First time visitor? Learn more.

Report of Team B II: Shariah – The Threat to America

by 1389AD ( 103 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezballah, Jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia (Islamic Law) at August 1st, 2011 - 11:30 am

Shariah The Threat logo

What would have to change if it turns out that all of those comforting assurances about Islam are completely wrong? What will we have to do differently?

Shariah – The Threat to America is a project of the Center for Security Policy. Here is a definitive analysis, which is in the public domain.


Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

103 Responses to “Report of Team B II: Shariah – The Threat to America
( jump to bottom )

  1. Eliana
    1 | August 1, 2011 11:48 am

    What would have to change if it turns out that all of those comforting assurances about Islam are completely wrong? What will we have to do differently?

    We need to punch liberals in the mouth.

    (It won’t help anything, but it would feel nice.)

    Just kidding.

    It’s hard to know what to do if the stealth Jihad ramps up. We’ve seen what ‘democracy’ looks like in the Muslim countries.

    It’s worrisome.


  2. 2 | August 1, 2011 11:52 am

    @ Eliana:

    The Left is allied with Islam.


  3. coldwarrior
    3 | August 1, 2011 11:54 am

    good find, 1389. the csp is a wealth of info.

    thanks.


  4. Eliana
    4 | August 1, 2011 11:54 am

    @ Rodan:

    The Left is allied with Islam.

    Absolutely.


  5. RIX
    5 | August 1, 2011 11:56 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Eliana:
    The Left is allied with Islam.

    And the Holy Warriors would love to
    kill them.


  6. coldwarrior
    6 | August 1, 2011 11:56 am

    @ Eliana:

    its more rewarding to goad a liberal into taking a swing at you. not only does it destroy their world view when they go to violence, but then you can ‘defend yourself’ without the law coming after you afterward.

    :)


  7. 7 | August 1, 2011 11:57 am

    @ Eliana:

    Many Leftists have taken the Shahda!


  8. The Osprey
    8 | August 1, 2011 11:58 am

    Has Imam Al-Chucki tossed Frank Gaffney and the CSP under the
    bus as well?


  9. Eliana
    9 | August 1, 2011 11:59 am

    @ coldwarrior:

    Yeah – I was kidding about punchin’ ‘em in the mouth.

    I read a liberal website last night.


  10. Eliana
    11 | August 1, 2011 12:07 pm

    @ The Osprey:

    Little green fatwas? :lol:


  11. 13 | August 1, 2011 12:23 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    We need to punch liberals in the mouth.

    Grab ‘em by the balls and their hearts and minds will follow! I havew no desire to be collegial with the Left. I want to destroy them, defeat them in detail, and drive them to utter despair! Anything that makes their day worse is a net gain. That is why I am cautiously positive towards the Debt Deal. With the way the Left is freaking out, you’d think we just shot their favorite dog. Good.


  12. 14 | August 1, 2011 12:23 pm

    Eliana wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    Little green fatwas?

    Do little green fatwas make a mess when you step on them?


  13. 15 | August 1, 2011 12:25 pm

    @ Eliana:

    Little green fat-ass! 8O


  14. Eliana
    16 | August 1, 2011 12:39 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Anything that makes their day worse is a net gain. That is why I am cautiously positive towards the Debt Deal. With the way the Left is freaking out, you’d think we just shot their favorite dog. Good.

    This does sound hopeful!


  15. yenta-fada
    17 | August 1, 2011 12:46 pm

    The tranzi progressive axis is spinning this whole mess as a result of the Tea Party and the republicans. You guys are being portrayed as kitten shooters. It’s very toxic, not to mention inaccurate.


  16. coldwarrior
    18 | August 1, 2011 12:49 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    The tranzi progressive axis is spinning this whole mess as a result of the Tea Party and the republicans. You guys are being portrayed as kitten shooters. It’s very toxic, not to mention inaccurate.

    did you expect anything less?

    do expect any republican that votes for this to be primaried by the tea party…u listening ltc west?


  17. yenta-fada
    19 | August 1, 2011 12:50 pm

    Also, from here, it looks like the Republican party is badly bifurcated between people who want to stay at the trough at any cost, and a few people who want government to be accountable to the citizenry.


