First time visitor? Learn more.

What Worries Me Most

by Iron Fist ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections, Elections 2010, Politics, Progressives at September 27th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

I am worried about the November Election. I am not worried because of Christine O’Donnell or Sharon Angle. I am not even worried by Nancy Pelosie or Harry Reid (directly, at any rate). I am worried that while we can win this election, we may not be able to win it beyond the Margin of Fraud. And my fears are well-founded. Consider the following:

Citizens’ Group Helps Uncover Alleged Rampant Voter Fraud in Houston
By Ed Barnes

Published September 25, 2010
| FoxNews.com

When Catherine Engelbrecht and her friends sat down and started talking politics several years ago, they soon agreed that talking wasn’t enough. They wanted to do more. So when the 2008 election came around, “about 50” of her friends volunteered to work at Houston’s polling places.

“What we saw shocked us,” she said. “There was no one checking IDs, judges would vote for people that asked for help. It was fraud, and we watched like deer in the headlights.”

Their shared experience, she says, created “True the Vote,” a citizen-based grassroots organization that began collecting publicly available voting data to prove that what they saw in their day at the polls was, indeed, happening — and that it was happening everywhere.

“It was a true Tea Party moment,” she remembers.

A true Tea Party moment. That’s nice. What they uncovered was not nice in the least:

“The first thing we started to do was look at houses with more than six voters in them” Engelbrecht said, because those houses were the most likely to have fraudulent registrations attached to them. “Most voting districts had 1,800 if they were Republican and 2,400 of these houses if they were Democratic . . .

“But we came across one with 24,000, and that was where we started looking.”

It was Houston’s poorest and predominantly black district, which has led some to accuse the group of targeting poor black areas. But Engelbrecht rejects that, saying, “It had nothing to do with politics. It was just the numbers.”

24, 000 houses with more than six registered voters. Very good citizens, these massively overcrowded people. It does get better:

“Vacant lots had several voters registered on them. An eight-bed halfway house had more than 40 voters registered at its address,” Engelbrecht said. “We then decided to look at who was registering the voters.”

Their work paid off. Two weeks ago the Harris County voter registrar took their work and the findings of his own investigation and handed them over to both the Texas secretary of state’s office and the Harris County district attorney.

Most of the findings focused on a group called Houston Votes, a voter registration group headed by Sean Caddle, who also works for the Service Employees International Union. Among the findings were that only 1,793 of the 25,000 registrations the group submitted appeared to be valid.

The other registrations included one of a woman who registered six times in the same day; registrations of non-citizens; so many applications from one Houston Voters collector in one day that it was deemed to be beyond human capability; and 1,597 registrations that named the same person multiple times, often with different signatures.

Caddle told local newspapers that there “had been mistakes made,” and he said he had fired 30 workers for filing defective voter registration applications. He could not be reached for this article.

So for the SEIU, less than one in ten voters registered was legit. That is not fraud on a small scale, or by a few “bad apple” members. That is RICO level Fraud, especially if it crosses State lines. That is something that the FBI would have to determine. There is no way a small volunteer group can undertake the kind of investigation that is warrented here.

Needless to say, the Holder Regime will get right on this. I expect a serious investigation to start any day. Of the volunteers that uncovered this scam, that is. Undoubtably, to Holder’s DoJ they are raaaaacists.

Scary times we live in. The people are going to vote for real change, but if the fraud in the election is as massive everywhere as was found here, then we may not win above the margin of fraud. This election will have questionable legitimacy. In that Obama and Holder have succeeded in turning America into a Third World Nation, because we can in no way trust the Holder Regime to honestly and fairly enforce the laws rearding voter protection.

Update:
This is more of what I fear:

September 27, 2010
Sneak Preview: The Hijacking of the 2010 Election
By Jack Cashill
Through a combination of massive, Somali-driven voter fraud, stunning Election Board incompetence, and the willful blindness of the Kansas City Star, machine Democrat J.J. Rizzo managed to beat conservative Democrat Will Royster by one vote in a Missouri State House primary on August 3.

There is no Republican running in this heavily Democratic, multi-ethnic Kansas City district. The Democratic nominee will face only a seriously outgunned Libertarian in the November election, and truth be told, Royster may be to the right of the Libertarian.

What the Democratic machine and the Star, which endorsed Rizzo, did not count on was for the intrepid Royster to challenge the election in court. In so doing, he has provided a sneak preview on how a desperate Democratic Party will attempt to neutralize the will of the people this November, and not just in Kansas City.

Royster, a retired Navy fighter pilot and all-around good citizen, asks a fundamental question: “If we won’t let Somalis hijack our ships, why do we let them hijack our elections?” As many as a hundred Somalis voted, nearly all of them illegally, likely all of them for Royster’s opponent, in a House district in which only 1,300 people showed up to vote

Voter fraud can tip the election against the will of the people. We saw that when Al Franken stole his Senate seat. We have to be willing to go to court, all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary, in every district in the nation. This is our year, if we don’t let them steal it from us.

Remember, Politics is War. War to the Knife, Knife to the Hilt. No Mercy.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

138 Responses to “What Worries Me Most”
( jump to bottom )

  1. snork
    1 | September 27, 2010 7:03 pm

    Which is what’s really behind this NBBP matter. If word goes out that minorities and only minorities have licence to cheat elections in any and every way, it’s obvious why the DNC would smile.


  2. Grimcargo
    2 | September 27, 2010 7:03 pm

    foist


  3. Grimcargo
    3 | September 27, 2010 7:04 pm

    ok then 2nd


  4. snork
    4 | September 27, 2010 7:04 pm

    Voter fraud can tip the election against the will of the people. We saw that when Al Franken stole his Senate seat.

    And Christine Gregior stole the governor’s mansion in Washington in broad daylight.


  5. buzzsawmonkey
    5 | September 27, 2010 7:05 pm

    In conjunction with this, I urge anyone who has not yet done so to read all of the material at Pajamas Media on the lack of race-neutral vote fraud enforcement in the Holder DOJ.


  6. 6 | September 27, 2010 7:05 pm

    @ snork:

    Exactly. And not merely cheat, but use force to obtain the results they desire. I’ll tell you this. If there is a NBPP motherfucker in front of my polling place I’ll take his little stick away from him and beat him to death with it. I won’t even pretend to be amused.


  7. Grimcargo
    7 | September 27, 2010 7:08 pm

    Iron Im with you on this. I am very sure Obama’s czars have it all figured out.


  8. buzzsawmonkey
    8 | September 27, 2010 7:08 pm

    The evil of unchecked—or, worse, connived at—voter fraud is twofold.

    First, it strikes at the heart of the concept that we are a government of laws, not of men.

