First time visitor? Learn more.

Who Are The 99ers?

by 1389AD ( 131 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, China, Economy, immigration, Socialism, Tranzis at December 25th, 2010 - 6:30 pm

At Christmas, let us pray for those who cannot find work to support their families!


This video is a real shocker:

Unemployment Benefits: The 99ers

Vast numbers of Americans who were laid off back in 2008 still cannot find jobs. There simply are nowhere near enough jobs to go around.

Despite what was said in the news about extending unemployment benefits for another “thirteen months,” this was a lie. There was no extension of benefits for those who have exhausted their 99 weeks of unemployment benefits and who still cannot find work, or are working at part-time jobs that don’t pay enough to live on.

You don’t have to be a wastrel to end up in that predicament. Many of these people are older, educated professionals who did all the right things: finished college and professional school, worked diligently, kept their skills up to date, saved for their retirement. Now they are cashing in their IRAs and their 401Ks just to survive, selling their homes at huge losses, moving in with strangers, going to soup kitchens, picking through garbage for items to recycle.

Per the video, “No one is expecting Congress to vote another extension of unemployment checks, given our historic budget deficits.”

House adjourns with no mention of tier 5 unemployment extension for 99ers

December 23rd, 2010 8:58 am ET.

The House of Representatives yesterday evening passed a motion to adjourn the 111th Congress with no mention of H.R. 6556, the bill that would have provided unemployment benefits for the 99ers. The bill was sponsored by Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-CA).

In an eloquent eulogy for tier 5, Michael Colliss laid into Lee, writing on the website All247News, “This latest disappointment to the 99ers was little more then an effort by a relatively unknown Congresswoman to get publicity. The 99ers have suffered – and are continuing to suffer – enough. This was a totally unnecessary, and in the opinion of this writer, basically cruel and insensitive effort by a person who did not care who she hurt to gain headlines. Considering the sad, unnecessary turmoil created by Congressman Barbara Lee of California, many unemployment advocates as well as 99ers are probably asking themselves, ‘With ‘friends’ like these who needs enemies?’”

Michael Colliss worked for 21 years as a staff member in Congress. He is now retired and works as a volunteer advocate for the 99ers.

The 112th Congress begins on Wednesday, January 5th, 2011. It is unlikely to pass legislation providing unemployment benefits for the 99ers. When asked about the future of the 99ers earlier this week, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said that the President intends to focus on job creation.

Read the rest.

I know only too well what the President means when he “intends to focus on job creation.” This means pork-barrel jobs for the TSA gropers, for the new food-inspection Nazis, for unneeded school administrators, and for all of the bureaucrats who are putting a stranglehold on private enterprise. There will be jobs for the SEIU and for other unions that have contributed to the election of Barack Hussein Obama.

This is how Obama’s “job creation” has worked out thus far:

Hot Air: Chart of the … year

(h/t: Iron Fist)

posted at 11:36 am on December 7, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Quite a few people have had the same reaction to this chart from Business Insider and Calculated Risk as John Derbyshire at The Corner, which is to offer a res ipsa loquitur rather than clutter it with commentary. But there is more to be said about the ramifications of this chart:

Chart showing nearly flat 'recovery' from 2008 recession - click for larger image

But calling it the Chart of the Day seems too limiting. I’d call this the Chart of the Year, for a couple of reasons. It demonstrates the folly of the Obama administration’s insistence that we have been experiencing a recovery and any sort of significant growth in job creation. After hitting the nadir of job losses relative to our peak inter-recession employment, we have essentially flatlined for far longer than any other post-recession period. Nothing in the data shows a hint that we will soon break out of that pattern either, and Ben Bernanke says we’ll probably go four to five more years on this same trajectory.

Read the rest.

But that’s not all, folks. The Obama Administration has been creating jobs, all right -- but not for Americans! The jobs are in other countries, in various industries that are profiting from US subsidies, sometimes through the costly stimulus program that was touted as a means of stemming American unemployment.

Our Tax Dollars ‘Saved or Created’ Jobs -- OVERSEAS!

Our economy is a mess -- millions of Americans are out of work and those who do have jobs are finding it increasingly difficult to afford the ever rising costs of living. With this in mind, it might make sense for the Obama administration to direct some of our tax dollars towards job creation, but what doesn’t make sense is the fact that millions of our dollars are being used by the Obama administration to create jobs in foreign countries!

Democrats are working very hard pushing the ‘green’ meme and fighting tirelessly to divert money to China for wind turbines -- which if made here instead could help put Americans back to work.’
[...]
Not to be outdone by his former rival & current underling, good ole Barry spent $22 MILLION dollars to train high tech workers in Sri Lanka! Jobs that, again, I’m sure many AMERICANS would have loved an opportunity to be trained for and to get. There was a lot of coverage of this in the right-blogosphere, and virtually none in the MSM (try not to look so surprised), here’s what Ed Morrissey had to say about it at Hot Air:

Obama WH spends $22 million to train workers …
August 4, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
As I noted earlier, Democrats plan to punish businesses that locate higher-paying manufacturing jobs overseas with higher taxes. What will they do with a White House that will spend $22 million to train programmers in Java — and English — in Asia? The program from USAID will train 3,000 programmers to compete for business in the high-tech sector…

Much more here.

