First time visitor? Learn more.

Turkish Deputy PM calls for UN action agaisnt Israel

by Rodan ( 132 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Fascism, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Libya, Muslim Brotherhood, Progressives, Tranzis at March 22nd, 2011 - 8:30 am

The Libyan intervention will have unintended consequence. The low bar that is now set for UN intervention could possible lead to international coalitions attacking nations they don’t like. Turkish Deputy PM Bülent Arınç recently commented that the UN should enforce resolutions against Israel. He is all but calling for a UN lead attack on Israel.

After assuring both Libyans and Turks that Turkey was not involved in airstrikes on Libya, Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç, of Turkey, said, “We wish that the United Nations had made such resolutions and countries had taken action in the face of incidents in Gaza, Palestine and the other regions.

This is exactly the problem I thought might arise from President Obama’s endorsement of the trendy principle of “Responsibility to Protect”. In yesterday’s blog, “The Rise of Samantha Power and the risks for the American-Israel relationship,” I speculated that the rationale Obama adopted to bomb Libya bore the risks of others adopting the same “principle” to justify punishing, if not bombing, Israel.

Read the rest: Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister calls for bombing of Israel

This speaks volumes to how this UN action against Libya will be used. It’s possible in the next Israel-Islamist war that a no fly zone will be ordered, thus attempting to prevent Israeli air supremacy over the battlefield. Clearly this is the Turkish Deputy PM’s wishes.

(Hat Tip: Da_Beerfreak)

Rodan Commentary:

This action against Libya will have other unintended consequences. Libya was the model of a rogue state that gave up it’s WMD program. It was rewarded by integration into the global economic system. Libya’s intelligence assisted the CIA against Al-Qaeda. Qaddafi paid money in restitution for the Lockerbie bombing. He was living up to his part of the agreement. By attacking Libya other rogue states will not give up their weapons. No one will trust us and an agreement signed with the US will be viewed as only good one Presidential term. The repercussions will be unforeseen.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

132 Responses to “Turkish Deputy PM calls for UN action agaisnt Israel”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Nevergiveup
    1 | March 22, 2011 8:34 am

    Turkey shouldn’t be in nato


  2. vagabond trader
    2 | March 22, 2011 8:35 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Niether should we.


  3. 3 | March 22, 2011 8:36 am

    I saw this coming. Once we asked “Mother, may I?” to the UN on Libya we made this inevitable. Now, what will Obama do?


  4. Nevergiveup
    4 | March 22, 2011 8:37 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Niether should we.

    We are nato


  5. vagabond trader
    5 | March 22, 2011 8:37 am

    And just like clockwork


  6. Nevergiveup
    6 | March 22, 2011 8:38 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    I saw this coming. Once we asked “Mother, may I?” to the UN on Libya we made this inevitable. Now, what will Obama do?

    Not much till after the 2012 election. He might even try to fuck Israel on his way out the door


  7. 7 | March 22, 2011 8:38 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    NATO has outlived its usefulness. We don’t still have the Alliance with the Soviet Union against Hitler hanging around our neck. Why should we have NATO? The reasons for its establishment have gone away. So should it.


  8. citizen_q
    8 | March 22, 2011 8:39 am

    The re-establishment of the caliphate proceeds apace added by the ummah’s “blue-eyed slaves”.

    Wonder if the jihad could be recast as a type of colonialism? If so it might elicit a knee-jerk opposition by the unthinking indoctrinates churned out by our left-wing educational system.


  9. Nevergiveup
    9 | March 22, 2011 8:39 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    And just like clockwork

    Yup– except to be fair to the Palis, they have been asking for that for the last 30 years, so that’s not new. It’s just that the context has changed


  10. 10 | March 22, 2011 8:39 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    Yes, don’t you remember that nice Palestinian family that the derranged Israeli settlers stabbed to death the other day? 8O


  11. vagabond trader
    11 | March 22, 2011 8:40 am

    Must read and remember who we are dealing with.


  12. 12 | March 22, 2011 8:40 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    Wonder if the jihad could be recast as a type of colonialism?

    Recast? Jihad is the oldest form of colonialism still practiced in the world today.


  13. Nevergiveup
    13 | March 22, 2011 8:41 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    NATO has outlived its usefulness. We don’t still have the Alliance with the Soviet Union against Hitler hanging around our neck. Why should we have NATO? The reasons for its establishment have gone away. So should it.

    Well the reason for NATO was not Hitler, but the Soviets. Nato was al alliance for Western European and North Atlantic Counties against the Soviet threat.


  14. 14 | March 22, 2011 8:43 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    I have speculated that the whole Libyan War may be a strategic move against Israel, by setting up the internationalist precedents of UN action and the US acting at the sufferance of the Arab League. I am not positive that is what it is, but this dovetails neatly with that theory.


  15. 15 | March 22, 2011 8:44 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Well the reason for NATO was not Hitler, but the Soviets. Nato was al alliance for Western European and North Atlantic Counties against the Soviet threat.