    Second, it is another expression of entitlement by progressives who believe that because of the merit of their views (as they see it), they are entitled to rule in the name of the people regardless of what the people themselves actually want.


  9. 9 | September 27, 2010 7:09 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    Right there with you and I intend to accompany the wife when She goes to vote.


  10. My 2 Cents
    10 | September 27, 2010 7:11 pm

    Like you, I am also very concerned. Our present DoJ simply has no respect for the law and is committed to helping the Democrats win, regardless of what Americans want. If this sort of crime is allowed to continue, America as we knew it will fall.
    Indeed, I am reminded of what Capt Picard said when facing the Borg, “the line must be drawn here!” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRmmHPE8EvA


  11. coldwarrior
    11 | September 27, 2010 7:12 pm

    vote fraud = democrat party.

    vote fraud makes me far angrier than corruption


  12. mfhorn
    12 | September 27, 2010 7:12 pm

    We need serious reform in the way people are registered to vote, and in how fraud, through one person voting multiple times, either in person or via mail, is stopped.

    Whether it’s to require something along the lines of a fingerprint ID when voting or to completely purge the list of registered voters every 2 or 4 years or something else, I don’t know.


  13. buzzsawmonkey
    13 | September 27, 2010 7:13 pm

    I would add that the recent switch to digital voting machines—as was done in the recent NY primary—enables much more silent fraud. Old-fashioned mechanical voting machines could be tampered with, but this would show physical tampering. An electronic machine shows no physical moving parts—but could surely be easily programmed to cancel out every other opposing ballot, or tally two for the right side where one is submitted.


  14. coldwarrior
    14 | September 27, 2010 7:15 pm

    the penalty for vote fraud should be death by hanging in the public square then the body is to remain there until picked clean by carrion birds and the bones left there to bleach in the sun as a reminder of the penalty of messing with the vote, a right that thousands have died for.


  15. buzzsawmonkey
    15 | September 27, 2010 7:21 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    The proggies just want to make sure that everyone is de-voted, to the public interest…


  16. 16 | September 27, 2010 7:21 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    It is a bit more complex that you assert. If I were setting up the security, I’d take a hash of the entire thing. Then you compare the hash at the end of voting. Igf the program has changewd, the hash will probably be different. You can mimic a hash. I’ve seen Microsoft do it. You and I in our basement wouldn’t be able to cook it up unless (unless) you had some idiot-savant level guy who could use a hex editor to make the changes. I couldn’t do it, but it is within the relm of the possible. It is best, then, to keep the variables under control. Contrrol who can vote, and the accuracy of the machines is less suspect. It is when the same person votes ten times and is counted that matters most.


  17. 17 | September 27, 2010 7:23 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    the penalty for vote fraud should be death by hanging in the public square then the body is to remain there until picked clean by carrion birds and the bones left there to bleach in the sun as a reminder of the penalty of messing with the vote, a right that thousands have died for.

    Yup….


  18. 18 | September 27, 2010 7:24 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    No, the proggies follow this:

    Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.

    J. Stalin, of course. That is the proggies Ideal, though they wouldn’t admit it except under torture.


  19. waldensianspirit
    19 | September 27, 2010 7:24 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    And fedex can tract a parcel and your credit card anywhere in the world. A voting system should allow for every individual to check on their vote and the whole checked by both parties.


  20. 20 | September 27, 2010 7:26 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    And fedex can tract a parcel and your credit card anywhere in the world. A voting system should allow for every individual to check on their vote and the whole checked by both parties.

    Exactly, if Fedex can keep their system safe, if the Banks and credit card companies can do it, the registrar of voters and election officials should be able to as well.


  21. waldensianspirit
    21 | September 27, 2010 7:28 pm

    Hell we wouldn’t even need representatives; we could just vote on everything ourselves.

    The next Democratic experiment can try that. Add tax payer only voting and it should be stable


  22. lobo91
    22 | September 27, 2010 7:30 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    And fedex can tract a parcel and your credit card anywhere in the world. A voting system should allow for every individual to check on their vote and the whole checked by both parties.

    The only reason there are opportunities for wholesale fraud like this is because the Dems want it that way. We could easily implement a system that couldn’t be gamed (for example, putting voter registration data onto people’s DL/state ID card). It’s not a question of technology, or feasibility.

    It’s a question of will.


  23. 23 | September 27, 2010 7:30 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Exactly. I have had to show picture ID in order to vote because of problems with my registration. This wasn’t a greater violation than being raped with a log splitter. That is how the Left (and, I might note, only the Left) seems to see it. It was no big nevermind. Nothing. Nada.

    Anyone with a problem with it intends fraud. It is like me bitching about the NFA, except I’ll abide by the NFA. I’d just have a rifle with a 12.7″ barrel and a suppressor IF the law allowed it.

    The people on the vote fraud thing don’t seem to care if the law allows it or not.


  24. 24 | September 27, 2010 7:30 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Hell we wouldn’t even need representatives; we could just vote on everything ourselves.
    The next Democratic experiment can try that. Add tax payer only voting and it should be stable

    Define tax payer first…


  25. 25 | September 27, 2010 7:30 pm

    @ lobo91:

    100%


  26. buzzsawmonkey
    26 | September 27, 2010 7:31 pm

    Anyone who has not seen the Preston Sturges film The Great McGinty should do so.

    Here’s an excerpt, after McGinty has voted thirty-seven times.


  27. 27 | September 27, 2010 7:33 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    The Democrats count on thousands of people doing that. That is how they win. If we had free and fair elections, hell, Obama might not even be President. Kennedy almost certainly wouldn’t have been.


  28. snork
    28 | September 27, 2010 7:36 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    I would add that the recent switch to digital voting machines—as was done in the recent NY primary—enables much more silent fraud. Old-fashioned mechanical voting machines could be tampered with, but this would show physical tampering. An electronic machine shows no physical moving parts—but could surely be easily programmed to cancel out every other opposing ballot, or tally two for the right side where one is submitted.

    It’s not as easy as it sounds, but after seeing this stuxnet thing, I’m not going to say anything’s impossible. That’s why we need open source voting. Make the machines themselves auditable.

    Of course we have another problem, and that is that RINOs are too collegial to do proper due diligence. That would be rude, acting as if you suspect your distinguished friends from the other party…


  29. lobo91
    29 | September 27, 2010 7:36 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Exactly. I have had to show picture ID in order to vote because of problems with my registration. This wasn’t a greater violation than being raped with a log splitter. That is how the Left (and, I might note, only the Left) seems to see it. It was no big nevermind. Nothing. Nada.

    Back when I worked for the legislature in NM, one of the committee hearings I sat in on was about this very subject, way back in 1999.

    The secretary of state (a Dem, of course) swore up and down that it would be a terrible burden on “poor people” to have to produce a photo ID in order to vote.

