sneaks onto one of our bases and kills a US Sailor, Soldier, AirMen, or Marine will Obama prosecute him in a civilian court?

    Isn’t that a war crime and against the Geneva rules? I read that using an enemy uniform is grounds for execution. Is that true?


  6. Nevergiveup
    6 | August 30, 2010 6:20 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Prosecute him? Why would Obama do that? They are brothers in the Ummah, after all. Or didn’t you see where Obama basically dropped the charges against the guy who did the Cole bombing? Planned it and executed it, anyway. Obama may think he is a god, but he can’t drop the charges against the ‘Splodeydopes where they are now…

    I don’t think they dropped the charges. They delayed the trial until after the elections because I think they intend to take him to a civilian court also


  7. Mad Mullah
    7 | August 30, 2010 6:21 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    So lemme ask a question: If an scumbag Islamie in US Military Uniform sneaks onto one of our bases and kills a US Sailor, Soldier, AirMen, or Marine will Obama prosecute him in a civilian court?

    Eric Holder will most likely say that it has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism at all, just like he was playing dumb when asked about the Fort Hood Islamic terrorist murder attack against US soldiers.

    And then Obama will probably order the case to be halted, just like with the USS Cole case recently. Then Obama will hold another speech in which he supports the GZ Mosque and remind everybody by repeating his deranged lie that Islam has always been a part of America and how great and peaceful that religion is.


  8. Nevergiveup
    8 | August 30, 2010 6:21 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    So lemme ask a question: If an scumbag Islamie in US Military Uniform sneaks onto one of our bases and kills a US Sailor, Soldier, AirMen, or Marine will Obama prosecute him in a civilian court?

    Isn’t that a war crime and against the Geneva rules? I read that using an enemy uniform is grounds for execution. Is that true?

    I think so


  9. 9 | August 30, 2010 6:22 pm

    I hope he runs!

    Are you ready for President John Bolton?


  10. 10 | August 30, 2010 6:23 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Yeah, I read that was a non no and if caught, you can be executed as a spy. I hope Lobo pops up on this thread.


  11. song_and_dance_man
    11 | August 30, 2010 6:23 pm

    Is the site running slow for anyone else but me?


  12. 12 | August 30, 2010 6:25 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    Is the site running slow for anyone else but me?

    Yeah it is a bit slow.


  13. RIX
    13 | August 30, 2010 6:28 pm

    Rodan
    5 | August 30, 2010 18:20
    Isn’t that a war crime and against the Geneva rules? I read that using an enemy uniform is grounds for execution. Is that true?

    It does violate Geneva & execution is allowed.
    look at the Gtimo prisoners, they are stateless terrorists.
    They have no Geneva protection & it is permited to shoot them.
    More than likely Obama will try to bring them to the States with
    taxpayer food, housing & education.


  14. Mad Mullah
    14 | August 30, 2010 6:28 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Yeah, I read that was a non no and if caught, you can be executed as a spy. I hope Lobo pops up on this thread.

    There were some German spies on US soil during WWII that were executed. Some of them landed by U-boat on the east coast in different places.


  15. 15 | August 30, 2010 6:32 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    See RIX’s 13.


  16. 16 | August 30, 2010 6:36 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    As I understand it, they could execute any of these terrorists under the Genenva Conventions. They aren’t POWs, because they aren’t lawful combatants. In practice, no one would do anything but whine if we fed these fucks feet first into a woodchipper. As a practical matter, we aren’t going to harm one hair on their precious little heads.


  17. Mad Mullah
    17 | August 30, 2010 6:38 pm

    RIX wrote:

    look at the Gtimo prisoners, they are stateless terrorists.
    They have no Geneva protection & it is permited to shoot them.

    And already, many of them have been released, and quite a few of those have gone right back to continuing their Jihad fight and they’re back to trying to kill Americans and Infidels.

    Call me crazy, or maybe I just have plain common sense, but I would have ordered them all to be executed.


  18. Nevergiveup
    18 | August 30, 2010 6:38 pm

    Who is “Bar” again and why is he shitting all over the last thread?


  19. 19 | August 30, 2010 6:40 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    I read that using an enemy uniform is grounds for execution. Is that true?

    Yes. You are considered a spy.


  20. 20 | August 30, 2010 6:40 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Yeah I wondered that too.


  21. song_and_dance_man
    21 | August 30, 2010 6:41 pm

    Never fight on behalf of Muslims The Left, and be exceedingly wary of Muslims The Left as enemies. Muslims The Left can never be counted on to follow the ‘normal’ rules of warfare politics, though Muslims The Left are always the first ones to complain whenever they can find a way to make it look as though we are not following our own rules.

    It fights rather nicely, doesn’t it?


  22. 22 | August 30, 2010 6:41 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Running slow for me as well, but I thought it was just my netbook (which has a slower processor than my laptop).

    Has the administration ever admitted outright that the Ft. Hood gunman was in fact a terror attack by a Islamofacist acting alone or are they still clinging to the “isolated psychologically impaired man with “pre-PTSD?”


  23. Mad Mullah
    23 | August 30, 2010 6:41 pm

    From ABC:
    Gitmo Recidivism Rate Rises to 20 Percent Confirmed to ABC

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/01/gitmo-recidivism-rate-rises-to-20-percent-confirmed-to-abc.html

    And this percentage is only growing, as it’s higher now than before.


  24. song_and_dance_man
    24 | August 30, 2010 6:42 pm

    aladamit I used the italic tool instead of the strike one.


  25. 25 | August 30, 2010 6:42 pm

    Mad Mullah wrote:

    Call me crazy, or maybe I just have plain common sense, but I would have ordered them all to be executed.

    You’re crazy! Of course, that is exactly what I’d have done with them after I’d drained thm of all possible information that they had. You can’t torture al Qaeda freaks. No matter what you do, it isn’t torture (complain about panties on their heasd now, Leftist pussies :P )


  26. Nevergiveup
    26 | August 30, 2010 6:44 pm

    If anyone wants to finally and absolutely know they are all out of their fuckin minds over in the swamp. They are now all jerking themselves off while either admitting they voted for Obama or saying how sorry they are that they voted for McCain/Palin. All of them!


  27. RIX
    27 | August 30, 2010 6:46 pm

    Mad Mullah
    17 | August 30, 2010 18:38
    And already, many of them have been released, and quite a few of those have gone right back to continuing their Jihad fight and they’re back to trying to kill Americans and Infidels.

    Call me crazy, or maybe I just have plain common sense, but I would have ordered them all to be executed.

    It is outrageous to release these people to go right back to the battlefield & kill our troops.
    To Obama the troops are lesser human beings. You know not Ivy League tpes & none of there wives have ever brought 40 of her friends to Spain.


  28. Mad Mullah
    28 | August 30, 2010 6:47 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Has the administration ever admitted outright that the Ft. Hood gunman was in fact a terror attack by a Islamofacist acting alone or are they still clinging to the “isolated psychologically impaired man with “pre-PTSD?”

    I would assume that they’re still trying to figure out what possible motivations a terrorist Muslim who ran around shotting and murdering people while shouting “allahu akbar” could have had.

    One of the most clueless and ignorant women in the country, Janet Napolitano said this after the massacre. Anybody with half a brain knows exactly what the motivation behind the shooting was.

    Janet Napolitano, the homeland security secretary, joined the calls for patience. “That investigation is under way by law enforcement authorities, and let’s let that be the number one priory in terms of ascertaining what motivations he had,” she said in a television interview.

    It’s been a while since the Fort Hood shootings, I’m going to have to assume that they still haven’t figured out what could have possibly been behind it, it’s a real enigma, a great mystery.


