Navy Seal Foundation Charity… Gun Raffle Tickets!
Great prize! Great cause!
Grover Norquist is a professional Islamoblow who, for many years, under the guise of an anti-tax activist, has made a career out of corrupting the Republican Party with his “Muslim outreach”. The upshot is that the Muslim agenda has reached into the Republican party and has tainted many prominent Republicans, including the Bush family.
We have no need for Norquist to be our spokesman for cutting taxes and spending – we have the Tea Party for that. Norquist is also at the root of the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum controversy in Texas, about which there is much more at the link below.
It is not too late for Rick Perry to show Norquist the door, and to disavow any further efforts to “reach out” to the “Muslim community” – who actually are enemy aliens for all intents and purposes, even (or perhaps especially) those who have sworn an oath of citizenship in violation of the teachings in the Qur’an. We don’t need to “reach out” to enemy aliens – we need to deport them forthwith. The main thing that we need to teach people about Islam is that it is one hundred percent incompatible with the US Constitution and with life in any part of the civilized world.
Yeah, I’m a hard liner if there ever was one. And I will never apologize for that.
The Perry/Aga Khan curriculum: Ace folds, presents as the curriculum material that isn’t the curriculum at all
Ace asks: “Ummm… we’re not allowed to talk with Grover Norquist anymore, Pam? Can’t sign his anti-tax pledges?” Actually, it’s the other way around: is it really necessary to play ball with Norquist in order to come out for cutting taxes? Is there no candidate who will have the courage to endorse his tax policies but distance himself from him because of his Islamic supremacist ties?
Read it all. There’s tons of well-researched information here.
I don’t speak for Pam Geller. But I do say this: No, you’re not allowed to talk with Grover Norquist anymore, unless you want the whole world to know that you are a sellout to the Islamic expansionist agenda. It’s all up to you.
Much more about Grover Norquist here.
Yes, Norquist is married to a Palestinian Muslima, hence his personal reasons for pushing the Islamic agenda every chance he gets. I remember the days when marriage to an enemy alien (which is exactly what she is) disqualified a person from any position of public trust. The above link also details Norquist’s associations with CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood front groups. He should be in prison for aiding and abetting terrorist organizations, not posturing as a “conservative” and corrupting the entire Republican Party.
Update:
Why must Rick Perry distance himself from Grover Norquist? The whole GOP should. He’s vile agent of the Muslim Brotherhood. He should be shunned by ALL Republicans, not just Rick Perry.
So singling out Perry is intellectually dishonest. Grover should be purged and shunned by all.
Fair enough. Consider it said.
Obviously, I am not sold on Rick Perry. That said, I am a counterjihad blogger, and it is not my business, nor that of 1389 Blog, to get in bed with any political candidate. We are not part of anyone’s political campaign. Our job is to determine where politicians actually stand on the counterjihad, and to hold every politician’s feet to the fire.
However, if Rick Perry is the GOP candidate, and I’m still alive by then (never a foregone conclusion for any of us over 55), I expect to be voting for him.
If I’m DEAD by then, I expect to be voting for Obama, along with the rest of the deceased-American community. Too bad this isn’t a joke.
Navy Seal Foundation Charity… Gun Raffle Tickets!
Great prize! Great cause!
Tags: Aga Khan, Bush Family, Grover Norquist, Jihad Watch, Pamela Geller, Rick Perry
Well thank goodness! For a moment there I was afraid I was in America or something…
Look every Republican big shot has met Norquist or either been on a the same stage with him (that includes Gingrich, W., Romney, etc.). I do’nt care for Norquistor his tax pledges (which seems infantile to me) at all but these Gellerian purity tests have got to stop. Rick Perry is a friend of Israel, that is all you need to know.
@ Mike C.:
I agree with you. I think Norquist is a self important blow hard but to make demands upon candidates who they can never talk to is authoritarian.
Just an objective observation from someone who has both attacked and defended the man – Grover Norquist certainly pisses a lot of people off.
