First time visitor? Learn more.

Mo-doggie Artist Lars Vilks US Appearances Cancelled

by 1389AD ( 129 Comments › )
Filed under Canada, Dhimmitude, Free Speech, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at October 4th, 2010 - 11:30 am

Thumbnail of Lars Vilks poster

From Blazing Cat Fur:

Mohammed cartoon controversy comes to Canada: Security concerns cancel 2 Lars Vilks dates

NB: Lars Vilks, Mohammed Cartoonist, will be in Toronto Sunday Oct 3. Ticket information here.

“It appears that Mr. Vilks is considered a very high security threat by U.S. law enforcement, and it was decided that they would cancel because they could not secure the event to everyone’s liking,” Ambrogio said.

Much more information is available at Gates of Vienna:

What YOU can do:

Lars Vilks' Mo-doggie free speech graphic

If you have a blog, a Facebook page, or a website, you can participate in the art project by visiting this site and putting the Mo-doggie graphic on your sidebar, wall, or web page:

Support Free Speech: Join Lars Vilks’ Art Project

Dereliction of Duty

The onus should NEVER be on the speaker to pay for security against leftist and/or jihadist thugs who use threatened or actual violence to suppress the freedoms of speech, the press, and assembly.

It is the job of the government to round up, arrest, try, and imprison (or deport) ALL lawbreakers who suppress our freedoms by threatening or committing violent acts, regardless of the religion or ideology espoused by the perpetrators.

Our public safety authorities have completely failed to do their jobs. There is absolutely NO excuse for this!

Update: Beeduwine points out:

Vilks is no cartoonist. He is an artist, art critic, art history phd, writer and debateur.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

129 Responses to “Mo-doggie Artist Lars Vilks US Appearances Cancelled”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | October 3, 2010 2:23 pm

    You scheduled two threads at the same time


  2. 2 | October 3, 2010 2:27 pm

    @ Speranza:
    The admins have rescheduled it for Monday.


  3. Speranza
    3 | October 4, 2010 11:32 am

    1389AD wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    The admins have rescheduled it for Monday.

    So I see.


  4. Nevergiveup
    4 | October 4, 2010 11:39 am

    Carter recovers, slams settlement building
    Former US president back to life as normal after hospitalization, calls on Israel to ‘give up its ambition to occupy and control Palestine’

    I guess we can rule out any death bed conversion?


  5. 5 | October 4, 2010 11:41 am

    This is Monday, so does that make me First? :evil:


  6. 6 | October 4, 2010 11:42 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    He’s served Satan his whole life. I have no doubt that he intends to serve him for all Eternity…


  7. mfhorn
    7 | October 4, 2010 11:46 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Hey Carter, ‘Palestine’ is a region, not a country. Let the ‘Palestinians’ go back to Jordan or wherever they’re from. Better yet, let some of the Arab or Muslim countries turn some land over to the ‘Palestinians’ for a homeland.

    I know, Carter’ll never pull his head out of his @ss. He’s just a typical left-wing Jew hater.


  8. kansas
    8 | October 4, 2010 11:53 am

    Hey Daisy Khan says she gets death threats too, but loves this country so much she won’t have body guards. Yeah I didn’t get that logic either. Well other than Islamic death threats are a lot more credible as they tend to actually whack people. Empty threats, or made up threats probably, are not that alarming.


  9. 9 | October 4, 2010 11:54 am

    @ mfhorn:

    Carter doesn’t want “Peace” in the Middle East, he wants a Judenrein Middle East. That should really have been the end of all negiotiation with the Palestinian animals. It amazes me to see the same freaks who call Israel an “apartheid State” have no problem whatsoever with the Palestinians demanding a Judenrein Palestine. Maybe if the Palestinians would use the German, so everyone would understand the dog-whistle they are really blowing…


  10. RIX
    10 | October 4, 2010 11:54 am

    I do think that putting the head of the Prophet on a dogs body is an insult to dogs.
    By bowing to the threats & denying this man an opportunity to
    speak, Canada trashes its ideals.


  11. RIX
    11 | October 4, 2010 11:58 am

    kansas
    8 | October 4, 2010 11:53
    Hey Daisy Khan says she gets death threats too, but loves this country so much she won’t have body guards.

    She also went on to say that she did not want to stick the taxpayer
    with the bill for her bodyguards.
    Why wouldn’t she provide her own protection?
    She knows that she is in no danger & only made this claim
    to insult Hrisi Ali who does have bodyguards.


  12. Macker
    12 | October 4, 2010 11:59 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Since 9/11, I’ve had the opinion that Arabic (the language of the Unholy Koran) should be spoken only in Hell.


  13. 13 | October 4, 2010 12:00 pm

    @ RIX:

    Violence gets results. It is an impossible fact for anyone to deny. Mohammedan violence breeds a respect of the Mohammednans, while American passivity breeds a contempt of America. Fuck Peace, we need some Old Fashioned War! Blow the goatfucking Mohammedans off the face of the earth. Talk to them in the only language they understand. I’ve been saying that since about 10:30 AM 11 September 2001. Someday, I believe, people will start listening to me, but a lot more Americans are going to have to die first.


  14. Macker
    14 | October 4, 2010 12:02 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    As many as Lewd Wig Von Queer says?


  15. 15 | October 4, 2010 12:03 pm

    @ Macker:

    I think we are on the same page.


  16. 16 | October 4, 2010 12:04 pm

    @ Macker:

    Naw, just until we run out of them…


  17. The Osprey
    17 | October 4, 2010 12:08 pm

    Gates of Vienna?

    VLAAMS BELAANG!


  18. snork
    18 | October 4, 2010 12:10 pm

    There’s a reason why law is enforced by the public, and not charged off to the private sector, and it’s an old legal doctrine that a crime (as opposed to an infraction) is an offense to the entire public, and not just the victim. By trying to selectively enforce criminal law like this, they’re undermining one of the most basic elements of law.

