First time visitor? Learn more.

EPA v.s. Working Class

by snork ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Environmentalism, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Regulation at September 16th, 2010 - 6:30 pm

In another installment of the environmental cult v.s. the working class, it seems that the EPA can’t wait to enact their version to cap-n-tax in order to shut down coal mines.

Since last year, The Environmental Protection Agency has stepped up regulation on mountaintop coal mining across six Appalachian states because the explosives that are used to remove mountain surfaces send debris into rivers and streams, endangering the environment.

But with the stricter rules in place, the industry, which is considered the lifeblood of Appalachian towns, argues it’s under attack. Workers and advocacy groups that represent them say the rules unfairly target their region and require mining firms to meet unrealistic standards.

They say the hold-up threatens mining jobs, industry investment and small businesses in the region that rely on the salaries of well-paid miners to keep their economy humming.

“It’s causing the elimination of jobs across Appalachia,” said Bryan Brown, executive director of the Federation for American Coal, Energy and Security, or FACES of Coal. “At a time when the nation’s trying to get people back to work, it’s threatening to take people’s jobs away.”

This isn’t the direct frontal attack that c-n-t would be, this is more typical of environmentalists; a sneaky underhanded weaselly abuse of science.

Citing the Clean Water Act, the EPA last June announced stricter environmental reviews for mountaintop coal mining in Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Then the EPA clamped down on the Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan County, W.Va., moving in March to hold up one of the largest mountaintop mining projects in the country, arguing the debris from the mine would suffocate nearby streams.

Then in April, the EPA issued a memorandum that called for mining firms to meet strict water quality standards. The rule requires the firms to minimize the amount of minerals and pollution running into the waterways as a result of their work.

The memo called the environmental impact “far-reaching,” citing studies showing that thousands of miles of streams had been filled in by debris and that nine of every 10 streams downstream from the mining activity were “impaired” by the work.

Notice that there’s no claim about impacted species or water quality?

The agency said its regulations were based on “extensive” scientific review, which is “documenting the significance of water quality and environmental impacts associated with coal mining operations including the loss of over 1,200 miles of headwater streams, contamination of streams from coal mining waste and potential public health concerns.”

But the industry argues that the rules were arbitrary and unfair, requiring companies to spend extra money for expensive water quality treatment; the National Mining Association filed suit against the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers in July, accusing the federal government of circumventing its own rulemaking process.

Brown said the standard the EPA uses is “ludicrous” and almost impossible to meet.

“Perrier drinking water doesn’t meet that standard,” he said. “They’ve implemented it knowing that the industry can’t meet it.”

I’m in full sympathy with these Appalachian coal miners on this, but I do have one question: where were you when these same groups and activists were trying this template out on the loggers of the Pacific Northwest with the Northern Spotted Owl ruse? Remember how Father Niemoller’s poem goes? Something like: first they came for the loggers jobs, and I said nothing because I wasn’t a logger…

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

123 Responses to “EPA v.s. Working Class”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | September 16, 2010 6:39 pm

    I posted this at the end of the last thread and didn’t want it to go unnoticed:

    http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-on-obama-the-president-is-losing-it/

    It’s all there, all the speculation confirmed, if it is genuine


  2. 2 | September 16, 2010 6:43 pm

    But look at the plus side. In a lot of these Appalachian communities the coal mines are the economy. The coal miners buy the gas and groceries that the gas stations and grocery stores sell, on down the line, providing the initial revenue streams that support entire communities. Get rid of the coal mines, and look how many people you can put on welfare! First, they’ll have two years of funemployment, of course, so their skills can atrophy, andf then what choice will they have? This is the best news since the poverty numbers came out this morning. Yay, welfare!


  3. 3 | September 16, 2010 6:44 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    He’ll come completely unglued after the election. Bank on it.


  4. buzzsawmonkey
    4 | September 16, 2010 6:44 pm

    The late Peter Cook as a coal miner.


  5. 5 | September 16, 2010 6:49 pm

    Scott Madsen wrote:

    I posted this at the end of the last thread and didn’t want it to go unnoticed:
    http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-on-obama-the-president-is-losing-it/
    It’s all there, all the speculation confirmed, if it is genuine

    There is a insider part 2 here:

    http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-part-2-the-president-needs-to-grow-up/


  6. m
    6 | September 16, 2010 6:50 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    His mom jeans are too tight.


  7. 7 | September 16, 2010 6:52 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Yep, as soon as Congress flips over, he’ll go ape shit when he can’t have it his way in any manner or form.