  18. yenta-fada
    20 | August 1, 2011 12:52 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I saw West being interviewed for a few minutes yesterday. His body language was completely stiff. Either he is being blasted from all directions by the insiders (very likely) or he is still trying to find his way in that cesspool. Or both.


  19. coldwarrior
    21 | August 1, 2011 12:54 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    I saw West being interviewed for a few minutes yesterday. His body language was completely stiff. Either he is being blasted from all directions by the insiders (very likely) or he is still trying to find his way in that cesspool. Or both.

    he got smoked on his facebook page last night for saying he will vote for this.


  20. yenta-fada
    22 | August 1, 2011 1:00 pm

    Gag me with a spoon. Al Jazeera English starts up in NYC.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0811/Al_Jazeera_English_launches_in_New_York.html


  21. 23 | August 1, 2011 1:00 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Michele Bachmann has said she won’t vote for this. I’m really kind of torn. It deosn’t feel like we are getting very much for our effort, but the Left is so freaked out that it just might possibly be a good thing. Now if we can just get Paul Krugman to renounce his citizenship and move to Norway… :P


  22. coldwarrior
    24 | August 1, 2011 1:01 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    the Republican party is badly bifurcated between people who want to stay at the trough at any cost, and a few people who want government to be accountable to the citizenry

    there is a generational gap in the GoP right now.

    the older, ‘establishment’ congressmen are useless hacks, they will take us down the same road as the democrats only slower, with a little less of an impact crater when we hit.

    the younger congressmen see the danger and are not infected by the brain virus of pestis potomaci.

    any gop’er that votes for this should expect to be primiaried or at least not have the support of the tea party.


  23. yenta-fada
    25 | August 1, 2011 1:01 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    To be fair to West, the pressures on him must be freaking enormous.


  24. 26 | August 1, 2011 1:02 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:
    @ coldwarrior:
    I saw West being interviewed for a few minutes yesterday. His body language was completely stiff. Either he is being blasted from all directions by the insiders (very likely) or he is still trying to find his way in that cesspool. Or both.
    he got smoked on his facebook page last night for saying he will vote for this.

    He should’ve been smoked. He earned. The Republicans were dealing from a position of power and the Dems would’ve folded if the Republicans had stayed untied and firm on the original Cut Cap and Trade. They should’ve come out untited and very vocal against the president and the Dems in the senate, especially Reid. They should’ve exposed his sham budget and highlighted his phony tax cuts.

    But no, they folded like a late August circus tent. Every one of them that capitualted needs to be replaced. EVERY ONE!

    So now we are back to business as usual, with no real tax cuts but many tax increases on the way and more and more debt.


  25. coldwarrior
    27 | August 1, 2011 1:03 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    this thing is crap.

    the dems set it up so the repubs WILL get all of the blame when the bicameral commission somehow cant seem to come to an agreement on spending cuts and then BAM!!!

    gop blamed for automatic defense and medicare cuts.

    its the ‘read my lips no new taxes’ deal all over again. this time the dems can hang the blame on all of the gop this time!


  26. coldwarrior
    28 | August 1, 2011 1:03 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    To be fair to West, the pressures on him must be freaking enormous.

    less than being in combat, i am sure.

    the only way he is feeling pressure is if he wants to keep his congressman job more than doing what is right.


  27. 29 | August 1, 2011 1:07 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    If he does what is right, he’ll keep that Congressional job. If he doesn’t, he won’t. I am sorry to see him vote this way.


  28. coldwarrior
    30 | August 1, 2011 1:10 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    If he does what is right, he’ll keep that Congressional job. If he doesn’t, he won’t. I am sorry to see him vote this way.

    he needs to get his head out of his ass.

    i’d hate to see him as a one termer cause he folded to the party leadership.

    if the establishment threatened him with preventing him from getting national office, he should go public with it.

    otherwise, remember who brung ya to the dance LTC…it was the teaparty.


  29. Da_Beerfreak
    31 | August 1, 2011 1:10 pm

    This ‘deal’ looks like a double helping of the same old shit to me. A real third party is just around the corner waiting for this bill to pass. The Orcs in control of Mordor on the Potomac are totally incapable of real change.


