I think we are seeing the predictable results of a man who despite his public inordinate self confidence, really in his heart of hearts knows that he is not fit to be leader of the free world. Can you imagine if Obama were president during the Brezhnev years on the Cold War? Soviet tanks would have poured through the Fulda Gap in Germany. Obama is so afraid to come across as a George W. Bush that he loses sight of the fact that a president needs to make decisions and quickly in the national interest. Instead, he obsesses over multilateralism – the God of all liberals.
by Jonah Goldberg
As someone who supported a Libyan no-fly zone from the earliest days of what once seemed like a revolution but now looks like a civil war, I have to admit that Operation Odyssey Dawn may be a perfect example of being careful about what you wish for.
To use a metaphor suitable for March Madness, Obama blew the fast break. The president, an avid hoopster, should understand the reference.
In basketball, a fast break is when the offense brings the ball down the court as quickly as possible so the defense doesn’t have time to set up. It’s all about the fluidity of the moment, pressing your advantages and keeping the opponent off-balance.
Obama went a different way. Back in February when the Libyan revolution was fresh and had momentum on its side, even a small intervention by the U.S. — say, blowing up the runways at Moammar Kadafi‘s military airbases or quietly bribing senior military officers — might have toppled Kadafi. Members of his government were resigning en masse. Pilots were refusing orders to kill fellow Libyans. Soldiers were defecting to the rebels. Libyan citizens openly defied the regime in Tripoli. Nearly everyone thought the madman’s time was up.
That was the time to seize the moment, to give Kadafi a shove when he was already off-balance. If the dictator had been toppled when the rebels were gaining strength, America’s support would have been written off as incidental, with the Libyans taking credit for their own revolution.
But such an approach would have required America to run down the court alone, out ahead of its allies and the international community. For Obama the multilateralist, that would have been too much unilateral hot-dogging.
So Obama slowed things down to set up the play he wanted rather than the play the moment demanded. As a result, Kadafi regained his balance.
Obama wanted a United Nations resolution, a coalition, the support of the international community, even the Arab League. It was as if his top priority was to launch a new war in the Middle East in a way that was exactly opposite from what George W. Bush did. And if that was the goal, he can hang his “Mission Accomplished” banner now; the French shot first.
[.....]
But there are real problems with Obama going to the corners, to use another basketball expression. In the heat of the moment, Obama could have taken out Kadafi without much of an explanation. But now he must offer a rationale that’s very hard to square with what’s going on in the rest of the Middle East. Obama says Libyan rebels must be protected from a leader who would kill them “without mercy.” OK, does that apply as well to Saudi, Yemeni, Bahraini and Iranian rebels? No? Why not?
And now that America is rescuing losing rebels rather than lending support to winning ones, we will “own” the next Libyan regime. Let’s cross our fingers on that score.
[....]
Read the rest – Obama’s missed break in Libya
Tags: Col. Mumar Qaddafi
Multilateralism – the first god of all liberals.
Diversity is another of their gods.
We are enabling an AL-Qaeda take over of Libya. Obama should of come out and said, No, the US is not getting involved.
Benghazi is a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalists.
The elites in both parties will regret their support for overthrowing Qaddafi.
Another consequences is no nation will give up their WMDs now. Libya came clean and played by teh rules. We still attacked them with a new President.
I never supported this and still don’t. Any action that concedes our military to the UN and a potus who absents himself from the USA during this war is unfit for command.
Rodan wrote:
No they won’t, not publically, anyway. They’ll just continually insist that Qaddaffi was a terrorist who killed not only his own people, but Americans also, so he needed to go. They NEVER admit they made a mistake. Never.
Rodan wrote:
Cyrenaica is where the oil is at.
Cyrenaica is where the mujahideen are at.
We should not have intervened. Furthermore, we should not have intervened on the side of the Cyrenaican mujahideen. That said, in the double desire to safeguard Cyrenaican oil and make Cyrenaican mujahideen love us, all we have done is made it possible for the former to fall into the hands of the latter (what a weapon for use against the mushrikeen is oil!), and embolden the latter in its quest for global Islamic domination while not making them disregard the fundamental Islamic doctrine of enmity towards all disbelievers (to do so would be “great apostasy”, as OBL says.)
vagabond trader wrote:
Hence the term “Canadian”-in-Chief. No offense to real Canadians!
