First time visitor? Learn more.

Occupy Wall Street losers joined by the Professional Left

by Rodan ( 200 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Fascism, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Socialism at October 6th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The Occupy Wall Street movement which was pioneered by 3rd World Liberation ideologue Van Jones, has gotten to a new level. Union leaders and Moveon.org have joined the protests. This is clearly a Far Left/Marxist movement. As is typical of all Progressive movements, they are an AstroTurf organization. Their goal is to emulate the Arab Spring and create a Popular Uprising. Then somehow, the Occupy Wall Street losers will end up in charge. Funny, we have elections for that and they are outgunned.

These are not the few bedraggled Occupy Wall Street protesters we knew in September.

Representatives from some of the most powerful labor unions in the country have arrived to march alongside the protesters, and students from New York universities joined the demonstrations this afternoon.

[....]

Many protesters carried signs or joined in chants about economic injustice, including: “Wall St. can’t you see we want a fair economy!”

[....]

Among the labor unions that marched today are representatives of the Chinatown Tenants Union, the Transit Workers Union, MoveOn.org, Working Families Party, United NY. See a full list here.

Read the rest: Occupy Wall Street protests grow in size and credibility

Do these Leftists think that they will overthrow the government? If so, Occupy Wall Street will become one of the biggest mass suicide movements. The tuth is, these losers have no popular support and are nothing but an organized mob.

The Obama regime’s finfingerprints are all over this gathering of Leftist rent a mob. After all, Obama was a community organizer. Van Jones’s involvement is the tip of the iceberg.

On a Personal note: I was at a conference recently in St. Pete, Fl. There was a Starbucks near the convention and I saw some recruiters for Occupy Tampa. I asked them what are their goals. One of the sociology students was telling me, they wanted free health-care, free education and guaranteed jobs. I retorted that they sounded like the Soviets. After a back and forth, I told him that he’s crazy if he thinks he can overthrow the government. I reminded him, it’s the Rightwing in this country who has most of the guns. I saw this clown go pale and look scared.

Reality hit him.

 

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

200 Responses to “Occupy Wall Street losers joined by the Professional Left”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | October 6, 2011 8:33 am

    The only thing they ought to occupy is a bathtub.


  2. 2 | October 6, 2011 8:35 am

    Reality eventually hits ,even the most idiotic ideologues…and then there are the evil control freaks.

    Btw, I’m in oldsmar today visiting a supplier. I feel like A cartoon character who went running off a cliff and is hanging there in the air with their wheels/legs spinning. LOL


  3. 3 | October 6, 2011 8:41 am

    Who’s giving Van Jones all the love? Wow! I guess we have more Leftist Lurkers than I expected…


  4. Crashnburn01
    4 | October 6, 2011 8:45 am

    Isn’t this what the Left used to call “Astroturfing”? Spontaneous it is not.


  5. 5 | October 6, 2011 8:49 am

    @ Crashnburn01:

    Target rich environment, though. These iPod “revolutionaries” think they want to smash the State. They can’t exist without the State. They need to grow up and get a life.


  6. 6 | October 6, 2011 8:51 am

    Speranza wrote:

    The only thing they ought to occupy is a bathtub.

    Mass grave…


  7. Fritz Katz
    7 | October 6, 2011 8:56 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Who’s giving Van Jones all the love? Wow! I guess we have more Leftist Lurkers than I expected…

    I understand why 88% of the worldwide aggregate of ‘SendLo<3' LOVE him. There must be many more socialist/leftist blogs listing his name that right-blogs. But something's clearly wrong with the chart showing Blogmocracy giving him 64% LOVE.

    Interesting: in the time it took for me to type this, Van Jones went from 88% to 69% LOVE.


  8. 8 | October 6, 2011 8:57 am

    Weekly jobless clamis again top 400,000:

    WASHINGTON — The number of people who applied for unemployment benefits rose slightly last week, a sign that the job market remains weak.

    Weekly applications increased by 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 401,000, the Labor Department said Thursday.

    The modest gain comes after applications plummeted by 33,000 in the previous week. The drop partly reflected technical difficulties with the department’s seasonal adjustment process.

    The four-week average, a less volatile measure, fell for the second straight week to 414,000, its lowest level in a month.

    The four-week average is what matters. They always adjust these things up. That is why the slight drop last week is really insignificant. We are bleeding jobs. If you have a cut femoral artery, you don’t really care ifg they bandage the shaving cut on your cheek.


  9. m
    9 | October 6, 2011 9:17 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    It’s not just him. Ahmmadamnjihadi isn’t at zero!! Frikken lizards…


  10. 10 | October 6, 2011 9:19 am

    @ m:

    They’ll try and rehabilitate Hitler next. He wasn’t really evil, you see. Merely misunderstood… :roll:


  11. 11 | October 6, 2011 9:32 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    @ Fritz Katz:
    @ Kirly:
    @ Crashnburn01:
    @ Speranza:

    These Neo-Stalinists think they will create a popular uprising.


  12. 12 | October 6, 2011 9:34 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ m:
    They’ll try and rehabilitate Hitler next. He wasn’t really evil, you see. Merely misunderstood…

    Oliver Stone is doing just that. He is making a movie that will rehabilitate Hitler as a Socialist who went wrong.

    Many on the Left now defend Hitler as a Socialists. He was one of them.


  13. 13 | October 6, 2011 9:39 am

    @ Rodan:

    They wouldn’t know what to do with it if they did get a popular uprising. They don’t really know what they want, they just want change. Any change is good. That is how leaders like Hitler and Stalin take powerr. They ride the popular discontent inot power, and then they crush that discontent utterly.


  14. Nevergiveup
    14 | October 6, 2011 9:46 am

    Hey let them riot and demonstrate and let the Unions and left wing progressives join them. It’s gonna look great in future Campaign commercials


  15. 15 | October 6, 2011 9:49 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    The difference is we have the 2nd Amendment. Good luck getting a Hitler or Stalin here.

    A Rightwing Paramilitary movement would be born that would wipe these fuckers clean.


  16. huckfunn
    16 | October 6, 2011 9:58 am

    Make no mistake. This rabble, the unions, Move.on.org, et al are the true face of the democrat party. The socialism that these people are advocating is what the dims truly want. They’ve been doing it by stealth for decades. What we’re seeing in the streets is where they really would like to take this country. The hot heads jumped the gun and I think hope that the electorate has woken up to the where this country was headed.


  17. m
    17 | October 6, 2011 9:59 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I know, right?

    It’s not like he was a REPUBLICAN or anything! Now THAT is unforgivable.


  18. 18 | October 6, 2011 10:00 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Whenever you see the term Popular Uprising, you know its manufactured.


  19. 19 | October 6, 2011 10:01 am

    @ Rodan:

    Yep. The Second Amendment is brilliant in its simplicity. You simply cannot totally oppress an armed populace. Our liberty has teeth, which we alone over the rest of the world possess.


  20. coldwarrior
    20 | October 6, 2011 10:01 am

    these punks wouldn’t survive day one in the state that they would love to create.

    uncle joe would have sent these useful idiots to gulag out of pure disdain


  21. 21 | October 6, 2011 10:02 am

    @ huckfunn:

    They are cowards.

    Hey around 2 on Special reports, I have a devastating post on Mitt Romney.

    He’s a draft dodging scumbag.

    I’m going all out on Mitt Romney.


  22. waldensianspirit
    22 | October 6, 2011 10:07 am

    Gee it is a dumb parent who lets Biden get around their kids


  23. 23 | October 6, 2011 10:09 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    @ m:
    They’ll try and rehabilitate Hitler next. He wasn’t really evil, you see. Merely misunderstood…
    Oliver Stone is doing just that. He is making a movie that will rehabilitate Hitler as a Socialist who went wrong.
    Many on the Left now defend Hitler as a Socialists. He was one of them.

    Good let them rehabilitate Hitler and we can hang Hitler and his murderous regime around their necks like 10 ton mill stones. Maybe we can finally get them to acknowledge Stalin’s 50 million and Mao’s 100 million murder victims.