H-1b: Importing foreigners to displace American tech workers

As if all that were not enough, the H-1b visa program remains in effect. This program imports foreign workers to work at high-tech jobs where there is supposedly a shortage of American workers. The program was a fraud from the get-go, and it still is. Never has there been a shortage of American workers in the IT and engineering fields. Instead, the H-1b workers are being imported as contractors, at lower wages than what American workers would be paid, despite the laws that supposedly prevent that. Because most of the H-1b workers lack understanding of the American business environment, not to mention English-language communication skills, the quality of their work falls far short of that of the experienced American workers whom they have displaced. But too many CEOs and CIOs who want to cut corners to improve their short-term results make use of these H-1b workers in droves.

I am one of the 99ers.

At the age of 57, I am one of those who are considered “too old to rehire, and too young to retire.”

If Barack Hussein Obama has his way, there will never be a job at a living wage for the likes of me.

Having been laid off from an IT job early in 2008, I am one of those who have no more unemployment benefits. I am currently working as a part-time retail clerk, at minimum wage. To put it bluntly, I am a diligent and reliable worker with a clean record and a cooperative attitude, and I am exceedingly frugal, but it is flat-out impossible to survive on what I earn. I have requested more hours, but business has been much too slow.

Unless my situation drastically improves after the beginning of 2011, I am seriously considering emigration.


Also see:


Originally posted on 1389 Blog.


Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

131 Responses to “Who Are The 99ers?”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Prebanned
    1 | December 25, 2010 6:40 pm

    Awesome post, please run for public office.


  2. m
    2 | December 25, 2010 6:43 pm

    Obama boom go BOOM!


  3. lobo91
    3 | December 25, 2010 7:05 pm

    When asked about the future of the 99ers earlier this week, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said that the President intends to focus on job creation.

    Of course, he said exactly the same thing a year ago.

    And the year before that.

    Maybe he should “focus” on something else for awhile…


  4. 4 | December 25, 2010 7:10 pm

    99 weeks of unemployment – unreal. When the bottom fell completely out of the hydrocarbon buisness in 86, I got 12 weeks of a very small unemplyment check and that was it. Nobody in DC or anywhere else stood up in public demanding me and my colleagues get more, I assure you. In fact, since the price of oil had fallen by 2/3rds in a mere 6 months, the majority of the country was dancing in the streets. We just had to root hog or die.


  5. 5 | December 25, 2010 7:11 pm

    Even if these people are able to survive until retirement age, their Social Security payments will be merely a pittance – payments are based on income of the most recent year. These people’s savings and investments have been decimated while just trying to keep what they have.

    We’re discarding the futures of at least two generations; those at the beginning of their careers who will have lost years of progress, and those at the end who’s achievements have been rendered worthless.


  6. mawskrat
    6 | December 25, 2010 7:14 pm

    I was smart I became a plumber


  7. Prebanned
    7 | December 25, 2010 7:15 pm

    mawskrat wrote:

    I was smart I became a plumber

    The plumber is the natural enemy of the electrician.


  8. Da_Beerfreak
    8 | December 25, 2010 7:16 pm

    MacDuff wrote:

    Even if these people are able to survive until retirement age, their Social Security payments will be merely a pittance – payments are based on income of the most recent year. These people’s savings and investments have been decimated while just trying to keep what they have.
    We’re discarding the futures of at least two generations; those at the beginning of their careers who will have lost years of progress, and those at the end who’s achievements have been rendered worthless.

    When the shit finally hits the fan it’s really going to be ugly. Civil War 2.0 is coming. It’s only a question of when and what form it will take when it gets here. :evil:


  9. Bumr50
    9 | December 25, 2010 7:16 pm

    The Obama administration, the Progressives, and our courts (for the most part) have no REAL intention of addressing your plight, the plight of so many.

    In my view, the problem is simple : redistribution of wealth.

    Redistribution far beyond (but not apart from) any ridiculous legislation proposed or passed in DC.

    A far too large percentage of those in power are actually quite happy that you are suffering, though they dare not utter that sentiment aloud.

    In their view, we are being put in our proper place as a nation.

    I was blessed to have found truly gainful in the natural gas field, yet everywhere I look there are groups looking to legislate this wealth producing phenomenon locally out of existence. You cannot truly gauge to what degree until you are actually involved.

    They quite literally HATE profit.

    I’m not sure how we are ever going to move forward economically as a nation when every profitable, productive thing is demonized out of existence.


  10. mawskrat
    10 | December 25, 2010 7:18 pm

    yeh I drill the holes and come back and there are wires
    run through them.

    // we can both hate dry wallers though


  11. mjazz
    11 | December 25, 2010 7:18 pm

    @ Prebanned:
    How come?


  12. Prebanned
    12 | December 25, 2010 7:18 pm

    MacDuff wrote:

    Even if these people are able to survive until retirement age, their Social Security payments will be merely a pittance – payments are based on income of the most recent year. These people’s savings and investments have been decimated while just trying to keep what they have.
    We’re discarding the futures of at least two generations; those at the beginning of their careers who will have lost years of progress, and those at the end who’s achievements have been rendered worthless.

