First time visitor? Learn more.

Friday with the ‘hammer – About that transparency thing

by Speranza ( 161 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Health Care, Republican Party at December 31st, 2010 - 2:00 pm

A perfect example as to how Democrats view politics is their attempts to get “end of life counseling” past a sleeping public. Obama and his cronies have the mentality of  third world dictators who prefer the  dictating to actually getting their hands dirty with work.  If  you think that The One is a left-wing, hard driving, ideologue, just wait and see what will happen if he gets a second term.

by Charles Krauthammer

Most people don’t remember Obamacare’s notorious Section 1233, mandating government payments for end-of-life counseling. It aroused so much anxiety as a possible first slippery step on the road to state-mandated late-life rationing that the Senate never included it in the final health-care law.

Well, it’s back – by administrative fiat. A month ago, Medicare issued a regulation providing for end-of-life counseling during annual “wellness” visits. It was all nicely buried amid the simultaneous release of hundreds of new Medicare rules.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), author of Section 1233, was delighted. “Mr. Blumenauer’s office celebrated ‘a quiet victory,’ but urged supporters not to crow about it,” reports the New York Times. Deathly quiet. In early November, his office sent an e-mail plea to supporters: “We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists . . . e-mails can too easily be forwarded.” They had been lucky that “thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it. . . . The longer this [regulation] goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it.”

So much for the Democrats’ transparency – and for their repeated claim that the more people learn what is in the health-care law, the more they will like it. Turns out ignorance is the Democrats’ best hope.

And regulation is their perfect vehicle – so much quieter than legislation. Consider two other regulatory usurpations in just the past few days:

On Dec. 23, the Interior Department issued Secretarial Order 3310, reversing a 2003 decision and giving itself the authority to designate public lands as “Wild Lands.” A clever twofer: (1) a bureaucratic power grab – for seven years up through Dec. 22, wilderness designation had been the exclusive province of Congress, and (2) a leftward lurch – more land to be “protected” from such nefarious uses as domestic oil exploration in a country disastrously dependent on foreign sources.

The very same day, the Environmental Protection Agency declared that in 2011 it would begin drawing up anti-carbon regulations on oil refineries and power plants, another power grab effectively enacting what Congress had firmly rejected when presented as cap-and-trade legislation.

For an Obama bureaucrat, however, the will of Congress is a mere speed bump. Hence this regulatory trifecta, each one moving smartly left – and nicely clarifying what the spirit of bipartisan compromise that President Obama heralded in his post-lame-duck Dec. 22 news conference was really about: a shift to the center for public consumption and political appearance only.

[...]

It’s Obama’s only way forward during the next two years. He will never get past the half-Republican 112th Congress what he could not get past the overwhelmingly Democratic 111th. He doesn’t have the votes and he surely doesn’t want the publicity. Hence the quiet resurrection, as it were, of end-of-life counseling.

Obama knows he has only so many years to change the country. In his first two, he achieved much: the first stimulus, Obamacare and financial regulation. For the next two, however, the Republican House will prevent any repetition of that. Obama’s agenda will therefore have to be advanced by the more subterranean means of rule-by-regulation.

But this must simultaneously be mixed with ostentatious displays of legislative bipartisanship (e.g., the lame-duck tax-cut deal) in order to pull off the (apparent) centrist repositioning required for reelection. This, in turn, would grant Obama four more years when, freed from the need for pretense, he can reassert himself ideologically and complete the social-democratic transformation – begun Jan. 20, 2009; derailed Nov. 2, 2010 – that is the mission of his presidency.

Read the rest: Government by regulation.  Shhhh.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

161 Responses to “Friday with the ‘hammer – About that transparency thing”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | December 31, 2010 2:04 pm

    Obama is emulating his former friend now foe, Hugo Chavez.


  2. Nevergiveup
    2 | December 31, 2010 2:05 pm

    I don’t mind a fight. Hey I love a fight. It keeps me young. I just hope my party grows a pair so I have a fight to fight


  3. Nevergiveup
    3 | December 31, 2010 2:07 pm

    Abbas lays first stone of Palestinian embassy in Brazil

    Doves released as PA president attends ceremony in Brasilia to place cornerstone in ground donated by Brazilian gov’t which will become first state-level Palestinian diplomatic mission in South America.

    So the ground is donated. It’s probably American Money building it. What a farce. And DOVES, DOVES, better to release vultures.


  4. buzzsawmonkey
    4 | December 31, 2010 2:08 pm

    Obama is transparent. Not honest, not trustworthy, not open.

    But transparent.


  5. 5 | December 31, 2010 2:09 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I don’t mind a fight. Hey I love a fight. It keeps me young. I just hope my party grows a pair so I have a fight to fight

    Thank you! That’s why I don’t like Boehner and McConnell. They are bunch of crybabies and chumps. I want a GOP that fights, not tries to get along.


  6. Nevergiveup
    6 | December 31, 2010 2:10 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I don’t mind a fight. Hey I love a fight. It keeps me young. I just hope my party grows a pair so I have a fight to fight

    Thank you! That’s why I don’t like Boehner and McConnell. They are bunch of crybabies and chumps. I want a GOP that fights, not tries to get along.

    Well hell I want to help Obama. Help him right out of Office!


  7. 7 | December 31, 2010 2:10 pm

    This is one thing we should raise as a campaign issue for 2012.

    So much for the Democrats’ transparency – and for their repeated claim that the more people learn what is in the health-care law, the more they will like it. Turns out ignorance is the Democrats’ best hope.

    These clowns, as part of the whole hopety change thing promised the most transparent Administration and Congress ever. The truth has been the exact opposite of course. Obama is going to spend the next two years speechifying as a tax reforming hawkish conservative while he governs somewhere to the left of Karl Marx. How will he accomplish this?

    And regulation is their perfect vehicle – so much quieter than legislation. Consider two other regulatory usurpations in just the past few days:

    The answer is through executive order, which will go completely unreported by the MSM.


  8. buzzsawmonkey
    8 | December 31, 2010 2:12 pm

    Flyovercountry wrote:

    part of the whole hopety change thing

    Since CAIR clearly has a friend in the White House, can we start calling its spokesman Hopety Hooper?