  24. waldensianspirit
    24 | October 6, 2011 10:12 am

    An Idiot with access to a computer terminal


  25. taxfreekiller
    25 | October 6, 2011 10:13 am

    Sometimes it pays to be near the loon loop.

    Dallas Texas today, 10:00 some estimated 300 to 1,000 of the loon left will march a mile to the Federal Reserve Bank down town Dallas.
    There are marxist Obama kooks, Ron Paul kooks who will be joined by a troop of Alexs Jones crack pots.

    Mix that up.

    Poor cops what a day they will have.

    Any one know a way to get a zombie type down there with cameras.

    What a show.


  26. m
    26 | October 6, 2011 10:13 am

    @ huckfunn:

    What I don’t understand is – they got their man in the whitehouse – so shouldn’t everything be rosey by now?!


  27. 27 | October 6, 2011 10:18 am

    Fear not Rodan, they will have every bit of the exact same impact that they exerted during the 60′s which is zero. Eventually they will get hungry, and the people giving them free shit will grow weary of the fact that they seem to be continually asking for free shit, and not really doing anything constructive like weeding and mowing the lawns or picking up their litter. What they need is to feel the consequences of their actions.

    As to their choice of weapons, we’ll let Tom Lehrer tell us about it.


  28. huckfunn
    28 | October 6, 2011 10:19 am

    @ m:
    Obama really wanted to “transform America” to what these bums want but 2 factors prevented his vision from being brought to total fruition. (1) Rank incompetence and (2) people woke up to what he was doing. He’s already looted the treasury and effectively redistributed the wealth. The debt is huge and will have to be paid back by the 50% of the population that works and pays taxes.


  29. 29 | October 6, 2011 10:19 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    and I think hope that the electorate has woken up to the where this country was headed.

    Nope, sorry the electorate is utterly clueless. The plan behind these protests is to start a series of violent conflicts that can then be used as an excuse to declare martial law. Read your history, this is how it was done in Imperial Russia, this is how it was done in Weimar Germany, and how it was done in Imperial China.


  30. waldensianspirit
    30 | October 6, 2011 10:21 am

    @ doriangrey:
    And now Imperial America


  31. huckfunn
    31 | October 6, 2011 10:22 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    They are cowards.

    Hey around 2 on Special reports, I have a devastating post on Mitt Romney.

    He’s a draft dodging scumbag.

    I’m going all out on Mitt Romney.

    I’ll be sure to take a look at that. Meanwhile, Perry’s headed south big time.


  32. waldensianspirit
    32 | October 6, 2011 10:22 am

    They are pissing off New Yorkers


  33. 33 | October 6, 2011 10:23 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    They are pissing off New Yorkers

    Which might be their sole redeeming grace.


  34. coldwarrior
    34 | October 6, 2011 10:24 am

    m wrote:

    @ huckfunn:
    What I don’t understand is – they got their man in the whitehouse – so shouldn’t everything be rosey by now?!

    they are trotskyites at heart…the revolution is never ending.


  35. 35 | October 6, 2011 10:25 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Hitler was a Leftist. He belongs in that camp anyway.


  36. 36 | October 6, 2011 10:26 am

    @ huckfunn:

    Conservative would rather throw Perry under the bus over 1 issue, but let Romney get away with his message of handling Socialism better than Obama.

    If Romney is the nominee I will write in someone else.

    FYI- Rubio has rejected being the GOP VP candidate.


  37. 37 | October 6, 2011 10:27 am

    The problem is all inside your head
    She said to me
    The answer is easy if you
    Take it logically
    I’d like to help you in your struggle
    To be free
    There must be fifty ways
    To piss off a New Yorker

    She said it’s really not my habit
    To intrude
    Furthermore, I hope my meaning
    Won’t be lost or misconstrued
    But I’ll repeat myself
    At the risk of being crude
    There must be fifty ways
    To piss off a New Yorker
    Fifty ways to piss off a New Yorker

    CHORUS:
    You just slip out the back, Jack
    Make a new plan, Stan
    You don’t need to be coy, Roy
    Just get yourself free
    Hop on the bus, Gus
    You don’t need to discuss much
    Just drop off the key, Lee
    And get yourself free

    She said it grieves me so
    To see you in such pain
    I wish there was something I could do
    To make you smile again
    I said I appreciate that
    And would you please explain
    About the fifty ways

    She said why don’t we both
    Just sleep on it tonight
    And I believe in the morning
    You’ll begin to see the light
    And then she kissed me
    And I realized she probably was right
    There must be fifty ways
    To piss off a New Yorker
    Fifty ways to piss off a New Yorker


  38. 38 | October 6, 2011 10:28 am

    @ doriangrey:

    The difference is we are armed. A Rightwing insurgency would form like the AUC did in Colombia. The Leftist regime wouldn’t last a year with martial law.

    The problem is there are so many Rightwing factions, we would probably end up fighting each other as well.


  39. 39 | October 6, 2011 10:28 am

    @ huckfunn:

    And yet, Perry has blown out the field in the very important category of fundraising. In 1/2 the time, about 45 days, he has blown the doors off of his competition. Remember the last 2 elections. Howard Dean was a clear front runner until votes were actually cast, as was Giuliani. We will see what tomorrow brings. I think calling anybody out at this moment is premature.


  40. huckfunn
    40 | October 6, 2011 10:29 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    and I think hope that the electorate has woken up to the where this country was headed.

    Nope, sorry the electorate is utterly clueless. The plan behind these protests is to start a series of violent conflicts that can then be used as an excuse to declare martial law. Read your history, this is how it was done in Imperial Russia, this is how it was done in Weimar Germany, and how it was done in Imperial China.

    The electorate has woken up to some degree, as BO-hole’s numbers are looking increasingly bad. He’s at -24 on the Rasmussen Poll 3 days in a row. As to the martial law, etc… I don’t think it will come to that, but I do need to stock up on my ammo.


  41. waldensianspirit
    41 | October 6, 2011 10:32 am

    Four New York State Senators, who recently released a report on cyberbullying, argued that free speech – in all its protected glory – should be viewed as a state granted privilege. They want to put further restrictions on the First Amendment, in order to protect the children.


  42. Nevergiveup
    42 | October 6, 2011 10:33 am

    obama presser at 11AM
    Let me guess: “Pass my yoobs bill NOW”
    Hey pal even the Dems hate that bill. I hope someone points that out to him


  43. 43 | October 6, 2011 10:39 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    huckfunn wrote:
    and I think hope that the electorate has woken up to the where this country was headed.
    Nope, sorry the electorate is utterly clueless. The plan behind these protests is to start a series of violent conflicts that can then be used as an excuse to declare martial law. Read your history, this is how it was done in Imperial Russia, this is how it was done in Weimar Germany, and how it was done in Imperial China.

    The electorate has woken up to some degree, as BO-hole’s numbers are looking increasingly bad. He’s at -24 on the Rasmussen Poll 3 days in a row. As to the martial law, etc… I don’t think it will come to that, but I do need to stock up on my ammo.

    It is going to come to a bloody civil war with the Marxist Fifth Column Treasonous Media claiming those of us who don’t want to surrender to the Marxist State are evil insurgents.

    The fighting will be between those who value and love the US Constitution and the Law Enforcement Community the National Guard’s and eventually the US Military.

    Sadly the rebels will never do what is necessary to win, which is target the Media, the politicians, the union leaders and the judiciary. Instead they will try to stand toe to toe with the LEO’s and the Military, and we will eventually lose because of that.


  44. lobo91
    45 | October 6, 2011 10:41 am

    @ huckfunn:

    He’s already looted the treasury and effectively redistributed the wealth.

    He did, but he didn’t redistribute it to them, which is why they’re pissed.


  45. huckfunn
    46 | October 6, 2011 10:44 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    huckfunn wrote:
    and I think hope that the electorate has woken up to the where this country was headed.
    Nope, sorry the electorate is utterly clueless. The plan behind these protests is to start a series of violent conflicts that can then be used as an excuse to declare martial law. Read your history, this is how it was done in Imperial Russia, this is how it was done in Weimar Germany, and how it was done in Imperial China.