  29. RIX
    29 | August 30, 2010 6:48 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    If anyone wants to finally and absolutely know they are all out of their fuckin minds over in the swamp. They are now all jerking themselves off while either admitting they voted for Obama or saying how sorry they are that they voted for McCain/Palin. All of them!

    Yeah, I took a look a while ago. Chuck started it talking about how he would like his vote back.
    He really doesn’t see what a nitwit he comes off as.


  30. 30 | August 30, 2010 6:49 pm

    Two Men on a Chicago to Amsterdam Flight have been arrested for Terrorism. Their luggage contained “a cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle, three cell phones taped together, several watches taped together, a box cutter and three large knives.”

    The Dutch Police have released the names of the suspected terrorists: Gary Anderson and Phil McNeil. They are believed to be linked to the Tea Party movement.

    Just kidding. Their names are Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezem al Murisi. I don’t think they are with the Tea Party movement.


  31. 31 | August 30, 2010 6:49 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Does that include the foreign ones? I bet they all voted for Obama. Every last one of them :evil:


  32. snork
    32 | August 30, 2010 6:49 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    If anyone wants to finally and absolutely know they are all out of their fuckin minds over in the swamp. They are now all jerking themselves off while either admitting they voted for Obama or saying how sorry they are that they voted for McCain/Palin. All of them!

    Sperm, sperm, sperm, sperm, sperm, sperm, and asswhistle lapping it up.


  33. Nevergiveup
    33 | August 30, 2010 6:50 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Does that include the foreign ones? I bet they all voted for Obama. Every last one of them

    No doubt


  34. 34 | August 30, 2010 6:50 pm

    BTW the Geneva Convention only applies to the treatment of soldiers from countries that signed the agreement.


  35. snork
    35 | August 30, 2010 6:51 pm

    10 Walter L. Newton Mon, Aug 30, 2010 3:34:50pm

    re: #5 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

    C’MON! GROUP HUG! EVERYONE!

    Sattv? Put on your pants.

    How can you group hug when all participants are in straight jackets?


  36. RIX
    36 | August 30, 2010 6:51 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    About two years ago eight Muslim yoots got busted for planning terrorist attacks right here.
    The idiot writing the story claimed that there was no commonality, because they all didn’t attend the same mosque.


  37. 37 | August 30, 2010 6:51 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    What? It isn’t like MOhammedans have been killing unbelievers for 1400 years or anything. Religion of Peace™, man. Religion of Peace™


  38. 38 | August 30, 2010 6:52 pm

    Two men who flew from Chicago to Amsterdam Sunday night have been arrested by Dutch police on charges they were preparing a terrorist attack…
    Despite security concerns surrounding them, Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezem al Murisi were allowed to board the United Airlines flight at O’Hare.
    Airport screeners in Birmingham, Alabama first stopped al Soofi and sent him to additional screening because of his “bulky clothing,” ABC News reported. A check of his luggage turned up large amounts of cash and cell phones taped together and to a Pepto-Bismol bottle.

    Why the hell were al soofi and al murisi allowed to board the flights in Alabama and then again in Chicago? What the hell is all this damn security for if we are still letting suspicious types like this on flights??? Can’t we see what they are doing?? I say they are testing the security.


  39. snork
    39 | August 30, 2010 6:52 pm

    11 Cato the Elder Mon, Aug 30, 2010 3:35:28pm

    Well, as someone who took a lot of heat here for revealing that I was going to vote for Obama, and for pointing out that Sawah Pawin is an utterly unredeemable idiot, let me just say how pleased I am to be able to say I told you so!

    So what’cha doin’ with your Obama money? Buyin’ internet?


  40. 40 | August 30, 2010 6:53 pm

    @ snork:

    Bukkake flick? I bet asswhistle can’t whistle when she gets done with that!

    Eeeeeeeeeewwwwwww!


  41. snork
    41 | August 30, 2010 6:55 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    Do weasels burp?


  42. danrudy
    42 | August 30, 2010 6:55 pm

    For Tim Blair, A Sincere Apology

    Wingnuts | Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:25:36 pm PDT

    Tim Blair is a funny person! Now he’s demanding an apology from me. What will he think next?

    This time he dug up an LGF post from the presidential election, in which I quoted some excerpts from Barack Obama’s autobiography about his prejudice toward white people, earlier in his life. (As with Shirley Sherrod, it’s only part of the story, because Obama has clearly moved past those prejudices.)

    In Blair’s dim bulb one-liner wingnut universe, quoting Barack Obama’s own stories about his youthful attitudes toward race is exactly the same as Glenn Beck’s accusation that Obama is “a racist with a deep seated hatred of white people or white culture.” For this transgression I must beg forgiveness from the world on bended knee.

    Well, I do want to apologize today for making a huge mistake.

    I’d like to express my sincere and utmost regret that I voted for John McCain and Sarah Palin, instead of Barack Obama.

    If I could go back in time and reverse that vote, knowing what I know today, I would.

    I’m sorry, Nation.

    LOL,,,and Charles banned me for trying to point out that relying on one liners from media matters taken out of context did not PROVE that Rush Limbaugh was a racist. What a Jackass… Crying about having his one liner taken out of context while condemning others for the same offense…Boo Hoo


  43. 43 | August 30, 2010 6:56 pm

    So the LGFers wish they had voted for Obama NOW? After seeing that he was far more left than they thought, after seeing what a bang up job he’s doing? Most folk who supported Obama want their vote back, I don’t know of anyone who wants their McCain vote back. Lemmings.


  44. RIX
    44 | August 30, 2010 6:57 pm

    snork
    39 | August 30, 2010 18:52
    So what’cha doin’ with your Obama money? Buyin’ internet?

    Ned thinks that Obama will get him lots of jury duty so that he can get a per diem, validated parking & a free lunch.
    That dog of his needs a rescue.


  45. NoThreat2U
    45 | August 30, 2010 6:57 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    Take no prisoners. Next time, shoot the bastards.


  46. NoThreat2U
    46 | August 30, 2010 6:58 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Again I have to ask, why are they apologizing for voting for McCain? Their wonderboy won. Ah the burning stupid……


  47. Nevergiveup
    47 | August 30, 2010 6:59 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:
    Take no prisoners. Next time, shoot the bastards.

    Well I would not say that. I’d do it, I just wouldn’t say it.


  48. buzzsawmonkey
    48 | August 30, 2010 6:59 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    What the hell is all this damn security for if we are still letting suspicious types like this on flights???

    To give plausible deniability to incompetent bureaucrats when we stop being lucky.


  49. 49 | August 30, 2010 6:59 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Who is “Bar” again and why is he shitting all over the last thread?

    Bar used to be an admin with us. I don’t get his beef.


  50. 50 | August 30, 2010 6:59 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    So lemme ask a question: If an scumbag Islamie in US Military Uniform sneaks onto one of our bases and kills a US Sailor, Soldier, AirMen, or Marine will Obama prosecute him in a civilian court?

    They did officially classify the Fort Hood shootings as “workplace violence” (with not a single mention of Islam or jihad in the final report). Sounds like a crime for a civilian court to me.


  51. snork
    51 | August 30, 2010 7:00 pm

    @ Rancher:
    He can walk with an umbrella.

    /D’oh!


  52. 52 | August 30, 2010 7:00 pm

    @ Rancher:

    Tey only think what Charles tells them to think. It is kind of fascinating watching the inner workings of a cult like you were a fly on the wall. I wonder if Janet Nepalitano is going to burn their server down? (It is a Janet thing. See if we ever have another AG named Janet…)


  53. Mad Mullah
    53 | August 30, 2010 7:01 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:
    About two years ago eight Muslim yoots got busted for planning terrorist attacks right here.
    The idiot writing the story claimed that there was no commonality, because they all didn’t attend the same mosque.

