First time visitor? Learn more.

Blogmocracy Live! 02 12 2012

by m ( 106 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Open thread, Politics at February 12th, 2012 - 7:59 pm


LIVE @ 8:00pm eastern!
Call in and join us! 1 (347) 996-5447
Email the gmail for a toll free number!
blogmocracy @ gmail .com



Listen to internet radio with The Blogmocracy on Blog Talk Radio

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

106 Responses to “Blogmocracy Live! 02 12 2012”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | February 12, 2012 8:04 pm

    Boogah boogah! Is chat on?


  2. Speranza
    2 | February 12, 2012 8:05 pm

    The guy who got creamed by 18% in his reelection campaign is the same guy that the rest of the nation is pining for. Yeah right!


  3. taxfreekiller
    3 | February 12, 2012 8:07 pm

    spaceala is over on dod.
    Go trash the punk as you listen to this.


  4. 4 | February 12, 2012 8:08 pm

    Rodan– Gimme the lowdown on HH’s astroturfing with backup.


  5. taxfreekiller
    5 | February 12, 2012 8:10 pm

    On the other hand, this low life stuff on Whitney Houston ,, it may be a step up in class for lgf’s and cj.


  6. Speranza
    6 | February 12, 2012 8:10 pm

    Ron Paul!

    He is an anarcho-capitalist.


  7. taxfreekiller
    7 | February 12, 2012 8:12 pm

    The reason al quita wants in power in Syria is to get their hands on the shit SoImInsane and the Russians hid there before we attacked.


  8. Brick
    8 | February 12, 2012 8:20 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    The reason al quita wants in power in Syria is to get their hands on the shit SoImInsane and the Russians hid there before we attacked.

    You think we rounded up and grabbed all the yellow cake?


  9. brookly red
    9 | February 12, 2012 8:20 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    The reason al quita wants in power in Syria is to get their hands on the shit SoImInsane and the Russians hid there before we attacked.

    that is a scary thought and also quite true.


  10. brookly red
    10 | February 12, 2012 8:21 pm

    Brick wrote:

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    The reason al quita wants in power in Syria is to get their hands on the shit SoImInsane and the Russians hid there before we attacked.

    You think we rounded up and grabbed all the yellow cake?

    all the chem stuff is still there


  11. taxfreekiller
    11 | February 12, 2012 8:22 pm

    So, as you helped Bunk with his request there is someting I need to know.

    All this talk of cj pecker being so small, who has photos or links to back that up?


  12. 12 | February 12, 2012 8:22 pm

    Thanks, Rodan. I’ll follow up.


  13. 13 | February 12, 2012 8:23 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:
    Breitbart. He has pictures of everyone.


  14. taxfreekiller
    14 | February 12, 2012 8:23 pm

    I would say that the Russians did not let us get much of it ever.@ Brick:


  15. m
    15 | February 12, 2012 8:24 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:

    Can’t attest to that, but I can tell ya he’s got a big fat dick – head!!! ON HIS SHOULDERS!


  16. 16 | February 12, 2012 8:24 pm

    @ Speranza:
    Crypto-anarcho-capitalist.


  17. 17 | February 12, 2012 8:25 pm

    @ m:
    The big fat dickheads on his shoulders are the BRC. Credit deserved.


  18. m
    18 | February 12, 2012 8:30 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Who represents good and evil? lol… I wanna see ISTE in the angel suite LOL!


  19. unclassifiable
    19 | February 12, 2012 8:33 pm

    Turkey involved in anything is guaranteed chaos.


  20. John Difool
    20 | February 12, 2012 8:34 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    So, as you helped Bunk with his request there is someting I need to know.
    All this talk of cj pecker being so small, who has photos or links to back that up?

    I believe Breitbart has an electron microscope video of Charles’ penis. Don’t blink because about two seconds in an Amoeba devours it.


  21. 21 | February 12, 2012 8:34 pm

    @ m:
    We mix and match, jump from shoulder to shoulder. Keeps CJ guessing. It’s tought to change costumes quickly, and if ISTE hands you the angel suit, steam clean it before you put it on. He slobbers all over the halo, too.


  22. Speranza
    22 | February 12, 2012 8:39 pm

    I’m afraid we are going to lose Scott Brown in The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts.


  23. Speranza
    23 | February 12, 2012 8:42 pm

    Had we won Colorado, Delaware, and Nevada in 2010 I would be feeling a hell of a lot better.