    The electorate has woken up to some degree, as BO-hole’s numbers are looking increasingly bad. He’s at -24 on the Rasmussen Poll 3 days in a row. As to the martial law, etc… I don’t think it will come to that, but I do need to stock up on my ammo.

    It is going to come to a bloody civil war with the Marxist Fifth Column Treasonous Media claiming those of us who don’t want to surrender to the Marxist State are evil insurgents.

    The fighting will be between those who value and love the US Constitution and the Law Enforcement Community the National Guard’s and eventually the US Military.

    Sadly the rebels will never do what is necessary to win, which is target the Media, the politicians, the union leaders and the judiciary. Instead they will try to stand toe to toe with the LEO’s and the Military, and we will eventually lose because of that.

    Could I offer you some de-caf? You got that AR-15 on safe, right? :mrgreen:


  46. 47 | October 6, 2011 10:44 am

    Open Thread: O’s Next Jobs Press Conference

    Somebody needs to tell Obama that Job’s is dead…


  47. 48 | October 6, 2011 10:45 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    McConnel wants to introduce the bill. It’s Harry who’s holding it up.


  48. waldensianspirit
    49 | October 6, 2011 10:46 am

    When will the loons of Culver City do their duty and have an anti Wall Street slouch?


  49. The Osprey
    50 | October 6, 2011 10:48 am

    Speaking of loons: Steve Jobs’ funeral to be picketed by Westboro Church


  50. waldensianspirit
    51 | October 6, 2011 10:48 am

    @ Rodan:
    Harry is adding millioniare tax to it first


  51. Nevergiveup
    52 | October 6, 2011 10:49 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    Speaking of loons: Steve Jobs’ funeral to be picketed by Westboro Church

    iCORRUMBA


  52. waldensianspirit
    53 | October 6, 2011 10:49 am

    @ The Osprey:
    Bring out the bikers


  53. lobo91
    54 | October 6, 2011 10:49 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    McConnel wants to introduce the bill. It’s Harry who’s holding it up.

    Reid’s holding it up because he knows it has zero chance of passing, and he doesn’t want to be blamed for it.


  54. 55 | October 6, 2011 10:49 am

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Millionares vote for Democrats, raise their taxes for all I care. The GOP should not defend Millionares who mostly support the Left.


  55. 56 | October 6, 2011 10:50 am

    @ lobo91:

    Plus he knows it will not create jobs. Reid is many things, stupid aint one of them.


  56. lobo91
    57 | October 6, 2011 10:50 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    Speaking of loons: Steve Jobs’ funeral to be picketed by Westboro Church

    I guess they must be PC users…


  57. huckfunn
    58 | October 6, 2011 10:50 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    He’s already looted the treasury and effectively redistributed the wealth.

    He did, but he didn’t redistribute it to them, which is why they’re pissed.

    The wealth was redistributed to them indirectly and they don’t seem to understand that. They don’t have to pay taxes or work, but they won’t get free X-Boxes and I-pads. They’ll always be bums and I guess that’s what makes them angry.


  58. Nevergiveup
    59 | October 6, 2011 10:51 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    McConnel wants to introduce the bill. It’s Harry who’s holding it up.

    Reid’s holding it up because he knows it has zero chance of passing, and he doesn’t want to be blamed for it.

    obama is gonna be really lonely on the campaign trial this fall. No body and I mean NO Bo Dy wants to appear any where near him


  59. lobo91
    60 | October 6, 2011 10:52 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Plus he knows it will not create jobs. Reid is many things, stupid aint one of them.

    I doubt that that really comes into the calculation.

    Creating jobs was never on the agenda. Transferring more money to the unions was, just like in the “stimulus.”


  60. The Osprey
    61 | October 6, 2011 10:53 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    Sadly the rebels will never do what is necessary to win, which is target the Media, the politicians, the union leaders and the judiciary. Instead they will try to stand toe to toe with the LEO’s and the Military, and we will eventually lose because of that.

    I think you are wrong. If it ever comes to a shooting civil war in this country there are many LEOs and Military people that would side with the Constitutionalists against the Marxists. In some states, like here in AZ I am betting the bulk of LEOs and National Guard would be on the Constitutionalist side.

    You think Sheriff Joe Arpaio is going to be on Obama’s side? :lol:


  61. Nevergiveup
    62 | October 6, 2011 10:53 am

    Yom Kippur War anniversary: IDF calls up reserves in drill
    By YAAKOV KATZ
    10/06/2011 16:39

    Surprise drill held to prepare reservists for possible emergency call-up; officer says it’s coincidence it took place on eve of Yom Kippur.

    Coincidence? Ya mean the Arabs have never attack on Yom Kippur before?


  62. Goodbye_Natalie
    63 | October 6, 2011 10:53 am

    Since they were envious of the groundswell called The Tea Party, may I suggest a new name for the malcontents?

    How about The TEAT Party?


  63. waldensianspirit
    64 | October 6, 2011 10:54 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Michelle fights him for the best secret service agents


  64. 65 | October 6, 2011 10:54 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Sadly the rebels will never do what is necessary to win, which is target the Media, the politicians, the union leaders and the judiciary.

    Not whichever Paramilitary unit I link up with. I will introduce AUC Colombian style tactics.

    My Target list would be:
    Student groups
    Radical professors
    Union leaders
    Progressive organizations
    Community Organizations
    Radical Immams
    Muslim Brotherhood groups

    That’s just starters.

    Again, this is all hypothetical. We are not there yet. But all Conservatives should read up on the AUC’s campaign against the Left in Colombia. That’s the model of a succesful Rightwing Insurgency.


  65. huckfunn
    66 | October 6, 2011 10:55 am

    Goodbye_Natalie wrote:

    Since they were envious of the groundswell called The Tea Party, may I suggest a new name for the malcontents?

    How about The TEAT Party?

    :lol: Excellent! You need to hang a TM on that. By the way, would someone please refresh me on how to do the superscript TM thing?


  66. 67 | October 6, 2011 10:55 am

    @ The Osprey:

    Exactly!

    The AUC in Colombia was aided by Police and military members.

    The AUC should be the model for a Rightwing Paramilitary movement should it come to it.


  67. Crashnburn01
    68 | October 6, 2011 10:56 am

    @ waldensianspirit:
    They must’ve missed that part about “unalienable rights” granted to us “by the Creator” part of those pesky founding documents. Yeah I know it was the Declaration and not the Constitution, but considering it was mostly the same people writing both documents there should be little doubt as to what they were thinking…


  68. waldensianspirit
    69 | October 6, 2011 10:57 am

    @ huckfunn:
    &trade;=™


  69. waldensianspirit
    70 | October 6, 2011 10:58 am

    @ Crashnburn01:
    And they tear it apart and make it “State granted” :spit:


  70. 71 | October 6, 2011 10:58 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Fifty? Is that all? 8)


  71. m
    72 | October 6, 2011 10:59 am

    @ The Osprey:

    Sent by … twitter for iphone. *snicker*


  72. lobo91
    73 | October 6, 2011 10:59 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Michelle fights him for the best secret service agents

    I’m guessing that their definition of “best” is different from yours or mine, though…


  73. huckfunn
    74 | October 6, 2011 11:00 am

    Kewl™ . Thanks!


  74. 75 | October 6, 2011 11:04 am

    @ lobo91:

    Redistribution teh wealth. That’s what Obama said to Joe the plumber.

    He wasn’t lying.


  75. 76 | October 6, 2011 11:04 am

    They published a list of their “needs” here in San Francisco — among them, a 3G phone, office space, fair trade coffee, coffee makers, a high speed printer (which I’ll assume is the need for an office), etc., etc., etc.

    Wait — don’t corporations own office buildings? Don’t corporations manufacture cell phones and coffee makers?

    I’m still waiting to see what those “knitted” sleeping bags are going to look like.

    So stupid it sits on them like a halo.


  76. 77 | October 6, 2011 11:05 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    Speaking of loons: Steve Jobs’ funeral to be picketed by Westboro Church

    This shouldn’t surprise anyone at all, given that Apple supports its workers who happen to be a member of the LGBT Community.