    That’s hardly surprising. It has become a common tactic of the left and liberals to defend Muslim terrorists at every opportunity they get using whatever braindead logic that pops into their ignorant, liberal minds. That braindead and ignorant logic usually involves invoking the name “Timothy McVeigh”, “Abortion bombers” or the “Crusades” :)

    The American “right” is far more dangerous than Al-Qaeda or the Taliban, according to those nutjobs, so why would anybody expect anti-American liberals to worked up over Islamic terrorism?

    In order to defeat the Islamists, a whole bunch of anti-American liberal trash will have to be defeated also.


  54. Nevergiveup
    54 | August 30, 2010 7:01 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Who is “Bar” again and why is he shitting all over the last thread?

    Bar used to be an admin with us. I don’t get his beef.

    Yeah I remember that, but what was his shtick? Was he a real right wing orthodox Jew like Wrath?


  55. 55 | August 30, 2010 7:01 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Bingo. And you got it right. When we stop getting lucky. It is only a matter of time before that happens.


  56. 56 | August 30, 2010 7:02 pm

    @ snork:

    The Dumbrella™

    (I got that from Ann Althouse :mrgreen: )


  57. NoThreat2U
    57 | August 30, 2010 7:03 pm

    @ snork:
    Seeing as how I am a lady, I probably shouldn’t laugh at that gross remark, but, oh well. Hahahahahahahahaha And eeeeeeewwwwwww!


  58. snork
    58 | August 30, 2010 7:05 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    That picture says so much. He can quote Marx chapter and verse, but something that requires the horse sense that God gave a llama baffles him.


  59. RIX
    59 | August 30, 2010 7:06 pm

    Mad Mullah
    53 | August 30, 2010 19:01

    You nailed it. Well said & all true.
    Everybody have a good evening.


  60. NoThreat2U
    60 | August 30, 2010 7:07 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Hell, I’ll scream it from the rooftop. lol


  61. Mad Mullah
    61 | August 30, 2010 7:08 pm

    V the K wrote:

    Just kidding. Their names are Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezem al Murisi. I don’t think they are with the Tea Party movement.

    Well, let’s not jump to any conclusions here.

    We don’t know that religion played any role in this. There is so far zero evidence that the two terrorist perpetrators who were seeking 72 virgins where Muslims. And if it is indeed found out that they were, then the first and foremost priority should be to worry about some drunk guy pissing on a rug in some Mosque.

    On Fox News now, they’re saying that this is most likely a dry-run.


  62. NoThreat2U
    62 | August 30, 2010 7:09 pm

    @ RoboMonkey:
    And one soldier who was shot numerous times cannot get benefits…it wasn’t considered a part of the “war”. I dont know how to explain it better.


  63. Nevergiveup
    63 | August 30, 2010 7:13 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Hell, I’ll scream it from the rooftop. lol

    If you scream it from a roof top and the prisoners in your trust turn up dead your in trouble. If you get silent and they try to escape well shit happens!


  64. 64 | August 30, 2010 7:15 pm

    Damn, the LLLibs just can’t help themselves, can they? Check this shit out:

    Sebelius: Time for ‘Reeducation’ on Obama Health Care Law
    August 30, 2010 6:10 PM

    Steven Portnoy reports:

    With a number of polls showing a sustained level of opposition to the Democrats’ health care reform efforts more than five months after passage, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the Obama administration has “a lot of reeducation to do” heading into the midterms.

    Hey, and “Work Makes Free” to you, too! Now, maybe this dumb cunt is so fucking stupid because she mainlines heroin in between huffing butane through her crack pipe, or maybe she is so used to using the term “reeducation” when discussing people’s political views that she doesn’t see the problem, but for the rest of us, well, she said a lot, didn’t she?


  65. 65 | August 30, 2010 7:16 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Damn, but I hate it when they try and crawl out through the woodchipper…


  66. Philip_Daniel
    66 | August 30, 2010 7:17 pm

    So, Obdicut on LGF makes the grossly-inaccurate claims that Imam Rauf is a Sufi, and that mujahedin groups are somehow anti-Sufi because they supposedly see Sufis as heretical and because Sufis are “nonviolent”…

    Well, I have news for you, Obdicut…

    Amir Timur, also known as Tamerlane, the founder of the Timurid Dynasty, stretching from the Caucasus to Xinjiang, killed millions of kuffar and even Muslims whom he deemed apostates. HE WAS A NAQSHBANDI SUFI, as are many of today’s Chechen mujahedin!!! Likewise, many members of the Taliban stem from the DEOBANDI SUFI movement. And, the Sufi Ahmad Sirhindi was a supporter of violent, expansionist jihad, as was the famous Sufi cleric al-Ghazali, considered the revitalizer of Islam although all he did was help to crush any remaining rationalist trends — for good.


  67. NoThreat2U
    67 | August 30, 2010 7:18 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    Christians do that shit all the time. Hellooooo….Tim McVeigh??

    //////// and so on and so forth.


  68. The Osprey
    68 | August 30, 2010 7:19 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    So lemme ask a question: If an scumbag Islamie in US Military Uniform sneaks onto one of our bases and kills a US Sailor, Soldier, AirMen, or Marine will Obama prosecute him in a civilian court?

    Isn’t that a war crime and against the Geneva rules? I read that using an enemy uniform is grounds for execution. Is that true?

    It was during WWII. SS Grüppenführer Otto Skorzeny had some of his men dress up in US uniforms during the Battle of the Bulge, they were captured and shot as spies, IIRC.


  69. NoThreat2U
    69 | August 30, 2010 7:19 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Well I am just a nobody. If I were someone important, I would keep my mouth shut. I know how to play the game ;)


  70. Philip_Daniel
    70 | August 30, 2010 7:19 pm

    snork wrote:

    11 Cato the Elder Mon, Aug 30, 2010 3:35:28pm

    Well, as someone who took a lot of heat here for revealing that I was going to vote for Obama, and for pointing out that Sawah Pawin is an utterly unredeemable idiot, let me just say how pleased I am to be able to say I told you so!

    European intellectuals on left and right alike see Obama as a failure, and even miss George W. Bush!

    I Told Ya So!!!


  71. Mad Mullah
    71 | August 30, 2010 7:22 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Damn, the LLLibs just can’t help themselves, can they? Check this shit out:

    Sounds like a typical, liberal-fascist. And those people have the nerve to call others racists or fascists or bigots or any of the other cards that they play from their pathetic deck on any given day.

    Somehow, I doubt that their “re-education” attempts will be successful.


  72. The Osprey
    72 | August 30, 2010 7:23 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    I hope he runs!

    Are you ready for President John Bolton?

    Fear the ‘stache!


  73. 73 | August 30, 2010 7:23 pm

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    There you go, pulling out the facts again! Well, mister, your puny facts are no match for Obdicut’s Invincible Ignorance™ (that does 5d6 damage, just for you, Dark Falcon, because I know you are reading :P ). Obdicut’s Invincible Ignorance™ is impervious to all facts, knowledge, and, most especially, any wisdom that it comes across. This makes him one of Charles’ most Favorite Posters® until such time as Charles, in his ineffible magesty, decides to ban him…


  74. 74 | August 30, 2010 7:29 pm

    Holy shit! Remington is making a 12ga in 3 1/2″ Nitro Magnum! Wow! I’m not sure I would want to shoot one…

    (OK, back to your regularly scheduled thread)


  75. Mad Mullah
    75 | August 30, 2010 7:30 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:
    Christians do that shit all the time. Hellooooo….Tim McVeigh??

    //////// and so on and so forth.

    And the funny part is that Christianity had nothing to do with that at all, not a thing.