I opposed the no-fly zone because I knew Obama wasnt up to the task, and because there is no compelling American interest in going to war for the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya. None. What have we gained by it? Can someone name one thing?
Two Christians gunned down by armed Muslims outside Church in Pakistan
In other news, Code Skank members cheer as their beloved brown freedom fighters kill oppressive white Christian people in Pakistan!
Rodan wrote:
That never even occurred to me, but it now seems so obvious.
@ Iron Fist:
Humanitarian Intervention™, R2P© Averting genocide!!!!!! Billions would die if we didn’t go in !!!!!!!!!!!
vagabond trader wrote:
Billions will die no matter what. We have gained nothing but the dubious possibility of being involved in a Third protracted war in the Middle East or turning tail and running like we did in Mogadishu under Clinton. Either way, the USA is the loser here. Big time.
@ Philip_Daniel:
@ Rodan:
No nation except the United States under الرئيس أوباما will give up its WMDs.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
Yeah and that’s all BS. Qaddafi came clean with his WMD’s, paid restitution to the victims of his past terror and helped us against AL-Qaeda.
Amazing how this is all being left out. We attacked an ally and no one will trust us again. Another win for Islamic Imperialists.
@ Macker:
Qaddafi did give his up. He lived up to his end of the bargain. We backstabbed him.
In addition the excellent reasons already given to not intervene, I oppose this since we should be facilitating muslims killing muslims, not hindering.
Never stop an enemy from harming himself.
The muzz know this and use it to great advantage.
@ Rodan:
So what do you see as the reason he did it?
@ Iron Fist:
I can’t think of anythuing. What sickens me is how many Conservatives are supporting this crap.
Macker wrote:
Canada under Stephen Harper is actually showing more spine than the US
under Oblablah.
Qaddafi is a bad guy but was somewhat muted. What will follow him is worse.
Rodan wrote:
I don’t disagree with you at all on that. I was referring to from this point forward.
Macker wrote:
*scratches head* Who coined it and what does it actually mean?
Even with its oil, Libya was a hell hole in World War II and it is one now.
vagabond trader wrote:
Qaddafi had beef with AL-Qaeda going back to the 90′s. After 9/11 he saw an opportunity to get out of isolation and join the US camp. Itw as the enemy of my enemy thinking.
Hey IF, thought you might get a kick out of this.
When a burly ex-convict forced his way into a posh Florida home last week, he had no idea what awaited him — a 25-year-old beauty queen with a pink .38-caliber handgun.
@ Speranza:
All the Muzz countries are hell holes. There isn’t one of them fit for human habitation, they are all dictatorships, and brutal theocracies. Why would this be any different? They are what they have been for 1400 years. Islam does not change, not can it change. It is a fountain of misery, a well-spring of destruction. It always has been and always will be.
@ citizen_q:
I saw that. Righteous kill. One to be proud of.
@ citizen_q:
I wonder if it was a Hello Kitty variant?
@ Macker:
You are correct, no one except probbaly us will.
Speranza wrote:
And that’s the real problem.
@ Macker:
Probably a Smith J-Frame. I’ve seen them in pink.
BBL
@ Guggi:
What an ass. Most French are concerned about the economy and Islamic immigration. They could care less about Louis XIV style Glory.
What sickens me is that Euro and US leaders went against the will of their voters. This will give ammo to people who claim Democracy is a sham and that the elites do what they want.
Speranza wrote:
We, the European, entered Libya 1911, 1922 and 2011. Three times we have invaded the country. This time with the help of the USA. We act like neo-colonialists.
@ Guggi:
20% of foreign fighters in Iraq were Libyan. Majority were from the Benghazi area.
@ Guggi:
Well to be fair, Turkey ruled Libya and Italy kicked out the Turks. It was just an exchange of masters.
