First time visitor? Learn more.

Mocking the Dog

by Bunk X ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Humor, OOT, Open thread at February 11th, 2012 - 11:00 pm


[via]
Yep, you guessed it.

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

Visual punnery provided for perusal on The Overnight Open Thread.

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

56 Responses to “Mocking the Dog”
( jump to bottom )

  1. gibsonz
    1 | February 11, 2012 11:31 pm

    It kind of reminds me of Charles Jonson hopping on the back of the next passing fad!


  2. Lost
    2 | February 11, 2012 11:45 pm

    Someone here was talking about this. Was it Rodan?


  3. gibsonz
    3 | February 11, 2012 11:56 pm

    It appears from my previous post I have misplaced the ‘h’ in Mr. Dingdongs last name…forgive me, for I have sinned! Actually, I find it fitting to leave out the ‘h’ and replace the first ‘n’ with a ‘L’ and seek redemption by casting Mr. Johnson in the lead role as ‘Mammy’ on his racist plantation of ‘little green subordinates’…


  4. 4 | February 12, 2012 12:21 am

    I was notified that something pissed off Coldwarrior last night. Hope it wasn’t serious.


  5. Lost
    5 | February 12, 2012 12:54 am

    @ Bunk X:
    Must have been major. He doesn’t get upset easily.


  6. 6 | February 12, 2012 1:37 am

    @ Lost:
    Sent him an email, haven’t heard back.


  7. 7 | February 12, 2012 2:19 am

    Bunk X wrote:

    I was notified that something pissed off Coldwarrior last night. Hope it wasn’t serious.

    Hope it didn’t have anything to do with me…

    Lost wrote:

    Someone here was talking about this. Was it Rodan?

    I had the story here.


  8. Lost
    8 | February 12, 2012 3:01 am

    @ Bunk X:
    Went downstairs to have a look. Apparently somebody erased a post of his. He has offered up his share of the blog and one poster encouraged him. (Didn’t get good vibes off of that one)

    CW, don’t go. If you leave, others will leave as well.


  9. 9 | February 12, 2012 4:25 am

    Something get into the water supply again?


  10. mtc
    10 | February 12, 2012 6:14 am

    @ Lost:
    That was me. I’m mad at him for censoring me for merely saying I agreed with Christopher Hitchens’ take on the Serbs in 1999. Well, he mentioned it first and I agreed. If he didn’t want it discussed then he shouldn’t have linked to his stories about the Serbs that he wrote for Vanity Fair.


  11. Bumr50
    11 | February 12, 2012 7:46 am

    @ mtc:

    He’s mad that his comment got deleted, not over any argument.


  12. 12 | February 12, 2012 7:55 am

    Good Morning All!

    I am somewhat confused here? Who would have the authority to delete one of CW’s posts?

    I run a blog or two on the WordPress platform and have had a comment go away. I did some serious digging into the database and found that guess what, sometimes WordPress just Shits The Bed!

    Damn Database claimed that the comment never existed!

    I do believe that this happenstance falls under the “Shit Happens” category!

    I would like to believe that CW stumbled into the same thing!

    BTW, my blogs are Self Hosted so not even the Hosting Service could get involved. Sometimes, Shit Just Happens!


  13. Bumr50
    13 | February 12, 2012 8:01 am

    United We Stand for Religious Freedom

    By DONALD WUERL, CHARLES COLSON AND MEIR Y. SOLOVEICHIK

    Stories involving a Catholic, a Protestant and a Jew typically end with a punch line. We wish that were the case here, but what brings us together is no laughing matter: the threat now posed by government policy to that basic human freedom, religious liberty.

    Last month the federal Department of Health and Human Services announced that the Affordable Care Act requires employers to pay for insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilizations and contraception. What made the announcement especially troubling is that HHS specifically declined to exempt religious institutions that serve those outside their own faiths, such as hospitals and schools.