    I’m pretty sure they never changed the law. It’s actually illegal for a poll worker to ask for ID in NM.


  30. mjazz
    30 | September 27, 2010 7:37 pm

    Get 51% of the people on the public dole and voila!, you’re in power.


  31. snork
    31 | September 27, 2010 7:38 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Anyone who has not seen the Preston Sturges film The Great McGinty should do so.

    Here’s an excerpt, after McGinty has voted thirty-seven times.

    And that’s what the whole NBBP thing is all about. They want it understood that there’s nothing that a person of color can do that will get them into trouble with the law.

    Once you do that, they’ll vote all day, and all night. And keep on voting the next day after the polls are closed.


  32. snork
    32 | September 27, 2010 7:39 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    The only reason there are opportunities for wholesale fraud like this is because the Dems want it that way. We could easily implement a system that couldn’t be gamed (for example, putting voter registration data onto people’s DL/state ID card). It’s not a question of technology, or feasibility.

    It’s a question of will.

    Precisely.


  33. lobo91
    33 | September 27, 2010 7:39 pm

    @ snork:

    It’s not as easy as it sounds, but after seeing this stuxnet thing, I’m not going to say anything’s impossible. That’s why we need open source voting. Make the machines themselves auditable.

    Personally, I’d rather see them get rid of electronic voting machines entirely.

    I fill out a paper ballot with little bubbles to fill in, and they stick it into a scanner, just like they do tests in school.

    I don’t see any reason they can’t use the same system at the polling place that’s used for absentee ballots.


  34. waldensianspirit
    34 | September 27, 2010 7:41 pm

    Or we could just beg Jimmy Carter to validate the election…


  35. waldensianspirit
    35 | September 27, 2010 7:42 pm

    @ lobo91:
    After we have all paper ballots punched, then what?


  36. lobo91
    36 | September 27, 2010 7:43 pm

    @ snork:

    I have 2 different government e-mail accounts.

    I can access both of them from my home computer, 24/7, by sticking my military ID card into a $15 card reader and typing in my PIN.

    I see no reason they couldn’t use the same sort of system to validate voter registration. All drivers licenses are machine-readable now. It would just require adding a PIN.


  37. 37 | September 27, 2010 7:43 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ snork:
    It’s not as easy as it sounds, but after seeing this stuxnet thing, I’m not going to say anything’s impossible. That’s why we need open source voting. Make the machines themselves auditable.
    Personally, I’d rather see them get rid of electronic voting machines entirely.
    I fill out a paper ballot with little bubbles to fill in, and they stick it into a scanner, just like they do tests in school.
    I don’t see any reason they can’t use the same system at the polling place that’s used for absentee ballots.

    Screw that, make voting machines just like ATM machines. Slide in your Drivers license, enter your social security number, you get to vote. One time per social security number, only valid social security numbers count.


  38. buzzsawmonkey
    38 | September 27, 2010 7:44 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Or we could just beg Jimmy Carter to validate the election…

    I wouldn’t let Jimmy Carter validate my parking.


  39. 39 | September 27, 2010 7:44 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ snork:
    I have 2 different government e-mail accounts.
    I can access both of them from my home computer, 24/7, by sticking my military ID card into a $15 card reader and typing in my PIN.
    I see no reason they couldn’t use the same sort of system to validate voter registration. All drivers licenses are machine-readable now. It would just require adding a PIN.

    ROTFLMAO… GMTA…


  40. lobo91
    40 | September 27, 2010 7:44 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    After we have all paper ballots punched, then what?

    For one thing, you’d be able to compare the ballots to what the computer says.


  41. waldensianspirit
    41 | September 27, 2010 7:45 pm

    And all interested parties should be able to run software looking for anomalies and verify any district


  42. lobo91
    42 | September 27, 2010 7:47 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Screw that, make voting machines just like ATM machines. Slide in your Drivers license, enter your social security number, you get to vote. One time per social security number, only valid social security numbers count.

    The problem with that is you’re still relying on the system to accurately tabulate the votes. Just because you pushed the button for candidate X doesn’t mean that’s how your vote will be counted.

    There’s no way to cross-check it.


  43. 43 | September 27, 2010 7:49 pm

    the ornery elephant said it months and months ago… they are acting as if they will never have to face the voters again. i’ve suspected voter fraud for years. the easier they make voting, the less meaningful it is. voting by mail is the absolute worst, in my opinion. it should be illegal. if you’re going to be out of town, fine, you should be able to go to the proper official location and vote early, in person. the only exceptions i find acceptable, are for the military, ambassadors, and their families. even if you live in a foriegn country, you should have to make your way to the consulate or something.

    that’s my two cents.


  44. snork
    44 | September 27, 2010 7:49 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    There’s no way to cross-check it.

    There is. You audit the firmware.


  45. 45 | September 27, 2010 7:50 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    You really want me running about the countryside, butchering people like they were free game…

    :P


  46. lobo91
    46 | September 27, 2010 7:51 pm

    We have 2 basic–and distinct–problems with the system today. You can’t fix them both with one solution.

    Requiring voters to show ID, and tying that ID to the actual registration, will solve the problem of people voting fraudulently.

    But it doesn’t solve the problem of someone being able to rig the machines themselves.


  47. Crashnburn01
    47 | September 27, 2010 7:51 pm

    Better put security on the graveyards too – you know how those dead people all tend to vote Democrat when they walk the Earth. You’d think they’d be tired from Halloween a few days earlier…

    Sadly, the Dems will block any reform as RAAAACCCIIIIIISSSSSSTTTTTTTT!!!!!

    1) Registration closed 1 week in advance. No running up with a fake utility bill and no ID last second.
    2) Real ID with picture from state or feds. Checked and verified. Need this to fly – and no one screams RRRAAACCCCISSST there, now do they?
    3) Small little test – who is your governor and name two US Supreme court justices – nothing too difficult. If you can’t tell us answers to these types of questions, you shouldn’t vote. i.e. If you’re not interested enough to know anything, we’re not real interested in your opinion. Jim Crow my ass.
    4) Indelible ink on thumb – Iraq had something there. Stops the Dem “vote early and vote often” meme.


  48. buzzsawmonkey
    48 | September 27, 2010 7:52 pm

    Crashnburn01 wrote:

    Indelible ink on thumb – Iraq had something there. Stops the Dem “vote early and vote often” meme.

    Give Vote Fraud the Finger!™


  49. snork
    49 | September 27, 2010 7:54 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    voting by mail is the absolute worst, in my opinion. it should be illegal

    AMEN!!! You put that thing in the mailbox, and you have no guarantee that it even got to the counting center. And it’s not hard to imagine some overzealous postal employee doing some zip code profiling. It’s no secret what the odds of a given ballot coming from zip 12345 to be R or D are.


