The Obama Cult is fanatical and something not seen in American politics. No matter what he does too many Americans love him. Many Obama cultists are with Obama doing some acts Bush did, which they once vehemently opposed. An Obama cultist named Mohamed Shohan recently hit his son for not paying attention to Obama’s State of the Union speech. This sick individual loves Obama more than his own son!
STAMFORD — A North Stamford father trying to make his pre-teenaged son listen to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech last month was arrested on a warrant Wednesday and accused of striking his son with a coffee mug when the youth would not pay attention.
Mohamed Shohan, 49, of 55 Mather Road, Stamford, was charged with third-degree assault, disorderly conduct and risk of injury to a child. He was released after posting $5,000 bond and will be arraigned on the charges at state Superior Court in Stamford Thursday.
Tags: False Messiah, Obama Cult
I notice the name “Mohamed”. The Mohammedans consider Hussein one of them, and I think they are basically right in this. Hussein may not be a beat-your-head-on-the-floor-five-times-a-day Mohammedan, but he certainly has an unnatural predilection for them.
If this had been a Republican, you can bet the left would trumpet the story from the rooftops from now until doomsday, blaming intolerance, Christianity, raaaaacism, sexism, homophobia and everything else in the book.
@ Iron Fist:
how does that saying go…
oh yeah,
“give me a child when he is very young and you can have him after that….he is mine for life.”
the muzz got barry when he was very young
oh, and soon to be at a planned parenthood clinic near you
British Clinics Offering Sex-Selection Abortions, No Questions Asked
An investigation by the Telegraph newspaper has found that some British abortion clinics are agreeing to terminate pregnancies based on the sex of the unborn baby — a practice which is not just immoral, but illegal under UK law.
Undercover reporters accompanied a number of pregnant women to clinics where they asked for their unborn baby to be terminated because it was the “wrong sex.” In some cases, Asian women carrying baby girls asked for the abortion on “cultural” grounds; in others, the women cited a desire for “family balancing.”
hmmm,who could those “asian women” be?
@ rain of lead:
Yep, the signs are all there. One has merely to observe how he acts in public. No need to guess what is in the privacy of his heart (I suspect he is an atheist, myself, but with a heafty dose of Muzz-Love from his mom and step-dad. Plus the hero-worship of his absentee father).
@ rain of lead:
“Asian” in Brit-speak is Muzz. I don’t know what they call Chinese…
@ rain of lead:
I assume these aren’t the hot oriental ( Thai, Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, etc…) girls I see around here.. Not that it allows them to do this.
You just don’t understand their culture.
@ Iron Fist:
So what you are saying is that he is f**ked up…
@ MikeA:
The Left refuse to admit how fundamentally anti-woman allowing sex-selective abortion is, but if you are going to allow abortion on demand, it is hard to say this is in some way immoral while aborting the child because it will get it the way of your partying on Friday night isn’t. Quite a corner the abortionists have painted themselves into. All theoretically in the name of women’s liberation…
@ Iron Fist:
Only those that have been born are against abortion. An unborn woman is not a woman according to them. They are just a fetus, a clump of tissue. Those 3D sonograms probaly have done more to help the pro-life people than anything. Once you see its not just a “clump” but a real baby, its harder to just have it ripped out.
@ Iron Fist:
Just a thought, doesn’t the fact that gender can be determined mean an acknowledgement that you are talking about something with the characteristics of a human being? Yet they still won’t make the leap that intervening to kill is murder?
@ MikeA:
People who say there are no psychological consequences to abortion are lying. Oh, some women show no ill side effects, any more than Billy the Kid worried about the 21 men he’d killed when he went to sleeep, but for others it becomes a nightmare that can never end.
citizen_q wrote:
It is a homicide that they approve of, so they don’t care. The results of decades of abortion on demand i (if not abortion on command) in China are horriffic, but the Left (and therefore the MFM) turn a blind eye because an objective analysis of the results might make more Americans question the sanctity of abortion, and that must never happen.