    I can’t tell the difference between McVeigh and a typical liberal, because what McVeigh wrote below, sounds exactly what liberals say. McVeigh was more of a liberal than he was a Christian, he even said that he had lost touch with it and that science was his religion.

    During his time in prison, McVeigh wrote various essays. An Essay on Hypocrisy describes the U.S. Government as hypocritical for justifying its attack on Iraq by stating that Iraq should not be allowed to stockpile weapons of mass destruction because it had used them in the past. He cited Hiroshima and Nagasaki as examples of the U.S. using nuclear weapons in the past.[61]


  76. 76 | August 30, 2010 7:32 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Mad Mullah
    17 | August 30, 2010 18:38
    And already, many of them have been released, and quite a few of those have gone right back to continuing their Jihad fight and they’re back to trying to kill Americans and Infidels.
    Call me crazy, or maybe I just have plain common sense, but I would have ordered them all to be executed.
    It is outrageous to release these people to go right back to the battlefield & kill our troops.
    To Obama the troops are lesser human beings. You know not Ivy League tpes & none of there wives have ever brought 40 of her friends to Spain.

    *facepalm*


  77. 77 | August 30, 2010 7:35 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    There has always been a lot of suspicion that McVeigh had Mohammedan help, but there has never been anything proven in that regard. Just some odd coincidences, and the fact that the Clinton Administration would have done anything (including quash leads) to pin the attack on the Right. Which McVeight was not part of. If you believe the popular fairy tale, excuse me, official story line, he was pretty much a loner hooked up with another loner and they made this marvelous bomb without any special training or outside help.

    That’s what they say, anyway…


  78. 78 | August 30, 2010 7:37 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    @ Iron Fist:
    @ Philip_Daniel:
    @ 1389AD:
    @ The Osprey:

    Post coming up at 8:30 EST about the 2 men arrested after a Chicago to Amsterdam flight.


  79. 79 | August 30, 2010 7:42 pm

    New DOD!

    I’m Sorry Nation


  80. buzzsawmonkey
    80 | August 30, 2010 7:43 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Post coming up at 8:30 EST about the 2 men arrested after a Chicago to Amsterdam flight.

    Note that although this arrest was made “at the request of the American authorities,” the American authorities allowed them both to get on the plane, which means they waltzed right through the TSA and Homeland Security.

    Sure they were arrested once they’d arrived at their destination, but like the Christmas bomber, if a plan to blow up the plane before arrival or hijack it and ram it into a building had been in effect, and effectual, “we asked them to arrest these guys at their destination” would look pretty damned lame.

    TSA FAIL.


  81. 81 | August 30, 2010 7:46 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Yup, big failure.


  82. waldensianspirit
    82 | August 30, 2010 7:50 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Equivalent random percentage to the profiling quota was already used up. They have to be allowed on.


  83. 83 | August 30, 2010 7:50 pm

    More inn the Oh,please category:

    There are now 13 Democrat-held Senate seats in play
    Richard Baehr

    Add West Virginia to the list of vulnerable Democratic held Senate seats with Governor Joe Manchin holding a slim 6% lead over Republican John Raese in a state where approval for President Obama is at 29%.

    The current list includes 5 states where Republicans hold solid leads: North Dakota, Delaware, Indiana, Arkansas and Pennsylvania; two states where the GOP holds a narrow lead: Colorado and Washington; 3 states where the race is essentially even: Nevada, Illinois, and Wisconsin; and 3 states where Democrats hold small and shrinking leads: California Connecticut and West Virginia.

    13. 13, and they need ten. Oh, my. Could we really have a repeate of the 1994 elections? Give the Republicans a chance for a complete do-over? That would be nice. Not enough to save the country, probably (they could have had they been serious in 1994), but it would give us a chance to go down fighting…


  84. bar
    84 | August 30, 2010 7:51 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Just like I have been saying, airport “security” failed us on 9/11/01. New rules don’t matter much when we continually fail to enforce existing rules.


  85. m
    85 | August 30, 2010 7:52 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Yeah, and that’s my route to Amsterdam.

    >:-[

    I have to go back too… I have to see it once more before it’s all islamic and the coffee shops are turned to hookah dens and the red light district is lit up in green with all of the window women wearing burkas for the temporary marriages to the muslim on the go…


  86. Mad Mullah
    86 | August 30, 2010 7:53 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    TSA FAIL.

    Those incompetent fuckheads found this in one of the terrorist’s luggage and they still allowed him to board? WTF?

    Soofi was found to be carrying $7,000 in cash and a check of his luggage found a cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle, three cell phones taped together, several watches taped together, a box cutter and three large knives. Officials said there was no indication of explosives and he and his luggage were cleared for the flight from Birmingham to Chicago O’Hare.


  87. 87 | August 30, 2010 7:53 pm

    @ m:

    I used to want to visit Amsterdam, but now that I’m engaged, it just doesn’t seem like it’d be worth the long flight ;-)


  88. 88 | August 30, 2010 7:54 pm

    @ m:

    Atlanta has flights to to Amsterdam.


  89. Doppelganger
    89 | August 30, 2010 7:54 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    Post coming up at 8:30 EST about the 2 men arrested after a Chicago to Amsterdam flight.
    Note that although this arrest was made “at the request of the American authorities,” the American authorities allowed them both to get on the plane, which means they waltzed right through the TSA and Homeland Security.
    Sure they were arrested once they’d arrived at their destination, but like the Christmas bomber, if a plan to blow up the plane before arrival or hijack it and ram it into a building had been in effect, and effectual, “we asked them to arrest these guys at their destination” would look pretty damned lame.
    TSA FAIL.

    They would have arrested them at the crash site, after the plane went down.

    Napolitano : The system worked ! We got ‘em ( pending dental record identification )


  90. Bagua
    90 | August 30, 2010 7:55 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Food Lion:
    hey Food Lion – some fool over at LGF claims that you are one of Bagua’s socks!

    Really?


  91. m
    91 | August 30, 2010 7:55 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Hell I could drive there and catch a flight! Last time my only layover options were Chicago and Germany.


  92. 92 | August 30, 2010 7:56 pm

    Remember how the national guard was to deploy to the international border with mexico? and remember how it was delayed? well, it finally happened today. a grand total of 30 showed up. not kidding. a few more will show up each monday. http://kirls.blogspot.com/2010/08/30-national-guard-soldiers-to-arizona.html


  93. 93 | August 30, 2010 7:57 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:

    What, don’t you always carry a little spare change with you when you are traveling? And you tape your cell-phone to your pepto for when you are motion sick, but you have to make a call to your bookie to bet on the camel races…

    (Definately a dry run. Just like the six Imams. I’d have probably killed one of those fuckers if I’d been on their plane. Betcha don’t think it’s so damn funny, now, asshole!) (Him, dead al Qaeda wannabe, not you :P )


  94. m
    94 | August 30, 2010 7:57 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    LOL!

    They have other attractions ~:D
    I cried like a baby through the Anne Frank house.


  95. 95 | August 30, 2010 7:58 pm

    @ Kirly:

    They have to give the drug smugglers trime to move extra people to the border so they can stay competitive. You wouldn’t want anything to interfere with Obama’s supply would you? He gets real testy if he misses his hourly re-fuel…


  96. 96 | August 30, 2010 8:00 pm

    @ m:

    Yeah, that one would bother me. I don’t think I could visit Auschwitz. I’d come away wanting to kill Germans. Bad Idea, there in the middle of Poland (or maybe not. Good way to get drinks on the house, perhaps)


  97. spinmore
    97 | August 30, 2010 8:02 pm

    . . . speaking of Tim McVeigh – just cracked open Jayna Davis’ book “The Third Terrorist” regarding Tim McVs ties to Hussain Al-Hussaini. Next time a Libtard drops the ‘McVeigh the Christian’ bullshit, ask ‘em about that one. Libs are more pseudo then even i think.