  50. 50 | September 27, 2010 7:55 pm

    @ lobo91:

    You have to audit the code. That is really the only way to be sure. You can put a trap in that reads:

    if(i==0)
    {
    voteDemocrat =+= 1;
    }
    else
    {
    voteRepublican += 1;
    }
    i = i%666;
    i=0;
    continue;

    Etc. All votes would count as Democrat votes. I have greatly simplified it, but you can toss in a handful of lines of code and change everything if you know what you are doing. The modern world is at the mercy of the coders, even though they have not realized this yet :P


  51. waldensianspirit
    51 | September 27, 2010 7:58 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    That’d beat Chavez’s record on voter love


  52. 52 | September 27, 2010 7:59 pm

    snork wrote:

    Kirly wrote:

    voting by mail is the absolute worst, in my opinion. it should be illegal

    AMEN!!! You put that thing in the mailbox, and you have no guarantee that it even got to the counting center. And it’s not hard to imagine some overzealous postal employee doing some zip code profiling. It’s no secret what the odds of a given ballot coming from zip 12345 to be R or D are.

    you add to my list of reasons to make it illegal.


  53. 53 | September 27, 2010 7:59 pm

    @ lobo91:

    You are 100% right. What has been damaged is people’s trust in the voting system. We watched Al Franken steal his Senate seat, and no one did anything. Yehn you recount votes, any random variation should go equally to each side. The existance of a trend is proof of fraud. Yet we, and the Republicans, let that slide so that Al Franken stole his Senate Seat.

    Don’t expect the Republicans to do any better this time around. They are still too busy being colliegial.


  54. 54 | September 27, 2010 7:59 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Screw that, make voting machines just like ATM machines. Slide in your Drivers license, enter your social security number, you get to vote. One time per social security number, only valid social security numbers count.
    The problem with that is you’re still relying on the system to accurately tabulate the votes. Just because you pushed the button for candidate X doesn’t mean that’s how your vote will be counted.
    There’s no way to cross-check it.

    Sure there is, it’s called a printed recite. As soon as you vote the machine prints out a recite which is printed you initial that it is your vote and give it to the poll worker. Now they have both an electronic record and a paper back up if the votes are contested.


  55. 55 | September 27, 2010 8:00 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Yeah, but I write elegant code :P


  56. snork
    56 | September 27, 2010 8:02 pm

    @ Kirly:
    That’s the default here. OTOH, I’m in hardcore hippy moonbat country, so my vote is pretty much assured a safe arrival.


  57. 57 | September 27, 2010 8:04 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    That’s the default here. OTOH, I’m in hardcore hippy moonbat country, so my vote is pretty much assured a safe arrival.

    i know it is. too bad. i really think it’s the root of most vote fraud.


  58. snork
    58 | September 27, 2010 8:04 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    The existance of a trend is proof of fraud.

    Bingo. That’s exactly what happened in Washington in 2004.

    Original vote: R ahead by a few hundred.
    First recount: R ahead by 129
    Second recount: D ahead by less than 100.

    So then they decided to stop counting.


  59. 59 | September 27, 2010 8:05 pm

    FNC’s O’Reilly is going to have that racist freak commie bastage mark lamont hill on to “prove” that the tea party has a racist agenda. i can’t stand that guy. fast talker. liar.


  60. snork
    60 | September 27, 2010 8:06 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    i know it is. too bad. i really think it’s the root of most vote fraud.

    It’s all part of an overarching strategy. It’s one piece, and the NBBP thing is another piece, and there are many others.


  61. Lost
    61 | September 27, 2010 8:06 pm

    Maybe that’s why Australia has mandatory voting.

    There is an incentive to check voter ID (they fine those that don’t vote).


  62. 62 | September 27, 2010 8:10 pm

    snork wrote:

    Kirly wrote:
    i know it is. too bad. i really think it’s the root of most vote fraud.
    It’s all part of an overarching strategy. It’s one piece, and the NBBP thing is another piece, and there are many others.

    i agree. they attack on every front. sometimes it’s tiny steps forward for their agenda, other times it’s huge steps. but it’s alway moving to the goal of tyranny.


  63. lobo91
    63 | September 27, 2010 8:10 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Maybe that’s why Australia has mandatory voting.
    There is an incentive to check voter ID (they fine those that don’t vote).

    That’s the last thing we need here.

    Millions more idiots going to the polls who have no idea who or what they’re voting for. Almost all of them would have voted for Obama, because they’d remember his name, rather than “that old white guy.”


  64. 64 | September 27, 2010 8:10 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Maybe that’s why Australia has mandatory voting.
    There is an incentive to check voter ID (they fine those that don’t vote).

    I don’t agree with that either. i don’t want stupid people voting so if they decide not to, then the hell with ‘em. imo.


  65. mfhorn
    65 | September 27, 2010 8:12 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Maybe even require signature or initials ON the printed receipt & match to the signature when you go to vote (or register) in case of recounts or questionable results.


  66. 66 | September 27, 2010 8:12 pm

    @ lobo91:
    i believe you’re right. in fact, many years ago i knew someone who would wait to the last minute to vote. he was watching the polls close. when i asked why, he said he was waiting to see who was winning because “I don’t want to vote for a loser“. idiot.


  67. lobo91
    67 | September 27, 2010 8:13 pm

    @ Kirly:

    i agree. they attack on every front. sometimes it’s tiny steps forward for their agenda, other times it’s huge steps. but it’s alway moving to the goal of tyranny.

    That’s why the Soros-funded Secretary of State Project was such a brilliant move on their part.

    95% of Americans couldn’t name their state’s Secretary of State, yet that’s the person in charge of all elections. It was really simple to get the people they wanted in, since nobody knows who they are, anyway.


  68. Dolphin
    68 | September 27, 2010 8:15 pm

    Scanned the thread – but to add to the above post, it is worse than that –

    A fire that destroyed nearly all Harris County’s electronic voting machines Friday has election officials scrambling to re-equip the county for an election in which early voting starts in just 51 days.
    Even before the pre-dawn fire was out, County Clerk Beverly Kaufman pledged to hold a “timely election” on Nov. 2 but suggested the county may have to run fewer than its planned 739 Election Day polling stations if it cannot find enough machines.
    Because she does not know how many machines will be available for each polling location, Kaufman started appealing almost immediately to voters to cast their ballots early to help avoid long lines on Election Day.

    Link: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7173960.html


  69. 69 | September 27, 2010 8:16 pm

    G’Night, Guys and Dolls. The Old Lady is home, and I am pussywhipped, so I must go :P

    I’ll be back around 3:30 AM if my insomnia kicks in. Have fun and play nice


  70. buzzsawmonkey
    70 | September 27, 2010 8:17 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Maybe that’s why Australia has mandatory voting.

