This entry was posted
on Sunday, February 12th, 2012 at 7:59 pm and is filed under Blogmocracy, Open thread, Politics.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
106 Responses to “Blogmocracy Live! 02 12 2012” ( jump to bottom )
So, as you helped Bunk with his request there is someting I need to know.
All this talk of cj pecker being so small, who has photos or links to back that up?
I believe Breitbart has an electron microscope video of Charles’ penis. Don’t blink because about two seconds in an Amoeba devours it.
@ m:
We mix and match, jump from shoulder to shoulder. Keeps CJ guessing. It’s tought to change costumes quickly, and if ISTE hands you the angel suit, steam clean it before you put it on. He slobbers all over the halo, too.
@ unclassifiable:
Turkey was why we went into Iraq, IMO. They declined flyovers, and we needed a base to operate from. Baghdad International served that purpose well.
Brietbart was just on Huckabee’s show.
He held up a yellow legal pad with a bit old “C” on it and said I am giving this to Obama…
Da ya thank the “C” repersents Chuck.
I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.
How scarey is this, the Republicans will need Ron Paul to get out his voters to win.
RP is and always will be a spoiler. His ego is too big to endorse anyone else so when he finally does drop out – he’ll leave his followers with – vote your conscience, even if it means not voting.
John Difool wrote:
I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.
John Difool wrote:
I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.
It could just stand for “College”.
could stand for cuckhold… heck a lot of words start wit the letter c…
John Difool wrote:
brookly red wrote:
John Difool wrote:
I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.
It could just stand for “College”.
could stand for cuckhold… heck a lot of words start wit the letter c…
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the “C” in question stands for “Columbia” as in the university.
Mitt Romney is too liberal for the conservative base, too Mormon for the evangelical base—which means that he is continually running to try and persuade half of his own electoral base to vote for him.
He is too conservative for much of the Democrat/”independent” base, and too religious for the secular base—which means that at least half of the electoral base he must pick up will not want to vote for him either.
His rhetoric is dreary and uninspiring, and at his most at-ease he radiates stiffness and discomfort. He also managed to lose, last time around, to the guy who lost to the guy he’s going to have to beat.
Tell me, somebody—anybody—why this man is deemed “electable.”
How much longer do we have to suffer this Claytonia fool over at DoD? If I wanted to be called a racist on every thread I’d go register at Huffpo or Kos
@ Brick:
Especially if its to catch criminals in the act.
Yea, fucking brilliant, right up until the government decides that opposing their decisions constitutes a capital offense, can’t happen here? Like hell it can’t, it already has and that why they want drones to monitor US Citizens.
@ m:
Lol. The missus thought the show needed a distraction, so I suggested she call in.
Later, Bunkessa said she wanted to all in and tell you about the bullet holes she found in her laptop.
Roger. Not saying I want the fucker banned but it’s parroting of left-wing talking points and it’s trollish bomb throwing act is starting to get tiresome.
I have no idea why this tool doesn’t feel right at home at 1.0
coldwarrior wrote:
alls good again
Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?
Accusing white southern conservatives of racism and white Christian males in general of racism every other thread is not exactly what I would consider being civil.
coldwarrior wrote:
alls good again
Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?
Are you saying even using drones is bad? I don’t like a police state. I was just thinking in terms of law enforcement.
Have you ever talked to anyone who lived in a genuine Marxist society? How many time do I have to explain this to you before you finally understand it. The Gestapo, the KGB, the Stasi were all their respective governments legitimate official Law Enforcement Organizations. Everything they did, they did out of patriotism and loyalty to their government, EVERYTHING they did, they did to protect their respective government from CRIMINAL element within their societies. Never ever forget, it is the government that decides what is criminal behavior.
Have you honestly never read the results of the Stanley Milgram experiments? The founding fathers of this once great republic genuinely understood what Stanley Milgram discovered in 1961.
“The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act.” –Stanley Milgram, 1974
They knew beyond any shadow of doubt that power corrupts, that for all practical and reasonable purposes, that it always corrupts. That is why they wrote a constitution that exclusively restricted the power of the government and protected the rights of citizens.
The founding fathers to a man would have considered our current police agencies to be unconstitutional and an abomination to the form of government they set up.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
You don’t like a police state???? You live in a police state that would have had America’s founding father’s starting another revolutionary war to end. You rant and rave about how wonderful Pinochet was, and he was a brutal dictator. You don’t object to the idea of a police state, you just want that police state to be YOUR political flavor of a police state.