    Dude’s never known opposition (arrested development), must suck to be him….the psyches are going to have a field day and will be falling out of the trees to publish after he is gone.


  8. wolfie
    8 | September 16, 2010 6:53 pm

    “…where were you when these same groups and activists were trying this template out on the loggers of the Pacific Northwest with the Northern Spotted Owl ruse?”

    Probably the same place most of us were. Sitting around talking about the destructiveness of the econuts. Shaking our heads. And knowing that there is not a thing we can do about it.

    Maybe it’s time for a Green-Tea Party. Maybe it’s time for the farmers of California, the laid-off workers at the incandescent bulb factory, coal-miners, oil-workers, the millions of people whose lives are threatened by the eco-Marxists to band together and fight back.


  9. wolfie
    9 | September 16, 2010 6:54 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    I’m glad you reposted that. Verrrrrrry interesting. ;)


  10. mfhorn
    10 | September 16, 2010 6:58 pm

    It doesn’t matter if thousands of people’s jobs are destroyed. What matters is that we save the planet from AGW! Obama will supply their needs from his own pocket, just like he’ll pay for people’s gas out of his own pocket.

    //


  11. RIX
    11 | September 16, 2010 7:01 pm

    @ wolfie:

    The moral supremicists on the left assume that only they care about the environmnet (while they travel in private jets)
    I care about the environment, but I do not want people unable to feed their families or become vassals of the state due to the AGW hoax.


  12. waldensianspirit
    12 | September 16, 2010 7:05 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:
    Those read fake


  13. Grimcargo
    13 | September 16, 2010 7:06 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    He’ll come completely unglued after the election. Bank on it.

    Him and Hen Johnson. Going to be fun


  14. Grimcargo
    14 | September 16, 2010 7:07 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    His mom jeans are too tight.

    lmao


  15. 15 | September 16, 2010 7:11 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Hillary person or the dialouge seems to much like a schematic of everything said about him by all of us in places like this?


  16. RIX
    16 | September 16, 2010 7:13 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    His mom jeans are too tight.

    The guy can’t throw a baseball 60 feet! I’m not talking about a screaming 98 mph fastball or a wicked curve.
    I’m just talking about getting it there. Pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  17. wolfie
    17 | September 16, 2010 7:14 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    “A scene unparalleled in the history of mining!”
    :lol: :lol: :lol:


  18. waldensianspirit
    18 | September 16, 2010 7:16 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:
    Maybe both. Definitely latter…thanks for help…cat on lap..typing difficult

    Maybe Obama will be a one termer.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1312462/Michelle-Obama-thinks-First-Lady-hell-says-Carla-Bruni.html


  19. Grimcargo
    19 | September 16, 2010 7:18 pm

    RIX wrote:

    m wrote:
    @ Scott Madsen:

    His mom jeans are too tight.

    The guy can’t throw a baseball 60 feet! I’m not talking about a screaming 98 mph fastball or a wicked curve.

    I can run faster than he can throw.

    I’m just talking about getting it there. Pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  20. snowcrash
    20 | September 16, 2010 7:18 pm

    m wrote:

    @ Scott Madsen:
    His mom jeans are too tight.

    Then he needs maternity jeans. LOL You have to have worn them to know how stylish they are. LOL


  21. Grimcargo
    21 | September 16, 2010 7:19 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    m wrote:
    @ Scott Madsen:

    His mom jeans are too tight.
    Then he needs maternity jeans. LOL You have to have worn them to know how stylish they are. LOL

    Just kill me


  22. wolfie
    22 | September 16, 2010 7:20 pm

    RIX wrote:

    I care about the environment, but I do not want people unable to feed their families or become vassals of the state due to the AGW hoax.

    Indeed.

    What really ticks me off about these holier-than-thou elitists is that no one, no one, cares more about the mountains than the people who live in them…..including, of course, the miners.


  23. RIX
    23 | September 16, 2010 7:21 pm

    @ Grimcargo:
    Hear me now , beleive me later, he’s a girl man!


  24. wolfie
    24 | September 16, 2010 7:21 pm

    RIX wrote:

    moral supremacists

    Good one, BTW! :)


  25. snowcrash
    25 | September 16, 2010 7:22 pm

    @ Grimcargo:
    I take it you have seen the stretchy front panel?


  26. Grimcargo
    26 | September 16, 2010 7:22 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:

    Hear me now , beleive me later, he’s a girl man!