Iron Fist wrote:
Sounds like G-d less religion to me.
@ citizen_q:
That is what it amounts to. They have their sacrements (abortion, for now. I suspect that if things continue as they are in 20 years you can add gay marriage to that), their creed, and now their secular Messiah, come to lead them into the Promised Lan of True Communism. They are every bit as fanatical as the most crazed Mohammedan, and they hate Christianity above all else (devoute Judaism comes in second)…
O-Dawg is our first pop culture Prezdent. He’s the American Idle.
Okay, that’s “Heh”-worthy…
@ The Osprey:
And to notice the crude degradation of the Office of the President is to be racist in the new-think.
Its like some kind of alternate Beverly Hillbillies sitcom.
@ Iron Fist:
I bet some of them view him as the Mahdi.
@ Iron Fist:
UnGODly is more like it….
@ The Osprey:
@ Mike C.:
Would American Eye-DULL also work? 8)
citizen_q wrote:
with sebelius as mrs hathaway.
@ Rodan:
It wouldn’t surprise me. He certaily sees himself as semi-divine, and many of his followers agree. He is their Golden Calf…
@ coldwarrior:
Does that make Hillary Clinton Jethro?
Iron Fist wrote:
there is a decided lack of good ole boys in this administration, isnt there.
at least billy-jeff had a few of ‘em.
obama is a regiona-a-a-a-alist!
@ coldwarrior:
harry reid as Mr. Driesdale
pelosi as granny
citizen_q wrote:
cant think of anyone to be elly may
@ Iron Fist:
Obama will unite the Muzz and Leftists. They both view him as a Messiah.
bo is obviously duke, a more hip urban duke tho
@ Iron Fist:
They’re have no problem with sex-based abortion. But as Rush pointed out a couple days ago, what happens the day they find the genetic marker for homosexuality? Can you see the reaction of the left when parents abort their babies because they find out there’s a possibility they might be gay? The 180 turnaround will be better than anything Linda Blair’s head did in the Exorcist.
@ coldwarrior:
That would have to a wildcard, Sarah Palin perhaps?
@ Carolina Girl:
Ewwwww, or the converse, selecting for ghey?
@ Carolina Girl:
Personally, if I had Down’s Syndrome or had a kid with it, I’d have been chilled to the core by the way Sarah Palin was treated over the issue. There is a group that the Democrats clearly feel have no right to Life. Of course, this desire to snuff all “defectives” has been a mainstay of Leftist thought from Adolf Hitler to Margaret Sanger. I really don’t know which of those two I consider more evil. They are certainly both very evil individuals.
O/T but I am excited about my “All American” weekend plans.
Big Gun show in York, PA Saturday, “Act of Valor” movie Sunday.
@ citizen_q:
African Americans won’t. You can bet on that. And what are liberals gonna do? Call them homophobes?
@ Iron Fist:
I raked a co-worker over the coals on that when she snotted “and she wouldn’t get an abortion and had that baby.” I understand from people in the office I could be heard clear down the corridor.
I got to thinking about the riots over in Afghanistan over the burning of the Koran. Now, Obozo’s apologized over this at least once, but just a few years ago, the Pentagon burned copies of the Bible, and the administration defended the practice, fearing the Afghan people would see the presence of Bibles as an effort to convert people from Islam.
Once again, Islam is viewed in a more favorable light that Christianity.
@ citizen_q:
Football combine…..Daytona 500….beer drinking opportunities. Trying to stay coherent before the radio show….
@ mfhorn:
…more favorable light THAN Christianity.
PIMF
Americans blame Obama for craptastic economy by 61-21 percent majority over congress.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/02/23/poll-americans-blame-obama-for-craptastic-economy-over-congress-by-huge-61-21-margin/
Ht WeaselZip
Back to the original topic, this guy’s mistake was not being in Phillie, apparently.