  77. Bumr50
    78 | October 6, 2011 11:06 am

    Effing Obungler is giving a press conference.

    He asserts “experts” have assured him that this jobs plan will help the economy NOW.

    We should love it because it cuts taxes on “new hires.” Now who in the hell would hire someone based on the fact that they’d be taxed lower?

    Now he’s talking about education and construction. No mention of the fact that unions have inf,ated costs of these industries to the point that we can’t afford to do them anywhere.

    And, he says, any congresscritter that votes no needs to “explain themselves.”


  78. coldwarrior
    79 | October 6, 2011 11:06 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    Establishment GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.

    i will not vote for that bastard ever, period.


  79. Bumr50
    80 | October 6, 2011 11:06 am

    “THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY MIGHT BE FALTERING”?!?!?!


  80. Nevergiveup
    81 | October 6, 2011 11:07 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    Establishment GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.

    i will not vote for that bastard ever, period.

    Don’t know what bastard you are referring to I’m voting for ABBO. And that is only reinforced seeing obama on TV this very moment


  81. waldensianspirit
    82 | October 6, 2011 11:08 am

    @ Bumr50:
    His numbers don’t work at all and shows his ignorance of our economy and how business run.


  82. lobo91
    83 | October 6, 2011 11:12 am

    @ Bumr50:

    And, he says, any congresscritter that votes no needs to “explain themselves.”

    That’s easy enough: “This bill was a worthless POS designed to loot even more money from the treasury and give it to Obama’s cronies, so I voted against it.”


  83. Bumr50
    84 | October 6, 2011 11:12 am

    How does he keep saying “tsunami”, “Europe”, and the “credit downgrade” with a striaight face?

    He says he’s “gone out of his way” to work with Republicans, “even at his own political peril.”

    TWO MILLION JOBS!!!! Get off it you POS liar!!

    He’s really laying it on thick this morning.

    “Independent analysts say that this bill will grow the economy a full
    2%”

    REALLY? Which ones?


  84. lobo91
    85 | October 6, 2011 11:13 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Bumr50:
    His numbers don’t work at all and shows his ignorance of our economy and how business run.

    And if his “experts” told him any different, they’re ignorant, too.

    Which wouldn’t surprise me at all.


  85. huckfunn
    86 | October 6, 2011 11:14 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    Establishment GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.

    i will not vote for that bastard ever, period.

    Republicans and dimocrats agree: A third party is needed. BTW; I’m gonna pitch the NCAA thread back to you for this weekend. I’m out in NM and have a pretty full plate.


  86. waldensianspirit
    87 | October 6, 2011 11:14 am

    @ lobo91:
    Valerie Jarrett says it will work it will work


  87. lobo91
    88 | October 6, 2011 11:14 am

    @ Bumr50:

    He’s just making shit up at this point.


  88. Bumr50
    89 | October 6, 2011 11:16 am

    So he DOES does like the 5.65 % surtax on millionaires!


  89. waldensianspirit
    90 | October 6, 2011 11:16 am

    Out of USA’s ashes will rise Obama’s Phoenix


  90. coldwarrior
    91 | October 6, 2011 11:16 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    romney.


  91. lobo91
    92 | October 6, 2011 11:16 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Valerie Jarrett says it will work it will work

    And aside from being part of the Chicago machine, WTF are her credentials as any sort of “expert” on anything?


  92. 93 | October 6, 2011 11:16 am

    @ Bumr50:

    Obama lying? Nahhhhhhhhhhh!
    //////////////////


  93. 94 | October 6, 2011 11:16 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    Sadly the rebels will never do what is necessary to win, which is target the Media, the politicians, the union leaders and the judiciary. Instead they will try to stand toe to toe with the LEO’s and the Military, and we will eventually lose because of that.
    I think you are wrong. If it ever comes to a shooting civil war in this country there are many LEOs and Military people that would side with the Constitutionalists against the Marxists. In some states, like here in AZ I am betting the bulk of LEOs and National Guard would be on the Constitutionalist side.
    You think Sheriff Joe Arpaio is going to be on Obama’s side?

    Yes, sorry to say that I do. LEO’s and Military personal are ideologically predisposed to support the government. They ARE the government. They will do their jobs, their jobs do not require them to question authority or to decide that the government has become corrupt, or even overthrown by Marxists.

    LEO’s all across America have been doing their jobs, enforcing unconstitutional laws for decades. Look at their attitudes towards gun owners or people videoing them. They have a locked in do not question authority mentality, 98 percent of LEO’s and 90 percent of the military will support the government because the Government is the lawful authority and they do not question authority.

    It’s all about LAWFUL… They will support that LAW, regardless of what the law says or who is telling them to enforce it. LEO’s and Military personal do what they are told. They will support the Government. They belong to the government body and soul. They have no mind of their own. Look around you, the evidence has been staring you in the face for at least 50 years.


  94. Nevergiveup
    95 | October 6, 2011 11:17 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    romney.

    ABBO


  95. Bumr50
    96 | October 6, 2011 11:17 am

    Whole room full of people and Chuck Todd gets to ask all the questions.


  96. The Osprey
    97 | October 6, 2011 11:17 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    Establishment GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.

    Love how that Herman Cain book ad pops up when you click a link to an article about Mittens. :lol:


  97. huckfunn
    98 | October 6, 2011 11:18 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    Establishment GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.

    i will not vote for that bastard ever, period.

    Don’t know what bastard you are referring to I’m voting for ABBO. And that is only reinforced seeing obama on TV this very moment

    Romney. GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.


  98. waldensianspirit
    99 | October 6, 2011 11:19 am

    @ doriangrey:
    Josey WWWWWWHHHHaaaaaaales!!!!!


  99. lobo91
    100 | October 6, 2011 11:19 am

    Bumr50 wrote:

    So he DOES does like the 5.65 % surtax on millionaires!

    As long as they give their cut to the DNC, I’m sure he’ll arrange it so that they don’t actually lose anything.

    You didn’t actually think that $447 billion was going to go into the pockets of unemployed people, did you?


  100. Bumr50
    101 | October 6, 2011 11:19 am

    Infrastructure and education. Infrastructure and education. Infrastructure and education.

    I agree with Hank.


  101. waldensianspirit
    102 | October 6, 2011 11:20 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    After ABBO comes someone who’ll make Obama Obama lite


  102. 103 | October 6, 2011 11:20 am

    @ coldwarrior:

    He’s a bigot and a demagogue on SOcial Security. Fuck him and his Socialism.


  103. waldensianspirit
    104 | October 6, 2011 11:21 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Were you one of those back a ways ABBsHrillary?

    How did that turn out?


  104. huckfunn
    105 | October 6, 2011 11:21 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    Establishment GOP seems hell-bent on nominating another loser.

    Love how that Herman Cain book ad pops up when you click a link to an article about Mittens.

    Complete with shit-eating grin. Love it.


  105. waldensianspirit
    106 | October 6, 2011 11:22 am

    Obama, RINO and then Obama heavy


  106. Nevergiveup
    107 | October 6, 2011 11:22 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    After ABBO comes someone who’ll make Obama Obama lite

    Not sure what you mean, but the damage this prick is causing America and American Interests is incalculable and he must be defeated. ABBO


  107. Nevergiveup
    108 | October 6, 2011 11:22 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Were you one of those back a ways ABBsHrillary?

    How did that turn out?

    Again I have no idea what your talking about


  108. lobo91
    109 | October 6, 2011 11:22 am

    Bumr50 wrote:

    Infrastructure and education. Infrastructure and education. Infrastructure and education.
    I agree with Hank.

    Code for “funnel money to the unions, which will dutifully pass back our cut.”


  109. 110 | October 6, 2011 11:23 am

    @ lobo91:

    You didn’t actually think that $447 billion was going to go into the pockets of unemployed people, did you?

    It’s going to bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.

    I saw an interview with an ex DOJ person. He said Holder was really into the black power crap.