Rodan wrote:
Sarkozy’s poll numbers have sky rocked since operation “Harmattan”. All the newspapers and intellectuals (yeo, the Jewish also) are behind him. At the moment he is the hero.
@ Guggi:
Actually, Africa could use colonization. They haven’t exactly covered themselves with glory in their attempts at self-governance.
Guggi wrote:
Trust me, we will get as much oil from a post Khadafy Libya as we got from a post Saddam Iraq – maybe even less.
Iron Fist wrote:
You mean that Idi Amin was not exactly a benevolent figure in Africa?
Guggi wrote:
It is never an exchange of bad leaders for better ones.
Iron Fist wrote:
The last semi decent Muslim nation was Turkey and after 80 years of secularism it reverted to primitivism.
Rodan wrote:
You know, this really is an excellent point. Let’s pretend for a moment, that our military objectives are met in a matter of days and that not a single American is harmed. What would that actually mean? All we will have accomplished is replacing an evil mostly cowed thug with far more violent and more dangerous thugs.
@ Guggi:
So the French love to be delusional that they are still the power as they were under the Sun King? No wonder they are screwed. Plus their hero needed the US to help France.
I don’t get the French.
Census; Detroit’s population drops by 25%
Decline reflects poor economy in only state whose population has fallen since 2000
Columbus Ohio now more populous then Detroit
@ Flyovercountry:
What pisses me off is that polls showed AMericans were against getting involved., Instead of hammering Obama on this, the GOP elites went along with this. The only 2 GOP candidates who spoke out against this were Haley Barbour and Trump. The rest, even Palin were all gung ho for this.
It makes me wonder, what’s the point in voting? We vote out one set of Transnationalists and replace them with another set.
This episode really disillusionaed me further with the American political system.
@ Speranza:
Hey, look what the Unions have done for the auto industry. And the Democrats for the City as a whole. Detroit is much greener now…
zero wants it both ways here. He wants to look like a tough guy who can come out swinging but the bottom line is he does NOT want to oust Qadaffi. That is why he dithered and gave daffy time to rally. And that is why he and Hillary etc are flip flopping all around on the purpose of this move.
The purpose is simply to set up a precedent for the future. Possibly to to use against Israel.
That’s all they want. And Aamantha Powers is smiling like a subversive scrunt who has gotten the ball rolling.
Iron Fist wrote:
Africa is more and more leaning to China. Europe has lost almost all her credibility. They don’t need “Gunboat Diplomacy” and especially in the poor countries Qaddafi was a hero because he invested in real jobs.
Sorry for going OT on my own thread but I just peaked at the Swamp and I got to say he has nothing up but hysterical threads about how the GOP is going to destroy us all. He is one sick, demented, fucker!
Guggi wrote:
So, the Turks aren’t colonial masters, having governed Libya from 1551 to 1911?
Guggi wrote:
1. Qaddafi was a terrorist creep and Mussolini made the trains run on time.
2. The African nations are sensing who is “the strong horse” – hint, it ain’t the USA any more.
Iron Fist wrote:
I agree and so do a lot of the starving imperiled citizens of many 3rd world African countries.
Ask the people of zimbabwe how much they miss the white farmers.
I heard that mugabe is even asking them to come back.
fck him and jimmy carter.
@ Guggi:
Qaddafi was a hero in Africa. He actually was trying to stabilize the place and assisted the US there as well.
chickadee wrote:
I doubt even Obama will do that to Israel because half the Democratic Party and all of the Republican Party would desert him and Israel would shoot down all the Fwench and Bwitish jets that appear over their airspace.
Rodan wrote:
Calling him a hero is a bit of a stretch. They put up with him because of the money he through their way but they knew he was a nut job.
@ Philip_Daniel:
Italy had a right to take Libya. It was once a former Roman province, seized by Arabs in the 7th Century. ASLso Tripoliw as help by Spain for a few decades. It was Latin territory and Italy had a right to liberate it.
See if the Muzzies can do it, so can Latins!