    Read Hermann the Irascible—a Story of the Great Weep, by Saki.

    Very mordant, very short story about voting.


  71. lobo91
    71 | September 27, 2010 8:19 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    G’Night, Guys and Dolls. The Old Lady is home, and I am pussywhipped, so I must go

    Night.

    I wish I had that problem…


  72. 72 | September 27, 2010 8:19 pm

    Dolphin wrote:

    A fire that destroyed nearly all Harris County’s electronic voting machines Friday has election officials scrambling to re-equip the county for an election in which early voting starts in just 51 days.
    Even before the pre-dawn fire was out, County Clerk Beverly Kaufman pledged to hold a “timely election” on Nov. 2 but suggested the county may have to run fewer than its planned 739 Election Day polling stations if it cannot find enough machines.
    Because she does not know how many machines will be available for each polling location, Kaufman started appealing almost immediately to voters to cast their ballots early to help avoid long lines on Election Day

    i find this very suspicious considering it was co-located with all the fraud discovered by regular everyday ordinary people.


  73. Lost
    73 | September 27, 2010 8:21 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Very cute.

    Whilst you make a good argument, as did Kirly and Lobo, there is no cure for stupid.

    Is there proof that mandatory voting brings more idiots to the polls as opposed to making people pay attention since they have to vote anyway?


  74. 74 | September 27, 2010 8:23 pm

    idiot and columbia university prof dr mark lamont hill says that racist signs are pervasive at tea parties. i went to a tea party. not one racist sign. and the ones he’s showing aren’t racist at all. weird. like a caricature of obama is racist? not unless a caricature of a white guy is racist too. this is so pissing me off.


  75. lobo91
    75 | September 27, 2010 8:24 pm

    @ Lost:

    Is there proof that mandatory voting brings more idiots to the polls as opposed to making people pay attention since they have to vote anyway?

    I’m not sure how you could really determine that either way. Australia’s always had mandatory voting, and we never have, so you can’t really compare.


  76. lobo91
    76 | September 27, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ Kirly:

    They’re getting really desperate now…


  77. 77 | September 27, 2010 8:26 pm

    @ Kirly:
    hahah! moron! he actually used a sign which said socialism communism is racist. gawd, he’s pathetic. nice education the dr got there. and this idiot lying piece of shit (oooh, that must be racist cuz shit is usually brown and so is he!!) teaches at columbia, an allegedly presitigious university.


  78. snork
    78 | September 27, 2010 8:26 pm

    Meanwhile in the worker’s paradise of Venezuela,

    The opposition MUD alliance (seriously) won 52 percent of the votes, but got 37 percent of the seats. Hmm.


  79. chickadee
    79 | September 27, 2010 8:26 pm

    When we take over, we need to push for that National Voter Photo I.D. Card.
    The dems have hollered that this is voter intimidation, voter rights violations etc. for a variety of reasons even when the card will be free to all citizens.
    We need to get this passed as law. It is the only way to be sure. Besides nuking dem districts from space.

    We need to fight the fcking fraudster dem cheats like our lives depend on it because they will in the new future.


  80. 80 | September 27, 2010 8:27 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Is there proof that mandatory voting brings more idiots to the polls as opposed to making people pay attention since they have to vote anyway?

    the proof is that there are more idiots in the population and if you force them to vote, then you have more idiots voting.

    besides, it’s idiotic not to vote so forcing those idiots to vote … well, you see where i’m going


  81. Lost
    81 | September 27, 2010 8:27 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Fair point, but mandatory voting is not proven to bring stupid to the polls.


  82. 82 | September 27, 2010 8:27 pm

    ugh. idiot hill pronounces the word strong as “shtrong”. i HATE that! idiot.


  83. snork
    83 | September 27, 2010 8:28 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    idiot and columbia university prof dr mark lamont hill says that racist signs are pervasive at tea parties. i went to a tea party. not one racist sign. and the ones he’s showing aren’t racist at all. weird.

    Meanwhile at LFG, some syphilitic crackhead lunatic named Johnson…


  84. buzzsawmonkey
    84 | September 27, 2010 8:28 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    columbia, an allegedly presitigious university.

    And, just by the way, the last of the Ivy League universities to abolish its quota limiting Jewish admission.


  85. 85 | September 27, 2010 8:28 pm

    bwahahahaha. hill is reduced to “but they’re wrong!” hahahahahahah idiot!


  86. rain of lead
    86 | September 27, 2010 8:29 pm

    well if we win by a big enough margin, their cheating is nullifyed

    GOAL 100 HOUSE SEATS

    The only limit on Republican gains in the midterm elections is that the GOP may be aiming too low. There are dozens of additional House seats we may be able to win if we would just adjust our sights upward.

    But a win of 100 seats, or anything on that order of magnitude, would be such a total repudiation of the Democratic Party that it would send shock waves through the liberal establishment. And it would amount to the eradication of an entire generation of liberal Democratic Congressmen

    “I have a dream…!”


  87. snork
    87 | September 27, 2010 8:29 pm

    @ Kirly:
    Brushing your teeth is racist. Can’t have any pearly whites, now…


  88. 88 | September 27, 2010 8:30 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Kirly wrote:
    columbia, an allegedly presitigious university.
    And, just by the way, the last of the Ivy League universities to abolish its quota limiting Jewish admission.

    the closest we’ll ever get to as fair a society as is humanly possible is to to be truly color blind. most people i know are. obama and idiots like this hill freak and obama’s butt buddy shabazz are the racists here.


  89. Lost
    89 | September 27, 2010 8:31 pm

    @ Kirly:
    ok, I see what you mean. Australia has a population of 22 million and America 300 million.
    That’s a lot of idiots!
    ;)


  90. taxfreekiller
    90 | September 27, 2010 8:32 pm

    ya, but that would ruin the pork market….@ rain of lead:


  91. Dolphin
    91 | September 27, 2010 8:33 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    Dolphin wrote:

    A fire that destroyed nearly all Harris County’s electronic voting machines Friday has election officials scrambling to re-equip the county for an election in which early voting starts in just 51 days.
    Even before the pre-dawn fire was out, County Clerk Beverly Kaufman pledged to hold a “timely election” on Nov. 2 but suggested the county may have to run fewer than its planned 739 Election Day polling stations if it cannot find enough machines.
    Because she does not know how many machines will be available for each polling location, Kaufman started appealing almost immediately to voters to cast their ballots early to help avoid long lines on Election Day

    i find this very suspicious considering it was co-located with all the fraud discovered by regular everyday ordinary people.

    So do a lot of people around here. The fire itself (the day it happened and reported on) was questioned as possible arson. Of course there was no follow up and no further reports (that I am aware of). The fire was just down the Hardy Toll road from us about 20 miles, very near the “wards” here in Houston.


