First time visitor? Learn more.

The March of the Pigs

by 1389AD ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Food and Drink, France, Humor, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Open thread, Sharia (Islamic Law) at April 24th, 2011 - 1:00 pm

Logo of La Marche des Cochons

Gates of Vienna: The March of the Pigs

Many of you will remember last year’s invasion of a French halal fast food restaurant by dozens of Counterjihad insurgents wearing pig masks. A video of the event became an instant hit on YouTube.

The first anniversary of this historic occasion will be celebrated on May 14 with a “March of the Pigs” in Lyon. Many thanks to Bear for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for subtitling the video announcement of this event.

YouTube: March of the pigs May 14 2011 Lyon

[The above YouTube link is not embeddable. Please click to view it on YouTube - it's quite funny!]

La Marche Des Cochons Website (French Language)

Click the thumbnail poster below to access this website.

Thumbnail of poster for La Marche des Cochons


Also posted on 1389 Blog.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

133 Responses to “The March of the Pigs”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Eliana
    1 | April 24, 2011 1:32 pm

    It must feel good for these guys to take a humorous stand against people who pose a very serious threat to France.


  2. Nevergiveup
    2 | April 24, 2011 1:58 pm

    I don’t know maybe it’s only me, but I don’t think it’s all that funny attacking a religions food laws. It wouldn’t be funny if it was a Kosher fair. Yeah Yeah I know the muslims are crazy and fanatics and all, but that doesn’t mean we have to fall tho their level and and act like assholes.


  3. 3 | April 24, 2011 2:18 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    It must feel good for these guys to take a humorous stand against people who pose a very serious threat to France.

    In the next march they should dress like Dogs! That really would freak the Dog hating Muzzies!


  4. coldwarrior
    4 | April 24, 2011 2:20 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    the jews arent using the kosher rules to close down joints and scare off other business…the muzz are

    halal mafia is one example


  5. vagabond trader
    5 | April 24, 2011 2:21 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Define religion.


  6. 6 | April 24, 2011 2:23 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    That is exactly it! Observant Jews don’t try and force everyonelse to live by thier dietary restrictions. They tend to their own obligations, even if it inconveniences them. The Muzz insist on pre-emminance, and they don’t give a damn about who they inconvenience in the process. Halal Mafia, indeed.


  7. Nevergiveup
    7 | April 24, 2011 2:24 pm

    O just think it’s juvenile and counter productive


  8. coldwarrior
    8 | April 24, 2011 2:25 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Define religion.

    not islam!


  9. DaveinAZ
    9 | April 24, 2011 2:26 pm

    What’s amazing is that they’re French.


  10. vagabond trader
    10 | April 24, 2011 2:26 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    An evil cult with a pedophile prophet. TS if I offend them and they can kiss my Jewish tuchas.


  11. coldwarrior
    11 | April 24, 2011 2:28 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    O just think it’s juvenile and counter productive

    yeah, its juvenile, and funny.

    counterproductive? dunno…


  12. 12 | April 24, 2011 2:29 pm

    @ vagabond trader:
    @ coldwarrior:
    @ Iron Fist:

    Islam is Arabic Imperialism. Non Arabic Muslims have adopted Arabic names and pray towards Arabia. It’s an Arabic political movement, not a religion.


  13. 13 | April 24, 2011 2:30 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I think it’s funny! I’m tired of being nice.


  14. Nevergiveup
    14 | April 24, 2011 2:31 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    O just think it’s juvenile and counter productive

    yeah, its juvenile, and funny.

    counterproductive? dunno…

    Well not all that important. I am really more concerned that the next bottle of wine I open is superb


  15. vagabond trader
    15 | April 24, 2011 2:32 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Personally I would not do it but understand why the French who are weary of having to accept these unassimilated orcs would.. ;-)


  16. vagabond trader
    16 | April 24, 2011 2:32 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    What is it?


  17. coldwarrior
    17 | April 24, 2011 2:34 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I am really more concerned that the next bottle of wine I open is superb

    priorities!

    :lol:


  18. Nevergiveup
    18 | April 24, 2011 2:35 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    What is it?

    A Pinot Noir from Italy


  19. vagabond trader
    19 | April 24, 2011 2:41 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Sounds yummy!

    My lasagna looks too purdy to cut. Oh the humanity.


  20. 20 | April 24, 2011 2:42 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I had a Rioja from Spain last night!


  21. coldwarrior
    21 | April 24, 2011 2:44 pm

    @ Rodan:

    i had an italian chianti…


  22. John Difool
    22 | April 24, 2011 2:45 pm

    For those who saw my post about the Dos Equis man Johnathan Goldsmith passing away on the other thread, disregard. It was an elaborate internet hoax. Somebody changed his Wiki page and now it’s changed back.

    He’s not dead.