    But the Boomers are well and truely screwed.


  13. grambo
    13 | December 25, 2010 7:20 pm

    @ MacDuff:
    While I agree with your point, you may want to check the “payments are based on …” part. In fact, it is based on most of one’s work history and how near to the maximum eligible for FICA withholding one makes in each of those years


  14. Prebanned
    14 | December 25, 2010 7:21 pm

    @ mjazz:
    I don’t do much residential, but when I do, there is always a blaganfrackish pipe in the way.


  15. mjazz
    15 | December 25, 2010 7:23 pm

    I’m a 99er. Apply for jobs, go on the interview, and see the same help wanted ad for the same job still there months later.
    When I run out of money in a year they’ll tax me 30% for cashing in my retirement, and then tax it again as money earned in the fiscal year, IIRC.


  16. Prebanned
    16 | December 25, 2010 7:25 pm

    @ mawskrat:
    To be fair, electricians are thier own worst enemy, usually conduit is run in a workmanlike manner that completely blocks all future conduit runs.


  17. 17 | December 25, 2010 7:25 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Drudge had a thing on just that the other day. It was kind of subtle, but he had links to the current “focus” comments, and the one the year before that, and the one before that. God help us if Obama really focuses. He’ll destroy the entire job market for all of us.


  18. mawskrat
    18 | December 25, 2010 7:25 pm

    @ Prebanned:
    yeah I started in residential and ended up
    working at a university / hospital as a Master Plumber


  19. grambo
    19 | December 25, 2010 7:27 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    I’m a 99er. Apply for jobs, go on the interview, and see the same help wanted ad for the same job still there months later.
    When I run out of money in a year they’ll tax me 30% for cashing in my retirement, and then tax it again as money earned in the fiscal year, IIRC.

    No, the only real penalty is 10% … and you may get a hardship exemption. Whoever disburses the funds will, however, have to Withhold 20% of it toward reporting it as ordinary income.


  20. Prebanned
    20 | December 25, 2010 7:28 pm

    @ mjazz:
    Stinks.


  21. lobo91
    21 | December 25, 2010 7:28 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Yeah…he does seem to have a reverse Midas touch…


  22. lobo91
    22 | December 25, 2010 7:29 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Apply for jobs, go on the interview, and see the same help wanted ad for the same job still there months later.

    My experience is much the same, without the pesky interview part.

    I can’t even seem to get one of those…


  23. mjazz
    23 | December 25, 2010 7:30 pm

    @ grambo:
    Where does the 20% go?


  24. mawskrat
    24 | December 25, 2010 7:30 pm

    the great thing about trade work is the side work
    you get


  25. lobo91
    25 | December 25, 2010 7:31 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ grambo:
    Where does the 20% go?

    Obama’s stash…


  26. grambo
    26 | December 25, 2010 7:32 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ grambo:
    Where does the 20% go?

    To Uncle Sugar …. just like the withholding from a regular paycheck.


  27. 27 | December 25, 2010 7:33 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    Awesome post, please run for public office.

    Awwww, thanks!

    I have actually thought about it, but I don’t think it’d be wise. My husband and I both have waaaay too many physical infirmities to pull that off. In addition, we have some security issues that would likely result in bad things happening to us if we were to assume a higher profile than we have been doing.


  28. mjazz
    28 | December 25, 2010 7:33 pm

    @ lobo91:
    I’ve only had maybe a couple of those myself. Applying online is a hell of a lot better than schlepping all over creation applying in person, as it used to be. I try to use gas now as little as possible.


  29. mjazz
    29 | December 25, 2010 7:35 pm

    @ grambo:
    So it does amount to 30%. I was just wrong about being taxed twice.
    I’m thinking there may be some kind of hardship exemption by that time.
    Unless unicorns come to the door with bags of money.


  30. Prebanned
    30 | December 25, 2010 7:36 pm

    @ mawskrat:
    I became unemployed in 2009, started my own thing wanting to do industrial controls, ended up scraping by on residential and the occasional industrial/commercial job nobody else wanted to tackle.
    Developed a reputation, started pulling in industrial control jobs and trouble calls. Got enough industrial customers to make it now but it took a year.


  31. 31 | December 25, 2010 7:36 pm

    @ grambo:It’s witholding from earnings, so how much the feds get to keep has to be figured out on your trusty 1040.


  32. Prebanned
    32 | December 25, 2010 7:37 pm

    @ lobo91:
    I did my three contacts a week for 6 months, and nothing.


  33. 33 | December 25, 2010 7:37 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    99 weeks of unemployment – unreal. When the bottom fell completely out of the hydrocarbon buisness in 86, I got 12 weeks of a very small unemplyment check and that was it. Nobody in DC or anywhere else stood up in public demanding me and my colleagues get more, I assure you. In fact, since the price of oil had fallen by 2/3rds in a mere 6 months, the majority of the country was dancing in the streets. We just had to root hog or die.