    This is also why that was complete bullshit that the city of Gainesville sent that Jones guy a bill. It’s not done that way, and it’s never been done that way. When a city incorporates, and choses to provide police protection, they agree to provide it to all, free of extra charge, as a service to the larger community to provide for peace and domestic tranquility.

    They’re reneging on a covenant that they’re committed to. But then again, there’s a lot of that going on these days. Welcome to the Animal Farm.


  19. RIX
    19 | October 4, 2010 12:12 pm

    Iron Fist
    13 | October 4, 2010 12:00
    @ RIX:

    Violence gets results. It is an impossible fact for anyone to deny. Mohammedan violence breeds a respect of the Mohammednans, while American passivity breeds a contempt of America.

    Islamic threats make the left & even the established power strusture
    want to appease the source of the threats. The beleive that then they will like us.
    Our passivity makes us look weak or guilty or both.


  20. Macker
    20 | October 4, 2010 12:13 pm

    @ snork:

    I’m beginning to think that those who currently run the Federal Government…are animals.


  21. m
    21 | October 4, 2010 12:17 pm

    Geert Wilders on Trial

    The trial of Dutch MP Geert Wilders began this morning and then was adjourned shortly afterward. Mr. Wilders called on the judges to recuse themselves.

    “We will now retire to consider” Wilders’ application, said judge Frans Bauduin, the chairman of a special panel of judges hastily convened to hear the recusal bid that interrupted Wilders’ trial.
    [...]
    Wilders, 47, risks up to a year in jail or a 7,600-euro fine for calling Islam “fascist” and likening the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf.


  22. RIX
    22 | October 4, 2010 12:21 pm

    The rally in DC yesterday featured the Communist Party of America,
    front & tenter. They were an official part of the event.
    Will CJ be outraged?
    He finds Nazis everywhere, in the Tea Party events etc.
    He even managed to find Nazi symbolism in the Stste Flag of
    Tennessee.
    So I’m sure that he will bash yesterdays rally, right?


  23. 23 | October 4, 2010 12:24 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    This is Monday, so does that make me First?

    Nope, Nevergiveup got ahead of you!


  24. 24 | October 4, 2010 12:24 pm

    @ RIX:

    Communism killed 100 million people last century, but Communism is cool now that Obama’s President. God, can you imagine him as President during Carter’s term? He’d let the Russians have Western Europe as a Peace Gesture. The only thing that is saving us now is the complete and utter incompetance of our enemies.


  25. Macker
    25 | October 4, 2010 12:25 pm

    @ RIX:

    That also means, to selrahC, that Animal House is Racist:


  26. 26 | October 4, 2010 12:25 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    I know! Wah™. :cry:


  27. MikeA
    27 | October 4, 2010 12:26 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    but how long will that last. Even a blind dog will find a bone eventually. I fear we will be hit again and this time much harder. will that wake the American people up? Unknown and sometime I doubt it since 9/11 did not.


  28. 28 | October 4, 2010 12:27 pm

    snork wrote:

    There’s a reason why law is enforced by the public, and not charged off to the private sector, and it’s an old legal doctrine that a crime (as opposed to an infraction) is an offense to the entire public, and not just the victim. By trying to selectively enforce criminal law like this, they’re undermining one of the most basic elements of law.
    This is also why that was complete bullshit that the city of Gainesville sent that Jones guy a bill. It’s not done that way, and it’s never been done that way. When a city incorporates, and choses to provide police protection, they agree to provide it to all, free of extra charge, as a service to the larger community to provide for peace and domestic tranquility.
    They’re reneging on a covenant that they’re committed to. But then again, there’s a lot of that going on these days. Welcome to the Animal Farm.

    EXACTLY MY POINT.

    If the city authorities are failing to do their jobs in an evenhanded manner, then it’s time to disband the city corporation and let the county sheriff take over the policing function.

    I say this because the county sheriff has to face the voters on a regular basis, and if the sheriff isn’t doing his job, he gets replaced by someone who will.


  29. RIX
    29 | October 4, 2010 12:28 pm

    @ m:

    Rather than prosecute Mr. Wilders wouldn’t it be more honest
    to have a nationally televised debate between him & a rpresentative of the RoP.
    Let them make opening statements, use exhibits & call their own
    witnwsses.
    I am confident that he could prove that Islam is fascist & the
    Koran is like Mein Kampf.


  30. m
    30 | October 4, 2010 12:29 pm

    @ MikeA:

    I think September 11th stunned people. And they were on their way back to sleep when the victory mosque stuff started. Now that they are listening and already irked another attack might just wake the giant.

    /hoping against an attack, but if there is one that America decides to actually fight


  31. 31 | October 4, 2010 12:30 pm

    @ MikeA:

    The reason 9/11 didn’t wake people up was our leaders kept people asleep. They said Islam was peace and told Americans to keep shopping. Then they let in more Islamic Immigrants and have made them a priviledge class in America. The next attack, our leaders will not be able to control America’s rage.


  32. m
    32 | October 4, 2010 12:31 pm

    @ RIX:

    Which is why it would never happen.

    :-/


  33. Macker
    33 | October 4, 2010 12:31 pm

    m wrote:

    @ MikeA:

    I think September 11th stunned people. And they were on their way back to sleep when the victory mosque stuff started. Now that they are listening and already irked another attack might just wake the giant.

    /hoping against an attack, but if there is one that America decides to actually fight

    Hopefully, without الرئيس أوباما to stand in the way.


  34. 34 | October 4, 2010 12:33 pm

    Here’s a good summation of the talk by Scaramouche. The Art of Freedom.

    There’s also a link there to a video of the talk.


  35. RIX
    35 | October 4, 2010 12:35 pm

    Macker
    25 | October 4, 2010 12:25
    @ RIX:

    That also means, to selrahC, that Animal House is Racist:

    But they liked Otis.