  23. coldwarrior
    23 | April 24, 2011 2:46 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    For those who saw my post about the Dos Equis man Johnathan Goldsmith passing away on the other thread, disregard. It was an elaborate internet hoax. Somebody changed his Wiki page and now it’s changed back.
    He’s not dead.

    HOOOORAYYYY!!!!!!


  24. buzzsawmonkey
    24 | April 24, 2011 2:48 pm

    I still want to see a “March of the Pigs” in the form of 10,000 Arkansas razorbacks being driven from the northern border of Gaza to the southern border.


  25. John Difool
    25 | April 24, 2011 2:49 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Also this guy has quite an impressive acting portfolio. He was gunned down by John Wayne in The Shootist.


  26. Poteen
    26 | April 24, 2011 2:49 pm

    @ John Difool:

    So I can finish my Guinness without guilt? Good!


  27. rain of lead
    27 | April 24, 2011 2:49 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    What is it?

    A Pinot Noir from Italy

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ Rodan:

    i had an italian chianti…

    I’m drinkin a Miller Lite


  28. coldwarrior
    28 | April 24, 2011 2:51 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    nothing wrong with that.

    i’ve never been a big fan of lagers.

    ale and stout makes me happy.


  29. coldwarrior
    29 | April 24, 2011 2:52 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    I still want to see a “March of the Pigs” in the form of 10,000 Arkansas razorbacks being driven from the northern border of Gaza to the southern border.

    you of course realize how vicious these razorbacks are, i’m sure.

    that is one nasty, nasty animal


  30. John Difool
    30 | April 24, 2011 2:53 pm

    @ Poteen:

    Yep, and I can get back to drinking my Yuengling


  31. coldwarrior
    31 | April 24, 2011 2:54 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Also this guy has quite an impressive acting portfolio. He was gunned down by John Wayne in The Shootist.

    and he can divide by 0


  32. buzzsawmonkey
    32 | April 24, 2011 2:54 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    you of course realize how vicious these razorbacks are, i’m sure.

    that is one nasty, nasty animal

    Yes. I figure that razorbacks v. Hamas is a fair fight. And I think it would be a nice nod to all those “green” folks in the West for Israel to take care of a noxious pest through the judicious importation of natural predators.


  33. vagabond trader
    33 | April 24, 2011 2:55 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Perfect critter companions for the ham-ass inbreds.


  34. rain of lead
    34 | April 24, 2011 2:56 pm

    I am shocked…shocked I tell you to see this headline

    Battered by gas prices, White House starts attacks on oil companies

    The White House has joined congressional Democrats in targeting oil companies with criticism for nearly $4 per gallon gas.

    President Obama lashed out at oil companies — and the tax breaks they get from the government — for a second consecutive day on Thursday and again in Saturday’s address.

    “Four billion dollars of your money are going to these companies at a time when they’re making record profits and you’re paying near record prices at the pump,” the president said at a Nevada town hall. “It has to stop.”

    hmmmmm…If you get rid of tax breaks for the oil co’s….wouldn’t
    that…..well……uh…..cause gas prices to go higher?

    just askin


  35. vagabond trader
    35 | April 24, 2011 2:57 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    Yeah,demagoguing big oil,its whats fer dinner with these class warriors.


  36. John Difool
    36 | April 24, 2011 2:58 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    I don’t think he’s aware of the fact that a lot of oil companies don’t control the price of a barrel of oil either.


  37. Guggi
    37 | April 24, 2011 2:58 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I don’t know maybe it’s only me, but I don’t think it’s all that funny attacking a religions food laws. It wouldn’t be funny if it was a Kosher fair. Yeah Yeah I know the muslims are crazy and fanatics and all, but that doesn’t mean we have to fall tho their level and and act like assholes.

    Thank you for your standpoint couldn’t agree more.


  38. vagabond trader
    38 | April 24, 2011 3:03 pm

    Anyone recall what happened to the little cafe in NYC that was across from an unholy mosk? The muzz wanted to drive them out for serving liquor and not keeping their windows properly covered.


  39. 39 | April 24, 2011 3:03 pm

    @ Guggi:

    Hey check #45 on the 1503 campaign!

    I sent ya a little message!

    :lol:


  40. 40 | April 24, 2011 3:04 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    They are still there!


  41. Nevergiveup
    41 | April 24, 2011 3:05 pm

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., urged a new level of allied involvement Sunday, calling for the U.S. and NATO to launch direct strikes on Qaddafi’s inner circle in Tripoli.

    Why? Apparently more people are being killed in Syria?


