First time visitor? Learn more.

Democrats Confident in Obama’s re-election

by Rodan ( 24 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Headlines at February 10th, 2012 - 9:41 am

The False Messiah’s poll ratings have increased in recent weeks. The media’s Obama Boom theme is working. The GOP as always has no coherent message and is an utterly useless political organization. Bouyed by this, Senate Democrats are confident in Obama’s re-election. They are also increasingly confident in their odds on holding the Senate.

Senate Democrats are optimistic about President Obama’s chances of re-election and think he may have coattails this November.

Democratic lawmakers described the president as being “really upbeat” and in a “good mood” on Wednesday when he addressed the Senate Democratic caucus during a one-day retreat at Nationals Park in Southeast D.C.

They said Obama’s campaign manager Jim Messina gave an encouraging presentation on the president’s strategy for winning re-election, a plan that relied heavily on using social media to mobilize voters.

IF the GOP loses in 2012, a Party reformation is needed.

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

24 Responses to “Democrats Confident in Obama’s re-election”
( jump to bottom )

  1. mfhorn
    1 | February 10, 2012 9:56 am

    While we can’t do anything about the bias of the media, Republicans could get a coherent message out, could nominate candidates with the stones to attack the terrible policies of Obama and could fight back.

    I found a good column on 5 things conservatives could learn from the left.

    The party needs to take this to heart.


  2. 2 | February 10, 2012 10:15 am

    @ mfhorn:

    Too many Conservatives are stubborn and refuse to emulate the Left’s message system.


  3. 3 | February 10, 2012 10:22 am

    Obama will be a formidible candidate. That cannot be discounted. People who think we will win by default aren’t paying attention to what is going on.


  4. huckfunn
    4 | February 10, 2012 10:25 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ mfhorn:

    Too many Conservatives are stubborn and refuse to emulate the Left’s message system.

    The repubs also are willing to share power rather than lead. However, last week’s Gallup Poll show a huge Obama defeat in November. As soon as the GOP has a nominee, there will be a singular anti-Obama message. Also, if King O doesn’t back off his contraceptive mandate (I actually hope he doesn’t) that will be the last nail for him.


  5. mfhorn
    5 | February 10, 2012 10:41 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ mfhorn:
    Too many Conservatives are stubborn and refuse to emulate the Left’s message system.

    The repubs also are willing to share power rather than lead. However, last week’s Gallup Poll show a huge Obama defeat in November. As soon as the GOP has a nominee, there will be a singular anti-Obama message. Also, if King O doesn’t back off his contraceptive mandate (I actually hope he doesn’t) that will be the last nail for him.

    I certainly hope that’s true. Another 4 years of an Obama administration, and I don’t know that this country could ever recover.


  6. 6 | February 10, 2012 10:50 am

    @ huckfunn:

    That’s against an un named Republican. But Obama is beating every Republican in head to heads.

    He has the most powerful political machine ever assembled. Plus unlike the GOP,. The Democrats are disciplined and stay on message.


  7. huckfunn
    7 | February 10, 2012 10:57 am

    Rodan wrote:

    That’s against an un named Republican. But Obama is beating every Republican in head to heads.

    He’s winning against a divided field. When there is 1 nominee, there will be one united anti-Obama message.

    Also; I’m really not sure what is the good of the constant defeatist message. “Oh no, we’ve really had it; Obama is such a bad ass; Yessiree, we’re doomed”. I just don’t buy it and I don’t think the constant drumbeat of pessimism helps our cause. What’s your opinion of that Gallup map that I posted?


  8. The Osprey
    8 | February 10, 2012 11:21 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    I just don’t buy it and I don’t think the constant drumbeat of pessimism helps our cause.

    It doesn’t.


  9. The Osprey
    9 | February 10, 2012 11:23 am


  10. lobo91
    10 | February 10, 2012 11:35 am

    @ Rodan:

    Too bad we can’t actually nominate an “unnmamed Republican,” sort of like Pelosi’s “We have to pass the bill to see what’s in it” deal…


  11. 11 | February 10, 2012 1:20 pm

    @ huckfunn:

    What’s your opinion of that Gallup map that I posted?

    <

    I think its meaningless. It doesn't name an opponent against Obama.

    If you want to believe Obama is easy to beat, go ahead.


  12. 12 | February 10, 2012 1:20 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Yeah, one can dream.