  36. RIX
    36 | October 4, 2010 12:35 pm

    @ m:
    True


  37. RIX
    37 | October 4, 2010 12:39 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Hitler was a monster & all agree.
    What gets lost is that Stalin, Mao & Pol Pot were more efficient
    murderers.
    Che executed as many as he could, but you know he got snuffed.


  38. snork
    38 | October 4, 2010 12:40 pm

    Damn, Skippy. Somebody got it right:


  39. Beeduwine
    39 | October 4, 2010 12:41 pm

    Vilks is no cartoonist. He is an artist, art critic, art history phd, writer and debateur.


  40. Macker
    40 | October 4, 2010 12:43 pm

    @ Beeduwine:

    As long as he is not a master debateur.


  41. Nevergiveup
    41 | October 4, 2010 12:43 pm

    The Saudi government had declared following its weekly cabinet meeting that Israel’s settlement construction undermines the renewal of direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians, and called for a building freeze for the sake of the future of the negotiations.

    In an official statement, the Saudi government called on the international community to “force Israel to halt construction, which is aimed at changing the reality on the ground.” (AFP)

    Ya know the Saudis are such useless piece of shits, that I amazed they don’t hire or demand that someone wipe their royal asses?


  42. MikeA
    42 | October 4, 2010 12:44 pm

    @ RIX:

    Agreed. The reason Hitler is so well known is the German efficiency tied to the Holocaust. They documented everything. Add to the the “industrial” nature of Final Solution”. Creating camps just for the industrial execution of humans really got people. But what we don’t hear about very often is the Ensanzgruppen in Eastern Europe that went in first.

    Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao also did their killing behind a curtain of secrecy. If the Nazis had won the war, they would probably be spoken of in the same way as the previous 3.


  43. waldensianspirit
    43 | October 4, 2010 12:44 pm

    @ Macker:
    One could argue as long as he is…


  44. Macker
    44 | October 4, 2010 12:44 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Ya know the Saudis are such useless piece of shits, that I amazed they don’t hire or demand that someone wipe their royal asses?

    Hence the need for importing slaves.


  45. Beeduwine
    45 | October 4, 2010 12:44 pm

    @ Macker:

    Hey, new avatar!


  46. Macker
    46 | October 4, 2010 12:45 pm

    @ Beeduwine:

    I actually went back to my “Mad Men” avatar, prior to the Telegraph Ave. Toasters.


  47. kansas
    47 | October 4, 2010 12:47 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ m:
    Rather than prosecute Mr. Wilders wouldn’t it be more honest
    to have a nationally televised debate between him & a rpresentative of the RoP.
    Let them make opening statements, use exhibits & call their own
    witnwsses.
    I am confident that he could prove that Islam is fascist & the
    Koran is like Mein Kampf.

    Well it would be more honest, and he could prove that, since it is obvious, but isn’t that the problem? The truth always makes Islam look bad.


  48. waldensianspirit
    48 | October 4, 2010 12:49 pm

    Progressives need to off themselves to protect the planet and leave the environment clean for good people.


  49. Beeduwine
    49 | October 4, 2010 12:49 pm

    @ Beeduwine:

    And his work in the Mohammed biz is refered to as the Roundabout Dog Drawings.


  50. snork
    50 | October 4, 2010 12:52 pm

    @ RIX:
    @ MikeA:
    It’s a myth that the death camps were efficient. They were tidy, but the way the commies did it was a lot more economical.


  51. waldensianspirit
    51 | October 4, 2010 12:52 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    7 stones wouldn’t do it


  52. RIX
    52 | October 4, 2010 12:53 pm

    MikeA
    42 | October 4, 2010 12:44

    That Hitler was evil was obvious, but not to the American Left.
    They were all god because Hitler & Stalin had a nonagression
    pact.
    It was only when Hitler turned on the Soviet Union that they
    decided that Hitler was a bad guy.


  53. waldensianspirit
    53 | October 4, 2010 12:54 pm

    @ RIX:
    To the progressives Hitler was far seeing in protecting the planet from evil, productive, energy-consuming people


  54. RIX
    54 | October 4, 2010 12:55 pm

    kansas
    47 | October 4, 2010 12:47
    An honest appraisal of Islam is ugly, which is why the MSM
    puts lipstick on it.


  55. 55 | October 4, 2010 12:56 pm

    kansas wrote:

    Well it would be more honest,

    Yes, but the Mother Fucking Fifth Column Treasonous Media utterly refuses to allow an open honest discussion on the subject.


  56. RIX
    56 | October 4, 2010 12:56 pm

    snork wrote:

    @ RIX:
    @ MikeA:
    It’s a myth that the death camps were efficient. They were tidy, but the way the commies did it was a lot more economical.

    That’s true. The Soviets were mor efficient monsters tha the Nazis.
    And Elenor Roosevelt just freeking loved Stalin.


  57. RIX
    57 | October 4, 2010 12:58 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ RIX:
    To the progressives Hitler was far seeing in protecting the planet from evil, productive, energy-consuming people

    The Left would never have turned on Hitler, if he had let
    Russia alone.


  58. Macker
    58 | October 4, 2010 12:58 pm

    @ RIX:

    Makes one wonder if she frakked him too.


  59. Beeduwine
    59 | October 4, 2010 12:59 pm

    @ RIX:

    You know what they say: You can put lipstick on a Palin, but…


  60. RIX
    60 | October 4, 2010 1:01 pm

    Macker wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Makes one wonder if she frakked him too.

    Wouldn’t be a huge surprise.


  61. RIX
    61 | October 4, 2010 1:01 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ RIX:
    You know what they say: You can put lipstick on a Palin, but…

    I take it that you don’t like palin?


