First time visitor? Learn more.

Nekama’s Troll Hammer: Where It All Began

by 1389AD ( 144 Comments › )
Filed under Fatah, Hamas, Hezballah, History, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Israel, Jihad, Judaism, LGF, Palestinians at September 18th, 2010 - 9:00 pm

The Memory Hole Versus The Wayback Machine

Although libelblogger Charles Johnson has long since flushed the highly esteemed Nekama’s Troll Hammer down the memory hole on his site, it lives on, courtesy of the Wayback Machine.

Author Nekama has declared it to be open source, so I urge you to follow his suggestion: update or replace expired links, bring it up to date, and post it everywhere.

#38 Nekama 8/17/2003 06:30PM PST

Please consider The Memo to be an open source, Linux based reply that all are welcome to use and improve upon.

Inspired by Zulubaby.

Nekama’s Original Troll Hammer from August 17, 2003

#19 Nekama 8/17/2003 06:10PM PST

#7 Leesider

Congratulations. You are the first to receive the memo:

MEMO

This is an automated reply from the Bulls–t Detector at Little Green Footballs.

Your recent post contained troll-like characteristics which resembles the type of message sent by spoiled ISM members on summer holiday, college students who have recently inhaled Noam Chomsky’s foul rantings, Adam Shapiro wannabes, Nazi sympathizers, or genuine Koranimals.

In order to prevent another thread being hijacked, and to send your message to the appropriate department for response (FOAD, GAZE, Go Away Gordon, or The Bus To Rachel Corrie’s Tomb Is Leaving – Be Sure You’re Under It), kindly reply to the following questions:

1. Are you aware that the Disputed Territories never belonged to the “Palestinians” and only came into Israeli possession as a result of the 1967 six day war in which Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon all massed forces at Israel’s border in order to “push the Jews into the sea”. The Arabs lost and Israel took control of the land. Do you agree that if the Koranimals don’t want to lose territory to Israel, then they shouldn’t start wars? Do you agree that there is justice that Israel, who as far back as 1948 has always sought peace with her far larger neighbors, should live in prosperity – making the desert bloom – while the residents of 19 adjacent Arab countries who are blessed with far more land as well as oil wealth live in their own feces?

2. Did you know that the “Palestinians” could have had their own country as far back as 1948 had they accepted the UN sponsored partition plan which gave Israel AND the Palestinians a countries of their own on land which Jews had lived on for thousands of years before Mohammed ever had a wet dream about virgins? The Arabs rejected the UN offer and went to war with the infant Israeli nation. The Arabs lost and have been whining about it ever since. Do you agree this is like a murderer who kills his parents and asks for special treatment since he is now an orphan?

3. Can you tell us ANY Arab country which offers Jews the right to be citizens, vote, own property, businesses, be a part of the government or have ANY of the rights which Israeli Arabs enjoy? Any Arab country which gives those rights to Christians? How about to other Arabs? Wouldn’t you just LOVE to be a citizen of Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran, or Syria?

4. Since as many Jews (approximately 850,000) were kicked out of Arab countries as were Arabs who left present day Israel (despite being literally begged to stay), why should Arabs be permitted to return to Israel if Jews aren’t allowed to set foot in Arab countries? Can you explain why Arabs can worship freely in Israel but Jews would certainly be hung from street lamps after having their intestines devoured by an Arab mob if they so much as entered an Arab country?

5. Israel resettled and absorbed all of the Jews from Arab countries who wished to become Israelis. Why haven’t any Arab countries offered to resettle Arabs who were displaced from Israel, leaving them to rot for 60 years in squalid refugee camps? And why are those refugee camps still there? Could it be that the billions of dollars that the UNWRA has sent there goes to terrorist groups like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, El Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, or Hezbollah? How did Yassir Arafat achieve his $300 million in wealth? Why aren’t these funds distributed for humanitarian use?

6. Did you know that the Arabs in the disputed territories (conquered by Israel in the 1967 war which was started by Arabs) and who are not Israelis already have two countries right now? And that they are called Egypt and Jordan?

7. If your complaint is about the security fence which Israel is finally building in the Disputed Territories, are you aware that it is built solely to keep the “brave” Arab terrorists out so that they can no longer self detonate on busses, in dining halls or pizzerias and kill Jewish grandmothers and schoolchildren? Why are the Arabs so brave when they target unarmed civilians but even when they outnumber their opponents they get their sandy asses kicked all the way to Mecca when they are faced with Jewish soldiers? Why do Arab soldiers make the French look like super heroes?

8. Please explain why you are so concerned about Arabs, who possess 99% of the land in this region and are in control of the world’s greatest natural resource, which literally flows out of the ground? Can’t their brother muslims offer some of the surplus land and nature’s riches to the “Palestinians”? Or is it true that Arabs are willing to die right down to the last “Palestinian”?

9. Why do you not exhibit the same level of concern for say, people in Saudi Arabia who are beheaded, subject to amputation, stoning, honor killing etc.? What about women who are denied any semblance of basic civil rights, including the right not to be treated as property for the entertainment and abuse of her father, brothers, or husbands? What about the Muslims in Sudan and Egypt who are still enslaved, or the women there whose genitalia are barbarically cut off? How about the oppression of Shiites by Sunnis, the gassing of the Kurds by Iraq, or the massacre of “Palestinians” by Jordan (Black September)? Why doesn’t this concern you?

10. Did you ever stop to wonder how much better off everyone in the region would be if Arabs stopped trying to kill Jews and destroy Israel? What would happen if the Israelis gave up their weapons and disarmed? Would they live to see the next day? But what would happen if the Arabs completely disarmed? You know the answer: They would all be AT PEACE! And if there is no war to rile them up, the Arabs would be forced to look at their own repressive, pre-medieval societies. Why would they want to do that when there are Jews to kill?