  92. 92 | September 27, 2010 8:34 pm

    Lost wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    ok, I see what you mean. Australia has a population of 22 million and America 300 million.
    That’s a lot of idiots!

    LOL
    well yes. but must you put it that way? i’m quite sure we have the same proportion of idiots in both countries. well, we have at least 2 more since we have obama and hill.

    omg. ahmadinijad wore the same clothes the entire three days he was here! peeeeeeyuuuuuuuuuwwwww!


  93. Lost
    93 | September 27, 2010 8:34 pm

    Lost wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    ok, I see what you mean. Australia has a population of 22 million and America 300 million.
    That’s a lot of idiots!

    Having said that, it would be interesting to see a study on whether forcing people to vote brings about a greater interest in the election.


  94. taxfreekiller
    94 | September 27, 2010 8:34 pm

    Serve two years in Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, (every one has to serve) then you can vote.

    180 days of basic training for every last person.

    Citizens only.


  95. 95 | September 27, 2010 8:35 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Having said that, it would be interesting to see a study on whether forcing people to vote brings about a greater interest in the election.

    you can’t force people to care.


  96. 96 | September 27, 2010 8:36 pm

    Bilderberg Group discusses “Global Cooling” at 2010 meeting

    come on little ice age


  97. rain of lead
    97 | September 27, 2010 8:36 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:
    dammit tfk… you owe me a beer cause I just spit my last one all over my desk….and monitor…..and the keyboard….. and the cat,
    boy is HE pissed.


  98. Lost
    98 | September 27, 2010 8:37 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    Lost wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    ok, I see what you mean. Australia has a population of 22 million and America 300 million.
    That’s a lot of idiots!

    LOL
    well yes. but must you put it that way? i’m quite sure we have the same proportion of idiots in both countries. well, we have at least 2 more since we have obama and hill.

    That’s what I want to test!

    omg. ahmadinijad wore the same clothes the entire three days he was here! peeeeeeyuuuuuuuuuwwwww!

    Are those the same clothes he wore on the flight over?

    Nothing screams “change me” more than clothes after a flight.


  99. rain of lead
    99 | September 27, 2010 8:39 pm

    @ Kirly:

    I posted that link yesterday,begging someone with a sock to post that
    at lgf aka dumbass central


  100. 100 | September 27, 2010 8:39 pm

    New DOD!

    Chuck sees Conspiracies Everywhere


  101. 101 | September 27, 2010 8:40 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Are those the same clothes he wore on the flight over?

    no idea!

    Nothing screams “change me” more than clothes after a flight.

    omgosh, i know! i used to travel to europe to work alot. bleh. but, nothing beats that 14 hour (or whatever it was; felt like three days) from LAX to Auckland.


  102. 102 | September 27, 2010 8:41 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    Bilderberg Group discusses “Global Cooling” at 2010 meeting
    come on little ice age

    Now it’s Global Cooling! well, I do believe in Climate Change. The Climate always changes! These people are so stupid, yet they are our elites!


  103. 103 | September 27, 2010 8:42 pm

    @ snork:

    It’s Chuck style Democracy!


  104. 104 | September 27, 2010 8:42 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    I posted that link yesterday,begging someone with a sock to post that
    at lgf aka dumbass central

    no socks here. besides, that place is crazy enough. if we make their brains explode, it’ll just be crazy and messy.


  105. 105 | September 27, 2010 8:43 pm

    @ Kirly:

    I have 10 socks, ready to use them Nov. 2nd!

    :lol:


  106. rain of lead
    106 | September 27, 2010 8:45 pm

    @ Rodan:

    from Kirlys link

    Almost every government in the Western world from the USA to Britain to all the other EU states to Australia and New Zealand is currently committed to a policy of “decarbonisation.” This in turn is justified to (increasingly sceptical) electorates on the grounds that man-made CO2 is a prime driver of dangerous global warming and must therefore be reduced drastically, at no matter what social, economic and environmental cost. In the Eighties and Nineties, the global elite had a nice run of hot weather to support their (scientifically dubious) claims. But now they don’t. Winters are getting colder. Fuel bills are rising (in the name of combating climate change, natch). The wheels are starting to come off the AGW bandwagon. Ordinary people, resisting two decades of concerted brainwashing, are starting to notice.

    All this, of course, spells big trouble for the global power elite. As well as leading to food shortages (as, for example, it becomes harder to grow wheat in northerly latitudes; adding, of course, to such already-present disasters as biofuels and the rejection of GM), global cooling is going to find electorates increasingly angry that they have been sold a pup.

    Our fuel bills have risen inexorably; our countryside, our views and our property values have been ravaged by hideous wind farms; our holidays have been made more expensive; our cost of living has been driven up by green taxes; our freedoms have been curtailed in any number of pettily irritating ways from what kind of light bulbs we are permitted to use to how we dispose of our rubbish. And to what end? If man-made global warming was really happening and really a problem we might possibly have carried on putting up with all these constraints on our liberty and assaults on our income. But if it turns out to have been a myth……

    Well then, all bets are off.

    The next few years are going to be very interesting. Watch the global power elite squirming to reposition itself as it slowly distances itself from Anthropogenic Global Warming (”Who? Us? No. We never thought of it as more than a quaint theory…”), and tries to find new ways of justifying green taxation and control. (Ocean acidification; biodiversity; et al). You’ll notice sly shifts in policy spin. In Britain, for example, Chris “Chicken Little” Huhne’s suicidal “dash for wind” will be re-invented as a vital step towards “energy security.” There will be less talk of “combatting climate change” and more talk of “mitigation”. You’ll hear enviro-Nazis like Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren avoid reference to “global warming” like the plague, preferring the more reliably vague phrase “global climate disruption.”

    And you know what the worst thing is? If we allow them to, they’re going to get away with it.

    Our duty as free citizens over the next few years is to make sure that they don’t.


  107. snork
    107 | September 27, 2010 8:45 pm

    Lost wrote:

    Having said that, it would be interesting to see a study on whether forcing people to vote brings about a greater interest in the election.

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Serve two years in Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, (every one has to serve) then you can vote.

    180 days of basic training for every last person.

    Citizens only.

    Or the Obamajugen.


  108. 108 | September 27, 2010 8:48 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    Nail them!


  109. snork
    109 | September 27, 2010 8:48 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Now it’s Global Cooling! well, I do believe in Climate Change. The Climate always changes! These people are so stupid, yet they are our elites!

    And Chuck’s got another bit of climate stupid up today, but after a while this get repetitious.

    Nuance isn’t his strong suit.


  110. Lost
    110 | September 27, 2010 8:49 pm

    @ rain of lead:
    Take into consideration what a carbon tax would do to the prices of food, services and petrol!