Yes, I am unequivocally stating that using drone’s to monitor US Citizens is both unconstitutional and one more step into totalitarianism. Obama has been shredding the US Constitution more or less at will for the last 3 years, isn’t that bad enough?
coldwarrior wrote:
huckfunn wrote:
coldwarrior wrote:
alls good again
Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?
close it up!
You rant and rave about how wonderful Pinochet was, and he was a brutal dictator.
What was the alternative, Allende? Read up what Allende was doing in conjunction with Cuban Intelligence. Pinochet saves his nation. Was he brutal, yes. But Chile is a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy because of him. As long as you were not a Leftist, you were in fine in Pinochet’s Chile.
I see your point about Drone for surveillance, I was talking about using them in pursuit of criminals. Its really a grey area. What can be used for Law enforcement today, can be used to oppress you tomorrow.
@ John Difool:
Good move. Claytonia is a troll for sure, but mostly I don’t mind a bit of idiocy on a blog just to keep things from settling into a goopy paste at the bottom of a swamp.
Was he brutal, yes. But Chile is a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy because of him. As long as you were not a Leftist, you were in fine in Pinochet’s Chile.
And you really don’t get what is wrong with that. That’s what scares me about you sometimes. Chile may seem like a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy to you right now, but you need to understand this. Once you allow a government to accept and function under the premise that the end justifies the means, it becomes a repressive totalitarian regime, it may relax it’s grip from time to time, like in Chile right now, but sooner or later those entrenched in power feel their power threatened and they clench that fist again.
Governments, unlike regular human beings, are extremely long lived. While one generation of rulers may be benevolent there is no guaranteeing that the next will also be benevolent. That was something our founding fathers understood and tried to protect the American people from.
Boogah boogah! Is chat on?
The guy who got creamed by 18% in his reelection campaign is the same guy that the rest of the nation is pining for. Yeah right!
spaceala is over on dod.
Go trash the punk as you listen to this.
Rodan– Gimme the lowdown on HH’s astroturfing with backup.
On the other hand, this low life stuff on Whitney Houston ,, it may be a step up in class for lgf’s and cj.
Ron Paul!
He is an anarcho-capitalist.
The reason al quita wants in power in Syria is to get their hands on the shit SoImInsane and the Russians hid there before we attacked.
taxfreekiller wrote:
You think we rounded up and grabbed all the yellow cake?
taxfreekiller wrote:
that is a scary thought and also quite true.
Brick wrote:
all the chem stuff is still there
So, as you helped Bunk with his request there is someting I need to know.
All this talk of cj pecker being so small, who has photos or links to back that up?
Thanks, Rodan. I’ll follow up.
@ taxfreekiller:
Breitbart. He has pictures of everyone.
I would say that the Russians did not let us get much of it ever.@ Brick:
@ taxfreekiller:
Can’t attest to that, but I can tell ya he’s got a big fat dick – head!!! ON HIS SHOULDERS!
@ Speranza:
Crypto-anarcho-capitalist.
@ m:
The big fat dickheads on his shoulders are the BRC. Credit deserved.
@ Bunk X:
Who represents good and evil? lol… I wanna see ISTE in the angel suite LOL!
Turkey involved in anything is guaranteed chaos.
taxfreekiller wrote:
I believe Breitbart has an electron microscope video of Charles’ penis. Don’t blink because about two seconds in an Amoeba devours it.
@ m:
We mix and match, jump from shoulder to shoulder. Keeps CJ guessing. It’s tought to change costumes quickly, and if ISTE hands you the angel suit, steam clean it before you put it on. He slobbers all over the halo, too.
I’m afraid we are going to lose Scott Brown in The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts.
Had we won Colorado, Delaware, and Nevada in 2010 I would be feeling a hell of a lot better.
@ John Difool:
Naw, it’s just inverted. Breitbart’s got a sonogram.
Brietbart was just on Huckabee’s show.
He held up a yellow legal pad with a bit old “C” on it and said I am giving this to Obama…
Da ya thank the “C” repersents Chuck.
@ taxfreekiller:
@ Bunk X:
Thank God this isn’t ‘selrahC….
@ unclassifiable:
Turkey was why we went into Iraq, IMO. They declined flyovers, and we needed a base to operate from. Baghdad International served that purpose well.
How scarey is this, the Republicans will need Ron Paul to get out his voters to win.
taxfreekiller wrote:
I wonder if he’s alluding to the videos he says he has of Obama in college? “C” could be the name of his boyfriend at the time or maybe it’s just “Commie”.
I road in a Trabant when I was in Prague. Scary experience!