11. Have you heard “People who define themselves primarily by what they hate, rather than who they love, are doomed to failure and misery”? Can you see the parallels to the Arabs, who are blessed with land and oil, but still gladly train their children to kill themselves in order to kill Jews? Have you heard Golda Meir’s words to the effect of “There will be peace when the Arabs love their children more than they hate ours”? Why do the Arabs hate so much?

Please state your answers to the questions listed above. If you need assistance or require additional study, then please refer to the following links:

History of the Middle East Conflict:
http://www.infoclick.org/conflict.html

Thousands of women killed for honor:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/02/0212_020212_honorkilling.html

Muslims lament Israel’s existence:
http://www.iht.com/articles/98479.html

Disputed Territories – Forgotten Facts
http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/go.asp?MFAH0n1m0

The size of Israel compared to neighboring countries in the region
http://www.iris.org.il/sizemaps.htm#index

Jews expelled from Arab Countries
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/A/JPArticle/PrinterFull&cid=1056508742342

One Million Jews flee Arab countries – why no right of return for them?
http://www.forgottenexodus.com/

Middle East Facts
http://yashiko.middleeastfacts.com/

Middle East Truth
http://www.mideasttruth.com/

Larry Miller on Hypocrisy
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/161yaihr.asp

Please respond to the items listed above. Based on your answers a thoughtful reply or instruction to FOAD will be provided.

Thank you for writing to Little Green Footballs.

Signed,

Troll Early Warning Detection Team


Note: This article dates back to 2003; not all of the above links still work.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

144 Responses to “Nekama’s Troll Hammer: Where It All Began”
( jump to bottom )

  1. snork
    1 | September 18, 2010 9:11 pm

    Exam to be given to spacecheese, Reggie, and about two dozen other leftys at LFG that I can’t even remember on this.


  2. taxfreekiller
    2 | September 18, 2010 9:15 pm

    Hammers hurt if your fingers are in the wrong places.

    Just saying, if the commie Democrats would just remove a few fingers from the pie they would not get so many fingers hammered.

    later all


  3. 3 | September 18, 2010 9:19 pm

    I must point out that not all of the links still work. It may be possible to replace them with links to the same factual material, appearing elsewhere on the interwebz.

    Has anybody seen Nekama lately?


  4. 4 | September 18, 2010 9:20 pm

    It lets you know Charles’ feelings on Irael that he’s memoryholed this. He doesn’t want someone using it on him when he finally comes out with his “Ten Reasons I Parted With Israel”.


  5. 5 | September 18, 2010 9:20 pm

    O/T:

    Some dirt on Coons:

    http://is.gd/fhfwD


  6. MrPaulRevere
    6 | September 18, 2010 9:25 pm

    You mean Nekama didn’t grill and roast trolls? Bow down before a superior intellect, Dark Falcon.


  7. 7 | September 18, 2010 9:30 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    It lets you know Charles’ feelings on Irael that he’s memoryholed this. He doesn’t want someone using it on him when he finally comes out with his “Ten Reasons I Parted With Israel”.

    I bet he has it in draft already. His pretext will be that Israel “back-stabbed” on his beloved Obama on his “peace efforts”and they he can’t back a “Fascist” state. Watch.


  8. 8 | September 18, 2010 9:36 pm

    @ Rodan:
    Here’s one for you to tackle, if you haven’t seen it already:

    Saturday Night Fever in Mecca

    Zeke’s comment says it all.


  9. Eliana
    9 | September 18, 2010 9:38 pm

    Obama’s going to go nuts soon when Israel’s settlement freeze ends.

    Obama and Hillary have been punishing Israel all year for being cooperative with concessions and being more than willing to meet face to face with Mahmoud Abbas.

    Mahmoud Abbas has been a horse’s ass all year (all his life, actually) by naming everything but his bellybutton after terrorists who had murdered Jews while also demanding PRE-CONDITIONS before he’s willing to talk to Israel.

    Obama and Hillary have been rewarding Abbas for this behavior all year.


  10. lobo91
    10 | September 18, 2010 9:44 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Sounds like my life.

    I found out today that they aren’t done punishing me for volunteering to go to Afghanistan.

    I’m losing my Reserve position now, too.


  11. Calo
    11 | September 18, 2010 9:47 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Oh Lobo. I am speechless.


  12. bellamags
    12 | September 18, 2010 9:48 pm

    I remember this very well..saw it a few times. Weird.


  13. lobo91
    13 | September 18, 2010 9:49 pm

    And with that, I’ll also lose my medical and dental insurance.

    I’m actually planning to suggest that they just burn my house down, while they’re at it, since that’s about all I have left.


  14. bellamags
    14 | September 18, 2010 9:50 pm

    @ Rodan:

    It’s pretty sad that he was fooled by the sparkley glittery Obama campaign. Either that or someone sneaked in his house and gave him a kool-aid injection.


  15. Calo
    15 | September 18, 2010 9:50 pm

    @ lobo91:
    What about some of the contract positions you were looking at this week?


  16. Eliana
    16 | September 18, 2010 9:50 pm

    @ lobo91:

    I found out today that they aren’t done punishing me for volunteering to go to Afghanistan.

    I’m losing my Reserve position now, too.

    Oh no – sorry to hear this.


  17. 17 | September 18, 2010 9:51 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Eliana:
    Sounds like my life.
    I found out today that they aren’t done punishing me for volunteering to go to Afghanistan.
    I’m losing my Reserve position now, too.

    Why is that?

    How dare they??


  18. lobo91
    18 | September 18, 2010 9:53 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    What about some of the contract positions you were looking at this week?

    Those are typical black hole online applications.

    I may or may not hear from a real human in a few months.


  19. Da_Beerfreak
    19 | September 18, 2010 9:54 pm

    @ lobo91:
    What the Hell is wrong with those people?!


  20. lobo91
    20 | September 18, 2010 9:57 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    Why is that?

    How dare they??