The judge there would have charged the kid, instead.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Something which, IMNSHO, they will never find. Besides, if there were such a marker…wouldn’t we all have it?
The Horrific Muslim Infestation Of Britain -- Luton, 2012
A Briton returns to her hometown to find it overrun with aggressive Islamics
@ citizen_q:
I haven’t gone to the theater to see a movie in at least two years, but I am going to have to see Act of Valor. It sounds like the kind of movie Hollyweird should have been making for the last ten years…
@ mfhorn:
Our elites love Islam.
@ lobo91:
We have athread going about that.
@ Macker:
No, it could be a gene with limited expression, limited phenotype, possibly a multiple allele situation. There are lots of reasons the vast majority of humans wouldn’t have the marker making them gay, just as most people don’t have polydactyl genes. I think there has to be a genetic component, though culture and upbringing probably lay their roles in whether or not someone acts on that genetic predisposition.
@ Macker:
Who knows. In many ways, it would “help” the Gay Rights cause if they did because then the “nature” argument prevails, and the argument for protected status is stronger. There are certain indicators they’re finding, or so they say, but I haven’t seen anything in the literature lately.
@ Iron Fist:
There’s a similar aspect to the ultraviolent criminals -- either an extra or even enhanced “Y” chromosome.
Iron Fist wrote:
Agreed.
I rarely to go the theater, but I want to see this one on a big screen.
@ Iron Fist:
My nephew is gay. He recently ‘came out’ but I’ve always kinda known it since he was about 8 or so.
Abu Graib! Abu Graib! Abu Graib! Abu Graib!
@ Carolina Girl:
Yes, they’ve speculated on that since I was a kid. I remember studying that in AP Biology. There are definate links between testosterone and aggression. I don’t know what the state of the research is, though. With anything as politically loaded as criminal behavior or homosexuality, I innately distrust the agendas of the researchers. As we have seen with the Global Warming Hoax, these people are not above making up “facts” to fit their pet theories.
Someday we’re going to here they’ve had a too simplistic understanding of genetics.
@ Iron Fist:
If they ever do discover a “gay gene,” it will be supressed.
Iron Fist wrote:
Secret Asians, man.
Secret Asians, man.
They exist in great numbers, and world dominance is their game.
@ lobo91:
No doubt, because they know that such a thing would be used for selective abortions. Especially, as Carolina Girl notes, in the black community (which already has an astronomical rate of abortion).
Iron Fist wrote:
lobo91 wrote:
The gay-rights crowd argues out of both sides of its mouth. Thirty years ago, rights for practitioners of homosexual behavior were being advocated on grounds of “sexual or affectional preference“; recently, however, the argument has been for “sexual orientation.”
The former, of course, is volitional; the second is hardwired, genetic, inborn. Gay-rights advocates will argue either—despite their being mutually exclusive in the gay-rights lexicon—according to whichever is calculated to further their “human rights” agenda at a given moment. Thus, for example, same-sex marriage is being demanded on the grounds that practitioners of homosexual behavior are hard-wired that way—but these same advocates for innate orientation can ban bisexuals from participation in a “gay softball league” for not being “gay enough.”
@ Iron Fist:
If a genetic component were to be discovered, someone would try to claim that it was a disability next…
Report: NATO Promised Karzai To Put American Soldiers On Trial For Burning Koran “As Soon As Possible”…
Human sacrifice of our soldiers to appease their blood god
lobo91 wrote:
The argument for samesex marriage is made by creating a false analogy to the anti-miscegenation laws which the Supreme Court voided in the 1960s—in other words, by declaring opposition to any portion of the gay-rights lobby’s agenda of the moment to “racism.” That was the purpose behind the manufacture of the bogus locution “homophobia,” which was consciously invented to counter the then-current view of homosexual orientation as a mental illness (“We’re not sick, you are!”)