  9. 9 | December 31, 2010 2:13 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Exactly, fight him without mercy!


  10. 10 | December 31, 2010 2:15 pm

    Flyovercountry wrote:

    This is one thing we should raise as a campaign issue for 2012.
    So much for the Democrats’ transparency – and for their repeated claim that the more people learn what is in the health-care law, the more they will like it. Turns out ignorance is the Democrats’ best hope.
    These clowns, as part of the whole hopety change thing promised the most transparent Administration and Congress ever. The truth has been the exact opposite of course. Obama is going to spend the next two years speechifying as a tax reforming hawkish conservative while he governs somewhere to the left of Karl Marx. How will he accomplish this?
    And regulation is their perfect vehicle – so much quieter than legislation. Consider two other regulatory usurpations in just the past few days:
    The answer is through executive order, which will go completely unreported by the MSM.

    Or by regulatory agencies.

    It’s up to the State governors, the blogosphere, and the Tea Party to get the word out.

    We need to get back onto the streets with our signs and flags ASAP.


  11. 11 | December 31, 2010 2:16 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Flyovercountry wrote:
    part of the whole hopety change thing
    Since CAIR clearly has a friend in the White House, can we startlol: calling its spokesman Hopety Hooper?

    :lol:


  12. 12 | December 31, 2010 2:19 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Now that’s funny!


  13. 13 | December 31, 2010 2:20 pm

    Admins: There’s a Caturday post in the queue.


  14. rain of lead
    14 | December 31, 2010 2:23 pm

    things that make ya’ll go hmmmm…..

    Israel Confirms Discovery of Massive Natural Gas Field…

    Exploratory drilling off Israel’s northern coast this week has confirmed the existence of a major natural gas field — one of the world’s largest offshore gas finds of the past decade — leading the country’s infrastructure minister to call it “the most important energy news since the founding of the state.”

    Houston-based Noble Energy, which is working with several Israeli partner companies, said that the field, named Leviathan, whose existence was suspected months ago, has at least 16 trillion cubic feet of gas [wow],at a likely market value of tens of billions of dollars and should turn Israel into an energy exporter.

    Arabs to file a complaint with the UN in 3…2…1


  15. Nevergiveup
    15 | December 31, 2010 2:25 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    Arabs to file a complaint with the UN in 3…2…1

    They already did months ago.


  16. Speranza
    16 | December 31, 2010 2:28 pm

    Obama is a tenacious ideologue.


  17. Speranza
    17 | December 31, 2010 2:28 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    On what grounds dare I ask?


  18. rain of lead
    18 | December 31, 2010 2:28 pm

    gee, maybe the repubs might actually be playing to win

    “Uh-Oh: Think Progress Frets “Proposed House GOP Rules Give Rep. Ryan ‘Stunning And Unprecedented’ Power To Shape Budget”
    —Ace

    The incoming Republican majority in the House of Representatives has laid out a series of changes it would like to make to the House rules, including replacing the current “pay-go” rules — which require all spending increases to be offset with spending cuts or tax increases — with a rule called “cut-go,” which requires that new spending programs — but not new tax cuts — be offset with spending cuts. The GOP has also proposed a new rule requiring that each piece of new legislation include a statement justifying the legislation’s constitutionality.
    That’s not all, however. As National Journal reported today, “a little-noticed detail in the new rules proposed by House GOP leaders would greatly increase the power of Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., the incoming chairman of the House Budget Committee.” Indeed, under the proposed rules, if the House and Senate do not agree on a budget resolution (a distinct possibility with a divided Congress), Ryan will be able to unilaterally set spending levels that are binding on the House, and any attempt to lessen the impact of these cuts can be ruled out of order


  19. Da_Beerfreak
    19 | December 31, 2010 2:29 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    things that make ya’ll go hmmmm…..
    Israel Confirms Discovery of Massive Natural Gas Field…
    Exploratory drilling off Israel’s northern coast this week has confirmed the existence of a major natural gas field — one of the world’s largest offshore gas finds of the past decade — leading the country’s infrastructure minister to call it “the most important energy news since the founding of the state.”
    Houston-based Noble Energy, which is working with several Israeli partner companies, said that the field, named Leviathan, whose existence was suspected months ago, has at least 16 trillion cubic feet of gas [wow],at a likely market value of tens of billions of dollars and should turn Israel into an energy exporter.
    Arabs to file a complaint with the UN in 3…2…1

    I fully expect this to be the central issue in the next war. Lebanon is all ready making the claim that Israel is stealing “their” gas.


  20. Nevergiveup
    20 | December 31, 2010 2:32 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    On what grounds dare I ask?

    I don’t remember, but they need a reason?


  21. tanker on the horizon
    21 | December 31, 2010 2:34 pm

    “On Dec. 23, the Interior Department issued Secretarial Order 3310, reversing a 2003 decision and giving itself the authority to designate public lands as “Wild Lands.” A clever twofer: (1) a bureaucratic power grab – for seven years up through Dec. 22, wilderness designation had been the exclusive province of Congress, and (2) a leftward lurch – more land to be “protected” from such nefarious uses as domestic oil exploration in a country disastrously dependent on foreign sources.”

    What assholes!

    When gas hits $5 a gallon I’ll laugh in the face of Obama’s whining constituency. Ride fucking bikes, rump-swabs.


  22. snowcrash
    22 | December 31, 2010 2:34 pm

    Obama was all for promises of transparency on the campaign trail. Remember when he promised to post bills online for five days before he signs them? That sure worked out well.


  23. 23 | December 31, 2010 2:36 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    gee, maybe the repubs might actually be playing to win
    “Uh-Oh: Think Progress Frets “Proposed House GOP Rules Give Rep. Ryan ‘Stunning And Unprecedented’ Power To Shape Budget”
    —Ace
    The incoming Republican majority in the House of Representatives has laid out a series of changes it would like to make to the House rules, including replacing the current “pay-go” rules — which require all spending increases to be offset with spending cuts or tax increases — with a rule called “cut-go,” which requires that new spending programs — but not new tax cuts — be offset with spending cuts. The GOP has also proposed a new rule requiring that each piece of new legislation include a statement justifying the legislation’s constitutionality.
    That’s not all, however. As National Journal reported today, “a little-noticed detail in the new rules proposed by House GOP leaders would greatly increase the power of Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., the incoming chairman of the House Budget Committee.” Indeed, under the proposed rules, if the House and Senate do not agree on a budget resolution (a distinct possibility with a divided Congress), Ryan will be able to unilaterally set spending levels that are binding on the House, and any attempt to lessen the impact of these cuts can be ruled out of order

    heh heh heh, Obama might think he can rule be executive decree, but he cant spend one single dime to enforce his will if the house refuses to fund his shit.


