First time visitor? Learn more.

American Sovereignty Under Attack By U.S. State Department

by Kafir ( 184 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Politics, United Nations at August 31st, 2010 - 11:30 am

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Huckfunn!


AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY UNDER ATTACK BY U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT


This is a topic that has gotten very little play in the media or blogosphere. On August 20th, the U.S. Statement Department issued a report to the U.N. which detailed the State Department’s view of human rights issues in the United States. While many countries around the world annually submit such a report to the U.N., this is the first time the United States has ever done so.

The entire report can be found here:
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/146379.pdf

What initially brought this matter to my attention was Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s letter to the State Department demanding a retraction of this part of the report which discusses Arizona’s recent passage of S.B.1070:

“A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world,” the report says. “The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined.”

Governor Brewer wrote to Hillary Clinton:

“Simply put, it is downright offensive that the State Department included the State of Arizona and S.B. 1070 in a report to the United Nations Council on Human Rights, whose members include such renowned human rights ‘champions’ as Cuba and Libya.” Governor Brewer additionally stated, “The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a State of the United States to ‘review’ by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional. Human rights as guaranteed by the United States and Arizona Constitutions are expressly protected in S.B. 1070 and defended vigorously by my Administration.”

Governor Brewer’s entire letter can be found here:
http://www.azgovernor.gov/dms/upload/PR_082710_LetterSecretaryClinton.pdf

Of all of the obominations heaped upon our nation by the Obama regime (high taxes, huge deficits, record spending, endless apologies to the world, Obamacare, etc…), this has got to be one of the worst. The notion that the sovereignty of The United States, her laws and her people, could ever be subordinated to the dictates of the U.N., or any other law save the U.S. Constitution, is as close to treason as anything I have ever seen. However, the idea of transnationalism (or treason for that matter) coming from the democrats should come as no surprise to us. During the 2004 election campaign would-be POTUS John Kerry famously talked about the U.S. needing to “pass a global test” prior to taking pre-emptive military action against foreign threats. Further, in 1970 Kerry told the Harvard Crimson, “I’m an internationalist, I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.”

Joe Wolverton, II of the New American says that following the submission of this report to the U.N. High Commissioner of Human Rights, “U.N. Human Rights Council will conduct a final audit of the current state of the promotion of human rights in the United States. Then, it will recommend a slate of necessary reforms to the laws of the United States.” His article can be found here:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/4411-state-department-submits-to-un-human-rights-review-for-the-first-time

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton submitted this vile piece of excrement to the U.N. Anyone who ever had the faintest idea that she is a “moderate” or “centrist” needs to get their mind right. When she runs for POTUS in the 2012 election this issue needs to be front and center.

-Huckfunn

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

184 Responses to “American Sovereignty Under Attack By U.S. State Department”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | August 31, 2010 11:37 am

    Tranzis on the loose.

    It’s time to dismantle the UN building brick by brick (and I don’t mean “brink”) and throw it all into the Atlantic. And return all its denizens whence they came. We can do it!


  2. 2 | August 31, 2010 11:38 am

    The UN needs to go.


  3. 3 | August 31, 2010 11:40 am

    I’ve been complaining about the UN since just about forever.

    Maybe this will wake enough people up so that everybody will realize just how much of a menace the UN really is.

    Not to mention the fact that we could save a TON of tax dollars by telling the UN to LEAVE US soil and getting out of it once and for all.


  4. buzzsawmonkey
    4 | August 31, 2010 11:40 am

    At the risk of repeating myself, I would remind people that “human rights” are, by their nature, antithetical to the concept of liberty as enshrined in the American Constitution.

    “Human rights” are dispensations doled out by the government to the people. The “human rights” view of the world is that government is the source of, and grantor of, rights. What this means, in practice, is that the government can grant or withhold “human rights” at its pleasure, and may give “human rights” to those groups it finds worthy on the basis of the government’s own criteria.

    The US Constitution is fundamentally different. It presumes that human beings have liberty—which is to say, citizens can do whatever they want except as their actions must be circumscribed by the government for the common good and maintenance of public order. To ensure that this circumscription is as minimal as possible, and that liberty is therefore as great as possible, the powers granted to the government are limited and enumerated—and civil rights, enforced by the rule of law, grant citizens rights against the government to ensure that the government does not exceed the limitations of its charter.

    Thus, “human rights” presume that government is all-powerful, and grants rights to the people—or withholds them—at its will. The Constitution presumes that people are free, that government is limited, and that such restrictions on people’s freedom as are necessary are further limited by the safeguards of civil rights.

    Any attempt to overlay a “human rights” model on the liberty and civil rights enshrined in the Constitution is an attack on the Constitution and the very idea of the United States.


  5. RIX
    5 | August 31, 2010 11:40 am

    Somewhat related. WLS Radio in Chicago just reported that the U.S
    government does not think that the Muslim yoots flying from Chicago to Amsterdam were engaged in a terrorist dry run.
    Dutch authorities disagree & continue to hold them.
    Let me see, luggage checked into a flight that the initial yoot was
    not flying on with three cell phones taped together.
    Ok, the same yoot had on baggy clothes on a hot summer day concealing a cell taped to a bottle of Pepto.
    The Obama administration is not even a little suspicious?


  6. m
    6 | August 31, 2010 11:41 am

    @ 1389AD:

    Sí se puede! lol


  7. 7 | August 31, 2010 11:42 am

    Also see:

    Screw the UN

    Reject the UN


  8. m
    8 | August 31, 2010 11:43 am

    @ RIX:

    The Obama administration is not even a little suspicious?

    Well yeah! Of tea partiers!


  9. citizen_q
    9 | August 31, 2010 11:43 am

    There is a lot to be concerned about at the State Department.

    A long time peeve of mine has been its arabist bent, and the subsequent employment as lobbyists for same.


  10. m
    10 | August 31, 2010 11:44 am

    @ 1389AD:

    UN Watch if anyone questions the reasoning.


  11. Nevergiveup
    11 | August 31, 2010 11:44 am

    Rodan wrote:

    The UN needs to go.

    Along with the State department and Obama


  12. 12 | August 31, 2010 11:44 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Neither the US government nor the UN seems interested in letting Christians have any ‘human rights’.


  13. F
    13 | August 31, 2010 11:45 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    You keep saying something that needs to be repeated, until even the Progressives get a clue about their betrayal. And then keep on saying it, speaking truth.


  14. huckfunn
    14 | August 31, 2010 11:45 am

    I agree that the UN needs to go. More than a giant waste of money, it’s an animal house pigpen for every popcorn-fart tyrant on the planet to spew their filth and steal from the West. The real point that needs to be driven home is that the democrat regime, and in particular Hillary Clinton’s State Department, desperately want to put the U.S. under the thumb of the U.N.


  15. 15 | August 31, 2010 11:46 am

    m wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    UN Watch if anyone questions the reasoning.

    They want to ‘reform’ it -- I want it GONE!


  16. F
    17 | August 31, 2010 11:47 am

    RIX wrote:

    The Obama administration is not even a little suspicious?

    Suspicious of Talk Radio, bitter clingers to their Bibles and Guns, anyone that resists the Tranzi takeover of the US, yes. Of Mooslums, hell no.


  17. m
    18 | August 31, 2010 11:48 am

    @ 1389AD:

    I think they’d be happy if it was gone too, LOL! But since it’s not someone had damn well better keep an eye on them!


  18. coldwarrior
    19 | August 31, 2010 11:48 am

    as we discusses last night:

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    I worry about the presidence. Shitsticks like John Kerry have wanted for a long time to farm out the U.S. military to the U.N. Sovereignty can be eroded and we must defend ours to the absolute max. The idea of “use it or lose it” comes to mind. I agree; we must push Hillary’s nose right into this pile of shit and make sure it sticks to her.

    this is a gimmee and further proof 0 wont run in 2012
    BEAT THE LEFT RELENTLESSLY WITH THIS!!!
    they are handing us piles of ammo to use against them, 65% of americans are for this law, use this act in campaign commercials. make EVERY dem answer for it…RELENTLESS BEATINGS!


