First time visitor? Learn more.

Father hits son for not watching the False Messiah’s speech

by Rodan ( 81 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives, Tranzis at February 24th, 2012 - 8:30 am

The Obama Cult is fanatical and something not seen in American politics. No matter what he does too many Americans love him. Many Obama cultists are with Obama doing some acts Bush did, which they once vehemently opposed. An Obama cultist named Mohamed Shohan recently hit his son for not paying attention to Obama’s State of the Union speech. This sick individual loves Obama more than his own son!

STAMFORD — A North Stamford father trying to make his pre-teenaged son listen to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech last month was arrested on a warrant Wednesday and accused of striking his son with a coffee mug when the youth would not pay attention.

Mohamed Shohan, 49, of 55 Mather Road, Stamford, was charged with third-degree assault, disorderly conduct and risk of injury to a child. He was released after posting $5,000 bond and will be arraigned on the charges at state Superior Court in Stamford Thursday.

Mohamed clearly loves Obama as much as he loves his namesake. The Obama Cult is fanatical and dangerous. Mr. Shohan is the poster child for the Obama cult. They love their false messiah more than their own kids.
This is the mentality the Right is dealing with. People love this man as a god and the way to beat him is to destroy Obama’s godlike aura. He must be Alinskied and destroyed as a man.

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

81 Responses to “Father hits son for not watching the False Messiah’s speech”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | February 24, 2012 8:33 am

    I notice the name “Mohamed”. The Mohammedans consider Hussein one of them, and I think they are basically right in this. Hussein may not be a beat-your-head-on-the-floor-five-times-a-day Mohammedan, but he certainly has an unnatural predilection for them.


  2. mfhorn
    2 | February 24, 2012 8:41 am

    If this had been a Republican, you can bet the left would trumpet the story from the rooftops from now until doomsday, blaming intolerance, Christianity, raaaaacism, sexism, homophobia and everything else in the book.


  3. rain of lead
    3 | February 24, 2012 8:42 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    how does that saying go…
    oh yeah,
    “give me a child when he is very young and you can have him after that….he is mine for life.”

    the muzz got barry when he was very young


  4. rain of lead
    4 | February 24, 2012 8:45 am

    oh, and soon to be at a planned parenthood clinic near you

    British Clinics Offering Sex-Selection Abortions, No Questions Asked

    An investigation by the Telegraph newspaper has found that some British abortion clinics are agreeing to terminate pregnancies based on the sex of the unborn baby — a practice which is not just immoral, but illegal under UK law.

    Undercover reporters accompanied a number of pregnant women to clinics where they asked for their unborn baby to be terminated because it was the “wrong sex.” In some cases, Asian women carrying baby girls asked for the abortion on “cultural” grounds; in others, the women cited a desire for “family balancing.”

    hmmm,who could those “asian women” be?


  5. 5 | February 24, 2012 8:46 am

    @ rain of lead:

    Yep, the signs are all there. One has merely to observe how he acts in public. No need to guess what is in the privacy of his heart (I suspect he is an atheist, myself, but with a heafty dose of Muzz-Love from his mom and step-dad. Plus the hero-worship of his absentee father).


  6. 6 | February 24, 2012 8:47 am

    @ rain of lead:

    “Asian” in Brit-speak is Muzz. I don’t know what they call Chinese…


  7. MikeA
    7 | February 24, 2012 8:48 am

    @ rain of lead:

    I assume these aren’t the hot oriental ( Thai, Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, etc…) girls I see around here.. Not that it allows them to do this.

    You just don’t understand their culture.


  8. MikeA
    8 | February 24, 2012 8:49 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    So what you are saying is that he is f**ked up…


  9. 9 | February 24, 2012 8:57 am

    @ MikeA:

    The Left refuse to admit how fundamentally anti-woman allowing sex-selective abortion is, but if you are going to allow abortion on demand, it is hard to say this is in some way immoral while aborting the child because it will get it the way of your partying on Friday night isn’t. Quite a corner the abortionists have painted themselves into. All theoretically in the name of women’s liberation…


  10. MikeA
    10 | February 24, 2012 9:01 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Only those that have been born are against abortion. An unborn woman is not a woman according to them. They are just a fetus, a clump of tissue. Those 3D sonograms probaly have done more to help the pro-life people than anything. Once you see its not just a “clump” but a real baby, its harder to just have it ripped out.


  11. citizen_q
    11 | February 24, 2012 9:07 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    Just a thought, doesn’t the fact that gender can be determined mean an acknowledgement that you are talking about something with the characteristics of a human being? Yet they still won’t make the leap that intervening to kill is murder?