  24. Da_Beerfreak
    24 | December 31, 2010 2:37 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    On what grounds dare I ask?

    I saw that a little while back myself but didn’t save a link for it. It’s something that is going to keep coming up. Any Israel drilling will be viewed a theft of a natural resource that Allah (pb&j) gave to his only chosen people the Arabs.


  25. buzzsawmonkey
    25 | December 31, 2010 2:38 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    heh heh heh, Obama might think he can rule be executive decree, but he cant spend one single dime to enforce his will if the house refuses to fund his shit.

    You don’t think he would issue executive orders regardless of whether there were funding or not? He’s already given away billions to favored constituencies with no accountability, the GAO has said the books are too messed up to audit, and the government has not shut down despite having failed to produce a budget for the just-ended year.

    How far away is that from ruling by executive decree and entirely disregarding Congress?


  26. taxfreekiller
    26 | December 31, 2010 2:39 pm

    Base Facts on how dumb commie crap is, “commie crap in action,,Hugo Chavez and his Venezoolala land.

    just google,,,venezuela defalues currency

    that way you get info on all 5 of Hugo’s moments in the sun


  27. buzzsawmonkey
    27 | December 31, 2010 2:40 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    Obama was all for promises of transparency on the campaign trail. Remember when he promised to post bills online for five days before he signs them? That sure worked out well.

    Mr. Public Funding for Everything also proclaimed he would abide by public-funding campaign finance limits—before he decided not to so that he could launder foreign donations and otherwise do end runs around campaign financing limitations.


  28. taxfreekiller
    28 | December 31, 2010 2:42 pm

    Moveing money from agency to agency goes on now inside the White House at light speed.

    Obama is a union thug crook, worse than a plain jane commie, the guy is a piggy bank robber.@ buzzsawmonkey:


  29. vagabond trader
    29 | December 31, 2010 2:43 pm

    I strongly disagree with Dr Ks suggestion we not fight he11care on the premise once people see what its about they’ll be hopping mad. No,people will cling bitterly to the entitlements as they start trickling in.Way too risky. Defund, block,and or let the courts decide,which I have less faith in than some.


  30. vagabond trader
    30 | December 31, 2010 2:45 pm

    @ tanker on the horizon:

    They want it more than $5.00,but its a start. Yeah,cannot wait til the lefturds here in the NE see their heating oil bills.


  31. 31 | December 31, 2010 2:47 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    heh heh heh, Obama might think he can rule be executive decree, but he cant spend one single dime to enforce his will if the house refuses to fund his shit.
    You don’t think he would issue executive orders regardless of whether there were funding or not? He’s already given away billions to favored constituencies with no accountability, the GAO has said the books are too messed up to audit, and the government has not shut down despite having failed to produce a budget for the just-ended year.
    How far away is that from ruling by executive decree and entirely disregarding Congress?

    You are forgetting, his lame ass democrats and RINO’s did that for him, and they no longer control congress. Look to see the shit hitting the fan next year as Darrel Issa becomes the Grand Inquisitor, he’s already got a stack of subpoenas three feet tall sitting on his desk.

    Paul Ryan just bought a great big box or specially made pens, they are veto pens for vetoing budget items. Obama’s rule by executive decree is about to come to a screeching halt.


  32. rain of lead
    32 | December 31, 2010 2:48 pm

    ya’ll knew this already …. but

    Rahm Emanuel will be Chicago’s next mayor.

    Based on Emanuel’s stellar political rise, I have to ask myself: Why would this man give up one of the most powerful jobs in the world in order to roll the dice that he, one of over a dozen contenders in Chicago’s Mayoral race, would indeed become the elected mayor of Chicago? My answer: He wouldn’t – unless the fix was in.


  33. snowcrash
    33 | December 31, 2010 2:49 pm

    Stupid, lazy uninformed voters don’t know how many contradictory statements Obama has made. Bush 41 made one…”No new taxes” and that was enough.


  34. vagabond trader
  35. wolfie
    35 | December 31, 2010 2:55 pm

    @ snowcrash:

    Yeah, well, the MSM still controls the narrative for the mushy (but crucial) center.
    That’s one reason why rule by executive degree can be so deadly if the MSM is on your side. They won’t cover what Obama’s doing.

    It’s not just that the MSM agrees with what Zero is doing, although that’s the main thing. Bureaucratic rulings don’t make good television the way political drama does.


  36. 36 | December 31, 2010 2:57 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    As much as some poor schlubs will see in a lifetime of work.

    Yup.


  37. Da_Beerfreak
    37 | December 31, 2010 2:59 pm

    wolfie wrote:

    @ snowcrash:
    Yeah, well, the MSM still controls the narrative for the mushy (but crucial) center.
    That’s one reason why rule by executive degree can be so deadly if the MSM is on your side. They won’t cover what Obama’s doing.
    It’s not just that the MSM agrees with what Zero is doing, although that’s the main thing. Bureaucratic rulings don’t make good television the way political drama does.

    And the MSM is sure to misrepresent all efforts by the right to stop Obummer’s abuses. We will always be the bad guys to them. :evil:


  38. buzzsawmonkey
    38 | December 31, 2010 2:59 pm

    For some reason, my last comment in the most recent DoD is “awaiting moderation.”


  39. 39 | December 31, 2010 2:59 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    ya’ll knew this already …. but
    Rahm Emanuel will be Chicago’s next mayor.
    Based on Emanuel’s stellar political rise, I have to ask myself: Why would this man give up one of the most powerful jobs in the world in order to roll the dice that he, one of over a dozen contenders in Chicago’s Mayoral race, would indeed become the elected mayor of Chicago? My answer: He wouldn’t – unless the fix was in.

