First time visitor? Learn more.

Two More “Green” Energy Companies File for Bankruptcy

by huckfunn ( 10 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Business, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Energy, Environmentalism, government, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Socialism, Special Report at January 26th, 2012 - 12:23 pm

Within the past month there have been 2 more “green” energy failures that will cost the the U.S. taxpayers over $260 million. The most recent losers are:

Ener1, a company that makes rechargeable batteries for electric cars filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy today. The company was the recipient of a $118 million Department of Energy Grant.

“Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) — Ener1 Inc., which received a $118 million U.S. Energy Department grant to make electric-car batteries, filed for bankruptcy protection today after defaulting on bond debt amid heavy competition from Asia.

The company listed as much as $100 million each in assets and debts in papers filed in New York. Among the company’s largest unsecured creditors were Liberty Harbor Special Investments of New York, holders of $39.4 million in senior notes; Itochu Corp. of Tokyo, holders of $10.2 million in senior convertible notes; and Goldman Sachs Palmetto State Credit Union of Florida, holders of $5.63 million in senior notes.

The company has been affected by competing battery developers in China and Korea, “which generally have a lower cost manufacturing base” and lower labor and raw material costs, interim Chief Executive Officer Alex Sorokin said in the petition.

The company makes lithium-ion batteries for plug-in electric cars, which are being scrutinized by federal auto- safety officials after a General Motors Co. Chevrolet Volt caught fire, people familiar with the probe said in November.”

Read the whole article here

Range Fuels was a company that was supposedly going to turn wood chips in to bio-fuels. Range was the recipient of over $162 million in federal grants and loan guarantees.

“It seemed like a great idea — turn the waste from Georgia’s abundant forestry industry into biofuel and provide much-needed jobs in one of the state’s poorest rural counties while helping free the country from dependence on foreign oil.

When Range Fuels Inc., a start-up based in Broomfield, Colo., announced in 2007 it would do just that, everyone — from locals to Silicon Valley venture capitalists, from then-Gov. Sonny Perdue to then-U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman — was excited and on board.

The new plant, touted as a major alternative energy coup for Georgia, would be the nation’s first facility to turn scrap wood from the harvesting of pine trees into cellulosic ethanol fuel.

Five years and more than $300 million in investments later, the plant that had been expected to produce as much as 20 million gallons of fuel a year as early as 2009 was sold in foreclosure for a mere $5.1 million.

Neither the 20 million gallons of ethanol nor any of the 70 promised jobs ever materialized, leaving taxpayers holding the bag for millions in grants and unpaid loans.

While published amounts vary, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports the failed Range plant cost U.S. taxpayers $64 million and Georgia taxpayers another $6.2 million. Authorities say the $5.1 million from the sale earlier this month to Lanza Tech, a New Zealand-based biofuel company, will help offset loan losses suffered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

So what happened to burst this promising biomass bubble?”

Read the whole article here:

However, you’ll be relieved to know that Rep. Jan Scharkowsky (D-umbass) says that the 20,000 jobs that would have been created by the Keystone XL Pipleline Project are no great shakes as “green” jobs are the way of the future.

“Twenty thousand jobs is really not that many jobs and investing in green technologies will produce that and more. But I’ll tell you what, you know it seems to me that the Republicans would rather have an issue than a pipeline.”

Read the whole goofy thing here

 

 

 

 

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

10 Responses to “Two More “Green” Energy Companies File for Bankruptcy”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Alberta Oil Peon
    1 | January 26, 2012 1:08 pm

    Hmmm. Range Fuels is just another Solyndra.

    What’s wrong with this business model? We take wood waste from the forest industry, brew it up in kettles (no doubt heated by something), and make alcohol, which then has to be distilled (requiring a lot more heat). Then we have the waste mash to dispose of, which may not be useable for animal feed, as is the case for using corn.

    Or we do this.

    Wood waste is fuel, so use it as fuel. full stop.


  2. Buffalobob
    2 | January 26, 2012 6:18 pm

    In the words of Kermit the Frog , It’s not that easy being green.


  3. Prebanned
    3 | January 26, 2012 6:50 pm

    @ Alberta Oil Peon:
    Green ain’t smart


  4. huckfunn
    4 | January 26, 2012 6:59 pm

    @ Prebanned:
    In my opinion, any person or company trying to sell me green or Eeek-O is just a scammer. I refuse to buy “green” products.


  5. darkwords
    5 | January 27, 2012 12:24 am

    Important news and good cartoon


  6. 6 | January 27, 2012 12:40 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ Prebanned:
    In my opinion, any person or company trying to sell me green or Eeek-O is just a scammer. I refuse to buy “green” products.

    The eco-movement is outright warfare against the middle class and working poor.


  7. 7 | January 27, 2012 7:27 am

    @ 1389AD:

    You have made an important point, and one that can not be understated. Commodities prices include a huge portion of things that we can not do without in our daily lives. They make up our basic family living expenses. When we introduce artificially supported inflationary pressures in the commodities market, such as those spurred on by the green fairy, the end result of that is that those on the low end of the income scale are devastated in most instances by the chicanery of the left. It is not just that we are robbing them of opportunity in the form of decreased employment, but also that we are robbing them of opportunity in the form of stealing their discretionary purchasing power. They are less able to save capital to start their own businesses. Match that with an beefed up regulatory environment, and we have really screwed the very people we were claiming to help.


  8. huckfunn
    8 | January 27, 2012 9:21 am

    @ 1389AD:
    @ Flyovercountry:
    I’d like to do a spreadsheet and then a post on how many government subsidized green businesses have failed. I would include columns for what they received in DOE grants and government loan guarantees as well as how many employees they had before going bust. I would then keep a running tally of the cost to the taxpayers. Any input will be appreciated.


  9. huckfunn
    9 | January 27, 2012 9:39 am

    Heh. President Obama leaves event promoting clean energy in a motorcade of 22 fossil-fueled vehicles


  10. 4_Sticks
    10 | January 28, 2012 2:35 am

    Late to the party … again, but this belongs here:

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/16-scientists-have-a-message-for-elected-officials-on-global-warming-drastic-action-unnecessary/

    As they say: ‘just sayin’


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David