    That’s what we have been doing. There is nothing for us to root up any more. I’m rooting as hard as I can and coming up with not nearly enough to live on. Them’s the facts!

    Look at the chart in the article. 1986 was not a year of widespread economic recession; thus, the bottom dropping out of one industry did not make it so that you could no longer find ANY work in ANY industry that would pay enough to live on.

    Therein lies the difference.


  34. grambo
    34 | December 25, 2010 7:38 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    @ grambo:It’s witholding from earnings, so how much the feds get to keep has to be figured out on your trusty 1040.

    Yes. Just like regular earnings. You may or may not get some back the following year when you file.
    But they hang on to your 20% until you do.


  35. 35 | December 25, 2010 7:39 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    I did my three contacts a week for 6 months, and nothing.

    I have done a helluva lot more than three contacts a week, for well over two years!

    Once in a great while I’ve gotten a phone interview. Occasionally, I get a rejection by email. In the vast majority of instances, absolutely no response whatsoever.

    The ONLY job offer I have had in well over two years is for the part-time retail work, which I accepted.


  36. Prebanned
    36 | December 25, 2010 7:39 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    Oh yeah.
    Is there any way you could start your own business?


  37. 37 | December 25, 2010 7:41 pm

    Bumr50 wrote:

    The Obama administration, the Progressives, and our courts (for the most part) have no REAL intention of addressing your plight, the plight of so many.
    In my view, the problem is simple : redistribution of wealth.
    Redistribution far beyond (but not apart from) any ridiculous legislation proposed or passed in DC.
    A far too large percentage of those in power are actually quite happy that you are suffering, though they dare not utter that sentiment aloud.
    In their view, we are being put in our proper place as a nation.
    I was blessed to have found truly gainful in the natural gas field, yet everywhere I look there are groups looking to legislate this wealth producing phenomenon locally out of existence. You cannot truly gauge to what degree until you are actually involved.
    They quite literally HATE profit.
    I’m not sure how we are ever going to move forward economically as a nation when every profitable, productive thing is demonized out of existence.

    You could submit that thread as an article in and of itself.


  38. 38 | December 25, 2010 7:44 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    Oh yeah.
    Is there any way you could start your own business?

    Me? No. I don’t have expertise in anything that could be used as the basis for starting a business. Nor do I have any capital for that. In addition, I would not have any way to get health insurance, and I have too many health issues to afford to pay for it on my own.

    The bottom has dropped out of the field that I have experience in (namely, mainframe computer work) so I got retrained in Microsoft network admin. Unfortunately, at my age, nobody will hire me for that either, unless I have some experience to go along with the certification, which I haven’t been able to get.

    This is a horrifically bad time for ANYBODY to be starting a business.

    At this point, I want to take a shot at getting people’s attention to correct the things in the economy that are causing this situation. The biggest issue right now is terminating H-1B, along with eliminating all of the incentives for outsourcing and offshoring.


  39. 39 | December 25, 2010 7:45 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    99 weeks of unemployment – unreal. When the bottom fell completely out of the hydrocarbon buisness in 86, I got 12 weeks of a very small unemplyment check and that was it. Nobody in DC or anywhere else stood up in public demanding me and my colleagues get more, I assure you. In fact, since the price of oil had fallen by 2/3rds in a mere 6 months, the majority of the country was dancing in the streets. We just had to root hog or die.
    That’s what we have been doing. There is nothing for us to root up any more. I’m rooting as hard as I can and coming up with not nearly enough to live on. Them’s the facts!
    Look at the chart in the article. 1986 was not a year of widespread economic recession; thus, the bottom dropping out of one industry did not make it so that you could no longer find ANY work in ANY industry that would pay enough to live on.
    Therein lies the difference.

    So, have you tried to convince somebody that your skills in one industry qualifies you for a job in their completely unrelated industry ? I have – didn’t work out at all.


  40. 40 | December 25, 2010 7:46 pm

    I have in My House one of my Step dad’s relatives who’s in the Colombian armed forces. He’s ex AUC but joined the regular forces in 2003. He goes to Israel often, I’m getting some juicy information.

    In short, Obama is trying to block Israel from selling Colombians the Merkava.

    I’ll report more in a bit.


  41. savages_girl
    41 | December 25, 2010 7:46 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Hey Lobo!

    Happy Birthday!


  42. Prebanned
    42 | December 25, 2010 7:46 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    I never even got anything back from the innertubes.
    I applied at all the local places in person and no luck.


  43. lobo91
    43 | December 25, 2010 7:47 pm

    @ Mike C.:

    So, have you tried to convince somebody that your skills in one industry qualifies you for a job in their completely unrelated industry ? I have – didn’t work out at all.

    These days, it’s rare enough to actually get to talk to a human, much less convince them of anything.


  44. lobo91
    44 | December 25, 2010 7:48 pm

    @ savages_girl:

    Thanks


  45. 45 | December 25, 2010 7:49 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    So, have you tried to convince somebody that your skills in one industry qualifies you for a job in their completely unrelated industry ? I have – didn’t work out at all.

    Well…I got the job in retail. Pretty much unrelated to IT work.