  30. yenta-fada
    32 | August 1, 2011 1:11 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Frankly, the entire government looks like a bunch of incompetents with this nonsense. Not only are they rattling international markets (with their own problems), but they are not dealing with the basic issue of unsustainable, unmanageable debt. There are plenty of people saying, more or less, that the emperor has no clothes.


  31. coldwarrior
    33 | August 1, 2011 1:12 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    and the good colonel needs to remeber, if he votes for this and it passes and he is still in congress, the second the automatic cuts to medicade start threatening, ads in his district will be run showing his vote for this mess and now becasue of him and otheres, the cuts to the old will occur!

    he represents god’s waiting room…the oldsters will revolt on him for this.


  32. 34 | August 1, 2011 1:13 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    Has Imam Al-Chucki tossed Frank Gaffney and the CSP under the
    bus as well?

    Yes he has!


  33. coldwarrior
    35 | August 1, 2011 1:13 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    This ‘deal’ looks like a double helping of the same old shit to me. A real third party is just around the corner waiting for this bill to pass. The Orcs in control of Mordor on the Potomac are totally incapable of real change.

    either primary every gop’er that votes for this and clean out the infected politicians, or start a third party.

    i am good with either


  34. Da_Beerfreak
    36 | August 1, 2011 1:14 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Frankly, the entire government looks like a bunch of incompetents with this nonsense. Not only are they rattling international markets (with their own problems), but they are not dealing with the basic issue of unsustainable, unmanageable debt. There are plenty of people saying, more or less, that the emperor has no clothes.

    Time for the international markets to dump the dollar. That might get noticed in Mordor on the Potomac, but it won’t change anything there…


  35. 37 | August 1, 2011 1:14 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    Bloomberg pushed hard for this. He’s a puppet of Islmaic interests.


  36. 38 | August 1, 2011 1:15 pm

    Eff Islam. I can pull out of my driveway and drive 75 miles ESE of here and wind up right in the middle of by far the biggest threat to America.


  37. Da_Beerfreak
    39 | August 1, 2011 1:15 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Same here. It’s past time for the Quisling RINOs to go!!


  38. 40 | August 1, 2011 1:15 pm

    Bolton on the debt deal. I don’t know what to think, but here is the opinion of one of the few public figures of the last decade that I respect:

    This deal may be the best we can get, and in many respects it is far better than we feared. But to have accomplished so much, and fended off so many harmful proposals, to stumble at the last hurdle is a great tragedy. Make no mistake, this deal, by risking massive defense cutbacks, potentially points a dagger at the heart of our national security.

    I don’t see why we had to agree to defense cuts. Maybe there is some fat left to cut. Maybe. BUt we have seen our Navy shrink by half since the end of the Cold War, and we can’t keep pirates out of the Barbary Coast any longer. They could have held out for across the board cuts back to the 2008 level. That seems like a good starting point for cuts. Then maybe take things back to the spending levels of the Clinton Administration. That was after the massive cuts they called the “Peace Dividencd”. That should have been enough cuts in Defense. The Democrats are playing to sterotype: raise taxes so they can spend the money and cut defense. They could break out campaign commercials from the Reagan Revolution and re-run them…


  39. 41 | August 1, 2011 1:15 pm

    OT:

    Two, truly, ‘must see’ (and distrubute) info re Islamists’ war against Israel.

    http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2011/07/palestinians-their-greatest-secret.html#links

    Is It Time Israel Ends Oslo?


  40. Da_Beerfreak
    42 | August 1, 2011 1:17 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    Eff Islam. I can pull out of my driveway and drive 75 miles ESE of here and wind up right in the middle of by far the biggest threat to America.

    I’m 1100 miles to the WNW and agree 110% with ya…


  41. 43 | August 1, 2011 1:20 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    And what do liberals do when they are in despair? Why simple: they frak and frak and frak and frak and frak and frak and frak and frak…and frak until it hurts and then frak some more!


  42. 44 | August 1, 2011 1:21 pm

    @ Mike C.:

    Are you in TN?