    We got a new commander last month. She decided that she wanted to bring someone into the unit, but didn’t have a position to assign him to.

    So they assigned him to mine, and coded me as “excess awaiting assignment.”

    I have 90 days to find a new position, or be involuntarily reassigned to the inactive reserve. And I already know there are no other positions available within commuting distance.


  21. Calo
    21 | September 18, 2010 9:58 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Lobo, are you saying you need to relocate to keep a new position?


  22. lobo91
    22 | September 18, 2010 10:00 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Lobo, are you saying you need to relocate to keep a new position?

    That’s one way of looking at it, although I’m not in a position to relocate.


  23. refugee000
    23 | September 18, 2010 10:00 pm

    Too funny.

    Here’s another page

    Cartoon Jihad, Round Two
    http://web.archive.org/web/20060323090909/littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=19740

    I see a comment from ‘M’ ( #10)

    There are also some nice examples of Kilgore’s current hypocrisy on the comment thread.


  24. lobo91
    24 | September 18, 2010 10:02 pm

    And there are damn few positions available anywhere, anyway.

    The excessive promotions they did over the past few years are starting to catch up to us. It’s a big game of musical chairs, and someone just stole my seat.


  25. Fritz Katz
    25 | September 18, 2010 10:04 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    I must point out that not all of the links still work. It may be possible to replace them with links to the same factual material, appearing elsewhere on the interwebz. …

    First, check the wayback machine at archive.org. For example here’s the link to ‘forgottenexodus’:

    One Million Jews flee Arab countries – why no right of return for them?
    http://www.forgottenexodus.com/


  26. 26 | September 18, 2010 10:07 pm

    @ Fritz Katz:

    Hello there!

    I’m at my Cousin’s house in Ft. Lauderdale!

    How you been?


  27. 27 | September 18, 2010 10:10 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Hey Eliana!

    I’m at my Cousin’s house in Ft. Lauderdale. We are about to hit the Las Olas Strip which is within walking distance. We’re tearing up da town!

    I’m tired and want to just hang out with you guys, but he’s all animated. Rum does that to him!

    :lol:

    I’m just sipping beers!


  28. 28 | September 18, 2010 10:12 pm

    @ bellamags:

    He’s a scumbag!


  29. mfhorn
    29 | September 18, 2010 10:13 pm

    @ lobo91:

    So sorry to hear that.


  30. lobo91
    30 | September 18, 2010 10:14 pm

    @ mfhorn:

    Thanks.


  31. lobo91
    31 | September 18, 2010 10:15 pm

    Anyone have a cardboard box Leia and I can move into?


  32. Fritz Katz
    32 | September 18, 2010 10:15 pm

    @ Rodan: Hey, Rodan. Doing well, back in school studying Cisco. My Dominican wife says ask Rodan: “Hola, ¿Cómo estas?”


  33. 33 | September 18, 2010 10:18 pm

    Fritz Katz wrote:

    @ Rodan: Hey, Rodan. Doing well, back in school studying Cisco. My Dominican wife says ask Rodan: “Hola, ¿Cómo estas?”

    Tell her hi and I’m with my Dominican Cousin!

    He’s a Hache, she’s knows who we are!


  34. 34 | September 18, 2010 10:19 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Anyone have a cardboard box Leia and I can move into?

    I’m sorry about your situation. Have you looked at positions here in Tampa? It’s Socom, sop maybe there’s something?


  35. lobo91
    35 | September 18, 2010 10:21 pm

    @ Rodan:

    I can’t relocate, and certainly not for a part-time job, anyway.


  36. Calo
    36 | September 18, 2010 10:24 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    I can’t relocate, and certainly not for a part-time job, anyway.

    Why can’t you relocate for a full-time job if one is presented to you?


  37. lobo91
    37 | September 18, 2010 10:25 pm

    @ Calo:

    Because I owe more on my house than it’s worth.


  38. Eliana
    38 | September 18, 2010 10:25 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Have fun!


  39. 39 | September 18, 2010 10:27 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    Nekama is banned, according to the official list, and I don’t know of any sighting elsewhere.

    But, Nekama’s original post still appears in that 2003 thread. (in fact, it carries 89 updings) It’s just the sidebar link and reference to it (like the LGF Dictionary) that are missing, right?

    So, one could theorize that the link was deemed no longer used due to the shift in subject matter, and that it may not have to do with any shift in the underlying belief. Now, if the post itself was deleted, there’d be a strong case for what Iron Fist was saying.

    For now, it’s delinked and forgotten, but not “memory holed” in the scrubbing text and thread meaning of the term. You really didn’t need the wayback machine, in other words.


  40. 40 | September 18, 2010 10:27 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Anyone have a cardboard box Leia and I can move into?

    I’m living with my husband and a cat in a motorhome. We’re all out of cardboard, and our cat is afraid of dogs.

    :(

    Plus, none of us are getting many hours at the store where I’m working. It’s slow this time of year; my guess is that it is particularly so on account of the economy.


  41. 41 | September 18, 2010 10:28 pm

    Off topic, something to ruin a good night.
    http://kansasredneck.blogspot.com/2010/09/new-dollar.html

    Found at huffpo.


  42. huckfunn
    42 | September 18, 2010 10:28 pm

    @ lobo91:
    This is probably old ground, but have you joined any of the vets service organizations like VFW or American Legion? Also, what about your state and local legislators, congressmen and senators.


  43. wolfie
    43 | September 18, 2010 10:30 pm

    @ lobo91:

    This is just WRONG.
    What are you supposed to do?


  44. 44 | September 18, 2010 10:31 pm

    ChenZhen wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    Nekama is banned, according to the official list, and I don’t know of any sighting elsewhere.
    But, Nekama’s original post still appears in that 2003 thread. (in fact, it carries 89 updings) It’s just the sidebar link and reference to it (like the LGF Dictionary) that are missing, right?
    So, one could theorize that the link was deemed no longer used due to the shift in subject matter, and that it may not have to do with any shift in the underlying belief. Now, if the post itself was deleted, there’d be a strong case for what Iron Fist was saying.
    For now, it’s delinked and forgotten, but not “memory holed” in the scrubbing text and thread meaning of the term. You really didn’t need the wayback machine, in other words.