    I know it. President Urkle the girly man. God I hate him and the camel he rode in on.


  27. Grimcargo
    27 | September 16, 2010 7:24 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ Grimcargo:

    I take it you have seen the stretchy front panel?

    Yeah my sister and that didnt stop her from knocking over every single thing in stores. How embarrassing.She wreaked things with her big front end loader.


  28. snowcrash
    28 | September 16, 2010 7:24 pm

    @ wolfie:
    Same thing with Ducks Unlimited and wetlands conservation.


  29. NoThreat2U
    29 | September 16, 2010 7:26 pm

    Let’s give a warm welcome to the Australian TEA Party! *clap clap*

    http://michellemalkin.com/2010/09/16/tea-party/

    An anti-tax, anti-government Tea Party has set up shop in Australia, inspired by the US-based movement that has turned the Republican Party upside down.


  30. waldensianspirit
    30 | September 16, 2010 7:27 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:
    Great news!


  31. Grimcargo
    31 | September 16, 2010 7:28 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    Let’s give a warm welcome to the Australian TEA Party! *clap clap*
    http://michellemalkin.com/2010/09/16/tea-party/
    An anti-tax, anti-government Tea Party has set up shop in Australia, inspired by the US-based movement that has turned the Republican Party upside down.

    Wow a Global thingy is afoot.


  32. RIX
    32 | September 16, 2010 7:28 pm

    wolfie
    22 | September 16, 2010 19:20
    Indeed.

    What really ticks me off about these holier-than-thou elitists is that no one, no one, cares more about the mountains than the people who live in them…..including, of course, the miners.

    Liberal elitists only care about people in the abstract.
    We are far too common for them & it is really about control.
    Vote,vote vote, take it back!


  33. RIX
    33 | September 16, 2010 7:30 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Now it needs to sprtead all over Europe.


  34. wolfie
    34 | September 16, 2010 7:30 pm

    @ snowcrash:

    Yes!
    The people with the most genuine interest in preserving game and habitats are hunters.


  35. NoThreat2U
    35 | September 16, 2010 7:32 pm

    Obama regime recieves a righteous smackdown. Muahahahahahahahahaha

    Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act will get a constitutional challenge soon, without the nine months of discovery requested by the Obama Justice Department.

    At PJM


  36. mfhorn
    36 | September 16, 2010 7:32 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    I care about the environment, but I do not want people unable to feed their families or become vassals of the state due to the AGW hoax.
    Indeed.
    What really ticks me off about these holier-than-thou elitists is that no one, no one, cares more about the mountains than the people who live in them…..including, of course, the miners.

    They don’t want to admit we can care about the environment without destroying the economy.

    They refuse to admit that it’s because of America’s prosperity, we can worry about the environment. If we’d lived under the environmental rules they want for the last hundred years, we’d be struggling much more to provide for our basic needs.


  37. NoThreat2U
    37 | September 16, 2010 7:33 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:
    @ Grimcargo:
    @ RIX:
    Yep!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  38. RIX
    38 | September 16, 2010 7:33 pm

    Now it is time to say goodnight.
    I am in a hotel in Cleveland & headed up to my room for room service.
    I know, you’re wondering who do I know to get this trip.
    Way too exciting!


  39. mfhorn
    39 | September 16, 2010 7:33 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Welcome Aussie Tea Partiers!

    Prepare to be accused of racism.


  40. snork
    40 | September 16, 2010 7:35 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Liberal elitists only care about people in the abstract.

    Which is great until they run out of cake.


  41. waldensianspirit
    41 | September 16, 2010 7:36 pm

    @ snork:
    Where does cake come from?


  42. snork
    42 | September 16, 2010 7:39 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ snork:
    Where does cake come from?

    THE GODDAMM STORE. JEEZ. HOW DO YOU EVER GET ANYTHING? DON’T YOU EVER GO TO THE STORE WHERE ALL THE STUFF COMES FROM?


  43. waldensianspirit
    43 | September 16, 2010 7:40 pm

    lol!


  44. Grimcargo
    44 | September 16, 2010 7:40 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Now it is time to say goodnight.

    I am in a hotel in Cleveland & headed up to my room for room service.

    I know, you’re wondering who do I know to get this trip.

    Way too exciting!

    Watch out for Al Gore


  45. NoThreat2U
    45 | September 16, 2010 7:40 pm

    @ snork:
    You remind me of someone…..