  43. Da_Beerfreak
    45 | August 1, 2011 1:21 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    The whole ‘deal’ is based on a false premise. The World will NOT end tomorrow if this ‘deal’ doesn’t pass. The lies never stop from the commie rat bastards…


  44. 46 | August 1, 2011 1:22 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Modernized nuclear deterrent and drop ships….


  45. 47 | August 1, 2011 1:22 pm

    I heard that in this deal 1/2 of the “cuts” are to come out of the Defense budget.


  46. 48 | August 1, 2011 1:23 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    There does have to be reform in military spending. Too many contracters are milking us. But the cuts will not effect them. It will be aimed at Combat Arms, while the Pentagon elite get to enjoy their perks.


  47. 49 | August 1, 2011 1:24 pm

    @ Macker:

    Pull out of Pedophile land (AFghanistan) and let them kill each other. There’s money right there you can save.


  48. Nevergiveup
    50 | August 1, 2011 1:25 pm

    WrathofG-d wrote:

    I heard that in this deal 1/2 of the “cuts” are to come out of the Defense budget.

    1/2 of the 1.2 trillion of the second set of cuts would be Defense if they can’t otherwise agree on alternate cuts/revenues by Thanksgiving. And that is already top of the Defense cuts in the first 1 trillion. It would be massive and blind cuts


  49. 51 | August 1, 2011 1:25 pm

    @ Macker:

    Fuck ‘em — with a chainsaw8O


  50. yenta-fada
    52 | August 1, 2011 1:25 pm

    From Melanie Phillips. ‘Hatred, smears, and bullying us into silence’:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2020924/Anders-Behring-Breivik-Liberals-hell-bent-bullying-silence.html


  51. Nevergiveup
    53 | August 1, 2011 1:26 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Macker:

    Pull out of Pedophile land (AFghanistan) and let them kill each other. There’s money right there you can save.

    We’re doing that anyway and the Dems are counting those savings 3 times over already


  52. yenta-fada
    54 | August 1, 2011 1:27 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    Bloomberg pushed hard for this. He’s a puppet of Islmaic interests.

    Bilderburger, Cheeseburger, Illuminatus!


  53. 55 | August 1, 2011 1:27 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    Eff Islam. I can pull out of my driveway and drive 75 miles ESE of here and wind up right in the middle of by far the biggest threat to America.
    I’m 1100 miles to the WNW and agree 110% with ya…

    Would both of you end up in DC?


  54. 56 | August 1, 2011 1:28 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    That is what bothers me. Why give them any defense cuts? Say rather, well, we need to cut the fat there too, but we want a trillion across the board in discretionary spending first. Then targeted cuts in defense where warrented. They could cut Federal salaries by 5% across the board, from office boy to Supreme Court Justice, first. That’d be savings worth signing on to. As it stands, I smell a trap. As TFK says, Ambush goes here


  55. yenta-fada
    57 | August 1, 2011 1:29 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    There does have to be reform in military spending. Too many contracters are milking us. But the cuts will not effect them. It will be aimed at Combat Arms, while the Pentagon elite get to enjoy their perks.

    It’s like the education system; fire the teachers, keep the administrators.


  56. 58 | August 1, 2011 1:30 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    At Bilderberger, ve build a better burger

    [/Conspiracy]


  57. Nevergiveup
    59 | August 1, 2011 1:30 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    I’m not in favor of drastic defense cuts. Not in this world we live in.


  58. 60 | August 1, 2011 1:30 pm

    the Q: “What would have to change if it turns out that all of those comforting assurances about Islam are completely wrong? What will we have to do differently?”

    The A: We would have to start enforcing the laws we already have on the books, and stop giving preferential treatment to Islamists, and Leftists.

    Explaination: It is already illegal to plot & in most cases, encourage the violent overthrow of the U.S. Gov. It is already illegal to push forth hate speech. It is already illegal to treat one differently (better or worse) due to religion (Islam), or National origin. It is already illegal to advocate violence against another due to their religion (Jew, Christian) or national origin. (Israeli), etc.


  59. Nevergiveup
    61 | August 1, 2011 1:31 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    It’s like the education system; fire the teachers, keep the administrators.

    Those who can’t teach, administrate?


  60. 62 | August 1, 2011 1:31 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    They are taking advantage of this.