  62. 62 | October 4, 2010 1:01 pm

    @ RIX:
    Commies were “smart” about it. They allowed the slaves to expire naturally from hard labor and disease instead of going to an extra expense of actively exterminating them. Talk about getting more bang for the buck. ALL of Soviet industrialization in the 20s-30s that was so lauded by air-headed Western “intellectuals” was built on brutal slave labor. Regions got quotas on how many able-bodied (or able-minded, depending on the project)humans to arrest and sentence.


  63. 63 | October 4, 2010 1:03 pm

    RIX wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Hitler was a monster & all agree.
    What gets lost is that Stalin, Mao & Pol Pot were more efficient
    murderers.
    Che executed as many as he could, but you know he got snuffed.

    Evil people are all pretty much the same. They are all tools of the very same devil, who has little imagination and no real creativity.

    The difference in the body counts has to do with only one thing: how long it takes for the rest of the world to put a stop to that particular evildoer and his evil organization.


  64. 64 | October 4, 2010 1:05 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    It seems they all die a horrible death. Even those who are not whacked and do not commit suicide appear to have a glimpse of where they are going right before they die, when it is already too late to do anything about it. Stalin’s death is an example.


  65. Beeduwine
    65 | October 4, 2010 1:05 pm

    @ RIX:

    No, I she is ok. I was referring to an incident during the campaign.

    Remember?


  66. Eliana
    66 | October 4, 2010 1:05 pm

    So Carter is all recovered from his virus and the first thing he does is to promote the idea that Jews can’t be allowed to live in certain places (like the old RESTRICTED neighborhoods, hotels and country clubs where the policy was NO JEWS ALLOWED).

    Carter is one of the most politically correct politicians of all time and he’s promoting the idea that Jews in particular must not be allowed to live wherever Jews want to live.

    The Arab world is expecting to get away with this at the UN Security Council too. They want an official restriction on the planet Earth about where Jews are allowed to live.

    Their primary target is JUDEA -- the exact place where Jews got our name “Jews” (“Judeans”).

    The planet Earth won’t spin properly if the JUDEANS are allowed to live in JUDEA.

    Carter and Obama are up to their necks in this.

    The tiny Jewish people must be prevented at all costs from living on our ancient tribal land in Judea.

    It’s mind-boggling.


  67. 67 | October 4, 2010 1:05 pm

    PrincessNatasha wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Commies were “smart” about it. They allowed the slaves to expire naturally from hard labor and disease instead of going to an extra expense of actively exterminating them. Talk about getting more bang for the buck. ALL of Soviet industrialization in the 20s-30s that was so lauded by air-headed Western “intellectuals” was built on brutal slave labor. Regions got quotas on how many able-bodied (or able-minded, depending on the project)humans to arrest and sentence.

    That’s exactly how it worked. I recommend that everyone go ahead and read all three volumes of The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. It’s a real eye-opener. Despite the length, the books are eminently well-written and no problem to understand.


  68. 68 | October 4, 2010 1:06 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    So Carter is all recovered from his virus

    I think it is the poor little virus that had finally recovered from the nasty Carter.


  69. RIX
    69 | October 4, 2010 1:07 pm

    PrincessNatasha
    62 | October 4, 2010 13:01
    @ RIX:
    Commies were “smart” about it. They allowed the slaves to expire naturally from hard labor and disease instead of going to an extra expense of actively exterminating them

    .

    Princess, you have knowledge of this.
    This knowledge is Soooooooo politically incorrect to our hip
    sophisticates.


  70. 70 | October 4, 2010 1:07 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    That’s exactly how it worked. I recommend that everyone go ahead and read all three volumes of The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. It’s a real eye-opener. Despite the length, the books are eminently well-written and no problem to understand.

    Indeed. Oddly enough, there is a campaign afoot, in Russia, to trash and discredit Solzhenitsyn and other anti-totalitarians. It is truly disgusting.


  71. Beeduwine
    71 | October 4, 2010 1:08 pm

    @ RIX:

    Actually, a more accurate statement would be I don’t dislike her. No member of her fan club.


  72. RIX
    72 | October 4, 2010 1:08 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ RIX:
    No, I she is ok. I was referring to an incident during the campaign.
    Remember?

    Went right over my head , sorry.
    Yes I do remeember.


  73. waldensianspirit
    73 | October 4, 2010 1:09 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1317519/Taliban-infiltrated-Afghan-forces-Sleeper-cells-awaiting-instructions-strike.html

    in·fil·trate (n-fltrt, nfl-)
    v. in·fil·trat·ed, in·fil·trat·ing, in·fil·trates
    v.tr.
    1.
    a. To pass (troops, for example) surreptitiously into enemy-held territory.
    b. To penetrate with hostile intent: infiltrate enemy lines; terrorists that had infiltrated the country.
    2. To enter or take up positions in gradually or surreptitiously, as for purposes of espionage or takeover: infiltrated key government agencies with spies.
    3. To cause (a liquid, for example) to permeate a substance by passing through its interstices or pores.
    4. To permeate (a porous substance) with a liquid or gas.
    v.intr.
    To gain entrance gradually or surreptitiously.
    n.
    One that infiltrates, especially an abnormal substance that accumulates gradually in cells or body tissues.

    Nope. Wrong word. Can we say Afghan forces ARE Taliban forces?


  74. Eliana
    74 | October 4, 2010 1:09 pm

    @ PrincessNatasha:

    So Carter is all recovered from his virus

    I think it is the poor little virus that had finally recovered from the nasty Carter.

    Agreed! :-)

    Actually, when I saw the news where he said he’d had a virus, my first thought was, “Stuxnet is more clever than I thought!!!” ;)


  75. 75 | October 4, 2010 1:10 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MikeA:
    The reason 9/11 didn’t wake people up was our leaders kept people asleep. They said Islam was peace and told Americans to keep shopping. Then they let in more Islamic Immigrants and have made them a priviledge class in America. The next attack, our leaders will not be able to control America’s rage.

    Exactly.

    There is another alternative -- that we, in the blogosphere, and in face-to-face discussions with other people on a regular basis, do the work of waking up Americans (and Canadians, and Europeans, and Australians, and so forth) before that happens.