  19. F
    20 | August 31, 2010 11:48 am

    @ m:
    Which means Bloomberg and that Imam will ratchet up the rhetoric that demands the thing be built where planned, regardless of how the governed feel. Consent of the Governed be damned, they know better than us rubes.


  20. m
    21 | August 31, 2010 11:49 am

    @ m:

    Hillel Neuer says on the floor of the UN what the American representatives should be saying!


  21. 22 | August 31, 2010 11:49 am

    m wrote:

    Poll after poll after poll…
    A poll released Tuesday found 71 percent of New Yorkers want the developers of an Islamic center and mosque near ground zero to voluntarily move the project.

    Here’s where they can move the thing.


  22. buzzsawmonkey
    23 | August 31, 2010 11:50 am

    1389AD wrote:

    Neither the US government nor the UN seems interested in letting Christians have any ‘human rights’.

    I’m not sure what in particular you’re referring to, but if you are referring to the protection of Christians under the lawless regimes around the world where Christians are persecuted, the selective application of “human rights” concern merely confirms my point above; “human rights” are a fraudulent term for special rights granted or withheld by the government, meant to obscure that there is neither liberty nor rule of law in such places.

    In our own country, “human rights”—whether used to apply to the building of footbaths to accommodate Muslims, to create a category of “hate crimes,” to apply to “desecration”, or to create other special rights for a favored constituency, are invariably special privileges sought from the government over and above the common freedoms we share.


  23. huckfunn
    24 | August 31, 2010 11:51 am

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Any attempt to overlay a “human rights” model on the liberty and civil rights enshrined in the Constitution is an attack on the Constitution and the very idea of the United States.

    Spot on! I’ll remind coldwarrior to pin a medal on one of your tentacles when he gets here. :grin: This issue is about the sovereignty of the United States and her Constitution and shining the light on those who would give it away.


  24. F
    25 | August 31, 2010 11:52 am

    @ coldwarrior:
    The problem is that we have to rely on a GOP that more and more only wants to get along so they get invited to all the cool Washington parties. It is a given that the Ds would condemn the TEA Party gatherings as collections of fringies, but now the Rs are increasingly echoing that sentiment.


  25. huckfunn
    26 | August 31, 2010 11:52 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    as we discusses last night:

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    I worry about the presidence. Shitsticks like John Kerry have wanted for a long time to farm out the U.S. military to the U.N. Sovereignty can be eroded and we must defend ours to the absolute max. The idea of “use it or lose it” comes to mind. I agree; we must push Hillary’s nose right into this pile of shit and make sure it sticks to her.

    this is a gimmee and further proof 0 wont run in 2012
    BEAT THE LEFT RELENTLESSLY WITH THIS!!!
    they are handing us piles of ammo to use against them, 65% of americans are for this law, use this act in campaign commercials. make EVERY dem answer for it…RELENTLESS BEATINGS!

    Amen bro! A medal for Buzz if you please.


  26. m
    27 | August 31, 2010 11:53 am

    @ 1389AD:

    Nice! But you know, they’d just make us pay for some underwater scenic tubage to get’em there and back!

    >:-[

    US OUTTA THE UN!
    UN OUTTA THE US!


  27. Canoe Convoy
    28 | August 31, 2010 11:53 am

    @ 1389AD:
    As long as we are discussing locations in the Atlantic, I nominate the South Atlantic.

    Let’s say, Tristan Da Cunha, or Gough, Islands. Maybe the South Sandwich Islands. Or Kerguelen Island.


  28. coldwarrior
    29 | August 31, 2010 11:54 am

    i already called my very vulnerable blue dog dem rep to make him explain this. sent an email as well…cant wait for the response!

    make all dems answer for this!


  29. Nevergiveup
    30 | August 31, 2010 11:54 am

    At Least 8 Killed in Cancun Bar Attack

    Hey how are the human rights in mexico?


  30. 31 | August 31, 2010 11:54 am

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    1389AD wrote:
    Neither the US government nor the UN seems interested in letting Christians have any ‘human rights’.
    I’m not sure what in particular you’re referring to, but if you are referring to the protection of Christians under the lawless regimes around the world where Christians are persecuted, the selective application of “human rights” concern merely confirms my point above; “human rights” are a fraudulent term for special rights granted or withheld by the government, meant to obscure that there is neither liberty nor rule of law in such places.
    In our own country, “human rights”—whether used to apply to the building of footbaths to accommodate Muslims, to create a category of “hate crimes,” to apply to “desecration”, or to create other special rights for a favored constituency, are invariably special privileges sought from the government over and above the common freedoms we share.

    That’s what I’m talking about. Protecting the lives, property, and freedom of Christians against Islamic or other totalitarian persecution.

    “Human rights” is indeed a fraud. It is specifically used as a club to beat Christians and Jews over the head with. Ask any Serb or Israeli.


  31. m
    32 | August 31, 2010 11:54 am

    @ m:

    OH THAT THING! LOL! I’m still bitching about the UN…

    /multitasking is not my forte


  32. coldwarrior
    33 | August 31, 2010 11:55 am

    @ F:

    i have already infiltrated my local party. the war is on


  33. 34 | August 31, 2010 11:56 am

    F wrote:

    It is a given that the Ds would condemn the TEA Party gatherings as collections of fringies, but now the Rs are increasingly echoing that sentiment.

    Only after the primaries however.


  34. 35 | August 31, 2010 11:56 am

    F wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    The problem is that we have to rely on a GOP that more and more only wants to get along so they get invited to all the cool Washington parties. It is a given that the Ds would condemn the TEA Party gatherings as collections of fringies, but now the Rs are increasingly echoing that sentiment.

    Anybody who worries about being accepted by the “cool kids” is a permanent loser. If you ever wonder whether you are “cool” or not, you are not and never will be.


  35. Canoe Convoy
    36 | August 31, 2010 11:57 am

    @ Rancher:

    What about if an incumbent loses in their primary ?


  36. huckfunn
    37 | August 31, 2010 11:59 am

    Sovereignty is the key issue. It can be eroded by neglect or, in the case of this bullshit human rights report, by willful malfeasance.


  37. coldwarrior
    38 | August 31, 2010 11:59 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    THE BGGCC AWARD:

    well done!!!

    your comment gets a ‘well said’.

    as the president of the Blogmocracy Golf Gun and Country Club and chair of the awards committee here at the BGGCC, i am pleased to inform you that your comment, that has reminded us to always be attuned to the differences between civil rights/liberties and the inherant evils of the illusion of ‘human rights’ has been awarded the “well said” award.

    “well said”! hoorah!

    the cc has spoken, as it were!

    -coldwarrior
    president, BGGCC
    awards committee chair


  38. RIX
    39 | August 31, 2010 12:00 pm

    m wrote:

    @ RIX:
    The Obama administration is not even a little suspicious?
    Well yeah! Of tea partiers!

    Those Tea Party Grannies are not fooling Obama & Super Sleuth CJ.
    They are the danger, not guys screaming Allah Akbar with bombs.


  39. 40 | August 31, 2010 12:00 pm

    We have the most liberal immigration policies in the world, our border security is a joke. Just about anyone from a carrier of any disease imaginable to a foreign agent hell bent on destruction can get a visa if they are viewed as oppressed or dimished in any manner as humans by the leftist twat waffles in Foggy Bottom.

    Our softness on this issue is a joke to officials of every nation on the globe, and that we the people and their States are being excortiated by our own federal government to gain points with their

    Zero’s Kids From the Halls of Academia are making us out for the suckers that they are and showing our ass wide open to any neo feudal johns who want to see it.

    If we don’t stop this in the next two elections we gonna be raped dry and hard by those old world leeches..