    In better times, there would be enough hours of work in the store, where I could make a living at it until something else became available.


  46. mjazz
    46 | December 25, 2010 7:49 pm

    @ Prebanned:
    I think they are hanging on to the cream of the crop resumes and when they think the economy may be making a turn for the better, pick the ‘winner’.


  47. lobo91
    47 | December 25, 2010 7:49 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    Oh yeah.
    Is there any way you could start your own business?

    My response to people who asked me that was usually to mention that doing so in my field (military) is illegal in most jurisdictions.

    I guess my current venture is about as close as I could come…


  48. mawskrat
    48 | December 25, 2010 7:51 pm

    @ Prebanned:

    I remember in the early 90′s DDC was just becoming
    a big deal where I worked


  49. 49 | December 25, 2010 7:51 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    I never even got anything back from the innertubes.
    I applied at all the local places in person and no luck.

    I pestered people in person over and over for months on end to get this job.

    However, on account of my not earning enough to keep going, my husband and I are considering leaving to go to some other state or country where the unemployment rate is lower, to see if I might possibly get back into IT work. He is disabled but does some work when he can, and might be able to find something for himself to do there too.

    I’m going to tell my employer that I really need a lot more hours in order to survive. If they are not in a position to give me a lot more hours, I am probably going to have to try someplace like Texas…or perhaps overseas. Trouble is, it costs a ton of money to move, even though we live in a motorhome. Fuel is expensive.


  50. savages_girl
    50 | December 25, 2010 7:52 pm

    I remember when I was on unemployment, it was barely enough to live on. Took three unemployment checks just to pay my rent. Then they only allowed you 6 months of unemployment. At least they’ve extended it for people in need. I now how stressful that can be. Believe me, I’m very grateful to have a (decent) job.


  51. grambo
    51 | December 25, 2010 7:53 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ Prebanned:
    I think they are hanging on to the cream of the crop resumes and when they think the economy may be making a turn for the better, pick the ‘winner’.

    That is correct … at least in my own experience.
    One of our departments has been understaffed by three for the past three years. We are now, finally, being allowed to hire ONE person. HR showed me a stack of resumes two feet tall.
    Of course, we have to post the job internally first …. including our operations in Honduras, Mexico, etc.etc.
    There was a time when I was proud of who I worked for …..


  52. Prebanned
    52 | December 25, 2010 7:54 pm

    @ mjazz:
    I will never take another job as long as I live. I still have to make My customers happy. In a sense, they are my boss. But I can’t get fired, and if I work my tail off, I get paid more because I’m not on salary.


  53. Prebanned
    53 | December 25, 2010 7:58 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    At least you won’t have to pack.


  54. 54 | December 25, 2010 7:59 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Mike C.:
    So, have you tried to convince somebody that your skills in one industry qualifies you for a job in their completely unrelated industry ? I have – didn’t work out at all.
    These days, it’s rare enough to actually get to talk to a human, much less convince them of anything.

    I pretty much gave up looking for “permanent” jobs about 10 years ago.


  55. swamprat
    55 | December 25, 2010 7:59 pm

    I thought Obama had finally discovered that he had to support industry in order to promote job growth.

    Then a coworker pointed out that he only tossed a few crumbs because he was forced to by the new power shift from the elections.


  56. mjazz
    56 | December 25, 2010 8:00 pm

    @ Prebanned:
    That’s the way to go.


  57. 57 | December 25, 2010 8:00 pm

    swamprat wrote:

    I thought Obama had finally discovered that he had to support industry in order to promote job growth.
    Then a coworker pointed out that he only tossed a few crumbs because he was forced to by the new power shift from the elections.

    And all those crumbs have strings attached to them and will be yanked back before they can have any significant impact.


  58. lobo91
    58 | December 25, 2010 8:01 pm

    swamprat wrote:

    I thought Obama had finally discovered that he had to support industry in order to promote job growth.
    Then a coworker pointed out that he only tossed a few crumbs because he was forced to by the new power shift from the elections.

    That’s the beauty of having idiotic supporters. He doesn’t have to actually do anything. He just has to say that he’s doing something, and they all believe him…

    How are all those new nuclear power plants coming along that he promised to support last January?


  59. mjazz
    59 | December 25, 2010 8:04 pm

    I had a Mitsubishi with a plow attachment that I bought from my father, but I didn’t use it because I didn’t want to mess up the front end.
    Eventually junked it, shoulda beat the shit out of it.


  60. 60 | December 25, 2010 8:04 pm

    OK, now this is cool….


  61. 61 | December 25, 2010 8:05 pm

    swamprat wrote:

    I thought Obama had finally discovered that he had to support industry in order to promote job growth.
    Then a coworker pointed out that he only tossed a few crumbs because he was forced to by the new power shift from the elections.

    Obama promised no more outsourcing. Yet his stimulus has given billions overseas.


  62. swamprat
    62 | December 25, 2010 8:07 pm

    Funny about those bills that passed without being read. Wonder what sort of stuff is hidden in all that verbage.