  24. 24 | February 12, 2012 8:45 pm

    @ John Difool:
    Naw, it’s just inverted. Breitbart’s got a sonogram.


  25. taxfreekiller
    25 | February 12, 2012 8:47 pm

    Brietbart was just on Huckabee’s show.

    He held up a yellow legal pad with a bit old “C” on it and said I am giving this to Obama…

    Da ya thank the “C” repersents Chuck.


  26. 26 | February 12, 2012 8:47 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:
    @ Bunk X:

    Thank God this isn’t ‘selrahC….


  27. 27 | February 12, 2012 8:47 pm

    @ unclassifiable:
    Turkey was why we went into Iraq, IMO. They declined flyovers, and we needed a base to operate from. Baghdad International served that purpose well.


  28. taxfreekiller
    28 | February 12, 2012 8:49 pm

    How scarey is this, the Republicans will need Ron Paul to get out his voters to win.


  29. John Difool
    29 | February 12, 2012 8:50 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Brietbart was just on Huckabee’s show.
    He held up a yellow legal pad with a bit old “C” on it and said I am giving this to Obama…
    Da ya thank the “C” repersents Chuck.

    I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.


  30. Speranza
    30 | February 12, 2012 8:53 pm

    I road in a Trabant when I was in Prague. Scary experience!


  31. brookly red
    31 | February 12, 2012 8:53 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.

    it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.


  32. Brick
    32 | February 12, 2012 8:54 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    How scarey is this, the Republicans will need Ron Paul to get out his voters to win.

    RP is and always will be a spoiler. His ego is too big to endorse anyone else so when he finally does drop out – he’ll leave his followers with – vote your conscience, even if it means not voting.


  33. John Difool
    33 | February 12, 2012 8:54 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    John Difool wrote:
    I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
    it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.

    It could just stand for “College”.


  34. The Osprey
    34 | February 12, 2012 8:54 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    I road in a Trabant when I was in Prague. Scary experience!

    Which is scarier…Trabant, or Chevy Volt?


  35. John Difool
    35 | February 12, 2012 8:56 pm

    Two words……. Walking Dead.

    Out.


  36. brookly red
    36 | February 12, 2012 8:56 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    John Difool wrote:
    I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
    it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.

    It could just stand for “College”.

    could stand for cuckhold… heck a lot of words start wit the letter c…


  37. taxfreekiller
    37 | February 12, 2012 8:58 pm

    The founding fathers would take up arms and fight once more.


  38. John Difool
    38 | February 12, 2012 9:00 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    John Difool wrote:
    brookly red wrote:
    John Difool wrote:
    I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
    it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.
    It could just stand for “College”.

    could stand for cuckhold… heck a lot of words start wit the letter c…

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the “C” in question stands for “Columbia” as in the university.

    More on that later, after The Walking Dead.


  39. Brick
    39 | February 12, 2012 9:01 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    Two words……. Walking Dead.
    Out.

    Why haven’t they made any suppressors for their weapons?

    It’s just silly now.


  40. The Osprey
    40 | February 12, 2012 9:04 pm

    Brick wrote:

    John Difool wrote:

    Two words……. Walking Dead.
    Out.

    Why haven’t they made any suppressors for their weapons?

    It’s just silly now.

    Not necessary. Zombies don’t hear well.


  41. taxfreekiller
    41 | February 12, 2012 9:05 pm

    The House of Rep.’s is the key. They have the purse.
    The Senate will help.

    The Pres. can be controled if we just do our jobs and vote in non commie Americans, hell even some democrats are better than some RINO’s.

    With out RINO’s the Democrats can not get shit passed.


  42. Brick
    42 | February 12, 2012 9:05 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    Brick wrote:
    John Difool wrote:
    Two words……. Walking Dead.
    Out.
    Why haven’t they made any suppressors for their weapons?
    It’s just silly now.

    Not necessary. Zombies don’t hear well.

    In the series they’re attracted to gunshots like flies to carrion.


  43. taxfreekiller
    43 | February 12, 2012 9:06 pm

    Savage, do you know any thing about cj’s pecker size and links.


  44. taxfreekiller
    44 | February 12, 2012 9:06 pm

    Islam will force a fight. There will be war it is just a matter of when and where.


  45. Speranza
    45 | February 12, 2012 9:07 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    I road in a Trabant when I was in Prague. Scary experience!