  40. huckfunn
    41 | August 31, 2010 12:01 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    i already called my very vulnerable blue dog dem rep to make him explain this. sent an email as well…cant wait for the response!

    make all dems answer for this!

    Hope you’ll share that response. Who’s the rep and how vulnerable or safe is he?


  41. buzzsawmonkey
    42 | August 31, 2010 12:01 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    Thank you!

    “Human rights,” and “human rights” language, have increasingly infiltrated domestic political discourse over the last 40-odd years.

    It began when the Civil Rights Movement, having been hijacked by the Marxists, separatists and Islamists, began demanding rights over and above the civil rights that King and the original movement had been rightly seeking.

    It continued when the gay-rights movement, which could not lay claim to “sexual preference or orientation” being a suspect classification under Constitutional law (as “race” was, and is), began demanding recognition, and concessions, on a “human rights” basis.

    It has continued since the Islamist movement, which took its playbook entirely from the gay-rights movement (including adoption of the bogus “-ophobia” locution), began demanding special rights over and above the freedom of religion which everyone enjoys.


  42. buzzsawmonkey
    43 | August 31, 2010 12:02 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Aw, shucks.


  43. F
    45 | August 31, 2010 12:03 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    i already called my very vulnerable blue dog dem rep to make him explain this. sent an email as well…cant wait for the response!
    make all dems answer for this!

    There needs to be some ‘splainin’ from more than a few RINOs as well.


  44. 46 | August 31, 2010 12:05 pm

    State Department spokesgirlieman P.J.Crowley says on Fox interview that the US statement is to “set an example” for other nations to follow.

    Of course, America is shrouded in mystery. The world at the UN does not know that America is a democratic republic. Why people flock legally and illegally to its borders must be a mystery to the Human Rights Commission.

    Still, now that the US has modeled a confessional report, the State Department expects Iran to follow its example. Perhaps Iran will illustrate its report with photographs of an 8 year-old Iranian boy who had his arm crushed by a vehicle as punishment for stealing bread at a market.


  45. coldwarrior
    47 | August 31, 2010 12:05 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    i already called my very vulnerable blue dog dem rep to make him explain this. sent an email as well…cant wait for the response!
    make all dems answer for this!

    Hope you’ll share that response. Who’s the rep and how vulnerable or safe is he?

    altmire, pa-4. this district bounce from republican to blue dog often.

    he is in trouble. sad thing is that he would be a better fit as a republican. too bad for him.


  46. 48 | August 31, 2010 12:05 pm

    Rodan you here?
    I have a dod idea for you!


  47. RIX
    49 | August 31, 2010 12:05 pm

    OK update on the Muslm Yoots in Amsterdam story.
    The U.S government admits that the luggage had three cells taped together, knives & box cutters & one kid had a cell on his person taped to a bottle of pepto.
    And yeah his luggage was headed to a destination that they were not.
    But wait, we are saying that the two were traveling seperately & just missed their flights & had to rebook.
    Can’t make this up.


  48. citizen_q
    50 | August 31, 2010 12:07 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    O/T:
    Spencer: Bloomberg’s Ground Zero Mosque dividend

    Ah, thanks for posting that! I was having a Sr. moment, when commenting about that story earlier. I could not remember where I saw it.


  49. snork
    51 | August 31, 2010 12:11 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    Amen bro! A medal for Buzz if you please.

    It seems like people are finally understanding what Buzz has been saying for months.


  50. chickadee
    52 | August 31, 2010 12:12 pm

    We really have reached the point where the ruling elite do not give a rat’s ass that we don’t want their dangerous destructive plans implemented in this country.
    80% of Americans were happy with their Health Care. So fcking what. 0-hole knew what was best for us.
    71% of Americans do NOT want the imperialist mosk at GZ. Look how we are being called names. As the progs continue to support the aggressive insensitive jihads. Once again they know what is best.

    This is a small minority of anti-American operatives who need to be bounced out of power everywhere in this country. They do not represent what is best for us. They have aligned themselves with the enemies of America. They are traitors.


  51. 4_Sticks
    53 | August 31, 2010 12:12 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    All this works if one believes in G_d.

    “The US Constitution is fundamentally different. It presumes that human beings have liberty—which is to say, citizens can do whatever they want except as their actions must be circumscribed by the government for the common good and maintenance of public order. To ensure that this circumscription is as minimal as possible, and that liberty is therefore as great as possible, the powers granted to the government are limited and enumerated—and civil rights, enforced by the rule of law, grant citizens rights against the government to ensure that the government does not exceed the limitations of its charter.

    It also helps if one has a belief in G_d. Except for the above,G_d is who I’m answerable to -- not the UN or Hillary, my neighbor,the police or the White House. And my rights/liberty are G_d given. Did I get something wrong in grade school ??


  52. huckfunn
    54 | August 31, 2010 12:13 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    Thank you!

    “Human rights,” and “human rights” language, have increasingly infiltrated domestic political discourse over the last 40-odd years.

    It began when the Civil Rights Movement, having been hijacked by the Marxists, separatists and Islamists, began demanding rights over and above the civil rights that King and the original movement had been rightly seeking.

    It continued when the gay-rights movement, which could not lay claim to “sexual preference or orientation” being a suspect classification under Constitutional law (as “race” was, and is), began demanding recognition, and concessions, on a “human rights” basis.

    It has continued since the Islamist movement, which took its playbook entirely from the gay-rights movement (including adoption of the bogus “-ophobia” locution), began demanding special rights over and above the freedom of religion which everyone enjoys.

    As with everything else the dims throw at us; the “human rights” thing is not about human rights, any more than cap and trade is about the environment. All of those so-called “issues” are only about pushing a marxist, anit-capitalism agenda and the accumulation of power and control over the masses. BTW, that medal looks good on you.


  53. 4_Sticks
    55 | August 31, 2010 12:13 pm

    PIMF -- not even gonna bother….jeeeez, 4 hours sleep ain’t cuttin’ it.


  54. 56 | August 31, 2010 12:14 pm

    @ m:

    Obama said its his duty as President to defend Muzzies. Well he’s living up to that promise.


  55. 57 | August 31, 2010 12:14 pm

    typicalwhitey wrote:

    Rodan you here?
    I have a dod idea for you!

    what is this idea?


  56. 58 | August 31, 2010 12:14 pm

    4_Sticks wrote:

    It also helps if one has a belief in G_d. Except for the above,G_d is who I’m answerable to – not the UN or Hillary, my neighbor,the police or the White House. And my rights/liberty are G_d given. Did I get something wrong in grade school ??

    Helps what?


  57. snork
    59 | August 31, 2010 12:14 pm

    @ Overlook:
    “Set an example”? Jezuz f’n Coyote, do they think they governments of the world are kindergarteners?


  58. Nevergiveup
    60 | August 31, 2010 12:15 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ m:

    Obama said its his duty as President to defend Muzzies. Well he’s living up to that promise.

    Well put one in that column at least i guess


  59. huckfunn
    61 | August 31, 2010 12:16 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    altmire, pa-4. this district bounce from republican to blue dog often.

    he is in trouble. sad thing is that he would be a better fit as a republican. too bad for him.

    I’m going to get an email to our commissar, Lloyd Doggett, and see where he stands on this issue. His seat is safe so he’ll probably send me some off-the-shelf bag o’ gas.


  60. 62 | August 31, 2010 12:17 pm

    @ snork:

    K through 12.


  61. huckfunn
    63 | August 31, 2010 12:19 pm

    snork wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    Amen bro! A medal for Buzz if you please.

    It seems like people are finally understanding what Buzz has been saying for months.

    I guess it takes something as agregious as the State Department report to get people to wake up and take a hard look at what these bums are up to.


  62. coldwarrior
    64 | August 31, 2010 12:19 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    i mess with altmire on a few issues…just to keep him on his toes.

    i wish he would come over top the gop.


