Chris Christie has jump the shark of late. He now compares the Tea Party to the Neo-Marxist Occupy Wall Street movement.
Focus on New Jersey and don’t discuss what you don’t know.
Chris Christie has jump the shark of late. He now compares the Tea Party to the Neo-Marxist Occupy Wall Street movement.
Focus on New Jersey and don’t discuss what you don’t know.
Tags: Chris Christie, Occupy Wall Street, Popular Uprising
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 18th, 2011 at 6:08 pm and is filed under Communism, Fascism, Headlines, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Nazism, Progressives, Republican Party, Socialism, Special Report, Tranzis. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!




he does not get the tea party at all.
An unwashed, filthy, sloppy Tea Party?
@ coldwarrior:
The sandwiches are too small…
Thank you for not running for Prez, Chris!
The Krispy Kremes went to his waistline, the donut holes are obviously in his head.
Everybody is comparing the OWS boobs to the Tea Party protests. Nothing wrong with that at all, but to say that they’re equivalent is moronic.
Both think there’s something amiss in America today.
Tea Party rightly identifies the problem as government.
OWS mistakenly identifies business as the problem.
Is post #8 some sort of spam?
Fritz Katz wrote:
It was…until I killed it
This guy is really full of himself. No one is waiting with baited breath for your latest Sermon on the Mount, Krispy Kreme. Especially when you can’t remember who the hell put you in office, only to be (once again) roundly disappointed when you revealed yourself to be nothing more than a garden variety RINO.
@ Carolina Girl:
I am worried that that is the choice we will be given in next year’s Presidential Election. I still like Perry, and understand that he did better in last night’s debate, but I am worried that Romney is going to be forced on us. I can’t enthusiastically support him. I’ll barely be able to pull the lever for him over Obama. And I won’t do that if he picks Christie as his VP. A lot of people are floating the “Christie for VP” idea. That abortion needs to be stillborn, or smothered in its crib. We don’t need that shit. If it is Romney, he needs to pick a Tea Party person as his VP, period. The fucking Republicans need to remember who it is that brought them to this dance.
@ Iron Fist:
This certainly seems to be the plan with the GOP Ruling Class -- get a RINO as the nominee, one that the Ruling Class can control and will not upset the status quo. Hence the reorganization of the primary schedule, which is bordering on the ridiculous. All designed to give Romney early wins and create the appearance of “frontrunner.” But I love Mark Levin’s quote “tell me, has anyone VOTED yet?” Polls indicate that over 75% of GOP voters want someone else. I think it’s also time for the also-rans to exit the stage, and that includes Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum and that jerk Ron Paul. I find this whole debate schedule absolutely silly. All it does is give soundbites to the Democrats and Jerk the Wonder Prez to use against the candidate.
My biggest fear is that because there is no Democrat primary this time around, that Dems will register as Republicans for primary purposes and take their marching orders from the Obummer campaign and vote for Romney in the primaries to insure his nomination. Of course, truthfully, we can’t complain -- after all, Rush Limbaugh told Republicans to do the same thing back in 2008 to keep Hillary! viable in the race once it was certain that McCain has sewed up the nomination.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Yeah, and I thought that was a mistake when he did it. We need to end open primaries. Republicans should be the ones who pick our Presidential Candidate, and by that I mean Republican voters, not the “elite” heirarchy.
In the spirit of the old Saturday Night Live sketch “Quien es mas macho?” I just have to ask,
Quién tiene los boobs más grandes del hombre? Charles Johnson o Chris Christie?
OWS is the TEA Party? What’s This guy smoking?
Ambos son fraudes gordos grandes
lobo91 wrote:
… and then my post became #8 and therefore some kind of spam
[...] (Sources: Politico.com, The Washington Examiner, and “The Blogmocracy”) [...]
[...] (Sources: Politico.com, The Washington Examiner, and “The Blogmocracy”) [...]