    Hadn’t thought of that. I had assumed that, since the sidebar link and reference was gone, the whole thing had already been deleted.

    Reminds me of the problems people have with long-term recall vs. long-term memory. People remember lots of stuff that they might recall if reminded by means of some verbal, visual, or other cues, but cannot simply recall at will.

    Wouldn’t surprise me if CJ does remove it entirely sometime soon.


  45. lobo91
    45 | September 18, 2010 10:32 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    Both my senators are idiots/Obamabots, so that’s probably a waste of time. I’m sure they’d be happy to send me a nice form letter telling me about how Obama’s saving the world, though. If I run short of toilet paper, I may go that route…

    I’ll probably contact my Congressman, but I haven’t been impressed with his work in the military arena so far. He’s good at forwarding whatever party line the Army puts out, basically.


  46. 46 | September 18, 2010 10:34 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Calo:
    Because I owe more on my house than it’s worth.

    Complain to your US congressman – preferably in person. If you see a staffer, you’ll have a better shot at having your concerns relayed along to the congressman.


  47. 47 | September 18, 2010 10:34 pm

    bellamags wrote:

    @ Rodan:

    It’s pretty sad that he was fooled by the sparkley glittery Obama campaign. Either that or someone sneaked in his house and gave him a kool-aid injection.

    It’s like The Andromeda Strain – why are some of us IMMUNE to the Kool-Aid?


  48. lobo91
    48 | September 18, 2010 10:34 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    This is just WRONG.
    What are you supposed to do?

    Well, what I’m supposed to do is sign a form tomorrow acknowledging the fact that I have 90 days to find a non-existent new position, and then salute.

    That’s probably not going to happen…


  49. lobo91
    49 | September 18, 2010 10:36 pm

    @ Rose:

    It’s like The Andromeda Strain – why are some of us IMMUNE to the Kool-Aid?

    I probably have immunity from all the years of being force-fed bullshit from the Army.


  50. 50 | September 18, 2010 10:36 pm

    @ ChenZhen:
    Has Nekama ever blogged anyplace else after being banned from Animal Farm?

    Nekama would be a tremendous asset here.


  51. wolfie
    51 | September 18, 2010 10:37 pm

    @ JeremyR:

    Bleccccccchhhh.
    Many levels of ugly…..and stupid.


  52. song_and_dance_man
    53 | September 18, 2010 10:40 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    Wouldn’t surprise me if CJ does remove it entirely sometime soon.

    If and when he throws Israel under the bus he just may want that and other posts that contradict his support to disappear.

    From my recollection Foster called the post genius.

    The day may also come when he will regret stealing the find of the fake but accurate Rather memo. I mean, he’s so close to that Leftist faction already it may be just a matter of time.


  53. 54 | September 18, 2010 10:41 pm

    Exposed: a world-class dumbass idea


  54. huckfunn
    55 | September 18, 2010 10:43 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Did anyone see Islamic Rage Boy at Big Journalism?

    http://bigjournalism.com/pgeller/2010/09/18/truth-is-the-new-hate-speech-long-past-time-to-overthrow-the-media-and-save-ourselves/

    I saw that earlier. As always, Pam’s right on the money.


  55. snork
    56 | September 18, 2010 10:43 pm

    ChenZhen wrote:

    Nekama is banned, according to the official list, and I don’t know of any sighting elsewhere.

    It happened in the past month, IIRC. If there was a good way to search Blogmocracy, you could find the chatter here about it.


  56. Speranza
    57 | September 18, 2010 10:44 pm

    Anyone catch this? I knew that O’Donnell was a lousy candidate
    Via Powerline

    Christine O’Donnell’s Career, RIP
    Share Post Print
    September 18, 2010 Posted by John at 11:53 AM

    Christine O’Donnell’s campaign went off the rails today when Bill Maher announced that he has previously-unseen clips of O’Donnell from the late 1990s when she appeared several times on his show. In one clip, she says that she once “dabbled into witchcraft.”

    I dabbled into witchcraft — I never joined a coven. But I did, I did. … I dabbled into witchcraft. I hung around people who were doing these things. I’m not making this stuff up. I know what they told me they do. [...]

    One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar, and I didn’t know it. I mean, there’s little blood there and stuff like that. … We went to a movie and then had a midnight picnic on a satanic altar.

    Good grief. Maher says there is a lot more where that came from. Not coincidentally, I’m sure, O’Donnell’s staff today canceled her scheduled appearances on Fox News Sunday and Face the Nation tomorrow. It seems apparent that O’Donnell was not properly vetted as a candidate and that she will be more the butt of jokes for the next six weeks than a serious candidate. This is not what the conservative movement needs.

    UPDATE: A reader adds:

    Yes, anything that revives Bill Maher’s noxious career is bad for Republicans, conservatives, and frankly the whole country.

    Maher is no Jon Stewart. As much as I might disagree with Stewart’s conventional Long Island liberalism, you cannot deny he is funny, humane, and modestly fair.

    Maher, on the other hand, is pure caustic spite with no talent and a bevy of very creepy demons of his own.

    That may be too generous toward Stewart, but it is certainly true as to Maher.


  57. 58 | September 18, 2010 10:44 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Did anyone see Islamic Rage Boy at Big Journalism?
    http://bigjournalism.com/pgeller/2010/09/18/truth-is-the-new-hate-speech-long-past-time-to-overthrow-the-media-and-save-ourselves/

    I don’t think that’s a new photo. I’ve been wondering if IRB has put in an appearance in the receent riots in India. He’s a Kashmiri Muslim.