  13. waldensianspirit
    13 | February 10, 2012 2:25 pm

    When no one will lend to the US and no one will accept dollars then it’ll all stop


  14. m
    14 | February 10, 2012 3:20 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    Also; I’m really not sure what is the good of the constant defeatist message. “Oh no, we’ve really had it; Obama is such a bad ass; Yessiree, we’re doomed”. I just don’t buy it and I don’t think the constant drumbeat of pessimism helps our cause.

    Hear, hear!

    This is all before consolidation and before the head to head debates.


  15. m
    15 | February 10, 2012 3:22 pm

    @ Rodan:

    He didn’t say it would be “easy” – he said accepting defeat 9 months before the election is pretty self-defeating.


  16. Lily
    16 | February 10, 2012 3:51 pm

    @ m:

    It is not going to be easy, but the media under estimates that their are a lot of people not happy with bho being president. Excatly who are they polling? That is the question.


  17. m
    17 | February 10, 2012 4:19 pm

    @ Lily:

    No shit.

    The media knows that some people just want to back the winner so if they can convince enough people that is the zero, well there are some more votes guaranteed.

    And they want to demoralize US so our turnout is depressed. More votes against their hero the zero- guaranteed not to be cast.


  18. 18 | February 10, 2012 4:28 pm

    @ Lily:

    Easy. They oversample Demo☭rat voters.


  19. huckfunn
    19 | February 10, 2012 5:30 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    What’s your opinion of that Gallup map that I posted?

    <

    I think its meaningless. It doesn't name an opponent against Obama.

    If you want to believe Obama is easy to beat, go ahead.

    It’s interesting how 2 people who are on the same side of an issue (defeat Obama) can look at the same data and come away with 2 totally different views. Here’s how I see it. The poll shows Obama beating GOP candidates A,B, C & D because just about everyone has taken a stand by saying “I won’t vote for so & so because he did or said something or other”. Now, look at the Gallup poll that shows Obama losing in a landslide to an un-named candidate. The so-called un-named candidate is ANYBODY BUT OBAMA. That tells me that as soon as one of the current candidates becomes the GOP nominee, he will immediately jump way out in front of Obama.

    Also, you’re confusing me with someone else. I never said that I believe Obama would be easy to beat.


  20. huckfunn
    20 | February 10, 2012 5:37 pm

    m wrote:

    Hear, hear!

    This is all before consolidation and before the head to head debates.

    Anyone but Obama. This latest power grab with the mandate for free abortions and contraceptives will be his downfall. When hardcore Obama slave, Chris Matthews, is on the same side as the Church, the world has turned upside down.
    Tingles On Obama’s Contraception Mandate: Even Liberal Catholics Will Stand With The Church On This, “May Come To Civil Disobedience”…


  21. darkwords
    21 | February 10, 2012 9:08 pm

    It’s a plank issue. Pure conservatsm like a santorum will lose badly to Obama in the fall. The big blocks of voters close to the GoP are independents, libertarians, and hispanics. The Conservative GoP voter has to make common cause with the most important issue of those three groups. Independents want jobs and secure borders i think. Libertarians want less government and free pot(the first one is the better one). Putting Ron Paul in a position is a good thing to do even though we don’t like him. What do hispanics want?


  22. Lily
    22 | February 11, 2012 4:07 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    m wrote:

    Hear, hear!

    This is all before consolidation and before the head to head debates.

    Anyone but Obama. This latest power grab with the mandate for free abortions and contraceptives will be his downfall. When hardcore Obama slave, Chris Matthews, is on the same side as the Church, the world has turned upside down.
    Tingles On Obama’s Contraception Mandate: Even Liberal Catholics Will Stand With The Church On This, “May Come To Civil Disobedience”…

    The sad thing is that it is not just about contraception. They leave out abortions and this is a big issue with the Church.


  23. Canoe Convoy
    23 | February 11, 2012 7:22 pm

    @ Rodan:
    Concur. But using some of the Left’s tactics works. It requires some thought, however, to figure out how to defeat their sense of moral superiority.


  24. huckfunn
    24 | February 11, 2012 7:37 pm

    Lily wrote:

    The sad thing is that it is not just about contraception. They leave out abortions and this is a big issue with the Church.

    Once again the big issue is big government intruding into every aspect of our personal lives. It’s who Obama and the democrats are.
    “The main reason I’m here is simple: I just want to say thank you,” Obama said. “I want to say thank you to each and every one of you, because the EPA touches on the lives of every single American every single day.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David