  98. Mad Mullah
    98 | August 30, 2010 8:02 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Definately a dry run. Just like the six Imams.

    A dry-run should be prosecuted in the same manner as if it was an actual attack.

    A mock-bomb on an airplane should be treated and prosecuted as if it were a real bomb.

    A bank robber with a toy gun is no less guilty of trying to rob the bank than one with a real gun.


  99. m
    99 | August 30, 2010 8:03 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    I hear ya.

    It was bad, but good.


  100. spinmore
    100 | August 30, 2010 8:05 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    . . . if it looks like a dry-run, just add water (waterboarding):)


  101. buzzsawmonkey
  102. Doppelganger
    102 | August 30, 2010 8:09 pm

    Carry a mock bomb?

    I think the German Shepherds need to be let loose on you to rip you to shreds looking for more weapons.

    just to be safe


  103. 103 | August 30, 2010 8:10 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Wow 30, OMG the Cartels are so scared!
    /

    NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    But we defend the villages of Afghan pedophiles.


  104. Mad Mullah
    104 | August 30, 2010 8:12 pm

    spinmore wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:
    . . . if it looks like a dry-run, just add water (waterboarding):)

    I agree with you of course, but unfortunately the only people who would get prosecuted would not be the terrorists, as Obama and Holder would obviously go after the American citizens who would support such barbaric and savage, medieval torture against innocent, nice people who just happen to like to travel with mock-bombs in their suitcase.

    I’m sure that Obama the cotton-picker (according to Rick Sanchez) will have something wise, intelligent and pragmatic to say about this latest matter as soon as he’s done giving shout-outs to any potential homeboys of his in the audience.


  105. 105 | August 30, 2010 8:12 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Wow 30, OMG the Cartels are so scared!
    /
    NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    But we defend the villages of Afghan pedophiles.

    the cartels control northern mexico now. they assassinated 2 mayors in 2 weeks (mayor of santiago, iirc, and now hidalgo). i wonder who they’ll take out next week? shouldn’t take too many more to reach the point where no one will run except the corrupt endorsed by the cartels.

    btw, pamela geller on fox business network “Money Rocks” holding her own against the idiot bob beckel yelling over her.


  106. m
    106 | August 30, 2010 8:13 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Even if it was 3000 weren’t they given orders to not actually enforce anything or something? It’s like

    w.t.h.?!


  107. NoThreat2U
    107 | August 30, 2010 8:14 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    You did notice my sarc tags right? I just wanna be sure. lol


  108. 108 | August 30, 2010 8:16 pm

    OK, I think I just might have found my 2012 Presidential candidate…

    Are you ready for President John Bolton?

    If he runs, I will vote for him…


  109. Mad Mullah
    109 | August 30, 2010 8:16 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:
    You did notice my sarc tags right? I just wanna be sure. lol

    Oh, ok :)

    I was being serious though.

    I wasn’t joking, I do honestly believe that the two terrorists should be waterboarded. Unfortunately that doesn’t happen anymore, under Obama the appeaser.


  110. spinmore
    110 | August 30, 2010 8:17 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    . . . you are correct sir (ala Ed Mcmaan)


  111. NoThreat2U
    111 | August 30, 2010 8:17 pm

    @ Kirly:
    30? All hail Obama!!! I apologize to the nation for voting for Sarah Palin. /


  112. 112 | August 30, 2010 8:18 pm

    Mad Mullah wrote:

    NoThreat2U wrote:
    @ Mad Mullah:
    You did notice my sarc tags right? I just wanna be sure. lol

    Oh, ok
    I was being serious though.
    I wasn’t joking, I do honestly believe that the two terrorists should be waterboarded. Unfortunately that doesn’t happen anymore, under Obama the appeaser.

    See my comment #108


  113. 113 | August 30, 2010 8:18 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Even if it was 3000 weren’t they given orders to not actually enforce anything or something? It’s like
    w.t.h.?!

    they are spotters only. they are not allowed to apprehend any illegals. they only spot them and report to the border patrol.


  114. 114 | August 30, 2010 8:18 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Our Mexican neighbors to the South are being killed and we do nothing. The people now think the Cartels are winning.

    We need to end this Mideast obsession and pay attention to our hemisphere.


  115. 115 | August 30, 2010 8:19 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Cool, man! I don’t know how you do it. It is a talent. You ought to be able to make money off of that, though. You are as good as Paul Shenklin or Weird Al :P


  116. 116 | August 30, 2010 8:19 pm

    @ Kirly:

    How effective!
    /


  117. NoThreat2U
    117 | August 30, 2010 8:19 pm

    The Obama regime. lol


  118. 118 | August 30, 2010 8:19 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    OK, I think I just might have found my 2012 Presidential candidate…
    Are you ready for President John Bolton?
    If he runs, I will vote for him…

    he’s my guy also!


  119. 119 | August 30, 2010 8:20 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    That’s one of my favorite movies.


  120. 120 | August 30, 2010 8:20 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    You got that right! Bolton/Palin 2012. The Libs heads would explode, so we should win easily :twisted:


  121. 121 | August 30, 2010 8:20 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Our Mexican neighbors to the South are being killed and we do nothing. The people now think the Cartels are winning.
    We need to end this Mideast obsession and pay attention to our hemisphere.

    the cartels ARE winning. mexico had to fire 10% of their federal police force. and it was the police who killed the mayor of santiago.


  122. Mad Mullah
    122 | August 30, 2010 8:21 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    =

    See my comment #108

    Yes, I heard about that earlier this afternoon. I like Bolton, he knows what the deal is.


  123. NoThreat2U
    123 | August 30, 2010 8:21 pm

    @ Mad Mullah:
    I am full of sarcasm ;)


  124. NoThreat2U
    124 | August 30, 2010 8:22 pm

    @ Rodan:
    Puff puff give…you’re fuckin’ up the rotation!!


  125. m
    125 | August 30, 2010 8:23 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    It’s Friiiiiiiiiiiiday, n’ you ain’t got no job!


  126. 126 | August 30, 2010 8:24 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    @ Iron Fist:
    @ Philip_Daniel:
    @ 1389AD:
    @ The Osprey:
    Post coming up at 8:30 EST about the 2 men arrested after a Chicago to Amsterdam flight.

    I’ll check it out.


  127. 127 | August 30, 2010 8:24 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Yeah, the cartels are winning. What do you expect, with Obama’s de facto open borders policy? They’ve never had it so good as right now. They aren’t likely to have it this good forever. Americans will either kick out Obama, wise up and legalize, or both. Any of those options, and the fun goes away…


  128. 128 | August 30, 2010 8:25 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    You got that right! Bolton/Palin 2012. The Libs heads would explode, so we should win easily

    Bolton would have a press conference and play this video and say, ok ya’ll know what time it is now right!!!…


  129. 129 | August 30, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Yet we do nothing and are concern about Muzzie countries. Oh I forgot, Mexico is Catholic-Christian so the State department don’t care about them.


  130. NoThreat2U
    130 | August 30, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ m:
    …and you aint got shit to do!


  131. Canoe Convoy
    131 | August 30, 2010 8:26 pm

    @ Rodan:
    Everyone get the walrus mustaches at the ready.