  42. vagabond trader
    42 | April 24, 2011 3:05 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Good!!! How offensive! :mrgreen:


  43. John Difool
    43 | April 24, 2011 3:06 pm

    Also evidently Obama is blaming the oil companies for price gouging and he’s supposedly putting together a task force to investigate them. I recall the Dems investigating them a few years ago and the oil company CEO’s handing them their asses in a very embarrassing manner prompting Maxine Waters to make her famous statement about “socializing them”.

    At any rate if they’re so up in arms about these tax breaks, why didn’t they do something about them over the last few years while they had control of The Whitehouse, The Senate and The House?

    Why, because this is nothing, but a usual dog and pony show and an attempt to blow even more smoke up the American peoples asses.


  44. Nevergiveup
    44 | April 24, 2011 3:06 pm

    BEIJING – Ex-U.S. President Jimmy Carter and three other former leaders arrived in Beijing on Sunday en route to North Korea to discuss the revival of nuclear disarmament talks.
    Carter and the group of veteran statesmen known as the Elders are to travel to Pyongyang on Tuesday as part of international efforts to restart the negotiations on ending North Korea’s nuclear program.
    The group, which includes former Finnish President Martti Ahtisaari, former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Brundtland and former Irish President Mary Robinson, said it also plans to discuss North Korea’s chronic food shortages.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/04/24/jimmy-carter-visit-north-korea/#ixzz1KT95tlN9

    What a freaken group?


  45. Nevergiveup
    45 | April 24, 2011 3:07 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    Why, because this is nothing, but a usual dog and pony show and an attempt to blow even more smoke up the American peoples asses.

    Yup


  46. vagabond trader
    46 | April 24, 2011 3:08 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Axis of As*holes


  47. John Difool
    47 | April 24, 2011 3:10 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Axis of As*holes

    Heh Heh Heh Heh


  48. vagabond trader
    48 | April 24, 2011 3:11 pm

    @ John Difool:

    :lol:


  49. Guggi
    49 | April 24, 2011 3:11 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Hey check #45 on the 1503 campaign!
    I sent ya a little message!

    Shoes? You should be afraid of little Rodan-dolls peppered with needles and secret spells :-P


  50. rain of lead
    50 | April 24, 2011 3:13 pm

    hey ya’ll
    did you know you are “slugs”
    your President seems to think you are

    Last weekend, His Presidency Barack Obama was captured making potentially offensive comments to a group of big money donors who had paid large sums of money for special access to His Presidency

    http://bigjournalism.com/amarcus/2011/04/18/media-doesnt-ask-for-obamas-full-hot-mic-remarks-heavily-edited-video-available-only/

    But where is the audio of the section where the President of the United States of America referred to some Americans as “slugs?”

    He did opine that some employees “are slugs” and not trying to do their job. But that’s true of any large institution.”

    If His Presidency of the United States referred to a group of Americans as “slugs” and it was recorded, that is news and we deserve to hear it. At least so that we might judge for ourselves just how much insight his comments provide on his assessment of the American people. For all we know, it sounds better than it reads, but it reads pretty bad.


  51. vagabond trader
    51 | April 24, 2011 3:16 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    Sounds like a kalegore trout reference.


  52. Guggi
    52 | April 24, 2011 3:18 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Why? Apparently more people are being killed in Syria?

    Oh, to make more anti-Western enemies ? There was an article in the conservative German newspaper “Die Welt” about a visit in Tripoli and the reporter told how much the relatives of the injured hate now the “West”. They told him “go the Benghazi and bomb them, they started the whole thing”.

    Btw: the German section of AI condemns the Nato bombing b’cause it kills more innocent people instead of protecting them.


  53. John Difool
    53 | April 24, 2011 3:19 pm

    @ rain of lead:

    They’ll get around to releasing it around the same time the L.A. Times releases his videotaped CAIR banquet speech when he was a Senator.


  54. rain of lead
    54 | April 24, 2011 3:23 pm

    @ John Difool:

    yeah, 10 years after he’s out of office


  55. Alberta Oil Peon
    55 | April 24, 2011 3:24 pm

    @ Guggi:
    Well, I couldn’t disagree more. Fuck ‘em if they can’t take a joke. I wouldn’t have this attitude were it not for the fact that the Satan-worshipping muzz always want us to bend over backwards to accommodate them.

    Fuck ‘em, and the camels they rode in on.


  56. Nevergiveup
    56 | April 24, 2011 3:31 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Well, I couldn’t disagree more. Fuck ‘em if they can’t take a joke. I wouldn’t have this attitude were it not for the fact that the Satan-worshipping muzz always want us to bend over backwards to accommodate them.

    Fuck ‘em, and the camels they rode in on.

    It’s not about them, fuck them. It’s about us and how we choose to express ourselves. And I don’t think parading around in pig masks is all that impressive


  57. Eliana
    57 | April 24, 2011 3:34 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    It’s not about them, fuck them. It’s about us and how we choose to express ourselves. And I don’t think parading around in pig masks is all that impressive

    Who are “we” and “us” in your argument?