    That is my point :roll: What are the Soviets threatening today? About as much as Hitler…


  16. Nevergiveup
    16 | March 22, 2011 8:46 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Well the reason for NATO was not Hitler, but the Soviets. Nato was al alliance for Western European and North Atlantic Counties against the Soviet threat.

    That is my point What are the Soviets threatening today? About as much as Hitler…

    ?? Well the Russians are still a threat. Not as much as when they were the evil empire, but they are still no friends of ours or Western Europe or Democracy. But there is no doubt that just like the UN, NATO in it’s present form has outlived it’s usefulness.


  17. Philip_Daniel
    17 | March 22, 2011 8:47 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    Wonder if the jihad could be recast as a type of colonialism?


    Or if they mean by “patriotism” the conquest of countries and lordship over the earth, Islam has already ordained that, and has sent out conquerors to carry out the most gracious of colonizations and the most blessed of conquests. This is what He, the almighty, says: “Fight them till there is no longer discord, and the religion is Allah’s” [Q.2:193].


    Six Tracts of Hassan Al-Bana’: A Selection from the Majmu’at Rasa’il al-Imam al-Shahid Hasan al-Banna’ (1906-1949), “Our Mission”, Hassan al-Banna’, p. 65


  18. vagabond trader
    18 | March 22, 2011 8:48 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Very bad juju imho.A warning at the very least. Samantha Power and her consort Cass Sunstein are eeeevil little trolls.


  19. Nevergiveup
    19 | March 22, 2011 8:51 am

    “Western nations have still to decide who will run the operation once Washington pulls back.”

    Who goes to “WAR” with out any idea who is gonna lead them? How fucked up is this?


  20. vagabond trader
    20 | March 22, 2011 8:53 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    Sorry Rodan,didn’t realize you already linked the Power story.I really think it is an ominous warning to Israel. People should remember this and disabuse themselves of the tedious notion Hussein is a naive academic,misled by his puppet masters and commie cadre. He knows precisely what he is doing.Doesn’t mean he isn’t nukkin futz . Look at what he has “accomplished” thus far.


  21. vagabond trader
    21 | March 22, 2011 8:54 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    ?? Well the Russians are still a threat

    Yeah I can just see the western powers going up against Russia anytime soon///


  22. citizen_q
    22 | March 22, 2011 8:55 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Agreed my point being is the understanding of those raised the evils of colonialism to see the actions of the jihad in that light. Hell most of them either deny there is a jihad, or think of it as a fuzzy-wuzzy inner-quest for spiritual growth.


  23. citizen_q
    23 | March 22, 2011 8:57 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    “Western nations have still to decide who will run the operation once Washington pulls back.”
    Who goes to “WAR” with out any idea who is gonna lead them? How fucked up is this?

    Fools and those who use the fools to further their own ends while minimizing their own risks.


  24. vagabond trader
    24 | March 22, 2011 8:58 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Who goes to “WAR” with out any idea who is gonna lead them? How fucked up is this?

    Who are the military toadies advising him on this? Do they all just nod their heads in unison and say yes sir?


  25. vagabond trader
    25 | March 22, 2011 9:01 am

    OT:

    Awww,expecting a bailout from the gay in chief any day now.


  26. Nevergiveup
    26 | March 22, 2011 9:03 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    ?? Well the Russians are still a threat

    Yeah I can just see the western powers going up against Russia anytime soon///

    Yeah, but neither do i see Russia challenging the Western Powers. COnventionally they not so strong Militarily. It is still their Nuclear Arsenal that is the threat and why Nato still has some relevance, but not in it’s now bloated political form


  27. 27 | March 22, 2011 9:03 am

    Think on this the next time the Teachers are squawking abut being “underpaid”:

    Phoenix superintendent to retire, return
    by Craig Harris – Mar. 22, 2011 12:00 AM
    The Arizona Republic
    .

    Phoenix’s Isaac School District, which plans to shutter schools and lay off employees because of money problems, will let Superintendent Carlos Bejarano retire June 30 and return to his same job – with the same compensation and perks – the next day.

    Bejarano, 58, will retain his $130,000 annual salary, an $8,400 car allowance, an $8,000 annual tax-deferred annuity, and a $3,000 community-affairs allowance to use at his discretion. The district also will give him $11,238 so he can buy health-insurance coverage, according to district officials.

    Pensions in Arizona a soaring burden

    Bejarano will receive an annual pension estimated at $104,650 after retiring with 35 years of service, records reviewed by The Arizona Republic show, bringing his total annual compensation to roughly $265,000.

    Damn, but I went into the wrong profession. That is insane. Yeah, he isn’t a teacher he is an superintendant, but damn, that money still comes out of the education budget. If they can afford to pay that, I don’t want to hear that education is underfunded…


  28. Nevergiveup
    28 | March 22, 2011 9:04 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Who goes to “WAR” with out any idea who is gonna lead them? How fucked up is this?