    That’s why we have to keep up this effort relentlessly.


  76. 76 | October 4, 2010 1:10 pm

    RIX wrote:

    Princess, you have knowledge of this.
    This knowledge is Soooooooo politically incorrect to our hip
    sophisticates.

    Heh. They think they are sophisticates. Naive, vulgar, sub-retarded, dependent rubes is what they are! If these snot-nosed wannabe ‘elites’ worked productively even only one day in their lives, they would not be such naive suckers buying nonsense and paying dearly for it later on down the road-- every damn time!


  77. 77 | October 4, 2010 1:12 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    Actually, when I saw the news where he said he’d had a virus, my first thought was, “Stuxnet is more clever than I thought!!!” ;)

    My first thought was, Hmmm, didn’t they mean to say, Jimmy Carter is a virus???


  78. RIX
    78 | October 4, 2010 1:12 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Actually, a more accurate statement would be I don’t dislike her. No member of her fan club.

    She is flawed , but who isn’t?
    I like her especially because of the beating that she takes
    & fights back.


  79. RIX
    79 | October 4, 2010 1:15 pm

    PrincessNatasha
    76 | October 4, 2010 13:10
    Heh. They think they are sophisticates. Naive, vulgar, sub-retarded, dependent rubes is what they are! If these snot-nosed wannabe ‘elites’ worked productively even only one day in their lives, they would not be such naive suckers buying nonsense and paying dearly for it later on down the road– every damn time!

    How true. I will bet that Obama nwver had calluses in his life
    from an honest day of work.


  80. taxfreekiller
    80 | October 4, 2010 1:19 pm

    The cult that supports Obama.

    Any one notice how that cult has certian easy to identfy charteristicts.

    If so, list them in the order of the most clear charteristicts.

    Be brave and truthful.


  81. 81 | October 4, 2010 1:20 pm

    snork wrote:

    Damn, Skippy. Somebody got it right:

    FoxNews just showed that… Fox is hammering the people behind that obscenity.


  82. RIX
    82 | October 4, 2010 1:20 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    The cult that supports Obama.
    Any one notice how that cult has certian easy to identfy charteristicts.
    If so, list them in the order of the most clear charteristicts.
    Be brave and truthful.

    An LGF accouunt?


  83. Beeduwine
    83 | October 4, 2010 1:20 pm

    @ RIX:

    I tolerate her because she is smoking hot.


  84. taxfreekiller
    84 | October 4, 2010 1:23 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:
    like

    NAACP
    Black Panthers
    Urban League
    Unions
    Southern Proverty Law Center
    Communist Party U.A.A.
    MSM
    BET


  85. taxfreekiller
    85 | October 4, 2010 1:25 pm

    La Raza
    MECHA
    Earth First
    Green Peace
    Urban Enviromental Terrorist
    @ taxfreekiller:


  86. taxfreekiller
    86 | October 4, 2010 1:27 pm

    Ambulance Chasing Lawyers
    SEIU thugs
    @ taxfreekiller:


  87. waldensianspirit
    87 | October 4, 2010 1:27 pm

    @ Beeduwine:
    I support her because she is better than the GOP elite males, correct about fiscal matters and I believe she doesn’t use all the mind altering drugs they do either.


  88. taxfreekiller
    88 | October 4, 2010 1:35 pm

    George Soros
    Charles Johnson
    Kos Kult of Kommies
    Jimmy Carter
    John F. Kerry
    Bill “Intern” Clinton
    Hilery “Bill Clinton Enableing” Clinton
    The U.N.@ taxfreekiller:


  89. RIX
    89 | October 4, 2010 1:36 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ RIX:
    I tolerate her because she is smoking hot.</blockquote

    >

    She is.


  90. Beeduwine
    90 | October 4, 2010 1:36 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Yeah, but sometimes I suspect her to take the odd happy pill.

    I would probably have ended up voting for her. Just like CJ!


  91. waldensianspirit
    91 | October 4, 2010 1:39 pm

    Doesn’t the travel advisory warning boil down to “Do your own damn profiling!” ?


  92. snork
    92 | October 4, 2010 1:39 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    That’s not the original. That one has been dicked with to make it more true to their real intent.


  93. chickadee
    93 | October 4, 2010 1:40 pm

    kansas wrote:

    Hey Daisy Khan says she gets death threats too, but loves this country so much she won’t have body guards. Yeah I didn’t get that logic either. Well other than Islamic death threats are a lot more credible as they tend to actually whack people. Empty threats, or made up threats probably, are not that alarming.

    She is lying. And she is an incredibly bad liar. Certainly the muzz are not threatening her and if any rednecks have done so, this scrunt would have body guards. That shit abt. loving this country too much, to take measures to protect herself, is laughably absurd.
    She loves America so much she is hell bent on changing it into a muzz cesspool.
    rofl


  94. Eliana
    94 | October 4, 2010 1:40 pm

    When Sarah Palin looked the American people in the eye while giving her speech at the Republican National Convention rather than doing the ping-pong match watching head turns that Obama does even when he’s talking to 6th graders -- I knew she would reach a lot of people in a big way.

    I can’t stand to watch Obama speak. I’m sick of seeing his right cheek then his left cheek then his right cheek, ad nauseum.

    Palin’s teleprompter at the Republican National Convention was getting ahead of her a bit due to the applause but she didn’t need it. She looked right at us (through the camera) instead.

    It’s no wonder that she drew amazing crowds every time she appeared in person. She connected with a lot of people by way of her common sense and her directness.