  110. waldensianspirit
    111 | October 6, 2011 11:23 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Anybody but Hillary Rodham Clinton got us Obama


  111. Bumr50
    112 | October 6, 2011 11:24 am

    Occupy Wall Street brought up.

    He thinks it expresses the frustrations of the American people.

    Protesters are giving voice to a broad based opposition.


  112. coldwarrior
    113 | October 6, 2011 11:24 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    romney.

    ABBO

    not this time, if its romney, i wont vote for him. anyone else and i can pull the lever.

    this is personal.


  113. Nevergiveup
    114 | October 6, 2011 11:24 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Anybody but Hillary Rodham Clinton got us Obama

    I’m a republican and never voted for, supported, or said a nice thing about hillary in my life. So not sure what your point is


  114. 115 | October 6, 2011 11:24 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Would you vote for an anti-semite over Obama?

    This is a hypothetical.


  115. lobo91
    116 | October 6, 2011 11:25 am

    @ Rodan:

    I saw an interview with an ex DOJ person. He said Holder was really into the black power crap.

    Might as well go with what works…


  116. waldensianspirit
    117 | October 6, 2011 11:25 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Right. People focused on defeating her. Mean while Obama waltzes in


  117. Nevergiveup
    118 | October 6, 2011 11:25 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    romney.

    ABBO

    not this time, if its romney, i wont vote for him. anyone else and i can pull the lever.

    this is personal.

    fine, but anyone or anything that makes it more likely that obama is re-elected is personal to me


  118. Mars
    119 | October 6, 2011 11:25 am

    @ doriangrey:
    Unless things have radically changed in the military since I left in 95 there is no way he will have the military behind him. There will be some groups like the black militants and the La Raza and gang scum who entered just for weapons training, and a small portion of the leadership is made up of liberals. But, even when I was in, the things Clinton was doing was making most in the service seriously consider what it would take before we had to have a coup. I would say opposition to a Marxist takeover of this country would run 96%+ within the military.


  119. Speranza
    120 | October 6, 2011 11:26 am

    this is personal.

    And your future unemployment (and mine) will be personal too.


  120. Nevergiveup
    121 | October 6, 2011 11:27 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Anybody but Hillary Rodham Clinton got us Obama

    I’m a republican and never voted for, supported, or said a nice thing about hillary in my life. So not sure what your point is

    The only one out there that remotely fits that profile is possibly Ron Paul. I don’t think I’ll have to confront that dilemma.


  121. Nevergiveup
    122 | October 6, 2011 11:28 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Right. People focused on defeating her. Mean while Obama waltzes in

    I can’t, don’t, and don’t care to speak for what democrats do


  122. Bumr50
    123 | October 6, 2011 11:29 am

    What about subprime loans that YOU made them pass YOU POS?!?!

    It’s not the BANKS, it’s government involvement IN BANKS, you stupid POS.

    THAT’S not gov’ts jobs?!?!

    Now he wants us to appoint Richard Cordray to the position of Consumer Finance God today. Haven’t researched him yet, but I’d bet my savings that he’s a Marxist.


  123. waldensianspirit
    124 | October 6, 2011 11:29 am

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Obama=26 trillion
    Romney=22 trillion

    What’s the diff as both destroy the country?


  124. 125 | October 6, 2011 11:29 am

    @ Speranza:

    WOuld you vote for an anti-semite over Obama?


  125. 126 | October 6, 2011 11:31 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Was that answre for me? Ron Paul fits teh bill of anti-semite so it looks like you responded to me.

    Just want to clarify.


  126. Nevergiveup
    127 | October 6, 2011 11:31 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Obama=26 trillion
    Romney=22 trillion

    What’s the diff as both destroy the country?

    if you speak english I can better answer your questions or more accurately accusations. Romney is not my candidate but, not matter what his faults, I find him far superior to obama in every way.


  127. lobo91
    128 | October 6, 2011 11:32 am

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:
    Obama=26 trillion
    Romney=22 trillion
    What’s the diff as both destroy the country?

    What makes you think that a Republican controlled House and Senate with significant Tea Party factions in both would let him do that?


  128. Nevergiveup
    129 | October 6, 2011 11:33 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Was that answre for me? Ron Paul fits teh bill of anti-semite so it looks like you responded to me.

    Just want to clarify.

    quite a choice ha? As I said i don’t think I’ll have to confront that choice. Having to pick one anti-semite over another


  129. Mars
    130 | October 6, 2011 11:33 am

    @ doriangrey:
    Apparently you’ve never served. And I find the “no mind of their own” to be ignorant asinine and insulting. The fact remains there is only so much they will take. Lawful orders are one thing. A blatant hostile takeover of the country is another. We had a whole list of things involved when it came to action against civilians. For one thing we were extremely limited on what we were able to do in case of insurrection. You may want to read and memorize the Posse Comitatus act.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

    As for the National Guard, sorry you fail again. They can only be mobilized inside this country by the individual Governors of their states, plus they are the normal people who work alongside you every day, and very very very few libs join the guard. The ones that do are ridiculed out in days.

    I would advise you to step back from insulting those of us who have served and learn a little damn history.


  130. 131 | October 6, 2011 11:34 am

    Mars wrote:

    I would say opposition to a Marxist takeover of this country would run 96%+ within the military.

    And yet a Marxist coup has taken place and they haven’t done anything. What did you think a Marxist coup in America would look like? Mao Christmas ornaments hanging from the Whitehouse Christmas tree? A life long committed Marxist sitting in the Oval Office? A Marxist congress that violates the US Constitution at every turn? Yea, sorry the LEO’s and the Military have already sided with the Marxists.


  131. coldwarrior
    132 | October 6, 2011 11:35 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    Nevergiveup wrote:
    coldwarrior wrote:
    @ Nevergiveup:
    romney.
    ABBO
    not this time, if its romney, i wont vote for him. anyone else and i can pull the lever.
    this is personal.

    fine, but anyone or anything that makes it more likely that obama is re-elected is personal to me

    did romney wipe out a good portion of you family’s jobs and wealth via bane capital?

    did he permanently destroy/export the businesses and factories that your relatives worked in?

    did he directly cause the unemployment of hundreds of people many of whom are your friends and family?

    i’ll bet the answer is no to those questions

    well, doc, he did that here to my family DIRECTLY. so this is personal.


  132. 133 | October 6, 2011 11:35 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    SO Romney running Hispnophobic ads is OK with you? I’m supposed to back a bigot just becasue the GOP nominates him?


  133. The Osprey
    134 | October 6, 2011 11:35 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:

    WOuld you vote for an anti-semite over Obama?

    Who is running who is more anti-Israel than Obama? Well, other than Prawn Roll, who doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting the nomination…


  134. waldensianspirit
    135 | October 6, 2011 11:35 am

    @ lobo91:
    They are lead by elites. Who foisted all that debt flooring on us. The GOP plans go toward 22 trillion after Obama and RINO


  135. Nevergiveup
    136 | October 6, 2011 11:36 am

    @ coldwarrior:
    OK I see YOUR point. That is personal. So in your case I give you a pass. Not that you need it from me, but I get where your coming from.


  136. 137 | October 6, 2011 11:36 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    See my 133.

    Romney is a Hispanophobe. I will not vote for someone who demonizes my ethnic Cousins.

    That’s why Romney must be defeated in the GOP primary.


  137. Bumr50
    138 | October 6, 2011 11:36 am

    Some moron finaly got to ask about Solyndra and Fast and Furious managed to bundle them all into a question with ‘why weren’r people on wall st. prosecuted?’

    Obama – “I have complete confidence in Eric Holder.”

    “He said he wasn’t aware, and I was not. And I would be very unhappy if I knew.”

    “Solyndra predates me and had support from Dems and Repubs.”

    “If we’re going to compete……….we have to dominate cutting edge manufacturing.”

    “the overall portfolio of the loan guarantee program has been successful.”

    WE CAN’T COMPETE WITH CHINA BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOUR ASS BUDDY DICKY TRUMKA AND EVERYBODY KNOWS IT. AND WHO’S BUYING ALL OF THIS WIND AND SOLAR CRAP????