  61. 63 | August 1, 2011 1:32 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    That’s the smoke and mirrors savings.


  62. Da_Beerfreak
    64 | August 1, 2011 1:33 pm

    father_of_10 wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    Mike C. wrote:
    Eff Islam. I can pull out of my driveway and drive 75 miles ESE of here and wind up right in the middle of by far the biggest threat to America.
    I’m 1100 miles to the WNW and agree 110% with ya…
    Would both of you end up in DC?

    I would and I’m guessing MikeC would too.

    Saint Paul to Baileys Crossroads was real close to 1100 miles.


  63. 65 | August 1, 2011 1:33 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I agree. Our Navy, for example, has been drawn down too far. We can’t keep the sea lanes relatively piracy free. Now, I think we could change that without adding a permanent carrier battle group to the Horn of Africa, but if that is what it takes to send the BArbary Pirates off o hell, then that is the cost of doing business. As a gentleman once said, billions or defense, but not one penny for tribute!


  64. 66 | August 1, 2011 1:34 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    That’s the cuts usually are.


  65. 67 | August 1, 2011 1:39 pm

    Macker wrote:

    @ Mike C.:
    Are you in TN?

    Shenandoah Valley. TN would be a lot longer drive.


  66. Da_Beerfreak
    68 | August 1, 2011 1:44 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I agree. Our Navy, for example, has been drawn down too far. We can’t keep the sea lanes relatively piracy free. Now, I think we could change that without adding a permanent carrier battle group to the Horn of Africa, but if that is what it takes to send the BArbary Pirates off o hell, then that is the cost of doing business. As a gentleman once said, billions or defense, but not one penny for tribute!

    A while back a Chicom Admiral suggested taking out the Somali ports instead of wasting time at sea chasing the Pirates down one or two at a time. Burn the nests out and be done with them was his plan.


  67. 69 | August 1, 2011 1:48 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    That works for me, but we clearly don’t have the command will to do that. Since we won’t, we have to do something. It is intolerable that the Somoli pirates operate essentially unopposed. If I were a big shipping line, I’d be looking for mercenary solutions. Send a few of the fuckers to the bottom with all hands and no quarter, and the piracy would end.


  68. Nevergiveup
    70 | August 1, 2011 1:50 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    I agree. Our Navy, for example, has been drawn down too far. We can’t keep the sea lanes relatively piracy free. Now, I think we could change that without adding a permanent carrier battle group to the Horn of Africa, but if that is what it takes to send the BArbary Pirates off o hell, then that is the cost of doing business. As a gentleman once said, billions or defense, but not one penny for tribute!

    A while back a Chicom Admiral suggested taking out the Somali ports instead of wasting time at sea chasing the Pirates down one or two at a time. Burn the nests out and be done with them was his plan.

    Sounds like a plan to me


  69. Da_Beerfreak
    71 | August 1, 2011 1:53 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    I have never been opposed to using violence where needed. Sometimes it’s the only solution to a problem. :twisted:


  70. 72 | August 1, 2011 1:54 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    The Somali pirates depnd on ports. Take out the ports and infrastructure and you can cripple them.


  71. Da_Beerfreak
    73 | August 1, 2011 1:57 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    Iron Fist wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    I agree. Our Navy, for example, has been drawn down too far. We can’t keep the sea lanes relatively piracy free. Now, I think we could change that without adding a permanent carrier battle group to the Horn of Africa, but if that is what it takes to send the BArbary Pirates off o hell, then that is the cost of doing business. As a gentleman once said, billions or defense, but not one penny for tribute!
    A while back a Chicom Admiral suggested taking out the Somali ports instead of wasting time at sea chasing the Pirates down one or two at a time. Burn the nests out and be done with them was his plan.

    Sounds like a plan to me

    Unintended pun alert… :lol:

    plan = Peoples Liberation Army Navy. :cool:

    Yes, that’s really what they call their Navy. :roll:


  72. 74 | August 1, 2011 1:57 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Kill the pirates, and they are dead. Rinse and repeat as necessary. But bombing the ports would work wonders, too. Nothing like making the land bases for the pirates feel that they have some skin in the game. Use cluster bombs. They linger for those unwise enough to come back. War is supposed to be terrible. There is nothing to be gained by turning it into a humanitarian venture…


  73. 75 | August 1, 2011 1:58 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    The Somali pirates depnd on ports. Take out the ports and infrastructure and you can cripple them.