@ chickadee:
Personally, I’d leave Africa Strictly alone. No colonization, no foreign aid, nothing. But it is no lie that the entire continent is fucked up. Some countries are worse than others, but all of them need straightening out. Simply giving them money to enrich their current crop of kleptocrats just exacerbates the problems. If we were going to give them money, it should be tied to sustantive reforms. That will, of course, never happen, so end all foreign aid.
@ Rodan:
I heard Guiliani yesterday, and he gets it also.
I also have another problem with all of this. If you do send our citizens to fight, send them to win, and don’t hamstring them with asinine rules of engagement. I am tired of sending our military over and pretending that their purpose is not to kill enemy combatants, destroy infrastructure, break the opposition’s will to fight. This surgical compassionate warefare is flat out stupid. Our military was never meant to be an international meals on wheels, but the muscle needed to inflict the political will of the executive branch.
chickadee wrote:
In 1987 when I was in London I met a white Zimbabwean couple who told me that life was not bad over there. I wonder (if they are even still alive) if they would say the same thing today.
Guggi wrote:
See, even the French crave a hero. Someone to show strength, courage and direction and not muddy the waters with meaningless p.c. platitudes.
People need real leadership in tough times.
btw, I read that Romney says he will end 0-care by executive order if he is elected.
I bet the goes up in the polls.
Flyovercountry wrote:
Even though people like to trash him over (in my opinion) nonsense – Rudy Giuliani always got it.
@ Speranza:
I am referring to how Africans viewed him. It was African tribes who gave him the King of Kings of Africa title.
Money buys love!
chickadee wrote:
People in democracies crave strong,decisive leadership. A strong, decisive leader will get cut a lot of slack even if he fails at times because we always respect confidence and strength (as opposed to arrogance and weakness).
Speranza wrote:
Maybe the pos will figure that out. But so far I don’t think he has.
Rodan wrote:
I think they were humoring him as they took his money and shipped it to their Swiss bank accounts.
Surprise!
Al Qaida commander backs Libyan rebels in message
Philip_Daniel wrote:
The Sultanate of Tripoli was only nominally part of the Ottoman Empire. The USA didn’t fight the Ottoman Empire during the barbary coast wars.
chickadee wrote:
The three scrunts – Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power and Susan Rice are running the foreign policy show right now. When she was running and then became Senator from New York, Hillary was more pro Israel then even Netanyahu although I knew it was patently insincere.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Too bad both sides cannot lose!
Iron Fist wrote:
Yes Detroit is greener now as whole neighborhoods are deserted and wild life is taking over.
@ Flyovercountry:
The problem is people like Rudy, Trump and Barbour are just 3 voices. Andrew McCarthy and Stanley Kurtz at National Review are the other 2. The rest of the Conservative/Republicans are all for this operation.
It’s becoming harder for me to do political posts. I really have lost even more faith in the system than I already had lost the last 21 years. I thought the Tea party was the beginning of something new. Instead that movement was hijacked as well. Hence no opposition to this useless adventure.
It’s really sick.
Speranza wrote:
Not at all: Qaddafi created a lot of jobs in countries like Zimbabwe and not only “projects”. From telecommunication to agriculture and the benefits had been re-invested in new jobs. That’s why they liked him. As a developer he did a better job than the Europeans.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Libyan fighters made up 20% of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. This is not being reported. FOX News is really dissapointing me. They are not saying the truth.
Rodan wrote:
The Tea Party should have stuck to its original grievances – high taxes, out of control spending, and humongous deficits. It started acting though like King Makers and allowed some opportunists to try to take over. When I read that so and so was running with the strong support of the Tea party I wondered – when was there a primary and who endorsed that candidate?
Speranza wrote:
Same thing with Mubarak. He wasn’t anywhere as bad as Qaddaffi, but he ruled with an iron fist. al Qaeda and the Islamists feared the Egyptian secret police. That’s why we’d send the baddest of the bad guys to Cairo to be interrogated. And now with them neutered, all bets are off.
@ Guggi:
Didn’t Qaddafi also move away from Socialism and had a Free Market economy in Libya?
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
For all his faults – we are going to rue the day that Hosni Mubarak left office.