    Who are the military toadies advising him on this? Do they all just nod their heads in unison and say yes sir?

    Those decisions don’t seem to seep down to my lowly level


  29. vagabond trader
    29 | March 22, 2011 9:06 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Service pays!


  30. 30 | March 22, 2011 9:07 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Our strategic arsenal, that Obama is busy trying to get rid of, is what hold the whip-hand there, not NATO. Britain and France have less than 500 deliverable weapons between them (maybe less than 400). That isn’t enough of a deterrant. Of course, Obama is cutting us down to 1500 (thanks in part to Senate RINOs; see why we need 42 solid Republican senators?). Is that enugh? Maybe, if we have the will to use them. That is something, though, that Russia has to doubt after our weak response to 9-11.


  31. vagabond trader
    31 | March 22, 2011 9:08 am

    Humanitarian Intervention. Wonder why Darfur is still ignored/


  32. Nevergiveup
    32 | March 22, 2011 9:10 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    I said NATO as it is constituted today is bloated and political. I’d like to see a smaller Nato with just the US, UK, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, and Israel. Maybe I missed someone, but ya know only real democracies and good guys.


  33. 33 | March 22, 2011 9:11 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    “Here! Hold my beer and watch this…” – Barack Hussein Obama


  34. vagabond trader
    34 | March 22, 2011 9:12 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Agreed,something like that league of democracy McCain talked about. I know,the old fool did have one good idea.


  35. buzzsawmonkey
    35 | March 22, 2011 9:20 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Must read and remember who we are dealing with.

    Thanks for the link.

    When Obama was elected, I tried to point out his connections with anti-Israel folks like Wright, Ayers, and Khalidi to the Jews I knew who were planning to vote for him. “Oh, no,” they said. “He’s got Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff, and Emanuel was in the IDF.” Emanuel was not, of course, in the IDF—he was a summer civilian volunteer with them when he was in college. And, too, the chief of staff is not a policy position.

    When I pointed out that Samantha Power was in the government in a policy position, they said, “Oh, no, she’s not at the top—and Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of State.”

    Well, Emanuel—whatever his influence was on Obama—is out. And this Administration has shown it has a penchant for people who are not formally “at the top” making policy decisions—e.g., Valerie Jarrett. But I have no doubt that the Jews who blinded themselves to Obama’s many anti-Israel connections (including, of course, the Hamas campaign phone banks) will ignore Power’s influence on Middle East Policy right up until the joint UN/US force invades Israel to give Jerusalem to the Arabs.


  36. Philip_Daniel
  37. Nevergiveup
    37 | March 22, 2011 9:23 am

    Philip_Daniel wrote:

    Azerbaijan calls for NATO to bomb the Armenians over “occupied” Nagorno-Karabakh…

    See where this is going?

    Hopefully back to a Republican/Adults back in the White House


  38. citizen_q
    38 | March 22, 2011 9:26 am

    Philip_Daniel wrote:

    Azerbaijan calls for NATO to bomb the Armenians over “occupied” Nagorno-Karabakh…
    See where this is going?

    I still remember when someone calling to get bombed was an invitation to go out drinking.

    /


  39. Nevergiveup
    39 | March 22, 2011 9:29 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    Philip_Daniel wrote:

    Azerbaijan calls for NATO to bomb the Armenians over “occupied” Nagorno-Karabakh…
    See where this is going?

    I still remember when someone calling to get bombed was an invitation to go out drinking.

    /
    And maybe get layed


  40. citizen_q
    40 | March 22, 2011 9:29 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    I quickly tired of being branded a racist, bigot, paranoid, etc… by pointing out these facts. Some people have so thoroughly bought into the obama meme they become astonishingly hostile to any dissent.


  41. Nevergiveup
    41 | March 22, 2011 9:32 am

    14:50France says UN may discuss Russia ceasefire call for Libya (Reuters)

    What a farce


  42. 42 | March 22, 2011 9:32 am

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Absolutely predictable. The Sons of Confederate Veterans should call on the UN to bomb DC to end the Occupation of the South…


  43. Nevergiveup
    43 | March 22, 2011 9:33 am

    14:46UN rights office urges Syria to probe deaths at protest (AP)

    yeah, they’ll get right on it


  44. 44 | March 22, 2011 9:33 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Yeah, this can’t end well for America, no matter what end comes.


  45. Macker
    45 | March 22, 2011 9:34 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    But isn’t beer unIslamic?


  46. Macker
    46 | March 22, 2011 9:36 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Absolutely predictable. The Sons of Confederate Veterans should call on the UN to bomb DC to end the Occupation of the South…

    You know, it seems that South is more American than the North ever will be. Well we all know about the West, other than the Left Coast, but that’s beside the point.