  58. 59 | September 18, 2010 10:44 pm

    Have “Islamic Rage Boy” posts been purged from LGF, too?


  59. Bagua
    60 | September 18, 2010 10:44 pm

    Nekama was back for a short period a while before my departure.


  60. 61 | September 18, 2010 10:46 pm

    Found one on Page 4 of a Google search:
    Poor Misunderstood Islamic Rage Boy
    Charles Johnson
    Nov 12, 2007 at 8:00 am PST

    Islamic Rage Boy gets an extension on his fifteen minutes of fame, with a slobbery puff piece by a hand-wringing British journalist in the Daily Mail: The surprising truth about Rage Boy, America’s hated poster-boy of Islamic radicalism.

    We nasty brutish Americans just don’t understand him, you see, him and his rage and his conspiracy theories. We’re full of hate and fear, according to Patrick French—completely missing the humor and sarcasm in almost all the blog posts about this pathetic loser. For example: The Rage Boy Photoshop Contest.


  61. song_and_dance_man
    62 | September 18, 2010 10:46 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Have “Islamic Rage Boy” posts been purged from LGF, too?

    Or, the Arafish, Red Binder or ROP strikes again?


  62. 63 | September 18, 2010 10:48 pm

    http://tinyurl.com/23x5arf (the LGF link above)


  63. song_and_dance_man
    64 | September 18, 2010 10:48 pm

    I know for certain the Supertankers were replaced with Wind Mills. Just can’t have any of that Right Wing oil on the Threads.


  64. MrPaulRevere
    65 | September 18, 2010 10:48 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Consider giving it a rest. Where are you going with this?


  65. lobo91
    66 | September 18, 2010 10:48 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:

    Or car swarms, or Palestinian work accidents?


  66. 67 | September 18, 2010 10:50 pm

    Hey check this out:

    http://digg.com/nekama


  67. Speranza
    68 | September 18, 2010 10:51 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Consider giving it a rest. Where are you going with this?

    Oh I going any freaking way with it, it just proved my point from the other day, It really no longer matters because the deed is done.


  68. mfhorn
    69 | September 18, 2010 10:51 pm

    @ JeremyR:

    Oh, Christ…


  69. 70 | September 18, 2010 10:51 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Dated somebody who called himself a “witch” who brought her to a place that was a “satanic altar” without her knowing it?

    Not. Her. Fault.


  70. MrPaulRevere
    71 | September 18, 2010 10:53 pm

    @ Speranza:

    It really no longer matters because the deed is done.

    That’s nice. I’ll eagerly await your post’s bashing her opponent.


  71. 72 | September 18, 2010 10:54 pm

    ChenZhen wrote:

    Hey check this out:
    http://digg.com/nekama

    I have been banned from Digg (thrice) and no longer have an active account there. I don’t go there even to visit.

    But if anybody here happens to have a Digg account, I’d like to ask you to send Nekama a message to let him know about Blogmocracy.


  72. snork
    73 | September 18, 2010 10:54 pm

    I wish certain “conservatives” were half as interesting in vetting Obama a couple years ago as they are in vetting O’Donnell now.


  73. 74 | September 18, 2010 10:55 pm

    Rose wrote:

    bellamags wrote:
    @ Rodan:
    It’s pretty sad that he was fooled by the sparkley glittery Obama campaign. Either that or someone sneaked in his house and gave him a kool-aid injection.
    It’s like The Andromeda Strain – why are some of us IMMUNE to the Kool-Aid?


  74. Calo
    75 | September 18, 2010 10:55 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    Date from hell.


  75. lobo91
    76 | September 18, 2010 10:55 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Dated somebody who called himself a “witch” who brought her to a place that was a “satanic altar” without her knowing it?
    Not. Her. Fault.

    If we were talking about the real world, I’d agree.

    But we’re talking about politics.

    The same world where the most famous Sarah Palin quote, “I can see Russia from my house,” wasn’t even uttered by her.


  76. MrPaulRevere
    77 | September 18, 2010 10:56 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Reposted from downstairs:

    Re. Christine O’Donnell: A lot of self-identified conservatives were not impressed with her and that’s fine and they are entitled to their opinion. But they seem now to be throwing juvenile temper tantrums to the point they are actively sabotaging her chances, i.e. they actually want her to lose just so they can say “I told you so”. This is beneath contempt.


  77. 78 | September 18, 2010 10:56 pm

    The good old days of LGF.

    Lots of fun stuff in that thread. How many others were there when it happened? (Many a nick change since then.)


  78. Speranza
    79 | September 18, 2010 10:57 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    It really no longer matters because the deed is done.
    That’s nice. I’ll eagerly await your post’s bashing her opponent.

    The fact that her opponent Coons sucks does not ******* mean that she is a good candidate herself. However considering how blue Delaware is we can kiss the seat goodbye -I hope I am wrong.


  79. 80 | September 18, 2010 10:57 pm

    Speranza – after Harry Potter – who hasn’t? My kids all run around saying “Expelliarmus!”

    I am more concerned about people who vote for bills they haven’t read.


  80. 81 | September 18, 2010 10:57 pm

    @ Calo:
    Exactly.


  81. MrPaulRevere
    82 | September 18, 2010 10:58 pm

    snork wrote:

    I wish certain “conservatives” were half as interesting in vetting Obama a couple years ago as they are in vetting O’Donnell now.

    Can I get an amen?


  82. Calo
    83 | September 18, 2010 10:58 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    Dorian haz a new web camera today to play with?


  83. 84 | September 18, 2010 10:58 pm

    I’m on digg, and I dunno how to send a message. All I can do is follow him. I’ll see if he’s on twitter.


  84. 85 | September 18, 2010 10:58 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    1389AD wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    Dated somebody who called himself a “witch” who brought her to a place that was a “satanic altar” without her knowing it?
    Not. Her. Fault.
    If we were talking about the real world, I’d agree.
    But we’re talking about politics.
    The same world where the most famous Sarah Palin quote, “I can see Russia from my house,” wasn’t even uttered by her.

