First time visitor? Learn more.

Friday with the ‘hammer – Syria offers a chance to weaken Iran

by Speranza ( 12 Comments › )
Filed under Hezballah, Iran, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Terrorism at February 3rd, 2012 - 3:00 pm

I am under no illusions that any Syrian government that will emerge will be a peaceful one. However if we  can break up the Tehran-Damascus-Beirut axis then ultimately the region will be a less volatile place. Remember – there are no good Islamic regimes, only less awful ones.

by Charles Krauthammer

Imperial regimes can crack when they are driven out of their major foreign outposts. The fall of the Berlin Wall did not only signal the liberation of Eastern Europe from Moscow. It prefigured the collapse of the Soviet Union itself just two years later.The fall of Bashar al-Assad’s Syria could be similarly ominous for Iran. The alliance with Syria is the centerpiece of Iran’s expanding sphere of influence, a mini-Comintern that includes such clients as Iranian-armed and -directed Hezbollah, now the dominant power in Lebanon; and Hamas, which controls Gaza and threatens to take the rest of Palestine (the West Bank) from a feeble Fatah.

[.....]

Of all these clients, Syria is the most important. It’s the only Arab state openly allied with non-Arab Iran. This is significant because the Arabs see the Persians as having had centuries-old designs to dominate the Middle East. Indeed, Iranian arms and trainers, transshipped to Hezbollah through Syria, have given the Persians their first outpost on the Mediterranean in 2,300 years.

But the Arab-Iranian divide is not just national/ethnic. It is sectarian. The Arabs are overwhelmingly Sunni. Iran is Shiite. The Arab states fear Shiite Iran infiltrating the Sunni homeland through (apart from Iraq) Hezbollah in Lebanon, and through Syria, run by Assad’s Alawites, a heterodox offshoot of Shiite Islam.

Which is why the fate of the Assad regime is geopolitically crucial. It is, of course, highly significant for reasons of democracy and human rights as well. Syrian Baathism, while not as capricious and deranged as the Saddam Hussein variant, runs a ruthless police state that once killed 20,000 in Hama and has now killed more than 5,400 during the current uprising. Human rights — decency — is reason enough to do everything we can to bring down Assad.

But strategic opportunity compounds the urgency. With its archipelago of clients anchored by Syria, Iran is today the greatest regional threat — to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states terrified of Iranian nuclear hegemony; to traditional regimes menaced by Iranian jihadist subversion; to Israel, which the Islamic Republic has pledged to annihilate; to America and the West, whom the mullahs have vowed to drive from the region.

[......]

At the end of this causal chain, Iran, shorn of key allies and already reeling from economic sanctions over its nuclear program, would be thrown back on its heels. The mullahs are already shaky enough to be making near-suicidal threats of blocking the Strait of Hormuz. The population they put down in the 2009 Green Revolution is still seething. The regime is particularly reviled by the young. And its increasing attempts to shore up Assad financially and militarily have only compounded anti-Iranian feeling in the region.

It’s not just the Sunni Arabs lining up against Assad. Turkey, after a recent flirtation with a Syrian-Iranian-Turkish entente, has turned firmly against Assad, seeing an opportunity to extend its influence, as in Ottoman days, as protector/master of the Sunni Arabs. The alignment of forces suggests a unique opportunity for the West to help finish the job.

How? First, a total boycott of Syria, beyond just oil and including a full arms embargo. Second, a flood of aid to the resistance (through Turkey, which harbors both rebel militias and the political opposition, or directly and clandestinely into Syria). Third, a Security Council resolution calling for the removal of the Assad regime. Russia, Assad’s last major outside ally, should be forced to either accede or incur the wrath of the Arab states with a veto.

Force the issue. Draw bright lines. Make clear American solidarity with the Arab League against a hegemonic Iran and its tottering Syrian client. In diplomacy, one often has to choose between human rights and strategic advantage. This is a rare case where we can advance both — so long as we do not compromise with Russia or relent until Assad falls.

Read the rest – Syria: It’s not just about freedom

 

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

12 Responses to “Friday with the ‘hammer – Syria offers a chance to weaken Iran”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | February 3, 2012 3:11 pm

    I am looking forward to seeing Baby Assad upside down on a meat hook like Mussolini.


  2. Da_Beerfreak
    2 | February 3, 2012 3:24 pm

    It wouldn’t surprise if he ended up retiring to a small Dacha outside of Moscow.


  3. Speranza
    3 | February 3, 2012 3:27 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    It wouldn’t surprise if he ended up retiring to a small Dacha outside of Moscow.

    I don’t think the Russkies have use for failed dictators and particularly if they still want to have some influence with the new Syrian regime.


  4. 4 | February 3, 2012 3:30 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Russians really don’t give a shit about the Muzz.


  5. 5 | February 3, 2012 3:44 pm

    First, a total boycott of Syria, beyond just oil and including a full arms embargo.

    The Russians will never cooperate. This has zero chance of going anywhere.


  6. 6 | February 3, 2012 3:52 pm

    @ Speranza:
    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    Better that dacha than getting sodomized by a bayonet!


  7. Speranza
    7 | February 3, 2012 4:02 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Russians really don’t give a shit about the Muzz.

    They don’t give a damn about anyone.


  8. yenta-fada
    8 | February 3, 2012 5:46 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    Russians really don’t give a shit about the Muzz.
    They don’t give a damn about anyone.

    imo, neither does the current White House.


  9. Bumr50
    9 | February 3, 2012 6:00 pm

    This sucks.

    Air Force plans to close 911th Airlift Wing in Moon


  10. Speranza
    10 | February 3, 2012 7:09 pm

    Pretty sad.


  11. Buckeye Abroad
    11 | February 3, 2012 7:34 pm

    @ Speranza:

    They don’t give a damn about anyone.

    Yeah, they only care about their own nation. They rest be damned.

    Wish America would rediscover that.


  12. 12 | February 3, 2012 9:07 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    Rodan wrote:
    @ Speranza:
    Russians really don’t give a shit about the Muzz.
    They don’t give a damn about anyone.
    imo, neither does the current White House.

    Wrong, the current White House backs the Muslim Brotherhood every chance it gets. They’re in the Saudis’ pockets.

    At least the Russians thus far have been smart enough not to go to war on the side of any Muslims.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David