  46. mfhorn
    46 | September 16, 2010 7:40 pm

    O’Donnell update: $1,184,309.66


  47. Grimcargo
    47 | September 16, 2010 7:41 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    O’Donnell update: $1,184,309.66

    WOW some of them dollars be mine. Yahhhh GO GIRL


  48. mfhorn
    48 | September 16, 2010 7:42 pm

    @ snork:

    A cake creator? You deny that cake evolved from lower forms of baked goods?


  49. wolfie
    49 | September 16, 2010 7:42 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    it’s because of America’s prosperity, we can worry about the environment.

    BINGO!


  50. 50 | September 16, 2010 7:43 pm

    snork wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    Liberal elitists only care about people in the abstract.
    Which is great until they run out of cake.

    The cake is a lie. Always was.


  51. snork
    52 | September 16, 2010 7:44 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    O’Donnell update: $1,184,309.66

    Hey Chuck. I know you’re reading this. This would be a good time to remind your faithful followers to hit the tip jar.


  52. waldensianspirit
    53 | September 16, 2010 7:45 pm

    @ Urban Infidel:
    along a yellow brink road, eh


  53. Lily
    54 | September 16, 2010 7:45 pm

    Scott Madsen wrote:

    I posted this at the end of the last thread and didn’t want it to go unnoticed:
    http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-on-obama-the-president-is-losing-it/
    It’s all there, all the speculation confirmed, if it is genuine

    Read that…problems in the marriage….pres throwing temper tantrums…..doesn’t like to do any work….
    The pressures of the WH will do this man in. He will crack even more through the next two years.


  54. wolfie
    55 | September 16, 2010 7:46 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    O’Donnell update: $1,184,309.66

    Win or lose, that is one powerful message to the GOP!


  55. 56 | September 16, 2010 7:47 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    along a yellow brink road, eh

    Apparently, from the comments, it looks like a stacked house of Princeton elites.

    On Monday, CNBC will host a town hall on the difficult state of the economy with President Obama in the Washington area. But finding suitable audience members to ask questions of the president is apparently proving difficult.

    According to an e-mail sent to an Ivy Leaguer (who also happens to be a big-time Republican), the network is reaching out to members of the Princeton Club for town hall participants. Here’s the e-mail, helpfully forwarded to Power Play:

    Dear XXXXX, AN ALUMNI ALERT ….

    The Princeton Club of Washington has received a TIME-SENSITIVE INVITATION to participate in a TOWN HALL with President Obama on Sept. 20. A special group will be selected for this, and it will be held in the Washington, D.C. area…. On Monday September 20, CNBC will be holding a special live town hall event from Washington D.C., featuring President Barack Obama.

    We would like to invite you to be a member of the audience. We want your voice to be heard. We are looking to capture the sentiment of the nation ahead of the midterm elections. Audience members will have the opportunity to ask their questions directly to the president during the live event.

    REQUIRED: That you be available from 10:00 a.m. – 1:30 p.m. on Monday, September 20. If this fits with your schedule, please e-mail the required information listed below to our producer: xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx This information if for security purposes, since the White House requires all audience members to be screened 72-hours in advance.

    PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, and YOUR QUESTION for the President ….

    -Full first name, middle initial, and last name
    -Date of birth
    -Social security number
    -Color photo (please attach the photo to the e-mail back to me)

    QUESTION: Please write a question you would like to ask or have answered by the president.

    Wrote the GOP Princetonian: “What better way to ‘capture the sentiment of the nation’ than to invite Princeton alumni of D.C. to a town hall? I wonder if DC-based Princeton alumnae Michelle Obama, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan are on the list?


  56. snork
    57 | September 16, 2010 7:48 pm

    Gee, that wasn’t very nice, Walter…

    226 Walter L. Newton Thu, Sep 16, 2010 4:38:32pm -4

    re: #221 SanFranciscoZionist

    Yeah. They lie awake nights, figuring out how to screw the children of the poor.

    From the horses mouth.


  57. waldensianspirit
    58 | September 16, 2010 7:48 pm

    @ wolfie:
    Yep, money they don’t get to appropriate as they please.


  58. snork
    59 | September 16, 2010 7:52 pm

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Yikes. The Princeton Club is, needless to say, a club open only to Princeton alums, and the dues are pretty steep. So it takes a couple of metric shitloads of chutzpah to say to that group:

    We would like to invite you to be a member of the audience. We want your voice to be heard. We are looking to capture the sentiment of the nation ahead of the midterm elections.