    All the more reason not to give in to that crap.


  85. song_and_dance_man
    86 | September 18, 2010 10:59 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Anyone catch this? I knew that O’Donnell was a lousy candidate

    Yeah and so was B. Hussein, and he got elected as POTUS. I’ll admit that we conservatives should require better of those whom we may have to vote for, as past deeds go, but everyone makes mistakes. The difference is the past deeds of B. Hussein were ignored by the MSM whereas O’Donnell will be held to account for hers. And I have to say, Christine’s past is no where near as reprehensible as the man we now call President.


  86. Speranza
    87 | September 18, 2010 10:59 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Speranza – after Harry Potter – who hasn’t? My kids all run around saying “Expelliarmus!”
    I am more concerned about people who vote for bills they haven’t read.

    It bothers me (maybe I am the only one here whom it does) that that seat was ripe for the taking.
    Anyway off to watch a DVD.


  87. 88 | September 18, 2010 10:59 pm

    Speranza – after Harry Potter – who hasn’t? My kids all run around saying “Expelliarmus!”

    I am more concerned about people who vote for bills they haven’t read.@ doriangrey:
    LOL – Dorian, good to SEE you!


  88. 89 | September 18, 2010 10:59 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    snork wrote:
    I wish certain “conservatives” were half as interesting in vetting Obama a couple years ago as they are in vetting O’Donnell now.
    Can I get an amen?

    Amen!


  89. 90 | September 18, 2010 10:59 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Dorian haz a new web camera today to play with?

    Oh gosh, what would make ya think a thing like that??? :lol:


  90. wolfie
    91 | September 18, 2010 11:00 pm

    @ Geepers:

    Geepers! :D


  91. 92 | September 18, 2010 11:00 pm

    Rose (#47),

    It’s like The Andromeda Strain – why are some of us IMMUNE to the Kool-Aid?

    Common sense?

    And are you the Rose that might have been at a BBQ here at 7 Acres?


  92. 93 | September 18, 2010 11:00 pm

    ooops – preview would have been my friend if I was paying attention


  93. 94 | September 18, 2010 11:00 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Speranza – after Harry Potter – who hasn’t? My kids all run around saying “Expelliarmus!”
    I am more concerned about people who vote for bills they haven’t read.@ doriangrey:
    LOL – Dorian, good to SEE you!

    {{Rose}} and kisses… :)


  94. 95 | September 18, 2010 11:01 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Calo wrote:
    @ doriangrey:
    Dorian haz a new web camera today to play with?
    Oh gosh, what would make ya think a thing like that???

    Your antics on the Caturday thread!


  95. snowcrash
    96 | September 18, 2010 11:01 pm

    Hey Speraza, about ODonnell, I don’t care if she doesn’t win. We are sending a message and if that message helps us get better qualified, fully vetted and responsible candidates in the next election cycle, then I am ok if she doesn’t win. Looks like the witchcraft and masturbation media coverage is doing its job, which is to deflect attention from “Obamanomics” and the real issues voters care about.


  96. mfhorn
    97 | September 18, 2010 11:01 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    There ARE other ideas out there- click the link towards the top of that page. Unfortunately, the Obama-one is leading right now.


  97. Speranza
    98 | September 18, 2010 11:02 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    Yeah and so was B. Hussein, and he got elected as POTUS. I’ll admit that we conservatives should require better of those whom we may have to vote for, as past deeds go, but everyone makes mistakes. The difference is the past deeds of B. Hussein were ignored by the MSM whereas O’Donnell will be held to account for hers. And I have to say, Christine’s past is no where near as reprehensible as the man we now call President.

    Quite concur however the media will make a major celebration with it and she will be totally Alinskyed. Oh you recognize that there are double standards at play in American poltiics?


  98. MrPaulRevere
    99 | September 18, 2010 11:02 pm

    @ Speranza:
    NO, you hope you are right so you can rub everyone’s noses in it. You have great insights 90% of the time, but its time to get with the program.


  99. 100 | September 18, 2010 11:03 pm

    Hi Wolfie.

    How’s tricks?


  100. snork
    101 | September 18, 2010 11:03 pm

    Earth to Bunk. Potential material.


  101. Calo
    102 | September 18, 2010 11:03 pm

    Dorian. Clean your house tomorrow. Or, at least put your laundry away in your drawers so they can be closed.
    //rant off//


  102. 103 | September 18, 2010 11:03 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    Calo wrote:
    @ doriangrey:
    Dorian haz a new web camera today to play with?
    Oh gosh, what would make ya think a thing like that???
    Your antics on the Caturday thread!


  103. 104 | September 18, 2010 11:04 pm

    @ Geepers:

    No, I am in CA. (Northern CA, pot and redwoods country)


  104. 105 | September 18, 2010 11:05 pm

    Calo wrote:

    Dorian. Clean your house tomorrow. Or, at least put your laundry away in your drawers so they can be closed.
    //rant off//

    Helloieeee…. I am a bachelor… That is what is not going to happen any time soon……. :razz:


  105. song_and_dance_man
    106 | September 18, 2010 11:06 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Oh you recognize that there are double standards at play in American poltiics?

    I find that a bit subtlety patronizing. But to answer your rhetorical question I would ask, should we also be employing the same standard as though we didn’t know any better?


  106. lobo91
    107 | September 18, 2010 11:06 pm

    Well, I need to get to bed.

    Have to go get into an argument with my commander in the morning…

    Later, all


  107. 108 | September 18, 2010 11:06 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Calo wrote:
    Dorian. Clean your house tomorrow. Or, at least put your laundry away in your drawers so they can be closed.
    //rant off//

    Helloieeee…. I am a bachelor… That is what is not going to happen any time soon…….