  138. Nevergiveup
    139 | October 6, 2011 11:37 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    SO Romney running Hispnophobic ads is OK with you? I’m supposed to back a bigot just becasue the GOP nominates him?

    How is he anti-hispanic? And you don’t have to be ok with anything he does or did. The only question you or anybody has to answer is ‘ABBO” better or is obama?


  139. waldensianspirit
    140 | October 6, 2011 11:38 am

    @ Nevergiveup:Companys I wanted to work for and supply in PA: overseas


  140. Nevergiveup
    141 | October 6, 2011 11:39 am

    @ Bumr50:
    Yeah lets throw all the capitalists into Jail and see how that works creating jobs? Brilliant


  141. Speranza
    142 | October 6, 2011 11:39 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    WOuld you vote for an anti-semite over Obama?

    Nobody is more anti Semitic then Barack Hussein Obama.


  142. waldensianspirit
    143 | October 6, 2011 11:39 am

    @ Bumr50:
    Eskimos?


  143. lobo91
    144 | October 6, 2011 11:42 am

    Nevergiveup wrote:

    @ Bumr50:
    Yeah lets throw all the capitalists into Jail and see how that works creating jobs? Brilliant

    That’s what those moron protesters want, basically.


  144. 145 | October 6, 2011 11:42 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    How’s it anti-Hispanic? He’s acting as if Vicente Fox is some evil leader and Perry is his puppet. That’s demonization. He’s implying these evil Mexicans are out to get you. If you can’t see it I don’t know what to tell you.

    I will NOT vote for a Hispnophobe.


  145. lobo91
    146 | October 6, 2011 11:44 am

    @ Rodan:

    I will NOT vote for a Hispnophobe.

    Could we not join the left in making up new bogus terms, please?


  146. 147 | October 6, 2011 11:44 am

    Mars wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Apparently you’ve never served. And I find the “no mind of their own” to be ignorant asinine and insulting. The fact remains there is only so much they will take. Lawful orders are one thing. A blatant hostile takeover of the country is another. We had a whole list of things involved when it came to action against civilians. For one thing we were extremely limited on what we were able to do in case of insurrection. You may want to read and memorize the Posse Comitatus act.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
    As for the National Guard, sorry you fail again. They can only be mobilized inside this country by the individual Governors of their states, plus they are the normal people who work alongside you every day, and very very very few libs join the guard. The ones that do are ridiculed out in days.
    I would advise you to step back from insulting those of us who have served and learn a little damn history.

    Sorry but you are mistaken on so many levels that it almost isn’t funny. Few people in this country have more love or respect for the US Military than I do. No I did not serve, but I am a military brat from a very long line of military people.

    The members of America’s military suffer from the exact same intellectual dysfunction that put a life long committed Marxist in the Oval office. It’s the “It can’t happen here” syndrome.

    The entire Democrat party is a socialist party and the majority of the Republic leadership are also socialists. It not only can happen here, it already has. America has already fallen to a Marxist coup, it now a race to consolidate that power.

    If you a former Military person can’t see this, why would you expect anyone currently serving to see it or do anything about it?


  147. 148 | October 6, 2011 11:47 am

    @ lobo91:

    It’s not a bogus term. I experienced it my life.


  148. Mars
    149 | October 6, 2011 11:48 am

    @ doriangrey:
    Right now it’s a quiet takeover. There have been no actions committed that the military is allowed to oppose. What you don’t seem to have any grasp of is the fact that there are more contingencies for opposing an out of control government in the military rules than there are for being used against civilians. Standard military procedure for engaging civilians within this country comes down to one standard statement (it isn’t done). However there are over twenty different circumstances that the military can take over the government and reestablish democracy.

    As for why nothing has happened yet, the nuts are careful and are staying on this side of the law. Once civil unrest gets to a certain point and they suspend elections, then the military is allowed to step in and depose the potential dictator.

    From our view things may be bad, but our military is bound by certain laws that civilians can’t even comprehend. Things have to be completely out of control before they can step in. Being ordered to engage civilians is a big one, as is the aforementioned suspension of democratic elections. Until we hit a point like that, there is nothing the military can legally do.

    But hey please continue painting the service with a broad based brush labeling them as brain washed drones. It’s not quite what I expected from someone I used to respect, but I guess you never really get to know someone online.

    And to a degree you are correct on civilian law enforcement, they have a far greater allowance for engaging civilians in unrest situations. But, there would be massive defections if that occurred.


  149. Nevergiveup
    150 | October 6, 2011 11:49 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    How’s it anti-Hispanic? He’s acting as if Vicente Fox is some evil leader and Perry is his puppet. That’s demonization. He’s implying these evil Mexicans are out to get you. If you can’t see it I don’t know what to tell you.

    I will NOT vote for a Hispnophobe.

    I have no idea what perry’s relation with Fox is, but I was never a great supporter of Fox or any Mexican Politician.


  150. 151 | October 6, 2011 11:49 am

    @ doriangrey:

    The entire Democrat party is a socialist party and the majority of the Republic leadership are also socialists.

    Spot on!


  151. lobo91
    152 | October 6, 2011 11:49 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    It’s not a bogus term. I experienced it my life.

    Bullshit.

    It’s just as bogus as “homophobia” and “islamophobia,” and you know it.


  152. Nevergiveup
    153 | October 6, 2011 11:50 am

    obama just said all the Republicans want is to roll back regulations? Well yeah that would be a start


  153. Mars
    154 | October 6, 2011 11:50 am

    @ doriangrey:
    Why in the hell would you think I don’t see it? What the f do you think I’ve posted about here day in and day out? You seem to have a very confused idea of what the military is and isn’t allowed to do. I’m kind of glad that I have to go downtown right now. I’m about to say some things that would not be able to be taken back.

    Do some research, learn something.


  154. 155 | October 6, 2011 11:51 am

    @ Nevergiveup:

    You don’t like it when Isralei PM is demonized? Why should I like when a Latin leader is demonized?


  155. 156 | October 6, 2011 11:52 am

    @ lobo91:

    Bullshit, I experienced it you didn’t so don’t try to lecture me on this, OK.


  156. Bumr50
    157 | October 6, 2011 11:52 am

    I quit listening.

    Adding insult to injury, my wife is home sick and watches the Price Is Right. He’s really on a roll here, and now she’s going to completely miss the show and make the rest of my day worse.

    I might hate this guy worse than any living human being in my relatively short lifetime.


  157. Nevergiveup
    158 | October 6, 2011 11:53 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    You don’t like it when Isralei PM is demonized? Why should I like when a Latin leader is demonized?

    I don’t think that is the question. Are Mexican policy’s on our southern border good for the USA?


  158. 159 | October 6, 2011 11:53 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    It is going to come to a bloody civil war with the Marxist Fifth Column Treasonous Media claiming those of us who don’t want to surrender to the Marxist State are evil insurgents.

    It may come to that. I am being prepared. Not as prepared as you are, but prepared. My main weapon is 5.56X45, and my main backup is .45. If they want to come out and play, well, I am willing to oblige them….


  159. 160 | October 6, 2011 11:55 am

    You kniow what, I’ll be on DOD for a while.

    I guess it’s OK for other groups to call out descrimination against them. But as a Hispanic I can’t call bigotry when I see it. I’m not dealing with this BS double standard.

    I call out anti-semitism, anti-White bigotry and anti-Black when I see it. But I have to be silent when it’s aimed at me.

    No fucking way. If people get mad becasue I stand up for myself. Well fuck you I don’t care. Enjoy the blog without me for while.

    Peace.


  160. Nevergiveup
    161 | October 6, 2011 11:56 am

    @ Rodan:
    Relax Rhodan


  161. 162 | October 6, 2011 11:56 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    The entire Democrat party is a socialist party and the majority of the Republic leadership are also socialists. It not only can happen here, it already has.

    Exactly. I don’t like to admit it, any more than anyone else, but you are right. It has happened here. The question becomes what do we do about it. Electing President Perry would be high on my list. Now that Palin is out, I suggest that you consider that option as well. Within the system, if we can. But armed to the teeth if we can’t…


  162. lobo91
    163 | October 6, 2011 11:57 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Bullshit, I experienced it you didn’t so don’t try to lecture me on this, OK.