    Given the painfully obvious fact that EVERYBODY in Chicago politics is a crook, without exception, it hardly matters any more who gets elected next time around. All I care about is the fact that, thank God, I’m not there to see it.


  40. Nevergiveup
    40 | December 31, 2010 3:00 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    He wouldn’t – unless the fix was in.

    This is Chicago, why are you repeating yourself?


  41. gulfloafer
    41 | December 31, 2010 3:01 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    For some reason, my last comment in the most recent DoD is “awaiting moderation.”

    Maybe if you weren’t so over the top all the time.
    //


  42. wolfie
    42 | December 31, 2010 3:02 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    And the MSM is sure to misrepresent all efforts by the right to stop Obummer’s abuses.

    Exactly!


  43. snowcrash
    43 | December 31, 2010 3:03 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Must have been a doozy. LOL just kiddin’


  44. wolfie
    44 | December 31, 2010 3:03 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    That system goes berserk from time to time.
    Beats me why.


  45. Da_Beerfreak
    45 | December 31, 2010 3:05 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    Given the painfully obvious fact that EVERYBODY in Chicago politics is a crook, without exception, it hardly matters any more who gets elected next time around. All I care about is the fact that, thank God, I’m not there to see it.

    I live two states away from Chicago and that’s still too damn close when you consider how far the rot spreads out from that cesspool. :evil:


  46. tanker on the horizon
    46 | December 31, 2010 3:06 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    I can’t wait until Chicago runs out of money. The various constituencies of that one-party city are going to be eating one another’s livers.

    Given Chicagoans’ propensity to riot over the trivial, e.g. Bulls’ championships, they’re in for hot times when the checks start bouncing.


  47. Prebanned
    47 | December 31, 2010 3:10 pm

    This is wonderful news, keep fighting Mr. President, the world need you.
    And to have the EPA involved in Cap and Tax? priceless.


  48. Da_Beerfreak
    48 | December 31, 2010 3:11 pm

    tanker on the horizon wrote:

    @ rain of lead:
    I can’t wait until Chicago runs out of money. The various constituencies of that one-party city are going to be eating one another’s livers.
    Given Chicagoans’ propensity to riot over the trivial, e.g. Bulls’ championships, they’re in for hot times when the checks start bouncing.

    An issue I wonder about all the time is just what will the progressive politicians do when their moonbat base starts to seriously riot with no end in sight??? It’s going to get really nasty, fast.


  49. 49 | December 31, 2010 3:12 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    1389AD wrote:
    Given the painfully obvious fact that EVERYBODY in Chicago politics is a crook, without exception, it hardly matters any more who gets elected next time around. All I care about is the fact that, thank God, I’m not there to see it.
    I live two states away from Chicago and that’s still too damn close when you consider how far the rot spreads out from that cesspool.

    Not only is everybody in Chicago politics a crook, but also the system is set up so that the biggest crook always wins.

    This has a deleterious effect on the entire US body politic.


  50. Brick
    50 | December 31, 2010 3:12 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    ya’ll knew this already …. but
    Rahm Emanuel will be Chicago’s next mayor.
    Based on Emanuel’s stellar political rise, I have to ask myself: Why would this man give up one of the most powerful jobs in the world in order to roll the dice that he, one of over a dozen contenders in Chicago’s Mayoral race, would indeed become the elected mayor of Chicago? My answer: He wouldn’t – unless the fix was in.

    Curious how eligibility requirements never apply to the Left. Pictures of boxes in a crawlspace constitute proof of residency for Rahm, and a picture of a COLB constitutes proof for Erkel.


  51. Prebanned
    51 | December 31, 2010 3:14 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    tanker on the horizon wrote:
    @ rain of lead:
    I can’t wait until Chicago runs out of money. The various constituencies of that one-party city are going to be eating one another’s livers.
    Given Chicagoans’ propensity to riot over the trivial, e.g. Bulls’ championships, they’re in for hot times when the checks start bouncing.
    An issue I wonder about all the time is just what will the progressive politicians do when their moonbat base starts to seriously riot with no end in sight??? It’s going to get really nasty, fast.

    Probably arm them and declare a socialist republic.


  52. mawskrat
    52 | December 31, 2010 3:16 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    For some reason, my last comment in the most recent DoD is “awaiting moderation.”

    have you posted alot today? evey thing in moderation


  53. mawskrat
    53 | December 31, 2010 3:17 pm

    I want to kill my eyboard!!!!!!


  54. Da_Beerfreak
    54 | December 31, 2010 3:18 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    tanker on the horizon wrote:
    @ rain of lead:
    I can’t wait until Chicago runs out of money. The various constituencies of that one-party city are going to be eating one another’s livers.
    Given Chicagoans’ propensity to riot over the trivial, e.g. Bulls’ championships, they’re in for hot times when the checks start bouncing.
    An issue I wonder about all the time is just what will the progressive politicians do when their moonbat base starts to seriously riot with no end in sight??? It’s going to get really nasty, fast.
    Probably arm them and declare a socialist republic.

    No doubt. Send them out to rape and pillage the suburbs while you grab your bags and bug out of Dodge. :twisted:


  55. mawskrat
    55 | December 31, 2010 3:20 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    let them eat cake


  56. gulfloafer
    56 | December 31, 2010 3:20 pm

    I’d like to see a muslim Cosby show too. It wouldn’t be short on content that’s for sure.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/12/katie_couric_wants_a_muslim_co.html


  57. Prebanned
    57 | December 31, 2010 3:21 pm

    mawskrat wrote:

    I want to kill my eyboard!!!!!!

    Buy the replacement first, so it knows what will happen if it displeases the Mawskrat.


  58. buzzsawmonkey
    58 | December 31, 2010 3:22 pm

    Got to go. Good Shabbos as appropriate, and happy New Year to all.


  59. gulfloafer
    59 | December 31, 2010 3:22 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Happy New Year Buzz.


  60. 60 | December 31, 2010 3:24 pm

    Happy New year buzz, and see you later on.


  61. Brick
    61 | December 31, 2010 3:24 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Got to go. Good Shabbos as appropriate, and happy New Year to all.

    You too, counselor.