    Which is scarier…Trabant, or Chevy Volt?

    Never had the mispleasure of riding in a Chevy Volt.


  46. 46 | February 12, 2012 9:08 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Savage, do you know any thing about cj’s pecker size and links.

    afraid not. hehehe


  47. Speranza
    47 | February 12, 2012 9:09 pm

    He’s a theocrat, not a conservative.


  48. taxfreekiller
    48 | February 12, 2012 9:09 pm

    We have nutty leadership. Obama
    They have nutty leadership. Emoms.

    War will be the result.


  49. Speranza
    49 | February 12, 2012 9:10 pm

    They had a primary in the tea party and Santorum won? Who knew??


  50. Brick
    50 | February 12, 2012 9:10 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    They had a primary in the tea party and Santorum won? Who knew??

    I never got my ballot! I demand a recount!


  51. Speranza
    51 | February 12, 2012 9:11 pm

    Rodan we want a kinder,gentler nation – someone said that in 1988.


  52. Speranza
    52 | February 12, 2012 9:11 pm

    Brick wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    They had a primary in the tea party and Santorum won? Who knew??

    I never got my ballot! I demand a recount!

    Me too! I must have treated it as junk mail.


  53. m
    53 | February 12, 2012 9:11 pm

    @ savage:

    I’d be afraid if you did.

    !

    ~:)


  54. Speranza
    54 | February 12, 2012 9:12 pm

    It would have been a Hail Mary but better then Newtie, Mittens and Father Santorum.


  55. The Osprey
    55 | February 12, 2012 9:14 pm

    Brick wrote:

    The Osprey wrote:

    Brick wrote:
    John Difool wrote:
    Two words……. Walking Dead.
    Out.
    Why haven’t they made any suppressors for their weapons?
    It’s just silly now.

    Not necessary. Zombies don’t hear well.

    In the series they’re attracted to gunshots like flies to carrion.

    They aren’t even real Zombies. Zombies aren’t caused by viruses. Zombies come from Haitian voodoo.
    And they vote democrat.


  56. 56 | February 12, 2012 9:16 pm

    m wrote:

    @ savage:
    I’d be afraid if you did.
    !
    ~:)

    Be afraid. Be very afraid LOL


  57. Speranza
    57 | February 12, 2012 9:18 pm

    Who is speaking?


  58. 58 | February 12, 2012 9:20 pm

    @ John Difool:
    NO WAIT!


  59. m
    59 | February 12, 2012 9:25 pm

    @ Speranza:

    I think you meant Matt from Florida. Maybe.


  60. Speranza
    60 | February 12, 2012 9:25 pm

    who’s that talking now (jambalaya girl)?


  61. John Difool
    61 | February 12, 2012 9:28 pm

    Maggie sure does have a nice ass on her.

    Oh wait…….did I just type that out loud?


  62. Speranza
    62 | February 12, 2012 9:28 pm

    “Hitler a Biography” by Ian Kershaw.


  63. 63 | February 12, 2012 9:32 pm

    http://skylinechili.com/


  64. 64 | February 12, 2012 9:32 pm

    good shit mmmmm


  65. m
    65 | February 12, 2012 9:42 pm

    @ Speranza:

    That’s Mrs. Bunk X


  66. Lost
    66 | February 12, 2012 9:44 pm

    Shucks,I meant to call in.
    Too late now.


  67. Brick
    67 | February 12, 2012 9:44 pm

    Speranza – you mentioned this very thing about Hollywood pimping Leftist ideas the other week.


  68. m
    68 | February 12, 2012 9:50 pm

    @ Lost:

    10 minutes left! come on in!


  69. 69 | February 12, 2012 10:00 pm

    Paulians are really out there. AI Drones?


  70. m
    70 | February 12, 2012 10:02 pm

    @ Rodan:

    No, The Rat paraphrased him in chat- they tell it where to go and the drone works it out. That’s all he meant.


  71. 71 | February 12, 2012 10:03 pm

    @ m:

    Ah OK!


  72. Brick
    72 | February 12, 2012 10:03 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Paulians are really out there. AI Drones?

    If they were armed drones…I could see a problem. But drones for simple surveillance? No big deal.


  73. 73 | February 12, 2012 10:04 pm

    @ Brick:

    Especially if its to catch criminals in the act.


  74. m
    74 | February 12, 2012 10:05 pm

    Bunk tell the Mrs it was nice to “meet” her!