  47. vagabond trader
    47 | March 22, 2011 9:38 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    It saddens me that a people who have gone through this time and again never seem to get it. We continue to sacrifice ourselves in order to be “liked” by those who are at best indifferent to us.

    btw,Rodan had already linked the AT article topside,had not noticed that because of my very poor habit of skimming a thread. :-)


  48. 48 | March 22, 2011 9:38 am

    @ Macker:

    Culturally and politically the Northeast and Left Coast are entirely different countries than the West and South. We don’t have much of anything in common.


  49. vagabond trader
    49 | March 22, 2011 9:38 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    :lol: :lol:


  50. Philip_Daniel
    50 | March 22, 2011 9:41 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Absolutely predictable. The Sons of Confederate Veterans should call on the UN to bomb DC to end the Occupation of the South…

    If anything, NATO should bomb its member-state Turkey to end the Oghuz Turk occupation of Anatolia…


  51. Macker
    51 | March 22, 2011 9:41 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    They call us Jesusland. Can we call them Gayland?


  52. Philip_Daniel
    52 | March 22, 2011 9:42 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Macker:

    Culturally and politically the Northeast and Left Coast are entirely different countries than the West and South. We don’t have much of anything in common.

    I was just in New England this past weekend. The differences between northern Vermont and southeastern Pennsylvania are quite remarkable…


  53. 53 | March 22, 2011 9:43 am

    China is calling for an immediate cease-fire too. How’s that leadership thingy working for ya, Obama? Found any dictators to bow to in South America?


  54. citizen_q
    54 | March 22, 2011 9:44 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    Just huge-O that I know of.


  55. 55 | March 22, 2011 9:45 am

    @ Macker:

    Anti-Christland…


  56. Nevergiveup
    56 | March 22, 2011 9:47 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    China is calling for an immediate cease-fire too. How’s that leadership thingy working for ya, Obama? Found any dictators to bow to in South America?

    And we lost an F-15 on this crap and launch around 130 + cruise Missiles.


  57. 57 | March 22, 2011 9:48 am

    OTOH, this is good news:

    House Foreign Affairs Chairman: U.S. Must Withdraw from U.N. Human Rights Council
    Tuesday, March 22, 2011
    By Patrick Goodenough

    Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) (AP Photo)

    (CNSNews.com) – The chair of the U.S House Foreign Affairs Committee said Monday she will introduce legislation that makes U.S. funding for the United Nations contingent on reform. It also calls for the U.S. to withdraw from the Human Rights Council.

    Describing the Obama administration’s attempts to reform the HRC as a failure, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said the U.S. should quit the HRC and “explore credible, alternative forums to advance human rights.”

    The Florida Republican’s statement came as the Geneva-based HRC began the final week of a month-long session in which it will adopt up to six resolutions condemning Israel.

    I’d just defund the UN, but retain our seat as a Veto Power. We could contribute whatever Russia does. China is a big economic powerhouse, we keep being told. Let her take up the slack, ’cause we’re broke…


  58. 58 | March 22, 2011 9:50 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Plus the B-2 sorties. Those aren’t cheap. What, maybe $500 million gone already? And for what? I doubt seriously you can get a straight answer out of Obama on that. I sure haven’t heard one.


  59. Nevergiveup
    59 | March 22, 2011 9:51 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    I’d just defund the UN, but retain our seat as a Veto Power. We could contribute whatever Russia does. China is a big economic powerhouse, we keep being told. Let her take up the slack, ’cause we’re broke…

    It’s not as easy as all that. If we don’t pay our “dues” , we could forfeit our seat on the Security Council until they are payed up


  60. m
    60 | March 22, 2011 9:56 am

    @ Macker:

    Hey, we have gay people in Jesusland. Gay Patriots as a matter of fact.


  61. citizen_q
    61 | March 22, 2011 9:57 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Plus the B-2 sorties. Those aren’t cheap. What, maybe $500 million gone already? And for what? I doubt seriously you can get a straight answer out of Obama on that. I sure haven’t heard one.

    In the calculus of the means justifying the ends, I doubt the real goal is libya at all, it is the precedent of ceding US sovereignty, and acting on the principle of Right to Protect in order to better ferment revolutions and instill their new world order.


  62. m
    62 | March 22, 2011 9:58 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    And our “dues” seem to be calculated a lil’ funny. Liberal math.


  63. 63 | March 22, 2011 9:58 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    If we don’t pay our “dues” , we could forfeit our seat on the Security Council until they are payed up

    I don’t think so. I don’t think any of the permanent members Can be kicked out for anything. But if they kick us off, we pull all the way out. Declare the UN null and void, and do as we please without regard to it. It is nothing but a corrupt institution. The only reason to stay in at all is to have the veto. The world would be a better place without the UN< anyway.


  64. Nevergiveup
    64 | March 22, 2011 10:00 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    If we don’t pay our “dues” , we could forfeit our seat on the Security Council until they are payed up

    I don’t think so. I don’t think any of the permanent members Can be kicked out for anything. But if they kick us off, we pull all the way out. Declare the UN null and void, and do as we please without regard to it. It is nothing but a corrupt institution. The only reason to stay in at all is to have the veto. The world would be a better place without the UN< anyway.