    Do you live in France? Did you go to this protest with a pig mask on your face or something?


  58. Nevergiveup
    58 | April 24, 2011 3:37 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    It’s not about them, fuck them. It’s about us and how we choose to express ourselves. And I don’t think parading around in pig masks is all that impressive

    Who are “we” and “us” in your argument?

    Do you live in France? Did you go to this protest with a pig mask on your face or something?

    No and I would not. I think it’s demeaning, insulting , and childish.


  59. Eliana
    59 | April 24, 2011 3:39 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I think it’s demeaning, insulting , and childish.

    Again, who are the “we” and “us” in your argument if you didn’t go to France to do this and no one else here did either?


  60. buzzsawmonkey
    60 | April 24, 2011 3:39 pm

    I’m surprised that the French protesters haven’t adapted the Marseillaise: “Marchons, cochons…”


  61. Nevergiveup
    61 | April 24, 2011 3:41 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I think it’s demeaning, insulting , and childish.

    Again, who are the “we” and “us” in your argument if you didn’t go to France to do this and no one else here did either?

    Look don’t start splitting hairs here. If some one chooses to post a thread here endorsing this type of behavior I am going to crtitisize it.


  62. Alberta Oil Peon
    62 | April 24, 2011 3:42 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Well, for you, maybe we could get a small herd of real pigs, feed them them a dose of Ex-lax, and turn them loose in a halal establishment.

    What part of islam not being a religion do you not understand? They don’t deserve respectful treatment, no as a group.


  63. buzzsawmonkey
    63 | April 24, 2011 3:43 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Look don’t start splitting hairs here.

    Bristling at swinish behavior?


  64. Eliana
    64 | April 24, 2011 3:44 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Look don’t start splitting hairs here. If some one chooses to post a thread here endorsing this type of behavior I am going to crtitisize it.

    There’s no harm in being accurate in your use of personal pronouns.

    You think THEY were childish (or whatever) in France for having this kind of protest.


  65. Nevergiveup
    65 | April 24, 2011 3:46 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    Well whether you like it or not islam is a religion. Not one I particularly like. But I don’t get what marching around in pig masks has to do with anything. As I said it’s foolish and childish and not something I like to be associated with


  66. Philip_Daniel
    66 | April 24, 2011 3:46 pm


  67. vagabond trader
    67 | April 24, 2011 3:49 pm

    We need to see more of this. Listen to the dhimmis crying we must not be provocative. Grrrrrr.


  68. Alberta Oil Peon
    68 | April 24, 2011 3:51 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Marching around in pig masks is mocking their fear and hatred of pigs. It goes far beyond a simple dietary law, you know. Superstitious muzz even fear a picture of a pig.

    Satan hates to be mocked, and these people are his servants.


  69. vagabond trader
    69 | April 24, 2011 3:53 pm

    Some religion huh?


  70. buzzsawmonkey
    70 | April 24, 2011 3:55 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    We need to see more of this. Listen to the dhimmis crying we must not be provocative. Grrrrrr.

    She reminds me of the Holocaust survivor in Marathon Man trying to get people on 47th Street to listen to her when she sees the “White Angel”—the Nazi played by Laurence Olivier—walking down the street.


  71. 71 | April 24, 2011 3:56 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Define religion.

    Me, I’m an American. I can kinda define “religion”, or at least as good as most. But I forbid my government to do so. In writing, yet.


  72. Eliana
    72 | April 24, 2011 3:56 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:

    Marching around in pig masks is mocking their fear and hatred of pigs. It goes far beyond a simple dietary law, you know. Superstitious muzz even fear a picture of a pig.

    It’s why many Muslims (including some Muslim governments) call Jews the “sons of pigs and apes.”

    Their culture regards Jews with as much hatred and superstitious fear as they do pigs.


  73. Guggi
    73 | April 24, 2011 3:56 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    Marching around in pig masks is mocking their fear and hatred of pigs

    The first thing they will do is calling them pigs b’cause they look like pigs. How stupid must one be to give them the opportunity to call them correctly pigs b’cause they’ve made themselves pigs.


  74. Alberta Oil Peon
    74 | April 24, 2011 3:59 pm

    @ Guggi:
    Well, I’d sooner be called a pig than a European. Or a muzz. Pigs are honorable beasts.


  75. vagabond trader
    75 | April 24, 2011 3:59 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    She does,I had forgotten that scene.Obviously the crowd thought this lady was out of bounds too.


  76. Eliana
    76 | April 24, 2011 4:02 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    She does,I had forgotten that scene.Obviously the crowd thought this lady was out of bounds too.

    What happened after she finished speaking?

    It looked like Muslims and cops were closing in on her.