    Coverage of this story has almost invariably been framed as a conflict between the federal government and the Catholic bishops. Zeroing in on the word “contraception,” many commentators have taken delight in pointing to surveys about the use of contraceptives among Catholics, the message being that any infringement of religious freedom involves an idiosyncratic position that doesn’t affect that many people.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. The Catholic Church’s teaching on contraception (not to mention abortion and surgical sterilization) has been clear, consistent and public. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’s decision would force Catholic institutions either to violate the moral teachings of the Catholic Church or abandon the health-care, education and social services they provide the needy. This is intolerable.

    Read the rest.


  14. RIX
    14 | February 12, 2012 8:11 am

    @ Bumr50:
    At mass yesterday , a priest who is a parctical man
    (used to be a commoodities broker) & I guy that I
    respect made some interesting comments from the
    pulpiy.
    He said ‘The government is coming after our tax
    exemption” He also said, “we will not comply
    with the new contraceptives mandate.”


  15. Bumr50
    15 | February 12, 2012 8:17 am

    @ RIX:

    That’s encouraging.

    It’s good to hear that on the parish level.

    Now if only we could get them to speak out against “Catholics United”…


  16. John Difool
    16 | February 12, 2012 8:19 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ Bumr50:
    At mass yesterday , a priest who is a parctical man
    (used to be a commoodities broker) & I guy that I
    respect made some interesting comments from the
    pulpiy.
    He said ‘The government is coming after our tax
    exemption” He also said, “we will not comply
    with the new contraceptives mandate.”

    They will come after their tax exempt status when they are not down with the party line, not helping Democrats get elected or not allowing Democrats to campaign from the pulpit.

    We have seen all three take place many times since 2008 without a peep from the LSM.

    Obama shit the bed on this one and pissed off a great deal of upper-mid-west and Northeast blue state Catholics who for the most part vote reliably Democrat, mostly due toi the fact they are strong union supporters. I’m sure father Phleger is just fine with it though.


  17. 17 | February 12, 2012 8:20 am

    @ Bumr50:

    It is, at the end of the day, an attempt to force the Catholics from the public square as providers of health care services, education, and services to the needy. It is about creating and protecting the Government Monopoly in those areas. If they are permitted to succeed here, they will come after other Christian organization in a similar manner, with the goal of driving them out of the public square. This is, indeed, a war on the Christian Religion, dressed up as a mere health care dispute. This ruling must not be permitted to stand. I suspect, with a majority of the Supreme Court being Catholic, that it will not stand for very long.


  18. RIX
    18 | February 12, 2012 8:22 am

    @ Bumr50:
    What a bunch of liberal flaks & Notre Dame needs
    a shake up. The alums are conservative & not happy.


  19. RIX
    19 | February 12, 2012 8:25 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    In order to establish the “Utopian” totalitraian model
    of government, religion needs to be destroyed or at
    least placed under the thumb of the governmant


  20. Bumr50
    20 | February 12, 2012 8:27 am

    @ RIX:

    That’s good to hear.

    Notre Dame is a very public face of the church, and if they were to publicly denounce the Obama administration it would be a potent PR blow for Team Obama.


  21. John Difool
    21 | February 12, 2012 8:32 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    In order to establish the “Utopian” totalitraian model
    of government, religion needs to be destroyed or at
    least placed under the thumb of the governmant

    In a nutshell, liberals are insanely jealous of any power structure that provides the wants and needs to the proletariat. They despise religion and it’s charities, they would rather the proles worship at their feet and sign up for the dole. They despise Walmart because it provides goods at a very affordable price and they would rather have you buying overpriced crap made by some union that pays them off.

    The list goes on and on, Rush has addressed this many times, but the bottom line is liberals want to be the end all be all and if you need anything no matter what it is, they want you to have to go through them first.


  22. Bumr50
    22 | February 12, 2012 8:33 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I’m a Catholic, but my wife’s parents are Salvation Army officers and my wife works for them as a bookkeeper.

    I’ve been telling them since Obama got elected that they are going to have to either capitulate to every whim or be in a fight for survival.

    This administration and the Left in general absolutely loathes charitable organizations that help people without enrolling them in the welfare system.

    They literally see it as competition.