    NOt kicked out but suspended.


  65. 65 | March 22, 2011 10:03 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    Nevergiveup wrote:
    If we don’t pay our “dues” , we could forfeit our seat on the Security Council until they are payed up
    I don’t think so. I don’t think any of the permanent members Can be kicked out for anything. But if they kick us off, we pull all the way out. Declare the UN null and void, and do as we please without regard to it. It is nothing but a corrupt institution. The only reason to stay in at all is to have the veto. The world would be a better place without the UN< anyway.

    NOt kicked out but suspended.

    Fine, while we are suspended we can suspend all the visa’s of the UN assholes. Lock the doors and turn out the lights.


  66. vagabond trader
    66 | March 22, 2011 10:04 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    She is a true patriot,Cubano American iirc.Knows the score when it comes to who the real bad actors are.


  67. Nevergiveup
    67 | March 22, 2011 10:05 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    Fine, while we are suspended we can suspend all the visa’s of the UN assholes. Lock the doors and turn out the lights.

    And ya know maybe the building might have an accident also. A little “Jewish” Lightening?


  68. vagabond trader
    68 | March 22, 2011 10:06 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Or turn it into “affordable” housing. :mrgreen:


  69. chickadee
    69 | March 22, 2011 10:07 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Must read and remember who we are dealing with.

    I remember when I first read abt. this scrunt’s outlandish and absurd plan that the U.S. military should invade Israel. I thought it was a crack pot joke. I laughed. Now look. They have laid down the ground work to make it possible.
    We can’t discount anything these traitors say.
    No matter how absurd it seems . . . it is what they are working for, what they intend to achieve.

    It’s like the scrunt who wrote abt. the how the gov. should take over everyone’s 401K retirement money and then give people a monthly benefit check. Oh they would be fair and honor their promise to dole out our own money back to us. LOL
    That scheme is still out there . . . . . they are salivating to get their greedy paws on all that cash.
    After all, zero thinks that at some point we have made enough money.


  70. 70 | March 22, 2011 10:09 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Nope. Read the Charter:

    1. The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.

    2. The non-permanent members of the Security Council shall be elected for a term of two years. In the first election of the non-permanent members after the increase of the membership of the Security Council from eleven to fifteen, two of the four additional members shall be chosen for a term of one year. A retiring member shall not be eligible for immediate re-election.

    3. Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.

    There is no provision for removing a permanent member of the Security Council. They migh could suspend us from other comittees or something. I don’t know that much about the UN Power Structure. But we are on the Security COuncil, and they have no mechanism for stopping us from wielding our veto. IIRC, before Clinton we were several years in arrears on our dues, and there was nothing done about it then. As I implied, though, they need us far more than we need them.


  71. 71 | March 22, 2011 10:10 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    Fine, while we are suspended we can suspend all the visa’s of the UN assholes. Lock the doors and turn out the lights.
    And ya know maybe the building might have an accident also. A little “Jewish” Lightening?

    Hmmm, Hey UN, that’s a nice building you got there, be a damned shame if something happened to it… :shock:


  72. Nevergiveup
    72 | March 22, 2011 10:10 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    OK


  73. 73 | March 22, 2011 10:11 am

    chickadee wrote:

    After all, zero thinks that at some point we have made enough money.

    But not him! He still hasn’t made enough money. Nor have the Clintons…


  74. vagabond trader
    74 | March 22, 2011 10:11 am

    Things that make you go hmmm. Why were they ever on this so called HRC? Behold the mind of a libral.


  75. 75 | March 22, 2011 10:13 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Nope. Read the Charter:

    1. The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.
    2. The non-permanent members of the Security Council shall be elected for a term of two years. In the first election of the non-permanent members after the increase of the membership of the Security Council from eleven to fifteen, two of the four additional members shall be chosen for a term of one year. A retiring member shall not be eligible for immediate re-election.
    3. Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.

    There is no provision for removing a permanent member of the Security Council. They migh could suspend us from other comittees or something. I don’t know that much about the UN Power Structure. But we are on the Security COuncil, and they have no mechanism for stopping us from wielding our veto. IIRC, before Clinton we were several years in arrears on our dues, and there was nothing done about it then. As I implied, though, they need us far more than we need them.

    Hmmm, technically the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics” doesn’t exist anymore, so why is Russia a permanent member?


  76. citizen_q
    76 | March 22, 2011 10:14 am

    chickadee wrote:

    It’s like the scrunt who wrote abt. the how the gov. should take over everyone’s 401K retirement money and then give people a monthly benefit check. Oh they would be fair and honor their promise to dole out our own money back to us. LOL
    That scheme is still out there . . . . . they are salivating to get their greedy paws on all that cash.
    After all, zero thinks that at some point we have made enough money.

    I was thinking about that. I have been at my current job for quite awhile and been putting the max into my 401K. If they do try to seize 401Ks and not IRAs, I would seriously consider resigning so that I could roll over those funds into a self-directed IRA.