John Difool wrote:
it could stand for his grades, it could stand for cocaine, it could stand for all of the above.
taxfreekiller wrote:
RP is and always will be a spoiler. His ego is too big to endorse anyone else so when he finally does drop out – he’ll leave his followers with – vote your conscience, even if it means not voting.
brookly red wrote:
It could just stand for “College”.
Speranza wrote:
Which is scarier…Trabant, or Chevy Volt?
Two words……. Walking Dead.
Out.
John Difool wrote:
could stand for cuckhold… heck a lot of words start wit the letter c…
The founding fathers would take up arms and fight once more.
brookly red wrote:
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the “C” in question stands for “Columbia” as in the university.
More on that later, after The Walking Dead.
John Difool wrote:
Why haven’t they made any suppressors for their weapons?
It’s just silly now.
Brick wrote:
Not necessary. Zombies don’t hear well.
The House of Rep.’s is the key. They have the purse.
The Senate will help.
The Pres. can be controled if we just do our jobs and vote in non commie Americans, hell even some democrats are better than some RINO’s.
With out RINO’s the Democrats can not get shit passed.
The Osprey wrote:
In the series they’re attracted to gunshots like flies to carrion.
Savage, do you know any thing about cj’s pecker size and links.
Islam will force a fight. There will be war it is just a matter of when and where.
The Osprey wrote:
Never had the mispleasure of riding in a Chevy Volt.
taxfreekiller wrote:
afraid not. hehehe
He’s a theocrat, not a conservative.
We have nutty leadership. Obama
They have nutty leadership. Emoms.
War will be the result.
They had a primary in the tea party and Santorum won? Who knew??
Speranza wrote:
I never got my ballot! I demand a recount!
Rodan we want a kinder,gentler nation – someone said that in 1988.
Brick wrote:
Me too! I must have treated it as junk mail.
@ savage:
I’d be afraid if you did.
!
~:)
It would have been a Hail Mary but better then Newtie, Mittens and Father Santorum.
Brick wrote:
They aren’t even real Zombies. Zombies aren’t caused by viruses. Zombies come from Haitian voodoo.
And they vote democrat.
m wrote:
Be afraid. Be very afraid LOL
Who is speaking?
@ John Difool:
NO WAIT!
@ Speranza:
I think you meant Matt from Florida. Maybe.
who’s that talking now (jambalaya girl)?
Maggie sure does have a nice ass on her.
Oh wait…….did I just type that out loud?
“Hitler a Biography” by Ian Kershaw.
http://skylinechili.com/
good shit mmmmm
@ Speranza:
That’s Mrs. Bunk X
Shucks,I meant to call in.
Too late now.
Speranza – you mentioned this very thing about Hollywood pimping Leftist ideas the other week.
@ Lost:
10 minutes left! come on in!
Paulians are really out there. AI Drones?
@ Rodan:
No, The Rat paraphrased him in chat- they tell it where to go and the drone works it out. That’s all he meant.
@ m:
Ah OK!
Rodan wrote:
If they were armed drones…I could see a problem. But drones for simple surveillance? No big deal.
@ Brick:
Especially if its to catch criminals in the act.
Bunk tell the Mrs it was nice to “meet” her!
Rodan wrote:
For some of those bigger ones, I’d imagine you’d need some kind of FAA approval to operate them as well.
m wrote:
She sounds like a definite keeper.
Mitt Romney is too liberal for the conservative base, too Mormon for the evangelical base—which means that he is continually running to try and persuade half of his own electoral base to vote for him.
He is too conservative for much of the Democrat/”independent” base, and too religious for the secular base—which means that at least half of the electoral base he must pick up will not want to vote for him either.
His rhetoric is dreary and uninspiring, and at his most at-ease he radiates stiffness and discomfort. He also managed to lose, last time around, to the guy who lost to the guy he’s going to have to beat.
Tell me, somebody—anybody—why this man is deemed “electable.”
@ Brick:
Go Bunk ~:)
@ buzzsawmonkey:
*crickets*
@ buzzsawmonkey:
One of the greatest mysteries since the transformation of Charles Johnson!
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Karl Rove said so?
How much longer do we have to suffer this Claytonia fool over at DoD? If I wanted to be called a racist on every thread I’d go register at Huffpo or Kos
@ buzzsawmonkey:
He’s delectable because he looks like the real-life version of Guy Smiley from Sesame Street.
Now tell me, who doesn’t love them some Guy Smiley?
@ John Difool:
Mitt Romney is an extruded plastic android in a checked shirt.
And those are his lovable qualities.
Rodan wrote:
Yea, fucking brilliant, right up until the government decides that opposing their decisions constitutes a capital offense, can’t happen here? Like hell it can’t, it already has and that why they want drones to monitor US Citizens.