  77. Eliana
    77 | April 24, 2011 4:03 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    Also, do we know what the speakers were saying that brought on her protest against them?


  78. buzzsawmonkey
    78 | April 24, 2011 4:03 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    She does,I had forgotten that scene.Obviously the crowd thought this lady was out of bounds too.

    That scene is the stuff of nightmare, as the woman attempts to get somebody’s—anybody’s—attention and no-one will listen.


  79. vagabond trader
    79 | April 24, 2011 4:11 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    That scene is the stuff of nightmare, as the woman attempts to get somebody’s—anybody’s—attention and no-one will listen.

    It was horrific,and the diamond merchant also knew who he was.

    httpw://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ybpsRNXUII


  80. vagabond trader
    80 | April 24, 2011 4:12 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    :oops:


  81. vagabond trader
    81 | April 24, 2011 4:15 pm

    @ Eliana:

    According to a poster at Atlas this was at a rally for Pierre Vogel,a salafist/radical.


  82. buzzsawmonkey
    82 | April 24, 2011 4:19 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    I do not want to see Germany overrun by Muslims, but there is nonetheless a poetic justice in Germans finding themselves, in their own country, in the position of the Holocaust survivor in that film.


  83. Eliana
    83 | April 24, 2011 4:21 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    Here’s something about Pierre Vogel at PoliticalForum.com:

    Two salafist preachers Pierre Vogel und Bilal Philips addressed 1500 people in Frankfurt yesterday despite the City of Frankfurt’s attempts to ban the meeting. At the gathering the men and women collected in separate sections and women with face coverings were not permitted to enter. The gathering was permitted by the court on the grounds that the city could ensure safety. The permission then granted was strict: no hate speech against segements of the population or calls to violence and the rights of others were not to be harmed, others insulted or denied.

    These preachers have previously called for the death penalty for homosexuals. Minister for Internal Affairs, Rhein and the Agency for Protection of the Constitution are of the view that the salafist preachers teach messages contrary to democrcy and help radicalise youths. Salafists seek an islamic world order, contrary to German consitutional law principles.


  84. vagabond trader
    84 | April 24, 2011 4:22 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    All of Europe for that matter.They gave up civilized Jews for the barbarian. Astonishing.


  85. vagabond trader
    85 | April 24, 2011 4:24 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Amazing, and a country preacher is not allowed to protest peacefully in front of a mosk on American soil.


  86. Nevergiveup
    86 | April 24, 2011 4:25 pm

    Prosecutor orders Mubarak be moved to prison hospital
    Mubarak was admitted to a hospital in Sharm el-Sheikh with an unspecified illness the day prosecutors ordered him detained for questioning; doctors say his heart could stop beating at any moment

    I “almost” feel sorry for the moron. He should have gotten out while the getting was good.


  87. vagabond trader
    87 | April 24, 2011 4:28 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    doctors say his heart could stop beating at any moment

    With a little help from his attendants no doubt.A KCL bolus = vapolock.


  88. Nevergiveup
    88 | April 24, 2011 4:29 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    doctors say his heart could stop beating at any moment

    With a little help from his attendants no doubt.A KCL bolus = vapolock.

    He’d be a lot safer in an Israeli Hospital. Oh the irony


  89. vagabond trader
    89 | April 24, 2011 4:30 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    No kidding huh?


  90. buzzsawmonkey
    90 | April 24, 2011 4:31 pm

    vagabond trader wrote:

    Amazing, and a country preacher is not allowed to protest peacefully in front of a mosk on American soil.

    Terry Jones is an ill-dressed hick with a mustache that is found, for the most part, only among bikers or low-class leatherboy homosexuals. He is a Christian preacher, and from the South, and he does not partake of the mealymouthed dhimmitude towards Muslims which is currently fashionable.

    For all these reasons, he will receive nothing but contempt from the American elite.


  91. vagabond trader
    91 | April 24, 2011 4:37 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Right on the money there.


  92. vagabond trader
    92 | April 24, 2011 4:42 pm

    More from those offended by pigs.


  93. 93 | April 24, 2011 4:43 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    See, there’s the problem with this stuff. How do you draw a line or lines amongst Terry Jones, Billy Graham, the Pope, Fred Phelps and Reverend Al ? Toss in a few imams, too, just for variety. Maybe some of those irritating Hari Krishna types, assuming there are any left out there. And a couple of Scientologists, too.

    Only the most dispassionate and legalistic-minded can draw anything equitable, and we’re always damned short of those, mainly because almost everybody hates them.


  94. buzzsawmonkey
    94 | April 24, 2011 4:46 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    See, there’s the problem with this stuff. How do you draw a line or lines amongst Terry Jones, Billy Graham, the Pope, Fred Phelps and Reverend Al ? Toss in a few imams, too, just for variety. Maybe some of those irritating Hari Krishna types, assuming there are any left out there. And a couple of Scientologists, too.