  12. 12 | February 24, 2012 9:09 am

    @ MikeA:

    People who say there are no psychological consequences to abortion are lying. Oh, some women show no ill side effects, any more than Billy the Kid worried about the 21 men he’d killed when he went to sleeep, but for others it becomes a nightmare that can never end.


  13. 13 | February 24, 2012 9:12 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    Yet they still won’t make the leap that intervening to kill is murder?

    It is a homicide that they approve of, so they don’t care. The results of decades of abortion on demand i (if not abortion on command) in China are horriffic, but the Left (and therefore the MFM) turn a blind eye because an objective analysis of the results might make more Americans question the sanctity of abortion, and that must never happen.


  14. citizen_q
    14 | February 24, 2012 9:15 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Americans question the sanctity of abortion, and that must never happen.

    Sounds like G-d less religion to me.


  15. 15 | February 24, 2012 9:20 am

    @ citizen_q:

    That is what it amounts to. They have their sacrements (abortion, for now. I suspect that if things continue as they are in 20 years you can add gay marriage to that), their creed, and now their secular Messiah, come to lead them into the Promised Lan of True Communism. They are every bit as fanatical as the most crazed Mohammedan, and they hate Christianity above all else (devoute Judaism comes in second)…


  16. The Osprey
    16 | February 24, 2012 9:23 am

    O-Dawg is our first pop culture Prezdent. He’s the American Idle.


  17. 17 | February 24, 2012 9:29 am

    He’s the American Idle.

    Okay, that’s “Heh”-worthy…


  18. citizen_q
    18 | February 24, 2012 9:31 am

    @ The Osprey:
    And to notice the crude degradation of the Office of the President is to be racist in the new-think.

    Its like some kind of alternate Beverly Hillbillies sitcom.


  19. 19 | February 24, 2012 9:33 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I bet some of them view him as the Mahdi.


  20. 20 | February 24, 2012 9:34 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    UnGODly is more like it….


  21. 21 | February 24, 2012 9:35 am

    @ The Osprey:
    @ Mike C.:

    Would American Eye-DULL also work? 8)


  22. coldwarrior
    22 | February 24, 2012 9:37 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    And to notice the crude degradation of the Office of the President is to be racist in the new-think.
    Its like some kind of alternate Beverly Hillbillies sitcom.

    with sebelius as mrs hathaway.


  23. 23 | February 24, 2012 9:38 am

    @ Rodan:

    It wouldn’t surprise me. He certaily sees himself as semi-divine, and many of his followers agree. He is their Golden Calf…


  24. 24 | February 24, 2012 9:39 am

    @ coldwarrior:

    Does that make Hillary Clinton Jethro? 8O


  25. coldwarrior
    25 | February 24, 2012 9:41 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Does that make Hillary Clinton Jethro?

    there is a decided lack of good ole boys in this administration, isnt there.

    at least billy-jeff had a few of ‘em.

    obama is a regiona-a-a-a-alist!


  26. citizen_q
    26 | February 24, 2012 9:41 am

    @ coldwarrior:
    harry reid as Mr. Driesdale

    pelosi as granny


  27. coldwarrior
    27 | February 24, 2012 9:43 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    harry reid as Mr. Driesdale
    pelosi as granny

    cant think of anyone to be elly may


  28. 28 | February 24, 2012 9:43 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Obama will unite the Muzz and Leftists. They both view him as a Messiah.


  29. coldwarrior
    29 | February 24, 2012 9:47 am

    bo is obviously duke, a more hip urban duke tho


  30. 30 | February 24, 2012 9:55 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    They’re have no problem with sex-based abortion. But as Rush pointed out a couple days ago, what happens the day they find the genetic marker for homosexuality? Can you see the reaction of the left when parents abort their babies because they find out there’s a possibility they might be gay? The 180 turnaround will be better than anything Linda Blair’s head did in the Exorcist.


  31. citizen_q
    31 | February 24, 2012 9:55 am

    @ coldwarrior:
    That would have to a wildcard, Sarah Palin perhaps?


  32. citizen_q
    32 | February 24, 2012 9:56 am

    @ Carolina Girl:
    Ewwwww, or the converse, selecting for ghey?


  33. 33 | February 24, 2012 9:59 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Personally, if I had Down’s Syndrome or had a kid with it, I’d have been chilled to the core by the way Sarah Palin was treated over the issue. There is a group that the Democrats clearly feel have no right to Life. Of course, this desire to snuff all “defectives” has been a mainstay of Leftist thought from Adolf Hitler to Margaret Sanger. I really don’t know which of those two I consider more evil. They are certainly both very evil individuals.