  95. yenta-fada
    95 | October 4, 2010 1:40 pm

    Account by Scaramouche, Canadian blogger on both Lars:

    It was a Lars double-header in Toronto last night as Lars Hedegaard, of the Danish Free Press Society, and Lars Vilks, the Swedish artist who got into a spot of bother with the zanies when he sketched a be-turbaned man’s head on a dog’s body, were able to speak as planned. The Larses (Larsi?) had been slated to speak in Boston, Philadelphia and Ottawa too, but due to, ahem, “security concerns” (“security concerns” being code for and a manifestation of our de facto dhimmitude, as more and more often these days the fear-averse in the democratic West crumple in the face of supremacist threats) those other IFPS-sponsored events were cancelled. Luckily, Toronto was able to muster plenty of muscle (burly JDLers along with hired private security), and the riff-raff were either kept out, or didn’t bother showing up. (Who knows, maybe they’d attended the George Galloway lecture earlier in the day and, since old George can talk your ear off about Zionist perfidy/Palestinian vicitmhood/Jason Kenney--the Galloway trifecta--they were plum talked out come evening.)

    Anyway, Danish Lars provided a snapshot of life in dhimmified Denmark--and it’s a mighty grim picture indeed. Free speech all but shut down, a casualty of a pervasive and suicidal political correctness. Pockets of the land ceded to Muslims and sharia law--”no go” zones--where Danish police fear to tread. Opponents of the sharia imperative derided and marginalized as “bigots,” perhaps charged with a “hate crime” (as Hedegaard has been), while the intolerances of Allah’s all-compassing law-for-all are all but ignored. And if you have the misfortune to be a Jew in Denmark, it’s much, much worse. Your kids won’t be able to attend many public schools in Copenhagen (those “security concerns” again) and the one Jewish school, tucked away behind high walls and barbed wall, looks more like a prison camp than a place of learning. And don’t expect any help from the land’s Official Jewry. The chief rabbi, Lars informs us, “is in cahoots” with the Islamists. So if you’re looking for the Denmark of old, the Denmark that stood up en masse to the Nazis to save its Jews, you will no longer find it. In one of history’s bleakest ironies, the land that once had balls enough to tell say “bite me” to Hitler is now, says Hedberg, giving up its Jews without a fight.

    After Danish Lars’ spiel I was thoroughly depressed (not least because his remedies for what ails us--demand a rollback of hate speech laws; put legal instruments in place that strengthen the rights of citizens; if all else fails, get a gun--were rather a downer). Fortunately, Swedish Lars came along to lighten the mood. The two Lars were a study in contrasts--the Danish Lars impeccably groomed, dressed soberly and neatly, in dark suit and tie, serious both in demeanour and speech; the Swedish Lars dressed casually, looking like he hadn’t swung by the barber’s the barber in quite some time, puckish, kind of silly, all in all the antithesis of serious. That’s because Swedish Lars is an artist. Not a cartoonist. An artist. And he considers everything in which he’s involved, including his appearance last night, to be part and parcel of his art. I have to say that as a survival strategy, especially when there’s a fatwa and your head for drawing a few sketches of Muhammad’s head on a doggy body, such solipsism--seeing yourself as the still, quiet centre in a vortex of hysteria, an artistic vortex of hysteria--is one of the best. So, now, how did these sketches, drawn in what Vilks describes as an “expressionistic” style, come to be? There’s a rather complicated back story, a shaggy dog story, if you will, since it involves a huge wooden doggy statue--Vilks’ “pet” project for some decades--and something called roundabout dogs. A quirky Swedish folk art phenomenon, roundabout dogs are homemade dog sculputes created by amateur artists that are placed in traffic roundabouts. Apparently, they are--or were--all the rage in Sweden, springing up in droves, origin unknown, when people were asleep. (Vilks showed us slides of some of the canine creations.) Apparently, Vilks’s sketches, which he drew for an art exhibition in Norway, were a cheeky reference to both the roundabout dogs and the Danish Motoons controversy. The sketches, which Vilks admits weren’t very good (he says his four-year-old daughter could have drawn them) would have languished in obscurity, along with their creator, had not a Swedish newspaper discovered them and featured one in an article about whether artists should be allowed the freedom to “insult” religion. That was enough to alert the zanies both Muslim and P.C. to the Vilks “blasphemy,” with predicably incendiary results. Soon enough, Vilks was being slammed by the Sweden’s political and intellectual elites, he became the subject of some very rude cartoons drawn by Muslim ‘toonists, and religious nutters in places like Pakistan and Bangladesh set Swedish flags (one, strangely enough, coloured a non-Swedish green) aflame. Also, Vilks found himself with a fatwa on his head, and was whisked away in the dead of night by Swedish police who told him THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS MATTER and that YOU MUST CHANGE YOUR IDENTITY AND GO INTO HIDING. Vilks declined to do either, viewing the maelstrom that had sprung up around him as art--art of a particularly chaotic and highly conceptualized nature, yes, but art nonetheless. He did hide out a friend’s house for a short time, but since the Swedish media kept writing that Vilks had gone into deep hiding, and had even gotten vicious dogs for protection (actually, the dogs shown in photos with him that turned up on the ‘Net belonged to friends), he figured it was safe to return home because that’s the last place anyone would be looking for him.

    Through it all, even as he checked under his car for bombs as instructed by Swedish police (Vilks showed us a picture of him doing so) Vilks remained amused and unflappable, adamant that his art was life and his life was art. The only occasion that gave him pause--and I include here a riot on the campus of Upsala University when during a Vilks appearance--was when the “Jihad Jane” plot was uncovered; it was one thing, explained Vilks, to be wary of Muslims who might want to kill you, but it was quite another for your assassin pool to now include blonde chicks. In Sweden. He even remained true to his art when a couple of young Muslims engaged in their own type of performance art and tried to burn down Vilks’s house. Alas for them, they were amateur artists--and not even of roundabout dog calibre. One of them managed to set himself on fire, and, in his haste to remove his flaming, melting clothing, left his wallet and house keys for police to find. Under the terms of Sweden’s excessively lenient laws, the two were sentenced to a mere two years in the slammer,

    Vilks wrapped up his presentation with a short film he had made--more performance art. The film featured some drum majorettes wearing exceptionally short skirts (very “cheeky”) interspersed with clips of quotes uttered by Swedes about Vilks. The words of one those quoted, a Swedish politician I believe, were sung/spoken over an old Fred Astaire film clip (of Fred dancing to “Puttin’ on the Ritz”).