  62. mawskrat
    62 | December 31, 2010 3:25 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    right back at yah


  63. Prebanned
    63 | December 31, 2010 3:26 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:
    I am far far away from Dodge.
    Yeah, they probably would declare martial law, collect the guns and distribute them to thier supporters.
    Then it would be off to the work camps for the rest of us.


  64. Da_Beerfreak
    64 | December 31, 2010 3:26 pm

    Napolitano Visit Aimed at Beefing Up Afghan Border Security, Customs

    Is it bad to wish that she would fall into the hands of the Taliban?? :twisted:


  65. Prebanned
    65 | December 31, 2010 3:27 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Got to go. Good Shabbos as appropriate, and happy New Year to all.

    Happy New Year Buzz!


  66. vagabond trader
    66 | December 31, 2010 3:27 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    A burka tossed over that can only be a good thing. :mrgreen:


  67. Prebanned
    67 | December 31, 2010 3:27 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Napolitano Visit Aimed at Beefing Up Afghan Border Security, Customs

    Is it bad to wish that she would fall into the hands of the Taliban??

    She definately brings the beef.


  68. mawskrat
    68 | December 31, 2010 3:28 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    dude they would pay us to take her back


  69. Bagua
    69 | December 31, 2010 3:28 pm

    Best wishes to all for a Happy and Prosperous New Year!


  70. Da_Beerfreak
    70 | December 31, 2010 3:28 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    All the beat to ya Buz.
    :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin:


  71. 71 | December 31, 2010 3:29 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Napolitano Visit Aimed at Beefing Up Afghan Border Security, Customs

    Is it bad to wish that she would fall into the hands of the Taliban??

    Perhaps, if being patriotic is bad, then yes wishing Napolitano fall into Al Queda/Taliban hands is bad.


  72. Brick
    72 | December 31, 2010 3:30 pm

    Islamic nesting sites on the rise in Spain.

    A foreshadow of what’s to happen here?


  73. snowcrash
    73 | December 31, 2010 3:31 pm

    @ Bagua:
    Happy New Year Bagua. Please head over to the DoD. I am sick of campaigning for you for flouncer of the year. I need links. LOL


  74. Da_Beerfreak
    74 | December 31, 2010 3:32 pm

    mawskrat wrote:

    @ Da_Beerfreak:
    dude they would pay us to take her back

    I was thinking along the lines that that would be a really nasty thing to do to the Taliban. I’m sure that would violate at least one of the rules of war or something like that. :twisted:


  75. Bagua
    75 | December 31, 2010 3:33 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    In the vicinity of $50 billion at current prices. Hard to believe that won’t increase as the NG price recovers.

    Of course, the Arabs and Iranians are already trying to claim part of the find and jump start their own exploration. Pity for them, they have destroyed their own infrastructure.


  76. Bagua
    76 | December 31, 2010 3:34 pm

    @ snowcrash:

    {{snowcrash}}


  77. Da_Beerfreak
    77 | December 31, 2010 3:34 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    That is the way I was looking at it. :mrgreen:


  78. Brick
    78 | December 31, 2010 3:34 pm

    Bagua wrote:

    Best wishes to all for a Happy and Prosperous New Year!

    Thanks. Same to you as well.


  79. 79 | December 31, 2010 3:36 pm

    Prebanned wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    tanker on the horizon wrote:
    @ rain of lead:
    I can’t wait until Chicago runs out of money. The various constituencies of that one-party city are going to be eating one another’s livers.
    Given Chicagoans’ propensity to riot over the trivial, e.g. Bulls’ championships, they’re in for hot times when the checks start bouncing.
    An issue I wonder about all the time is just what will the progressive politicians do when their moonbat base starts to seriously riot with no end in sight??? It’s going to get really nasty, fast.
    Probably arm them and declare a socialist republic.

    An unusual Chicago story…


  80. lobo91
    80 | December 31, 2010 3:39 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Napolitano Visit Aimed at Beefing Up Afghan Border Security, Customs

    Is it bad to wish that she would fall into the hands of the Taliban??

    What the hell does Napolitano know about “beefing up” anyone’s border security or customs operations?


  81. Buckeye Abroad
    81 | December 31, 2010 3:41 pm

    Hope everyone here has a great 2011! Best of health and luck to you all.

    I give to you a short New Year’s Eve classic they have been showing in Germany since 1963:

    Dinner for One
    Enjoy!


  82. lobo91
    83 | December 31, 2010 3:43 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    The past month was Britain’s coldest December for 120 years, meteorologists have said.

    Good thing they made everyone switch over to those “green” boilers that don’t work when it’s cold…
    //


  83. coldwarrior
    84 | December 31, 2010 3:43 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    Napolitano Visit Aimed at Beefing Up Afghan Border Security, Customs
    Is it bad to wish that she would fall into the hands of the Taliban??
    What the hell does Napolitano know about “beefing up” anyone’s border security or customs operations?

    perhaps she is testing and gathering info in afghanistan BEFORE she tries any of that here.

    not.


  84. mawskrat
    85 | December 31, 2010 3:43 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    I guess they could use her as a mule


  85. 86 | December 31, 2010 3:44 pm

    ROTFLMAO…

    Is this going to be our Happy New Year thread? My best wishes to all for a great 2011. Thank Mr. Morrissey and Mr. Pundit, you are the best.

    Cindy Munford on December 31, 2010 at 3:35 PM

    Now where have we seen this kind of ass kissing before… HotAir readers now following Charles Jonhsons Lizard’s over the cliff. They have noticed the disappearance of many many former HotAir commentors as Ed and Allah stealth ban people.


  86. 87 | December 31, 2010 3:44 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    Admins: There’s a Caturday post in the queue.

    We got it!


  87. lobo91
    88 | December 31, 2010 3:45 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Remember, that’s zero C (32 F).

    Not exactly beach weather, but not as bad as it sounds.

    It’s currently 6 F here, expected to get down to -7 tonight.


  88. lobo91
    89 | December 31, 2010 3:46 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I suppose they could tell the Afghans before she comes into the room, “Do exactly the opposite of everything she says.”