Guggi wrote:
He did not develop anything He had no trained people or specialists to send anywhere, however he had a lot of money.
Q-daffy sez…
@ Speranza:
Yeah I thought it was a movement back to Reagan/Goldwater Style Conservatism. Instead it’s the same shell game of the last 21 years.
I’s just very disillusioned with everything right now.
Guggi wrote:
Yeah, so what? I never said they were Sovereign over such territory. Like Wallachia, Moldova, Transylvania, the Crimea, Ragusa, Circassia, the Kurdish and Arab chieftainships, the Meccan Sharifate, at times Lower and Upper Hungary, Montenegro, the Cossack Hetmanate, and from a legal perspective the eastern fringe of Austria (“Royal Hungary”) and even the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth between the Treaty of Buczacz and the Treaty of Zurawno, the Turks were only Suzerains, with limited control over said territory, such degrees of authority differing between each himaye. Legally, Tripolitania was still submissive to the Porte, even if in reality it was mostly self-governing. The reality of Ottoman Suzerainty instead of Sovereignty certainly does not stop men such as Ahmet Davotoglu and Adnan Oktar from dreaming of a return of Libya to the Turkish “embrace”…
@ Iron Fist:
I don’t have a link for this but I heard that at least one gov. official in some african country has asked that the u.s. stop sending them cast off used clothing because they are full up with that rubbish and it interferes with their economy and the limited clothing manufacturing they are trying to establish. It made sense to me. I thought, if true, how little we know abt, how to really help them. Dumping used clothing on them apparently does more harm than good, after a point. Maybe even financial aid is bad too because the thugs in control steal it.
Rodan wrote:
So what will Obombya do now that we are essentially doing al qaeda’s dirty work?
Flyovercountry wrote:
Guiliani/West 2012
Speranza wrote:
What’s really worse about this is that the article I linked is from March 13th!
OT, breaking:
Game on…
Speranza wrote:
He really does. We need a leader like Rudy now. He loves America.
He understands the muzz enemy. And he might even have gained a new perspective on the 2nd Amendment.
Rodan wrote:
No, not real a free market economy. He subsidized basic food, living space, education (for the six to fifteen years old education was free but there were a lot of well paid scholarships for university students either in Libya or abroad), health care was free etc. Libya had the most women working in jobs (1 Million out of a population of ~ 6.4 Million) and to open a business was no problem for a woman.
@ chickadee:
I don’t think a Guiliani candadcy is really viable. He did too poor a job of running his campaign last time. He’d have to do something stunning to set himself off from the pack now, and frankly I don’t think he has it in him. He was a good mayor of New York, especially in a crisis, but that doesn’t make him Presidential material and he proved that last time around.
@ Speranza:
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
@ Urban Infidel:
@ Philip_Daniel:
@ huckfunn:
@ chickadee:
@ Iron Fist:
@ Flyovercountry:
This article read my mind.
Why the Tea Party isn’t opposing Obama’s position on Libya.
Over the last couple of days, since the United States joined in establishing a United Nations no-fly zone over northern Libya, Mark Williams has been yelling at Fox News and agreeing with liberals. Why are we there? Why was the intervention kicked off by a U.N. vote and not a vote in Congress?
@ Guggi:
That’s another thing about Qaddafi no one mentions. He actually believes in Women’s equality. Something the Al-Qaeda backed rebels don’t.
@ Rodan:
It should be a bigger issue. Obama has done a lot worse than this, though, with precious little real opposition. I expect the fucker to win in 2012. Especially if he plays his cards minimally right and doesn’t throw Israel under the bus or try and make the gun controller’s wet dreams come true.
Another great article.
The New GOP Warmongers
More bad news for OChaos.
Iran Orders Attacks on Saudi Interests Worldwide
Furious over Bahrain, Iranian leaders are openly recruiting suicide bombers to strike at the kingdom.
No wonder Hillary is bolting.