  34. citizen_q
    34 | February 24, 2012 9:59 am

    O/T but I am excited about my “All American” weekend plans.

    Big Gun show in York, PA Saturday, “Act of Valor” movie Sunday.


  35. 35 | February 24, 2012 9:59 am

    @ citizen_q:

    African Americans won’t. You can bet on that. And what are liberals gonna do? Call them homophobes?


  36. 36 | February 24, 2012 10:01 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I raked a co-worker over the coals on that when she snotted “and she wouldn’t get an abortion and had that baby.” I understand from people in the office I could be heard clear down the corridor.


  37. mfhorn
    37 | February 24, 2012 10:03 am

    I got to thinking about the riots over in Afghanistan over the burning of the Koran. Now, Obozo’s apologized over this at least once, but just a few years ago, the Pentagon burned copies of the Bible, and the administration defended the practice, fearing the Afghan people would see the presence of Bibles as an effort to convert people from Islam.

    Once again, Islam is viewed in a more favorable light that Christianity.


  38. 38 | February 24, 2012 10:03 am

    @ citizen_q:

    Football combine…..Daytona 500….beer drinking opportunities. Trying to stay coherent before the radio show….


  39. mfhorn
    39 | February 24, 2012 10:03 am

    @ mfhorn:

    …more favorable light THAN Christianity.

    PIMF


  40. The Osprey
    40 | February 24, 2012 10:08 am

    Americans blame Obama for craptastic economy by 61-21 percent majority over congress.
    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/02/23/poll-americans-blame-obama-for-craptastic-economy-over-congress-by-huge-61-21-margin/

    Ht WeaselZip


  41. lobo91
    41 | February 24, 2012 10:08 am

    Back to the original topic, this guy’s mistake was not being in Phillie, apparently.

    The judge there would have charged the kid, instead.


  42. 42 | February 24, 2012 10:08 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:

    They’re have no problem with sex-based abortion. But as Rush pointed out a couple days ago, what happens the day they find the genetic marker for homosexuality? Can you see the reaction of the left when parents abort their babies because they find out there’s a possibility they might be gay? The 180 turnaround will be better than anything Linda Blair’s head did in the Exorcist.

    Something which, IMNSHO, they will never find. Besides, if there were such a marker…wouldn’t we all have it?


  43. 43 | February 24, 2012 10:09 am

    The Horrific Muslim Infestation Of Britain – Luton, 2012

    A Briton returns to her hometown to find it overrun with aggressive Islamics

    httpv://youtu.be/4P7978Lvb5Y


  44. 44 | February 24, 2012 10:10 am

    @ citizen_q:

    I haven’t gone to the theater to see a movie in at least two years, but I am going to have to see Act of Valor. It sounds like the kind of movie Hollyweird should have been making for the last ten years…


  45. 45 | February 24, 2012 10:12 am

    @ mfhorn:

    Our elites love Islam.


  46. 46 | February 24, 2012 10:13 am

    @ lobo91:

    We have athread going about that.


  47. 47 | February 24, 2012 10:14 am

    @ Macker:

    No, it could be a gene with limited expression, limited phenotype, possibly a multiple allele situation. There are lots of reasons the vast majority of humans wouldn’t have the marker making them gay, just as most people don’t have polydactyl genes. I think there has to be a genetic component, though culture and upbringing probably lay their roles in whether or not someone acts on that genetic predisposition.


  48. 48 | February 24, 2012 10:19 am

    @ Macker:

    Who knows. In many ways, it would “help” the Gay Rights cause if they did because then the “nature” argument prevails, and the argument for protected status is stronger. There are certain indicators they’re finding, or so they say, but I haven’t seen anything in the literature lately.


  49. 49 | February 24, 2012 10:20 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    There’s a similar aspect to the ultraviolent criminals – either an extra or even enhanced “Y” chromosome.


  50. citizen_q
    50 | February 24, 2012 10:21 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    It sounds like the kind of movie Hollyweird should have been making for the last ten years…

    Agreed.

    I rarely to go the theater, but I want to see this one on a big screen.


  51. 51 | February 24, 2012 10:32 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    My nephew is gay. He recently ‘came out’ but I’ve always kinda known it since he was about 8 or so.


  52. waldensianspirit
    52 | February 24, 2012 10:33 am

    Abu Graib! Abu Graib! Abu Graib! Abu Graib!


  53. 53 | February 24, 2012 10:35 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Yes, they’ve speculated on that since I was a kid. I remember studying that in AP Biology. There are definate links between testosterone and aggression. I don’t know what the state of the research is, though. With anything as politically loaded as criminal behavior or homosexuality, I innately distrust the agendas of the researchers. As we have seen with the Global Warming Hoax, these people are not above making up “facts” to fit their pet theories.