  111. Lost
    111 | September 27, 2010 8:51 pm

    snork wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    Nuance isn’t his strong suit.

    No, but racism is.


  112. coldwarrior
    112 | September 27, 2010 8:53 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    I have 10 socks, ready to use them Nov. 2nd!

    shitbag will shut off comments or have a sekrit thread


  113. 113 | September 27, 2010 8:54 pm

    Lost wrote:

    @ rain of lead:
    Take into consideration what a carbon tax would do to the prices of food, services and petrol!

    they have indeed. they believe it would serve us evil rich westerners right. and knock us down to the level of the rest of the world. it’s why i have ranted many times that “these freaks will have us all living in caves!”


  114. snork
    114 | September 27, 2010 8:54 pm

    I mean, have you ever see a middle-aged man so proud of his ability to cut and paste?


  115. rain of lead
    115 | September 27, 2010 8:55 pm

    @ Lost:

    carbon tax….baaaad!


  116. coldwarrior
    116 | September 27, 2010 8:55 pm

    Kirly wrote:

    they have indeed. they believe it would serve us evil rich westerners right. and knock us down to the level of the rest of the world. it’s why i have ranted many times that “these freaks will have us all living in caves!”

    my cave will have a plasma screen, shooting range, wet bar, and bbq pit.


  117. buzzsawmonkey
    117 | September 27, 2010 8:57 pm

    snork wrote:

    I mean, have you ever see a middle-aged man so proud of his ability to cut and paste?

    Outside of the Kidnappers’ Club ransom note class, you mean?


  118. snork
    118 | September 27, 2010 8:57 pm

    @ Kirly:
    Meanwhile today in Bloomberg – and I really don’t know what to make of this; maybe Mike C. or Bagua could shine some light – is a piece about how they claim that they can produce shale gas for 1/3 of the cost of conventional natural gas and there’s 3 times as much.

    You can compress that and run engines off of it directly, or you can make synthetic diesel and gas. But the carbon Stasi is not pleased.


  119. waldensianspirit
    119 | September 27, 2010 8:58 pm

    snork wrote:

    middle-aged man

    who hates women and older people. Folks with this outlook on life tend to minimize their own longevity


  120. Lost
    120 | September 27, 2010 9:00 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    I need to get a boat for mine.

    My disaster plan has a “get off the Island” segment.


  121. song_and_dance_man
    121 | September 27, 2010 9:02 pm

    Late to the thread.

    If the voter fraud is as touted in the Post, then it could be construed as good news.

    The real story is not that the Left has cheated once again, but rather the majority of Americans are adverse to their agenda.

    The Left must cheat, because there is no other way they could get the power they need to demolish our Representative Republic and transform it into another Socialist experiment.


  122. 122 | September 27, 2010 9:02 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Kirly wrote:

    they have indeed. they believe it would serve us evil rich westerners right. and knock us down to the level of the rest of the world. it’s why i have ranted many times that “these freaks will have us all living in caves!”

    my cave will have a plasma screen, shooting range, wet bar, and bbq pit.

    geothermal power? that would be awesome. in fact, i wanna go live in a silo house. no exit. just a chute for supplies.


  123. 123 | September 27, 2010 9:03 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ Kirly:
    Meanwhile today in Bloomberg – and I really don’t know what to make of this; maybe Mike C. or Bagua could shine some light – is a piece about how they claim that they can produce shale gas for 1/3 of the cost of conventional natural gas and there’s 3 times as much.
    You can compress that and run engines off of it directly, or you can make synthetic diesel and gas. But the carbon Stasi is not pleased.

    there is something to this. they are suppressing new technology for extracting these fuels. imo.


  124. rain of lead
    124 | September 27, 2010 9:04 pm

    grin worthy from hot air

    HIPPIE PUNCHING

    Oh my: Biden tells liberal base to “stop whining

    At a fundraiser in Manchester, NH, today, Vice President Biden urged Democrats to “remind our base constituency to stop whining and get out there and look at the alternatives. This President has done an incredible job. He’s kept his promises.”…

    That’s from Tapper, who reminds us that The One’s been throwing himself a big pity party lately because liberals don’t appreciate him but neglects to mention the comic pathos of last week’s nutroots conference call with David Axelrod. And what about Gibbs’s shot heard ’round the world in unloading on the “professional left,” or Rahm’s infamous salute to liberals who wanted ObamaCare to be even more statist? At this point there’s no one in the inner circle except, I guess, Valerie Jarrett who hasn’t grumbled publicly about the lefty base, which amazes me in light of all the anger at the moment among conservatives directed at establishment Republicans like Rove and Krauthammer for lesser sins. Can you imagine the reaction on the right if, say, President Romney’s team was endlessly whining about how unappreciated they felt by the Republican base? We’d need to add a new server to handle the comment load. Which is to say, as much as I enjoy this hot internecine blue-on-blue action, I can’t blame rank-and-file lefties for being annoyed with Team Barry. If anything, their reaction thus far has been remarkably subdued.
    But maybe that ends now, or soon. Surely there comes a point when a hippie takes so many punches that he simply can’t drag himself down to the polling place, no? Show ‘em who’s boss by staying home, liberals. Think of it as … punching back twice as hard.

    hahahahah


  125. 125 | September 27, 2010 9:05 pm

    I find it very little mentioned that Al Franken stole the election in Mn. Even Michelle Malkin lost the guts to say it anymore. I appreciate that it is mentioned here.

    It irritates me to no end that the sleazebag is in the Senate and he is in their illegally.


  126. mfhorn
    126 | September 27, 2010 9:07 pm

    @ Lost:

    It doesn’t matter! If we all stay at home & go to bed at sundown, it’ll save the planet for people who are important & who are wise.

    //


  127. lobo91
    127 | September 27, 2010 9:09 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    Surely there comes a point when a hippie takes so many punches that he simply can’t drag himself down to the polling place, no? Show ‘em who’s boss by staying home, liberals. Think of it as … punching back twice as hard.

    I suspect that’s exactly what’s going to happen this fall.


  128. chickadee
    128 | September 27, 2010 9:09 pm

    I don’t think our tsunami of enthusiasm can be thwarted in November.
    It is people like Velma ? who make me think that. She is the black gal, who spoke up to zero at a Town Hall a few days ago, and said she was tired of defending him and his policies that weren’t working. She said she had hoped to get beyond a beans and franks diet by voting for him. That is the current zero voter. Very dissatisfied. There is no momentum in the dem camp. He is hurting everyone. They won’t show up at the polls.

    Right now zero is trying to motivate the college crowd. LOL. They think he is an asshole too.
    They will graduate with massive debt and no jobs to look forward to.

    Recently zero was in North Carolina, and could only fill the end seats of an assembly hall. Everyone was herded into that small area and the mfm shot photos as if the huge place was filled to capacity.