  132. 132 | August 30, 2010 8:26 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Mad Mullah:
    I am full of sarcasm

    Cough cough cough… ROTFLMAO… cough cough cough… Is that what you are full of…. :shock:


  133. 133 | August 30, 2010 8:27 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Yeah, the cartels are winning. What do you expect, with Obama’s de facto open borders policy? They’ve never had it so good as right now. They aren’t likely to have it this good forever. Americans will either kick out Obama, wise up and legalize, or both. Any of those options, and the fun goes away…

    Plus a Mexican Version or Pinochet (Chile) or Uribe (Colombia) may rise and restore order. Of course not with Obama in power as he would interfere to prevent order restored in Mexico. The Leftist NGO’s would whine to no end.

    Mexico needs a strongman to solve its issues and real support from us.

    With this regime, it will not happen.


  134. m
    134 | August 30, 2010 8:28 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    “You got to be a stupid motherfucker to get fired on your day off.”

    ~:D
    I’m ashamed of us, LOL!


  135. m
    135 | August 30, 2010 8:28 pm

    @ Canoe Convoy:

    Yosimite Sam
    ! ! !

    Love him!


  136. 136 | August 30, 2010 8:29 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Hell, I just found the whole lineup:

    President Sarah Palin
    VP Chris Christie
    Sec of State John Bolton
    Attourney General Fred Thompson
    Sec of Defense Petraeus
    Sec of Interior Jan Brewer
    Sec of Commerce Mitt Romney
    Sec of Homeland Security Rudy Guilani
    White House Dog Catcher Mike Huckabee

    William Amos on August 30, 2010 at 5:04 PM

    Except for that william amos dude, I think we have a winner :evil: Don’t just run the President. Run the Administration. After OBozo the WonderPrez™ people woill see how important that is…


  137. NoThreat2U
    137 | August 30, 2010 8:29 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    Yes it is ;)


  138. huckfunn
    138 | August 30, 2010 8:29 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Our Mexican neighbors to the South are being killed and we do nothing. The people now think the Cartels are winning.
    We need to end this Mideast obsession and pay attention to our hemisphere.

    the cartels ARE winning. mexico had to fire 10% of their federal police force. and it was the police who killed the mayor of santiago.

    Here’s a sampler. This is the Juarez section of the El Paso Times. Just scroll down and look at all of the stories about mayhem and killing. It’s endless. And remember; Juarez is essentially South El Paso. I used to live 90 miles north of there.


  139. 139 | August 30, 2010 8:30 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    White House Dog Catcher Mike Huckabee

    :lol: !!!!!!!!!!!

    OMG!


  140. m
    140 | August 30, 2010 8:30 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Put the Nuge in there somewhere and it’s on.


  141. NoThreat2U
    141 | August 30, 2010 8:30 pm

    @ m:
    That was the best!!!!!!! roflmao Whaddup Big Perm!!!!!!!!!!


  142. 142 | August 30, 2010 8:31 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Yeah, the cartels are winning. What do you expect, with Obama’s de facto open borders policy? They’ve never had it so good as right now. They aren’t likely to have it this good forever. Americans will either kick out Obama, wise up and legalize, or both. Any of those options, and the fun goes away…

    legalization? so we can be more like mexico? no thanks.


  143. NoThreat2U
    143 | August 30, 2010 8:31 pm

    @ m:
    Why you stealing boxes? You building a clubhouse???


  144. 144 | August 30, 2010 8:33 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Hell, I just found the whole lineup:

    President Sarah Palin
    VP Chris Christie
    Sec of State John Bolton
    Attourney General Fred Thompson
    Sec of Defense Petraeus
    Sec of Interior Jan Brewer
    Sec of Commerce Mitt Romney
    Sec of Homeland Security Rudy Guilani
    White House Dog Catcher Mike Huckabee
    William Amos on August 30, 2010 at 5:04 PM

    Except for that william amos dude, I think we have a winner Don’t just run the President. Run the Administration. After OBozo the WonderPrez™ people woill see how important that is…

    Ummm, no. I’m thinking Bolton/Palin… John Bolton has the same kind of titanium steel running down his spire as Harry S did when he told Hap Arnold to drop that damned bomb…


  145. song_and_dance_man
    145 | August 30, 2010 8:33 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Hell, I just found the whole lineup:

    President Sarah Palin
    VP Chris Christie
    Sec of State John Bolton
    Attourney General Fred Thompson
    Sec of Defense Petraeus
    Sec of Interior Jan Brewer
    Sec of Commerce Mitt Romney
    Sec of Homeland Security Rudy Guilani
    White House Dog Catcher Mike Huckabee
    William Amos on August 30, 2010 at 5:04 PM

    Except for that william amos dude, I think we have a winner Don’t just run the President. Run the Administration. After OBozo the WonderPrez™ people woill see how important that is…

    Someone at Hot Air suggested Ted Nugent as Chief of Staff. I like it.


  146. 146 | August 30, 2010 8:33 pm

    @ huckfunn:
    thanks for that link. i can make great use of that on my blog. yes, indeed, i know how close juarez is to el paso. way too close.


  147. 147 | August 30, 2010 8:33 pm

    @ Rodan:

    I concur. I just don’t see that strongman (and it pretty much has to be a man without a family) on their screen. Legalize the shit up here, work out deals in the countries it is grown in so that the peasants get the profit (no drug lords), cut out all the middlemen, perhaps to the point that the US Government sells the legal (and pure) shit at way below street cost (they don’t have to make a profit), and you may have the best andswer we have to the drug program. It isn’t a good answer, God knows, but what we have going on right now is about the worst it could get.


  148. 148 | August 30, 2010 8:33 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Mexico’s problem is lack of leadership. Colombia and Chile were turned around. The right leadership can turn around any nation.


  149. song_and_dance_man
    149 | August 30, 2010 8:34 pm

    And Ron Paul as Bizarre Czar.


  150. m
    150 | August 30, 2010 8:34 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Every time I come in the kitchen, you in the kitchen, eatin’ up all the food!


  151. 151 | August 30, 2010 8:35 pm

    CSPAN is showing the restoring honor rally again right now.


  152. 152 | August 30, 2010 8:35 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    \In 1972, no one saw Pinochet and in 2001, no one saw Uribe. It can’t happen while Obama is power because of Leftist NGO’s. It’s in our long term interest a stable Mexico. I rather help my Mexican catholic-Christian brothers than the Afghan Muzzie pedophiles.


  153. NoThreat2U
    153 | August 30, 2010 8:35 pm

    Tired. Out for now. See yinz all later!


  154. 154 | August 30, 2010 8:35 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Mexico’s problem is lack of leadership. Colombia and Chile were turned around. The right leadership can turn around any nation.

    that may be one of their problems but i believe their biggest problem is corruption. has been for decades.


  155. 155 | August 30, 2010 8:36 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Yes it is

    Oh my :o pps: and here I thought it was sugar and spice an stuff like that… :shock: :razz:


  156. NoThreat2U
    156 | August 30, 2010 8:37 pm

    @ m:
    We could do this all nite!

    “Use water, it won’t hurt” LMAO
    “Ham and no burger, peanut butter and no jelly!”
    ROFLMAO******


  157. 157 | August 30, 2010 8:37 pm

    no strongman can help any leader in mexico if the police and military are infiltrated by the cartel. the cartel will just take ‘em all out one by one.

    this is what we have to thank the pot heads, the coke heads, and the meth heads for. i hope they’re proud.


  158. NoThreat2U
    158 | August 30, 2010 8:37 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    Well yeah, that too :)


  159. 159 | August 30, 2010 8:37 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Colombia and Chile was that way also and the situation was turned around. The problem is that Obama would not assist a person trying to restore order. Pinochet had help from Nixon/Ford and Uribe from Bush. Obama would not help and probably undermine Mexico to please his leftist Human Rights NGOs.


  160. NoThreat2U
    160 | August 30, 2010 8:38 pm

    Really out this time. Nite all. M, we will have to do this again sometime!