  54. waldensianspirit
    54 | February 24, 2012 10:38 am

    Someday we’re going to here they’ve had a too simplistic understanding of genetics.


  55. lobo91
    55 | February 24, 2012 10:49 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    If they ever do discover a “gay gene,” it will be supressed.


  56. buzzsawmonkey
    56 | February 24, 2012 10:54 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    “Asian” in Brit-speak is Muzz. I don’t know what they call Chinese…

    Secret Asians, man.
    Secret Asians, man.
    They exist in great numbers, and world dominance is their game.


  57. 57 | February 24, 2012 10:56 am

    @ lobo91:

    No doubt, because they know that such a thing would be used for selective abortions. Especially, as Carolina Girl notes, in the black community (which already has an astronomical rate of abortion).


  58. buzzsawmonkey
    58 | February 24, 2012 11:00 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    With anything as politically loaded as criminal behavior or homosexuality, I innately distrust the agendas of the researchers. As we have seen with the Global Warming Hoax, these people are not above making up “facts” to fit their pet theories.

    lobo91 wrote:

    If they ever do discover a “gay gene,” it will be supressed.

    The gay-rights crowd argues out of both sides of its mouth. Thirty years ago, rights for practitioners of homosexual behavior were being advocated on grounds of “sexual or affectional preference“; recently, however, the argument has been for “sexual orientation.”

    The former, of course, is volitional; the second is hardwired, genetic, inborn. Gay-rights advocates will argue either—despite their being mutually exclusive in the gay-rights lexicon—according to whichever is calculated to further their “human rights” agenda at a given moment. Thus, for example, same-sex marriage is being demanded on the grounds that practitioners of homosexual behavior are hard-wired that way—but these same advocates for innate orientation can ban bisexuals from participation in a “gay softball league” for not being “gay enough.”


  59. lobo91
    59 | February 24, 2012 11:04 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    If a genetic component were to be discovered, someone would try to claim that it was a disability next…


  60. waldensianspirit
    60 | February 24, 2012 11:05 am

    Report: NATO Promised Karzai To Put American Soldiers On Trial For Burning Koran “As Soon As Possible”…

    Human sacrifice of our soldiers to appease their blood god


  61. buzzsawmonkey
    61 | February 24, 2012 11:10 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    If a genetic component were to be discovered, someone would try to claim that it was a disability next…

    The argument for samesex marriage is made by creating a false analogy to the anti-miscegenation laws which the Supreme Court voided in the 1960s—in other words, by declaring opposition to any portion of the gay-rights lobby’s agenda of the moment to “racism.” That was the purpose behind the manufacture of the bogus locution “homophobia,” which was consciously invented to counter the then-current view of homosexual orientation as a mental illness (“We’re not sick, you are!”)

    Homosexual behavior not being well thought of in the black community—which also guards its “racism” franchise very, very avidly—the equation of the quest for samesex marriage with the miscegenation laws is not well-beloved there. But it goes over very, very well in the guilty-white-liberal community, which is always willing to expand comparisons to anti-black racism if it gives them another reason to grovel.


  62. citizen_q
    62 | February 24, 2012 11:13 am

    @ waldensianspirit:
    I am hoping there are some people with honor, strength of character and intelligence in the chain of command and those involved have be reassigned and spirited out of country.


  63. lobo91
    63 | February 24, 2012 11:24 am

    @ citizen_q:

    I didn’t see any reference to the US Army agreeing to charge anyone.

    “NATO” can agree to anything it likes, but it has no authority over our personnel.


  64. citizen_q
    64 | February 24, 2012 11:29 am

    @ lobo91:
    Hopefully it goes no further than that.


  65. 65 | February 24, 2012 11:32 am

    @ lobo91:

    How about we send Charles Johnson instead?


  66. citizen_q
    66 | February 24, 2012 11:33 am

    From the dumb criminal files:

    Authorities say a man was arrested after he dropped his gun durring a robbery and returned to the scene to try and buy it back from the victims.

    Cedrick Mitchell, 39, faces charges of armed home invasion and resisting an officer, according to online jail records. He is being held without bond in Manatee County Jail.

    Police said Mitchell entered a motel room and asked for pills from the two men inside. When they responded that they didn’t have any, Mitchell took out his gun and told the men “everything you got,” according to the Bradenton Herald.

    Mitchell dropped his gun when the men began to fight with him, police say. One of the victims sprayed him with pepper spray and Mitchell ran away, authorities said.