  77. 77 | March 22, 2011 10:15 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Yeah, I noticed that too. Russia is a successor state to the USSR, but so is the Ukraine. I see it as a de facto admission that might, in the form of nuclear weapons, is the ultimate arbiter of International Law.


  78. 78 | March 22, 2011 10:17 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    chickadee wrote:
    It’s like the scrunt who wrote abt. the how the gov. should take over everyone’s 401K retirement money and then give people a monthly benefit check. Oh they would be fair and honor their promise to dole out our own money back to us. LOL
    That scheme is still out there . . . . . they are salivating to get their greedy paws on all that cash.
    After all, zero thinks that at some point we have made enough money.
    I was thinking about that. I have been at my current job for quite awhile and been putting the max into my 401K. If they do try to seize 401Ks and not IRAs, I would seriously consider resigning so that I could roll over those funds into a self-directed IRA.

    When they decide to seize 401K and IRA’s I am pretty sure they will lock the accounts specifically to prevent people from doing exactly that.


  79. citizen_q
    79 | March 22, 2011 10:20 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    When they decide to seize 401K and IRA’s I am pretty sure they will lock the accounts specifically to prevent people from doing exactly that.

    Probably, but they were also too smart to put in a serverabilty clase into the he11care bill. I might get lucky.


  80. 80 | March 22, 2011 10:20 am

    @ doriangrey:

    They’d also better get ready for the hot phase of our current Civil War. People won’t take the expropriation of their lie’s savings sitting down. I never expect that to happen (expropriation, that is; I can see us fighting a hot Civil War over a number of issues).


  81. 81 | March 22, 2011 10:21 am

    Y’all will like this


  82. vagabond trader
    82 | March 22, 2011 10:22 am

    @ chickadee:

    Hi chickie! :D

    Yeah,this Samantha Power scrunt and her hideous mate,Cass Sunstein are speshul faves of the anointed one. All Haaarvard alum dontcha know.They make one frightening trio with all their Jew hating connections and personal ideology. This R2P/humanitarian intervention is commie speak,a global testing for their pet theories of world busybodying governance. Unfortunately 42% of Americans handed them the keys.


  83. 83 | March 22, 2011 10:27 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    They’d also better get ready for the hot phase of our current Civil War. People won’t take the expropriation of their lie’s savings sitting down. I never expect that to happen (expropriation, that is; I can see us fighting a hot Civil War over a number of issues).

    Just keep this in mind when contemplating a hot civil war. The first lethal conflicts will be with local law enforcement officials. It is the local LEO’s who will attempt to enforce whatever legal rulings start the hostilities. LEO’s don’t question the constitutional legality of the laws they enforce, they just enforce whatever laws they are told to enforce. They are Stanley Milgram‘s subjects on steroids.


  84. 84 | March 22, 2011 10:35 am

    @ doriangrey:

    That is a decision that ultimately they will have to decide. They go around trying to confiscate property at the point of a gun or rounding people up, and they will get what is coming to them.


  85. Philip_Daniel
    85 | March 22, 2011 10:35 am

    Georgia is planning to settle Turks in the Javakhk region?

    Have they lost their minds?!


  86. 86 | March 22, 2011 10:39 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I think a good part of that will be regional. Take, for example gun control. I think the vast majority of law enforcement in the South would refuse to enforce such a law. They probably would stand aside and allow the Federals to enforce it, but even that is not certain, especially in States with Firearms Freedoms laws where such enforcement is technically illegal. OTOH, the confiscation of property that is stored electronically, like money in banks, probably wouldn’t even involve law enforcement personnel. Just an order that would go out. Then we’d see who the people hanged in response…


  87. Philip_Daniel
    87 | March 22, 2011 10:39 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Yeah,this Samantha Power scrunt and her hideous mate,Cass Sunstein are speshul faves of the anointed one. All Haaarvard alum dontcha know.They make one frightening trio with all their Jew hating connections and personal ideology. This R2P/humanitarian intervention is commie speak,a global testing for their pet theories of world busybodying governance. Unfortunately 42% of Americans handed them the keys.

    Ivy League-educated Progressives support the most Reactionary global factions. Do they really believe that they can control these factions to their own advantage? If so, do they have empty cranial cavities, or is their brain matter merely atrophied as a result of their never having to think for themselves?


  88. Nevergiveup
    88 | March 22, 2011 10:39 am

    15:55Obama and Erdogan reaffirm full support for UN resolution on Libya (Reuters)

    Some pair ha?


  89. 89 | March 22, 2011 10:40 am

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Hey, we’re settling Somolis in Murfreesboro. Same kind of suicidal behavior…


  90. Philip_Daniel
    90 | March 22, 2011 10:42 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    Hey, we’re settling Somolis in Murfreesboro. Same kind of suicidal behavior…

    Their cousins back home in Mogadishu want to conquer Alaska!