    ‘Scuse me, the sentiment of the members of the Princeton Club is not the sentiment of the nation.

    Asshole.


  59. snork
    60 | September 16, 2010 7:53 pm

    @ snork:
    I didn’t even read the snarky comment on the bottom.


  60. 61 | September 16, 2010 7:58 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ snork:
    I didn’t even read the snarky comment on the bottom.

    I’m surprised that the comments on mediabistro are that conservative.


  61. 62 | September 16, 2010 8:01 pm

    Scott Madsen wrote:

    I posted this at the end of the last thread and didn’t want it to go unnoticed:
    http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-on-obama-the-president-is-losing-it/
    It’s all there, all the speculation confirmed, if it is genuine

    It doesn’t bother him that people are actually suffering because they are out of work. What bothers him is that the job figures make the Obama Administration look bad, and he has to blame somebody else.

    Much as Stalin sent huge numbers of people accused of being “wreckers” (saboteurs) to the Gulag to spread the blame for shortfalls in his five-year plans.


  62. Eliana
    63 | September 16, 2010 8:02 pm

    OT – I’m heading out but I wanted to add something to what we were talking about earlier with regards to Ludwig’s (and others) trashing Christianity at the Swamp.

    They’re defending Islam to the death and trashing Christianity with every ounce of their beings (some of them).

    It’s a political choice. They see Christians as Republicans and Muslims as possible Democrat Party voters.

    They trying to woo the world of Islam as their allies while many people are also taking note of how dangerous it is to exercise things like free speech when it comes to the world of Islam.

    Dangerous business.


  63. snork
    64 | September 16, 2010 8:03 pm

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Sending something like that out to the Princeton Club is borderline asstroturfing.


  64. 65 | September 16, 2010 8:04 pm

    snork wrote:

    waldensianspirit wrote:
    @ snork:
    Where does cake come from?
    THE GODDAMM STORE. JEEZ. HOW DO YOU EVER GET ANYTHING? DON’T YOU EVER GO TO THE STORE WHERE ALL THE STUFF COMES FROM?

    If you don’t want to visit a supermarket or a bakery, you can always buy flour, sugar, milk, eggs, and butter, and a pan, to make your own.


  65. waldensianspirit
    66 | September 16, 2010 8:04 pm

    The indubitable Frank J. :-)
    http://www.imao.us/index.php/2010/09/they-make-it-too-easy/


  66. 67 | September 16, 2010 8:06 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Sending something like that out to the Princeton Club is borderline asstroturfing.

    And how ironic that he’s going to talk about the economy on CNBC, where Rick Santelli single-handedly gave birth to the Tea Party.


  67. snork
    68 | September 16, 2010 8:06 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    It’s a political choice. They see Christians as Republicans and Muslims as possible Democrat Party voters.

    Which ties in to the lies from CAIR about the number of muslims in the US. Their 7 million number is neither correct nor arbitrary. It’s political calculus. With 6.something million Jews, 7 million makes them the prize.

    Of course, it’s all politics. And they’re chumps for buying the propaganda.


  68. snork
    69 | September 16, 2010 8:09 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    But those things all come from the store, too. And don’t try to feed me any fairy tails about farms and chickens and all that nonsense. Chickens are in the meat section, and they’re as hard as rocks and can’t lay eggs.


  69. mfhorn
    70 | September 16, 2010 8:11 pm

    @ snork:

    If they want to get the pulse of America, they’d randomly pick a dozen or so people from across the country.

    I wouldn’t expect that to happen no matter which party was in the White House.


  70. snork
    71 | September 16, 2010 8:16 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    @ snork:

    If they want to get the pulse of America, they’d randomly pick a dozen or so people from across the country.

    I wouldn’t expect that to happen no matter which party was in the White House.

    I guess they’re just lying to themselves, then. Kinda like “I don’t know anybody for voted for Nixon”.


  71. 72 | September 16, 2010 8:21 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Sending something like that out to the Princeton Club is borderline asstroturfing.

    We should have an open thread and watch it.


  72. lobo91
    73 | September 16, 2010 8:22 pm

    @ Lily:

    I thought this part was interesting:

    As much as I admire Palin’s ability to connect with the American people, I just can’t stand her politics. I am a pro-choice Democrat. I support unions. I support welfare programs. Sarah Palin understands America, but that doesn’t mean she understands the best parts of America.

    So to this person, abortion, unions, and welfare programs represent “the best parts of America”?