    I’m not lecturing anyone.

    I’m just telling you that you’re full of shit.

    There is no psychological condition that amounts to an “irrational fear of Hispanics,” which is what that bogus term implies.

    It’s the same crap the gays and the Islamists pulled, and we don’t need to play their game.


  163. 164 | October 6, 2011 11:58 am

    @ Rodan:

    Man, you know I don’t feel that way. Do what you must, but you will be missed…


  164. lobo91
    165 | October 6, 2011 11:59 am

    @ Rodan:

    I guess it’s OK for other groups to call out descrimination against them. But as a Hispanic I can’t call bigotry when I see it. I’m not dealing with this BS double standard.

    Nobody said any such thing.

    You’re not talking about bigotry. You’re inventing new fake psychological conditions.


  165. 166 | October 6, 2011 12:00 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    I’m in. Let’s start with the BATF. The Bat-Fags (a term I got from a DEA agent) want to roll back freedom. Let’s show them what freedom does instead.


  166. The Osprey
    167 | October 6, 2011 12:02 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Mexico is a screwed up country that just happens to be Hispanic. One can certainly criticize Mexico, its government and people with out necessarily being prejudiced against all Hispanics. It’s only one country out of many. Hell, there are a lot of Hispanics here in AZ who will tell you flat out that the Mexican government sucks! :lol:


  167. Nevergiveup
    168 | October 6, 2011 12:04 pm

    I am not sure where Rhodan is coming from. Most Republicans I know strongly support South American Leaders that support us and Democracy/Capitalism. And also support the anti-castro cubans in Florida and NJ. It’s just most of us don’t see Mexico as particularly friendly to the US and US Interests or at best unable to control their own failed State?


  168. 169 | October 6, 2011 12:07 pm

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Rodan is sensitive to this issue. I think we should respect that. Moreover, I am a knife-fighter. I believe in using whatever is at hand. Rodan is expressing the resentments of a lot of Hispanics. We can turn that itno a weapon, if we are willing to use it.


  169. 170 | October 6, 2011 12:08 pm

    Mars wrote:

    Right now it’s a quiet takeover.

    A take over is still a take over quite or violent.

    There have been no actions committed that the military is allowed to oppose.

    And as long as the Marxist are in control that will not change, because they write the laws.

    Look no further than the Rules of Engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan to see what the Marxists are able to do to the US Military.

    Once civil unrest gets to a certain point and they suspend elections, then the military is allowed to step in and depose the potential dictator.

    Once that happens, the laws allowing the Military to step in will have been changed. Remember, Congress writes the laws, and as we have seen in the last 3 years, they don’t give a rats ass what the US constitution actually says.

    Obamacare… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    Stripping GM and Chrysler shareholders of their stock and giving it to the Union’s… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    The Gulf Permatoriun… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    Fast and Furious… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    Ignoring the War Powers Act vis a via Libya… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    The Whitehouse and DOJ refusing to uphold and defend the DOMA… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    Obama’s Czars… Blatantly Unconstitutional.

    The list goes on and on and on. Congress will do whatever they want with no regard for the US Constitution and that includes changing the laws that would have allowed the US Military to step in and end this Marxist coup. Once they have done that Posse Comitatus is just another law that they can ignore violate or change to suit their Marxist agenda.

    In his October 2000 essay ‘The Myth of Posse Comitatus’ posted at the Department of Homeland Security website, Army Reserve Major Craig T. Trebilcock notes that

    ‘Congress has also approved the use of the military in civilian law enforcement through the Civil Disturbance Statutes: 10 U.S.C. sections 331—334 (which) permit the president to use military personnel to enforce civilian laws where the state has requested assistance or is unable to protect civil rights and property. In case of civil disturbance, the president must first give an order for offenders to disperse. If the order is not obeyed, the president may then authorize military forces to make arrests and restore order.’

    The author goes on to say that the scope of these statutes is broad enough to encompass disturbances resulting from ‘terrorist or other criminal activity.’

    In addition, there is the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C., Section 5121, which allows federal troops to be deployed in times of natural disaster at the request of a governor, as President Bush requested of Governor Blanco. Under this Act a president may declare a major disaster and send in forces on an emergency basis for up to 10 days to preserve life and property.


  170. Nevergiveup
    171 | October 6, 2011 12:09 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Nevergiveup:

    Rodan is sensitive to this issue. I think we should respect that. Moreover, I am a knife-fighter. I believe in using whatever is at hand. Rodan is expressing the resentments of a lot of Hispanics. We can turn that itno a weapon, if we are willing to use it.

    Yeah I get that, but being critical of Fox and Mexico is a seperate issue


  171. Nevergiveup
    172 | October 6, 2011 12:11 pm

    @ doriangrey:
    I have not been following this argument. But if someone wants to arm me and let me walk around arresting and scaring civilians well hell I’m all in favor of that?


  172. 173 | October 6, 2011 12:11 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    I don’t disagree with anything you have written. The question is what do we do about it. I am not up for violent revolution at this time. That is subject to change. I want a peaceful Conservative Revolution. The “Occupy Wall Street” crowd won’t like that, but fuck them with a chainsaw. This isn’t about being liked.


  173. Bumr50
    174 | October 6, 2011 12:19 pm

    OT – And why the hell NOT?

    (Reuters) – More than half of all Germans would like to bring back the Deutsche mark, although the number has remained stable even as the euro zone debt crisis escalated in the last year, a survey released on Wednesday showed.

    A Forsa poll conducted for Stern magazine said that 54 percent of Germans favor a return of their former currency, an identical figure to a poll taken in May 2010, said Forsa.


  174. lobo91
    175 | October 6, 2011 12:21 pm

    @ Bumr50:

    Fortunately for the EU bureaucrats, they don’t have to worry about trivial things like public opinion…


  175. 176 | October 6, 2011 12:22 pm

    Mars wrote:

    I’m about to say some things that would not be able to be taken back.

    Do some research, learn something.

    Dont worry about offending me, my skin isn’t all that thin. I have done a lot more research than you seem to think. I know who my enemies are, I know how they think and how they work, and I know what they have already achieved.

    Believe me when I tell you this, no matter how angry you might be with me, I am far angrier at those who have betrayed the US Constitution and the American people.

    No matter how ignorant you might think I am, nor how angry that might make you with me, we have something very important in common. Both of us love the US Constitution and the American people, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson hated each other, but they loved the US Constitution and the American people more than they hated each other. As long as the same is true of both of us, I’m ok with that.


  176. 177 | October 6, 2011 12:22 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    @ m:
    They’ll try and rehabilitate Hitler next. He wasn’t really evil, you see. Merely misunderstood…
    Oliver Stone is doing just that. He is making a movie that will rehabilitate Hitler as a Socialist who went wrong.
    Many on the Left now defend Hitler as a Socialists. He was one of them.

    Hitler was indeed a socialist, and said so.

    That is no defense of him or of his supporters, then or now.

    Socialism is evil.


  177. 178 | October 6, 2011 12:28 pm

    1389AD wrote:

    Socialism is evil

    That can’t be said enough. Our enemies areevil. Not misguided but well-meaning, not sad, or even disturbed, but evil. Until we recognize that, and call evil what it is, we will continue to lose to it. Evil relies on the good to misunderstand it.


  178. 179 | October 6, 2011 12:30 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Rodan is sensitive to this issue.

    Overly sensitive in my opinion, but that is his right and prerogative. I live right next to the Mexican border, I have relatives that are of Hispanic heritage, I’m Black Irish, which technically make me somewhat of Hispanic heritage, but I am not blind to what is happening regarding the illegal immigration issue with Mexico. Nor will I turn a blind eye to it just because my nephews and nieces are of Mexican/Hispanic heritage.


  179. 180 | October 6, 2011 12:33 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Evil relies on the good to misunderstand it.

    No… Evil relies on good people not confronting it or doing anything about it.