    Only the most dispassionate and legalistic-minded can draw anything equitable, and we’re always damned short of those, mainly because almost everybody hates them.

    Not quite sure of your point here.


  95. Beeduwine
    95 | April 24, 2011 4:56 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    I still want to see a “March of the Pigs” in the form of 10,000 Arkansas razorbacks being driven from the northern border of Gaza to the southern border.

    Combine it with 10,000 menstrual, uncovered, infidel women running from east to west, and we have a party.


  96. Beeduwine
    96 | April 24, 2011 4:59 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Well, I’d sooner be called a pig than a European. Or a muzz. Pigs are honorable beasts.

    Thank you.


  97. 97 | April 24, 2011 4:59 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    It’s just that these things always devolve into some sort of partisan screaming match. I don’t mean here on this blog -- I mean in general. I pity the jurists that have to deal with it -- they’re always wrong no matter what decision they reach. And you can always depend on the partisans to push the limits so that the jurists are forced to deal with it.

    I’m guessing it’s just a part of the massive decline in civility. I find it all vey depressing.

    Not much of a point, is it? But there you have it.


  98. buzzsawmonkey
    98 | April 24, 2011 5:02 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    It’s just that these things always devolve into some sort of partisan screaming match. I don’t mean here on this blog – I mean in general. I pity the jurists that have to deal with it – they’re always wrong no matter what decision they reach. And you can always depend on the partisans to push the limits so that the jurists are forced to deal with it.

    I’m guessing it’s just a part of the massive decline in civility. I find it all vey depressing.

    Not much of a point, is it? But there you have it.

    Terry Jones is being blocked from his demonstration—rude or silly as it may be—for two reasons, both of them worthless: he is being canceled by the “heckler’s veto,” i.e., fear of the response of those he is demonstrating against, which is wholly contrary to the principles of the First Amendment, and he is having this imposed on him because he is visibly not a member of the elite class.


  99. coldwarrior
    99 | April 24, 2011 5:09 pm

    strongly worded letter alert:

    Syria: President Bashar al-Assad faces indictment by the International Criminal Court
    President Bashar al-Assad faces indictment by the International Criminal Court as Western leaders were told on Sunday that the Syrian leader could be held to account for the deaths of 120 anti-government protesters…

    Such condemnation is unlikely to pacify human rights activists. The ICJ called for Syria to be referred to the United Nations Security Council. “There is enough evidence suggesting mass killings now,” said Said Benarbia, the ICJ’s legal officer for the Middle East. “The Security Council must assess the magnitude of human rights violations. It must decide whether to have an international fact-finding mission and, if there is enough evidence, refer it to the International Criminal Court.”


  100. 100 | April 24, 2011 5:11 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I have no argument against either of those points. But I find it depressing anyway.


  101. Beeduwine
    101 | April 24, 2011 5:19 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    The first point is undoubtedly true. So true, I imagine, “they” never got around to even consider the second point.


  102. buzzsawmonkey
    102 | April 24, 2011 5:26 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    The first point is undoubtedly true. So true, I imagine, “they” never got around to even consider the second point.

    The two are inextricably intertwined. Were Jones not considered a piece of trash by the Proper People, effort would have been expended to ensure that his First Amendment rights were not abrogated by a heckler’s veto. But because Jones stands outside the Comfortable Class, no such consideration was extended to him.


  103. Beeduwine
    103 | April 24, 2011 5:42 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Beeduwine wrote:
    The first point is undoubtedly true. So true, I imagine, “they” never got around to even consider the second point.
    The two are inextricably intertwined. Were Jones not considered a piece of trash by the Proper People, effort would have been expended to ensure that his First Amendment rights were not abrogated by a heckler’s veto. But because Jones stands outside the Comfortable Class, no such consideration was extended to him.

    Well, then we could go the other way around too: Proper People would never do such a thing as to protesting a mosque, in other words, the moment you take such action you are no longer proper people.


  104. buzzsawmonkey
    104 | April 24, 2011 5:45 pm

    Beeduwine wrote:

    Well, then we could go the other way around too: Proper People would never do such a thing as to protesting a mosque, in other words, the moment you take such action you are no longer proper people.

    True, to a point—but the thing is, were Jones to have been someone from the Right Seminary, with the Right Background, representing the Right Denomination, some consideration would have been extended to indulge him even if he was going against the stream. The fact is, Jones is none of these things—and on that score there is no impetus to extend to him the benefits of the Constitution which is supposed to protect him.