  161. snork
    161 | August 30, 2010 8:38 pm

    Doppelganger wrote:

    Carry a mock bomb?

    Six imams?


  162. m
    162 | August 30, 2010 8:38 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Because keeping them illegal keeps drugs out?

    How about we dry up their customer base and let the boys in Tennessee and Georgia make the cash, LOL!


  163. Lily
    163 | August 30, 2010 8:39 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    If anyone wants to finally and absolutely know they are all out of their fuckin minds over in the swamp. They are now all jerking themselves off while either admitting they voted for Obama or saying how sorry they are that they voted for McCain/Palin. All of them!

    Good lord…..all kneeling down to pay homage to the great cj….
    Do they get the irony obama won….so whether they voted for McCain is pointless….he lost. Idiots.


  164. 164 | August 30, 2010 8:39 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    no strongman can help any leader in mexico if the police and military are infiltrated by the cartel. the cartel will just take ‘em all out one by one.
    this is what we have to thank the pot heads, the coke heads, and the meth heads for. i hope they’re proud.

    Yes a strong man can make a difference. It happened in Colombia and can happen in Mexico. I rather help teh Mexicans than the Afghans.


  165. snork
    165 | August 30, 2010 8:40 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    btw, pamela geller on fox business network “Money Rocks” holding her own against the idiot bob beckel yelling over her.

    Chuck’s head approaching 800 psi. Cap’n, she’s gonna blow!!!


  166. m
    166 | August 30, 2010 8:40 pm

    @ Kirly:

    You do realize meth heads get their shit at CVS?


  167. Doppelganger
    167 | August 30, 2010 8:40 pm

    I told a liberal colleague today, that I wondered if Obama will blame Bush for his Loss in 2012.

    I said , I hope so


  168. 168 | August 30, 2010 8:40 pm

    the assualt on Arizona continues.
    Justice Department Accuses Arizona Colleges of ‘Discrimination’ in Immigration Suit


  169. huckfunn
    169 | August 30, 2010 8:41 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Mexico’s problem is lack of leadership. Colombia and Chile were turned around. The right leadership can turn around any nation.

    Every president they elect down there talks the big bullshit but all they ever do is loot the treasury and build big Swiss bank accounts. The current guy is pals with O-hole and thinks the problem is Arizona’s new law. What a loser he is. I wonder if the person who could solve Mexico’s problems has even been born yet.


  170. 170 | August 30, 2010 8:41 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    You do realize meth heads get their shit at CVS?

    doesn’t matter. they all disgust me. they are all part of the problem.


  171. 171 | August 30, 2010 8:41 pm

    Beck “stirred up” a couple hundred thousand people, (80,000 according to SeeBS), because things aren’t going too well, so says Obama. So he thinks they are a bunch of dumb clingers that Beck could mobilize like so many liztards. The actual leftist talking point, Juan Williams just parroted it on Bill O’Reilly
    , is that his call for a return to Judeo Christian values that this country was founded on is an attempt to set up a theocracy. Why is that a problem for leftist but the Muslim Brotherhood Mosque at ground zero that has the same objective isn’t?


  172. 172 | August 30, 2010 8:43 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    Might be an lurking behind the scenes. But that person would need the full backing of the US as Pinochet and Uribe had. As you said, we have Obama so it would be pointless.


  173. 173 | August 30, 2010 8:43 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Because keeping them illegal keeps drugs out?
    How about we dry up their customer base and let the boys in Tennessee and Georgia make the cash, LOL!

    a fence can keep the illegals AND the drugs out of the USA far better than legalization or our current policy of open borders, anything goes.


  174. snork
    174 | August 30, 2010 8:44 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Our Mexican neighbors to the South are being killed and we do nothing. The people now think the Cartels are winning.

    This is what the donkeys seem to get. While Obama’s gut reaction is to try to find someone to surrender to, the Mexican public is getting screwed, and even the illegal aliens don’t like it. The legal immigrants and citizens of Mexican decent sure don’t. They’re not getting any political points with Hispanics in general by surrendering to the drug cartels.


  175. 175 | August 30, 2010 8:44 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Colombia and Chile was that way also and the situation was turned around. The problem is that Obama would not assist a person trying to restore order. Pinochet had help from Nixon/Ford and Uribe from Bush. Obama would not help and probably undermine Mexico to please his leftist Human Rights NGOs.

    it wasn’t that much better with Bush.


  176. snork
    176 | August 30, 2010 8:44 pm

    Don’t seem to get.


  177. Doppelganger
    177 | August 30, 2010 8:44 pm

    @ Rancher:

    Another libtard I work with today laughed off the 87,000 people as an indication of Tea Party weakness.

    I happily pointed out that I firmly stand for practically everything on the Tea Party agenda, and that I am too busy paying taxes so the fucking bums on welfare can take off at the drop of a hat to do a million man march or a code pink rally.

    and that there are millions who were there in spirit but we were too busy raising families and being productive citizens to march.

    We’ll do our marching on election day


  178. 178 | August 30, 2010 8:45 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Most of the Marijuana in the United States is homegrown or comes from Canada.

    So even if you cut off the supply from Mexico, there will still be weed around. Where’s there demand, there’s supply! It’s Economic 101.


  179. rain of lead
    179 | August 30, 2010 8:46 pm

    hey ya’ll

    been catching up on the last couple of threads

    weeee, busy busy busy

    seems we have an influx of new and old/new again posters

    welcome all


  180. Lily
    180 | August 30, 2010 8:46 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ Kirly:
    Mexico’s problem is lack of leadership. Colombia and Chile were turned around. The right leadership can turn around any nation.
    that may be one of their problems but i believe their biggest problem is corruption. has been for decades.

    Corrupted to the core…and spilling in over the border. But we can’t stop it because that would make us……baaaaaaaaaaad.
    Common sense has left the building concerning our government.


  181. 181 | August 30, 2010 8:47 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Bush was only concerned about the spreading Democracy in the Muslim countries. He didn’t care about Latin America. Colombia was the only country he helped and that was because Colombia was bordering Hugio Chavez.

    Hey new thread on the 2 Muzzies caught!


  182. m
    182 | August 30, 2010 8:47 pm

    @ Kirly:

    I’m not for anything goes by a long shot, but I do think legalizing weed would dry up [ a lot of ] the money they’re using to terrorize their own people and ours.

    Legalizing weed would not turn us into cartel controlled Mexico. Amsterdam doesn’t have a problem with warring cartels (oh i’m sure there is some back and forth with distributors but nobody dies, LOL!)


  183. huckfunn
    183 | August 30, 2010 8:47 pm

    @ Rodan:
    It needs to be an utterly ruthless strong man with a “take no prisoners” mentality. And yes; the backing of the U.S.


  184. 184 | August 30, 2010 8:48 pm

    @ Kirly:

    Making drugs illegal has done nothing to curb the use of drugs. People who want them are still getting them. Kids in high school are able to get them. It is just that the way things are right now the only effective mechanism for contract enforcement in the drug world is violence. The only effective method they have for competing with each other is violence. Drugs being illegal just guarantees that drugs will be associated with violence. Pretty extreme levels of mviolence, because the money involved is spectacular. You are well into the territory thast most people would kill over the money when you are talking an average shipment of drugs. People will kill to take it from you, people will kill to keep it. Needless to say, since drug trafficing is illegal, it attracts criminals who are already more predisposed to violence than the rest of us. You can keep it illegal, and simply accept that that is the structure that illegality will build, or you can legalize it and take the necessities that create that structure away. Those are the choices on the table. That is how it is if we have a President who will defend the border. If drugs are illegal and the border is open, oh my. It’ll spiral out of control until it reaches some kind of self-sustaining level where the people who would traffic the drugs stay away because of the danger. But that option isn’t going to happen because ytou have all the illegals flowing through the same gaping hole in the border. Those people can be used to get the drugs through the danger zone, and if they are killed, it is no loss to the cartels. That is what we have now. How do you fix that short of sending in the marines and killing everyone associated with trafficing in the area (essentially depopulating a good chunck of Northern Mexico)? That last one might work, but it involves invading a failing but still soverign nation, and butchering people on a scale not seen since WWII. Good luck getting that through the Obama Administration.