I drove round trip from the Chiacgo Area to St. Louis
last week. I’ts about five hours one way & beats flying.
Going to St. Louis I had a bald eagle fly overhead
at LaSalle Peru, magnificent!
But driving back a couple of days later it went from
the sublime to the ridiculous.
There was a car on the sholder & as I appoached a figure
popped out, bent out & hung his ass right in the road,
I had to change lanes. The guy had robes on.
Sure enough, I stopped at a rest stop to get out of business
clothes for the drive & in walks the guy in robes
& full pious Muslim beard.
Damn, I had a target of opportunity!
If you are lurking from Culver City, that’s a joke.
The idea that any Governor of a state with a Muslim population (no matter how peaceful they are) will not send out a Happy Ramadan message or never have his photo taken with a Muslim is absurd. If you are looking for a candidate to meet the 1389/Geller purity test on Islam – you will wait a very long time.
Bumr50 wrote:
Oh he is a jerk. He also is such a Reagan worshiper that he was proposing having Reagan replace Hamilton on the $10 bill and to have at least one federal building in every county in America be named after him. However to make talking to him or being on the same stage as him verboten is a terrible idea.
It’s a pity Dennis the Peasant went off to do meat space stuff – some current situations (including this one) simply cry out for his “Total Nuclear Destruction”-style take on things.
Speranza wrote:
Good points. I do think that the key is to not grant
unusual privileges to Muslims that do not apply to
the rest of the population.
Also, political correctness should not shield any Mosque or
individual from scrutiny.
RIX wrote:
I agree however the strident tone “He must do blah blah blah” is a total turn off. Every governor at one time or another has meetings with Muslims who lives in their state – big deal.It’s called politics. By her standards then George W. Bush was a traitor. This is a non issue created by Spencer/Geller in order to push their candidate who has not even declared and probably will not run, Sarah Palin. The idea that Texas – the Don’t Mess With Texass – is a state that promotes sharia is laughable.
These purity test really have got to go. We are starting to sound like the Left.
Ace has a new one up (http://ace.mu.nu/archives/320661.php) which raises one interesting (to me) point a ways down. If we’re to condemn Perry for meeting, talking with, apppearing with/whatever Grover Nordquist, then we have to be equally tough on a few other folks as well. Names? Miir Romner, Michelle Bachman, Newt Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty, Herman Cain, Allen West, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan and yes, even Sarah Palin.
I guess it’s Ron Paul for the win, then.
The muzz are swarming all around us. They want to infest the Western World and gain control. Through out breeding us and through insinuating themselves into our society at all levels. And they don’t take a rest in their goal. It is constant and relentless.
I’m shocked to read that muzz operatives are so blatant that they are actually ‘dressing islamists up as Patriotic Republicans so they can infiltrate government.’ That is outrageous. It tells you what we are up against. The jihadis are attacking on all fronts.
Read this from the link:
Grover Norquist almost singlehandedly ushered Islamic supremacist leaders into America’s highest levels of government — subversives, the Islamic fifth column. He gave them unparalleled access. Why didn’t Gaffney’s revelations, and those that preceded and followed his exposé, end Norquist’s influence among conservatives? Why does he still have so much power?
We need a potus who understands islam and will not sell us out for muzz money.
For Yenta, if she is arounf:
Guns Better Than Gold?
Invest now, while you can…
The problem with the whole thing is summed up nicely in this:
I guess I’m having a hard time figuring out how this is a “zero sum” question.
A better question would be : Is there any candidate who would be stupid enough to equate tax policy with Islam in the same statement, and somehow involve Grover Norquist?
Why should any candidate be forced to renounce someone who isn’t even a part of normal discussions on the Right, and is only relevant because Leftists demagogue him?
If I were running, I wouldn’t touch it with a ten foot pole.