  63. Crashnburn01
    65 | August 31, 2010 12:19 pm

    RIX wrote:

    OK update on the Muslm Yoots in Amsterdam story.
    The U.S government admits that the luggage had three cells taped together, knives & box cutters & one kid had a cell on his person taped to a bottle of pepto.
    And yeah his luggage was headed to a destination that they were not.
    But wait, we are saying that the two were traveling seperately & just missed their flights & had to rebook.
    Can’t make this up.

    This kind of BS makes me feel REALLY good about spending half an hour to an hour in line at the airport for “security”. My favorite thing is when the 93rd TSA type I’ve seen this month suddenly decides something I have been carrying for 5 years is a danger to society and confiscates it. A generic bottle (2 oz) with hair gel in it. He said (I shit you not) that “this item needs to be in a branded bottle” to which I replied (in my head or I’d be in GITMO) “Oh yeah -- a terrorist would NEVER think to use a branded bottle”…


  64. buzzsawmonkey
    66 | August 31, 2010 12:19 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    As with everything else the dims throw at us; the “human rights” thing is not about human rights, any more than cap and trade is about the environment. All of those so-called “issues” are only about pushing a marxist, anit-capitalism agenda and the accumulation of power and control over the masses. BTW, that medal looks good on you.

    Yes. And thank you for the medal!

    I have been vaporing on here at length, and have gone into some of the history of how “human rights” were interjected into our political discourse, because I have found that when I say in conversation that I utterly reject the concept of “human rights” people are shocked and disconcerted.

    It is important to understand how fundamentally different the “human rights” concept is from the principles underlying the Constitution, and what some of the history is, to be able to—one hopes—sway others towards such an understanding.


  65. 67 | August 31, 2010 12:22 pm

    911 Families for a Safe and Strong America
    I’ve added it to my blogroll.


  66. 68 | August 31, 2010 12:23 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    typicalwhitey wrote:
    Rodan you here?
    I have a dod idea for you!
    what is this idea?

    And herel..

    here.

    Here.

    LOL


  67. 4_Sticks
    69 | August 31, 2010 12:23 pm

    @ m:

    Chucky could care less that this puts him in the remaining 29% -- in fact it only goes to prove that hes so ‘above’ the average dolt.


  68. 70 | August 31, 2010 12:23 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:
    @ huckfunn:
    Thank you!
    “Human rights,” and “human rights” language, have increasingly infiltrated domestic political discourse over the last 40-odd years.
    It began when the Civil Rights Movement, having been hijacked by the Marxists, separatists and Islamists, began demanding rights over and above the civil rights that King and the original movement had been rightly seeking.
    It continued when the gay-rights movement, which could not lay claim to “sexual preference or orientation” being a suspect classification under Constitutional law (as “race” was, and is), began demanding recognition, and concessions, on a “human rights” basis.
    It has continued since the Islamist movement, which took its playbook entirely from the gay-rights movement (including adoption of the bogus “-ophobia” locution), began demanding special rights over and above the freedom of religion which everyone enjoys.
    As with everything else the dims throw at us; the “human rights” thing is not about human rights, any more than cap and trade is about the environment. All of those so-called “issues” are only about pushing a marxist, anit-capitalism agenda and the accumulation of power and control over the masses. BTW, that medal looks good on you.

    That’s threadworthy.


  69. 71 | August 31, 2010 12:24 pm

    It looks to me like Mochelle has been busy buying furniture at Goodwill to bring the Oval Office up to standards

    http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Oval-Office-makeover-to-debut-in-Iraq-speech-638787.php


  70. huckfunn
    72 | August 31, 2010 12:25 pm

    Have you all taken the “global test”? You can find it right here. Results are due into Shrillary’s office at State first thing in the morning.


  71. 4_Sticks
    73 | August 31, 2010 12:25 pm

    @ Overlook:

    To understand the concepts the founding fathers worked with.


  72. 74 | August 31, 2010 12:25 pm

    Crashnburn01 wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    OK update on the Muslm Yoots in Amsterdam story.
    The U.S government admits that the luggage had three cells taped together, knives & box cutters & one kid had a cell on his person taped to a bottle of pepto.
    And yeah his luggage was headed to a destination that they were not.
    But wait, we are saying that the two were traveling seperately & just missed their flights & had to rebook.
    Can’t make this up.
    This kind of BS makes me feel REALLY good about spending half an hour to an hour in line at the airport for “security”. My favorite thing is when the 93rd TSA type I’ve seen this month suddenly decides something I have been carrying for 5 years is a danger to society and confiscates it. A generic bottle (2 oz) with hair gel in it. He said (I shit you not) that “this item needs to be in a branded bottle” to which I replied (in my head or I’d be in GITMO) “Oh yeah – a terrorist would NEVER think to use a branded bottle”…

    Grrr…
    Drugstores even SELL generic 2-oz bottles to put your cosmetics in, so that you can get small amounts of cosmetics through the TSA check.


  73. 75 | August 31, 2010 12:26 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Overlook:
    “Set an example”? Jezuz f’n Coyote, do they think they governments of the world are kindergarteners?

    Setting an example has always been an important plank of Obama’s foreign policy.
    Bowing, apologizing, holding out hands, reducing arms, agreeing with enemies’ assessments of America, holding parties. “Smart power”.


  74. huckfunn
    76 | August 31, 2010 12:26 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    That’s threadworthy.

    Run with it. I’ll cheer you from the gallery.


  75. H
    77 | August 31, 2010 12:28 pm

    The argument that a large part UN is comprised of rogue, backwards states is as simple and elegant as it is true. I can’t for the love of God understand why it does not get through.


  76. 78 | August 31, 2010 12:29 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    There is no accounting for taste, of course. Shades of shit are considered “warm”. Does one take off one’s shoes in the Oval Office?


  77. 79 | August 31, 2010 12:30 pm

    O/T:

    For some reason, this old post from November 2007 on my blog is suddenly getting page hits. Dunno why…

    It is time to punt Little Green Footballs

    ? ? ?


  78. 80 | August 31, 2010 12:30 pm

    Another for you Rodan.


  79. 4_Sticks
    81 | August 31, 2010 12:32 pm

    @ Overlook:

    Ooops, really not having a good day here.Hit ‘Submit’ instead of PIMF -- supposed to have included this:

    “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable (nontransferable) Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness…”

    (This is what I was referring to)


  80. 82 | August 31, 2010 12:34 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    We really have reached the point where the ruling elite do not give a rat’s ass that we don’t want their dangerous destructive plans implemented in this country.
    80% of Americans were happy with their Health Care. So fcking what. 0-hole knew what was best for us.
    71% of Americans do NOT want the imperialist mosk at GZ. Look how we are being called names. As the progs continue to support the aggressive insensitive jihads. Once again they know what is best.
    This is a small minority of anti-American operatives who need to be bounced out of power everywhere in this country. They do not represent what is best for us. They have aligned themselves with the enemies of America. They are traitors.

    You got that right.


  81. Nevergiveup
    83 | August 31, 2010 12:37 pm

    By the Way ACE has the same thread up now as we do. Great Blogs think alike I guess


  82. 4_Sticks
    84 | August 31, 2010 12:38 pm

    @ Overlook:

    Don’t you think that if this is ones core belief,thinking/doing what the hilldabeast just did/wrote/submitted would not be possible if she was like minded ??


  83. m
    85 | August 31, 2010 12:40 pm

    Oh dear Lord the world is coming to an end.

    This white house is actually rallying people to honor our troops.

    I’m stunned.


  84. 86 | August 31, 2010 12:41 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    By the Way ACE has the same thread up now as we do. Great Blogs think alike I guess

    Thanks for the compliment! Thanks for your support, you’re one of my favorite posters on here! Your knowledge of National Security issues, is a great asset to the blog!