    The somali pirates, like the Islamists around the world, depend on weak Western authorities who are so crippled with self-reflection, P.C. nonsense, and guilt over self-defense they are frozen to property respond in almost all cases.


  74. waldensianspirit
    76 | August 1, 2011 1:59 pm

    I haven’t said this out loud for a bit because it disturbs people. But today I’ll say it again. The Union of 50 States will be dissolved in the not too distance future


  75. coldwarrior
    77 | August 1, 2011 2:00 pm

    (deleted)

    (CNSNews.com) – The bill to increase the federal debt limit that has been put before Congress today would increase that limit by up to $2.4 trillion, which would be the largest increase in the debt limit in U.S. history by a margin of half a trillion dollars, according to records published by the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service.

    In fact, according to records published by the Congressional Research Service, if the current bill is passed and the debt limit is increased by $2.4 trillion, the two largest debt-limit increases in U.S. history would come in back-to-back years, both during the presidency of Barack Obama.


  76. coldwarrior
    78 | August 1, 2011 2:01 pm

    Bachmann: Debt Limit Deal Means ‘We Embrace Being Greece’


  77. coldwarrior
    79 | August 1, 2011 2:01 pm

    When a cut is not a cut
    By Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)
    – 08/01/11 12:15 PM ET

    One might think that the recent drama over the debt ceiling involves one side wanting to increase or maintain spending with the other side wanting to drastically cut spending, but that is far from the truth. In spite of the rhetoric being thrown around, the real debate is over how much government spending will increase.

    No plan under serious consideration cuts spending in the way you and I think about it. Instead, the “cuts” being discussed are illusory, and are not cuts from current amounts being spent, but cuts in projected spending increases. This is akin to a family “saving” $100,000 in expenses by deciding not to buy a Lamborghini, and instead getting a fully loaded Mercedes, when really their budget dictates that they need to stick with their perfectly serviceable Honda. But this is the type of math Washington uses to mask the incriminating truth about their unrepentant plundering of the American people.


  78. 80 | August 1, 2011 2:02 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Not to distant == next 15 years. You are probably correct. We simply cannot support the level of spending that we currently have, and neither Party is serious about curtailing it. That leaves bankruptcy as the only logical option, and the Union won’t long survive insolvancy.


  79. Da_Beerfreak
    81 | August 1, 2011 2:03 pm

    The inability to keep the sea lanes relatively piracy free is a good example of how useless International Law really is in the Real World.


  80. coldwarrior
    82 | August 1, 2011 2:05 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    1 and 1/2 of the parties arent serious about cutting spending.

    the other tea party one half is and will be fired up over this


  81. Da_Beerfreak
    83 | August 1, 2011 2:05 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    I haven’t said this out loud for a bit because it disturbs people. But today I’ll say it again. The Union of 50 States will be dissolved in the not too distance future

    Doesn’t bother me one bit when someone speaks the truth. DC Town is going down and the States will not go with them. This Country is more then just Washing DC, a lot more.


  82. 84 | August 1, 2011 2:06 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    the two largest debt-limit increases in U.S. history would come in back-to-back years, both during the presidency of Barack Obama.

    That needed to be repeated. That is unreal. Anyone under the illusion that the parasite class is going to let go when the host weakens needs to look at that. As we die off, the ticks will just get more tenacious…


  83. 85 | August 1, 2011 2:07 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Just destroy their ports. I could care less if they starve from lack of ships.


  84. 86 | August 1, 2011 2:08 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    Eff Islam. I can pull out of my driveway and drive 75 miles ESE of here and wind up right in the middle of by far the biggest threat to America.

    I’m 1100 miles to the WNW and agree 110% with ya…

    It is a mere 12 miles to the due South for me! I live directly in the beaten zone.


  85. waldensianspirit
    87 | August 1, 2011 2:08 pm

    I believe there will be 4 regions that form into countries.
    Two in the west coast, New England/New York area and the rest.