@ Bumr50:
We’re not going to find an electable candidate who is with us on the Muslim Qusetion, because the mainstream of America is not with us. They have bought into the “Religion of PEace™” bullshit, and do not see the Enemy for whom they are. Until that changes, you will have candidates that are at least passingly tolerant of Islam. That is just the cold hard facts of politics rigght now. Even if Perry were to agree with us whole-heartedly, he’d be wise to keep that to himself.
@ Iron Fist:
I doubt the nation thinks Islam is a Religion of Peace.
@ Speranza:
.
Agreed , but if you spent time going to banquets
honoring a Palistinian terrorist supporter as an
Illinois State Snator, you probably should not
be POTUS.
Speranza wrote:
If you attended one of my family get togethers,
you would unfortunately find a lot of people who
have bought in.
Ron Paul just eviscerated FEMA on FNS.
Sometimes I love the guy.
Bumr50 wrote:
I heard that & he is 100% right.
I often disagree with him, but he strikes
me as honorable.
Bumr50 wrote:
He is a nut job and his followers even more so.
Speranza wrote:
Texas has many unfortunate connections to Islam, due to the “awl bidness”. Saudi Aramco has a big presence there, and there is a massive mosque in downtown Houston that looks like a fortress, the “Islamic Da’wa Center”. Where there are Saudis, there are Wascawwy Wahabists.
The Holy Land Foundation Palestinian terror funding org was headquartered in Texas, IIRC.
RIX wrote:
I am not including ultra liberals – no disrespect to your family. I’ll bet in their heart of hearts they do not even believe it.
RIX wrote:
I have friends who think this too. They refuse to accept the evidence that is right before them.
They are so afraid of appearing “intolerant” they can’t even discuss the facts and draw conclusions abt. what the muzz do in the name of islam.
Too much indoctrination by the muzz loving progs. They have elevated islam to such a protected class that many people are even afraid to whisper abt. the atrocities committed all over the world in the name of the rop.
These same people have no problem, though, trashing the Judaeo-Christian foundation of our country.
Makes me really want to say the word:
“Doomage.”
lol
@ The Osprey:
Texans themselves are an independent lot and I doubt they would tolerate sharia. Of course Austin and Houston are probably different.
Speaking of Ron Paul!
Ron Paul says U.S. intervention motivated 9/11 attacks
Ignorant jackass!
chickadee wrote:
The current generation of 20 somethings, particularly in the Blue States has been spoon fed “diversity” and “tolerance” since grade school.
With the exception of our young soldiers who will experience the joys of the Islamic world first hand,
most of them will have difficulty believing Islam is not a “religion of peace”.
RIX wrote:
I am sorry, but in my book he is NOT honorable, due to his sheer Ignorance of the grave threat Islam is to Western Civilization. He expects us to stick or heads in the sand and simply allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons?
And he is OK with that? BULL-SHIT!
Speranza wrote:
Although I’m about as far from being a Ron Paul supporter as you can get, what part of that do you disagree with?
@ Speranza:
Unfortunately, they do. It is only about 10 out
of 65 people, but they are screaming Obama
supporters.
One even admitted that she gets Dem talking points
off of a web-site each morning.
@ Macker:
Maybe a better term is consistent.
He is all wrong about the causes of 9/11 &
a lot of other things.
But, I would like to see an audit of the Fed.
@ RIX:
So do most of the MSM, so she’s in good company…
@ The Osprey:
You ai not kidding. Back at the old workplace Isat next to some 20-something who did not even know who Нанси Пелоси or Гарри Рид were, or their roles for that matter.
And she called herself..a Demo☭rat!
RIX wrote:
So would I. That said…none of that matters if we are all DEAD.
@ chickadee:
The same people that refuse to accept the truth about Islam,
can scream about Christian extremism.
They love to point out Timothy McVeigh.
He was not a Christian. He was a fallen away Catholic
& Christianity had not one thing to do with it.
@ Macker:
One does not lead to the other. I don’t want Ron
Paul elected to anything.