    Charitable non-profits are all on the list, Catholics just happened the first and most public. By using contraception as a wedge issue the administration thinks that they can keep public sentiment on their side.


  23. Moe Katz
    23 | February 12, 2012 8:34 am

    Last night Madame Moe and I went to see Hitchcock’s “I Confess” last night in the Quebec City movie theater in which it premiered in 1953 – it was mainly shot here also. The plot revolves around a priest who is accused of a murder and who cannot exculpate himself because the real murderer confessed his guilt to him, priests being unable to divulge the content of a confession. Speaking of Catholicism … anyway, Montgomery Clift was great as the priest and Anne Baxter was … hot.


  24. Bumr50
    24 | February 12, 2012 8:34 am

    John Difool wrote:

    They despise Walmart because it provides goods at a very affordable price and they would rather have you buying overpriced crap made by some union that pays them off.

    Excellent comparison.

    Power and control.


  25. 25 | February 12, 2012 8:34 am

    @ AZOlddog:

    I am somewhat confused here? Who would have the authority to delete one of CW’s posts?

    Any other admin, I would guess. But the “shit happens” surmise is not unlikely, because it most certainly does, regardless of platform.


  26. RIX
    26 | February 12, 2012 8:37 am

    @ Bumr50:
    Notre Dame has a President that honored Obama
    with an honorary doctrate shortly after his election.
    Due to Obamas stance on abortion & his vote against
    the Born Aive Infants Prtection Act.
    The Domers that I know are very unhappy with Father
    Jenks and are not donating.
    I really likle Notre Dame, but they need a shake up.


  27. John Difool
    27 | February 12, 2012 8:44 am

    Bumr50 wrote:

    John Difool wrote:
    They despise Walmart because it provides goods at a very affordable price and they would rather have you buying overpriced crap made by some union that pays them off.
    Excellent comparison.
    Power and control.

    They want Walmart unionized It’s like the holy grail of labor to them. Nevermind the fact that the prices would go up if that happens and consumers will just go someplace else and it would severely damage the company, that matters not one bit.

    Back in ’06 when the Dems took the House and Senate this was mission #1. Walmart was forced to shell out millions in payoff money to unions and lawyers to fight off the onslaught of frivolous lawsuits. It was basically a shakedown. Once the Dems and their union handlers got their cash, they backed off but it probably won’t be long before they want to hit that cash-cow up again.


  28. Bumr50
    28 | February 12, 2012 9:00 am

    @ RIX:

    Locally, Duquesne University is a trainwreck.

    I went to their “Recent News” section of website, and much to my chagrin these were among the latest entries:

    Duquesne’s Human Rights Film Series Presents ‘When We Leave’

    Duquesne Sustainability Speaker Series Highlights Social Dimensions of Climate Change

    Center for African Studies Gains Momentum at Duquesne; Acting Director Named

    Is Climate Change Driving Another Mass Extinction?

    New Statewide Coalition Promotes Pennsylvania Wind to Green Energy Buyers

    Duquesne’s Human Rights Film Series Presents ‘Blue Gold’

    Those are just news items for the past two weeks.

    Not one mention in the student newspaper on anything even related to the mandate, or even Obamacare in general.


  29. RIX
    29 | February 12, 2012 9:07 am

    @ Bumr50:
    It looks like a student could get in a groove and
    major in Transgender Studies with a minor in Drowning
    Polar Bears.


  30. John Difool
    30 | February 12, 2012 9:11 am

    @ RIX:

    Yep, and these Occupy folks wonder why their unemployable.


  31. John Difool
    31 | February 12, 2012 9:16 am

    Breitbart loses his shit @ Occupiers.


  32. lobo91
    32 | February 12, 2012 9:20 am

    Mike C. wrote:

    @ AZOlddog:

    I am somewhat confused here? Who would have the authority to delete one of CW’s posts?

    Any other admin, I would guess.

    I’m pretty sure I could.

    But I wouldn’t.

    The only times I’ve ever messed with anyone else’s comments without being asked was to fix videos that didn’t embed, or to delete a double post. I’d never delete a comment because of its content (and certainly not one from CW).