    Plus you’re a Yankee fan!
    :-)


  85. 4_Sticks
    87 | August 31, 2010 12:41 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    BTW, should have said ‘good one’.I woulda updinged ya if….ah,never mind :-)


  86. Nevergiveup
    88 | August 31, 2010 12:42 pm

    m wrote:

    Oh dear Lord the world is coming to an end.

    This white house is actually rallying people to honor our troops.

    I’m stunned.

    Yeah like they really mean it?


  87. 89 | August 31, 2010 12:42 pm

    m wrote:

    Oh dear Lord the world is coming to an end.
    This white house is actually rallying people to honor our troops.
    I’m stunned.

    He’s doing it for his own reasons.


  88. Nevergiveup
    90 | August 31, 2010 12:42 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    By the Way ACE has the same thread up now as we do. Great Blogs think alike I guess

    Thanks for the compliment! Thanks for your support, you’re one of my favorite posters on here! Your knowledge of National Security issues, is a great asset to the blog!

    Plus you’re a Yankee fan!

    Thanks. Was that $25 tip enough?


  89. 91 | August 31, 2010 12:42 pm

    Likely Terror Attack ‘Dry Run’ Exposes Dangerous TSA Missteps (Updated)

    UPDATE: Holes continue to grow in the dry run story. Interviews with law enforcement and airline personnel have brought up a key question.

    It remains unreported where exactly al Soofi went through customs — namely in Birmingham or Chicago. This would help explain whether or not al Soofi’s luggage had been cleared all the way to Yemen in Alabama. If not, he would have had access to the box cutters and knives in his bags, as well as his mock bombs, at the airport in Chicago when he retrieved them to transfer to an international flight. If he was cleared all the way to Yemen, then when he was in Chicago he would have moved through a secure area during his transfer process. Once an international passenger has been cleared by U.S. customs, the federal security rules change considerably. If al Soofi was cleared for international travel in Birmingham, Alabama, then he should not have been able to change his ticket to an entirely different continent (Europe) so easily in Chicago — certainly not without his bags coming off the Yemen-bound airplane. The air carrier involved in the Yemen-bound flight has not been named and United Airlines has not returned calls.

    Not sure why it knocks a hole in the “Dry Run” theory but the idea that you can clear one screening and then have access to your bag and not have to be rescreened is troubling. Am I reading this right?


  90. snork
    92 | August 31, 2010 12:45 pm

    4_Sticks wrote:

    BTW, should have said ‘good one’.I woulda updinged ya if….ah,never mind

    Sorry Charles, but I had to downding you, because you’re a fucking idiot, but it’s nothing personal, you see… :roll:


  91. m
    93 | August 31, 2010 12:46 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Yeah, no… but still -- it’s a good front and maybe some of that patriotism will rub off on the O’s.


  92. m
    94 | August 31, 2010 12:46 pm

    Maybe?

    Hopefully?


  93. huckfunn
    95 | August 31, 2010 12:47 pm

    m wrote:

    Oh dear Lord the world is coming to an end.

    This white house is actually rallying people to honor our troops.

    I’m stunned.

    As much as I can’t stand to watch or listen to O-hole, I’ll listen to his bloviations to see if he has a word to say about the success of the Bush-Petraeas surge. I’ll bet he doesn’t offer an ounce of credit to Bush.


  94. buzzsawmonkey
    96 | August 31, 2010 12:48 pm

    m wrote:

    Oh dear Lord the world is coming to an end.

    This white house is actually rallying people to honor our troops.

    I’m stunned.

    There’s an election coming up, and a whole hell of a lot of people running for office want their prior lack of support for the troops and for the Iraq war to be conveniently forgotten.


  95. Nevergiveup
    97 | August 31, 2010 12:49 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    I’ll bet he doesn’t offer an ounce of credit to Bush.

    No you won’t, who in his right mind would take the other side of that bet?


  96. 98 | August 31, 2010 12:49 pm

    @ Rodan:

    He sides with the Muzzies against America. Just as his Open Borders policy is designed to destroy American Soverignty and cultural and territorial integration. He can’t be blind to the disaster in the Southwest. He isn’t stupid, whatever his other failings. He is getting exactly what he wants in Arizona. That is why he is suing the State of Arizona to keep them from interferring with what he is doing. Open the gates and let the Meth/coke/smack flow in! Why legalize it? That would take all the fun and profit out of it. Much better to have Mexico fall apart in Civil War. I think that is his goal for us as well.


  97. 4_Sticks
    99 | August 31, 2010 12:49 pm

    @ m:

    Wonderin’ if this was in the works prior to Becks rally or a post rally,last minute “hey guys -- me too !!”. The latter would really be a tail waggin’ the dog moment.I’m sure its just coincidental -- a little too cynical of me I guess….hmmmmmmmm.


  98. 100 | August 31, 2010 12:50 pm

    Overlook wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    There is no accounting for taste, of course. Shades of shit are considered “warm”. Does one take off one’s shoes in the Oval Office?

    Foreign dignitaries will be wondering why they were invited to a confrence room at a cheap hotel intead of the White House


  99. 101 | August 31, 2010 12:51 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Not me. I ain’t completely stupid. He isn’t going to credit the Surge or Petraeus, either. Success in Iraq is due to His Magnificance, so vote Democrat or you could find yourself back like you were under Bush.

    With a job.


  100. 102 | August 31, 2010 12:51 pm

    @ 4_Sticks:

    For me, the self-evidentiality is the key idea. The original endowment of what the constitution protects -- rights, including rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness -- is attributed to a divine entity to place ultimate authority for the nature of mankind out of political reach. Theology is not part of, and does not shape the civil compact. The polity agrees that these rights are the ones the polity is constituted to protect, being the rights of every individual, accorded to each individual by virtue of being alive, not by virtue of being a believer in any particular originator. Nothing is more self-evident than what is (no matter how it began.)


  101. snork
    103 | August 31, 2010 12:52 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    There’s an election coming up, and a whole hell of a lot of people running for office want their prior lack of support for the troops and for the Iraq war to be conveniently forgotten.

    Next thing you know, Obama’s going to become a Friedmanian. Until mid-November, anyway.


  102. 104 | August 31, 2010 12:52 pm

    @ m:

    The Obama’s are Patriotic to their nation. The Nation of Islam, that is…


  103. huckfunn
    105 | August 31, 2010 12:52 pm

    Scott Madsen wrote:

    Overlook wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    There is no accounting for taste, of course. Shades of shit are considered “warm”. Does one take off one’s shoes in the Oval Office?

    Foreign dignitaries will be wondering why they were invited to a confrence room at a cheap hotel intead of the White House

    Looks like the waiting room at your friendly local death panel office. There’s not even any magazines.


  104. buzzsawmonkey
    106 | August 31, 2010 12:54 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    Looks like the waiting room at your friendly local death panel office. There’s not even any magazines.

    The magazines at the death panel office are over by the gun rack.


  105. chickadee
    107 | August 31, 2010 12:56 pm

    m wrote:

    Oh dear Lord the world is coming to an end.

    This white house is actually rallying people to honor our troops.

    I’m stunned.

    This is abt. o-hole. Period. He wants to look patriotic to benefit the dims.
    He doesn’t honor the troops at all. In fact he has to grit his teeth to go through with this charade.


  106. 108 | August 31, 2010 12:56 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    Ha! A generic, international airport hotel. That is, in fact, a perfect visualization of the post-national world by a post-national president.

    And talking of pretending to be demotic, how is that veggie patch doing at the White House? and that hideous swing-set? Do the girls ever use it?


  107. 109 | August 31, 2010 12:57 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Mexico is a Christian Country, so its in his interest for it to collapse. Then the effects spill over here which is what he wants. It’s a win win for him.


  108. 110 | August 31, 2010 12:58 pm

    @ Rancher:

    What it sounds to me is that maybe he intended to do something after Chicago, and then didn’t have access to his bags. Terrorist incompetance preventing a terrorist attack. It damn sure wouldn’t be the first time that happened.