  105. Beeduwine
    105 | April 24, 2011 5:56 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Beeduwine wrote:
    Well, then we could go the other way around too: Proper People would never do such a thing as to protesting a mosque, in other words, the moment you take such action you are no longer proper people.
    True, to a point—but the thing is, were Jones to have been someone from the Right Seminary, with the Right Background, representing the Right Denomination, some consideration would have been extended to indulge him even if he was going against the stream. The fact is, Jones is none of these things—and on that score there is no impetus to extend to him the benefits of the Constitution which is supposed to protect him.

    Probably true, but let me present a different take on it. “They” look at constitutional rights or freedoms like an insurance company would: They’ll guarantee you protection from ruin if you have an accident (excercise your freedom) that is covered, but not if you on beforehand announce that you are going to have an accident.

    Ah, shit, messy analogy, but I’m not going to clean it up and I’m sure you catch my aimless drift.


  106. Nevergiveup
    106 | April 24, 2011 5:57 pm

    I kinda find Jones a little amusing, but what worries me, is if he distracts from the task at hand: DEFEAT OBAMA IN 2012


  107. Nevergiveup
    107 | April 24, 2011 6:02 pm

    Libya: western leaders call for Nato to target Gaddafi
    Senior western leaders called for Nato to adopt an assassination policy against Col Muammar Gaddafi to salvage the bombing campaign in Libya from a descent into stalemate

    (Scratches head) So I guess with hope and change in the White House, assasinations are Oki Doki?


  108. Da_Beerfreak
    108 | April 24, 2011 6:19 pm

    You got to love the way Russia and China stood back at the United Nations Security Council and let 0dumbo dive head first into the Libyan cesspool. It would be really funny if it wasn’t so sad. :oops:


  109. Nevergiveup
    109 | April 24, 2011 6:21 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    You got to love the way Russia and China stood back at the United Nations Security Council and let 0dumbo dive head first into the Libyan cesspool. It would be really funny if it wasn’t so sad.

    Very well put


  110. Da_Beerfreak
    110 | April 24, 2011 6:29 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I think Russia and China both knew this was not going to turn out well for the west. China has been putting a lot of time and money into Africa in the form of foreign aid and investment. China is the one to watch because the way things are going they are in the best position to make big gains from the mess 0dumbo is making.


  111. huckfunn
    111 | April 24, 2011 6:31 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    You got to love the way Russia and China stood back at the United Nations Security Council and let 0dumbo dive head first into the Libyan cesspool. It would be really funny if it wasn’t so sad.

    Indeed! As Rush sez, “put a pile of excrement in front of a dimocrat and he’ll step in it everytime”.


  112. Guggi
    112 | April 24, 2011 6:32 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    let 0dumbo dive head first into the Libyan cesspool

    And now they demand to take care of human rights and accuse the USA/F/GB et all of human rights violations in Libya.


  113. Nevergiveup
    113 | April 24, 2011 6:32 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I think Russia and China both knew this was not going to turn out well for the west. China has been putting a lot of time and money into Africa in the form of foreign aid and investment. China is the one to watch because the way things are going they are in the best position to make big gains from the mess 0dumbo is making.

    And I bet China and Russia are also helping Kaddafi some also. That has been reported


  114. Da_Beerfreak
    114 | April 24, 2011 6:35 pm

    @ huckfunn:
    I have heard Rush say that many times over the years too. I wasn’t thinking about that when I wrote the post, but it it is a perfect fit. :lol:


  115. vagabond trader
    115 | April 24, 2011 6:37 pm

    Well what would you expect.

    For all the Islamic’s.
    Denny’s was never known for Political correctness. Here we go again.


  116. John Difool
    116 | April 24, 2011 6:41 pm

    @ vagabond trader:

    Uh oh, Bacon-Allah ! It’s On Like Donkey Kong !


  117. Guggi
    117 | April 24, 2011 6:43 pm

    The coalition under the umbrella of the Nato could have turned around after the head chopping video from Benghazi.


  118. Da_Beerfreak
    118 | April 24, 2011 6:43 pm

    @ Guggi:
    China has already complained about GB sending in a handful of advisers to aid the Rebels. :roll:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    That would not surprise me one bit, in fact I would be worried if they weren’t taking advantage of the situation. :twisted:


  119. Nevergiveup
    119 | April 24, 2011 6:44 pm

    Guggi wrote:

    The coalition under the umbrella of the Nato could have turned around after the head chopping video from Benghazi.

    I don’t think McCain saw that one


  120. John Difool
    120 | April 24, 2011 6:48 pm

    I’m really looking forward to “Moons Over My-Hammad “


  121. Nevergiveup
    121 | April 24, 2011 6:48 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    I’m really looking forward to “Moons Over My-Hammad “

    Richard Dryfus out of work again?


  122. Guggi
    122 | April 24, 2011 6:52 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    I don’t think McCain saw that one

    He should stay away from politics.