  63. 63 | December 25, 2010 8:07 pm

    swamprat wrote:

    Funny about those bills that passed without being read. Wonder what sort of stuff is hidden in all that verbage.

    Exactly!


  64. 64 | December 25, 2010 8:08 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    swamprat wrote:
    I thought Obama had finally discovered that he had to support industry in order to promote job growth.
    Then a coworker pointed out that he only tossed a few crumbs because he was forced to by the new power shift from the elections.
    That’s the beauty of having idiotic supporters. He doesn’t have to actually do anything. He just has to say that he’s doing something, and they all believe him…
    How are all those new nuclear power plants coming along that he promised to support last January?

    Yup, it’s a genuine wonder that Obama worshipers brains generate enough electricity to keep their bodies moving.


  65. lobo91
    65 | December 25, 2010 8:09 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    I want one of those…


  66. mawskrat
    66 | December 25, 2010 8:10 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    I still like my local bar tender


  67. 67 | December 25, 2010 8:10 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    swamprat wrote:
    Funny about those bills that passed without being read. Wonder what sort of stuff is hidden in all that verbage.

    Exactly!

    Hmmm, maybe we can get a legislative malfeasance law passed and then prosecute those that signed legislation that they never read?


  68. lobo91
    68 | December 25, 2010 8:10 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Reminds me of the idiots who were going on all the talk shows last week touting how much Obama’s done for border security.

    The funeral of that dead Border Patrol agent didn’t even slow them down…


  69. 69 | December 25, 2010 8:11 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ 1389AD:
    At least you won’t have to pack.

    That’s true – and that figured in our decision to move into the motorhome. We did that so that we could move to wherever the work is; at that time, there actually was some.

    If we end up having to emigrate, we’ll either have to sell the motorhome (in which case, we’ll have to fix it up somewhat first) or sign it over to my husband’s daughter. We don’t have that much to pack, but it’s still costly to move.


  70. Prebanned
    70 | December 25, 2010 8:13 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    I would pay dearly for a self-filling beer cup.


  71. 71 | December 25, 2010 8:13 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    swamprat wrote:
    I thought Obama had finally discovered that he had to support industry in order to promote job growth.
    Then a coworker pointed out that he only tossed a few crumbs because he was forced to by the new power shift from the elections.
    Obama promised no more outsourcing. Yet his stimulus has given billions overseas.

    As our representative Joe Wilson pointed out, the dude’s a liar.

    Or his speechwriters are; after all, Obozo can’t even call his dog without a teleprompter.


  72. 72 | December 25, 2010 8:14 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Reminds me of the idiots who were going on all the talk shows last week touting how much Obama’s done for border security.
    The funeral of that dead Border Patrol agent didn’t even slow them down…

    Yup, kind of like Barney Franks and the question about gays using the same showers as straights, then when asked if women and men should be forced to use the same showers, his response without hesitation was… Ewww no that would be icky, but it would be unacceptable discrimination for gays and straights to not shower together.


  73. mjazz
    73 | December 25, 2010 8:14 pm

    @ Rodan:
    Well, see, once their standard of living is up to ours, they’ll be able to charge us as much as it would cost to produce something here.


  74. swamprat
    74 | December 25, 2010 8:15 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    We need a law that all legislation be published for public examination before it is passed.( say 30 days) A website would be an ideal venue. Paper copies available for a nominal fee.


  75. 75 | December 25, 2010 8:16 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Barney Fag no doubt thinks heterosexual sex is icky. The human race should reproduce like lesbians do: with turkey-basters…


  76. 76 | December 25, 2010 8:16 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    He is a liar.


  77. 77 | December 25, 2010 8:17 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Well, see, once their standard of living is up to ours, they’ll be able to charge us as much as it would cost to produce something here.

    Or ours is down to theirs… :oops:


  78. mjazz
    78 | December 25, 2010 8:17 pm

    @ swamprat:
    I wish the non obvious ones had names attached to the earmarks.


  79. mawskrat
    79 | December 25, 2010 8:17 pm

    @ mjazz:

    we have to become a third world country first


  80. 80 | December 25, 2010 8:18 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Reminds me of the idiots who were going on all the talk shows last week touting how much Obama’s done for border security.
    The funeral of that dead Border Patrol agent didn’t even slow them down…

    Meanwhile he is against making the E-Verify system mandatory.


  81. 81 | December 25, 2010 8:18 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Barney Fag no doubt thinks heterosexual sex is icky. The human race should reproduce like lesbians do: with turkey-basters…

    To bad we cant get a court to order a late term abortion on Bawney Fwanks… ( a really really really late term abortion)


  82. Prebanned
    82 | December 25, 2010 8:18 pm

    @ 1389AD:
    I lived in a travel trailer while I went to college on the GI bill.
    Easy to clean. My electric bill was $35.
    That thing should at least get 6 MPG, You could go for 50 cents per mile and have a place to live when you got there.


  83. mjazz
    83 | December 25, 2010 8:19 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    That’s right. That 50 dollar chain saw isn’t so cheap when I’m making just above minimum.