RIX wrote:
He is a dangerous freak.
lobo91 wrote:
It is not a question of agreeing with a statement or not, he is a naive crank. I for one will not cut a crank any slack just because they may make a true statement once in a wile. The trite cliche about the broken clock while a cliche is still true.
@ Speranza:
He has no chance of getting nominated & I am glad
of that. All I’m saying is that he is not always wrong,
the Fed & Libya are examples.
Do I think that he is off of the wall? yes.
Speranza wrote:
On this, we can agree!
@ Speranza:
Hardly.
He’s a mostly irrelevant House member from middle-of-nowhere Texas.
He’s never going to be president, or even speaker of the House.
There are a lot more dangerous people to worry about, like the current occupant of the White House.
Off for a bike ride.
Speranza wrote:
Speranza, yes indeed. Good call.
@ lobo91:
Have you ever seen and dealt with Paulians? They need to be derogrammed, they remind me of the kids in the 1960 movie Village of the Damned.
Speranza wrote:
They’re still irrelevant.
I don’t consider the ability to spam internet polls to be a danger to the republic.
lobo91 wrote:
Yes. The Ronulans are a pain in the ass!
@ Speranza:
They may not believe it, but you are kidding yourselfg if you think the mainstream believes that we are in an existential war with Islam. A political leader can’t even say that in today’s ultra-PC environment. I do think that the nation is primed to accept that if and when another big 9-11 style attack happens. If we then have a leader who is willing to step forward and lead us. Unfortunately, most of the American populace are lemmings. They’ll follow the popular leader, whomever that is. As evidence I present to you Barack Hussein Obama. He was elected because of this, and his popularity, while declining, is still ten points higher than a comparable white Republican President’s would be.
lobo91 wrote:
But…But, they also put up signs and bumper stickers EVERYWHERE! That’s a clear and present danger. /
@ Iron Fist:
Half the population believes the PC bullshit. Another 25% wouldn’t know a Muslim from a muskrat.
Maybe 25% of the public has something resembling a clue.
@ DaveinAZ:
I’ve never actually met one, personally.
They’re no different from Howard Dean’s rabid supporters, who were convinced that he was a shoe-in, because everyone they knew suported him.
What they failed to consider was the fact that “everyone they knew” were all people they met at Howard Dean rallies…
are we still on this shit? really?
we would have been rid of the ethanol boondogle, but norquist twisted enough arms that the vote never happened…see he was getting all pissy that there was going to be no tax cuts to go with the removal of the program, so to him that is a sin.
screw him. he just hurt america and the rest of the world bad. next time you pay more for food, thank good ole grover, because of him we are still putting corn in our gas tanks instead of in our cows and chickens,
he is a moron.
as for the idea that anyone who has talked with him etc is somehow an islamisist, well that is just foolish. we can afford to have the anti-jihadi’s sit home and not vote, i wont care one wit, pam,rob et al…sit home and mope.
we cannot afford the purity test shit that i keep seeing, so i invite all of you anti-jihadi’s that if perry is the nominee to stay the hell home and wrap yourself in your blanket of anti-jihad purity, we will get him elected without you if he is the nominee)
you pure anti-jihadi’s just keep[ peeling off groups and individuals, your voices are diminishing as you you become more and more shrill over smaller and smaller details…cry wolf much?
@ coldwarrior:
Norquist is publicity hound and a pain in the ass. We do not need him but to as kfor Perry to disavow him and none of the other candidates is hypocritical..
@ coldwarrior:
Well said, sir!
lobo91 wrote:
They are pretty similar to Lyndon LaRoucies.
Sarah Paln shaking hands with Grover Norquist.
Why must Rick Perry distance himself from Grover Norquist? The whole GOP should. He’s vile agent of the Muslim Brotherhood. He should be shunned by ALL Republicans, not just Rick Perry.
So singling out Perry is intellectually dishonest. Grover should be purged and shunned by all.