  91. chickadee
    91 | March 22, 2011 10:43 am

    @ vagabond trader:
    Yes, that R2P (responsibility to protect) gives them a lot of leeway to cause harm.
    It is total commie b.s. double speak.


  92. 92 | March 22, 2011 10:45 am

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    The Alaskans might have something to say about that. I am not impressed with Mohammedan Marksmanship. They can basically hold the trigger of a machinegun down and point it in the general direction of the target. Good enough for terrorism, but Alaskans can, for the most part, shoot. Like as not, they’ll field-dress the somolis afterward, or feed the remains to the bears…


  93. 93 | March 22, 2011 10:46 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    That is a decision that ultimately they will have to decide. They go around trying to confiscate property at the point of a gun or rounding people up, and they will get what is coming to them.

    They already do that kind of crap every day of the week. American’s bitch and complain about police brutality and abuses of authority all the time, but don’t actually do much about it. Americans have been thoroughly indoctrinated to believe that justice will prevail through the court system. Most American’s simply refuse to believe that the Justice system could be corrupt.

    Congress and State legislature pass laws, LEO’s enforce those laws, and the court system slaps down anyone who challenges that enforcement. How many years did it take for Heller to finally be decided? During that entire time the local LEO’s continued to enforce unconstitutional laws.

    The US Constitution does not allow for any restriction’s on firearms ownership, yet federal, state and local governments have placed unconstitutional restrictions on firearms ownership and the local LEO’s enforce those unconstitutional laws and are fully 100 percent supported in their doing so by the court system.


  94. 94 | March 22, 2011 10:47 am

    Clusterfuck explained…


  95. RIX
    95 | March 22, 2011 10:48 am

    Things are just going swimmingly in Libya./
    Our stated intention was to protect civilians.
    Instead we are providing air cover for the Rebels
    to launch attacks. They now refer to us as “our
    Airforce.”
    Nato admits “We know little about these rebels”


  96. Philip_Daniel
    96 | March 22, 2011 10:52 am

    RIX wrote:

    Our stated intention was to protect civilians.
    Instead we are providing air cover for the Rebels
    to launch attacks. They now refer to us as “our
    Airforce.”
    Nato admits “We know little about these rebels”

    We have become the Air Force of the mujahideen.

    Bosnia/Kosovo 2.0


  97. BuddyG
    97 | March 22, 2011 10:56 am

    Coalition of the shrilling


  98. RIX
    98 | March 22, 2011 10:57 am

    @ <a href="#co_724837" title="Go to comment of this

    author”>Philip_Daniel

    :
    We have become the Air Force of the mujahideen.

    Bosnia/Kosovo 2.0
    It does look that way. A news report last night said that
    many of the terrorists that our troops are fighting
    in Afghanistan are from Eastern Libya.
    Bet that they returned home to enjoy our aircover.


  99. citizen_q
    99 | March 22, 2011 11:01 am

    RIX wrote:

    t does look that way. A news report last night said that
    many of the terrorists that our troops are fighting
    in Afghanistan are from Eastern Libya.
    Bet that they returned home to enjoy our aircover.

    So if those returnees habits die hard, and they shoot at our forces, would that be friendly fire? But in Afghanistan they were enemies? I am sooooo confused!


  100. Nevergiveup
    100 | March 22, 2011 11:02 am

    Huge fire in the Interior Ministry ( Police-Secret Police) in Egypt–I am sure it’s an innocent fire?


  101. Nevergiveup
    101 | March 22, 2011 11:02 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Huge fire in the Interior Ministry ( Police-Secret Police) in Egypt–I am sure it’s an innocent fire?

    Actually how do you say ” Reistag” in Arabic


  102. 102 | March 22, 2011 11:04 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Huge fire in the Interior Ministry ( Police-Secret Police) in Egypt–I am sure it’s an innocent fire?

    Reichstag Fire Redux…


  103. citizen_q
    103 | March 22, 2011 11:05 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Actually how do you say ” Reistag” in Arabic

    mousk?


  104. taxfreekiller
    104 | March 22, 2011 11:06 am

    amabO got no clue what to do.


  105. taxfreekiller
    105 | March 22, 2011 11:12 am

    amabO, oh amabO who took all your clues
    amabO, oh amabO do you know what you sit on
    amabO, oh amabO take a seat, ,,,there thats you
    amabO, oh amabO get your finger out make yourself easy.


  106. vagabond trader
    106 | March 22, 2011 11:14 am

    @ Philip_Daniel:

    If so, do they have empty cranial cavities, or is their brain matter merely atrophied as a result of their never having to think for themselves?

    Both I’m afraid.

    Any particular schools front runners for you? :-)


  107. vagabond trader
    107 | March 22, 2011 11:15 am

    @ citizen_q:

    :lol:


  108. BuddyG
    108 | March 22, 2011 11:16 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Actually how do you say ”Reistag” in Arabic

    ”Al Reistag”


  109. taxfreekiller
    109 | March 22, 2011 11:17 am

    am’abO’

    ama bO

    a ma b.o.