    So now what--for the Larses and for us? Well, Danish Lars, as I mentioned, will be put on trial for hate speech in his native land (as Geert Wilders, another truth-teller whose “blasphemy” cannot be tolerated by dhimmis and their overlords, is on trial in a now pathetically dhimmified Netherlands starting today). The Swedish Lars still has a fatwa on his head, still a pariah in Sweden, and still committed to getting on with his art. He’s even decided to return to Upsala U., scene of some particularly overwrought “art,” for another “debate”; barring more “security concerns,” he’ll be there this Thursday. So far he seems to have weathered the storm very well, in his uniquely artistic fashion. Debbie downer that I am, however, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that it’s all fun and games and Fred Astaire until some jihadi nutjob (who can’t do what you can, backwards and in heels) with a sharp blade sneaks up behind you and cuts off your head. That said, it was both delightful and thrilling to be in the presence of someone who, knowing that reality, refuses to be cowed. “The right of artists to have freedom of expression must always be defended,” he declared, words that are pure poison to the jihadis, and pure oxygen for all freedom-lovers.


  96. Beeduwine
    96 | October 4, 2010 1:40 pm

    Ok, so who do I have to sleep with around here to get a correction regarding Vilks being labelled a cartoonist?


  97. 97 | October 4, 2010 1:43 pm

    PrincessNatasha wrote:

    1389AD wrote:
    That’s exactly how it worked. I recommend that everyone go ahead and read all three volumes of The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. It’s a real eye-opener. Despite the length, the books are eminently well-written and no problem to understand.
    Indeed. Oddly enough, there is a campaign afoot, in Russia, to trash and discredit Solzhenitsyn and other anti-totalitarians. It is truly disgusting.

    Same thing happened on this side of the pond. The leftists hate Solzhenitsyn.

    You should contribute a post on this.


  98. yenta-fada
    98 | October 4, 2010 1:43 pm

    @ PaladinPhil:

    Oops, Paladin Phil. I didn’t see your reference. Thanks


  99. Nevergiveup
    99 | October 4, 2010 1:44 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    Ok, so who do I have to sleep with around here to get a correction regarding Vilks being labelled a cartoonist?

    Picture?


  100. yenta-fada
    100 | October 4, 2010 1:45 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    Ok, so who do I have to sleep with around here to get a correction regarding Vilks being labelled a cartoonist?

    lol. Scaramouche’s account is quite careful to describe him as an artist. #95. But thanks for the offer. :-)


  101. waldensianspirit
    101 | October 4, 2010 1:46 pm

    Hey @ snork:
    http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2010/10/01


  102. 102 | October 4, 2010 1:46 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    Vilks is no cartoonist. He is an artist, art critic, art history phd, writer and debateur.

    It’s a quote from Blazing Cat Fur. I can’t very well re-word blockquotes from other sites. Email blazingcatfur@gmail.com.


  103. 103 | October 4, 2010 1:50 pm

    [...] Beeduwine points out: Vilks is no cartoonist. He is an artist, art critic, art history phd, writer and [...]


  104. chickadee
    104 | October 4, 2010 1:51 pm

    Not allowing Lars Vilks into America is another win for the muzz.

    We are bowing to the threats that savages are making to the civilized world.
    Why would they stop when we are rolling out the red carpet, inviting them to continue their violence.
    We must stop showing weakness. They thrive on it.


  105. Eliana
    105 | October 4, 2010 1:52 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Beeduwine wrote:

    Ok, so who do I have to sleep with around here to get a correction regarding Vilks being labelled a cartoonist?

    Picture?

    :lol:


  106. Beeduwine
    106 | October 4, 2010 1:52 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Are you a voluptuous dame?


  107. 107 | October 4, 2010 1:52 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    :)

    /in a slow mood today, mostly lurking.


  108. waldensianspirit
    108 | October 4, 2010 1:53 pm

    Where you’ll never find me:


  109. 109 | October 4, 2010 1:54 pm

    RIX wrote:

    PrincessNatasha
    76 | October 4, 2010 13:10
    Heh. They think they are sophisticates. Naive, vulgar, sub-retarded, dependent rubes is what they are! If these snot-nosed wannabe ‘elites’ worked productively even only one day in their lives, they would not be such naive suckers buying nonsense and paying dearly for it later on down the road– every damn time!
    How true. I will bet that Obama nwver had calluses in his life
    from an honest day of work.

    I’d like to see him run a cash register or a switchboard for one shift, without getting rattled by angry customers.


  110. Nevergiveup
    110 | October 4, 2010 1:56 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Are you a voluptuous dame?

    Nah I’m a guy. I guess you are also. Unless your a voluptuous dame and gay. Not that there is anything wrong with that.


  111. MikeA
    111 | October 4, 2010 1:57 pm

    @ chickadee:

    The part that I find amusing is this Daisy Khan character wants to help the muzzies get the upper hand here in America except when they do, she gets put in a bag and the old imam and get a couple of more wives. She is either a masocist ( and being a muzzie, probably) or is stupid beyond belief to think SHE will be above them.


  112. 112 | October 4, 2010 1:57 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    Ok, so who do I have to sleep with around here to get a correction regarding Vilks being labelled a cartoonist?

    I fixed it on this end. That said, I consider cartooning and caricature to be a perfectly valid art form, and someone who is a “serious” artist in every respect can draw a cartoon or a caricature.

    The Mo-doggie drawings are, in my opinion, political cartoons, intended to carry a political message. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

    Cartoon


  113. Beeduwine
    113 | October 4, 2010 2:00 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    In that case I will inform you Yours Truly is a somewhat happily married man.