  89. NoThreat2U
    90 | December 31, 2010 3:46 pm

    @ lobo91:
    It is friggin beautiful here! Just kidnapped a friend of mine for a bit and we were riding around with the windows down and the music blaring. lol lol


  90. coldwarrior
    91 | December 31, 2010 3:47 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Remember, that’s zero C (32 F).
    Not exactly beach weather, but not as bad as it sounds.
    It’s currently 6 F here, expected to get down to -7 tonight.

    that’s cold for the UK. i spent a lot of time there.


  91. coldwarrior
    92 | December 31, 2010 3:47 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    ROTFLMAO…
    Is this going to be our Happy New Year thread? My best wishes to all for a great 2011. Thank Mr. Morrissey and Mr. Pundit, you are the best.
    Cindy Munford on December 31, 2010 at 3:35 PM

    Now where have we seen this kind of ass kissing before… HotAir readers now following Charles Jonhsons Lizard’s over the cliff. They have noticed the disappearance of many many former HotAir commentors as Ed and Allah stealth ban people.

    really, are they having ‘issues’ over there?


  92. 93 | December 31, 2010 3:48 pm

    Brick wrote:

    Islamic nesting sites on the rise in Spain.
    A foreshadow of what’s to happen here?

    The construction of new mosques comes at a time when municipalities linked to the Socialist Party have closed dozens of Christian churches across Spain by way of new zoning laws that several courts have now ruled discriminatory and unconstitutional. It also comes at a time of growing anti-Semitism in Spain.

    The Left is doing this against the will of the people. This will change once the Partido Popular comes into power. They will have a surprise for the Muzzies.


  93. coldwarrior
    94 | December 31, 2010 3:48 pm

    @ Buckeye Abroad:

    same to you!


  94. waldensianspirit
    95 | December 31, 2010 3:49 pm

    I have no problem with end-of-life counseling for progressives


  95. coldwarrior
    96 | December 31, 2010 3:50 pm

    heh ™

    the catholics are stomping the convicts…nd 24 – miami 0

    my favorite ncaa teams are whoever is playing miami and whoever beat them last.


  96. coldwarrior
    97 | December 31, 2010 3:51 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    It is friggin beautiful here! Just kidnapped a friend of mine for a bit and we were riding around with the windows down and the music blaring. lol lol

    i was out running phoebe-dog, what a break from the last 3 weeks!


  97. Bagua
    98 | December 31, 2010 3:57 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Good thing they made everyone switch over to those “green” boilers that don’t work when it’s cold…
    //

    They had their eye on the imaginary CO2e “threat”. The boilers themselves are ok, but the guidance didn’t specify routing the drainage inside, where it wouldn’t freeze. Yet another preventable major screw up because of their focus being on saving “carbon” not preparing for cold.


  98. Brick
    99 | December 31, 2010 3:57 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    An unusual Chicago story…

    That was a great read.


  99. 100 | December 31, 2010 3:58 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    ROTFLMAO…
    Is this going to be our Happy New Year thread? My best wishes to all for a great 2011. Thank Mr. Morrissey and Mr. Pundit, you are the best.
    Cindy Munford on December 31, 2010 at 3:35 PM
    Now where have we seen this kind of ass kissing before… HotAir readers now following Charles Jonhsons Lizard’s over the cliff. They have noticed the disappearance of many many former HotAir commentors as Ed and Allah stealth ban people.

    I used to have them on my own blogroll. No more.


  100. NoThreat2U
    101 | December 31, 2010 3:59 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    I cant handle it. I am gonna be spoiled now!


  101. Brick
    102 | December 31, 2010 4:02 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Brick wrote:
    Islamic nesting sites on the rise in Spain.
    A foreshadow of what’s to happen here?

    The construction of new mosques comes at a time when municipalities linked to the Socialist Party have closed dozens of Christian churches across Spain by way of new zoning laws that several courts have now ruled discriminatory and unconstitutional. It also comes at a time of growing anti-Semitism in Spain.
    The Left is doing this against the will of the people. This will change once the Partido Popular comes into power. They will have a surprise for the Muzzies.

    Maybe, but you can’t un-ring a bell. How do you counter the damage already done?


  102. Bagua
    103 | December 31, 2010 4:02 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Remember, that’s zero C (32 F).
    Not exactly beach weather, but not as bad as it sounds.
    It’s currently 6 F here, expected to get down to -7 tonight.

    The problem being that they are woefully unprepared having spent billions on “climate change” and too few millions on salt, grit, snow plows, aircraft de-icer. Thus, storms that would be laughed at stateside are crippling. As the greenies have also run up the price of fuel, the elderly and poor are unable to keep warm, suffering from an unnecessary fuel poverty, intentionally created by the greenies.


  103. coldwarrior
    104 | December 31, 2010 4:06 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I cant handle it. I am gonna be spoiled now!

    i hear ya!


  104. yenta-fada
    105 | December 31, 2010 4:11 pm

    Why the world economy sucks; Q and A

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcEEaniU1OU


  105. coldwarrior
    106 | December 31, 2010 4:16 pm

    Bagua wrote:

    The problem being that they are woefully unprepared having spent billions on “climate change” and too few millions on salt, grit, snow plows, aircraft de-icer. Thus, storms that would be laughed at stateside are crippling. As the greenies have also run up the price of fuel, the elderly and poor are unable to keep warm, suffering from an unnecessary fuel poverty, intentionally created by the greenies.

    i hear if you cut the greenies into squares they can be burned just like peat blocks.


  106. NoThreat2U
    107 | December 31, 2010 4:16 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    *snort*


  107. waldensianspirit
    108 | December 31, 2010 4:18 pm

    @ Bagua:
    Greenies need swift kicks in the nuts.


  108. Brick
    109 | December 31, 2010 4:18 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Why the world economy sucks; Q and A
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcEEaniU1OU

    Brief and simple. Just my speed.


  109. Calo
    110 | December 31, 2010 4:20 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    Ringing in the New Year with some good cheerful news?


  110. Brick
    111 | December 31, 2010 4:20 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    i hear if you cut the greenies into squares they can be burned just like peat blocks.

    Kinda’ like soylent green for your furnace? Neat.


  111. yenta-fada
    112 | December 31, 2010 4:24 pm

    Calo wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    Ringing in the New Year with some good cheerful news?