Speranza wrote:
LOL
The Three Scrunts
@ Rodan:
I am hardly going to turn Peacenik over this. When there is a compelling American interest in using Military Force, I am all for it. War is Politics by other methods, after all. But when you can’t demonstrate any compelling American interest, and it seems to have been done haphazardly and without the appropriate planning and thought that something that serious requires, then I am opposed to it. That is the case here.
@ chickadee:
@ Iron Fist:
I would vote for Rudy. Perhaps he learned from his experience in 2008. Oart if what sunk his candidacy was Charlie, no longer a Republican Crist. That being said, I have no problems with a guy learning from his failures and gaining strength. Reagan went for the GOP nomination in 1968 and 1976 before finally succeeding in 1980.
@ Rodan:
From your link, best description I’ve heard of Odummy yet:
Rodan wrote:
It’s about time someone did this: High-Profile Conservative Group Files Lawsuit Against Obama Administration Over Health Care Waivers
Talk about opening a can of worms.
@ Urban Infidel:
Obam may very well qualify for the letter of the Law on being a Natural born citizen, but he definately violates the intent of it. The Founding Fathers didn’t forsee a person born native to this soil being raised in a foreign land to hate everything the country stands for.
@ Rodan:
The problem, (if you could call it that,) is that the Tea Party was a grass roots movement with no real leadership of policy position. It was entirely about bloated government growth and unaccountability. The thunder has been stolen, like it inevitably always is. At all of the Tea Pary Rallies, I do not remember a single foreign policy discussion taking place. Now that the GOP is making at least half assed attempts at cutting spending, (bear in mind that this is the first time in American History that money has actually been taken off the table for real,) the Tea Party is starting to lose some of its fizzle. If the Boehner led house goes back on their word, it’ll gain that fizzle back again quick.
@ Iron Fist:
I only support Military action for economic reasons or to confront Islam. I would support Actioan agaisnt Venezuela, Somai pirates or Iran. Not another nation building excercise, but just wars for pure destruction.
What the article points out is that the GOP is now supporting war, for the sake of supporting war. This is revolution without end. The Jacobins would be proud of today’s GOP. This is not a Conservative attitude, this is Progressives.
The fact that the GOP supports any war without debate is insane.
Qaddafi wasn’t our enemy. He was helping us against Al-Qaeda and we attacked him. This is disgusting.
Iron Fist wrote:
I’m not counting him out. His last campaign was a disaster. And such a disappointment. wtf was he thinking.
That said, I think, the race is wide open because of the huge debacle that is zero. I think Rudy is a strong law and order, anti-muzz, pro-America real leader.
He can redeem himself. We will see.
Speranza wrote:
And in a strange way he is right, just not in the way he thinks. At the rate the GOP leadership is going they will destroy America, but it will be by not taking action, by being content to surrender to the Marxist Democrats, by compromising with those inside forces like the Unions who are actively trying to crash America’s economy and rebuild America as a Marxist Utopia.
@ Flyovercountry:
We need a foreign policy debate in the GOP. Whenever someone challenges the current thinking, they get labeled an isolationist. We really do need a debate on what a Conservative foreign policy should be.
For me it should be the US dominating it’s Hemisphere and Containing Islamic-Imperialism. If we go to war, we launch wars of destruction, not nation building. That too me should be our foreign policy.
@ doriangrey:
Plus useless wars were ther is no economic gain.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Click on the link and listen to the broadcast. It’s interesting.
huckfunn wrote:
LOL, if obama-care was such a “gift” to us, why is everyone crying for a waiver?
fcking commies who come bearing gifts . . . .
“gifts,” that have to be forced down your throat.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Megyn Kelly seems to have figured out that we’re helping al Qaeda in Libya…
chickadee wrote:
Here’s the official Obamacare Waver
doriangrey wrote:
I kind of concur!
@ lobo91:
That’s tonight’s thread!
Ancient Aliens: The Hugo Chavez Edition!
I even have a few new of his songs!
Rodan wrote:
We should sit on the sidelines and let Obama take full responsibility for this adventure. No fig leafs cover for him!
Democrats get every one killed.
Democrats are not even smart enough to stay out of the line of fire they get going out of pure dumb ass shit themselves.