Homosexual behavior not being well thought of in the black community—which also guards its “racism” franchise very, very avidly—the equation of the quest for samesex marriage with the miscegenation laws is not well-beloved there. But it goes over very, very well in the guilty-white-liberal community, which is always willing to expand comparisons to anti-black racism if it gives them another reason to grovel.
@ waldensianspirit:
I am hoping there are some people with honor, strength of character and intelligence in the chain of command and those involved have be reassigned and spirited out of country.
@ citizen_q:
I didn’t see any reference to the US Army agreeing to charge anyone.
“NATO” can agree to anything it likes, but it has no authority over our personnel.
@ lobo91:
Hopefully it goes no further than that.
@ lobo91:
How about we send Charles Johnson instead?
From the dumb criminal files:
Authorities say a man was arrested after he dropped his gun durring a robbery and returned to the scene to try and buy it back from the victims.
My wife sprained her knee badly yesterday, and we went to the ER.
NOW, since she called it a “work injury,” we have to go see ANOTHER doctor (NOT an ortho) TODAY so that we can get a referral to got to the ortho that we NEED to see. Apparently, workers’ comp won’t allow the ER doc to refer to a specialist, but we MUST go to the “approved” doctor TODAY in order to get this referral.
If I weren’t home and out on the job, there’s a good chance that my wife would injure herself further trying to get to this appointment at the Concentra clinic. As it is, she’s in a ton of pain and would be much better served medically by resting. It’s not like the ortho is going to see her STAT.
If I were to experience the same minor injury, I’d be strongly tempted to lie about the circumstances and just use my insurance.
This is ridiculous.
@ Bumr50:
PS -- The ER already gave her an immobilizer, crutches, and pain meds.
WTF are they going to do today?
@ Bumr50:
It is going to get worse. One of the side effects from ObamaCare is going to be to make the current system god-awful for everyone so that people will clamor for relief. Said relie will be in the form of “single-payer” socialized medicine, of course, not in repealling this monstrosity. This is not an accident. It is the way that they want things to work out.
Iron Fist wrote:
Everybody will be Cloward by insurance, and there will be more Piven-tative medicine.
@ Bumr50:
The rules must be followed so every practice gets their fair share of the money. Sickening aint it?
NoThreat2U wrote:
if there weren’t so many people faking injuries to get on comp this process wouldn’t be needed.
Gingrich: ‘If Karzai…Doesn’t Feel Like Apologizing We Should Say Goodbye and Good Luck’
Has Gingrich been reading theblogmocracy?
coldwarrior wrote:
No dearth of good ole girly-men, though.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
@ coldwarrior:
Yes that is very true also. I have seen some literally crippled people have to fight for years for what they deserve while others just wander away with the bennies.
What if he had shot his son’s notebook computer and then posted it on Youtube with a rant about his son not respecting President Obama?
@ Vinegar Joe:
His son would still be smarter than him.
What’s disrespectful about being bored with a boring speech?
@ waldensianspirit:
I wish he was.
New Thread.
@ Iron Fist:
It includes Hindus, Sikhs, and even Christians from the former colony of India and other parts of the Empire settled by them. People from China, Japan, and Korea would be spoken of as “orientals”.
I am fairly certain that the lion’s share of “asians” that make the papers for atrocious behavior are in fact muslims.
But to be clear, honor killings are not exclusively a muslim phenomenon. One of the first such I ever heard of was back in the late ’70s or early ’80s in British Columbia, and was perpetrated by a Sikh man whose daughter married out of the faith, and settled in the little town of Merritt with her new husband. Daddy sent her an electric kettle as a “wedding gift”. She plugged it in, and the dynamite packed into its base exploded, killing both her and her new husband.
It’s a chicken vs egg question, I think. Was honor killing endemic in the Indian subcontinent, and got adopted by the muzz who conquered the place, or did the non-muslims there adopt the practice from the muzz?
What is clear is that muslim jurisprudence seems to wink at the practice.