    His appeal is gone. Wow. Only his union grifters are showing up to try to keep their grea$y gravy train on track.


  129. lobo91
    129 | September 27, 2010 9:11 pm

    Underzog wrote:

    I find it very little mentioned that Al Franken stole the election in Mn. Even Michelle Malkin lost the guts to say it anymore. I appreciate that it is mentioned here.
    It irritates me to no end that the sleazebag is in the Senate and he is in their illegally.

    You can thank Soros and his Secretary of State Project for that.


  130. 130 | September 27, 2010 9:13 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Kirly wrote:
    they have indeed. they believe it would serve us evil rich westerners right. and knock us down to the level of the rest of the world. it’s why i have ranted many times that “these freaks will have us all living in caves!”
    my cave will have a plasma screen, shooting range, wet bar, and bbq pit.

    Hmmm, my cave apparently needs to have a door into coldwarrior’s cave…


  131. 131 | September 27, 2010 9:15 pm

    b>@ Rodan:

    Snicker. It is good that people such as us left because we refused to kiss his ass when he said such stupid things, than be those people such as Irish Rose and even Cato who pretty much kissed Chuckie’s @$$, but he got rid of them anyway because he didn’t quite like the analingus technique.

    I also here that as a good racist he has insulted your hispanic heritage.


  132. rain of lead
    132 | September 27, 2010 9:16 pm

    maybe the last post of a dying thread

    An Open Letter to President Obama
    by Charlie Daniels

    Mr. President,

    I write this letter as a patriot, a taxpayer, a lifelong resident and as concerned citizen of what I consider to be the greatest nation ever known to man, the United States of America.

    I am Caucasian, so let’s get the racial aspect out of the way to start with. This letter has nothing to do with your race. I lived through the cruelty of Jim Crow and segregation and learned early on in my life that the color of my skin does not make me better or worse than any other man.

    We all remember Martin Luther King, Jr.’s statement about judging people, not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character, and I believe that with all my heart.

    I believe that America is an exceptional country. We have been liberator, benefactor and leader of the free world for centuries. America is an example of what can be achieved by free people living under the free enterprise system.

    We have led the world in technology, industry, science and medicine for a long time.

    Our capitalist system guarantees that those who explore new worlds and bring us new products and better techniques are amply rewarded for their efforts, and this is as it should be.

    A person who is the first one to get there and the last one to leave, who burns the midnight oil and never gives up until they realize their goals, are a boon to humankind. They’re the ones who discover new cures, start new industries and create jobs.

    These people deserve to be rewarded for their hard work and for the products and services they bring to make life better for all mankind.

    Mr. President, it is my personal opinion that you want to take the well-earned rewards of these people and give it to those who have done nothing to deserve them.

    It’s really redistribution of wealth, and it’s nothing new. It’s been tried many places before and it has miserably failed in every one of them.

    It’s called socialism.

    Am I calling you a socialist? Yes, I am. I firmly believe that you are a socialist and a globalist, and that you think America should have a comeuppance and have our playing field leveled to match those of other countries not as industrious or as innovative as we are.

    Mr. President, how can you support the building of a mosque in the very same area where Islamic radicals murdered so many Americans?

    Just who’s side are you on?

    Am I accusing you of being a Muslim? No I’m not, but the jury is still out a little bit on that subject in my mind, because many times your sympathies seem to lean in that direction. You need to watch who you bow to Mr. President.

    You have betrayed a whole generation of African-Americans who voted for you because they really believed all that junk about “hope and change,” they really thought you were going to do something great and the only thing you’ve done is to make their jobs disappear and their health insurance go up.

    You and your party have corrupted duly elected officials in an effort to get your legislative agenda passed. Remember the “Louisiana Purchase” and the “Cornhusker Kickback,” and that’s just a couple we know about, but you bought off a bunch of congressmen and senators, knowing that you were going against the will of the majority of Americans, because you think that you and your arrogant friends know more about what’s good for America than the citizens your disastrous actions effect.

    Am I accusing you of being an elitist? You bet.

    I don’t believe you take the Islamic threat to America nearly as seriously as you should. You use semantics like “Overseas Contingency Operation” and “Man Caused Disasters” to soften your rhetoric toward people who would like nothing better than decapitate the entire population of America.

    And Mr. President, if you’d really like to know the kind of warriors who are fighting the “Overseas Contingency Operation,” and you would like to really know about what kind of enemies they’re fighting, you should read a book called Lone Survivor by a brave, young Navy Seal named Marcus Lutrell who went to hell and back for his country, and is still a dedicated patriot. I think you’d find it enlightening, Mr. President and after you finish it would you pass it on to Janet Napolitano? And by the way, tell her that my invitation to take her to Iraq and show her some “Man Caused Disasters” is still open.

    Am I calling you naïve? Absolutely.

    You seem to think that America has an endless supply of tax dollars for you to waste and give away, and the debt you’ve piled up could well bankrupt the greatest nation on earth.

    Am I calling you a failure, Mr. President? With all due respect that’s exactly what I’m doing.

    oh snap, that’s gonna leave a mark


  133. Lost
    133 | September 27, 2010 9:25 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    @ Lost:

    It doesn’t matter! If we all stay at home & go to bed at sundown, it’ll save the planet for people who are important & who are wise.

    //

    Do you think I’m a CHICKEN!?!


  134. song_and_dance_man
    134 | September 27, 2010 9:25 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    concerned citizen of what I consider to be the greatest nation ever known to man, the United States of America.

    I can imagine B. Hussien tossing the letter right after reading that.


  135. Lost
    135 | September 27, 2010 9:28 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    rain of lead wrote:

    concerned citizen of what I consider to be the greatest nation ever known to man, the United States of America.

    I can imagine B. Hussien tossing the letter right after reading that.

    If he would bother finishing it.


  136. huckfunn
    136 | September 27, 2010 10:01 pm

    @ Lost:

    EXCELLENT!

    Am I accusing you of being an elitist? You bet.

    Am I calling you naïve? Absolutely.

    Am I calling you a failure, Mr. President? With all due respect that’s exactly what I’m doing.


  137. huckfunn
    137 | September 27, 2010 10:03 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Lost:

    EXCELLENT!

    Am I accusing you of being an elitist? You bet.

    Am I calling you naïve? Absolutely.

    Am I calling you a failure, Mr. President? With all due respect that’s exactly what I’m doing.

    I don’t know why that went to Lost. I was replying to rain of lead. At any rate, great post, rain, and God bless Charlie Daniels.


  138. Aussie Infidel
    138 | September 27, 2010 11:10 pm

    RINOED (v) RYE’ no’d …….To be opposed by a so called ally (RINO (n) ) so that the enemy can slip in between and win a seat.

    Should come in handy in November !

    :)


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David