    He returned to the motel room minutes later and offered the men $40 in exchange for the gun he dropped, the Herald reported . He was pepper-sprayed in the face again.

    Police found Mitchell when he was running away.


  67. Bumr50
    67 | February 24, 2012 11:39 am

    My wife sprained her knee badly yesterday, and we went to the ER.

    NOW, since she called it a “work injury,” we have to go see ANOTHER doctor (NOT an ortho) TODAY so that we can get a referral to got to the ortho that we NEED to see. Apparently, workers’ comp won’t allow the ER doc to refer to a specialist, but we MUST go to the “approved” doctor TODAY in order to get this referral.

    If I weren’t home and out on the job, there’s a good chance that my wife would injure herself further trying to get to this appointment at the Concentra clinic. As it is, she’s in a ton of pain and would be much better served medically by resting. It’s not like the ortho is going to see her STAT.

    If I were to experience the same minor injury, I’d be strongly tempted to lie about the circumstances and just use my insurance.

    This is ridiculous.


  68. Bumr50
    68 | February 24, 2012 11:40 am

    @ Bumr50:

    PS – The ER already gave her an immobilizer, crutches, and pain meds.

    WTF are they going to do today?


  69. 69 | February 24, 2012 11:42 am

    @ Bumr50:

    It is going to get worse. One of the side effects from ObamaCare is going to be to make the current system god-awful for everyone so that people will clamor for relief. Said relie will be in the form of “single-payer” socialized medicine, of course, not in repealling this monstrosity. This is not an accident. It is the way that they want things to work out.


  70. buzzsawmonkey
    70 | February 24, 2012 11:46 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    It is going to get worse. One of the side effects from ObamaCare is going to be to make the current system god-awful for everyone so that people will clamor for relief. Said relie will be in the form of “single-payer” socialized medicine, of course, not in repealling this monstrosity. This is not an accident. It is the way that they want things to work out.

    Everybody will be Cloward by insurance, and there will be more Piven-tative medicine.


  71. NoThreat2U
    71 | February 24, 2012 11:47 am

    @ Bumr50:
    The rules must be followed so every practice gets their fair share of the money. Sickening aint it?


  72. coldwarrior
    72 | February 24, 2012 11:52 am

    NoThreat2U wrote:

    @ Bumr50:
    The rules must be followed so every practice gets their fair share of the money. Sickening aint it?

    if there weren’t so many people faking injuries to get on comp this process wouldn’t be needed.


  73. waldensianspirit
    73 | February 24, 2012 11:55 am

    Gingrich: ‘If Karzai…Doesn’t Feel Like Apologizing We Should Say Goodbye and Good Luck’

    Has Gingrich been reading theblogmocracy?


  74. buzzsawmonkey
    74 | February 24, 2012 11:58 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    there is a decided lack of good ole boys in this administration, isnt there.

    No dearth of good ole girly-men, though.


  75. waldensianspirit
    75 | February 24, 2012 12:01 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    girly-man mom genes


  76. NoThreat2U
    76 | February 24, 2012 12:19 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Yes that is very true also. I have seen some literally crippled people have to fight for years for what they deserve while others just wander away with the bennies.


  77. Vinegar Joe
    77 | February 24, 2012 12:30 pm

    What if he had shot his son’s notebook computer and then posted it on Youtube with a rant about his son not respecting President Obama?


  78. waldensianspirit
    78 | February 24, 2012 12:41 pm

    @ Vinegar Joe:
    His son would still be smarter than him.

    What’s disrespectful about being bored with a boring speech?


  79. 79 | February 24, 2012 12:43 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    I wish he was.


  80. 80 | February 24, 2012 12:43 pm

    New Thread.


  81. Alberta Oil Peon
    81 | February 24, 2012 3:37 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    It includes Hindus, Sikhs, and even Christians from the former colony of India and other parts of the Empire settled by them. People from China, Japan, and Korea would be spoken of as “orientals”.

    I am fairly certain that the lion’s share of “asians” that make the papers for atrocious behavior are in fact muslims.

    But to be clear, honor killings are not exclusively a muslim phenomenon. One of the first such I ever heard of was back in the late ’70s or early ’80s in British Columbia, and was perpetrated by a Sikh man whose daughter married out of the faith, and settled in the little town of Merritt with her new husband. Daddy sent her an electric kettle as a “wedding gift”. She plugged it in, and the dynamite packed into its base exploded, killing both her and her new husband.

    It’s a chicken vs egg question, I think. Was honor killing endemic in the Indian subcontinent, and got adopted by the muzz who conquered the place, or did the non-muslims there adopt the practice from the muzz?

    What is clear is that muslim jurisprudence seems to wink at the practice.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David