    And if I were a dame, I would be fugly.


  114. m
    114 | October 4, 2010 2:01 pm

    @ chickadee:

    They were quick to say the NYPD verified the threats happened. If they verified the calls they know who did it… so I still call bullshit.


  115. chickadee
    115 | October 4, 2010 2:02 pm

    MikeA wrote:

    @ chickadee:

    The part that I find amusing is this Daisy Khan character wants to help the muzzies get the upper hand here in America except when they do, she gets put in a bag and the old imam and get a couple of more wives. She is either a masocist ( and being a muzzie, probably) or is stupid beyond belief to think SHE will be above them.

    Power sharing for the bitches is not going to work when the muzz ponzi scheme is the only game in town.
    Lots of women in Iran thought they would be more free when the mad mullahs took over.
    They must have been so shocked when they had to cover up their nice designer outfits they had been able to vogue around in when the shah was in power.


  116. Beeduwine
    116 | October 4, 2010 2:07 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    I agree with everything you wrote. But Vilks would not agree to the label cartoonist, I believe. His concept is, on the basis of the rondellhund drawings, to turn his situation into art. Him not being allowed at this event is part of his performance. Brilliant.


  117. 117 | October 4, 2010 2:09 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    I wish I could have gone to the event in Canada, but I live in the US, over a thousand miles away. Maybe someday…


  118. 118 | October 4, 2010 2:12 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    I agree with everything you wrote. But Vilks would not agree to the label cartoonist, I believe. His concept is, on the basis of the rondellhund drawings, to turn his situation into art. Him not being allowed at this event is part of his performance. Brilliant.

    If you have a blog or a Facebook page, you can participate in the art project by going here and put this picture on your wall, sidebar, or whatever:

    Support Free Speech: Join Lars Vilks’ Art Project


  119. Eliana
    119 | October 4, 2010 2:12 pm

    @ MikeA:

    Have you ever known a Muslim woman who has been part of a multiple wives situation in her own life?

    I know an American woman who was approached and converted to Islam in America to become part of a multiple wives arrangement in Saudi Arabia (Mecca).

    It wasn’t a love situation. The Saudi Arabian man was probably attracted to her because she has very pale blue eyes and blond hair. He said he would take care of her in Saudi Arabia so she converted and married him. She was part of a four wives arrangement and she bore him two children.

    I think she saw the offer of marriage in Saudi Arabia as an adventure and a drastic change. I think she saw herself as becoming some kind of princess.

    It was NOT a fun situation, though. She had no privacy and her possessions were taken at will by other wives and the children of other wives. She wasn’t allowed to teach her own children English because they suspected that she would talk privately to her children about the other wives and their children. She was fluent in Arabic and spoke to her children only in Arabic. They still don’t know English.

    After 5 or 6 years, the husband decided to dump her. She lost her children and every single thing she owned in Saudi Arabia. She went to live with some people who’d given her a room in Mecca so that she could be near her children.

    Then another Saudi man came along who said he was looking for another wife and she was married again. This time she had four children before the husband dumped her. She lost all four of these children and all her possessions this time too.

    She returned to America. She has some contact with at least one of her children on the telephone, but she’ll never see any of them again.

    She was chosen to bear children and to put up with the intrigue that goes on when four people share the same spouse.

    Her choices were incredibly unfortunate but her descriptions of life in this situation were eye opening. Women are not treated well in this culture in general but this polygamy situation is really rough on women in particular.


  120. waldensianspirit
    120 | October 4, 2010 2:15 pm

    Ace point out Star Parker is running


  121. chickadee
    121 | October 4, 2010 2:17 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Ace point out Star Parker is running

    I heard on Hannity the other day. She is so awesome and brilliant, Hannity didn’t even interrupt her.
    lol


  122. lobo91
    122 | October 4, 2010 2:19 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Her choices were incredibly unfortunate but her descriptions of life in this situation were eye opening. Women are not treated well in this culture in general but this polygamy situation is really rough on women in particular.

    It reminds me of nothing so much as the way cattle ranches are run…


  123. snork
    123 | October 4, 2010 2:25 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    Her choices were incredibly unfortunate but her descriptions of life in this situation were eye opening. Women are not treated well in this culture in general but this polygamy situation is really rough on women in particular.

    But try to warn her before hand, and you’re …
    You guessed it …
    A racist.


  124. Beeduwine
    124 | October 4, 2010 2:28 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    Can’t. That would be professional suicide.


  125. 125 | October 4, 2010 2:33 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    Can’t. That would be professional suicide.

    Understood.

    But other people here may be able to do so.


  126. 126 | October 4, 2010 2:37 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 1389, The Blogmocracy. The Blogmocracy said: Mo-doggie Cartoonist Lars Vilks US Appearances Cancelled http://goo.gl/fb/UxjGv #canada #dhimmitude #freespeech [...]


  127. Eliana
    127 | October 4, 2010 2:46 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Her choices were incredibly unfortunate but her descriptions of life in this situation were eye opening. Women are not treated well in this culture in general but this polygamy situation is really rough on women in particular.

    It reminds me of nothing so much as the way cattle ranches are run…

    Now that you mention it, it reminds me of this too.

    The whole burqa banning debate only barely scratches the surface of what’s going on with women in this culture.


  128. lobo91
    128 | October 4, 2010 2:55 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Women in Islam are only valued for two things: Bearing (male) children, or cementing alliances between clans.

    Obviously, an American woman is of no value in the latter capacity, so her only value is for breeding. If she was perceived as a troublemaker by the other wives, the husband most likely made the calculation that it was time to cut his losses and get rid of her.


  129. 129 | October 4, 2010 6:04 pm

    @ MikeA:

    The reason Hitler is so well known is the German efficiency tied to the Holocaust.

    Careful, Mike. Possum made a similar point several weeks ago. Expect to be stalked, attacked, shaved and banned.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David