    And damn it, how the hell did you know that was my laundry???


  108. wolfie
    109 | September 18, 2010 11:06 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    The difference is the past deeds of B. Hussein were ignored by the MSM whereas O’Donnell will be held to account for hers.

    And that’s a big difference. The sad fact is that the MSM still wields tremendous power in elections. It isn’t the kind of absolute power it used to have, but it still determines the basic narrative for the squishy voters.

    The left can afford to have candidates with all kids of baggage. Our candidates have to be perfect. And even then they’ll make up things.


  109. Calo
    110 | September 18, 2010 11:06 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    I was afraid of that. Like the youtube posts!
    Possum, are you taking lessons here?


  110. Brick
    111 | September 18, 2010 11:07 pm

    @ lobo91:

    If nothing else, she’s obviously perceived as a serious threat (possibility of winning) by the bad guys or they wouldn’t be going at her sideways like they are.

    What I can’t figure out is, why she’s taking so much friendly fire? I mean, Rove trashed her AFTER she won, and to date has only semi-recanted, the NRSC originally said best of luck to ya, then less than 24hrs later said, our bad, here’s a check for $42k.

    Are the PTB really this shook up that they might not retain their coveted kingmaker status?


  111. song_and_dance_man
    112 | September 18, 2010 11:08 pm

    subtlety = subtly .


  112. Speranza
    113 | September 18, 2010 11:08 pm

    @ snowcrash:
    The message will be that we stand for something and that thing is defeat. John Kerry will remain as head of the Foreign Relations committee and Pat Leahy (I think) will still be chairman of he Judiciary committee. We should have picked up that seat. Better to win with a guy you will agree with 50% of the time then lose with someone you will agree with 80% of the time. This ideological purity is unrealistic when you are dealing with the Northeast. Also even if by some chance C O’D were to win, what guarantee do you have that in order for her to be reelected in a pretty liberal state she will start moving to the center and wind up disappointing you? (See Scott Brown in Massachusetts).Just asking. Hey I did not support her but once she won I wanted her to win in November.


  113. refugee000
    114 | September 18, 2010 11:09 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ song_and_dance_man:
    Or car swarms, or Palestinian work accidents?

    I really miss the “palestinian car swarm” ;-)

    That even got a listing in Urban Dictionary

    1. car swarm 240 up, 3 down

    A peculiar Palestinian custom of swarming around a car which had recently held Palestinian extremists but which was then blown up by Israel in a targeted killing of the terrorists inside. Often, thousands of Palestinian men will swarm around the destroyed vehicle, looking to retreive bits of flesh from the incinerated “martyrs.” The bodily remains are then paraded around in triumph.

    Of course, now that would be considered “islamophobic” by the littlegreendhimmi.


  114. wolfie
    115 | September 18, 2010 11:10 pm

    Geepers wrote:

    How’s tricks?

    Pretty good.
    Hey! I like your funny little hat, but what’s with the funny red gloves?!!
    :lol:


  115. 116 | September 18, 2010 11:10 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Dorian, just think THEATRE! PROPS! Backdrops!


  116. 117 | September 18, 2010 11:11 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    I was afraid of that. Like the youtube posts!
    Possum, are you taking lessons here?

    Lets see if this works…


  117. snowcrash
    118 | September 18, 2010 11:13 pm

    @ Speranza:
    That has been my voting strategy for a long time, but like I said in an earlier thread, I’m doing something different this time. I have to.


  118. MrPaulRevere
    119 | September 18, 2010 11:13 pm

    @ Speranza:
    I disagree. It is the Carville’s and the Begala’s and Joe Klein who are whispering in your ear, telling you that a conservative cannot be elected in New England. Lets find out.


  119. MrPaulRevere
    120 | September 18, 2010 11:15 pm

    @ Speranza:
    We are letting the left define the rules of the game. Screw that.


  120. snowcrash
    121 | September 18, 2010 11:16 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    Hi dorian!Nice to see you.


  121. 122 | September 18, 2010 11:17 pm

    @ snowcrash:
    @ MrPaulRevere:

    One of my hero’s, Albert Einstein, once said, insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. Fuck what the Democrat strategists say, time to try something different, kick the fucking RINO’s to the curb and try someone new. Because the RINO’s are just Democrat infiltrators destroying the Conservatives from the inside out.


  122. 123 | September 18, 2010 11:19 pm

    wolfie (#115),

    Hey! I like your funny little hat, but what’s with the funny red gloves?!!

    Hat? That’s my mobile blog up-loader antenna.

    And the red gloves are the result of the clarified butter tragedy of ’06.

    Never again… never again…


  123. 124 | September 18, 2010 11:19 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    We are letting the left define the rules of the game. Screw that.

    Exactly, as long as we allow our opponents to make up the rules we have lost before the contest even begins.


  124. 125 | September 18, 2010 11:21 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Hi dorian!Nice to see you.

    Why hello snowcrash…. <—– looks for snowcrash… I cant seem to see you??? must need new glasses or something… :shock:


  125. Calo
    126 | September 18, 2010 11:23 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    Link sent to Possum! ROTFLMAO. Thanks Dorian.


  126. snork
    127 | September 18, 2010 11:23 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    One of my hero’s, Albert Einstein, once said, insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.

    Some idiot upthread kept linking the same 8-second video over and over again. He must be insane.


  127. Calo
    128 | September 18, 2010 11:24 pm

    New thread upstairs folks.


  128. 129 | September 18, 2010 11:24 pm

    snork wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    One of my hero’s, Albert Einstein, once said, insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.
    Some idiot upthread kept linking the same 8-second video over and over again. He must be insane.


  129. MrPaulRevere
    130 | September 18, 2010 11:27 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    MrPaulRevere wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    We are letting the left define the rules of the game. Screw that.

    Exactly, as long as we allow our opponents to make up the rules we have lost before the contest even begins.