  73. mfhorn
    74 | September 16, 2010 8:23 pm

    @ snork:

    It’s sad when someone’s that isolated from the world they don’t even know people with a differing viewpoint.


  74. snork
    75 | September 16, 2010 8:25 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    @ snork:

    It’s sad when someone’s that isolated from the world they don’t even know people with a differing viewpoint.

    They’d go ballistic if they ever met one. They really don’t want to. Look at the unhinged reactions to Sarah Palin.


  75. mfhorn
    76 | September 16, 2010 8:27 pm

    @ snork:

    Sarah Palin. Rush. Hannity. Christine O’Donnell…


  76. Lily
    77 | September 16, 2010 8:28 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Lily:
    I thought this part was interesting:
    As much as I admire Palin’s ability to connect with the American people, I just can’t stand her politics. I am a pro-choice Democrat. I support unions. I support welfare programs. Sarah Palin understands America, but that doesn’t mean she understands the best parts of America.
    So to this person, abortion, unions, and welfare programs represent “the best parts of America”?

    Yeah actually those articles did seem genuine. It explains the dis-connect and all those vacations. Michelle being in Spain while her husband had his birthday bash…yet still not wanting to bash obama that bad. This person came off rather disappointed…not hating. But still toeing the democratic line.


  77. Lily
    78 | September 16, 2010 8:38 pm

    Not to mention Michelle saying it is ‘hell’ being in the White House.
    And according to this insider after the elections more will come out and say something.
    I don’t know..it does seem to add up. Obama does indeed love campaigning…and his history has shown he doesn’t do any real work.


  78. Lily
    79 | September 16, 2010 8:39 pm

    Is everyone gone?
    Have I killed another thread yet again? ;)


  79. NoThreat2U
    80 | September 16, 2010 8:41 pm

    @ Lily:
    That’s why he is having such a grand old time campaigning for the other dems. That’s all he knows how to do. As for the actual work after winning…not so much.


  80. snork
    81 | September 16, 2010 8:44 pm

    @ Lily:

    This part rings true:

    What about Hillary Clinton? Obama is scared to death of Hillary. He doesn’t trust her – obsesses over her almost as much as he does Fox News. He respects her though, which might be why he fears her so much as well. He talks the game, but when it comes down to it, she has played the game on a far tougher level than he has, and Obama knows that.

    I expect her to challenge him in the primary. He has good reason to be terrified of Team Clinton.


  81. Lily
    82 | September 16, 2010 8:44 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Lily:
    That’s why he is having such a grand old time campaigning for the other dems. That’s all he knows how to do. As for the actual work after winning…not so much.

    Yeah that is what he is doing….I think he indeed is being crushed under the pressure of the WH and having marital problems (that is a new one but believable one). Not liking Biden etc. I don’t know it does seem to ring true. He can’t handle it.


  82. NoThreat2U
    83 | September 16, 2010 8:44 pm

    YOU MUST GO AND READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=969


  83. lobo91
    84 | September 16, 2010 8:45 pm

    @ Lily:

    I’m being crushed under the pressure of him being in the White House, too…


  84. waldensianspirit
    85 | September 16, 2010 8:47 pm

    Just look at her! There is no way humans evolve. All we can do is try to restitute back toward Eve.


  85. Lily
    86 | September 16, 2010 8:47 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Lily:
    This part rings true:
    What about Hillary Clinton? Obama is scared to death of Hillary. He doesn’t trust her – obsesses over her almost as much as he does Fox News. He respects her though, which might be why he fears her so much as well. He talks the game, but when it comes down to it, she has played the game on a far tougher level than he has, and Obama knows that.
    I expect her to challenge him in the primary. He has good reason to be terrified of Team Clinton.

    I do too. He rode in on Bush Derangement mindset…and now he is kinda of clueless or really doesn’t want to do the job. Next two years shall show if starts cracking more and if the Nov. elections do go R his thin skinnedness ….. he may go total meltdown if he is already cracking.


  86. 87 | September 16, 2010 8:48 pm

    Lily wrote:

    NoThreat2U wrote:
    @ Lily:
    That’s why he is having such a grand old time campaigning for the other dems. That’s all he knows how to do. As for the actual work after winning…not so much.
    Yeah that is what he is doing….I think he indeed is being crushed under the pressure of the WH and having marital problems (that is a new one but believable one). Not liking Biden etc. I don’t know it does seem to ring true. He can’t handle it.