  75. Brick
    75 | February 12, 2012 10:06 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Brick:
    Especially if its to catch criminals in the act.

    For some of those bigger ones, I’d imagine you’d need some kind of FAA approval to operate them as well.


  76. Brick
    76 | February 12, 2012 10:07 pm

    m wrote:

    Bunk tell the Mrs it was nice to “meet” her!

    She sounds like a definite keeper. :)


  77. buzzsawmonkey
    77 | February 12, 2012 10:15 pm

    Mitt Romney is too liberal for the conservative base, too Mormon for the evangelical base—which means that he is continually running to try and persuade half of his own electoral base to vote for him.

    He is too conservative for much of the Democrat/”independent” base, and too religious for the secular base—which means that at least half of the electoral base he must pick up will not want to vote for him either.

    His rhetoric is dreary and uninspiring, and at his most at-ease he radiates stiffness and discomfort. He also managed to lose, last time around, to the guy who lost to the guy he’s going to have to beat.

    Tell me, somebody—anybody—why this man is deemed “electable.”


  78. m
    78 | February 12, 2012 10:15 pm

    @ Brick:

    Go Bunk ~:)


  79. m
    79 | February 12, 2012 10:17 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    *crickets*


  80. 80 | February 12, 2012 10:19 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    One of the greatest mysteries since the transformation of Charles Johnson!


  81. Bumr50
    81 | February 12, 2012 10:22 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Karl Rove said so?


  82. John Difool
    82 | February 12, 2012 10:26 pm

    How much longer do we have to suffer this Claytonia fool over at DoD? If I wanted to be called a racist on every thread I’d go register at Huffpo or Kos


  83. John Difool
    83 | February 12, 2012 10:28 pm

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    He’s delectable because he looks like the real-life version of Guy Smiley from Sesame Street.

    Now tell me, who doesn’t love them some Guy Smiley?


  84. buzzsawmonkey
    84 | February 12, 2012 10:29 pm

    @ John Difool:

    Mitt Romney is an extruded plastic android in a checked shirt.

    And those are his lovable qualities.


  85. 85 | February 12, 2012 10:30 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Brick:
    Especially if its to catch criminals in the act.

    Yea, fucking brilliant, right up until the government decides that opposing their decisions constitutes a capital offense, can’t happen here? Like hell it can’t, it already has and that why they want drones to monitor US Citizens.


  86. coldwarrior
    86 | February 12, 2012 10:32 pm

    John Difool wrote:

    He’s delectable because he looks like the real-life version of Guy Smiley from Sesame Street.

    :lol:


  87. 87 | February 12, 2012 10:32 pm

    @ John Difool:

    Put him in his place and ignore him. If he acts up I will warn him.


  88. 88 | February 12, 2012 10:33 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    I was taking about Police Departments. They use helicopters to pursue criminals.

    Are you saying even using drones is bad? I don’t like a police state. I was just thinking in terms of law enforcement.


  89. buzzsawmonkey
    89 | February 12, 2012 10:33 pm

    Tomorrow, God willing.


  90. 90 | February 12, 2012 10:34 pm

    @ m:
    Lol. The missus thought the show needed a distraction, so I suggested she call in.
    Later, Bunkessa said she wanted to all in and tell you about the bullet holes she found in her laptop.


  91. Lost
    91 | February 12, 2012 10:35 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Good to see YOU!

    *Whew, he’s still around!*


  92. John Difool
    92 | February 12, 2012 10:36 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Roger. Not saying I want the fucker banned but it’s parroting of left-wing talking points and it’s trollish bomb throwing act is starting to get tiresome.

    I have no idea why this tool doesn’t feel right at home at 1.0


  93. 93 | February 12, 2012 10:37 pm

    @ John Difool:
    Scroll if you need to. S/he is only there for the lulz and plays the baiting game. As long as s/he’s civil, who cares?


  94. 94 | February 12, 2012 10:39 pm

    @ John Difool:
    S/he can’t speak his/her mind at the Swamp, and enjoys sparring without the threat of banning. S/he’s said so several times.


  95. coldwarrior
    95 | February 12, 2012 10:44 pm

    Lost wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Good to see YOU!
    *Whew, he’s still around!*

    we had some tech problems with posts and comments…some stuff disappeared

    alls good again


  96. huckfunn
    96 | February 12, 2012 10:49 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    alls good again

    Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?