Democrats are the one clear and present danger to U.S. and all others on planet earth who love freedom and justice.
November 2012
November 2014
November 2016
We must all be ready with votes every November until they are done.
@ Rodan:
I remember calling you an isolationist once, but I also remember that we each misunderstood each other’s positions. For my part, it would be this way:
Protect our interests, where ever they may be. This would include defending our allies when they needed defending, just like we would expect them to defend us also. When we do need to fight, we should go to win, period. Allow the military leaders to prosecute the hostilities in any way that they see fit. I am bothered by the term, exit strategy. Our exit strategy should be victory. Under my doctrine, Iran would pay heavily for their continued proxy war with Israel. By heavily, I mean I would be so terribly worried about colatteral casualties, or how many things in Iran I broke. An ally would be defined as any nation who signed an alliance treaty with us. Mostly consisting of nations with whom we enjoyed fair and free trade agreements. (This includes opening their markets to our companies free from tarriff as well.) If two of our allies decided to fight, we would disable both from waging war, by any means necessary. For nations we are not allied with, you are on your own, and good luck to you. Learn to protect yourselves.
breaking:
Eiffel Tower Evacuated over Suspicious Package
@ huckfunn:
Rule One.
Ambushs suck.
We have no reason to walk into any ambush, for sure we have no excuse to allow the Republican Party leadership to walk point and spring the f’n trap we will be destroyed in.
It is not up to the Republican Party Leadership, it is up to U.S., get over blameing the Republican Party.
We the People know what to do, lets just do it.
Vote, Votes and more Votes.
It is U.S. or them.
Urban Infidel wrote:
On the way out she managed to grace the Obama White House steps with a huge flaming turd.
I can’t think of any better reason to saddle Obama with a war against Libya than to boost her chances of challenging him in 2012.
I see the savages are back at work
Jerusalem bombing comes amid rising Israel-Gaza violence
@ Flyovercountry:
I can agree to that. I just don’t want any more wars for Muslim Democracy. I want to cripple and isolate Dar AL islam, not spend treasure to help them.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Probably wasn’t Muslims, since they’re saying they received a call warning about the bomb.
refugee000 wrote:
They figure once Israel goes all out, they will beg for a no fly zone.
Israel should watch the Hezzies in the north as well.
@ refugee000:
They never stopped. Gaza flung something like 50 mortar shells and rockets at Israel over the weekend. Such shit simply isn’t reported, because it would hurt the Liberal narragtive too much.
@ Rodan:
This is all rapidly swirling down the toilet.
Hussein’s sniveling appeasement, sympathy for Islamic imperialism, messages of American weakness–it’s all causing the middle east to blow up.
The sharks smell blood.
Keep in mind.
If the U.S. does flounder and get weak or worse, the leaders of both parties will abandon ship to some where else or they will be the few elites at the top bleeding the few poor souls who remain.
Our only choice is to fight with votes and win.
This way of this link and or any other way, just get started and never turn back.
http://www.blowoutcongress.com
lobo91 wrote:
I wonder why…
To reiterate, for emphasis’ sake…
Rodan wrote:
I agree. No more aid to the enemy: Islam.
Iron Fist wrote:
Hell the University of Chicago faculty did as much damage to Obama’s fitness to preside over the Union as any Indonesian Madrass. We have to be vigilent for traitors and subversives within our borders.
Obama the Nicolaitan
Bureaucat wrote:
Why doesn’t she just Get Up and Go NOW?
Rodan wrote:
Muslim Democracy: One Man, One Vote, One Time ONLY.
Gee should we make that into a bumper sticker?
So I took a look at al-chuki’s toilet.
He has the a story about the Jerusalem bombing. Very low key.
I was wondering if he had blamed the GOP for it.
Curiously, there are few comments, and only a few of the old names who are commenting about it.
@ refugee000:
Or Sarah Palin, who was just there over the weekend.
Nato is dead. We have more in common with iraq than we do the EU.
Qadafi is just gonna wait the presidential 90 days out. It’s either kill him or force him to run. That means in this case someone has to be shooting at him constantly.