  109. H
    111 | August 31, 2010 12:58 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I think he actually might give Bush credit. It’s the smart thing to do politically at this moment in time. He can see november from hus house.


  110. 4_Sticks
    112 | August 31, 2010 1:00 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Too bad it had to take a private citizen (Beck) to stage a rally first.
    This sound a bit too much like jumpin’ on the band wagon and a day late and dollar short to me.


  111. Macker
    113 | August 31, 2010 1:00 pm

    Too bad Governor Brewer couldn’t have just written: “Go to Hell, you fucking cunt.”


  112. huckfunn
    114 | August 31, 2010 1:01 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    I’ll bet he doesn’t offer an ounce of credit to Bush.

    No you won’t, who in his right mind would take the other side of that bet?

    Dang! I was looking for some easy money and was counting on you. :lol:


  113. 115 | August 31, 2010 1:02 pm

    @ Rodan:

    I don’t see Mexico going Mohammedan at least. But that wouldn’t stop Mohammedans using the Chaos to move through into the United States. I think the bigger threat there is simply everything in Mexico moving North. Certainly there are a lot more kidnappings in Pheonix now than there used to be. It is scary shit going on down there, and Obama is doing his damnedest to make it worse.


  114. 116 | August 31, 2010 1:02 pm

    @ H:
    I think he might too.
    It will kill him but he will do what he must politically.


  115. H
    117 | August 31, 2010 1:03 pm

    I guess you’ve already seen this?

    http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/08/drudge-is-giving-obama-hard-time-this.html


  116. 118 | August 31, 2010 1:03 pm

    .@ H:
    @ Iron Fist:
    @ huckfunn:

    The propblem is Iraq is not really a success. They have Sharaia Law, the parties are Pro-Iranian, China got the oil and the Christian population has been decimated. That’s not a success to me. It’s not a failure, but let’s not delude ourselves either.


  117. buzzsawmonkey
    119 | August 31, 2010 1:05 pm

    By the way, I was reading an historical summary the other day which discussed the unrest on the Southern border when the Mexican Revolution broke out. There were a number of incursions into the United States by the Mexican rebels, and a number of Americans were killed.

    President Wilson, despised here as a Progressive, sent General Pershing and his troops down to the border to harry the rebels and bandits, and secure the border; in fact, he also landed the Marines at Vera Cruz to protect the Americans there.

    Progressives sure have diminished in 100 years, haven’t they?


  118. vapig
    120 | August 31, 2010 1:05 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    Have you all taken the “global test”? You can find it right here. Results are due into Shrillary’s office at State first thing in the morning.

    Whoa-hoo! I scored -6900!


  119. H
    121 | August 31, 2010 1:05 pm

    @ typicalwhitey:

    Pretty lady! We’ll see. I’m not taking the bet, though.


  120. 122 | August 31, 2010 1:06 pm

    Well who would think the Administration has a favorite team?

    ReEducation secretary urged his employees to attend Sharpton’s rally

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/Education-secretary-urged-his-employees-to-go-to-Sharpton_s-rally-651280-101839293.html#ixzz0yCGbYPAl

    By: Lisa Gartner
    Examiner Staff Writer
    August 30, 2010
    A Department of Education e-mail sent Wednesday encouraged workers to join Education Secretary Arne Duncan, above, at a rally led by the Rev. Al Sharpton. (AP file photo)

    President Obama’s top education official urged government employees to attend a rally that the Rev. Al Sharpton organized to counter a larger conservative event on the Mall.

    “ED staff are invited to join Secretary Arne Duncan, the Reverend Al Sharpton, and other leaders on Saturday, Aug. 28, for the ‘Reclaim the Dream’ rally and march,” began an internal e-mail sent to more than 4,000 employees of the Department of Education on Wednesday.

    Sharpton created the event after Glenn Beck announced a massive Tea Party “Restoring Honor” rally at the Lincoln Memorial, where King spoke in 1963.

    The Washington Examiner learned of the e-mail from a Department of Education employee who felt uncomfortable with Duncan’s request.

    Although the e-mail does not violate the Hatch Act, which forbids federal employees from participating in political campaigns, Education Department workers should feel uneasy, said David Boaz, executive vice president of the libertarian Cato Institute.

    “It sends a signal that activity on behalf of one side of a political debate is expected within a department. It’s highly inappropriate … even in the absence of a direct threat,” Boaz said. “If we think of a Bush cabinet official sending an e-mail to civil servants asking them to attend a Glenn Beck rally, there would be a lot of outrage over that.”

    Russ Whitehurst, director of the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution’s Brown Center of Education Policy, said nothing like this happened when he was a Department of Education program director from 2001 to 2008: “Only political appointees would have been made aware of such an event and encouraged to attend.”

    Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/Education-secretary-urged-his-employees-to-go-to-Sharpton_s-rally-651280-101839293.html#ixzz0yCijCHtX


  121. H
    123 | August 31, 2010 1:06 pm

    @ Rodan:

    100 percent correct.


  122. 124 | August 31, 2010 1:07 pm

    @ H:

    This suggests otherwise:

    Previewing Obama Iraq speech, Gibbs won’t credit surge
    By: Byron York
    Chief Political Correspondent
    08/30/10 6:49 PM EDT

    White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    At Monday’s White House briefing, spokesman Robert Gibbs gave reporters a preview of President Obama’s speech on Iraq. Obama will apparently take credit for withdrawing U.S. troops — “We are completing a drawdown of almost 100,000 troops that…many did not think was possible,” Gibbs said -- but is unlikely to acknowledge any special role played by George W. Bush’s troop surge. Gibbs said Obama plans to call Bush before the speech, but through repeated questioning would not admit that the surge played any especially important role in the war’s progress.

    That is so bad even the MFM can’t stand the smell. I don’t think Obama cares about the election. He is letting himself go free of constraints, not worrying about the damage done to his Party so long as he can do the damage to this (not his) Country. A hung congress probably looks pretty good to him. He’ll just have HSS and the EPA mandate everything he wants done. Who can stop him?


  123. 125 | August 31, 2010 1:07 pm

    @ H:

    The umbrella should be a symbol of Obamacare -- and all obama policy. Useless protection in the hands of an incompetent dolt.


  124. buzzsawmonkey
    126 | August 31, 2010 1:08 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    He’ll just have HSS and the EPA mandate everything he wants done. Who can stop him?

    Justice Kennedy. Some of the time.


  125. 127 | August 31, 2010 1:08 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Progressives are like a dead body lying in the sun. They don’t age very well.


  126. 128 | August 31, 2010 1:10 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Yeah, but thattakes time. It is like the drilling moritorium. By the time the Supreme Court kicks it out (if it does), the jobs will be gone, and it will take years to recover. How many more times will Obama play that out over the next two years?


  127. huckfunn
    129 | August 31, 2010 1:10 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    .@ H:
    @ Iron Fist:
    @ huckfunn:

    The propblem is Iraq is not really a success. They have Sharaia Law, the parties are Pro-Iranian, China got the oil and the Christian population has been decimated. That’s not a success to me. It’s not a failure, but let’s not delude ourselves either.

    One thing to remember. Saddam’s Iraq was a counter balance to Iran. One of the hard facts about our measured success in Iraq is that now Iran has a totally free hand to run amok as they please.


  128. buzzsawmonkey
    130 | August 31, 2010 1:11 pm

    Overlook wrote:

    The umbrella should be a symbol of Obamacare

    See, I’m surprised he was carrying an umbrella at all. Isn’t it traditional for emperors and tribal chieftains to have someone walking behind them with an umbrella to shield them from the elements?


  129. chickadee
    131 | August 31, 2010 1:11 pm

    H wrote:

    I guess you’ve already seen this?

    http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/08/drudge-is-giving-obama-hard-time-this.html

    o-hole does well with hanging curtains.
    Notice how the petulant dork is wearing mom jeans, riding a girl’s bike and looking like a moron in helmet while riding down a safe sidewalk.