  84. 84 | December 25, 2010 8:20 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    @ doriangrey:
    Reminds me of the idiots who were going on all the talk shows last week touting how much Obama’s done for border security.
    The funeral of that dead Border Patrol agent didn’t even slow them down…

    Meanwhile he is against making the E-Verify system mandatory.

    And against requiring every voter to show proof of citizenship before being allowed to vote.


  85. Macker
    85 | December 25, 2010 8:20 pm

    Regarding Барни Франк: Is this your Christmas Wish too?


  86. 86 | December 25, 2010 8:21 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    I think it is really sad that Ann Dunham didn’t have access to safe and legal abortion. Really, really sad…


  87. swamprat
    87 | December 25, 2010 8:21 pm

    The last time I checked, five states had unemployment levels equal to, or greater than, the worst Katrina levels in Louisianna.
    And Nevada’s graph looked like a bottle rocket.


  88. 88 | December 25, 2010 8:23 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Barney Fag no doubt thinks heterosexual sex is icky. The human race should reproduce like lesbians do: with turkey-basters…

    We need to put in a “puke” emoticon somehow. :mrgreen:


  89. Prebanned
    89 | December 25, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    It would change nothing, the idiots who voted for Barney would just vote for another loon.
    I used to shower with 14 other guys at a time, I would shower with Barney if I could then take Him on a two week hike. He would probably give up the first day.


  90. mjazz
    90 | December 25, 2010 8:25 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    …Dunham’s daughter, Maya Soetoro-Ng

    I didn’t know he had a sister, or step sister.


  91. 91 | December 25, 2010 8:26 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:

    I think it is really sad that Ann Dunham didn’t have access to safe and legal abortion. Really, really sad…

    Would you date a woman named Stanley? How about Albert?


  92. 92 | December 25, 2010 8:26 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    You can skin the wordpress emoticons, but they just show up differently on your machine. It’d be a pain in the ass to get us all using the same ones. Wah :cry:


  93. mjazz
    93 | December 25, 2010 8:26 pm

    @ mjazz:
    OK, half sister.


  94. 94 | December 25, 2010 8:28 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    I think it is really sad that Ann Dunham didn’t have access to safe and legal abortion. Really, really sad…

    Frank Marshall Davis knocked her up! Poor Obama Sr. he saw the kid wasn’t his.


  95. 95 | December 25, 2010 8:28 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Half sister. He doesn’t seem like much of a family guy. “Cold fish” I believe fits him best, and that extends to his daughters. He let them grow up listening to Rev.Wright. If that ain’t child abuse, not much is.


  96. Brick
    96 | December 25, 2010 8:28 pm

    It’s hard to grasp that less than 600 people can make such a mess of things for 300 million.

    435 Reps
    100 Sens
    1 Pres
    9 SC Justices
    and a buncha’ Czars and Cabinet Heads.


  97. 97 | December 25, 2010 8:29 pm

    Stanley Ann majored in anthropology. Now that explains a few things but I won’t say just in case someone might call me …..


  98. 98 | December 25, 2010 8:30 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ 1389AD:

    You can skin the wordpress emoticons, but they just show up differently on your machine. It’d be a pain in the ass to get us all using the same ones. Wah

    Skin?


  99. swamprat
    99 | December 25, 2010 8:30 pm

    Here is a handy link. You can click and unclick various states as you choose. Left click and choose “open in new window”.
    http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=usunemployment&met=unemployment_rate&tdim=true&dl=en&hl=en&q=%22current+unemployment+rate%22+graph


  100. lobo91
    100 | December 25, 2010 8:30 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    Stanley Ann majored in anthropology. Now that explains a few things but I won’t say just in case someone might call me …..

    Reportedly, the reason she dumped her second husband is that he became too westernized.

    She was a seriously whacked out woman…


  101. mjazz
    101 | December 25, 2010 8:31 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    It will be interesting to see how his daughters turn out.


  102. Prebanned
    102 | December 25, 2010 8:31 pm

    @ Brick:
    What’s also sad is how hard it is to come up with replacements for these bozo’s. How in the world did so many get re-elected?


  103. 103 | December 25, 2010 8:32 pm

    Grimcargo wrote:

    Stanley Ann majored in anthropology. Now that explains a few things but I won’t say just in case someone might call me …..

    Frank Marshall David were her trainer. Obama was the result.

    Obama Sr. was the sucker who claimed the kid. It wasn’t his. It was Frank.

    Pictures don’t lie.


  104. Macker
    104 | December 25, 2010 8:32 pm

    Brick wrote:

    It’s hard to grasp that less than 600 people can make such a mess of things for 300 million.

    435 Reps
    100 Sens
    1 Pres
    9 4 SC Justices
    and a buncha’ Czars and Cabinet Heads.

    I’m fixing this one for you, because the SCOTUS Justice we have to be concerned about are Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg, and Breyer. The rest we pray for their well being and good health.


  105. 105 | December 25, 2010 8:32 pm

    @ lobo91:

    The reason Obama Sr. left her was because the kids wasn’t his.


  106. lobo91
    106 | December 25, 2010 8:32 pm

    mjazz wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    It will be interesting to see how his daughters turn out.