  180. 181 | October 6, 2011 12:33 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton come to mind. I might kill you over our differences (not you, but in the generic), but we agree on the general direction of this nation, American Greatness, and so forth. Not so the fools in the “Occupy Wall Street” movement.


  181. 182 | October 6, 2011 12:35 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Same thing, really. I think that to not confront evil, you have to mislead yourself about its nature. Good people confront evil every day, it just doesn’t make the news.


  182. 183 | October 6, 2011 12:38 pm

    Okay, I need to correct a post I made last night because while some people have “egg” on their face, I am apparently wearing an entire omelet.

    I emailed a fellow Cal alum saying how sad it was that our fellow student, Steve Jobs, had died, and she came back with “Jobs didn’t go to Cal – he just hung out with Woz so much people thought he did.”


  183. 184 | October 6, 2011 12:47 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton come to mind. I might kill you over our differences (not you, but in the generic), but we agree on the general direction of this nation, American Greatness, and so forth. Not so the fools in the “Occupy Wall Street” movement.

    I have a respect for America’s Military people that is nothing short of hero worship, this even includes people like Mar’s who believes I am an imbecile. But just because I suffer hero worship of these people does not mean that I do not understand that they are human being just like everyone else, fallible, frail and imperfect.

    They are deceived, misled and manipulated just as easily as anyone else. They are among the finest patriots and citizens America has ever produced, but they are not gods or even demigods. Look at John F’ing Kerry, John Murtha, John McCain, Mike Mullens or Colin Powell. Even Military people make mistakes and get sucked into the evil that is communism/socialsim/Marxism.

    Perhaps my greatest Military hero was David Hackworth, and even he was a mere human who made mistakes.


  184. 185 | October 6, 2011 12:49 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    I am apparently wearing an entire omelet.

    Is there cheese in that omelet? Lot’s of good cheese? :razz:


  185. 186 | October 6, 2011 12:56 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    My greatest military hero is William Tecumsah Sherman. Sherman knew how to get it done. Absolutely kick-ass. The South had their great heros, even including Nathan Bedford Forrest (an action hero, by anybody’s definition), but Sherman was the best of both sides. Or the worst of both sides…


  186. 187 | October 6, 2011 1:06 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    My greatest military hero is William Tecumsah Sherman. Sherman knew how to get it done. Absolutely kick-ass. The South had their great heros, even including Nathan Bedford Forrest (an action hero, by anybody’s definition), but Sherman was the best of both sides. Or the worst of both sides…

    It is my personal opinion that one of the greatest tragedies to befall America was the assignation of Lincoln, not because he was victorious in the civil war, but because his death meant that his plan for reconstruction died with him.

    In Lincoln’s reconstruction plan the men and women who fought on the side of the Confederacy would have been granted fully US Military Honors are the great Americans that they were. That plan died with him and instead we got a reconstruction that demonized some of America’s finest sons and daughters.

    Instead of bringing the country back together and healing the wounds of the civil war we got over 100 years of bitterness between the South and North.

    This is just my opinion, if your differs that does not make it any less valid.


  187. 188 | October 6, 2011 1:10 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    In Lincoln’s reconstruction plan the men and women who fought on the side of the Confederacy would have been granted fully US Military Honors are as the great Americans that they were.

    Are=as :oops:


  188. 189 | October 6, 2011 1:15 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    Lincoln wanted healing for the nation. As opposed to the current President, who wants to divide us.


  189. 190 | October 6, 2011 1:25 pm

    @ 1389AD:

    And more to the point, Socialism has an inherent need to destroy anyone who is individually successful. The Jews have always been an easy target for this primarily because there are so few of us, and we tend to be easily identifiable in a crowd. Socialists always need someone to hate, and they need to drum up hatred for some group to keep their supporters perpetually engaged in a mob mentality. The smaller the group that they can sort out for demagoguery, the better off they are. Small groups have a harder time fighting back than larger ones.


  190. The Osprey
    191 | October 6, 2011 1:44 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    I am apparently wearing an entire omelet.

    Is there cheese in that omelet? Lot’s of good cheese?

    California Cheese from Happy Cows (just what are they putting into that cattle feed in Mendocino?)


  191. livefreeor die
    192 | October 6, 2011 3:20 pm

    Bumr50 wrote:

    How does he keep saying “tsunami”, “Europe”, and the “credit downgrade” with a striaight face?
    He says he’s “gone out of his way” to work with Republicans, “even at his own political peril.”
    TWO MILLION JOBS!!!! Get off it you POS liar!!
    He’s really laying it on thick this morning.
    “Independent analysts say that this bill will grow the economy a full
    2%”
    REALLY? Which ones?

    He’s desperate and into outright lying mode rather than stealth lying mode.


  192. buzzsawmonkey
    193 | October 6, 2011 4:23 pm

    Buzz Ballad @ PJM: Send in the Thugs.


  193. Lost
    194 | October 6, 2011 6:21 pm

    This protest craze is spreading.

    Drove down Dandenong Rd. (major thoroughfare) this morning and hanging from a pedestrian bridge was the sign “Occupy Melbourne” and a date.

    Idiots.


  194. Lily
    195 | October 6, 2011 6:41 pm

    Mars wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Unless things have radically changed in the military since I left in 95 there is no way he will have the military behind him. There will be some groups like the black militants and the La Raza and gang scum who entered just for weapons training, and a small portion of the leadership is made up of liberals. But, even when I was in, the things Clinton was doing was making most in the service seriously consider what it would take before we had to have a coup. I would say opposition to a Marxist takeover of this country would run 96%+ within the military.

    This goes for LEO’s too. They are mostly conservative and not mindless drones. Not to mention if the White House ‘actually’ would want the military to turn on Americans….I just don’t see that the military would do this.


  195. Lily
    196 | October 6, 2011 7:04 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    My greatest military hero is William Tecumsah Sherman. Sherman knew how to get it done. Absolutely kick-ass. The South had their great heros, even including Nathan Bedford Forrest (an action hero, by anybody’s definition), but Sherman was the best of both sides. Or the worst of both sides…

    It is my personal opinion that one of the greatest tragedies to befall America was the assignation of Lincoln, not because he was victorious in the civil war, but because his death meant that his plan for reconstruction died with him.

    In Lincoln’s reconstruction plan the men and women who fought on the side of the Confederacy would have been granted fully US Military Honors are the great Americans that they were. That plan died with him and instead we got a reconstruction that demonized some of America’s finest sons and daughters.

    Instead of bringing the country back together and healing the wounds of the civil war we got over 100 years of bitterness between the South and North.

    This is just my opinion, if your differs that does not make it any less valid.

    Actually you are quite right on this note. It took the South a very long time to recover from the Civil War…Lincoln did not want that.


  196. Lily
    197 | October 6, 2011 7:06 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ doriangrey:

    Lincoln wanted healing for the nation. As opposed to the current President, who wants to divide us.

    This president is doing so much damage to this great nation it is hard for me to believe so few are seeing it.


  197. Lily
    198 | October 6, 2011 7:09 pm

    Lost wrote:

    This protest craze is spreading.

    Drove down Dandenong Rd. (major thoroughfare) this morning and hanging from a pedestrian bridge was the sign “Occupy Melbourne” and a date.

    Idiots.

    There never seems to be a drought when it comes to idiots…it seems to be that idiots are raining down upon us….close to flooding.


  198. Tanker
    199 | October 6, 2011 7:14 pm

    @ Lily:

    Done underestimate some of the mindless drones in the Military/LEO. I do agree, most of the military would question orders to turn on Americans, but there are those that would without question. The question for me is, to what length would the major go to stop the administration or refuse the orders.

    I personally thought the ROE we were given in Afghanistan went against everything I’d ever been taught (maybe unlawful), and stated such many times while I was there. It put me in a real tough situation, but I continued to voice my concerns. It won me respect from some (not spoken out loud), down right hostility from some and a written reprimand from one asshole (I framed it and put it on my wall).


  199. Tanker
    200 | October 6, 2011 7:15 pm

    @ Tanker:

    Done = Don’t


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David