  110. taxfreekiller
    110 | March 22, 2011 11:17 am

    am a bo


  111. taxfreekiller
    111 | March 22, 2011 11:18 am

    President Am A BO


  112. taxfreekiller
    112 | March 22, 2011 11:19 am

    man is a joke
    laugh him out of office


  113. BuddyG
    113 | March 22, 2011 11:19 am

    Send one hellfire-missile-equipped-Predator-drone over Libya and assassinate that fu*kin’ ugly bastard. Mission accomplished.


  114. 116 | March 22, 2011 11:21 am

    BuddyG wrote:

    Send one hellfire-missile-equipped-Predator-drone over Libya and assassinate that fu*kin’ ugly bastard. Mission accomplished.

    Getting rid of K’daffy isn’t and never was the “Mission”. Setting a precedent for the United States subjecting itself to the authority of the UN is and was the mission.


  115. 117 | March 22, 2011 11:22 am

    @ BuddyG:

    You don’t have the same mission in mind that Obama does. What you suggest would do nothing to subordinate America to the UN or undermine American power abroad. That is the primary mission here, I think…


  116. 118 | March 22, 2011 11:23 am

    @ vagabond trader:

    I’d get myself in trouble with that… 8O


  117. taxfreekiller
    119 | March 22, 2011 11:24 am

    These leaders on the Joint Chiefs, these other leaders of our fighting men ,,better get to reviewing who they in fact work for. We the People hired them and this clown President, Am A BO, all of them are subject to getting their ass’s fired for failure to preform their duties.

    like that, all of them,start with

    http://www.blowoutcongress.com

    Work up and down from there.


  118. BuddyG
    120 | March 22, 2011 11:24 am

    @ doriangrey:

    And while we’re at it, we should also take MadMood I’m-a-Dick-in-the-Ass Fu*k out of everyone’s misery as well. Irregardless of the UN.


  119. BuddyG
    121 | March 22, 2011 11:25 am

    ooops


  120. vagabond trader
    122 | March 22, 2011 11:26 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Getting one for the old mans b’day. He’ll put it to good discrete use. I hope. :mrgreen:


  121. vagabond trader
    123 | March 22, 2011 11:26 am

    @ taxfreekiller:

    Damn straight tfk!


  122. chickadee
    124 | March 22, 2011 11:27 am

    BuddyG wrote:

    Send one hellfire-missile-equipped-Predator-drone over Libya and assassinate that fu*kin’ ugly bastard. Mission accomplished.

    I don’t know what to think at this point.
    If daffy stays in control, then that is a massive pr fail for zero. Even tho he has said daffy is not the target of the mission obviously people want him gone.
    But zero may not want him out, pr fail notwithstanding, because zero is thinking abt. that 6 billion in gold that Daffy has buried.
    Since zero has no honor, he would eat the pr fail and wait for the gold.

    That’s our c-n-c.

    It’s a tuff call. What is the best outcome. To have zero humiliated on the world stage or deprive him of all that money.


  123. BuddyG
    125 | March 22, 2011 11:31 am

    @ chickadee:

    IMHO Pan Am 103 is good enough reason to ventilate Daffy’s cranium.
    Might as well take advantage now that the bullets are flyin’


  124. 126 | March 22, 2011 11:37 am

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Who goes to “WAR” with out any idea who is gonna lead them? How fucked up is this?
    Who are the military toadies advising him on this? Do they all just nod their heads in unison and say yes sir?

    More to the point, where are American Jews, the majority of whom voted for Obama, and some of whom contributed to his campaign? Shouldn’t they be telling Obozo that they’ve had quite enough of this, and shouldn’t they be writing checks to the Allen West presidential campaign? Only half joking, but Allen West will protect both the US and our ally Israel.


  125. BuddyG
    127 | March 22, 2011 11:43 am

    Special Delivery


  126. 128 | March 22, 2011 11:49 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:
    Huge fire in the Interior Ministry ( Police-Secret Police) in Egypt–I am sure it’s an innocent fire?
    Actually how do you say ”Reichstag” in Arabic

    I am SURE that the Muslim Brotherhood knows very well how to say it, with impeccable pronounciation, in the original German.


  127. 129 | March 22, 2011 11:51 am

    Philip_Daniel wrote:

    Georgia is planning to settle Turks in the Javakhk region?
    Have they lost their minds?!

    Can you submit that as a thread?


  128. 130 | March 22, 2011 11:52 am

    never mind I’ll throw it into the queue w/ hat-tip to you.


  129. RIX
    131 | March 22, 2011 12:11 pm

    @ citizen_q:

    So if those returnees habits die hard, and they shoot at our forces, would that be friendly fire? But in Afghanistan they were enemies? I am sooooo confused!

    I would say that they would be misunderstanders
    of the koran.


  130. 132 | March 22, 2011 1:04 pm

    [...] Philip Daniel) By Times.am at 5 March, 2011, 5:56 pm by Ara Khachatouryan, [...]


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David