    It’s a satire. Besides, this blog has a penchant for seeing the world as it is. :-) Happy New Year to you and your nearest and dearest. (That goes for the whole blog too, of course.) :-) :-)


  112. 113 | December 31, 2010 4:24 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Bagua wrote:
    The problem being that they are woefully unprepared having spent billions on “climate change” and too few millions on salt, grit, snow plows, aircraft de-icer. Thus, storms that would be laughed at stateside are crippling. As the greenies have also run up the price of fuel, the elderly and poor are unable to keep warm, suffering from an unnecessary fuel poverty, intentionally created by the greenies.
    i hear if you cut the greenies into squares they can be burned just like peat blocks.

    Provided anybody could stand the stench!
    Greenies are not big on personal hygiene. Just sayin’. :mrgreen:


  113. waldensianspirit
    114 | December 31, 2010 4:25 pm

    Obam’s car czar Steve Ratner is just another robber baron and one without charm or class to boot.

    When are the American people going to wake up?


  114. waldensianspirit
    115 | December 31, 2010 4:25 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:
    ht Stacey McCain


  115. 116 | December 31, 2010 4:26 pm

    mawskrat wrote:

    I want to kill my eyboard!!!!!!

    Seems like it’s already just about dead.

    Time to stop by your local store and spring for a new one.


  116. waldensianspirit
    117 | December 31, 2010 4:27 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    mawskrat wrote:
    I want to kill my eyboard!!!!!!

    Seems like it’s already just about dead.
    Time to stop by your local store and spring for a new one.

    Some times shaking the salt grains from out from under the keys helps


  117. 118 | December 31, 2010 4:29 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Obam’s car czar Steve Ratner is just another robber baron and one without charm or class to boot.
    When are the American people going to wake up?

    Why are we reading about a NY scandal in the UK press?

    Just askin’.


  118. snowcrash
    119 | December 31, 2010 4:29 pm

    Is Beed still around? He is in the CET zone and it is getting close to the New Year!


  119. 120 | December 31, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    You have about got me convinced on gold, just as a reserve, except I am not sure how to cash it in if SHTF. OTOH, things are looking so dicey for the next 15 years that I don’t see any real safe harbor. I certainly wouldn’t mind having a pound of Krugerrands in my safe, though :P


  120. Calo
    121 | December 31, 2010 4:30 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    Back at you Yenta.
    Thank you.

    I did enjoy the utoobage though!


  121. 122 | December 31, 2010 4:30 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    1389AD wrote:
    mawskrat wrote:
    I want to kill my eyboard!!!!!!
    Seems like it’s already just about dead.
    Time to stop by your local store and spring for a new one.
    Some times shaking the salt grains from out from under the keys helps

    I don’t believe in eating near a keyboard. Unfortunately, my husband does. :( A can of compressed air sometimes helps.


  122. 123 | December 31, 2010 4:32 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I cant handle it. I am gonna be spoiled now!

    Now?!? 8O


  123. NoThreat2U
    124 | December 31, 2010 4:34 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    Yeah only NOW. lol I’ve never been spoiled so I don’t know how to behave. It could be dangerous 8O


  124. Calo
    125 | December 31, 2010 4:37 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:
    I could give you some advice, but that would give my secrets away and then how would I get my way?


  125. yenta-fada
    126 | December 31, 2010 4:39 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    You have about got me convinced on gold, just as a reserve, except I am not sure how to cash it in if SHTF. OTOH, things are looking so dicey for the next 15 years that I don’t see any real safe harbor. I certainly wouldn’t mind having a pound of Krugerrands in my safe, though

    Buy it in fractionals if you can.(i.e. 1/10th oz, 1/2 ounce, but don’t pay big premiums for that convenience. Make friends with your local or regional coin dealer. When the SHTF, my belief is that they will include a fractional amount of gold in whatever currency stays around. There is a unit called the “bancor” being discussed. The truth is, nobody knows what is being planned, but they will have to unravel the mess at some point and find a point of reference for a means of doing business and trade. Perhaps there will be a debt holiday, perhaps not. WTHDIK. Gold has been a STORAGE of WEALTH for 5000 years. For the past decade, it has been doing its job quietly and away from the headlines.


  126. NoThreat2U
    127 | December 31, 2010 4:39 pm

    @ Calo:
    LOL I could use the help. lol lol lol I think I will go hit the bar and make men buy me drinks. WOuld that be considered being spoiled? At least to a certain degree?? lol


  127. coldwarrior
    128 | December 31, 2010 4:39 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    if ya dry em out a little the funk aint so bad


  128. Brick
    129 | December 31, 2010 4:40 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    Low level, or isolated civil unrest, gold and silver should have value. (Assuming a non-confiscatory policy remains in place.)

    Anything more intense…general commerce will likely be reduced to a barter level. Skills or goods for an equivalently valued skill or good – determined by both parties to the transaction. Bids and Asks, on a micro-level.


  129. yenta-fada
    130 | December 31, 2010 4:41 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    You have about got me convinced on gold, just as a reserve, except I am not sure how to cash it in if SHTF. OTOH, things are looking so dicey for the next 15 years that I don’t see any real safe harbor. I certainly wouldn’t mind having a pound of Krugerrands in my safe, though

    BTW, I bought one kruggerand ten years ago and sold it to a Mississipi Riverboat gambler. (If anybody is asking.)


  130. NoThreat2U
    131 | December 31, 2010 4:42 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    “Funk” A word that just doesn’t get used often enough anymore. lol


  131. coldwarrior
    132 | December 31, 2010 4:42 pm

    Brick wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Low level, or isolated civil unrest, gold and silver should have value. (Assuming a non-confiscatory policy remains in place.)
    Anything more intense…general commerce will likely be reduced to a barter level. Skills or goods for an equivalently valued skill or good – determined by both parties to the transaction. Bids and Asks, on a micro-level.

    i know how to distill grains into alcohol.


  132. yenta-fada
    133 | December 31, 2010 4:43 pm

    Brick wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Low level, or isolated civil unrest, gold and silver should have value. (Assuming a non-confiscatory policy remains in place.)
    Anything more intense…general commerce will likely be reduced to a barter level. Skills or goods for an equivalently valued skill or good – determined by both parties to the transaction. Bids and Asks, on a micro-level.