  33. 33 | February 12, 2012 9:21 am

    @ Bunk X:
    @ Lost:
    @ Bumr50:
    @ AZOlddog:

    Savage.


  34. RIX
    34 | February 12, 2012 9:22 am

    John Difool wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Yep, and these Occupy folks wonder why their unemployable.

    Hard to understand why a degree in Diversity Studies
    withn a minor in Peace Studies does’nt get you the
    corner office & stock options.
    Go figure.


  35. lobo91
    35 | February 12, 2012 9:39 am

    @ RIX:

    Corner office and stock options?

    Hell, most of them aren’t qualified to be WalMart cashiers, degree or not.

    They’ve never worked a day in their lives, and have no idea what it means to actually have to show up for work day in and day out.

    And they’d never take a job that wouldn’t allow them to spend all day on Facebook.


  36. John Difool
    36 | February 12, 2012 9:46 am

    @ lobo91:

    Just wait until the Republican National Convention. This is where we’re gonna see real violence and bloodshed with these pukes. I hope they turn the Dem’s convention into something that would make the ’68 convention look like a church picnic.


  37. lobo91
    37 | February 12, 2012 9:56 am

    I think my adventure today with the Kuwaiti bureaucracy is going to be hard even for them to top for sheer waste of time.

    They recently reversed their policy on giving drivers licenses to foreigners, so my company submitted about 100 applications en masse. We’ve been going to various places to jump through their hoops ever since.

    Today, I had to report for blood type determination. I was a bit confused, since I’ve neve seen a drivers license anywhere that contained blood type, but I guess they can put whatever they want on it. I had to be at one of our off-post offices at 9:30, so I didn’t bother going to my office this morning. I would have had to leave about an hour after getting there.

    So, 9:30 rolls around, and the company rep starts filling out these forms for us. They needed our passport number, civil ID number (a Kuwaiti green card, basically), name, sex, and there was a row of boxes for blood type, which I gave them.

    Out of the 20 or so of us in the group, 3 didn’t know their blood type. They loaded us all up onto a bus and drove us to a decrepit-looking Kuwaiti clinic, where we all sat down to wait in the hallway, assuming that they’d call us in one at a time.

    The only people they caled in were the 3 who didn’t know their blood type. Those 3 were poked in the finger. The rest of us just had our forms stamped.

    Then we got back on the bus and went back to the office, where they told us we were done.

    By the time I got to my office, it was lunch time. I wasted 4 hours with this nonsense that could have been completed with an email.


  38. lobo91
    38 | February 12, 2012 10:00 am

    @ John Difool:

    That reminds me, The Walking Dead returns to AMC tonight.


  39. RIX
    39 | February 12, 2012 10:01 am

    @ lobo91:

    They’ve never worked a day in their lives, and have no idea what it means to actually have to show up for work day in and day out.

    But bthey feel entitled. Their Profs told them
    that they are the hpoe of the future.
    For no logical reason , they actully beleive it.
    Obama is the perfect leader for other lazy, lay abouts.


  40. lobo91
    40 | February 12, 2012 10:04 am

    @ RIX:

    Of course they believe it.

    They paid $150,000 to hear it.


  41. John Difool
    41 | February 12, 2012 10:06 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ John Difool:
    That reminds me, The Walking Dead returns to AMC tonight.

    Can’t wait. Hopefully this season will be better, the last episode was awesome but it started getting a little too soapy for my liking.

    The Dead & The Restless…….The Dead of Our Lives.


  42. RIX
    42 | February 12, 2012 10:09 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Of course they believe it.
    They paid $150,000 to hear it.

    In loans & now they’re pissed.


  43. John Difool
    43 | February 12, 2012 10:11 am

    RIX wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    @ RIX:
    Of course they believe it.
    They paid $150,000 to hear it.

    In loans & now they’re pissed.

    And guess who sits on the boards of these loan companies and have stock in them?


  44. lobo91
    44 | February 12, 2012 10:16 am

    @ RIX:

    I don’t blame them for being pissed.