    I can see there might be marital problems if he was on the down low when he was in Chicago.


  87. m
    88 | September 16, 2010 8:48 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Wow.


  88. NoThreat2U
    89 | September 16, 2010 8:48 pm

    @ Lily:
    Finally realized he isn’t as smart as he thinks he is.


  89. snork
    90 | September 16, 2010 8:49 pm

    The President of the United States threw a temper tantrum. The jobs reports are always setting him off, and he is getting increasingly conspiratorial over the unemployment numbers. I never heard it myself, but was told that Obama thinks the banking system is out to get him now. That they and the big industries are making him pay for trying to regulate them more. That is the frame of mind the President is in these days. And you know what? Maybe he is right, who knows?

    Shades of RMN.


  90. CynicalConservative
    91 | September 16, 2010 8:49 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:
    I hope they pass the full package of extending the tax cuts and that bambi vetos’ it and then gets his first bipartisan effort in congress to overrule him since they want to save their jobs.

    /dreaming.


  91. Lily
    92 | September 16, 2010 8:51 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Lily:
    I’m being crushed under the pressure of him being in the White House, too…

    Many people are ….. and he doesn’t care. This is one pres that really isn’t pro-american. No one is hiring. They don’t know what will be coming …. under obama.

    One good question what if he does actually crack up? Then what? We have Biden?


  92. NoThreat2U
    93 | September 16, 2010 8:51 pm

    I really think my link above deserves a thread sometime. It is astonishing. Just reminding yinz to take a look at it :)


  93. NoThreat2U
    94 | September 16, 2010 8:52 pm

    @ Lily:
    Biden can be controlled. This joker now is all about himself and what HE wants to do.


  94. buzzsawmonkey
    95 | September 16, 2010 8:53 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Disgusting, but alas not surprising.


  95. lobo91
    96 | September 16, 2010 8:55 pm

    @ Lily:

    Many people are ….. and he doesn’t care. This is one pres that really isn’t pro-american. No one is hiring. They don’t know what will be coming …. under obama.

    So far, since learning that the Army won’t let me go to Afghanistan, I’ve found exactly 3 civilian jobs to apply for.

    Two are in Iraq, and one is in Afghanistan.


  96. Lily
    97 | September 16, 2010 8:55 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    YOU MUST GO AND READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=969

    Good heavens! The world is upside down right now!


  97. NoThreat2U
    98 | September 16, 2010 8:56 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    @ Lily:
    We knew this was gonna happen the minute that asshole signed us on. Unreal.


  98. Lily
    99 | September 16, 2010 8:56 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Lily:
    Many people are ….. and he doesn’t care. This is one pres that really isn’t pro-american. No one is hiring. They don’t know what will be coming …. under obama.
    So far, since learning that the Army won’t let me go to Afghanistan, I’ve found 3 civilian jobs to apply for.
    Two are in Iraq, and one is in Afghanistan.

    Excellent! At least you can see some light at the end of this tunnel you have been going through! Prayers that you get hired. :)


  99. 100 | September 16, 2010 8:58 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    I really think my link above deserves a thread sometime. It is astonishing. Just reminding yinz to take a look at it

    I did. Trouble is, I am too burned out to do any halfway complicated threads at the moment. I already have too many threads in the works that I’ve done some research for, but haven’t gotten around to putting together.

    I suggest you make up a guest post and email it to the Blogmocracy addy, which is on the sidebar of the main page.


  100. Lily
    101 | September 16, 2010 8:58 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Lily:
    Biden can be controlled. This joker now is all about himself and what HE wants to do.

    True. Need pelsesoi and reid out too.
    /really dreaming. But not so far fetched!


  101. m
    102 | September 16, 2010 8:58 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    OH MY GOD!!!!!


  102. lobo91
    103 | September 16, 2010 9:00 pm

    @ Lily:

    It’s not really what I want to do, but I don’t have much choice at this point.

    From what I’ve seen, though, the deployment schedule doesn’t seem to be that bad. It’s a rotation of 90-120 days over there, followed by a month at home.


  103. NoThreat2U
    104 | September 16, 2010 9:00 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    I am hoping one of the admins will pick it up. I am not a good “guest poster”.


  104. 105 | September 16, 2010 9:01 pm

    snork wrote:

    The President of the United States threw a temper tantrum. The jobs reports are always setting him off, and he is getting increasingly conspiratorial over the unemployment numbers. I never heard it myself, but was told that Obama thinks the banking system is out to get him now. That they and the big industries are making him pay for trying to regulate them more. That is the frame of mind the President is in these days. And you know what? Maybe he is right, who knows?
    Shades of RMN.