    People will learn to be creative. Yankee traders. :-) Paper is paper when all is said and done.


  133. 134 | December 31, 2010 4:43 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    Thanks for the tip! That way I can buy it in small quantities, and accumulate it over the next few years (or however long we have). It won’t hurt anything sitting in the safe…


  134. yenta-fada
    135 | December 31, 2010 4:44 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Calo:
    LOL I could use the help. lol lol lol I think I will go hit the bar and make men buy me drinks. WOuld that be considered being spoiled? At least to a certain degree?? lol

    That would be considered as making you a barfly. lol lol


  135. coldwarrior
    136 | December 31, 2010 4:44 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    “Funk” A word that just doesn’t get used often enough anymore. lol

    now that parliament and p*funk arent touring and george clinton is retired, we are in a ‘funk’ deficit.


  136. NoThreat2U
    137 | December 31, 2010 4:45 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    No a barfly is when all you do is sit in a bar. I never go to bars. I just don’t have anything better to do right now. lol


  137. NoThreat2U
    138 | December 31, 2010 4:46 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    We need the funk. Gotta have that funk. But that is JMO :)


  138. Brick
    139 | December 31, 2010 4:46 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    No better commercial skill if things get really sideways.


  139. 140 | December 31, 2010 4:46 pm

    @ Brick:

    I can teach martial arts, weld, and program a computer. Only the first has any application if SHTF for real. Lesser breakdowns, though, I might could make my bread.


  140. 141 | December 31, 2010 4:47 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:

    It is the caging drinks that makes you a barfly. Are you good looking? You can probably get laid, too 8O


  141. Bagua
    142 | December 31, 2010 4:47 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Nothing knocks creating whatever wealth you can month to month, year to year. It’s also good to have a stash and some investments as a lottery ticket, but bet on what is real now. Being productive and frugal is best in my view.


  142. snowcrash
    143 | December 31, 2010 4:49 pm

    @ NoThreat2U:
    Can’t get enough of that funky stuff. Funk is very good for New Years Eve.


  143. yenta-fada
    144 | December 31, 2010 4:49 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    Thanks for the tip! That way I can buy it in small quantities, and accumulate it over the next few years (or however long we have). It won’t hurt anything sitting in the safe…

    Start now. Adjusted for inflation, gold should already be well over $2,000 an ounce. It is a commodity manipulated by the Big Boys. I buy stocks for income, but that requires time, interest, and study. Meantime, use “clownbucks” for real things.


  144. NoThreat2U
    145 | December 31, 2010 4:50 pm

    If you fake the funk your nose will grow.


  145. Brick
    146 | December 31, 2010 4:50 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Brick wrote:
    @ Iron Fist:
    Low level, or isolated civil unrest, gold and silver should have value. (Assuming a non-confiscatory policy remains in place.)
    Anything more intense…general commerce will likely be reduced to a barter level. Skills or goods for an equivalently valued skill or good – determined by both parties to the transaction. Bids and Asks, on a micro-level.
    People will learn to be creative. Yankee traders. Paper is paper when all is said and done.

    Paper will always be useful in various sanitation/hygiene roles.


  146. coldwarrior
    147 | December 31, 2010 4:51 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    @ NoThreat2U:
    Can’t get enough of that funky stuff. Funk is very good for New Years Eve.

    END THE FUNK DEFICIT!!!


  147. NoThreat2U
    148 | December 31, 2010 4:52 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    LMAO************* I’m sure I could but no, I don’t pick up men in bars. lol This is a little town, I know everyone and I can’t think of any I would want to sleep with. lol


  148. Brick
    149 | December 31, 2010 4:52 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    The need for a warrior mindset and training to support it will be another highly marketable skill.


  149. yenta-fada
    150 | December 31, 2010 4:53 pm

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    No a barfly is when all you do is sit in a bar. I never go to bars. I just don’t have anything better to do right now. lol

    I was keeding. :-) We are home for the night, as usual. I’m always grateful for what we have and the people we have in our lives. I’m sending you lots of good vibes. :-)


  150. yenta-fada
    151 | December 31, 2010 4:54 pm

    @ Brick:

    Toilet paper futures! lol


  151. NoThreat2U
    152 | December 31, 2010 4:58 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    I could use the good vibes. Just still h8ting on the holidays. lol I’m…I’ll live.


  152. Brick
    153 | December 31, 2010 5:03 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    @ Brick:
    Toilet paper futures! lol

    :)
    As long as there’s people, there will be…caca.


  153. lobo91
    154 | December 31, 2010 5:05 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    waldensianspirit wrote:
    Obam’s car czar Steve Ratner is just another robber baron and one without charm or class to boot.
    When are the American people going to wake up?
    Why are we reading about a NY scandal in the UK press?
    Just askin’.

    Because the US press considers Obama and his cronies to be “too big to fail.”


  154. Speranza
    155 | December 31, 2010 5:13 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Because the US press considers Obama and his cronies to be “too big to fail.”

    You got that right!


  155. 156 | December 31, 2010 5:41 pm

    [...] (h/t: yenta-fada) [...]


  156. orangecrush
    157 | December 31, 2010 5:53 pm

    @ 152 NoThreat2U: Schnapps….. On New Years Eve I always go out in the cold and drink a couple of shots of schnapps in honor of the old man. He used to let me drink schnapps once a year with him since I was four. lol

    It has to be dark. It has to be cold. The schnapps has to be cheap and just plain schnapps.


  157. Speranza
    158 | December 31, 2010 6:23 pm

    Brick wrote:

    As long as there’s people, there will be…caca.

    What did they use for toilet paper during the American Revolution?


  158. Speranza
    159 | December 31, 2010 6:24 pm

    snowcrash wrote:

    Can’t get enough of that funky stuff. Funk is very good for New Years Eve.

    New Years eve is the ultimate Amateurs Night.


  159. Speranza
    160 | December 31, 2010 6:25 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    What the hell does Napolitano know about “beefing up” anyone’s border security or customs operations?

    “The system worked” /


  160. Speranza
    161 | January 1, 2011 8:59 am

    snowcrash wrote:

    Can’t get enough of that funky stuff. Funk is very good for New Years Eve.

    Alka Seltzer is good for New Years Day.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David