  185. spinmore
    185 | August 30, 2010 8:49 pm

    @ Rancher:
    . . . careful there, you’re gettin’ close to crackin’ the code


  186. 186 | August 30, 2010 8:49 pm

    @ snork:

    The Mexican people’s biggest mistake is being Catholic-Christian. If they converted to Islam, we would help them.

    Oh wait!

    :lol:


  187. 187 | August 30, 2010 8:50 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    To paraphrase Someone, quite concur.


  188. 188 | August 30, 2010 8:55 pm

    @ m:

    Actually, we exported a lot of the meth to Mexico. Here in TN you have to show a Driver’s License to buy Sudafed to combat Meth. I called that the Mexican Meth Manufacturer’s Full Emp0loyment act when it passed. It has worked about like I expected it to. Marijuana is a cash crop in nearly every State in the Union (some of the desert States and Alaska may not see it grown on a large scale). The Taliban are getting rich off of heroin trafficing since they figured out that selling drugs to the Great Satan is just taqiyya and kitman with a huge prophet margin. The only thing that is actually scarce is prescription pills, and they aren’t that scarce. You can get them in the right circles, you just have to know where to go and be known so that they don’t act like they don’t know what you are talking about.


  189. rain of lead
    189 | August 30, 2010 8:59 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    another ingredent in making meth is muratic acid
    I know a lowes that sells 5 cases a week
    ain’t that much pool cleaning going on


  190. 190 | August 30, 2010 9:00 pm

    Mexican ‘Ice’ Replaces Home-Cooked Meth in U.S.
    and that was in ’07


  191. 191 | August 30, 2010 9:01 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    another ingredent in making meth is muratic acid
    I know a lowes that sells 5 cases a week
    ain’t that much pool cleaning going on

    My pool requires 1-2 pints of muratic acid a week. more in the summer.


  192. buzzsawmonkey
    192 | August 30, 2010 9:01 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    another ingredent in making meth is muratic acid
    I know a lowes that sells 5 cases a week
    ain’t that much pool cleaning going on

    Hey, you also need it to prepare cement floors to take epoxy paint.


  193. buzzsawmonkey
    193 | August 30, 2010 9:02 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    Mexican ‘Ice’ Replaces Home-Cooked Meth in U.S.
    and that was in ’07

    So hard to get real home cookin’ any more…


  194. 194 | August 30, 2010 9:04 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Most of the Marijuana in the United States is homegrown or comes from Canada.
    So even if you cut off the supply from Mexico, there will still be weed around. Where’s there demand, there’s supply! It’s Economic 101.

    that is the same argument napolitano uses to not stop illegal immigration… why fix one leak in a dam? there will just be another.

    that’s absurd. the problem is with a society that tolerates potheads and coke heads and the rest.

    @ m:
    legalizing pot would make more potheads. something i do not want.

    @ Iron Fist:
    that’s the same argument again.


  195. rain of lead
    195 | August 30, 2010 9:04 pm

    heh
    old and busted
    opinion article offering $100,000 for a “sex tape or phone records or anything else” that succeeds in removing Fox News host Glenn Beck “

    new hotness

    By Monday afternoon, his article was removed, with a message from an editor in its place explaining that the piece was “published directly to the Huffington Post by its author” and “didn’t meet our editorial standards.”


  196. Buckeye Abroad
    196 | August 30, 2010 9:15 pm

    121. Kirly

    the cartels ARE winning. mexico had to fire 10% of their federal police force. and it was the police who killed the mayor of santiago.

    My wife and I saw that report on CNN international. She sighed, “and I thought the Moscow metropoltan police were corrupt.”

    G’night all.


  197. m
    197 | August 30, 2010 9:30 pm

    @ Kirly:

    There are some very productive members of society that happen to smoke weed. They’re not all spicoli.


  198. 198 | August 30, 2010 9:34 pm

    @ Kirly:

    You support Legal Alcohol? What about the domestic violence, DUIs and personalities change Alcohol does?

    Do you support banning Alcohol?

    After all, we don’t want more alcoholics!


  199. 199 | August 30, 2010 9:36 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    There are some very productive members of society that happen to smoke weed. They’re not all spicoli.

    Potheads don’t cause violence and I know many in the IT feild. Meanwhile I know many Alcoholics on food stamps and welfare.


  200. 200 | August 30, 2010 9:37 pm

    Now I have seen the light. I will channel my inner Progressive and desire to control people’s lives.

    I want to ban alcohol for the sake of society!


  201. Alberta Oil Peon
    201 | August 30, 2010 9:41 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    As I understood the story, the authorities determined that the suspects didn’t have any actual bombs in their luggage, and allowed them to proceed, presumably in order to see who met them on the other end. It’s what I would do if I were running the show. Once you’re certain that they are not an immediate threat to the flight, give ‘em enough rope to hang themselves or to rope in other members of the cell.


  202. Alberta Oil Peon
    202 | August 30, 2010 10:20 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Most of the Marijuana in the United States is homegrown or comes from Canada.
    So even if you cut off the supply from Mexico, there will still be weed around. Where’s there demand, there’s supply! It’s Economic 101.

    Precisely! You cannot control drugs by restricting the supply. All that does is to reward the successful peddlers by eliminating some of their competitors, and keeping the price up nice and high.

    If it were up to me, I’d say legalize marijuana, and tax it and regulate it, same as alcohol. It really hasn’t proven to be any more harmful than alcohol or tobacco. The worst feature of pot is that its illegality means that pot consumers are kept in touch with the criminal element that would be happy to sell them other more harmful, and more profitable drugs, too. Yeah, pot’s a gateway drug, and the reason for that is simply that it is illegal, so you have to deal with criminals to get it.

    Now, OTOH, heroin, cocaine, crack, and crystal meth are seriously bad shit, and should remain illegal. But, as I said above, you simply cannot make them go away by concentrating the enforcement efforts on dealers. You are to have to target the consumers. IMHO, anybody who has become addicted to any of those drugs is basically a wasted person; whatever contribution they can make to society has essentially been nullified by their addiction. So, I propose a 3-strikes program for hard drug addicts. Something like: first offence gets you 90 days in jail, plus compulsory detox, and a year’s supervised probation. Second offence, a year in jail, plus the detox, and 5 years supervised probation. Third offence: a bullet in the brain. Just to bend over backwards to be fair, we could rest the counter to zero a year after the probation period expires without any further offences.

    Yeah, it’s harsh, but the heroin addicts, crackheads and tweakers are in the process of slow suicide, and if we don’t intervene, they will die miserably, anyhow.


  203. 203 | August 31, 2010 10:40 am

    [...] Originally posted on 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


  204. 204 | September 12, 2010 12:48 pm


    CheapTabletsOnline.com. Canadian Health&Care.Special Internet Prices.Best quality drugs.No prescription online pharmacy. No prescription pills. Buy pills online

    Buy:Human Growth Hormone.Actos.Zovirax.Prevacid.Zyban.Arimidex.100% Pure Okinawan Coral Calcium.Mega Hoodia.Prednisolone.Retin-A.Synthroid.Valtrex.Petcam (Metacam) Oral Suspension.Nexium.Accutane.Lumigan….


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David