  97. coldwarrior
    97 | February 12, 2012 10:51 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    alls good again
    Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?

    close it up!

    :lol:


  98. John Difool
    98 | February 12, 2012 10:52 pm

    @ Bunk X:

    Accusing white southern conservatives of racism and white Christian males in general of racism every other thread is not exactly what I would consider being civil.

    But I guess my mileage may vary.

    Anyhoo, I guess I’ll just ignore the twit.


  99. CynicalConservative
    99 | February 12, 2012 10:55 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Looks like there may be an escapee on the main page. Speranza’s thread with zero comments.

    /lurk


  100. huckfunn
    100 | February 12, 2012 10:58 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    alls good again
    Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?

    close it up!

    Accchhhhmed is most disappointed. :roll:


  101. coldwarrior
    101 | February 12, 2012 10:59 pm

    CynicalConservative wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Looks like there may be an escapee on the main page. Speranza’s thread with zero comments.
    /lurk

    thanks!


  102. 102 | February 12, 2012 11:00 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Are you saying even using drones is bad? I don’t like a police state. I was just thinking in terms of law enforcement.

    Have you ever talked to anyone who lived in a genuine Marxist society? How many time do I have to explain this to you before you finally understand it. The Gestapo, the KGB, the Stasi were all their respective governments legitimate official Law Enforcement Organizations. Everything they did, they did out of patriotism and loyalty to their government, EVERYTHING they did, they did to protect their respective government from CRIMINAL element within their societies. Never ever forget, it is the government that decides what is criminal behavior.

    Have you honestly never read the results of the Stanley Milgram experiments? The founding fathers of this once great republic genuinely understood what Stanley Milgram discovered in 1961.

    “The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act.” –Stanley Milgram, 1974

    They knew beyond any shadow of doubt that power corrupts, that for all practical and reasonable purposes, that it always corrupts. That is why they wrote a constitution that exclusively restricted the power of the government and protected the rights of citizens.

    The founding fathers to a man would have considered our current police agencies to be unconstitutional and an abomination to the form of government they set up.

    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin

    You don’t like a police state???? You live in a police state that would have had America’s founding father’s starting another revolutionary war to end. You rant and rave about how wonderful Pinochet was, and he was a brutal dictator. You don’t object to the idea of a police state, you just want that police state to be YOUR political flavor of a police state.

    Yes, I am unequivocally stating that using drone’s to monitor US Citizens is both unconstitutional and one more step into totalitarianism. Obama has been shredding the US Constitution more or less at will for the last 3 years, isn’t that bad enough?


  103. coldwarrior
    103 | February 12, 2012 11:00 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    huckfunn wrote:
    coldwarrior wrote:
    alls good again
    Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?
    close it up!

    Accchhhhmed is most disappointed.

    ululululuuluuu!!!

    BOOM!


  104. 104 | February 12, 2012 11:39 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    You rant and rave about how wonderful Pinochet was, and he was a brutal dictator.

    What was the alternative, Allende? Read up what Allende was doing in conjunction with Cuban Intelligence. Pinochet saves his nation. Was he brutal, yes. But Chile is a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy because of him. As long as you were not a Leftist, you were in fine in Pinochet’s Chile.

    I see your point about Drone for surveillance, I was talking about using them in pursuit of criminals. Its really a grey area. What can be used for Law enforcement today, can be used to oppress you tomorrow.


  105. 105 | February 12, 2012 11:41 pm

    @ John Difool:
    Good move. Claytonia is a troll for sure, but mostly I don’t mind a bit of idiocy on a blog just to keep things from settling into a goopy paste at the bottom of a swamp.


  106. 106 | February 12, 2012 11:59 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Was he brutal, yes. But Chile is a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy because of him. As long as you were not a Leftist, you were in fine in Pinochet’s Chile.

    And you really don’t get what is wrong with that. That’s what scares me about you sometimes. Chile may seem like a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy to you right now, but you need to understand this. Once you allow a government to accept and function under the premise that the end justifies the means, it becomes a repressive totalitarian regime, it may relax it’s grip from time to time, like in Chile right now, but sooner or later those entrenched in power feel their power threatened and they clench that fist again.

    Governments, unlike regular human beings, are extremely long lived. While one generation of rulers may be benevolent there is no guaranteeing that the next will also be benevolent. That was something our founding fathers understood and tried to protect the American people from.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David