  123. huckfunn
    123 | April 24, 2011 6:52 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    I’m really looking forward to “Moons Over My-Hammad “

    How ’bout Allah Ak-Bar’s Open


  124. John Difool
    124 | April 24, 2011 6:59 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    That was pretty awesome.


  125. The Osprey
    125 | April 24, 2011 7:06 pm

    Alberta Oil Peon wrote:

    @ Guggi:
    Well, I’d sooner be called a pig than a European. Or a muzz. Pigs are honorable beasts.

    “Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals. I like pigs.”
    -Winston Churchill


  126. Guggi
    126 | April 24, 2011 7:08 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    “Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals. I like pigs.”
    -Winston Churchill

    So, where is the problem when they call us the daughters and sons of pigs ?


  127. Eliana
    127 | April 24, 2011 7:14 pm

    @ Guggi:

    So, where is the problem when they call us the daughters and sons of pigs ?

    The people who call Jews “the sons of pigs and apes” also glorify the act of committing suicide to kill us.

    If they weren’t trying to kill us all the time, it would be a little easier to ignore their hatred.


  128. Eliana
    128 | April 24, 2011 7:22 pm

    There’s a large culture in this world that believes suicide is glorious and something for the family of the suicide to celebrate if they died while killing Jews (or westerners in general, in the case of the terror attacks like the ones on 9/11 in America and the terror attacks in Madrid and London).

    This is psycho-hatred that civilized societies find monstrous.

    It’s acceptable and glorified in one large general culture.


  129. 129 | April 24, 2011 7:33 pm

    omg. i despise the french just a teensy bit less. well, those young folks anyway. i see their lame stream media is just as lame as ours calling them right wing extremists.


  130. Buffalobob
    130 | April 24, 2011 8:03 pm

    Pickled Pigs Feet yum.


  131. 131 | April 26, 2011 2:04 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:

    I think it’s funny! I’m tired of being nice.

    Me too! If I had money to burn, I’d put on a pig mask and fly over there myself to join in. And no, it’s not counterproductive at all. It makes the point -- that we will not be intimidated -- in a very funny, cute, and eye-catching way.

    huckfunn wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    You got to love the way Russia and China stood back at the United Nations Security Council and let 0dumbo dive head first into the Libyan cesspool. It would be really funny if it wasn’t so sad.

    Indeed! As Rush sez, “put a pile of excrement in front of a dimocrat and he’ll step in it everytime”.

    And then they’ll pick up what’s left of the pile and try to throw it at us.


  132. 132 | April 26, 2011 2:12 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Libya: western leaders call for Nato to target Gaddafi
    Senior western leaders called for Nato to adopt an assassination policy against Col Muammar Gaddafi to salvage the bombing campaign in Libya from a descent into stalemate

    (Scratches head) So I guess with hope and change in the White House, assasinations are Oki Doki?

    It used to be that we avoided such things because of the disastrous effects of our enemies retaliating in kind by assassinating OUR political leaders.

    That would be no loss to us (quite the contrary), BUT for the fact that assassinations of American politicans are always used as an excuse for intensified (and flagrantly unconstitutional) repressive measures against the US citizenry.

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:

    It’s just that these things always devolve into some sort of partisan screaming match. I don’t mean here on this blog – I mean in general. I pity the jurists that have to deal with it – they’re always wrong no matter what decision they reach. And you can always depend on the partisans to push the limits so that the jurists are forced to deal with it.

    I’m guessing it’s just a part of the massive decline in civility. I find it all vey depressing.

    Not much of a point, is it? But there you have it.

    Terry Jones is being blocked from his demonstration—rude or silly as it may be—for two reasons, both of them worthless: he is being canceled by the “heckler’s veto,” i.e., fear of the response of those he is demonstrating against, which is wholly contrary to the principles of the First Amendment, and he is having this imposed on him because he is visibly not a member of the elite class.

    AND because Jones is impeding the smooth implementation of the hidden agendas of the elite class, who are trying to sell the rest of us out to our sworn enemies -- as rapidly as possible, and before anybody notices it in time to put a stop to it.


  133. 133 | April 26, 2011 2:21 am

    Mike C. wrote:

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    See, there’s the problem with this stuff. How do you draw a line or lines amongst Terry Jones, Billy Graham, the Pope, Fred Phelps and Reverend Al ? Toss in a few imams, too, just for variety. Maybe some of those irritating Hari Krishna types, assuming there are any left out there. And a couple of Scientologists, too.

    Only the most dispassionate and legalistic-minded can draw anything equitable, and we’re always damned short of those, mainly because almost everybody hates them.

    Simple.
    A religion is a matter of purely VOLUNTARY private or group devotion.
    A political ideology (e.g., Islam, which is undeserving of continued existence, let alone the protection of the First Amendment) is a matter of imposing one’s beliefs on others through force, fraud, or both.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David