    Yep.

    Getting paranoid, mistaking simple self-preservation for malice directed at him. Big industries aren’t hiring because Obama is such a loose cannon that they are afraid that they will go broke if they take any risks or make any investments right now.

    IOW, it’s his own fault.


  105. NoThreat2U
    106 | September 16, 2010 9:01 pm

    @ Lily:
    When all these losers are ousted, Imma run around the yard singing NA NA NA NA HEY HEY HEY GOODBYE!!!!!!! Keep your eyes out in the Pittsburgh papers…I’ll probably get arrested. lol


  106. mfhorn
    107 | September 16, 2010 9:02 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Notice how she calls them the ‘Obama middle class tax cuts’. What a crock.


  107. 108 | September 16, 2010 9:02 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    I am hoping one of the admins will pick it up. I am not a good “guest poster”.

    The admins will probably send it along to me, and I’m too tired to cope right now.


  108. lobo91
    109 | September 16, 2010 9:02 pm

    @ Lily:

    True. Need pelsesoi and reid out too.
    /really dreaming. But not so far fetched!

    Pelosi’s not going anywhere. The only thing that would keep her from being re-elected would be an even farther-left candidate in her district.


  109. Lily
    110 | September 16, 2010 9:02 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Lily:
    It’s not really what I want to do, but I don’t have much choice at this point.
    From what I’ve seen, though, the deployment schedule doesn’t seem to be that bad. It’s a rotation of 90-120 days over there, followed by a month at home.

    Prayers then to something you really want to do too then.


  110. Lily
    111 | September 16, 2010 9:03 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Lily:
    True. Need pelsesoi and reid out too.
    /really dreaming. But not so far fetched!
    Pelosi’s not going anywhere. The only thing that would keep her from being re-elected would be an even farther-left candidate in her district.

    You are probably right…but damn I want her out.


  111. 112 | September 16, 2010 9:03 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Lily:
    When all these losers are ousted, Imma run around the yard singing NA NA NA NA HEY HEY HEY GOODBYE!!!!!!! Keep your eyes out in the Pittsburgh papers…I’ll probably get arrested. lol

    Why, are you planning to run around the yard nekkid?


  112. NoThreat2U
    113 | September 16, 2010 9:04 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    ;) lol


  113. mfhorn
    114 | September 16, 2010 9:05 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    Could the Jewish people living here in the US finally get a clue about this jackass? He doesn’t give a rats ass about you


  114. Lily
    115 | September 16, 2010 9:06 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    @ NoThreat2U:
    Could the Jewish people living here in the US finally get a clue about this jackass? He doesn’t give a rats ass about you

    Does he give a rats ass about any of us?


  115. 116 | September 16, 2010 9:07 pm

    Thursday Fight Club is up!


  116. lobo91
    117 | September 16, 2010 9:08 pm

    Lily wrote:

    mfhorn wrote:
    @ NoThreat2U:
    Could the Jewish people living here in the US finally get a clue about this jackass? He doesn’t give a rats ass about you
    Does he give a rats ass about any of us?

    I think you know the answer to that already…


  117. livefreeor die
    118 | September 16, 2010 9:13 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    YOU MUST GO AND READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=969

    Disgusting. And not surprising given this administration’s desire to cozy up to Muslim nations.


  118. Lily
    119 | September 16, 2010 9:15 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Yeah I do. No he doesn’t. And he doesn’t really know what he is doing in the WH.


  119. 120 | September 16, 2010 9:15 pm

    @ Lily:

    Whoa…is it raining frogs in DC yet?


  120. Lily
    121 | September 16, 2010 9:20 pm

    @ Scott Madsen:

    Should be..it is insane!


  121. ms.p.henry
    122 | September 16, 2010 9:37 pm

    I wonder if these are the same miners that proudly displayed their UMWA Obama-Biden campaign signs in the front yard of their homes in Southern W. VA when I drove through there before the election? I guess they didn’t hear BO say he was going to shut them down. That’s something he didn’t lie about.


  122. 123 | September 17, 2010 7:16 am

    [...] Versus the Economy The Obama EPA is shutting down coal mines by setting clean water standards that are impossible to me…. Not oven pure, bottled water is required to be as clean as the EPA is demanding water downstream [...]


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David