    But they’re pissed at the wrong people.


  45. RIX
    45 | February 12, 2012 10:18 am

    Jack Lew, Asst Sec of State is on Fox News Sunday.
    He is saying that actuarial studies show that it is
    cheaper for insurance companies to provide free
    contraceptives, rather than cover maternity.
    To the Catholic Bishops that is not the point.
    But, I spend some time around actuaries & I never heard of such a study. If that is the case, why didn’t the Insurance
    companies make free contraceptives available on their own?


  46. RIX
    46 | February 12, 2012 10:20 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ RIX:
    I don’t blame them for being pissed.
    But they’re pissed at the wrong people.

    Yeah, a college education is way to expensive.
    Year to year increases always run ahead of the national
    rate of inflation.
    They shoud be protesting the Dean & tenured profs.


  47. Bumr50
    47 | February 12, 2012 10:22 am

    @ RIX:

    They are desperately trying to make the issue about end-user cost.

    Santorum rightfully pointed out the absurdity of that argument in his CPAC speech.

    It’s an already inexpensive category, especially in terms of medicine, but they want to get the “free” meme out there as much as they can to negate the argument over principle.

    I guess the theory is to get a populist outcry.


  48. lobo91
    48 | February 12, 2012 10:23 am

    @ RIX:

    They should be protesting the Dems in Congress who keep raising the amount students can borrow.

    That’s why tuition is so high. If they didn’t enable every 18 year old in America to borrow tens of thousands of dollars based solely on the fact that they got some college to accept them, tuition wouldn’t be that high.


  49. RIX
    49 | February 12, 2012 10:33 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ RIX:
    They should be protesting the Dems in Congress who keep raising the amount students can borrow.
    That’s why tuition is so high. If they didn’t enable every 18 year old in America to borrow tens of thousands of dollars based solely on the fact that they got some college to accept them, tuition wouldn’t be that high.

    All true.


  50. RIX
    50 | February 12, 2012 10:35 am

    @ John Difool:

    And guess who sits on the boards of these loan companies and have stock in them?

    “Culture of Corruption” Chicago Democrats don’t
    know any other way.


  51. Bumr50
    51 | February 12, 2012 10:37 am

    @ lobo91:

    They are trying to do away with “for-profit” schools as well, so that every student who wishes to attend college will HAVE TO apply for Federal loans.


  52. RIX
    52 | February 12, 2012 10:37 am

    @ Bumr50:
    What they overlook is that these Catholic organizations
    are either fully experience rated if they are insured,
    or they are self insured.
    Either way, they wind up paying for the meds.
    It’s an NY sidewalk shell game.


  53. John Difool
    53 | February 12, 2012 10:45 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ John Difool:
    And guess who sits on the boards of these loan companies and have stock in them?
    “Culture of Corruption” Chicago Democrats don’t
    know any other way.

    I know that John Kerry, John Edwards and Al Gore are/were involved in several. The cost of tuition goes up and the loans go up along with the interest on them and wallah, lib politicians and lib academia get filthy rich off of tons of useless lib study degrees.


  54. RIX
    54 | February 12, 2012 10:48 am

    @ John Difool:
    And the joke is on us.


  55. John Difool
    55 | February 12, 2012 10:55 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ John Difool:
    And the joke is on us.

    If the Occupy folks were truly legit and knew who the true perps responsible for their misery and malaise were (other than themselves) there wouldn’t be a Dem politician who would be safe out in the streets right now.

    Of course Van Jones, Bill Ayres, Anita Dunn, Cass Sunstein, Samantha Power, Soros and others are behind these folks and funding them and I suspect most of them are very aware the true nature of these protests which is a dry run on Billy Boy’s American Bolshevik revolution


  56. RIX
    56 | February 12, 2012 11:04 am

    @ John Difool:
    The OWS, like Acorn, Move On & some of the more
    radical unions are the Obama shock troops.
    If the OWS yoots were legitimate they would not
    be wallowing in filth ,associating with those that
    abuse children, assault women and get violent just
    because they feel like it.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David