    Doesn’t our leader set a great example for us.
    roflmao


  130. 132 | August 31, 2010 1:11 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    I think it was a dry run to see what could be detected, whether you could get box cutters into the cargo hold and then retrieve them later without being rescreened and whether you can get baggage on one flight and switch flights without having your luggage switched. All of which seemed to have happened.


  131. 133 | August 31, 2010 1:12 pm

    @ Rodan:

    I agree with you there. There are positives: Saddam and crew are gone. Whatever Iraq becomes, it is likely to be less of a threat/disaster than that was. But I agree about Shari’ia law. That shouldn’t have been permitted, and something should have been done about the ethnic cleansing against the Christians.


  132. Nevergiveup
    134 | August 31, 2010 1:13 pm

    H wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I think he actually might give Bush credit. It’s the smart thing to do politically at this moment in time. He can see november from hus house.

    Gibbs absolutely refused to even recognize the question when he appeared on FOX News this AM even after being asked 5 times


  133. 135 | August 31, 2010 1:14 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    Iran was the next target, but traitors in Congress and at the CIA kept that blow from falling. I believe that Bush intended to take Iran out.


  134. H
    136 | August 31, 2010 1:16 pm

    @ Overlook:

    “obamacare” is tricky. The general idea is one thing, the implementation another.


  135. 137 | August 31, 2010 1:17 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Isn’t it traditional for emperors and tribal chieftains to have someone walking behind them with an umbrella to shield them from the elements?

    She did.


  136. Nevergiveup
    138 | August 31, 2010 1:17 pm

    H wrote:

    @ Overlook:

    “obamacare” is tricky. The general idea is one thing, the implementation another.

    Ain’t no trick about it. It is socialized Medicine which by definition means rationing and a lower quality of care


  137. buzzsawmonkey
    139 | August 31, 2010 1:17 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Iran was the next target, but traitors in Congress and at the CIA kept that blow from falling. I believe that Bush intended to take Iran out.

    I had always thought that, too—that the troops, “blooded” by their experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, and with secure bases there, were supposed to put Iran in a pincer, but that the sudden and continuing withdrawal of support prevented the plan from succeeding.


  138. 140 | August 31, 2010 1:19 pm

    Bloody leftists and their need for gun control. I hope they lose big time come September (Canadian issue)


  139. huckfunn
    141 | August 31, 2010 1:20 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    Iran was the next target, but traitors in Congress and at the CIA kept that blow from falling. I believe that Bush intended to take Iran out.

    I had hoped that he would have gotten that done between the election and Christmas and was disappointed that he didn’t.


  140. H
    142 | August 31, 2010 1:20 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Yes, yes and not necessarily. I’m typing on a cellphone, so I can’t really expand on it.


  141. snork
    143 | August 31, 2010 1:21 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Progressives sure have diminished in 100 years, haven’t they?

    Progressively. Let’s follow the progression:

    T. Roosevelt: Outright aggressive foreign policy.
    Wilson: Pacifist who got the US into WWI.
    F. Roosevelt: Prosecuted WWII successfully.
    Truman: Korean stalemate.
    LBJ: Fucked up Vietnam.
    Clinton: Successfully bombed asprin plant.
    Obama: no comment.


  142. 144 | August 31, 2010 1:21 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    By the way, I was reading an historical summary the other day which discussed the unrest on the Southern border when the Mexican Revolution broke out. There were a number of incursions into the United States by the Mexican rebels, and a number of Americans were killed.blockquote>
    There was one raid by Pancho Via on Columbus, NM. A few people did get killed. Pershing ran around Mexico looking for Via but never found him. Patton did get to kill a Rebel Captain though. We learned alot that we then put to use in WWI.


  143. Da_Beerfreak
    145 | August 31, 2010 1:21 pm

    Overlook wrote:

    The umbrella should be a symbol of Obamacare – and all obama policy. Useless protection in the hands of an incompetent dolt.

    The only fitting symbol for Obamacare is a Vaseline® jar full of sand. :evil:


  144. chickadee
    146 | August 31, 2010 1:24 pm

    Rancher wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    I think it was a dry run to see what could be detected, whether you could get box cutters into the cargo hold and then retrieve them later without being rescreened and whether you can get baggage on one flight and switch flights without having your luggage switched. All of which seemed to have happened.

    They were definitely up to some kind of terrorist activity. They are constantly checking for weak links in the system. For this to be dismissed as nothing is a mistake.
    Also, every time these scum disrupt the happy flow of our lives, it is a win for them, They smile and praise allah.
    The muzz will not stop trying to spread their disease.


  145. The Osprey
    147 | August 31, 2010 1:25 pm

    Arizona has a message for B-HO and the UN.

    BITE ME


  146. 148 | August 31, 2010 1:26 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    The top hat -- or bowler -- and the brolly were appurtenances of status throughout Africa.
    Witch doctors wear stethoscopes round their necks. These are the magic objects of the West brought into superstitious service -- just like bones through noses.


  147. chickadee
    149 | August 31, 2010 1:29 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    H wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I think he actually might give Bush credit. It’s the smart thing to do politically at this moment in time. He can see november from hus house.

    Gibbs absolutely refused to even recognize the question when he appeared on FOX News this AM even after being asked 5 times

    I can’t imagine a small, mean, vindictive, jealous, worthless, inept pos like 0-hole giving Pres. Bush credit for anything regarding Iraq and that is going to have serious blowback on 0-hole. He will sink lower in the muck of bad character, in the eyes of Americans who remember that o-hole voted against the Iraq war and against the surge. And he said our troops were over there air raiding villages and terrorizing women and children.
    yeah, o-hole is a joke who prosecuted and won a war. lol
    Maybe the war on America but not a war on the muzz.


  148. The Osprey
    150 | August 31, 2010 1:30 pm

    @ Overlook:

    Witchdoctor? That’s racist, so sayeth Teh Chuck!


  149. 151 | August 31, 2010 1:30 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    Lube?

    Naw, an 18 grit carborundum sanding drum used as a dildo is more like it.


  150. huckfunn
    152 | August 31, 2010 1:31 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    Arizona has a message for B-HO and the UN.

    BITE ME

    I wonder if the local tattoo shop has that available. Looks great!


  151. Da_Beerfreak
    153 | August 31, 2010 1:35 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:
    Too true. I was just trying to be polite. :twisted:


  152. 154 | August 31, 2010 1:36 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    Come to Tennessee. I can hook you up!
    :mrgreen:


  153. 155 | August 31, 2010 1:36 pm

    Surely he will give Bush credit.
    It he doesn’t, THAT will be the talking points in the media imo.


  154. 156 | August 31, 2010 1:39 pm

    H wrote:

    @ Overlook:

    “obamacare” is tricky. The general idea is one thing, the implementation another.

    The general idea of the umbrella is to keep off the rain while you walk. If it is too big to get through an obstacle on your path, you have a choice: partially close it, thereby getting wet, but continuing to walk, or standing still in front of the obstacle staying dry until the rain stops. Progress with risk, or stasis without. The Obama uncertainty principle. Yes, ideas are one thing, implementation another.


  155. 157 | August 31, 2010 1:40 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    @ Overlook:

    Witchdoctor? That’s racist, so sayeth Teh Chuck!

    It was the nose-bone that clinched it.


  156. Bob in Breckenridge
    158 | August 31, 2010 1:45 pm

    American Sovereignty Under Attack By U.S. State Department Obama administration

    FIFY. That’s where the blame lies.