    He’ll probably marry them off to tribal leaders in exchange for some goats…


  107. 107 | December 25, 2010 8:32 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Grimcargo wrote:

    Stanley Ann majored in anthropology. Now that explains a few things but I won’t say just in case someone might call me …..

    Reportedly, the reason she dumped her second husband is that he became too westernized.

    She was a seriously whacked out woman…

    Yeah and I think her mom and daddy were just as whacked as she was.


  108. swamprat
    108 | December 25, 2010 8:33 pm

    @ swamprat:
    Dammit, right click.


  109. 109 | December 25, 2010 8:33 pm

    Macker… Found this at the bottom of that link… Now this is just plain funny… :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Macker wrote:

    Regarding Барни Франк: Is this your Christmas Wish too?


  110. mjazz
    110 | December 25, 2010 8:33 pm

    @ swamprat:
    I wonder what happened in 2008?/


  111. Brick
    111 | December 25, 2010 8:35 pm

    @ Macker:
    Fair enough.


  112. swamprat
    112 | December 25, 2010 8:39 pm

    @ mjazz:
    The evil bush regime left the noble democrats with

    a president who openly was anti- industr…

    I mean, housing bubble caused by banks strong armed into selling houses to people who couldn’t affor

    Look! a shiny!


  113. 113 | December 25, 2010 8:39 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 1389 and Inside USAID, The Blogmocracy. The Blogmocracy said: Who Are The #99ers? http://goo.gl/fb/eTOZu #barackobama #china #economy #socialism #tranzis #immigration #h1b [...]


  114. Macker
    114 | December 25, 2010 8:40 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    ROFLMAIAO!


  115. lobo91
    115 | December 25, 2010 8:41 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    This is why I don’t go home for Christmas anymore…


  116. mjazz
    116 | December 25, 2010 8:42 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    That was swell!


  117. mjazz
    117 | December 25, 2010 8:43 pm

    @ mjazz:
    * remember, you saw that word resurrected here first 8)


  118. lobo91
    118 | December 25, 2010 8:46 pm

    @ mjazz:

    Maybe we could convince the Secret Service that Obama was bitten by a zombie…


  119. 119 | December 25, 2010 8:48 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ mjazz:
    Maybe we could convince the Secret Service that Obama was bitten by a zombie…

    ROTFLMAO… If only…. :mrgreen:


  120. Brick
    120 | December 25, 2010 8:51 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    @ mjazz:
    Maybe we could convince the Secret Service that Obama was bitten by a zombie…

    ROTFLMAO… If only….

    “Teleprompter:

    Okay, now act like a zombie.”

    Shouldn’t be too tough, you think?


  121. 121 | December 25, 2010 8:53 pm

    ROTFLMAO… another really great video from Kicking and Screaming H/T Macker… This one is seriously for lobo…


  122. 122 | December 25, 2010 8:55 pm

    @ lobo91:

    How swould you tell? Off prompter, he’s pretty inarticulate…


  123. lobo91
    123 | December 25, 2010 8:59 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Two paws up!


  124. lobo91
    124 | December 25, 2010 8:59 pm

    This one is pretty amusing:


  125. swamprat
    125 | December 25, 2010 9:00 pm

    The state with unemployment rate greater than 10.6 percent( which Louisianna had during Katrina)

    Rhode Island 11 percent
    Florida 11.6 percent
    California 12 percent
    Michigan 12 percent
    and the winner is
    NEVADA! 13.7 percent

    Nevada! you have been hit hardest by a force more damaging than hurricane Katrina!

    Hurricane Obama! Five states and holding strong, but down from the 7 previously held.


  126. The Osprey
    126 | December 25, 2010 9:05 pm

    @ lobo91:

    ROFLMAO!


  127. Calo
    127 | December 25, 2010 9:07 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Glocks!
    LMAO
    Aren’t all guns shiny black?


  128. lobo91
    128 | December 25, 2010 9:08 pm

    “So, let me get this straight: Your original plan was to get an expensive assault rifle with a ton of ammo, 2 Glocks, a plate carrier with no plate, and a bunch of needless gear and head for the mountains, where you have no experience, and live out the rest of your life with a bunch of other idiots not unlike yourself, spending your days cold and starving to death with your cool special warfare wannabe gear?”

    “Basically, yeah”


  129. lobo91
    129 | December 25, 2010 9:09 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Glocks!
    LMAO
    Aren’t all guns shiny black?

    No. Cool guns are flat black.
    //


  130. Brick
    130 | December 25, 2010 9:25 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Excellent!

    At first I thought this was an Arfcom gig, but then after the crack, I figured it was done by someone on lightfighter.

    Besides, everyone knows all you need is one K-31 for distance, a 1911 for up close, and a dozen Glocks for area denial. Just pull the pin on a Glock and toss. :)


  131. 131 | December 25, 2010 10:33 pm

    Late to this thread. There’s another graph prepared by the same guy here:
    http://cr4re.com/charts/chart-images/EmploymentRecessionsNov.jpg
    Note that the current recession (red) stops at Month 35. This sets Month 0 at January 2009, the month the democrats took control of Congress.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David