    Precisely. We have a historic opportunity here, voter dissatisfaction is at all time highs. Its time to step on the gas, not tap the brakes.


  130. 131 | September 18, 2010 11:30 pm

    Why is it conservative WOMEN get scrutinized and attacked – but Dodd and Kennedy’s waitress sandwich didn’t disqualify them – Barney Franks disgusting arrangement didn’t disqualify him, Clinton’s antics brushed aside – not to mention Kennedy/Chappaquiddick – stay more current – think barbara Boxer is a saint? She’s not.

    Obama got NO scrutiny – but these women take the full brunt of it.


  131. 132 | September 18, 2010 11:30 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    MrPaulRevere wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    We are letting the left define the rules of the game. Screw that.
    Exactly, as long as we allow our opponents to make up the rules we have lost before the contest even begins.

    Precisely. We have a historic opportunity here, voter dissatisfaction is at all time highs. Its time to step on the gas, not tap the brakes.

    Step on the gas my ass, time to drop a gear, hit the gas and spin the wheels, get sideways, and slide it across the finish line.


  132. chickadee
    133 | September 18, 2010 11:31 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    We are letting the left define the rules of the game. Screw that.

    I couldn’t agree more. I think we over estimate the power of the cranky old mfm. Look at Sarah, she ignores the hell out of them and he is reaching who she needs to.
    Wouldn’t it incredible if, at this point, O’Donnell never even acknowledges these snakes and she actually wins. That would be a big stake in the hearts of these manipulative prog lib meddlers. Their evil reign needs to crumble to dust. LIke Helen Thomas.

    At this point, something like that could happen. She could win with out these fckers. We have so much momentum. Now is the time to use it.
    I think she should ignore the mfm. They want to destroy her.
    And abt. the witchcraft thing. My nieces were doing that in their teens. Big fcking deal.


  133. 134 | September 18, 2010 11:34 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Why is it conservative WOMEN get scrutinized and attacked – but Dodd and Kennedy’s waitress sandwich didn’t disqualify them – Barney Franks disgusting arrangement didn’t disqualify him, Clinton’s antics brushed aside – not to mention Kennedy/Chappaquiddick – stay more current – think barbara Boxer is a saint? She’s not.
    Obama got NO scrutiny – but these women take the full brunt of it.

    Conservatives let the Dem’s get away with that shit because the Republican leadership are really nothing but democrat infiltrators. Time to tie David Frum and David Brooks together and force the fucking RINO’s to use them as a raft to float down shit creek on.


  134. 135 | September 18, 2010 11:36 pm

    chickadee wrote:

    MrPaulRevere wrote: And abt. the witchcraft thing. My nieces were doing that in their teens. Big fcking deal.

    That was my first reaction too – who hasn’t – God, if you take the baby boomers, what haven’t they dabbled in?


  135. song_and_dance_man
    136 | September 18, 2010 11:37 pm

    Rose wrote:

    Why is it conservative WOMEN get scrutinized and attacked – but Dodd and Kennedy’s waitress sandwich didn’t disqualify them – Barney Franks disgusting arrangement didn’t disqualify him, Clinton’s antics brushed aside – not to mention Kennedy/Chappaquiddick – stay more current – think barbara Boxer is a saint? She’s not.
    Obama got NO scrutiny – but these women take the full brunt of it.

    The only answer is; it’s expected of them. We all know they are predisposed to this kind of behavior (even they know it) so when it happens, it’s no big deal. It is in similitude to the old saying boys will be boys, but with a twist that takes it to 11.


  136. MrPaulRevere
    137 | September 18, 2010 11:39 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    @ chickadee:
    This is the same faction of the GOP that told us Ronald Reagan could never win a Presidential election.


  137. 138 | September 18, 2010 11:43 pm

    Rose wrote:

    chickadee wrote:
    MrPaulRevere wrote: And abt. the witchcraft thing. My nieces were doing that in their teens. Big fcking deal.
    That was my first reaction too – who hasn’t – God, if you take the baby boomers, what haven’t they dabbled in?

    When the Dems pull crap like this it just shows how scared they are, they would be the first to scream unfair, prejudiced if conservatives said the exact same thing about a dem.


  138. 139 | September 18, 2010 11:45 pm

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    @ chickadee:
    This is the same faction of the GOP that told us Ronald Reagan could never win a Presidential election.

    Exactly, and they can go to hell.


  139. chickadee
    140 | September 18, 2010 11:48 pm

    Rose wrote:

    chickadee wrote:

    MrPaulRevere wrote: And abt. the witchcraft thing. My nieces were doing that in their teens. Big fcking deal.

    That was my first reaction too – who hasn’t – God, if you take the baby boomers, what haven’t they dabbled in?

    Exactly, zero openly talked in his books of being a drug addled derelict when he was young.
    He got a pass for everything, including attending that anti-American, black liberation theology (Communist) , muzz loving hate church for 20 years.
    Rev Wrong’s voodoo jibber jabber, cursing Amerikkk and God damning this country was just fine with the progs but let a teenage girl wave a glo-wand. . . . then it’s double double toil and trouble.

    The hypocrisy is stunning.


  140. chickadee
    141 | September 18, 2010 11:52 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    MrPaulRevere wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    @ chickadee:
    This is the same faction of the GOP that told us Ronald Reagan could never win a Presidential election.

    Exactly, and they can go to hell.

    Concur.


  141. 142 | September 19, 2010 7:36 am

    [...] Updated Version: Originally posted on 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


  142. Canoe Convoy
    143 | September 19, 2010 8:48 am

    @ Rose:

    Another angle: If it were any ordinary man, we would be in court, up to my ears in fighting sexual harassment lawsuits. These guys act this way, and they get a “free pass” !


  143. 144 | September 19, 2010 11:43 am

    [...] Nekama's Troll Hammer: Where It All Began › 2.0: The Blogmocracy [...]


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David