John Difool wrote:
@ John Difool:
Put him in his place and ignore him. If he acts up I will warn him.
@ doriangrey:
I was taking about Police Departments. They use helicopters to pursue criminals.
Are you saying even using drones is bad? I don’t like a police state. I was just thinking in terms of law enforcement.
Tomorrow, God willing.
@ m:
Lol. The missus thought the show needed a distraction, so I suggested she call in.
Later, Bunkessa said she wanted to all in and tell you about the bullet holes she found in her laptop.
@ coldwarrior:
Good to see YOU!
*Whew, he’s still around!*
@ Rodan:
Roger. Not saying I want the fucker banned but it’s parroting of left-wing talking points and it’s trollish bomb throwing act is starting to get tiresome.
I have no idea why this tool doesn’t feel right at home at 1.0
@ John Difool:
Scroll if you need to. S/he is only there for the lulz and plays the baiting game. As long as s/he’s civil, who cares?
@ John Difool:
S/he can’t speak his/her mind at the Swamp, and enjoys sparring without the threat of banning. S/he’s said so several times.
Lost wrote:
we had some tech problems with posts and comments…some stuff disappeared
alls good again
coldwarrior wrote:
Well dangit. I had some A-rab at Ebay on the hook for your blog share for $38.67. He was the 9th bidder. Shall I close the bids and get rid of him?
huckfunn wrote:
close it up!
@ Bunk X:
Accusing white southern conservatives of racism and white Christian males in general of racism every other thread is not exactly what I would consider being civil.
But I guess my mileage may vary.
Anyhoo, I guess I’ll just ignore the twit.
@ coldwarrior:
Looks like there may be an escapee on the main page. Speranza’s thread with zero comments.
/lurk
coldwarrior wrote:
Accchhhhmed is most disappointed.
CynicalConservative wrote:
thanks!
Rodan wrote:
Have you ever talked to anyone who lived in a genuine Marxist society? How many time do I have to explain this to you before you finally understand it. The Gestapo, the KGB, the Stasi were all their respective governments legitimate official Law Enforcement Organizations. Everything they did, they did out of patriotism and loyalty to their government, EVERYTHING they did, they did to protect their respective government from CRIMINAL element within their societies. Never ever forget, it is the government that decides what is criminal behavior.
Have you honestly never read the results of the Stanley Milgram experiments? The founding fathers of this once great republic genuinely understood what Stanley Milgram discovered in 1961.
They knew beyond any shadow of doubt that power corrupts, that for all practical and reasonable purposes, that it always corrupts. That is why they wrote a constitution that exclusively restricted the power of the government and protected the rights of citizens.
The founding fathers to a man would have considered our current police agencies to be unconstitutional and an abomination to the form of government they set up.
You don’t like a police state???? You live in a police state that would have had America’s founding father’s starting another revolutionary war to end. You rant and rave about how wonderful Pinochet was, and he was a brutal dictator. You don’t object to the idea of a police state, you just want that police state to be YOUR political flavor of a police state.
Yes, I am unequivocally stating that using drone’s to monitor US Citizens is both unconstitutional and one more step into totalitarianism. Obama has been shredding the US Constitution more or less at will for the last 3 years, isn’t that bad enough?
huckfunn wrote:
ululululuuluuu!!!
BOOM!
@ doriangrey:
What was the alternative, Allende? Read up what Allende was doing in conjunction with Cuban Intelligence. Pinochet saves his nation. Was he brutal, yes. But Chile is a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy because of him. As long as you were not a Leftist, you were in fine in Pinochet’s Chile.
I see your point about Drone for surveillance, I was talking about using them in pursuit of criminals. Its really a grey area. What can be used for Law enforcement today, can be used to oppress you tomorrow.
@ John Difool:
Good move. Claytonia is a troll for sure, but mostly I don’t mind a bit of idiocy on a blog just to keep things from settling into a goopy paste at the bottom of a swamp.
Rodan wrote:
And you really don’t get what is wrong with that. That’s what scares me about you sometimes. Chile may seem like a Free Market prosperous society and a Democracy to you right now, but you need to understand this. Once you allow a government to accept and function under the premise that the end justifies the means, it becomes a repressive totalitarian regime, it may relax it’s grip from time to time, like in Chile right now, but sooner or later those entrenched in power feel their power threatened and they clench that fist again.
Governments, unlike regular human beings, are extremely long lived. While one generation of rulers may be benevolent there is no guaranteeing that the next will also be benevolent. That was something our founding fathers understood and tried to protect the American people from.