Speranza wrote:
norquist is the classic example of a purity test HUTING america.
he remained pure, and america (and the world)pays more for food.
what i am getting sick and damned tired of is stupid minor bullshit. perry, and any politician, is in public for years, they are going to meet and talk to all kinds of people. that is the god damned job of a politician: to talk to his people.
not all the people talked to will pass the ‘purity test’
and, i read the cirriculae with my own two eyes, it is a slam against main stream islam for not modernizing. it looks like it was taken out of father dave’s ‘the history and comparison religion’ classes at my local catholic high school.
Speranza wrote:
oh my….PURGE SARAH!!!!!!!
coldwarrior wrote:
My,my,my do we have a case of hypocrisy there Robert Geller???
lol
@ coldwarrior:
All Republicans should ignore Norquist. Not just Perry. Singling him out is a double standard.
Even Poppy and Jr Bush met with him regularly.
coldwarrior wrote:
The purity tests have got to slow down.
It has got to be a full court press to
dump Obama.
Hell, I voted for that old fool McCain &
I will support the Republican nominee this
time.
RIX wrote:
Moi aussi!
coldwarrior wrote:
I hate to admit it, but I think I actually shook hands with Norquist once, back around 1998 when I was in DC for a seminar.
I guess I’ll have to be purged, too.
lobo91 wrote:
PURGE YOU!!!!!
EVIL!!!!
@ coldwarrior:
Someone will eventually start a rumor that I’ve become a Muslim, anyway…
//
lobo91 wrote:
well, you ARE in kuwait,,,,
@ lobo91:
No, only Rick Perry must be purged! He’s evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
/////////////////////////////
@ RIX:
All the Republcians met Norquist. So why is that not being mentioned?
Rodan wrote:
because robert geller and ‘anti-jihad’ incorporated didnt get any traction out of the texas cirruculae story against perry, that’s why…they have to make drama to sell books.
@ The Osprey:
Perhaps that explains why Perry has befriended the Aga Khan. Gets him his “inclusionist” cred without him having to be buddy-buddy with the Wahabbis from Saudi. If so, smart move on his part.
Count me as another who decries these ridiculous purity tests, and guilt by association.
DaveinAZ wrote:
Sadly it’s only when talking about candidate he prefers that speranza adopts this tone of reasonability. If this were a thread about Michelle Bachmann he would be blowing a gasket or if it were about Sarah Palin he would be repeating the Fifth Column Treasonous Media’s talking points.
Rodan wrote:
Fair enough. All Republicans should ignore Norquist.
Ever wonder why Poppy and Jr Bush were so soft on Islam? And why GWB gave preference to Muslim immigrants? And why they never cracked down on the MB front groups? There’s your answer!
Rodan wrote:
They should have complained about Norquist’s inclusion in any conservative and/or GOP (certainly not the same thing) conferences or events that they were planning to attend.
Meeting him by chance, in a public venue, is one thing. Meeting with him REGULARLY, compromising with him, making deals with him, is something else. Norquist is the interface between the Muslim Brotherhood front groups and the Republican Party.
@ 1389AD:
norquist also controls a very large and powerful PAC that is concerned with taxation.
repubs pretty much have to meet with him occasionally to stay on the god side of tax hawks
doriangrey wrote:
Oh horse excrement!
@ Alberta Oil Peon:
Count me, too.
Speranza wrote:
Sorry, but the fact do not support your assertion.
[...] As Rodan pointed out: Why must Rick Perry distance himself from Grover Norquist? The whole GOP should. He’s vile agent of the Muslim Brotherhood. He should be shunned by ALL Republicans, not just Rick Perry. [...]
@ Speranza: THe Ron Paul blowback theory. My reply would be ‘damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” Any policy based on blowback to American influence abroad should be ignored. Let the markets decide.
Blowback management is what makes a country politically correct and weak.
@ 77 Eliana: I don’t think I would sign a pledge as a candidate and i would find a tactful way around it that the average american appreciates.