    Power will still be projected but much less


  86. waldensianspirit
    88 | August 1, 2011 2:10 pm

    People from John Kerry to Medved will do the international thing to escape from retribution


  87. Nevergiveup
    89 | August 1, 2011 2:10 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    I believe there will be 4 regions that form into countries.
    Two in the west coast, New England/New York area and the rest.

    Power will still be projected but much less

    Oh please


  88. 90 | August 1, 2011 2:11 pm

    New thread.


  89. 91 | August 1, 2011 2:11 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    The South is both Geographically and culturally distinct from the rest of the United States. We are also where the bulk of our military personnel come from if I am not mistaken. We have many of the ports, though obviously lack a Pacific port (maybe we annex part of Mexico? Why not? The population is already here :P ) It’ll be interesting to see if the Socialist sections of the country remain so without the rest of the country to be parasitic on…


  90. 92 | August 1, 2011 2:12 pm

    Our biggest danger down here is the Mexican border. DC is just an annoying Sniper for us.


  91. Da_Beerfreak
    93 | August 1, 2011 2:13 pm

    @ AZOlddog:
    With nothing but a bunch of Baltimorons to your North and an Orc infested swamp to your South. That’s being stuck between a rock and a hard place for sure. :shock:


  92. 94 | August 1, 2011 2:14 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Just destroy their ports. I could care less if they starve from lack of ships.

    But what about the children that live in those port cities? Have you no compassion for the children?


  93. Da_Beerfreak
    95 | August 1, 2011 2:15 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    waldensianspirit wrote:
    I believe there will be 4 regions that form into countries.
    Two in the west coast, New England/New York area and the rest.
    Power will still be projected but much less

    Oh please

    The United States will reform after TSHTF without Washington DC to mess thing up.


  94. 96 | August 1, 2011 2:15 pm

    @ father_of_10:

    Not really. Next question…


  95. Da_Beerfreak
    97 | August 1, 2011 2:16 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:
    “Never mind” :oops:


  96. Da_Beerfreak
    98 | August 1, 2011 2:17 pm

    father_of_10 wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ Iron Fist:
    Just destroy their ports. I could care less if they starve from lack of ships.
    But what about the children that live in those port cities? Have you no compassion for the children?

    Nope, let them go play in the freeway for all I care.


  97. waldensianspirit
    99 | August 1, 2011 2:18 pm

    So was the era of the he-goat that flies from the West making undefeatable war without touching the ground. Defeated by ‘rebels’ within.

    Enough for now


  98. waldensianspirit
    100 | August 1, 2011 2:22 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    It’ll be interesting to see if the Socialist sections of the country remain so without the rest of the country to be parasitic on…

    They will try…


  99. waldensianspirit
    101 | August 1, 2011 2:24 pm

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    Oh please

    You will still have plenty of cusps to drill between


  100. 102 | August 1, 2011 6:45 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    good find, 1389. the csp is a wealth of info.
    thanks.

    You’re welcome!

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ waldensianspirit:
    The South is both Geographically and culturally distinct from the rest of the United States. We are also where the bulk of our military personnel come from if I am not mistaken. We have many of the ports, though obviously lack a Pacific port (maybe we annex part of Mexico? Why not? The population is already here ) It’ll be interesting to see if the Socialist sections of the country remain so without the rest of the country to be parasitic on…

    Now you’re starting to sound like me!

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Me too!


  101. 103 | August 1, 2011 6:49 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    I haven’t said this out loud for a bit because it disturbs people. But today I’ll say it again. The Union of 50 States will be dissolved in the not too distance future

    Yup.

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    I agree. Our Navy, for example, has been drawn down too far. We can’t keep the sea lanes relatively piracy free. Now, I think we could change that without adding a permanent carrier battle group to the Horn of Africa, but if that is what it takes to send the BArbary Pirates off o hell, then that is the cost of doing business. As a gentleman once said, billions or defense, but not one penny for tribute!

    A while back a Chicom Admiral suggested taking out the Somali ports instead of wasting time at sea chasing the Pirates down one or two at a time. Burn the nests out and be done with them was his plan.

    Works for me!


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David