  157. Bob in Breckenridge
    159 | August 31, 2010 1:50 pm

    BTW, has anyone pointed out that the fat-ass pony-tailed douchebag totally ignored the terrorists arrested yesterday on that flight? Every thread at his shit hole is either Beck, Geller, or R.S. McCain. or the “bigots” opposed to the mosque.
    I hate that asshole…


  158. Formercorpsman
    160 | August 31, 2010 1:57 pm

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    BTW, has anyone pointed out that the fat-ass pony-tailed douchebag totally ignored the terrorists arrested yesterday on that flight? Every thread at his shit hole is either Beck, Geller, or R.S. McCain. or the “bigots” opposed to the mosque.
    I hate that asshole…

    Well they’re not really a threat anymore. Come on Bob, get with the program.


  159. H
    161 | August 31, 2010 1:58 pm

    @ Overlook:

    We might be in agreement. I’m not sharpest spoon in the drawer, so I hope I got your reasoning right.

    Now I oppose Obamacare, but for completely selfish reasons. They’re also probably not very well founded.


  160. vapig
    162 | August 31, 2010 1:59 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    H wrote:
    @ Overlook:
    “obamacare” is tricky. The general idea is one thing, the implementation another.
    Ain’t no trick about it. It is socialized Medicine which by definition means rationing and a lower quality of care

    What gets me is there is a gold coin tax tucked in the hellcare bill.


  161. smokefire
    163 | August 31, 2010 2:00 pm

    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/31/palestinian-kills-israelis-eve-peace-talks/?test=latestnews

    Fox News 1359 hours EDT. 4 Israeli’s shot and killed in West Bank by Palestinian gunmen.


  162. MightyConservative
    164 | August 31, 2010 2:01 pm

    Checking in on the topic here … this is an absolute outrage. We’ve finally reached the day and age where we have an administration so spineless that they will drum up support anyway they can … AND AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

    Absolutely disgusting. We are America. We do not bow to anyone. We’ve earned that right by being the only legitimate superpower on the planet.

    By putting this up for discussion at the “Human Rights” panel at the UN, you’re effectively giving every two-bit chickenshit hellhole like China, Cuba, Libya, Russia, and Saudi Arabia to take a shot at us.

    I’d like to find one motherfucker that that has the guts to say in public they think this is a good idea. Just one.

    They keep talking about how brilliant Obama is, but this just looks like a ‘running to mommy because I got my ass kicked’ move made at the expense of the American people, the very population that Fuckface is supposed to represent. Jesus Christ, am I pissed. I cannot wait until that son of a bitch leaves office. I will throw a party of a lifetime.


  163. 165 | August 31, 2010 2:01 pm

    @ Bob in Breckenridge:
    And to think I used to go there for the latest news from around the world.


  164. 166 | August 31, 2010 2:03 pm

    Good almost afternoon… Wow lot’s of new faces here…


  165. H
    167 | August 31, 2010 2:03 pm

    @ Bob in Breckenridge:

    Funny how he chose to pick on McCain. It made McCain relevant, and LGF irrelevant. McCain is an ass though. Less so than CJ, but still an ass. A petite older lady’s ass.


  166. MightyConservative
    168 | August 31, 2010 2:03 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Any attempt to overlay a “human rights” model on the liberty and civil rights enshrined in the Constitution is an attack on the Constitution and the very idea of the United States.

    Yes, exactly. Our freedoms are guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Absolutely disgusting!


  167. MightyConservative
    169 | August 31, 2010 2:04 pm

    m wrote:

    @ RIX:

    The Obama administration is not even a little suspicious?

    Well yeah! Of tea partiers!

    He actually views the general American public as the enemy.


  168. 170 | August 31, 2010 2:05 pm

    @ H:
    You are starting to grow on me H..
    ;)


  169. H
    171 | August 31, 2010 2:06 pm

    @ typicalwhitey:

    Must be the ass.


  170. 172 | August 31, 2010 2:11 pm

    H wrote:

    @ typicalwhitey:
    Must be the ass.

    Na, she has a rather nice little ass of her own, probably the content of your character.


  171. buzzsawmonkey
    173 | August 31, 2010 2:14 pm

    MightyConservative wrote:

    He actually views the general American public as the enemy.

    Hope that it is still true…


  172. H
    174 | August 31, 2010 2:16 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    I’m an ass? Heh.

    This one’s for the romantically inclined:

    http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=US#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=-6Zi4AyzRC4


  173. Bob in Breckenridge
    175 | August 31, 2010 2:19 pm

    Formercorpsman wrote:

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
    BTW, has anyone pointed out that the fat-ass pony-tailed douchebag totally ignored the terrorists arrested yesterday on that flight? Every thread at his shit hole is either Beck, Geller, or R.S. McCain. or the “bigots” opposed to the mosque.
    I hate that asshole…
    Well they’re not really a threat anymore. Come on Bob, get with the program.

    My bad. Sorry.


  174. Nevergiveup
    176 | August 31, 2010 2:22 pm

    typicalwhitey wrote:

    @ H:
    You are starting to grow on me H..

    Antibiotics are good for that


  175. 177 | August 31, 2010 2:24 pm

    H wrote:

    I’m an ass? Heh.

    Nope, not implying that at all, TW is a pretty good judge of character plus I was attempting something I am not particularly well known for.. I was trying to subtly state TW’s gender… TW is a GILF… (TW, please do not take that in the wrong way)


  176. H
    178 | August 31, 2010 2:36 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Don’t know what a GILF is. I think I figured out the gender, unless GILF is a third gender previously unknown to me.

    I’m a dude, btw. Insanely good looking & happily married.


  177. 4_Sticks
    179 | August 31, 2010 2:46 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Exactly. When Lib friends used to drop by and argue “why are we there (Iraq) ?” I used to bring them over to the world map I hand pinned on the wall and had them take a good look at the area. I’d tell them to ignore the borders -- envision the entire damned area as one big battle field while keeping in mind Irans location. The usual response was: ‘But Bush isn’t saying this -- he said its because Iraq has wmds”.
    Thats when I’d do a fake ‘smack’ upset they’re pointy little head(s) (yes, more than one had this same line of sh*t) “Whats he supposed to do -- announce it to the freakin’ world ?? Ever think he figured Americans were smart enough to figure this out ?? Ever hear of a ‘wink and a nod’ ?” If the Americans of WWII were as clueless we’d be eating with chop sticks or speaking German today.


  178. 4_Sticks
    180 | August 31, 2010 2:47 pm

    @ H:

    Know what a ‘MILF’ is ??


  179. H
    181 | August 31, 2010 2:57 pm

    @ 4_Sticks:

    I’m utterly ashamed to say that I do. Got it now. Whoa!


  180. 182 | August 31, 2010 3:22 pm

    H wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Don’t know what a GILF is. I think I figured out the gender, unless GILF is a third gender previously unknown to me.
    I’m a dude, btw. Insanely good looking & happily married.

    Genders are something that don’t translate very well in cyberspace, since I didn’t know yours but I did know her’s and since men seldom talk about their ass’s being attributes, rather than gamble on what your gender might have been, I tried using subtly to inform you of her’s.

    Oh, and referring to TW as a GILF was suppose to be a 100 percent pure compliment. (which is why I put the tag on it please don’t take this the wrong way) TW loved to post pictures of her grandson, who is quite a character, and she is in a number of those pictures, TW is a very attractive and classy woman.


  181. 183 | September 8, 2010 2:02 pm

    [...] is a brief essay that buzzsawmonkey posted as a comment in a recent guest post by huckfunn, namely American Sovereignty Under Attack By U.S. State [...]


  182. 184 | September 12, 2010 8:29 am


    CheapTabletsOnline.com. Canadian Health&Care.Special Internet Prices.No prescription online pharmacy.Best quality drugs. No prescription drugs. Buy pills online

    Buy:Tramadol.Soma.Maxaman.Viagra Professional.Cialis Super Active+.Super Active ED Pack.Cialis.Zithromax.Viagra.VPXL.Viagra Super Force.Levitra.Cialis Professional.Cialis Soft Tabs.Propecia.Viagra Super Active+.Viagra Soft Tabs….


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David